WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, it just goes from bad to worse for the

2
00:00:02.600 --> 00:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>high speed rail project. On Wednesday, they had a budgetary

3
00:00:09.519 --> 00:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>hearing about it at the State Assembly. Here's the story

4
00:00:14.320 --> 00:00:16.519
<v Speaker 1>about it from Ashley Zavala. Ashley Zavalla, by the way,

5
00:00:16.559 --> 00:00:19.359
<v Speaker 1>who you should all look up on Twitter. Ashley Zavalla.

6
00:00:19.440 --> 00:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>She's a reporter for She's just a local news reporter

7
00:00:22.320 --> 00:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in Sacramento, and she's like the only reporter who breaks

8
00:00:26.320 --> 00:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>any news about anything happening within state government. It's actually remarkable.

9
00:00:30.920 --> 00:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>She's far and away the best person to follow about

10
00:00:34.560 --> 00:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>news in Sacramento. And I think she's kind of putting

11
00:00:40.000 --> 00:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>every every reporter for every other news outlet that's based

12
00:00:44.039 --> 00:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in California to shame. Anyway, she writes, California's embattled high

13
00:00:50.000 --> 00:00:53.039
<v Speaker 1>speed rail project will soon need at least seven billion

14
00:00:53.159 --> 00:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars in order to move forward. During a budget hearing

15
00:00:56.000 --> 00:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>focused on transportation in the State Assembly on Wednesday, Helen

16
00:01:00.159 --> 00:01:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Kirstein with the California Legislative Analysts Office told lawmakers the

17
00:01:04.799 --> 00:01:07.439
<v Speaker 1>project faces a seven bohbo bo bo bo bo bo

18
00:01:07.519 --> 00:01:11.799
<v Speaker 1>bo billion dollar budget gap and the funds need to

19
00:01:11.840 --> 00:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>be secured by next June. So June end of fiscal

20
00:01:16.640 --> 00:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>year twenty five twenty six. If not, Kirstine said, it

21
00:01:20.879 --> 00:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>will create yet another delay for plans to finish the

22
00:01:24.200 --> 00:01:30.599
<v Speaker 1>project's first segment between Merced and Bakersfield. There is no

23
00:01:30.840 --> 00:01:34.439
<v Speaker 1>specific plan to meet that roughly seven billion dollar gap.

24
00:01:35.079 --> 00:01:37.799
<v Speaker 1>We also think there is some risk that gap could grow.

25
00:01:37.959 --> 00:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna interpret that as it's AB's a freaking loutly

26
00:01:41.159 --> 00:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be more than seven billion dollars. Kirstine said.

27
00:01:44.560 --> 00:01:48.159
<v Speaker 1>This isn't a way out in the future funding gap.

28
00:01:48.560 --> 00:01:52.319
<v Speaker 1>This is a pretty immediate This isn't a way out

29
00:01:52.359 --> 00:01:55.439
<v Speaker 1>in the future funding gap. This is a pretty immediate

30
00:01:55.480 --> 00:02:01.239
<v Speaker 1>funding gap. Wednesday's hearing on the project was brief. Well,

31
00:02:01.519 --> 00:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't want to spend a lot of time on it.

32
00:02:03.680 --> 00:02:06.159
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the great things about the California legislature.

33
00:02:06.200 --> 00:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Like they introduce a bill in committee, usually one side

34
00:02:11.159 --> 00:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>only gets two minutes to discuss it, and the side

35
00:02:14.400 --> 00:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that they want to v for gets as much time

36
00:02:15.840 --> 00:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>as they want. Anyway, Wednesday's hearing on the project was brief,

37
00:02:19.360 --> 00:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>as the High Speed Rail Authority submitted an incomplete project

38
00:02:22.680 --> 00:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>update to lawmakers in time for the hearing. Good the

39
00:02:28.639 --> 00:02:30.479
<v Speaker 1>High Speed Rail Authority that they can't even get a

40
00:02:30.520 --> 00:02:36.919
<v Speaker 1>full update in time for hearings. Officials said the update

41
00:02:36.919 --> 00:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>would be ready sometime later this summer, which irked lawmakers.

42
00:02:44.199 --> 00:02:47.199
<v Speaker 1>We have no plan, we have a good likelihood it's

43
00:02:47.240 --> 00:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>going to get worse, and we have a short time

44
00:02:49.840 --> 00:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>to solve the problem, set Assemblyman Stephen Bennett, a Democrat

45
00:02:52.960 --> 00:02:56.199
<v Speaker 1>from Ventura. That's not a good place for government to

46
00:02:56.240 --> 00:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>put itself into. The project was originally pitched to voters

47
00:03:01.280 --> 00:03:03.599
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight. Ah, let's let's go back

48
00:03:03.639 --> 00:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand and eight, the two thousand and eight November.

49
00:03:07.000 --> 00:03:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Elections in California.

50
00:03:09.080 --> 00:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>What a What a wild election that was the same

51
00:03:12.439 --> 00:03:16.479
<v Speaker 1>election where we overwhelmingly elected Barack Obama, we passed Proposition

52
00:03:16.560 --> 00:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>eight to define marriages between one man and one woman,

53
00:03:19.479 --> 00:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>and we decided to build the bullet train. What a

54
00:03:23.960 --> 00:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>wild election that was anyway. The project was originally pitched

55
00:03:28.520 --> 00:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to voters in two thousand and eight as a forty

56
00:03:30.439 --> 00:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar bullet train that would take riders from Los

57
00:03:32.960 --> 00:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Angeles to San Francisco. Since then, the price tag for

58
00:03:35.479 --> 00:03:38.599
<v Speaker 1>the original vision has swelled to at least one hundred billion,

59
00:03:38.639 --> 00:03:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and most of the money has yet to materialize. While

60
00:03:41.639 --> 00:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the state has spent about fourteen billion on the project

61
00:03:44.319 --> 00:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>so far overall, it still needs more than double that

62
00:03:48.719 --> 00:03:52.319
<v Speaker 1>amount in order to finish the merce said to Bakersfield Line,

63
00:03:52.400 --> 00:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>which project leaders hoped to be completed between twenty thirty

64
00:03:56.719 --> 00:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and twenty thirty three, Well, that's an awfully big window.

65
00:04:04.000 --> 00:04:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Twenty thirty to twenty thirty that's like a four different

66
00:04:08.680 --> 00:04:12.639
<v Speaker 1>years in which that could be completed. The Trump administration

67
00:04:12.719 --> 00:04:15.319
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year launched an investigation into the use of

68
00:04:15.360 --> 00:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>about four billion dollars in federal funds, which is still underway.

69
00:04:19.199 --> 00:04:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Lawmakers acknowledged the administration could halt future money or try

70
00:04:25.439 --> 00:04:28.639
<v Speaker 1>to claw back the dollars. Kirstine told lawmakers the rail

71
00:04:28.680 --> 00:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>authorities incomplete update assumes it will still receive and keep

72
00:04:33.519 --> 00:04:37.519
<v Speaker 1>federal dollars. Okay, so we're we're facing a seven billion

73
00:04:37.639 --> 00:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>dollar shortfall.

74
00:04:40.480 --> 00:04:42.639
<v Speaker 2>And that's assuming that we can keep.

