Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, It's Thursday and the ninth
Speaker 2: of April. You're of our Lord, twenty twenty six. Well,
Speaker 2: today we're going to take a look at the Taco
Speaker 2: two step. We walk right up to the edge of
Speaker 2: the abyss and then walk up back a little bit.
Speaker 2: What has really changed. We're going to take a look
Speaker 2: at what was we're told was agreed to, what is
Speaker 2: actually happening less than a day later. This ceasefire looks
Speaker 2: to be not so much a ceasefire, certainly not on
Speaker 2: Israel's side. We're going to take a look at Laura
Speaker 2: Lumer and Lindsey Graham, Lindsay and Lumur, their inversion, their
Speaker 2: perversion of the Constitution. How the Zionists are really not
Speaker 2: very happy about this. Here's a secret, folks. Trump lost
Speaker 2: big time, and it's not that I want to see
Speaker 2: the US lose. I want to see the US not
Speaker 2: act criminally, and I don't want to see this guy
Speaker 2: get away with it. We're going to talk about what
Speaker 2: is really happening there, as well as some updates on
Speaker 2: the direction our society is headed. We've got a North
Speaker 2: Carolina University training teenagers to be abortion doulas. Can you
Speaker 2: imagine be right back? Well, I want to thank the
Speaker 2: many people who sent us emails and wished us well
Speaker 2: for our celebration of the day I took off yesterday.
Speaker 2: Of course, we had a couple of interviews that we
Speaker 2: had recorded a day or so earlier, Eric Peters, as
Speaker 2: well as a man who does drone manufacturing, to kind
Speaker 2: of give us a feel for the state of the art.
Speaker 2: What do we do about these drunks? What's the best
Speaker 2: defense for these drums? Right? We see people talking about, well,
Speaker 2: we got to defend our AI data centers, you know,
Speaker 2: not any of the other infrastructure for the rest of us. Right.
Speaker 2: They don't care about our electricity, our water, anything about us.
Speaker 2: But that tells you everything about the future that Trump
Speaker 2: and these other people, And I would include in that
Speaker 2: Marsha Blackburn here in Tennessee, who's going to be the
Speaker 2: next governor. For sure. She has been at the forefront
Speaker 2: of selling this Trump agent, trying to get it enacted
Speaker 2: in the legislation in the Senate. And they want to
Speaker 2: see everything concentrate into Washington. They want to create a
Speaker 2: police surveillance state. AI data centers are at the very
Speaker 2: center of all this stuff. That's what they want to protect.
Speaker 2: They're not going to protect anything that has to do
Speaker 2: with you and I. Folks, You're on your own. There's
Speaker 2: nobody coming from either party to rescue us. So prepare
Speaker 2: for what you need. We've got landslicking all kinds of
Speaker 2: alternative fields and things like that. But yeah, do some
Speaker 2: research on your own. There's some wood gasification stuff that
Speaker 2: is out there. They're going to shut everything off for us.
Speaker 2: That is the intention and the plan. It is a
Speaker 2: massive surveillance state. Anyway. In terms of talking about that,
Speaker 2: they say, well, you've got to protect them against drones
Speaker 2: because that is going to be a huge part of
Speaker 2: the threat. So what do we do. Well to put
Speaker 2: up guns around there to shoot them down. He says, well,
Speaker 2: you do that. It's like starting to fire a higher
Speaker 2: powered rifle in a house that's got a lot of
Speaker 2: sheet rock. You know what's on the other side of that.
Speaker 2: You got to be very careful. So he was saying,
Speaker 2: it's an interesting interview. If you didn't catch it, you're
Speaker 2: saying the best thing you could possibly do would be
Speaker 2: to take a drone down with another drone or several
Speaker 2: drunes or whatever, just a collision, and that might be
Speaker 2: your best chot. But let's talk about taking down entire civilizations,
Speaker 2: because this is what broke. It just kept getting worse.
Speaker 2: Yesterday when I was gone, I'm looking at all this
Speaker 2: stuff that Trump is putting out there and shaking my head.
Speaker 2: You know, we were in Knoxville, Tennessee. I went to
Speaker 2: concert at a place called the Biju Theater, which is
Speaker 2: really kind of interesting. Theater was one hundred and I say,
Speaker 2: what it is, one hundred and something years old. I forget,
Speaker 2: huh seventeen thank you, Karen's over here in the peanut gallery.
Speaker 2: One hundred and seventeen years old. That's it. And so
Speaker 2: I was looking at all the detailed architecture in and
Speaker 2: anything was really nice. And on the outside they had
Speaker 2: these giant pictures that they had blown up put on
Speaker 2: the side of the building showing it when it was
Speaker 2: when it first opened up, like in nineteen o nine
Speaker 2: or whatever, right, and so the hell the model t's
Speaker 2: and everything in the streets, and so I looked it
Speaker 2: up to compare it to another theater that I was
Speaker 2: very familiar with in Tampa, the Tampa Theater, which is
Speaker 2: built in nineteen twenty six, an amazing piece of architecture.
Speaker 2: For that as well, I went to many many movies,
Speaker 2: one of the most memorable ones setting in that really
Speaker 2: old movie theater that was mostly empty of all this
Speaker 2: really old Art Deco architecture and watching Psycho when I
Speaker 2: was six years old. It was a perfect setting for it. Actually.
Speaker 2: But anyway, that movie theater was several million dollars during
Speaker 2: the depression. It was designed by a guy that had
Speaker 2: done five hundred theaters throughout the country. He said that
Speaker 2: was his favorite one that he did. Very interesting theater.
Speaker 2: They kept it going, but it's having its one hundredth
Speaker 2: anniversary this year. But the Biju Theater was again I
Speaker 2: looked at and I'm thinking, you know, we've just lost
Speaker 2: our culture, haven't we. Nobody cares enough to build anything
Speaker 2: like those theaters anymore, and we just playing vanilla boxes,
Speaker 2: just throw them out there. It's all utilitarian. It's a shame, really.
Speaker 2: And the same thing happened really with the music as well.
Speaker 2: It was the Knoxville Jazz Orchestra, very good group of guys,
Speaker 2: but and very competent in terms of the craft, and
Speaker 2: I'm listening to it and I'm thinking, you know, I'm
Speaker 2: looking at the audience and they're all old like us,
Speaker 2: and I'm thinking, it's just not anybody anymore that really
Speaker 2: understands music. It's like a foreign language to them. You
Speaker 2: really do have to have some understanding of it that
Speaker 2: you're not going to get just pushing play on some
Speaker 2: device you actually got in order to really appreciate it.
Speaker 2: It's like a sport. In order to really appreciate sports,
Speaker 2: you have to play them, and you have to do
Speaker 2: the same thing with music. You have to try to
Speaker 2: recreate those sounds before we can really appreciate just how
Speaker 2: beautiful an artist can be in terms of what they do.
Speaker 2: So it was a great guy. His name was his
Speaker 2: last name was Well, and he's a tenor sax player
Speaker 2: discovered by Bob James years ago. But anyway, it was
Speaker 2: it was a great experience and I appreciate all the
Speaker 2: messages wishing us a happy anniversary. We did it in
Speaker 2: celebration of our first date fifty four years ago when
Speaker 2: we I took Karen with a group of people who
Speaker 2: went to a Dixion Way and jazz concert. This is
Speaker 2: as close as I could find to it. But we
Speaker 2: like all kinds of jazz, and it was really it
Speaker 2: was really nice. So I'm looking meanwhile, take some time
Speaker 2: to take out the phone while we're on a date,
Speaker 2: and because I'm looking at these unhinged tweets, and Trump
Speaker 2: is just getting worse as the week goes on. The
Speaker 2: whole civilization is going to die tonight. And it's like,
Speaker 2: what is going on with this guy? Who's going to
Speaker 2: get rid of this guy? It clearly is an issue.
Speaker 2: And so we're driving around to Knoxville. On one corner,
Speaker 2: there's a crowd of people at the Only Good News here.
Speaker 2: A lot of them were young. Now they may be
Speaker 2: protesting Trump because they're socialists and they just don't like
Speaker 2: what they think he stands for. But it was all
Speaker 2: signs about impeach and no war and all the rest
Speaker 2: of the stuff, and a lot of people are hanking
Speaker 2: their horns in this Republican state. I know Knoxville is
Speaker 2: a kind of a purple area, but nevertheless, let's talk
Speaker 2: about the truth and tell actually, we'll talk about the
Speaker 2: truce and the toll that it's here and we got
Speaker 2: all these crazy people like Franklin Graham talking about the
Speaker 2: Persians being Amelek is like, no, not at all, not
Speaker 2: at all. And of course I had a listener who
Speaker 2: corrected me, and I appreciate the correction. I was saying, Joshua,
Speaker 2: you know who's on the lord's side, come to me,
Speaker 2: And that was actually Moses who said that. I think
Speaker 2: Joshua was standing there with him. I'm probably thinking of
Speaker 2: the movie more than more than the actual book of
Speaker 2: Exodus when I made that statement. So I appreciate the
Speaker 2: correction with that. And we need to correct the idea
Speaker 2: that the Persians are amelik. The Amalakites were a group
Speaker 2: of people that they when you look at the Zionists,
Speaker 2: they always label a group of people that they want
Speaker 2: to eradicate, commit genocide on. They always call them Amalekites, right, amelik.
Speaker 2: And it was actually the Persians who stopped that. So
Speaker 2: they referred to Franklin Graham referred to the Book of Esther,
Speaker 2: and he got the nationalities mixed up, like the I
Speaker 2: got Moses and Shashua mixed up. So we need to
Speaker 2: make those corrections. Anyway, a whole civilization will die tonight,
Speaker 2: never to be brought back again and alec, Yeah, that's
Speaker 2: what it sounds like, doesn't it. Uh. I get so
Speaker 2: frustrated with all this stuff. I put out one tweet.
Speaker 2: I said, you know, I've never voted Democrat in my life.
Speaker 2: Why Because I'm pro life, I'm pro liberty, I'm pro
Speaker 2: free markets. Democrats don't support that stuff. Republicans say they do,
Speaker 2: but in reality they don't. But since Trump is a
Speaker 2: New York City Democrat, he opposes all three of those,
Speaker 2: adamantly opposes them. How can you say that your pro
Speaker 2: life if you want to wipe out an entire civilization,
Speaker 2: if you initiate wars, you don't fight to stop a war,
Speaker 2: you fight to keep it going because you're the one
Speaker 2: who started it. How do you square that with being
Speaker 2: a Republican, being a Christian, being any of these things.
Speaker 2: And so Trump's openly genocidal threat, as everybody who's pointing
Speaker 2: out many people said, if you look it up, this
Speaker 2: is the very definition just as I played the clip
Speaker 2: for you the other day, very definition of terrorism is
Speaker 2: what Trump has been doing. My name's Josephine Gilbel.
Speaker 3: I'm a farmer intelligence officer. I spent seventeen years in
Speaker 3: the US Army. I was a counter terrorism officer, and
Speaker 3: I want to give you the definition of terrorism. Terrorism
Speaker 3: is the pre meditated use of violence or threat of
Speaker 3: violence against civilians or property to induce fear, coercion, or intimidation,
Speaker 3: aimed at government or societies to achieve political, religious, or
Speaker 3: ideological objectives. Given this information, we're going to focus back
Speaker 3: now to the bombing of Manob. One hundred and sixty
Speaker 3: five little girls were killed by United States Tomahawks from
Speaker 3: a United States vessel in the area of operation. A
Speaker 3: modern Tomahawk missile is equipped with onboard cameras, real time
Speaker 3: targeting imagery. Satellite imagery is constantly collected by several intelligence
Speaker 3: agencies several countries in real time. Now, let's talk about
Speaker 3: when the attack started on Eton ten Am. At ten am, Israel,
Speaker 3: along with the United States, began attacking Ethon. By ten twenty,
Speaker 3: the staff at Minob's school began evacuating the children. Multiple sources,
Speaker 3: including intelligence reports, regional sources, and US official are required
Speaker 3: to confirm a target for the US Navy and military
Speaker 3: operations to ensure accuracy.
Speaker 1: And reduce errors.
Speaker 3: This is how it works. Why we just bombed the
Speaker 3: school knowing it was a school. Who are the terrorists?
Speaker 3: Who are the bad guys in this story? By our
Speaker 3: own definition of terrorism? And I can say this as
Speaker 3: a farmer counter terrorist officer, we are the terrorists.
Speaker 2: And we are the genocidal maniacs as well. And the
Speaker 2: very definition of terrorism, very definition of genocide, and Trump
Speaker 2: checks all of the boxes. And the entire world is
Speaker 2: saying this to the extent that you know, he came
Speaker 2: out and he said he's very popular in Venezuela. He
Speaker 2: could go down there and become president with Venezuela.
Speaker 4: And we just understand that people of Venezuela, they say,
Speaker 4: if I ran for president of Venezuela, I'm pulling higher
Speaker 4: than anybody has ever.
Speaker 1: Polled in Venezuela.
Speaker 4: So well Trumps with this, I can go to Venezuela.
Speaker 4: I will quickly learn Spanish, it won't take too long.
Speaker 4: I'm good at language, and I will go to Venezuela.
Speaker 4: I got to run for president.
Speaker 2: You know. Well, that's just so you know that, as
Speaker 2: crazy as that sounds, he actually said that this is
Speaker 2: the original. They put a mustache and black hair on
Speaker 2: him and a little bit of Latin music in the background,
Speaker 2: but it's the original said the.
Speaker 4: People of Venezuela. They say, if I ran for president
Speaker 4: of Venezuela, I'm pulling higher than anybody has ever pulled
Speaker 4: in Venezuela. So after I'm finished with this, I can
Speaker 4: go to Venezuela. I will quickly learn Spanish. It won't
Speaker 4: take too long.
Speaker 2: I'm good at language. And well, you know, maybe he's
Speaker 2: making that up. Or maybe the people in Venezuela really
Speaker 2: don't like their leaders, because right now they are burning
Speaker 2: Trump and net in Yahoo and effigy. They've been doing
Speaker 2: this last week or so. Bring them an effigy. So
Speaker 2: maybe with since he's a terrorist and he wants to
Speaker 2: commit genocide, perhaps he was thinking, well, you know, the
Speaker 2: Nazis went to Argentina, didn't they in Brazil? Maybe I
Speaker 2: could go to Venezuela and hide out. Maybe I could
Speaker 2: become president down there. I think that exit has been
Speaker 2: cut off for him. Actually, so genuinely one of the
Speaker 2: most profoundly evil men of all time, wrote a podcast
Speaker 2: host and former Democrat congressional candidate Crystal Ball. Who this
Speaker 2: person is but I love today it's Crystal with a K.
