Speaker 1: See marks and traits of the cult guru. They do
not typically like you doing well.
Speaker 2: What they have Sugart, They're doing not the Ice Seas
death Farm take dollars, but they do not under.
Speaker 3: That's that booger whistle bation their energy bands. That's that
booger whistle bation. I got the booger whistle flute their
energy bands. That's that booger whistle whistle.
Speaker 1: Oftentimes, the communal living of the guru demands doesn't match
up to the.
Speaker 3: Guru who's driving around in a freaking rolls Royce.
Speaker 1: How many swamis got a dangn rolls Royce? Hey, I
was dis rolls na.
Speaker 2: Yes, send the nostos came down in the four years.
There's mean, don't get roys rations.
Speaker 3: I start booger whistlection their energy bad birds. I stept
booger whistle. I got the booger whistle flop their energy
bad birds.
Speaker 1: I start booger whistlection.
Speaker 4: Turn many rolls roses.
Speaker 5: You got get over there in.
Speaker 1: That canyone living by the way, get out.
Speaker 4: Of my rolls or you got dann rolls rights.
Speaker 2: And by Monday even I about fifty.
Speaker 3: I start booger whistlection their energy bad birds. I start
booger whistlection. I got the murger whistle.
Speaker 4: They're enernew bad bird.
Speaker 3: That's that.
Speaker 1: Black gang, black.
Speaker 6: Bishops, black players, people of the Chocolate Persuasion, Kang Blam bishops,
black players, people of the Chocolate Persuasion, Kang, black bishops,
black players, people of the Chocolate Persuade, Ling Kang, black bishops,
black players, people of the Chocolate Persuasion.
Speaker 7: But the Dark Ages was a time when black people
ruled Europe.
Speaker 8: So when you go into the real history, you'll see
King James with that's King James, or that's.
Speaker 1: A day Lebron, that's King lebar right now black.
Speaker 9: He was not a white guy.
Speaker 10: You'll see his whole lineage of kings, black king, black.
Speaker 6: Bishops, black players, people of the Chocolate Persuade, Black Kang,
black bishops, black players, people of the Chocolate Persuade, Lang Kang,
black bishops, black players, people of the Chocolate persuey Lang Kang,
black bishops, black players, people of the Chocolate persuasion.
Speaker 8: Who was a homostsexual himself, who was in love with
his sister Lucretia, who have made the image of Lucretia to.
Speaker 1: Be married, and that became the Renaissance era queen.
Speaker 4: So are you telling me Lucretia that's a black game.
Speaker 11: Are you going to say that the people that was
framing the black people were also black? They don't make
no sense. Lucretias are black as hell named Lucreatia. The
Church even allowed it, you know what I'm saying. The
Church allowed for straight pimples that have been suppressed, that
have been suppressed.
Speaker 1: Listen to them.
Speaker 5: I'm fifteen hundreds.
Speaker 1: It was legal to be a puny Black gangs, black.
Speaker 6: Bishops, black players, people of the chocolate persuasive, black gangs,
black bishops, black players, people of the Chocolate persuasions.
Speaker 12: Mormon space Wise, Let's created lives, Mormon space Wives.
Speaker 4: Our God has a body.
Speaker 1: It's a very tone body.
Speaker 5: He looks good.
Speaker 4: Mormon Space.
Speaker 13: Mormon space Wives, Space space Man, Mormon space Wise, Lords
of Color. Let me have into Messy William on the neighble,
Magic Us title magic from Stamer.
Speaker 14: Still, Mormon space Wise, creating New Life.
Speaker 1: You guys think on meaning means. You guys think on
meaning means.
Speaker 5: Understruct ste.
Speaker 15: St st st st st st st stop.
Speaker 5: You may think of being means.
Speaker 1: I'm just your to bate.
Speaker 15: St st st st ste st.
Speaker 5: St st.
Speaker 15: St st stop speak of me.
Speaker 14: I'm mm hmm.
Speaker 1: Damn's Workers of the world unite, Cocky workers of the world, unite.
Dang I see you on that sens. The Graham girl
and the Bilberg dants made me think.
Speaker 7: M hm.
Speaker 16: Hm sex A little con you names sex, A little
con you names working at the precess Ooh sex, a
little socials like the books we eat for access. You
just got a little extray call it for annesses you,
oh my one, and the means of production. Let me
show you mommies a free root show.
Speaker 9: M h.
Speaker 1: Fetal self Right tonight's the night ballin like Joseph Stalin.
Speaker 4: Oh sex, A little con you men, sex, a little
coruny do a little pract.
Speaker 16: Oh senior on my instagame. You made him since the
day sex A little socially.
Speaker 4: You gonna make me more says because he the love
you much most A big booting just through your car.
Speaker 1: It doesn't all right? What's up nerds? Welcome everybody, It's
time to do it up again. We're gonna open it
up open for him. That means you can call in
and put me in my place. That means you can
rebuke me, correct me, you can prove me wrong. I
forgot to start the let's start the beat boop. Hope
everybody's in a good mood today. It's a nice ball
me freezing sort of day. Ready to get my butt
handed to me, ready to get refuted, Ready to get
in a large scale intimacy sexual scandal so that I
can finally be popular. Apparently the only way to be
listened to is to have some sort of big scandal,
because then everybody will pay attention and you're actually vindicated.
So I said, what did I say? I said, I
guess I'm at that weird stage where I need a
giant sex scandal to actually grow the audience, to have
people pay attention, because actually being correct over the last
ten to fifteen years really is irrelevant. What you actually
need is to touch butts. So who wants to touch butts?
Let's arrange a giant touch butt festival. I'm thinking Daytona.
I'm thinking at least ten thousand bikers and biker skanks.
What do you guys think? Then then we'll have an audience.
What do you guys think? No, PSA and ten Let's
go to our first caller, True Bird. Now, the topics today,
you guys, are basically pretty broad. You can call about
anything related to Justin McCaffrey. You can call about that's
within the cos obviously. You can call about biblical theology
if you want to debate that, if you want to
talk about your theological issues and disagreements. We can talk
about church history. We can talk about tag we talk
about atheism, we can talk about all of those. The
first room that I made Twitter space whatever, for some reason,
it froze up and it kept crashing, so I had
to remake the link. So there's a new link. It's
in the show description and it's also at the top
of my profile. So we're going to start it up now.
Welcome everybody. We got our first caller again. The subjects
are the recent files. This is part five in our
series covering these almost day by day. We may get
into some of the Bannon interview again if we if
we don't get some good calls or challenges, we may
go back to that. We may look at some of
the updates in terms of the information that's come out
or it's been discovered in the last day or two.
Prue Bird, what's what's on your mind?
Speaker 5: Hey?
Speaker 9: J how's it going?
Speaker 5: Can you hear me?
Speaker 9: Yeah?
Speaker 1: What's up?
Speaker 5: Hey?
Speaker 17: I wanted to ask you two questions, if you don't mind, they're.
Speaker 5: Both process related questions.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: So the first question is, with all of the.
Speaker 17: Information coming out in the Epstein documents and a lot
of it seeming to confirm a lot of what you've
been saying for years, now, what what do you do
to kind of window expectations When there's a lot of
ambiguity in some of the emails, like the one with
all the code words, how do you how do you
prevent from, like I guess, over interpreting.
Speaker 1: I think I've I had the approach of being very
measured and so for example, the email that's discussing the
crazy person's account of being cut on their feet with
no scars and that George Bush was humping them in
the bot, I mean, I think that's you look at
that and you can tell that's obviously just somebody's tip
or story. A lot of that doesn't make sense. So
use a lot of common sense with these. I don't
put a lot of weight or or credit in there,
or I don't rest a lot of argumentation on the
more spectative ones, because the ones that are less speculative
are themselves just absolutely damaging and devastating. So the one
that you're talking about, is that the one where it
was just a bunch of list of words, or you're
talking about pizza and grape soda, the.
Speaker 5: Pizza and grape soda. But I was actually thinking.
Speaker 1: Of the one that was a list of random way. Yeah, yeah, again,
I mean, we just don't we just don't know. And so,
you know, I think when I covered those, I simply
just said, it's unclear what those are the list of words,
but they could be code. But I do think that
it is admitted that the terminology of pizza and hot
dogs and all that that's admitted by the FBI to
be potential code. So the frequency of all of that
is definitely suspicious. But I don't think we have to
rest the you know, case on that, because you've got
so many other emails basically saying we're gonna tap into
a pool of a million children in Thailand. We're gonna, uh,
here's the ages of these kids, and it's you know,
it's all different lists of age groups. You have him
asking for wishing that he had two babies that were
twins to experiment on all of those are as far
as I can tell, real emails and real accounts, and
you can go most of these, you can look them up,
because a lot of people are just simply putting you
link or the reference in there.
Speaker 17: Yeah, and there's so much coming out and it makes
me wonder, are you planning on doing any sort of
aside from the video, some sort of a long threat
of analysis and sort of tracing of all the things
that you're.
Speaker 5: Finding in these emails.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's what these live streams are. We did
six hours the first night, four or five hours, the
next night, three hours, two hours, three hours. I mean,
that is what we're doing. What do you mean, do
you mean something different?
Speaker 17: Yeah, something like a cohesive you know, almost like a
step by step timeline a little bit more direct, I suppose.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean we did.
Speaker 9: We did.
Speaker 1: We did an hour long summary with Sean Attwood and
I got a lot of views. Then we did an
hour long summary with Harrison Smith, and so that's the
best I could say in terms of cohesive. But I mean,
I'm not even There's so much stuff, and it's happening
so quick every minute that it's almost I don't even
know how to collate it a cohesive way. Do you
have any ideas well?
Speaker 9: That's actually kind.
Speaker 5: Of my next process question.
Speaker 17: It's about your research and note taking methodology. I know
you've done a lot of streams on that, but there
is one methodology in particular that I've come across called
the zeedlcast In or smart note method, where you basically
take smart notes that are linked to each other, and
it apparently helps produce cohesive works of literature, whether it's
a report or otherwise.
Speaker 5: Have you heard of that method before?
Speaker 1: No, I'm not familiar with that.
Speaker 5: Okay, I know that you do a.
Speaker 17: Lot of research, so you know, if ever, you could
take a look at that smart note method.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I'd love to hear your thoughts on that.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No, that's a good idea I need. Maybe I
should look into systematizing better. I'm not the greatest system
systematizing of information. I'm good at boiling it down and
conveying that information in a cohesive, compact way verbally, and
I think do pretty good with writing the information that way,
But when it comes to figuring out how to systematize
all of this kind of stuff, it's just so it's
so much information. And again, remember we're not just talking
about you know, these sort of files coming out. We're
also talking about the background that I think helps and
is necessary for a lot of people to get that
don't know, you know, the history books. They don't know
what's in you know, Whitney Webb's book. They don't know,
you know, the biography of the Rothchild's And so what
we try to do is give the big picture, the fuller,
you know, total context to a lot of this stuff.
