Speaker 1: This is Dan Caples and welcome to today's online podcast edition
Speaker 1: of The Dan Caplas Show. Please be sure to give
Speaker 1: us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform.
Speaker 2: First guest today truly a national treasure.
Speaker 1: His name is Andy McCarthy and he's a senior fellow
Speaker 1: at the National Review and also author A Ball of Colusion,
Speaker 1: the Plot to rig an election and destroy a Presidency,
Speaker 1: also The McCarthy Report. I've got two main go to podcasts.
Speaker 1: One is his father, Mike Schmidtz. The other is The McCarthy Report.
Speaker 1: They just dropped their three hundredth episode, this one titled
Speaker 1: a Quick Trip to Saudi Arabia. Andy, thanks for making
Speaker 1: the quick trip over here. Welcome back to the Dan
Speaker 1: Caplis Show.
Speaker 2: Fang, great to be with you.
Speaker 1: Well, thank you, my friend. I wanted to get your
Speaker 1: take on the plane, the plane and listen. I think
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has done some historically great stuff, including in
Speaker 1: the last forty eight hours. But I wonder what there's
Speaker 1: really serious about the plane, because I think there are
Speaker 1: so many different problems with it. But you wrote to
Speaker 1: it so please, if you would take the floor and
Speaker 1: give everybody.
Speaker 3: Your take, well, I take the plane of disgrace.
Speaker 4: Even if I wasn't concerned about the jihadist regime in Kutter,
Speaker 4: which is a historic backer of Sunni jihadist organizations from
Speaker 4: al Qaeda through Amas and a.
Speaker 5: Use full ally to.
Speaker 4: The Iranians, even if that weren't the case, I'm sort
Speaker 4: of offended as an American at the thought that we,
Speaker 4: the United States government, which has the most powerful air
Speaker 4: force and armed forces in the history of the world,
Speaker 4: needs to accept a plane to fly our chief executive
Speaker 4: around from another country, even if it was a friendly country.
Speaker 4: I think I I'd have.
Speaker 3: Great qualms over it.
Speaker 4: But under these circumstances, it's just it's inexplicable, and just
Speaker 4: as a legal matter, it's not only a clear violation
Speaker 4: to my mind, of the Themolument's clause of the Constitution,
Speaker 4: which forbids officials and offices of high public trust to
Speaker 4: accept gifts from foreign sovereigns and foreign powers. Depending on
Speaker 4: how you look at the details, bribery, which this I
Speaker 4: think gets close to, is a predictive for a separate
Speaker 4: predicive from high crimes. In this demeanors, as you know,
Speaker 4: from impeachment under the Constitution. So why the president.
Speaker 5: Would even dabble in this, I don't know.
Speaker 1: Well, and Andy, before I get to that bigger question,
Speaker 1: so do those laws still apply if it's a gift
Speaker 1: to the nation rather than the individual.
Speaker 4: No, the Emolument's clause is clearly applicable to officeholders, not
Speaker 4: the general public. For example, the French gifted us with
Speaker 4: the Statue of Liberty, I believe in eighteen seventy seven.
Speaker 3: The interesting thing about.
Speaker 4: That, though, dan is the more something legitimately is a
Speaker 4: gift to the public, you know, to the American public
Speaker 4: or to the United States government, the less reason there
Speaker 4: would be for a president not to submit it to Congress,
Speaker 4: because if you submit to Congress that we want to
Speaker 4: accept this gift, Congress can approve it even under the
Speaker 4: emolument's clause. So a president can accept the gift, even
Speaker 4: to the president, if Congress approves it.
Speaker 5: And you know, the Statue of.
Speaker 4: Liberty, which was obviously not a gift to the president
Speaker 4: at the.
Speaker 3: Time, it was a gift to the public. It was
Speaker 3: nevertheless proposed to Congress. Congress was asked to.
Speaker 5: Pass on it and accept it. So I just think that.
Speaker 4: It's obvious from the terms of this arrangement, which you know,
Speaker 4: we have circumstances where the President is upset that Boeing
Speaker 4: hasn't delivered.
Speaker 3: On the new air Force one. Apparently the one that
Speaker 3: is currently in use is not sufficiently. I don't know
Speaker 3: what standards it is, is opulence or luxury or usefulness,
Speaker 3: whatever it is, but Trump is unhappy.
Speaker 4: I'd be pretty happy with air Force, I tell you, but.
Speaker 5: You know I don't run in his circle.
Speaker 4: So he's unhappy whether he thinks it needs an upgrade,
Speaker 4: he's annoy that Boeing won't have it until close to
Speaker 4: the end of his term, and they were already late,
Speaker 4: so who knows whether it'll whether.