Speaker 2: And so the military needs revolt in a sane country.
Speaker 2: He would be immediately removed. I agree. Now let me
Speaker 2: explain this to this is another letter. I got a
Speaker 2: lot of people who wish to us a happy anniversary.
Speaker 2: I have one guy who is so upset about the
Speaker 2: clips that I played of that Florida sheriff Grady was
Speaker 2: Grady Long? Is that his name? I'm not even sure
Speaker 2: what his name is. But he's the guy with the
Speaker 2: moonpie clip. How dare you play that guy's clip? Don't
Speaker 2: you realize that he's a drug warrior? I say, yeah,
Speaker 2: I realize he's a drug warrior. I mentioned that when
Speaker 2: I played the clip, and but then he comes back
Speaker 2: and you know, he tells me, oh, well, now he's
Speaker 2: pushing the COVID shot. I have a lot of questions
Speaker 2: about your motivations in terms of doing this, and said, look,
Speaker 2: I will you know. I play clips from Bill Maher
Speaker 2: because I think they're funny. I played the clip from
Speaker 2: Woody Harrelson when he was making the joke to criticize
Speaker 2: and satire, to criticize the moderna adfiser. Does that mean
Speaker 2: that I agree with Bill Maher? Absolutely not. I mean
Speaker 2: this guy is heavily anti God. He's actually done a
Speaker 2: movie about it a little documentary about it irreligious or
Speaker 2: something like that.
Speaker 5: But.
Speaker 2: I never bothered to watch it. But I don't agree
Speaker 2: with him on politics. I probably don't agree with Woody
Speaker 2: Harrelson on a lot of his politics. I don't pick
Speaker 2: people to follow, and you shouldn't be doing that either.
Speaker 2: You shouldn't be following me. You shouldn't be following Anybody's
Speaker 2: a better way. Take a look, try to get different
Speaker 2: sources of information. Think for yourself, do research about this.
Speaker 2: I'm not here to throw you a lifeline of hope
Speaker 2: and say here's the guy that you should hope in.
Speaker 2: You should hope in Donald Trump or Joe Biden or
Speaker 2: Sheriff Long or Grady or whatever his name is. That's
Speaker 2: not what this program is about. And if you're looking
Speaker 2: for somebody that you can put your hope into, somebody
Speaker 2: that you can worship, somebody that you think is going
Speaker 2: to be infallible, h this is not the broadcast for you.
Speaker 2: You're not going to enjoy this broadcast if you can't
Speaker 2: take a joke, if you can't laugh at satire, if
Speaker 2: you can't laugh at the jokes of your enemies. That's
Speaker 2: the bottom line. So the wipe out entire civilization, which
Speaker 2: is also the UN's definition of genocide. It everybody's definition
Speaker 2: of genocide. So I had a lot of people commenting
Speaker 2: about that, both left in right, and you know, we'll
Speaker 2: mention the people on the left who said, Brian Krassenstein,
Speaker 2: this is literally genocide. I agree with that. I don't
Speaker 2: know if I agree with him on other issues. He's
Speaker 2: known as a liberal influencer. He is about to genocide
Speaker 2: ninety million people, said one person, And so people start thinking,
Speaker 2: if he's going to wipe out the entire population, is
Speaker 2: he telegraphing that he's going to use nuclear weapons? You know?
Speaker 2: The bottom line was going to take a look at
Speaker 2: what did Trump get out of this? How did we
Speaker 2: get roped into this in the first place. It's a
Speaker 2: very interesting article from the New York Times, Maggie Halberman
Speaker 2: and another individual there. That article is interesting for a
Speaker 2: number of reasons. First of all, it was so detailed
Speaker 2: about what happened at the White House with Benjamin Ett.
Speaker 2: Now we're going to talk about that coming up. What
Speaker 2: happened in the meeting, how it was set up, who
Speaker 2: was there in attendance, what they were told and everything.
Speaker 2: But everybody who was there where they set all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff, And I thought, well, either they
Speaker 2: know they're totally making up a fantastic story out of
Speaker 2: whole cloth, or they've got some very high source that
Speaker 2: is putting this information out, and that would be one
Speaker 2: of the people at the meeting. And we were talking
Speaker 2: about the top level people in the Trump cabinet at
Speaker 2: that meeting and subsequent meetings, And so the question is
Speaker 2: who is it at that level that is leaking and
Speaker 2: why would they be leaking? Are they Is it somebody
Speaker 2: who wants to try to distance themselves from this tar
Speaker 2: baby of a war that Trump has gotten himself caught into.
Speaker 2: This is going to pull down not only Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: it's going to pull down Rubio. It's going to pull
Speaker 2: down JD. Vance. They can kiss their careers goodbye, and
Speaker 2: they should. I've had it with career politicians. You know,
Speaker 2: the founders of this country never looked at politics as
Speaker 2: a career. It was a sacrificial service that they were doing.
Speaker 2: They didn't need it, and that was one of the
Speaker 2: things that was characterized early America. It wasn't until Abraham
Speaker 2: Lincoln that you started seeing the professional politician, and that
Speaker 2: was one of the key criticisms of Lincoln. Oh, he's ambitious.
Speaker 2: He wants the office of presidency because he's ambitious. That
Speaker 2: was a damning criticism. That was about as bad as
Speaker 2: it could get. That's like saying, well, this guy's a
Speaker 2: pedophile today. Right, they couldn't even imagine something like that.
Speaker 2: But that was the worst that they could come up
Speaker 2: with them. But then we'd look at the twenty fifth Amendment.
Speaker 2: What does it require to get him out? Well, it's
Speaker 2: not a vote of Congress, you know, that's impeachment. The
Speaker 2: twenty fifth Amendment is the majority of Trump's own cabinet. Yeah,
Speaker 2: the handpicked yes men have to get rid of him.
Speaker 2: I don't think that's going to happen unless somebody has
Speaker 2: a talk with him and says, you know what, you're
Speaker 2: dead politically unless you get rid of this guy. I
Speaker 2: don't know if they're doing that kind of stuff in
Speaker 2: the background not. The article from the New York Times
Speaker 2: gives me hope that there's at least some people who
Speaker 2: realize that he is an albatross, that he is going
Speaker 2: to do more damage to the Republican Party than Jimmy
Speaker 2: Carter did to the Democrat Party. But while we're talking
Speaker 2: about dementia. This is an article that came out. It
Speaker 2: wasn't linked to Trump at all. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: the picture that they have there is of Bruce, the
Speaker 2: diehard guy. What's his name?
Speaker 6: Willis?
Speaker 2: Bruce Elis. There's an example of dementia that we usually
Speaker 2: think of, right, I think they to call people's names,
Speaker 2: So I'm getting old. But it's not necessarily just memory loss.
Speaker 2: That's where it really hangs its hat. That's where it
Speaker 2: manifests itself fully and finally. But in the early stages
Speaker 2: of dementia, there's a lot of other issues. And so
Speaker 2: the early signs of dementia beyond memory loss, not being
Speaker 2: able to remember Bruce Willis's name. How's that for irony?
Speaker 2: Making impulsive irrational decisions could be an early sign of
Speaker 2: brain damage caused by dementia. Dementia damages the frontal lobe
Speaker 2: and the orbito frontal cortex. These are regions of the
Speaker 2: brain that we're told or responsible for judgment and ahibition,
Speaker 2: planning and evaluating risks. So the damage can result in
Speaker 2: money mismanagement habits, you know, like a forty trillion dollar deficit.
Speaker 2: Check that box. Impulsive shopping or maybe an impulsive invasion
Speaker 2: we could check that box, or maybe signing up for
Speaker 2: unneeded credit cards, or an unwanted genocide. But anyway, it
Speaker 2: is uh, it is not. As I said before, it
Speaker 2: doesn't even hang on whether or not he's got a
Speaker 2: medical diagnosis of dementia. It really hangs on who he is.
Speaker 2: And that was another thing I think I put in
Speaker 2: the tweet. I was thinking it. I don't know if
Speaker 2: I wrote down in the tweet, because you know, I'm
Speaker 2: getting old, but I said, and I said on the
Speaker 2: show the other day, I said, we have to hold
Speaker 2: people who are in that office to a much higher
Speaker 2: standard of mental clarity and of moral clarity. They have
Speaker 2: to be held to a higher standard. There's just too
Speaker 2: much that one person who is dangerous, demented, crazy, evil,
Speaker 2: to pick your adjective, someone like Donald Trump. There's just
Speaker 2: too much much damage that one person like that can
Speaker 2: do in the office of the presidency. And just take
Speaker 2: a look at what's happened in the last month or the
Speaker 2: last year, starting with the tariff stuff. This guy is
Speaker 2: like a one man wrecking crew. As I've said before,
Speaker 2: he's a one man fourth turning. He's taking the entire
Speaker 2: world into global depression and perhaps a global war. And
Speaker 2: we look at the amount of damage a tool or
Speaker 2: a full like Trump can do. That's the real issue.
Speaker 2: And it's even bigger than the Iran war. It started
Speaker 2: with the tariffs and with so many other things domestic
Speaker 2: as well, when you look at how he used ice.
Speaker 2: It's a real problem, and he's the open border immigration
Speaker 2: is a real problem. And what he is doing is,
Speaker 2: as he's done with other issues, he's totally discrediting it,
Speaker 2: just as he did with the birthright citizenship. You make
Speaker 2: a bad argument, you do bad policy in order to
Speaker 2: respond to it. If you come in ham fisted like
Speaker 2: a bull in a china shop and you do a
Speaker 2: lot of damage, you're doing damage to the constitution. You're
Speaker 2: doing damage to try to write things making it impossible.
Speaker 2: I mean, think how odious it's going to be when
Speaker 2: somebody repeats the same goals that Trump has articulated, however
Speaker 2: awkwardly he articulated them. Well, somebody says something about the
Speaker 2: real problems that are there that he's identified, people are
Speaker 2: going to instantly link those people to the failed approaches
Speaker 2: that Donald Trump did. He's poisoning the water for reform
Speaker 2: at the same time he's creating global chaos. Trump's a
Speaker 2: ron threat that a whole civilization will die, condemned on
Speaker 2: both sides of the Aisle as well as both sides
Speaker 2: of the Atlantic as well, called evil and madness. And
Speaker 2: so they got a lot of quotes here from Marjorie
Speaker 2: Taylor Green and Piers Morgan. And again just another disclaimer
Speaker 2: and reminder that when I read a quote from somebody,
Speaker 2: I may agree with what they say about a particular issue.
Speaker 2: That doesn't mean that I endorse Piers Morgan or Marjorie
Speaker 2: Taylor Green. I could have signed both of them in
Speaker 2: the past. So there's a long list of people that
Speaker 2: they in this article at the rap that they pulled
Speaker 2: out of social media. I'll just read a couple of
Speaker 2: them to you. Trump believes that he is threatening Iran
Speaker 2: with destruction, but it is America that now stands in danger.
Speaker 2: This is Joe Kent, by the way, the guy who
Speaker 2: resigned his position to criticize this or he was the
Speaker 2: deputy to Tulsa Gabbard. He Kent goes on to say,
Speaker 2: if Trump attempts to eradicate Iranian civilization, the US will
Speaker 2: no longer be viewed as a stabilizing force in the world. Well,
Speaker 2: I think that boat sailed a long time ago, so
Speaker 2: you'd say sunk. But he'll be will be viewed as
Speaker 2: an agent of chaos, which I've been saying for the
Speaker 2: longest time, as well, effectively ending our status as the
Speaker 2: world's greatest superpower. Yeah, we, as I said before, go
Speaker 2: back to get smart chaos and control. Well, we need
Speaker 2: to get smart about this and get smart about Trump
Speaker 2: as well. So this is as he's saying, the stuff
Speaker 2: open the effing straight. You'll be living in hell. You
Speaker 2: crazy anyway, you know, it's that type of thing. It's
Speaker 2: not just the language, it's the desperation. As I said
Speaker 2: on Monday, there is a not so quiet desperation in
Speaker 2: that tweet that tells you how frustrated, how impotent this
Speaker 2: guy was feeling that he would say something like that.
Speaker 2: So the Allies are worried that they're tied to an
Speaker 2: erratic US and they now have turned. The GOP is
Speaker 2: not worried about that, though, they're not worried that they've
Speaker 2: got this albatross around their neck. The Europeans, however, are
Speaker 2: they say Tarker Colson says, urges US officials to defy
Speaker 2: Trump on Irani. On the orders about Iran, he says,
Speaker 2: say no, absolutely no. And of course I saw a
Speaker 2: comment from Colonel Douglas McGregor as well. He said, he
Speaker 2: was in Washington. You talked to a congressman at one
Speaker 2: point time a couple of decades ago, and the congressman said, well,
Speaker 2: it's a good thing we don't have the draft anymore.
Speaker 2: We got this volunteer army because we wouldn't be able
Speaker 2: to do this stuff if there was a draft. That'd
Speaker 2: be too much pushback against it. There's Colonel McGregor who
Speaker 2: said that. He said, yeah, when people don't have skin
Speaker 2: in the game, when you're looking at and some of
Speaker 2: them have actually said this, that's part of their calculus.
Speaker 2: I just heard somebody say that recently. You know, it's
Speaker 2: only a couple of percent of the country. It's either
Speaker 2: in the military or has family in the military. The
Speaker 2: rest of the people don't really care. And he said,
Speaker 2: go back and look at what George W. Bush said.
Speaker 2: He said, don't worry about this, go shopping. You know,
Speaker 2: we've got our war over here. Don't worry about that.
Speaker 2: And again he said, what they've done is they've turned
Speaker 2: There's a lot of advantages to having a professional military,
Speaker 2: but the problem is these politicians are turning them into mercenaries.
Speaker 2: I agree, I agree. No civilization will die. Yeah, well,
Speaker 2: let me tell you this. The American civilization is dead.
Speaker 2: Stick a fork in it. It's done. Any country that
Speaker 2: can allow somebody like this to not only take power,
Speaker 2: but to keep power, to vote for him again after
Speaker 2: what he did in twenty twenty, that civilization is dead,
Speaker 2: brain dead, morally dead. We are the sovization that died.
