Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 3: As the clock strikes thirteen, It's Friday, the eighth of November.
Speaker 3: Here of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're
Speaker 3: going to be taking a look at tokenization. Is this
Speaker 3: the back door the de facto CBDC? I think it is,
Speaker 3: And we'll see how it folds in with Elon Musk,
Speaker 3: And of course Elon Musk is folding in with President Trump,
Speaker 3: the king of crony capitalism. It's not going to be
Speaker 3: the president of crony capitalism. We'll have Eric Peters on
Speaker 3: in the third hour. That was the first time Eric
Speaker 3: and I talked. We talked about Elon Musk and his
Speaker 3: crony capitalism. Looks like he's got a very effective strategy.
Speaker 3: But we're going to begin today with the election of
Speaker 3: a salon owner who stood against the lockdown. A very
Speaker 3: important story and a story that shows how Fauci and
Speaker 3: all the rest of these people flipped their narrative over
Speaker 3: about a five six year period. Six years. We'll be
Speaker 3: right back. Well, I've talked to people who have stood
Speaker 3: against the lockdown tyranny of four years ago. Time for
Speaker 3: us to remember that, because as we look at the
Speaker 3: Maha people, Maha, I see that. I always think, maybe
Speaker 3: you remember it the movie Hawaii based on James Mitchener,
Speaker 3: a very anti Christian movie, but had Maxwaan Sidao as
Speaker 3: a missionary, Julie Andrews as his wife, and there was
Speaker 3: this big fat Hawaiian queen. You go, mah, That's what
Speaker 3: I think of when I see this laughable joke of
Speaker 3: make America healthy again. I am so sick and tired
Speaker 3: of Maga Maha and all these variables. Is like, but
Speaker 3: you know, it is the most important election of our lifetime.
Speaker 3: Let's not forget that. So we gotta take it seriously.
Speaker 3: Calm down. But yeah, when we look at this and
Speaker 3: you look at the fact that Robert Redfield, all it
Speaker 3: took was just this little bit of flattery from RK
Speaker 3: to RFK Junior. Rkjue. Oh, I talked a lot about
Speaker 3: Robert Redfield in my book. I guess maybe I was wrong,
Speaker 3: as he said some nice things about me. Then he's
Speaker 3: out there pushing bird flow. So let's go back and
Speaker 3: take a look at the pandemic before we had COVID
Speaker 3: and how people reacted to that. Ebola when Ebola came
Speaker 3: to town, and just to remind you, it was a
Speaker 3: situation where Obama was president and it was twenty fourteen
Speaker 3: and you had a illegal immigrant. I think he was illegal,
Speaker 3: but he was African, so he's an immigrant of color
Speaker 3: and he comes into the country with Ebola, and the
Speaker 3: local official there in Dallas where he got sick, did
Speaker 3: everything he could, everything he could to assuage the fear
Speaker 3: of people. That's not anything to worry about. It's fine.
Speaker 3: They had Obama come down, and Fauci came down, Francis
Speaker 3: Collins came down, They did meetings that they televised, they
Speaker 3: did press conferences till there. It's fine, it's okay, it's okay.
Speaker 3: The chief official there in county Dallas County was a
Speaker 3: guy named Clay Jenkins, who's got the title of judge.
Speaker 3: That's what they called the chief official in the county
Speaker 3: in Texas. I don't know why they do that. It's
Speaker 3: confusing because he's not a judge in a courtroom. And
Speaker 3: this story does have a judge in a courtroom as well.
Speaker 3: So I've got two people, both of them are the
Speaker 3: title of judge and they're doing completely different offices. Of course,
Speaker 3: in Tennessee you have the chief official in the counties
Speaker 3: called the mayor of the county, which is not the
Speaker 3: same as the mayor of a city, you know, so
Speaker 3: the same type of thing. It's like we seem to
Speaker 3: not be able to come up with new words to
Speaker 3: describe them. I've got a lot of words to describe
Speaker 3: people like this, but we're not allowed to put those
Speaker 3: in his official titles. It gets you banned on social
Speaker 3: media if you use those kinds of words. So he
Speaker 3: was doing everything he can because you see, if Ebola
Speaker 3: comes into the country with an illegal immigrant or a migrant,
Speaker 3: whether he's illegal, a migrant of color, now it's got
Speaker 3: this disease, has got civil rights, and we need to
Speaker 3: treat it with kid gloves. And so here he is,
Speaker 3: as Ebola is coming in, and we'll show you how
Speaker 3: his tune changed when it was COVID.
Speaker 4: Forty four of the forty eight people, why were original
Speaker 4: contacts for Eric Duncan, Because they've now rolled off of
Speaker 4: our contact list and they're going to be rejoining society and.
Speaker 3: Into no problem.
Speaker 1: Important moment for Dallas.
Speaker 4: We need to welcome these children back into school, these
Speaker 4: families back in the community and do what we're good at,
Speaker 4: which is treating other people where we ourselves would want
Speaker 4: to be treated.
Speaker 5: They're surprise and anguish in the US after revelations at
Speaker 5: a hospital worker in Texas has caught the ebola virus
Speaker 5: only days after Spain found herself in a similar situation.
Speaker 5: A worker who looked after a librarian man who later died,
Speaker 5: has also now tested positive. Officials in Dallas are defending
Speaker 5: their procedures, but can't yet explain how a new infection
Speaker 5: was possible in a hospital.
Speaker 4: We expected that something that it was possible that a
Speaker 4: second person could contract the virus.
Speaker 3: Actually, contingency planning a third person did in the hospital.
Speaker 4: Put into a place in the hospital.
Speaker 3: Will oh well, the way that the.
Speaker 4: Healthcare worker followed those contingency plans.
Speaker 5: The hospital says it's still investigating.
Speaker 1: Two or three questions for doctor. We're still confident that
Speaker 1: the precautions that we have in place will protect our
Speaker 1: healthcare workers.
Speaker 3: We don't. And then a second one got sick, So
Speaker 3: you have this very serious disease. Actually he died. This
Speaker 3: is not like the COVID pandemic, where nobody was dying
Speaker 3: and we declared a global pandemic. I think, what was it,
Speaker 3: Gerald Slunty's thing. You know, five people alleged to have
Speaker 3: died from COVID or something in China. You know, one
Speaker 3: and a half billions safe. It's not deadly, but you know,
Speaker 3: the bowl of stuff can be very serious. Whatever it is,
Speaker 3: you die bleeding out of every orifice. Just amazing. That's
Speaker 3: what Trump said about Megan Kelly that one time. But
Speaker 3: she didn't she didn't have a BOLLA. So uh so,
Speaker 3: he he did everything he could. I mean, he did
Speaker 3: everything but go in and lick the walls where this
Speaker 3: guy was living. You know, I said, we're gonna forty
Speaker 3: eight people we think have been in contact with him,
Speaker 3: watching him for a couple of days. But you know,
Speaker 3: you don't have to worry about this, he said. At
Speaker 3: the time, we got football games that are coming up.
Speaker 3: We got Houston and Dallas playing an NFL game. Just go,
Speaker 3: he said, we got X number of hospitals, and we
Speaker 3: got X number of doctors and nurses and medical staff
Speaker 3: and Dallas. We're fine. You're fine. Don't worry about any
Speaker 3: of this stuff. And so at the time, Fauci, who
Speaker 3: was not that well known, came to town federal health
Speaker 3: official that was him says, mandatory quarantines are not helping
Speaker 3: the bull of fight. Whoa how is that mandatory quarantines
Speaker 3: didn't help? Did they have people wearing you know, makeshift
Speaker 3: masks and you know bandannas and stuff like that. Did
Speaker 3: they have people walking and one direction in the grocery
Speaker 3: store and all this other kind of simon says nonsense.
Speaker 3: Fauci said that he doesn't recommend a twenty one day
Speaker 3: quarantine for returning high risk travelers like those institute this
Speaker 3: week in Illinois, New York, and New Jersey because they
Speaker 3: discouraged volunteers. So we got at the time, the controversy
Speaker 3: was that you had doctors and nurses who were medical
Speaker 3: staff there were going to Africa treating people in Africa
Speaker 3: that had this disease, and they were getting sick themselves,
Speaker 3: some of them died, some of them were being brought
Speaker 3: back to hospitals in the US, and people are very
Speaker 3: concerned that this is going to spread somehow that was contagious. Illinois,
Speaker 3: New York, New Jersey said We're going to put people
Speaker 3: in quarantine. He says, well, no, if we do that,
Speaker 3: it's going to scare people and they won't go help
Speaker 3: people in Africa, said Fauci. So that's the most important thing.
Speaker 3: We want doctors to go to Africa. We want Africans
Speaker 3: to come to America. So let's not stop it travel
Speaker 3: at all. He said that active self monitoring can be
Speaker 3: as effective as quarantining. He said, to Bola spread through
Speaker 3: direct contact with bodily fluids, and which is exactly what
Speaker 3: medical staff are doing. That's why people said, well, if
Speaker 3: you're going there to help people medically, maybe we should
Speaker 3: have you in quarantine before you come back. But the
Speaker 3: person who was on the other side speaking out quite
Speaker 3: a bit was New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. He defended
Speaker 3: his state's quarantine policy following Fauci's criticism. He said, he
Speaker 3: thinks that the CDC will eventually come around to our
Speaker 3: point of view. Yeah, they did. They locked everybody down
Speaker 3: even when there wasn't a disease like this. Christy has
Speaker 3: also been criticized by the ASLU, which remained completely and
Speaker 3: strangely silent as everything was being locked down in twenty twenty.
Speaker 3: Isn't that interesting? ASILU boy, you can never depend on
Speaker 3: them to defend liberty. Ever, ever, they've always got a
Speaker 3: political agenda there. It's very subversive organization. They won't when
Speaker 3: we were working as a third party. They would never
Speaker 3: defend free speech, ballot access debates, any of this kind
Speaker 3: of stuff. But they would defend Nazis marching in Skokie, Illinois,
Speaker 3: which is mostly Jewish, because they wanted a virtue signal
Speaker 3: about that. And so here they are saying that Christy
Speaker 3: should not be quarantining a nurse who tested negative for ebola.
Speaker 3: They said, serious constitutional concerns about the state abusing its powers. Well,
Speaker 3: I agree with that at the time, but then they
Speaker 3: completely forgot about it when COVID came around. You know,
Speaker 3: they were right then, and then when it went everywhere,
Speaker 3: they just ignored it. Christy said, I don't believe when
Speaker 3: you're dealing with something as serious as this, so we
Speaker 3: can count on a voluntary system if anything else. The
Speaker 3: government's job is to protect the safety and the health
Speaker 3: of our citizens. But then when COVID came, this judge
Speaker 3: Clay Jenkins in Dallas, and he still, amazingly enough, he
Speaker 3: is still judged. Publicans tried to get him out because
Speaker 3: of his heavy handedness, and I'm going to show you
Speaker 3: right now, but when COVID came to town. Instead of
Speaker 3: Ebola coming to town, it was a different story.
Speaker 6: Dallas County Commissioner JJ Koch filed a lawsuit and temporary
Speaker 6: restraining order against Judge Clay Jenkins. He also called for
Speaker 6: his removal from office. It comes almost a week after
Speaker 6: Coach was removed from a city council meeting for refusing
Speaker 6: to wear a mask at the request of Jenkins. In
Speaker 6: the lawsuit, Coach says Jenkins is issuing illegal orders and
Speaker 6: misusing the power of his position to prevent fellow commissioners
Speaker 6: from participating when he knows that his rules are illegal.
Speaker 7: Tonight, Dallas County ready to enforce an executive order requiring
Speaker 7: non essential businesses to close. They zeroed in on hobby
Speaker 7: lobby stores tonight, where Andrea Lucia in fact found sheriff's
Speaker 7: deputies delivering a warning directly at he stores.
Speaker 8: Doors were scheduled to stay open late into the evening,
Speaker 8: that is, before law enforcement arrived with a letter from
Speaker 8: the county judge accusing it of operating against his orders.
Speaker 8: It warned the store to shut down his orders are
Speaker 8: not law or face legal action. Business at the hobby
Speaker 8: lobby on Dallas's Preston Avenue halted abruptly. I guess the
Speaker 8: manager came on the intercom and immediately told everyone to
Speaker 8: stop shopping, put their items down, and to leave the
Speaker 8: store immediately. Libya van Buren walked away from a full
Speaker 8: shopping cart. Can we at least check out? Can I
Speaker 8: buy one thing? They're like, nope, can't buy anything, Just
Speaker 8: have to leave yet.
Speaker 3: No, she's not wearing a mask.
Speaker 8: Reporters, not Dallas Kunny, Judge Claychon.
Speaker 3: None of these cops are wearing a mask. Not six
Speaker 3: feet apart my name.
Speaker 4: If a hobby lobby and you work at hobby lobby, particularly,
Speaker 4: you go ahead and lock up and leave as soon
Speaker 4: as possible.
Speaker 8: Why we were there just downfter what law?
Speaker 3: Look at this? Nobody's wearing a mask.
Speaker 8: Pulled up and posted the cease and assist letter at
Speaker 8: the door. A hobby lobby in Garland was still open
Speaker 8: when deputies arrived there, handed the letter to the manager
Speaker 8: and watched to make sure it's shut down. Signs posted
Speaker 8: at the stores claim they are an essential business.
Speaker 3: The rest they tried to comply with tyranny.
Speaker 8: If they sell materials you can use to make your
Speaker 8: own masks, as well as educational office and small business supplies.
Speaker 8: But Judge Jenkins, who issued the county's emergency order, says
Speaker 8: there's no reason a craft store should be open.
Speaker 3: He's decided.
Speaker 4: Hes to the businesses that are following this order.
Speaker 3: Why tian does that make your blood boil? It should
Speaker 3: It's going to happen again, and it's going to happen
Speaker 3: because we're going to go to sleep. Trump's in charge.
Speaker 3: We've reached nirvana. America has been saved. We've got Trump
Speaker 3: and Musk. These billionaires are going to rob us blind,
Speaker 3: but we've been saved. H Well, all that stuff was happening.
Speaker 3: Trump was showering money on the state governors, who was
Speaker 3: showering money on the states, and it was trickling down,
Speaker 3: not trickle down prosperity, trickle down tyranny. Yeah, the buck.
Speaker 3: The orders began with Trump and they were implemented with
Speaker 3: all of that, and he released the money. Well, that
Speaker 3: makes my blood boil to see all that stuff. And
Speaker 3: you know that you can't comply with tyranny, right, nobody
Speaker 3: ever complied their way out of tyranny and put signs up.
Speaker 3: We are an essential business. You know, people can use
Speaker 3: our craft stuff to make their own masks, because what
Speaker 3: is a mask? We don't know what a mask is.
Speaker 3: We don't know what a woman is. We don't know
Speaker 3: what a baby is. We don't know what an abortion is.
Speaker 3: We don't know anything anymore. Right, that's where they want us.
Speaker 3: What is a mask? It could be anything. I saw
Speaker 3: a picture that was put up with Whitney Webb got
Speaker 3: into back and forth with Bert Weinstein, you know, because he's, oh,
Speaker 3: we got trump back, and it's like you pathetic, you know,
Speaker 3: she said, essentially paraphrasing. But he pushes back on it,
Speaker 3: and she puts a picture up that he should have
Speaker 3: put it in the She puts a picture up that
Speaker 3: he put up of himself where he's doing some interview
Speaker 3: and he's got like a red writer be begun a
Speaker 3: special bandana mask. You know, it's going to protect you
Speaker 3: from the bad guys in the bag viruses that are
Speaker 3: out there. And he's got goggles on and he's got
Speaker 3: the mask like up underneath the goggles. The most ridiculous,
Speaker 3: absurd thing I've ever seen in my life. This guy
Speaker 3: is some kind of a medical person or something like that.
Speaker 3: Walk away from people like that as I said, if
Speaker 3: I go somewhere, whether it's a doctor or nurse wearing
Speaker 3: a mask, I go the other direction. I don't want
Speaker 3: to have somebody that blazingly ignorant doing any medical stuff
Speaker 3: around me. And I don't want to listen to Burt Weinstein.
Speaker 3: If he's that stupid that he would put that up,
Speaker 3: that's even dumber than his political decision. But when you
Speaker 3: look at what they were trying to do and think
Speaker 3: about that, it's a pandemic, this horrible panda where you
Speaker 3: can make your own mask. There's no specifications on it.
Speaker 3: What utter nonsense, But it is infuriating. And the point
Speaker 3: is is that this guy, Dallas Jenkins, when Ebola was
Speaker 3: there and you had the guy who had it died,
Speaker 3: he gave it to two hospital workers who were wearing
Speaker 3: protective clothing and all the rest of stuff. Somehow they
Speaker 3: got sick and they nearly died in the hospital. Fortunately
Speaker 3: they didn't. But Clay Jenkins was telling me, it's all fine,
Speaker 3: we go to send the kids back to school. You
Speaker 3: treat them like you would you want to be treated yourself.
Speaker 3: And his dog, they said that they came to him.
Speaker 3: They said, well, you know when this happened in Spain.
Speaker 3: The person that got sick and died had a dog
Speaker 3: that put the dog down. Well, this is not Spain.
Speaker 3: I'm going to personally take care of that dog and
Speaker 3: I'm personally driving this guy to the hospital and all
Speaker 3: the rest of this stuff. I mean, he did everything
Speaker 3: he could to assuage fear, and then when COVID came,
Speaker 3: he did everything he could to push fear, irrational fear
Speaker 3: about everything. And so it's kind of interesting going back
Speaker 3: to twenty twenty, this article about what was happening. One
Speaker 3: person defied him and she went to jail. And I
Speaker 3: had an interview that I did with somebody who defied
Speaker 3: Tim Waltz in Minnesota, and he's already fading from memory.
Speaker 3: Tim Kane, Tim Wallace is it. But that's a good thing.
Speaker 3: But he locked up a shop on a restaurant or
Speaker 3: a shop owner. Forget what her business was now had
Speaker 3: it up for quite some time, depended on Twitter, but
Speaker 3: she didn't get the national attention that Shelley Luther. Does
Speaker 3: that sound familiar? Had a salon there in Dallas, and
Speaker 3: that guy, Clay Jenkins went to war against her. After
Speaker 3: Shelley Luther was jailed for opening her salon and blatant
Speaker 3: defiance of emergency orders. Top Texas Republicans and all three
Speaker 3: branches of government scrambled to ensure her release. The article
Speaker 3: is how a Dallas salon owner changed Texas's reopening debate.
Speaker 3: You see, everybody was fed up with this. Everybody knew
Speaker 3: it was fiction and nonsense. But you've gotta have somebody
Speaker 3: who stands up and does something about it, right. And
Speaker 3: then in her particular case, there were other people who
Speaker 3: stood there with her. She wasn't just standing by herself,
Speaker 3: you know, the lady who stood by herself and tried
Speaker 3: to organize things in Minnesota, and there were a couple
Speaker 3: hundred businesses in Minnesota said we're going to not do this,
Speaker 3: We're not going to shut down. So like, all right, good,
Speaker 3: we hang together, we can do this. And at the
Speaker 3: last minute they all chickened out, and there was only
Speaker 3: about a handful of businesses that did it. And then
Speaker 3: the governor sent a threatening letter to them or some official,
Speaker 3: and then everybody but the lady that I interviewed back down.
Speaker 3: She would not back down. She stood alone. Now, Shelley
Speaker 3: Luther was not standing alone for very long. Other people
Speaker 3: got involved, and there had been some other salon owners
Speaker 3: in Laredo, Hispanic salon owners. Then they did not get
Speaker 3: attention until she, Shelley Luther, got large and with all
Speaker 3: of this stuff, and then she made common cause with
Speaker 3: them as well. By April twenty seventh, Remember this all
Speaker 3: began the middle of March, so we're now six weeks
Speaker 3: into it. When Governor Abbot announced that hair salons and
Speaker 3: barbershops would have to remain closed after six weeks, the
Speaker 3: Republican Governor Shelley Luther's Salon Ala Mode is what she
Speaker 3: called it, Salon Ala Mode had long since opened for business.
Speaker 3: Her stylus trimmed and chatted as Abbot said that restaurants
Speaker 3: could partially reopen, but not salons, where he said the
Speaker 3: risk of spreading COVID nineteen eighty four was higher because
Speaker 3: of close quarters. He reminded the news cameras that violators
Speaker 3: faced a one thousand dollars fine and up to one
Speaker 3: hundred and eighty days in jail. Six months Luther knew
Speaker 3: that she was operating in blatant defiance of emergency orders
Speaker 3: from the state and county. She had already torn up
Speaker 3: a cease and desist letter from local authorities, winning loud
Speaker 3: cheers on stage at an Open Texas rally in Frisco.
Speaker 3: But when the governor's team reached out to her that week,
Speaker 3: it was not to demand that she close or to
Speaker 3: threaten the jail time that he had warned people about. Instead,
Speaker 3: his advisers sought her guidance. How could they open salons sooner?
Speaker 3: What safety measures did she recommend? And this is what
Speaker 3: we say. The person who is the head of the
Speaker 3: CDC right now was the public health state public health
Speaker 3: director in North Carolina, appointed by that Democrat governor. And
Speaker 3: she was laughing. She said, I don't know what to do.
Speaker 3: I called up people you know in other states and said,
Speaker 3: are you going to let them do this?
Speaker 9: You not?
Speaker 3: Okay? Well I won't let them do that either. Making
Speaker 3: this stuff up. Obviously we all knew it. And this
Speaker 3: is all political. What does she know about medicine? Why
Speaker 3: would Abbot call her? What does Abbot know about medicine?
Speaker 3: What does Shelley Luther know about medicine? But they know
Speaker 3: about politics. Just over a week later, Abbot had done
Speaker 3: what Luther wanted, allowing salons to reopen sooner than anticipated,
Speaker 3: and Luther was in jail. A Democrat judge in Dallas
Speaker 3: issued the sentence when she repeatedly refused to close her salon. Now,
Speaker 3: this is the judge who has a courtroom as opposed
Speaker 3: to the judge who has a county. Yeah, two offices,
Speaker 3: same title. She wasn't the first beautician to find herself
Speaker 3: in legal trouble for violating coronavirus orders. Two Laredo women,
Speaker 3: Anna Isabel Castro Garcia and Brenda Stephanie Matta were arrested
Speaker 3: in mid April for offering cosmetic services. This is a
Speaker 3: legacy of Donald Trump, and I will never support that
Speaker 3: man no matter what he does. I'll applaud if he
Speaker 3: does the right thing, but I will never forget what
Speaker 3: he brought to our country, the precedent that he set.
Speaker 3: And I'm not just talking about gun control by executive
Speaker 3: order or take the guns into the due process later.
Speaker 3: I'm talking about everything that happened and the people that
Speaker 3: he killed with the ventilators, the rim Deserveir, the medazzelamb
Speaker 3: and the money he killed people with the money he
Speaker 3: paid the hospitals to kill people and say it was COVID,
Speaker 3: son of a gun. What a traitor he is to
Speaker 3: this country and the people who applaud that. Unlike those cases,
Speaker 3: Luther's arrest prompted widespread sustained outraged, and the ideological right,
Speaker 3: and Abbot joined a cluster of GOP officials and all
Speaker 3: three branches of the government clamoring for her release. After
Speaker 3: an emergency request from her prominent Republican attorneys, the Texas
Speaker 3: Supreme Court ordered it. She took it to the Supreme
Speaker 3: Court and won. She's become a cost a lab on
Speaker 3: the right and a persona nongrada on the left, bolstered
Speaker 3: by a half million dollars in crowdfunded support and a
Speaker 3: new press team of prominent GEOPE consultants. In March, as
Speaker 3: a new coronavirus was just starting to cause wide spread death. No,
Speaker 3: not widespread death, they even say in this article from
Speaker 3: the Texas Tribune, obviously not sympathetic to what she's doing,
Speaker 3: as the new coronavirus was just starting to cause widespread concern, concern.
