WEBVTT

1
00:00:23.640 --> 00:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Dire wave. The scientific method cannot justify the scientific method.

2
00:00:44.679 --> 00:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Therefore itself is a dogmatic.

3
00:00:47.119 --> 00:01:33.959
<v Speaker 2>Respre submissions stood stop stop stop stop stop.

4
00:01:35.200 --> 00:01:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Stop stop stop stop stops stop stop stop stop.

5
00:01:50.640 --> 00:02:01.719
<v Speaker 2>STA standings standing.

6
00:02:04.079 --> 00:02:11.319
<v Speaker 3>Assist.

7
00:02:14.360 --> 00:03:32.680
<v Speaker 2>It's ssssss stop stops its stocks asses.

8
00:04:52.759 --> 00:04:55.319
<v Speaker 1>The Presenski model of techno crowd model was much more

9
00:04:55.360 --> 00:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>interested in incremental slocal babing out approach to bringing the.

10
00:05:01.079 --> 00:05:02.319
<v Speaker 4>Technocracy into being.

11
00:05:03.000 --> 00:05:06.439
<v Speaker 1>So they're not going to send the Homeland Security troops

12
00:05:06.519 --> 00:05:08.759
<v Speaker 1>to round you up and put you in a FEMA camp.

13
00:05:09.360 --> 00:05:12.879
<v Speaker 1>They'd much rather promote everybody being in mesched.

14
00:05:13.040 --> 00:05:15.639
<v Speaker 4>Video games, the Disney.

15
00:05:15.279 --> 00:05:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Gulog, the virtual reality gulog, all this kind of stuff

16
00:05:19.040 --> 00:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>is in much better FEMA camp in your home. They

17
00:05:22.399 --> 00:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>don't need the FEMA camp.

18
00:05:23.920 --> 00:05:29.040
<v Speaker 4>It's it's too messy, it's a big ordeal, and it's

19
00:05:29.079 --> 00:05:31.040
<v Speaker 4>all the nonsense of all.

20
00:05:31.000 --> 00:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>The patriot crap on the radio. That's not gonna happen.

21
00:05:35.160 --> 00:05:39.519
<v Speaker 4>They don't need to the shadow of the global government

22
00:05:39.680 --> 00:05:42.839
<v Speaker 4>is already here, and as we said, it's in the

23
00:05:43.600 --> 00:05:45.959
<v Speaker 4>latter stages of the mopping up process.

24
00:05:46.160 --> 00:05:49.879
<v Speaker 1>To move it into the next phase ig between two

25
00:05:49.959 --> 00:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>ages of the next age. Once you have atheism. There's

26
00:06:35.639 --> 00:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>not really any foundation. Anything can come and go.

27
00:07:01.360 --> 00:07:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Ship no sishlish elish a fish ship, fish ships, ship

28
00:07:23.680 --> 00:08:17.079
<v Speaker 2>shipsh ash ash ash ash ash lash ships ship ship

29
00:08:18.480 --> 00:08:52.360
<v Speaker 2>shish ships, the storm of wish ship ships and ashsh

30
00:08:53.919 --> 00:08:59.720
<v Speaker 2>ash ash ash ash.

31
00:09:25.399 --> 00:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome. I'm a little bit late, so it's not Snack's fault,

32
00:09:31.559 --> 00:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it's my fault.

33
00:09:34.399 --> 00:09:34.519
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

34
00:09:35.320 --> 00:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's see. I gotta move.

35
00:09:40.000 --> 00:09:40.039
<v Speaker 4>Me.

36
00:09:41.000 --> 00:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>There we go, bathing that light baby, Here we go?

37
00:09:52.559 --> 00:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Here he comes almost, he's almost here? M hm, can

38
00:10:10.600 --> 00:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you hear me?

39
00:10:11.039 --> 00:10:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Bro?

40
00:10:14.399 --> 00:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Should I rib it to you? Frog man? Can we

41
00:10:20.519 --> 00:10:24.919
<v Speaker 1>be heard? Everybody here? Is okay? Everybody hear me? I

42
00:10:24.960 --> 00:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he's used he may not have used

43
00:10:26.600 --> 00:10:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Scott yet. There we go? Can you hear me? We're

44
00:10:32.879 --> 00:10:35.679
<v Speaker 1>almost there? Hello?

45
00:10:36.799 --> 00:10:37.480
<v Speaker 5>Hello? Yeah?

46
00:10:37.879 --> 00:10:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Perfect? Yes? How you doing man?

47
00:10:41.919 --> 00:10:42.679
<v Speaker 5>I'm doing all right?

48
00:10:44.360 --> 00:10:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Can you speak up? A little bit? Is much better?

49
00:10:53.480 --> 00:10:53.799
<v Speaker 2>All right?

50
00:10:53.840 --> 00:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome everybody. We've got our ortho bro from France holding

51
00:10:58.399 --> 00:11:04.279
<v Speaker 1>it down. He's the French. He's the I was trying

52
00:11:04.320 --> 00:11:05.879
<v Speaker 1>to come up with something clever. I couldn't. He's the

53
00:11:05.960 --> 00:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>master French apologist. How's that? And he joins us tonight

54
00:11:10.200 --> 00:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to cover idols icons iconicalasm. What's up.

55
00:11:18.679 --> 00:11:22.799
<v Speaker 5>Hello, happy to be here once again, and yet today

56
00:11:22.840 --> 00:11:26.360
<v Speaker 5>you're going to cover a big topic itys a youte

57
00:11:26.480 --> 00:11:30.679
<v Speaker 5>history you theological ramifications, iconoclasm.

58
00:11:32.080 --> 00:11:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know we've done. By the way, if you're

59
00:11:34.840 --> 00:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>new to Snax's material, you can follow him on Twitter.

60
00:11:38.039 --> 00:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I've got his link below. He and I have done

61
00:11:40.519 --> 00:11:44.759
<v Speaker 1>multiple streams now where we've covered histrionic women, so called

62
00:11:44.799 --> 00:11:48.879
<v Speaker 1>saints of the Roman Catholic era. We've covered our church,

63
00:11:48.960 --> 00:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>We've covered the Jesuits, we've covered christology, the logos. We've

64
00:11:54.159 --> 00:11:58.399
<v Speaker 1>done multiple high quality streams. So I hope that you

65
00:11:58.480 --> 00:12:01.519
<v Speaker 1>will go check out all of the previous snack streams.

66
00:12:04.480 --> 00:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why these messages keep getting deleted. I'm

67
00:12:06.960 --> 00:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>sorry about that. I didn't mean to delete that message.

68
00:12:09.279 --> 00:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>There not averse. Tonight we're gonna talk about aconoclasm. Sneck

69
00:12:13.600 --> 00:12:17.159
<v Speaker 1>has done a lot of research in and covering new

70
00:12:17.759 --> 00:12:21.759
<v Speaker 1>historical material. He's really good at digging out this just

71
00:12:21.879 --> 00:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>really obscure historic stuff. He's he's the master of that.

72
00:12:25.840 --> 00:12:27.639
<v Speaker 1>I have an old essay that I did just kind

73
00:12:27.679 --> 00:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of defending iconography from the Bible, So I'm gonna touch

74
00:12:32.120 --> 00:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>on some of that and we're also going to get

75
00:12:34.679 --> 00:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>into the heresy and motivations of iconoclasm where it comes from.

76
00:12:39.120 --> 00:12:40.639
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna try to touch on all of it, but

77
00:12:41.559 --> 00:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>on our mind. Viewers, if you have superchats, the new

78
00:12:44.600 --> 00:12:47.879
<v Speaker 1>way to superchat is through stream Labs, so you can

79
00:12:47.960 --> 00:12:50.759
<v Speaker 1>ask your questions there through the superchats at stream Labs.

80
00:12:51.360 --> 00:12:53.519
<v Speaker 1>And we'll go ahead and get started here, snack. Where

81
00:12:53.519 --> 00:12:55.919
<v Speaker 1>do you want to start? What's what's the good place

82
00:12:56.279 --> 00:12:58.399
<v Speaker 1>that you think you've uncovered something worth getting to.

83
00:13:00.360 --> 00:13:02.360
<v Speaker 5>I think we should start from the beginning, from the

84
00:13:02.519 --> 00:13:06.840
<v Speaker 5>biblical times, and actually we should start in Genesis because

85
00:13:07.080 --> 00:13:10.200
<v Speaker 5>the first occurrence of the idea of the icon the

86
00:13:10.320 --> 00:13:15.159
<v Speaker 5>image is interestingly linked to Genesis, to creation and to

87
00:13:15.279 --> 00:13:19.080
<v Speaker 5>the fact that our God is a creator God. He

88
00:13:19.480 --> 00:13:23.679
<v Speaker 5>is interacting with matter. And that's why you see the

89
00:13:23.759 --> 00:13:30.440
<v Speaker 5>first departure between you know, iconoclasm and iconodulia, which is

90
00:13:30.519 --> 00:13:36.960
<v Speaker 5>what we practice. God being a creator is him interacting

91
00:13:37.039 --> 00:13:40.559
<v Speaker 5>with matter, so matter cannot be intrinsically bad, as many

92
00:13:40.600 --> 00:13:45.080
<v Speaker 5>gnostics believe. And that's why you will see that the

93
00:13:45.519 --> 00:13:49.159
<v Speaker 5>gnostics will actually believe that matter was created by a

94
00:13:49.240 --> 00:13:52.159
<v Speaker 5>demiurge or something like this, and therefore all matter is bad.

95
00:13:52.240 --> 00:13:55.720
<v Speaker 5>And that's why the also iconoclastic to an extent that

96
00:13:56.039 --> 00:13:59.600
<v Speaker 5>in Genesis you can already see interaction in the creation

97
00:13:59.720 --> 00:14:04.759
<v Speaker 5>of them. Specifically, Adam is in the image of the

98
00:14:04.960 --> 00:14:08.320
<v Speaker 5>and the rest symblance of God. So it's you already

99
00:14:08.360 --> 00:14:12.639
<v Speaker 5>have the term I can't present here. So from the beginning,

100
00:14:13.320 --> 00:14:17.679
<v Speaker 5>a conoclasm wasn't really a thing in you know, Judean

101
00:14:17.799 --> 00:14:22.759
<v Speaker 5>times and things like this, because because you have this

102
00:14:23.000 --> 00:14:27.519
<v Speaker 5>idea of God interacting with man, and you can you

103
00:14:27.559 --> 00:14:30.120
<v Speaker 5>can see it all throughout the Bible. So obviously idols

104
00:14:30.159 --> 00:14:34.240
<v Speaker 5>are bad. We don't like idols, and idols, according to

105
00:14:34.279 --> 00:14:36.960
<v Speaker 5>the Bible, are God that are that we made by

106
00:14:37.000 --> 00:14:40.399
<v Speaker 5>ourselves false gods. It can be ideas, and it can

107
00:14:40.440 --> 00:14:46.559
<v Speaker 5>also be statues or anything, or oftentimes they are referred

108
00:14:46.600 --> 00:14:50.399
<v Speaker 5>to as being gods of metal, wood and so on.

109
00:14:52.120 --> 00:14:55.279
<v Speaker 5>So you have the first distinction. And that's where many

110
00:14:55.600 --> 00:14:58.200
<v Speaker 5>people would you know, solely take the Bible. We say,

111
00:14:58.919 --> 00:15:02.840
<v Speaker 5>any graven image, any any painting and so on, it's

112
00:15:02.840 --> 00:15:05.240
<v Speaker 5>already an insult to God and we cannot we cannot

113
00:15:05.240 --> 00:15:08.320
<v Speaker 5>allow this. If you look a little bit further in

114
00:15:08.360 --> 00:15:11.639
<v Speaker 5>the Bible, you will we will see that God actually

115
00:15:12.559 --> 00:15:17.639
<v Speaker 5>a loose worship in a physical sense. It's a temple

116
00:15:17.679 --> 00:15:23.600
<v Speaker 5>of David, perfect example. Example, the tabernacle as well, full

117
00:15:23.639 --> 00:15:33.720
<v Speaker 5>of imagery, full of engravings, sculptures of angels and so on,

118
00:15:33.960 --> 00:15:36.320
<v Speaker 5>the arc of the cabinet as well. You can see

119
00:15:36.360 --> 00:15:40.600
<v Speaker 5>the exodus as well, give the brazen snack snake sorry

120
00:15:41.000 --> 00:15:46.039
<v Speaker 5>a serpent. And you can also see it a bit

121
00:15:46.159 --> 00:15:51.360
<v Speaker 5>later on in the Book of Daniel, chapter five. So

122
00:15:51.519 --> 00:15:53.399
<v Speaker 5>you have any any commonsence this before I go a

123
00:15:53.440 --> 00:15:55.840
<v Speaker 5>little bit further, just.

124
00:15:55.879 --> 00:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>To lay out that right away at the beginning, the

125
00:15:58.960 --> 00:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>notion of man in the garden. And by the way,

126
00:16:02.159 --> 00:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>this is another reason why genesis and creation is important,

127
00:16:05.559 --> 00:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is that we have to maintain the doctrine of man

128
00:16:10.399 --> 00:16:15.399
<v Speaker 1>as an icon of God. Image. The word is icon.

129
00:16:16.200 --> 00:16:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Man is an icon of God. That's what it means

130
00:16:18.720 --> 00:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to be made in the image and likeness of God.

131
00:16:21.000 --> 00:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>In the teaching the Church fathers, the image is what

132
00:16:24.279 --> 00:16:26.919
<v Speaker 1>man possesses in terms of his reason and his faculties

133
00:16:26.960 --> 00:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and all that. And then the likeness is the presence

134
00:16:30.360 --> 00:16:33.559
<v Speaker 1>of the Holy Spirit, the deifying power, the uncreated energies

135
00:16:33.600 --> 00:16:36.759
<v Speaker 1>that man possessed and then lost when he fell. So

136
00:16:36.919 --> 00:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>for the father's image and likeness go together, and when

137
00:16:41.279 --> 00:16:45.519
<v Speaker 1>Adam fell, he lost the likeness the theosis, so that

138
00:16:45.639 --> 00:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>has to be regained, and that's why we are told

139
00:16:49.080 --> 00:16:54.679
<v Speaker 1>that Christ comes as the re establishment of that icon,

140
00:16:55.080 --> 00:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of that image of man as the type to prototype, right,

141
00:16:59.360 --> 00:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>God being the archetype and then Man as prototype. So

142
00:17:04.200 --> 00:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that will be a consistent philosophical train of argumentation that

143
00:17:08.599 --> 00:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Saint John Damascus and St. Theodore the Student will use

144
00:17:11.599 --> 00:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in their defense of iconographic theology. But you're absolutely right

145
00:17:19.319 --> 00:17:21.839
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the garden that the beginning of

146
00:17:23.079 --> 00:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the rejection of man has made in the image of

147
00:17:25.799 --> 00:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>God is actually inspired by Satan, and it's the original

148
00:17:30.039 --> 00:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>attack on icons. Absolutely, it's Satanic in its origin. Yeah.

149
00:17:37.160 --> 00:17:42.039
<v Speaker 5>Correct, So we already established that icons are present, these

150
00:17:42.079 --> 00:17:46.440
<v Speaker 5>images are not idols, and they're present in the space

151
00:17:46.519 --> 00:17:50.799
<v Speaker 5>of worship. But now the question is we venerate icons

152
00:17:51.200 --> 00:17:53.119
<v Speaker 5>and where where can we find that in the Bible?

153
00:17:53.319 --> 00:17:56.839
<v Speaker 5>And I think Daniel chapter five is an excellent example

154
00:17:57.440 --> 00:18:01.839
<v Speaker 5>because so it's it's after and as a, it takes

155
00:18:01.880 --> 00:18:10.519
<v Speaker 5>over Jerusalem and Nebrakatin as A celebrates his victory with

156
00:18:10.720 --> 00:18:15.279
<v Speaker 5>the vases of the temple, and it desecrates them and

157
00:18:15.440 --> 00:18:20.960
<v Speaker 5>forces it gets killed a bit later on by God.

158
00:18:22.319 --> 00:18:25.839
<v Speaker 5>And how does it desecreate the vases? It de secreates

159
00:18:25.880 --> 00:18:32.480
<v Speaker 5>them by using them in a profane manner and praying

160
00:18:32.720 --> 00:18:36.359
<v Speaker 5>to false God, idols of wood, metal, and so on

161
00:18:36.559 --> 00:18:39.880
<v Speaker 5>with it. So we can see that there is a

162
00:18:40.000 --> 00:18:45.680
<v Speaker 5>veneration that is required of the objects of worship. There

163
00:18:45.799 --> 00:18:48.279
<v Speaker 5>are the veneration of the object of worship is already

164
00:18:48.319 --> 00:18:51.119
<v Speaker 5>present in the Old Testament. And we'll see that since

165
00:18:51.319 --> 00:18:55.960
<v Speaker 5>very early Christian times and at the time of David's Temple,

166
00:18:59.119 --> 00:19:03.640
<v Speaker 5>icons were depart of the worship. So here you know,

167
00:19:03.759 --> 00:19:07.319
<v Speaker 5>many pros and for example, will say, oh, veneration adoration,

168
00:19:07.640 --> 00:19:11.240
<v Speaker 5>there's no such distinction. But here we can see that

169
00:19:11.319 --> 00:19:17.359
<v Speaker 5>clearly people are killed because it did not venerates a basis.

170
00:19:17.440 --> 00:19:20.160
<v Speaker 5>Obviously they did not believe the basis. When Gods God

171
00:19:20.240 --> 00:19:26.000
<v Speaker 5>doesn't mand it to to you know, worship basis, but

172
00:19:26.119 --> 00:19:29.960
<v Speaker 5>to respect what is part of the liturgy, I hope

173
00:19:30.039 --> 00:19:30.640
<v Speaker 5>they disagree.

174
00:19:30.960 --> 00:19:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I've got a bunch of examples of this too.

175
00:19:33.799 --> 00:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So if we look even in the Old Testament, right,

176
00:19:36.920 --> 00:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, typically when Saya Protestant has a problem with

177
00:19:39.200 --> 00:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>this idea that's, oh, the Ten Commandments, you can't do this,

178
00:19:42.920 --> 00:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>can't have images, can't do that, you can't bow before

179
00:19:45.920 --> 00:19:49.559
<v Speaker 1>anything that's created, because they'll view it in this legalistic

180
00:19:49.640 --> 00:19:52.519
<v Speaker 1>way as if the action of bowing itself is the

181
00:19:52.799 --> 00:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>root of the idolatry, when it's actually the motivation of

182
00:19:55.400 --> 00:19:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the heart that's the root of the idolatry, and the

183
00:19:58.359 --> 00:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>bowing or the bodily express essions are just the external

184
00:20:01.200 --> 00:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>manifestations of what is in the heart of the mind.

185
00:20:03.720 --> 00:20:06.279
<v Speaker 1>So it's not really so much about that. Because you'll

186
00:20:06.359 --> 00:20:14.519
<v Speaker 1>notice in let's see Genesis forty two seven, all the

187
00:20:15.279 --> 00:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Joseph's family bows and prostrates themselves before Joseph. In Second

188
00:20:21.279 --> 00:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Kings two fifteen, the prophets bow and prostrate themselves before Elijah.

189
00:20:27.720 --> 00:20:31.279
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at Romans thirteen seven, Paul says

190
00:20:31.440 --> 00:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to give honor or give honor to whom honor is due.