Speaker 2: He's giving a rebirth to Iranian civilization. They are feeling,
Speaker 2: you know, they understand that they're winning. And of course
Speaker 2: you want to talk about regime change. The people who
Speaker 2: got regime changed. I'm just gonna say, my pad's about
Speaker 2: to go out here, so let me bug this thing in.
Speaker 2: The people who got regime changed, having a replacing the
Speaker 2: Iatota Kamane with the Iotola Kamane, there's not much of
Speaker 2: a regime change. But the people who are left there
Speaker 2: are now a lot more radical. You made them a
Speaker 2: lot more dangerous. As Winston Churchill said at one point
Speaker 2: in time, he said, nothing is more exhilarating than being
Speaker 2: shot at without result. And I would say that about
Speaker 2: the survivors in Iran, they are emboldened and they are
Speaker 2: exhilarated about this. There hasn't been any regime change except
Speaker 2: to make it more radical, which has been the policy,
Speaker 2: the result of the policy of American foreign policy, the
Speaker 2: result of American foreign policy for the last seventy three years,
Speaker 2: not forty seven seventy three years, The result of seventy
Speaker 2: three years of America messing with Iran has always ratcheted
Speaker 2: up the radical side in terms of reaction to what
Speaker 2: we're doing, and understandably so quite frankly, and so it's
Speaker 2: just another bad policy, making them more anti American, making
Speaker 2: them more dangerous. So Tucker also said, well, you know
Speaker 2: Trump is considering nukes against Iran. He doesn't know that.
Speaker 2: But again, if you're going to say that they're all
Speaker 2: going to die, there's only one way to accomplish that
Speaker 2: in a country that size, with ninety million people. Ron
Speaker 2: is now demanding this. This is what's happening with the tolls.
Speaker 2: They're now demanding between one and two million dollars, depending
Speaker 2: on who you read and which currency they're guessing. I guess,
Speaker 2: but you know, one or two million dollars per ship
Speaker 2: to pass through, and how are they collecting this? Well,
Speaker 2: at first they were supporting the Chinese yuan, trying to
Speaker 2: support the idea of a Chinese petro yu wan or
Speaker 2: some kind of a bricks thing as opposed to the
Speaker 2: American petro dollar. But now they're doing this they want
Speaker 2: it in bitcoin. They said, you're going to pull up here,
Speaker 2: You're going to you got just a few seconds to
Speaker 2: Vessels will be given a few seconds to pay in bitcoin,
Speaker 2: ensuring that they can't be traced or confiscated due to sanctions.
Speaker 2: The entire financial system that has been a big part
Speaker 2: of the American empire, the American power structure, and of
Speaker 2: course for each one of us as Americans, it's been
Speaker 2: something that has helped us financially materially, it has hurt
Speaker 2: us as well in terms of creating a government that
Speaker 2: is so big that it can bribe state and local
Speaker 2: officials to do anything that is unconstitutional. They just bribe them.
Speaker 2: And I pointed that out with the COVID stuff. That's
Speaker 2: how they get around the tenth Amendment. You do this
Speaker 2: and I'll give you a lot of money that I
Speaker 2: just printed over here right here. Have some monopoly money. Well,
Speaker 2: that fantasy world is about to collapse. That is the foundation.
Speaker 2: America is a country that is built not on foundations
Speaker 2: of morality, but on the foundations of a Ponzi scheme.
Speaker 2: That's what the Bretton Woods and the Dollar system is
Speaker 2: that Nixon and Henry Kissinger created a spokesperson for Iran's oil,
Speaker 2: gas and petrochemical products Exporters union call the Financial Times
Speaker 2: that the tariff would add about a dollar per barrel
Speaker 2: of oil to the price. What's the email arrives and
Speaker 2: Ron completes its assessment. Vessels are given a few seconds
Speaker 2: to pay and bitcoin, ensuring that they can't be traced
Speaker 2: or confiscated due to sanctions. We have weaponized the financial
Speaker 2: system that gave us dominance. It began with Biden and
Speaker 2: then Trump escalated in the same way that the COVID lockdown,
Speaker 2: mask vaccine. All that stuff began with Trump, then they
Speaker 2: switched out to Biden. Biden escalated, then they switched back
Speaker 2: to Trump. After Biden starts the financial attacks and Trump
Speaker 2: escalates the financial attacks on us. It's a tag team
Speaker 2: and it's a professional wrestling game, folks. Trump has suggested
Speaker 2: that the US is hoping to get in on this scheme. Yeah,
Speaker 2: he wants to. He smells some money, so he's trying
Speaker 2: to put a positive spent on this and saying, hey,
Speaker 2: we're going to get some of that toll money too. Well,
Speaker 2: that's not in the agreement. It'll be interesting to see
Speaker 2: if he gets it. He says, we're thinking of doing
Speaker 2: it as a joint venture. So he goes within less
Speaker 2: than twelve hours, he goes from threatening to wipe out
Speaker 2: their entire civilization to insinuating that he's got a joint
Speaker 2: venture going on with them, even though there's nothing even
Speaker 2: in writing. It's a way of securing it, also securing
Speaker 2: it from lots of other people. He said, Well, within
Speaker 2: the last twenty four hours, the president went from threatening
Speaker 2: to wipe out a whole civilization to suggesting that he
Speaker 2: had to deal with him. That's right, we're now partners.
Speaker 2: And his apologists say, see the genius of this guy.
Speaker 2: That's not genius at all, folks. The Whill points out
Speaker 2: such joint venture is not a part of the ten
Speaker 2: point peace plan. Despite the alleged ceasefire, the situation appears
Speaker 2: largely unchanged. In the strait of our moves is The
Speaker 2: New York Times reports vessels aren't lining up to pass
Speaker 2: through as of Wednesday afternoon local time, with experts warning
Speaker 2: that shipping operators may still not want to take the risk.
Speaker 2: They're still not sure what's going to happen with all
Speaker 2: this stuff. As a matter of fact, I think out
Speaker 2: of the eight hundred ships that are trapped there, only
Speaker 2: two passed through. And now there's more questions about whether
Speaker 2: or not it's a deal. So no, And yet we
Speaker 2: see the markets, the stock market, the gold market, immediately
Speaker 2: react to this stuff as if it was real. This
Speaker 2: is the insanity that these markets are constantly reacting to
Speaker 2: all the stuff that Trump says, and just like they
Speaker 2: react to every kind of rumor, they immediately react to
Speaker 2: it as if it is real. And again, it's just
Speaker 2: like when we look at what politicians say, especially when
Speaker 2: they are candidates. If somebody is a candidate and you
Speaker 2: don't really have any record on them, especially Trump. I mean,
Speaker 2: Trump is somebody who held political office anywhere about anything,
Speaker 2: and so all you had was the stuff that he said.
Speaker 2: So when he's running, he's an open slate. And if
Speaker 2: he's saying the right stuff, just like Julian A. Sein says, well,
Speaker 2: we know that Hillary Clinton is a warmonger and a criminal.
Speaker 2: We don't know yet about Trump. Well, now we do.
Speaker 2: We know about him in this first term. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, we learned the bad lessons about Trump
Speaker 2: in his first term. Now we're getting a post graduate
Speaker 2: class and Trump's evil. So Ron gave a humiliating ten
Speaker 2: demands for Trump, including the one million pound a ship
Speaker 2: fee for Homer's straight. And perhaps that's where the question
Speaker 2: of whether it's one or two million dollars depending on
Speaker 2: the currency that you calculated in. I think it is
Speaker 2: a one point one million pounds two million dollars. As
Speaker 2: the way this is looking, Trump wrote on a post
Speaker 2: and truth social I agree to suspend the bombing and
Speaker 2: attack of Iran for a period of two weeks. This
Speaker 2: will be a double sided cease fire. It puts an
Speaker 2: all upper case. We received a ten point proposal from
Speaker 2: Iran and believe that it is a workable basis for
Speaker 2: which to negotiate. Almost all the various points of the
Speaker 2: past contention have been agreed to between the US and Iran,
Speaker 2: but a two week period will allow the agreement to
Speaker 2: be finalized and consummated. So when you look at the
Speaker 2: ten point plan, other stuff like, you know, stop killing
Speaker 2: people in Iran. That's a big part of it. But
Speaker 2: also and don't start this again. But another part of it,
Speaker 2: which immediately failed, was end to Israeli strikes in Lebanon.
Speaker 2: That's the third of the ten points, as you're reading
Speaker 2: down the list. And of course Israel refused us to
Speaker 2: do that. Not only refused, they escalated to the highest
Speaker 2: level that they'd ever had with Lebanon, Israel saying well,
Speaker 2: we're not a party to it. And so again Israel
Speaker 2: does not want peace. Israel wants land, and they're willing
Speaker 2: to kill people for it. That's what the Zionists do.
Speaker 2: Zionism is all about stealing land and killing anybody that
Speaker 2: gets in your way. That's the bottom line. It is
Speaker 2: not some kind of Old Testament prophecy fulfillment. It's just
Speaker 2: a bunch of criminals. It's a criminal thug gang that
Speaker 2: even other Jews reject, and we should as well. Number seven,
Speaker 2: Iran would impose the fee of two million dollars per ship.
Speaker 2: Iran would split these fees with Oman, not with the US.
Speaker 2: You know, said they didn't say anything about giving any
Speaker 2: of these fees to the US, they were going to
Speaker 2: split them with Oman because Oman is the other side
Speaker 2: of the strait, the tip of the spear. If you
Speaker 2: will Iran's beautiful toll, we'll see ships pay up to
Speaker 2: two million dollars to pass the straight of our moves.
Speaker 2: Now this one again goes back to one million dollars,
Speaker 2: but it is two million dollars, I believe. Nevertheless, it's
Speaker 2: a lot of money. So yeah, there's no regime change. Instead,
Speaker 2: the regime is going to get a lot of change
Speaker 2: from people passing through the strait that they ever got before.
Speaker 2: This is a huge windfall for Roan if this is
Speaker 2: what comes out of all this. And as we look
Speaker 2: at this agreement and what is being talked about, we
Speaker 2: go back and look at their four points. The first
Speaker 2: one was we're going to do a decapitation strike and
Speaker 2: then we're going to wipe out all of their missiles
Speaker 2: and drones that type of thing. And the US government
Speaker 2: when asked about that, they said, well, yeah, we can
Speaker 2: do that. We can do this first two and it
Speaker 2: mays be seen if they've done the second part. Then
Speaker 2: the third thing was to have regime change, right, we
Speaker 2: need to create a revolution there in Iran and have
Speaker 2: regime change. Well, that clearly is not happening. Just the
Speaker 2: opposite happened with that. You have the people have lined
Speaker 2: up in support of the regime as they're being bombed
Speaker 2: by Trump. As I said from the very beginning, if
Speaker 2: he wanted to have a regime change from a popular uprising,
Speaker 2: he should have not attacked the civilians. You know, when
Speaker 2: he starts attacking the civilians, now he's the outside in me.
Speaker 2: That's the way it works. That's the way it always works.
Speaker 2: That's why attacking civilian populations is not only strategically fruitless,
Speaker 2: I mean not only morally fruitless, but it's also strategically
Speaker 2: a mistake as well. And then the fourth one is
Speaker 2: get the nuclear stuff. We're not hearing anything at all
Speaker 2: about that, as well as the the popular rising and
Speaker 2: regime change. Now that's really about the only thing that
Speaker 2: they were able to do was to decapitate the top leaders,
Speaker 2: and they wind up with some people taking their place.
Speaker 2: They're arguably worse the other three aspects of this, destroying
Speaker 2: their missile and drone capability, getting regime change broadly based,
Speaker 2: taking out the Islamic Sharia theocracy that is there. That's
Speaker 2: not happening, and the nuclear stuff, they've actually strengthened their
Speaker 2: desire to have nuclear weapons, and they got rid of
Speaker 2: the guy who would put a fatwah against having nuclear weapons.
Speaker 2: So this has been a total disaster. Then you can
Speaker 2: add to that the fact that now they're going to
Speaker 2: be getting large sums of money for all the ships
Speaker 2: that pass through there million dollars two million dollars a ship,
Speaker 2: and so they now get to tax twenty percent of
Speaker 2: the world's oil supply. So whether we see a rapid
Speaker 2: reach the more likely measured application of hybrid strategies in
Speaker 2: the next two weeks, there will be no immediate sustained
Speaker 2: relief for shippers, said one person, adding that bookings made
Speaker 2: today for the Persian Gulf will still carry the risk
Speaker 2: of renewed closure in two weeks time. With eight hundred
Speaker 2: ships there and only two of them they got through.
Speaker 2: Before things started getting even more dicey, ship traffic remained throttled,
Speaker 2: and then apparently because of Israel's violation of the third
Speaker 2: term of the agreement, not only did they not stop
Speaker 2: attacking Lebanon, but they escalate it to a level that
Speaker 2: never seen before. Because they don't want this war to stop.
Speaker 2: Net Yahoo and his party want war. They want it
Speaker 2: to continue, and you can see that. And the politicians
Speaker 2: that they own here, the people like Lindsay Graham, Laura Lumer,
Speaker 2: and many others, they do not want, under any circumstances,
Speaker 2: to stop the destruction of the Middle which is what
Speaker 2: Israel wants. Israel wants to turn the entire Middle East
Speaker 2: into what they have done in Gaza. They want to
Speaker 2: reduce everything to ruins so they can come in and
Speaker 2: take it over. There are a few signs on Wednesday
Speaker 2: of a large scale return of shipping through the Strait
Speaker 2: of Hormuz. The US said they would work to get
Speaker 2: more vessels through the crucial waterway is part of the
Speaker 2: cease fire agreement. Vance warns Irani as the head of
Speaker 2: the Pakistan Talks, that the US has all the cards
Speaker 2: and we want the nuclear fuel. This is how stupid
Speaker 2: and dishonest the Trump administration is. And again it doesn't
Speaker 2: matter to me whether they are lying straight to your
Speaker 2: face or whether they really believe this stuff themselves. They
Speaker 2: don't hold the cards. They don't have any cards with this.
Speaker 2: Iran holds all the cards. The first two ships they
Speaker 2: went through as Iran sidell demand that shipping companies pay
Speaker 2: the tolls in cryptocurrency. However, hours later they announced that
Speaker 2: they shut the straight down again as a response to
Speaker 2: Israel pummeling Lebanon. And it has been massive. In ten
Speaker 2: minutes time, they targeted one hundred targets. Now that doesn't
Speaker 2: mean a hundred bombs. That means one hundred targets. Don't
Speaker 2: know how many pieces of ordinance, missiles, bombs or whatever
Speaker 2: they dropped on those one hundred targets in just ten minutes.
