WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.399 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bedtime Astronomy. Explore the wonders of the cosmos

2
00:00:07.759 --> 00:00:12.279
<v Speaker 1>with our soothing Bedtime Astronomy podcast. Each episode offers a

3
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>gentle journey through the stars, planets, and beyond, perfect for

4
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>unwinding after a long day. Let's travel through the mysteries

5
00:00:20.239 --> 00:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the universe as you drift off into a peaceful

6
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>slumber under the night sky.

7
00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever considered the inherent bias in how we

8
00:00:31.440 --> 00:00:32.560
<v Speaker 2>observe the universe.

9
00:00:32.640 --> 00:00:34.560
<v Speaker 3>It's a massive bias, right.

10
00:00:34.359 --> 00:00:36.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when you look up at the night sky,

11
00:00:36.799 --> 00:00:40.880
<v Speaker 2>you are basically experiencing a severely filtered version of reality, just.

12
00:00:40.840 --> 00:00:43.039
<v Speaker 3>A tiny fraction of what's out there exactly.

13
00:00:43.079 --> 00:00:46.240
<v Speaker 2>You see the stars, the planets, maybe the Andromeda Galaxy.

14
00:00:46.240 --> 00:00:48.759
<v Speaker 2>If you are in a dark enough location, you're lucky. Yeah,

15
00:00:48.759 --> 00:00:52.600
<v Speaker 2>if you're lucky. But fundamentally, human eyes, and by extension,

16
00:00:52.640 --> 00:00:56.719
<v Speaker 2>the vast majority of our optical telescopes, they are drawn

17
00:00:56.840 --> 00:00:58.840
<v Speaker 2>exclusively to the brightest sources of light.

18
00:00:59.039 --> 00:01:02.200
<v Speaker 3>It's a foundational paradox in astrophysics, really.

19
00:01:02.079 --> 00:01:05.040
<v Speaker 2>It is. We build our entire models of the cosmos

20
00:01:05.040 --> 00:01:08.439
<v Speaker 2>based on these blazing beacons in the dark. You know,

21
00:01:08.480 --> 00:01:11.359
<v Speaker 2>the massive, highly luminous galaxies and quasars.

22
00:01:11.400 --> 00:01:13.959
<v Speaker 3>But doing that, relying just on the bright spots leaves

23
00:01:13.959 --> 00:01:15.480
<v Speaker 3>a monumental blind spot, a.

24
00:01:15.480 --> 00:01:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Huge one, because what about the vast spaces between those objects,

25
00:01:19.120 --> 00:01:22.400
<v Speaker 2>seemingly empty voids, because they are not empty at all,

26
00:01:22.480 --> 00:01:25.359
<v Speaker 2>far from it. So today we are doing a deep

27
00:01:25.400 --> 00:01:29.200
<v Speaker 2>dive into a groundbreaking publication from the Astrophysical Journal. This

28
00:01:29.359 --> 00:01:32.640
<v Speaker 2>was released very recently March three, twenty twenty six.

29
00:01:32.840 --> 00:01:35.159
<v Speaker 3>Based on some incredible.

30
00:01:34.599 --> 00:01:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Data, yes, data from the hobby Everly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment,

31
00:01:39.439 --> 00:01:43.280
<v Speaker 2>which will refer to as HIA dectics. Our mission today

32
00:01:43.319 --> 00:01:46.560
<v Speaker 2>for you, the listener, is to understand how astronomers are

33
00:01:46.599 --> 00:01:48.920
<v Speaker 2>finally looking past those bright stars.

34
00:01:49.040 --> 00:01:51.239
<v Speaker 3>They're finding a hidden ocean, basically.

35
00:01:50.879 --> 00:01:54.519
<v Speaker 2>A vast, hidden sea of light residing right between really galaxies.

36
00:01:55.040 --> 00:01:59.000
<v Speaker 2>And we'll explore what mapping this invisible cosmic web actually

37
00:01:59.079 --> 00:02:02.200
<v Speaker 2>means for our fundamental understanding of the universe.

38
00:02:02.560 --> 00:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>This research really represents a complete paradigm shift in observational cosmology.

39
00:02:07.120 --> 00:02:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Ow so well, we are looking at a highly critical

40
00:02:10.560 --> 00:02:14.800
<v Speaker 3>epoch in the universe's history, specifically the period between nine

41
00:02:14.840 --> 00:02:16.240
<v Speaker 3>and eleven billion years ago.

42
00:02:16.319 --> 00:02:19.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's unpack this. Why are astronomers so heavily focused

43
00:02:19.680 --> 00:02:22.400
<v Speaker 2>on this particular window. What makes the universe of ten

44
00:02:22.479 --> 00:02:25.719
<v Speaker 2>billion years ago so crucial for understanding the galaxies we

45
00:02:25.759 --> 00:02:26.759
<v Speaker 2>see around us today.

46
00:02:26.960 --> 00:02:31.280
<v Speaker 3>That timeframe, it corresponds to what astrophysicists often call cosmic.

47
00:02:30.879 --> 00:02:33.479
<v Speaker 2>Noon, cosmic noon. I love that term.

48
00:02:33.560 --> 00:02:36.039
<v Speaker 3>It's very descriptive. If you look at the cosmic star

49
00:02:36.280 --> 00:02:37.560
<v Speaker 3>formation rate history, it.

50
00:02:37.560 --> 00:02:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Isn't a flatline, right, not at all.

51
00:02:40.120 --> 00:02:43.159
<v Speaker 3>The universe did not produce stars at a constant rate.

52
00:02:44.000 --> 00:02:47.199
<v Speaker 3>About nine to eleven billion years ago, the universe was

53
00:02:47.280 --> 00:02:50.400
<v Speaker 3>experiencing its absolute peak of star formation.

54
00:02:50.360 --> 00:02:52.199
<v Speaker 2>So it was just churning out stars.

55
00:02:52.319 --> 00:02:56.960
<v Speaker 3>It was an incredibly dynamic, violently active epoch. The galaxies

56
00:02:57.039 --> 00:03:01.120
<v Speaker 3>during this period, they weren't the settled, beautiful spiral galaxies

57
00:03:01.199 --> 00:03:02.240
<v Speaker 3>we see today.

58
00:03:02.039 --> 00:03:03.199
<v Speaker 2>Like the Milky Way, right.

59
00:03:03.199 --> 00:03:05.840
<v Speaker 3>They weren't like the Milky Way. They were chaotic. They

60
00:03:05.840 --> 00:03:10.080
<v Speaker 3>were actively pulling in or accreting massive amounts of primordial

61
00:03:10.120 --> 00:03:13.479
<v Speaker 3>gas from the intergalactic medium, just feeding on this gas

62
00:03:13.520 --> 00:03:17.680
<v Speaker 3>exactly and igniting stars at rates hundreds or sometimes thousands

63
00:03:17.719 --> 00:03:19.919
<v Speaker 3>of times higher than what our galaxy does today.

64
00:03:20.000 --> 00:03:24.719
<v Speaker 2>So it's essentially the peak of cosmic construction. But observing

65
00:03:24.759 --> 00:03:29.280
<v Speaker 2>that construction comes with significant physical limitations, doesn't it very significant?

66
00:03:29.479 --> 00:03:31.479
<v Speaker 3>The primary limitation is just surface.

67
00:03:31.199 --> 00:03:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Brightness because it's so far away, right, Because.

68
00:03:33.879 --> 00:03:36.800
<v Speaker 3>We're looking at objects nine to eleven billion light years away,

69
00:03:37.240 --> 00:03:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the inverse square law dictates that the light reaching us

70
00:03:40.680 --> 00:03:41.719
<v Speaker 3>is exceptionally faint.

71
00:03:41.879 --> 00:03:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but we can see some galaxies from back then.

72
00:03:44.319 --> 00:03:48.759
<v Speaker 3>We can resolve the most massive hyperluminous galaxies from that era, yes,

73
00:03:49.599 --> 00:03:54.560
<v Speaker 3>because their localized starburst activity is so incredibly intense. But

74
00:03:54.639 --> 00:03:58.240
<v Speaker 3>the smaller stuff, the fainter dwarf galaxies, and more importantly,

75
00:03:58.560 --> 00:04:02.240
<v Speaker 3>the sprawling filaments of fuse hydrogen gas that form the

76
00:04:02.319 --> 00:04:03.360
<v Speaker 3>cosmic web.

77
00:04:03.280 --> 00:04:04.000
<v Speaker 2>The fuel lines.