191
00:20:37.519 --> 00:20:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's nothing wrong with giving honor when honor is due.

192
00:20:40.880 --> 00:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And in the ancient world, there's nothing wrong with reverencing, prostrating.

193
00:20:45.000 --> 00:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>Joseph even bows before Pharaoh. There's the example in the

194
00:20:50.720 --> 00:20:53.759
<v Speaker 1>case of the Ark of the Covenant, where Solomon prays

195
00:20:53.920 --> 00:20:57.759
<v Speaker 1>and everybody bows themselves towards the temple, prostrates themselves in

196
00:20:57.799 --> 00:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>front of the ark. These were all created images. They're

197
00:21:00.720 --> 00:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>all created things, the art, the tabernacle, the temple itself

198
00:21:04.599 --> 00:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is full of iconography. It's full of images of angels

199
00:21:07.559 --> 00:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and seraphim and so forth. So this is just based

200
00:21:11.039 --> 00:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on ignorance that people don't even know that the temple

201
00:21:14.039 --> 00:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>itself was full of iconography and even the term if

202
00:21:20.039 --> 00:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>you just think of this as an argument John Damascus makes,

203
00:21:22.119 --> 00:21:24.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just think of the word itself, like the

204
00:21:24.200 --> 00:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Bible itself is a bunch of letters, which are symbols words.

205
00:21:28.240 --> 00:21:32.079
<v Speaker 1>They're just another type of iconographic representation. So if you

206
00:21:32.160 --> 00:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>have the word good or y HWH or l r D,

207
00:21:37.640 --> 00:21:42.319
<v Speaker 1>those are symbols that refer to God. So there's nothing

208
00:21:42.400 --> 00:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>inherently wrong with created symbols referencing God. And in fact,

209
00:21:47.319 --> 00:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely necessary meaningful conversation, meaningful discussion logos itself, right,

210
00:21:55.599 --> 00:22:03.599
<v Speaker 1>logical meaningful transference of meaning loogie logic requires the ability

211
00:22:03.720 --> 00:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to signify divine realities in created forms. Right, So it's

212
00:22:08.759 --> 00:22:13.599
<v Speaker 1>just a stupid idiotic level of thinking to think that, oh, well,

213
00:22:13.720 --> 00:22:17.519
<v Speaker 1>the symbolic presentation of the image is somehow evil. But

214
00:22:17.680 --> 00:22:21.079
<v Speaker 1>the word that's also a symbolic representation, that's an image.

215
00:22:21.160 --> 00:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Words themselves are symbol images. They're they're good, but pictures

216
00:22:25.400 --> 00:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>are bad. They're both pictures obviously.

217
00:22:29.200 --> 00:22:32.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Like you know, that's what genes is important, because

218
00:22:32.799 --> 00:22:38.240
<v Speaker 5>if you have a god's interactive creation, there's already some

219
00:22:38.440 --> 00:22:42.240
<v Speaker 5>level of an international principle, you know, or at least

220
00:22:42.279 --> 00:22:47.440
<v Speaker 5>for us to understand it. Then we're gonna go a

221
00:22:47.480 --> 00:22:50.000
<v Speaker 5>little bit further in time, and you will see that

222
00:22:51.519 --> 00:22:58.480
<v Speaker 5>early Christian worship includes frescoes, includes this kind of explanations.

223
00:22:58.680 --> 00:23:01.799
<v Speaker 1>So did Judas too. By the way, I have a

224
00:23:01.880 --> 00:23:04.039
<v Speaker 1>screenshot of this that I'm gonna put up here.

225
00:23:04.640 --> 00:23:06.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, this is a very famous synagogue.

226
00:23:09.039 --> 00:23:12.039
<v Speaker 1>What is it do or Europa or something like that. Yeah,

227
00:23:12.279 --> 00:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and you'll notice there this is from some blog, but

228
00:23:15.759 --> 00:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>ancient dress synagogues were filled with icons. Scripture required the

229
00:23:19.920 --> 00:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>inside of the Jerusalem Temple to display icons of angels.

230
00:23:22.599 --> 00:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Icons in the Jewish Synagogue depicted numerous scenes from Scripture.

231
00:23:26.359 --> 00:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Duo Europa Synagogue two forty four a d.

232
00:23:29.680 --> 00:23:32.400
<v Speaker 1>You'll see images of the Bernie Bush, the rescue of

233
00:23:32.440 --> 00:23:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Moses Miracle, the Water, Aaron, the Temple, Samuel and David,

234
00:23:35.880 --> 00:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Ark of the Covenant, Ezekiel's vision of the dry Bones,

235
00:23:39.640 --> 00:23:46.279
<v Speaker 1>and that the blog there has all those pictures. I'll

236
00:23:46.319 --> 00:23:48.799
<v Speaker 1>put the link into the chat if anybody wants to

237
00:23:48.839 --> 00:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>go look at the different images that that blog has.

238
00:23:52.119 --> 00:23:53.599
<v Speaker 1>I can't vouch for that blog. I don't know who

239
00:23:53.599 --> 00:23:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it is, just the one that popped up.

240
00:23:55.240 --> 00:24:00.440
<v Speaker 5>Go ahead, yeah, so we can see that the time,

241
00:24:00.720 --> 00:24:04.839
<v Speaker 5>be it in Christian worship or Jewish worship, icons are present.

242
00:24:05.000 --> 00:24:07.559
<v Speaker 5>The only ones that do not have these kind of icons,

243
00:24:07.640 --> 00:24:12.119
<v Speaker 5>that do not allow images are the Gnostics. To these

244
00:24:12.160 --> 00:24:15.519
<v Speaker 5>are some some Christian consuls that are influenced by Gnosticism,

245
00:24:16.039 --> 00:24:20.079
<v Speaker 5>like the concept of Elvira, which is influenced by gnosticisms

246
00:24:20.119 --> 00:24:22.720
<v Speaker 5>that forbids images. It's the same consul by the way,

247
00:24:22.799 --> 00:24:27.680
<v Speaker 5>that forbids, which is the first consul that forbids priests

248
00:24:27.720 --> 00:24:30.240
<v Speaker 5>to marry. You know, so it's linked. You know, rejection

249
00:24:30.359 --> 00:24:33.440
<v Speaker 5>of the body is rejection of good point. Yeah, yeah,

250
00:24:33.599 --> 00:24:39.519
<v Speaker 5>completely linked. So at the time, you know, today Jewish

251
00:24:39.519 --> 00:24:43.000
<v Speaker 5>worship is more econoclastic, we'll see why, but at the

252
00:24:43.039 --> 00:24:45.039
<v Speaker 5>time it did not exist. So if you look at

253
00:24:45.079 --> 00:24:49.759
<v Speaker 5>the traditions. There's a clear continuation from Genesis to Exodus,

254
00:24:50.200 --> 00:24:54.799
<v Speaker 5>to the time of Christ, to early Christian period to

255
00:24:54.920 --> 00:24:58.119
<v Speaker 5>what we do today. But the first real religion to

256
00:24:58.920 --> 00:25:06.079
<v Speaker 5>institutionalize icono pleasant is Islam. So the rise of Islam

257
00:25:06.599 --> 00:25:12.359
<v Speaker 5>is linked to the their theology, and the rise of

258
00:25:12.920 --> 00:25:15.559
<v Speaker 5>icono pleasant is into the theology.

259
00:25:16.720 --> 00:25:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Well before before we jump to Islam, though, I want

260
00:25:18.759 --> 00:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to I want to illustrate that as this debate takes

261
00:25:21.759 --> 00:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>place in the early Church, recall that you can go

262
00:25:26.440 --> 00:25:30.599
<v Speaker 1>back to, say, the first period of the post appstock

263
00:25:30.640 --> 00:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>fought like right after the Apostles. You've already got justin

264
00:25:34.119 --> 00:25:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Martyr ieron As talking about the real presence of Christ

265
00:25:36.960 --> 00:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Eucharist. And so the real presence is also

266
00:25:39.759 --> 00:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>connected to this debate because it stands to reason that

267
00:25:42.759 --> 00:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>if the incarnation was real, and all those church fathers

268
00:25:45.400 --> 00:25:50.599
<v Speaker 1>that are defending the reality of the incarnation, it's directly

269
00:25:50.680 --> 00:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>connected in their argumentation apologetic to the doctrine of the

270
00:25:53.400 --> 00:25:56.799
<v Speaker 1>real presence. Right, so it only makes sense to argue

271
00:25:56.839 --> 00:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>for the real presence if Christ really did become incarnate

272
00:26:00.039 --> 00:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in the flesh, right, if the Son of God is

273
00:26:02.519 --> 00:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>incarnating human flesh. So there's a direct connection. If you

274
00:26:05.559 --> 00:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>look at Ephesus, when Saint Cyril is arguing against Nestorius,

275
00:26:09.319 --> 00:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>especially in the Anathemas ephesis, is very clear that the

276
00:26:12.799 --> 00:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>argumentation for the reality of the second person that God

277
00:26:16.160 --> 00:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>had assuming human nature is based on Cyril's argumentation about

278
00:26:20.000 --> 00:26:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the real presence. He says, you and Astorias, do you

279
00:26:22.799 --> 00:26:26.079
<v Speaker 1>eat the body, blood, soul, and divinity of a mere

280
00:26:26.200 --> 00:26:28.599
<v Speaker 1>man or of the Son of God. Right, so it

281
00:26:28.839 --> 00:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>necessitates the reality of the incarnation. Arguments based on the Eucharist,

282
00:26:34.119 --> 00:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the real presence of Christ, and the Eucharist, the real

283
00:26:36.759 --> 00:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>presence of Christ is an immediate destroyer of all of

284
00:26:40.000 --> 00:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the Protestant sort of gnostic iconoclastic argumentation because it's directly

285
00:26:45.240 --> 00:26:48.559
<v Speaker 1>connected to correct Christology. Then you'll see that when they

286
00:26:48.599 --> 00:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>get up to the Seventh Council, and I see it

287
00:26:50.920 --> 00:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>two in seven eighty seven, when the debate is being

288
00:26:53.480 --> 00:26:57.559
<v Speaker 1>had about whether icons are blasphemous or whether they are

289
00:26:57.640 --> 00:27:01.640
<v Speaker 1>idolatry or whatever, it's always connected to a consistent argumentation

290
00:27:01.759 --> 00:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>about Christology and about the incarnation and the real presence. Right,

291
00:27:06.000 --> 00:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>All of these doctrines follow through to a logically consistent

292
00:27:08.759 --> 00:27:13.799
<v Speaker 1>position that Christ has sanctified matter itself and the Church

293
00:27:14.000 --> 00:27:18.039
<v Speaker 1>by extension has the power to then also sanctify matter. Right,

294
00:27:18.359 --> 00:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>So the priest can bless the waters of baptism, right,

295
00:27:21.279 --> 00:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the priests can, through the epiclasis, pray for the coming

296
00:27:24.279 --> 00:27:27.319
<v Speaker 1>down of the Holy Spirit to transform the elements in

297
00:27:27.400 --> 00:27:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the Lord's Supper. All of these things are connected, and

298
00:27:30.319 --> 00:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>they're all based on that incarnational principle. It all hangs

299
00:27:33.519 --> 00:27:37.079
<v Speaker 1>and falls together, right, relics, All of that goes together

300
00:27:37.160 --> 00:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>with the same idea.

301
00:27:39.319 --> 00:27:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly, And you know, straight to my point, why

302
00:27:44.559 --> 00:27:48.920
<v Speaker 5>does Islam promote iconoclasm Because they do not have the

303
00:27:48.960 --> 00:27:55.480
<v Speaker 5>incarnational principle, and that's why they were fiercely antichonoclastic. At least,

304
00:27:55.480 --> 00:27:58.759
<v Speaker 5>they do not even believe that God enters creation in

305
00:27:58.920 --> 00:28:01.920
<v Speaker 5>that sense. It's linked to gnarstissism. You know, the revelation

306
00:28:02.559 --> 00:28:06.759
<v Speaker 5>that is given to to Muhammad is is done through angels,

307
00:28:06.839 --> 00:28:10.400
<v Speaker 5>it's not God directly. They do not recognz theophanies. So

308
00:28:11.000 --> 00:28:13.680
<v Speaker 5>then you've got the first shift, the first real religion

309
00:28:13.759 --> 00:28:23.200
<v Speaker 5>that institutionalizes iconoclasm, and from them the iconoclass period starts.

310
00:28:23.359 --> 00:28:26.920
<v Speaker 5>So first the Jews getting influenced by them. So that's

311
00:28:26.920 --> 00:28:29.359
<v Speaker 5>the period where you know, you see the move from

312
00:28:29.440 --> 00:28:33.440
<v Speaker 5>these synagogues full of icons to the more modern type

313
00:28:33.440 --> 00:28:37.759
<v Speaker 5>of synagogues you can see today, just you know, a

314
00:28:37.839 --> 00:28:45.240
<v Speaker 5>slow shift, and it starts to influence Christian theology because

315
00:28:46.039 --> 00:28:49.920
<v Speaker 5>in the in the Christian East, Muslim start influence and people,

316
00:28:50.440 --> 00:28:53.119
<v Speaker 5>people's people start thinking, oh, you know, we we destroyed

317
00:28:53.160 --> 00:28:56.240
<v Speaker 5>the idols, which is perfectly fine to do, and the

318
00:28:56.839 --> 00:29:00.440
<v Speaker 5>icons isn't all this iconography sort of it? Other tis

319
00:29:01.200 --> 00:29:04.319
<v Speaker 5>And then you've got this these debates, and of course

320
00:29:04.599 --> 00:29:09.359
<v Speaker 5>incarnational principle requires this. You've got the seven counsul, You've

321
00:29:09.359 --> 00:29:12.200
<v Speaker 5>got a little bit of back and forth. Even we

322
00:29:12.440 --> 00:29:15.599
<v Speaker 5>look at history, we see that they were present because

323
00:29:15.640 --> 00:29:19.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, consoles are but affirming previously held dogma. So

324
00:29:19.519 --> 00:29:21.240
<v Speaker 5>we see that they are present. We see that this

325
00:29:21.400 --> 00:29:23.960
<v Speaker 5>coherent through theology. We see that Christ is incarnated. We

326
00:29:24.039 --> 00:29:28.039
<v Speaker 5>see that we have scientification of matter, we have the

327
00:29:28.119 --> 00:29:31.759
<v Speaker 5>idea of people being icons of Christ, you know, relics.

328
00:29:32.079 --> 00:29:35.759
<v Speaker 5>You know, why do we venerate relics Because these people

329
00:29:35.920 --> 00:29:39.160
<v Speaker 5>gain back the image and the resemblance to God. People

330
00:29:39.559 --> 00:29:42.279
<v Speaker 5>became icons of God once again. And that's why we

331
00:29:42.359 --> 00:29:43.400
<v Speaker 5>can venerate relics.

332
00:29:43.720 --> 00:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, second King is thirteen the Bones of Elisha resurrect

333
00:29:47.519 --> 00:29:52.319
<v Speaker 1>a dead soldier. The same principle carries over into Acts

334
00:29:52.440 --> 00:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eleven and twelve, where cloths and handkerchiefs touched by

335
00:29:57.000 --> 00:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Saint Paul himself are able to do the same type

336
00:30:00.160 --> 00:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>miracles drive out evil spirits, as we see in Tewod

337
00:30:02.680 --> 00:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>King thirteen. But to your point about Islam, I want

338
00:30:05.440 --> 00:30:10.319
<v Speaker 1>to illustrate this to maybe make it helpful through visual illustration.

339
00:30:10.519 --> 00:30:12.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what I'm saying, what we're saying is really

340
00:30:12.640 --> 00:30:15.519
<v Speaker 1>not that that complicated or difficult if you just think

341
00:30:15.519 --> 00:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>about it in terms of Look, if God is supremely transcendent,

342
00:30:19.559 --> 00:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>then how are we going to relate or know about

343
00:30:21.480 --> 00:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that God. This is the argument I've been continually making

344
00:30:23.960 --> 00:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Muslims when we have these debates. If the

345
00:30:26.319 --> 00:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>world is separate, right, God world separate? We agree with

346
00:30:29.240 --> 00:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that God is not identical to his creation obviously, and

347
00:30:33.079 --> 00:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the medium by which we know about God is texts.

348
00:30:35.839 --> 00:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Guess what texts are created? Things that are full of images. Right,

349
00:30:42.400 --> 00:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>all a word is is just a different type of image,

350
00:30:45.000 --> 00:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>just because I'm not drawing a picture and By the way,

351
00:30:47.359 --> 00:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>some languages are pictographic, right, hieroglyphics. That's a language Chinese,

352
00:30:53.799 --> 00:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. I think Japanese pictographic languages. Doesn't matter whether

353
00:30:58.480 --> 00:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I if I use a pictographic or if I use

354
00:31:01.319 --> 00:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a You know, the English symbols there, these letters are

355
00:31:08.359 --> 00:31:12.039
<v Speaker 1>standing for in a certain combination. They're created symbols that

356
00:31:12.160 --> 00:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>stand for this is just basic semiotics. Let's stand for

357
00:31:15.960 --> 00:31:20.079
<v Speaker 1>this or truths about this. So you're not avoiding the

358
00:31:20.200 --> 00:31:23.599
<v Speaker 1>problem when you act like we're going to get rid

359
00:31:23.640 --> 00:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of all images, we're gonna get we're gonna crusade against it.

360
00:31:26.880 --> 00:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>That's that's how I'm able to, as an apologists, immediately

361
00:31:30.039 --> 00:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>turn that around around around on all the Muslims and say,

362
00:31:32.720 --> 00:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>then you don't know anything about God because nothing, nothing

363
00:31:36.079 --> 00:31:37.359
<v Speaker 1>can tell you about that.

364
00:31:40.799 --> 00:31:44.200
<v Speaker 5>Exactly. And you know, the funny thing about Islam is

365
00:31:44.279 --> 00:31:47.240
<v Speaker 5>that you know that God still is a creative and

366
00:31:47.960 --> 00:31:51.799
<v Speaker 5>it's even adea to natural theology to a huge extent.

367
00:31:52.359 --> 00:31:56.680
<v Speaker 5>So they still have to venerate to an extent creation.

368
00:31:56.799 --> 00:31:57.799
<v Speaker 5>And how does it do this.

369
00:31:58.599 --> 00:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, It's interesting because whether you're Protestant or Muslim or

370
00:32:04.559 --> 00:32:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Calvinists or whatever. I mean, I know Calvinists. But you

371
00:32:08.640 --> 00:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm saying, like, you're still venerating the book, right, Yeah,

372
00:32:13.400 --> 00:32:15.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean they treat the book the same way that

373
00:32:15.599 --> 00:32:19.799
<v Speaker 1>we The Holy Book, right, is like the incarnational principle

374
00:32:19.839 --> 00:32:20.119
<v Speaker 1>for them.

375
00:32:21.240 --> 00:32:27.559
<v Speaker 5>Exactly, the Quran basically behaves like anyposthasis, you know, exactlys

376
00:32:27.599 --> 00:32:30.240
<v Speaker 5>in Islam. But yeah, like, how do you signify the

377
00:32:30.279 --> 00:32:34.000
<v Speaker 5>respect to the book? You know, people, people would get

378
00:32:34.039 --> 00:32:36.400
<v Speaker 5>mad if you do anything to a current, to a

379
00:32:36.519 --> 00:32:39.359
<v Speaker 5>huge extent in the Muslim world for this reason because

380
00:32:40.440 --> 00:32:44.640
<v Speaker 5>it's it is, to an extent a type of the prototype,

381
00:32:44.640 --> 00:32:48.279
<v Speaker 5>which is the Word of God. And how does it

382
00:32:48.319 --> 00:32:51.599
<v Speaker 5>signify this with calligraphy? You know, Oh, we cannot joy anything.

