WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I've made the point repeatedly on the show that there

2
00:00:03.160 --> 00:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of problems in California where everyone fully

3
00:00:06.240 --> 00:00:10.599
<v Speaker 1>understands what the problem is, what the solution is, and

4
00:00:10.759 --> 00:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>just decides not to solve it. And by everyone, I

5
00:00:13.919 --> 00:00:16.199
<v Speaker 1>guess what I really mean is the Democrats were in

6
00:00:16.239 --> 00:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the majority. They fully completely understand, particularly when it comes

7
00:00:24.280 --> 00:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to gas prices, energy costs, that it's their environmental policies.

8
00:00:30.359 --> 00:00:37.039
<v Speaker 1>Their environmental policies make gasoline more expensive, their emission standards

9
00:00:37.079 --> 00:00:40.759
<v Speaker 1>requiring California to have its own special blend of gas

10
00:00:40.799 --> 00:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that's put into you know, that's put into your car

11
00:00:43.679 --> 00:00:51.119
<v Speaker 1>from the pump, their specific high gasoline taxes. That's the

12
00:00:51.119 --> 00:00:53.679
<v Speaker 1>reason why gas prices are high in California. It's not

13
00:00:53.719 --> 00:00:57.799
<v Speaker 1>a mystery. It's not some gas companies are greedy, but

14
00:00:57.880 --> 00:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>just in California. For some reason, once you cross the

15
00:01:00.560 --> 00:01:03.759
<v Speaker 1>border into Arizona, Nevada or Oregon or something, they all

16
00:01:03.759 --> 00:01:07.519
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden become less greedy. No, it's California's own

17
00:01:07.560 --> 00:01:10.239
<v Speaker 1>policies that make gas and all kinds of other things

18
00:01:11.239 --> 00:01:14.519
<v Speaker 1>much more expensive. It's California's own policies that make it

19
00:01:14.599 --> 00:01:19.519
<v Speaker 1>more difficult to build in California, and I think a

20
00:01:19.840 --> 00:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal piece about this. Just read a phenomenal piece about

21
00:01:24.040 --> 00:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>this in the California Globe written by John Fleischman. Now,

22
00:01:30.200 --> 00:01:35.439
<v Speaker 1>John Fleischmann is a very interesting writer that I recommend

23
00:01:35.439 --> 00:01:38.359
<v Speaker 1>to all of you. You can find him on Twitter.

24
00:01:38.719 --> 00:01:47.519
<v Speaker 1>His Twitter account is at flash Report. Fleischmann used to

25
00:01:47.680 --> 00:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>run Brightbart's sort of California specific web page that was

26
00:01:53.719 --> 00:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>back in the day when Andrew Breitbart was still alive.

27
00:01:56.799 --> 00:01:59.879
<v Speaker 1>And he's a very smart guy and a very shrewd

28
00:02:00.319 --> 00:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>commentator on sacrament on California politics. I got to hear

29
00:02:03.840 --> 00:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>him speak one time about California politics, about Sacramento politics,

30
00:02:10.319 --> 00:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and like California state politics, not local Sacramento politics, and

31
00:02:14.719 --> 00:02:19.599
<v Speaker 1>uh he honestly, like, in one talk I got to

32
00:02:19.680 --> 00:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>fully understand all the dynamics of how politics works in Sacramento,

33
00:02:24.360 --> 00:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>how much the labor unions completely run everything in Sacramento,

34
00:02:30.199 --> 00:02:34.479
<v Speaker 1>how they are the driving force in California politics. He's

35
00:02:34.520 --> 00:02:37.759
<v Speaker 1>a brilliant guy, and he has a great piece about

36
00:02:38.680 --> 00:02:47.479
<v Speaker 1>California's carbon crusade. California's carbon crusade a reckless assault on prudence.

37
00:02:49.240 --> 00:02:55.039
<v Speaker 1>California's leaders let the poor subsidize their eco fantasies, driving

38
00:02:55.360 --> 00:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>misery for minimal gain. California's single state war on human

39
00:03:01.960 --> 00:03:06.759
<v Speaker 1>produced carbon emissions is a case study in policy without prudence.

40
00:03:07.759 --> 00:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>From Sacramento lawmakers til tech climate windmills, imposing draconian measures

41
00:03:12.919 --> 00:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>that harm residents while achieving little globally. The state's cap

42
00:03:16.719 --> 00:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and trade program, punishing electricity taxes and regulatory over each

43
00:03:20.599 --> 00:03:22.759
<v Speaker 1>drive up costs for those least able to afford them,

44
00:03:22.840 --> 00:03:26.879
<v Speaker 1>exacerbate the housing crisis, and ignore the irony of wildfires

45
00:03:27.000 --> 00:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>dwarfing their efforts. This column critiques the worst of their policies,

46
00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>highlighting their futility against the backdrop of California's self inflicted woods.

47
00:03:36.319 --> 00:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>So first he talks a little bit more about the

48
00:03:39.719 --> 00:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>cap and Trade program, which I'll confess I was. I'm

49
00:03:44.400 --> 00:03:52.759
<v Speaker 1>not super familiar with it, but it I had not

50
00:03:52.800 --> 00:03:55.639
<v Speaker 1>been super familiar with it up to this point, but

51
00:03:55.800 --> 00:03:59.439
<v Speaker 1>he kind of explains it a little bit. The Cap

52
00:03:59.520 --> 00:04:04.479
<v Speaker 1>and Trade aid program, which is billed as a market

53
00:04:04.520 --> 00:04:10.719
<v Speaker 1>based fix for emissions, is a bureaucratic mess. The Cap

54
00:04:10.759 --> 00:04:13.759
<v Speaker 1>and Trade program what it does is it puts a

55
00:04:13.800 --> 00:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>cap on total emissions and it lets companies trade allowances

56
00:04:23.079 --> 00:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>to pollute within that limit. Okay, so we have a

57
00:04:25.879 --> 00:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>certain limit. Companies are allowed to pollute up to that limit,

58
00:04:29.160 --> 00:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>but companies are allowed to trade with each other allowances.

59
00:04:34.439 --> 00:04:38.319
<v Speaker 1>In reality, it's a hidden tax inflating costs for businesses

60
00:04:38.759 --> 00:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that trickle down to consumers. A twenty twenty three study

61
00:04:42.600 --> 00:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>pegged its impact at ten to fifteen cents per gallon

62
00:04:47.079 --> 00:04:54.639
<v Speaker 1>of gasoline. So it's another policy decision on California's part

63
00:04:54.759 --> 00:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that makes all kinds of energy, but including you know,

64
00:04:57.720 --> 00:05:02.199
<v Speaker 1>gas at the pump, about ten to fifteen cents more expensive.