78
00:04:04.039 --> 00:04:06.439
<v Speaker 3>Basically right the fuel lines, they fall well below the

79
00:04:06.479 --> 00:04:10.039
<v Speaker 3>detection limits of standard optical imaging. The light from that

80
00:04:10.120 --> 00:04:12.960
<v Speaker 3>diffuse gas has spread out over billions of light years.

81
00:04:13.159 --> 00:04:15.800
<v Speaker 2>By the time it hits a telescope mirror on Earth.

82
00:04:15.560 --> 00:04:19.600
<v Speaker 3>It's effectively indistinguishable from the ambient background noise of the

83
00:04:19.720 --> 00:04:22.839
<v Speaker 3>night sky, or even the thermal noise of the camera

84
00:04:22.879 --> 00:04:23.879
<v Speaker 3>instruments themselves.

85
00:04:24.079 --> 00:04:26.319
<v Speaker 2>The time machine aspect of this is something that always

86
00:04:26.360 --> 00:04:29.720
<v Speaker 2>strikes me. We use that term colloquially, but mathematically that

87
00:04:29.879 --> 00:04:33.399
<v Speaker 2>is exactly what telescope data from this era represents.

88
00:04:32.959 --> 00:04:34.759
<v Speaker 3>It's literally a time machine, right.

89
00:04:34.680 --> 00:04:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Because the speed of light is a hard limit. When

90
00:04:37.519 --> 00:04:40.920
<v Speaker 2>we pull data from ha tex that originated ten billion

91
00:04:41.000 --> 00:04:44.399
<v Speaker 2>years ago, we are capturing photons that have been traveling

92
00:04:44.439 --> 00:04:48.319
<v Speaker 2>through the vacuum of space since before our sun even existed.

93
00:04:48.160 --> 00:04:51.279
<v Speaker 3>Long before the Earth is roughly four and a half

94
00:04:51.319 --> 00:04:52.319
<v Speaker 3>billion years old.

95
00:04:52.639 --> 00:04:54.920
<v Speaker 2>So this light had already been traveling for over five

96
00:04:55.000 --> 00:04:57.720
<v Speaker 2>billion years before our planet even coalesced from a cloud

97
00:04:57.759 --> 00:05:00.800
<v Speaker 2>of dust. It's staggering to think about it really is,

98
00:05:00.920 --> 00:05:04.839
<v Speaker 2>and capturing that specific ancient light to reconstruct those early

99
00:05:04.920 --> 00:05:08.519
<v Speaker 2>fuel lines, it requires an entirely different approach than just

100
00:05:08.560 --> 00:05:10.480
<v Speaker 2>taking a long exposure photograph.

101
00:05:10.600 --> 00:05:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Right, you get to take a picture. Taking a standard

102
00:05:13.439 --> 00:05:17.079
<v Speaker 3>optical image of this epoch to find diffuse gas is

103
00:05:17.199 --> 00:05:18.399
<v Speaker 3>largely feudile.

104
00:05:18.319 --> 00:05:20.079
<v Speaker 2>Because the background washes it out.

105
00:05:20.199 --> 00:05:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Exactly The broad band filters used in standard photography or

106
00:05:23.920 --> 00:05:27.720
<v Speaker 3>photometry simply let into much background light. It washes out

107
00:05:27.720 --> 00:05:28.680
<v Speaker 3>any faint structures.

108
00:05:29.120 --> 00:05:30.839
<v Speaker 2>So what's the alternative to.

109
00:05:30.839 --> 00:05:33.959
<v Speaker 3>Map the intergalactic gas ten billion years ago? We have

110
00:05:34.000 --> 00:05:38.199
<v Speaker 3>to abandon images completely. We rely almost entirely on spectroscopy.

111
00:05:38.279 --> 00:05:41.040
<v Speaker 2>We're not looking for the physical shape of a galaxy anymore.

112
00:05:41.199 --> 00:05:44.439
<v Speaker 3>No, we are looking for the highly specific physical signatures

113
00:05:44.600 --> 00:05:49.839
<v Speaker 3>hidden within the electromagnetic radiation itself. We isolate distinct wavelengths

114
00:05:49.839 --> 00:05:52.120
<v Speaker 3>of light that prove the presence of specific matter.

115
00:05:52.439 --> 00:05:55.759
<v Speaker 2>That requires transitioning our focus to the actual language of light,

116
00:05:55.839 --> 00:05:59.319
<v Speaker 2>the spectrum. Now for you listening, breaking light down into

117
00:05:59.399 --> 00:06:02.720
<v Speaker 2>a spectrum reveals the emission and absorption lines of chemical

118
00:06:02.720 --> 00:06:03.399
<v Speaker 2>elements like.

119
00:06:03.399 --> 00:06:05.600
<v Speaker 3>A cosic barcode, right, a barcode.

120
00:06:05.800 --> 00:06:08.399
<v Speaker 2>But I want to zero in on the specific wavelength

121
00:06:08.439 --> 00:06:13.800
<v Speaker 2>that makes this entire HGDX map possible. The Liman alpha emission.

122
00:06:13.439 --> 00:06:15.319
<v Speaker 3>Line the holy grail for this era.

123
00:06:15.839 --> 00:06:19.519
<v Speaker 2>Why is this specific quantum transition the ultimate tool for

124
00:06:19.600 --> 00:06:20.720
<v Speaker 2>looking at the cosmic noon?

125
00:06:21.319 --> 00:06:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, the Limon alpha line is the cornerstone of high

126
00:06:23.959 --> 00:06:27.519
<v Speaker 3>redshift observational astronomy. To understand why, we just need a

127
00:06:27.600 --> 00:06:30.040
<v Speaker 3>quick look at the quantum mechanics of the hydrogen atom.

128
00:06:29.879 --> 00:06:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Which is the most abundant element out there by far.

129
00:06:33.240 --> 00:06:35.759
<v Speaker 3>So when a hydrogen atom sits near a region of

130
00:06:35.800 --> 00:06:39.720
<v Speaker 3>intense star formation, like those massive chaotic galaxies we talked about,

131
00:06:39.959 --> 00:06:43.000
<v Speaker 3>it gets bombarded by extreme ultraviolet.

132
00:06:42.480 --> 00:06:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Radiation from the young hot stars.

133
00:06:44.639 --> 00:06:48.439
<v Speaker 3>Yes, specifically massive o and B type stars. This radiation

134
00:06:48.560 --> 00:06:52.240
<v Speaker 3>is so energetic that ionizes the hydrogen. It physically strips

135
00:06:52.240 --> 00:06:54.000
<v Speaker 3>the electron away from the proton, and.

136
00:06:54.000 --> 00:06:56.759
<v Speaker 2>The signal we're looking for is created when that electron

137
00:06:56.800 --> 00:06:57.639
<v Speaker 2>finds its way.

138
00:06:57.439 --> 00:07:02.639
<v Speaker 3>Back right correct, when the pro eventually recombines with an electron,

139
00:07:02.879 --> 00:07:08.399
<v Speaker 3>that electron cascades down through the atom's specific quantized energy.

140
00:07:08.160 --> 00:07:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Level, well stepping down a ladder, exactly.

141
00:07:10.160 --> 00:07:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Like stepping down a ladder, and when it drops from

142
00:07:12.399 --> 00:07:15.319
<v Speaker 3>the first excited state down to the grounds the bottom

143
00:07:15.360 --> 00:07:18.800
<v Speaker 3>run of the ladder, it releases a photon with a

144
00:07:18.920 --> 00:07:21.399
<v Speaker 3>very specific, unchangeable.

145
00:07:20.800 --> 00:07:23.399
<v Speaker 2>Wavelength, and that wavelength is one hundred.

146
00:07:23.079 --> 00:07:25.839
<v Speaker 3>And twenty one point six nanometers. That is the Liman

147
00:07:25.879 --> 00:07:26.439
<v Speaker 3>alpha line.

148
00:07:26.439 --> 00:07:28.360
<v Speaker 2>We one hundred and twenty one point six.

149
00:07:28.199 --> 00:07:31.319
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Because the early universe was absolutely dominated by hydrogen

150
00:07:31.600 --> 00:07:34.920
<v Speaker 3>and the star formation rates were so extreme, these galaxies

151
00:07:34.959 --> 00:07:38.519
<v Speaker 3>act as colossal Liman alpha factories. They pump out an

152
00:07:38.519 --> 00:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>astonishing number of these specific photons.

153
00:07:40.879 --> 00:07:43.360
<v Speaker 2>But wait, one hundred twenty one point six nanometers is

154
00:07:43.399 --> 00:07:46.319
<v Speaker 2>deep in the ultraviolet spectrum that's invisible to the human eye.