Speaker 3: We locked people down because of concern, not because of death.
Speaker 3: It was the medical orders, the financial and financially incentivized
Speaker 3: medical mass murders, not even financially incentivized malpractice. It was murder.
Speaker 3: They knew what they were doing. I used to call
Speaker 3: it financially incentivized medical malpractice. We found out that they
Speaker 3: knew what they were doing. It was murder, but I
Speaker 3: had spread concern widespread. The death came afterwards, with the
Speaker 3: hospitals and the vaccines. She drove her boyfriend at that
Speaker 3: point in time, from Dallas to Galveston to board a cruz.
Speaker 3: I have a real good friend who's a doctor, he
Speaker 3: told a local news station. It's really nothing more than
Speaker 3: a severe cold. As panic ramped up to you in
Speaker 3: the end of the month. Luther was at first willing
Speaker 3: to tolerate the state home orders it shuttered businesses across
Speaker 3: the state, but by April she had changed her mind,
Speaker 3: insisting that she had to reopen out of economic necessity.
Speaker 3: Reopening my salon wasn't a political statement. It was a
Speaker 3: necessity for people that rely on it. Whatever her intentions
Speaker 3: as the Texas Tribune, she quickly made a splash in
Speaker 3: political circles. Her media appearances drew the attention of Rick Hire, who,
Speaker 3: like Luther, was a member of the Open Texas Facebook
Speaker 3: group that it agitated for a faster and more complete
Speaker 3: reopening of Texas businesses. So that's one of the reasons
Speaker 3: why they started having enhanced censorship on social media to
Speaker 3: shut down people from being able to organize it. Through that,
Speaker 3: he offered to use the website to support Luther, writing
Speaker 3: that she was the group's first patriot cause, and he
Speaker 3: launched the crowd funding page April the twenty third. On
Speaker 3: April the twenty fourth, she opened her business to medium.
Speaker 3: Malstrom Camera's customers waited outside. Online donations poured in, and
Speaker 3: so did a letter from the Dallas County Judge Clay
Speaker 3: Jenkins directing her to shut her her salon immediately. Luther
Speaker 3: ignored him, and she asked if anybody could help. Custom
Speaker 3: printed T shirt that said cease and assist Jenkins. Abbott
Speaker 3: had warned that it could be dangerous to reopen salons,
Speaker 3: but he also said that he wanted to do so
Speaker 3: as soon as possible. Luthor was one of the salon
Speaker 3: owners his team reached out to that week an effort
Speaker 3: to gather information on how they might do so safely. Again,
Speaker 3: she is an expert, right, medical expert. This is a
Speaker 3: medical lockdown. Now it's plit and about that same time. Actually,
Speaker 3: it was a couple couple of weeks before that that
Speaker 3: he got tired of people complaining about the arbitrary lockdown
Speaker 3: and these rules. Scott Adams, you know the guy who
Speaker 3: has that stupid column, Dilbert. I could, if I want
Speaker 3: to be imployed, I could give it a different name
Speaker 3: that sounds very much like that. But Scott Adams, but
Speaker 3: now he said, it's getting harder and hard to tell
Speaker 3: the freedom lovers from sociopaths. Sociopaths if you push back
Speaker 3: against this stuff. Scott Adams, big Trump supporter, always yeah,
Speaker 3: built his brand support in Trump on Trump's gotels. If
Speaker 3: you are a freedom lover, you're a sociopath. You shut
Speaker 3: down and do what you're told, said Scott Adams. I replied,
Speaker 3: I said it's getting harder and harder to tell the
Speaker 3: pragmatists from detalitarians. The group included several members of the
Speaker 3: Texas who would not typically go either way. To disagree
Speaker 3: with Abbot. State Representative James White, a Republican, said an
Speaker 3: all upper case enough and then he said, you're the
Speaker 3: only one that can uppercase stop this enough, they said,
Speaker 3: tweeted that at Abbot. Montgomery County Judge Mark Keo, claiming
Speaker 3: Abbot's directions had been unclear, said that he would allow
Speaker 3: all businesses to reopen. Then the Attorney General, Ken Paxton,
Speaker 3: this guy who's such a hero to the Maga crown,
Speaker 3: he is a total fraud, folks. He's got a lot
Speaker 3: of shady stuff in his background, but you know it
Speaker 3: broke down into this. Well. We got the establishment Republicans
Speaker 3: out here, so he must be a good guy, Ken Paxton.
Speaker 3: And he is an incredible demogogue, not a democrat, a demagogue.
Speaker 3: Ken Paxton quickly reiterated that Abbot had ordered salons to
Speaker 3: stay closed a directive of his office said was quote
Speaker 3: neither vague nor unenforceable. He was threatening people, the Republican
Speaker 3: Ken Paxton, the hero of the Maga people. And they'll
Speaker 3: do it to you again, folks. These people will do
Speaker 3: it to you again. On May fifth, two Texas House
Speaker 3: Republicans visited a Houston area barbershop, also in open defiance
Speaker 3: of emergency orders for illegal haircuts. One of them, Briscoe Caine,
Speaker 3: who was a member of Luther's legal team, called it,
Speaker 3: quote an act of civil disobedience. Did you ever think
Speaker 3: that with all Republicans in charge, Republican president of Republican governor,
Speaker 3: Republican Attorney general, all of them dearly loved by the
Speaker 3: Maga cult. Did you ever think that we would have
Speaker 3: to have a haircut as an act of civil disobedience?
Speaker 3: And of course it was happening in Michigan as well.
Speaker 3: There it was against Whitmer got more attention, right, So
Speaker 3: then she went to a judge with the courtroom. His
Speaker 3: name was Moyer. I think the way he pronounced his name,
Speaker 3: he's got an accept mark over the e. He send
Speaker 3: it to her to seven days in jail, but before
Speaker 3: doing so, he gave her an opportunity to apologize, telling
Speaker 3: her that if she pledged not to reopen her salon
Speaker 3: until emergency orders are lifted, he would consider levying only
Speaker 3: a fine and allowing her to avoid jail time. She said,
Speaker 3: I'm not going to shut the salon, defiant. By the
Speaker 3: end of the first week of May, Luther had retained
Speaker 3: too well connected GOP lawyers. As the two attorneys fought
Speaker 3: for her release in court, ultimately appealing to the Texas
Speaker 3: Supreme Court, Republican officials issued an outpouring of support. Paxton
Speaker 3: has now changed at this point, in just a week
Speaker 3: or so, from saying that the letter, the governor's order
Speaker 3: is not unclear and it is not unenforceable. Now, Ken
Speaker 3: Paxton wrote an unusual direct appeal to the Dallas Judge,
Speaker 3: claiming that he had abused his discretion and he should
Speaker 3: immediate order Luther's release. You see, if you fight these people,
Speaker 3: they start to back down. They start to back down.
Speaker 3: And at this point in time, Ken Paxton and Greg
Speaker 3: Abbott had wet their fingers and stuck them in the
Speaker 3: wind to see which way the wind was blowing, and
Speaker 3: it really wasn't too hard. They didn't even need to
Speaker 3: wet their finger. Then you had another one of these
Speaker 3: grifting gloryhound Republicans. Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick offered to pay
Speaker 3: her fine and to serve seven days of house arrest
Speaker 3: in place of her jail. Senates, Yeah right, I'll lock
Speaker 3: myself down great. Abbott then joined the chorus, more cautiously,
Speaker 3: saying that he had he joined Paxton and quote disagreeing
Speaker 3: with the excessive action by the Dallas Judge. He said
Speaker 3: there was already pressure building, so and it was a
Speaker 3: pressure that was building on Abbot. He told a radio
Speaker 3: interviewer that he would take longer for a potential pardon
Speaker 3: to go through in the state process, and it would
Speaker 3: for Luthor to be able to legally open up. But
Speaker 3: he left open the possibility of a pardon somewhere down
Speaker 3: the road. You see what he's doing. He's trying to
Speaker 3: straddle the fence placate everybody. Well, you know, yeah, would
Speaker 3: you partner it? Well, I think about it, but that
Speaker 3: would take a long time for me to do that.
Speaker 3: Did it take a long time for him to put
Speaker 3: out an order telling everybody you can't open up? He
Speaker 3: just did it. Did it take a long time? Now,
Speaker 3: he just did it right away. You know, it's just
Speaker 3: these people. I have no respect for these politicians. I
Speaker 3: don't care what party they're in. As outrage continued to mount,
Speaker 3: Abbot went on to Twitter and said I'll make further
Speaker 3: announcements about this and related issues in the morning. But
Speaker 3: the next day, hours before he was due at the
Speaker 3: White House for an appearance with President Trump, Abbitt retroactively
Speaker 3: the enforcement mechanism from his executive orders, decreasing that confined
Speaker 3: decreeing brother that confinement was no longer a possible penalty
Speaker 3: for violating one of them. And then he says, well, now,
Speaker 3: if correctly applied, this should free Luther. We're not under
Speaker 3: a rule of law. It is medical martial law. Well,
Speaker 3: yesterday you go to jail for this, but now today
Speaker 3: I'm going to do it because there's public pressure pushing
Speaker 3: back in this all it required, folks, when we stopped
Speaker 3: complying with this stuff, it all just kind of disappeared.
Speaker 3: Isn't that amazing? Mass non compliance just made the virus
Speaker 3: go away. It just disappeared because it was all political
Speaker 3: in the first place. With an hour is the point
Speaker 3: was moot, the all Republican Texas Supreme Court ordered Luther's
Speaker 3: immediate release. They were all scrambling for a cover. A
Speaker 3: reporter asked Deborah Burks, the White House coronavirus Response coordinator
Speaker 3: doctor Scarf, if she thought Texas's reopening plan was great,
Speaker 3: the phrase that Abbott had repeatedly attributed to her. She said, So,
Speaker 3: we talked about, you know, not having them in the
Speaker 3: first opening wave because you can't really physically distance. And
Speaker 3: we had that discussion and he agreed, and so we've
Speaker 3: moved forward together. They said, well, is Texas a role
Speaker 3: model for everybody? Should everybody be doing this now? Because
Speaker 3: we got to know, we've got to have a centralized approach,
Speaker 3: and she said, well, every state is different. It is
Speaker 3: the virus different in every state. I mean, do they
Speaker 3: have a Texas variant and a Washington state variant, in
Speaker 3: a California and an Illinois and a Michigan variant do
Speaker 3: they have that? Is it different in every state? No,
Speaker 3: what's different is the politics. And this was a pandemic
Speaker 3: of politics. There's never a pandemic of a virus. And
Speaker 3: this is why I say, the people who are medical
Speaker 3: profects were really slow, painfully slow to catch on to
Speaker 3: this stuff, painfully so people who follow politics could see
Speaker 3: this from the very beginning, and the people that I
Speaker 3: all worked with could see it. And yet they lied
Speaker 3: to you about it. And I'll never forget that either.
Speaker 3: They lied. They knew what was going on. They had
Speaker 3: watched this game, this flu vaccine game played annually. They
Speaker 3: knew about Dark Winter, they knew about Event to a One,
Speaker 3: they knew about all of the germ games in the middle,
Speaker 3: and they still pushed this panic button on people. I'll
Speaker 3: never forget that. Now, out of jail, Luther's already leveraging
Speaker 3: her new celebrity status. They said, well, she ran for
Speaker 3: office but didn't get elected. She said, the time Texans
Speaker 3: need to be treated as adults. She headlined a Laredo
Speaker 3: Freedom rally where she stood alongside the two Latino women
Speaker 3: who had hair or nail salons or something like that
Speaker 3: and got arrested one of them. Matta said, I never
Speaker 3: expected to be in this situation. Luther came on stage,
Speaker 3: high heeled boots and a black face mask and hugged her.
Speaker 3: That was the picture at the top of the article.
Speaker 3: She said, we're literally treated like criminals. I know I
Speaker 3: wasn't doing anything wrong. Luther said, don't ever apologize for working.
Speaker 3: Don't ever apologize, and then she took her mask off
Speaker 3: to great applause. Well in the aftermath of that, the
Speaker 3: Dallas News had an op ed piece that attacked Shelley
Speaker 3: Luther and defended the judge who put her in jail.
Speaker 3: The judge who jailed Dallas salon owner Shelley Luther was
Speaker 3: upholding the rule of law. That's the title of the article. No,
Speaker 3: there was no law, Dallas News. It was medical martial law.
Speaker 3: And is you know, are we going to operate under
Speaker 3: a judge? Dread type of society? I am the law.
Speaker 3: Remember that Sylvester stallone did it? I am the law
Speaker 3: whateverster goes, because I'm a judge. Well, we had a judge,
Speaker 3: Clay Jenkins, and then we had another judge who had
Speaker 3: a little courtroom and they were the law. Or was
Speaker 3: it Greg Abbott who was the law? Or was it
Speaker 3: Ken Paxton who was a law or Lieutenant Governor Dan
Speaker 3: Patrick who was the law? Was it the Supreme Court?
Speaker 3: All of these people Republicans except for Clay Jenkins and
Speaker 3: that judge. Of the two judges different offices, everybody else
Speaker 3: was all Republican from Trump on down. And there was
Speaker 3: no rule of law. That's the biggest issue. It was
Speaker 3: medical martial law. These orders were issued to protect all
Speaker 3: citizens from the hazards of a deadly virus. Prove it.
Speaker 3: You didn't care about it, deadly disease. I don't know
Speaker 3: if it's a virus whatever ebola is, but they didn't
Speaker 3: care about that. And this is the kind of mental
Speaker 3: derangement that we have seen and we'll see with the
Speaker 3: climate nonsense. We got to have you do this because
Speaker 3: everybody's lives are in danger. Well, I'll tell you, when
Speaker 3: we live under dictatorship, everybody's lives are in danger. So
Speaker 3: where are we today, Well, on Tuesday, after running several
Speaker 3: times and losing, Shelley Luther has now won Salon owner
Speaker 3: jailed amid COVID lockdown. When's election, Shelley Luther has achieved
Speaker 3: resounding victory in Texas House District sixty two, captured over
Speaker 3: seventy five percent of the vote, decisively defeating the Democrat.
Speaker 3: And again, the name of her business was Salon a
Speaker 3: la Mode. And when all this was happening, she put
Speaker 3: up a hashtag remember the Alamode. They knew how to
Speaker 3: market it too, right. She has sought election in North
Speaker 3: Texas three times. After an unsuccessful bid for the state
Speaker 3: Senate in twenty twenty and a defeat in the twenty
Speaker 3: twenty two Republican primary for the House District sixty two,
Speaker 3: she made a comeback by defeating the incumbent in the
Speaker 3: March fifth primary, paving her way to victory in the
Speaker 3: general election. And so where does that leave us today? Well,
Speaker 3: when we look what is coming, we've already had Robert Redfield,
Speaker 3: who is dearly beloved now by Robert Robert Redford RFK
Speaker 3: Junior Robert Kennedy. He's dear Robert Redfield is loved by
Speaker 3: Robert Kennedy because of a little bit of flattery. That's
Speaker 3: all it takes, evidently for these narcissistic politicians. And look,
Speaker 3: Trump may be the most narcissistic politician we've had, but
Speaker 3: they are all narcissists. So why undetected bird flu cases
Speaker 3: forced the CDC to alter testing guidelines? Is it going
Speaker 3: to be rinse and repeat now from Redfield? Is it
Speaker 3: going to be rinse and repeat with the Trump administration.
Speaker 3: The CDC unveiled updated recommendations yesterday after a new study
Speaker 3: of one hundred and fifteen dairy farm workers in Colorado
Speaker 3: and Michigan, which found that seven percent of them appeared
Speaker 3: to have been infected with bird flu, but only half
Speaker 3: of those workers recalled having symptoms. We got one hundred
Speaker 3: and fifteen dairy farm workers that have bird flu, but
Speaker 3: they don't even know how did they know that they
Speaker 3: had it? Yeah, the PCR nonsense. If we don't debunk
Speaker 3: the PCR thing, folks, they will heck dress forever. That's
Speaker 3: a key thing for people to understand the PCR. You know,
Speaker 3: we've got to debunk the CO two and we've got
Speaker 3: to debunk the PCR. These are the tools of tyranny
Speaker 3: and of propaganda and of muddying the water fear. So
Speaker 3: these people, none of them were sick. None of them
Speaker 3: were sick. They had a PCR test. A few of them,
Speaker 3: just a few said yeah, you know, you got anything
Speaker 3: at all? Anything? Yeah, we got this positive PCR test.
Speaker 3: Can you think of anything that you're feeling that is unusual. Well,
Speaker 3: I got a little bit of itchiness in my eyes
Speaker 3: and they're a little bit pink iye, okay, we'll call
Speaker 3: that bird flu, no fever, no respiratory illness, but we'll
Speaker 3: call it bird flu. Pink eye, pink ie one of
Speaker 3: the most common things, perhaps even more common than the
Speaker 3: common cold or maybe you know, if you're definitely if
Speaker 3: you're working on a dairy farm, working with animals, if
Speaker 3: you don't keep your hands clean, you rub your eyes,
Speaker 3: you're going to get it. Used to get it all
Speaker 3: the time when I was in elementary school in Florida.
Speaker 3: We didn't have air conditioning when I was going to school,
Speaker 3: but we certainly did have a lot of gnats and
Speaker 3: with the open windows, and we got a lot of
Speaker 3: pink eye then. And so this is the pronouncement from
Speaker 3: the CDC's principal deputy director, principal deputy director at a bureaucracy,
Speaker 3: they've got We in public health need to cast a
Speaker 3: wider net in terms of who was offered a test
Speaker 3: so that we can identify, treat, and isolate those individuals. No,
Speaker 3: so we can pretend that there's a pandemic. Examples of
Speaker 3: high risk exposure include being splashed with raw milk from
Speaker 3: an infected cast. See, it always comes back to their agendas.
Speaker 3: We got to stop raw milk. You remember back in
Speaker 3: twenty twenty who according to NPR and the CDC, and
Speaker 3: I remember MPR published at many many times, but it
Speaker 3: was a coming from the CDC. The riskiest thing you
Speaker 3: could do was to attend church. Remember that that was
Speaker 3: the highest risk category. But you know now high risk
Speaker 3: categories raw milk kind of like they've got targeted things
Speaker 3: that are coming after almost like that, the less screwm
Speaker 3: we give this virus to run talking about bird flu, now,
Speaker 3: the fewer chances it has to cause harm or to change.
Speaker 3: And the best way to limit the virus's room to
Speaker 3: run is to test, identify, treat, and isolate as many
Speaker 3: cases as possible in humans. So the CDC updated recommendations,
Speaker 3: based in part on their study of one hundred and
Speaker 3: fifteen dairy workers in Colorado and Michigan. Blood tests found
Speaker 3: that eight workers had been infected with bird flu, but
Speaker 3: only four of those workers recalled having symptoms. Four out
Speaker 3: of one hundred and fifteen. Is that rare? Rare? Is
Speaker 3: that rare? Right? If they gave a vaccine to one
Speaker 3: hundred and fifteen people and they dropped dead, four of
Speaker 3: them drop dead, if act, you'd say it's rare. Or
Speaker 3: if that's some other horrific lifelong condition, it's rare. I
Speaker 3: don't care about that, right, But only for these people
Speaker 3: even had symptoms. What was the symptoms? Oh, the symptoms
Speaker 3: were red and draining and itchy eyes, pink eye. They
Speaker 3: tested one hundred and fifteen people and blow it up
Speaker 3: by a trillion times because now they have made the
Speaker 3: PCR tests even more absurdly cranked up, and they identify
Speaker 3: this whatever it is, bird flu, and again I don't
Speaker 3: They don't have a virus. This virus stuff, folks, is
Speaker 3: as stupid as the CO two stuff. They don't have
Speaker 3: a virus. They've got a computer model of some genetic
Speaker 3: strain that they're looking for, and then they take a
Speaker 3: sample of people and they blow it up by one
Speaker 3: hundred by one point one trillion times, and out of
Speaker 3: one hundred and fifteen people they get eight people got
Speaker 3: a match. Only four of them have got pink eye.
Speaker 3: So bird flu has spread rapidly across the US dairies.
Speaker 3: This has coming from USA today, by the way, since
Speaker 3: being detected, farm workers in multiple states have been infected.
Speaker 3: Absolutely absolute liars, They're absolutely undeterred by reality. They'll even
Speaker 3: report at the end of the article what actually happened. Really,
Speaker 3: one hundred and fifteen people tested, eight of them said positive.
Speaker 3: Only four of them had anything and it was just
Speaker 3: pink eye. But now they're back to the fear mode.
Speaker 3: They'll ended up on the fear mode. Its spread rapidly
Speaker 3: across the world. And so then if the last sentence
Speaker 3: of the article, milk is safe to drink once it's pasteurized,
Speaker 3: stop raw milk. We don't need to stop fentanyl. We
Speaker 3: need to stop raw milk. Yeah. Well, North American house
Speaker 3: hipost says, My favorite Walmart moment was walking in mask
Speaker 3: free the greeter. I was going to say something, and
Speaker 3: I channeled my inner Blues brothers and said, don't you
Speaker 3: say a fornicating word. Uh. Yeah, I had to had
Speaker 3: that issue with a security guard at the bank. Wun't
Speaker 3: let me in and uh and I argued with him
Speaker 3: and I said, I said, you don't believe it either.
Speaker 3: You don't even have your little cloth mask over your nose.
Speaker 3: And he looked like the thing go wrong. I knew,
Speaker 3: we all knew. There are cameras all over the place.
Speaker 3: It's this mask up over his nose sheepishly and was like,
Speaker 3: what a choke? Get me the manager. I needed to
Speaker 3: talk to somebody how I get my money out of
Speaker 3: this stupid place. Bluten. I knew it was nonsense from
Speaker 3: the get go, especially when Milania was still getting her
Speaker 3: nails done walking after lockdowns. Yeah, her nails and whatever else.
Speaker 3: I mean, you know that's this walking plastic surgery factory. Ambergold,
Speaker 3: thank you for the tip. I appreciate that. And Bernie
Speaker 3: D says in the nineties, doctor P. Gilbert predicted a
Speaker 3: medical and pharmaceutical tyranny. I was young and thinking, how
Speaker 3: can somebody force me to take medication? Well? Now we know,
Speaker 3: now we know, don't we We'll be right back.
Speaker 2: Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, this is from Reason magazine. So the next
Speaker 3: president should abolish everything they've just I like that. I
Speaker 3: hardly endorse that message. Let's just abolish everything, Abolish the
Speaker 3: fed federal government its entirety. They have put out and
Speaker 3: abolished everything issue that Reason magazine. They said, pick at random.
Speaker 3: And this is a quote. This is a quote from
Speaker 3: Milton Freeman who said this decades ago. He said, pick
Speaker 3: at random. Any three letters from the alphabet, put them
Speaker 3: in any order, and you'll have an acronym designating a
Speaker 3: federal agency that we can do without. I'd never seen
Speaker 3: that quote before. That's one to remember. I love that. Yeah,
Speaker 3: any three letters, put them in random order, and you'll
Speaker 3: have a corresponding federal agency that we can do without.