But yeah, so those are good ideas. Icon what's up man?
Speaker 9: Am I out?
Speaker 1: Yeah? What's up?
Speaker 18: Dog?
Speaker 5: Hey?
Speaker 19: Okay, so I'm trying to keep this real quick.
Speaker 5: So the first one, it's a little bit funny.
Speaker 18: All the buzzles was coming out and yeah, we did this.
Speaker 5: It's real all uh, we would do X y Z.
Speaker 19: And meanwhile, their profit is literally in hell because he's
a PDA of murder rapist.
Speaker 9: All of this.
Speaker 19: I thought that was the layers you seeing all the
Muslims posting that on Twitter. But the most important one
I wanted to ask is about the information drop of
all of the Epstein files. I was looking at somebody's page.
I think it's John.
Speaker 5: I don't know if Jonathan, but Pagio has a brother,
but he does.
Speaker 1: Yes, oh yeah, okay, yeah, So I've.
Speaker 19: Seen his page and he was saying that why do
you think the government of the government published the steam files?
Speaker 5: I have several theories, not mutually.
Speaker 20: Exclusive here free but we're really quick is really three
quick sentenceus.
Speaker 5: It's part of the Black Noe operation to published samples.
It's part of a plan to replace.
Speaker 19: Human government by AI government. It's part of a plan
to create confusion.
Speaker 5: And I was looking at some of the things you were.
Speaker 19: Saying, and I think I agree with like, we're just
going to post this sample and if you don't cooperate,
then we're gonna put the rest out. Because I thought
it was weird how they put out all this information
that they had for years. It's not like they just
collected this yesterday, and yet nobody's went to jail, nobody's
being investigated, nobody's been at least nobody's asking anybody questions
from their fr like, nothing's.
Speaker 5: Happened, So I didn't.
Speaker 19: Want to ask, like, and they're also deleting stuff too,
so I think that's fishy as well. So I wanted
to ask, like, really quick, what's your thoughts on why
this information is coming out?
Speaker 5: But yet nothing's happening, and just at this time, why
is it? You know why now?
Speaker 9: So that's all that.
Speaker 1: I mean, somebody I saw the other day. I don't
know the timing, and people can speculate. I mean they
might have you know, it might have come out because
they thought it would dammage Trump. And then you had
a lot of Democrats saying, oh wait, no atally don't
have this information come out, Bring it and take it down.
I mean there's a lot of speculation. I don't know,
but when it comes to I mean Pago's brother, I
don't I don't interact with Pago's brother. I mean, he's
he's an interesting character. I don't want to be mean,
but I think he has some issues with like paranoia
and things like that, and he tends to think that
you know, now that you've mentioned him, he's going to
think that you're at tracking him and out to get him.
So I think that that's a person who's struggling with
with issues. And I'm not saying that it all to
be mean or rude. You know, I want him to
do well. I think he's a smart guy, but also
you know, he struggles with mental issues, I think, so
I don't know how he figures factors into this other
than you know, I wouldn't really pay much attention to that.
Pat Jack's what's up?
Speaker 14: Man?
Speaker 1: Pat Jackson? What's up? You want to unmute?
Speaker 5: Okay?
Speaker 1: Nika on what's up? What's that?
Speaker 9: Man?
Speaker 5: Can you hear me?
Speaker 14: Yeah?
Speaker 1: You do good?
Speaker 9: How are you.
Speaker 1: Get what's on your mind?
Speaker 5: Living it up? Okay?
Speaker 21: So I feel like this is perfect time for you
were mentioning you're going to be doing an interview with
Cubric's daughter or some kind.
Speaker 5: Of collaboration or something with her.
Speaker 9: I'm just curious, like.
Speaker 5: When that's going to happen. I feel like I wonder
if she would have some insight, you know, on eyes
wide shot and just maybe with Kubrick knew. I don't know.
I was just curious like that it'd be cool if
you got her on soon.
Speaker 18: Right.
Speaker 5: It's it's like perfect timing for.
Speaker 1: That, yeah, except that she just simply doesn't really want
to talk about that stuff. So she wants to talk
about Zionism and Islam, and she has issues with both
of those. I did get her She did say she
would talk a little bit about Kubrick's films, but I
think you know a lot of times the children of directors,
they get sick of talking about their parents' films. So
she probably doesn't want to spend a whole lot of
time talking about that. So we'll see what she will
talk about. What's up, Swift? What's on your mind? Guys?
Remember the topics are pretty open form. You can talk
about whatever you want. You can bring it to the four.
If you disagree, you can make your argument. If you
want to talk tag, if you want to talk about PSA,
you want to talk about Epstein' geopolitics, history, church history,
church fathers, you name it. What's up?
Speaker 5: Am I on? Yep beautiful?
Speaker 22: Sorry for being stupid, Thank you for having me on.
God bless the work you do. And it's awesome you
let anyone just hop on.
Speaker 5: I've been kind of I don't know.
Speaker 22: I've been following your streams the last week, and I've
been kind of I don't know. I've been toying with
the idea that they would necessarily need to have farms,
Like I know they have the farms and the factories
and the human mills, but I feel like eventually they
would try to move away from like actually having a
physical location, and with the way that everyone's already monitored
and the way everyone is tied onto their phones, I
feel like they'd be able to groom anyone into being
whatever they want. And since they'd be able to track them,
they'd probably just be able to I don't know, be
anywhere they want them to be, or set up opportunities
for them to be at the right place in the
right time.
Speaker 9: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean there were Epstein emails discussing the possibility of
modeling and AI sort of versions of a child's mind.
He wanted an AI that was a child's mind, So
I mean, yeah, they probably would like to have something
like that. Elijah was something. By the way, if you disagree,
or if you'd like to ask a question, or if
you'd like to call in, you can call in through
the Twitter space link. Got to make a new one
because for some reason that other one just kept crashing,
So here is the new link. If you're an atheist,
if you're something else, you disagree, feel free to call
on What's up man Swift or ashu me Elijah you
want to mute.
Speaker 18: Heydrian I was gonna ask about a pistemology, can you
hear me?
Speaker 5: Yeah, I was gonna ask, what's your tip for it?
Speaker 1: Hear you talk about it a lot, but I don't
really understand how to get into it or understand it.
I would read the book Epistemology by W. J. Wood,
and then I would read the Bonjour text that's Green
on epistemology, So that's where I would begin reading wise.
And then you know, there's lectures and people online who
have tons of epistemology talks, including Father deaconductor Ananias. But
do you want to be more specific, like what do
you mean when you're saying getting into it?
Speaker 18: Well, just trying to understand, Like, I guess, just a foundation,
I just just a foundation.
Speaker 1: I suppose. Yeah. I think those books will probably be
the best route. I mean, they're pretty easy and accessible
if you begin with the Wood book, and then that
would progress to the other one, because the Green one
is more of a grad school text, so it's going
to be a little bit of a challenge. But I
also have my philosophy course which you can get in
the show description here, and it covers all three of
the basic you know areas of philosophy, ethics, metaphysics, and epistemology.
And I think we had father Deacon doctor Antonias on
for the epistemology episode. It's a twelve twelve lecture course series,
kind of a masterclass type thing, and that is in
the show description in the autonomy Agora Marketplace with Richard
Grove Caliora VLTA.
Speaker 5: What's up?
Speaker 23: What up? Dog?
Speaker 9: It was good?
Speaker 5: Can you hear me?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 14: I had a question about well, I guess I just
wanted to inquire about toll Houses.
Speaker 5: I've never heard you talk about him before.
Speaker 24: I don't know if you have before, but I was
just wondering, like, what's the correct interpretation?
Speaker 5: Was Father Sarah and Rose correct in his interpretation? The
Church fathers isn't even real in the first place? Stuff
like that.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I think it is part of the Orthodox
mystical tradition, and I would look at his book on it.
It's pretty good. Sam, what's up, Sam Decker? It's just
usually the you know, that subject comes up, I would
say once every six months. So yeah, we've talked about
it a bit a lot. It's just something that I
don't typically go into Orthox mystical theology on live streams
because it's not very conducive to that. But what's up, man, Sam,
what's up?
Speaker 9: Yo?
Speaker 13: Yo?
Speaker 23: Jay?
Speaker 25: Yes, sir, I just wanted to tack onto something you
mentioned in the previous dream about the Epstein stuff and
the Orthodoxy being the kind of like one of the
last bastions against this like debauchery, and.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think we talked about that last night. Yeah,
what about it?
Speaker 20: Well, Like, I was just thinking about how in Orthodoxy,
like if you're an Orthodox Christian, like the power of
blackmail doesn't really have much control over you because the
Church has like the systems and the sacraments in place
for you to like confess all this stuff.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean maybe on a private level, but even
in terms of you know, Orthodox countries, I'm sure blackmail
plays a significant role in political life because that's just
it's universal, goes right back to the ancient world.
Speaker 20: So right right, Yeah, as like as like a tool
for power, sure, but yeah, I mean, And then I
had a question on bitcoin in terms of your views
on it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I was I've just been following the.
Speaker 20: Markets the past few years, and you know, I haven't
really done much investing or anything, but are you a
bitcoin maximalist in the terms of like it's the only
crypto or you're just like in general.
Speaker 5: Like that's the main investment for Yeah.
Speaker 1: I think it's the only thing that's money. The rest
of that stuff is just essentially gambling or some form
of you know, a tokenized application, and if you want
to play with that stuff, you can, But I think
that ultimately they're not really going to pan out unless
there's you know, something that ends up being like a
stable coin or something like that. But I mean, outside
of that, no, I don't. I'm a big I call
myself a bit bitcoin supremacist, but if people want to,
people want to gamble, they can't. But no, I only
I only promote bitcoin. And by the way, you notice
we had the biggest I don't ever remember one whole
day where it went from six eleven thousand dollars in
one day, so that was pretty well but go ahead.
