Speaker 1: Welcome to the three Stories version of the Todd Hermer Show.
Story number one Prayer works, Tina Peter's sentence has been overturned,
and the David Delighten case has finally been tossed. That's
our Faith and Flag segment. Story number two Food Far
from God, our Faith and Fitness segment, and story number
three fact checking the top five Christian arguments on all
of Twitter dash x. Our Faith and Fact segment. We'll
talk about this all with the help of God Almighty.
Speaker 2: But Todd Herman Show is one percent disapproved by big
pharma technocrats and tyrants everywhere from the high mountains of
Free America. Here's the Emerald City XI.
Speaker 1: Todd Herman. Today is the day the Lord has made,
and these are the times to which God has decided
we shall live. Prayer works. A couple of things have
happened in the justice system that I know a lot
of people have been praying about. And I know that
people are going to come back in the comment section
or elsewhere and say, well, if prayer works, how come
it doesn't work? How come you know it was prayer?
This time we'll talk about that because it's important to
this dynamic. Do you remember Tina Peters. Tina Peters did
a horrible thing, and her sentence has been overturned. I
can't wait for you to hear from the judgement. Let's
start with one that goes even further back. Prayer Works.
The David Delighten case has finally been dismissed against David
Delighten for what he did, and he did a terrible, horrible,
unthinkable thing that's never been done in the whole history
of journalism. He went with hidden cameras to an organization
they were investigating. He caught them on camera saying that
they sell the aborted body part arts of babies. If
you never saw his features on this, the Center for
Medical Progress. He also caught them saying things like, yeah,
we sell babies organs when they're not quite dead yet,
or like in the Princess Bride, they're almost mostly dead.
So when he did this and went undercover to prove this,
he was proven that they were violating as a recall,
state and federal laws. David de Leiden was taken to courts.
In fact, they raided his home, in his apartments and
took his computers in his work product. By the way,
there was a prosecutor working on that by the name
of kame Oh yeah, Kamala Harris, Cammy Harris. She used
a prosecutor of powers to force this guy to raise
money for the past ten to twelve years to defend
himself against well charges of being a journalist. There were
no real crime charges. But it's only now that this
stuff has finally been exposed for what it was and
the charges have finally been dismissed. Now, why would I
say that prayer works because other people are going to say, well, what,
people pray for a lot of things. Well, in this case,
let's look at what was being done here. Yes, a
lot of people were praying for a lot of things.
In relation to David Delighten. I'm sure some people were
praying that he would go to prison for the rest
of his life. But what did he do. David Delighten
revealed what Planned Parenthood was doing when they killed babies.
He revealed their motive, He revealed the money they were making.
He revealed how they were treating the least of these.
He revealed how they lied to women. He revealed how
they lied to the public. God operates in light. God
is light in him. There is no darkness at all.
If we say we walk with God but choose to
walk in darkness, then we are liars, and we make
God a liar. The we're the only ones lying. God
operates in light. It is Satan who operates in the dark.
Satan who wants to operate in the shadows. Everything whispered
in the dark one day be shouted from the rooftop.
That's from the Bible. All the decisions that planned parrot
had made to do this stuff was whispering in the dark.
It will one day be shouted from the rooftops. All
the things you do in the dark that you think
no one is noticing, they will be shouted from the rooftops.
There are no secrets from God Almighty, and in the
New Heaven and the New Earth, there aren't going to
be any secrets at all. So when we're praying God's will,
something we know is aligned with God's will, these are
prayers that are more likely to come to fruition. If
you're praying for a new maserati, that's unlikely to come
to fruition. Because God is not a vending machine. He
does not say turned to me for your worldly wants,
but instead, when we're praying. We're trying to pray in
line with what the Father wants. Now, does that mean
prayer works are really just doing what God already wants? Yes,
and yes. The closer we get to God, the more
we let God work through us, the more likely we
are to pray into things that He already wants for us.
Because He knows what's good for us, He designed us.
So in this case, thousands millions of people prayed for
David de Lydon. We see now this charges have finally
been dismissed, and David de Lyden now can maybe get
back into the business of actually being an investigative journalist
instead of a full time defendant in court. Praise God.