383
00:32:51.680 --> 00:32:54.960
<v Speaker 5>We're just gonna make like beautiful, intricate calligraphy. So you

384
00:32:55.559 --> 00:32:57.400
<v Speaker 5>and you say that this is a technique that is

385
00:32:57.480 --> 00:33:01.440
<v Speaker 5>actually being used by econoclass. So you know, we're not

386
00:33:01.559 --> 00:33:04.839
<v Speaker 5>going to have image because this is idolatry, but we're

387
00:33:04.960 --> 00:33:08.960
<v Speaker 5>actually going to venerate calligraphy. What's the difference? Where does

388
00:33:09.000 --> 00:33:12.200
<v Speaker 5>it start? You know, like even letters, you know, for example,

389
00:33:12.519 --> 00:33:17.000
<v Speaker 5>the Greek alph of it, it starts aspectrographic. Well, what's

390
00:33:17.119 --> 00:33:20.079
<v Speaker 5>what's the difference? And even all defense. You know, in

391
00:33:20.160 --> 00:33:23.640
<v Speaker 5>the Seventh Council when it comes to the to the

392
00:33:23.720 --> 00:33:28.559
<v Speaker 5>veneration of icons, we explain that it's part of the liturgy.

393
00:33:28.880 --> 00:33:31.480
<v Speaker 5>You know, the liturgy is a type of heaven. We

394
00:33:31.680 --> 00:33:35.519
<v Speaker 5>we venerate all the other parts of liturgy, we kiss

395
00:33:35.599 --> 00:33:36.200
<v Speaker 5>the Bible.

396
00:33:36.599 --> 00:33:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, just think about how absurd you know,

397
00:33:38.519 --> 00:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>John is seeing into heaven. He's seeing all these things.

398
00:33:41.200 --> 00:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what about I just did. I covered Isaiah

399
00:33:43.640 --> 00:33:46.519
<v Speaker 1>one through seven last night, and then I covered the

400
00:33:46.599 --> 00:33:49.519
<v Speaker 1>next seven chapters after that, and the part too for subscribers.

401
00:33:49.519 --> 00:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>If you missed that, you can subscribe and get access

402
00:33:51.559 --> 00:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to all that. But Isaiah says in Isaiah six, I

403
00:33:54.279 --> 00:33:57.759
<v Speaker 1>have seen the Lord with my eyes. So Isaiah quite

404
00:33:57.839 --> 00:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>literally saw that vision of Jesus lifted up on the

405
00:34:02.160 --> 00:34:05.759
<v Speaker 1>throne in the heavenly Temple, and there's a liturgical worship

406
00:34:05.839 --> 00:34:08.559
<v Speaker 1>service going on all around him. Right. There's it's full

407
00:34:08.599 --> 00:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>of sounds and smells and chants, Holy, Holy, Holy, right,

408
00:34:13.719 --> 00:34:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of visual imagery. It's exact same stuff that

409
00:34:16.480 --> 00:34:20.400
<v Speaker 1>John sees in the Apocalypse right chapter four five. He

410
00:34:20.519 --> 00:34:23.599
<v Speaker 1>sees this liturgical worship going on in heaven. He sees

411
00:34:24.039 --> 00:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>saints underneath the altar, interceding for praying for vengeance, for

412
00:34:28.039 --> 00:34:32.119
<v Speaker 1>the church on earth, offering up incense. Right, that's why

413
00:34:32.199 --> 00:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>we do what we do. We're doing the worship that

414
00:34:35.039 --> 00:34:38.559
<v Speaker 1>John sees on Earth. It's the same service.

415
00:34:41.760 --> 00:34:48.119
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, correct, So again you're gonna have some level anyway

416
00:34:48.199 --> 00:34:51.440
<v Speaker 5>of veneration for things. So that's why I kind of

417
00:34:51.480 --> 00:34:57.400
<v Speaker 5>please him, is you know, not consistent eternally unless you

418
00:34:57.480 --> 00:35:01.480
<v Speaker 5>believe that like literally everything on Earth bad, including your text,

419
00:35:01.559 --> 00:35:02.480
<v Speaker 5>and you don't know anything.

420
00:35:03.920 --> 00:35:06.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's really arbitrary, and they have to the only thing.

421
00:35:06.440 --> 00:35:10.679
<v Speaker 1>The Calvinists will say things like, well, you can't make

422
00:35:10.800 --> 00:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>up a worship service because of the regulative principle. So

423
00:35:14.000 --> 00:35:16.079
<v Speaker 1>they'll point to like text and the little it because

424
00:35:16.079 --> 00:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>we're Nadev and Aby who basically did their own little

425
00:35:19.760 --> 00:35:22.679
<v Speaker 1>incense thing and God burned them up, and they'll say, ah,

426
00:35:22.840 --> 00:35:25.039
<v Speaker 1>see the regulative principal worship. That means that you can't

427
00:35:25.079 --> 00:35:29.599
<v Speaker 1>worship in a way other than God has ordained. The

428
00:35:29.679 --> 00:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>problem with that argument is that guess how David organized

429
00:35:34.039 --> 00:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the worship of Israel. If you read my essay that

430
00:35:36.800 --> 00:35:39.039
<v Speaker 1>I did on tradition in the Bible, you'll see that

431
00:35:39.119 --> 00:35:42.280
<v Speaker 1>David did it on the basis of tradition. David was

432
00:35:42.360 --> 00:35:45.079
<v Speaker 1>not given all of the ways that the choir and

433
00:35:45.239 --> 00:35:48.159
<v Speaker 1>the services were to be conducted. He did it on

434
00:35:48.239 --> 00:35:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the basis of a tradition that he knew about. And

435
00:35:50.760 --> 00:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>guess what, Calvinists, I can turn that regulative principal argument

436
00:35:54.039 --> 00:35:56.400
<v Speaker 1>right back on you and point out that you're correct.

437
00:35:56.559 --> 00:35:59.679
<v Speaker 1>You have to worship the way that the Church lays down,

438
00:36:00.639 --> 00:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's already been laid down by tradition by the Apostles,

439
00:36:04.320 --> 00:36:08.639
<v Speaker 1>because they established churches that developed their worship service by

440
00:36:08.679 --> 00:36:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Apostolic authority on the basis of the temple and the

441
00:36:11.400 --> 00:36:15.039
<v Speaker 1>synagogue services of that time. So therefore the regular principle

442
00:36:15.079 --> 00:36:17.679
<v Speaker 1>means you have to obey the Orthodox liturgy, and you don't.

443
00:36:17.920 --> 00:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>So by your own argument, you are nadab and abaye

444
00:36:21.239 --> 00:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>who Calvinists. Yeah, so.

445
00:36:28.960 --> 00:36:32.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, This mostly influence causes what is called the Ecmoclastic

446
00:36:32.880 --> 00:36:38.119
<v Speaker 5>period in the East, and people who often focus on

447
00:36:38.159 --> 00:36:42.039
<v Speaker 5>these sayings that it's strictly a Byzantine thing, and of

448
00:36:42.119 --> 00:36:44.960
<v Speaker 5>course it was. It was more violent in the Bysantine

449
00:36:45.000 --> 00:36:49.679
<v Speaker 5>Empires than anywhere else, but it touched the entirety of Christendom.

450
00:36:51.599 --> 00:36:56.159
<v Speaker 5>So the Seventh Council lays down the seventh Yeah, seventh

451
00:36:56.199 --> 00:37:00.599
<v Speaker 5>Council explained, yes, we can venerate because it's a type.

452
00:37:01.320 --> 00:37:04.760
<v Speaker 5>We can we can venerate because the glory of the

453
00:37:05.320 --> 00:37:07.159
<v Speaker 5>of the given to the type will go back to

454
00:37:07.239 --> 00:37:12.559
<v Speaker 5>the prototype. We can venerate because icons statues a lot

455
00:37:12.679 --> 00:37:17.039
<v Speaker 5>before not a problem. And we can venerate because we

456
00:37:17.159 --> 00:37:20.519
<v Speaker 5>need to we need to give respect to the objects

457
00:37:20.559 --> 00:37:23.920
<v Speaker 5>of worship, the objects that are used in the liturgy.

458
00:37:25.079 --> 00:37:30.760
<v Speaker 5>Uh So it explains all this and it sets out

459
00:37:31.599 --> 00:37:36.280
<v Speaker 5>real rules. For example, the Seventh Council appeals to a

460
00:37:36.320 --> 00:37:39.719
<v Speaker 5>canon of the Tulo Council. And by the way, it's

461
00:37:39.800 --> 00:37:42.679
<v Speaker 5>very funny because Tulo Council is not rejected by the papacy,

462
00:37:42.760 --> 00:37:45.880
<v Speaker 5>but the Purpose very happy to use this canon and

463
00:37:45.960 --> 00:37:51.320
<v Speaker 5>to declare this exactly. Yeah. But this canon says we

464
00:37:51.440 --> 00:37:54.920
<v Speaker 5>need to to give real images, and that's where you

465
00:37:55.000 --> 00:37:57.199
<v Speaker 5>have the idea of, you know, communication between the type

466
00:37:57.239 --> 00:37:59.920
<v Speaker 5>and the prototype. But we need to represent Christ as

467
00:38:00.039 --> 00:38:03.559
<v Speaker 5>real images. And we know that in the past there

468
00:38:03.599 --> 00:38:08.519
<v Speaker 5>were icons of Christ where it was depicted as a lamb,

469
00:38:09.480 --> 00:38:12.920
<v Speaker 5>and this is not forbidden because Christ too humanity, Christ

470
00:38:13.000 --> 00:38:15.440
<v Speaker 5>to con human flesh. And this is very interesting in

471
00:38:15.719 --> 00:38:18.800
<v Speaker 5>the in the current context because many people will try

472
00:38:18.920 --> 00:38:21.519
<v Speaker 5>to make you know, Choese Jesus or Rasta.

473
00:38:21.320 --> 00:38:25.079
<v Speaker 1>Jesus or rost Jesus. Mind.

474
00:38:25.840 --> 00:38:30.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, like you know, to what to what prototype does this?

475
00:38:30.800 --> 00:38:35.559
<v Speaker 5>You know, rasta Jesus type will give glory to none.

476
00:38:35.679 --> 00:38:39.679
<v Speaker 5>Like there's not Rasta Jesus in heaven. So yeah, like

477
00:38:39.920 --> 00:38:42.119
<v Speaker 5>like we need to you know, and that's why we

478
00:38:42.199 --> 00:38:44.920
<v Speaker 5>have the first iconographic canons that are really being put

479
00:38:44.960 --> 00:38:49.159
<v Speaker 5>into place in the Seventh Council. But the problem is

480
00:38:50.360 --> 00:38:56.599
<v Speaker 5>the Seventh Consul wasn't accepted, wasn't fully accepted in the

481
00:38:57.079 --> 00:38:58.000
<v Speaker 5>in the West.

482
00:38:58.320 --> 00:39:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Right, and we cover them stream where we had Charlotte

483
00:39:01.760 --> 00:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Charlomagne basically rejecting it.

484
00:39:04.559 --> 00:39:09.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so the Frankish Church actually fought against it. We

485
00:39:09.400 --> 00:39:11.519
<v Speaker 5>have people a Theodore for Aliance, which is a Roman

486
00:39:11.599 --> 00:39:16.280
<v Speaker 5>Catholic saint who was econoclastic, but you know, still wanted

487
00:39:17.800 --> 00:39:21.119
<v Speaker 5>some icons in his in his personal chapel.

488
00:39:22.760 --> 00:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

489
00:39:23.440 --> 00:39:28.840
<v Speaker 5>But what's very funny is how did Theodolf mark is

490
00:39:30.840 --> 00:39:34.719
<v Speaker 5>iconoclasm the same way as the Muslim did. He actually

491
00:39:35.199 --> 00:39:40.519
<v Speaker 5>commissioned very ornate bibles with you know, the pages died

492
00:39:40.599 --> 00:39:44.639
<v Speaker 5>in purple, which was the most precious pigment at the

493
00:39:44.679 --> 00:39:49.960
<v Speaker 5>time the most precious colors, colors the kings with very

494
00:39:50.079 --> 00:39:55.039
<v Speaker 5>ornate calligraphy in letters of gold. So you see the

495
00:39:55.119 --> 00:39:59.239
<v Speaker 5>same the same strategems that the Muslims had to resort

496
00:39:59.280 --> 00:40:02.760
<v Speaker 5>to the Franks, and the econoplasm matters all too. We

497
00:40:02.880 --> 00:40:06.320
<v Speaker 5>have the idea also of increased symbolism, you know, just

498
00:40:06.519 --> 00:40:10.360
<v Speaker 5>using the cross. That's why you have specific worship around

499
00:40:10.400 --> 00:40:15.320
<v Speaker 5>the cross that appear, and a full on rejection of

500
00:40:15.480 --> 00:40:19.920
<v Speaker 5>the theology of the Seventh Council, because the idea of

501
00:40:20.000 --> 00:40:22.960
<v Speaker 5>the Seventh Console is, as Symtohn of the Mascus puts it,

502
00:40:23.599 --> 00:40:29.880
<v Speaker 5>we do not worship, we do not venerate wood and paint.

503
00:40:30.599 --> 00:40:34.440
<v Speaker 5>Like if my icon is broken, if I cannot see anything,

504
00:40:34.519 --> 00:40:38.119
<v Speaker 5>if it does not represent the type any longer I

505
00:40:38.199 --> 00:40:42.320
<v Speaker 5>can burn it. It's the idea that it is it

506
00:40:42.480 --> 00:40:45.320
<v Speaker 5>is the image and not the matter, because if the

507
00:40:45.440 --> 00:40:48.400
<v Speaker 5>matter had anything to do in the worship and not

508
00:40:48.519 --> 00:40:50.960
<v Speaker 5>the image, then we would actually focus on matter, and

509
00:40:51.039 --> 00:40:54.440
<v Speaker 5>that would be like pagan paganism. And act think that's

510
00:40:54.599 --> 00:40:57.239
<v Speaker 5>an augment that theodoret uses. It says that, you know,

511
00:40:57.440 --> 00:41:00.199
<v Speaker 5>we ought not to worship these images, but we we

512
00:41:00.360 --> 00:41:03.519
<v Speaker 5>ought to to to venerate these images. But we are

513
00:41:03.599 --> 00:41:07.199
<v Speaker 5>to venerate matters that is venerable. And that's why you

514
00:41:07.320 --> 00:41:10.039
<v Speaker 5>see many, many new relics being made in the West

515
00:41:10.599 --> 00:41:13.840
<v Speaker 5>because they want, you know, they want to to venerate

516
00:41:13.960 --> 00:41:18.719
<v Speaker 5>some things that is material and not not t iconographic.

517
00:41:19.440 --> 00:41:22.639
<v Speaker 5>So we have new relics, you have increased veneration of relics.

518
00:41:23.920 --> 00:41:26.960
<v Speaker 5>This will give rise to some other kind of worship,

519
00:41:27.039 --> 00:41:30.960
<v Speaker 5>for example, eucharistic worship. We do not have this because

520
00:41:31.000 --> 00:41:35.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, we believe that Christ told us to eat,

521
00:41:35.039 --> 00:41:38.159
<v Speaker 5>to splash and drink his blood. But what happened in

522
00:41:38.199 --> 00:41:41.440
<v Speaker 5>the Roman Catholic Church later on is that because of

523
00:41:41.519 --> 00:41:44.679
<v Speaker 5>these ideas, because the Seventh Council wasn't really fully understood, right,

524
00:41:46.440 --> 00:41:50.000
<v Speaker 5>just added to say, oh, you know, since the Eucharist

525
00:41:50.119 --> 00:41:52.280
<v Speaker 5>is full of the body of Christ, then it has

526
00:41:52.280 --> 00:41:55.519
<v Speaker 5>the essence of God and we can worship the essence.

527
00:41:55.719 --> 00:41:58.840
<v Speaker 5>You know again you see the idea of essence coming

528
00:41:58.920 --> 00:42:02.280
<v Speaker 5>before per Ma said before image.

529
00:42:02.440 --> 00:42:04.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Also, if you go back and listen to the

530
00:42:04.280 --> 00:42:07.679
<v Speaker 1>old interview that I did, what did we title it,

531
00:42:07.960 --> 00:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>uh anatomizing Divinity? The old old talk I did with

532
00:42:11.800 --> 00:42:14.320
<v Speaker 1>an interview with James Kelly. He made a good point

533
00:42:14.320 --> 00:42:17.199
<v Speaker 1>at that time that showing that the Carolinian theologians had

534
00:42:17.199 --> 00:42:20.480
<v Speaker 1>actually adopted a lot of neoplatonic ideas, so they just

535
00:42:20.639 --> 00:42:24.639
<v Speaker 1>viewed all images as well, this world is basically just

536
00:42:24.719 --> 00:42:27.519
<v Speaker 1>a path back to the essence of God. Uh So

537
00:42:27.639 --> 00:42:31.559
<v Speaker 1>they kind of had these weird neopolatanic neoplatonic ideas influencing

538
00:42:31.639 --> 00:42:38.920
<v Speaker 1>their version of iconographic representations in the Carolinian theological argumentation.

539
00:42:39.199 --> 00:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a big part of it, and that actually makes

540
00:42:41.000 --> 00:42:44.199
<v Speaker 1>sense why they would change or deviate or not understand

541
00:42:44.880 --> 00:42:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the kind of norms that had that had been, that

542
00:42:48.599 --> 00:42:50.760
<v Speaker 1>had kind of developed to be in place for how

543
00:42:50.840 --> 00:42:54.639
<v Speaker 1>we do iconographic representations in the Church. So you know,

544
00:42:54.679 --> 00:42:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Byzantium had had had developed this very well, not out

545
00:42:58.800 --> 00:43:03.199
<v Speaker 1>of like arbitr speculation, but on the basis of philosophic

546
00:43:04.400 --> 00:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and logical principles. Right, if you read on the Divine

547
00:43:07.840 --> 00:43:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Images by Saint John Damascus, or if you read St.

548
00:43:10.400 --> 00:43:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Theodore Studite's book, I mean, these are the arguments that

549
00:43:13.960 --> 00:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>will make up the argumentation of the Seventh Council. And

550
00:43:18.119 --> 00:43:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a very consistent philosophic and theological presentation. It's not like, oh,

551
00:43:24.960 --> 00:43:27.360
<v Speaker 1>let's just sit around and speculate about, like you know,

552
00:43:27.440 --> 00:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the mysticism of images or something like that. It's all

553
00:43:30.719 --> 00:43:36.840
<v Speaker 1>really again premised on correct Christology. All of the theology,

554
00:43:36.960 --> 00:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the sacraments, or whether it's ecclesiology, or whether

555
00:43:39.960 --> 00:43:44.559
<v Speaker 1>it's iconography or whether it's anthropology, it all flows from

556
00:43:44.880 --> 00:43:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the triad and Christology. These are two ironclad starting points

557
00:43:48.960 --> 00:43:52.920
<v Speaker 1>for orthodoxy that are different, that make it unique. That's

558
00:43:52.960 --> 00:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>why the councils hammered out triadology and Christology first, and

559
00:43:58.559 --> 00:44:01.119
<v Speaker 1>then by extension the other doctrines that kind of flow

560
00:44:01.159 --> 00:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>from that. But to Snack's point, it's not by accident

561
00:44:04.559 --> 00:44:06.679
<v Speaker 1>that at the beginning of this Carolinium period that's when

562
00:44:06.679 --> 00:44:10.639
<v Speaker 1>you start to see the deviations not just in pictographic

563
00:44:10.800 --> 00:44:16.360
<v Speaker 1>or images, but also the imagery and statuary. These statuary

564
00:44:16.440 --> 00:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>starts to come in. You also see changes in the liturgy.