Speaker 20: Yeah yeah, So like I could see Bitcoin probably going
down for like the rest of the year and maybe
hit a bottom, and so it's like that's why I'm
like excited, because it's going to be a really good
year to like not just the same time, but I mean,
there's gonna be other assets that are going to go down.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean I think, you know, we haven't left
the traditional four year cycles. So we're in the bear
market now, and it's you know, not surprising. I think
when we talked about you know, where bitcoin w we
go whenever it peaked, so we peaked at one twenty
whatever it was, I think we said that in the
bear market we would probably go back down to I
think I said sixty or seventy, So that's exactly where
we were. We could go lower because I think this
is a bear market, but people are freaking out. That's
actually good news, right, So that what this means is
that a lot of the higher price action was due
to institutional speculation, and to flush out the speculators is
necessary for the long term strength of bitcoin. So I
bought literally at the bottom yesterday. So anyway, so I
put my money where my mouth is one trying to say, Sam,
what's up? And then JR.
Speaker 26: Well, goshally learned is that Epstein runs bitcoin and is
Russian agent, and so that's who's really controlling the bitcoin markets.
Speaker 5: Epstein, Pork and co.
Speaker 1: Put uh, there we go, Dan Panya the great Boomer,
And I got to mention this because Mike Bens went
on Bennie what's the guys name, Bennie Johnson and they
did this interview where you believe Benny Johnson. Now, let's
what this is. We're not gonna spend all day on bitcoin,
but this is this is interesting.
Speaker 27: Jeffrey Epstein created bitcoin. You have this Daniel Pena clip
that's going so viral and he's like, you won't be
able to sleep at night. I'm sure you've seen it. Yeah,
now you find out who makes who create a bitcoin?
You're not gonna be able to sleep at night and
it's going to fing zero.
Speaker 1: Now they don't play the clip, right, they don't play
the full clip. It's an edited clip. And I've been
complaining about this clip now for two or three years.
But who does Dan Payna, the screaming, cussing boomer say
that was the creator of bitcoin? It's Putin if you
watch the full clip, which is utterly ridiculous, was Putin
working at the NSA. So here's what Dan.
Speaker 5: Putin. Could I say something about the one of the
last callers.
Speaker 28: It's a rusky conspiracy to fuck up the American economy
in the world.
Speaker 1: So Putin is a Russian conspiracy ahead, John, Oh, no.
Speaker 29: Go ahead, go ahead with your clip.
Speaker 1: I'll say that now that is the clip. It's just
dam Payne saying Putin created bitcoin.
Speaker 7: You know he's behind bitcoin.
Speaker 5: Putin.
Speaker 24: I was going to say the guy who was asking
about AI, the goal is to make you more predictable.
Speaker 29: So if you were more predictable, it's a symbiotic thing
between the you know, the mathematician stuffed behind the AI.
Speaker 5: But it's not really that. The AI is not that smart.
So the goal was always to end in near you
to be.
Speaker 1: More predictable, absolutely sewn. You want to say, yeah, man, hey, hey,
I help, you're well.
Speaker 30: My question is more of like a what now question?
With all of these disclosures and stuff, what's your opinion
on what the world is going to look like? It
seems like Trump is more concerned over attacking the.
Speaker 5: People that actually got these files.
Speaker 30: Released than doing anything about arresting anyone that have committed
any crimes or anything like that. There's been some stuff
overseas with people stepping down and stuff. But do you
think we're gonna go to war? Do you think there's
gonna be more volatility? You know, in the markets, because
of it. I'm just I'm curious on your opinion. We
did a Catechism live stream last night, and that's all
anyone wants to really talk about, you know, is you know,
what's gonna happen now. So I'm just curious about your opinion.
Does the world get more volatile? Are there more disclosures,
do people go to jail? Or is just you know,
life as usual.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean, I have no idea. I
wish I had better ask I mean, people were asking
this last night. I don't know, what's I don't know.
Speaker 30: I mean, we have like hierarchs in town, you know,
and we were asking you know them this question. And
the one thing that they, you know, they said they
kind of like stuck with me, is that the Orthodox
Church is the oldest institution in the world today. You know, Rome, Felts, Antium, Feld,
all of this stuff is falling, all of these.
Speaker 5: Empires have fallen, but the Church has stayed, you know.
So I think, I think if you're in the church,
you just do the work of.
Speaker 30: Repentance and do all that stuff, and you know, carry
on as usual while the.
Speaker 1: World gets more chaotic.
Speaker 30: So you know, I mean, we have that solace, I
guess being in the church, but I was just curious
your opinion.
Speaker 1: You know, I don't know. I mean, there's people saying
that they think that this was leaked to demoralized people
because it shows that. I think Father Spiriton said that
it shows that no one will get in trouble. So
it's a it's a demoralizing thing. I mean, it could be,
but I mean, to me, it demonstrates the reality of
good and evil, the demonic and the angelic of you know, God,
and the enemies of God, those that hate God. You know,
they live, they really do live their lifestyle. And most
of us, I guess, are mediocre. You know, we're not
on either side. We're kind of thinking that we're good,
but we're probably we're probably lukewarm. But you know, people
like Jeff Si mcguffrey, he took his Satanic Cabbalism or
whatever his worldview is, atheism, cobblism seriously, so you know,
he seemed to be into it. I'm not saying that's good.
I'm just saying, like, well, he's not luke warm. And
you could say that what's up, verge, what's up?
Speaker 5: Okay? What's going on?
Speaker 21: Many did I have a more of like philosophy worldview question.
Speaker 1: If you're doing those tonight, you can talk about anything,
all right, cool?
Speaker 5: So are you familiar with His name is nn Wilbur.
Speaker 1: New Ager. I think so, yeah. I know that guy
as like a new age you guy.
Speaker 26: Yeah.
Speaker 31: Yeah.
Speaker 21: I had a buddy who was like, hey, you should
give this a listen.
Speaker 5: I think you'd be interested in that. And I'm always
willing to at least listen to something. But I think
since I became.
Speaker 21: Orthodox, and since I actually started listening to your stuff
and diving more into philosophy, I got just a lot
more skeptical whenever anyone sends me something that's like a worldview.
Like I had a buddy who was trying to send
me a book that was some sort of hindu Veda book.
I was like, I'm just not interested, man, I just
don't really care to spend any time in that at all.
But I respect this guy a lot, and so I
decided to give it a listen. And one of the
things he was talking about was the you know, the
map is not the territory, and he was going into
talking about, you know, how every single worldview is like
a little bit correct, and so you can try and
pull pieces from each individual worldview that are correct.
Speaker 5: And I started thinking about that.
Speaker 9: I was like, well, I mean, I look at it,
there's one that's more correct.
Speaker 21: It can't be that they're all just equally correct, you know.
I think that there are things that are more correct
than others. And that's why I stand by orthodoxy and
I think it's the most correct representation of God. But
I was curious if you had any thoughts on that,
Like if you've ever kind of delve into that conversation
with people or any of your own you know, writings
or anything like that that you want to point me
towards their videos, just about like understanding multiple different worldviews,
you know, is it that it's objectively one is correct,
that means everything else is wrong from what they believe,
or I think you kind of get where I'm going
with it.
Speaker 1: I think that people have fundamental elements of a worldview
that are necessary. So there's there's necessary elements within the
three paradigm or within the three domains of philosophy, epistemology, metaphysics,
and ethics. And you can't have a worldview at all
if you tinker with or reject the fundamentals within that
paradigm or within you, within your your worldview. So the basics,
everybody has to have to have a worldview. But then
down the line, downstream from that, people will have all
kinds of differing discoveries and opinions, and that really is
not necessarily reflective of their commitments or their precondition. So,
in other words, an atheist can make discoveries in mathematics,
but the discoveries that he's making are really inconsistent with
or not compatible with his pre commitments if he was
aware of it, or if he was reasoning correctly. Because
our argument is that atheism and these kinds of worldviews
actually lead people to not reason correctly. So the flaw
and their reasoning is a result of the atheism. But
the atheism is due to moral problems, not actually an
epistemic or a The root of it is moral. It's
a spiritual problem, it's not it's not mainly an intellectual
problem exactly. Yeah, okay, so yeah, so world, you know,
a Hindu guy can discover, you know, something about math
or logic that does make Hinduism true. Right so, but
but ultimately there can only be one paradigm that is
internally consistent and universally coherent and cohesive.
Speaker 5: So that when you say internally consistent, do you.
Speaker 21: Mean that like across the three domains, that it's consistent
across those, whereas like when you look at other worldviews
like Islam, Hinduism, et cetera, like they're not consistent across.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we're talking about that at a fundamental level. We're
not talking about at every single element or level. What
do you mean by that when you say at a
fundamental level the pre commitments, the basics of metaphysics, ethics,
and epistemology, you can't deny those and have a worldview.
It'll be nonsense, right, And so are you.
Speaker 5: Saying that, like, for instance, Islam denies those.
Speaker 1: Islam ends up denying those things when it has a unitarian, unknowable,
unassociable deity, because he's nothing like the creative order.
Speaker 21: So, if I'm understanding correctly, when you unpack these different worldviews,
they eventually end up denying those three areas.
Speaker 1: We're one of those three areas, and so it becomes inconsistent. Correct. Okay,
that makes a lot of sense. Thank you, man, I
appreciate you. No, that's a great question. I'm glad that
glad we were able to clear that up. So there's
a guy saying, Jay, you are wrong. Call There's the
link to call in right there, So you're welcome to
call in and set me straight because I'm wrong. What's
up Ben.
Speaker 13: Jake on.
Speaker 4: Feeding Date?
Speaker 1: What's up?
Speaker 14: Ben?
Speaker 5: Hey? Can you em me? Jay? I was wondering if
you well.
Speaker 32: First off, I just want to say hello, man, I'm
a big fan, learned a lot from you over the years.
But my question was about Anya Win. Just see if
you have checked out her claims and what you think
about the legitimacy of what she's claiming.
Speaker 33: Uh.
Speaker 5: With that scene and her.
Speaker 1: Connection, I don't know who that is. What's her claim?
Speaker 5: She was on Seana Atwoods?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 5: Is she? Oh?
Speaker 1: Is she the one that talked about bail?
Speaker 5: Uh?
Speaker 9: I didn't hear that part?
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's her, I know you're talking about I just
heard her. Yes, I heard. I just heard the part
of the interview where she claims to be that she
was raised in a cult that worships bail. So oh, yes,
I don't know.
Speaker 18: Said sorry, Yeah, she did say, uh, Paul or bail.
Speaker 5: You know that she was a part of that cult.
Speaker 32: And that also she's a shy above twin sister.
Speaker 1: Well that that's that seems like it's getting a little
outlander so not, I mean, I don't I would assume
she's not Shilabaf's twin sister, you know, not obviously not.
Speaker 32: An identical uh twin, as she's claiming. But I was
just curious if you had checked her out at all.
Speaker 10: I hadn't really made up my mind.