65
00:05:02.240 --> 00:05:05.879
<v Speaker 1>So emission standards add this much. Cap and trade adds

66
00:05:05.959 --> 00:05:08.879
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifteen cents on the ten to fifteen cents

67
00:05:09.079 --> 00:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>per gallon gas taxes in California add another you know,

68
00:05:14.240 --> 00:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>chunk of money, which is painful in a state with

69
00:05:18.879 --> 00:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>high Cap and Trade impacts the price of gasoline by

70
00:05:23.279 --> 00:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifteen cents per gallon, which is painful in

71
00:05:25.560 --> 00:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a state with already sky high fuel prices, while hiking

72
00:05:28.600 --> 00:05:33.879
<v Speaker 1>electricity and heating bills. Small businesses drown in compliance costs,

73
00:05:34.480 --> 00:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>while corporate giants game the system. For all this, the

74
00:05:38.639 --> 00:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>climate impact is negligible. California produces less than one percent

75
00:05:44.639 --> 00:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of global CO two, and even zeroing out its emissions

76
00:05:50.199 --> 00:05:53.759
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't sway the global trend when nations like China add

77
00:05:53.839 --> 00:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>coal power plants weekly. Yet policy makers cling to this scheme,

78
00:05:59.600 --> 00:06:03.639
<v Speaker 1>oblivion to its regressive sting as if symbolic wins trump

79
00:06:03.680 --> 00:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>real world harm. That this is this is why, this

80
00:06:13.920 --> 00:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>is like a limit of federalism. Why does any state

81
00:06:19.399 --> 00:06:28.519
<v Speaker 1>have like emissions regulations like the idea emissions regulations that

82
00:06:28.720 --> 00:06:33.879
<v Speaker 1>are designed to help like the global ozone the global

83
00:06:34.120 --> 00:06:41.639
<v Speaker 1>trends of carbon based warming. Flash makes this point throughout

84
00:06:41.680 --> 00:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the piece. California the sixth biggest economy or whatever is

85
00:06:48.199 --> 00:06:51.959
<v Speaker 1>the the stat that Gavenusom always likes to trump. California

86
00:06:52.079 --> 00:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is like the sixth biggest economy in the world just

87
00:06:54.319 --> 00:06:58.399
<v Speaker 1>on its own, if considered separately from the United States,

88
00:06:59.560 --> 00:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it pretty use is less than one percent of global

89
00:07:04.560 --> 00:07:13.279
<v Speaker 1>CO two. So we are killing ourselves with environmental regulation

90
00:07:16.519 --> 00:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>for something that's not really impacting much of anything. I mean,

91
00:07:20.959 --> 00:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>we only we have forty million people. There are eight

92
00:07:25.480 --> 00:07:30.199
<v Speaker 1>billion people on the planet. We're not really changing much.

93
00:07:30.240 --> 00:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>We're a relative I mean, if you're looking at the

94
00:07:32.600 --> 00:07:37.319
<v Speaker 1>globe as a whole, we're a relatively small part of

95
00:07:37.680 --> 00:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>this continent. The idea that we are saving the environment

96
00:07:44.319 --> 00:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>by killing our businesses by regressively putting the costs for

97
00:07:51.399 --> 00:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>environmental compliance on lower income people paying the tax of

98
00:07:55.839 --> 00:07:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the pump. You know this is it's the the idea

99
00:07:58.439 --> 00:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of a regressive versus a aggressive tax. Okay. A progressive

100
00:08:04.079 --> 00:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>tax system is where people at the higher end of

101
00:08:08.920 --> 00:08:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the wealth spectrum pay a greater percentage of their wealth.

102
00:08:14.160 --> 00:08:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Why well, if someone who only has ten thousand dollars

103
00:08:21.160 --> 00:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>has to spend ten percent of their wealth on taxes.

104
00:08:26.160 --> 00:08:28.519
<v Speaker 1>So someone only has ten thousand dollars left to their name,

105
00:08:28.759 --> 00:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not They're not in good shape. Okay. If they

106
00:08:32.080 --> 00:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have to give the government one thousand dollars in taxes,

107
00:08:35.200 --> 00:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge blow to them. If someone with a

108
00:08:41.200 --> 00:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars has to give even fifty percent of their

109
00:08:45.600 --> 00:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>wealth away to the government in taxes, well, they've still

110
00:08:50.080 --> 00:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>got five hundred million dollars. They're fine. Their quality of

111
00:08:53.519 --> 00:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>life has not been impacted. There are no basic necessities

112
00:08:56.840 --> 00:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>that they are being shortchanged out of, even though they

113
00:08:59.720 --> 00:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>are being taxed at a much higher percentage. So that

114
00:09:02.279 --> 00:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is a progressive taxation system. And I don't think it's

115
00:09:06.879 --> 00:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>supposed to carry like progressive is a very positive sounding word.

116
00:09:11.200 --> 00:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's the idea. It's just that as

117
00:09:13.240 --> 00:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you gain more money, you progress in your rate of

118
00:09:17.039 --> 00:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>how much you pay. That's a progressive tax system. A

119
00:09:20.039 --> 00:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>regressive tax system would say everyone pays forty percent. Okay,

120
00:09:26.039 --> 00:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>well again, someone with a billion dollars paying forty percent

121
00:09:29.519 --> 00:09:31.559
<v Speaker 1>is really not going to be hurt very much. But

122
00:09:31.679 --> 00:09:35.399
<v Speaker 1>someone who's only making, you know, fifty thousand dollars a year,

123
00:09:36.039 --> 00:09:38.519
<v Speaker 1>they need that forty percent much more badly than the

124
00:09:38.519 --> 00:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>guy with a billion dollars. Flat taxes, one could a

125
00:09:43.720 --> 00:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>flat tax where everyone's tax at the same rate can

126
00:09:47.080 --> 00:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>be deemed regressive. And sales taxes, taxes on basic necessities

127
00:09:55.480 --> 00:10:03.759
<v Speaker 1>like gas or food, those are regressive because it's more

128
00:10:03.919 --> 00:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>burdensome for someone on the lower end of the income spectr.