155
00:07:46.399 --> 00:07:48.120
<v Speaker 2>It is, and it doesn't stay at one hundred and

156
00:07:48.160 --> 00:07:51.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty one point six nanimeters either because of the expansion.

157
00:07:50.560 --> 00:07:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Of the universe right the red shift.

158
00:07:52.240 --> 00:07:55.319
<v Speaker 2>As those photons travel through space for ten billion years,

159
00:07:55.680 --> 00:07:58.639
<v Speaker 2>space itself expands, it physically stretches the light.

160
00:07:58.600 --> 00:08:01.319
<v Speaker 3>Waves, so by the time they reach the HGTX instruments

161
00:08:01.360 --> 00:08:05.040
<v Speaker 3>in Texas, that ultraviolet light has been red shifted straight

162
00:08:05.079 --> 00:08:07.160
<v Speaker 3>into the visible optical bands right.

163
00:08:07.040 --> 00:08:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Around three hundred and fifty to five hundred and fifteen

164
00:08:09.160 --> 00:08:13.240
<v Speaker 2>nanimeters greenish blue light exactly. The source material notes this

165
00:08:13.279 --> 00:08:16.839
<v Speaker 2>shows up as a dramatic peak in the data. If

166
00:08:16.879 --> 00:08:20.720
<v Speaker 2>you picture the spectrographic feed, you have this relatively flat

167
00:08:20.800 --> 00:08:26.279
<v Speaker 2>continuum of background emission and then boom, a violent, unmistakable.

168
00:08:25.600 --> 00:08:28.519
<v Speaker 3>Spike at that specific red shifted wavelength.

169
00:08:28.759 --> 00:08:32.440
<v Speaker 2>It's the undeniable fingerprint of excited hydrogen at that exact

170
00:08:32.440 --> 00:08:33.440
<v Speaker 2>distance in the universe.

171
00:08:33.799 --> 00:08:37.000
<v Speaker 3>We call that dramatic peak a Liman alpha emitter or

172
00:08:37.039 --> 00:08:40.279
<v Speaker 3>an lae An lee. Finding those massive spikes is the

173
00:08:40.320 --> 00:08:44.159
<v Speaker 3>traditional methodology for locating high red shift galaxies. If you

174
00:08:44.200 --> 00:08:48.320
<v Speaker 3>see that peak, you have definitively located a bright active

175
00:08:48.320 --> 00:08:50.000
<v Speaker 3>galaxy from that specific epoch.

176
00:08:50.120 --> 00:08:51.759
<v Speaker 2>But the galaxies aren't the whole story.

177
00:08:51.919 --> 00:08:55.240
<v Speaker 3>No, theoretical models of the cosmic web have always suggested

178
00:08:55.240 --> 00:08:57.720
<v Speaker 3>that lemon alpha mission shouldn't just be restricted to the

179
00:08:57.759 --> 00:08:58.600
<v Speaker 3>massive galaxies.

180
00:08:58.600 --> 00:09:00.360
<v Speaker 2>The gas in between them should be glowing too.

181
00:09:00.600 --> 00:09:04.000
<v Speaker 3>The vast filaments of intergalactic gas drifting between the galaxies

182
00:09:04.120 --> 00:09:07.480
<v Speaker 3>should also be emitting these photons, either through recombination from

183
00:09:07.519 --> 00:09:10.279
<v Speaker 3>the background radiation or just from gas falling into dark

184
00:09:10.320 --> 00:09:11.600
<v Speaker 3>matter halos and heating up.

185
00:09:11.840 --> 00:09:15.399
<v Speaker 2>But the emission from those gas filaments that would be

186
00:09:15.960 --> 00:09:19.840
<v Speaker 2>orders of magnitude weaker than the galaxies themselves.

187
00:09:19.360 --> 00:09:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Vastly weaker. I mean, the peaks from the galaxies are

188
00:09:21.679 --> 00:09:24.600
<v Speaker 3>highly localized, they're relatively easy to extract from the data.

189
00:09:24.759 --> 00:09:25.720
<v Speaker 2>They stand out.

190
00:09:25.639 --> 00:09:28.600
<v Speaker 3>They do, but the emission from the intergalactic gas is

191
00:09:28.679 --> 00:09:34.200
<v Speaker 3>exceptionally diffuse. It's just a subtle, incredibly faint glow spread

192
00:09:34.240 --> 00:09:36.440
<v Speaker 3>across massive cosmic volumes.

193
00:09:36.039 --> 00:09:38.480
<v Speaker 2>And for decades, finding that faint signal was thought to

194
00:09:38.480 --> 00:09:39.840
<v Speaker 2>be impossible.

195
00:09:39.360 --> 00:09:42.879
<v Speaker 3>Virtually impossible on a large scale. The instrumental noise, the

196
00:09:42.919 --> 00:09:46.320
<v Speaker 3>foreground light from our own solar system, it all drowns it.

197
00:09:46.320 --> 00:09:48.879
<v Speaker 2>Out, which brings us to the sheer scale of the

198
00:09:48.919 --> 00:09:52.639
<v Speaker 2>instrument required to even attempt this. You cannot just point

199
00:09:52.639 --> 00:09:55.519
<v Speaker 2>a standard observatory telescope at the sky and hope to

200
00:09:55.519 --> 00:09:56.360
<v Speaker 2>map this stuff.

201
00:09:56.440 --> 00:09:57.480
<v Speaker 3>No, you need a behemoth.

202
00:09:57.600 --> 00:10:00.879
<v Speaker 2>You need the hobby Eberly Telescope Dark e Energy Experiment

203
00:10:00.919 --> 00:10:04.000
<v Speaker 2>at the McDonald Observatory in West Texas. Let's discuss the

204
00:10:04.080 --> 00:10:07.240
<v Speaker 2>volume of this survey, because the engineering reality of headdecks

205
00:10:07.440 --> 00:10:09.080
<v Speaker 2>is staggering the hobby.

206
00:10:09.080 --> 00:10:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Every telescope. The HET is a totally unique piece of engineering.

207
00:10:13.600 --> 00:10:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Most big telescopes move on dual axis, right, They tilt

208
00:10:16.519 --> 00:10:19.039
<v Speaker 2>up and down and spin around to track the sky.

209
00:10:19.399 --> 00:10:23.159
<v Speaker 3>Right. But the HT has a fixed elevation angle. It

210
00:10:23.240 --> 00:10:25.159
<v Speaker 3>sits permanently at fifty five degrees.

211
00:10:25.320 --> 00:10:25.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

212
00:10:26.000 --> 00:10:29.720
<v Speaker 3>It simply rotates in asimuth around in a circle while

213
00:10:29.919 --> 00:10:33.639
<v Speaker 3>a highly complex tracker moves across the focal plane at

214
00:10:33.639 --> 00:10:37.120
<v Speaker 3>the top to follow the astronomical targets as the Earth turns.

215
00:10:37.279 --> 00:10:38.559
<v Speaker 2>That's incredibly clever.

216
00:10:38.799 --> 00:10:42.000
<v Speaker 3>It's very efficient, and for the dark energy experiment, the

217
00:10:42.039 --> 00:10:45.159
<v Speaker 3>telescope was upgraded with a massive array of spectrographs.

218
00:10:45.200 --> 00:10:49.600
<v Speaker 2>They call it VIRUS, the Visible Integral Field Replicable Unit spectrograph.

219
00:10:49.639 --> 00:10:52.639
<v Speaker 3>That's the one, and VIRUS isn't just one single instrument, No.

220
00:10:52.600 --> 00:10:57.159
<v Speaker 2>It's a massive replication strategy. Instead of building one giant spectrograph.

221
00:10:57.279 --> 00:10:59.879
<v Speaker 2>They build dozens of identical units and fed them with

222
00:11:00.159 --> 00:11:02.039
<v Speaker 2>thousands of optical fibers.

223
00:11:01.679 --> 00:11:04.879
<v Speaker 3>Over thirty thousand optical fiber thirty thousand. This allows eighth

224
00:11:05.080 --> 00:11:09.200
<v Speaker 3>decics to perform integral field spectroscopy on an industrial scale.

225
00:11:09.480 --> 00:11:12.360
<v Speaker 3>They're taking spectra of thousands of discrete points on the

226
00:11:12.360 --> 00:11:14.679
<v Speaker 3>sky simultaneously.

227
00:11:13.919 --> 00:11:17.320
<v Speaker 2>And their primary mission, as the name implies, is mapping

228
00:11:17.399 --> 00:11:20.399
<v Speaker 2>the expansion history of the universe to constrain dark energy.