Speaker 5: Fully on her, but I.
Speaker 1: Would be skeptical. And the reason is because unfortunately a
lot of times when these you know, high profile cases
come out like this, suddenly everybody is connected and they, oh,
I was actually Bill Clinton is my father, and David
Rockefeller was present when I was being satanically ritually abused
when I was five years old at Disneyland and the
underground tunnels. And it's like, there's just no way to
know or confirming me that it's just all hearsay, an assertion.
And I'm not saying there aren't actual cult people that
are abused. It's just that I've been reading and studying.
The first ritual book that I read was two thousand
and three, and it's William Kennedy's book on ritual abuse
in the Roman Calloy Church. That was the first one
I read two thousand and three, I think that's when
it came out. It's called Lucifer's Lodge, and he was
a journalist, traditional Catholic journalist who wrote about the PDF
scandals up to that time two thousand and three, and
I was, you know, shocked. It was very, very difficult read.
I think a lot of people perhaps right now in
twenty twenty six are feeling what I felt in two
thousand and three when I read that book. And you know,
that kind of stuff. I think you can verify, you
can see that that's real. You can look up the
court cases, you can look up even mainstream you know
articles that are still out there on that stuff. But
the victims, and I'm not saying they're not victims, this
is a lot of times and watching this for twenty
plus twenty three years, they end up shooting themselves in
the foot. That becomes some of the worst proofs of
this if they are victims, because they end up tacking
on all this crazy shit like, okay, it sounds believable
that I was, you know, somebody was messed with by
a politician and then the more they do interviews, they
have to make the next interview kind of like canvases
show more and more outlandish and outrageous. Then it becomes
just nonsensical. Yes, I saw the aliens in the underground
base and that they were using my you know, fetal
tissue to clone the aliens, and it gets into crazy shit.
I've been seeing this for twenty three years. So there's
always somebody who steps into the I mean, let's take
that girl. Who is that woman Anika? And the first
half of the story sounds pretty credible, right, she was
on with PbD and and I'm saying she will most
but like the first half of the story sounds credible,
and then Patrick bed David says, so wait a minute.
You were a New York social lite hanging out with
the elites in New York for all these years, and
you get invited to David Rockefeller's party, but you had
never heard of David Rockefeller. Yes, I had no idea
who he was, never heard of him. I mean, it's
just that's very it's not plausible. Like the most famous
New York wealthy elite guy and you're in the socialite
circles and you're about to be trafficked to him, but
you've never heard of him. You don't know who the
Rockefellers are. It's just bizarre. And then when and Nette Lucas,
that's it. And then when Patrick bed Davis is asking
her questions, she is really mad that he's pressing her
on the details that don't make sense. Well, I'm sorry,
even if you are legitimately a victim of things, people
are going to press you on the details. And it's
not everybody else's fault if your details don't make sense.
For example, that crazy guy's story that when I was
getting pumped in the booty by George Bush Senior, they
cut my feet with a simtar, but it was a
special knife that doesn't leave scars. I mean, nobody's going
to listen to that because it just sounds like bullshit.
And guess what what are we learning from media? People
bullshit all the time. People love to bullshit, They lie
all the time. Duper's delight. Have you heard of Duper's delight?
People actually get off on duping people. That's a real
criminal thing, especially with.
Speaker 5: The Rockepellers, because remember back in.
Speaker 29: The day, there was that guy who said he was
the anti Christ and he was David Rockepiller's son.
Speaker 5: Rockepiller, right.
Speaker 1: Point, and that's that's what partly, by the way, makes
a lot of this stuff look retarded. Right again, by
the way, we got we got another hit from Canadas today,
another greatest hit from Queen kwandas. Uh So, let's go
over here and I'll show you what I mean. So
here's uh yeah, here's the net Lucas PbD podcast and
then okay, there's no chapters to this.
Speaker 34: If you want to show.
Speaker 4: There you go her face.
Speaker 7: I see my daughter.
Speaker 1: I got an eight year old girl and a three
year old girl. I'm not okay with that.
Speaker 7: There's a part of me that is a naturally my
entire life have been very protective since we lived in
saying let's have men compete against.
Speaker 23: One where.
Speaker 34: That has been become the thing. The biggest issue that
is not every woman would know that, being a mother
fiverse of what I've been through, would not really say
yes to that.
Speaker 1: I agree. I'm trying to find the part in the
interview where she gets mad at him over this, and
I know it's later on in it.
Speaker 7: Her life and I who was missing those children. I
want more attention to it.
Speaker 34: They're all saying about pedophilia.
Speaker 7: I read the lyrics.
Speaker 1: Here's the lyrics.
Speaker 7: It says she's just sixteen.
Speaker 34: Years old and survive. I had an extremely big near
death experience.
Speaker 1: Kay.
Speaker 7: I'm disappointed with our politicians that they don't spend enough.
Speaker 34: Time period of sometimes it's just boom. When he died,
it was immediate and I immediately got the memories and
there was no question.
Speaker 1: Okay. So but here's another thing that's odd too, is
she didn't know any of this until she heard David
Rockefeller dying. That's what it was in mainstream media, and
she didn't know who he was.
Speaker 5: This is it this?
Speaker 1: So listen of this. This doesn't make any sense animal.
Speaker 34: So that's what was being sold. So that's how the
parfulman would then fall for me and then I could
maybe marry a president. You know, that's possible. Whatever it was,
But it was really Rockefeller who was behind it.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 7: So when you're spending time with Rockefeller, you said you
didn't know was him until he died in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So this is how this is very unbelievable. How
would you be in these circles? And by the way,
It's not just that she didn't know it when she
was young allegedly being abused. She says she didn't know
who David Rockefeller was until he died in twenty seventeen,
and then she got back all the memories of the abuse. Okay,
so that just does not make sense.
Speaker 5: I'm sorry.
Speaker 7: If you're going to these events, in these parties and
they're mentioning his name, don't they say David Rockefeller?
Speaker 34: The name I never heard, the name.
Speaker 7: I don't miss David, so they wouldn't say, please help
me bring up the you know, great David Rockefeller.
Speaker 34: If I saw his face, I really would have seen it,
because the thing is I would have not done.
Speaker 1: So again, it's not just that, Okay, may'aw. Maybe when
you're a kid, you don't know who this person is.
She never knew who David Rockefeller was at all her
entire life until he died in twenty seventeen, and then
she had the recovered memories of the abuse. Okay, that
just does not make sense.
Speaker 24: I honestly don't think that the old elites are kind
of that sloppy.
Speaker 5: They were all they were all very like like guys
like Rocke Peller, like they were. There were guys like
that come from that area where they're kind of unblack mailable.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's not just she she woke up. It's like
she had this flood of memories of who he was,
which doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 34: And well, if I had remembered him while I was alive,
because he got so deep. You understand, I was a
child sex slave. I had not known any love and
this was the best I got at that time, and
because of that, I would have maybe there's a lot
of parts in me that were very attached to him,
that loved him very much. It's part of the reason. Also,
I wouldn't want to necessarily say the name. You know,
it feels like this look, but.
Speaker 1: She didn't know the name, So how could she say
the name without never without ever hearing it or knowing it?
Speaker 34: Oil somewhere too.
Speaker 1: This is where she gets mad at him for pressing
this issue, by the way.
Speaker 34: Believe it or not to him, to him because there's
still parts inside of me that are also attached to him, and.
Speaker 1: So she still loves him. It doesn't make any sense,
and I'm not driving me. It's just like, and obviously
you understand that people who are mentally unstable and who
are schizophrenic, they latch onto conspiracy theories. When they hear
conspiracy theory, they then make themselves the lead actor in
the global targeted individual conspiracy.
Speaker 34: I've learned a lot the more I heal. You see,
you're talking like somebody who doesn't understand healing very well,
because the healing comes from you. How is it possible?
It's very possible that I had vague memories of an
American and some positive connection to that, but then there
was also the memory of how I had met him.
Speaker 1: I remember. It's also possible that she was abused. It
just may not have been David Rockefeller, right. I mean,
there's a lot of possibilities here, but to use these
witness testimonies as proof, it only goes so far until
there's any there's substantial evidence. Otherwise it's just claims and assertions,
and the claims assertions can be true. But again, people
have to understand this when it comes to especially these
victim survivor people like I've seen this for twenty three years,
and this is a repeated pattern every few years. Even
back in going back to the two thousands, there were
people who would come out I'm an Illuminati sex whistleblower
and I was in the underground based Arizona Wilder. I
went to the underground bases and there was cloning, and
there was this, and there was that, and the first
part of it sounds plausible. Then it turns into aliens, right,
no different. So I'm just saying that that ends up
shooting in the foot. Anybody any credibility? Did you want
to say something? John?
Speaker 24: Yeah, It's another thing too, is like it's like similar
when people say like they come back as famous.
Speaker 35: People, like they were a famous person in another light,
like they choose they choose famous people in these instances,
similar with this episode.
Speaker 36: But it's always like, oh, I'm gonna you know, David
Rocketpiller obviously doesn't mean much to younger people, but like
for me and you and people older than us, he
was like the King.
Speaker 26: Supreme, you know, conspiracy guy that everybody looked at.
Speaker 1: So he's like chooses, like, yeah, look, if I'm gonna
be if if I'm going to have people going up
in my body, it's going to be the most important
man in the world.
Speaker 29: Right, Or if I'm gonna be somebody else in another life,
it's gonna be Cleopatra.
Speaker 5: Or you know, Napoleon. It's not going to be uh.
I came back as you know, the guy who owns
the house.
Speaker 1: Two doors down for me, right, And here's Arizona Wilder
being interviewed by David Ike and what if she say, Oh,
it turns out it's the Queen's a reptile And all
this time.
Speaker 23: Started looking into my life. Back in nineteen eighty nine,
I was starting to have the flashes of things and
my life was not what it seemed to be, which
is why I started looking into it. The aaryans, the arians,
and the purity of the blood, and what it's all
about is that the blood, and the menstrual blood contains
something that is important for the propagation of this race
that is controlling things on this planet.
Speaker 1: So it sounds Epstein is right, menstrual blood. Epstein talked
about that, Niguard talked about that. We played the clip
last night where Nieguard says, I'll pay you black women
for your fetal cells for your bobo babies, right, and
then she goes into the alien races that use the systems.
It just gets crazy. So you see what I'm saying
is like you've got things that you can verify, and
then you've got the things that turn into this, you know,
David Hyite level bullshit.
Speaker 23: Years to go again, she will be put into the
body the essence of her, and the reptilian form will go,
or the essence of her will go.