Speaker 3: And which also he doesn't say, but it is not
Speaker 3: in the constitution. Not a specific doesn't have the authority
Speaker 3: to exist. Trillions and taxpayer dollars in decades, even centuries
Speaker 3: of meddling, and these agencies have hampered economic growth, They
Speaker 3: have violated human rights, they have eroded civil liberties, and
Speaker 3: they have somehow managed to make air travel more frustrating,
Speaker 3: education more expensive, and drug enforcement more violent. Education is
Speaker 3: not just more expensive, it's now pubic education instead of
Speaker 3: public education. What follows is an idiosyncratic, non exhaustive list
Speaker 3: of parts of government that we truly do without. And
Speaker 3: we've left untouched some functions specifically mentioned in the Constitution,
Speaker 3: such as the postal Service, and we have confined just
Speaker 3: to the federal level, not to the state and local level.
Speaker 3: They said, even though we didn't put it in, there
Speaker 3: is no love lost for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Speaker 3: But we ran out of pages. They said, that's long list, alphabetically, Amtrak, Antitrust, Army, borders, DEA,
Speaker 3: Department of Education, Department of Transportation, EPA, FCC because you know,
Speaker 3: we're not supposed to have a standing army. We're supposed
Speaker 3: to have a militia, right, the FDA, the Federal Reserve,
Speaker 3: the Federal Minimum WADS, the Federal Student Loans, FEMA, FEYA, ICE, IRS,
Speaker 3: income Tax, National Park Service, NSACIA, Obamacare, Small Business Administration,
Speaker 3: Social Security, TSA, Bureau of Alcohol to back on farms,
Speaker 3: abolish them all. I hardly agree. In Tennessee, a push
Speaker 3: to stop statewide property taxes before they start. And this
Speaker 3: is a good idea, and we're starting to see people
Speaker 3: get the idea we're going to stop property taxes where
Speaker 3: they're going to use it to steal our homes. These
Speaker 3: carpetbackers out of Davos at the un and their puppets
Speaker 3: in the federal government. Senate joint resolution would prohibit the
Speaker 3: Tennessee General Assembly from levying, authorizing, or otherwise permitting a
Speaker 3: state tax on property. This is coming from Tennessee Star
Speaker 3: by the way. It would specifically amend Article two, section
Speaker 3: twenty eight of the Tennessee Constitution, which currently authorizes taxation
Speaker 3: of all property according to its value by tax any
Speaker 3: taxing authority, including state, counties and municipalities. During the most
Speaker 3: recent legislative session, the resolution passed both the Tennessee Senate
Speaker 3: by a twenty six to six vote and the House
Speaker 3: of Representatives by an eighty one to one vote. Wasn't
Speaker 3: even close, So it looks like Tennessee will not be
Speaker 3: adding a property tax. Hopefully they're going to thou to
Speaker 3: put it in the constitution. They will have to put
Speaker 3: it on the ballot and it will be presented voters
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty six, and hopefully the voter's not stupid
Speaker 3: enough to want to tax themselves. But every time I
Speaker 3: see a bond issue for schools, it seems to always pass.
Speaker 3: It's like, if you put something out there and call
Speaker 3: it bondage, I'm not voting for it. Okay, just I'm
Speaker 3: again bondage. I don't like bondage to the state. And
Speaker 3: that's what this is, bondage in order to pay for
Speaker 3: what now have become pubic schools. We haven't talked about
Speaker 3: this for a while, but when the devastation that happened
Speaker 3: in the recovery and the suffering is going on in
Speaker 3: western North Carolina, is really everybody's moved on. It's past
Speaker 3: their tension span. Nobody's really talking about it anymore. Everybody's
Speaker 3: talking about, well, what did Trump have for lunch today? Well,
Speaker 3: he put in the first female White House chief of staff.
Speaker 3: Whoop do you do? And they're i mean, top news everywhere,
Speaker 3: Fox News, the Virtue Signal, Identity, politics and artists and stuff. Look,
Speaker 3: I think that she probably will be very good at
Speaker 3: her position. She is a very sharp political consultant. She
Speaker 3: was running his campaign, has been involved in a lot
Speaker 3: of political campaigns. I don't like the people that she
Speaker 3: hangs out with. I think she is she's a Nikki
Speaker 3: Haley Pompeo type of person. It's another indication of where
Speaker 3: he's going. But she was somebody who ran his campaign,
Speaker 3: did a good job, and she is really there was
Speaker 3: a split between her and DeSantis, so she really hates DeSantis.
Speaker 3: People who are trying to float lad A Poe as
Speaker 3: head of FDA or HHS. I forget which one they
Speaker 3: wanted to put him in, as that probably ain't gonna happen.
Speaker 3: Probably not going to get friends of DeSantis put in
Speaker 3: with this lady in charge. I can't remember what her
Speaker 3: married name is. She was Pat Somemral's daughter, which is
Speaker 3: kind of interesting. Always like listening to Pat Somerrawl's voice.
Speaker 3: He had a great voice. He did a lot of
Speaker 3: commentary on a lot of different sports, not just football.
Speaker 3: But anyway, you know, she's she's there based on merit.
Speaker 3: She's not a DEI pick, but the press is playing
Speaker 3: it that way, playing it up as a DEI pick.
Speaker 3: And I'm not saying criticizing him for being DEI. I'm
Speaker 3: talking about the conservative and Maga media are saying, well, look,
Speaker 3: he pointed a woman. Don't you like him better?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 3: So let's talk about what's happening in western North Carolina.
Speaker 3: I forty, connecting Tennessee and North Carolina is expected to
Speaker 3: be opening by New Years. So what they're saying about
Speaker 3: one hundred days after this happened. Since Hurricane the detect
Speaker 3: the Tennessee Department of Transportation has worked to reopen. They're
Speaker 3: part of I forty to re establish connection for local traffic.
Speaker 3: Not sure what's happening in North Carolina, they said. However,
Speaker 3: the nine mile stretch of the Gorge connecting Tennessee and
Speaker 3: North Carolina remains closed. North Carolina Department Transportation said it
Speaker 3: is still trying to stabilize the nine mile stretch to
Speaker 3: open up enough space for vehicles to travel at forty
Speaker 3: miles an hour in one lane in each direction. What
Speaker 3: a nightmare that must be to try to have to
Speaker 3: go through there. But again, it just completely wiped out
Speaker 3: the roadbeds that are there. It's a temporary project to
Speaker 3: restore traffic, expected to be completed by January the first,
Speaker 3: twenty twenty five. And so as that is happening, you
Speaker 3: go back a couple of weeks now the middle of October,
Speaker 3: and of course the government, state and federal North Carolina
Speaker 3: was a wall and then when they shut up, things
Speaker 3: got worse. And it wasn't just FEMA where things got worse.
Speaker 3: It was also some local officials. I'm in charge here,
Speaker 3: you know the type of thing you know, we've seen that.
Speaker 3: We saw that with a local sheriff who started confiscating supplies.
Speaker 3: You know, you can't put that here, and that type
Speaker 3: of thing, so bad people, or the or the fire
Speaker 3: chief who told the volunteer helicopter guy, you know you can't.
Speaker 3: You brought this woman out, You can't go back and
Speaker 3: get her husband. You got to leave him there. It's like,
Speaker 3: or I'm going to have you arrested anyway. So there
Speaker 3: were some coal miners that came in I think they're
Speaker 3: from westfordin I don't remember now, and they took pictures
Speaker 3: of themselves. They brought in heavy equipment and other things
Speaker 3: like that. They're rebuilding some roads there, volunteer rebuilding the roads.
Speaker 3: Just one of the things some people say, well, the government,
Speaker 3: what are we going to do if we don't have government,
Speaker 3: who will build the roads, who will maintain the roads.
Speaker 3: It's like, sorry, they're not building or maintaining the roads now,
Speaker 3: and especially when something of this happens, so These are
Speaker 3: volunteers who are coming in redoing the roadbed and working
Speaker 3: on that. And then they had an official come over
Speaker 3: to them. Local official said you got to stop, all right.
Speaker 1: So let me ask you this.
Speaker 6: So we have the locals here, no excusa exactly, it's
Speaker 6: the government.
Speaker 1: Do you know. Do you know who invited us.
Speaker 7: We have friends that said that there is an event
Speaker 7: going on in late Lord and they said that they
Speaker 7: want us to be there or we allowed to go
Speaker 7: to that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we just listen to you.
Speaker 7: We're all tired, if we're all exhausted, like, we don't
Speaker 7: want to piss you off.
Speaker 6: It's like the government comes in a daily and a
Speaker 6: dollar short and starts waving clipboards around.
Speaker 1: None other people here care.
Speaker 4: We don't care. Tell you what time I arrived on
Speaker 4: Saturday morning after half I tell you.
Speaker 3: I got over one hundred trees, damn. And he's telling
Speaker 3: them they got to leave.
Speaker 1: And I know what.
Speaker 3: They can't fix anyone roads.
Speaker 1: Let us help you what We're here to help. That's
Speaker 1: why we're here.
Speaker 6: But listen, they said that they wouldn't get road through
Speaker 6: their people that can't.
Speaker 1: Get to their houses.
Speaker 3: And I apologize for custom in the next four or
Speaker 3: five years. They said they can't get got through there
Speaker 3: in the next nine years.
Speaker 1: And now we have people that are able to go
Speaker 1: to their homes and or we're dealing.
Speaker 6: We're delegitimizing and undermining the credentials of the government. So
Speaker 6: now they're going to come here and try to make
Speaker 6: it seem like.
Speaker 3: They have purpose. Not true. I just told you you
Speaker 3: can't do that though. That's it's not because you're in
Speaker 3: the mind of my credentials. Uh, what we have here,
Speaker 3: it's a failure to communicate. What'd you think that's gonna
Speaker 3: get you? Uh, we go out there and build a road.
Speaker 3: What do you think that's gonna happen to my job?
Speaker 3: If you go out there and build a road. Somebody
Speaker 3: put this up and reply to it. Car versus a road.
Speaker 3: It shows a picture of a car. It's like a
Speaker 3: transparent picture. You see all the engine and the suspension,
Speaker 3: all the rest of this stuff, says one of the
Speaker 3: most complex machines in human history, built by hundreds of companies,
Speaker 3: easy to repair in your own garage. Then underneath it
Speaker 3: they show a straight, flat road. And they said, here's
Speaker 3: a flat thing that is far too complicated for anyone
Speaker 3: to try without the magic of government. Yeah, that's what
Speaker 3: we're really talking about. So again, it's the it's the
Speaker 3: people who are sticking around, the Men of Nights, the
Speaker 3: amasure there. They're building wooden shelters and anything. Elon Musk
Speaker 3: could bring in some of these things and put them
Speaker 3: up overnight, he's not going to do any of it.
Speaker 3: He's spending his money buying the presidency. By the way,
Speaker 3: when we look at what's happening, and we'll be talking
Speaker 3: about this and many other issues when Eric Peters joins US.
Speaker 3: Nissan another company that is being killed by the ev bug,
Speaker 3: the electronic virus they all caught. They're being spread around
Speaker 3: by the government with his dirty cash. They're spreading around
Speaker 3: this electronic virus to all the car companies to kill them.
Speaker 3: It's just accelerating faster than they expected. Nissan is going
Speaker 3: to have to cut nine thousand jobs. We've got Volktag
Speaker 3: and cutting jobs and Germany and all the rest of stuff.
Speaker 3: And they said the CEO is they're going to cut
Speaker 3: nine thousand jobs. And the CEO has said he's going
Speaker 3: to reduce his pay by fifty percent as this company
Speaker 3: faces severe situation. CEO Makoto Uchidah offered to immediately begin
Speaker 3: forfeiting half of his monthly compensation. Well that's nice. And
Speaker 3: I looked at it, and it's like, I wonder if
Speaker 3: he'll be able to survive on that half of the compensation,
Speaker 3: because I imagine he's pretty highly compensated. And so I
Speaker 3: looked in the article. They didn't have anything about it.
Speaker 3: So I started looking and all these articles everywhere saying
Speaker 3: the same thing. He's going to cut half his pace,
Speaker 3: He's going to cut well, what is his pay? You
Speaker 3: need to know if this guy is going to be
Speaker 3: able to make it or not. You know, I'm worried
Speaker 3: about him. I had to dig and I found some
Speaker 3: articles about a year ago that at that time his
Speaker 3: pay was four point four million dollars a year. He
Speaker 3: might be able to make it on two point two million.
Speaker 3: I don't know no word as to what kind of
Speaker 3: austerity he's going to have make. I have to sell
Speaker 3: a few of his villas or something somewhere. And then
Speaker 3: the German government has just collapsed. You know, everybody's so excited,
Speaker 3: Oh what's happy? Days are here again? And so is
Speaker 3: Donald Trump. And we're so happy as Eric and I
Speaker 3: were talking about yesterday, not Eric Tony. Tony Ardterman and
Speaker 3: I were talking about. He said, yeah, everybody's really excited
Speaker 3: about the stock market. Crypto has gone straight up, and
Speaker 3: gold and silver retraced a little bit, you know, going
Speaker 3: back to the record highs of just a couple of
Speaker 3: months ago, you know, just under twenty seven hundred dollars.
Speaker 3: I mean, there was only a couple of months ago
Speaker 3: that went down, and now I think it's up above
Speaker 3: twenty seven hundred again. But fundamentally nothing has changed, and
Speaker 3: the problems are not just in America. We have international problems.
Speaker 3: The German government has collapsed. So what happens next. They're
Speaker 3: going to have to have an election. They put together
Speaker 3: a three way coalition, and of course, in every other
Speaker 3: country but America, pretty much when they allow more than
Speaker 3: two parties, and then what happens is is very rare
Speaker 3: that a political party will get more than fifty percent
Speaker 3: of the vote, so they have to create a coalition
Speaker 3: with other groups afterwards, and so that's the way Germany
Speaker 3: is set up. The coalition has now collapsed after three years,
Speaker 3: following a lengthy dispute over how to stop a multi
Speaker 3: billion euro hole in next year's budget, plunging Europe's largest
Speaker 3: economy into a period of considerable unst certainty. And it
Speaker 3: has a very very big effect on the entire European economy.
Speaker 3: Germany does, and Germany is really you know, Britain is
Speaker 3: not in the EU anymore. But Britain is having to
Speaker 3: shut down all their manufacturing because of the price of energy,
Speaker 3: and they're shutting down their coal plants and all the
Speaker 3: rest of this stuff. And energy there is four to
Speaker 3: five times higher than is in the United States, which
Speaker 3: is many multiples higher than it is that it costs
Speaker 3: in China. And so Germany is going right down that
Speaker 3: same path. All Schultz of the SPD sacked his finance minister,
Speaker 3: Christian Linder, from the FDP he was the FDP leader,
Speaker 3: on Wednesday night after months of disagreement over how to
Speaker 3: deal with a gaping hole in Germany's budget. Schultz wants
Speaker 3: to boost spending by taking on more debt, which is
Speaker 3: what they always do, citing the impact of Russia's invasion
Speaker 3: of Ukraine. Linder opposed this and insisted instead on an
Speaker 3: array of tax and spending cuts that the SPD and
Speaker 3: the Greens said were impossible. To accept, as it would
Speaker 3: torpedo much of government's programs at stake. And here's what
Speaker 3: they cannot do without welfare payments, climate emergency measures and
Speaker 3: support for Ukraine. It's what we've always called the warfare
Speaker 3: welfare state. No, no, we're not going to cut either
Speaker 3: one of those. And now you've got the Greens in there,
Speaker 3: so now it's warfare, welfare and climate. Those are non negotiable.
Speaker 3: And all three of those things are going to bankrupt us,
Speaker 3: especially in combination, all the Western countries, not just Germany,
Speaker 3: all the Western countries are going to be bankrupted by warfare,
Speaker 3: welfare and climate. And climate is an interesting combination of
Speaker 3: warfare and welfare. It's warfare against the people and welfare
Speaker 3: for the elites. It is a massive it's for of wealth.
Speaker 3: It is both warfare and welfare. Federal elections were scheduled
Speaker 3: for next autumn. They're likely to be shifted for by
Speaker 3: about six months to March or to April. Schultz has
Speaker 3: tabled a vote of confidence for the fifteenth of January,
Speaker 3: so they wanted to move it even closer. They wanted
Speaker 3: to have an election in just a couple of months,
Speaker 3: but he's pushing it off a little bit, and then
Speaker 3: in China, even China is especially China is feeling the
Speaker 3: economic pressure as I mentioned, because of their potemp Can economy,
Speaker 3: their can real estate build out, the bubble that they
Speaker 3: created with that that a lot of billionaires, and about
Speaker 3: a third of their billionaires are no longer billionaires. The
Speaker 3: Chinese tax noose is tightening, and this is something that
Speaker 3: is a harbinger of what's going to happen in America
Speaker 3: as well, and I think that will likely happen under
Speaker 3: Trump as the rush to try and save is econom
Speaker 3: me via stimulus continues. You think you'll do that, You
Speaker 3: think Trump will do stimulus and increase the deficit. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 3: China is simultaneously looking to shake down its citizens for
Speaker 3: unpaid taxes. So first they give you a stimulus check,
Speaker 3: then they raise the deficit and raise your taxes. This
Speaker 3: push for compliance may further impact investor confidence in China's economy,
Speaker 3: the world's second largest. Look both Trump and la Law,
Speaker 3: neither one of them, and neither did Mike Johnson, the
Speaker 3: Republican Speaker of the House. They all signed on just
Speaker 3: like Biden and onto this idea that they're going to
Speaker 3: give eighty billion dollars to the IRS, an agency that
Speaker 3: had a budget of thirteen billion, So they had an
Speaker 3: entire budget of thirteen and they're going to give them
Speaker 3: an increase of eighty billion so they can add artificial
Speaker 3: intelligence in eighty thousand IRS agents to harass our people
Speaker 3: and to eat out their substance. As the Declaration of
Speaker 3: Independence complained about the British tyranny, and why are they
Speaker 3: going to do that? Because with one hand they give
Speaker 3: you a stimulus, with one hand they give you a
Speaker 3: tax break depending on what voter group you are, and
Speaker 3: then with the other hand they take everything away from you.
Speaker 3: As gerald Ford said, the government that is big enough
Speaker 3: to give you everything you want is also big enough
Speaker 3: to take everything you've got, and they usually do it
Speaker 3: simultaneously or close to that. Recent tax demands have caused
Speaker 3: concern and even fear among wealthy individuals and cities like
Speaker 3: Beijing shanghaitions, and according to local tax advisor, he said,
Speaker 3: some of them simply didn't know what to declare when
Speaker 3: they were asked to conduct self inspections. Many didn't realize
Speaker 3: before that their overseas personal gains be subjected to taxes
Speaker 3: in China. Does that sound familiar, which had Supreme Court case.
Speaker 3: I said, well, you have something and it's overseas and
Speaker 3: you haven't sold it, but the paper or value has
Speaker 3: gone up, so we can tax you on that, right, folks.
Speaker 3: It is a global conspiracy. And the same mentality that
Speaker 3: you see in Germany, warfare, welfare climate, the same predatory
Speaker 3: tax stuff that you see in China, the same artificially
Speaker 3: inflated economy. All of that stuff is going to be
Speaker 3: coming here. It's the same everywhere. I talked about the
Speaker 3: company at TSMC from Taiwan, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing company, and
Speaker 3: this factory they're going to spend, well, it was like
Speaker 3: twelve billion dollars of their money to set up this
Speaker 3: factory town in Phoenix. I talked about it a little
Speaker 3: bit in terms of the smart thing, but also in
Speaker 3: terms of corporate culture. And of course they get a
Speaker 3: matching set of another twelve billion from Washington out of
Speaker 3: this Chips Act. As they're trying to establish onshore semiconductor
Speaker 3: manufacturing that is now being done offshore, much of it
Speaker 3: in Taiwan. And one of the things that I thought
Speaker 3: was really striking about it, and I said, you know, look,
Speaker 3: at the way they demand. The corporations demand more and
Speaker 3: more and more and more of your life and of
Speaker 3: your time. You don't have a life outside of the corporation.
Speaker 3: And that was what these Taiwanese engineers were trained. You know,
Speaker 3: the Americans were complaining about it. They said, you know,
Speaker 3: these guys are just hanging around to look good. They
Speaker 3: don't have a life outside of the thing. And I
Speaker 3: don't mind working, but for what Why would I just
Speaker 3: hang around here all the time just to impress my bosses?
Speaker 3: And that's what they demand in that culture. They said,
Speaker 3: if a machine breaks down at midnight, it'll be fixed
Speaker 3: by one o'clock and the entire in Taiwan and the
Speaker 3: Taiwanese engineer's wife will not have a problem with that.
Speaker 3: So the problem with the Americans is you won't fix
Speaker 3: it until the morning when the guy comes to work.
Speaker 3: We'll call the guy up in the middle of the night,
Speaker 3: get him out of bed, make him come down here,
Speaker 3: and then he can put in a full, full day's
Speaker 3: work as well. And look, I've been in that culture
Speaker 3: as well. I talked about that, working late at night
Speaker 3: at Texas Instruments, and I was the last one out
Speaker 3: of there, and I pull up and there's this traffic light,
Speaker 3: you know, and it's turning, it's turning red, still in yellow,
Speaker 3: and I start to speed up to go through it.
Speaker 3: And then I look and over to the right is
Speaker 3: a cop setting at the traffic light, and I know
Speaker 3: that he's going to pull me over if I go
Speaker 3: through that yellow light. So I put on brakes and
Speaker 3: I stopped and didn't skid or anything like that. And
Speaker 3: I looked over at him and I grinned, thought you
Speaker 3: had me. The next morning I came in. So that's
Speaker 3: late at night. There was like two or three o'clock
Speaker 3: at night. I'm working on the project. I come in
Speaker 3: the next morning at eight and he's waiting for me,
Speaker 3: and he pulls me over for changing lanes without using
Speaker 3: a turn signal. Ah, you know that's yeah. Gradually I
Speaker 3: learned about the whole system. I was fit to be tied.
Speaker 3: So with that in mind, the twenty countries with the
Speaker 3: lowest fertility rates, and guess what's up there at number one?
Speaker 3: Taiwan the country you know again TSMC, the biggest company
Speaker 3: in Taiwan, big semiconductor company. It's thirty percent of their
Speaker 3: stock market. They said it is the mountain that protects
Speaker 3: our country from Chinese invasion, because if the Chinese invade
Speaker 3: and destroyed wolves set that down, and all the semiconductors
Speaker 3: everywhere will be shut down. And so they work their
Speaker 3: people like slaves and they don't have a life outside
Speaker 3: of that company environment. They have the lowest popular You
Speaker 3: need two point one of children per couple. I guess
Speaker 3: I don't think that. Oh per woman, number of children
Speaker 3: per woman two point one. Okay, Taiwan the lowest, tied
Speaker 3: with South Korea at one point one. One point one.