75
00:04:42.480 --> 00:04:46.439
<v Speaker 1>All the federal money which the Trump administration is actively

76
00:04:46.600 --> 00:04:53.639
<v Speaker 1>trying to claw back. Mike Tolifson, the chief of staff

77
00:04:53.639 --> 00:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for the High Speed Rail Authority, told lawmakers the project's

78
00:04:56.360 --> 00:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>new CEO is working to review the project. Overall, we

79
00:05:01.079 --> 00:05:04.519
<v Speaker 1>are diligently working to get that information respect to scope

80
00:05:04.639 --> 00:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>schedule ridership, Toulson told the panel, You've been working on

81
00:05:09.879 --> 00:05:12.959
<v Speaker 1>this for forever. How is that not all one hundred

82
00:05:12.959 --> 00:05:21.959
<v Speaker 1>percent laid out in detail already? Kirstin recommended that lawmakers

83
00:05:22.120 --> 00:05:23.399
<v Speaker 1>try to figure this out.

84
00:05:24.879 --> 00:05:26.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, maybe maybe you should figure it out.

85
00:05:27.279 --> 00:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Kirstine recommended that lawmakers try to figure this out as

86
00:05:31.160 --> 00:05:33.319
<v Speaker 1>they work to determine the state spending plan for the

87
00:05:33.360 --> 00:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>next fiscal year, which starts in July. The timing of

88
00:05:37.319 --> 00:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the project review seems totally out of whack with when

89
00:05:41.720 --> 00:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we need to be making decisions, said Assembly Member Kaddy

90
00:05:45.560 --> 00:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Petrick Norris, a Democrat from Irvine.

91
00:05:48.759 --> 00:05:49.879
<v Speaker 2>That this is this is key.

92
00:05:50.160 --> 00:05:53.720
<v Speaker 1>The timing of the project review seems totally out of

93
00:05:53.759 --> 00:05:56.879
<v Speaker 1>whack with when we need to be making decisions. The

94
00:05:56.920 --> 00:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and

95
00:05:59.120 --> 00:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>over again, ex backing a different outcome. So I think

96
00:06:01.759 --> 00:06:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the point she's trying to make is, you know, the

97
00:06:04.399 --> 00:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>governor starts working on next year's budget in I don't know,

98
00:06:10.079 --> 00:06:15.759
<v Speaker 1>like December January. We're in March. We're now learning about

99
00:06:15.759 --> 00:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this seven billion dollar shortfall, and if we don't get

100
00:06:23.160 --> 00:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that money by June of next year, the high speed

101
00:06:26.759 --> 00:06:28.959
<v Speaker 1>rail will be delayed until. I mean now the window

102
00:06:29.000 --> 00:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is twenty thirty to twenty thirty three, what'll it be,

103
00:06:32.120 --> 00:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it'll be like, twenty thirty two

104
00:06:36.199 --> 00:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>to twenty thirty six, I don't know. Meanwhile, State Senate

105
00:06:44.319 --> 00:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Transportation Committee Chairman David Cortes Cortesi told KCRA three he

106
00:06:51.720 --> 00:06:53.439
<v Speaker 1>is hoping to schedule a hearing on the high speed

107
00:06:53.519 --> 00:06:57.759
<v Speaker 1>rail project in May. Wednesday's hearing happened hours after Governor

108
00:06:57.759 --> 00:07:00.439
<v Speaker 1>gavenue From released the latest episode of his pot cast

109
00:07:01.839 --> 00:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>featuring political commentator and author Ezra Kleine, in which the

110
00:07:05.160 --> 00:07:09.319
<v Speaker 1>governor defended the project. We did the railhead. We're starting

111
00:07:09.319 --> 00:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to lay track. This thing is starting to get very

112
00:07:11.959 --> 00:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>very real, the governor said. The episode focused on how

113
00:07:16.600 --> 00:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>now that's actually interesting. I maybe I need to go

114
00:07:19.240 --> 00:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to Gavin Newsom.

115
00:07:22.279 --> 00:07:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Gosh, it would really suck. As part of my job.

116
00:07:24.319 --> 00:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I need to actually listen to a Gavin Newsom podcast

117
00:07:26.959 --> 00:07:30.319
<v Speaker 1>every week. Ezra Kline is a columnist for The New

118
00:07:30.439 --> 00:07:35.319
<v Speaker 1>York Times, and he's been highly critical of democratic leaders

119
00:07:35.360 --> 00:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>basically being unable to accomplish big goals in the high

120
00:07:38.560 --> 00:07:43.199
<v Speaker 1>speed rail was one of the chief objects of his approbrium,

121
00:07:43.600 --> 00:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So it seems that Newsom is trying to have him

122
00:07:45.920 --> 00:07:47.439
<v Speaker 1>on to say, oh, no, it's not that bad.

123
00:07:48.040 --> 00:07:48.920
<v Speaker 2>I think this is.

124
00:07:48.920 --> 00:07:53.079
<v Speaker 1>Newsom trying to lay the groundwork for his twenty twenty

125
00:07:53.079 --> 00:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>eight presidential campaign and so oh no, no, no, high

126
00:07:55.120 --> 00:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>speed reel isn't total failure. The episode focused on how

127
00:08:00.600 --> 00:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Democratic leaders have struggled to build and finish major projects

128
00:08:04.160 --> 00:08:06.839
<v Speaker 1>in recent decades, which has frustrated the party's supporters and

129
00:08:06.920 --> 00:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>voters overall. Newsome acknowledged the challenges with the California's high

130
00:08:10.480 --> 00:08:12.639
<v Speaker 1>speed rail project, but claimed, now the hard work is

131
00:08:12.639 --> 00:08:15.439
<v Speaker 1>behind us and now we're laying track. Well, clearly the

132
00:08:15.439 --> 00:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>hard work is not behind you, because you've got a

133
00:08:17.600 --> 00:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>seven billion dollars short fall. When Klein pressed him about

134
00:08:21.920 --> 00:08:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the money shortfalls to complete the project overall and then

135
00:08:24.319 --> 00:08:26.759
<v Speaker 1>are said to Bakersfield line, Newsom replied, at the end

136
00:08:26.800 --> 00:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of the day, we've got these constraints that are well

137
00:08:28.920 --> 00:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>established in existing constraints. That's not an answer. At the

138
00:08:34.519 --> 00:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, we've got these constraints. Yeah, the

139
00:08:36.399 --> 00:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>constraint that you don't have enough money. There's not a

140
00:08:42.039 --> 00:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>high speed rail system that doesn't have some popularity and success.

141
00:08:45.639 --> 00:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Most are wildly popular. It's an experience no one has

142
00:08:49.000 --> 00:08:51.919
<v Speaker 1>had in the United States of America. At least we're

143
00:08:51.960 --> 00:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>out here. We're out there daring, he said. I was

144
00:08:57.120 --> 00:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in middle school when this happens, said Assembly Member Alexandra Mesido,

145
00:09:00.840 --> 00:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a Republican from Tularry who was elected to the state

146
00:09:03.000 --> 00:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Assembly in the last election.

147
00:09:04.960 --> 00:09:07.320
<v Speaker 2>We don't have the time, we don't have the money.

148
00:09:07.399 --> 00:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>We just need to pull the plug on this project,

149
00:09:09.519 --> 00:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>she said, as the voters passed it in two thousand

150
00:09:11.720 --> 00:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and eight.