Speaker 1: Now now it's uh reincarnation and alien reincarnation through reptilian bodies,
and it just turns into bullshit. Dude, seen it for
all these years, man, over two decades of this stuff.
Come on, Mattie, what's up? Or mat excuse me, Matt Scruggins,
Matt Scroggins, what's up? How you doing?
Speaker 9: Jay?
Speaker 5: So? I don't have a question, but I do have
two pusships for you.
Speaker 1: That's the only thing we accept as quertions.
Speaker 5: All right, Well let's go portion number one.
Speaker 10: Have you seen Moses the Black Yad And what do.
Speaker 5: You think about it?
Speaker 10: No?
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't have near me any kind of
independent theater that would play that, gotcha, And ain't no
independent theaters in the middle of nowhere, Tennessee.
Speaker 5: Dog.
Speaker 1: I mean maybe I can find it online. You know,
I am looking forward to to talking about it. Father
Turbo is wanting to do an interview about it, so,
you know, I think eventually, I'm sure i'll see it,
but I've not yet seen it. Now, okay, have you
seen it?
Speaker 5: What?
Speaker 1: What did you think?
Speaker 10: I have not been able to see it yet. I've
talked to a few people in my parish back at Birmingham.
I'm a truck driver, so I don't really get a
lot of free time.
Speaker 1: Hey, Jamie, did you make me a coffee before you
do your podcast? I'm sorry, I'm listening. I'm listening. Go ahead, Okay.
Speaker 9: If I have some time in the.
Speaker 1: Next day or two, I might try to get to
a theater.
Speaker 5: But I got to bake.
Speaker 10: Miles for a bit. But anyways, my second question for
question excuse me? What do you think about Ryan at Austin?
Speaker 1: Not a huge fan of Brian Dawson, honestly. I mean
I tried to, uh, you know, debate. We tried to
have a debate on atheism and it didn't go well
for him, and I don't I don't think he's ever
talked to me since then. Have you seen the debate?
Speaker 9: I have not checked out the debate.
Speaker 1: It's it's funny, it's pretty it's an amusing debate. But
also you know, he tends to you know, just kind
of hop on and align himself with all of the
Muslim influencers, and it's you know, it's just kind of
to me, there's a lot of red flags there where
I just don't even pay much attention to it. I
got you.
Speaker 10: So I brought it up because he was on a
podcast with Clan Ruttel. They dropped maybe today, maybe yesterday.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the libertarian dude I was on. I was on
Luke Radowski's podcast with I'm familiar with him.
Speaker 10: Yeah, he brought up an interesting idea on why the
Epstein files are dropping now.
Speaker 5: And his theory was basically that.
Speaker 10: So Trump basically ran his twenty twenty four campaign like
very heavily on releasing you know, JFK, RFK and Epstein files.
And his speculation was that, you know, because Trump's like
major financial base or his campaign was a bunch of
Zio people that they were basically behind the scenes like
you idiot, what are you doing.
Speaker 5: You're not gonna do that, and He's.
Speaker 10: Like, I'll just you know, run at by people. He
kind of speculated that the bullet was like that, you know,
raised his head in twenty four was like kind of
some Zio people telling him to.
Speaker 5: Get in line.
Speaker 10: He gets into office, he assumes he can just do
the thing, that public event with all those influencers, with
the binders, and then kind of sweep it under the rug.
And that the reason it's happening now is that that
shot like basically his takeheadedness in the campaign about this
and you know, shining a light on it basically just
rent his base up and then got in like he's
not doing anything related to that stuff for his base,
like the way he thought he said he.
Speaker 5: Was going to. So they get pissed.
Speaker 10: The Democrats basically see you know, red and deep, they
can kind of jump on to like run against them
because they're brands in the toilet.
Speaker 5: And then you have Thomas Massey.
Speaker 10: Who's probably just I don't think he's the most perfect
person ever, but relatively virtuous for being a congressman and
just kind of runs the media and like press is
really hard on that. And it's like basically because of
kind of those factors, the UH file over getting released,
So it's not like it's a you know, a part
of like a globalist.
Speaker 1: Plan or you know, I mean I don't think that
I don't think they wanted this information out there. That's
why they're running cover. I mean you see you know
Net and Yahoo, uh uh, Ben Shapiro, Bongino, like all
of these top people are saying it's nothing, don't look
at it. You know, the UK police are saying, don't
share this information or look at it. Remember they did
the same thing with wiki leaks. Remember the uh what
was it the the acousta guy went on CNN and
said it is illegal to look at wiki leaks. Well,
they don't do that when it's a fake league. I mean, uh,
you know, in my experience, usually over conspiracy, theorizing is wrong.
Sometimes sometimes it's a you know, deep, deep, deep weird thing,
but most of the time it's it's not that deep.
It's like if you see all these you know, zioe
people running point for it, trying to cover it up. Uh,
they didn't want that, Like why would they, right exactly
why are they all saying, I mean, Laura Lumers are
her saying there's an email where Epstein says he doesn't
like Israel at all, therefore he's not working for Israel.
The email says, I don't have I don't want a
meeting in Israel, doesn't say he doesn't work.
Speaker 10: It's so stupid, right, Yeah, it's like it's like the
idea that Israel's not involved with this when looking at
the totality of how much they.
Speaker 1: Come up, and you know, there's the entire mainstream media
is saying in Unison, it's it's Russia and he works
for Putin and none of them have covered or mentioned
anything about the real issues, which we've been covering for
five six days straight, a week straight.
Speaker 24: Now what he's what it is, Jay, is.
Speaker 10: What you don't understand is that it's actually that's a
like that email that he's going back and forth with
Zelensky on how to like basically threw over poot.
Speaker 9: That's just they.
Speaker 10: Knew before the Stein files are going to come out,
this is going to come out, so that email.
Speaker 24: Was set up to one cover for him actually being
a run.
Speaker 1: So now they're now they're que tards again. Right, that's
Q tard level argumentation. I'm serious because every time Q
would get debunked, they would say, oh, this one was
in her own purpose to make it look like it's
being debunked. And Trump's leading people off of the trail
and Uh yeah, it's just totally retarded. Like anybody with
common sense should be able to like get the basics here, right.
I mean, I understand people don't know the history of
Nathan Rothschild and Waterloo, and you know, I get it,
people don't know the background. They don't have a context,
but like, come on, man, like a lot of this
stuff is not even that. Look here, Ted krue Ted
cruz Epstein is not working for Israel. Ben Shapiro no
ties with is or Epstein works for North Korea in rush.
I mean, it's is so retarded. This should totally discredit
these people. But I mean, man, we got really dumb
people out here. Half of the country, man is like
SSRI medicated, just mind bombed zombies. And if you don't
believe me, look at the people that are supporting Antifa.
Look at the people protesting ICE. I mean they're they're
actually what's the biblical term, sons of belial. I mean,
they're legit sons of Ballio out here. Doctor Thomas Raspberry,
what's that dog? Hey Jay yeop, Hey.
Speaker 5: I have a question.
Speaker 31: I'm sorry, I wanted to ask something that's going to
change the.
Speaker 5: Topic just a little bit.
Speaker 1: It's anything.
Speaker 5: On top of it, a couple of young men at
both at church and.
Speaker 31: Just in gentleal in my life who are coming across
real problems with women. And it's starting to be sort
of like the same kind of presentation whenever they approach
me and asked me for advice, Like either they're young
and they're talking about women who kind of fit the
same profile like they are. They're looking for women who
are under thirty five, and they always find these women
who are into tarro and they believe in, you know,
do age nonsense. They're far left, they left home when
they were eighteen and you know, call their dad a
an essay or whatever, and they've sort of had these
it's almost like they have a narrative that's like one personality,
and it's just sort of like copied and pasted on
just about every young woman who's like under thirty five.
And I notice also kind of stabled with that. It's
like Democratic Party is almost two to one now of
college educated women.
Speaker 5: And I just worry about young men now and who.
Speaker 31: Are coming into the church and just trying to find
somebody and they're you know, having these sorts of issues,
and I don't I don't know what to say. I mean,
I think it might complain like social media influencing.
Speaker 1: But yes, the last hope, as I've been saying for dudes,
is you're gonna have to go to the local evangelical
Christian coffee shop or perhaps even your Starbucks or whatever,
and you're gonna have to take your Orthodox study Bible,
this thing right here, and you're gonna go and you're
gonna sit in your Christian Baptist coffee house and you're
gonna sit and read your Orthodox study Bible, and you're
going to strike up conversations with the Baptist girls, and
you're gonna convert the Orthodox. That's your best hope. You're
not going to get chicks on TikTok or which talk
or whatever like that. That's the only avenue left, is
like if you're in the Bible Belt, and if you're not,
like you can still find these enclaves where Yeah, that's
you're just gonna have to convert into evangelical.
Speaker 9: Yeah, I.
Speaker 1: Just think it's it is frightening me, and it is
that bad. This is what boomers don't understand. Yeah, just
get out there and work hard and get a job
and show that girl, the buyers some flowers. They don't
they I hate men. They're already brainwashed the hate men.
So uh, somebody said, convert a Roman Catholic girl. I
mean that's possible, but I mean Roman Catholic girls are
probably a little I don't know who would be. I would.
I would think you probably do better. I mean, look,
I live in the Bible Belt. I have relatives, I've met,
you know, Baptist girls that are good girls, relatively speaking
compared to the rest of the degenerous society. So I
think that's your best bet. I don't know. I don't
know what else to tell you. I mean, where you're
gonna where else you're gonna go tender? Does that still exist?
I don't even know.
Speaker 5: I think it does.
Speaker 31: They talk to me about getting on these websites that
are you know, still dating websites or something. They can
never find somebody because all the women are, you know,
approaching people who are rich or six foot three hundred
inches or something like that. Like it's it's like the
women themselves have unrealistic expectations, and I just I don't know,
I don't understand like where this is coming from and
how I can.
Speaker 1: Advise it's social media. You're absolutely right. It's from social media.
You're absolutely right. Social media has become a very powerful,
potent brainwashing operation, exactly what the Silicon Valley oligarchical overlords
wanted it to be. It's a feedback loop, and that's
that's what it was designed to be. But yeah, I
don't know what to say other than that, Like, you know,
that's the best I could come up with. I'm sorry.
Speaker 5: It couldn't green in the culture of the past twenty.
Speaker 9: Five years as well.
Speaker 5: And if it's cultural, then it gets passed along like
a virus.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 24: And so women talking to women passing that stuff around,
if they don't have any grounding and anything Christian or
they think Christianity or you.
Speaker 5: Know, anything like that is stupid, then.