565
00:44:21.119 --> 00:44:24.960
<v Speaker 1>This is when infants no longer begin to partake of

566
00:44:25.000 --> 00:44:28.159
<v Speaker 1>pedal communion. You start to have the banning of infants

567
00:44:28.199 --> 00:44:31.280
<v Speaker 1>from the table. You start to have these other weird

568
00:44:31.400 --> 00:44:35.440
<v Speaker 1>practices enter in liturgically that the later Byzantine lists would

569
00:44:35.519 --> 00:44:38.599
<v Speaker 1>reject in the West. But just to sum up real quick,

570
00:44:38.800 --> 00:44:42.079
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple points I didn't mention. If you're looking

571
00:44:42.119 --> 00:44:46.760
<v Speaker 1>for biblical presentation, remember one King six. This tells us

572
00:44:46.800 --> 00:44:50.679
<v Speaker 1>about all of the variations of imagery in the Temple.

573
00:44:51.599 --> 00:44:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Number twenty one. This is the serpent lifted up on

574
00:44:54.320 --> 00:44:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a pole. If it was always wrong to have imagery,

575
00:44:57.480 --> 00:44:59.519
<v Speaker 1>why did God direct the Israelites to look at the

576
00:44:59.599 --> 00:45:02.119
<v Speaker 1>serpent on a poll which Jesus says in John three

577
00:45:02.719 --> 00:45:05.920
<v Speaker 1>was the type of the cross. Paul says in Colossians

578
00:45:05.920 --> 00:45:08.880
<v Speaker 1>two thirteen to fifteen that the cross itself has power

579
00:45:09.000 --> 00:45:13.719
<v Speaker 1>to despoil the principalities, demons and powers that had control

580
00:45:13.800 --> 00:45:18.119
<v Speaker 1>of us through the vices and the passions Colossians one fifteen.

581
00:45:18.440 --> 00:45:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Jesus is the icon ko n and the Greek of God,

582
00:45:23.199 --> 00:45:27.079
<v Speaker 1>the direct representation. Remember, Jesus says, no man has seen

583
00:45:27.159 --> 00:45:30.519
<v Speaker 1>God at any time, but everybody who in the Old

584
00:45:30.519 --> 00:45:34.039
<v Speaker 1>Testament saw the Word right, the word of the Lord

585
00:45:34.199 --> 00:45:37.679
<v Speaker 1>came to Isaiah. I saw the Lord. Who's he seeing?

586
00:45:37.840 --> 00:45:41.800
<v Speaker 1>He's seeing Christ. Paul Tewond Corinthians three argues that Moses

587
00:45:41.920 --> 00:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>saw Christ face to face. So if you can't see

588
00:45:45.519 --> 00:45:48.079
<v Speaker 1>the Father, but you saw God, who did you see?

589
00:45:48.719 --> 00:45:52.199
<v Speaker 1>You saw the Angel of the Covenant, the Angel of

590
00:45:52.320 --> 00:45:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the Lord, the Messenger of the Covenant, the Face of God,

591
00:45:56.320 --> 00:46:00.400
<v Speaker 1>who is Christ himself. According to Paul John five, this

592
00:46:00.559 --> 00:46:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is an overlooked one. And I'm pointing this out because

593
00:46:02.920 --> 00:46:08.519
<v Speaker 1>the same a principle applies to locations and buildings. Right, prozz,

594
00:46:08.760 --> 00:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking about a temple?

595
00:46:10.480 --> 00:46:10.599
<v Speaker 4>Right?

596
00:46:10.679 --> 00:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>We just have a strip mall.

597
00:46:11.960 --> 00:46:12.159
<v Speaker 3>Dude.

598
00:46:12.840 --> 00:46:15.400
<v Speaker 1>My pastor threw up a strip mall in five days

599
00:46:15.440 --> 00:46:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and big metal building. That's the church. No, dude, that's

600
00:46:18.559 --> 00:46:21.639
<v Speaker 1>not the church. Strip malls are not churches. Churches still

601
00:46:21.719 --> 00:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>exist as holy places, and the New Testament still acknowledges

602
00:46:26.440 --> 00:46:31.599
<v Speaker 1>locations sites places as holy John five, the Pool of

603
00:46:31.719 --> 00:46:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Siloam a site where an angel comes down and stirs

604
00:46:34.960 --> 00:46:39.079
<v Speaker 1>the pool and people are healed there. That's a holy place.

605
00:46:40.400 --> 00:46:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Tewod Peter One's sixteen to eighteen Peter calls the Mountain

606
00:46:44.159 --> 00:46:49.079
<v Speaker 1>of Transfiguration the holy mountain where he saw Christ transfigured

607
00:46:49.119 --> 00:46:52.800
<v Speaker 1>with Moses and Elijah. So places in the New Testament,

608
00:46:53.400 --> 00:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>buildings matter can still be holy, holy water. All these

609
00:46:58.239 --> 00:47:01.199
<v Speaker 1>things still exist just because that was something that you

610
00:47:01.320 --> 00:47:02.840
<v Speaker 1>thought was in the Old test Oh, we're in the

611
00:47:02.920 --> 00:47:07.119
<v Speaker 1>spiritual New Testament. Now it's not physical, not true, that's gnostic.

612
00:47:07.639 --> 00:47:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And then lastly again Apocalypse four and five, when John

613
00:47:10.360 --> 00:47:13.960
<v Speaker 1>sees into heaven, he sees all this liturgical worship, all

614
00:47:14.000 --> 00:47:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of the sights, smells, and bells that we think are

615
00:47:17.119 --> 00:47:19.559
<v Speaker 1>in the liturgy on earth. It's the same liturgy. It's

616
00:47:19.559 --> 00:47:23.119
<v Speaker 1>not two different things. Right, Jesus brought heaven to earth

617
00:47:23.440 --> 00:47:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in the first Advent.

618
00:47:27.480 --> 00:47:31.079
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly, you know. And it's not because it's a

619
00:47:31.159 --> 00:47:34.280
<v Speaker 5>body of chrisis in temple that we cannot all bes

620
00:47:34.280 --> 00:47:35.039
<v Speaker 5>a temple as well.

621
00:47:36.079 --> 00:47:38.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a good point either, and that doesn't mean.

622
00:47:38.880 --> 00:47:42.280
<v Speaker 5>That we cannot have temples. You know, churches are still

623
00:47:43.000 --> 00:47:45.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, it's still the same layout as a temple.

624
00:47:48.519 --> 00:47:51.360
<v Speaker 5>It's a bit ludic chrius to create dialectic.

625
00:47:52.159 --> 00:47:56.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is a dialectic. Yeah, that's a good point. Yeah,

626
00:47:56.599 --> 00:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to cut you off. You're you're making

627
00:47:58.039 --> 00:48:02.840
<v Speaker 1>great points. And just real quick couple. Now. The Protestants

628
00:48:02.840 --> 00:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>will love to say, oh, Butanius ep fantas. First of all,

629
00:48:06.159 --> 00:48:10.119
<v Speaker 1>there's an argument to be made that the writings attributed

630
00:48:10.159 --> 00:48:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to Epiphanius are forgeries. But even if they're not, so

631
00:48:13.559 --> 00:48:16.119
<v Speaker 1>what this is the game that Protestants play where they

632
00:48:16.239 --> 00:48:19.159
<v Speaker 1>just pick out a single church father. Oh look, Jerome

633
00:48:19.280 --> 00:48:22.599
<v Speaker 1>says that, he lists the canon that we have, and

634
00:48:22.679 --> 00:48:26.280
<v Speaker 1>then Jerome turns around and talks about tradition, talks about bishops,

635
00:48:26.320 --> 00:48:28.960
<v Speaker 1>talks about the Eucharist. Oh, none of that, right, So

636
00:48:29.039 --> 00:48:31.079
<v Speaker 1>they just play this kind of pick and choose game

637
00:48:31.119 --> 00:48:35.079
<v Speaker 1>out of the church fathers. Right, But nobody actually follows

638
00:48:35.159 --> 00:48:39.079
<v Speaker 1>any single church father, whether you're Protestant, Roman, Catholic, or Orthodox.

639
00:48:39.559 --> 00:48:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Nobody has the position that you just randomly pick one

640
00:48:42.159 --> 00:48:45.559
<v Speaker 1>to follow. Well, unless you just randomly decide that Augustine

641
00:48:45.639 --> 00:48:47.039
<v Speaker 1>is the one that you're supposed to follow. I don't know.

642
00:48:47.119 --> 00:48:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Some people do do that, but no, they're just following

643
00:48:50.599 --> 00:48:54.559
<v Speaker 1>that idea of just picking an individual. When, for example,

644
00:48:54.639 --> 00:48:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Jerome says it against raparium. He says, we do not

645
00:48:57.000 --> 00:49:04.159
<v Speaker 1>worship matter, we do not adore, He says the non autoramus,

646
00:49:04.199 --> 00:49:05.840
<v Speaker 1>for fear that we should bow down to a creature

647
00:49:06.639 --> 00:49:09.400
<v Speaker 1>rather than the creator. But rather we do venerate hon Oramos.

648
00:49:09.480 --> 00:49:11.960
<v Speaker 1>In the Latin, the relics of the of the Martyrs

649
00:49:12.079 --> 00:49:15.559
<v Speaker 1>in order to adore him, whose martyrs they are Saint

650
00:49:15.639 --> 00:49:18.559
<v Speaker 1>Cyril of Alexandria. Says, we do not consider the martyrs

651
00:49:18.639 --> 00:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to be gods, nor do we bow down to them

652
00:49:21.079 --> 00:49:23.679
<v Speaker 1>adoringly as if they were gods, but only relatively and

653
00:49:23.840 --> 00:49:28.159
<v Speaker 1>in reverence. Out of Latria. He says, that's against Julian

654
00:49:28.239 --> 00:49:32.239
<v Speaker 1>by Saint Alexander, Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Likewise, Augustine says

655
00:49:32.320 --> 00:49:35.639
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. We celebrate the memory of the martyrs

656
00:49:36.079 --> 00:49:39.119
<v Speaker 1>with ritual salinity because we want to be inspired by

657
00:49:39.159 --> 00:49:41.719
<v Speaker 1>their example, We want to share in their merits and

658
00:49:41.760 --> 00:49:44.599
<v Speaker 1>be helped by their prayers. We erect no altars to

659
00:49:44.920 --> 00:49:47.960
<v Speaker 1>any of the martyrs themselves, nor even in the martyrs

660
00:49:48.039 --> 00:49:50.559
<v Speaker 1>burial chapels are they are we honoring the martyrs but

661
00:49:50.679 --> 00:49:54.000
<v Speaker 1>rather in themselves, but rather Christ. And then he goes

662
00:49:54.079 --> 00:49:57.760
<v Speaker 1>on to say multiple times the same thing. He says

663
00:49:57.800 --> 00:49:59.679
<v Speaker 1>that in City of God and in many of his works.

664
00:50:00.320 --> 00:50:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So excuse me, that's against fossis the Manichian where Augustine

665
00:50:05.320 --> 00:50:10.559
<v Speaker 1>says that, So you know, Augustine has that distinction, Saint

666
00:50:10.639 --> 00:50:13.519
<v Speaker 1>Jerome has that distinction, Saint Cerl Alexandria has that distinction.

667
00:50:14.079 --> 00:50:16.039
<v Speaker 1>And they didn't just make that up. It's based on

668
00:50:16.280 --> 00:50:18.559
<v Speaker 1>the arguments that I was just pointing out in scripture

669
00:50:18.639 --> 00:50:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that it's okay to venerate a ruler, to bow before

670
00:50:22.440 --> 00:50:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a ruler, It's okay to venerate the arc the temple,

671
00:50:26.239 --> 00:50:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to bow prostrate. All these things occur without it being idolatry.

672
00:50:30.920 --> 00:50:36.360
<v Speaker 5>Go ahead, Yeah, And so I wanted to stress out

673
00:50:36.400 --> 00:50:39.719
<v Speaker 5>the difference, you know, with the with the West. For example,

674
00:50:40.039 --> 00:50:43.079
<v Speaker 5>you mentioned statuary. Statuary are perfectly find in the Ostock scense,

675
00:50:43.119 --> 00:50:47.960
<v Speaker 5>but statuary taking precedence of icons. Again, that's the idea

676
00:50:48.039 --> 00:50:52.320
<v Speaker 5>of you know, the physical matter being more important than

677
00:50:52.400 --> 00:50:55.519
<v Speaker 5>the image as is. And that's again you know, this

678
00:50:56.199 --> 00:51:01.519
<v Speaker 5>pagan understanding that we are wed to worship something that

679
00:51:01.679 --> 00:51:04.679
<v Speaker 5>is ultimately material, and that's where we are to look,

680
00:51:06.639 --> 00:51:10.400
<v Speaker 5>not like, you know, to look directly at the essence again,

681
00:51:10.480 --> 00:51:11.400
<v Speaker 5>you see essentialism.

682
00:51:11.920 --> 00:51:12.800
<v Speaker 1>We do not have this.

683
00:51:13.000 --> 00:51:17.280
<v Speaker 5>We have the essence energy distinction. We believe that icons

684
00:51:17.320 --> 00:51:22.000
<v Speaker 5>to an extent representation of the type of heaven and

685
00:51:22.360 --> 00:51:23.800
<v Speaker 5>as such venerable.

686
00:51:24.719 --> 00:51:28.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean the argumentation for example, in St. Theodore

687
00:51:28.079 --> 00:51:30.599
<v Speaker 1>or the STUDEI, if you read his on the Holy Images,

688
00:51:31.800 --> 00:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Holy icons, he premises the argument on the

689
00:51:35.000 --> 00:51:37.960
<v Speaker 1>nature person distinction and the essence energy distinction. Right, we're

690
00:51:38.000 --> 00:51:41.400
<v Speaker 1>not signifying the essence of God by the icon, we're

691
00:51:41.400 --> 00:51:44.440
<v Speaker 1>signifying the hoopostasis that's revealed energetically.

692
00:51:45.320 --> 00:51:48.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and that's where I'm going to comment on the icons.

693
00:51:49.639 --> 00:51:52.639
<v Speaker 5>Everybody knows the hailo and the icon, and that's what

694
00:51:52.800 --> 00:51:56.079
<v Speaker 5>it represents. So the background of the icon is usually golden,

695
00:51:56.440 --> 00:52:01.119
<v Speaker 5>and you've got this golden halo around the head, and

696
00:52:01.679 --> 00:52:05.360
<v Speaker 5>that represents the energies. That represents the light of Tabor,

697
00:52:05.559 --> 00:52:08.079
<v Speaker 5>the divine light. The fact that this person is in

698
00:52:08.159 --> 00:52:13.119
<v Speaker 5>a transfigured state in heaven. That's what it represents. That's

699
00:52:13.159 --> 00:52:16.840
<v Speaker 5>why we have this so even well to we represented icons,

700
00:52:16.880 --> 00:52:19.440
<v Speaker 5>and this is before the schism, before because you can

701
00:52:19.480 --> 00:52:24.599
<v Speaker 5>see hellos and every sort of icons from every denomination.

702
00:52:25.840 --> 00:52:30.199
<v Speaker 5>This Hello is here specifically to signify a transfigured state.

703
00:52:30.480 --> 00:52:34.480
<v Speaker 5>It's specifically to signify theosis, and it is the energies.

704
00:52:35.400 --> 00:52:38.360
<v Speaker 5>It is the divine energies. That's somethings that's very interesting

705
00:52:38.400 --> 00:52:43.559
<v Speaker 5>because if you skip forward to so West, you can

706
00:52:43.599 --> 00:52:48.440
<v Speaker 5>see that this Hello is being modified after the Renaissance.

707
00:52:48.800 --> 00:52:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, naturally it would be modified if you believe

708
00:52:51.920 --> 00:52:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in absolute divine simplicity and you don't recognize the reality

709
00:52:55.400 --> 00:52:57.599
<v Speaker 1>of the distinction between nature and person. You're no longer

710
00:52:57.719 --> 00:53:01.920
<v Speaker 1>imaging the hopostosis or the particuticular person of the Sun.

711
00:53:02.400 --> 00:53:05.920
<v Speaker 1>You begin to see all of reality is just images

712
00:53:06.360 --> 00:53:09.599
<v Speaker 1>of the prototypes in the essence of God. Right, I mean,

713
00:53:10.119 --> 00:53:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the Western view of divine exemplarism then conditions their view

714
00:53:14.280 --> 00:53:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of iconography. Because Augustine taught the Western view of exemplarism.

715
00:53:17.880 --> 00:53:20.119
<v Speaker 1>He didn't recognize the essence Inergi distinction, so he said

716
00:53:20.159 --> 00:53:24.159
<v Speaker 1>that reality itself, all of reality is patterned on the

717
00:53:24.239 --> 00:53:26.920
<v Speaker 1>divine ideas, the exemplars in the essence of God. So

718
00:53:27.159 --> 00:53:30.199
<v Speaker 1>ultimately everything is just an icon of the essence of God.

719
00:53:30.719 --> 00:53:34.239
<v Speaker 1>And then the particularity of the hypostosis of the sun

720
00:53:34.440 --> 00:53:37.920
<v Speaker 1>loses its significance. It's not picking out icons. Are no

721
00:53:38.079 --> 00:53:42.840
<v Speaker 1>longer holy images that pick out the person of the logos, right,

722
00:53:42.920 --> 00:53:45.599
<v Speaker 1>it becomes something else exactly.

723
00:53:45.920 --> 00:53:50.719
<v Speaker 5>So you start to see more profane images exactly.

724
00:53:50.840 --> 00:53:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Then you get to Renaissance gibberish pornography basically.

725
00:53:55.159 --> 00:53:57.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and you see many saints. So I'm going to

726
00:53:57.760 --> 00:54:01.800
<v Speaker 5>talk specifically as a heno because it's very interesting. You

727
00:54:01.840 --> 00:54:04.719
<v Speaker 5>can see that it sometimes disappears, which is very very

728
00:54:05.079 --> 00:54:08.159
<v Speaker 5>you know, it is terrible for us, because especially for Christ,

729
00:54:08.280 --> 00:54:11.840
<v Speaker 5>Christ needs to have is halo to signified divinity, and

730
00:54:12.239 --> 00:54:13.800
<v Speaker 5>the cruciform halo gives it on.

731
00:54:14.719 --> 00:54:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I was gonna say, the whole on is important

732
00:54:16.920 --> 00:54:19.239
<v Speaker 1>because that identifies him as the I Am. It also

733
00:54:19.320 --> 00:54:23.519
<v Speaker 1>identifies him as the Angel of the Lord. So actually

734
00:54:23.639 --> 00:54:28.079
<v Speaker 1>every Byzantine icon that has that identifies him as the

735
00:54:28.280 --> 00:54:32.960
<v Speaker 1>one right of Exodus three fourteen. And if you read Isaiah,

736
00:54:33.239 --> 00:54:36.679
<v Speaker 1>then Isaiah explicitly, as Sam Chumon pointed out the other day,

737
00:54:37.000 --> 00:54:42.480
<v Speaker 1>explicitly identifies Jesus as the Angel of the good Counsel,

738
00:54:42.880 --> 00:54:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the Angel of the Lord, the Angel of wonderful counsel.