Speaker 3: They need two point one. They're dying. It's not just
Speaker 3: killing their lives, it's killing their entire country. Chasing money,
Speaker 3: you know, more productivity, more, more and more, got to
Speaker 3: have more chips. Yesterday I talked about it. I said,
Speaker 3: here's an alternative. You know what people are starting to
Speaker 3: figure out in America is you don't have to go
Speaker 3: to college. You don't have to have this corporate career. Instead,
Speaker 3: learn a skill. Learn a skill. Because of society collapses,
Speaker 3: you got that skill. But even if society doesn't collapse,
Speaker 3: you got some measure of independence because you've got a
Speaker 3: skill and you can become an entrepreneur. You can start
Speaker 3: a company because you got a skill, but it gives
Speaker 3: you independence and freedom, and your life is not subsumed
Speaker 3: by your work. Yes, we all work, but it doesn't
Speaker 3: have to be subsumed by that. Shortly right after that
Speaker 3: one point one for Taiwan, then you've got You've got Singapore, Ukraine,
Speaker 3: Hong Kong, Macau. At one point two. Again, you need
Speaker 3: two point one to maintain your population. They're all dying.
Speaker 3: Ukraine is dying. Even if you don't send off all
Speaker 3: of your Even if you don't shanghai or press gang
Speaker 3: your young men and send them off to be Kennon
Speaker 3: fodder for NATO and Lindsey Graham, you're still dying because
Speaker 3: you're not having families. That was one of the things
Speaker 3: that people in exile the Israel. It's in exile in
Speaker 3: Bablon and Jeremiah, you know that passage that everybody knows.
Speaker 3: I know the plans I have for you, plans to prosper,
Speaker 3: not to harm. First thing he says to them, he says,
Speaker 3: have you know, give your sons and daughters in marriage
Speaker 3: and have children. You build your homes, build your farms,
Speaker 3: and work for the peace of your country. That you're
Speaker 3: in because that will be your piece. The first thing
Speaker 3: he tells them is you don't have a life. Focus
Speaker 3: on your family. That's the key thing. And so they
Speaker 3: go through this and a lot of a lot of
Speaker 3: countries are way way both one point three. That group
Speaker 3: is Puerto Rico, Italy, Spain, Poland, Montserrat. And then at
Speaker 3: one point four you got Bosnia, British Virgin Islands, Japan, Japan, Greece,
Speaker 3: Costa Rica, Bahamas, Belarus and so forth. The global average
Speaker 3: is two point three. But it's not happening in those countries.
Speaker 3: All those countries I just mentioned, Italy, Spain, Poland, Greece, Japan, Taiwan,
Speaker 3: South Korea, they're all dying, Ukraine, Hong Kong, they're all dying.
Speaker 3: They're not They've sacrificed their life corporation. UH. And I
Speaker 3: hope that makes them happy, because it won't make them
Speaker 3: happy for them long. And thank you very much for
Speaker 3: the tip. Congrats on the nude baby. What is your
Speaker 3: grandpa name going to be? Uh? Prayers to the mama
Speaker 3: and daddy, so happy everyone is doing well. We went
Speaker 3: into one of the tourist shops and they had this
Speaker 3: and it was a local artist that had these clay
Speaker 3: cups that they did, and they had every name that
Speaker 3: you can imagine for grandparents that were there. We had
Speaker 3: a lot of fun looking at that, and I said,
Speaker 3: I like Pappy, so it makes me laugh. And you know,
Speaker 3: if he calls me Pappy, I think that'll be funny.
Speaker 3: Uh So, yeah, I'm gonna go with Pappy. I think
Speaker 3: I got a cup to show it to you, and
Speaker 3: I know everybody will be making fun of it on
Speaker 3: here as well. Uh dialectical Hegelian. Uh, let's see dialectic
Speaker 3: is HEGELI? There we go. In Europe when the Democrats lose,
Speaker 3: they truly shut the government down, something I wish the
Speaker 3: American Democrats would do instead of threatening to do. Yes,
Speaker 3: I agree, Yeah, you always say you're going to shut
Speaker 3: the government down, but you never do. And the Republicans
Speaker 3: threatened to shut it down as well, but they never
Speaker 3: do either. We'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 3: Welcome back. Karen ran to get the the mug Pappy
Speaker 3: on it. I don't know how often I'll use that
Speaker 3: because it's pretty small, but yeah, she said she was
Speaker 3: going to get lolly if I had chosen Pop, but
Speaker 3: sother way with Pappy. She didn't get that yet. Let's
Speaker 3: talk a little bit about Elon Musk, and we're going
Speaker 3: to talk about this when Eric Peters comes on. Musk
Speaker 3: is about to find out what one hundred and thirty
Speaker 3: million dollars for Trump gets him, because you know, one
Speaker 3: of the first times I talked to Eric Peters was
Speaker 3: when we talked about Musk as the king of crony capitalism.
Speaker 3: How he became the richest man in the world. And
Speaker 3: it's probably no person on earth that's more politically astute
Speaker 3: than Elon Musk to profit like he has. And now
Speaker 3: he is proudly taking over the Oval Office, kitchen, sink
Speaker 3: and all. As he put the meme out. Musk, who's
Speaker 3: growing political apparatus, has already proved its metal will gain
Speaker 3: more than just an ally in the White House. Trump
Speaker 3: has vowed to give him an official title cutting government spending.
Speaker 3: How is that for irony? No, actually, it's hypocrisy. Right,
Speaker 3: We're going to take the guy the king of crony
Speaker 3: capitalism and Trump is going to make him the guy
Speaker 3: in charge of cutting government spending. And the idiots and
Speaker 3: MAGA are going gaga over all of this stuff. Oh,
Speaker 3: this is great, the great the guy who has become
Speaker 3: the world's richest man by grifting the government with crony capitalism.
Speaker 3: And he's going to be the person in charge of
Speaker 3: cutting spending. Yeah, I got a bridge. I can sell
Speaker 3: you too. He does as well, with it the power
Speaker 3: to influence policy and federal agencies and to oversee the
Speaker 3: vast empire of companies. Trump said of Musk, he's a
Speaker 3: special guy. He's a super genius. If I were a
Speaker 3: rich man, I would sit all day in the gate
Speaker 3: and I would talk and people would think I really
Speaker 3: knew because I was such a wealthy man. Right, I'm
Speaker 3: filling on the roof. So Teva says, yeah, and so
Speaker 3: you know, hey, if you're rich, you're smart. Right. Not necessarily,
Speaker 3: he does have lots of money. He says, we have
Speaker 3: to protect our geniuses. We don't have that many of them.
Speaker 3: And we also don't have that many people have a
Speaker 3: net worth of two hundred and fifty six billion dollars
Speaker 3: who are giving me money. CASSLA stocks are surging. The
Speaker 3: stocks swored as much as fifteen percent in the US
Speaker 3: trading is. Investors looked to cash in on Trump's return
Speaker 3: to the White House. Musk also posted a chart early
Speaker 3: Wednesday morning that he said showed record usage of X
Speaker 3: his social media and he said, let that sink in
Speaker 3: as he was posting that and then carrying a sink
Speaker 3: into the Oval office, a parody of what he did
Speaker 3: when he took over Twitter, and now he's taking over
Speaker 3: the White House. Musk spent more than one hundred and
Speaker 3: thirty million dollars on Trump and on down ballot Republicans
Speaker 3: and competitive house races, and again to normalize this, since
Speaker 3: he has a net worth that is more than a
Speaker 3: million times what the average Americans net worth is, it's like,
Speaker 3: you know, one point three million times, but since he
Speaker 3: has a net worth a million times more than the
Speaker 3: average American, that'd be like you or me spending one
Speaker 3: hundred and thirty dollars right to get all of this.
Speaker 3: Musk voted in Texas and then he flew in his
Speaker 3: private chat to Florida to watch returns with Trump and
Speaker 3: his family at mar Lago. His pack posted a photo
Speaker 3: of him sitting shoulder to shoulder with Trump and Dana White,
Speaker 3: the chief executive officer of the Ultimate Fighting Championship. Well, okay,
Speaker 3: the Ultimate Fighting Championship is not professional wrestling, but you
Speaker 3: know McMahon is having some issues with sexual stuff, so
Speaker 3: as close as they can get to a professional wrestling,
Speaker 3: I guess how appropriate. And then this is a Pennsylvania
Speaker 3: state director of the Early Vote Action says Musk is
Speaker 3: new to politics, but it means a lot for a
Speaker 3: billionaire in a tech mogul to go all in for
Speaker 3: President Trump. Is Musk new to politics? No, politics is
Speaker 3: how he made his money. But this is what is
Speaker 3: being sold to people. You know, Babylon be's okay. He
Speaker 3: sacrificed forty billion dollars to save our free speech. He
Speaker 3: oversees an empire of six companies, several of which are
Speaker 3: highly entangled in the US federal government. SpaceX Tesla is
Speaker 3: also looking to roll out autonomous robotaxis, but there are
Speaker 3: tremendous regulatory hurdles for both Tesla's robotaxis and for space X.
Speaker 3: Nobody ever mentions even though this guy made his fortune
Speaker 3: off of the CO two fantasy and global warming, and
Speaker 3: nobody ever mentions the emissions from his rockets. There's rockets
Speaker 3: that the most powerful rockets that we've ever had didn't
Speaker 3: have powerful rockets like this when we went to the moon.
Speaker 3: Isn't that amazing? Because when he lit this one up.
Speaker 3: I remember a year or two ago he lit it
Speaker 3: up and it created this crater and blew rocks and
Speaker 3: concrete and everything miles away, blew it into some kind
Speaker 3: of a precious reserve. It's precious to them or whatever.
Speaker 3: But still the debris that it hurled everywhere. He said, well,
Speaker 3: we've never had anything this powerful before. How did we
Speaker 3: get to the moon? I just can't figure it out.
Speaker 3: Musk pitched a job for himself to cut government bureaucracy
Speaker 3: and waste. The ultimate hypocrite. He's going to be our
Speaker 3: cost cutter, said Trump. Musk has joked that he'll lead
Speaker 3: the Department of Government Efficiency, what he calls Doge like
Speaker 3: his doge coin. Musk has claimed that he could cut
Speaker 3: an unprecedented two trillion from the federal budget just by
Speaker 3: getting rid of his companies. No, I mean, he didn't
Speaker 3: say that. He hasn't said which agencies he will go after. Well,
Speaker 3: I don't know what's the annual budget of the federal government.
Speaker 3: I could cut almost all of them, so could the
Speaker 3: people at Reason. Like I mentioned earlier, he described a
Speaker 3: SpaceX rocket that set on a launch pad for two
Speaker 3: months waiting for approval. He said, we could build a
Speaker 3: rocket faster than they could approve the paperwork. He says,
Speaker 3: I'm like Gulliver being tied down by a million little strings.
Speaker 3: He doesn't say I but he said this, This is
Speaker 3: like Gulliver, but he's talking about himself. I'm Gulliver, the
Speaker 3: giant in a land of little Aputians, being tied down
Speaker 3: by a million little strings. And he says, it's not
Speaker 3: like any one string is the problem, but you got
Speaker 3: a million of them. He's sorry. He said that he'll
Speaker 3: try to use whatever power he gets to push for
Speaker 3: a federal approval process of fully autonomous vehicles for himself.
Speaker 3: Current rules prevent manufacturers from putting more than a couple
Speaker 3: thousand cars on the road per year without steering wheels
Speaker 3: or other controls. So you've got a flood our highways
Speaker 3: with cars under his control. They don't have steering wheels
Speaker 3: or brakes. What could possibly go wrong? During his first term,
Speaker 3: Trump appointed Steve Manuchin, former Goldman Sachs Group executive. But
Speaker 3: of course they don't mention the fact that he also
Speaker 3: put in from Goldman Cone, who They wanted Goldman, wanted
Speaker 3: him in there so badly that they gave him his
Speaker 3: golden parachute of two hundred and fifty million dollars, and
Speaker 3: they changed their corporate rules so he could get it
Speaker 3: all in a lump sum to go be the chief
Speaker 3: of staff. I think for Trump, Musk's potential role of
Speaker 3: cutting government spending isn't expected to be a cabinet level position,
Speaker 3: meaning that he wouldn't be required to step away from
Speaker 3: his CEO duties. See unlike Alex Czar that Trump brought
Speaker 3: in to run HHS, Alex'zar was the CEO of Eli Lilly.
Speaker 3: He had to leave that corporate position at Big Pharma
Speaker 3: to take over the regulatory agency to shut everything down,
Speaker 3: but also play footsie with the pharmaceutical companies. But see
Speaker 3: Elon Musk has got it even better. Elon Musk can
Speaker 3: stay and it's not even a revolving door. He doesn't
Speaker 3: have to change buildings. He can just stay where he is,
Speaker 3: continue to make money, and then also exercise his own
Speaker 3: strings and levers of control. After the billionaire's endorsement in July,
Speaker 3: Trump changed his tune on electric vehicles. He went from
Speaker 3: entirely railing against what he called quote Crooked Joe's insane
Speaker 3: electric vehicle mandate unquote, to praising evs at times. This
Speaker 3: is the genius of Elon Musk. He can see that
Speaker 3: Trump is doing well, and he can see that Trump
Speaker 3: is doing well by opposing EV's where he makes a
Speaker 3: lot of money. So I will get behind him and
Speaker 3: I'll change him. Now. Trump says, I'm for electric cars.
Speaker 3: I have to be, you know, because Elon endorsed me
Speaker 3: very strongly. Elon, so I have no choice, he said
Speaker 3: during an August rally. Trump has no principles. He's for
Speaker 3: sale to the highest bidder on each and every issue. Folks.
Speaker 3: It doesn't matter whether it's the pharmaceutical company's buying him
Speaker 3: in the transition period in twenty seventeen, or if it's
Speaker 3: this on every issue. The man has no principles. He's
Speaker 3: all it's just the love of money. It's just like
Speaker 3: his program. He said. I'd never seen his program, and
Speaker 3: I was I was scurious. One I thought, well, what
Speaker 3: was his theme song? Opened up and it was like money, money, money, money,
Speaker 3: you know, you probably all know it. I had never
Speaker 3: seen it, and it's just flaunting the wealth as he does.
Speaker 7: You know.
Speaker 3: Yeah. When they did the movie, which again I had
Speaker 3: not watched the Apprentice movie, talking about his apprenticeship under
Speaker 3: Roy Cohen. They were talking about out how they're going
Speaker 3: to set up the sets to film the movie, and
Speaker 3: one person said, make it look expensive and tasteless. That's it, expensive, garish, tasteless.
Speaker 3: Like Trump, Musk is pushing conspiracy theories and talking about
Speaker 3: immigrants and how that's got to be controlled, and he's
Speaker 3: talking about it on X This is from Yahoo. They
Speaker 3: don't like that. But what I'm concerned about is that
Speaker 3: Trump has said, and I've played the clip for you,
Speaker 3: I don't have it in the thing today, but we're
Speaker 3: going to stop it, whether it's land see or air, right,
Speaker 3: we're going to stop these people coming in lands her air.
Speaker 3: We're gonna do it with biometrics and all the rest.
Speaker 3: You gotta be very careful. They've got the MAGA people
Speaker 3: so worked up. And of course they would be concerned
Speaker 3: if it was Biden who was going to enact a
Speaker 3: biometric control system on us at the borders and internally, right,
Speaker 3: But when Republicans do it, it's okay. Right, when DeSantis
Speaker 3: did it in Florida. Instead, we're going to now have mandatory.
Speaker 3: Everifi you're going to have to mandatory get permission from
Speaker 3: the federal government to get a job. And DeSantis and
Speaker 3: the Republicans there past that, everybody just laid down that
Speaker 3: they wouldn't have done that. If it had been Democrats,
Speaker 3: it would have been suspicious. But when you have Republicans
Speaker 3: doing that to people, they just step aside and let
Speaker 3: it happen. And like Trump, Musk was also all about
Speaker 3: the mRNA vaccine CureVac. He made a lot of money
Speaker 3: off of that on EV's Tesla has received billions from
Speaker 3: Biden's policies, which Trump has vowed to dismantle. Another reason
Speaker 3: for him to back Trump, who is obviously going to win.
Speaker 3: I say, obviously, but you could see Biden sinking. I
Speaker 3: think these people know far more than we do. In
Speaker 3: the background, not too long ago, Musk was calling for
Speaker 3: Trump to quote, hang up his hat and sail into
Speaker 3: the sunset. Then they started realizing, wait a minute, looks
Speaker 3: like this guy is going to win. And again he
Speaker 3: can read that better than pretty much anybody America. Pack
Speaker 3: he said, is going to keep going after this election.
Speaker 3: That was the thing that he set up to comply
Speaker 3: with the election laws. You say, Danish de Suzza gave
Speaker 3: when the limit was twenty five hundred dollars, He gave
Speaker 3: twenty five thousand to a former friend they were in
Speaker 3: college together, who was running for office, and Obama put
Speaker 3: DeNisi to Susan in jail. I mean, usually it's just
Speaker 3: a fine. But because of politics and the way the
Speaker 3: Democrats are now using law fair against people. You know,
Speaker 3: that was one of the early examples of it, when
Speaker 3: they put Danish to Suza in jail. Well, Elon Musk
Speaker 3: can set this up and he can give one hundred
Speaker 3: and thirty million dollars, and he can be the sole
Speaker 3: donor of a political action committee. See, the elites are
Speaker 3: the ones who are writing the rules. The elites are
Speaker 3: the ones who are hiring the army of years to
Speaker 3: go through and make sure that everything is in compliance.
Speaker 3: America Pack is going to keep going after this election,
Speaker 3: said Musk. And now he's got contact information on a
Speaker 3: lot of voters that he gave forty seven dollars to.
Speaker 3: They signed up and said I agree with the first
Speaker 3: and second Amendment, and here's my name in contact information.
Speaker 3: He gives them forty seven dollars and now they're on
Speaker 3: his list, just like he can scan through and find
Speaker 3: the people on Twitter who like him and silence to
Speaker 3: people who don't like him, like me, and like Eric
Speaker 3: coming on. So instead what you see is this kind
Speaker 3: of a naive take from the Daily Skeptic headline what
Speaker 3: Elon did to Twitter he can now do to the
Speaker 3: deep State. We see this from the Daily Skeptic, We
Speaker 3: see it from Bablon b. I mean, these people have
Speaker 3: been totally can in by Musk worship, but not Brian
Speaker 3: shall Hobby at Health Impact News. He said, Elon Musk
Speaker 3: wants Americans to vote. He said, I told Joe Rogan
Speaker 3: vote like your life depends on it, he said, But
Speaker 3: it's actually his life that depends on it, says prosperity
Speaker 3: his money, which is his life. And again all these people,
Speaker 3: even the people who are hailing him as a hero,
Speaker 3: have got these pictures of him dressed up in his
Speaker 3: Bofamet outfit with his satanic upside down cross. I mean,
Speaker 3: nothing to see there, right, just move on? Well, Brian
Speaker 3: shall Hobby says, you know, one of the things that
Speaker 3: was interesting that came out of this, and I didn't
Speaker 3: see anybody else pick this up he said, I've read
Speaker 3: in the past that Elon must loves to play the
Speaker 3: online game called Diablo Spanish War. Of course it means double,
Speaker 3: and he says he sometimes plays it for many hours. However,
Speaker 3: Musk revealed that not only does he play this on
Speaker 3: online game, but he told Joe Rogan that he is
Speaker 3: in the top twenty worldwide for the highest scores in
Speaker 3: this game, and there's only one other American in the
Speaker 3: top twenty. Of course, what Elon Musk was saying in
Speaker 3: the clip, I'm not going to play it. But what
Speaker 3: Elon Musk was saying was that everybody else in the
Speaker 3: top twenty is Asian. So he's talking about, you know,
Speaker 3: the future is in Asia or whatever. So eighteen of
Speaker 3: the top twenty a Asian, and then you have Elon
Speaker 3: Musk and an American who are in the top twenty.
Speaker 3: He says, I'm in the top twenty in the world
Speaker 3: in Diablo for I'm listed with my actual name on
Speaker 3: the list. You know. Joe Rogan said, so, what's your
Speaker 3: handle there? You don't want to tell people? He goes, No,
Speaker 3: it's my actual name that's there. He says, there's only
Speaker 3: two Americans in the top twenty on one of them.
Speaker 3: If I play a video game on extreme difficulty, I
Speaker 3: have to concentrate fully on the game. He kind of
Speaker 3: helps him to relax, he said, so. Brian Shallabby says, well,
Speaker 3: you know, I don't have any time for something like this,
Speaker 3: but I know how popular online gaming has become in
Speaker 3: the past few years worldwide. As matter of fact, top
Speaker 3: gamers in the world earn millions of dollars in gaming.
Speaker 3: Show the chart that he put up there, the twenty
Speaker 3: richest online gamers. Here's the guy pootye Pie, you know,
Speaker 3: making over sixty million. Under him, is Richard Ninja, Tyler
Speaker 3: Blevins making forty million, Michael Shroud is making twenty eight million,
Speaker 3: and so forth. Right, so these people are making lots
Speaker 3: of money playing video games branchial hobby. Says well, I
Speaker 3: suspect this is not a hobby for most of these
Speaker 3: serious gamers who are making tens of millions of dollars,
Speaker 3: and a whole bunch of them, the one who is
Speaker 3: the twenty richest online gamers, the poorest one of them,
Speaker 3: is making over a million dollars a year. He says,
Speaker 3: It's basically a full time job for these people, right,
Speaker 3: they're out there competitively, and they're making tens of millions
Speaker 3: of dollars, he says, at least for a slight few
Speaker 3: who are among the top players worldwide. So if somebody
Speaker 3: can claim that they're in the top twenty of a
Speaker 3: game that is being played by millions of online gamers worldwide,
Speaker 3: what does that say about the person and the amount
Speaker 3: of time that he spends online gaming? He said, I
Speaker 3: would assume that pretty much everyone reading this article knows
Speaker 3: of people who are addicted to online gaming, just as
Speaker 3: much as I know people who are addicted to gambling.
Speaker 3: But what kind of people are they? If you know
Speaker 3: them or you know of them, Are they the type
Speaker 3: of people who usually corporate CEOs or rich doctors or
Speaker 3: rich lawyers. I personally don't know any gamers who spend
Speaker 3: that much time online and who are also successful business
Speaker 3: owners or professionals. Because spending so much time online gaming
Speaker 3: to boast that you are in the top twenty worldwide
Speaker 3: of a game that is one of the most popular
Speaker 3: that has millions of people playing, you wouldn't have enough
Speaker 3: time to run your business or to practice your PF successfully.
Speaker 3: So this begs a question that I've previously asked about
Speaker 3: Elon Musk. Is he smart or is he just rich stupid? Well,
Speaker 3: you know, there's also I'm surprised that Brian didn't put
Speaker 3: it in here. But there's also the thing where Satan
Speaker 3: Diablo says, worship me, I have all the kingdoms of
Speaker 3: the world. I can give you everything. Jesus didn't say no,
Speaker 3: you can't. You're lying to me, he responded. He says,
Speaker 3: it's in my power to do that. He didn't say no,
Speaker 3: it's not your power to do that. It is in
Speaker 3: Satan's power to give that whoever he wishes. Maybe he
Speaker 3: gives it to people who wear Bahomet costumes and upside
Speaker 3: down crosses. He says, I think the answer is clearer now.
Speaker 3: Musk did not invent the Tesla, but he bought it
Speaker 3: from the guys who did. And his SpaceX company has
Speaker 3: become rich on government contracts, and the evidence is that
Speaker 3: he is almost no hands on management of SpaceX, but
Speaker 3: he is wealthy enough to buy people who are smart
Speaker 3: and who do all the work. While Musk may get
Speaker 3: credit for SpaceX's ambitious mission to make life multiplanetary, he
Speaker 3: says SpaceX's org chart confirms something long understood by insiders
Speaker 3: of the one hundred and eighty billion dollar rocket startup.
