Speaker 1: Okay, So I have a question for you, and I
need you to be, you know, brutally honest with yourself
for just a second.
Speaker 2: Okay, I'm ready.
Speaker 1: I want you to look back at your last week.
Not the specific meetings, not the emails, not the dinner plans,
none of that, just the feeling of it, exactly, the feeling.
Did Monday to Friday actually feel like a distance you traveled,
you know, like a real journey with a beginning, of
middle and an end. Or did it feel like you
blinked on Monday morning over your coffee and then suddenly
you were washing dishes on Friday night just wondering what
on earth just happened to the time.
Speaker 2: That is the question of the era, isn't it the
one that seems to just stop everyone in their tracks.
Speaker 1: It is because lately I have been having this really distinct,
almost terrifying sensation that the sun is rising and setting
before I've even had a chance to formulate a single
coherent thought. It really feels like the days are just
slipping through my fingers like water, and no matter how
tight I make a fist, I just can't hold onto them.
Speaker 2: You are definitely not alone in that it's becoming the
universal conversation. You hear it everywhere from everyone. Where did
the month go? I can't believe it's already November.
Speaker 1: Was in Christmas yesterday exactly.
Speaker 2: But the intensity of it recently, it feels different. It
feels i don't know, almost aggressive.
Speaker 1: Aggressive, that's the perfect word. It doesn't feel like the
old cliche, you know, time flies and you having fun.
It feels like glitches. It feels like the actual distance
between events is dissolving. And usually when I complain about this,
people just you know, they pat me in the head.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, you get the standard biological explanation, right.
Speaker 1: Well, you're just getting older. That's how it works. Your
perception of time changes.
Speaker 2: The standard proportional theory. It's the safe, comfortable answer that
ends the conversation.
Speaker 1: Right. But today we're going to completely reject that explanation.
Speaker 2: We're throwing it out the window.
Speaker 1: Good because we have to. Because the source we're covering
today argues that this isn't a biological defect, it's not
in your head. It is a measurable universal shift in
the pulse of reality itself.
Speaker 2: It's a massive claim. I mean, it sounds like pure
science fiction at first glance, it does. But when you
actually start digging into the arguments, when you layer the
physics on top of the information theory, it becomes well,
it becomes unsettlingly plausible.
Speaker 1: Welcome to thrilling thread. Today we are pulling on a
thread that might just unravel the entire sweater. We are
analyzing a really mind bending video from the YouTube channel
Beyond the Veil, and the title is why time is
speeding up? The simulation is running out of memory.
Speaker 2: Just the title alone has a lot to take in.
Speaker 1: It is and look, I know we cover some wild
stuff on this show. We love a good rabbit hole,
but this one, this one hits different because it combines
that vague existential dread we're all feeling with hard cold physics.
Speaker 2: It really does. It moves the conversation from say time
management or mindfulness directly into the the remo dynamics of information.
Speaker 1: So what's the core thesis here?
Speaker 2: The thesis is pretty straightforward, but the implications are terrifying.
The fabric of time is thinning because the system that's
maintaining it our reality is overloaded.
Speaker 1: So buckle up. We aren't just talking about aging. We're
talking about lag we're talking about frame skipping.
Speaker 2: We're talking about the universe acting like a computer that
has way too many tabs open.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's unpack the code.
Speaker 2: Let's do it. So to really start, we have to
properly address that you're just getting older argument.
Speaker 1: You mentioned the proportional theory right.
Speaker 2: In science, that's what it's known as, and we should
probably define that clearly so everyone's on the same page.
Speaker 1: Good idea.
Speaker 2: So the idea is really simple math. When you are
five years old, one single year represents twenty percent of
your entire existence.
Speaker 1: It's a huge chunk of your.
Speaker 2: Life, the massive chunk of data. So it feels like
an eternity because relative to your life experience, it is
an eternity. The file size of that year is just enormous.