739
00:54:46.000 --> 00:54:48.119
<v Speaker 1>How do I know that that's Jesus, because it's the

740
00:54:48.199 --> 00:54:51.159
<v Speaker 1>same subject in Isaiah nine, that is, the son that

741
00:54:51.320 --> 00:54:54.719
<v Speaker 1>is born unto us. His name will be called wonderful

742
00:54:54.760 --> 00:54:58.519
<v Speaker 1>Angel of counsel, angel of great Council, or wonderful counsel.

743
00:54:58.760 --> 00:55:01.519
<v Speaker 1>That's the same person as the sign. And Isaiah nine

744
00:55:01.559 --> 00:55:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to five. That proves that the Angel of the Lord

745
00:55:04.760 --> 00:55:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is the sign Jesus Isaiah nine six.

746
00:55:11.639 --> 00:55:15.159
<v Speaker 5>Exactly. And this Hello, which represents the divine energies, and

747
00:55:15.239 --> 00:55:18.199
<v Speaker 5>not only for Christ, but also the saints, which represents

748
00:55:18.280 --> 00:55:20.880
<v Speaker 5>a the fat state. You can see it being further alta.

749
00:55:21.039 --> 00:55:26.760
<v Speaker 5>So not only it's it's something in Western iconography post Renaissance,

750
00:55:27.199 --> 00:55:31.719
<v Speaker 5>but it also loses his sense, its sense. So as

751
00:55:31.800 --> 00:55:36.199
<v Speaker 5>they moved to representation in three dimension, you can see

752
00:55:36.199 --> 00:55:38.920
<v Speaker 5>it being a plate and then just being a circle,

753
00:55:39.280 --> 00:55:42.760
<v Speaker 5>and you know, being being matter being limited. Whereas you

754
00:55:42.840 --> 00:55:45.719
<v Speaker 5>can see that or understanding of iconography, especially the more

755
00:55:47.159 --> 00:55:50.679
<v Speaker 5>realistic types of air comes we can have always depicted

756
00:55:50.760 --> 00:55:53.199
<v Speaker 5>as as ray, you know, like like it's either just

757
00:55:53.280 --> 00:55:56.400
<v Speaker 5>a circle and the more simplistic type or race. But

758
00:55:56.960 --> 00:55:58.679
<v Speaker 5>by doing this you can see also an understanding of

759
00:55:58.960 --> 00:56:04.000
<v Speaker 5>creative grace because this this halo, it signifies grace. You know,

760
00:56:04.480 --> 00:56:12.480
<v Speaker 5>no longer is this light radiant light, it's just circles, plates.

761
00:56:13.440 --> 00:56:16.239
<v Speaker 5>It starts to be very limited, and you can see, yeah,

762
00:56:16.320 --> 00:56:17.360
<v Speaker 5>you can train exactly.

763
00:56:17.400 --> 00:56:19.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a great point snag. You can trace the loss

764
00:56:20.039 --> 00:56:24.679
<v Speaker 1>of theological teaching in the icons themselves, right. Yeah, So

765
00:56:24.800 --> 00:56:27.639
<v Speaker 1>that that goal that's painted there, the halo that is

766
00:56:27.679 --> 00:56:32.320
<v Speaker 1>supposed to signify transfiguration, the divine, the uncreated, divine light

767
00:56:32.880 --> 00:56:35.719
<v Speaker 1>in our realm. And you notice there above christ head,

768
00:56:35.800 --> 00:56:41.320
<v Speaker 1>what does it say, hold on? Right, see that. Yeah,

769
00:56:41.599 --> 00:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>oh ho omega new hold on right, the one I

770
00:56:48.159 --> 00:56:51.039
<v Speaker 1>am he that's what it means, That's what it's referring to.

771
00:56:51.840 --> 00:56:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So the loss of iconographic truths is connected to the

772
00:56:55.880 --> 00:56:57.400
<v Speaker 1>loss of theological truths.

773
00:56:59.519 --> 00:57:02.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. So you can see it everywhere, by the way,

774
00:57:04.320 --> 00:57:09.159
<v Speaker 5>For example, is the Oriental Orthodox, you know the Monophysites

775
00:57:09.239 --> 00:57:13.440
<v Speaker 5>monophsycte metaphysite. What was one of the first actions of

776
00:57:13.599 --> 00:57:20.440
<v Speaker 5>servers of Antioch when when seizing his cathedral and removing icons?

777
00:57:23.480 --> 00:57:27.440
<v Speaker 5>Used to be like that bismal found Yeah, I checked

778
00:57:27.559 --> 00:57:29.480
<v Speaker 5>the sources that quote scholar.

779
00:57:33.039 --> 00:57:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Eire you checked it out.

780
00:57:35.360 --> 00:57:43.960
<v Speaker 5>What check checked? There are several sources that are matching. Uh.

781
00:57:45.239 --> 00:57:47.280
<v Speaker 5>So they used to be.

782
00:57:48.840 --> 00:57:59.400
<v Speaker 1>It is hello, hello, snack, Hello, you're cutting out? Can

783
00:57:59.440 --> 00:57:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you start over?

784
00:58:00.039 --> 00:58:00.119
<v Speaker 5>There?

785
00:58:00.199 --> 00:58:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Used to be what.

786
00:58:03.519 --> 00:58:06.880
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Yeah, there used to be a bird to signify

787
00:58:07.039 --> 00:58:11.840
<v Speaker 5>the Holy Spirit, to signify the theophony of Christ. And

788
00:58:11.960 --> 00:58:14.119
<v Speaker 5>the first thing that he did was remove it, remove

789
00:58:14.159 --> 00:58:14.840
<v Speaker 5>it melted down.

790
00:58:15.239 --> 00:58:18.039
<v Speaker 1>Just like now. We got some people in the chats

791
00:58:18.480 --> 00:58:21.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to say Severs was not an iconoclast. So do

792
00:58:21.440 --> 00:58:23.119
<v Speaker 1>you have a I'm not saying you're wrong, but do

793
00:58:23.159 --> 00:58:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you have a source on that?

794
00:58:25.800 --> 00:58:28.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? I'm gonna I'm gonna find it. I've got all

795
00:58:28.400 --> 00:58:32.239
<v Speaker 5>sourced on my server. Okay.

796
00:58:32.360 --> 00:58:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Second, by the way, so snackt server is listed there.

797
00:58:35.679 --> 00:58:37.880
<v Speaker 1>His discord is in is in the show description. If

798
00:58:37.920 --> 00:58:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to go in there and or you can

799
00:58:39.880 --> 00:58:42.119
<v Speaker 1>come to my server and we can we can hash

800
00:58:42.159 --> 00:58:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it out there if you want to do that. But

801
00:58:46.039 --> 00:58:46.519
<v Speaker 1>I'll go ahead.

802
00:58:46.519 --> 00:58:49.480
<v Speaker 5>I don't mean to control all right, Yeah, I'm gonna

803
00:58:49.480 --> 00:58:53.199
<v Speaker 5>send the source, have it right now. But by the way,

804
00:58:53.280 --> 00:58:57.639
<v Speaker 5>that this is actually a recurrent problem in is your I.

805
00:58:57.639 --> 00:59:01.519
<v Speaker 1>Mean, they have problems with maintaining their iconographic tradition even now.

806
00:59:02.480 --> 00:59:07.599
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, okay, so I'm gonna go on this one. Actually,

807
00:59:07.679 --> 00:59:12.519
<v Speaker 5>they had an iconoclastic patriarch in the nineteenth century serial

808
00:59:12.639 --> 00:59:16.880
<v Speaker 5>the sixth or the fourth I think the sixth, yeah,

809
00:59:16.960 --> 00:59:20.679
<v Speaker 5>serial the fourth series. The fourth actually burned down icons

810
00:59:22.199 --> 00:59:25.239
<v Speaker 5>So that was in the nineteenth century. That's that's very new.

811
00:59:25.360 --> 00:59:29.880
<v Speaker 5>So they lost a lot of the partrimony to to Islam.

812
00:59:31.039 --> 00:59:33.519
<v Speaker 5>And yeah, this was like the last name on the coffin.

813
00:59:34.039 --> 00:59:37.800
<v Speaker 5>And today you can see that the tradition of iconography

814
00:59:37.840 --> 00:59:44.559
<v Speaker 5>in the in the Coptic Church sadly was recreated from nothing.

815
00:59:45.679 --> 00:59:49.119
<v Speaker 5>So after after they destroyed the patrimony. It was the

816
00:59:49.199 --> 00:59:52.760
<v Speaker 5>first time of you know, inter Christian meetings, and they

817
00:59:52.840 --> 00:59:55.440
<v Speaker 5>got help from the from the Catholics in re establishing

818
00:59:56.000 --> 01:00:01.079
<v Speaker 5>iconographic tradition and basically the flicks and some prost and

819
01:00:02.480 --> 01:00:04.719
<v Speaker 5>you know, they believe the Cops to be you know,

820
01:00:04.840 --> 01:00:10.519
<v Speaker 5>Eastern simplistic, and that's why they made icons that were

821
01:00:10.599 --> 01:00:16.840
<v Speaker 5>based of you know, more shide like. Ye, it looks

822
01:00:16.880 --> 01:00:21.599
<v Speaker 5>like far to an extent. So yeah, that's why it

823
01:00:21.760 --> 01:00:24.559
<v Speaker 5>is as it is right now. But there has been

824
01:00:24.880 --> 01:00:27.920
<v Speaker 5>a constant problem because of Christological problems as well.

825
01:00:28.679 --> 01:00:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, ultimately the root is Christological quite quite clearly.

826
01:00:32.199 --> 01:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting that you see both in the in

827
01:00:34.079 --> 01:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>the the so called Oriental Orthodox Churches and in the

828
01:00:38.239 --> 01:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholic Churches, both of these groups kind of going

829
01:00:41.840 --> 01:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>off and doing all kinds of weird things, right, and

830
01:00:44.679 --> 01:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>because there's not a consistent canonical holding to what the

831
01:00:48.599 --> 01:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>Seventh Ecumenical Council laid down. And if you don't know,

832
01:00:51.719 --> 01:00:54.559
<v Speaker 1>the Seventh that Coumenical Council did not just say we

833
01:00:54.679 --> 01:00:57.039
<v Speaker 1>have icons. Okay, Roman Catholics. I don't know if you

834
01:00:57.199 --> 01:01:01.039
<v Speaker 1>know this, but that the Council actually produced an entire

835
01:01:01.679 --> 01:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>series of anathemas called the Sonoticon of Orthodoxy. If you're

836
01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in a Russian Orthodox Church or more traditional Orthodox church,

837
01:01:08.840 --> 01:01:11.559
<v Speaker 1>they will actually read all of the anathemas and maybe

838
01:01:11.639 --> 01:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>even some spicy little new ones like the Metropolitan surfem

839
01:01:15.000 --> 01:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and Pereis does. So I'll put in the link in

840
01:01:18.760 --> 01:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the chat there the link to the full Sonoticon of Orthodoxy,

841
01:01:22.800 --> 01:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>which is part of the liturgy. It's actually read out

842
01:01:25.480 --> 01:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in the liturgy most of the time. If you're at

843
01:01:29.880 --> 01:01:33.519
<v Speaker 1>a liturgy where the bishop is present, they'll do kind

844
01:01:33.559 --> 01:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of the full thing. You can go to Ortho Christian

845
01:01:36.039 --> 01:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>or you can look on YouTube and you can hear

846
01:01:38.039 --> 01:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the full anathemas being read out. And this is interesting

847
01:01:41.960 --> 01:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>because the anathemas anathematize Hellenism, Platonism, Arisitilianism, Originism. All of

848
01:01:51.360 --> 01:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>these heresies are read in the anathemas. And yet what

849
01:01:54.599 --> 01:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>do we have clowns today who want to resurrect all

850
01:01:59.360 --> 01:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of these heresies. Now, a lot of the trads and

851
01:02:03.400 --> 01:02:06.079
<v Speaker 1>people like this have tried to call out us as

852
01:02:06.440 --> 01:02:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Hellenists and Neoplatonists actually weakened them. Neoplatonism in the sonata

853
01:02:12.719 --> 01:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>con and it's you guys that have adopted the neoplatonic

854
01:02:16.119 --> 01:02:22.239
<v Speaker 1>doctrine of statue aaryan images. Yeah.

855
01:02:22.639 --> 01:02:25.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so again, you know, we only tuit that maintained

856
01:02:25.599 --> 01:02:29.880
<v Speaker 5>something consistent. There were problems in the Roman Catholic world.

857
01:02:29.920 --> 01:02:33.440
<v Speaker 5>You can see that it's constantly degrading. You know, it

858
01:02:33.920 --> 01:02:37.800
<v Speaker 5>moved to more purely symbolical. You know, he started the

859
01:02:38.760 --> 01:02:41.320
<v Speaker 5>lemb of God. He remembers this canon I mentioned. I

860
01:02:41.400 --> 01:02:43.440
<v Speaker 5>guess what, you know, it's the canons that allows us

861
01:02:43.480 --> 01:02:47.960
<v Speaker 5>to have icons, and Rome doesn't follow it. So, you know,

862
01:02:48.280 --> 01:02:53.719
<v Speaker 5>Zabell allow more and more the artists to come in.

863
01:02:54.000 --> 01:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Chinese Jesus, black Jesus, which is not as gnostic.

864
01:02:58.599 --> 01:03:00.719
<v Speaker 1>You have to depict, do you ish Jesus?

865
01:03:02.920 --> 01:03:06.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, like you know, and if you want Christ to

866
01:03:06.519 --> 01:03:11.159
<v Speaker 5>be your race to feel concerned by salvation, you know,

867
01:03:11.960 --> 01:03:15.280
<v Speaker 5>then you're a really racist. You know, you believe you're

868
01:03:15.280 --> 01:03:17.480
<v Speaker 5>not consubstantial with a black person.

869
01:03:17.880 --> 01:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly right. Human nature is universal, and Christ assumed

870
01:03:22.800 --> 01:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>universal human nature and his singular hypostasis as the teaching

871
01:03:25.880 --> 01:03:28.159
<v Speaker 1>of the fathers. Yeah, and again.

872
01:03:29.480 --> 01:03:33.079
<v Speaker 5>It removes the idea of Mesianity. The Messiah is specifically

873
01:03:33.519 --> 01:03:34.320
<v Speaker 5>a son of David.

874
01:03:34.599 --> 01:03:37.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he has to fulfill the prophecies of the Old Testament,

875
01:03:37.719 --> 01:03:41.079
<v Speaker 1>namely that the root of David, right, this is Isaiah eleven.

876
01:03:41.119 --> 01:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I just read it last night. Now noticed also that

877
01:03:44.199 --> 01:03:47.599
<v Speaker 1>this is I believe. This is why this is not

878
01:03:47.679 --> 01:03:50.679
<v Speaker 1>a kind of Orthodox. He mentions the Platonic ideas. He

879
01:03:50.840 --> 01:03:55.119
<v Speaker 1>says to them who refashioned creation by means of mythical

880
01:03:55.159 --> 01:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>fabrications and accept the Platonic ideas as veritable, saying that

881
01:03:59.599 --> 01:04:03.119
<v Speaker 1>matter being subsistent is given form by the Platonic ideas,

882
01:04:03.480 --> 01:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>who thereby calumniate the free will of God, the Creator,

883
01:04:06.840 --> 01:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>who brought all things into being out of non beings.

884
01:04:09.320 --> 01:04:13.079
<v Speaker 1>So there's creation x nilo, and who, as Maker established

885
01:04:13.159 --> 01:04:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of all things by the authority of his sovereignty. Anathema, anathema, anathema,

886
01:04:17.320 --> 01:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>so there's the triple anathema is pronounced by those who

887
01:04:21.039 --> 01:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>teach the Neoplatonic doctrine of creation as an emanation of

888
01:04:25.400 --> 01:04:29.239
<v Speaker 1>divine ideas, to those who then also babble about the

889
01:04:29.440 --> 01:04:34.239
<v Speaker 1>general resurrection, this is gnostic stuff here. And then to

890
01:04:34.360 --> 01:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>those who have the Greek teaching of the pre existence

891
01:04:36.639 --> 01:04:43.199
<v Speaker 1>of souls and the restoration of all beings, Originism anathema, anathema,

892
01:04:43.239 --> 01:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>anathema right to those who have the pagan heterodox teaching

893
01:04:47.480 --> 01:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>of Again, it's just talking about the Greeks, Greek Hellenism.

894
01:04:51.480 --> 01:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>It's condemned multiple times over in the Sonoticon. So anybody

895
01:04:54.800 --> 01:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>who goes to an Orthodox Sunday of Orthodoxy liturgy, I forgot.

896
01:05:01.920 --> 01:05:06.079
<v Speaker 1>The Aristotle is mentioned too, by the way, the ideas

897
01:05:06.559 --> 01:05:10.559
<v Speaker 1>of Plato, the heresies of Aristotle, they're all mentioned as anathema.

898
01:05:10.800 --> 01:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So this nonsense that Orthodoxy is neoplatonic is actually ironically

899
01:05:16.559 --> 01:05:20.599
<v Speaker 1>refuted in the very Council that Protestants and Trads think

900
01:05:20.920 --> 01:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>is sometimes neoplatonic. That's the irony here.

901
01:05:24.719 --> 01:05:27.039
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and of course you know it's the center of

902
01:05:27.119 --> 01:05:29.559
<v Speaker 5>Orthodox history at the same time where we parade the icons,

903
01:05:29.599 --> 01:05:33.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, we so everything is linked. That's what It's

904
01:05:34.039 --> 01:05:36.840
<v Speaker 5>very powerful, and that's why we should really keep to

905
01:05:36.880 --> 01:05:45.639
<v Speaker 5>our iconographic tradition because it testifies for theology, for history everything. Actually,

906
01:05:45.800 --> 01:05:48.599
<v Speaker 5>I've made an article on my site and just before icons,

907
01:05:48.599 --> 01:05:51.280
<v Speaker 5>the economic Crucifixion, I managed to cover the detrition of

908
01:05:51.360 --> 01:05:56.480
<v Speaker 5>faith of all seven of the first sec medical consuls.

909
01:05:57.000 --> 01:05:59.519
<v Speaker 5>It's very deep. It's very rich, and that's why we

910
01:05:59.599 --> 01:06:02.280
<v Speaker 5>really need to keep to it. Everything is there for

911
01:06:02.360 --> 01:06:06.119
<v Speaker 5>a reason. The hello is specifically here to depig divine energies,

912
01:06:06.199 --> 01:06:08.280
<v Speaker 5>which is which is why it's funny, because we can

913
01:06:08.360 --> 01:06:12.239
<v Speaker 5>see degrade very fast in other churches do not accept

914
01:06:12.280 --> 01:06:17.519
<v Speaker 5>the distinction, and iconography needs to keep to to some

915
01:06:17.719 --> 01:06:20.719
<v Speaker 5>cannons otherwise it will it will degrade. And that's what

916
01:06:20.920 --> 01:06:24.480
<v Speaker 5>you'll see in Rome because the prices and become iconoclass.