Speaker 3: The president and chief operating Officer, Gwyn Shotwell is the
Speaker 3: one who's running the show. Shot Well overseas nearly every
Speaker 3: single team at SpaceX, which is around thirteen thousand employees
Speaker 3: at facilities spread across California, Texas, and Florida. Her twenty
Speaker 3: one direct reports include executives running the satellites internet business, Starlink,
Speaker 3: the Falcon rocket launch business, and the development of SpaceX's
Speaker 3: ambitious new rocket Starship. And that's according to an internal
Speaker 3: ORG chart. Among those direct reports to Shotwell is the
Speaker 3: top engineer, the chief financial office, or et cetera. Musk
Speaker 3: seems to have a lot of enemies on Wall Street,
Speaker 3: and they're probably and also not happy about his desire
Speaker 3: to replace banks with companies like X, which Musk wants
Speaker 3: to turn into the largest payment and bank replacement app
Speaker 3: in the world. Here's a reminder.
Speaker 9: Essentially, if done right, the X would be with serve
Speaker 9: people's financial needs to such a degree that over time
Speaker 9: it would become I don't know, maybe half of the
Speaker 9: global financial system wow, or some big number. I'm not
Speaker 9: sure what the numbers are pretty big, so it would
Speaker 9: be by far the biggest sort of financial institution. Like
Speaker 9: I said, not really in the way that people are
Speaker 9: used to thinking about banks, just just the most efficient
Speaker 9: database with a thing that is money. They said, like
Speaker 9: at least amount of fraud. Everything's real time and if
Speaker 9: it involves money in any way to be dealt with
Speaker 9: seamlessly on one of the location.
Speaker 3: And you know, as they said, whatever we're kind of
Speaker 3: using for money, you know, whatever that is, and we're
Speaker 3: going to talk about that as well. We're going to
Speaker 3: talk about tokenization and how that is. I think the
Speaker 3: direction that they're going it's going to be the de
Speaker 3: facto central bake digital currency. People are onto this game.
Speaker 3: If you know, Biden does it with decrees and declarations
Speaker 3: and here's all of government order for how we're going
Speaker 3: to roll this thing out. People like Biden, people like
Speaker 3: Elizabeth Warren, they're not as dangerous as people like Trump
Speaker 3: and Musk. Those guys will come after you in a
Speaker 3: very subtle way. And as Soilin Goy says, my gutards
Speaker 3: will cheer for digital ID if Trump sells it as
Speaker 3: a way to stop illegal immigration and election fraud. And
Speaker 3: I'll also add another one, the Christians will jump behind
Speaker 3: it if he uses it as a way to stop
Speaker 3: online porn for kids in Australia. They've just said we're
Speaker 3: going to make it illegal for kids to get on
Speaker 3: to social media before I think it's the age of
Speaker 3: sixteen or something like that. They want to be the parents,
Speaker 3: They want to you know, why can't parents do that?
Speaker 3: I think it's a very bad idea for kids to
Speaker 3: be on social media, especially the younger they are. The
Speaker 3: worse idea it is. But it's a bad idea even
Speaker 3: when you get older. It's a bad idea to spend
Speaker 3: much time on social media, really bad idea. But why
Speaker 3: can't we do that ourselves? Why do we need to
Speaker 3: have government do that? Why can't parents do that? Why? Well,
Speaker 3: you know, parents need to be able to say I'm sorry,
Speaker 3: but you can't do that because that's against the law.
Speaker 3: The parents are so weak that they don't have any
Speaker 3: printal authority anymore. Oh yeah, that's the case, I think,
Speaker 3: And so we get weaker and weaker. But yeah, you
Speaker 3: throw in the porn stuff and the Conservatives and the
Speaker 3: Christian maga people jump on it. Yeah, everybody's got to
Speaker 3: have an id to do everything. Got to have an
Speaker 3: ID to get online, travel, move anywhere. Jason Barker Knights
Speaker 3: of the Storm exactly, David, I've been pointing this out.
Speaker 3: Elin is not a genius except for grifting. He is
Speaker 3: a genius in terms of manipulating politicians. And we've just
Speaker 3: seen that he can understand who the people are that
Speaker 3: he needs to get behind to get what he wants.
Speaker 3: He is a genius at that. It's kind of like
Speaker 3: the Jeffrey Epstein tapes that came out by the guy
Speaker 3: who wrote a book about Trump, and he interviewed Jeffrey
Speaker 3: Epstein before Jeffrey Epstein died, we'll just say, whatever happened,
Speaker 3: or maybe he disappeared. Well, you know again, a lot
Speaker 3: of people think he didn't die, so before he he
Speaker 3: left us just inclusively there, he did an interview with
Speaker 3: this guy, right and they put the audio stuff up
Speaker 3: as a last minute dig at Trump because he said
Speaker 3: certain things like he said Trump he says he's not
Speaker 3: a businessman, he doesn't know how to read a balance sheet.
Speaker 3: He's awful at all that he says. But he's a
Speaker 3: genius at one thing. He knows real estate, and he
Speaker 3: knows where to find the value in real estate. And
Speaker 3: I think that's the case with Elon Musk. He's a
Speaker 3: genius at knowing who to find the people that he
Speaker 3: needs to manipulate. Again, Jason Barker, Knights of the Storm.
Speaker 3: You'll see him on Twitter as well as go to
Speaker 3: the Knights. I think it's the Knights of the Storm
Speaker 3: dot com. But if you go there, they've got a
Speaker 3: list of programs and they were nice enough to include me,
Speaker 3: But a lot of programs like Guard Goldsmith's program, Liberty
Speaker 3: Conspiracy and many many others, And so a whole bunch
Speaker 3: of people that I think are honest and that they
Speaker 3: think are honest, that tell you what they really think
Speaker 3: rather than trying to tell the room what the room
Speaker 3: wants to hear. It's a really important thing. Thank you
Speaker 3: very much for the tip, Doug. I appreciate that. Well,
Speaker 3: just real quickly before we leave this AI thing. This
Speaker 3: from expose a News in the UK expose a News
Speaker 3: dot com. Those who push for a transhuman AI future
Speaker 3: are part of a clinically insane, anti life, demonic cult
Speaker 3: that's right now. One thing about that is that the
Speaker 3: technocracy will put themselves out there as not being anti life.
Speaker 3: They want you to have more kids that they can control.
Speaker 3: But it is a demonic cult, Julia Rose writes. To
Speaker 3: resist this enslavement, people must adopt a lifestyle that is
Speaker 3: the opposite of one that is dependent on digital technology,
Speaker 3: starting by recognizing their reliance on it and taking steps
Speaker 3: to release themselves from its control. And you know, just
Speaker 3: as I talked about yesterday, releasing yourself from the control
Speaker 3: of I've got to go to college and I've got
Speaker 3: to get a job with a big corporation, that type
Speaker 3: of thing, right, I mean, it used to be you
Speaker 3: can get a job and that was a job for
Speaker 3: life or someone. Those days are long gone. That was
Speaker 3: really dying, even when I was an engineer forty five
Speaker 3: years ago. But she says, tapping into this common sense
Speaker 3: and freeing oneself from the blind acceptance of the digital
Speaker 3: control system, because that's going to be another place that
Speaker 3: it inserts itself. The proponents of a transhumanist AI future
Speaker 3: are clinically insane, anti life, demon a demonic cult. Do
Speaker 3: I still want to do business with him? And you know,
Speaker 3: when we look at AI, it is the essence of
Speaker 3: Satanic cult. You know, Satan doesn't create, he copies what
Speaker 3: God has created. And that's exactly what it does. He
Speaker 3: is the father of lies. AI is designed to lie.
Speaker 3: AI is designed to surveil us and to pull out
Speaker 3: and amplify our faults to the people who want to
Speaker 3: rule over us as if they were God. One can
Speaker 3: only put an end to something by first recognizing its
Speaker 3: existence and one's reliance upon it. This is the first
Speaker 3: phase of release from slavery and in taking control of
Speaker 3: one's destiny. So what could such a diametrically opposite lifestyle
Speaker 3: to one of a toxic it dependency, b and practice.
Speaker 3: It could take many different forms, it could go many
Speaker 3: different directions, but it'd all be about getting out of
Speaker 3: jail while one still can. And you said, down, that's
Speaker 3: one of the reasons why they call them cell phones.
Speaker 3: It's the way of keeping us in an open air,
Speaker 3: wireless prison, if you will. It's going to be increasingly
Speaker 3: used for that. But what she does is she focuses
Speaker 3: on electricity being at the center of that. And I've
Speaker 3: said that for the longest time that the electric grid
Speaker 3: and the reason they are so manic to replace everything
Speaker 3: with all electric compliances, all electric heating and air conditioning,
Speaker 3: everything has got to be electric. It's got to be
Speaker 3: battery operated. It can't have like a fuel cell that
Speaker 3: generates the electricity because you must be to the electric grid,
Speaker 3: because the electric grid is going to be their control grid.
Speaker 3: And that's why they're so manic about it. Public transportation,
Speaker 3: private cars, cooking, heat pumps, home heating, air conditioning, metering systems,
Speaker 3: telephone chargers, all communication tools, all household items, street lights,
Speaker 3: ventilation systems, and on and on. It's all going to
Speaker 3: be tied to the grid to monitor and to control you.
Speaker 3: And so when she talks about this, she's very concerned
Speaker 3: about EMF perhaps, you know, if there's nanoparticles or things
Speaker 3: like that in the vaccines or the chemtrails, it's going
Speaker 3: to be manipulating us. But where we part ways is
Speaker 3: where she says, we are on Earth, but we are
Speaker 3: from the Cosmos. We're universal sparks of the supreme nucleus
Speaker 3: that brought all life into being. Now she's heading into
Speaker 3: this technocracy new age nonsense that Alex does all the time,
Speaker 3: Alex Jones, you know, and it is absolute nonsense. It
Speaker 3: is anesthetical to what we believe is Christians, And we
Speaker 3: don't come from the cosmos. We were divinely created, and
Speaker 3: so we don't ignore that. And here's an example of that.
Speaker 3: For example, we have the human brain. This is an
Speaker 3: interesting article. A decade ago, a small, unassuming brain sample
Speaker 3: arrived at doctor Jeff Lickman's lab at Harvard University. It
Speaker 3: measured less in size than a grain of rice. And
Speaker 3: yet this one cubic millimeter of tissue contained fifty seven
Speaker 3: thousand cells and one hundred and one hundred and fifty
Speaker 3: million set apses, each one a vital part of the
Speaker 3: brain's intricate communication system. You said, this thing is part
Speaker 3: of brain tissue that is smaller than a grain of ice,
Speaker 3: is more complicated and more interconnected than all these networks
Speaker 3: that they're talking about. Doesn't that say to you that
Speaker 3: it was created by God, that it was a created
Speaker 3: and designed thing. It just didn't happen by random chance.
Speaker 3: It couldn't. And when you look at its design, truly
Speaker 3: is amazing. Because you get this many synapses and transistors
Speaker 3: and things like that, you're going to have to have
Speaker 3: some heat issues with it. And yet for the entire brain,
Speaker 3: not just for a little piece of it that's smaller
Speaker 3: than a grain of rice, all the calculations that are
Speaker 3: being done by our brain. It's not overheating. Isn't that interesting?
Speaker 3: After a decade of collaboration with Google scientist, a monumental
Speaker 3: data set of fourteen hundred terabytes has turned in the
Speaker 3: most detailed map of the human brain ever created. A
Speaker 3: terabyte is for most people gigantic, yet a fragment of
Speaker 3: a human brain, just a minuscule, keeny weeny little bit
Speaker 3: of human brain. Still thousands and thousands of terabytes, They said,
Speaker 3: the detail three D reconstruction reveals beautiful structures in the brain,
Speaker 3: neurons forming dozens of connections. Plup some of the pictures
Speaker 3: that they have there because they've gone in, look at
Speaker 3: that dozens of connections, mirror image, neutral pairs, networks far
Speaker 3: more complex than expected. See, if they thought that this
Speaker 3: all just came together by random chance processes, they wouldn't
Speaker 3: expect this kind of complexity, just like they didn't expect
Speaker 3: the complexity of DNA, and they still don't understand it.
Speaker 3: They'll still come in and say, you know, most of
Speaker 3: the DNA's junk DNA. No, that means that you don't
Speaker 3: understand it. These are some of the groundbreaking discoveries, they said,
Speaker 3: I remember the moment going into the map and looking
Speaker 3: at just one individual synapse from the woman's brain and
Speaker 3: then zooming out into these other millions of pixels set
Speaker 3: a senior scientist at Google, it felt sort of spiritual excitatory.
Speaker 3: Neurons color coded by size, with red being the largest
Speaker 3: and blue the smallest. Cell cores range from fifteen to
Speaker 3: thirty micrometers, they said. One unexpected discovery in the study
Speaker 3: was the presence of axon whorls who rls tangled loops
Speaker 3: of blue axons, which typically transmit signals away from nerve cells.
Speaker 3: These structures were rare in the sample, and sometimes they
Speaker 3: appear to be resting on yellow cells. Their purpose remains unclear. Well, again,
Speaker 3: we can see that we are all created. That's very clear.
Speaker 3: It's clear, and creation it's clear. When the more we
Speaker 3: look and the more we know, the less excuse there
Speaker 3: is to deny that there is a creator. And yet
Speaker 3: when you see that there is a creator like this brain,
Speaker 3: the purpose can still be unclear. And so I think
Speaker 3: the purpose is clear when you read the Bible. I
Speaker 3: think the Bible has many proofs in it that whether
Speaker 3: you're talking about prophecy centuries ahead of time, that can
Speaker 3: be validated the age of the books as well as
Speaker 3: what exactly happened when we talk about prophecy, when you
Speaker 3: talk about the internal consistency with it, many other things, archaeology,
Speaker 3: all these other outside proofs, but clearly, if you read it,
Speaker 3: I think with an open mind, you will see that
Speaker 3: purpose that is there. We're going to take a quick
Speaker 3: break and we will be right back.
Speaker 2: Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: Well, welcome back. McGowan fan says David. I'm a chartered
Speaker 3: financial analyst and I attended events concerning tokenization. Please post
Speaker 3: a segment about this so I can pass it along.
Speaker 3: We don't see the danger book smarts versus street smarts. Well,
Speaker 3: there happens to be an excellent article about tokenization on
Speaker 3: Wine Press News and it refers to Gerald Silent's Trends
Speaker 3: Journal back in December of twenty twenty three. Saw this
Speaker 3: coming and he's got one of the best explanations and
Speaker 3: trends journal I've seen anywhere. By the way, you can
Speaker 3: get ten percent off of Transjournal Jeralsalint's trans Journal with
Speaker 3: a code night. Just go to trends Journal dot com.
Speaker 3: You can see samples of it there, excellent stuff and relevant.
Speaker 3: It's not about Taylor Swift, It's about tokenization. And so
Speaker 3: wine Press News comments and says it may not get
Speaker 3: announce of mainstream or even alternative media coverage, but right now,
Speaker 3: world central banks, financial juggernauts, fintech groups are rapidly developing
Speaker 3: a system by which literally everything will be converted into
Speaker 3: a unique digital record stored on a blockchain. This process
Speaker 3: is known as tokenization, where all things will be converted
Speaker 3: into a token, a piece of digital representation that's then bought, sold,
Speaker 3: and traded as a commodity. This system is needed to
Speaker 3: truly enable proper effectiveness for central bank digital currencies. Such
Speaker 3: a system would fully allow central banks and asset managers
Speaker 3: to know precisely what people possess at all times, as
Speaker 3: all transactions and purchases would be completely tracked and mitigated
Speaker 3: in real time, and would us fulfill the ominous statement
Speaker 3: by the World Economic Form that you will own nothing
Speaker 3: but be happy. Right, and so this is the type
Speaker 3: of this tokenization. I think maybe you should call it
Speaker 3: fiatization in a sense because they can take things that
Speaker 3: are worthless. I mean, look at the NFTs, right, non
Speaker 3: fungible tokens, and Trump is certainly on board of that.
Speaker 3: He's made a lot of money selling some artwork to
Speaker 3: people inflated prices and saying it's unique. You now own
Speaker 3: this type of thing, and they can trace the ownership
Speaker 3: of it, so they can authenticate it just in the
Speaker 3: same way that you would authenticate a signature on a
Speaker 3: even more easily like you would authenticate a signature on
Speaker 3: a baseball by a baseball player something like that. But
Speaker 3: certainly they understand this, I think is all about the
Speaker 3: when we start to look at things like ETFs and
Speaker 3: stuff like that. We've looked at that in the past.
Speaker 4: And.
Speaker 3: Paper gold and paper silver. You've had derivatives like we
Speaker 3: kind of blew up the real estate market. You know,
Speaker 3: real estate derivatives are not real estate. Okay, paper gold
Speaker 3: is not gold, paper silver is not silver. But by
Speaker 3: putting things in a derivative status, and what they're doing
Speaker 3: is they're kind of adding this blockchain aspect of it,
Speaker 3: which is supposed to give it some authenticity and yet
Speaker 3: at the same time it's going to make it very,
Speaker 3: very traceable. That's one of the things that Steve Chennik
Speaker 3: was saying with the stings. Hey, look we can You know,
Speaker 3: we had blockchain watermark ballots, so we can trace all
Speaker 3: these things. Those guys have been plotting this kind of
Speaker 3: stuff for quite some time now. Of course that was
Speaker 3: a lie, they didn't have that, but that would be
Speaker 3: the way that you would track what people do, whether
Speaker 3: they're voting or doing something else. So in December twenty
Speaker 3: twenty three, tuns Journal warned envision for a moment a
Speaker 3: mechanism where every single conceivable asset, including life itself or
Speaker 3: life expectancy, which is also an asset, is reduced into
Speaker 3: a token. Well, I'm here to reveal to you that
Speaker 3: this is exactly what is going to happen. The new
Speaker 3: tokenized system is going to represent, he says. Pay attention
Speaker 3: to that word represent not just currency and other financial
Speaker 3: assets such as real estate, but all assets, including you,
Speaker 3: your past, what you have done, even speculation on what
Speaker 3: you may do, including things like your life expectancy. Understand
Speaker 3: that the Internet of Things is also going to be
Speaker 3: the Internet of people, because they see you as a
Speaker 3: thing that needs to be tracked and traced. What you earn,
Speaker 3: what you will potentially earn in the future, what you buy,
Speaker 3: what you may buy past illnesses, potential future illnesses, family history,
Speaker 3: what medications you take, what medications you will probably we
Speaker 3: need in the future, You're vax record, your DNA, et cetera.
Speaker 3: Which means that this new token based system in its entirety,
Speaker 3: will reduce, will represent everything to a digital tradable asset.
Speaker 3: Human life is going to become a tradable, cross border
Speaker 3: convertible asset along with every manner of its associated derivatives.
Speaker 3: Tokenization is simple and incredibly cost effective. Tokenization eliminates the
Speaker 3: need for any asset to be converted into something else
Speaker 3: or transactions that take place anywhere in the world. This
Speaker 3: is the universal new world, one world system. And when
Speaker 3: Eli Musk starts talking about well, I can see that
Speaker 3: X is going to be some way that we have money,
Speaker 3: whatever money is, whatever they've tokenized, and they want to
Speaker 3: be able to track and trace, and you know, he says,
Speaker 3: we could do that there, and I could see it
Speaker 3: being half of the world transactions. So again, what is
Speaker 3: a token? Will Winepress News says, according to the Bank
Speaker 3: of International Settlements, a relatively unknown entity referred to as
Speaker 3: the Central Banks of central banks, whose mission is to
Speaker 3: quote support central banks pursuit of monetary and financial stability
Speaker 3: through international cooperation, and to act as a bank for
Speaker 3: central banks. That's their definition. They define tokenization as quote
Speaker 3: the process of representing claims digitally on a programmable platform
Speaker 3: unquote like X, you know maybe or any of these,
Speaker 3: adding that a token can be seen as an next
Speaker 3: logical step in digital record keeping and asset transfer. A
Speaker 3: token is a digital asset that can be manipulated by
Speaker 3: financial institution. A tokenized customer's deposit is subject to the
Speaker 3: rules defined by its issure. For example, the token may
Speaker 3: be spent or exchange only within the scope of a
Speaker 3: pre defined set of rules. An asset, for example, a
Speaker 3: customer's bank deposit, may have rules and allow the money
Speaker 3: to be spent only on certain services or products. This
Speaker 3: is what we've talked about the danger of central bank
Speaker 3: digital currency. Sorry you've had too much meat. I don't
Speaker 3: like it when people buy more than x amount of
Speaker 3: milk or whatever. You can't, I'm not going to approve
Speaker 3: that transaction, block it, and they track everything that you
Speaker 3: have consumed. Further, a token stores all information about the
Speaker 3: underlying asset, the previous owners, the dates of purchase, sale,
Speaker 3: transaction dates, etc. And this data is all stored on
Speaker 3: the blockchain that is managed by a financial institution or
Speaker 3: maybe by Elon Musk's X. You know, Larry Fink is
Speaker 3: all about toganization, and Larry Fink says this election doesn't
Speaker 3: change anything, doesn't change anything in terms of what he
Speaker 3: wants to do, because he knows that this might actually
Speaker 3: be a faster path. You got Trump who has had experience,
Speaker 3: so then fts you've got Musk, who certainly knows what
Speaker 3: this is all about. It's not going to change any
Speaker 3: of Larry Fink Black Rock CEO, it's not going to
Speaker 3: change any of his plans because he's fully on board
Speaker 3: with tokenization. This is one of the reasons why and
Speaker 3: you know, before we do we have Eric yet. Okay, good,
Speaker 3: So before we go to Eric, this is one of
Speaker 3: the reasons why I want to get out of this system.
Speaker 3: I want to get out of digital. Tony Ardban has
Speaker 3: set up David Knight dot Gold. You can start accumulating
Speaker 3: gold and silver on a regular basis. He's set up
Speaker 3: the wolf Pack so you can buy in fifty dollars
Speaker 3: is the lowest level. I don't know what the highest
Speaker 3: level is, but you can set up a savings program
Speaker 3: and gradually accumulate this cost, average it and all the
Speaker 3: rest of this, you know, on a regular basis as
Speaker 3: kind of a wealth protection, but also to get out
Speaker 3: of the system. Like I was just talking about the
Speaker 3: other lady said, they want to trap. They want everything
Speaker 3: to be electric so that we're trapped on their control grid.
Speaker 3: They want everything to be on a blockchain. They can
Speaker 3: see everything that we're doing. I don't want that, And
Speaker 3: so if you want freedom, you've got to start thinking
Speaker 3: about how you're going to actively get out of that system,
Speaker 3: such your cell phone doesn't become your Gail cell and
Speaker 3: all the rest of this, and tokenization is a huge
Speaker 3: part of it, and we've got more that we could
Speaker 3: say about it, but we're not going to do that today.
Speaker 3: We're going to take a quick break and we will
Speaker 3: be right back.
Speaker 2: You know, world of deceit, Telling the truth is a
Speaker 2: revolutionary act. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: All right, And joining us now is Eric Peters of
Speaker 3: Eric Peters auto dot com autos plural Eric petersautos dot com.
Speaker 3: And I wanted to get Eric on because he's had
Speaker 3: He's posted several things about the election, and of course
Speaker 3: also about cars. I always love to talk about cars
Speaker 3: and transportation because that is a very important component today
Speaker 3: of freedom, and that's what they want to take away
Speaker 3: from us. Good to have you on, Eric, Thanks thank
Speaker 3: you for joining us.