The Tina Peters case, she did something utterly horrible and
I'll talk to you about this in just a second,
because in her case, again I think prayer works. Prayer
did not work. To keep our friend John Caldwell alive.
John was the founder of Alan Soaps. A lot of
us prayed for him to live, and then John came
to me privately and said, dude, I'm done. I've been
finding cancer most of my life. I'm done. I'm tired.
I've talked to my wife. I've talked to my kids.
I want to go home.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: Did we pray him to death? No, it was God's
will that he died. But he died peacefully, as peaceful
as you could. John did not leave this earth until
his oldest son made it to the hospital. John stayed
alive until he got there, and then he hugged his
neck and they talked a little bit, and then John said, Okay,
time for lights out, time to go to Jesus. And
he did. He leaves behind his son and his wife
and this soap company called Alan Soaps. I this is
the first time you've heard of it. These are soaps
made in America by a family with three generations of
soap making expertise, absolutely zero chemicals in it. And the
mission of Alan Soaps is to provide the world's best soap, healthiest,
best for you, made in America for the best reason.
That is to employ John's kids, Alan and Ian. Alan
specifically has huge challenges. He's thirteen, He's been through eighteen operations.
He's effectively nonverbal. He's so high up on the autism spectrum.
For a time we were employing other young people, and
then things got rough as John was on his way
back to the Lord. Now his wife Tina is running
the program. Go there, try the soap when you love it,
because you will subscribe and support a great company that
exists for great reasons. It's Alansoaps dot com slash Todd.
He's promo code todd to get ten percent off all
their products. Alan Soaps dot Com slash Todd. So Tina
Peters has had her appeals court has thrown out the
case against Tina Peters in her nine year prison term.
So if you don't know this, here's what Tina Peters did.
She did the unthinkable. She saw problems in the elections
in Colorado. She saw that there were miscounts. She saw
that none of it made sense. She observed what she
thought was observable fraud. She had fears that the companies
that ran the election processes were frauds. So she took
some backup copies of ballot images and counts that did
not match what was being shown to the public, because
those things said match up. When you're balancing a check
book back in the day, he's use thing called balancing
in her checkbook. You wanted what's in your checkbook to
match was in your account. Otherwise something was wrong and
someone was off somewhere. She saw that the counts were off.
She raised her concerns. This was her job to raise
her concerns. But when she raised them, she was told
to shut up, we're not going to talk about this.
She then took these copies so she could have evidence.
It's for having the evidence and having the goal to
come out and say, hey, I think these elections are
being rigged that she was put in prison. She is
an older woman with huge health concerns, and she was
put in prison. She had a nine year prison sentence,
not for trying to steal an election, but for coming
out to say I think it was stolen and saying, yeah,
but you stole these images. It was her job to
protect the election. So how can I say that God's
will has been done here? You shall not steal. Use
honest weights and measures. If you're counting an election, use
honest weights and measures in how you count them. And
please do not be the people who get to me
in the comment section or through email saying that was
the Old Testament and that's from dead old people, and
that was written about bread and measuring doorways. No, that
was an example. The same God who said do not lie,
did not say unless it's in the form of election counting,
then it's okay to lie. He didn't do that. He
said you shall not lie, you shall use honest weights
and measures, and Tina Peters was trying to do that.
So here's part of the news article. Colorado Appeals court
throws out TEENA. Peter's nine year prison term, ordering resentencing.
The Colorado Court of Appeals throughout the nine year sentence
for discredited elections clerk Tina Peters on Thursday discredited according
to them, and ordered that she be re sentenced by
a district court judge. The panel of three judges found
that the original judges wrongly based part of their sentence
on Peters's exercise of her right to free speech. According
to a seventy eight page opinion released Thursday, they base
part of their opinion, part of their opinion part of it.
She observed errors in counting. The numbers did not add up.
This was for a li elections to government offices. She
was a elections clerk. She had license to look at
the images. She took copies of the images to be
able to share, to have evidence of what she thought
was either mistakes or rigging of an election. Had she
not done these things, she would have been darrel in
her duty. And when we serve in a job, we're
to serve as if we're serving the Lord Jesus himself.
He makes that very very clear to us. Even if
you're working for a bad, challenging boss, you're to act
as if you were serving the Lord Jesus himself because
you've been put in that position. In this position, she
was given much, and to whom much is given, much
is expected. So again prayer works. God is pro free speech.