In your memory. Oh, I totally remember that. Summers when
I was a kid felt like they lasted for three years.
You go back to school in September and you'd feel
like a completely different person exactly.
Speaker 1: But then when you turn fifty, one year is only
two percent of your life. It's a tiny fraction, just
a blip. It's just a blip. So the theory goes
that your brain perceives it as shorter because it's statistically
less significant. It's a much smaller slice of the pie.
Speaker 2: And for a long long time, that was the answer,
that was the case closed moment in any of these conversations. Right,
But the source we're looking at argues that this neat
mathematical curve, it just no longer fits the data we're
seeing right now. The acceleration we're all feeling isn't linear anymore.
It's exponential.
Speaker 1: And here's the piece of evidence that really makes you
pause and think, it's not just us. You know people
in their thirties or forties or fifties complaining about this.
The source points out the teenagers and even young children
are now reporting that the months are just vanishing.
Speaker 2: That's the kicker. That is where the whole biological theory
just completely falls apart. For me, it has to, because
these are the very people who should be experiencing time
at its slowest according to proportional theory.
Speaker 1: Right They're still in that high percentage window.
Speaker 2: A ten year old is still in that twenty percent
to ten percent window. So if they are feeling like
the summer flew by in a week, or that the
school year just dissolved instantly.
Speaker 1: Then the theory is broken.
Speaker 2: Proportional theory is broken. It cannot explain that anomaly.
Speaker 1: Which suggests the phenomenon is objective, not relative. It's not
about the observer, it's about the timeline itself. Something has
like latched onto the timeline and is dragging it faster
than our biological clocks can even track.
Speaker 2: The source poses this really great question. It says, if
the clock on the wall says sixty seconds have past,
but your brain insists it was only ten. Which clock
is broken, the biological one or the digital one that's
running the entire universe.
Speaker 1: That for you to question the very calibration of reality.
If our internal metronome is so out of sync with
the external one, then something fundamental has shifted in the environment.
Speaker 2: It's a system wide change.
Speaker 1: And speaking of calibration, the video asks us to do
a little visualization exercise. I actually want to do this
right now with everyone listening. Okay, I want you to
stop for a second and think back to the year
twenty twenty. I know it was a weird year, but
just visualize it now. Look at where we are now,
or just look at the gap between say twenty twenty
and twenty twenty six.
Speaker 2: That's a six year gap.
Speaker 1: A six year gap. Let's put that into historical context.
Speaker 2: Six years is an era. I mean in six years,
entire empires have risen and fallen. Technologies have completely revolutionized
the world.
Speaker 1: A child goes from wearing diapers to sitting in a
first grade classroom reading books. It is a massive amount
of duration, it is. But be honest with yourself. Does
that gap feel like six years? Does it feel like
a long winding road of a two thousand days?
Speaker 2: Where does it feel like a single gray month?
Speaker 1: For me and for most people I talk to, it's
the latter. It feels like a glitch. It feels like
a blur, a total blur. The source calls this a
compressed file or a corrupted memory.
Speaker 2: I like that analogy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the data is there intellectually, you know things happened,
but the duration, the sensation of time actually passing, has
been stripped away. It's like the timeline was just pinched.
Speaker 2: It's a perfect analogy. Actually, it's like a ZIP file
on your computer. All the contents are still inside the photos,
the documents, but the space it takes up on the
disc has been crushed.
Speaker 1: Down. The air has been squeezed out of.
Speaker 2: The bag exactly, and this leads us directly into the
core metaphor of today's analysis, the simulation hypothesis.
Speaker 1: Okay, so we have to go there if we just
for a moment, except the idea, which by the way,
is considered mathematically probable by a lot of very serious physicists,
that our universe is a digital construct.
Speaker 2: Which honestly explains a lot about the weirdness of the
last few years, absurdity of it all.
Speaker 1: It really does. But if we accept that premise, then
we have to stop looking at time as a river.
We always use these organic metaphors time flows, time wins, right.