151
00:09:12.039 --> 00:09:16.440
<v Speaker 2>It's never going to happen. Hard to argue with that.

152
00:09:21.840 --> 00:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I am really struggling with how Democrats can't

153
00:09:29.000 --> 00:09:33.399
<v Speaker 1>come to that analysis. The sunk cost fallacy, all right,

154
00:09:34.039 --> 00:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>The sunk cost fallacy is basically, I've got a failing project,

155
00:09:41.559 --> 00:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but I've invested so much into it that I can't

156
00:09:47.279 --> 00:09:53.399
<v Speaker 1>just give up on it. That is feeding into the

157
00:09:53.440 --> 00:09:58.279
<v Speaker 1>sunk cost fallacy. No, at a certain point, you need

158
00:09:58.320 --> 00:10:02.759
<v Speaker 1>to just accept the loss, cut your losses and move on.

159
00:10:03.120 --> 00:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Will actually be a better outcome than continuing to stick

160
00:10:06.639 --> 00:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>with something that's doomed. And Gavin Newsom is desperate. That's

161
00:10:16.360 --> 00:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is that we have people with lots.

162
00:10:18.960 --> 00:10:22.679
<v Speaker 2>Of different motivations. So let's think about this.

163
00:10:25.000 --> 00:10:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Nobody currently in the state legislature was in the state

164
00:10:31.480 --> 00:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>legislature in two thousand and eight. Okay, California has term limits,

165
00:10:37.120 --> 00:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve year term limits, So nobody who's currently in the

166
00:10:40.480 --> 00:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>state legislature was in the state legislature in two thousand

167
00:10:44.879 --> 00:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>and eight when the high speed rail was passed.

168
00:10:46.639 --> 00:10:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

169
00:10:47.120 --> 00:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>There are very few people left in the state legislature

170
00:10:50.639 --> 00:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>who feel some kind of political need to keep defending

171
00:10:55.960 --> 00:11:00.159
<v Speaker 1>the high speed rail. Now, Newsom was around in two

172
00:11:00.159 --> 00:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight. He was supportive of it then and

173
00:11:05.480 --> 00:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>critically Newsom made this big decision after he was elected

174
00:11:10.000 --> 00:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>governor in twenty nineteen. A lot of people thought that

175
00:11:13.759 --> 00:11:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Newsom would cut bait on the high.

176
00:11:16.200 --> 00:11:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Speed rail project.

177
00:11:17.799 --> 00:11:19.919
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of reporting that he was less enthused

178
00:11:19.919 --> 00:11:25.519
<v Speaker 1>about it than Jerry Brown was, and it seems of

179
00:11:25.559 --> 00:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>what happened was he got convinced of this idea well,

180
00:11:28.399 --> 00:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>merced to Bakersfield, merceaid to Bakersfield, and Newsom's entire governorship,

181
00:11:32.559 --> 00:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>all we've heard about is we're cutting our loss, We're

182
00:11:35.320 --> 00:11:37.759
<v Speaker 1>going to focus on let's just get merced to Bakersfield done,

183
00:11:38.639 --> 00:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and once me said to Bakersfield is done, it will

184
00:11:41.240 --> 00:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>demonstrate the viability of the system as a whole, which

185
00:11:46.600 --> 00:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>was always an argument that it just didn't make any

186
00:11:50.399 --> 00:11:55.639
<v Speaker 1>flippant sense. Merceaid to Bakersfield was never going to be.

187
00:11:56.879 --> 00:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>That's not representative of the system as a whole. Okay,

188
00:12:02.519 --> 00:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it's building it across the least populous and flattest stretch

189
00:12:10.039 --> 00:12:16.519
<v Speaker 1>of California, with the least amount of problems with eminent

190
00:12:16.600 --> 00:12:22.279
<v Speaker 1>domain seizures, the fewest engineering challenges as far as navigating

191
00:12:22.279 --> 00:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the terrain. Okay, you don't have to blast through mountains,

192
00:12:26.679 --> 00:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>which apparently we I don't know that we even today,

193
00:12:31.240 --> 00:12:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there's a great strategy for how

194
00:12:34.279 --> 00:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we get this high speed rail across the Grapevine. And

195
00:12:42.000 --> 00:12:46.039
<v Speaker 1>it's also I also have always thought that there's no

196
00:12:46.120 --> 00:12:48.279
<v Speaker 1>way this is going to demonstrate the viability of the

197
00:12:48.360 --> 00:12:51.279
<v Speaker 1>high speed rail just based on ridership, because who in

198
00:12:51.320 --> 00:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the San Joaquin Valley, the San Wauquin Valley, which is

199
00:12:53.879 --> 00:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the most negative region in the in the state with

200
00:12:57.159 --> 00:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>regards to its opinions on the high speed rail. Who

201
00:12:59.600 --> 00:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>in the San Joachin Valley is gonna ride this thing.

202
00:13:04.519 --> 00:13:09.399
<v Speaker 1>There's no trip all right. Merced to Bakersfield itself is

203
00:13:09.639 --> 00:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>roughly a I don't know, a three hour car drive,

204
00:13:15.320 --> 00:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's not a lot of direct mer said to

205
00:13:17.159 --> 00:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Bakersfield traffic.

206
00:13:18.360 --> 00:13:19.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, mostly it's okay.

207
00:13:20.000 --> 00:13:21.519
<v Speaker 1>If you live in Fresno and you want to go

208
00:13:21.519 --> 00:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to Bakersfield, what are you gonna do? Well, you can

209
00:13:24.879 --> 00:13:28.919
<v Speaker 1>either get to a train station forty minutes early, get

210
00:13:28.919 --> 00:13:31.919
<v Speaker 1>on the train, take the train to Bakersfield, takes about

211
00:13:31.919 --> 00:13:35.919
<v Speaker 1>an hour. You get off in Bakersfield, and then what.

212
00:13:35.879 --> 00:13:38.279
<v Speaker 2>Are you gonna do? You're gonna take an uber or something.

213
00:13:39.679 --> 00:13:48.399
<v Speaker 1>You haven't really saved any time, so, I mean, and

214
00:13:48.440 --> 00:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>then when you're.

215
00:13:49.000 --> 00:13:51.600
<v Speaker 2>In Bakersfield, you don't have the flexibility of your own car.

216
00:13:54.200 --> 00:13:56.919
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think anyone is gonna actually ride this

217
00:13:57.000 --> 00:14:01.879
<v Speaker 1>thing from Merced to Bakersfield. I just don't see how

218
00:14:01.919 --> 00:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this is going to happen unless you have I don't know,

219
00:14:04.519 --> 00:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>you work in downtown Fresno and you're going to someplace

220
00:14:08.600 --> 00:14:10.519
<v Speaker 1>that happens to be right next to the train station

221
00:14:10.559 --> 00:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in Bakersfield or Maderra, Merced or whatever. But to me,

222
00:14:17.639 --> 00:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like there's no way anybody's going to

223
00:14:20.600 --> 00:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>ride this thing or its ridership is going to be

224
00:14:22.639 --> 00:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>really small. How is this going to demonstrate the viability

225
00:14:25.080 --> 00:14:33.759
<v Speaker 1>of anything. Newsom sort of decided in twenty nineteen this

226
00:14:33.960 --> 00:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>was what he was going to do, and he needs

227
00:14:39.279 --> 00:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>this to work. He can't abandon it like a sunk

228
00:14:43.240 --> 00:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>cost because it's about his presidency. When we return, I

229
00:14:45.480 --> 00:14:47.919
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about how important the high speed rail

230
00:14:48.039 --> 00:14:49.559
<v Speaker 1>is for his presidential ambitions.