Speaker 2: They are rapidly turning Lebanon into Gaza. And we know why.
Speaker 2: It's just disgusting to watch this happening over and over
Speaker 2: again from these people who, as I've said before, the
Speaker 2: ultra orthodox Jews, absolutely loathe the state of Israel. They said,
Speaker 2: God condemns it, said one guy, he said, violates the Torah.
Speaker 2: You know, we have these commands, do not kill, do
Speaker 2: not steal. That is the essence of Zionism, kill and steal.
Speaker 2: And he said, yeah, we believe God's going to give
Speaker 2: us a land. But we believe God's going to do it,
Speaker 2: we don't have to do it ourselves. And so there
Speaker 2: is a And they said We also don't want to
Speaker 2: be mistaken for these people, and unfortunately for them, they
Speaker 2: are because they have the most unusual appearance and they're
Speaker 2: easily identified. It's like when people were upset after nine
Speaker 2: to eleven, believing that Afghans had flown planes into buildings
Speaker 2: and they collapsed in their own footprint. People were coming
Speaker 2: after anybody's wearing a turban. So they're coming after a
Speaker 2: lot of Sikhs from India thinking that they were Afghan people.
Speaker 2: So the same type of thing is happening to a
Speaker 2: lot of the ultra orthodox Jews. Parliament speaker in Israel
Speaker 2: complained that three key clauses have been violated, and this
Speaker 2: is I'm sorry, not in Israel, this is in Iran.
Speaker 2: This is Gallibath. He said. First of all, there's Israel's
Speaker 2: ongoing attacks on Lebanon. There is the ongoing US Israeli
Speaker 2: violation of Iranian airspace, and then there is Iran's right
Speaker 2: to enrich uranium. He said, these were all part of
Speaker 2: the ten ten points. So you know, seventy percent compliance
Speaker 2: with a ten point ceasefire plan ain't going to cut it.
Speaker 2: So Iran has halted shipping through the strait now and
Speaker 2: it's issue new demands. Is Trump's crumbling ceasefire faces furious
Speaker 2: Republican backlash. So a lot of the Israel Firsters are
Speaker 2: really upset about this, people like Lindsay Graham, Laura Lmer,
Speaker 2: and Iran. Because Israel stepped up the attacks in Lebanon,
Speaker 2: Iran attacked Kuwait as well as Saudi Arabia the pipeline
Speaker 2: Saudi Lindsay Graham demanded that JD Vance appear before Congress
Speaker 2: to explain the terms of the agreement after JD Vance
Speaker 2: allegedly spearheaded and eleventh our peace talks mediated by Pakistan.
Speaker 2: So think about this. This is why I said at
Speaker 2: the very beginning of the program, Lindsey Graham and his perverted, inverted,
Speaker 2: twisted and pulled inside out view of the Constitution. According
Speaker 2: to Lindsey Graham, we don't need to have Congress involved
Speaker 2: to start a war. Congress has to be involved in
Speaker 2: order to stop a war. Isn't that amazing. It's what
Speaker 2: they've done to our individual rights and pretty much everything
Speaker 2: in the Constitution. You know, now, you're not innocent until
Speaker 2: proven guilty of what. You don't have any rights the
Speaker 2: government might grant you privileges if they like you. Right,
Speaker 2: that's basically what they're done to the Bill of Rights
Speaker 2: and to many other things. And you go just every
Speaker 2: time you go fly, you're guilty, and you have to
Speaker 2: prove that you're not a terrorist. And it's this terrorist
Speaker 2: government out of Washington that's going to evaluate you. How's
Speaker 2: that for hypocrisy and irony? Right, The people who are
Speaker 2: literally terrorists are going to vet you to see if
Speaker 2: you are a terrorist. So, he said, the supposed negotiating
Speaker 2: documents and my view, have some troubling aspects. The time
Speaker 2: will tell. So if you want war, president can do that, fortunately,
Speaker 2: says Trump. I can do that myself. I don't need
Speaker 2: a declaration of war like the Constitution says. But you
Speaker 2: want peace, you better explain yourself to the representatives of
Speaker 2: the Zionist cult of death in Congress, the people like
Speaker 2: Lindsay Graham who've been bought and sold by these people.
Speaker 2: Then you got Don Bacon, who fortunately is leaving. He
Speaker 2: said Trump had secured significant victories, but expressed skepticism over
Speaker 2: the peace talks. I express skepticism over the so called
Speaker 2: significant victories. Again, this is just trying to curry favor
Speaker 2: the government, he said, is still in place, and we
Speaker 2: should be negotiating from a position of strength, not a
Speaker 2: position that's good for them. And again that's Don Bacon.
Speaker 2: That's what victors do. Okay, losers don't get to do that.
Speaker 2: That's the bottom line. Laura loser Lumer said that Trump
Speaker 2: she's predicted. She said the ceasefire will fill. Well, of
Speaker 2: course it will because the people that she's really loyal
Speaker 2: to will make sure of it. They made sure of
Speaker 2: it from the very beginning. Oh, we're supposed to stop
Speaker 2: attacking Lebanon, Well let's escalate it like we've never done before.
Speaker 2: She says, I don't know why people are acting like
Speaker 2: this as a win, Well, because we don't want a
Speaker 2: war loomor that's what you don't understand. And then Mark Levin,
Speaker 2: of course, like I said, it's all the Zionist toadies
Speaker 2: that are lining up here. And what do the Zionists want?
Speaker 2: They want or they want civilizational destruction, he's Mark Levin.
Speaker 2: The enemy is still the enemy. They're still surviving. Can't
Speaker 2: have anybody surviving, whether it send Gaza or Lebanon or
Speaker 2: Ron kill everybody. When are we how do we get
Speaker 2: rid of net Yahoo and his ilk, And how do
Speaker 2: we get rid of people like Levin? Well, boycott him,
Speaker 2: first of all. That's what he's so proud of, is boycotting.
Speaker 2: People just don't pay any attention to the guy except
Speaker 2: to hold him up as a point of ridicule. But
Speaker 2: there isn't any twenty fifth Amendment to get rid of
Speaker 2: an occupying foreign government like net Yahoo. And that's the
Speaker 2: unfortunate thing here. The economic scars are going to last,
Speaker 2: said one analyst. Approximately eight hundred ships will need to
Speaker 2: be stuck there. Only two got through. As I pointed out,
Speaker 2: markets have responded, however, positively, with a fifteen percent fall
Speaker 2: in the market price of boiling gas and a rally
Speaker 2: in the stock markets. Again, this is why it's stupid
Speaker 2: to try to time the market, because the big guys
Speaker 2: are going to move the market, and the market is
Speaker 2: going to be moved. Whether you're talking about gold and silver,
Speaker 2: you're talking about stocks, any of these markets are going
Speaker 2: to be moved by rumor in the window. That's the
Speaker 2: way the big guys like it, because they're the ones
Speaker 2: who have the inside information. They're the ones who are
Speaker 2: spreading the rumors. They're the ones who are saying things
Speaker 2: like Donald Trump did, Yeah, we're going to blow you
Speaker 2: off the face of mat Well, never mind, we got
Speaker 2: to forget about that, and he manipulates the market going
Speaker 2: up and going down at the same time, just like
Speaker 2: a federal Reserve chairman. Well, traffic flow freely, is suggested
Speaker 2: by Trump, or will it flow via coordination with Iran's
Speaker 2: armed forces and we do consideration to technical limitations as
Speaker 2: suggested by Iran's foreign minister. This is vital not just
Speaker 2: for oil and gas, but also for everything else that
Speaker 2: we depend on coming from their jet fuel, sulfur urea diesel, helium,
Speaker 2: you name it. Also, a lot of aluminum is coming
Speaker 2: from there as well. It also raises a fundamental question
Speaker 2: about any piece that Iran has now created in this
Speaker 2: new reality in the Gulf, that has established that it
Speaker 2: can control the key maritime chook point even without a
Speaker 2: navy and even without an air force. This is why
Speaker 2: we've been seeing for the longest time, or Pete holding
Speaker 2: his press conferences talking about, oh, we got rid of
Speaker 2: their air force and got rid of their navy. They
Speaker 2: didn't have much of a navy anyway, but they still
Speaker 2: do have ships that are escorting other ships. So even
Speaker 2: that tiny inconsequential navy was not completely destroyed, but they
Speaker 2: don't need to have a navy in order to control
Speaker 2: the Strait of hor Moves. And we've got a massive
Speaker 2: navy and it can't go there without being sunk. So
Speaker 2: they're out there making a great, big, one hundred mile
Speaker 2: square circles out of the deep ocean to try to
Speaker 2: get keep from getting sunk. If they go the Straight
Speaker 2: of hor Moves, they will be sunk. So has Trump
Speaker 2: turned Straight of hor Moves into the world's most lucrative
Speaker 2: toll booth with many ships paying million dollar transit fees.
Speaker 2: That's the question some people are asking. The economics of
Speaker 2: this war has always been a central factor, not a byproduct.
Speaker 2: And that's what I've been saying for the longest time.
Speaker 2: This has been not just asymmetric warfare. There's an element
Speaker 2: of that, you know, cheap drones and missiles like that,
Speaker 2: you know, against very complex centrally controlled systems that they
Speaker 2: began attacking the central nerve point of these anti ballistic
Speaker 2: missile systems. And of course the calculus of this stuff
Speaker 2: is always screwed up. You've got an incoming missile and
Speaker 2: it's so difficult to hit an incoming missile that you've
Speaker 2: got to use two or three missiles to try and
Speaker 2: take it down. Even have a reasonable percentage chance of
Speaker 2: taking down. It's not one hundred percent even then. And
Speaker 2: so you know, and our anti ballistic missiles are far
Speaker 2: more expensive and complicated than the attacking missiles. You know,
Speaker 2: you go back and you play the game of risk.
Speaker 2: It's been a long time since U lated. But I
Speaker 2: think if I remember correctly, maybe you can correct me
Speaker 2: if I'm wrong, Travis, But I think you know, when
Speaker 2: you are an attacking company a country, your attack it.
Speaker 2: You are the attacker. You're rolling the dice and you
Speaker 2: have to you know, the other guy gets i think
Speaker 2: more dice to roll to and you match them up, right.
Speaker 6: Yeah, they gets an advantage of some So that's right.
Speaker 2: The defender, I think gets three dice or something in
Speaker 2: you roll two dice, and so he takes his highest
Speaker 2: dice and compared to your highest dice, and then his
Speaker 2: second highest dice and so forth. But he's got three
Speaker 2: chances to feat you. And that's the way it's always
Speaker 2: been in warfare that the defender has an advantage. But
Speaker 2: with this, the defender has a disadvantage. So why didn't
Speaker 2: anybody ever think about that? So there's an asymmetry that's
Speaker 2: there in the warfare, but the key asymmetry has been
Speaker 2: in the economic area, and that still is the case.
Speaker 2: They utilized economic warfare and they did it asymmetrically. Important
Speaker 2: issue here, two questions, five scenarios of what happens next.
Speaker 2: Now that the initial euphoria in the stock market and
Speaker 2: the commodity markets, which is what always happens again, the
Speaker 2: New York Stock Exchange is as bad as the occult.
Speaker 2: In terms of reacting to Trump, they take him literally,
Speaker 2: they take him seriously as if he were telling the truth.
Speaker 2: Iran's ability to shut the waterway will embed a risk
Speaker 2: premium and the price of all commodities flowing through it
Speaker 2: and the foreseeable future. And so again the fate of
Speaker 2: Iran's enriched uranium remains unsettled. So it's just another one
Speaker 2: of these issues that are out there. And when we
Speaker 2: look at the asymmetry of the economic warfare, Trump was
Speaker 2: calling NATO a paper tiger, whatever, calling Europe a paper tiger.
Speaker 2: We are the paper tiger, and the paper is the
Speaker 2: Fiat currency. And that has been the basis of our power.
Speaker 2: People are realizing it is a Ponzi scheme. They're realizing
Speaker 2: that the US is unable, even if it is willing.
Speaker 2: It's not always willing, but it is unable, unwilling in
Speaker 2: many cases to protect the people that are looking for
Speaker 2: the US to provide a kind of packs Americana, to
Speaker 2: provide peace and prosperity. We're doing just the opposite. So
Speaker 2: Hegsas said that Iran would give up the uranium, but
Speaker 2: also suggested that the US would have to send in
Speaker 2: special ops troops. He said, we'll do it. If whatever
Speaker 2: is necessary, we'll do it. So again, you know, you
Speaker 2: can take everything he has to say with a grain
Speaker 2: of salt, maybe less than a grain. Trump said Iran's
Speaker 2: nuclear sites had been hit so hard in the war
Speaker 2: that it take months to get near the nuclear dust.
Speaker 2: But again, this stuff was gone long before the war began.
Speaker 2: They have no idea where it is. Israelis. We're concerned
Speaker 2: that the ceasefire could hold beyond two weeks without any
Speaker 2: agreement to ensure the highly enriched uranium was removed from Iran.
Speaker 2: So this fear exists at a former brigadier general, and
Speaker 2: they have made sure that it's not going to be
Speaker 2: a CEASAR. They don't want a CEASAR. They don't want
Speaker 2: an end to the war. Even if Iran's leadership loses
Speaker 2: access to the material, the country could turn to allies
Speaker 2: like North Korea for help obtaining a nuclear weapon. The
Speaker 2: lesson from all of this is that if they want
Speaker 2: to be left alone, if they want to have a
Speaker 2: guarantee of peace, the word of the American government, especially
Speaker 2: of Donald Trump and Jared Kushner, means absolutely nothing. We've
Speaker 2: shown over and again that it is treachery and perfidy
Speaker 2: when they negotiate with us. So any agreement that they
Speaker 2: get from the United States is not where the paper
Speaker 2: is signed on. The only way they're going to be
Speaker 2: able to take themselves is with nuclear weapons, and so
Speaker 2: you better believe they're going to get it one way
Speaker 2: or the other now at this point in time. So
Speaker 2: it made it certain if the Iranians decided the only
Speaker 2: thing that will protect the regime is nuclear weapons, well
Speaker 2: why wouldn't they conclude that? The central question is what
Speaker 2: will the determination of the United States and the world
Speaker 2: be to prevent them from going down that path? Says
Speaker 2: the former Israeli general well I would say, you know,
Speaker 2: they have their nuclear weapons, they do it in secret,
Speaker 2: they do it without signing the Non Proliferation Treaty, they
Speaker 2: did it without inspectors, and they have their nuclear deterrence
Speaker 2: to protect themselves. But of course nobody else is allowed
Speaker 2: to have that. And I guess at this point he said,
Speaker 2: what will what will the determination of the US and
Speaker 2: the world be to prevent Iran from having nuclear weapons?