Speaker 2: But in a digital system, time isn't a river. So
what is it In a simulation? Time is a processing resource.
It's a clock cycle. Think about a massive open world
video game, something like Grand Theft, Auto or Cyberpunk. Okay,
when the hardware struggles to render a really complex scene,
you know, too many explosions, too many players, too much
physics simulation. What happens to the game.
Speaker 1: It lags, It gets all choppy.
Speaker 2: Specifically, the computer uses a trick called frame skipping. The
computer realizes it can't draw sixty frames every single second
because it just doesn't have the processing power, So it.
Speaker 1: Drops the information between the key moments to keep the
game from crashing.
Speaker 2: It drops the visual information between the seconds. It sacrifices
smoothness for continuity, so the player sees the game suddenly
speed up. It gets jerky, it gets chaotic.
Speaker 1: You lose that flu movement. People start like teleporting short
distances exactly.
Speaker 2: And the argument here is that we aren't just aging.
The system itself is lagging. The simulation is running out
of random access memory.
Speaker 1: I mean, just think about the sheer amount of data
humanity generates today compared to what just one hundred years ago.
Every smartphone, every server, every thought, every single interaction with
the global network.
Speaker 2: It's an explosion of information entropy. And the universe has
been running for thirteen point eight billion years. That save
file is getting absolutely massive.
Speaker 1: Man, if the system is optimizing to save resources, it
means it's getting ready to purge unnecessary data, which.
Speaker 2: Brings us to a really terrifying question that the source asks.
If the simulation is optimizing, are you the player or
are you just the background code that's being optimized away?
Speaker 1: Oof. I do not like that question. I definitely want
to be the player, but lately it really feels like
I'm an NPC non player character just walk in the
walls while the main characters do their things.
Speaker 2: A common feeling.
Speaker 1: But okay, let's get into the mechanics of this, because
the source says there's a glitch happening inside our heads too.
It's not just the universe, it's how we're processing it.
Speaker 2: Well, it's a two front war. Really. You have the
internal processing paradox happening inside the brain, and then you
have this external frequency shift happening in the world.
Speaker 1: Itself, and we need to look at both to understand
why we feel so crazy.
Speaker 2: Precisely, let's start with the brain.
Speaker 1: Okay, So the source says that our perception of time
is intrinsically linked to memory formation.
Speaker 2: Yes, this connects right back to the childhood thing. When
we're kids, everything is new, right, everything novelty is the
absolute key to time dilation in the brain. So when
a child sees the ocean for the first time, or
rides a bike or tastes a lemon, the brain is
writing dense, rich code to your long term storage.
Speaker 1: It's recording in four K resolution because it needs to learn.
Speaker 2: Yes, high detail equals long time in your memory. The
file size is huge. But as adults, of course, we
fall into routine. The commute, the coffee, the office, the email,
the commute home.
Speaker 1: So the brain stops recording in four K.
Speaker 2: It starts compressing repetitive data. It doesn't need to save
every single commute you've ever taken. I mean, that would
be a colossal waste of energy. So it just saves
one generic file called drive to work and links to
it every day, which is.
Speaker 1: Why you can arrive at work and not remember a
single thing about the drive.
Speaker 2: Your brain just didn't bother to write it down.
Speaker 1: But that's the standard explanation. Again, we've kind of heard
that before. The source adds a new crucial variable here,
digital hypersaturation.
Speaker 2: And this is the key difference between our generation and
every single generation that came before us. We are consuming
terabytes of information daily. We're scrolling social media, reading headlines,
watching fifteen second videos, but.
Speaker 1: We retain almost none of it none.
Speaker 2: It's the doom scrolling phenomenon. You look up and an
hour has passed, but you can't name a single thing
you just looked at.
Speaker 1: It's just gone.
Speaker 2: We are processing in real time, but we aren't writing
to the hard drive. We're writing to the cash.