129
00:10:08.000 --> 00:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everyone has to drive, or most people anyway,

130
00:10:11.480 --> 00:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>have to drive for their work. People who only make

131
00:10:17.600 --> 00:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>forty thousand dollars a year have to drive to work

132
00:10:19.480 --> 00:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>just the same as you know, a fancy schmanaged lawyer

133
00:10:22.480 --> 00:10:27.639
<v Speaker 1>who makes two million dollars a year. High gas costs

134
00:10:28.159 --> 00:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>impact the guy making forty thousand dollars a year worse

135
00:10:32.240 --> 00:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>than it does the lawyer making two million a year

136
00:10:35.440 --> 00:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>driving his corvette. You know, even if the guy with

137
00:10:38.159 --> 00:10:40.759
<v Speaker 1>the corvette is pumping in premium gasoline and has a

138
00:10:40.759 --> 00:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>car that gets terrible gas mileage. In fact, i'd given

139
00:10:46.440 --> 00:10:48.639
<v Speaker 1>how much remote work is being done by a white

140
00:10:48.639 --> 00:10:52.799
<v Speaker 1>collar workers nowadays, I'd venture the lower income guy probably

141
00:10:52.919 --> 00:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is has to drive more than the upper income person,

142
00:10:58.159 --> 00:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>all things being equal. So this is that's sort of

143
00:11:05.759 --> 00:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the inegalitarian aspect of what California does. We lump so

144
00:11:13.240 --> 00:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>many of our costs on. We have all these costs

145
00:11:19.000 --> 00:11:24.919
<v Speaker 1>associated with our environmentalism that are disproportionately burdening the middle

146
00:11:25.399 --> 00:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and lower socioeconomic classes. Rich people in the Bay Area

147
00:11:31.279 --> 00:11:35.759
<v Speaker 1>are fine with it. Rich people in you know, Beverly

148
00:11:35.840 --> 00:11:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Hills or whatever, they're fine, but not lower income people

149
00:11:41.399 --> 00:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>who have to you know, on whom those burdens are

150
00:11:46.000 --> 00:11:52.879
<v Speaker 1>far heavier. Small businesses drown and compliance costs, while corporate

151
00:11:52.960 --> 00:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>giants gain the system. For all this, the climate impact

152
00:11:55.480 --> 00:11:58.399
<v Speaker 1>is negligible. California produces less than one percent of global

153
00:11:58.480 --> 00:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>CO two, and even zuring out its emissions won't sway

154
00:12:01.840 --> 00:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the global trend. Yeah, I mean we're killing ourselves to

155
00:12:06.759 --> 00:12:09.639
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent of all new car sales in California

156
00:12:09.679 --> 00:12:15.399
<v Speaker 1>by twenty thirty five are going to be electric vehicles. Meanwhile,

157
00:12:15.480 --> 00:12:20.399
<v Speaker 1>China's just polluting like crazy, just dumping, you know, producing

158
00:12:20.480 --> 00:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>coal power plants, just dumping more pollutants into the environment

159
00:12:24.759 --> 00:12:27.799
<v Speaker 1>than we even know about it. Said, I'd be like,

160
00:12:28.720 --> 00:12:30.879
<v Speaker 1>what is the point of us breaking our back if

161
00:12:30.960 --> 00:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>India and China are going to be these massive polluters.

162
00:12:35.159 --> 00:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Electricity prices already crushing showcase California's disdain for affordability, at

163
00:12:41.039 --> 00:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty two cents per kilowatt hour in twenty twenty four,

164
00:12:44.440 --> 00:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>which is double the national average. The state's rates stem

165
00:12:48.960 --> 00:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>from relentless regulations in taxes. Mandates for wind and solar,

166
00:12:53.279 --> 00:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>which demand costly grid upgrades for their intermittency, and the

167
00:12:57.519 --> 00:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>phase out of reliable natural gas plants have triggered blackouts

168
00:13:01.360 --> 00:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>like those in twenty twenty and twenty twenty two. Low

169
00:13:03.720 --> 00:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>income households suffer the most. A twenty twenty four California

170
00:13:06.840 --> 00:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Public Utilities Commission report found one in four families struggle

171
00:13:10.480 --> 00:13:15.039
<v Speaker 1>with electric bills, many facing shutoffs. One in four families

172
00:13:15.080 --> 00:13:19.279
<v Speaker 1>wow prudence would balance green goals with keeping the lights on,

173
00:13:19.919 --> 00:13:23.639
<v Speaker 1>but California's leaders let the poor subsidize their eco fantasies,

174
00:13:23.720 --> 00:13:28.639
<v Speaker 1>driving misery for minimal gain. This war on carbon also

175
00:13:28.679 --> 00:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>fuels California's housing crisis, a catastrophe of affordability made worse

176
00:13:33.039 --> 00:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>by reckless policy, stringent environmental regulations layered atop emissions goals

177
00:13:39.200 --> 00:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>in flight construction costs. The California Environmental Quality Act my favorite,

178
00:13:46.600 --> 00:13:49.879
<v Speaker 1>often weaponized to block development, delays projects for years, adding

179
00:13:50.000 --> 00:13:54.399
<v Speaker 1>legal and compliance expenses estimated at one hundred thousand dollars

180
00:13:54.399 --> 00:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>per housing unit in some cases. Wow estimating here. I

181
00:14:02.000 --> 00:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>guess some people are estimating. He's citing them that SEQUA.

182
00:14:06.159 --> 00:14:07.759
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about SEQUA a bunch of times on the

183
00:14:07.759 --> 00:14:14.519
<v Speaker 1>show before. The idea with SEQUA is basically, anybody can

184
00:14:14.639 --> 00:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>sue someone starting some kind of construction, real estate project,

185
00:14:19.600 --> 00:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>real estate project, any kind of business, construction project on

186
00:14:24.919 --> 00:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the grounds that it's environmental impact study is insufficient. And

187
00:14:32.480 --> 00:14:35.679
<v Speaker 1>it's been used a lot by these left wing nonprofits

188
00:14:36.120 --> 00:14:38.879
<v Speaker 1>to stop construction they don't like on some kind of

189
00:14:39.000 --> 00:14:43.399
<v Speaker 1>environmental grounds. I thought the craziest example of this was

190
00:14:43.440 --> 00:14:48.879
<v Speaker 1>back in December when they stopped construction of a hydrogen

191
00:14:49.000 --> 00:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>power plant, a zero emissions green energy hydrogen power plant

192
00:14:55.320 --> 00:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that Gavin Newsom is like desperately hoping we can build

193
00:14:57.840 --> 00:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>more of these in California. That was going to be

194
00:15:00.000 --> 00:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>built in Pixley on the grounds of what Pixley For

195
00:15:04.679 --> 00:15:06.919
<v Speaker 1>those of you who don't know, maybe you're in the

196
00:15:06.960 --> 00:15:09.799
<v Speaker 1>North Valley and you're not familiar with Pixley. Pixley is

197
00:15:09.840 --> 00:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>basically a pit stop on the ninety nine, kind of

198
00:15:13.440 --> 00:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in between where you would turn off on one ninety

199
00:15:16.480 --> 00:15:20.679
<v Speaker 1>eight to go to Icelia. In between there and Bakersfield.

200
00:15:21.279 --> 00:15:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Pixley is a tiny little town. It just kind of

201
00:15:25.879 --> 00:15:31.879
<v Speaker 1>straddles the ninety nine. They stopped construction of this green

202
00:15:32.200 --> 00:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>energy hydrogen power plant on the grounds that well, it

203
00:15:35.120 --> 00:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>would lead to more trucks coming into Pixley to drop

204
00:15:38.039 --> 00:15:40.559
<v Speaker 1>off I guess the raw hydrogen, liquid hydrogen or something.