231
00:14:49.600 --> 00:14:51.480
<v Speaker 2>That's next on the John Growardy Show.

232
00:14:53.480 --> 00:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Newsom needs the high speed rail project to work

233
00:14:57.159 --> 00:14:59.639
<v Speaker 1>because he needs to run for president.

234
00:15:00.919 --> 00:15:04.320
<v Speaker 2>He needs it. It's an essential cog in his desire

235
00:15:04.360 --> 00:15:05.200
<v Speaker 2>to run for president.

236
00:15:07.399 --> 00:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>If at least merced De Bakersfield isn't completed or well

237
00:15:13.759 --> 00:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>on the road to completion, this is what the debate

238
00:15:18.399 --> 00:15:23.679
<v Speaker 1>stage is gonna look like for the presidential election. You

239
00:15:23.759 --> 00:15:27.039
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about infrastructure, This guy can't even get

240
00:15:27.080 --> 00:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>his high speed rail project done. He's been working on

241
00:15:29.759 --> 00:15:32.039
<v Speaker 1>it in California. He worked on it in California for

242
00:15:32.039 --> 00:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>eight years. When he started. There wasn't a single inch

243
00:15:35.000 --> 00:15:37.159
<v Speaker 1>of operable track. When he left office, there wasn't a

244
00:15:37.159 --> 00:15:41.399
<v Speaker 1>single inch of operable track. They had to and Newsome

245
00:15:41.960 --> 00:15:45.639
<v Speaker 1>is so vulnerable about the high speed rail, He's gonna

246
00:15:45.679 --> 00:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>get roasted on a debate stage when that subject is

247
00:15:50.120 --> 00:15:52.759
<v Speaker 1>brought up, whether that's in the primary debates against other

248
00:15:52.759 --> 00:15:57.519
<v Speaker 1>Democrats or if it's on the main debate stage going

249
00:15:57.559 --> 00:16:00.759
<v Speaker 1>up against Jade Vance, he's gonna get fried.

250
00:16:03.240 --> 00:16:04.799
<v Speaker 2>So here's the thing.

251
00:16:05.960 --> 00:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I think most lawmakers, even on the Democrats side, would

252
00:16:09.639 --> 00:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>be open to the idea of is this the sunk

253
00:16:12.759 --> 00:16:15.679
<v Speaker 1>cost fallacy? Should we just cut our losses? Should we

254
00:16:15.759 --> 00:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>just say forget it? We need to just abandon this project.

255
00:16:18.120 --> 00:16:21.759
<v Speaker 1>It's never gonna happen. It's just not viable. Forget it,

256
00:16:21.799 --> 00:16:27.039
<v Speaker 1>We're done, roll it all up, deconstruct it, get all

257
00:16:27.080 --> 00:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the stuff for salvage or something, and move on.

258
00:16:31.120 --> 00:16:33.440
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of Democrats would be open to that.

259
00:16:34.039 --> 00:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I think particularly a lot of Democrats from the Los

260
00:16:36.399 --> 00:16:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Angeles area. Los Angeles was always less supportive of high

261
00:16:39.559 --> 00:16:42.519
<v Speaker 1>speed rail than San Francisco was. It was always going

262
00:16:42.559 --> 00:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to be more of a benefit to San Francisco. Why well,

263
00:16:46.360 --> 00:16:50.039
<v Speaker 1>home prices in San Francisco are too insane. The trend

264
00:16:50.120 --> 00:16:52.519
<v Speaker 1>has been in the San Francisco in the Bay area

265
00:16:52.919 --> 00:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>just to move further and further south away from the

266
00:16:56.120 --> 00:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Bay Area and have longer and longer commutes. Speed rail

267
00:17:00.480 --> 00:17:04.039
<v Speaker 1>was a very attractive thing if you're a young if

268
00:17:04.039 --> 00:17:07.039
<v Speaker 1>you're an urban professional, you want to buy a big

269
00:17:07.039 --> 00:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>old house in Madera or something and commute twice a

270
00:17:10.440 --> 00:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>week to San Francisco, get a high speed rail train

271
00:17:13.519 --> 00:17:16.799
<v Speaker 1>and by to being by a bang baa boom. That

272
00:17:17.559 --> 00:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of sense for the Bay Area. It

273
00:17:19.440 --> 00:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make as much sense for Los Angeles. So, I mean,

274
00:17:25.599 --> 00:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone's going to buy a home in

275
00:17:27.920 --> 00:17:33.079
<v Speaker 1>Bakersfield to go, you know, commute two hours to go

276
00:17:33.119 --> 00:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>into Los Angeles or something. So high speed rail was

277
00:17:39.240 --> 00:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>always more popular in the Bay Area. I could see

278
00:17:42.160 --> 00:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of LA Area lawmakers thinking this is dumb,

279
00:17:46.279 --> 00:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Like why are we still This is not really going

280
00:17:48.279 --> 00:17:51.559
<v Speaker 1>to benefit our region all that much. It's going to

281
00:17:51.640 --> 00:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>cost a lot of money, and like, you know, it's

282
00:17:56.000 --> 00:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>not very environmentally sensitive to say, but we have a

283
00:17:58.440 --> 00:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>high speed system to get from to San Francisco.

284
00:18:00.960 --> 00:18:01.880
<v Speaker 2>It's called airplanes.

285
00:18:02.440 --> 00:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>We got a gazillion planes that shuttle back and forth

286
00:18:05.559 --> 00:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>forty minutes flat you go from Los Angeles to San Francisco.

287
00:18:13.720 --> 00:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So I could see lawmakers from Los Angeles saying, you know,

288
00:18:19.680 --> 00:18:22.799
<v Speaker 1>forget it. I'd never voted for the Look I could

289
00:18:22.799 --> 00:18:25.559
<v Speaker 1>see a lawmaker from Los Angeles saying, hey, I was

290
00:18:25.599 --> 00:18:28.559
<v Speaker 1>like sixteen when the state voted for the high speed

291
00:18:28.599 --> 00:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>rail in two thousand and eight. Alexandra Mesdo, the assembly

292
00:18:32.400 --> 00:18:35.279
<v Speaker 1>member from Visalia, is saying that same thing.

293
00:18:35.359 --> 00:18:37.119
<v Speaker 2>She said, I was in middle school when the state

294
00:18:37.200 --> 00:18:39.559
<v Speaker 2>voted for this. A lot of these.

295
00:18:39.519 --> 00:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Lawmakers from LA could say, look, I wasn't a prominent

296
00:18:44.359 --> 00:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>person pushing for the high speed rail in two thousand

297
00:18:46.640 --> 00:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and eight. I don't have any commitment to this. I'm out.

298
00:18:50.400 --> 00:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to keep voting for its funding anymore.