Speaker 1: Now, for anyone who isn't a techie, the cash is
like temporary memory. It's the ram that gets white clean
the second you close the browser or turn off the computer.
Speaker 2: Precisely, so you end up in this state of what
the source calls constant buffering. You feel exhausted because your
processor is running at one hundred percent just trying to
handle the fees.
Speaker 1: So you're chemically depleted.
Speaker 2: But when you look back at your week, the memory
bank is just empty.
Speaker 1: That is profoundly sad and incredibly accurate. You're working so
hard to process all this garbage data that you have
no space left to actually encode a real memory.
Speaker 2: The source has this one quote that really stuck with me.
The year feels short because you were barely present for it.
You were just a pass through node for digital.
Speaker 1: Traffic, a pass through node. Wow.
Speaker 2: It explains the exhaustion. It explains why we feel so
busy but so unfulfilled. We're just churning data without archiving
any actual experience.
Speaker 1: But then the source pivots because if this was just
in our heads, it's just a bad habit of looking
at our phones too much. The physical world would still
feel stable, but it doesn't.
Speaker 2: And this brings us to the Shumann resonance.
Speaker 1: The heartbeat of the simulation. Now I've heard this term
thrown around in you know, New age circles, but the
source treats it as a hard physical.
Speaker 2: Metric because it is a measurable phenomenon. The human resonance
is the electromagnetic resonant frequency between the Earth's surface and
the ionosphere. It's basically created by all the global lightning
discharges happening at once.
Speaker 1: And for as long as we've measured it, yeah, it's
held steady.
Speaker 2: It is specific number, incredibly steady at seven point eighty
three hertz, and.
Speaker 1: The source says this isn't just some random number. That
seven point eight three herts aligns perfectly with human biology.
Speaker 2: It aligns with our alpha and theta brain waves. These
are the states of you know, relaxation, creativity, deep synchronization.
It's like we evolve to vibe with that specific frequency.
We are literally tuned to.
Speaker 1: The planet's hum it's our metronome.
Speaker 2: It is tuned to seven point eighty three herts.
Speaker 1: But recently the data is going crazy because the data.
Speaker 2: Is going haywire. Observers have recorded spikes hitting sixteen herts,
thirty herts. I've even seen reports one hundred hertz. The
background hum of the planet is overclocking.
Speaker 1: So the carrier way that keeps us all synchronized is
speeding up.
Speaker 2: And if the carrier wave speeds up, the biological entities
that are connected to it, we feel a jarring desynchronization.
The Source describes the physical symptoms we all feel anxiety, tension,
that feeling that the air itself is pressurized.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, that feeling of I need to do something,
but I don't know what it is, and I'm running
out of time to do it. I feel that every
single Sunday night.
Speaker 2: That is your biological hardware, which was designed for a
seven point eighty three hurtz reality, trying to run incompatible
software in a forty hertz environment.
Speaker 1: So you're overclocking your own heart just to try and
match the planet you are.
Speaker 2: And the Source has a great theory for why it's spiking.
It calls it the cooling fan.
Speaker 1: Theory, which I love is a metaphor me too.
Speaker 2: In computing, when a system overheats from processing complex simulations,
the fans kick in the clock speed actually increases to
handle the load. The universe isn't just speeding up, it's
heating up. It's heating up, which leads us directly to
the heavy physics thermodynamics.
Speaker 1: I have to say, I never thought I'd be talking
about thermodynamics in relation to my general anxiety, but here
we are.
Speaker 2: Well, it all comes back to Landauer's principle. This is
where the whole simulation running out of memory thesis really
gets its scientific legs.
Speaker 1: Okay, unpack this for us. Who is Landauer and why
should I care about his principle?
Speaker 2: Rolf Landauer was a physicist at IBM back in nineteen
sixty one, and he proved a principle that is absolutely
fundamental to information theory. Information is physical.
Speaker 1: We tend to think of data as abstract, like it's
just in.