Speaker 2: In other words, to protect Israel? And yet it is
Speaker 2: a mutually assured destruction. And I guess that is a
Speaker 2: good question because at this point, from what we've seen
Speaker 2: with Gaza, with Lebanon, what we're seeing with Iran, why
Speaker 2: would anyone come to the rescue of this Zionist government anymore?
Speaker 2: I think that day is over unless we can't figure
Speaker 2: out how to get rid of these traders in Congress
Speaker 2: who have sold us out to a foreign country. Well,
Speaker 2: we're going to take a look at as I said,
Speaker 2: I want to come back and take a quick look
Speaker 2: at this report that was released from or Times. Some
Speaker 2: high level leaker was talking about how BB trapped Trump
Speaker 2: into this war. And again we can look at that
Speaker 2: and we can question, well, the motivations are of the
Speaker 2: Trump administration and whoever it was, it was a high
Speaker 2: level leaker. I think there are some other issues involved here.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a quick break. However, we're going
Speaker 2: to be right back. Stay with us. There we are.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 7: APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your
Speaker 7: mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen
Speaker 7: wherever you go.
Speaker 2: Well, welcome back, and many of you might be asking
Speaker 2: the same question as Travis days I do we do
Speaker 2: not have Tony today, and I forgot to tell Travis.
Speaker 2: I forgot to tell you Tony will not be joining
Speaker 2: us today. His father is in the hospital, and so
Speaker 2: please keep his father in your prayers and Tony as well.
Speaker 2: But we are going to talk about gold. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, I'm going to do it right now,
Speaker 2: before I get any more into the Iranian stuff. We
Speaker 2: had gold slightly up, silver slightly down as people reacting
Speaker 2: to this so called truth. And you see the reactions
Speaker 2: in the marketplace. Of course, with I said before, gold
Speaker 2: was up a little over two percent. All the markets
Speaker 2: are volatile because people are just paying too much attention
Speaker 2: to rumor. They're paying attention to what they want to
Speaker 2: see happen. There's a lot of people out there who
Speaker 2: are just like Trump was when he got sold the
Speaker 2: rosy scenario that Nat Yahoo is giving him. You know,
Speaker 2: they have this Goldilocks war that they hear. So everything's
Speaker 2: going to go right. We don't have to worry about
Speaker 2: the straight over our moves, none of that stuff. We
Speaker 2: got a it's going to be just right. And when
Speaker 2: you do that, that rarely happens, doesn't it. So the
Speaker 2: focus is on the anticipation rather than on the fundamentals.
Speaker 2: But the fundamentals are the reality, and the reality the
Speaker 2: fundamentals have not changed except to go in the same
Speaker 2: direction they've been going that drove gold up in the
Speaker 2: first place. So that's the reality that we're faced here with.
Speaker 2: But there's a very interesting thing that's happening with the
Speaker 2: Central Bank of France. For example, they sold one hundred
Speaker 2: and twenty nine tons of the US gold reserve, then
Speaker 2: they bought it back in Europe and they made a
Speaker 2: fifteen billion dollar profit. Now they didn't do it all
Speaker 2: at once, but they've been doing some pretty large amounts
Speaker 2: and that has also you know, people trying to time
Speaker 2: the market. You never know what's going to happen with this,
Speaker 2: I mean, bottom line is they can sell it, depress
Speaker 2: the price momentarily, and then buy it back and raise
Speaker 2: the price back up, and they're were to keep gold
Speaker 2: long term all along. But these kinds of massive moves
Speaker 2: that are made by central banks of whales that are
Speaker 2: there are things that can always manipulate the market. So again,
Speaker 2: your best bet is to try to do dollar cost averaging,
Speaker 2: and that's what Tony does with a wolf pack. So
Speaker 2: there's a lot involved with us. As a matter of fact.
Speaker 2: First of all, when I first saw this reported, a
Speaker 2: lot of people were saying, well, you know, they were
Speaker 2: pretty smart about this. Germany's been trying to repatriate their
Speaker 2: gold from the US Federal Reserve deposit and they've been
Speaker 2: dragging their feet and refusing to do it. The French, however,
Speaker 2: instead of going that route, what the French did as
Speaker 2: they said, well, sell it and then they bought it
Speaker 2: back in Europe. So they sold it in the US,
Speaker 2: they sold the gold, their gold that was at the
Speaker 2: US Federal Reserve, and then they bought it back in Europe.
Speaker 2: And what that allowed them to do was to get
Speaker 2: away from the Federal Reserve that was dragging its feet
Speaker 2: on the German Central Bank and saying, well, I don't know,
Speaker 2: we had to figure out where it is or something whatever.
Speaker 2: They're telling them that you can't have it, same type
Speaker 2: of stuff you're seeing from black Rock and some of
Speaker 2: the others saying well, you can't cash out of the
Speaker 2: mutual fund. Well, I guess there was something akin to
Speaker 2: that with the US Federal Reserve. So that's one issue.
Speaker 2: Then the other issue is that they would have to
Speaker 2: go through the very expensive process of moving one hundred
Speaker 2: and twenty nine tons of gold from the US to France.
Speaker 2: They don't have to do that now, you know, they
Speaker 2: can sell it in the US and then they can
Speaker 2: buy it over there, so they don't have to have
Speaker 2: all the expensive security and insurance that would be required
Speaker 2: with that. But there's something else involved in this when
Speaker 2: you go back and look at what happened to set
Speaker 2: up Breton Woods too, Charles de gaul and France was
Speaker 2: not happy and many countries are not happy with what
Speaker 2: had happened to the Breton Woods agreement. Right after World
Speaker 2: War Two. The agreement was that the US dollar was
Speaker 2: going to be the global currency because we had so
Speaker 2: much gold. We had basically all the gold, and we
Speaker 2: were going to back the dollar with gold. But they
Speaker 2: realized pretty quickly that the US was printing more dollars
Speaker 2: than they had gold to back it up. They were
Speaker 2: not happy with that. So from nineteen sixty three nineteen
Speaker 2: sixty six you had France pulling out all their gold
Speaker 2: out of London and out of the US. And many
Speaker 2: people believe that that was really a primary catalyst for
Speaker 2: Nixon going off of the gold standard, the Nixon shock
Speaker 2: that happened in nineteen seventy one. All right, we're not
Speaker 2: going to have a gold anymore. And then Henry Kisninschuer
Speaker 2: came up with this petro dollar, which now Biden and
Speaker 2: Trump have worked very hard to destroy very quickly. But
Speaker 2: that was bretton Wood's part two basically still maintaining a
Speaker 2: global financial system based on the dollar, but based on
Speaker 2: a petro dollar, not on a gold dollar, and that
Speaker 2: now is being destroyed. But the interesting thing with this
Speaker 2: particular case was that the way this really worked out,
Speaker 2: France asked for the turn of the gold. The US
Speaker 2: had already sold it. In other words, they said we
Speaker 2: don't have it. They said, all right, so give us
Speaker 2: the money. Basically called their bluff. And so you know,
Speaker 2: maybe they didn't have the gold at all, they sold
Speaker 2: it some time ago. Maybe that's why they're dragging their
Speaker 2: feet on Germany. They don't have the gold that belongs
Speaker 2: to the Germans. But they said, okay, so if you
Speaker 2: sold it, then give us the money. They can take
Speaker 2: those Fiat dollars still and they can buy some more
Speaker 2: gold in Europe. And they did it. In terms of
Speaker 2: the timing when they did it, they made a fifteen
Speaker 2: billion dollar profit. So the US wired them the money,
Speaker 2: and then both countries agreed to a spin on how
Speaker 2: they're going to tell the public about this. Rather than saying,
Speaker 2: you know, the Federal Reserve doesn't have the gold, they
Speaker 2: decided that they would come up with this story saying
Speaker 2: that we have this new standard for gold bars, and
Speaker 2: so we wanted to sell the stuff in America so
Speaker 2: we could have this new European standard of gold bars,
Speaker 2: whatever it is. But as one person pointed out, nine
Speaker 2: nine nine point nine fine gold is equal to nine
Speaker 2: nine nine point nine fine gold everywhere. There's no difference
Speaker 2: between fundamentally between the European standard and the US standards.
Speaker 2: So It is simply a story that they told everybody
Speaker 2: about this. So the move was as clever as it
Speaker 2: was profitable. Unlike the ongoing saga of Germany's massive US
Speaker 2: based gold holdings, which remained in the Federal Reserve of
Speaker 2: New York's vaults, supposedly to the consternation of many of
Speaker 2: Germany's politicians, the Bank of France did not try to
Speaker 2: raise the issue of a drawl or transfer. Instead, they
Speaker 2: simply sold the older, less pure goal bars in New
Speaker 2: York for what they were worth in US dollars or
Speaker 2: goal prices were reaching all time highs. Then they pocketed
Speaker 2: the cash and they bought bars that met their updated weight
Speaker 2: and purity standards in Europe as prices conveniently pulled back,
Speaker 2: and so again we're talking about weight and purity standards.
Speaker 2: It's a nine nine, nine point nine. It's going to
Speaker 2: be any different. And the reality is is that they
Speaker 2: already sold it. Why would they sell it without their permission?
Speaker 2: The bottom line is that the gold was gone. He said, here,
Speaker 2: we'll give you some Fiat currency and you can buy
Speaker 2: that to buy some real stuff in Europe.
Speaker 8: Maybe that's also incredibly convenient that when you unload that
Speaker 8: amount of anything into the market, it's probably going to
Speaker 8: cause the price to immediately drop as well.
Speaker 2: That's right, right, So you can manipulate the market, so
Speaker 2: you sell massive quantities of gold and then you can
Speaker 2: buy that discounted price. That's how they manipulate the market.
Speaker 2: That's how they made the fifteen billion.
Speaker 8: Even if they're not directly colluding, they're not sitting there
Speaker 8: with each other, Oh we'll do this, we'll do that.
Speaker 8: The amount of money they have at their disposal allows
Speaker 8: them to flood markets.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. So again, what's the lesson for each
Speaker 2: and every one of us. We can't do anything about that.
Speaker 2: We just try to we understand what the fundamentals are.
Speaker 2: We don't try to time the market. You just pick
Speaker 2: it up over a longer period of time, because the
Speaker 2: fundamentals are the fundamentals and they're still real. And so
Speaker 2: in reaction to this so called ceasefire, the price of
Speaker 2: gold jumped by two percent as well. But when you
Speaker 2: look at what is happening with gold, it really is
Speaker 2: interesting to see the bigger picture of all these different curses. Again,
Speaker 2: Iran wants to be paid in bitcoin, and you know
Speaker 2: this is as we work out Bitcoin and the crypto scandals.
Speaker 2: It's kind of interesting that Javier Malai in Argentina is
Speaker 2: now at the center of a crypto scandal. It's funny
Speaker 2: how how much alike he is with Trump. I mean,
Speaker 2: these guys, they don't just have crazy hair and wild antics,
Speaker 2: but they also have crypto scandals that are tied to them,
Speaker 2: which is not surprising when you look at it. These
Speaker 2: guys have all got something in common. You know, we
Speaker 2: go back and we look at the white collar criminals
Speaker 2: and embezzlers and that Trump has pardoned over and over again,
Speaker 2: and they seem to all be connected to the same
Speaker 2: few synagogues, and that, I guess, is what's going on
Speaker 2: with Javier Malai, the Chabad Lubovich Zionists that are there.
Speaker 2: Court documents raised questions about the Argentine president's statements that
Speaker 2: he had no connection to the launch of the Libra
Speaker 2: crypto current see and yet the reality is he said,
Speaker 2: I was simply highlighting a private venture. I had no
Speaker 2: connection to the digital coin itself. However, they got the
Speaker 2: phone logs and they found out that on the day
Speaker 2: that he was promoting Libra, on that particular day, he
Speaker 2: got seven phone calls from the people who were doing it,
Speaker 2: so it looks like there was some collusion that was there.
Speaker 6: It was just a butt dial, you know, seven times
Speaker 6: in a row.
Speaker 2: That's right. So then we look at, you know, how
Speaker 2: do you Again, you don't try to time the market,
Speaker 2: but it makes a big difference who you buy your
Speaker 2: goal from. This is an interesting article that is talking
Speaker 2: about MAGA influencers who are promoting gold and again, Tucker
Speaker 2: Carlson said he had when he started his broadcast, he
Speaker 2: had somebody offer him twenty million dollars to sign up.
Speaker 2: I don't think he mentioned which gold company that was,
Speaker 2: but we also had somebody who offered us a lot
Speaker 2: of money. Certainly wasn't twenty million dollars, but the when
Speaker 2: I looked at it, it was like it was a
Speaker 2: lot of money for us, and that is there's got
Speaker 2: to be something wrong if they would give me that
Speaker 2: much money. That just doesn't seem right. And so we
Speaker 2: didn't go with that. We went with Tony, who has
Speaker 2: I've known Tony for a long time. I used him
Speaker 2: personally before ever started recommending him on air, and before
Speaker 2: he ever set up David Knight dot gold to take
Speaker 2: you to Wisewolf gold, and so there was.
Speaker 8: A lot of money to throw around our almost all
Speaker 8: ways into something sketchy. It seems like the system as
Speaker 8: it set up, rewards scummy business practices, which is Tony
Speaker 8: works very very hard to make sure that he provides
Speaker 8: a good service and a great product.
Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah, he's and he is working really hard
Speaker 2: with the you know, the crazy market that's there. I
Speaker 2: don't know how he does it. But you know this
Speaker 2: issue here that has come to light, and it's a
Speaker 2: very long article and basically hits pretty much all of
Speaker 2: the major MAGA influencers. You got Megan Kelly, You've got
Speaker 2: Candice Owens, You've got Donald Trump Junior, Laura Lumer, Steve Bannon.