How do I know? Because I just said words. God
is pro accountability for speech. How do I know? Because
there's only one unforgivable sin. And guess what. It's not
a sexual sin. It's not taking from somebody, it's not murder,
it's not rape. The one unforgivable sin is a speech
sin and a thought sin. It is to blaspheme the
Holy Spirit, using your mouth to deny the Holy Spirit,
or to blaspheme the Spirit. It's a spoken sin. The
only unforgivable sin is a spoken sin. The God who
invented speech and gave us free speech is the God
of accountability, which means you should listen very very closely
to this Democrat Colorado judge named Matthew Barrett. He's talking
here about Tina Peters.
Speaker 4: Folks didn't have four lawyers representing them, they didn't have
a team of assistants helping them. They're not getting rides
in private jets all over the country. I know the
people who sit in that chair suffer, generally speaking, immeasurable
trauma in life, struggle mightily with alcohol abuse, substance abuse,
mental health struggles, family loss. They come from broken homes.
Speaker 1: So this guy by he's suggesting here that good old
fashioned criminals, they have a reason for being there. But
not Tina Peters, this horrible person who had the audacity
to say, I'm concerned her elections are being stolen. And
this so called judge continues his rant.
Speaker 4: The cards they were dealt were never the cards that
you were dealt, miss Peters. So when I hear you
discuss your husband, which sadly passed away recently, your.
Speaker 1: Family struggle while she was behind bars.
Speaker 4: And your son, who served our country admirably and made
the ultimate sacrifice, I consider it, and I note too
that he honored his oath to the country, something that
is not lost on me when considering the circumstances under
which you find your here.
Speaker 1: She honored her oath to the country, You black robe wearing, hypocrite, Sorry, hypocrite.
Her oath was to protect the United States Constitution from
enemies foreign and domestic. And she thought the election was
being stolen or rigged, and so she went and got evidence.
Prayer works. All this is being revealed. Everything whispered in
the dark will one day be shadowed from the rooftops.
It's happening everywhere we look. You can go look at
the debate around the a citizenship issue and birthright citizenship.
You can read the actual congressional record, the actual discussions
between the President of the Senate and the politicians who
are pushing for this that, of course, just would not
allow foreigners to come to our country, give birth and
become instant citizens. It's right there in writing. That's being revealed.
God is light in him, there is no darkness at all.
And if we claim to walk in the light with
him yet to brother, than we are trying to make
God a liar. And that will not stand. Prayer works.
When we pray it accordance with God's will. Story number two,
food far from God. Does that sound like a strange topic,
that there's food far from God. Let's pause and think
about the foods that God designed and gave to us.
They're included to what we call the common blessings. Now
I have a theory that we should look at common
blessings in a far more expansive way. But let's just
stay biblical. That God causes it to rain and the
righteous and the unrighteous alike. And inherent in that statement,
rain of course is of course the water of biological life,
Jesus being the water from which we never thirst again
once we take this, He's the water of eternal life.
Water is the source of biological life. So he causes
it to rain on the righteous and the unrighteous alike.
This is a common blessing, So as sunshine is considered
this and air to breathe, these are things God gives everybody.
Everybody has access to this. Everybody we can have access
to food. You know, in capitalists and socialist systems, in fact,
any human system, people don't have access to food. Equally,
we who've been given much, there's much expected of us,
including feeding our neighbors who don't have food. It's expected
and we should do this joyfully. But there's food that's
far from God. God in the Garden of Eden had
the basic foods for us. In fact, a strict reading
of the Bible would indicate there was never any killing
of an animal. We didn't eat meat there because the
first blood taking was when adam ne forgidden animal skins
because they had tossed themselves from the Garden of Eden
by refusing to follow God's command simply don't eat from
that treat. And yet they had sustenance and food. So
if you look at food the way God designed it,
you should be able to look at it at them
and say, oh, that's a tomato or that's a potato.
And what's happened in modern foods which is holding our
bodies captive and I think harming our souls because our
bodies are temples. If we are Christians and we have
the Holy Spirit, this is the temple of the Holy Spirit,
and we should keep it clean. You'd want the House
of God to be clean. We should keep it healthy.