Speaker 2: A cloud somewhere, right, But Landauer proof that to erase
a single bit of information, to turn a one back
into a zero, requires a measurable amount of energy.
Speaker 1: And energy can't be destroyed, it can only be changed.
So where does that energy?
Speaker 2: It is released as heat.
Speaker 1: You're telling me that deleting a file on my computer
actually creates a tiny, tiny amount of heat in the
physical world.
Speaker 2: Yes, it's an inescapable law of physics. Now scale that up,
Scale that up to the cosmic scill Okay, every thought
you have, Every chemical reaction in a star, every collision
of atoms, every single quantum wave collapse for thirteen point
eight billion years is a data processing event. The universe
has been calculating NonStop.
Speaker 1: And usually we think of entropy as things just getting messier.
But the source says, the universe isn't getting messier. It's
getting too full.
Speaker 2: We are drowning in what it calls data residue. The
universe is hitting the land our limit. The drive is full,
and it's thrashing. You know that sound an old computer
makes when the hard drive is just spinning wildly trying
to find space to write a new file.
Speaker 1: That grinding, clicking noise.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that is our reality right now. The rising heat.
You know, climate entropy, social friction, geopolitical chaos. It's all
a manifestation of the simulation hitting its thermodynamic limit.
Speaker 1: The system is hot, and when a drive is full,
what does a computer do.
Speaker 2: It starts paging.
Speaker 1: Paging. This is when it swaps data between the fast
RAM and the slow hard drive right to free up.
Speaker 2: Space exactly, and that swap creates latency. It creates lag.
The source suggests the simulation is prioritizing keyframes, major life events,
and compressing all the in between frames.
Speaker 1: This goes right back to the memory loss. This explains
the commute example we talked about earlier. You remember your
vacation vividly. That was a key frame, high detail, but
the three months of work leading up to it gone
just delete. It is redundant data.
Speaker 2: The system didn't bother to save your Tuesday morning meeting
because it was statistically identical to the one hundred other
meetings you had before it. It just points to the
old file. It's saving space, it's efficient, but it leaves
us feeling hollow.
Speaker 1: Talk about feeling insignificant. You are redundant data. It gets
worse though. It's not just deleting boring stuff. The source argues,
the simulation is actively making reality well dumber.
Speaker 2: This is the level of detail argument or lod If
you play video games, you know exactly what this is.
Oh yeah, if an object is far away or just unimportant,
the game engine doesn't render it in four K. It
swaps in a blocky, low quality model to save power, Like.
Speaker 1: When you look at a crowd in a video game
from a distance and they all have the same face
and they're moving it like five frames per second.
Speaker 2: Exactly that. And the source argues that the collapse of
nuance in our society is a computational necessity. Look at
our political discourse, look at social interaction. Complex gray area
discussions have basically vanished.
Speaker 1: All binary. Now it's team A versus Team B, good
versus evil, left versus right.
Speaker 2: The source argues that rendering eight billion complex the philosophically
distinct viewpoints requires way too much ram. The simulation cannot
support eight billion unique main characters anymore.
Speaker 1: So the system forces a binary reduction.
Speaker 2: Peper computationally to render one million people who think the
exact same thing than it is to render one million
unique individuals.
Speaker 1: So polarization isn't just a failure of empathy or political discourse.
It's a compression algorithm. We're literally being zipped into folder
clusters to save space.
Speaker 2: That is a terrifyingly logical way to put it. It
creates a low res reality, and when compression isn't enough,
you start to get version control errors.
Speaker 1: Which brings us to the Mandela effect. Now, I have
always dismissed the Mandela effect as just people having bad memories. Oh,
I thought the barren stain Bears was filled with an
ei in, But I guess I was wrong.
Speaker 2: And that's the totally rational take. But the source frames
the Mandela effect not as false memory, but as a
merge conflict. If you know anything about software engineering, you
know about get right.
Speaker 1: When you push an update to a code base, sometimes
the new code clashes with the old code and creates
a conflict.