205
00:15:41.039 --> 00:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>More trucks coming into Pixley and would lead to more

206
00:15:43.120 --> 00:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>truck pollution. Pixley is nothing but truck pollution. Then ninety

207
00:15:47.559 --> 00:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>nine goes right through the The whole town just kind

208
00:15:50.080 --> 00:15:53.039
<v Speaker 1>of straddles the ninety nine. The whole town is there's

209
00:15:53.120 --> 00:15:55.919
<v Speaker 1>no part of the town that's more than like, I

210
00:15:55.960 --> 00:15:59.559
<v Speaker 1>don't know, half a mile away from the ninety nine.

211
00:15:59.600 --> 00:16:02.879
<v Speaker 1>That's all Pixley is. It's the ninety nine. You know

212
00:16:03.000 --> 00:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>how many gazillions of trucks go through Pixley every year,

213
00:16:06.639 --> 00:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>every every day, Oh but a few will park at

214
00:16:11.360 --> 00:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a power plant every day. That's that's what's gonna change

215
00:16:16.519 --> 00:16:21.519
<v Speaker 1>the whole environmental outlook of Pixley to make a green

216
00:16:21.720 --> 00:16:24.679
<v Speaker 1>energy power plant. That's the kind of insanity we're talking about.

217
00:16:25.120 --> 00:16:28.639
<v Speaker 1>All of these housing construction projects that can get stopped

218
00:16:28.720 --> 00:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with one jerky lawsuit that some left wing nonprofit wants

219
00:16:35.000 --> 00:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to file to make a name for itself. All right,

220
00:16:38.519 --> 00:16:40.519
<v Speaker 1>we'll keep going through this piece again. You can find

221
00:16:40.559 --> 00:16:42.639
<v Speaker 1>it at my Twitter account, Twitter dot com, slash president

222
00:16:42.720 --> 00:16:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Johnny at President Johnny next on the John Girardi Show.

223
00:16:47.879 --> 00:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>A great piece in the California Globe, a website i'd

224
00:16:52.159 --> 00:16:53.399
<v Speaker 1>like to recommend to you, by the way, I just

225
00:16:53.399 --> 00:16:55.679
<v Speaker 1>stumbled across. It seems to be kind of a conservative

226
00:16:55.759 --> 00:17:00.759
<v Speaker 1>leaning California news and opinion site. John Fleischmann has a

227
00:17:00.759 --> 00:17:04.160
<v Speaker 1>great piece in it. John Fleischman is Everyone should follow him.

228
00:17:04.200 --> 00:17:07.079
<v Speaker 1>Go to Twitter, go to x I can't call it X.

229
00:17:07.440 --> 00:17:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I just I'd rather have Elon Musk own Twitter than

230
00:17:13.079 --> 00:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the people who owned it before. But I hate the

231
00:17:17.160 --> 00:17:20.799
<v Speaker 1>X brand. I think it's so dumb anyway, But you know,

232
00:17:20.880 --> 00:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>he's got several hundred billion dollars more than I do,

233
00:17:24.000 --> 00:17:27.519
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he knows what he's doing. Anyway. Go to

234
00:17:27.559 --> 00:17:32.599
<v Speaker 1>Twitter dot com, look up at flash report. That's John Fleischman.

235
00:17:32.640 --> 00:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>He's a great commentator on California political stuff. Used to

236
00:17:36.200 --> 00:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>be Andrew bright Bart's main guy for California stuff. Check

237
00:17:40.960 --> 00:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>him out, or just go to my Twitter account and

238
00:17:43.160 --> 00:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I've got the story retweeted. He's talking about California environmental

239
00:17:50.039 --> 00:17:52.759
<v Speaker 1>law and the variety of ways in which California just

240
00:17:52.799 --> 00:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>completely fails the test of prudence, Like, Okay, you want

241
00:17:56.720 --> 00:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to help the environment, but you're putting all these costs

242
00:18:00.240 --> 00:18:04.519
<v Speaker 1>on people in California. You're making California just incredibly difficult

243
00:18:04.519 --> 00:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to live in to what benefit. Meanwhile, he writes, so

244
00:18:10.200 --> 00:18:12.799
<v Speaker 1>after going through all these different ways, you know, the

245
00:18:12.839 --> 00:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>cap and trade system, gas prices, SEQUA, and how SEQUA

246
00:18:19.880 --> 00:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>could add one hundred thousand dollars of costs per housing

247
00:18:23.440 --> 00:18:26.759
<v Speaker 1>unit in some cases. He then goes on to address

248
00:18:30.839 --> 00:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>wildfires and the fact that because we've had so many wildfires,

249
00:18:37.079 --> 00:18:44.759
<v Speaker 1>it's basically completely undone whatever benefit accrued from all the

250
00:18:44.759 --> 00:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>state's environmental policies put together, wildfires mock the state's efforts,

251
00:18:51.000 --> 00:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>spewing carbon far beyond what regulations curb. In twenty twenty,

252
00:18:56.519 --> 00:19:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Do y'all remember the summer of twenty twenty when basically, uh,

253
00:19:00.920 --> 00:19:03.839
<v Speaker 1>it was COVID, so everything was a bunch of stuff

254
00:19:03.880 --> 00:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>was closed. And then we had all the wildfires and

255
00:19:08.319 --> 00:19:11.559
<v Speaker 1>the whole San Juaquin Valley basically looked like Mordor for

256
00:19:12.200 --> 00:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a solid month. You got outside and the sun was

257
00:19:16.920 --> 00:19:19.559
<v Speaker 1>glowing and the evil orange in your car. If you

258
00:19:19.599 --> 00:19:22.519
<v Speaker 1>parked your car outside, it was covered with ash. Yeah,

259
00:19:22.519 --> 00:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that was fun or or whatever it was. In twenty twenty,

260
00:19:27.279 --> 00:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>fires released one hundred and twenty seven million metric tons

261
00:19:33.240 --> 00:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of CO two equivalent, triple California's annual industrial emissions. Decades

262
00:19:41.799 --> 00:19:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of forest mismanagement, including restricted burns and logging bands so

263
00:19:46.000 --> 00:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>bands on restricted burns and logging have left landscapes primed

264
00:19:51.160 --> 00:19:54.839
<v Speaker 1>to blaze. Yet instead of tackling this, Sacramento fixates on

265
00:19:55.119 --> 00:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>tailpipes and power plants. It's like mopping the floor in

266
00:19:59.759 --> 00:20:04.599
<v Speaker 1>a fl blood resources squandered on optics while forests burn.