Speaker 2: And I feel bad for the people who lost a
Speaker 2: lot of money with this. But the one guy who
Speaker 2: was talking about he said to well, this company was
Speaker 2: recommended by Donald Trump Junior and Steve Bannon. He goes,
Speaker 2: if you can't trust the stuff they recommend, can you trust?
Speaker 2: It's like, oh, you trust? First of all, there's Don
Speaker 2: Trump Junior and his dad, but just Steve Bannon. For example,
Speaker 2: Steve Bannon was convicted, he had to have a pardon
Speaker 2: from Trump. He was convicted for ripping off his own
Speaker 2: followers on this we build a Wall thing. I mean,
Speaker 2: he has a documented crook, So no, you can't trust him.
Speaker 2: And I keep telling people don't trust them for your
Speaker 2: news either, because they're lying to you about Trump, not
Speaker 2: just about the gold company that they use. The one
Speaker 2: they focused on this article for the most parts of
Speaker 2: the company called Birch Gold Group. Some of the biggest
Speaker 2: names in the MAGA movement, as I mentioned, Candice Owen,
Speaker 2: Don Trump Junior, Laura Lomer, Steve Bannon, have touted gold
Speaker 2: investments to their audiences and utteral regulator, state authorities and
Speaker 2: investors have filled I'm sorry, filed more than a dozen
Speaker 2: cases against gold companies accusing them of misrepresentations and of
Speaker 2: steep fees. Financial Times are the ones who wrote this
Speaker 2: article out of the UK. They said they found seventeen
Speaker 2: cases in US courts by investors or regulators against gold
Speaker 2: companies over the past decade, including some in which companies
Speaker 2: filed for bankruptcy only to reopen under a new name
Speaker 2: or management. And here's an example. This guy is a
Speaker 2: sixty year old former US Navy officer. He used his
Speaker 2: life savings to make two purchases totaling three hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty thousand dollars of precious metals from Birch Gold. And
Speaker 2: he was the one who said Bannon's podcast War Room
Speaker 2: was the reason I went with him. Trump Junior pitches it,
Speaker 2: who do people trust more than these guys? Yeah? Yeah.
Speaker 2: He also filed a lawsuit for alleged overcharges of nearly
Speaker 2: one hundred thousand dollars, And that's what we're seeing that
Speaker 2: seems to be kind of the The amount that these
Speaker 2: people are suing Birch Gold for seems to be between
Speaker 2: thirty and forty percent overcharges that they've done. And how
Speaker 2: do they do it well? For the most part, what
Speaker 2: they're doing is they're taking collectible coins that come from
Speaker 2: you know, it could be the Canadian men or the
Speaker 2: UK meant or whatever some of the examples that they
Speaker 2: give of this, and they charge you a premium price.
Speaker 2: They mark it up like sixty percent. So stick with bullion,
Speaker 2: and that's one of the things that you need to
Speaker 2: look at, not just dollar cost averaging, but also make
Speaker 2: sure that you stick with just you're buying the gold,
Speaker 2: buy the weight, and take a look at your receipt.
Speaker 2: And of course you can try that. You can try,
Speaker 2: you know, try Tony. You can see how he deals
Speaker 2: with people, how he itemizes it and so forth, and
Speaker 2: take a look. You can see that the price is
Speaker 2: fair and that he's not charging a premium for some
Speaker 2: collectible coin or something. And of course you can specify,
Speaker 2: you know, what you want from him. But that was
Speaker 2: the repeating pattern that we see over and over again.
Speaker 2: One case filed against metals dot Com. In the lawsuit,
Speaker 2: they described it as a Wolf of Wall Street environment,
Speaker 2: complete with an office cash blowing machine. I looked at that,
Speaker 2: I thought, what is an office cash blowing machine? Is
Speaker 2: that a counter? Because I've seen the counters that they
Speaker 2: have at the bank, so you know where they're counting
Speaker 2: a lot of cash and it kind of blows the dollars. No, no, no,
Speaker 2: it's not time about. This is more like the grabbing
Speaker 2: the dollars. You know, you get in a booth, they've
Speaker 2: got the money, they close the doors, and the wind
Speaker 2: comes and starts blowing the cash all around, and you
Speaker 2: are grabbing the cash and anything that you can grab
Speaker 2: you get to keep. Evidently they were doing this in
Speaker 2: their office environment. Maybe that's you know, you pull one
Speaker 2: over on some retire and you get five minutes in
Speaker 2: the cash grab booth. I guess I don't know that
Speaker 2: works anyway. The federal court Frozer assets after regulators said
Speaker 2: the company has defrauded sixteen hundred seniors out of one
Speaker 2: hundred and eighty five million dollars by overcharging them. They
Speaker 2: overcharge them anywhere from one hundred percent to three hundred
Speaker 2: twelve percent on gold and silver coins. These companies no
Speaker 2: longer exist, they said. Daniel McDowell, professor from Syracuse University
Speaker 2: of New York, said, well, you know, when you look
Speaker 2: at this, it's a natural fit for conservatives who are
Speaker 2: skeptical of deficit spending, concerned about the budget deficit, concerned
Speaker 2: about the Fiat currency and the economics of it. But
Speaker 2: he goes, even if these people don't deep down think
Speaker 2: that it's real, you can still profit off of this
Speaker 2: because your audience does. Well, I got to tell you,
Speaker 2: I think it's real. It is. I'm absolutely convinced that
Speaker 2: when you look at what is happening with the financial situation,
Speaker 2: these fundamentals are absolutely real. As a matter of fact.
Speaker 2: Just you know for yourself what inflation has done to
Speaker 2: the purchasing power of the dollar. I don't need to
Speaker 2: tell you that. And you know that it's worse than
Speaker 2: the government says that it is. They're published inflation data
Speaker 2: is rigged as well. Birch Gold has been a particular
Speaker 2: beneficiary the MAGA adjacent endorsements by Kelly Bennon and Trump's
Speaker 2: recent FBI director Dan Bongino. Back in the news with
Speaker 2: Donald Trump Junior, I just want you to be prepared
Speaker 2: for the future. So protect your hard earned savings with gold,
Speaker 2: says Trump Junior. Again, it's just like what daddy does.
Speaker 2: You know, we got real issues with open borders. But
Speaker 2: then what he does is he poisons that issue by
Speaker 2: the way he uses ice. And he says, yeah, if
Speaker 2: you want to be prepared for the future, because daddy's
Speaker 2: killing all the small businesses, and he's killing the middle class,
Speaker 2: and he's killing the dollar. So if you know what's
Speaker 2: good for you, better get into something that Daddy doesn't
Speaker 2: have any control over. Vax Daddy. Another one of these cases,
Speaker 2: this is a woman sixty two from California, but in
Speaker 2: three hundred and fifty thousand dollars with Birch in September
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four, the same day her bars and coins
Speaker 2: were purchased, her account showed a market value of less
Speaker 2: two hundred and twenty thousand, no explanation for where the
Speaker 2: other one hundred and thirty thousand dollars went, and again,
Speaker 2: that's thirty seven percent of what she put in disappeared
Speaker 2: just like that. Key discrepancy in her account appeared to
Speaker 2: be her purchase of some Gold Liberty and Britannia fixed
Speaker 2: mintage coins from the UK Royal Mint. Each coin was
Speaker 2: engraved with the image of King Charles. Don't you want
Speaker 2: to have one of those? I wouldn't want to have
Speaker 2: a coin with his face on it. It was a
Speaker 2: quarter ounce of gold, which on the day of her
Speaker 2: purchase was worth six hundred and sixty dollars on the
Speaker 2: spot market, but Birch charged her eleven hundred dollars for
Speaker 2: each coin, again getting close to doubling the price. Salespeople
Speaker 2: claim the fixed mintage coins are safer or they can
Speaker 2: outperform standard bullion to hide or to justify their sixty
Speaker 2: five percent markups, said one person. It was because of
Speaker 2: Megan Kelly and Ben Shapiro, people I trusted who pushed
Speaker 2: me towards this dealer again. Ben Shapiro is another one
Speaker 2: we hadn't mentioned before. He did not respond to a
Speaker 2: request for comment either, So in January she asked Birch
Speaker 2: to quote her a price for the mintage coins. They
Speaker 2: offered her less than thirteen hundred and thirty dollars each.
Speaker 2: She had a gain of twenty percent, but the goal
Speaker 2: market had gone up by eighty percent in the meantime.
Speaker 2: That's why you want to get billion and you want
Speaker 2: to keep it yourself. The involvement of government designated mints
Speaker 2: which manufacture these sovereign currencies a deal and limited run
Speaker 2: precious metal collector coins, and again the collector manufactured collector
Speaker 2: markets or something I stay out of even you know,
Speaker 2: whatever it is, whether it's toys or beanie babies or
Speaker 2: dolls or whatever it is. But and I feel the
Speaker 2: same way about the coins. I tell you there's a
Speaker 2: big scam that's going to be coming up. If they've
Speaker 2: been making most of this money by selling people collectible,
Speaker 2: limited edition meant coins of people like Prince Charles who
Speaker 2: is now King Charles. If they can sell people, build
Speaker 2: the goods with that and market up by sixty five percent,
Speaker 2: imagine what they're going to do with this upcoming twenty
Speaker 2: four care gold coin with Trump's based on it. Well,
Speaker 2: these people are going to go wild selling this stuff.
Speaker 2: Maybe not now after the Iran war, but who knows.
Speaker 2: Retirees are often undaware the coins value does not directly
Speaker 2: reflect the spot price of gold. Elderly conservatives are upsold
Speaker 2: exclusively or fixed mintage coins that far exceed the value
Speaker 2: of the gold and the coin. And I guess when
Speaker 2: that happens, they get their chance to go into the
Speaker 2: cash booth and see how much they can grab. Companies
Speaker 2: also offer free coins as an incentive for positive reviews
Speaker 2: on consumer sites like Better Business Bureau. In other words,
Speaker 2: they're bribing people to give them a good rating. You know,
Speaker 2: you give me a good reading, I'll give you a
Speaker 2: quote unquote free coin. Again. Tucker Carlson said he was
Speaker 2: offered twenty million dollars up front for a goal company
Speaker 2: to front for a goal company, and he said, you know,
Speaker 2: what he saw was disgusting, but then he created his
Speaker 2: own gold company. I will trust Tucker when he comes
Speaker 2: clean on Building seven and on the COVID scam. You know,
Speaker 2: if he's going to remain silent and just say well,
Speaker 2: you and I can't really talk about Building seven. I
Speaker 2: get fired, and he still hasn't talked about it even
Speaker 2: after he got fired to criticize it. So he covered
Speaker 2: for it for a very long time. He covered relief
Speaker 2: for the COVID scam and kept quiet. So again the
Speaker 2: question is when you look at these guys, if you
Speaker 2: can't trust them with news, can you trust them with
Speaker 2: your life savings? As well, Carlson released a podcast taking
Speaker 2: aim at conservatives with millions of followers, including Lumer. Bill
Speaker 2: O'Reilly there's a new name, and Bannon teaming up with
Speaker 2: crooks in the gold industry to scam you, he said.
Speaker 2: Then Laura Lumer said, well, Tucker loves attacking those he
Speaker 2: doesn't like for doing what he himself is doing. Having
Speaker 2: a gold and precious metal sponsor. O'Reilly promotes American Hartford Gold,
Speaker 2: which faced in October twenty twenty two court case accusing
Speaker 2: it of misleading customers, with one salesman making one and
Speaker 2: a half million dollars in a four month period must
Speaker 2: be really good at grabbing those floating dollar bills in
Speaker 2: the cash prooth right. The company allegedly told employees its
Speaker 2: revenue was six hundred million two seven hundred million in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty one, and it was projected to earn eight
Speaker 2: hundred million in twenty twenty two. The case was settled.
Speaker 2: The terms are not disclosed, reports The Financial Times. In
Speaker 2: twenty twelve, gold Line agreed to pay four million dollars
Speaker 2: in customer refunds for operating a bait and switch scheme.
Speaker 2: In January twenty twenty two, you had Lear Capital, and
Speaker 2: this is a that's a familiar name for me. Guys
Speaker 2: used to listen to ser radio. You'd hear them advertise
Speaker 2: all the time, which claimed to have had handled more
Speaker 2: than three billion dollars in transactions, had to pay back
Speaker 2: six million to customers. After years of misleading consumers on
Speaker 2: coin investments, Lear Capital underwent a court supervised Chapter eleven
Speaker 2: bankruptcy reorganization which outlined a plan to resolve remaining consumer
Speaker 2: claims and implement new fee disclosure requirements. Both Goldline and
Speaker 2: Lear Gold were promoted by conservative media personality Glenn Beck,
Speaker 2: yet another name there who touted a three G system
Speaker 2: of God, guns and gold. Well. I got to say
Speaker 2: his God that he sells is even more suspect than
Speaker 2: his gold. In a series of report is titled The
Speaker 2: End of the Dollar Empire. Steve Bannon argues that government spending,
Speaker 2: along with bricks nations that includes Russian China, are trying
Speaker 2: to destroy the US dollar as the global rest currency.
Speaker 2: All that is true, folks, but that doesn't mean you know,
Speaker 2: because he then directs somebody to a gold company that
Speaker 2: has a sixty five percent markup on collectible coins, that
Speaker 2: doesn't mean that those fundamental things are not true. They
Speaker 2: are true. That's the real issue. This is why he's
Speaker 2: just like a political candidate. Just because a person identifies
Speaker 2: what the real problem is, you still have to watch
Speaker 2: what they do, not just what they have to say.
Speaker 2: That's the bottom line. Well, we're going to take a
Speaker 2: quick break after all that. I'll just say, David and
Speaker 2: I Doud Gold. I have absolutely no problem recommending Tony Rdman.
Speaker 2: I've used him even before he was a supporter of
Speaker 2: this show. I used Tony personally. That's why I used him.
Speaker 2: It's why I didn't go with somebody that's going to
Speaker 2: offer you a lot of money for us upfront to
Speaker 2: promote this stuff because I just didn't know them, so
Speaker 2: I didn't trust them. Uh, but you try the wolf
Speaker 2: Pack thing. You can uh get a feel for dealing
Speaker 2: with Tony if you haven't dealt with him before, and
Speaker 2: if you you know, uh you should keep everybody at
Speaker 2: arm's length. But try that and see how he operates.
Speaker 2: And then if you have the ability to buy physical gold,
Speaker 2: get bullioned, don't get collectible coins. We'll take a break
Speaker 2: and be right back.
Speaker 5: M M M d N.
Speaker 2: Think about the.