Speaker 1: Oh, likewise, say thank you for having me. I'm not
Speaker 1: sure whether to be leaved or nervous, and I'd like
Speaker 1: to show the audience something in the way of the
Speaker 1: historical remembers. You guys, remember this, This.
Speaker 3: Is that's Bush clod I say the nose, I couldn't
Speaker 3: say it was straight on. I couldn't say they had
Speaker 3: like a Pinocchio thing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it was a real naval aviator. But the reason
Speaker 1: that I wanted to bring him up people might recall
Speaker 1: when conservatives Republicans, not so much libertarians, but conservatives and
Speaker 1: Republicans were just ecstatic that George W. Bush meat al Gore.
Speaker 1: You know, we had saved all the danger of al Gore.
Speaker 1: And when he became the war president, he had something
Speaker 1: like a ninety plus percent approval rating and essentially was
Speaker 1: able to rule as a dictator. And he called himself
Speaker 1: essentially that I am the desire. You remember that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And we got into great trouble because of that, and
Speaker 1: then worse trouble followed on his heels. Because I believe
Speaker 1: that it was on account of everything that George W.
Speaker 1: Bush did that we ended up with Barack Obama, which
Speaker 1: in turn gave us Trump and Biden and all the
Speaker 1: rest of it. So these things do have consequences, and
Speaker 1: I think it's important that well, you know, I'm very
Speaker 1: much relieved that the overt communists didn't win this particular selection.
Speaker 1: I'm still kind of nervous about what the Orange Man
Speaker 1: might actually once he's inaugurated two months from now.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, yeah, I saw. You know, I've been talking
Speaker 3: about these pronouncements from a lot of Christian leaders, saying, well,
Speaker 3: you know, you just got to there's no question about
Speaker 3: you know, you can't vote for her, so you got
Speaker 3: to vote for him. That type of thing. And one
Speaker 3: guy has stood out and he has caught a lot
Speaker 3: of grief, and he said this because you got the
Speaker 3: lesser two evils. He said, the presidential electure results. Having
Speaker 3: delivered us from one evil, God now tests us with
Speaker 3: another right. And I thought that was pretty good. He's
Speaker 3: testing you to see, because the price of liberty is
Speaker 3: eternal vigilance. And the key thing about Trump is that
Speaker 3: he puts people to sleep and he puts a pacifire
Speaker 3: in their mouth. Everybody and this club is afraid to
Speaker 3: speak out. Just like if you were at a drag
Speaker 3: queen festival, you don't want to point out that the
Speaker 3: lady up on stage or the man up on stage
Speaker 3: isn't wearing any clothes, right, because then everybody's going to
Speaker 3: hop on you. You don't want to point out that the
Speaker 3: Emperor is engaging in naked tyranny if you're part of
Speaker 3: the Maga cult, because then they're all going to hop
Speaker 3: on you as well.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, a lot of people are rightly, in my view,
Speaker 1: concerned with regard to what might happen visa the Israel
Speaker 1: and what's going on there, and you know, I share
Speaker 1: that concern. But another concern that I have, I think
Speaker 1: is more subtle, or at least it hasn't been commented
Speaker 1: on very much that I'm aware of. You know, one
Speaker 1: of the planks I think that got Trump elected was
Speaker 1: that he's going to promise to do something about this
Speaker 1: flood of illegal aliens migrants into the country. Well, what
Speaker 1: exactly is he going to do and what are people
Speaker 1: going to be willing to accept, particularly on you know,
Speaker 1: so to speak, our side of the fence, what if
Speaker 1: he institutes a regime of your papers please, you know,
Speaker 1: on us, you know, and of course our side largely
Speaker 1: I think would probably go along with that, because after all,
Speaker 1: we got to get it under control, you know, we
Speaker 1: got to catch all these illegal aliens and do something
Speaker 1: about them. But what may end up happening is something
Speaker 1: is done to us, and I'm very much concerned about that.
Speaker 3: Oh I agree as well. We were just talking about
Speaker 3: that earlier. Had a listener who pointed that out, and
Speaker 3: I said, yeah, that's right. The immigration and several of
Speaker 3: these voters, voter fraud and that type of But it'll
Speaker 3: also be you know, a lot of people will jump
Speaker 3: on and say, well, you know, we got porn being
Speaker 3: given to kids, so we need to have an ID
Speaker 3: to get on the internet and all this other kind
Speaker 3: of stuff. Right, because they're already saying in Australia that
Speaker 3: you can't use social media. They're introducing a bill so
Speaker 3: you can't use social media if you're not sixteen years old.
Speaker 3: How they going to know that? Well, that means that
Speaker 3: everybody's got a register, right that's obviously the situation. So
Speaker 3: if you want government to fix everything like that, you're
Speaker 3: going to have to give it total to solitary and power.
Speaker 3: And that is a very dangerous thing. And I've played
Speaker 3: the clip of Trump thing We're going to stop them
Speaker 3: by the air, by the land, by the sea, you know,
Speaker 3: and all the rest of this stuff. The technocracy would
Speaker 3: love to do this with IDs, digital IDs. And as
Speaker 3: you point out, your identity papers please right. The hallmark
Speaker 3: of an occupied to tolitarian government is to have to
Speaker 3: have identity papers to go everywhere, including internally.
Speaker 1: I don't think Trump is a stupid man. I think
Speaker 1: it's silly to suggest that he's stupid. But I do
Speaker 1: think that he can be thoughtless and reactionary and very
Speaker 1: delibs sometimes in terms of the things that he advocates,
Speaker 1: uh you know, the classic who want example of that
Speaker 1: might be uh, you know, due process later, take the
Speaker 1: guns now, things like that, instead of stopping for a
Speaker 1: little bit to think about it before he shoots off
Speaker 1: at the mouth or acts. And I wish that he
Speaker 1: were a little bit more reflective than thoughtful. But we'll see,
Speaker 1: you know, the die has been cast. As Caesar said before,
Speaker 1: he lost the rubicon. Uh, and it's now essentially a fate,
Speaker 1: a complete We're going to see what he does, and
Speaker 1: it's going to get very interesting.
Speaker 3: I think I think we crossed rubicon four years ago. Well,
Speaker 3: true enough, that wasn't a rubicon. I don't know what is, but.
Speaker 1: You know, this is this is you know, And people
Speaker 1: use the word consequential perhaps too often, but I do
Speaker 1: think this is a consequential election in that if he
Speaker 1: does not do anything, I don't think it's going to
Speaker 1: wear will So He's probably going to do something. And
Speaker 1: then the question becomes, Okay, exactly what and how is
Speaker 1: that going to affect America and Americans? You know, and
Speaker 1: it may affect a man and Americans in a very
Speaker 1: negative manner that they're right now completely blisfully unaware of
Speaker 1: as a bask in the orange globe.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right. Well, I fully expect him to really
Speaker 3: energize the base and see them go absolutely crazy if
Speaker 3: he de escalates or ends this Ukraine war. Right, this
Speaker 3: is wearing on. Everybody is sick of that as well,
Speaker 3: sick of the money. Every Zelensky has become this comic
Speaker 3: little clown that's grifting everybody so you know, he could
Speaker 3: end that, but I think at the same time what
Speaker 3: he would do is escalate the war with Iran because
Speaker 3: you've got Lindsay Graham and all these other people, and
Speaker 3: Lindsey Graham was saying, yeah, they got this man, I
Speaker 3: forget what he was. It's like they got seventeen trillion
Speaker 3: dollars worth of resources and Ukraine. We don't want Russia
Speaker 3: getting all that. We want it for ourselves, you know,
Speaker 3: I mean this is like neocolonialism. It's crazy, and he's
Speaker 3: actually saying this kind of.
Speaker 1: It's apocalyptic and dangerous. He probably this goes back a
Speaker 1: few weeks before the election to Scott Riber, you know,
Speaker 1: the UN the Inspector of Weapons of Mass Destruction, because
Speaker 1: a very incredible person published an interesting article about what
Speaker 1: appears to have been an underground nuclear test in Iraq.
Speaker 1: You know, there was seismic evidence that something happened out
Speaker 1: there that wasn't an earthquake. It's not yet been verified,
Speaker 1: but the possibility that they have acquired a nuclear weapons
Speaker 1: capability is something that really ought to be thought about.
Speaker 1: You know, if if Trump decides to lob bombs on them,
Speaker 1: they might swamp back a different kind of bomb and
Speaker 1: start something altogether horrible. You know, they could be absolutely
Speaker 1: cataclus them for all of us. And I pray that
Speaker 1: saner commer heads prevailed over this thing.
Speaker 3: Well, I think that, you know, certainly they would have
Speaker 3: to do something asymmetric. They would not be able to
Speaker 3: launch a trans continental ballistic at the United States and
Speaker 3: hit US. What they would wind up doing maybe smuggling something,
Speaker 3: you know, across the open border. And then that would
Speaker 3: be the excuse to clamp everything down. And now everybody
Speaker 3: is clamoring for complete biometric control and IDA and all
Speaker 3: that because we don't want to have another one of
Speaker 3: these attacks. So yeah, I think something like that that
Speaker 3: easily could happen. But you know, you talk about how
Speaker 3: Trump can change. Earlier in the program, as I was
Speaker 3: talking about Elon Musk, and of course I said, you're
Speaker 3: going to be coming on. I said, the first time
Speaker 3: I talked to you, we talked about Elon Musk is
Speaker 3: the King of crony capitalism. That was your article at
Speaker 3: the time. Now I guess he's going to be the
Speaker 3: president of crony capitalism. And it's just amazing to me
Speaker 3: to see this guy who's become the world's richest man
Speaker 3: put out as somebody who is going to make government
Speaker 3: eliminate government waste. He is government waste.
Speaker 1: I wonder whether Trump, now that Elon Musk is apparently
Speaker 1: his best friend, is going to do anything to end
Speaker 1: this pushing of the electric vehicles that have made Elon
Speaker 1: Musco billionaire. Most people outside of the business don't understand that.
Speaker 1: The reason the Muscus of billionaires because he's managed to
Speaker 1: leverage these zero emissions requirements and these carbon credits into
Speaker 1: this vast empire that's funded his electric car drift. Now,
Speaker 1: you know one thing I would like to see Trump do,
Speaker 1: and I hope that he does do this is tackles
Speaker 1: the issue of the permanent bureaucracy, the regulatory state, which
Speaker 1: is serving now as a de facto legislature. You know,
Speaker 1: they'll issue a regulation and the regulation has to be
Speaker 1: complied with, so it has the force of law, and
Speaker 1: yet it's not a law, and it's not constitutional. The
Speaker 1: Constitution says that Congress must write the laws. Congress has
Speaker 1: abrogated that and has given it over to this unelected
Speaker 1: regulatory apparat for a number of reasons. One they're lazy,
Speaker 1: but two I think more importantly, they do not want
Speaker 1: to be held accountable. Now Congressmen can say, well, it's
Speaker 1: not my fault, it's the bureaucracy. You know, the reason
Speaker 1: that you you know, you have to spend a fortune
Speaker 1: to get your homes air condition to replaced. Now it's
Speaker 1: not because of me. You know, these bureaucracts did it,
Speaker 1: These all whole bureaucrats. And of course you can't vote
Speaker 1: the bureaucrats out, so they're utterly unaccountable once they get
Speaker 1: in there. So, you know, Trump has a constitutional argument,
Speaker 1: first of all, and he even has a juridical one
Speaker 1: in regard to the Chevron decision, which says that, you know,
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court ruled that these these bureaucrats can't just
Speaker 1: summarily issue decrees like that that have the force of law.
Speaker 1: And then there's just the war argument is wrong. Why
Speaker 1: do they get to one more shot over our lives?
Speaker 1: So I hope he'll do that. Unfortunately, I don't think
Speaker 1: he'll do that. Everything that he has said thus far
Speaker 1: indicates that he's not so much opposed to regulations, he's
Speaker 1: just opposed to the way the regulations have been used
Speaker 1: by the other side. So in that sense he's sort
Speaker 1: of a typical Republican and that he's not opposed to
Speaker 1: big government. He just wants big government to be used
Speaker 1: in the way that he'd like the government to be used.
Speaker 3: Oh, I agree, I agree. And you know, if we
Speaker 3: go back and we look, and I've talked about this
Speaker 3: many times, you get civil asset forfeiture for example, right,
Speaker 3: people have their property stolen, as you well know, you know,
Speaker 3: in the name of the war on drugs, they steal
Speaker 3: people's property. They call it asset forfeiture, a theft. And
Speaker 3: they don't find you guilty. First, they don't even charge
Speaker 3: you with the crime. They charge the property with the crime.
Speaker 3: So it's the US government versus nine thousand dollars cash,
Speaker 3: or the US government versus lear Jet serial numbers such
Speaker 3: and such. And they say that they don't have to
Speaker 3: follow the Constitution because they say that rules are different
Speaker 3: they and so they not only have to find they
Speaker 3: don't have to find you guilty. You don't have a
Speaker 3: presumption of innocence. They don't have to have an indictment,
Speaker 3: a trial, a finding of guilt. And they are also
Speaker 3: not required to obey the prohibition against excessive fines and
Speaker 3: punishment because they say it's a rule, not a law.
Speaker 3: So if it was done by Congress, it would be
Speaker 3: a law and they'd have to follow the Constitution. But
Speaker 3: if they create this as a rule, none of the
Speaker 3: Constitution applies. That's one of the most amazing things. And
Speaker 3: both Republicans and Democrats go along with it because you
Speaker 3: point out if things go wrong, they don't want the
Speaker 3: responsibility for it, and they can always if things go wrong,
Speaker 3: they can always blame it on that regulatory agency, and
Speaker 3: they can come in and rescue everybody and look like
Speaker 3: the good guys by putting the regulatory agency back in
Speaker 3: its place. And so that allows the implausible deniability from
Speaker 3: all this stuff. They love to abdicate their authority over
Speaker 3: to it. And I'll give you an example of Trump
Speaker 3: doing this in his first term. The Dreamer thing, right,
Speaker 3: the idea that you had daka the Deferred Action on
Speaker 3: Childhood rivals. That was an executive order from the Obama administration.
Speaker 3: It wasn't a law coming from Congress, and so they
Speaker 3: just put this thing out as an executive order. Now
Speaker 3: Trump comes along and he says, well, I'm going to
Speaker 3: change that. I'm going to get rid of that but
Speaker 3: I've got to ask permission from the Supreme Court to
Speaker 3: do that. It's like, how do you have to ask
Speaker 3: them permission? As for an executive order from the previous president?
Speaker 3: You can just do it. But he played that game
Speaker 3: and then the Supreme Court came back and said, no,
Speaker 3: you can't do it, and so he said, oh, okay,
Speaker 3: I can't do it. And so it allows these guys
Speaker 3: to escape from their campaign promises and all the rest
Speaker 3: of this stuff. And that whole regulatory rule regime is awful.
Speaker 3: And we saw it in spades when all the pandemic
Speaker 3: stuff came, didn't we re see.
Speaker 1: As it is tyrannical. They call it an administrative procedure
Speaker 1: and it goes all the way down in a number
Speaker 1: of states to traffic infractions. It used to be that
Speaker 1: you'd actually have a day in court, you know, if
Speaker 1: a cop pulls you over for something, speeding, whatever it
Speaker 1: might be, you had a legal right to your day
Speaker 1: in court and to present your case to a judge
Speaker 1: and even a jury if you wanted to. In some cases, well,
Speaker 1: what they did was to make it into an administrative
Speaker 1: matter and in some cases handed over into a private
Speaker 1: company to deal with and you had the only thing
Speaker 1: that you were allowed to do was to submit in writing,
Speaker 1: not in person. You know, your your supposed explanation and
Speaker 1: or excuse or defense or whatever it was. And that
Speaker 1: was totally performa. You know, you're going to pay regardless,
Speaker 1: you know, and if you didn't pay, then they'd go
Speaker 1: after you with the credit card credit bureaus then slam
Speaker 1: your credit you know, if you didn't, if you didn't
Speaker 1: hand over the money. And it's a really solid thing,
Speaker 1: and it's just sort of leached out and pervaded the
Speaker 1: whole system. And I do think the one positive thing
Speaker 1: I think we can we can take away from this election,
Speaker 1: I do think there is an awakening going on. I
Speaker 1: think by and large, a lot of people are beginning
Speaker 1: to realize the maliciousness that just saturates the system now
Speaker 1: and how the deck is stacked. And granted, you know
Speaker 1: that Trumps has leveraged and used that, but that doesn't
Speaker 1: mean it's not real, and that doesn't mean that it
Speaker 1: is going to be sated by non action. I think
Speaker 1: people are going to demand that things get better, and
Speaker 1: that is something that makes me feel good about the
Speaker 1: election results.
Speaker 3: Well, I think you know, when you're talking about the
Speaker 3: red light cameras and speed cameras and things like that,
Speaker 3: where you've got a corporation that is accusing you of
Speaker 3: something and you don't have a right to confront your accuser.
Speaker 3: Sometimes that's been overturned in Texas, and I don't know
Speaker 3: how it is in Virginia. I don't know how it
Speaker 3: is in Tennessee either. But in Texas, it was in
Speaker 3: the state constitution that if you got a speeding ticket,
Speaker 3: you could demand a jury trial. And I used that
Speaker 3: demand for a couple of tickets that I got in
Speaker 3: Texas to basically negotiate away the ticket and you know,
Speaker 3: to make it disappear, and because they don't want to
Speaker 3: do a jury trial. So it's a great negotiating tool.
Speaker 3: I didn't absolutely I didn't have the time where I
Speaker 3: could go do it. You know, I'm going to travel
Speaker 3: to some speed trapped town in East Texas and fight
Speaker 3: this thing in a small hit. But I hung tough
Speaker 3: on it and made the thing go away. But that's
Speaker 3: the key thing, and you can put that in. My
Speaker 3: point is is that you can put that in at
Speaker 3: the state level, local level things like that to stop
Speaker 3: red light cameras, to stop speed cameras, to have a
Speaker 3: day in court. Those are the types of things that
Speaker 3: you can do at the local level that Trump isn't
Speaker 3: necessarily going to do anything for you or the Congress.
Speaker 3: We need to start redirecting. I think everybody's focused back
Speaker 3: to the local level. I think that's where it's really important.
Speaker 1: Well, I agree, but at the same time, there is
Speaker 1: absolutely now a mandate, and it's not just Trump's. It
Speaker 1: operates in the House and the Senate. The Republicans have
Speaker 1: been handed this victory, and I think one of the
Speaker 1: things that they will hold their feet to the fire too,
Speaker 1: with regard to these regulations and the regulatory operatus and
Speaker 1: going forward, if we're going to even have to have
Speaker 1: these things, that they be subjected to a cost benefit
Speaker 1: analysis with public ears before they are an accident imposed
Speaker 1: on people, so you don't have some bureaucrat in the
Speaker 1: EPA or the DOT which just summarily decreased something that's
Speaker 1: going to end up costing everybody who buys a car
Speaker 1: another five hundred bucks up front and god knows how
Speaker 1: much money down the road when the thing feels beyond
Speaker 1: the basis of some speculative hypothesized gain. That is literally
Speaker 1: like contemplating how many angels can dance on the head
Speaker 1: of a pin. You've got to show that there's going
Speaker 1: to be a meaningful and justifiable benefit before that regulation
Speaker 1: is imposed on people. I think that's an extremely reasonable
Speaker 1: and fair position to take.
Speaker 3: Oh, I agree. I think the problem that we face
Speaker 3: you and I is that there's not any corresponding organization
Speaker 3: for cars like there is for guns right. You've got
Speaker 3: the NRA, You've got Gun Owners of America, and a
Speaker 3: lot of others National Association for Gun Right. There's several
Speaker 3: of them that are out there, and they're all focused
Speaker 3: on a single issue. And you can say the same
Speaker 3: thing about the pro life issue or whatever. And there's
Speaker 3: other ones that are out there as well. Could look
Speaker 3: at on the left side, you could look at marijuana
Speaker 3: prohibition stuff normal and a bunch of others who are
Speaker 3: successful and nullifying the un I've talked about this this week.
Speaker 3: You know, even though you had you had in three
Speaker 3: conservative states Florida, North and South Dakota, you had an
Speaker 3: issue on the ballot to legalize recreational use of marijuana,
Speaker 3: not just medical marijuana, because medical marijuana is now nullified
Speaker 3: by two thirds of the states, actually more than that,
Speaker 3: and so if that had passed in those states, you
Speaker 3: would have had more than half of the states, would
Speaker 3: have nullified even recreational use of marijuana. And yet according
Speaker 3: to the War on Drugs, it is a Schedule one drug.
Speaker 3: My point being is that if we do things at
Speaker 3: the state level, we can nullify this tyranny. And if
Speaker 3: we start to and I think really the only way
Speaker 3: that we ever make any traction is if we've got
Speaker 3: an organization that is a single issue organization that's going
Speaker 3: to push on that single issue. Because the politicians are
Speaker 3: this grocery cart full of garbage, and some of the
Speaker 3: stuff in there is good, and some of the stuff
Speaker 3: in there is bad. Most of it's bad, but you
Speaker 3: can't really get anything done. Instead, if you focus on
Speaker 3: a local on a specific issue, and you attack it
Speaker 3: at the state level, that's what we're missing. Maybe that's
Speaker 3: what you should do. You should start an organization is
Speaker 3: going to fight against car regulations.
Speaker 1: Well, actually, there is such an organization. It already exists. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and I'm affiliated with it. It's the National Motorist Association.
Speaker 3: Yes, I've interviewed them. It's been a while, but yeah,
Speaker 3: and I think they advertise on your.
Speaker 1: And a lot of people are not aware of the
Speaker 1: existence of the NME, but the NIME played a critical
Speaker 1: role back in the nineties and securing the repeal of
Speaker 1: what was called the NMSL, the National Maximum Speed Limit
Speaker 1: Law which played the country for twenty years from seventy
Speaker 1: four up to about ninety four, which required a fifty
Speaker 1: five mile an hour speed limit on the highways. You
Speaker 1: remember it, I remember it. You know, a lot of
Speaker 1: people were.
Speaker 3: A Republican president.
Speaker 1: It was absolutely miserable and made driving anywhere to such
Speaker 1: a hassle and an expense. You know, millions of people
Speaker 1: molted of millions of dollars for driving its seeds that
Speaker 1: were legal and so presumably safe before drive fifty five
Speaker 1: came along. Anyway, Animation did the omens work lobbying Congress,
Speaker 1: you know, I was involved in that when I was
Speaker 1: at the Washington Times back in the nineties to get
Speaker 1: rid of the NMSL, And they are really a fantastic
Speaker 1: organization lobbying specifically on these issues that affect motorists driving.
Speaker 1: Your freedom to buy the kind of car that you
Speaker 1: want and so on. So if people are interested in that,
Speaker 1: I recommend they check out the site. It's motorists dot Org.
Speaker 1: Good people. I've known them personally, I've worked with them
Speaker 1: for thirty years.
Speaker 3: Good. Yes, And that is the key thing. You have
Speaker 3: to have those kinds of single issue organizations. And for
Speaker 3: the most part, most of these things have to be
Speaker 3: done at the local level. You know, for example, the
Speaker 3: fifty five on hour speed limit that could have been
Speaker 3: nullified at the local love it's good to repeal it nationally. Okay,
Speaker 3: I'm not saying that's not bad thing, but I'm saying
Speaker 3: that individual states could have refused to do that, they
Speaker 3: would have lost highway funds. They were being blackmailed by money.