229
00:11:20.720 --> 00:11:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, their stated goal was to chart the three D

230
00:11:23.639 --> 00:11:29.159
<v Speaker 3>positions of over one million bright Liman alpha emitting galaxies.

231
00:11:29.480 --> 00:11:32.360
<v Speaker 2>To get that catalog of a million galaxies, they had

232
00:11:32.360 --> 00:11:35.399
<v Speaker 2>to cover a massive area of the sky, an area

233
00:11:35.480 --> 00:11:37.399
<v Speaker 2>measuring over two thousand full moons.

234
00:11:37.440 --> 00:11:39.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a huge swathe of the celestial sphere.

235
00:11:39.519 --> 00:11:42.399
<v Speaker 2>Let's help you visualize that the angular diameter of the

236
00:11:42.399 --> 00:11:45.320
<v Speaker 2>full moon is about half a degree, so taking up

237
00:11:45.360 --> 00:11:49.679
<v Speaker 2>two thousand full moons, that is a massive, sweeping expanse

238
00:11:49.759 --> 00:11:50.120
<v Speaker 2>of space.

239
00:11:50.159 --> 00:11:53.120
<v Speaker 3>They're just blindly pointing these thirty thousand fibers at the sky,

240
00:11:53.279 --> 00:11:57.840
<v Speaker 3>pulling in light, separating into wavelengths, and generating an unbelievable

241
00:11:57.919 --> 00:11:59.879
<v Speaker 3>six hundred million individual spectra.

242
00:12:00.080 --> 00:12:03.000
<v Speaker 2>He Here's where it gets really interesting. Carl Gipart, the

243
00:12:03.039 --> 00:12:06.480
<v Speaker 2>principal investigator for at DENEX, revealed a metric about this

244
00:12:06.559 --> 00:12:10.039
<v Speaker 2>data collection that fundamentally alters how we view these surveys.

245
00:12:10.159 --> 00:12:10.840
<v Speaker 3>It really does.

246
00:12:11.000 --> 00:12:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Despite gathering six hundred million spectra that primary dark energy mission,

247
00:12:15.360 --> 00:12:18.639
<v Speaker 2>the effort to map the one million bright galaxies, it

248
00:12:18.720 --> 00:12:21.399
<v Speaker 2>only utilizes roughly five percent of the collected data.

249
00:12:21.440 --> 00:12:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Five percent. That is the crucial pivot point of this

250
00:12:24.440 --> 00:12:27.200
<v Speaker 3>entire deep dive. It's what the primary pipeline for h

251
00:12:27.279 --> 00:12:31.759
<v Speaker 3>DEX is designed for point source extraction. It scans all

252
00:12:32.120 --> 00:12:37.279
<v Speaker 3>six hundred million spectra looking for high signal to noise ratio.

253
00:12:37.000 --> 00:12:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Peaks the bright galaxies.

254
00:12:38.960 --> 00:12:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Exactly once it identifies in catalogs at Galaxy. The rest

255
00:12:43.240 --> 00:12:45.960
<v Speaker 3>of the data surrounding that peak, which makes up ninety

256
00:12:46.000 --> 00:12:49.519
<v Speaker 3>five percent of the total data set, is mathematically categorized

257
00:12:49.559 --> 00:12:50.440
<v Speaker 3>as background noise.

258
00:12:50.720 --> 00:12:52.720
<v Speaker 2>They threw out ninety five percent of the data, I

259
00:12:52.720 --> 00:12:54.840
<v Speaker 2>mean not literally deleted it from the hard drives, but

260
00:12:55.240 --> 00:12:58.480
<v Speaker 2>scientifically it was sideline was ignored. You build this incredibly

261
00:12:58.480 --> 00:13:02.279
<v Speaker 2>complex array of thirty five optical fibers, you survey two

262
00:13:02.320 --> 00:13:05.399
<v Speaker 2>thousand full moons of sky and ninety five percent of

263
00:13:05.440 --> 00:13:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the photons you catch are deemed irrelevant just because they

264
00:13:08.720 --> 00:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>don't cross a specific brightness threshold.

265
00:13:11.159 --> 00:13:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, from a traditional survey perspective, that is standard operating procedure. Really, yes,

266
00:13:17.080 --> 00:13:20.519
<v Speaker 3>if your objective is a highly pure catalog of discrete

267
00:13:20.679 --> 00:13:24.840
<v Speaker 3>individual objects, anything that cannot be confidently resolved as an

268
00:13:24.840 --> 00:13:26.399
<v Speaker 3>object is an impediment.

269
00:13:26.480 --> 00:13:28.039
<v Speaker 2>It's just getting in the way, exactly.

270
00:13:28.200 --> 00:13:31.039
<v Speaker 3>It's four ground light, it's atmospheric air glow, it's thermal

271
00:13:31.080 --> 00:13:32.600
<v Speaker 3>noise in the CCD detectors.

272
00:13:32.799 --> 00:13:35.759
<v Speaker 2>But Masha Lujah Niemeyer and the team behind this new

273
00:13:35.799 --> 00:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>publication they recognized a profound philosophical flaw in that approach.

274
00:13:41.600 --> 00:13:44.639
<v Speaker 3>They realized that ninety five percent is not empty noise,

275
00:13:44.960 --> 00:13:46.240
<v Speaker 3>no among.

276
00:13:45.919 --> 00:13:49.519
<v Speaker 2>The instrument artifacts, and the air glow is the literal

277
00:13:49.600 --> 00:13:51.559
<v Speaker 2>sea of light from the cosmic web.

278
00:13:51.799 --> 00:13:54.720
<v Speaker 3>It contains the aggregate liman alpha emissions of all the

279
00:13:54.799 --> 00:13:58.200
<v Speaker 3>dwarf galaxies that were too faint to trigger the detection algorithms,

280
00:13:58.799 --> 00:14:01.519
<v Speaker 3>plus the glowing films of intergalactic gas.

281
00:14:02.000 --> 00:14:04.559
<v Speaker 2>It's the difference between mapping the peaks of a mountain

282
00:14:04.639 --> 00:14:07.879
<v Speaker 2>range and mapping the entire tectonic plate underneath it.

283
00:14:07.919 --> 00:14:08.919
<v Speaker 3>That's a great way to put it.

284
00:14:08.960 --> 00:14:12.080
<v Speaker 2>The bright galaxies are just the most luminous nodes of

285
00:14:12.120 --> 00:14:16.519
<v Speaker 2>a much larger, interconnected structure. But the challenge wasn't getting

286
00:14:16.600 --> 00:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>the data hadx already banked half a petabite of it.

287
00:14:20.200 --> 00:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>The challenge was statistical, highly statistical. How do you extract

288
00:14:24.039 --> 00:14:27.159
<v Speaker 2>an incredibly faint, highly diffused signal from a data set

289
00:14:27.200 --> 00:14:30.080
<v Speaker 2>where the noise is orders of magnitude louder than the signal.

290
00:14:30.200 --> 00:14:33.320
<v Speaker 3>You have to completely abandon the concept of object resolution.

291
00:14:33.080 --> 00:14:35.639
<v Speaker 2>Stop looking for individual things exactly.

292
00:14:35.799 --> 00:14:38.000
<v Speaker 3>You can no longer ask the data pipeline to find

293
00:14:38.000 --> 00:14:42.039
<v Speaker 3>a specific galaxy. This requires transitioning to a technique known

294
00:14:42.080 --> 00:14:43.919
<v Speaker 3>as line intensity mapping.

295
00:14:44.360 --> 00:14:46.759
<v Speaker 2>Line intensity mapping or LIMB.

296
00:14:46.600 --> 00:14:50.320
<v Speaker 3>WIM fundamentally redefines the objective of the survey. Instead of

297
00:14:50.360 --> 00:14:54.320
<v Speaker 3>searching for spatial coordinates of bright peaks, LIMB measures the

298
00:14:54.360 --> 00:14:58.399
<v Speaker 3>integrated surface brightness of a specific spectral line across large

299
00:14:58.399 --> 00:14:59.360
<v Speaker 3>cosmic volumes.

300
00:14:59.600 --> 00:15:02.399
<v Speaker 2>To make that concrete for you, listening, Shuleian Mignot's, a

301
00:15:02.480 --> 00:15:05.440
<v Speaker 2>co author on the paper, offered an excellent analogy regarding

302
00:15:05.440 --> 00:15:07.559
<v Speaker 2>how we view the spatial distribution.

303
00:15:07.159 --> 00:15:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Of light, the airplane analogy.