After all, it's a temple the Holy Spirit. There are
plenty of foods that in the modern worlds you could
look at you have no idea what they are. I
always like to use the example of fruit leather. If
you looked at that and it was laying on the street,
would you go, hmm, I'm going to eat that. No,
you'd say wow, something flatten, something gross. And in the
grocery business it's called distancing. The further they can take
a food from its origin, the more profitable it is
for them, because people convince themselves they can't make it
at home. So let me give you an example of
food far from God. Now you can have all the
belief you want in the tectocratic medical system. And since
this is likely to end up on YouTube, I can't
say what I really think about vaccines because YouTube are
massive horrible sensors on this topic. But I speak about
it all the time on my national radio programs and
at my substack that's the Todd Herman Show, that substack
dot com. But even if you're pro vaccine, this should
make you itch or maybe want to keel over and
yuke up your lunch aty lunch. Give me example of
a food that's a vaccine.
Speaker 3: You're right, Yes, University of California, Riverside has already perfected
the ability to put human vaccines into our lettuce right now,
as also tomatoes has the ability to do that also
for UC Berkeley, and then a big tobacco RJ. Reynolds
and Stuff has perfected the ability to put a human
vaccine into tobacco products Jerman clements.
Speaker 1: And is that even legal to do in the state
of Tennessee to sell those with a vaccine in them?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 3: Well, I'm not arguing at that point. What I'm saying
is there is no law deeming those that when you
go into a grocery store you should know as a
consumer this head of lettuce is a head of lettuce.
The head of lettuce right next week could contain a
vaccine in it.
Speaker 1: Gosh, do you think we should know these things? You
want to talk about food far from gods? Hey, if
they can put this stuff in it, what can't they
put in it?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 1: That's one example. But to give you another one. Now,
this is not food that's been perverted. It's food that's food,
it's the mind that had been perverted. These are little
kids in a classroom and the sky is apparently a chef,
and he likes to go expose how kids view food.
This is a phenomenal video. He's showing them things like
tomatoes and potatoes and beats and watch this or listen
to it. Who knows what this is? Tomatoes? Blank faces? Potatoes?
Speaker 3: Potato? So you think these to potatoes not potatoes?
Speaker 1: He's smelling them. Do you know what it is? Who
knows what tomorr? Ketchup is? All the hands? The test
I did with the kids today was shocking. Do you
know what that is? Cauliflower? What about this? A good
old friend? Do you know what this is? Beat? No, honey, strawberry?
You know? Immediately you get a really clear sense of
do the kids know anything about where food comes from?
Who knows what that is? Okay, that's an plants and
doesn't grow scary looking, and it's a good thing that
kids don't know eggplants or that's like an invasion of
the body snatches. Now they've been distanced not just from food,
they've been distanced from the rally of what plants are,
meaning they've been distanced from what God gave them in
forms of common blessings. How can they recognize God's majesty
when they can't recognize what God created? God Country Team
appears on every single bag of bone Frog Coffee common blessing.
It comes from coffee beans. My friend Tim Krukshank founded
the company. He's a former Navy seal. He did three
deployments on our behalf, including fighting wars in Babylon. If
you want to right now support the fall in the
families of fallen Navy seals, purchase bone Frog Coffee. Get
ten percent off your first purchase at Bonefrog Coffee dot
com slash todd if you're already subscribing. Pro tip you
get free delivery when your subscription includes eight eighty dollars
of coffee. So subscribe. Move your subscription up to at
least eighty dollars at a time, and you get free
delivery Bonefrogcoffee dot com slash tod. Use promo code tod
to get ten percent off your first purchase and fifteen
percent of subscription coffee. That's Bonefrog Coffee dot Com slash todd.
Story number three. Fact checking the top five Christian arguments
on all of Twitter dash X. I did something of
a fun exercise. I went to the Grock machine, the
so called AI on Twitter, and I said, what are
the top five debates around Christianity? On the platform according
to traffic and retweets or Rex's reposts, Rex and views,
and a number of them appeared, and I went through it.