917
01:06:24.559 --> 01:06:26.360
<v Speaker 5>And we're going to see why in a minute. But

918
01:06:26.719 --> 01:06:32.280
<v Speaker 5>how does romance this by using icons to antagonize them

919
01:06:32.800 --> 01:06:37.159
<v Speaker 5>by starting to paint the theatre because as basically a

920
01:06:37.320 --> 01:06:42.960
<v Speaker 5>cone of jewelry being being, you know, using more and

921
01:06:43.079 --> 01:06:49.519
<v Speaker 5>more precious matter, using more and more statuary, and it's

922
01:06:49.559 --> 01:06:52.559
<v Speaker 5>just a way to empaganize them. So again you can

923
01:06:52.599 --> 01:06:57.280
<v Speaker 5>see that bad icons. It can evolve to an extent

924
01:06:57.519 --> 01:07:04.199
<v Speaker 5>into idolatry. And it's also iconopleasm because you're also destroying

925
01:07:04.280 --> 01:07:10.880
<v Speaker 5>a real type by corrupting the icon and only should

926
01:07:10.880 --> 01:07:15.960
<v Speaker 5>maybe covers a prostans, yes, because because the prostant's originally

927
01:07:16.119 --> 01:07:18.599
<v Speaker 5>Lutheran's on the accepted images to an.

928
01:07:18.480 --> 01:07:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Extent, Yeah, this is a weird one. Because you know,

929
01:07:21.760 --> 01:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you've got or the first generation Reformers kind of don't

930
01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>go as far as you know, Puritans and stuff like that,

931
01:07:30.119 --> 01:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>so you'll get like perpetual virginity of Mary is taught

932
01:07:32.800 --> 01:07:37.239
<v Speaker 1>by Luther and Calvin. Luther has a you know, baptismal regeneration.

933
01:07:37.480 --> 01:07:40.239
<v Speaker 1>He has no problem with some weird doctrine of real

934
01:07:40.320 --> 01:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>presence based on Christ's humanity taking on divine properties. He

935
01:07:45.559 --> 01:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>has no problem with, you know, some imagery and some

936
01:07:49.639 --> 01:07:51.639
<v Speaker 1>sacraments in the sense of like priests and this kind

937
01:07:51.639 --> 01:07:54.199
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. And then over time it just kind of

938
01:07:54.679 --> 01:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>falls away because it's all just the next guy's opinion, right,

939
01:07:58.760 --> 01:08:02.559
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's not based grounded in anything beyond the

940
01:08:02.679 --> 01:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>latest dude in his ideas. And that's the bane of

941
01:08:06.519 --> 01:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>all Protestantism. And that's why it's the next phase of

942
01:08:10.440 --> 01:08:14.039
<v Speaker 1>the Puritans who really go crazy with this. And what's

943
01:08:14.079 --> 01:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>funny is, and I've spent many years you know, in Calvinism.

944
01:08:16.840 --> 01:08:19.159
<v Speaker 1>I know it very well. You'll never get a consistent

945
01:08:19.239 --> 01:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>idea from Calvinist as to what is and isn't idolatry

946
01:08:23.039 --> 01:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in this sense, right, So I talked about the regular

947
01:08:25.119 --> 01:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>principle earlier. But it even goes so far to people

948
01:08:27.880 --> 01:08:31.199
<v Speaker 1>like if you read Charles Hodge, the famous systematic theologian

949
01:08:32.399 --> 01:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Presbyterian theologian. They were having debates in Hodge's day as

950
01:08:35.920 --> 01:08:41.239
<v Speaker 1>to whether the Ten Commandments forbade having making a map literally,

951
01:08:41.760 --> 01:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>like there were Puritans who argued that you can't have

952
01:08:43.960 --> 01:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>maps because it's an idol. It's that stupid.

953
01:08:49.199 --> 01:08:52.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. But the funny thing is that prost and God's

954
01:08:52.880 --> 01:08:56.800
<v Speaker 5>ConA class him from a Catholic saint, from Theodal Forfolians.

955
01:08:57.439 --> 01:09:00.239
<v Speaker 5>So Calvin, when he was looking as a consul, he

956
01:09:00.399 --> 01:09:04.600
<v Speaker 5>found that field Wilf rejected it and he actually went

957
01:09:04.680 --> 01:09:08.399
<v Speaker 5>none of it. So it's very funny. But the source

958
01:09:08.720 --> 01:09:13.560
<v Speaker 5>of prost and iconoclasm is a Catholic saint. So today's

959
01:09:13.600 --> 01:09:17.640
<v Speaker 5>Catholic will be complaining about this, but it came through

960
01:09:17.720 --> 01:09:20.359
<v Speaker 5>one of your guys, and the president will will be

961
01:09:20.520 --> 01:09:23.479
<v Speaker 5>very anti Islam. And actually, if you trace the root

962
01:09:23.520 --> 01:09:26.159
<v Speaker 5>of the econoclasm, you know, from the Muslim to the

963
01:09:26.880 --> 01:09:31.159
<v Speaker 5>to the Byzantine economclass crisis, to the Franks too, to

964
01:09:31.239 --> 01:09:35.279
<v Speaker 5>the early reformers to them, their econoclasm actually comes from Islam,

965
01:09:35.399 --> 01:09:39.279
<v Speaker 5>which is very funny. When you think about it, because

966
01:09:39.439 --> 01:09:45.039
<v Speaker 5>this iconoclasm is revived by Calvin and you've got people

967
01:09:45.319 --> 01:09:49.079
<v Speaker 5>who was a president that you have today will tell

968
01:09:49.079 --> 01:09:53.319
<v Speaker 5>you you cannot you cannot have anything that veneration. You

969
01:09:53.359 --> 01:09:55.560
<v Speaker 5>can have statues, you can have stuff, but they're gonna

970
01:09:55.560 --> 01:09:57.600
<v Speaker 5>have pictures, they're gonna have Yeah.

971
01:09:57.680 --> 01:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>And ironically, the Protestants, by the way, also almost to

972
01:10:01.840 --> 01:10:04.479
<v Speaker 1>a t ninety nine point nine percent of them all

973
01:10:04.520 --> 01:10:08.079
<v Speaker 1>fall into crystallogical heresies. So once again you see that

974
01:10:08.199 --> 01:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the rejection of the liturgical principle. They don't even realize

975
01:10:13.680 --> 01:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's connected to their crystallogical heresy because they're almost

976
01:10:16.960 --> 01:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>all a historian, especially if you look at their doctrine

977
01:10:19.039 --> 01:10:26.119
<v Speaker 1>penal sanction, penal sacrifice, penal sanction. Their doctrine of justification

978
01:10:26.359 --> 01:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>is premised on the idea of the damning of the

979
01:10:29.399 --> 01:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>second person, that godhead, so that leads them to the

980
01:10:32.640 --> 01:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Nestorian doctrine to maintain their justification doctrine, and then everything else.

981
01:10:37.920 --> 01:10:41.039
<v Speaker 1>Christology is just an afterthought to Calvinism. They don't even

982
01:10:41.119 --> 01:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>know what you're talking about when you get into it.

983
01:10:43.960 --> 01:10:48.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's a funny thing. Ultimately, the consistency of the

984
01:10:49.479 --> 01:10:55.079
<v Speaker 5>Orthodox econographic tradition is literally an icon of for theology exactly,

985
01:10:56.720 --> 01:10:59.840
<v Speaker 5>and that's why it's very important. That's why we we

986
01:11:00.079 --> 01:11:02.640
<v Speaker 5>accuse the icons as that's why we have no problem

987
01:11:02.720 --> 01:11:07.359
<v Speaker 5>generating them. That's why it's very important in a worship.

988
01:11:08.840 --> 01:11:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's why the apathetic theology is connected to iconography.

989
01:11:13.279 --> 01:11:15.079
<v Speaker 1>That might sound a little bit strange, but once again,

990
01:11:15.279 --> 01:11:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you have to have the nature Verson distinction, the Essen

991
01:11:17.159 --> 01:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>synerg distinction in order to have iconography. And it makes sense.

992
01:11:21.840 --> 01:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>That's how we're not ident we're not picturing or circumscribing

993
01:11:25.680 --> 01:11:30.039
<v Speaker 1>the uncircumscribable essence of God. But the second person of

994
01:11:30.079 --> 01:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the Godhead became circumscribable, as St. Theodore and Saint John

995
01:11:33.840 --> 01:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Damascus say. So even though the interest, by the way,

996
01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:39.239
<v Speaker 1>I would add, just to kind of go through a

997
01:11:39.279 --> 01:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit of Saint Theodore's argumentation, he says, the incarnation

998
01:11:43.119 --> 01:11:48.239
<v Speaker 1>is a paradox, not a contradiction. How the uncircumscribable God

999
01:11:49.199 --> 01:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>became circumscribed, we do not know, but we do accept

1000
01:11:52.359 --> 01:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it because it is revealed that way. And then he

1001
01:11:54.640 --> 01:11:57.239
<v Speaker 1>goes on to say that part of the argumentation of

1002
01:11:57.439 --> 01:11:59.479
<v Speaker 1>iconography is based on the fact that there's no human

1003
01:11:59.520 --> 01:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>hypo states in Christ. It's the second person the God

1004
01:12:02.680 --> 01:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>had who assumed human nature, and so therefore iconographic representation

1005
01:12:08.439 --> 01:12:12.359
<v Speaker 1>directly refutes Nestorianism. Therefore, it's not an accident that the

1006
01:12:12.439 --> 01:12:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Puritans and the Iconoclasts are an nestorian in their Christology.

1007
01:12:16.800 --> 01:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>He says, God did not become incarnate in a mental way, right,

1008
01:12:22.840 --> 01:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't God just choose to become a mental representation

1009
01:12:26.920 --> 01:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to us? Maybe God could have just beamed right, the

1010
01:12:29.680 --> 01:12:32.399
<v Speaker 1>logos mentality to us in a mental way, but he

1011
01:12:32.479 --> 01:12:38.039
<v Speaker 1>actually chose to become physical you see. Next he st

1012
01:12:38.119 --> 01:12:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Theodore argues the real presence. He says, the real presence

1013
01:12:41.159 --> 01:12:48.119
<v Speaker 1>itself presupposes that it is biblical to iconographically represent Christ

1014
01:12:48.239 --> 01:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>because Christ chose to icon himself, you could say, in

1015
01:12:52.800 --> 01:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>an incarnate state. He says that when we look at

1016
01:12:55.840 --> 01:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the cross, it burns the devils in exorcisms. Right by

1017
01:12:59.640 --> 01:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, are the Calvinists exorcists? There aren't any. There

1018
01:13:02.800 --> 01:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>never have been because they don't have power. They don't

1019
01:13:04.840 --> 01:13:08.359
<v Speaker 1>have the authority of the church because they aren't the church. Next,

1020
01:13:08.439 --> 01:13:10.239
<v Speaker 1>he says that one of the reasons that we can

1021
01:13:10.319 --> 01:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>know this is true is that the tradition of the

1022
01:13:12.119 --> 01:13:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Church has always held this right. Tradition is another strong argument. Next,

1023
01:13:21.199 --> 01:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>he goes on to refuting them from scripture. He does

1024
01:13:24.760 --> 01:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of argumentation that I did that you saw

1025
01:13:27.880 --> 01:13:30.319
<v Speaker 1>me do from In fact, I think I wrote that

1026
01:13:30.479 --> 01:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>article a long time ago, ten years ago. On the

1027
01:13:32.960 --> 01:13:38.239
<v Speaker 1>basis of this writing of this work, I highly recommend this.

1028
01:13:38.279 --> 01:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's still available, but you can

1029
01:13:39.680 --> 01:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>get it on Amazon, or it's the Saint Lad's edition

1030
01:13:43.239 --> 01:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of Saint Theodore the studit. But this should this should,

1031
01:13:46.960 --> 01:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>this would refute anything like that. We see texts even

1032
01:13:50.119 --> 01:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>there's one I forgot, Wisdom six five and six, which

1033
01:13:55.119 --> 01:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is applied to honoring the emperor. I think Wisdom sixty

1034
01:13:58.880 --> 01:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>five and six talks about honoring the emperor, and I

1035
01:14:01.800 --> 01:14:06.279
<v Speaker 1>think it uses the Greek word uh dulia.

1036
01:14:07.960 --> 01:14:08.359
<v Speaker 2>What else?

1037
01:14:09.720 --> 01:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just breezing through this to see there's any other good.

1038
01:14:12.760 --> 01:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>He argues that it's pretty much the universal teaching of

1039
01:14:15.279 --> 01:14:18.279
<v Speaker 1>the fathers and the councils. So if you reject imagery

1040
01:14:18.319 --> 01:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and icons by extension, you're also going to reject relics,

1041
01:14:22.199 --> 01:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're also going to reject the reality of grace.

1042
01:14:25.640 --> 01:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And the sacraments. And guess what, that's what the Calvinists do.

1043
01:14:31.279 --> 01:14:35.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, a whole doctrine of deification. Well, what what are relics?

1044
01:14:35.119 --> 01:14:37.720
<v Speaker 5>Relics are part of a person who became an icon,

1045
01:14:37.840 --> 01:14:40.319
<v Speaker 5>a part of a person who became day fighted like

1046
01:14:40.479 --> 01:14:45.000
<v Speaker 5>truly day fight. So it's also fully linked to divine energies.

1047
01:14:45.439 --> 01:14:48.439
<v Speaker 5>You know, we we do not. We do not venerate

1048
01:14:48.560 --> 01:14:52.960
<v Speaker 5>someone was defied by an angel, by by by a creature.

1049
01:14:54.119 --> 01:14:59.279
<v Speaker 5>We venerate a person who truly became the icon. I've

1050
01:14:59.319 --> 01:15:02.520
<v Speaker 5>got through God any divine energies.

1051
01:15:02.800 --> 01:15:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Yep. He also argues that Christ can be circumscribed as

1052
01:15:06.359 --> 01:15:10.479
<v Speaker 1>an individual because he became an individual in terms of

1053
01:15:10.560 --> 01:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>his human nature. He although he assumed human nature in general,

1054
01:15:13.880 --> 01:15:17.319
<v Speaker 1>he says, he became singular in terms of his historic

1055
01:15:17.439 --> 01:15:20.119
<v Speaker 1>incarnate state. This human nature did not have its existence

1056
01:15:20.159 --> 01:15:24.159
<v Speaker 1>in a self subsisting, circumscribed person. As if there was

1057
01:15:24.960 --> 01:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a hypostasis apart from the word. The word is the

1058
01:15:27.920 --> 01:15:32.279
<v Speaker 1>only hypostasis, but has its existence in the humanity has

1059
01:15:32.319 --> 01:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>its existence in the hypostasis of the word, which is what,

1060
01:15:34.840 --> 01:15:37.399
<v Speaker 1>of course I've always said. If there is, however, a

1061
01:15:37.560 --> 01:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>second person, Oh excuse me, if because a second person

1062
01:15:42.039 --> 01:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is not admitted in the hypostasis of Christ, the iconoclass

1063
01:15:45.119 --> 01:15:49.319
<v Speaker 1>should say that the hypostasis is therefore uncircumscribable in respect

1064
01:15:49.359 --> 01:15:52.159
<v Speaker 1>to his humanity, they must necessarily say that there is

1065
01:15:52.399 --> 01:15:55.359
<v Speaker 1>one nature of the word compounded from two natures, and

1066
01:15:55.479 --> 01:15:58.439
<v Speaker 1>therefore uncircumscribed because the property of one of the two

1067
01:15:58.520 --> 01:16:01.439
<v Speaker 1>natures has been a limited eminated, which is to fall

1068
01:16:01.520 --> 01:16:04.359
<v Speaker 1>into the heresy of the apollinarians. So in other words,

1069
01:16:04.399 --> 01:16:07.119
<v Speaker 1>it's removing the full humanity of Christ to say that

1070
01:16:07.800 --> 01:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Christ cannot be circumscribed or pictured or imaged, because if

1071
01:16:12.640 --> 01:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>he's fully man, he can be circumscribed.

1072
01:16:18.159 --> 01:16:18.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1073
01:16:18.399 --> 01:16:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Correct, which is because I wouldn't have thought about that

1074
01:16:24.279 --> 01:16:28.039
<v Speaker 1>being an a pollinarian conclusion which removes the full humanity.

1075
01:16:28.800 --> 01:16:31.239
<v Speaker 1>But it would be right. It's not exactly identical to

1076
01:16:31.319 --> 01:16:35.399
<v Speaker 1>what a pollinarist said, because he replaced the mind of

1077
01:16:35.479 --> 01:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Christ with the logos, and he said that Christ didn't

1078
01:16:37.600 --> 01:16:40.079
<v Speaker 1>have a fully human mind. But it's the same idea

1079
01:16:40.199 --> 01:16:43.039
<v Speaker 1>of a pollinarianism by making Christ not fully human by

1080
01:16:43.119 --> 01:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>saying that because of the incarnation, he cannot be circumscribed, right,

1081
01:16:46.600 --> 01:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that would be a gnostic a pollinarian slash heresy. Okay,

1082
01:16:57.359 --> 01:17:00.319
<v Speaker 1>those are some good little arguments from a Saint Theodore.

1083
01:17:00.359 --> 01:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>And then, by extension, although not directly connected just to icons,

1084
01:17:06.119 --> 01:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I will add that consistent with this flow of argumentation

1085
01:17:11.479 --> 01:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>is the classic commentary of Saint Germanis of Constantinople on

1086
01:17:15.439 --> 01:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the Divine Liturgy. I read this back in two thousand

1087
01:17:18.640 --> 01:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and seven when I read this the Theodore of the

1088
01:17:20.800 --> 01:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Studeic Book, and they're both really good, and they go

1089
01:17:23.239 --> 01:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>together in terms of showing the continuity between liturgical worship

1090
01:17:26.680 --> 01:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and iconography. I mean, these all of these things are

1091
01:17:28.840 --> 01:17:31.039
<v Speaker 1>going to hang or fall together, right, They're gonna They're

1092
01:17:31.039 --> 01:17:34.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna go together consistently. And he's going to argue that

1093
01:17:34.359 --> 01:17:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the liturgy is just the worship of Heaven on earth, it.

1094
01:17:41.279 --> 01:17:45.960
<v Speaker 5>Which is signified by you know, as in Exodus, there's

1095
01:17:46.199 --> 01:17:51.039
<v Speaker 5>the divine beings, Angel and so on. And that's why

1096
01:17:51.239 --> 01:17:53.920
<v Speaker 5>we have the saints. That's why we represent the saints there,

1097
01:17:54.079 --> 01:17:57.039
<v Speaker 5>because when you enter liturgy, you truly are in heaven.

1098
01:17:57.520 --> 01:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you well, we read so when Moses goes on

1099
01:18:01.680 --> 01:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>top of the mountain, he sees the worship of heaven,

1100
01:18:05.479 --> 01:18:10.079
<v Speaker 1>and then when he comes down to establish the animal

1101
01:18:10.399 --> 01:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>sacrifices and the Mosaic ceremonies. The text explicitly says that

1102
01:18:15.199 --> 01:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>he Moses received a type of the things in heaven.

1103
01:18:18.960 --> 01:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>So Mosaic worship, according to scripture, is a type tupos,

1104
01:18:22.960 --> 01:18:27.039
<v Speaker 1>an image of the heavenly worship when Jesus came and

1105
01:18:27.199 --> 01:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>set up the Lord's Supper and all the worship that

1106
01:18:30.880 --> 01:18:35.159
<v Speaker 1>we have. That is the reality of which the type signified.