267
00:20:05.240 --> 00:20:08.519
<v Speaker 1>Prudence would fund fire breaks and brush clearing, but California's

268
00:20:08.519 --> 00:20:12.599
<v Speaker 1>carbon tunnel vision prevails. Contrast this with the Trump administration's

269
00:20:12.640 --> 00:20:15.839
<v Speaker 1>pragmatic energy policies from twenty seventeen to twenty twenty one

270
00:20:15.880 --> 00:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and resuming in twenty twenty five. Trump prioritized domestic production oil, gas, coal,

271
00:20:21.039 --> 00:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and cut red tape, lowering electricity costs and boosting self sufficiency.

272
00:20:25.640 --> 00:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's the thing California. I've heard this point

273
00:20:28.559 --> 00:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe before. California has a bunch of oil. We have

274
00:20:31.799 --> 00:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>oil that we can get, We have ways of generating

275
00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>power just from our own state, but we refuse to

276
00:20:38.160 --> 00:20:40.079
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of it. And as a result, we then

277
00:20:40.240 --> 00:20:45.599
<v Speaker 1>have to get oil and other sources of energy from abroad,

278
00:20:45.680 --> 00:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>from like Saudi Arabia and stuff. And last I checked,

279
00:20:51.720 --> 00:20:55.599
<v Speaker 1>oil doesn't get from Saudia Arabia to here in a

280
00:20:55.759 --> 00:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>carbon zero fashion. There are no green shipping cruiser, you know,

281
00:21:02.920 --> 00:21:07.599
<v Speaker 1>the the enormous shipping vessels that have you know, eight

282
00:21:07.680 --> 00:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred like truck, you know the big things that the

283
00:21:13.480 --> 00:21:16.799
<v Speaker 1>big rectangle things that eighteen wheelers are carrying those things,

284
00:21:16.799 --> 00:21:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the big truck containers. Yeah, they're that are carrying you know,

285
00:21:20.759 --> 00:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a thousand of those at a time. Yeah, those guys

286
00:21:23.799 --> 00:21:28.319
<v Speaker 1>go through a lot of gas. Got it takes a

287
00:21:28.359 --> 00:21:33.599
<v Speaker 1>lot of gas to get from Saudi Arabia to California.

288
00:21:34.480 --> 00:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Go through the Panama can I don't even know what

289
00:21:37.079 --> 00:21:41.279
<v Speaker 1>route they take. Did they They go through the Suez Canal,

290
00:21:41.480 --> 00:21:45.039
<v Speaker 1>through the Mediterranean out into the Atlantic. They go through

291
00:21:45.079 --> 00:21:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the Panama Canal. I guess up up to California. Yeah,

292
00:21:48.799 --> 00:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a long trip. You're burning a lot of gas

293
00:21:51.200 --> 00:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to do that. California's lead. Let's see emissions now, that's

294
00:22:00.759 --> 00:22:04.079
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Trump was president twenty seventeen to twenty one.

295
00:22:04.720 --> 00:22:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Emissions still dropped. Emissions dropped driven by market shifts to

296
00:22:10.839 --> 00:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>natural gas, not by mandates. This balance growth and affordability

297
00:22:15.680 --> 00:22:20.519
<v Speaker 1>highlights California's folly. California's leaders, with Governor Gavin Newsom atop

298
00:22:20.559 --> 00:22:23.599
<v Speaker 1>the pack, lack the humility to see their limits. Their

299
00:22:23.640 --> 00:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>anti carbon crusade ignores the state's poverty, housing woes, and

300
00:22:27.519 --> 00:22:33.039
<v Speaker 1>global insignificance. Again, less than one percent of emissions. Cap

301
00:22:33.079 --> 00:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and trade burdens the poor for no climate gain. Electricity costs,

302
00:22:36.400 --> 00:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>crushed families to fund, shaky renewables, housing grows unattainable under

303
00:22:42.400 --> 00:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>the weight of regulations. Wildfires expose the absurdity of it all.

304
00:22:46.160 --> 00:22:50.039
<v Speaker 1>Prudence demands focus on what works, affordable energy, fire prevention

305
00:22:50.400 --> 00:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>homes people can buy, and not on a quixotic quest

306
00:22:54.480 --> 00:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to save the planet alone. Because that's the thing. There's

307
00:22:58.720 --> 00:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this attitude of, well, everyone has to do their part,

308
00:23:02.480 --> 00:23:04.799
<v Speaker 1>and so we Californians, we're doing our partns Like, yeah,

309
00:23:04.799 --> 00:23:08.279
<v Speaker 1>but if only you were doing your part separate from like,

310
00:23:08.720 --> 00:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>at the very least, a nationwide federal policy, then it's pointless.

311
00:23:14.920 --> 00:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>It's pointless if the United if if California alone adopts

312
00:23:19.400 --> 00:23:23.079
<v Speaker 1>some kind of super rigorous uh, you know, in green

313
00:23:23.240 --> 00:23:28.319
<v Speaker 1>environmental policy, if Texas and Oklahoma and Nevada and Wyoming

314
00:23:28.359 --> 00:23:30.079
<v Speaker 1>and idahoa blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah,

315
00:23:30.119 --> 00:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>don't follow suit. What's the point again? We are you

316
00:23:34.200 --> 00:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>look at a globe, California is a blip, all right,

317
00:23:38.240 --> 00:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really not very much land mass. We're not saving

318
00:23:44.480 --> 00:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the planet with these regulations. And if anything, our environmental

319
00:23:48.240 --> 00:23:52.599
<v Speaker 1>regulations have contributed to more environmental harm given their responsibility,

320
00:23:53.119 --> 00:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, no control burns, no brush clearing. They're the

321
00:23:55.960 --> 00:23:58.759
<v Speaker 1>responsibility of those policies for so many of the wildfires

322
00:23:58.759 --> 00:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>we've had. All Right, when we return, I'm not sure.

323
00:24:03.359 --> 00:24:06.039
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna talk a little bit about planned

324
00:24:06.079 --> 00:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>parenthood's bad financial state. Maybe we'll talk a little bit

325
00:24:09.200 --> 00:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>about Harvard University losing its money or potentially losing its money.

326
00:24:13.680 --> 00:24:15.759
<v Speaker 1>I might talk about that, is Harvard gonna lose its money?

327
00:24:15.799 --> 00:24:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Should Harvard lose its money? Next on the John Growardy Show.