299
00:18:54.119 --> 00:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrats could do that, but there's one Democrat who needs

300
00:18:57.680 --> 00:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it to succeed, and it's Gavin Newsom. If Gavin Newsom,

301
00:19:04.519 --> 00:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>if his own Democrats rebel and say we're done with

302
00:19:09.160 --> 00:19:11.559
<v Speaker 1>the high speed rail, we're giving up. If Gavin Newsom,

303
00:19:12.480 --> 00:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>seven years into his eight years of governorship, were to

304
00:19:17.599 --> 00:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>finally pull the plug on the high speed rail.

305
00:19:19.920 --> 00:19:20.559
<v Speaker 2>Now.

306
00:19:23.480 --> 00:19:28.559
<v Speaker 1>There's no way he's running for president. Now it's different.

307
00:19:28.599 --> 00:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>If Newsom on day one had said forget it. This

308
00:19:31.240 --> 00:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>high speed rail is a it's a train of nowhere.

309
00:19:33.440 --> 00:19:36.559
<v Speaker 1>It's never gonna happen, and he withdrew support. If he

310
00:19:36.599 --> 00:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>withdrew support for it in twenty nineteen when he started

311
00:19:39.200 --> 00:19:42.799
<v Speaker 1>as governor, he'd be in a much better position right now.

312
00:19:45.359 --> 00:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>He wouldn't have this issue hanging over his head.

313
00:19:50.599 --> 00:19:52.440
<v Speaker 2>But he's in too deep now.

314
00:19:54.400 --> 00:19:58.039
<v Speaker 1>He has the high speed rail has to work for

315
00:19:58.160 --> 00:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>his political ambitions.

316
00:20:00.200 --> 00:20:02.119
<v Speaker 2>There's no other option for him.

317
00:20:02.319 --> 00:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>If if the state legislature pulls all the funding for

318
00:20:04.720 --> 00:20:06.079
<v Speaker 1>the high speed rail and gives up on.

319
00:20:06.079 --> 00:20:08.240
<v Speaker 2>It, he's done.

320
00:20:08.480 --> 00:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I don't think he's got a prayer in

321
00:20:11.920 --> 00:20:15.519
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat presidential contest against Jade Vans if they can

322
00:20:15.680 --> 00:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>just say, look at this idiot who supported this high

323
00:20:18.720 --> 00:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>speed rail project that was such a waste of money,

324
00:20:21.519 --> 00:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>such a disaster that his own Democrats couldn't even support

325
00:20:25.440 --> 00:20:30.079
<v Speaker 1>it anymore. I think he's cooked, and I think he

326
00:20:30.200 --> 00:20:33.799
<v Speaker 1>knows it. I think he understands that's why he's bringing

327
00:20:33.839 --> 00:20:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Ezra Clin on to try to onto his podcast to

328
00:20:36.839 --> 00:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>try to like talk to him about oh, no, no, no,

329
00:20:39.279 --> 00:20:41.519
<v Speaker 1>it's not a disaster. And then of course the next

330
00:20:41.599 --> 00:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>day here's the budgetary thing where they say, yeah, there's

331
00:20:46.720 --> 00:20:51.039
<v Speaker 1>actually a seven billion dollars short shortfall that we need

332
00:20:51.079 --> 00:20:58.839
<v Speaker 1>to get resolved by June of twenty twenty six. He's

333
00:20:59.839 --> 00:21:04.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if he doesn't get the high speed rail

334
00:21:05.319 --> 00:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>on track to be completed in twenty thirty twenty thirty three,

335
00:21:09.680 --> 00:21:16.839
<v Speaker 1>he's cooked. And if the state legislature undoes it there,

336
00:21:16.880 --> 00:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's if the state legislature eventually pulls its support,

337
00:21:20.680 --> 00:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>if all the Democrat lawmakers from Los Angeles southern California

338
00:21:24.799 --> 00:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>join with all the Republicans, it could be doomed for him,

339
00:21:30.720 --> 00:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's what he's worried about. I wonder

340
00:21:34.920 --> 00:21:38.079
<v Speaker 1>how much juice he still has. Our lawmakers still afraid

341
00:21:38.119 --> 00:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of him. I think they are, probably because he's got

342
00:21:42.000 --> 00:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>such a good connection with the donor class. Probably still

343
00:21:47.680 --> 00:21:49.599
<v Speaker 1>be a bad idea to make an enemy out of him.

344
00:21:51.920 --> 00:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I don't know that Newsome. I think a

345
00:21:58.720 --> 00:22:02.599
<v Speaker 1>lot of lawmakers are willing to accept this is a

346
00:22:02.599 --> 00:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>sunk cost. We got to just cut our losses and

347
00:22:05.519 --> 00:22:10.039
<v Speaker 1>move on. But he can't. He can't if he wants

348
00:22:10.039 --> 00:22:13.519
<v Speaker 1>to run for president, he can't make that decision. So

349
00:22:13.799 --> 00:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>as a result, I think he's gonna have enough sway

350
00:22:16.519 --> 00:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>with his fellow Democrats to move them to keep on,

351
00:22:19.960 --> 00:22:23.759
<v Speaker 1>keep on, keeping on, keep on funding this thing in

352
00:22:23.759 --> 00:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a state where we're running deficit every year, we don't

353
00:22:26.480 --> 00:22:29.519
<v Speaker 1>have enough money for it. I think he's gonna keep

354
00:22:29.559 --> 00:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>pouring money into this. I wish he'd be willing to

355
00:22:33.759 --> 00:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of accept reality, but he can't do that and

356
00:22:38.279 --> 00:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>then run for president.

357
00:22:39.359 --> 00:22:40.559
<v Speaker 2>It just it won't work.

358
00:22:42.319 --> 00:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>When we return the alternate universes of Gavin Newsom next

359
00:22:47.240 --> 00:22:52.279
<v Speaker 1>on the John Zarardy Show, it's funny to think how

360
00:22:52.400 --> 00:22:55.839
<v Speaker 1>it all could have gone so much differently for Gavin Newsom.

361
00:22:57.279 --> 00:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>If he had made a couple of different decisions, he

362
00:23:00.759 --> 00:23:06.799
<v Speaker 1>would be the rock star of the left and probably

363
00:23:06.839 --> 00:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the shoe in for twenty twenty eight.

364
00:23:10.039 --> 00:23:14.119
<v Speaker 2>The left would look at him the way you know.

365
00:23:15.200 --> 00:23:17.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if if Trump had not come back to

366
00:23:17.920 --> 00:23:20.759
<v Speaker 1>run in twenty twenty four, Ron DeSantis would have been

367
00:23:20.759 --> 00:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the rock star for the right. And I think DeSantis

368
00:23:23.640 --> 00:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>probably would have kicked Biden's but I think DeSantis probably

369
00:23:25.920 --> 00:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>would have kicked Kamala Harris's but and would would have

370
00:23:30.160 --> 00:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>had this rock star. And DeSantis is a very popular

371
00:23:32.960 --> 00:23:36.799
<v Speaker 1>Republican governor. I think Newsom is not that to the left.

372
00:23:38.279 --> 00:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I think he's disliked by the hard Bernie left, and

373
00:23:42.400 --> 00:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people look at him skeptically,

374
00:23:44.279 --> 00:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>even on the more moderate left, the kind of the

375
00:23:47.480 --> 00:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the John Fetterman types. I don't think he's a beloved figure.