Speaker 24: They will gravitate towards a form of spirituality.
Speaker 5: That is the direct opposite of that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I haven't I haven't risen anybody in a long time.
But I mean, I know that human nature is still
human nature, So there's still going to be some baseline
things that are still going to be true with women.
But you're also dealing with pretty heavy, you know, social
media brainwashing. So I'm sure it is tough the force.
What's up, man, I'm you.
Speaker 9: Hey, what's going on?
Speaker 37: Jay?
Speaker 28: Honored to TATSI Man, I've been a fan of you
on infol wars for a while.
Speaker 9: Here's my deal, man, Like, what are we doing? What
are we talking about?
Speaker 28: First of all, I just posted in the comments section,
who did COVID nineteen? Forbes article costs US twenty four
trillion dollars?
Speaker 5: Were bankrupt?
Speaker 28: Trump printed eight trillion from covid? Who did COVID nineteen?
Speaker 9: That's pretty important?
Speaker 28: Right now?
Speaker 9: We have smoking guns.
Speaker 5: I just came out of the recent Epstein files.
Speaker 28: Not one person was talking about Jay. I'm going to
offer you the story of the century on a silver platter.
I've given you all the infel with the links in
the comments. It was Nathan Wolf who who headed the
global the Eco.
Speaker 5: Health that.
Speaker 28: Created a virus that gave them an excuse to print
four plus trillion dollars for the rothschild bankers.
Speaker 1: Now are you saying, is this the one that Epstein
was colluding with and saying, hey, let's put pressure on
the Trump administrations. That you're talking about.
Speaker 28: Nathan Wolf is the virologist who headed the Eco Health
Global Viral Project. He works for eco Health, DARPA and
Bill Gates Foundation. Now eco Health's former VP Andrew Huff
he was on Alex Jones. I mean he had a
CIA guy or something come to his house and try
to like scare him or shoot him. He was the
guy who revealed that Peter Dassek of eco Health told
him he's working with CIA.
Speaker 9: RFKJ Junior on Jimmy Dor.
Speaker 33: Said, yeah, the CIA did it.
Speaker 9: Well.
Speaker 28: Yeah, Dennis Carroll of us AI A D he's on
the Global Viral Project as well. But how do I
know that Nathan Wolfe headed it? Well, he was boys
with Epstein. We have the email where he says, what's
meat the plot that's in the comment section.
Speaker 9: I have the link to it as well.
Speaker 28: So they planned it. And twenty ten, twenty eleven, you
have Boris Nicolick, Bill Gates' top science advisor. He's at
the WEES meetings. He's there in twenty ten in January,
we have the smoking gun emails in the comment section.
Speaker 9: I posted it.
Speaker 28: He said, let's set you up Epstein. He's emailing Epstein
his boy, Let's set you up with Nathan wolf this virologist.
Speaker 5: They're planning.
Speaker 9: So let me read the exact text. So Boris Nicolack, Bill.
Speaker 28: Gates tops and remember there's the famous photo from twenty eleven.
Speaker 9: I think of Bill.
Speaker 28: Gates, Boris Nicolick, Epstein, and then and then Jeff Staley right,
the JP, Morgan Banker, the Rob Child Baker, somebody else.
Speaker 9: What were they planning in twenty ten? What were they
all just chilling their meeting about? It was COVID nineteen.
Speaker 28: Now we know this from the files we have. Let's
see Sunday, January start. I'm looking at the email in
the comment section right now from Jeffrey Epstein to Bill
Gates' science advisor, Boris Nicolack, What time Monday? I have
Nathan Wolfe's the virologist here. It might be beneficial for
you or Alice to tell him what you guys are
up to? So what the hell was was Boris Nicolak,
Bill Gates science advisor and all these guys up to, Well,
they were planning COVID nineteen. And then we have an
we have an email from Nathan wolf again, the virologist
Q Jeffrey Epstein in twenty twelve and you and New
York City this weekend meet up to plat.
Speaker 9: I mean, we have the smoking gun emails.
Speaker 28: This is the guy who headed the Eco Health Global
Viral Project that created COVID. Now, as we'll see in
my infographic, he began working with Wuhan.
Speaker 9: That lady, she's Anglee.
Speaker 28: Now, her job was simple to go out and find
wild back coronaviruses out in Ks and China that would
never evolve in a million years to infect us. But
as doctor Richard Ebright of Rutgers pointed out, I mean,
in twenty eighteen, you got Peter Dasik who told Huff
he's working with the CIA.
Speaker 9: He says, oh, he proposes to dart ball Let's graft.
Speaker 28: On an activated fearing cleavage site at the S one
S two junction of a wild back coronavirus that would
never evolved.
Speaker 5: To in fact humans.
Speaker 9: They did that, So in twenty eighteen you proposed it.
Twenty nineteen that.
Speaker 5: Exact virus comes out.
Speaker 9: That's what he Wright said in the great article by
the Intercept. And Nathan Wilp began working with Wuhan, Bat lady.
It's on the.
Speaker 28: Wuhan Institute of Virologists on site.
Speaker 9: It's right there in the info graphic.
Speaker 5: And twenty thirteen. So they planned COVID.
Speaker 28: They wanted a virus that they could, you know, manipulate
to do whatever they wanted.
Speaker 9: This one killed a lot of old people. I mean,
anyone over seventy year eighty have like a four percent
death rate.
Speaker 28: If you were healthy under fifty, it barely affected you,
especially if you had high vitamin D. It only killed
people low light them and D. That's why, faux you
never mentioned it. It's just just so we have the
biggest story and I'm just sitting here stunt. Why not
one major influencer has hopped onto this the biggest story
of ever twenty four I mean forges article twenty four trillion.
This cost the world, This bank brought to the whole world.
But not only that, just you know, the deaths from
the virus itself of old people and of the vaccines
that affected males under forty specifically, we have the evidence
that it specifically hurt them, that hurt us because I'm
a male under forty.
Speaker 9: They were coming from me, and.
Speaker 28: So when they declare war on me, that's when I
had to wake up and say, what the fuck is
going on here? When I have Jeffrey Epstein's best friend,
who thinked I've seen in his twenty eleven book Viral
Storm where he predicted all everything that he was about
to do, and he thinks Epstein and then there he
is with Glene Maxwell the time one hundred. But yeah,
he is one of the top one hundred influential. He
created COVID nineteen. So how is Nathan Wolf still walking
around and not in prison? And how is anyone involved
in this not in prison? Because Trump bank up to
the country and then he punted it trillion for the
bankers because the other because they released this in September.
September twelfth was when Wuhan took their virus Coronavirus lab
made sequences offline. They released at nine to eleven. I'm
pretty sure that we know what came out in September.
All the data shows at Former CDC director Robert Redfield.
Speaker 9: Said, Yeah, a lot of funny things happened in September.
Speaker 5: At twenty nineteen.
Speaker 9: The Wuhan lab wondered military.
Speaker 28: Lockdown, reached the events system, deleted the sequences, the virus
came out, he says it and funny. Another funny thing
happened in September twenty nineteen, there was a REPO crisis
in the Federal Reserve, like they essentially went through and
the Liberty Savage does a great job analyzing it on
x we were going through another twenty two collapse, and
so they needed an excuse to print Trullius to keep
this FIAT bas system going, this roth Child money system.
You got you stay small a secret to the Cetter
Reserves talks about.
Speaker 9: What the roth Child's install the.
Speaker 28: Setter Reserve twenty thirteen with are representatives.
Speaker 9: Of course they don't. This isn't Game of Thrones where
they go on and put flags on the ground House Rothchild.
We just took you over. No, now they use agents.
Speaker 28: Now they use representatives. JP Morgan, that's who you stay
Smallen's sites.
Speaker 7: No.
Speaker 1: I sided that two nights ago, that Jap Morgan was
the Rothchild front.
Speaker 9: Yeah. Absolutely. So I'm just wondering. We have the biggest
story ever right now. No one's taking it. No one's
taking it.
Speaker 1: Well, I just heard this, So this is new. This
is new. Okay, chill out, dude. I appreciate it, man,
this is new to me. So all of this is
breaking by the minute, and all I know is what
pops up at the top of my screen, so I
don't I don't see this until I search this very topic.
So definitely, it looks like you can see here that
they're meeting. Definitely is talking about uh just Slaine and Jeffrey,
I have Nathan the virologists here us A, I D
Meta Biota. This one says, I wish they would link
the the here's the link here, let's see, here's one
about him, so that one's real. Here is let's meet
up to plot. Yep, looks real. Yeah, well, I'll mention
this to Alex because yeah, by the way, what makes
you a pandemic expert? How exactly does a person do
you get a PhD in pandemics? Like like my PhD
in CIA? What's up? I, Tanya, what's up?
Speaker 5: Hello?
Speaker 1: Yeah, what's up? What's on your mind? H?
Speaker 33: Well?
Speaker 38: The first to address what obi Wan just said is
that I feel like what Trump talks about constantly is
that things don't appear in the media and they don't
break the story because it's dangerous to and it's against
the media's own interests. We just connected to what I
wanted to say about Tati.
Speaker 1: He's talking about alternative media what you're talking about.
Speaker 38: When I came in, which was like the point in
which these testimonies are even uh, you know, the exhibitions
become bullshit.
Speaker 1: But I mean to say, what becomes what are you
talking about?
Speaker 5: What?
Speaker 38: Well, like what it looks like David Ike, who obviously
is full of bullshit, he does it because he genuinely
believes the bullshit, but to insulate himself from what's true.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 39: And I think when you have you know, these children
who can be three years.
Speaker 5: Old and are being bombarded with incredibly.
Speaker 39: Even just violent imagery at that age, and like connected
to whoever it was that was abusing them, it's kind
of harsh to say.
Speaker 5: I mean, if they think.
Speaker 38: That there were aliens involved, they could have just been
around adults that were talking about immigrants.
Speaker 23: Well.
Speaker 1: I mean a lot of these no, a lot of
these things that.
Speaker 39: Can't be tracked because they don't have a document.
Speaker 1: Okay, thank you appreciate that. I mean a lot of
these interviews don't say that though, they don't say maybe
this is illegal immigrants. A lot of these interviews, as
the women go on to have these really outlandish, wild
stories about it being actual aliens and underground based again.
I've been seeing this for twenty three years. Door, what's up?
Guys who would like and share, it's open for them,
feel free to call in and offer your questions, disagreements, insights. Door,
what's up? I'm you, yeah, Hi?
Speaker 5: Can you hear me? Is it okay? If I talk
about the Iran stuff.
Speaker 1: You guys here, anything is open for him, Okay.