Speaker 3: And that's what we've got to get people to understand
Speaker 3: is how the federal government gets around the Constitution, gets
Speaker 3: around the tenth Amendment, specifically by handing out money. That's
Speaker 3: what people can't understand about what Trump did in twenty twenty.
Speaker 3: But it's the same thing that Nixon did with a
Speaker 3: fifty five million hour speed limit. If you do this
Speaker 3: fifty five million hour speed limit, I'll give you money.
Speaker 3: And so everybody gets upset with the state government or
Speaker 3: the local law enforcement or the highway patrol or whatever
Speaker 3: who's enforcing it. But it's also being driven by federal money.
Speaker 1: Well, it's even worse than that, because first they extract
Speaker 1: the money from the seats. Yeah, they take the money,
Speaker 1: and then then they say, well, the Fed sig well
Speaker 1: we'll give you some of it back, you know, provided
Speaker 1: provide did you do what we want you to do?
Speaker 7: You know?
Speaker 1: And it really it's paralyzing. So I think you're might
Speaker 1: have to go one step farther back and somehow perhaps
Speaker 1: just stop getting the money. You know, that day has
Speaker 1: got to come. We've got to stand up to that
Speaker 1: and resurrect the principle if it's not yours, you don't
Speaker 1: have a right to it from the individual all the
Speaker 1: way on up. You know, as Tom Soull was set,
Speaker 1: boy exactly, is a fair share of somebody else's money
Speaker 1: that you didn't work for.
Speaker 3: That's absolutely right. Yeah. Well, it's kind of interesting when
Speaker 3: we look at Musk. He's going to be able to
Speaker 3: exert the kind of control that all these different industries
Speaker 3: dream of, and yet he doesn't even have to take
Speaker 3: a cabinet position with Trump. He can stay as CEO.
Speaker 3: Earlier in the program, eric I talked about the fact
Speaker 3: that the two of them were throwing shade at each
Speaker 3: other earlier this year, or Trump was talking about EV's
Speaker 3: and Biden and about Tesla and everything in a derogatory way.
Speaker 3: Musk was saying that Trump just needs to, you know,
Speaker 3: put on a cowboy hat or whatever and right off
Speaker 3: into the sunset. But then when Musk started, Musk perceptively
Speaker 3: realized that everything was turning in Trump's direction, and it
Speaker 3: started channeling money to him. Then it became a love fest.
Speaker 3: In August, Trump said, well, I have to like evs
Speaker 3: because Elon gave me a lot of money. I mean,
Speaker 3: he just says that, he says the quiet part out loud.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, it's interesting about Musk. You're absolutely right.
Speaker 1: He's cunning, he knows where he's first lie, and I
Speaker 1: think it's important to judge him according to actions and
Speaker 1: not what he says. And I'll give you two specific examples,
Speaker 1: one of which I know you're aware of. You know,
Speaker 1: at first, when when the thug government in Brazil ordered
Speaker 1: him to suppress the posts of some politicians and people
Speaker 1: in the in the country that the ruling junta did
Speaker 1: not like. Initially, Elon publicly opposed that. But when he
Speaker 1: counted the shakles and realized he was potentially going to
Speaker 1: lose a lot of money if the thugs in Brazil
Speaker 1: shut down X in Brazil, he counts out and caved.
Speaker 1: So if he counts out and caved to the thugs
Speaker 1: in Brazil, what makes anybody think that he's not going
Speaker 1: to do this here and he already is as you know,
Speaker 1: and I know X suppresses speech by suppressing reach, you know,
Speaker 1: unless unless you pay musk an ongoing fee to be
Speaker 1: verified each and every month. And in addition to that,
Speaker 1: don't post anything long thankful your post is sent of
Speaker 1: the timeout room. It's very clever, you know. It's not
Speaker 1: that you can't post. Sure you can post. The problem
Speaker 1: is half the time nobody sees what she posted, right,
Speaker 1: which has the same effect as that.
Speaker 3: Didn't even change anything for me when I paid the
Speaker 3: eight bucks. You know, it's it's like it's it's still
Speaker 3: I'm not I'm not saying the stuff that he wants
Speaker 3: to hear. But you're absolutely right. He literally bowed and
Speaker 3: scraped to Theory Breton, the guy from the EU, saying, well,
Speaker 3: we got this ds A thing that's going to come
Speaker 3: in here, and you're going to have to obey that, right, Oh, yes, yes,
Speaker 3: I'll do that, Yes, yes. And then what happened was
Speaker 3: that Theory Breton, I call him conspiracy theory, conspiracy theory,
Speaker 3: tried to censor speech out within the election and in America,
Speaker 3: and that was a bridge too far for him. He
Speaker 3: jumped the shark at that point and they kicked him out.
Speaker 3: But it wasn't like Elon Musk resisted this. And yet
Speaker 3: what you see is all these all these people who
Speaker 3: it's the same people who support Trump that support Musk.
Speaker 3: So if any governor goes to Davos, like Brian Kemp
Speaker 3: or like Glenn Youngkin or whatever or anybody else, they
Speaker 3: rightfully or suspicious of that. And ye know, when Trump
Speaker 3: goes there and he does it just a couple of
Speaker 3: weeks before he locks the world down, they're not. They
Speaker 3: make excuses for it, and they talk about how look
Speaker 3: it he told them told them off, and he told them,
Speaker 3: you know that we're not going to be a part
Speaker 3: of this, and he stood up to these people. And
Speaker 3: so they see the same thing as you point out.
Speaker 3: They they trumpet the fact that Musk is there pushing
Speaker 3: back against Brazil. But then all of the conservative and
Speaker 3: alternative media is silent when he caves into them and
Speaker 3: does exactly one.
Speaker 1: This bizarre wheeling around, and it occurs on both sides
Speaker 1: of the same point. You know, You've got if he
Speaker 1: went back what a year or two ago, Musk was
Speaker 1: the hero of the left, he was the darling of
Speaker 1: the left, you know, and then when he started to
Speaker 1: kind of come around to the Trumpian point of view,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, the left hates him and now
Speaker 1: the right loves him, and nothing is really to change.
Speaker 1: He's the same guy and he's playing them both, you know,
Speaker 1: and it just as sounds me that people on both
Speaker 1: sides don't see that.
Speaker 3: Yes, oh yeah, absolutely true. Let's talk a little bit
Speaker 3: about well, you mentioned the internal passport regime. That's one
Speaker 3: of the things that we're very concerned about. And I
Speaker 3: really liked what you just put up yesterday. Don't deport,
Speaker 3: defund and tell people about that.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Essentially, you know, there are all these calls now
Speaker 1: that Trump has been elected, Okay, we're going to have
Speaker 1: these deportations. We're going to round up all these people
Speaker 1: who came into the country illegally, which has a very
Speaker 1: strong superficial appeal. Because so many people are so tired citizens.
Speaker 1: I mean of having to pay taxes that go to
Speaker 1: finance things like hotel rooms in New York City and
Speaker 1: debit cards that are filled up with thousands of dollars
Speaker 1: of the money that they had to work for. People
Speaker 1: are understandably outraged about that. So clearly something does have
Speaker 1: to be done. But I think the most effective thing
Speaker 1: that could be done to deal with the problem of
Speaker 1: the people who are already here, as well as the
Speaker 1: people who might come here, is simply to make it
Speaker 1: unlawful for any public official to dispense or disburse any
Speaker 1: public money, any taxpayer money that will go to benefit
Speaker 1: anybody who isn't an American citizen. It's entirely reasonable.
Speaker 3: You know, if I.
Speaker 1: Travel to Mexico, I don't have a right to the
Speaker 1: benefits that are afforded to Mexican citizens because I'm not Mexican.
Speaker 1: You know, in the system, I'm not supposed to be
Speaker 1: in that country.
Speaker 3: I agree. I've said for the longest time, I said,
Speaker 3: the issue is the welfare magnet, and we've got such
Speaker 3: a big magnet that we're pulling people around the wall,
Speaker 3: over the wall, under the wall, through the wall, if
Speaker 3: you've got a big enough welfare magnet, you're going to
Speaker 3: get people to come in. And they're going to do it.
Speaker 3: Even if you set up some kind of a slave
Speaker 3: ID system that you know Trump has talked about doing,
Speaker 3: even if you set up some kind of a horrendous
Speaker 3: internal biometric ID system, You're still going to get people
Speaker 3: to come in if the financial rewards are enough. And
Speaker 3: these financial rewards are unbelievable. We have provided for these
Speaker 3: people in poor countries. This is the pot of gold
Speaker 3: at the end of the rainbow. And if we don't
Speaker 3: stop that, that's the essence of it. And that's the
Speaker 3: one thing that they could stop very easily, but they
Speaker 3: won't do it. I absolutely agree with you. Defund it.
Speaker 3: You don't have to worry about deporting these people. Just
Speaker 3: defund it.
Speaker 1: And well, there's a humane aspect of it too. I think,
Speaker 1: you know, if you say, look, if you're willing to work,
Speaker 1: and you're willing to provide for your family and meet
Speaker 1: your needs and so on, I don't really have an
Speaker 1: issue with that myself, because why I would if somebody
Speaker 1: wants to get up on a roof and hammer shingles
Speaker 1: all day long and earn money. That's cool. I'm okay
Speaker 1: with that. That's a a positive contribution to our society.
Speaker 1: You know, I don't. I don't have any desire to
Speaker 1: have a guy who's up on the roof putting shingles down,
Speaker 1: rounded up and thrown back across the border. So you know,
Speaker 1: you can.
Speaker 3: Put into some detention camp or something concentration, can the optics.
Speaker 3: I don't think you'll ever do that because I think
Speaker 3: the optics on it are so bad, and in his
Speaker 3: second term, I think he's going to want to be
Speaker 3: remembered in a in a fond and positive way. So
Speaker 3: I don't think they will do that. But also don't
Speaker 3: think that they'll stop the welfare stuff either, And that
Speaker 3: would be the obvious thing as you point out people
Speaker 3: who want to come across and work hard workers. I'm
Speaker 3: fine with that. Yeah, there's competition with people who are
Speaker 3: here and depressing wages. But you know, maybe what you
Speaker 3: do is something else. Maybe you organize, maybe you learn
Speaker 3: Spanish and you organize these people and you've got your
Speaker 3: company and you know whatever. There's a lot of different
Speaker 3: ways that we could go with that. But you know,
Speaker 3: as long as they're working, I don't have that much
Speaker 3: of a problem with it as But when I have
Speaker 3: a problem with is the welfare thing. If you're pointing
Speaker 3: out it's bad enough to take money from a citizen
Speaker 3: and give it to another one, but it's even worse
Speaker 3: when you give it to somebody's not a citizen.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean.
Speaker 1: Interestingly, you know, Trump made great intros with Hispanic people
Speaker 1: in the selection. Yeah, citizens, I mean, because they also
Speaker 1: are tired of this.
Speaker 3: Yes, you know.
Speaker 1: So it's it's not about being mean to people, which
Speaker 1: is the way it's framed and portrayed by the left.
Speaker 1: It's about not being mean to Americans, you know, constantly
Speaker 1: saddling them with bills for other people literally limitless number
Speaker 1: of you know, nobody has ever said, okay, we're going
Speaker 1: to have a maximum of let's say, five million people
Speaker 1: coming into the country every year. It's literally limitless, you know,
Speaker 1: according to the open borders people, which is a recipe
Speaker 1: for national suicide. Culturally and economically.
Speaker 3: Oh, I agree. I've said for the longest time that
Speaker 3: we're not going to have an American dream of owning
Speaker 3: a home, which you pretty much don't have now because
Speaker 3: of regulatory costs and everything. I have that as long
Speaker 3: as we've got the dreamers because they can come here
Speaker 3: and get a free education and many other benefits, and
Speaker 3: they will continue to keep coming and it'll be funded
Speaker 3: with property taxes. So you're not going to be able
Speaker 3: to afford a home, or you're not going to be
Speaker 3: able to afford much of a rental place either, because
Speaker 3: the property taxes are embedded in that. People just don't
Speaker 3: seem to think about the real cost of this stuff.
Speaker 3: I would pay money to keep my kids out of
Speaker 3: the government school. Oh yeah, but they got me for
Speaker 3: financial reasons. Yeah.
Speaker 1: That I think is you get to the root of
Speaker 1: it and pull it out of the ground and destroy it.
Speaker 1: And you're right, this whole idea of having government schools.
Speaker 1: Parents ought to be the ones that are responsible directly,
Speaker 1: and that's not a burden. That's a good thing because
Speaker 1: you have control over your kids' education. If you're hiring
Speaker 1: a tutor or a teacher, you're the one who's paying
Speaker 1: the bill. And if you discover that the person that
Speaker 1: you hire to teach your kids is incompetent or in
Speaker 1: any other way somebody that you don't want to be
Speaker 1: teaching your kids, and you can fire them. What happens
Speaker 1: when the kid is in the government school, how much
Speaker 1: power do you have over what your kid is being
Speaker 1: taught and by whom? And the answer is absolutely none.
Speaker 1: You're paying through the nose and property tax and your
Speaker 1: kids aren't even being educated.
Speaker 3: That's right. And in New Jersey they just came up
Speaker 3: with a law that you know, anybody else would go
Speaker 3: to jail. But if you show obscene material to a minor,
Speaker 3: that's fine as long as your teacher, right, don't here's
Speaker 3: some obscene If I hire a tutor and the tutor
Speaker 3: is showing obscene material to my child and saying don't
Speaker 3: tell your parents, that person is going to go to
Speaker 3: jail or worse if you catch them. But you know
Speaker 3: with the government school says okay. That's why I talked
Speaker 3: about this earlier this week. I said, I'm going to
Speaker 3: call them from here on out instead of public schools,
Speaker 3: I'm going to call them pubic schools because it seems
Speaker 3: to be they're interested and they're not interested in reading, writing,
Speaker 3: and arithmetic. They're interested in sexualization of children, and that's
Speaker 3: really what they have focused on. It's insane that we
Speaker 3: have to pay for this as well.
Speaker 1: It's not from their point of view, you know, by
Speaker 1: stupidizing kids, by rendering them cognitive cripples, making them illiterate
Speaker 1: and enumerate, and then also warping them with all of
Speaker 1: the surprise, what do you end up with? Will you
Speaker 1: end up with these preaching, emotionally incontinent, blue haired people
Speaker 1: who are exactly what Leannon referred to when he called
Speaker 1: them useful idiots.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right, useful because.
Speaker 1: They are very vulnerable. You know, they're not able to
Speaker 1: think clearly. They feel and they react and they irerupt
Speaker 1: and they stamp their feet, and they're exactly the kind
Speaker 1: of flodder that you need if you want to create
Speaker 1: an authoritarian police. See.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right. Yeah. You have a good article about
Speaker 3: the roots of Marxism, the neighborliness of communists, and you've
Speaker 3: got all these different planks of the Karl marks, of
Speaker 3: different goals that he wanted to have.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 3: Of course, one of them was compulsory state education paid
Speaker 3: for by taxes and that type of thing. But all
Speaker 3: these different things that are part of it, that is
Speaker 3: what they have been able to impose upon us. I've
Speaker 3: talked to shi Van Fleet, who grew up in China.
Speaker 3: She knows what a struggle session is she says, all
Speaker 3: of this stuff about being you know, anti racism and
Speaker 3: all the rest of the stuff, she said, that's that's
Speaker 3: just a struggle session with a different name. All this
Speaker 3: woke stuff. It's the same tactics that they've been using
Speaker 3: for the longest time and the same goals that they
Speaker 3: have been using for the longest time.
Speaker 1: Well, they've gotten a little bit more clever though. You know,
Speaker 1: if you read if you read Marx, and even if
Speaker 1: you read Lenin, they were rather honest and open about
Speaker 1: what they intended to do. You know, Lenin spoke of
Speaker 1: imposing terror and using terror to foment his political ends,
Speaker 1: and Marx was very direct. If you read the Communist
Speaker 1: Manifesto and read the planks of the Communist Manifesto, and
Speaker 1: it's appalling to anybody who's not out of their minds
Speaker 1: when they when they hear and read this stuff. So
Speaker 1: they don't generally talk about that stuff anymore. They put
Speaker 1: it in this sort of sitting around the campfire holding
Speaker 1: hands kumbayah kind of language, you know, or neighborly. Waltz
Speaker 1: used that in the campaign. Neighborly, I mean, it's it's
Speaker 1: an inversion of reality, and it's a psychological technique.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 1: They want you to think of it in terms of like, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm just going to go over to my neighbor's house
Speaker 1: and ask him whether I can borrow something, you know,
Speaker 1: but you're not being asked. You're having a bayonnet shoved
Speaker 1: in your back and being made to hand it over.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 1: And it's not your neighbor, per se who's doing it.
Speaker 1: It's some government thug.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: That's the kind of neighborliness that they that they need.
Speaker 1: And it's so much of this verbiashually. You know, they
Speaker 1: won't just say hand over your money. They'll say, we're
Speaker 1: asking you to pay your fair ship. There's no asking.
Speaker 1: If you can't say no without repercussions, you're not being asked,
Speaker 1: you're being.
Speaker 3: Told that's right, that's right. And that's one of the
Speaker 3: things that we see. You know, you talk about how
Speaker 3: they used to be more upfront about it, and it
Speaker 3: was really Antonio Gramsey, the founder of the Italian Communist Party.
Speaker 3: He said, yeah, we don't want to have a we
Speaker 3: want to be upfront about this. We don't want to
Speaker 3: have a violent revolution. Let's do it by marching through
Speaker 3: the institutions. And that was where Pete Bouotyguay's dad spent
Speaker 3: his entire career as a college professor at Notre Dame,
Speaker 3: studying the life work of Antonio Gramsey in order to
Speaker 3: march through the institutions. And then he sends Pete Boutigue
Speaker 3: to Harvard, where he studied under a guy who loved
Speaker 3: the Italian Communists so much, Saco and Benzetti, that he
Speaker 3: changed his name to Sakvan Berkovich. And everything that he
Speaker 3: wrote was saying America based on the principles of the
Speaker 3: Pilgrims and Puritanism. And that's the problem for all of
Speaker 3: the you know, everything that we have in society is
Speaker 3: all based on that, and we've got to eliminate that.
Speaker 3: And that's really where all of the democrats are coming
Speaker 3: from now, by taking over the institutions very subtly, and
Speaker 3: they have taken them all over. And so that's why
Speaker 3: I think, you know, if we don't realize that the
Speaker 3: institutions have been taken over, like the schools especially that
Speaker 3: is the most obvious case, the schools, the media, entertainment,
Speaker 3: we don't realize that those things have been taken over.
Speaker 3: You know, voting for our president in Washington is completely meaningless. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they did it piece by piece, and they begin
Speaker 1: with the government school system, you know, Frank School, going
Speaker 1: all the way back to the twenties and the thirties,
Speaker 1: and infiltrating that had consequences. Is what they did was
Speaker 1: they were able to mold the minds of the next generation.
Speaker 1: And those people ended up going into the corporations and
Speaker 1: into the media and into law, and it propagates. And
Speaker 1: that's why now all of a sudden, we find ourselves
Speaker 1: dealing with a company like, you know, Anheuser Busch, you know,
Speaker 1: having Dylan mulvaney as their mascot. How did that happen?
Speaker 1: Such a thing would have been inconceivable thirty years ago
Speaker 1: because the people who are running a major corporation like that,
Speaker 1: they would have regarded that as sick and alien, you know,
Speaker 1: whatever their greed headed interests, they wouldn't have done that.
Speaker 1: But now this rising generation woke people. You know, I
Speaker 1: disagree with Elon Musk about a lot of things, but
Speaker 1: he refers to this woke mind virus, and he's absolutely correct,
Speaker 1: and it's it's sort of the latest strain or variant
Speaker 1: of Marxism. It's just the same thing repackaged.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Well, of course, the people who are taken out
Speaker 3: of the corporations and everything have been trained in all
Speaker 3: this in the schools, but they're also having a lot
Speaker 3: of economic pressure put on them by Blackrock and these
Speaker 3: other corporations to do that very thing. And if they're
Speaker 3: publicly traded corporations, they have a great deal of leverage
Speaker 3: over them if you do what they you know, if
Speaker 3: they like your company, you can it's basically a license
Speaker 3: to print money. But if they don't like your company,
Speaker 3: they can pretty much drive you out of business. And
Speaker 3: so they're more beholden to the Black Rocks than they
Speaker 3: are to the customers, and so everything is turned upside
Speaker 3: down with this stuff.
Speaker 1: This ESG stuff that almost nobody knew about until about
Speaker 1: Dr Soogo. It is what drove Akio Toyota out of
Speaker 1: the leadership role at Toyota, notwithstanding that he is the
Speaker 1: grandson of the founder of the company, because the people
Speaker 1: on the board reeled that kind of power and that
Speaker 1: they were very interested in pushing this ESG agenda. You know,
Speaker 1: in the case of Toyota, particularly with regard to this
Speaker 1: electric vehicle thing. Akio Toyota was opposed to it. You know,
Speaker 1: he was one of the few big wig people within
Speaker 1: the car business who said, more than a year ago,
Speaker 1: this is a bad idea. This is going to cost
Speaker 1: massive dislocation even bankruptcy across the industry. You know, this
Speaker 1: is not going to work. Well, we shouldn't do this,
Speaker 1: you know. And having the audacity to say that, and
Speaker 1: for not toying line and going along, he was summarily
Speaker 1: removed and they installed a more appliable person in his place.
Speaker 3: And of course Toyota has understood that, you know that
Speaker 3: this is unworkable. It's an unworkable solution, and so they
Speaker 3: put their engineers into oh, let's try something else. It's
Speaker 3: you know, maybe try fuel cells or something. It's like, no, no,
Speaker 3: it's got to be tied to the electric grid, because
Speaker 3: that's going to be our control grid. You know, no
Speaker 3: other solutions are going to be allowed. That's a real tell.
Speaker 3: Just like the vaccine thing was, well, we got a
Speaker 3: problem here, Okay, I'll believe your problem. I believe that
Speaker 3: we've got some kind of mysterious COVID virus out there.
Speaker 3: But how about if we try this or try that no, no,
Speaker 3: you can't try that. You're only going to have this solution,
Speaker 3: and that's it. That's another tell that it's a there's
Speaker 3: not a real problem, you.
Speaker 1: Know, it's it's it's really sad to me, as somebody
Speaker 1: who has a great emotional attachment to cars and loves
Speaker 1: the industry, to see the damage that has been caused,
Speaker 1: particularly to Toyota. You know, Toyota has had, and deservedly so,
Speaker 1: a reputation for building outstanding vehicles for years and outstandingly
Speaker 1: durable and long lived engines for years. That's been shattered.
Speaker 1: Just recently, they had to recall more than one hundred
Speaker 1: thousand of their new turbo hybrid V six engines that
Speaker 1: have replaced the V eight in the Toyota Tundra pickup
Speaker 1: because the thing had a catastrophic problem that resulted in
Speaker 1: catastrophic failure. So can you imagine what that has done
Speaker 1: to Toyota's reputation. Imagine if you bought a brand new,
Speaker 1: sixty thousand dollars Tundra, brand new and within a month
Speaker 1: the engine total failure and you have to have the
Speaker 1: engine replaced. You know, it's egregious.