304
00:15:08.879 --> 00:15:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, he compared the traditional cataloging method to flying in

305
00:15:12.399 --> 00:15:14.840
<v Speaker 2>an airplane at night and trying to map a country's

306
00:15:14.879 --> 00:15:17.559
<v Speaker 2>population by only looking at the brightest city centers.

307
00:15:17.600 --> 00:15:20.879
<v Speaker 3>It's highly illustrative. If your optical censor on the aircraft

308
00:15:20.919 --> 00:15:24.600
<v Speaker 3>is calibrated to only register the intense light output of

309
00:15:24.759 --> 00:15:28.039
<v Speaker 3>major metropolitan areas like New York, Chicago.

310
00:15:27.639 --> 00:15:31.159
<v Speaker 2>Los Angeles, then your resulting map implies a binary distribution.

311
00:15:31.360 --> 00:15:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, it implies there are intense points of existence surrounded

312
00:15:34.480 --> 00:15:36.960
<v Speaker 3>by total empty voids.

313
00:15:36.679 --> 00:15:39.919
<v Speaker 2>But we know demographically that the population is continuous.

314
00:15:40.200 --> 00:15:44.919
<v Speaker 3>There are sprawling suburbs, rural highway corridors, and small towns

315
00:15:44.960 --> 00:15:46.720
<v Speaker 3>connecting those major hubs.

316
00:15:46.559 --> 00:15:51.480
<v Speaker 2>And the traditional point source extraction of ATX was mapping

317
00:15:51.519 --> 00:15:54.519
<v Speaker 2>the cosmic cities, but it was completely blind to the

318
00:15:54.559 --> 00:15:58.159
<v Speaker 2>cosmic suburbs and the interstate highways of gas connecting.

319
00:15:57.720 --> 00:16:01.039
<v Speaker 3>Them, because the light from the suburbs is isn't concentrated

320
00:16:01.159 --> 00:16:02.399
<v Speaker 3>enough to trigger the sensor.

321
00:16:02.840 --> 00:16:06.879
<v Speaker 2>So to map the entire landscape, Muno's suggests keeping the

322
00:16:06.919 --> 00:16:09.759
<v Speaker 2>airplane at the exact same altitude, looking at the exact

323
00:16:09.799 --> 00:16:13.200
<v Speaker 2>same landscape, but changing the optical properties of the sensor.

324
00:16:13.320 --> 00:16:15.679
<v Speaker 3>You look through a deliberately smudged window.

325
00:16:15.519 --> 00:16:16.559
<v Speaker 2>A smudged window.

326
00:16:16.799 --> 00:16:20.679
<v Speaker 3>The smudged window represents the spatial and spectral smoothing inherent

327
00:16:20.759 --> 00:16:24.320
<v Speaker 3>in line intensity mapping. When you apply a smoothing kernel

328
00:16:24.320 --> 00:16:27.840
<v Speaker 3>to the data, you intentionally degrade the resolution. You make

329
00:16:27.879 --> 00:16:30.120
<v Speaker 3>it burry, You make it very blurry. You can no

330
00:16:30.200 --> 00:16:33.279
<v Speaker 3>longer distinguish the sharp boundaries of the major cities. The

331
00:16:33.360 --> 00:16:35.120
<v Speaker 3>points of light blur and expand.

332
00:16:35.159 --> 00:16:38.440
<v Speaker 2>But there's a mathematical advantage to that, right, a critical one.

333
00:16:38.919 --> 00:16:42.559
<v Speaker 3>While resolution is lost, the total photon count is conserved,

334
00:16:42.639 --> 00:16:46.919
<v Speaker 3>it's aggregated. The faint sub threshold light from the cosmic

335
00:16:46.960 --> 00:16:51.279
<v Speaker 3>suburbs is integrated into larger volumetric pixels, which we call.

336
00:16:51.159 --> 00:16:53.879
<v Speaker 2>Voxels vouxeles three D pixels right.

337
00:16:53.960 --> 00:16:57.240
<v Speaker 3>And by integrating over larger volumes, the faint signal of

338
00:16:57.279 --> 00:17:02.039
<v Speaker 3>the diffuse limon al for emission constructively interferes. It naturally

339
00:17:02.159 --> 00:17:06.200
<v Speaker 3>rises above the threshold of the random, uncorrelated instrumental noise.

340
00:17:06.400 --> 00:17:10.319
<v Speaker 2>It's a brilliant statistical maneuver. You sacrifice the ability to

341
00:17:10.359 --> 00:17:14.079
<v Speaker 2>say there is a distinct dwarf galaxy exactly at coordinate X,

342
00:17:14.559 --> 00:17:17.039
<v Speaker 2>but you gain the ability to say this entire region

343
00:17:17.079 --> 00:17:21.000
<v Speaker 2>of space is radiating a faint Liman alpha glow. The

344
00:17:21.039 --> 00:17:24.880
<v Speaker 2>blurry picture actually contains more cosmological information about the distribution

345
00:17:24.920 --> 00:17:27.680
<v Speaker 2>of matter than the sharp, highly filtered picture did.

346
00:17:27.880 --> 00:17:30.799
<v Speaker 3>It's a more complete truth. Now the source material does

347
00:17:30.799 --> 00:17:33.440
<v Speaker 3>clarify that line intensity mapping itself is not a newly

348
00:17:33.480 --> 00:17:34.319
<v Speaker 3>invented concept.

349
00:17:34.480 --> 00:17:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Right radio astronomers have used it.

350
00:17:36.000 --> 00:17:37.799
<v Speaker 3>They've used it for years to map the twenty one

351
00:17:37.880 --> 00:17:41.519
<v Speaker 3>centimeter line of neutral hydrogen. But applying this technique to

352
00:17:41.599 --> 00:17:44.599
<v Speaker 3>the ultraviolet Liman alpha e missions in the optical band.

353
00:17:44.680 --> 00:17:46.839
<v Speaker 2>Over a survey area of two.

354
00:17:46.680 --> 00:17:50.359
<v Speaker 3>Thousand full moons, that is entirely unprecedented.

355
00:17:49.720 --> 00:17:53.759
<v Speaker 2>And the application at this scale introduces formidable computational complexities.

356
00:17:53.839 --> 00:17:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Massive complexities in twenty one centimeter mapping. The foregrounds are intense,

357
00:17:57.960 --> 00:18:00.799
<v Speaker 3>but the spectral line itself is relative straightforward.

358
00:18:00.839 --> 00:18:02.799
<v Speaker 2>But Lyman alpha is messy.

359
00:18:03.039 --> 00:18:07.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a resonant line. The focons scatter repeatedly off neutral

360
00:18:07.079 --> 00:18:10.519
<v Speaker 3>hydrogen atoms before they ever escape the galactic halo. It

361
00:18:10.559 --> 00:18:13.839
<v Speaker 3>makes the radiative transfer extremely complex to model.

362
00:18:14.160 --> 00:18:18.599
<v Speaker 2>Plus the data set itself is gargantuan. To apply line

363
00:18:18.599 --> 00:18:22.079
<v Speaker 2>intensity mapping to the discarded ninety five percent of the

364
00:18:22.240 --> 00:18:25.839
<v Speaker 2>HX data required processing roughly half a petabyte of raw

365
00:18:25.880 --> 00:18:29.160
<v Speaker 2>spectroscopic files. Half a petabyte, let's give that some scale.

366
00:18:29.519 --> 00:18:31.880
<v Speaker 2>If you consider a high definition movie to be roughly

367
00:18:31.960 --> 00:18:35.240
<v Speaker 2>five gigabytes, half a petabyte is equivalent to one hundred

368
00:18:35.359 --> 00:18:37.000
<v Speaker 2>thousand high definition movies.

369
00:18:37.079 --> 00:18:38.480
<v Speaker 3>You're not doing that on all laptop.

370
00:18:38.680 --> 00:18:41.480
<v Speaker 2>No. Processing that volume of data isn't something you do

371
00:18:41.559 --> 00:18:44.400
<v Speaker 2>on a workstation in a university lab. The team had

372
00:18:44.400 --> 00:18:48.079
<v Speaker 2>to rely on the Texas Advanced Computing Center or TACC.

373
00:18:48.319 --> 00:18:52.359
<v Speaker 3>They were utilizing supercomputers like Fronterra and Stampede.

374
00:18:51.759 --> 00:18:55.839
<v Speaker 2>Running completely customed pipelines. They had to mathematically strip away

375
00:18:55.839 --> 00:18:59.440
<v Speaker 2>the atmospheric emission lines, the foreground zodiacal light from our

376
00:18:59.440 --> 00:19:02.440
<v Speaker 2>solar system, the galactic cirrus from the Milky Way, and

377
00:19:02.599 --> 00:19:04.880
<v Speaker 2>all the instrumental artifacts.