I grabbed the very top five and reviewed them. And
this comes from something that's meant to be provocative. It's
meant to be engagement bait. Therefore, it's an account that
calls itself Lilith with a picture of a demonic woman
demon an atheist from the depths of Hell, former wife
of Adam, queen of the damned, too hot to handle,
too cold to hold, fictional persona, no kidding, And they
wrote this The Grock Machine about this post. A post
listing numerous and moral Biblical practices, including slavery, Exodus twenty
one two through six, stoning of non versions, deuterotomy, genocidal
commands for Samuel fifteen thirteen, anti LGBQ, so called t
Versus Leviticus eighteen twenty two drew forty one hundred and
forty four replies and significant back and forth on whether
these reflect divine morals or historical context. So this is
this account that wrote, I get my morals from gods
in the all cap no cap thing. Slavery. The Bible
regulates but does not condemned slavery. Exodus twenty one, verses
two through six, which is now seen as a violation
of human rights. Okay, it talked about slavery, and what
did God do for the Hebrew people? What were they?
They were slaves? God freed them in Exodus. What did
he tell them to do to not keep slaves? Subordination
of women passages instruct women to be subissive and quiet.
First Timothy, Chapter two, verses eleven through twelve, conflicting with
modern gender equality. Okay, well, you can have your modern equality.
But the Lord Jesus taught that women were not to
be pastors and to not teach men. And in this case,
this is a specific passage happening at a specific time
where in the early era of the church, when women
had not been in church because they had not really
been allowed to go into church proper, they were asking
questions of their husband. Wait a minute, what does that mean?
What does this mean? And what they were saying was, hey,
don't do that in church. Go home and ask these questions.
It was because it was disruptive. It wasn't because they
were women. It was disrupting the processes. Polygamy polygay supported
in the Old Testament Rodoby twenty one fifteen through seventeen,
but is wide they considered unethical today. Every single Jewish
king who practiced polygamy paid a cost for this, a
horrible cost. It destroyed their families. God made it very
clearer that this is not a practice. People will undertake genocide.
God commands the Israelites to wipe out entire nations First
Samuel fifteen thirteen, an act that contradicts modern human rights principles.
Notice that this is all Old Testament, same God, different
set of behaviors. Because Jesus came to fulfill the law.
God was showing people you can't do it. You can't
fulfill the law. And in cases like this, God warned
people stay away from the Hebrew people, leave them alone,
let them travel through your lands. Do not come and
pervert them with your idols, he warned them. And when
they wouldn't stop that, he said this, yes, then go
end them. And it's difficult reading. Anyone who reads the
Old Testament looks as says, my gosh, it's gory and bloody. Right,
And here came Jesus Christ. You guys couldn't do it.
I'll do it, I will pay the cost for all
sins future and past. I will, with my perfect sinless
blood go become sin for you. So in the cases
where God gave these orders, here's what was happening. These
people were infiltrating the Jewish nations. They were seducing the men,
sometimes the women with temple prostitutes, etc. Bringing their idols
in to convince the Jewish people to go back to
doing things like child sacrifice, which was practiced by these
pagan tribes. And the Lord was saying, you will not
sacrifice your children to bay all. You will not have
sexual prostitutes or temple prostitutes. When these tribes came in
and infiltrated the Jewish people, they helped turn them back
to these horrible evil ways. That's why God said, wipe
them out. These things matter. Death penalty for minor offenses.
That's his prescribed for cursing parents, adultery, homosexuality, and working
on the Sabbath. Okay, these punishments are considered extremely they
sure are. And who came and died the final death
for sin Jesus Christ, who was he? He was and
is God's son, part of the triune Godhead, the Lord
loved us so much that he put his own son
on the cross to suffer a horrible death, so that
we never had to worry about death again in this form.
And what did Jesus teach us? Let he who is
without sin cast the first son, said the man who
was about to go to the cross. Context matters corporal
punishment for children. Proverbs thirteen twenty four endorses physical physical
punishment for children, which is discourage or illegal in many
societies today. Okay, it's discourge, your illegal, got it. It
also says fathers, do not exasperate your children, but bring
them up in what is right. In other words, don't
frustrate them, don't cause them to misbehave, don't cause them
to push back. Quote the word of God, write it
on the door frames of your home, but don't exasperate.