Speaker 3: Yeah, oh yeah, yeah, And they're.
Speaker 1: Having problems with the new Tacoma. You know, the Tacoma
Speaker 1: was one of the best vehicles in that class of vehicle,
Speaker 1: mid sized pickup truck. They got rid of the V six,
Speaker 1: this bulletproof you know, that's a three hundred thousand mile engine.
Speaker 1: They got rid of it in favor of a turbo
Speaker 1: hybrid four cylinder engine, and they're having all sorts of
Speaker 1: problems with the things.
Speaker 3: Now, yeah, there's.
Speaker 1: The market demand for this. The market didn't say we
Speaker 1: don't want a V six, we don't want to V eight.
Speaker 1: We crave tiny turbocharged four cylinder engines with hybrid systems
Speaker 1: attached to them. There's absolutely nothing driving this other than
Speaker 1: the pressure to comply with the regulatory regime.
Speaker 3: That's right, and this has been building for a very
Speaker 3: long time. You go back and you look at the
Speaker 3: Toyota Highlux. You know, it's legendary. You've got top gear guys.
Speaker 3: You know the Toyota high Lux that they tried everything
Speaker 3: they could to kill it, and they couldn't kill Finally,
Speaker 3: I think they put it in salt water and left
Speaker 3: it or something like that, and then they hung it
Speaker 3: from the ceiling of the of the set there. But
Speaker 3: it was legendary in terms of its ability to keep going.
Speaker 3: But because it had I think it was a diesel
Speaker 3: engine or something like that, they wouldn't let that come
Speaker 3: into the US because of the EPA.
Speaker 1: The EPA, Yes, And now this year twenty twenty four
Speaker 1: or twyter brought out a striped down version of the
Speaker 1: Hilux called the Champ and it has a gas engine
Speaker 1: and it doesn't pollute. Nothing's polluted since the nineties. If
Speaker 1: you want to get into that topic, but you can't
Speaker 1: have it and get so much A highlux costs markets
Speaker 1: coming thirteen thousand bucks to start.
Speaker 3: What's crazy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean if people are interested, I've got a
Speaker 1: couple of articles on the site about that.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: It's designed to be configurable. It's basically the cab and
Speaker 1: then the back where the bed would be is whatever
Speaker 1: you want it to be. Toyota has to partnered with
Speaker 1: a number of aftermarket suppliers, So if you want to
Speaker 1: make it into a Jitney bus, if you want to
Speaker 1: make it into a food truck, or if you just
Speaker 1: want a conventional bed on the back of it, well
Speaker 1: you can specify what you want. It's got all the
Speaker 1: preteral detachment points. It's modular, so it's designed to be
Speaker 1: able to do all of those different things really easily
Speaker 1: and really inexpensively. The point is it's a thirteen thousand
Speaker 1: dollars truck. You know, you looked at the price of
Speaker 1: a new truck in this century. What we're allowed to buy,
Speaker 1: I mean, the least expensive of them are thirty thousand
Speaker 1: dollars in up.
Speaker 3: Yes. And it's not just the cars, it's the homes,
Speaker 3: it's the appliances, it's everything that we got, and they
Speaker 3: are trying to strangle us with every one of these things.
Speaker 3: I was talking about that Taiwan Semiconductor and Manufacturing Corporation
Speaker 3: TSMC that's got this big thing that they're bringing into Phoenix,
Speaker 3: this big factory town that they're bringing in. One of
Speaker 3: the things they were talking about was the fact that
Speaker 3: housing in the United States is four to five times
Speaker 3: the cost of housing in Taiwan. Why is that they
Speaker 3: don't have nice houses there? Well, actually they do. It's
Speaker 3: just arbitrary, you know, regulations on about everything that raises
Speaker 3: the cost. And they're doing that to everything that we
Speaker 3: have to make us artificially poor, to rob us.
Speaker 1: And they're specifically targeting the rising generation of young people.
Speaker 1: I can't across some situate. It's as sounding. I don't
Speaker 1: know whether you saw this, but guess what the average
Speaker 1: age of a first time home buyer is in the
Speaker 1: United States as of twenty twenty four.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, I saw that. It was I was fifty
Speaker 3: something or something like that.
Speaker 1: Fifty four.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: The people who are past the agent which most people
Speaker 1: start raising families, you know, And what are you supposed
Speaker 1: to do if you're twenty four to twenty five, you know,
Speaker 1: and you want to get your first house. It's impossible.
Speaker 1: The average cost of a new single family house I
Speaker 1: think is about four hundred twenty thousand bucks, which means
Speaker 1: you've got to come up with ten percent in cash
Speaker 1: on that. I mean, how many people in their twenties
Speaker 1: are ever going to be able to do that? So
Speaker 1: what they're doing, and I think this is part of
Speaker 1: the maliciousness that I like to talk about. Don't like
Speaker 1: to talk about it, but it's an important thing to
Speaker 1: talk about, is to alienate the young, to antagonize and
Speaker 1: annoy the young, and make them feel that they haven't
Speaker 1: got a shot, they haven't got a chance, there's no
Speaker 1: hope that the government will help you. We've got the answer.
Speaker 1: You know, Harris did this during the campaign. She tried
Speaker 1: to bribe the young people and say, well, we'll give
Speaker 1: you twenty five thousand dollars in assistance, you know, to
Speaker 1: get your to get your first first home. Well, what
Speaker 1: would really help. One thing that would help is getting
Speaker 1: rid of these zoning requirements. You know, in most places
Speaker 1: in this country, you can't put up a modest sized
Speaker 1: single family home anymore that would be affordable to a
Speaker 1: first time buyer. You have to put up some gigantic
Speaker 1: McMansion because the zoning laws specify that the house that
Speaker 1: you put here has to be essentially similar to the
Speaker 1: one that's next door and the one that's on the
Speaker 1: other side. That's why you see all these cooking cutter
Speaker 1: neighborhoods with all essentially the same houses everywhere.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and it goes to the appliances. Look at all
Speaker 3: the appliants that though you got to you can't have
Speaker 3: a gas appliance, so you can't have this or that,
Speaker 3: you've got to have this electric appliance. And we're going
Speaker 3: to dictate h and everything that you can have and
Speaker 3: how it's going to operate and of course, we've seen
Speaker 3: this type of thing as well in the UK. I
Speaker 3: remember a few years ago they were talking about how
Speaker 3: the prices of houses had rapidly grown, gone up very
Speaker 3: quickly in the UK and priced the younger people out
Speaker 3: of the market completely. And now it's come here. And
Speaker 3: what typically happens is they kind of use the UK
Speaker 3: as a test bad and then it goes from the UK,
Speaker 3: goes to California, and then it goes to the rest
Speaker 3: of America. And so that's really kind of what we're
Speaker 3: seeing with a lot of this stuff. Now they've run
Speaker 3: this game, they know how to manipulate it, so we
Speaker 3: can't afford anything. Electricity costs in the UK right now
Speaker 3: are four to five times the cost of electricity in America,
Speaker 3: and we're about to have an explosion. And all that
Speaker 3: is they're going to build these offshore windmill farms off
Speaker 3: the coast of Long Island. They're going to the profits
Speaker 3: that these European companies that are making this wind farm
Speaker 3: are going to make. Their profits are going to be
Speaker 3: somewhere in fifty dollars per megawatt hour whosletsale. Their profit
Speaker 3: is going to be something like fifty dollars. But the
Speaker 3: entire cost today off of the existing power structure is
Speaker 3: in the thirties and so just their profits alone are
Speaker 3: going to be that much. It's going to be four
Speaker 3: or five times the cost of what people on Long
Speaker 3: Island are paying right now for electricity, if not more.
Speaker 3: And so this is the way that they are. You know,
Speaker 3: we're going to require that you do this. And by
Speaker 3: the way, speaking of California, you just put up an
Speaker 3: article about helmet laws. But did you see and I
Speaker 3: want to talk about that, but did you see that
Speaker 3: Newsom has now put up a requirement for electric bikes.
Speaker 3: They're going to have to have like fifty percent by
Speaker 3: twenty thirty or something like that. Cycle. Yeah, yeah, motorcycles. Yeah,
Speaker 3: they're going to have to have electric motorcycles. And it's
Speaker 3: going to be like fifty percent by such and such
Speaker 3: a date, and then after that it's going to be
Speaker 3: eventually it's going to be one hundred percent electric motorcycles.
Speaker 1: That will get absolutely nowhere. And the reason for that
Speaker 1: is it's one thing to try to push that on
Speaker 1: car buyers because a lot of car buyers are they
Speaker 1: view the car as a necessary appliance, you know, they're
Speaker 1: not necessarily enthusiast people like you and I are who
Speaker 1: have an emotional attachment to driving into cars. They just
Speaker 1: want to get from A to B. So you might
Speaker 1: be able, assuming costs in an issue, to persuade them
Speaker 1: to drive an electric car. Maybe people who ride motorcycles,
Speaker 1: and I'm one, want to ride a motorcycle. They don't
Speaker 1: want to ride something that looks like a motorcycle that
Speaker 1: isn't one, you know, And that's what we're talking about here,
Speaker 1: something that doesn't have an engine, that doesn't have a
Speaker 1: transmission because it's electric, you know, it's just a direct drive,
Speaker 1: so you don't check anything. Just sit on this thing.
Speaker 1: It's a scooter. It's a fast scooter, but that's what
Speaker 1: a scooter is.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's not.
Speaker 1: Going to work. They're not going to be able to
Speaker 1: sell that to people. Now, they can try to legislate
Speaker 1: old motorcycles off the road, and I have no doubt
Speaker 1: they're going to try to do that probably, and they
Speaker 1: will do the same with cars, but they're never going
Speaker 1: to succeed. It's going to put companies like Harley Davidson
Speaker 1: out of business, and Harley Davidson is already almost out
Speaker 1: of business, precisely because they've got this German CEO who's
Speaker 1: a big time woke DEI guy and who has completely
Speaker 1: alienated people from most people from wanting to buy Harley
Speaker 1: Davidson motorcycle.
Speaker 3: Mm hmmmm yeah, oh yeah, absolutely. Talk about the helmet laws, well, Ben,
Speaker 3: because that's been You've got an article that says why
Speaker 3: helmet laws are silly and tyrannical.
Speaker 1: Well, they're silly in the first place because they're arbitrary.
Speaker 1: You know, we're told I'm told that I have to
Speaker 1: wear a helmet in order to be able to legally
Speaker 1: ride my motorcycle. But I'm able to wear flip flops,
Speaker 1: I'm able to wear shorts and a T shirt if
Speaker 1: I want to, so I guess my head will look
Speaker 1: good in my coffin. I mean, if their argument is
Speaker 1: that you know that the thing is about safety, well
Speaker 1: it doesn't make any sense. That's not really a rational
Speaker 1: position to take. And as far as the tyrannical stuff,
Speaker 1: I think it sort of explains itself. It's nobody else's
Speaker 1: business what risks I choose to assume. Of course, the
Speaker 1: predicate is this socialist argument that, well, if you get
Speaker 1: into an accident, society will be made to pay the costs.
Speaker 1: But that presumes that society. You know, that we have
Speaker 1: this socialist system in which what I choose to do
Speaker 1: somehow imposes an obligation on you and other people to
Speaker 1: be responsible for it. And that's outrageous. You know, if
Speaker 1: I choose to ride a motorcycle and flip flops in
Speaker 1: a short and shorts and without a helmet and I wreck,
Speaker 1: well that's on me, you know, morally, and it should
Speaker 1: be legally nobody else's responsibility that I do those things,
Speaker 1: just the same as Look, I choose to go to
Speaker 1: the gym and work out and run because you know,
Speaker 1: I want to try to keep myself in good shape
Speaker 1: and not die prematurely. But I don't think people who
Speaker 1: are overweight and who don't exercise should be fined. I mean,
Speaker 1: we want to have cops walking down the street and
Speaker 1: if they notice you've got a big gut, they roll
Speaker 1: up to you and give you a ticket for, you know,
Speaker 1: posing costs on society. You can make exactly the same argument.
Speaker 3: It could happen. You know, they've got religious police in
Speaker 3: Saudi Arabia and Iran, so we could have obesity police.
Speaker 3: Why not there'd be a source of revenue for that.
Speaker 3: You know, you point out if you question why we
Speaker 3: should have to have a license, ask yourself why George
Speaker 3: Washington did not need a license to operate his horse
Speaker 3: on the public right away? And so yeah, exactly that.
Speaker 1: You know, there's another there's another argument that is interesting.
Speaker 1: And again I speak as somebody who's been riding for decades,
Speaker 1: so I feel I have some standing to say this,
Speaker 1: and you know, down and I when we go out riding,
Speaker 1: oftentimes we do this, we do a freedom right and
Speaker 1: we take our helmets off on the back roads. And
Speaker 1: I am always amazed by how much my peripheral vision
Speaker 1: increases when I don't have the stupid helmet on. When
Speaker 1: I have helmet on, i'm sort of blinkered. I can
Speaker 1: see what's ahead of me, but in order to see
Speaker 1: what's on either side of me, I have to rotate
Speaker 1: my head left right in order to be able to
Speaker 1: see it. Whereas I can look straight ahead and have
Speaker 1: a panoramic view of the road ahead. Also, I can
Speaker 1: hear things much better because my ears aren't stuffed up
Speaker 1: by the helmet. And finally, unless you spend a lot
Speaker 1: of money on an extremely expensive, lightweight helmet. You know,
Speaker 1: your typical moderately priced which will cost about one hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty bucks or so. You wear that thing for
Speaker 1: an hour and your neck will start to hurt, because,
Speaker 1: believe it or not, that slight amount of weight that
Speaker 1: you have added to your head strings your neck. And
Speaker 1: when your neck is strained and your shoulders are stiff,
Speaker 1: you're not in as good a position to be a
Speaker 1: competent and safe rider because that's distracted as you would
Speaker 1: be if you were in full command of all your senses.
Speaker 1: So you can make a very persuasive argument in my
Speaker 1: view that the actual effect of helmets is less safe
Speaker 1: than the hypothetical benefit of wearing the helmet.
Speaker 3: That's right. And I've known people have motorcycle riders. I'm
Speaker 3: not a motorcycle rider myself, but who said that some
Speaker 3: of these helmets they can add weight and if you
Speaker 3: don't have something to keep it from going quick and
Speaker 3: snap your neck, if you get into a bad accent
Speaker 3: to it can increase the chances of that happening. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Sure, And you know, at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: the thing I guess I object to the most is
Speaker 1: this obnoxious busy body condescending parents of adults. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm a grown man. I can make my own decisions.
Speaker 1: I don't need somebody else trying to hold my hand
Speaker 1: like a good little boy or a bad little boy
Speaker 1: and telling you what I'm allowed to do and what
Speaker 1: I'm not allowed to do. We should be living in
Speaker 1: a free country where adults are free to make cost
Speaker 1: benefit choices, risk reward analysis and be held accountable for
Speaker 1: that absolutely, but be left free to make those decisions
Speaker 1: for themselves.
Speaker 3: Well yeah, and we also had all the people out
Speaker 3: there demanding masks, and remember what they said, and I
Speaker 3: just like, are you kidding me? That's your argument? Said, well,
Speaker 3: we can tell you to wear a mask because we
Speaker 3: tell you to wear seat belts. Let me tell you
Speaker 3: to wear motorcycle helmets and all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 3: And I said, oh, okay, So my seat belt protects you,
Speaker 3: my helmet protects you, and that's why I have to
Speaker 3: wear it. What claim do you have on that? And
Speaker 3: of course my mask doesn't protect you either. If you've
Speaker 3: been told that, you've believed a lie here. But that
Speaker 3: was the kind of insanity. It's like, well can and
Speaker 3: it didn't have anything to do with whether any of
Speaker 3: the stuff was safe or affected. They just had to do. Well,
Speaker 3: I've got the authority to tell you that you've got
Speaker 3: to wear a helmet. I've got the authority to tell
Speaker 3: you got to wear a seat belt, so I can
Speaker 3: tell you that you got to wear a mask.
Speaker 1: But you know, they actually did have a point, and
Speaker 1: that if you accept the idea of the principle that
Speaker 1: it's legitimate for the government to tell you that you
Speaker 1: have to have a car with a seatbelt and then
Speaker 1: you have to wear a seatbelt, well doesn't everything else follow?
Speaker 1: You know that it has to be rejected at the root.
Speaker 1: You know, it's not the government's business to tell you
Speaker 1: that you have to buy a car with a seatbelt
Speaker 1: or wear one, and if you go down that road,
Speaker 1: then well, yeah, the government doesn't have any business telling
Speaker 1: you you have to wear a mask or a helmet
Speaker 1: or get a jab from some pharmaceutical company either.
Speaker 3: Yeah. I remember my dad started talking about the license
Speaker 3: that George Washington didn't even have. My dad started driving
Speaker 3: a car when he was eight years old because back
Speaker 3: then there weren't that many cars, and a lot of
Speaker 3: it was off road stuff because they didn't have a
Speaker 3: lot of roads, and if you could find somebody that
Speaker 3: was willing to turn their car over to you, that
Speaker 3: was the key thing, right, If they could trust you
Speaker 3: with a car not to wreck it, you could drive it.
Speaker 3: And in my generation, I started driving motor boats because
Speaker 3: we lived in Florida. I was driving motor boats when
Speaker 3: I was eight, and then when we went to Virginia
Speaker 3: to cover a story, at one point we wanted to
Speaker 3: rent a boat and so we could get a better
Speaker 3: angle at what we were shooting. And I was able
Speaker 3: to do it because of my age. They had a
Speaker 3: grandfather clause there, and this is actually even before I
Speaker 3: became a grandfather, but I was old enough they were
Speaker 3: calling me a grandfather because they knew that people our
Speaker 3: age had been driving boats for a long time, and
Speaker 3: we're going to put up with this licensing stuff, right,
Speaker 3: So they put that requirement on the younger people to
Speaker 3: get them in line. But they said, well, if you're
Speaker 3: over a certain age, you don't need to have a
Speaker 3: license to drive a boat. Is that crazy stuff?
Speaker 1: Well, the really incredible thing is that even doesn't even
Speaker 1: have anything to do with confidence as far as rock.
Speaker 1: That's right, it's purely a government issued ID and it's
Speaker 1: another obedience training session, that's all it is. You know,
Speaker 1: a pilot at least who gets a license to fly
Speaker 1: a private airplane or a commercial airplane actually has to
Speaker 1: demonstrate that he's got the confidence to fly the airplane.
Speaker 1: Nobody has to demonstrate any particular competence to get a
Speaker 1: driver's license. So the whole thing is absurd.
Speaker 3: That's you're absolutely right talking about Clarkson. Jeremy Clarkson. You
Speaker 3: got an article there. He's had an interesting life after
Speaker 3: cars are no more interesting. So now he's doing pubs
Speaker 3: and he did a farm and all the rest of
Speaker 3: this stuff, right, But his comment about cars, what did
Speaker 3: he say?
Speaker 1: Well, he used an expletive, which we all know. He's right.
Speaker 1: You know, Clarkson is one of the old guys, the
Speaker 1: old guard guys, and you know I admired him when
Speaker 1: I was coming up, and also guys like brocky E
Speaker 1: so you might remember from the cannonball around those yes,
Speaker 1: and that was back in the days when car journalists
Speaker 1: actually liked cars. You know, it seems like most of
Speaker 1: the ones that are doing car journalism today actively dislike cars.
Speaker 1: You know, they surely everything that makes cars unplayed unwanted
Speaker 1: by people who actually do like cars.
Speaker 10: You know.
Speaker 1: Clarkson was a gear head and an enthusiast, and so
Speaker 1: that clicked and resonated with you know, guys like me
Speaker 1: when I was coming up, who loved cars, you know,
Speaker 1: And he's what he meant by the exclutive was that
Speaker 1: they are all just these homogeneous appliances now that try
Speaker 1: to parent you, that try to data mine you, correct you,
Speaker 1: and anybody who enjoys driving will hate these things. And
Speaker 1: he's absolutely right. And you know, me is an active
Speaker 1: journalist who reviews cars. You can't believe how difficult it
Speaker 1: is for me sometimes to sit down and come up
Speaker 1: with something positive to say about these new cars, or
Speaker 1: at least I should phrase it differently, something different, like
Speaker 1: what makes this appliance different than that appliance? Well, let's see,
Speaker 1: this appliance has a nine inch LCD touchscreen and this
Speaker 1: one over here has a twelve inch touchscreen.
Speaker 3: That's right, you said for the longest time that just
Speaker 3: turned into mobile cell phones that you're right inside of.
Speaker 3: And Rowan Atkinson played mister Bean a lot of other things.
Speaker 3: He's a black Adder, he's he's an engineer by trade
Speaker 3: and became an actor, but he's and he's got these
Speaker 3: very expensive cars and he's had them for a long time,
Speaker 3: and years ago he said, you don't really drive these cars,
Speaker 3: you managed them. And that's really one of the things
Speaker 3: that you're talking about when you go back in the article,
Speaker 3: you talk about when you're in high school and how
Speaker 3: you know the cars were had their own idiosyncrasies, their
Speaker 3: own failures, leaking roofs and rusty you know, floor pans
Speaker 3: and all the rest of this stuff. But it was
Speaker 3: fun and I had the same kind of experience. We
Speaker 3: all had that experience. You know, we could get a
Speaker 3: cheap car and it was a lot of fun even
Speaker 3: with all those flaws.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this brings up something I wrote about a few
Speaker 1: days ago. You know, Volkslagen has acquired the Rice to
Speaker 1: the Scout and the older National Scout remember that, Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: and bringing that thing back now as another battery powered
Speaker 1: device that's exorbitantly expensive and YadA, YadA, YadA. But in
Speaker 1: researching the article, I came across some interesting comments by
Speaker 1: the guy who's in charge of this operation, and he
Speaker 1: had the audacity, i think, to refer to this thing
Speaker 1: as a connection machine. Now there's nothing at all in
Speaker 1: this thing that connects you to anything except sensors and actuators.
Speaker 1: You know, they tried to make the interior look like
Speaker 1: the old Scout in that it has levers and so on,
Speaker 1: but those levers don't connect anything. You know, in the
Speaker 1: old International Scout, you had a mechanical lever that connected
Speaker 1: to the four wheel drive and the transfer case, and
Speaker 1: you know you maybe had to get out and manually
Speaker 1: locked put. That was connection rolling down a window. That's
Speaker 1: physical mechanical connection. Now you sit inside your rolling app
Speaker 1: and you know, you tap a screen and you push
Speaker 1: a button and the computer then, you know, registers whatever
Speaker 1: the data input is and then it decides to do something.
Speaker 1: It is the It is the antithesis of being connected
Speaker 1: in my opinion.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, you're wired and that's it. You know, numbing.
Speaker 3: It's a real numbing experience. Absolutely is always great to
Speaker 3: talk to you. Thank you so much, Eric, Eric petersautos
Speaker 3: dot com. Always about liberty and about mobility. Thank you
Speaker 3: so much, and everyone, have a great weekend and hopefully
Speaker 3: we will see you next week.
Speaker 10: And the David Night Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
Speaker 10: If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The
Speaker 10: David Night Show. Please do your part and try not
Speaker 10: to spread it. Financial support or simply telling others about
Speaker 10: the show causes this dangerous information to spread. Father people
Speaker 10: have to trust me, I mean trust the science. Wear
Speaker 10: you mask, take your vaccine, don't ask questions.
Speaker 2: Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Night Show.