378
00:19:04.440 --> 00:19:06.559
<v Speaker 3>From six hundred million spectra, all.

379
00:19:06.400 --> 00:19:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Without accidentally erasing the incredibly fragile ultra faintlyman alpha signal

380
00:19:11.839 --> 00:19:12.759
<v Speaker 2>hidden underneath.

381
00:19:12.920 --> 00:19:16.119
<v Speaker 3>The data reduction pipeline is an engineering marvel in itself,

382
00:19:16.839 --> 00:19:21.400
<v Speaker 3>but raw computational power is meaningless without a rigorous physical

383
00:19:21.440 --> 00:19:24.279
<v Speaker 3>framework to guide it. If we connect this to the

384
00:19:24.319 --> 00:19:27.920
<v Speaker 3>bigger picture, the actual methodology used to reveal the cosmic

385
00:19:27.960 --> 00:19:30.599
<v Speaker 3>web relies on a foundational property of.

386
00:19:30.559 --> 00:19:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Cosmology, gravitational clustering.

387
00:19:32.960 --> 00:19:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, the universe is not a uniform soup of matter.

388
00:19:37.039 --> 00:19:40.119
<v Speaker 3>It is heavily structured by the gravitational potential wells of

389
00:19:40.200 --> 00:19:41.559
<v Speaker 3>dark matter halos.

390
00:19:41.279 --> 00:19:45.119
<v Speaker 2>And this is where Chro Komatsu's signpost technique comes into play.

391
00:19:45.400 --> 00:19:48.559
<v Speaker 2>Kamatsu is a highly respected cosmologist at the Max Planck

392
00:19:48.680 --> 00:19:50.119
<v Speaker 2>Institute for Astrophysics.

393
00:19:50.279 --> 00:19:53.000
<v Speaker 3>His contribution here is brilliant. It bridges the gap between

394
00:19:53.000 --> 00:19:55.799
<v Speaker 3>the five percent catalog and the ninety five percent noise.

395
00:19:56.160 --> 00:20:00.599
<v Speaker 2>He utilizes the concept of cross correlation. Since gravity dictates

396
00:20:00.640 --> 00:20:04.319
<v Speaker 2>that matter will pool inside these dark matter halos, we

397
00:20:04.400 --> 00:20:07.799
<v Speaker 2>know that massive bright galaxies do not exist in isolation.

398
00:20:08.000 --> 00:20:11.920
<v Speaker 3>They seated the densest nodes of the cosmic web exactly.

399
00:20:11.680 --> 00:20:16.000
<v Speaker 2>The one million bright Lineman alpha emitters the five percent

400
00:20:16.039 --> 00:20:20.640
<v Speaker 2>of the data already cataloged by HDX. They aren't discarded

401
00:20:20.680 --> 00:20:21.400
<v Speaker 2>in this new.

402
00:20:21.279 --> 00:20:23.799
<v Speaker 3>Map, far from it. They are the anchors.

403
00:20:23.960 --> 00:20:24.599
<v Speaker 2>The anchors.

404
00:20:24.640 --> 00:20:27.519
<v Speaker 3>In cosmology, we use a metric called the two point

405
00:20:27.559 --> 00:20:31.480
<v Speaker 3>correlation function, which means it essentially calculates the probability of

406
00:20:31.480 --> 00:20:34.440
<v Speaker 3>finding a specific signal at a given distance from a

407
00:20:34.440 --> 00:20:35.400
<v Speaker 3>known reference point.

408
00:20:35.440 --> 00:20:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

409
00:20:35.839 --> 00:20:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Commants's signpost method leverages this by cross correlating the known

410
00:20:39.279 --> 00:20:43.039
<v Speaker 3>three D positions of the bright galaxies the cities with

411
00:20:43.160 --> 00:20:47.000
<v Speaker 3>the heavily smoothed faint intensity map of the remaining ninety

412
00:20:47.039 --> 00:20:48.759
<v Speaker 3>five percent of the data the suburbs.

413
00:20:48.799 --> 00:20:51.480
<v Speaker 2>So the supercomputer takes the coordinates of a known bright

414
00:20:51.559 --> 00:20:54.160
<v Speaker 2>galaxy and says, based on the laws of gravity, there

415
00:20:54.160 --> 00:20:57.039
<v Speaker 2>should be a localized over density of gas and dwarf

416
00:20:57.079 --> 00:20:58.839
<v Speaker 2>galaxies right around.

417
00:20:58.680 --> 00:21:00.759
<v Speaker 3>This coordinator right knows where to look.

418
00:21:00.839 --> 00:21:03.240
<v Speaker 2>It then looks at the intensity map for that specific

419
00:21:03.319 --> 00:21:07.519
<v Speaker 2>region and extracts the faint signal that statistically correlates with

420
00:21:07.559 --> 00:21:09.039
<v Speaker 2>the presence of that bright anchor.

421
00:21:09.200 --> 00:21:13.000
<v Speaker 3>The bright galaxies act as gravitational signpost shedding. Look here,

422
00:21:13.319 --> 00:21:15.519
<v Speaker 3>the cosmic web is thickest right around me.

423
00:21:15.839 --> 00:21:19.799
<v Speaker 2>By stacking the signals around hundreds of thousands of these signposts,

424
00:21:19.799 --> 00:21:21.440
<v Speaker 2>something amazing happens.

425
00:21:21.079 --> 00:21:24.599
<v Speaker 3>With the math. The random instrumental noise, which obviously does

426
00:21:24.640 --> 00:21:27.839
<v Speaker 3>not correlate with the physical positions of the galaxies, averages

427
00:21:27.880 --> 00:21:28.599
<v Speaker 3>out to zero.

428
00:21:28.640 --> 00:21:32.640
<v Speaker 2>But the real astrophysical signal from the intergalactic.

429
00:21:32.000 --> 00:21:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Gas it constructively adds up. It stacks this cross correlation

430
00:21:37.119 --> 00:21:41.559
<v Speaker 3>technique allowed the supercomputers to mathematically triangulate and reveal the

431
00:21:41.599 --> 00:21:44.519
<v Speaker 3>three dimensional morphology of the diffuse gas.

432
00:21:44.680 --> 00:21:47.519
<v Speaker 2>It's incredible to visualize the output. You begin with an

433
00:21:47.559 --> 00:21:51.880
<v Speaker 2>empty void punctuated by one million isolated, brilliant points.

434
00:21:51.559 --> 00:21:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Of light a standard scatterplot.

435
00:21:53.440 --> 00:21:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Exactly a scatterplot. But as the cross correlation algorithm runs

436
00:21:56.960 --> 00:22:00.440
<v Speaker 2>across the half petabyte of data, the spaces between those

437
00:22:00.440 --> 00:22:01.920
<v Speaker 2>points begin to glow.

438
00:22:01.960 --> 00:22:05.559
<v Speaker 3>The massive filaments of hydrogen gas emerge from the background noise.

439
00:22:05.599 --> 00:22:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Stretching across millions of light years, linking the bright nodes together.

440
00:22:10.240 --> 00:22:12.279
<v Speaker 2>The cosmic suburbs are illuminated.

441
00:22:12.559 --> 00:22:15.920
<v Speaker 3>It transforms our view of the nine to eleven billion

442
00:22:16.000 --> 00:22:19.599
<v Speaker 3>year old universe from a collection of isolated islands into

443
00:22:19.640 --> 00:22:21.519
<v Speaker 3>a massive, contiguous structure.

444
00:22:22.119 --> 00:22:25.200
<v Speaker 2>So what does this all mean. The empirical observation of

445
00:22:25.240 --> 00:22:29.559
<v Speaker 2>the structure is a monumental achievement, obviously, but why does

446
00:22:29.559 --> 00:22:33.119
<v Speaker 2>having this empirical map matter if we already had theoretical models.

447
00:22:33.160 --> 00:22:34.039
<v Speaker 3>That's a great question.

448
00:22:34.559 --> 00:22:38.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we have massive supercomputer simulations like Illustris, TNG

449
00:22:39.240 --> 00:22:43.680
<v Speaker 2>or the EGL project. These simulations take the initial conditions

450
00:22:43.680 --> 00:22:46.799
<v Speaker 2>of the Big Bang, apply the laws of fluidynamics, dark

451
00:22:46.799 --> 00:22:48.720
<v Speaker 2>matter gravity and run it forward to see how the

452
00:22:48.759 --> 00:22:52.599
<v Speaker 2>cosmic web forms. Aren't those simulations accurate enough.