376
00:23:55.000 --> 00:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's so interesting to think what kind of a

377
00:23:57.720 --> 00:24:00.519
<v Speaker 1>governorship he could have had if he had just taken

378
00:24:00.640 --> 00:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different steps, even on things that don't

379
00:24:04.440 --> 00:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily touch on like core liberal beliefs, or on things

380
00:24:09.200 --> 00:24:12.519
<v Speaker 1>where he could have been more liberal. So let me

381
00:24:12.559 --> 00:24:23.799
<v Speaker 1>count the waves. So Gavin Newsom comes in in twenty nineteen.

382
00:24:24.119 --> 00:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>He's sworn in January of twenty nineteen. It was right

383
00:24:28.400 --> 00:24:31.519
<v Speaker 1>then where there was all this talk about is Newsome

384
00:24:31.599 --> 00:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna abandon the high speed rail? A lot of people

385
00:24:33.759 --> 00:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>thought he was going to abandon in the high speed rail,

386
00:24:37.240 --> 00:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>broad understanding that he was less enthused about it than

387
00:24:40.000 --> 00:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Brown, was less idealistic about it. He was cutting,

388
00:24:43.680 --> 00:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we were going to cut our losses, were done with

389
00:24:45.519 --> 00:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>high speed rail. He comes in though, with this half

390
00:24:48.440 --> 00:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>measure of like, well, he basically cannot bring himself fully

391
00:24:52.920 --> 00:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to abandoned high speed rail. He gets convinced to well,

392
00:24:56.519 --> 00:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>we'll just finish merceaid to Bakersfield without hending seemingly that

393
00:25:01.440 --> 00:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>merceaid to Bakersfield is an incredibly tall order still for

394
00:25:05.480 --> 00:25:12.759
<v Speaker 1>which we still don't have the money, and he basically

395
00:25:12.759 --> 00:25:15.599
<v Speaker 1>takes the position we will finish merceaid to Bakersfield in

396
00:25:15.680 --> 00:25:17.880
<v Speaker 1>order to demonstrate the viability of the system as a whole,

397
00:25:17.920 --> 00:25:20.559
<v Speaker 1>so he doesn't abandon high speed rail when he could have.

398
00:25:20.640 --> 00:25:23.519
<v Speaker 1>He had an opportunity to credibly do that in twenty nineteen,

399
00:25:24.920 --> 00:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do it. That's a big sliding doors moment.

400
00:25:30.640 --> 00:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, take the red pill or take the blue pill.

401
00:25:33.640 --> 00:25:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Which way are you going to go? He chose the

402
00:25:37.640 --> 00:25:41.599
<v Speaker 1>easier way out, easier as far as Democrats were more

403
00:25:41.599 --> 00:25:48.519
<v Speaker 1>okay with it, and as a result, for his presidential ambitions,

404
00:25:49.559 --> 00:25:52.599
<v Speaker 1>he eats all the blame for high speed rail because

405
00:25:52.640 --> 00:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>he committed himself to it and he's too deep in

406
00:25:56.319 --> 00:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, as I talked about in the first two segments,

407
00:25:59.079 --> 00:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>just on Way, there was a budgetary hearing in which

408
00:26:02.000 --> 00:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it was revealed that we need seven billion dollars before

409
00:26:06.200 --> 00:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>June of twenty twenty six for this upcoming budgetary cycle.

410
00:26:08.960 --> 00:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>We need seven billion dollars for the high speed rail.

411
00:26:10.920 --> 00:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>If we don't get seven billion dollars. High speed drill

412
00:26:13.480 --> 00:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to be delayed further, so Newsome doesn't look good.

413
00:26:24.519 --> 00:26:27.359
<v Speaker 2>With high speed rail. Here's another sliding door.

414
00:26:29.279 --> 00:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many of you remember this, but

415
00:26:31.920 --> 00:26:35.839
<v Speaker 1>when Newsom was campaigning in twenty eighteen, he was a

416
00:26:35.960 --> 00:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>very big proponent of single pair health care. The idea

417
00:26:42.599 --> 00:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>with single pair health care is instead of a marketplace

418
00:26:47.279 --> 00:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>of insurance companies, there's only one insurance company, the government, Calcare.

419
00:26:53.119 --> 00:27:03.079
<v Speaker 1>And Newsome advocated for it, and he even very specifically

420
00:27:03.759 --> 00:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>used language like I don't like it when these liberal

421
00:27:08.839 --> 00:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>politicians they say they're going to push for single payer healthcare,

422
00:27:12.000 --> 00:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and then when they actually get in a position to

423
00:27:13.720 --> 00:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>do it, it's, oh, it's not the right time and it's

424
00:27:16.920 --> 00:27:20.559
<v Speaker 1>too difficult, and oh and they kicked the can down

425
00:27:20.599 --> 00:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the road.

426
00:27:20.920 --> 00:27:21.519
<v Speaker 2>I don't like that.

427
00:27:21.759 --> 00:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>He was so explicit about how these other politicians they

428
00:27:27.319 --> 00:27:28.839
<v Speaker 1>just say they're going to pursue single payer, and then

429
00:27:28.880 --> 00:27:30.319
<v Speaker 1>when the rubber meets the road, they don't.

430
00:27:30.119 --> 00:27:30.759
<v Speaker 2>Actually do it.

431
00:27:31.240 --> 00:27:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's precisely what Newsom did. He when the rubber

432
00:27:34.559 --> 00:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>met the road, he didn't do it. Insurance companies got

433
00:27:38.359 --> 00:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to him. He realized how much taxes would have to

434
00:27:43.279 --> 00:27:46.839
<v Speaker 1>be increased, and he just didn't pursue it.

435
00:27:48.400 --> 00:27:50.079
<v Speaker 2>Again, kind of a sliding doors moment.

436
00:27:50.119 --> 00:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>What does his governorship look like if he actually does

437
00:27:52.480 --> 00:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>pursue it. It becomes the single issue of his camp,

438
00:27:55.920 --> 00:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the most singular issue of his campaign. Too, was a

439
00:28:01.160 --> 00:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>very good year for Democrats.

440
00:28:02.799 --> 00:28:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

441
00:28:04.480 --> 00:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he would have lost, and he would

442
00:28:07.680 --> 00:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>have moved that ratchet one way for Democrats nationwide. I

443
00:28:12.200 --> 00:28:16.319
<v Speaker 1>think he would have become a hero on the left.

444
00:28:17.759 --> 00:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Now a question is, well, what would that have done

445
00:28:20.160 --> 00:28:22.799
<v Speaker 1>to California health care? Would that have done to California's

446
00:28:22.799 --> 00:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>economy if the tax if taxes had been increased to

447
00:28:25.480 --> 00:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that extent, what would that have done to our revenue base?

448
00:28:29.039 --> 00:28:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Would everyone who's wealthy have left?

449
00:28:31.799 --> 00:28:34.599
<v Speaker 1>More people who are wealthy than who left the state

450
00:28:34.680 --> 00:28:37.759
<v Speaker 1>during COVID? How would that have functioned during COVID? I mean,

451
00:28:38.000 --> 00:28:40.799
<v Speaker 1>would that have put different kinds of strain on the system.

452
00:28:40.839 --> 00:28:42.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't know if it would have

453
00:28:42.359 --> 00:28:44.519
<v Speaker 2>made the situation better or worse.