328
00:24:19.960 --> 00:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>All Right, President Trump made some news. He's basically right

329
00:24:25.000 --> 00:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>now in this little fight with Harvard. Harvard University has

330
00:24:32.319 --> 00:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>been resistant to Trump administration desires that it cut out

331
00:24:37.759 --> 00:24:44.519
<v Speaker 1>some of its DEI stuff. Harvard has faced some accusations

332
00:24:44.559 --> 00:24:49.519
<v Speaker 1>over how Jewish students were being treated based on the

333
00:24:49.559 --> 00:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>toleration that was given to pro Hamas align well some

334
00:24:58.799 --> 00:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>possibly Prohamaca line protesters on Harvard's campus, and the possible

335
00:25:04.160 --> 00:25:07.079
<v Speaker 1>violation of federal civil rights laws that may have ensued

336
00:25:07.119 --> 00:25:09.640
<v Speaker 1>on Harvard's campus as a result. So one of the

337
00:25:09.680 --> 00:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>aspects of federal civil rights law when it comes to

338
00:25:12.799 --> 00:25:18.599
<v Speaker 1>universities is basically, if students are being hindered in their

339
00:25:18.640 --> 00:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>ability to walk around on campus. And if a campus

340
00:25:21.960 --> 00:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>is tolerating such kinds of conditions, there's a lot of

341
00:25:25.160 --> 00:25:30.599
<v Speaker 1>existing federal civil rights law to say, hey, that's no good. Universities,

342
00:25:30.599 --> 00:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>if they're going to take public money, cannot gage in

343
00:25:34.759 --> 00:25:41.400
<v Speaker 1>race based discrimination. They cannot allow students of race or religion,

344
00:25:41.680 --> 00:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of a certain race or religion or ethnic backroom whatever

345
00:25:45.119 --> 00:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to be subject to those kinds of mistreatment. Okay, let's

346
00:25:48.440 --> 00:25:52.079
<v Speaker 1>think about again, a lot of federal civil rights laws

347
00:25:52.119 --> 00:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the South, and our experience, the experience

348
00:25:57.039 --> 00:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of African Americans, not our experience, I'm not the experience

349
00:26:00.119 --> 00:26:04.559
<v Speaker 1>to African Americans. Our American experience, if you will, Where

350
00:26:05.519 --> 00:26:10.559
<v Speaker 1>African Americans finally were allowed to be admitted to certain

351
00:26:10.640 --> 00:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>kinds of historically all white schools and may have been

352
00:26:16.000 --> 00:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>subject to mistreatment, threatened, made to feel like they can't

353
00:26:19.759 --> 00:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>actually exercise their ability to be students on campus. So

354
00:26:24.480 --> 00:26:30.839
<v Speaker 1>there's federal civil rights law on the books to basically say, hey, universities,

355
00:26:30.880 --> 00:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't allow that right if you want to, all

356
00:26:33.920 --> 00:26:36.039
<v Speaker 1>of you are getting federal money of some sort. If

357
00:26:36.079 --> 00:26:42.839
<v Speaker 1>you want to keep getting federal money, then okay, that's fine,

358
00:26:42.880 --> 00:26:44.559
<v Speaker 1>but you got to play by our rules. You can't

359
00:26:44.599 --> 00:26:47.640
<v Speaker 1>engage in various kinds of race based discrimination. You have

360
00:26:47.680 --> 00:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to follow various kinds of federal civil rights laws. And

361
00:26:54.039 --> 00:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>between that and then affirmative action, between that affirmative action

362
00:26:59.279 --> 00:27:02.319
<v Speaker 1>and dei, Harvard, I think is not in a great spot.

363
00:27:02.359 --> 00:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So Harvard was like the subject of the big Supreme

364
00:27:07.480 --> 00:27:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Court case that ultimately decided it was Harvard and University

365
00:27:11.400 --> 00:27:14.279
<v Speaker 1>of North Carolina. They were the subject of this big

366
00:27:14.319 --> 00:27:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court case that was just decided a year ago saying, hey,

367
00:27:18.720 --> 00:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>no more affirmative action in admissions. Okay, you can't positively

368
00:27:24.319 --> 00:27:30.400
<v Speaker 1>weigh people just on the basis of their race. And

369
00:27:28.920 --> 00:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the twenty years ago sort of cut the baby in

370
00:27:35.039 --> 00:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>half solution devised by Sandrade O'Connor. We're getting rid of that.

371
00:27:40.079 --> 00:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So Sandrede O'Connor was such a Santade O'Connor is basically

372
00:27:44.759 --> 00:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the pre twenty twenty four from about two

373
00:27:49.720 --> 00:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>whenever those decisions came down. In the early two thousands,

374
00:27:52.960 --> 00:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we were living under Sandrade O'Connor's basically legal regimes surrounding

375
00:27:57.640 --> 00:28:02.559
<v Speaker 1>affirmative action for the last twenty years and O'Connor's viewpoint

376
00:28:02.720 --> 00:28:12.759
<v Speaker 1>was schools can't have a crude point system where it

377
00:28:12.799 --> 00:28:16.640
<v Speaker 1>was the Grutter and Grats cases, where basically they were

378
00:28:16.640 --> 00:28:20.039
<v Speaker 1>looking at the University of Michigan's undergrad admissions system and

379
00:28:20.079 --> 00:28:23.799
<v Speaker 1>their law school admission system, which were slightly different. So

380
00:28:24.119 --> 00:28:26.519
<v Speaker 1>at that time, University of Michigan, just if you were

381
00:28:26.880 --> 00:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a minority, a racial minority, and you wanted to go

382
00:28:30.440 --> 00:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to the University of Michigan, they basically scored all their

383
00:28:34.000 --> 00:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>applicants with a kind of points system, and if you

384
00:28:37.160 --> 00:28:41.359
<v Speaker 1>were black, you got automatically a certain number of points

385
00:28:42.119 --> 00:28:46.799
<v Speaker 1>just by virtue of being black. And O'Connor said, now

386
00:28:46.839 --> 00:28:50.519
<v Speaker 1>you're not allowed to do that. You can't have quotas,

387
00:28:50.559 --> 00:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't have a point system like that. University of

388
00:28:55.200 --> 00:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Michigan's law school, though, had a system where there wasn't

389
00:29:00.359 --> 00:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a points system, but admissions advisors could take into account

390
00:29:05.720 --> 00:29:09.599
<v Speaker 1>raised as part of a broad reaching review of students.