Speaker 40: I'm Iranian, myself and my parents and myself. We've been
following all the information like coming from Iran, but I
noticed that there's like an entirely different day, probably social
media algorithms or whatever. It's like completely split the discourse
on what's happening in Iran. It's like, on one and
you have the leftist saying it's a Zionist color revolution,
you know, they hate Israel. They're looking at Iran as
if it's like Palestine two point zero, they're you know,
the whole poor little Muslims and all that stuff. And
on the other hand, there's right wingers who are saying,
you know, it's a Jewish color revolution.
Speaker 5: You know, I hate the Jews looking at Iran and
thinking I don't want to be in a forever war.
Speaker 22: And to be fair, that that's more fair than the leftist.
Speaker 5: It's probably true to you know point.
Speaker 40: But the thing is that US us Arians are looking
at it and we're like this whole discussion is being subverted.
Speaker 5: Eron's like just to put a little bit of a.
Speaker 40: Background here, Iran's secret intelligence agency has like a huge
online presence, and.
Speaker 5: They have a lot of people in the media, a lot.
Speaker 22: Of like fake journalists who act and pretend like feminists
and commonists stuff.
Speaker 1: Every country has the exact same thing.
Speaker 5: Yeah, yeah, exactly. And one of the best examples that
I can give right now that's.
Speaker 22: Happening right now in Iran is they had this like
milk toast rapper named like too much so that heat
or something.
Speaker 5: He got thrown into prison.
Speaker 40: And now he's talking on like social media inside the prison, right.
Speaker 5: It's like a potentcan village sort of thing right.
Speaker 40: At Like at the same time, there is testimony from
other prisoners in that same prison who are saying they're
like killing us behind the scenes and stuff like that.
But then like there's an additional factor with Iran where
like we have like a lot of fake critics, you know,
they're whitewashing what the regime is doing. They're shifting it
into typical like Western talking points of anti semitism, woman's rights, feminism,
blah blah blah, democracy, democracy, all of this stupid bullshit,
as if like those are the real problems.
Speaker 1: Sorry, what was that a right insat thing? Okay?
Speaker 33: Uh?
Speaker 40: And you know they're not talking about the actual things
that are happening meanwhile, you know, because we're talking to
our relatives over like WhatsApp and stuff.
Speaker 5: Like that, Apparently they're monitoring, monitoring it a lot too,
so we're usually using like code words. I don't know
if that's necessary, but we're very nervous here.
Speaker 24: Uh.
Speaker 40: You know, they're talking about things that are happening, like
mass rapes, mass murders, stuff like this just happening everywhere
right now.
Speaker 5: The whole stuff about like the body bags.
Speaker 40: I know that showed up in like the propaganda pro
Iran propaganda, not the regime, but the people that that
stuff is true.
Speaker 22: That's actually happening. They are even saying that you have to,
you know, pay for the bullet and stuff like this.
Speaker 5: It's it's anyways, just to get the body back is
when I mean to bury it.
Speaker 40: But you know they're using fake prisoners to make it
seem like that's not happening. They're using fake protests to
make it seem like it's not happening.
Speaker 5: And the one thing, and I don't imagine.
Speaker 40: That this what I'm saying right now will change anything,
because I think Iranians are kind of like too stupid
to get their heads out of nineteen seventies level activism.
They think that if they appeal to the media and
they say, oh, oh I want Western talking points, I
love you know, maybe if I cram enough Western talking
points into a short interview, the Trump is going to
send them Bajillian missiles and people over here to free
us from the regime.
Speaker 5: They're stupid, they don't get it.
Speaker 40: I don't even like they weren't even that violent in
the last protest, which is frankly speaking, an indictment on them.
Speaker 1: But I, well, I want say that, but yeah, I
appreciate that. Yeah, I don't really know what to say
or I don't have a whole lot of input there.
I mean clearly the I mean I don't I think
Shia Islam is an insane cult. But also, uh, I
don't want a regime change in war, so I don't
I don't really, I don't know what to say there,
right wing? What's up? H? I mean, I think the
main point here is that obviously the Trump administration is
going to do what Netna who wants? So I think
we all know that. So Kat's trader? What's up? And
isn't it interesting? Timing too?
Speaker 35: Right?
Speaker 1: Like all the Epstein stuff is a week straight time
to bomb around? What's up?
Speaker 5: Hey? Hey, what's okay?
Speaker 1: What's on your mind?
Speaker 16: Yeah?
Speaker 1: I'm what's in my mind? I guess can you speak up?
I can barely hear you, myies? Is this any better?
Speaker 9: Now?
Speaker 1: Little better?
Speaker 14: Ahead?
Speaker 5: Okay?
Speaker 8: So on my mind is what I would hope be
on everybody is mine is of course being mindful that
you're on YouTube.
Speaker 5: It's babies, it's the babies, it's the next generation.
Speaker 8: It's the fact that when we really moved past, when
we really moved past Iran, he is.
Speaker 5: Not real the money, the et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 37: This is a spiritual war when really people want to
get to like doing their own research or using some
form of God I should I shouldn't say that, but discernment,
using the fucking discernment within themselves to get to the
answer themselves, because now we're in the age of the influencer,
in the age of the complete milndness, the age of the.
Speaker 1: Face lord dude, age of the faith lord. Sorry, go ahead,
Megan jokes, go aha.
Speaker 8: Yes, And and the issue is that, if I might
say briefly, I was an ian the fed Carol's chat,
but for joining yours and the the npcoice uh NPC
retardation my friend.
Speaker 5: Of people, I could not believe it.
Speaker 41: And that was the I guess the second conversation I
personally had today where people didn't even know these dumps
had happened, these millions they had, they had, they had
no clue, and I said that I thought they were joking,
and I was like.
Speaker 5: What are you living under another planet?
Speaker 42: And then I showed them the BBC News et cetera,
CNN talking about it.
Speaker 5: I'm not just a skid stor retired.
Speaker 42: They are eating baby La la la, because obviously I
started off with this, and so the issue, obviously, to
to long story short here is that, yes, of course
there are all these things going on. I'm sure you
know you're very verse in these types of things, and yeah,
it's very difficult. Now, yeah, I believe with all of
the symbolic nature of it, we are very much in
these end times. It seems like this for turning moon cycle,
sun cycle, democratic democratic control, we're coming into this level
of sun God, all.
Speaker 1: Right, So you'd appreciate that we've getting a little too
new agy there for me. But look a lot of
you guys over here on this channel. The reason you, guys,
the reason that you're not vibing well with the low
IQ chatters out there, is because you like books.
Speaker 4: You door books, doors rock your books.
Speaker 40: Reading books is a very cheap way to I guess
entertain I wouldn't call it entertainment because my brain is
far too advanced.
Speaker 1: I'm too smart to read. I think you sit there
and go smart people read.
Speaker 24: No.
Speaker 4: I need action.
Speaker 1: I need constant chaos in my life to feel content.
Speaker 10: I need to be driving a supercar and fucking fucking
a bunch of hoes and champagne and going crazy.
Speaker 1: I can't just sit there. Oh oh, and the pirate
on the Pope. Just for people with slow brains. Yes,
reading is for people with slow brains. That's your problems.
Reading is for slow brain people. Did you know that?
That's why I played what John.
Speaker 5: Another thing too, John, can you talk.
Speaker 1: Or you too slow brain? From the books you read?
Are you able to talk?
Speaker 5: I am not able to because I read the book.
Speaker 9: Another thing that the guy who was just on here.
Speaker 24: One of the problems is we have gone from like
a world in the twentieth century of mass media and
mass communication to you know, a lot of people thought,
you know, not not you and me, but a lot
of people thought like, hey, man, when the Internet comes in, man,
we're going.
Speaker 5: To take control of everything.
Speaker 24: And they don't realize that they they themselves built their
own digital partitions and.
Speaker 5: They're in their own isolated universe.
Speaker 24: So whereas there's there's always going to be good or
bad things, and it's not it's not like either or,
it's a both and but it seems like they're they're
succeeding with with partitioning off certain amounts of information that
would get out.
Speaker 5: Into Normyville, right because.
Speaker 24: Like like you and I were talking about the other day,
was like I was somewhere and Fox News was on,
and like the the information that's going on on the
interwebs is nowhere in the vicinity.
Speaker 1: Of FOXD I mentioned these things to a relative and
the relative was not aware of this information coming out
for a week straight. So they have successfully compartmentalized through
the many, many outlets that if you're not on X,
you're not seeing this or perhaps elements of YouTube, right,
you're not even seeing this information. And for Boomerdom, they
don't even know that there's all this Epstein dump, which
is absolutely crazy because this is the biggest news story
or series of news stories, all of these emails together
is the biggest news story of our lifetime. And according
to boomerdum, it doesn't exist. And they're listening to Ben
Shapiro say that it's North Korea utterly ridiculous, utterly stupid,
totally retarded. We're getting different realities. And that's what John
is talking about, is that the Internet and the tech
overlords have been successful, probably through the algorithm as well.
I don't understand or know how all this algorithmic censorship
goes down, but they're able to, I guess, control what
people are seeing, so that that's essentially making I'm not
saying ontologically different realities, but in people's minds, there's totally
different worlds. In the Boomers' minds, there's not even an
Epstein issue, right, now, which is absolutely insane.
Speaker 9: It's different.
Speaker 24: It's not like like you were saying, it's not an
ontological reality, but it's like different perceptive reality.
Speaker 5: Like your perception is you know that Kissinger quota up perception.
That's the world we're living in.
Speaker 1: Yes, is that is?
Speaker 5: That perception is reality? And like like I was saying,
you have these.
Speaker 24: Digital partitions for certain segments and going back to the
guy who is asking earlier, if you're a creature of habit,
which we all are, I unless you're cognitive cognitively aware
of like I'm not gonna go to the same website
all the time.
Speaker 5: I'm gonna, you know, get a different VPN or whatever
somebody's gonna do. You're a creature of habit, and that's
how they know you.
Speaker 24: And then through the repetition of what you're doing, you
become more predictable, and then they feed you more stuff.
Speaker 5: That's the loop.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The first night that we started covering this, after
my live stream, I went and checked what mainstream media
was saying, and my tweet got absolutely buried because I
said the exact same thing that I saw two days later,
thousands of people saying I'm going to show you if
I didn't get rid of it. Sometimes they get rid
of the tweets, so don't get it, don't go anywhere.
But I went to the front piers of Drug Report
and it was saying that here it is, look at
this So February first, here's my tweet, the greatest leftist
disinformation post of all time. And I'm saying that because
Drudge Report is essentially Democratic party mouthpiece now and they
put up right away bombshell Epstein bankroll by KGB, and
then this tweet got no traction, and then thousands of
tweets days later saying the same thing got millions of views.