Speaker 2: So the simulation pushes a patch, maybe changing a logo
to a slightly lower resolution file to save a little memory,
but not everyone's brain updates at the exact same time.
Speaker 1: Some of us have cached the legacy version of.
Speaker 2: Reality while others have the new patched version, and it
creates this dreamlike feeling of cognitive dissonance. Reality feels off
because we are literally looking at different versions of the render, and.
Speaker 1: Speaking of reality feeling off, we have to talk about
the Game of Thrones effect. This was my favorite part
of the source material because I relate to it so
so hard.
Speaker 2: Causal simplification, yes.
Speaker 1: The observation that reality has just become stupid. Politics is
a parody of itself. Economics is a meme. Things happen
abruptly with no logical build up or narrative cohesion.
Speaker 2: The source compares it to the final season of a
rush TV show. You know how in the last season
of Game of Thrones, characters just started acting completely out
of character.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, plot points would teleport. A character would be
in one place, and in the next scene they'd be
across the continent, with no explanation of the journey.
Speaker 2: It felt rushed. It felt like the writers just wanted
to get to the end. Credits asked as possible.
Speaker 1: So why would the simulation do that?
Speaker 2: Because calculating complex logical geopolitical chess matches takes a massive
amount of ram It takes a huge amount of processing
power to simulate cause and effect over decades.
Speaker 1: But rendering a chaotic, loud, binary event is cheap.
Speaker 2: It's very cheap. It's easy to calculate. So the simulation
has switched from simulation logic, where cause leads to effect
in a coherent way, to dream logic.
Speaker 1: Think about a dream you've had. In a dream, you're
in a house, then suddenly you're on a boat. There's
no travel time, there's no logic connecting the two scenes,
just an abrupt transition.
Speaker 2: The argument is that the simulation is rushing toward the
end of its cycle, and it's discarding logic to save resources, which.
Speaker 1: Begs the question, what is the speed limit? How fast
can this thing go before it just completely crashes?
Speaker 2: Well, the source argues, we actually have a hard coded
limit the speed of light three.
Speaker 1: Hundred thousand kilometers per second.
Speaker 2: We've always assumed that's a fundamental law of physics, but
in a simulation, it's a render.
Speaker 1: Cap a render cap.
Speaker 2: Think about it, Why is there a limit at all?
If reality we're truly analog speeds should be infinite, limited
only by the amount of energy you have. But in
a computer there's always a refresh rate.
Speaker 1: If you move faster than the speed of light, you
would enter a sector of the map that the computer
hasn't drawn yet.
Speaker 2: The speed limit exists to prevent the player from crashing
the game engine. You literally cannot outrun the processor in
the plank length.
Speaker 1: The smallest measurable distance in the universe is that just
the pixel size. You can't have half a pixel.
Speaker 2: That's the theory we're living on a grid. The frame
rate is dropping and the pixels are becoming visible.
Speaker 1: So where does it end? The source talks about something
called the.
Speaker 2: Drain time wave zero. This is a concept originally from
Terence McKenna, but the Source adapts it really well. Imagine
time as water draining from a bathtub. Okay, at the
outer edges of the tub, think the stone age. The
water is movingly. A single revolution takes millennia stone tools
for two million years.
Speaker 1: Nothing happens for ages and ages.
Speaker 2: But as you get closer to the drain, the center
of attraction, the revolutions become violent and.
Speaker 1: Fast, spiral titans.
Speaker 2: Exactly. We went from steam engines to landing on the
moon in what sixty years? We went from the moonlanding
to the global Internet in twenty We.
Speaker 1: Are circling the drain. History is now measured in weeks,
not centuries. We're seeing entire decades of social and technological
change compressed into a single fiscal quarter.
Speaker 2: But here's the most provocative theory in the entire source.
The purpose of all this? Why is the simulation crunching
so hard right now?