391
00:29:09.599 --> 00:29:13.119
<v Speaker 1>And then there are genuine benefits, educational benefits that diversity

392
00:29:13.160 --> 00:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>affords to lawyers. And that so what O'Connor wound up approving,

393
00:29:20.759 --> 00:29:23.839
<v Speaker 1>and she was kind of the determinative swing vote on

394
00:29:23.880 --> 00:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the court for this, and what O'Connor wound up approving

395
00:29:29.519 --> 00:29:34.039
<v Speaker 1>was basically the worst possible system. As crude as the

396
00:29:34.079 --> 00:29:39.079
<v Speaker 1>points based system was for affirmative action, it at least

397
00:29:39.160 --> 00:29:43.519
<v Speaker 1>left a paper trail, you know, it was at least measurable,

398
00:29:45.799 --> 00:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so you could see when the university was discriminating. And

399
00:29:50.680 --> 00:29:53.279
<v Speaker 1>basically what all these universities did was they would just have,

400
00:29:53.359 --> 00:29:56.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, these broad based assessments solve an applicants, so

401
00:29:56.920 --> 00:30:01.079
<v Speaker 1>strengths and weaknesses. That would always result in at African

402
00:30:01.079 --> 00:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>American students, who on average had lower SAT scores getting

403
00:30:05.480 --> 00:30:11.599
<v Speaker 1>in over and against in particular Asian students. Asian Americans

404
00:30:11.599 --> 00:30:15.839
<v Speaker 1>were the most disadvantaged by this whole system. And if

405
00:30:15.880 --> 00:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it had been a straight, you know, objective assessment looking

406
00:30:19.640 --> 00:30:22.759
<v Speaker 1>at your test scores, where we're we're not actually considering

407
00:30:22.799 --> 00:30:27.759
<v Speaker 1>your race, one Iota, Harvard and Stanford and a lot

408
00:30:27.759 --> 00:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of these elite institutions would have just been huge number,

409
00:30:31.759 --> 00:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>even even greater numbers of Asian American students would have

410
00:30:35.400 --> 00:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten into those schools. And then you have the whole

411
00:30:40.519 --> 00:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>DEI system. The whole idea of DEI seems frankly to

412
00:30:46.480 --> 00:30:51.839
<v Speaker 1>me to be contrary to the federal Civil rights regime.

413
00:30:52.519 --> 00:30:55.279
<v Speaker 1>The whole idea of federal civil rights law is that

414
00:30:55.359 --> 00:31:00.759
<v Speaker 1>you will not allow discrimination on the bays of and

415
00:31:00.799 --> 00:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>then it gives a list of categories race, sex, ethnic origin, religion,

416
00:31:08.160 --> 00:31:11.279
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Colleges and universities have

417
00:31:11.359 --> 00:31:16.519
<v Speaker 1>to abide by a lot of those provisions, as both

418
00:31:16.519 --> 00:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>both public and private universities have to do that. Public

419
00:31:20.240 --> 00:31:22.799
<v Speaker 1>universities have to do it as kind of a constitutional

420
00:31:23.039 --> 00:31:27.200
<v Speaker 1>mandate as government institutions. Private institutions have to comply with

421
00:31:27.240 --> 00:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it by pretty much the exact same standard on the

422
00:31:31.400 --> 00:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>basis of the fact that they receive federal money. If

423
00:31:33.960 --> 00:31:36.279
<v Speaker 1>they want to keep receiving federal money, they have to

424
00:31:36.319 --> 00:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>abide by those standards. And we sort of allowed to

425
00:31:40.480 --> 00:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>have the dei regime be imported into so many colleges

426
00:31:45.000 --> 00:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and universities and the court into corporate settings in spite

427
00:31:48.640 --> 00:31:50.759
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that I think it's very clearly violative

428
00:31:51.119 --> 00:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of the whole broad concepts of the civil rights sect Okay,

429
00:31:57.480 --> 00:32:02.599
<v Speaker 1>this was the importance of the Civil Rights Act. The

430
00:32:02.680 --> 00:32:11.519
<v Speaker 1>idea was that hey, your business, this government institution whatever like,

431
00:32:11.559 --> 00:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>take it in the context of a private business. Okay,

432
00:32:14.160 --> 00:32:17.519
<v Speaker 1>you run a grocery store, if you just say, well,

433
00:32:17.599 --> 00:32:20.119
<v Speaker 1>we don't serve black people, you know, they can go

434
00:32:20.119 --> 00:32:22.319
<v Speaker 1>to a different groceryutton. But it's my private business. Now,

435
00:32:22.319 --> 00:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to let black people out. Well, all right,

436
00:32:25.759 --> 00:32:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Grocery stores are this kind of business that provides a

437
00:32:29.599 --> 00:32:33.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of basic service. People need food, and it's a

438
00:32:33.440 --> 00:32:38.519
<v Speaker 1>massive hindrance to just living and existing in society if

439
00:32:38.839 --> 00:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to like carefully curate which businesses to go

440
00:32:44.079 --> 00:32:46.519
<v Speaker 1>to that will legally allow you to come in the

441
00:32:46.559 --> 00:32:50.319
<v Speaker 1>door on the basis of something so meaningless as your

442
00:32:50.359 --> 00:32:59.599
<v Speaker 1>skin color. And as a result, you know, African Americans

443
00:32:59.599 --> 00:33:02.799
<v Speaker 1>in the South both faced this with other kinds of

444
00:33:02.839 --> 00:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>basic services like restaurants and hotels. In fact, that there

445
00:33:06.200 --> 00:33:10.599
<v Speaker 1>was a movie the Green Book, big O Mortensen and

446
00:33:10.680 --> 00:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>herschel Ali were in it, and it's The Green Book

447
00:33:14.799 --> 00:33:19.279
<v Speaker 1>was basically this travel guide for African Americans traveling in

448
00:33:19.319 --> 00:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the South to let them know, Okay, well you can

449
00:33:21.519 --> 00:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>go to in Okay, if you're traveling to this city

450
00:33:28.680 --> 00:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in Louisiana, you can go to this restaurant, this restaurant, restaurant.

451
00:33:32.000 --> 00:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't go to this restaurant, this restaurant this restaurant,

452
00:33:34.039 --> 00:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you can stay in this hotel, this hotel, this hotel.

453
00:33:35.680 --> 00:33:37.559
<v Speaker 1>You can't stay at this hotel, this hotel, at this hotel.

454
00:33:39.279 --> 00:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>So here's this massive way in which African Americans had

455
00:33:42.160 --> 00:33:45.039
<v Speaker 1>to like kind of totally recalibrate where they could go.

456
00:33:45.160 --> 00:33:48.039
<v Speaker 1>It made certain parts of town basically off limits to them,

457
00:33:48.119 --> 00:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>or you know, it was this huge hindrance to their

458
00:33:50.720 --> 00:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>day to day existence. These sorts of private actors engaging

459
00:33:55.480 --> 00:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in racial discrimination put real social limits on how far

460
00:33:59.440 --> 00:34:02.279
<v Speaker 1>African Americas could advance in society. Well, this hospital doesn't

461
00:34:02.359 --> 00:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>hire black doctors. You know, we just don't want to

462
00:34:04.519 --> 00:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>hire black doctors. This law from Oh, we just don't

463
00:34:06.640 --> 00:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>want to hire black lawyers. This college, you know, we

464
00:34:11.000 --> 00:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>just don'tt accept black applicants. And so the civil rights

465
00:34:15.000 --> 00:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>law said, no, you just are not allowed to consider that.