Speaker 1: U using free speech to free minds. It's the David
Speaker 1: Knight Show.
Speaker 7: Elvis, the Beatle, and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find
Speaker 7: them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 8: Welcome back, folks, I'm gonna read some comments here. We've
Speaker 8: got New Republic Rising eighty three says ceiling on an
Speaker 8: age for presidents is important to consider moving forward, since
Speaker 8: being old and out of touch is now an excuse
Speaker 8: for horrific inhumane violence.
Speaker 5: Yeah that's right. Yeah, can't help myself. Help, I've bombed iron,
Speaker 5: I can't get up. North American House. Hipposa is one
Speaker 5: of my maggot coworkers.
Speaker 8: Loves Trump because he gave him all that unemployment money
Speaker 8: in twenty twenty.
Speaker 6: I mean seriously, well.
Speaker 2: Now he's gonna love universal basic income isn't he. Well,
Speaker 2: I want to get back to what I had to
Speaker 2: say about how we got tripped into this by Bibi
Speaker 2: and what I think about that report that came from
Speaker 2: the New York Times. But as important as the war is,
Speaker 2: there are other things that are important in the world
Speaker 2: as well. And I think when we look at the
Speaker 2: large spectrum of being a pro life I think it's
Speaker 2: always a blind spot with conservatives in terms of you know,
Speaker 2: they'll fight for the life of a baby before birth,
Speaker 2: but they don't care when you got somebody like Trump
Speaker 2: and Nettan Yahoo going out killing people wholesale every age right,
Speaker 2: So they'll fight against abortion, and they'll fight against euthan asia,
Speaker 2: which they should do, but they turn a blind eye
Speaker 2: to war. And while we're talking about abortion, you got
Speaker 2: David Elid, remember him, the Center for Medical Progress, How
Speaker 2: he did the undercover thing. It was actually twenty fifteen,
Speaker 2: eleven years ago that stuff broke. That was very very
Speaker 2: powerful stuff where he went undercover, you know, like James
Speaker 2: O'Keeffe and got these people talking about you. Yeah, I
Speaker 2: want to I can give you whatever you want. What
Speaker 2: do you want from a baby? I can kill one
Speaker 2: and give you the baby parts. I want to get
Speaker 2: a Lamborghini. That's my aspirations. Mayber all that stuff. I
Speaker 2: mean literally said that I'm going to get a Lamborghini.
Speaker 2: And so they're talking about how they're going to cut
Speaker 2: up babies and save the parts and what they have
Speaker 2: to do when they kill the baby in order to
Speaker 2: save the parts. Well, I can't do this because that
Speaker 2: spoils it, you know. I mean, it was ghoulish. It
Speaker 2: was so damning as a matter of fact. Then they
Speaker 2: pulled out the big guns. Planned Parenthood went to the
Speaker 2: reliable go to person at the time, La La Harris,
Speaker 2: who was at that point in time the State Attorney
Speaker 2: Journal in California, and said, go after this guy. She
Speaker 2: didn't go after the people who were trafficking in baby
Speaker 2: body parts. She went after the guy who exposed it
Speaker 2: over a kind of process crime, saying you didn't properly
Speaker 2: get consent for this. And so he's been fighting this
Speaker 2: for the longest time. And it was again it's the
Speaker 2: Democrat Party and Joe Biden right at the center of
Speaker 2: all this because Lala Harris kicked this stuff off and
Speaker 2: then she ran for Senate, got into the Senate, and
Speaker 2: the person who took her place as attorney journal in
Speaker 2: California was none other than Javier Bessera. Javier Bessara was
Speaker 2: picked then as Biden's head of HHS. Lala Harris is
Speaker 2: picked as his vice president, and we saw Joe Biden
Speaker 2: go after people who were standing peacefully near abortion clinic,
Speaker 2: saying you stood too close. I'm going to swap raid
Speaker 2: your family, your homeschool family of seven kids, and I'm
Speaker 2: going to take the dad and put them in prison
Speaker 2: for a decade or two. I mean, that's how crazy
Speaker 2: the Biden Lalla Harrison, Alvierver Sarah people are. Anyway, He's
Speaker 2: been fighting this for eleven years after he published the
Speaker 2: undercover videos and La La Harris sent agents to his doorstep.
Speaker 2: He said, it started out as a day like any other,
Speaker 2: except this was nineteen eighty four. In terms of how
Speaker 2: it went down, to storm into a private citizen's home
Speaker 2: with a search warrant is outrageously out of proportion to
Speaker 2: the type of crime alleged. It's a discredit to law enforcement.
Speaker 2: It's an oppressive abuse of government power. And we saw
Speaker 2: Biden do that with a face act and with peaceful
Speaker 2: abortion protesters went in gun drawn when there's seven kids
Speaker 2: in the home. This is the hallmark of tyranny. And
Speaker 2: so we've seen this type of thing for different reasons
Speaker 2: from both of Biden and the Trump administration. Recently, legal
Speaker 2: warfare waged by the state against a private citizen for
Speaker 2: daring to expose Planned Parenthood's grizzly commodification of aborted baby parts.
Speaker 2: After and during nine years the weaponized political prosecution, putting
Speaker 2: an end to the law fair that was launched by
Speaker 2: Laala Harris as a huge victory for my investigative reporting,
Speaker 2: he said, and for the public right to know the
Speaker 2: truth about Planned parenthood sale of aborted baby parts. Now
Speaker 2: we must all work to protect families and infants from
Speaker 2: the criminal abortion industrial complex, he wrote. And if you
Speaker 2: think that Donald Trump is supportive of the First Amendment,
Speaker 2: think again. I mean, look at how many times he's
Speaker 2: gone after news organizations or comedians or whatever. He just
Speaker 2: recently because Erica Kirk was trolled by what was that guy?
Speaker 2: He's he's a black comedian. It's pretty heavy, Drew Ski.
Speaker 2: Drewsky is his name?
Speaker 5: You?
Speaker 2: And he did a thing. He's done a lot of
Speaker 2: comedies where he dresses up in white face or whatever. Right,
Speaker 2: he did a redneck guy in white face, and I
Speaker 2: actually I thought it was pretty funny.
Speaker 8: The funniest thing to me is that he goes to
Speaker 8: a NASCAR event, you know, allegedly this plays with a
Speaker 8: bunch of racist Southerners and doing something that you would
Speaker 8: think would set all these people into a frenzy if
Speaker 8: they're really racist, and you know, they all seem to
Speaker 8: be having a great time. I think it's hilarious.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, So anyway, the Trump said Erica should sue him. No,
Speaker 2: it's called satire. It's called comedy. And so again, his
Speaker 2: instincts are the same, may be over different issues, but
Speaker 2: he does not tolerate free speech, or free press or
Speaker 2: satire either, he continued. David Lyden said today the state
Speaker 2: of California agreed totally dismissed the unpressent video recording case
Speaker 2: that La La Harris brought against me nine years ago
Speaker 2: in exchange for my entering a new plea of no
Speaker 2: contest on a single charge. The agreement involves no admission
Speaker 2: of wrongdoing, no fines, no probation. The no contest plea
Speaker 2: will be entered into judgment as a misdemeanor in six
Speaker 2: to twelve months, then converted to a not guilty plea
Speaker 2: and then dismissed Center for Medical Progresses. Undercover reporting at
Speaker 2: issue in the case, however, led to a seven point
Speaker 2: eight million dollar settlement in which two companies admitted illegally
Speaker 2: selling aborted fetuses from Planned Parenthood in southern California, a
Speaker 2: settlement with disgorgement of profits from the sale of aborted
Speaker 2: fetal organs in Arizona, and the disqualification of Planned Parenthood
Speaker 2: from state and federal funding in Texas reviolating medical standards
Speaker 2: and ethics that were documented in his undercover footage. Planned
Speaker 2: Parenthood now faces a nearly two billion dollar Federal False
Speaker 2: Claims Act case. So again it is that's caused to
Speaker 2: celebrate that at least some justice has been done. More
Speaker 2: should have been done. There should have been prison sentences
Speaker 2: for these people. There's an interesting article from World magazine
Speaker 2: says Christianity is not a politician's prop and this is
Speaker 2: what we've been seeing over and over again. What is
Speaker 2: so disgusting And it reminds me of you know, Trump's
Speaker 2: closet christ that he brought out with Laura Lumer. And
Speaker 2: I can't tell you how many maga. People I've seen
Speaker 2: who just oh, this is so courageous for the president
Speaker 2: to do this, and it's very cool. He's got a
Speaker 2: purported picture of Jesus, somebody's idea of Jesus, just what
Speaker 2: up yesterday, and he's hung it on the wall and
Speaker 2: put a blue curtain in front of it. I call
Speaker 2: it his closet Jesus, even Jesus. So as they point
Speaker 2: out here's Andrew Walker, he says, mean it when you
Speaker 2: say it, or don't say it. And again, what we
Speaker 2: see from the Trump administration is really reprehensible warpete out
Speaker 2: there twisting scripture and using Christianity by name in order
Speaker 2: to baptize his Zionist murder and war campaigns that are
Speaker 2: out there when all he wants to talk about is lethality.
Speaker 2: But you also got this on the left, You've got
Speaker 2: James Tollerico, You've got Andy Basheer, who is the governor
Speaker 2: of Kentucky, regularly invoked their Christian faith to justify abortion
Speaker 2: and transgender mutilation of minors and sterilization. So at the
Speaker 2: White House, she had PAULA White who was comparing the
Speaker 2: battles that Donald Trump has had to the crucifixion of
Speaker 2: Jesus Christ. You know, Jesus was our example of overcoming
Speaker 2: all these obstacles. No, that wasn't what the death and
Speaker 2: resurrection of Christ was about. That was him paying for
Speaker 2: our sins and him being raised as validation that that
Speaker 2: was acceptable as a sacrifice. That's what it's about. He
Speaker 2: didn't die as an example, I mean. And that's the
Speaker 2: other part of it. James Tollerico out there saying, well,
Speaker 2: they you know, they've got these pastors are saying that
Speaker 2: I need to be crucified with Christ. They want to
Speaker 2: kill me. It's it's not that it's to say that
Speaker 2: you give up your priorities in your life and that
Speaker 2: you align yourself with Christ. That is what they were
Speaker 2: talking about, because obviously this guy is not aligning himself
Speaker 2: with the teachings of Christ. And but it's not the
Speaker 2: you know, following those teachings is not going to earn
Speaker 2: you away and to heaven. That was what Christ's death
Speaker 2: and resurrection was about. And so we got Paul White
Speaker 2: out there just trying to grift people from money. In
Speaker 2: comparing the battle of Trump to the death and resurrection
Speaker 2: of Jesus, look to social media on Easter Sunday to
Speaker 2: spew vulgarities completely at odds with presidential decorum. As he said, well,
Speaker 2: that was part of it. I think it is kind
Speaker 2: of interesting to see. I guess it's a lot of
Speaker 2: people who are come from a conservative Baptist It was
Speaker 2: more offensive to them that he'd use the F word
Speaker 2: than that he would threaten to destroy an entire civilization
Speaker 2: a matter of.
Speaker 6: Genocide. But the word that's a step too far right.
Speaker 2: I dare him.
Speaker 6: You should at least say please and thank you.
Speaker 2: People like when you threatened to kill an entire civilization,
Speaker 2: please reopen the strait of Hormuz, or I will kill
Speaker 2: every last one that's rank you. Thank you for your attention.
Speaker 2: The problem is not with the invocation of Christianity per se.
Speaker 2: The problem only surfaces in Christianity's mind for political purposes,
Speaker 2: at odds with the core theological substance of Christian doctrine.
Speaker 2: It's used as a prop in the hands of officials
Speaker 2: who are apt to abuse it for partisan gain. What then,
Speaker 2: is the proper use of Christianity in the wholes of power.
Speaker 2: Should we just tell people shut up, don't see anything. No,
Speaker 2: there is a way the things that you can do
Speaker 2: to do this. And you know, maybe it starts with
Speaker 2: following the teachings of Christ. Maybe it starts with not
Speaker 2: starting wars. Maybe it starts with not killing massive numbers
Speaker 2: of people. That would be a start. But in this
Speaker 2: article he points out three ways Christianity can be responsibly invoked.
Speaker 2: He said, first of all, is the historical reality to
Speaker 2: rightly remind citizens, especially your children, when you teach them
Speaker 2: that America owes a debt to Christian thought, from the
Speaker 2: total moral imagination that underpins the Decoration of Independence to
Speaker 2: the great awakenings that shaped America's moral conscience from the
Speaker 2: nineteenth century to the present. Then secondly, you can talk
Speaker 2: about the providential reality. Politicians will be right to communicate
Speaker 2: that all of history, including America, is unfolding under the
Speaker 2: watchful gaze of an almighty God. That's right, and again
Speaker 2: that God is not going to be mocked by somebody
Speaker 2: like Trump or Warpete or Tallarico. A third is the
Speaker 2: moral matter. Christianity can and should provide the moral ballast
Speaker 2: that anchors American civic and moral ideals. We have to
Speaker 2: have an objective basis of morality. It is necessary before
Speaker 2: we can have human rights. How do we say that
Speaker 2: something is wrong when we don't have a basis of
Speaker 2: morality by whose standard is it wrong? Right? Why is
Speaker 2: it wrong to kill somebody and steal their land? Well,
Speaker 2: because we have a moral basis for that that's based
Speaker 2: in the Bible. The invocation of Christianity in public life
Speaker 2: does not require that our politicians attend seminary, especially not
Speaker 2: the seminary that Talla Rico is attending, or demonstrate exegetical mastery.
Speaker 2: If politicians can't wield Christianity responsible in their comments, it
Speaker 2: would be better for them to shut up and not
Speaker 2: talk about it at all. Actually, Trump should talk about
Speaker 2: his God money, I think. Well, Tucker Carlson had a
Speaker 2: lot to say about Franklin Graham going to the White
Speaker 2: House over the Easter weekend and praying that essentially confusing
Speaker 2: the Persian people with the Amalek people. Tucker quote was
Speaker 2: he said, the fealty to Israel prevents Franklin Graham from
Speaker 2: preaching Christianity. I think that's part of it. But I
Speaker 2: think he's like his father, Billy Graham. He just wants
Speaker 2: to be close to power, and he's willing to say
Speaker 2: anything to get close to power. You know, you look
Speaker 2: at whether or not Billy Graham was giving the gospel.