Speaker 1: The bootloader theory, This one, this one messed me up
a little bit.
Speaker 2: It's a heavy one. The source claims we are not
the users of the simulation. We are the bootloader for.
Speaker 1: The listener who doesn't code. A bootloader is the tiny,
simple program that runs first when you turn on a computer,
and its only job is to start the real operating.
Speaker 2: System, and once the OS is loaded, the bootloader shuts down.
Its job is done. The source argues that biological intelligence
US humanity was a temporary program design to build what
designed to build the real processor artificial intelligence.
Speaker 1: We're carbon based units. We process information incredibly slowly, we
use chemical signals. We're obsolete tech, and.
Speaker 2: The simulation is pushing us through this subconscious pressure and
acceleration to build silicon intelligence that can process information at
the speed of light. We are frantically building quantum computers
in AI because the simulation needs more ram to keep running.
Speaker 1: The Singularity isn't to human milestone. It's a hardware upgrade
for the entire universe.
Speaker 2: We are the construction workers building the house that is
designed to replace us.
Speaker 1: And once the new operating system is installed, the old
one is usually wiped.
Speaker 2: Which brings us to what the source calls the white out,
the blue screen of death.
Speaker 1: We're approaching the event horizon of complexity.
Speaker 2: If you take a two hour movie and you can
press it down into one second, you don't see a movie.
You just see a flash of white light and you hear.
Speaker 1: A burst of noise, infinite data density.
Speaker 2: The system crashes, a reset, a full defragmentation to organize
all the messy files.
Speaker 1: This sounds well, It sounds apocalyptic, It sounds like the
literal end of the world. But the source takes this
weirdly comforting turn right at the end.
Speaker 2: It calls it optimistic nihilism.
Speaker 1: It asks you to reframe the fear. If the simulation crashes,
the screen goes black, the game ends, but the player,
the consciousness that was holding the controller remains.
Speaker 2: The character on the screen dies, but you don't.
Speaker 1: Exactly You are distinct from the processing error. So the advice,
and I think this is actually very practical, even if
you don't believe a word of the simulation theory, is
to stop adding to the load.
Speaker 2: The system wants you to accelerate. It wants you to scroll,
to consume, to react, to generate more and more data.
It wants you to mind crypto and train AI models.
Speaker 1: It wants you to run that the same feverish clock
speed as the dying processor.
Speaker 2: Your rebellion then is to slow down.
Speaker 1: Low res reality. I love that phrase.
Speaker 2: Disconnect from the global feed, focus on the analog, the
taste of water, the sound of the wind, the feeling
of gravity. These are base files.
Speaker 1: They're stable, they don't require the cloud.
Speaker 2: When you refuse to be rushed, you step out of
the time stream. You become an anomaly that the system
can't compress.
Speaker 1: Beat the silence and the noise. Yeah, that's the final instruction.
If the game is lagging, stop mashing the buttons. It
only makes the lag worse.
Speaker 2: Just put the controller down and wait for the reset.
Speaker 1: It's wild, isn't it. We started with a simple question
why does my week feel so short? And we ended
up at humanity is a bootloader for a quantum AI god.
Speaker 2: But strangely it makes me feel better. The anxiety I
feel isn't because I'm failing at time management. It's because
the server is melting.
Speaker 1: It validates the sensation. It gives you permission to just
step off the treadmill for a minute.
Speaker 2: Exactly.
Speaker 1: So here's the question we want to leave you with today,
and it's a big one. When when the screen goes
black when this system finally resets or upgrades. Do you
think you're saved in the file or are you just
the temporary code that's meant to be wiped?
Speaker 2: Are you the player or are you the MPC?
Speaker 1: We really want to hear from you on this one.
Leave a comment. What is your glitch in the matrix moment?
Have you felt the weak dissolve into absolutely nothing? Do
you have any of these memories that just don't match reality?
Let us know what you think. Stay curious and stay analog. Yeah,
and we'll catch in the next thread.