454
00:28:44.640 --> 00:28:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the situation with California healthcare right now is

455
00:28:47.839 --> 00:28:51.079
<v Speaker 1>really this sort of half measure that doesn't work where

456
00:28:51.119 --> 00:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>we massively expand medical eligibility so that everyone's covered by

457
00:28:54.720 --> 00:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>medical even though we don't have enough money in medical

458
00:28:57.240 --> 00:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to cover everybody. I mean, just just about a month ago,

459
00:29:03.319 --> 00:29:04.759
<v Speaker 1>they had the story that they need to take out

460
00:29:04.799 --> 00:29:08.359
<v Speaker 1>a big loan to help pay for medical because, oh geez,

461
00:29:08.960 --> 00:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>adding illegal aliens to the medical roles is more expensive

462
00:29:13.000 --> 00:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>than we thought. And that's how Newsome kind of got

463
00:29:18.160 --> 00:29:19.279
<v Speaker 1>around that campaign promise.

464
00:29:19.359 --> 00:29:20.440
<v Speaker 2>What he said was, well, what I.

465
00:29:20.440 --> 00:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Was trying to do, I wasn't just really what I

466
00:29:23.440 --> 00:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't concerned about was single payer necessarily. I just wanted

467
00:29:26.759 --> 00:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone to be covered by health insurance, and I've accomplished that.

468
00:29:30.559 --> 00:29:33.039
<v Speaker 2>It's like, all right, well that's a very different thing.

469
00:29:33.160 --> 00:29:35.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's sort of a seems like kind of

470
00:29:35.640 --> 00:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a half measure that you enacted here. And meanwhile, you know,

471
00:29:39.559 --> 00:29:42.319
<v Speaker 1>here's Madera community hospital going out of business. Why because

472
00:29:42.359 --> 00:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent of their patients are medical and they lose

473
00:29:44.400 --> 00:29:51.119
<v Speaker 1>money on their medical patients or they can't make money.

474
00:29:50.319 --> 00:29:51.839
<v Speaker 2>Too many medical beneficiaries.

475
00:29:52.240 --> 00:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Not enough money going into the state's coffers to pay

476
00:29:55.079 --> 00:29:59.119
<v Speaker 1>doctors for reimbursements for services to Medicaid patients, to medical patients,

477
00:30:03.079 --> 00:30:03.599
<v Speaker 1>so that's.

478
00:30:03.480 --> 00:30:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Another sliding door.

479
00:30:04.839 --> 00:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>It's very I don't now, I don't know if he

480
00:30:08.480 --> 00:30:12.079
<v Speaker 1>would be better off worse off politically. I think he'd

481
00:30:12.119 --> 00:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>be a rock star on the left certainly if he

482
00:30:14.440 --> 00:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>had gotten single payer healthcare past it's an interesting sliding door.

483
00:30:19.960 --> 00:30:23.119
<v Speaker 1>What would have happened if Newsom had actually pushed for

484
00:30:23.200 --> 00:30:31.079
<v Speaker 1>single pair? The other stuff is just kind of stuff

485
00:30:31.079 --> 00:30:34.279
<v Speaker 1>that isn't necessarily super politically coded. What if Newsom had

486
00:30:34.319 --> 00:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>really taken fire prevention in forestry management, really, really seriously,

487
00:30:42.480 --> 00:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>if Newsom had been willing to buck the environmentalists, how

488
00:30:51.039 --> 00:30:55.599
<v Speaker 1>popular would he be? Right, I'm well, let me correct it.

489
00:30:56.000 --> 00:31:01.519
<v Speaker 1>How many horrible black eyes would Newsom have avoided if

490
00:31:01.559 --> 00:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we had enough water going to the Los Angeles area

491
00:31:05.279 --> 00:31:09.599
<v Speaker 1>through the California State Water System, if we had appropriate

492
00:31:09.640 --> 00:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>forestry management where we were actually allowed to cut down

493
00:31:12.160 --> 00:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>some trees to prevent worse burns. If Newsom just decided

494
00:31:19.000 --> 00:31:22.119
<v Speaker 1>to stop taking calls from the Sierra Club and went

495
00:31:22.119 --> 00:31:24.519
<v Speaker 1>to his donors directly and said, listen, I understand you

496
00:31:24.559 --> 00:31:27.119
<v Speaker 1>donate to them. I'm going to stand on my own

497
00:31:27.160 --> 00:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>here and I'm not going to.

498
00:31:29.640 --> 00:31:30.839
<v Speaker 2>Support their policies.

499
00:31:33.079 --> 00:31:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Where would he be I mean he would have avoid

500
00:31:34.880 --> 00:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's sort of hard to know because it's

501
00:31:37.240 --> 00:31:42.839
<v Speaker 1>disasters that would have just not happened. But I think

502
00:31:42.960 --> 00:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>his presidential ambitions in twenty twenty eight are not going

503
00:31:45.759 --> 00:31:50.799
<v Speaker 1>to be helped by the fires that we experienced last

504
00:31:50.839 --> 00:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>year in Los Angeles. I don't think his presidential ambitions

505
00:31:53.880 --> 00:31:56.599
<v Speaker 1>are going to be helped by the horrible forest fires

506
00:31:56.599 --> 00:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen and twenty twenty. And lastly, I sort

507
00:32:03.240 --> 00:32:07.119
<v Speaker 1>of wonder if Newsom had taken a page out of

508
00:32:07.160 --> 00:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the DeSantis Kemp playbook during COVID, what would life what

509
00:32:15.039 --> 00:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>would his perception be. Desantasen Kemp became significant figures on

510
00:32:22.960 --> 00:32:27.559
<v Speaker 1>the national right because of COVID, because of how they

511
00:32:27.599 --> 00:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>managed their states during COVID, their willingness to go against

512
00:32:30.680 --> 00:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the grain and to say no, these lockdown measures aren't

513
00:32:34.960 --> 00:32:38.519
<v Speaker 1>really necessary for public health, and they're destroying businesses and

514
00:32:38.559 --> 00:32:44.319
<v Speaker 1>we just can't do this. Newsom went whole hog the

515
00:32:44.359 --> 00:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>other way. I don't think anyone in California loved it.

516
00:32:50.359 --> 00:32:52.119
<v Speaker 2>There was a real moment where the.

517
00:32:52.039 --> 00:32:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Recall effort and sort of the Larry Elder recall effort

518
00:32:55.480 --> 00:32:58.599
<v Speaker 1>against Newsom, there was a real moment where it looked

519
00:32:58.599 --> 00:33:00.839
<v Speaker 1>like Newsom could lose, and then what happened, Well, Nwsom

520
00:33:00.880 --> 00:33:03.119
<v Speaker 1>opened up all the schools, like, you know, two months

521
00:33:03.119 --> 00:33:06.079
<v Speaker 1>before the recall election, and then he wins sixty three percent.

522
00:33:07.799 --> 00:33:10.119
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think anyone got out of that feeling like, oh,

523
00:33:10.160 --> 00:33:10.599
<v Speaker 1>we love.

524
00:33:10.480 --> 00:33:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Gavin Newsom so much. And that's the thing with COVID.