So I mean, I'm not saying like that's intentionally censoring me.
I don't know it could be, but I mean we just,
you know, we don't know how the magic of this
algorithmic censorship actually works, because I mean, some of my
posts this week did really well. I got two hundred
and fifty three hundred thousand, you know, impressions on some
of these, but a lot of them got absolutely nothing,
which is really weird. So you know, I don't know
how it could just be random or it's actually kind
of suppressed. You know, who knows But what is interesting
is a little reminder. I meant to show you guys this.
You know, I'm not gonna play the whole clip, just
to play a little bit of it, but I just
remember that. You know, everybody's talking today about the possibility
of that Epstein's still alive. I don't have any set
opinion on that. I've not seen anything convincing necessarily to
that degree yet, but nothing would surprise me. You know,
they do have the ability to if they can go
down and axel trait Maduro and arrest him, although they
can't arrest any of these people. So Maduro can be
arrested who I'm sure he is a socialist comebag, but like,
what about all these comebacks? Oh, none of these people
can be arrested so that they're all blacked out and
protected for national security. But we can go actual trait
some socialist leader, which is which is retarded, right, So
reminder too. I did interview, I did multiple podcasts with
the most famous living hit man. Okay, so Sammy the
Boll I know, Sammy the Bowl. We've had many many conversations,
and one of the first things I wanted to ask
him was do you think Epstein killed himself, had multiple discussions.
This is just one clip of the five or six
lengthy podcast that we did. So here's what Sammy the
Bull said. And the reason that he matters is because
he stayed in the exact same supermax. So Sammy spent
I think he said, several months in that supermax prison.
He said. He claims it's the same area that Epstein
was in. So is it plausible that he killed himself.
Let's see Sammy's opinion on this.
Speaker 43: Why Clinton can do what he's doing, He can just
keep his mouth shut and excuse me, he's he committed
suicide in jail. I'm sure that that is a another
thing that the deep state has buried beyond belief that
we can't find. So they hold the two correction offices
that was supposed to be watching him, They fire them,
they discipline them.
Speaker 1: By the way, this clip is from a year ago
and YouTube buried this clip when I put it up.
But that's it.
Speaker 43: That's as far as the investigation went.
Speaker 9: But that's that's a total joke.
Speaker 44: Epstein's right in that in that same area and in
the in the hole that was in the same exact area,
and there's cameras there's gods, there's everything under the sun.
There's so many questions with that. Now he had to
sell it. So a lot of times when you were
in the hole in MCC the place is packed, you
got to sell it. He had to sell it. Why
would they take his selling out? So now he's alone.
I mean, this is so set up, it's crazy. They
would have gods who were there all the time. There's
always gods, even late at night. And uh, they fell asleep,
that's bullshit. They run shifts, they walk.
Speaker 23: Every so often.
Speaker 1: You know that he's there.
Speaker 5: The whole thing is bullshit.
Speaker 44: So again, if it's all bullshit, then he didn't commit suicide,
just killed them.
Speaker 9: I agree, I don't think he did.
Speaker 1: Now if you watch the clip. He goes on to
say that it is very difficult in that supermax to
actually unlive yourself because if you try to do that,
they will strap you down and force feed you. So
they don't let you try to unlive yourself in the Supermax,
And he says typically what happens is people that try
to do that they do it through not eating right.
So they do like a you know, prisoners fast or whatever,
hunger strike, and that he says ends up usually not
working because they'll force feed you too if you try
it that way. So he says, if most of the
time the prisoners have to resort to hunger strikes, then
how less likely is it that he was able to
obtain implements to quote hanging himself. It's just he said
it's very unlikely. He said it would be very, very difficult.
He made it. I couldn't tell he's joking or being serious,
but he said he actually tried to get out of
that supermax. He said that it was very difficult. He failed,
He wasn't able to sneak out of it. But I mean,
maybe he was joking. I don't know when he said that.
Speaker 5: But.
Speaker 1: Quite a few people were sharing what I thought was
was obviously an AI image. They were like, look, we
found Epstein walking around Tel Aviv, and it's like, come on, dude,
that's obviously fake. But then again, they wouldn't be flooding
the information zone with all this fake crap. I mean,
there's not that much fake stuff. Actually, to be honest
with you, I'm actually surprised there's not more really really
silly fake stuff flooding the zone, given how wild this
is I also suspect they might think that the population
is debased and demoralized enough that they don't care really
that this is out. I mean, I don't that's me speculating,
but I mean I see people who basically are saying
that who cares, It doesn't matter anymore, who cares about Epstein?
Boomers are saying, who cares? We're tired of talking about Epstein.
They're just repeating what the mainstream media is saying. But
it's like, you don't care about the biggest news story
of the fricking century. I mean, Epstein. You've got emails
of just laying being asked to be on the Shadow
nine to eleven commission. I never even heard of a
shadow on nine to eleven commission. I read multiple books
on the Big nine event, So I mean, I don't.
Speaker 5: Know what that is.
Speaker 1: But like this, should you know, ten years ago, assuming
that the media was a real fifth column, you know,
the whole people accountable or whatever, fifth of state? I
should say, it's it's supposally a fifth of state, it's
actually a fifth column of subversion. But you know, I mean, media,
the mainstream meing is pretty much dead. And basically what
happened was all of the mainstream media people basically just
became alternative media people. And these are all the spin
doctors and the bullshit artists and the people that are
like turning it into just total ridiculous nonsense or covering up.
Ben Shapiro's probably the greatest example of all. I mean
this over and over and over, you know, doubling down
and saying the stupidest stuff. I cannot believe anyone still
follows these people. But then I have to say, well,
people are dumb. I mean, like that one caller said it,
We've really got people that are super dumbed down. Coteil
just did a stream the other day, and assuming the
statistics are right, Cotel was saying that there's people going
into college who can't compose sentences and have never read
a book. Now, how do you get to college without
ever having read a book? I don't know. But you've
also got tait Over saying reading is for idiots. I mean,
I don't. I mean, look, I deal on a daily
basis with a lot of people, and that's through you know,
my own little media staff and other media outlets that
I work with that are huge. Meeting a lot of
people dealing with a lot of comments I get, you know,
a lot of emails and dms. Now, we've had years
of people calling in and we have a pretty high
IQ audience over here, probably the highest IQ audience on
the way. And I gotta say, and I don't mean
this to be you know, elitist or rude, but people
are retarded.
Speaker 14: Man.
Speaker 1: They're super freaking dumb. They don't have any discernment. It's sad,
and they fall for the same stuff over and over
and over and over, and they're yeah, exactly, they're relying
on AI and chat GPT now and that's making them
even dumber. It's crazy, dude. So we're going like full dystopia.
And I don't mean to be black killed or I'm
not trying to black kill you guys, because you know,
if you're not super dumb, or if you're not just
totally degenerate, like, there's a lot of positive things happening,
there's a lot of good information coming out ways that
you can position yourself even in these bad times to
you know, actually, by God's grace, still have a very good,
you know, wholesome life even in the midst of all
this bad stuff. Noah what's up? The topics are open
pretty much anything you guys want to talk about. Feel
free to disagree, feel free to offer a topic of debate,
if you want to challenge me on something, if you
want to ask a question, if you want to get
reading recommendations, you name it. It's up to you. What's up, Noah? Hello?
Speaker 5: All right?
Speaker 1: You there, Lucas. What's up, Lucas? I mean Lucas unmute? Aries,
what's up?
Speaker 5: You know?
Speaker 24: A lot of times two Jay is the is like
with something like this happens with the f Steine thing,
it blackpills people even.
Speaker 5: More as the opposite effect. But then like they get
to the point to where.
Speaker 24: You know, because nothing ever happens, So then they're like,
nothing ever happens, it's not going to change anything.
Speaker 5: I've been there myself, so I'm sure.
Speaker 24: That there's a lot of people who know that this,
you know, has happened, but they're like, yeah, nothing's ever
gonna happen, nothing's ever going to change, as if that's
up to us anyways.
Speaker 1: Yeah, uh, Aries, what's up?
Speaker 5: Man? Hey, what's up?
Speaker 28: Jake?
Speaker 9: Sorry if I can't hear me.
Speaker 45: I got the flu this morning, so I'm kind of
on flu medication.
Speaker 5: But I was wanting to talk to you about this
new term woke, right, because I've.
Speaker 45: Been seeing a lot of the Zionist side has started
to call people who just aren't on board with Trump
hiding hiding in the faces of suspects in this drop,
and I was just wondering what your thoughts were on that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's all bullshit. It's all bullshit from.
Speaker 5: The ones like thew in Hollywood.
Speaker 1: It's bullshit from James, it's bullshit from James Lindsay. So
of course we've talked about that for a long time.
And I asked James Lindsey about five times a debate,
four or five times, and of course he said no,
every single time. Do you still host with Lord Voldemart? Yes?
Here it is from seven days ago, right here, Renee?
What's up? By the way, are we all gonna overlook
who's really Jeff Stein's handler? Are we all seriously going
to overlook us when it's right in our face? What's up, dude? Renee?
Speaker 5: I'm you, Hey, Jay, thank you, well.
Speaker 33: Done on all the breakdown of Epstein release.
Speaker 5: My question this evening, please, is.
Speaker 33: What are your thoughts on the future of the Vatican,
I mean, via Gladio, via the Vatican Bank, and really
getting out.
Speaker 5: In the public.
Speaker 23: Now.
Speaker 5: I'm really curious to hear your thoughts on its future.
Thank you.
Speaker 34: Well.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, I don't really have any different
analysis other than what we've commented on and covered for many, many,
many years, which is that the Vatican continues to be
one of percent on board with the you know, World
Economic Form Davos globalist agenda. You have since Vatican two
no Stratate teaching the radical humanist line, which is a
violation of the exclusivity of the Gospel in John fourteen six.
You have the Vatican being at a geopolitical level compromise
with Gaudie met Spez teaching Marxist Fabian socialism explicitly. And
so we shouldn't be surprised that ever since the nineteen
sixties and Vatican two, the Vatican has continued that official
dogmatic policy, even to the point of working hand in hand,
hand in glove with the intelligence agencies. The making a
joke obviously with this image here, but he actually did
visit the island and was reportedly getting it on. We
don't know how right I'm talking about Stephen Hawking.
Speaker 32: Here, But
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean I don't know that in the future
of the Vatican is obviously to one percent continue on
as it's a function area of the octopus, you know,
an element