453
00:22:52.519 --> 00:22:56.359
<v Speaker 3>Well, simulations are inherently limited by their resolution and by

454
00:22:56.440 --> 00:22:59.599
<v Speaker 3>the assumptions encoded within their subgrid physics.

455
00:22:59.200 --> 00:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Some grid physics.

456
00:23:00.039 --> 00:23:03.359
<v Speaker 3>In a cosmological simulation spanning hundreds of millions of light years,

457
00:23:03.440 --> 00:23:06.759
<v Speaker 3>it is computationally impossible to model the physics of individual

458
00:23:06.839 --> 00:23:09.200
<v Speaker 3>stars or individual supermassive black holes.

459
00:23:09.200 --> 00:23:11.240
<v Speaker 2>The scale is just too vast right.

460
00:23:11.839 --> 00:23:16.519
<v Speaker 3>Therefore, simulators use recipes to approximate the effects of supernova

461
00:23:16.519 --> 00:23:20.200
<v Speaker 3>feedback or active galactic nucleus agen feedback.

462
00:23:20.000 --> 00:23:23.680
<v Speaker 2>The processes that violently eject gas out of galaxies and

463
00:23:23.759 --> 00:23:25.559
<v Speaker 2>back into the intergalactic medium.

464
00:23:25.599 --> 00:23:28.759
<v Speaker 3>Precisely, they have to estimate how much energy a black

465
00:23:28.759 --> 00:23:32.000
<v Speaker 3>hole dumps into the surrounding gas because they can't simulate

466
00:23:32.079 --> 00:23:33.160
<v Speaker 3>every photon.

467
00:23:33.680 --> 00:23:38.400
<v Speaker 2>And if the assumptions in those feedback recipes are slightly inaccurate, then.

468
00:23:38.279 --> 00:23:41.680
<v Speaker 3>The resulting distribution of gas in the simulation will diverge

469
00:23:41.680 --> 00:23:45.359
<v Speaker 3>from reality. H Prior to the eight dex line intensity map,

470
00:23:45.759 --> 00:23:48.640
<v Speaker 3>theorists could simulate the flow of gas into and out

471
00:23:48.640 --> 00:23:52.359
<v Speaker 3>of galaxies at cosmic noon, but they lacked the comprehensive

472
00:23:52.359 --> 00:23:56.720
<v Speaker 3>observational data to verify if their feedback models were actually correct.

473
00:23:57.119 --> 00:24:00.400
<v Speaker 2>The hate dex map provides the ground truth is the

474
00:24:00.440 --> 00:24:03.440
<v Speaker 2>real universe. So cosmologists can now take the mock liman

475
00:24:03.480 --> 00:24:07.440
<v Speaker 2>alpha emission catalogs generated by their simulations and directly cross

476
00:24:07.440 --> 00:24:11.119
<v Speaker 2>correlate them with the actual spatial distribution observed by eight decks.

477
00:24:11.240 --> 00:24:14.039
<v Speaker 3>It's the ultimate reality check for theoretical physics.

478
00:24:14.279 --> 00:24:16.720
<v Speaker 2>If your simulation says the gas should be blown five

479
00:24:16.799 --> 00:24:19.559
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand light years away from the galaxy by a quasar,

480
00:24:20.200 --> 00:24:22.960
<v Speaker 2>but the hetdex map shows the gas is tightly bound

481
00:24:23.000 --> 00:24:24.519
<v Speaker 2>within one hundred thousand light.

482
00:24:24.400 --> 00:24:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Years, you know your subgrid physics recipe for a GM

483
00:24:27.279 --> 00:24:28.200
<v Speaker 3>feedback is wrong.

484
00:24:28.319 --> 00:24:31.480
<v Speaker 2>It forces the theoretical models to conform to the empirical

485
00:24:31.519 --> 00:24:37.200
<v Speaker 2>reality exactly and honestly. This dynamic testing sophisticated models against raw, messy,

486
00:24:37.440 --> 00:24:41.720
<v Speaker 2>real world data is a critical philosophical anchor, not just

487
00:24:41.759 --> 00:24:45.359
<v Speaker 2>in astrophysics, but in any data driven field. Today. Absolutely,

488
00:24:45.680 --> 00:24:48.799
<v Speaker 2>we live in an era heavily dependent on predictive models

489
00:24:48.799 --> 00:24:53.640
<v Speaker 2>and algorithms we simulate climate impacts, economic shifts, epidemiological spread.

490
00:24:54.119 --> 00:24:56.759
<v Speaker 2>It is incredibly easy to trust the output of a

491
00:24:56.799 --> 00:24:59.319
<v Speaker 2>model simply because its internal logic is sound.

492
00:24:59.440 --> 00:25:01.799
<v Speaker 3>But the the X project reminds us that the model

493
00:25:01.839 --> 00:25:03.880
<v Speaker 3>is merely a hypothesis.

494
00:25:03.640 --> 00:25:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Until it is aggressively tested against the totality of the

495
00:25:06.279 --> 00:25:08.880
<v Speaker 2>available data, not just the five percent that is bright,

496
00:25:09.000 --> 00:25:10.440
<v Speaker 2>clean and easy to measure.

497
00:25:10.640 --> 00:25:14.440
<v Speaker 3>That is a highly pertinent observation. The reliance on heavily

498
00:25:14.480 --> 00:25:18.680
<v Speaker 3>filtered data to inform generalized models is a systemic vulnerability

499
00:25:18.720 --> 00:25:19.920
<v Speaker 3>across all sciences.

500
00:25:20.160 --> 00:25:23.720
<v Speaker 2>The head dex map unequivocally demonstrates the value of mining

501
00:25:23.759 --> 00:25:25.119
<v Speaker 2>the discarded data.

502
00:25:25.279 --> 00:25:28.759
<v Speaker 3>And within the context of astrophysics, this initial map is

503
00:25:28.839 --> 00:25:30.759
<v Speaker 3>really merely the vanguard.

504
00:25:30.559 --> 00:25:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Just the beginning.

505
00:25:31.599 --> 00:25:35.279
<v Speaker 3>The successful application of line intensity mapping to liman alpha

506
00:25:35.319 --> 00:25:40.319
<v Speaker 3>emission establishes a rigorous methodological foundation for the entire future

507
00:25:40.359 --> 00:25:41.240
<v Speaker 3>of cosmic.

508
00:25:40.920 --> 00:25:45.039
<v Speaker 2>Cartography, because the research team is already pivoting toward applying

509
00:25:45.079 --> 00:25:47.599
<v Speaker 2>this technique to different spectral lines right.

510
00:25:47.519 --> 00:25:51.039
<v Speaker 3>Yes, to map entirely different components of the galactic ecosystem.

511
00:25:51.119 --> 00:25:53.799
<v Speaker 2>Because the Liman alpha line only tells us part of

512
00:25:53.839 --> 00:25:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the story, it traces the ionized and excited neutral hydrogen.

513
00:25:58.200 --> 00:26:00.960
<v Speaker 3>It shows us where the massive hot stars are irradiating

514
00:26:00.960 --> 00:26:01.960
<v Speaker 3>the surrounding gas.

515
00:26:02.200 --> 00:26:05.400
<v Speaker 2>It maps the active, violent regions of the cosmic web.

516
00:26:05.880 --> 00:26:09.359
<v Speaker 2>But to understand the complete baryon cycle how gas flows

517
00:26:09.359 --> 00:26:13.240
<v Speaker 2>from the voids, cools, condenses, and eventually form stars, we

518
00:26:13.279 --> 00:26:15.079
<v Speaker 2>need to map the cold gas as well.

519
00:26:15.160 --> 00:26:17.920
<v Speaker 3>This raises an important question, how do we observe the

520
00:26:18.000 --> 00:26:22.119
<v Speaker 3>reservoirs of fuel that haven't ignited yet the dark stuff right?

521
00:26:22.519 --> 00:26:26.039
<v Speaker 3>The immediate next step outlined by the researchers involves targeting

522
00:26:26.039 --> 00:26:28.839
<v Speaker 3>the emission lines of carbon monoxide.

523
00:26:28.240 --> 00:26:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Specifically the rotational transitions of the co molecule.

524
00:26:31.640 --> 00:26:34.599
<v Speaker 3>Well Linman alpha traces gas at temperatures of roughly ten

525
00:26:34.640 --> 00:26:38.559
<v Speaker 3>thousand kelvin. Carbon monoxide is an excellent proxy for locating

526
00:26:38.599 --> 00:26:40.039
<v Speaker 3>giant molecular.