It talks about families, society, where fathers come under mothers
to lift them up, where we serve one another. God
said to men that you love your wife as Christ
love the church He died for the church. Men come
under and lifts up. Women obeyed their husbands and spiritual
leaders as long as the husband's obeying the word of
the Lord. Jesus children obey their parents that live along
in the land. The corporal punishment, spanking of a child,
it still happens, and it's debatable. And Jesus didn't go
spank anybody. But again Old Testament rape victim punishment. Man
who rapes an unmarried woman must marry her deuterotomy two
through twenty nine and a moral practice by modern staturns
and a moral practice fair enough. And in the New Testament,
what do we get again, going back to Jesus, when
there was a woman who supposed the committed adultery. Tradition
tells us that when Jesus knelt in the knelt and
was writing in the sand, he was writing the names
of the men and their sins, which is why the
oldest ones walked away first, because he said that he
is without sin, cast the first stone. Jesus Christ, the
Son of God came to complete the law, and he
did and to clarify sexual sin, raising the bar. Now
a man who even looks at a woman with lust
in his eyes has already committed adultery or fornication. He
raised the bar. Discrimination against LGB so called t individuals,
condemnation of same sex relationships with Levitgus eighteen twenty two
contributes to discrimination, which is now considered unjust by you.
It should not contribute to discrimination in jobs, fair enough,
and the Bible doesn't say it should. What it states
is not just in the Old Testament. When Jesus raised
the bar on sexuality, he said, effectively, I tell you,
a man who looks at a woman with lust in
his eyes has already committed adultery. You could extend the
same thought to same sex fornication or same yeah, same
sex fornication, which is sex outside of marriage. When Jesus
raised the bar on this, it was also mentioned in Revelation.
It's mentioned multiple times by Whole as something that can
keep you out of heaven. But it's not just LBG
LGBQ so called t stuff. It is opposite sex activity
as well. And the list continues. There is also the
discussion of selection of use of the Old Testament like Levitigus,
like we just talked about against same sex relationships Genesis
two twenty four man woman marriage to support modern arguments,
will dismithing others prompting twenty eight replies debating hypocrisy in
Biblical application. Well, first of all, this comes from a
guy named Ed Karenstein, and Ed's whole role is provocateur.
Ed's whole role is engagement bait lists of things the
Bible says you shouldn't do, but you do them anyway.
For those who constantly use the Bible to push certain
quote morals and those who claim other religions are ridiculous.
No clothes made of mixed fabrics Levitigus, nineteen nineteen, Goodbye
polyester blends. Good thing. The Lord Jesus came along and
said that he talked about people as whitewash tombs. He
was pointing out that you could wear whatever you like,
but if you're dirty on the inside spiritually, then you're
a whitewashed tomb. Good thing. Jesus came along and clarified
that for us stone business, respectful children to death deuterotomy
twenty one eighteen through twenty one. Yikes, indeed, yikes. Thank
god we no longer live under the law, and thank
god the Lord Jesus himself modeled different behaviors on that,
not eating shrimp, lobster, or crab Levitgus eleven ten. There
goes the seafood broil man. You're a funny guy yed.
And then there goes the Lord Jesus saying, it's not
what goes in the mouth that what comes out that
defiles a man. The Lord Jesus went through and clarified
all of these beings ed Karenstein. He also wrote, funny,
how some folks say that's the Old Testament. It doesn't
apply anymore until it supports their arguments. Old Testament versus
use today to push moral positions. Levitigus eighteen twenty two,
twenty thirteen against same sex relationships, repeated in the New Testament,
repeated in Jesus' sexual teachings Psalm one thirty nine thirteen
through sixteen, Jeremiah one through five against abortion. You shall
not murder Jesus repeated the same thing. He didn't come
to destroy the law, but completed Genesis nine six for
the death penalty. Jesus has said that when he came
to complete the law, he did not say you shall
not inflict a death penalty. He said you shall not murder,
which is to take innocent life. So there's that. Genesis
two twenty four. Marriage much be between a man and
a woman. Jesus never contradicted that, not a single time
Jesus in fact said it is therefore why a man
leaves his family and clings to his wife, and they
become one flesh, just as it says in Genesis, one flesh.