1107
01:18:35.359 --> 01:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>So we don't have as the Protestants would have it,

1108
01:18:37.920 --> 01:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>they would have us back in the Mosaic period of

1109
01:18:40.239 --> 01:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>still using types. No, the Mosaic administration was the types

1110
01:18:45.039 --> 01:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Jesus brought the reality. Therefore you have to believe in

1111
01:18:47.239 --> 01:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the real presence. But all the Protestants want to go

1112
01:18:49.520 --> 01:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>back to the Mosaic period to say always just types

1113
01:18:51.880 --> 01:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and symbols. No, it's the reality, the real power, the

1114
01:18:56.720 --> 01:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>reality of Pentecosts, the reality of body blows soul and

1115
01:19:00.720 --> 01:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>uncreated grace energy is present in the worship. That's why

1116
01:19:04.880 --> 01:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>only Orthodox worship is the full continuity with the synagogue

1117
01:19:08.840 --> 01:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and temple. If you want to read about that, read

1118
01:19:11.640 --> 01:19:12.039
<v Speaker 1>this book.

1119
01:19:13.159 --> 01:19:15.479
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and that's the part for points that I wanted

1120
01:19:15.520 --> 01:19:18.560
<v Speaker 5>to make. If you look at the history of the Church,

1121
01:19:18.640 --> 01:19:23.520
<v Speaker 5>be it in terms of theology, worship, and iconography, with

1122
01:19:23.680 --> 01:19:28.239
<v Speaker 5>the only church that did not degenerate, you know, one

1123
01:19:28.399 --> 01:19:32.119
<v Speaker 5>or the other. We are a perfect continuity. And this

1124
01:19:32.319 --> 01:19:35.279
<v Speaker 5>is all present in the icons themselves, in the way

1125
01:19:35.680 --> 01:19:39.399
<v Speaker 5>we understand them, in the way we pain them. It's

1126
01:19:39.439 --> 01:19:40.239
<v Speaker 5>a complete system.

1127
01:19:40.359 --> 01:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I remember when I was when I was looking

1128
01:19:42.680 --> 01:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>into Orthodoxy, you know, I was. I had gone from

1129
01:19:45.960 --> 01:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Calvinism into Rome Catholicism. I'd been Romancalluy for many years,

1130
01:19:48.800 --> 01:19:50.239
<v Speaker 1>and I was starting to look at Orthodoxy about two

1131
01:19:50.239 --> 01:19:54.079
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven six, and I was thinking, well, why

1132
01:19:54.159 --> 01:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>do they Why is the iconographic tradition done a certain way?

1133
01:20:00.399 --> 01:20:04.239
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't really understand that it was because of

1134
01:20:04.439 --> 01:20:08.039
<v Speaker 1>the theological positions. Right, So when you read Saint Theodore,

1135
01:20:08.600 --> 01:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and I got my notes here that I made back

1136
01:20:10.640 --> 01:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and seven, where I was, I was

1137
01:20:12.680 --> 01:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>writing out what hypostasis means, and I was writing about

1138
01:20:15.720 --> 01:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>what a historian and what fusis is. Right, So I

1139
01:20:18.000 --> 01:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>was actually making all these notes about the significance of

1140
01:20:20.760 --> 01:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>these things because Sat Theodore is arguing.

1141
01:20:22.560 --> 01:20:23.000
<v Speaker 5>That the.

1142
01:20:25.319 --> 01:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Meaning, the symbolism, the form, the structure, the balance, the colors.

1143
01:20:31.840 --> 01:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>The way the iconographic presentation is put forth is all

1144
01:20:36.680 --> 01:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to teach and signify the theological meanings. And once you

1145
01:20:42.159 --> 01:20:47.239
<v Speaker 1>learn how precise Orthodox theology is, then it makes sense. Oh,

1146
01:20:47.319 --> 01:20:50.079
<v Speaker 1>now I understand why it's so precise like that, it's

1147
01:20:50.159 --> 01:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>not just made up. Oh, let's just do it this way.

1148
01:20:54.119 --> 01:20:58.159
<v Speaker 5>Exactly. And that's why this is an emphasis on not innovating,

1149
01:20:58.439 --> 01:20:58.640
<v Speaker 5>you know.

1150
01:20:59.079 --> 01:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, Yeah, because would change the theology.

1151
01:21:01.880 --> 01:21:03.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we don't. We don't call people like, you know,

1152
01:21:04.359 --> 01:21:07.359
<v Speaker 5>icon artists. We call them iconography.

1153
01:21:07.880 --> 01:21:12.039
<v Speaker 1>Writers exactly because they're they're writing the theological truths, just

1154
01:21:12.159 --> 01:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>like you were writing a book.

1155
01:21:13.800 --> 01:21:16.359
<v Speaker 5>Right, Yeah, And that's the real danger of you know,

1156
01:21:16.560 --> 01:21:25.600
<v Speaker 5>introducing new traditions and transforming, transforming your iconographic tradition using artists.

1157
01:21:25.720 --> 01:21:28.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, Michael Angelo is a good example. But today

1158
01:21:29.039 --> 01:21:32.880
<v Speaker 5>you can see, especially in the West, and some people

1159
01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:36.199
<v Speaker 5>want to do this to to to orthodox yicography. But

1160
01:21:36.399 --> 01:21:41.720
<v Speaker 5>people like destroying religion itself by destroying these images.

1161
01:21:42.039 --> 01:21:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you want a good if you want a

1162
01:21:44.119 --> 01:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>good thing to read on this, if you read The

1163
01:21:45.640 --> 01:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Theology of the icon Volume two. The main reason I

1164
01:21:49.680 --> 01:21:54.319
<v Speaker 1>recommend this is because of the chapter on Orthodoxy versus humanism.

1165
01:21:54.640 --> 01:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>So actually this chapter is about how the uncreated energies

1166
01:21:59.399 --> 01:22:02.079
<v Speaker 1>are shown and taught in the theology of iconography, and

1167
01:22:02.199 --> 01:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>so the created light of Barlam is actually the reason

1168
01:22:06.039 --> 01:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>why the Latin tradition goes away from our tradition. That's

1169
01:22:10.800 --> 01:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole chapter on that very doctrine that that

1170
01:22:13.760 --> 01:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Snack was talking about earlier. That this book is worth

1171
01:22:17.880 --> 01:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it just for that chapter. Noticed that, right, hechasm and humanism.

1172
01:22:26.039 --> 01:22:31.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and many of the things we can we can link,

1173
01:22:31.760 --> 01:22:37.640
<v Speaker 5>for example, is the emphasis of the renaissance and anatomy.

1174
01:22:38.239 --> 01:22:40.479
<v Speaker 5>This is this is you know, we were moving away

1175
01:22:40.520 --> 01:22:40.800
<v Speaker 5>from that.

1176
01:22:41.119 --> 01:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Hold on can you say that again, renaissance on what anatomy?

1177
01:22:45.600 --> 01:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>You know anatomy? Yes, exactly right, what what do you

1178
01:22:49.039 --> 01:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>make of that flesh? That out some more? That's a

1179
01:22:51.600 --> 01:22:53.279
<v Speaker 1>good thing, you know, and thought about.

1180
01:22:53.039 --> 01:22:56.439
<v Speaker 5>That we're moving away from this, you know, god centric

1181
01:22:56.560 --> 01:22:59.800
<v Speaker 5>worship like why why why do we have a veneration

1182
01:22:59.880 --> 01:23:03.119
<v Speaker 5>of icons Is because these people are saints because in

1183
01:23:03.279 --> 01:23:03.960
<v Speaker 5>heaven you know.

1184
01:23:04.840 --> 01:23:07.039
<v Speaker 1>Now we're like worshiping the form of the body.

1185
01:23:08.479 --> 01:23:10.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so you have the form of the body, you

1186
01:23:10.039 --> 01:23:14.640
<v Speaker 5>have humanism, the hello st the beer and I think

1187
01:23:14.720 --> 01:23:19.359
<v Speaker 5>There's there's a painting of Christ's death, you know, Christ

1188
01:23:19.439 --> 01:23:23.359
<v Speaker 5>in his tomb that was commented by Dostoevsky and he

1189
01:23:23.399 --> 01:23:26.000
<v Speaker 5>said this picture could turn anybody into an atheist.

1190
01:23:27.479 --> 01:23:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, yeah, yeah, I see.

1191
01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:34.840
<v Speaker 5>Fully defeated Christ, fully defeated in that sense, you know,

1192
01:23:35.039 --> 01:23:39.319
<v Speaker 5>like really represented as a carrier. And and I remember

1193
01:23:40.119 --> 01:23:44.000
<v Speaker 5>was commenting in this painting saying, you're gonna have atheism.

1194
01:23:45.199 --> 01:23:51.239
<v Speaker 5>That's why you have atheism because you you you two man,

1195
01:23:51.520 --> 01:23:54.000
<v Speaker 5>and you you will you worship, you know, with humanism

1196
01:23:54.520 --> 01:23:59.159
<v Speaker 5>man alone, and your iconography is showing it. And since

1197
01:23:59.239 --> 01:24:01.800
<v Speaker 5>man is mortal, you're going to turn to atheism.

1198
01:24:02.319 --> 01:24:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Well, and this also explains why all this Renaissance stuff

1199
01:24:05.119 --> 01:24:08.199
<v Speaker 1>is hermetic, right. I used to think that wasn't the case,

1200
01:24:08.319 --> 01:24:12.279
<v Speaker 1>and then when I started reading like occult Renaissance Church

1201
01:24:12.359 --> 01:24:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of Rome books like that, you realize that no, actually

1202
01:24:14.720 --> 01:24:20.239
<v Speaker 1>they really were Bernini, all these guys were deep into hermeticism, Leonardo.

1203
01:24:20.399 --> 01:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>They were into the occult alchemy, weird stuff. And that's

1204
01:24:23.920 --> 01:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>why the stuff that they're painting. Even though we can

1205
01:24:26.920 --> 01:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the artistic skill, I'm not denying that these guys

1206
01:24:31.800 --> 01:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>are good at what they do. But the point is

1207
01:24:34.439 --> 01:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that it is not the tradition of what had already

1208
01:24:37.640 --> 01:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>been laid down at the seventh Ecamdical Council. I mean,

1209
01:24:40.720 --> 01:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>look at these two things. You couldn't be further from

1210
01:24:43.159 --> 01:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the truth, right. And again, it's not that we're we're

1211
01:24:46.560 --> 01:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>not rating them on. Oh this one's cooler than that one.

1212
01:24:50.239 --> 01:24:53.039
<v Speaker 1>That's not the point. The point is the theological doctrines

1213
01:24:53.079 --> 01:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that are taught by these different traditions.

1214
01:24:55.039 --> 01:24:58.760
<v Speaker 5>You see, yeah, I mean you're showing your assisting chapel

1215
01:24:58.840 --> 01:25:02.359
<v Speaker 5>right now. It's very interesting because what does it teach us.

1216
01:25:02.600 --> 01:25:05.159
<v Speaker 5>First of all, the fathers represented. The father should not

1217
01:25:05.239 --> 01:25:05.800
<v Speaker 5>be represented.

1218
01:25:06.159 --> 01:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>You're not supposed to represent the father exactly, even though yes,

1219
01:25:09.680 --> 01:25:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I will have to admit trad sometimes Orthodox people are

1220
01:25:12.640 --> 01:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>not consistent with this, they're not consistent. But technically you're

1221
01:25:16.920 --> 01:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to represent the father because the only representation

1222
01:25:21.039 --> 01:25:22.079
<v Speaker 1>of the father is the son.

1223
01:25:23.079 --> 01:25:25.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but here you can see a first Stringerian mistake

1224
01:25:26.800 --> 01:25:32.399
<v Speaker 5>in this very famous painting from the System Chapel. It's

1225
01:25:32.439 --> 01:25:36.880
<v Speaker 5>a father that gives life to creation, that gives.

1226
01:25:36.760 --> 01:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Life to Aidam, but worse worse Christ.

1227
01:25:41.119 --> 01:25:45.319
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the treaty does this, like Tenesis teaches. You can

1228
01:25:45.359 --> 01:25:48.239
<v Speaker 5>see errors being introduced and layered and layered and layered,

1229
01:25:48.479 --> 01:25:50.039
<v Speaker 5>and of course these people are going to you know,

1230
01:25:50.119 --> 01:25:52.960
<v Speaker 5>fully Christian. If you look at yeah, it's very emetic.

1231
01:25:53.439 --> 01:25:56.520
<v Speaker 5>You have a lot of esoteric stuff going in there.

1232
01:25:57.399 --> 01:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And if anybody doubts that, just read cult ren

1233
01:26:00.079 --> 01:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>not short of Rome. It proves that beyond any shadow

1234
01:26:02.520 --> 01:26:06.079
<v Speaker 1>of a doubt, from hundreds of citations of the Renaissance

1235
01:26:06.279 --> 01:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>hermeticist scholars themselves. So let's see, was there anything else

1236
01:26:11.920 --> 01:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to get to If you get anything else

1237
01:26:13.720 --> 01:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>in your notes, We've gone for about an hour and

1238
01:26:15.399 --> 01:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a half and then we've got some super chats. But

1239
01:26:18.159 --> 01:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to stop if you got more.

1240
01:26:21.279 --> 01:26:23.319
<v Speaker 5>No, I just want to say that today you can

1241
01:26:23.359 --> 01:26:27.319
<v Speaker 5>see that these paintings here for the art people do

1242
01:26:27.439 --> 01:26:31.279
<v Speaker 5>not the no longer object of veneration. The theology is lost,

1243
01:26:31.520 --> 01:26:34.119
<v Speaker 5>and that's why sometime it will shocked Westerners and even

1244
01:26:34.199 --> 01:26:36.359
<v Speaker 5>Catholic you know, when they say, oh, you know you're

1245
01:26:36.439 --> 01:26:40.600
<v Speaker 5>kissing icons. You know, it's it's weird. It's ironically, there

1246
01:26:40.600 --> 01:26:43.920
<v Speaker 5>will things that it's idolatrous because because of all these

1247
01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:47.439
<v Speaker 5>degradations that they've lost, this tradition, and that's very sad

1248
01:26:47.520 --> 01:26:50.399
<v Speaker 5>because it's part with the seventh console, and you cannot

1249
01:26:50.399 --> 01:26:53.239
<v Speaker 5>bring the seventh console against the price and to then

1250
01:26:53.359 --> 01:26:54.399
<v Speaker 5>not respect it yourself.

1251
01:26:55.399 --> 01:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it also reminds me of the weird like another

1252
01:26:57.720 --> 01:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>weird thing that was. I'm pretty sure it's too. I mean,

1253
01:27:00.920 --> 01:27:03.319
<v Speaker 1>it's been fifteen years since I looked at this, but

1254
01:27:03.920 --> 01:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the famous Calvinist, Francis Turitan, speculated that after

1255
01:27:09.319 --> 01:27:13.079
<v Speaker 1>the Resurrection, Jesus would shed his human nature, he wouldn't

1256
01:27:13.119 --> 01:27:18.319
<v Speaker 1>need it anymore. Well, that's just more gnosticism, more proof

1257
01:27:18.880 --> 01:27:23.479
<v Speaker 1>that Protestantism, Calvinism, and Puritanism especially are gnosticism, because the

1258
01:27:23.520 --> 01:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>whole point of the incarnation was that he would take

1259
01:27:26.199 --> 01:27:29.279
<v Speaker 1>on human nature and that he would always and forever

1260
01:27:29.479 --> 01:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>be incarnate. That's one of the amazing mysteries of the

1261
01:27:32.439 --> 01:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>incarnation is that that God will for all eternity be man. Right,

1262
01:27:37.640 --> 01:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the second person that got hit will forever an all

1263
01:27:39.680 --> 01:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>eternity be man. He will never leave it, shed his

1264
01:27:43.840 --> 01:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>humanity like it was some kind of snake skin or

1265
01:27:45.880 --> 01:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>some nonsense like this. But I'm pretty sure a Turretin

1266
01:27:48.720 --> 01:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>speculator said that maybe even Jonathan Edwards or somebody else,

1267
01:27:52.560 --> 01:27:54.479
<v Speaker 1>and the Calvinist tradition said something like that. But the

1268
01:27:54.520 --> 01:27:56.640
<v Speaker 1>point is that that you're only saying that because you're

1269
01:27:56.640 --> 01:27:59.239
<v Speaker 1>gnostic and they don't believe. As if you read the

1270
01:27:59.279 --> 01:28:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Paniotas now Us, a book on deification, the whole first

1271
01:28:02.359 --> 01:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>chapter is dedicated to showing that the incarnation was always

1272
01:28:06.760 --> 01:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the plan. The incarnation is not a plan B based

1273
01:28:10.239 --> 01:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>on the fall. The incarnation was always the plant. Creation

1274
01:28:13.680 --> 01:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>itself presupposes the incarnation, and that's unique to Orthodox theology,

1275
01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>by the way.

1276
01:28:20.359 --> 01:28:23.279
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, correct, Yeah, pretty good. We've covered the whole history

1277
01:28:23.319 --> 01:28:28.079
<v Speaker 5>of it, We've covered the theology of it, gave examples. Yeah,

1278
01:28:28.079 --> 01:28:32.159
<v Speaker 5>I'm pretty spect Okay, we've just extream. Yeah, we can

1279
01:28:32.199 --> 01:28:34.399
<v Speaker 5>close and this and go to the super checks.

1280
01:28:34.399 --> 01:28:34.720
<v Speaker 2>All right.

1281
01:28:35.319 --> 01:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Our Seneca Arseni Boca for thirteen forty eight. He says,

1282
01:28:41.039 --> 01:28:46.319
<v Speaker 1>our base relief presentation is part of Orthodoxy. I've not

1283
01:28:46.439 --> 01:28:50.359
<v Speaker 1>seen them in Byzantine or Romanian churches, but I've seen

1284
01:28:50.399 --> 01:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>them in Russian churches. Do you have any opinions on this?

1285
01:28:53.720 --> 01:28:56.479
<v Speaker 1>They seem to be classical, Hellenic and Catholic to me.

1286
01:28:57.640 --> 01:29:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know specifically about that, but there are obviously,

1287
01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:05.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, representations that are more Western in style that

1288
01:29:05.319 --> 01:29:09.239
<v Speaker 1>influenced different periods. I mean, this is this is true.

1289
01:29:09.560 --> 01:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>You know in architecture that you have the you know,

1290
01:29:11.760 --> 01:29:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Saint Petersburg kind of being neo classical, and this kind

1291
01:29:15.399 --> 01:29:18.359
<v Speaker 1>of stuff happens, of course, but I'm not so sure

1292
01:29:18.399 --> 01:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that that that's necessary. Just because there's a cross pollination

1293
01:29:22.840 --> 01:29:26.319
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that, oh well, then we're denying the whole uh,

1294
01:29:26.479 --> 01:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, validity of the liturgy. I mean the point

1295
01:29:29.760 --> 01:29:33.079
<v Speaker 1>here is that it's what we're talking about is in

1296
01:29:33.159 --> 01:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the context of the liturgy, in the context of the church.

1297
01:29:36.720 --> 01:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, do you know about Bay's relief representations?