527
00:26:39.519 --> 00:26:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Clouds where the gas temperatures drop to just tens of

528
00:26:42.519 --> 00:26:44.240
<v Speaker 2>degrees above absolute.

529
00:26:43.880 --> 00:26:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Zero, freezing cold.

530
00:26:45.440 --> 00:26:49.119
<v Speaker 2>And those freezing incredibly dense molecular clouds are the actual

531
00:26:49.279 --> 00:26:53.160
<v Speaker 2>stellar nurseries. You need cold gas because thermal pressure fights

532
00:26:53.200 --> 00:26:53.960
<v Speaker 2>against gravity.

533
00:26:54.200 --> 00:26:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Heat pushes out, gravity pulls in right.

534
00:26:56.839 --> 00:26:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Only when the gas cools down sufficiently can gravity take over,

535
00:27:00.240 --> 00:27:02.799
<v Speaker 2>causing the cloud to collapse and ignite nuclear fusion to

536
00:27:02.839 --> 00:27:03.759
<v Speaker 2>birth new stars.

537
00:27:04.000 --> 00:27:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Exactly so, by conducting line intensity mapping surveys for carbon

538
00:27:07.720 --> 00:27:12.720
<v Speaker 3>monoxide using millimeter wavelength rays like LMA or future facilities.

539
00:27:12.200 --> 00:27:16.519
<v Speaker 2>And cross correlating that data with the HTDX Liman alpha.

540
00:27:16.319 --> 00:27:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Map, astronomers can effectively trace the entire thermodynamic life cycle

541
00:27:20.519 --> 00:27:21.559
<v Speaker 3>of galactic evolution.

542
00:27:21.880 --> 00:27:24.680
<v Speaker 2>You map the cold in falling molecular gas with.

543
00:27:24.759 --> 00:27:28.200
<v Speaker 3>CO, you map the regions of active massive star formation

544
00:27:28.720 --> 00:27:30.680
<v Speaker 3>with the bright Liman alpha peaks.

545
00:27:30.599 --> 00:27:34.720
<v Speaker 2>And you map the diffuse outflowing or heavily irradiated gas

546
00:27:34.759 --> 00:27:38.559
<v Speaker 2>in the circumgalactic medium with the faint Liman alpha intensity map.

547
00:27:38.960 --> 00:27:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Layering these maps over the exact same cosmological volume will

548
00:27:42.720 --> 00:27:45.559
<v Speaker 3>give us a complete multi phase view of the universe

549
00:27:45.640 --> 00:27:47.000
<v Speaker 3>at its most active epoch.

550
00:27:47.160 --> 00:27:50.720
<v Speaker 2>We will literally watch the respiratory system of the cosmos.

551
00:27:50.400 --> 00:27:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Galaxies inhaling cold molecular gas and exhaling hot ionized plasma.

552
00:27:55.039 --> 00:27:58.160
<v Speaker 2>The technological capacity to do this is rapidly expanding, to

553
00:27:58.680 --> 00:28:02.319
<v Speaker 2>with pioneering instruments like the hobby Everly Telescope paving the way,

554
00:28:02.519 --> 00:28:05.680
<v Speaker 2>and upcoming line intensity mapping missions like sphere x and

555
00:28:06.039 --> 00:28:07.680
<v Speaker 2>exclaim coming online soon.

556
00:28:08.160 --> 00:28:11.759
<v Speaker 3>We are transitioning from an era of cataloging isolated objects

557
00:28:12.000 --> 00:28:14.880
<v Speaker 3>to mapping the continuous fluid dynamics of the universe.

558
00:28:14.960 --> 00:28:18.599
<v Speaker 2>Julian Uinhos correctly categorize this as entering a golden age

559
00:28:18.599 --> 00:28:19.559
<v Speaker 2>for cosmic mapping.

560
00:28:19.839 --> 00:28:23.160
<v Speaker 3>It truly is. The HDX publication is a proof of

561
00:28:23.240 --> 00:28:27.480
<v Speaker 3>concept that fundamentally validates the intensity mapping technique for optical

562
00:28:27.559 --> 00:28:30.440
<v Speaker 3>and ultraviolet wavelengths on cosmological scales.

563
00:28:30.680 --> 00:28:33.720
<v Speaker 2>It proves that the faint, unresolved emission is not a

564
00:28:33.720 --> 00:28:37.920
<v Speaker 2>barrier to observation, but rather a profound source of physical information.

565
00:28:38.319 --> 00:28:41.039
<v Speaker 3>Let's summarize the sheer scope of what we've discussed today.

566
00:28:41.079 --> 00:28:44.240
<v Speaker 2>We've ventured ten billion years into the past to the

567
00:28:44.319 --> 00:28:48.440
<v Speaker 2>cosmic noon, an era defined by extreme galactic assembly.

568
00:28:48.920 --> 00:28:51.680
<v Speaker 3>We examined how the quantum transition of the hydrogen atom

569
00:28:51.920 --> 00:28:54.279
<v Speaker 3>produces the one hundred and twenty one point six nanimeter

570
00:28:54.400 --> 00:28:55.640
<v Speaker 3>liman alpha line, and.

571
00:28:55.519 --> 00:28:59.119
<v Speaker 2>How cosmological redshift stretches that signal all the way into

572
00:28:59.119 --> 00:28:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the optical band.

573
00:29:00.160 --> 00:29:02.839
<v Speaker 3>We detailed the massive engineering of the htd.

574
00:29:02.839 --> 00:29:04.880
<v Speaker 2>X project, the thirty thousand fivers, and.

575
00:29:04.920 --> 00:29:09.680
<v Speaker 3>The brilliant statistical pivot from point source cataloging to line

576
00:29:09.680 --> 00:29:10.960
<v Speaker 3>intensity mapping.

577
00:29:10.839 --> 00:29:14.880
<v Speaker 2>By utilizing supercomputers to cross correlate the known coordinates of

578
00:29:15.000 --> 00:29:19.000
<v Speaker 2>one million bright galaxies With half a petabyte of highly smooth,

579
00:29:19.160 --> 00:29:23.720
<v Speaker 2>previously discarded data, the team successfully illuminated the faint, diffuse

580
00:29:23.759 --> 00:29:25.119
<v Speaker 2>filaments of the cosmic web.

581
00:29:25.359 --> 00:29:28.759
<v Speaker 3>They transformed ninety five percent background noise into the most

582
00:29:28.839 --> 00:29:32.680
<v Speaker 3>robust empirical test of cosmological simulations ever created.

583
00:29:32.880 --> 00:29:35.240
<v Speaker 2>The transition from viewing the universe as a collection of

584
00:29:35.279 --> 00:29:39.799
<v Speaker 2>discrete luminous points to a continuous, interconnected topological field. It's

585
00:29:39.880 --> 00:29:42.160
<v Speaker 2>just an extraordinary scientific advancement.

586
00:29:42.440 --> 00:29:46.440
<v Speaker 3>It underscores a fundamental principle. Really, the limits of our

587
00:29:46.559 --> 00:29:50.200
<v Speaker 3>understanding are often dictated not by the absence of information,

588
00:29:50.559 --> 00:29:54.640
<v Speaker 3>but by our methodological filters. Wow, we structured our most

589
00:29:54.680 --> 00:29:58.480
<v Speaker 3>advanced cosmological models while ignoring ninety five percent of the

590
00:29:58.519 --> 00:30:02.240
<v Speaker 3>observational data because it failed to cross an arbitrary threshold

591
00:30:02.279 --> 00:30:03.240
<v Speaker 3>of clarity.

592
00:30:03.160 --> 00:30:05.839
<v Speaker 2>Which demands that we ask a pretty profound question.

593
00:30:06.039 --> 00:30:09.640
<v Speaker 3>It does if the literal, connective tissue of the universe

594
00:30:09.720 --> 00:30:13.160
<v Speaker 3>was hiding in the noise we systematically discarded. What other

595
00:30:13.279 --> 00:30:16.519
<v Speaker 3>foundational truths in physics, in the complex systems of our

596
00:30:16.559 --> 00:30:19.200
<v Speaker 3>own planet, or even the structure of our societies are

597
00:30:19.200 --> 00:30:22.640
<v Speaker 3>we completely missing simply because we have not yet developed

598
00:30:22.640 --> 00:30:24.240
<v Speaker 3>the framework to find meaning in the blur.

599
00:30:24.480 --> 00:30:27.799
<v Speaker 2>The h x map proves the information is there. The

600
00:30:27.920 --> 00:30:29.680
<v Speaker 2>challenge is having the vision to read.

601
00:30:29.480 --> 00:31:55.079
<v Speaker 4>It tis the nations choo