There was a threat on racial and ethnic tensions in scripture,
citing Genesis genealogy and no inner marriage with Canaanites and
juterotomy seven to three forbidding marriage to foreigners, which led
the sixty six replies arguing over whether the Bible promotes
xenophobia or uniqueness uniqueness. God knit us together in our
mother's womb. He counted every hair on our head. We
are unique and made in God's image. We're all created
in the eyes of God, so we're all equal. Wrong.
Bible says quite the opposite. It begins with the very
specific genealogy. Most of the books are about racial tensions.
In Genesis, Abraham Wuonelah's son Isaac to marry Canaanite woman
because they're racially different and inferior. In Deuterotomy and Joshua,
God commands the Israelites to exterminate the Canaanites and the
Israelites because they are racially unique. Liar. The reason this
was prohibit is because these people weren't walking with God.
God had set the Jewish people apart, the exiled elect
we are moved apart to be in the world and
not of it, and the Jewish people the Hebrew people
were not to be part of the world. Therefore, joining
with pagan tribes who are doing things like child sacrifice
was not allowed. That's why these things were frowned upon.
There's a post outline of the contradictions like Judah's death
Matthew twenty seven to five versus Acts one point eighteen
in Animals on the Arc Genesis six nineteen verses seven
two sparkan replies that harmonize versus acknowledging textual issues. If
you grew up religious but became an atheist, what was
the turning point for you? Yemi wrote the dream Code.
Prophet wrotees I read the Bible myself that I read
multiple translations, then I read other versions in related texts.
Then I went to seminary insteaded it professionally covered to
cover firsthand. The deeper I went and were contradictions piled up.
Eventually became clear there was no single truth there at all.
That is what pulled me away from your underscore or
non cap God, May I ask what contradictions you found,
because in my opinion, the Bible doesn't have a single
one that can't be explained. If you talk to anybody
who's ever been a police officer and they've ever taken
witness statements, you're going to find out that I witness statements.
In say a bank robbery, you will have people say, oh, no,
the robber was six foot three and wore a purple shirt,
someone else saying, oh no, he was five nine and
wore a black shirt. Human nature, as we see things differently.
If the Bible was going to be faked, why wouldn't
they then go remove the contradictions? If they were trying
to lie to people, why wouldn't they move the contradictions.
So there are people who emphasize certain things within certain
gospel accounts. Peter pulling a sword cutting an ear versus
Peter just pulling a sword is natural and human interactions
in human remembrance of things, they're not contradictions. There's sometimes
emphasis points. There are portions of the Bible that repeat themselves.
Some of them are focusing on the genealogical aspects of
a story. Others are focusing on the miraculous aspects of
a story, the dream code, prophet rights. Almost too many
to list, but here's to solve small sampling of straight contradictions,
not just old versus do law, just internal tensions. Who
incited David to take the census? Second Samuel twenty four
one says God did first, Chronicles twenty one one says
Satan did. And if you want to go look at
this as a contradiction, fine for me. The issue here,
that's a salvation issue. These are emphasis points. One is
talking about the divinity of David in the Davidic line.
Another is talking about the activities of Satan on earth
to proceed to dissuade people and to distract people. How
did Judas die? Matthew twenty seven and five says he
hanged himself. Acts two to eighteen said he fell and
burst open. You know what often happened to people when
they hung themselves. Body's blowed it up and they fell
off the tree and they burst open. So when you
talk about salvation issues, the core teachings, they're not changing,
they're not changeable. There are observations people made in emphasis
points they made they don't add up to contradictions that
disprove the Bible, how many women went to the tomb
and who was there. The four Gospels give different details
on both. Praise God that they do, because guess what
cops will tell you if you're ever interviewing two suspects
at the same time, one's in one room and one's
in the other, and they give you the exact same story,
with the exact same timeline and the exact same perceptions
of things. They have rehearsed their stories because it's not
human nature. The Bible is sometimes accused of being made
up and fictionalized and massage to fit into this or
that timeline, et cetera, or to pretend Jesus was a
deity when he was not. If they wanted to do that,
they would have wiped out every single contradiction. Instead, it
is a human account inspired by God, but written by humans.
Human beings are God is not, and on the court teachings.
The Bible does not and cannot change. This is the
Todd Hermannshaw. Please go be well, be strong, be kind,
and please make every effort to walk in the light
of Christ.