1298
01:29:42.000 --> 01:29:45.199
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so we do have icons, because that doesn't mean

1299
01:29:45.279 --> 01:29:48.439
<v Speaker 5>we cannot have other sort of representation. We can have statuary,

1300
01:29:48.640 --> 01:29:53.960
<v Speaker 5>at least the cannons that condemned statues. It doesn't condemned

1301
01:29:54.000 --> 01:29:54.960
<v Speaker 5>statues per se.

1302
01:29:55.039 --> 01:29:58.199
<v Speaker 1>It just says make sure, I mean you can have us. Yeah,

1303
01:29:58.880 --> 01:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean I could put a statue of Saint Paul

1304
01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>right here. So what but in terms of the liturgical worship,

1305
01:30:04.920 --> 01:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it's very precise as the point. And yeah, sometimes churches

1306
01:30:08.640 --> 01:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>do not always follow this, right, I mean You've got

1307
01:30:10.600 --> 01:30:14.039
<v Speaker 1>Western ride churches that are using the some of them

1308
01:30:14.119 --> 01:30:17.199
<v Speaker 1>are putting the Sacred Heart, well, the sacred Hearts in

1309
01:30:17.239 --> 01:30:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the Historian and Jesuit. It's not Orthodox, it shouldn't be there.

1310
01:30:21.760 --> 01:30:24.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but I don't think barrel LIFs would be would

1311
01:30:24.560 --> 01:30:27.680
<v Speaker 5>be a problem specifically, you know, it's it's not a

1312
01:30:27.720 --> 01:30:33.000
<v Speaker 5>problem of the image being graven or not. So Yeah,

1313
01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:35.520
<v Speaker 5>I don't see I don't see any problem. We should

1314
01:30:35.520 --> 01:30:40.319
<v Speaker 5>try to keep to more classical iconographic standards because they're

1315
01:30:40.359 --> 01:30:44.439
<v Speaker 5>here for a reason. But again, I've really seen like

1316
01:30:44.600 --> 01:30:49.319
<v Speaker 5>really huge iconographic abuse except in some Western rights.

1317
01:30:49.800 --> 01:30:50.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1318
01:30:50.319 --> 01:30:54.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, apartem is, I wouldn't consider this a big problem exactly.

1319
01:30:55.119 --> 01:31:00.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, A good point. Next question is Eastern Rome and

1320
01:31:00.199 --> 01:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>for five dollars, it's interesting to consider that the historical

1321
01:31:03.840 --> 01:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>context of why iconoclasm grew grew in popularity and empire

1322
01:31:08.840 --> 01:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>since the Amorillon. I don't know what that is, the

1323
01:31:12.880 --> 01:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Amorione I introduced it in the wake of the loss

1324
01:31:16.640 --> 01:31:22.119
<v Speaker 1>of Egypt and the levant to the Muslims, I don't know.

1325
01:31:22.359 --> 01:31:26.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, people thought at the time that they were being

1326
01:31:26.640 --> 01:31:29.439
<v Speaker 5>punished the Islam was a score of God, which, by

1327
01:31:29.479 --> 01:31:34.600
<v Speaker 5>the way, some people hold today and it is there

1328
01:31:34.680 --> 01:31:36.600
<v Speaker 5>is the typology of the apocalypse, and you know, anti

1329
01:31:36.720 --> 01:31:41.159
<v Speaker 5>Christian Muhammad. But yeah, people thought that they were being

1330
01:31:41.239 --> 01:31:45.800
<v Speaker 5>punished for excesses, especially in terms of some mosaics, iconography

1331
01:31:45.840 --> 01:31:52.319
<v Speaker 5>and song. So yeah, the idea of iconoclasm in Byzantium

1332
01:31:52.520 --> 01:31:55.680
<v Speaker 5>came from Islam. So yeah, it's right.

1333
01:32:03.359 --> 01:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>All right. So Eastern Romans says, sorry, my bad, it

1334
01:32:07.960 --> 01:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>was the Assaryoi. It was the Amorioi were after the Assorioid.

1335
01:32:19.760 --> 01:32:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Milford donate his thirty dollars and he says Calvinists

1336
01:32:24.439 --> 01:32:30.319
<v Speaker 1>will cite Irnas critiquing the Nostic carporcration usage of images

1337
01:32:30.479 --> 01:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in against Heresy's one twenty five six. Well, first of all, again,

1338
01:32:34.319 --> 01:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>if you read book three of Irenaeus and book four,

1339
01:32:38.239 --> 01:32:41.039
<v Speaker 1>he's not a Calvinist. So he believes in Abstolt succession,

1340
01:32:41.079 --> 01:32:43.119
<v Speaker 1>he believes in tradition, he believes in the Deudo canon,

1341
01:32:43.439 --> 01:32:45.439
<v Speaker 1>he believes in the real presence of Christ. He will

1342
01:32:45.439 --> 01:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>believe and it believes in a succession of bishops. So

1343
01:32:48.319 --> 01:32:51.479
<v Speaker 1>they're picking and choosing, obviously, as they always do. But

1344
01:32:51.760 --> 01:32:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the point is not that all images. The point is

1345
01:32:56.319 --> 01:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever carpent cration images were being used. I mean a

1346
01:32:59.720 --> 01:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of these sex worship the serpent, So we'd have

1347
01:33:02.960 --> 01:33:07.159
<v Speaker 1>to see exactly what image the corpor creations we're using.

1348
01:33:09.159 --> 01:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, I'm gonna look at that quote and see

1349
01:33:11.720 --> 01:33:12.159
<v Speaker 1>what he says.

1350
01:33:12.880 --> 01:33:15.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you're gonna find some church. Father would say that

1351
01:33:15.800 --> 01:33:18.640
<v Speaker 5>good prayers don't visit image. And it is true, like

1352
01:33:18.840 --> 01:33:21.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, when you do the Hezekas prayer, you shouldn't

1353
01:33:22.079 --> 01:33:24.960
<v Speaker 5>you shouldn't image things, You shouldn't have images in your head.

1354
01:33:25.399 --> 01:33:27.600
<v Speaker 5>But that doesn't mean that you cannot have image in worship.

1355
01:33:27.720 --> 01:33:30.560
<v Speaker 5>That doesn't mean that you can signify and teach through

1356
01:33:30.640 --> 01:33:33.600
<v Speaker 5>these things. And actually that's an error that some Oriental

1357
01:33:33.680 --> 01:33:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Orthodox do. So they keep to teachings of Evagrius Spontikus

1358
01:33:39.960 --> 01:33:42.960
<v Speaker 5>on the image, and they actually removed all images from

1359
01:33:43.279 --> 01:33:46.760
<v Speaker 5>the liturgy. They're not econoclastic, per saved. It's a semi

1360
01:33:46.800 --> 01:33:51.399
<v Speaker 5>econoclastic because of this, at least a lot of them are.

1361
01:33:52.079 --> 01:33:57.840
<v Speaker 5>But that's again creating a needless, needless dialectic. You know,

1362
01:33:58.119 --> 01:34:03.479
<v Speaker 5>just because theosis for us is a process of prayer

1363
01:34:03.680 --> 01:34:08.880
<v Speaker 5>and of you know, being apathetic, removing ideas from your

1364
01:34:08.920 --> 01:34:12.199
<v Speaker 5>head doesn't mean that we cannot have images. And again

1365
01:34:12.279 --> 01:34:16.880
<v Speaker 5>we've seen that icons are linked to apophetic theology, so

1366
01:34:17.520 --> 01:34:18.039
<v Speaker 5>it's linked.

1367
01:34:18.399 --> 01:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, and then when we read what the actual

1368
01:34:20.960 --> 01:34:24.159
<v Speaker 1>quote says, it doesn't prove what the Calvinist wants. As usually,

1369
01:34:24.840 --> 01:34:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll read the quote, some of the Gnostics employ outward marks,

1370
01:34:28.600 --> 01:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>branding their disciples inside the whole of the right ear

1371
01:34:32.359 --> 01:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>from Among these they also arose a certain Marcellina who

1372
01:34:35.920 --> 01:34:40.319
<v Speaker 1>came to Rome under the episcopate of an Isotus, and

1373
01:34:40.439 --> 01:34:44.039
<v Speaker 1>he held these doctrines, and she led many multitudes astray.

1374
01:34:44.640 --> 01:34:48.199
<v Speaker 1>They styled themselves Gnostics and possessed images, some of which

1375
01:34:48.239 --> 01:34:51.159
<v Speaker 1>are painted, others of which are formed of different kinds

1376
01:34:51.199 --> 01:34:54.479
<v Speaker 1>of materials. While they maintained that a likeness of Christ

1377
01:34:54.960 --> 01:34:58.319
<v Speaker 1>was created by Pilot at the time when Jesus lived

1378
01:34:58.319 --> 01:35:01.199
<v Speaker 1>among them. They crowned the these images and set these

1379
01:35:01.239 --> 01:35:04.079
<v Speaker 1>images up along with images of the philosophers of the world,

1380
01:35:04.239 --> 01:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>such as Pythagoras, Plato, and Aristotle. They have modes of

1381
01:35:08.359 --> 01:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>honoring these images that is the same as the honor

1382
01:35:11.800 --> 01:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of the gentiles. So it's talking about idolatrous pagan images.

1383
01:35:17.079 --> 01:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not saying that all imagery itself is wrong. Let's see.

1384
01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>But good question, Jeremy. Now Bill for five dollars, what

1385
01:35:28.079 --> 01:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>snacks imagine? I don't know what that means, but thank you,

1386
01:35:32.079 --> 01:35:37.079
<v Speaker 1>No Bill, Mowgli for ten dollars. What does the image

1387
01:35:37.159 --> 01:35:42.199
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom of some Orthodox Study Bibles represent? The

1388
01:35:42.319 --> 01:35:47.159
<v Speaker 1>image at the bottom that I mean, it's just the

1389
01:35:47.279 --> 01:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>dome of the church with a cross. So is that?

1390
01:35:51.680 --> 01:35:54.319
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's what you're talking about, Mowgli. If you

1391
01:35:54.399 --> 01:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>want to qualify that in the chat, let me know.

1392
01:35:57.720 --> 01:36:05.439
<v Speaker 1>But I don't. I don't know what else you're talking about. Okay,

1393
01:36:05.520 --> 01:36:07.439
<v Speaker 1>it says that the spine of the Orthodox Study at all,

1394
01:36:07.560 --> 01:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just a church with a dome of a church.

1395
01:36:11.800 --> 01:36:15.279
<v Speaker 5>That's it is the logo of Ancient Face Radio.

1396
01:36:15.880 --> 01:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>It might be their logo or is it just a dome.

1397
01:36:19.319 --> 01:36:19.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

1398
01:36:19.640 --> 01:36:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what the logo is anyway, it's

1399
01:36:25.199 --> 01:36:27.479
<v Speaker 1>not a mystic that's the teric symbol.

1400
01:36:30.039 --> 01:36:30.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

1401
01:36:33.640 --> 01:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks has donated fifteen dollars, Thanks well, thank you. Thanks

1402
01:36:37.319 --> 01:36:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Levilla Floria, Levu Floria three dollars. The Renaissance was funded

1403
01:36:41.800 --> 01:36:45.199
<v Speaker 1>by international bank elite families such as the Medicis, who

1404
01:36:45.199 --> 01:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>flourished in Italy around the center of an international finance

1405
01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:51.399
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Yes, that is true. I have read

1406
01:36:51.560 --> 01:36:54.399
<v Speaker 1>multiple books that cover that, and I think it's also

1407
01:36:54.520 --> 01:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>covered in a cult Renaissance Church of Rome. That is correct.

1408
01:36:58.279 --> 01:37:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Mima phobe five dollars. Do you have any thoughts on

1409
01:37:02.199 --> 01:37:05.199
<v Speaker 1>the terraffim mentioned many times in the Old Testament? It

1410
01:37:05.279 --> 01:37:09.319
<v Speaker 1>just means statue and what because David had a terraffim

1411
01:37:09.399 --> 01:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>for example, when he snuck out and he put a

1412
01:37:12.319 --> 01:37:16.119
<v Speaker 1>traffim under the sheets, he did the whole cartoon teenager

1413
01:37:16.199 --> 01:37:18.479
<v Speaker 1>trick of like putting a statue under the sheet so

1414
01:37:18.520 --> 01:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>it looks like somebody's asleep. That's all teriffim means. But

1415
01:37:25.439 --> 01:37:30.119
<v Speaker 1>it also could be a statue used in pagan worship. So,

1416
01:37:30.319 --> 01:37:32.760
<v Speaker 1>but just having a statue, there's nothing wrong with that.

1417
01:37:32.920 --> 01:37:38.800
<v Speaker 1>David had a terraffim, It wasn't an idol. What does

1418
01:37:38.840 --> 01:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>that tell us about changes and what was acceptable in

1419
01:37:41.479 --> 01:37:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the early Biblical era. Well, if you listen to the

1420
01:37:43.319 --> 01:37:46.039
<v Speaker 1>whole talk, nothing changed. That was the whole point of

1421
01:37:46.079 --> 01:37:49.359
<v Speaker 1>this talk is that we have a consistent a kind

1422
01:37:49.399 --> 01:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of graphic presentation. There was no no images in the

1423
01:37:53.600 --> 01:37:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Old Testament. Now you can use images. That's simply not true.

1424
01:37:56.640 --> 01:38:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the temple is full of Imagesiam, do you

1425
01:38:00.479 --> 01:38:01.159
<v Speaker 1>have anything to say on.

1426
01:38:01.159 --> 01:38:04.960
<v Speaker 5>That, Snick, No, I mean, you know, we've we've proven

1427
01:38:05.039 --> 01:38:09.600
<v Speaker 5>that point by point from Oltists and Bible, New Testament,

1428
01:38:11.199 --> 01:38:13.399
<v Speaker 5>apostlic times to today.

1429
01:38:14.479 --> 01:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>William Bergen ten dollars, snack and jay, I am newly

1430
01:38:17.640 --> 01:38:24.319
<v Speaker 1>illumined here, welcome many years. Is anti is anti Marianism

1431
01:38:24.399 --> 01:38:28.079
<v Speaker 1>connected to iconoclasm? Yes, So, even though it might be

1432
01:38:28.159 --> 01:38:32.359
<v Speaker 1>directly connected to it, the consistent presentation, as we said,

1433
01:38:32.439 --> 01:38:36.319
<v Speaker 1>of theosis, real presence of Christ liturgy, all of these

1434
01:38:36.359 --> 01:38:38.479
<v Speaker 1>things kind of go together. So the very idea of

1435
01:38:38.600 --> 01:38:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the the the theotokis being raised to the status of

1436
01:38:42.840 --> 01:38:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the highest of God's creatures, Queen of Heaven and Apocalypse twelve,

1437
01:38:46.840 --> 01:38:51.439
<v Speaker 1>it would pretty, you know, pretty necessarily be connected to iconoclasm.

1438
01:38:51.600 --> 01:38:54.199
<v Speaker 1>And as we said, iconoclasm is just kind of another

1439
01:38:54.319 --> 01:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>denial of the incarnation. So when you deny the incarnation

1440
01:38:57.479 --> 01:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Orthodox sense, you get these weird deviations and

1441
01:39:01.960 --> 01:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>these weird sex and these weird views that also will

1442
01:39:05.319 --> 01:39:09.119
<v Speaker 1>have heretical heterodox views in other areas of their theology.

1443
01:39:09.439 --> 01:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So naturally they're going to you know, prefer Nestorian ideas

1444
01:39:13.640 --> 01:39:17.079
<v Speaker 1>of who Mary is. Right, she's Thestoria says, she's Christodicos,

1445
01:39:17.199 --> 01:39:18.039
<v Speaker 1>not theoticas.

1446
01:39:19.279 --> 01:39:23.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly, like icons are signify of the incarnational principle,

1447
01:39:23.960 --> 01:39:28.720
<v Speaker 5>and the Theotokos is you know, the ultimate incarnational principle.

1448
01:39:28.920 --> 01:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she is the new arc of the Covenant, exactly.

1449
01:39:31.319 --> 01:39:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1450
01:39:32.199 --> 01:39:34.439
<v Speaker 1>And so if you don't believe in that incarnational principle,

1451
01:39:34.479 --> 01:39:36.119
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to believe in theosis. You're not going

1452
01:39:36.199 --> 01:39:40.199
<v Speaker 1>to believe that that individual humans can become living arcs

1453
01:39:40.600 --> 01:39:41.239
<v Speaker 1>of the Covenant.

1454
01:39:43.079 --> 01:39:43.760
<v Speaker 5>Is going to be messed up.

1455
01:39:43.800 --> 01:39:45.840
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, the Christology is going to be all screwed up.

1456
01:39:47.399 --> 01:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, I don't see any more super chats. Thank

1457
01:39:49.720 --> 01:39:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you guys. That was a lot of fun. Be sure

1458
01:39:51.760 --> 01:39:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and follow Snack on his He has a pretty hype Twitter.

1459
01:39:54.960 --> 01:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>He's always rolling up some people. He's fun to follow

1460
01:39:58.520 --> 01:40:01.479
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. He's got an Instagram as well, And if

1461
01:40:01.560 --> 01:40:04.319
<v Speaker 1>you want to get into our discord or his discord,

1462
01:40:04.439 --> 01:40:07.399
<v Speaker 1>you can follow that as well. In the links. You

1463
01:40:07.439 --> 01:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>can also join my website anything you want to promote Snack.

1464
01:40:12.119 --> 01:40:13.920
<v Speaker 5>No, it's mostly in French. We're going to start some

1465
01:40:15.479 --> 01:40:18.000
<v Speaker 5>new things. So the discord is mostly in French, but

1466
01:40:18.159 --> 01:40:22.840
<v Speaker 5>we've got like good archives, a good library, and we're

1467
01:40:22.880 --> 01:40:28.720
<v Speaker 5>going to start to do some fundraising soon for monasteries

1468
01:40:28.960 --> 01:40:31.880
<v Speaker 5>for skitties that are being set up in France. So

1469
01:40:32.319 --> 01:40:36.399
<v Speaker 5>we're gonna keep your passion on that. But yeah, it's growing. Actually,

1470
01:40:36.439 --> 01:40:42.000
<v Speaker 5>it's now the biggest Christian server in France because the

1471
01:40:42.159 --> 01:40:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Treads and the and the Concilia just canceled one another.

1472
01:40:47.600 --> 01:40:50.039
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, right now it's the biggest Christian serve in France.

1473
01:40:50.159 --> 01:40:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we possess the biggest Orthodox Christian server snacks

1474
01:40:53.399 --> 01:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in there as well, So he's got the biggest French

1475
01:40:55.000 --> 01:40:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Orthodox server. So you said the biggest Christian or biggest

1476
01:40:57.920 --> 01:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>French Christian Christian Oh wow, okay, so so yeah, a

1477
01:41:02.079 --> 01:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of converts being made through his and by God's grace,

1478
01:41:06.800 --> 01:41:10.039
<v Speaker 1>a lot of converts in ours as well. So if

1479
01:41:10.119 --> 01:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to join the discord, just follow my Twitter

1480
01:41:13.680 --> 01:41:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and periodically I will post invites for debate or whatever

1481
01:41:18.439 --> 01:41:21.239
<v Speaker 1>people want to do to come to the Twitter, I

1482
01:41:21.319 --> 01:41:22.439
<v Speaker 1>mean to to the discord.

1483
01:41:24.000 --> 01:41:25.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and it's on my Twitter bio.

1484
01:41:26.800 --> 01:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, awesome, all right, everybody, have a good night