Speaker 2: There's that famous clip where he's with I think it's
Speaker 2: Bishop Sheen or something, and the two of them were saying, yeah,
Speaker 2: there's a wideness in God's mercy. Christ is not the
Speaker 2: only way. Well, there is a wideness in God's mercy
Speaker 2: that it doesn't matter what you have done previously, it
Speaker 2: doesn't keep you from his mercy. You're ethnic, a religious identity,
Speaker 2: your nationality, whether you're male or female, none of that
Speaker 2: is in the way. There's a wideness to God's mercy
Speaker 2: in that, But there's not a wideness in God's mercy
Speaker 2: that there is a way to God other than through Christ.
Speaker 2: Jesus said, I am the Way, the Truth, the Life.
Speaker 2: No one comes to the Father but by Me. And
Speaker 2: so it made it very clear that there's one way
Speaker 2: to come. And it's not that there's all these different paths.
Speaker 2: You know, that's the broad highways that lead to Hell,
Speaker 2: not to God. And so as he's talking about this,
Speaker 2: Franklin Graham said in his prayer he referenced the story
Speaker 2: of Esther, the Book of Esther, that where the Jewish
Speaker 2: people were nearly wiped out by Hayman, who was a ameleek,
Speaker 2: and he was, but he was living in the you know,
Speaker 2: the Persian court there at the time. And actually, I
Speaker 2: guess you could say the Persians were also used, not
Speaker 2: just Esther, but the Persians were also a part of
Speaker 2: God's plan to keep them from being wiped out. If
Speaker 2: you go back and you look at the Persians, you
Speaker 2: had Persian kings like Darius, who after they defeated the Babylonians,
Speaker 2: the babble Onions took they choose into captivity. After the
Speaker 2: Persians defeated them, Darius, the Persian king, ordered the temple
Speaker 2: to be rebuilt in Jerusalem, to be rebuilted it and
Speaker 2: happened in his time. But when Cyrus comes in, you've
Speaker 2: got the Book of Isaiah's shown him and he's mentioned
Speaker 2: by name in that, and as the Bible tells us,
Speaker 2: that was something that had a big effect on him.
Speaker 2: You can imagine if you take over a kingdom and
Speaker 2: you're taken and taken in the back room and you're
Speaker 2: showing an ancient scroll they dusted off and pull it
Speaker 2: off the shelf and unroll it and there's your name,
Speaker 2: and so anyway, he gave them the money to do that.
Speaker 8: And the thing is, I think you could pull one
Speaker 8: of our politicians aside and show them something like that,
Speaker 8: and it wouldn't change them in the slightest I don't
Speaker 8: think it would affect them.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right. Well, you know what Franklin said.
Speaker 2: He said in his prayer, He said, Father, you told
Speaker 2: us in the Book of Esther, the Persians, the Iranians
Speaker 2: were wanting to kill every Jew. And again, this is different. Right.
Speaker 2: It may be a Persian civilization, but the Iranians and
Speaker 2: the Iatolas are not the same as these Persian kings,
Speaker 2: just like the people who are ruling Israel today. The
Speaker 2: Lekud party is not the Israel of King David or
Speaker 2: King Solomon, or certainly not the Israel of Samuel. So
Speaker 2: they're wanting to kill every Jew, and they want to
Speaker 2: do it in one day. But you raised up Esther
Speaker 2: to save the Jewish people. Father, we thank you today.
Speaker 2: The Iranians, the wicked regime of their government wants to
Speaker 2: kill every Jew and destroy them with atomic fire. But
Speaker 2: you have raised up Trump. You've raised him up for
Speaker 2: such a time as this. We pray that you will
Speaker 2: give him victory. This is the best example of how politicians,
Speaker 2: even a politician that's not running off as a politician
Speaker 2: like Franklin Graham, will abuse and twist this for his
Speaker 2: own political agenda and not focus on the morality of
Speaker 2: the war. Carlson criticized Graham for not requesting wisdom and
Speaker 2: restraint but appearing to endorse the murder of civilians, which
Speaker 2: is a war crime, but more importantly, it is a
Speaker 2: moral crime. As Carlson said, you can't kill people who
Speaker 2: have committed no crime, and you don't have a justified
Speaker 2: war if you are the aggressor. It's just that simple.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 2: I don't know if it's true or not, but I
Speaker 2: actually saw a headline article saying that the Pope has
Speaker 2: canceled his trip coming back to America because evidently somebody
Speaker 2: in the Trump administration threatened to made the Vatican. I
Speaker 2: don't know with anybody else that would not have any
Speaker 2: credibility at all, And I don't know if this is true,
Speaker 2: but that does seem to have some plausibility with the
Speaker 2: Trump crew. I mean, if you've threatened to invade Greenland
Speaker 2: and everybody else and you do it with Venezuela, I
Speaker 2: don't know. Are they getting ready to go to the vaticannects.
Speaker 2: They take over all those art treasures and put them
Speaker 2: in his buildings places humans are already in contact with aliens,
Speaker 2: says Tim Burchett of Tennessee. This is a guy who's
Speaker 2: been pushing the UF hoax quite a bit lately, and
Speaker 2: the stuff that he's saying is truly, truly sensational, and
Speaker 2: I think it is anti Christian. Quite frankly, he says,
Speaker 2: they gave I talked to a lot of people. You know,
Speaker 2: he got all these people coming by, They got uniforms,
Speaker 2: they got titles, and so this is an example of
Speaker 2: what is wrong with our government right when you've got
Speaker 2: gullible people who don't have any foundation that is in
Speaker 2: anything that is real, and they are blown around by
Speaker 2: every wind that comes to them. Especially with somebody in
Speaker 2: an official capacity, it comes to tell him something. I
Speaker 2: had this issue with Jake Tapper when he reported that
Speaker 2: Sam Hyde had had been caught, and I think it
Speaker 2: was like the Ghost of Kiev or something where they
Speaker 2: of course, Sam Hyde is a satirical comedian who always
Speaker 2: he or his followers will put up that he was
Speaker 2: the mass shooter with every mass shooting or whatever.
Speaker 8: Yeah, his followers routinely anytime this happens, they tweet at
Speaker 8: media organizations the shooter's been identified and it's a picture
Speaker 8: of him either photos.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And so I was laughing about that, and I
Speaker 2: tweeted that, you know, the the what I was saying
Speaker 2: in terms of I can't believe these people fell for it.
Speaker 2: I tweeted that at Jake Tapper and said, you know,
Speaker 2: look at this. He they fell for this, They reported it.
Speaker 2: And he came back at me and he said, well,
Speaker 2: we were told that by a US congressman. I said,
Speaker 2: so that's your stand. Whatever US congressman tells you is
Speaker 2: the gospel truth. You don't investigate that, which is why,
Speaker 2: which brings us back to Tim Burchett. This is a
Speaker 2: US congressman telling you this. Well, who told him that,
Speaker 2: you know, is this is a satire? Is a is
Speaker 2: he being misled? He said, they gave specifics, they gave addresses,
Speaker 2: they gave times, they gave dates, and people who were
Speaker 2: at the meeting. And this went all the way up
Speaker 2: to the executive branch of previous presidents, not the current president,
Speaker 2: of course, because we've got to not criticize Trump. That
Speaker 2: tells you something right there, doesn't it. And so he's
Speaker 2: going to cheerlead for Trump. But you got to understand that.
Speaker 2: You know he's going to believe this stuff because it
Speaker 2: came from some official or whatever. And now a lot
Speaker 2: of people are going to say, well, I was told
Speaker 2: by a congressman that humans are already in contact with
Speaker 2: space aliens. Burchett also said he doesn't believe extraterrestrial beings
Speaker 2: pose a threat to humanity. He said, I don't think
Speaker 2: we're in danger of this. I mean, these things exist
Speaker 2: as I think they do, and they could have destroyed
Speaker 2: us with a blink of an eye. This is a
Speaker 2: thoroughly pagan worldview that Tim Burchett is putting out. What
Speaker 2: happened to Tennessee. I thought we used to be the
Speaker 2: Bible Belt. How do we get a congressman like this
Speaker 2: that has a totally pagan view of the world. Look,
Speaker 2: who can destroy you in the blink of an eye?
Speaker 2: As God? And we have to not, as Christians, run
Speaker 2: away from the supernatural. If you believe that God created
Speaker 2: heavens and the earth, which is what it says at
Speaker 2: the very first verse of the Bible, if you believe
Speaker 2: that then we're talking about something someone who is above nature.
Speaker 2: That's what supernatural means. It means above and outside of nature.
Speaker 2: God is not created, he's not a part of nature.
Speaker 2: He's above and outside of nature. Therefore, he and many
Speaker 2: other beings that He has created and told us about
Speaker 2: in the Bible. If you have a biblical world of course,
Speaker 2: you're going to look at this from a biblical worldview.
Speaker 2: You're going to see these individuals as demons, right, And
Speaker 2: so he doesn't have that worldview. He thinks that we've
Speaker 2: got some super aliens that could destroy us in the
Speaker 2: blink of an eye, and so since they haven't done it,
Speaker 2: they've got to be benevolent. Don't believe that for a minute.
Speaker 2: This is the major distraction. Why is it that they
Speaker 2: always get Trump in when they want to push some
Speaker 2: major deception, some great deception. That's what they get Trump for.
Speaker 2: He is the four D chess master, and those four d's,
Speaker 2: I guess are deception, deception, deception, deception. And this is
Speaker 2: going to be the next one. Here the lawmaker who
Speaker 2: warned they're releasing classified information about alleged alien encounters could
Speaker 2: shake public confidence, public confidence, and what could shake my
Speaker 2: public confidence, shake the public's confidence and ourselves that we
Speaker 2: are the masters of our fate, the captains of our destiny,
Speaker 2: or whatever. The Invictus thing was it something like that,
Speaker 2: our confidence in our invincibility as Americans. Well, if Ron
Speaker 2: hasn't done that, well what are we supposed to have confidence? Then?
Speaker 2: I thought it was in God that we trust as Americans.
Speaker 2: If you trust in God, if you believe God's word,
Speaker 2: you believe the Bible is God's word, He's not going
Speaker 2: to shake your confidence any of this stuff. You're not
Speaker 2: going to believe it in the first place. He says,
Speaker 2: I've been briefed by just about every alphabet agency. No,
Speaker 2: tim You've been lied to by just about every alphabet agency.
Speaker 2: That's all they do is lie, he said. If they
Speaker 2: released what I've seen, you'd be up at night worrying
Speaker 2: about it. Yeah, well, you know he's up at night
Speaker 2: worrying about this.
Speaker 8: There's a famous clip from the children's TV show Arthur
Speaker 8: where one of the characters just sitting there and goes,
Speaker 8: would someone really do that? Just go on the internet
Speaker 8: and tell lies? And people routinely use that when someone
Speaker 8: falls for an obvious kind of like yes, meme right,
Speaker 8: someone would definitely just spread lies.
Speaker 6: People do it all the time. Some people do it
Speaker 6: for no financial gain and no purpose.
Speaker 8: These people do it for billions or trillions of dollars
Speaker 8: of financial gain.
Speaker 6: And you know, evil machiavellian purposes.
Speaker 2: That's right. Well, you know, so what do we trust? Right?
Speaker 2: It's interesting because at the same time this is coming up,
Speaker 2: we got ken Ham from Answers in Genesis who is
Speaker 2: taking aim at Eric Metaxas and Hugh Ross has said
Speaker 2: they put man's word above God's word and that has
Speaker 2: been really the mission of ken Ham and Answers in Genesis.
Speaker 2: And I would highly recommend you know, if you have
Speaker 2: a such when you look at the world, it's pretty
Speaker 2: clear to everybody that there is there has to be
Speaker 2: an intelligence that created all this. It fits together right.
Speaker 2: Day by day the heavens declared the glory of God,
Speaker 2: and day by day and night by night they utter speech.
Speaker 2: We can see this. Everybody can see that there is
Speaker 2: a creator God, right, there's no question about that. The
Speaker 2: question is has he spoken to us? And did he
Speaker 2: speak to us through the Bible? And that's what ken
Speaker 2: Ham's Answers and Genesis is about. And if you discount that,
Speaker 2: then where do you get your moral standard? That is
Speaker 2: the fundamental issue. And so you know when people say, well,
Speaker 2: you know, just like Ben Shapiro asked if he believes
Speaker 2: in the partying of the reds, say yeah, I don't
Speaker 2: believe in that. You know, he doesn't believe in miracles. Well,
Speaker 2: you don't believe in miracles. You don't believe that God
Speaker 2: created the heavens, the earth. You don't believe that Christ
Speaker 2: died for your sins and rose from the grave. You
Speaker 2: are without hope in this world. I hope you art
Speaker 2: have a good day.
Speaker 8: And quickly before we go, I want to say thank
Speaker 8: you to for love of the road, he says, speaking
Speaker 8: of abortion. Randall Terry and Terrissa Bucovinak got married on
Speaker 8: March thirtieth. You shared her video when she ran for president.
Speaker 8: She was with a group that found the one hundred
Speaker 8: and fifteen beetle remains in DC back in twenty twenty two. Yeah,
Speaker 8: n and thank you real Jason Barker, Yes, thank you.
Speaker 8: That is very generous.
Speaker 2: He has done a great job of finding a lot
Speaker 2: of archive quips. We're going to start playing some of
Speaker 2: the ones that Ryan has found for us. I appreciate that.
Speaker 6: Ryan, thanks yeah, and thank you. Jason.
Speaker 8: You can find him on Nights of the Storm and
Speaker 8: go to Knights Ofthstorm dot com. He says, let's all
Speaker 8: say a prayer for Tony and his father. Yes, just
Speaker 8: a reminder, be praying for Tony and for his dad.
Speaker 8: His dad is in the hospital right now.
Speaker 2: Yeah. We don't know what the situation is, but we
Speaker 2: don't need to know. God knows what that is. And
Speaker 2: so yeah, please keep Tony and his father and your prayers.
Speaker 2: Thank you, have a good day. The common man, they
Speaker 2: created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created
Speaker 2: common Past to track and control us. They're Commons project
Speaker 2: to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 2: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 2: each of us has worth and dignity created in the
Speaker 2: image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 2: everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 1: It's time to turn that around.
Speaker 2: And expose what they want to hide. Please share the
Speaker 2: information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 2: Thank you for listening, thank you for sharing. If you
Speaker 2: can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
Speaker 2: D Davidnightshow dot com