466
00:34:18.480 --> 00:34:20.559
<v Speaker 1>You know, I always laugh at businesses that have a

467
00:34:20.599 --> 00:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>sign up that says we reserve the right. I don't

468
00:34:26.039 --> 00:34:27.519
<v Speaker 1>know what reserving the right is. I just went to

469
00:34:27.599 --> 00:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>law school. I'm not exactly sure what reserving a right means.

470
00:34:30.719 --> 00:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>But businesses who hang up a sign that say we

471
00:34:33.599 --> 00:34:36.559
<v Speaker 1>reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason.

472
00:34:36.960 --> 00:34:41.519
<v Speaker 1>You realize that that sign is completely meaningless. It affords

473
00:34:41.559 --> 00:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>you no power, like nothing magical happens when you put

474
00:34:45.239 --> 00:34:49.119
<v Speaker 1>that sign up, and you still can't reserve the right.

475
00:34:49.320 --> 00:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't have the right to refuse someone's service for

476
00:34:53.039 --> 00:34:57.840
<v Speaker 1>any reason. I mean, imagine how silly that would be.

477
00:34:57.840 --> 00:35:01.039
<v Speaker 1>We reserve the right to refuse anyone's for any reason,

478
00:35:01.159 --> 00:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>especially the Blacks and the Jews. Like, no, you can't

479
00:35:03.960 --> 00:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>do that. That's against the law. You're not allowed to

480
00:35:06.960 --> 00:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>refuse someone's service because they're Black, or because they're Jewish,

481
00:35:09.480 --> 00:35:13.280
<v Speaker 1>or because they're Chinese or whatever. It's a violation of

482
00:35:13.280 --> 00:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>federal civil rights law. And I think it's generally it's

483
00:35:16.039 --> 00:35:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a good legal regime. It makes sense. Well, Harvard has

484
00:35:19.880 --> 00:35:23.360
<v Speaker 1>basically been in violation of that, and they get two

485
00:35:23.400 --> 00:35:28.320
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars from the federal government. So President Trump tweets out,

486
00:35:29.119 --> 00:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>perhaps Harvard should lose its tax exempt status and be

487
00:35:33.440 --> 00:35:36.760
<v Speaker 1>taxed as a political entity if it keeps pushing political

488
00:35:36.840 --> 00:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>ideological and terrorist inspired supporting sickness. Remember, tax exempt status

489
00:35:43.039 --> 00:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is totally contingent on acting in the public interest. Now,

490
00:35:47.440 --> 00:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>when we return the woosy libertarian response to this tweet

491
00:35:50.480 --> 00:35:52.800
<v Speaker 1>from President Trump, that's next on the John Gerardy Show.

492
00:35:54.800 --> 00:35:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Libertarians and libertarian leaning conservatives are always very concerned with

493
00:35:59.679 --> 00:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>pro cess, a bad process that they think could set

494
00:36:04.039 --> 00:36:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a bad precedent, And they're so obsessed with process that

495
00:36:06.400 --> 00:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>they often lose sight of the actual end goal of politics,

496
00:36:10.800 --> 00:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>which is actually attaining your desired goals. Here's President Trump

497
00:36:16.000 --> 00:36:20.079
<v Speaker 1>looking at Harvard that is basically refusing to comply with

498
00:36:20.119 --> 00:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>federal civil rights law, doesn't want to get rid of

499
00:36:23.400 --> 00:36:26.079
<v Speaker 1>its DEI regime. And again, the whole idea, I didn't

500
00:36:26.079 --> 00:36:27.800
<v Speaker 1>get to this in the last second, but the whole

501
00:36:27.840 --> 00:36:30.880
<v Speaker 1>idea of DEI runs counter to the whole idea of

502
00:36:30.920 --> 00:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>federal civil rights law. The whole idea of federal civil

503
00:36:33.039 --> 00:36:39.039
<v Speaker 1>rights law is, don't discriminate pro or content pleas or

504
00:36:39.039 --> 00:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>minus whatever on the basis of race. Don't disadvantage people

505
00:36:43.960 --> 00:36:46.400
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of race or sex or this or that,

506
00:36:46.880 --> 00:36:50.119
<v Speaker 1>whatever these other categories are that we're protecting. The whole

507
00:36:50.199 --> 00:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>idea of DEI is affirmatively to discriminate in favor of

508
00:36:55.760 --> 00:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>whoever is deemed at the moment to be a historically

509
00:36:59.400 --> 00:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>disfavored group. By the way, Latinos, if you keep voting

510
00:37:04.280 --> 00:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>for Donald Trump, you are going to be out of

511
00:37:07.000 --> 00:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the DEI lottery. You guys are gonna be no longer

512
00:37:10.280 --> 00:37:14.320
<v Speaker 1>treated as an oppressed minority group. The liberals are already

513
00:37:14.360 --> 00:37:18.039
<v Speaker 1>rumbling about that, so, uh, you know, just be warned.

514
00:37:21.639 --> 00:37:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump tweets out about Harvard. You know, hey, perhaps Harvard

515
00:37:25.400 --> 00:37:28.119
<v Speaker 1>should lose its tax exempt status and be taxed as

516
00:37:28.119 --> 00:37:31.039
<v Speaker 1>a political entity if it keeps pushing political ideological and

517
00:37:31.159 --> 00:37:36.559
<v Speaker 1>terrorists inspired supporting sickness. Remember, tax exempt status is totally

518
00:37:36.599 --> 00:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>contingent on acting in the public interest, And all these

519
00:37:38.840 --> 00:37:43.039
<v Speaker 1>libertarian leaning conservatives are like, oh, that's not a good idea. Well,

520
00:37:43.320 --> 00:37:46.119
<v Speaker 1>imagine what would if if liberals applied that standard to

521
00:37:46.159 --> 00:37:49.519
<v Speaker 1>conservative nonprofits or religious nonprofits. Oh, that would be terrible.

522
00:37:49.639 --> 00:37:53.079
<v Speaker 1>They already did that, do you guys not remember Lois Learner,

523
00:37:53.360 --> 00:37:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the IRS head under Barack Obama, who initiated all kinds

524
00:37:57.760 --> 00:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of audits and all kinds of spurious legal action again

525
00:38:00.239 --> 00:38:05.079
<v Speaker 1>conservative nonprofits for no reason. They've literally already done this before.

526
00:38:05.320 --> 00:38:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Why should we be afraid of breaking a precedent that

527
00:38:07.800 --> 00:38:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have already broken? And by the way, none of

528
00:38:10.599 --> 00:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>those conservative nonprofits were violating federal civil rights law and

529
00:38:14.559 --> 00:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>letting Jewish students get harassed for no reason. That'll do it.

530
00:38:18.039 --> 00:38:20.079
<v Speaker 1>John grolready show see you next time. I'm power Talk