525
00:33:14.880 --> 00:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>It was so bizarre with COVID, how one strategy versus

526
00:33:18.480 --> 00:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>another got coded as liberal versus conservative, left wing versus

527
00:33:23.079 --> 00:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>right wing. It was all just sort of artificial grouping

528
00:33:27.440 --> 00:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of people together because I think the left perceived that

529
00:33:33.279 --> 00:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump it was all like it really it honestly

530
00:33:36.519 --> 00:33:40.359
<v Speaker 1>felt like so much of it was the left organizing

531
00:33:40.400 --> 00:33:45.519
<v Speaker 1>itself against what they perceived Donald Trump wanted. I mean,

532
00:33:45.720 --> 00:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>all the raging against hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were purely because

533
00:33:50.440 --> 00:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump said something positive about it. Yeah, I feel like

534
00:33:53.920 --> 00:33:59.839
<v Speaker 1>there was literally no other reason, Like the whole healthcare

535
00:33:59.880 --> 00:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is establishment seemed to organize itself around the principle of

536
00:34:03.200 --> 00:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't like Donald Trump, or we don't like Trump

537
00:34:08.480 --> 00:34:09.880
<v Speaker 1>supporters or something.

538
00:34:14.039 --> 00:34:16.199
<v Speaker 2>So it it kind of.

539
00:34:19.039 --> 00:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there was really any like core liberal

540
00:34:21.480 --> 00:34:25.239
<v Speaker 1>beliefs that Newsom would have actually violated if he would

541
00:34:25.280 --> 00:34:26.639
<v Speaker 1>have just had to go against the grain of all

542
00:34:26.679 --> 00:34:29.559
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the Democrats in the country, and possibly

543
00:34:29.599 --> 00:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>against the grain of you know, Joe Biden in twenty

544
00:34:32.840 --> 00:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. But Newsom could have stood on his own

545
00:34:37.039 --> 00:34:39.119
<v Speaker 1>two feet and said, no, you know, no, we're not

546
00:34:39.239 --> 00:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>going whole hog the way all these other liberal states

547
00:34:41.960 --> 00:34:43.280
<v Speaker 1>are going. We're not going to be like New York.

548
00:34:43.280 --> 00:34:44.760
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to be like all these other states.

549
00:34:44.960 --> 00:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be pretty open and we're going to

550
00:34:47.559 --> 00:34:53.599
<v Speaker 1>let people conduct business. But Newsom didn't do that. If

551
00:34:54.199 --> 00:34:57.159
<v Speaker 1>if he had governed California the way to Santis governed Florida,

552
00:34:59.000 --> 00:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you probably would have had a a lot fewer people

553
00:35:01.039 --> 00:35:03.639
<v Speaker 1>leaving the state to go to Texas, to go to Idaho,

554
00:35:03.760 --> 00:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to go here.

555
00:35:04.440 --> 00:35:04.639
<v Speaker 2>There.

556
00:35:04.679 --> 00:35:06.320
<v Speaker 1>We lost a lot of people and a lot of

557
00:35:06.360 --> 00:35:10.119
<v Speaker 1>tax revenue during COVID. Would we be facing the kind

558
00:35:10.119 --> 00:35:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of budget shortfall we have now if we didn't lose

559
00:35:12.480 --> 00:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>all those people to COVID and if we had abandoned

560
00:35:18.000 --> 00:35:23.559
<v Speaker 1>high speed rail project right away. Honestly, Gavin Newsom, if

561
00:35:23.559 --> 00:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>he had done a lot of these things, you know,

562
00:35:26.360 --> 00:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is it better, is it worse?

563
00:35:27.440 --> 00:35:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

564
00:35:27.800 --> 00:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>The single payer healthcare, that's a wild card. Maybe that

565
00:35:31.039 --> 00:35:35.159
<v Speaker 1>would have made him a lot more hated in some ways.

566
00:35:35.239 --> 00:35:37.159
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that would have driven more business out of the state.

567
00:35:37.239 --> 00:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but it's a fascinating thing. How he

568
00:35:42.079 --> 00:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of really big time moments where he

569
00:35:45.840 --> 00:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>had to decide, who am I going to listen to?

570
00:35:50.000 --> 00:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Am I going to do what my backers tell me

571
00:35:52.840 --> 00:35:54.440
<v Speaker 1>or not? Am I going to stand on my own

572
00:35:54.480 --> 00:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>two feet and be my own man? Or am I

573
00:35:57.039 --> 00:35:58.920
<v Speaker 1>going to do what all the money'd interest want me

574
00:35:58.960 --> 00:35:59.119
<v Speaker 1>to do?

575
00:36:00.119 --> 00:36:00.199
<v Speaker 2>It?

576
00:36:00.239 --> 00:36:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Shut downs A lot of that were prompted by the

577
00:36:01.639 --> 00:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>teachers' unions. Teachers unions didn't want to go back to work,

578
00:36:05.559 --> 00:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and he felt he had to listen to them. It's

579
00:36:11.480 --> 00:36:16.679
<v Speaker 1>really a fascinating sliding doors thought experiment because Newsom will

580
00:36:16.960 --> 00:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think a couple of changes, and Newsom would be

581
00:36:20.480 --> 00:36:26.559
<v Speaker 1>standing right now as the rock star likely hero heading

582
00:36:26.599 --> 00:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>into the twenty twenty eight election, and heck, maybe he

583
00:36:31.559 --> 00:36:33.880
<v Speaker 1>throws his hat in more aggressively for twenty twenty four

584
00:36:35.280 --> 00:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>when we return the United Kingdom really get into the

585
00:36:37.559 --> 00:36:40.599
<v Speaker 1>root of their problems with public violence.

586
00:36:40.760 --> 00:36:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Banning ninja swords.

587
00:36:42.440 --> 00:36:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Next on the John Girardi Show. Keir Starmer, the Prime

588
00:36:47.320 --> 00:36:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Minister of Great Britain, just tweeted out his announcement that

589
00:36:50.639 --> 00:36:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Great Britain would be banning ninja swords.

590
00:36:54.320 --> 00:36:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Saying, when we make commitment, when we bloody well make commitments,

591
00:36:57.960 --> 00:37:00.320
<v Speaker 2>we follow through on them. I don't know why assume

592
00:37:00.320 --> 00:37:06.239
<v Speaker 2>that here Starmer sounds like Winston Churchill. You know, here's

593
00:37:06.280 --> 00:37:11.400
<v Speaker 2>the funny thing about banning ninja swords. This is the

594
00:37:11.480 --> 00:37:17.800
<v Speaker 2>problem is that there is likely a clandestine group of

595
00:37:18.000 --> 00:37:25.679
<v Speaker 2>highly trained, secretive warriors who are one the most likely

596
00:37:25.719 --> 00:37:30.920
<v Speaker 2>group of people to use ninja swords and because of

597
00:37:30.960 --> 00:37:36.239
<v Speaker 2>their martial arts, prowess, their ability to operate in the shadows,

598
00:37:38.360 --> 00:37:46.119
<v Speaker 2>and their deadliness, the most likely to evade your silly

599
00:37:46.159 --> 00:37:50.679
<v Speaker 2>little ban on ninja swords. Keir Starmer, the.

600
00:37:50.679 --> 00:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Ninja assassins are coming for you and for all Britannia.

601
00:37:56.079 --> 00:37:58.280
<v Speaker 2>That'll do it, John Girardi Show. See you next time

602
00:37:58.400 --> 00:37:59.039
<v Speaker 2>on Power Talk.