Speaker 3: They'll produce it or not.
Speaker 5: So he's in a hurry.
Speaker 3: And I know if he's doing this to light a
Speaker 3: fire and demoing, maybe I would.
Speaker 5: Feel better if I thought that was what he was doing. Well,
Speaker 5: But you know, I just think the fact we as
Speaker 5: we know them, where he toured the plane when it
Speaker 5: was parked in Palm Beach to see if it would
Speaker 5: be acceptable to him.
Speaker 3: And the arrangement is supposed to be that it's for
Speaker 3: his use as Air Force one, and then when he
Speaker 3: leaves the presidency it would be it would be transferred
Speaker 3: to the Trump Presidential Library, probably not before he gets
Speaker 3: a couple of years that you said.
Speaker 1: Of it, Andy McCarthy, our special guest McCarthy Report, a
Speaker 1: podcast everybody should download now, Andy, I think Trump has
Speaker 1: done so many smart things that I've got to believe
Speaker 1: there's some bigger play here, right, because there are so
Speaker 1: many obvious reasons why this would be a huge mistake.
Speaker 1: And so I'm just wondering if the endgame is pressure
Speaker 1: on Boeing or something else. But at the end of
Speaker 1: the day, if we were betting the biggest best stake
Speaker 1: in Colorado, do you bet that he goes through with this?
Speaker 1: Because I don't think he will. Oh, I think he will.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think he will. I don't. I'm not as
Speaker 3: I'm not as confident Dan, I think as you seem
Speaker 3: to be that he's always got a master plan. I'm
Speaker 3: not saying you said that characterize what you said, but
Speaker 3: I don't.
Speaker 4: Think he's always got a master plan. I think he
Speaker 4: shoots from the head an awful lot. And I also
Speaker 4: think the more he gets criticized about something, the less
Speaker 4: willing he is to come down from it, because that's
Speaker 4: like an admission, yeah, that he was wrong, which is
Speaker 4: not a thing.
Speaker 1: Yeah wow, Well this will be fascinating to watch. But
Speaker 1: at the end of the day, legally, your thought is
Speaker 1: that if he goes ahead and he accepts the plane
Speaker 1: and the conditions are that it goes to his library
Speaker 1: after words, etc.
Speaker 2: You do think that would be a legal violation.
Speaker 4: Well, I do, but I don't think anybody can do
Speaker 4: anything about it except for Congress, and Congress has.
Speaker 3: No intention to do anything about it.
Speaker 5: I think part of what's made.
Speaker 3: Trump a little bit more reckless than he might.
Speaker 4: Otherwise see is the conflict of interest rules don't apply
Speaker 4: to the president in the sense that they're not enforceable
Speaker 4: against the president, and the Supreme Court has said that
Speaker 4: anything the president does within the official duties of the
Speaker 4: executive branch is at least presumptively immune from prosecution.
Speaker 3: And what they're trying to say there is that in
Speaker 3: this system.
Speaker 4: The checks on executive excess belong to Congress, not to
Speaker 4: prosecutors or courts. But Congress doesn't seem interested.
Speaker 3: In doing much in the way of oversight.
Speaker 4: I think that'll change if the Democrats take Congress in
Speaker 4: the midterms.
Speaker 3: As I said, I wrote a.
Speaker 4: Book about this about a decade ago called Faithless.
Speaker 3: Execution for a little more than that now.
Speaker 4: And basically, if Congress won't check the president, then the
Speaker 4: only limit on the president's power.
Speaker 5: Is what he thinks he can get away with politically, and.
Speaker 3: That's a lot of running room.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 1: Well, and he's so grateful for the time, and I'm
Speaker 1: really grateful for your work overall. This McCarthy Report podcast
Speaker 1: has just been fantastic and I learned so.
Speaker 2: Much on it.
Speaker 1: I do hope everybody downloads it and look forward to
Speaker 1: the next visit.
Speaker 5: I really appreciate it.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Dan, Thank you my friend Andy McCarthy. I
Speaker 2: mean it. He is a national treasurer.
Speaker 1: Obviously we don't always agree on everything, but he's a
Speaker 1: brilliant guy, intellectually, fearless, he follows the facts in the
Speaker 1: law as he sees them. Also very accessible. So yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm glad he's out there. And seriously, do you download
Speaker 1: this McCarthy Report.
Speaker 2: Ryan, Oh?
Speaker 6: I value Andy McCarthy's analysis highly. I'm always tuned in,
Speaker 6: especially when he's on Fox News, And like you said,
Speaker 6: he might present a side of an issue that I
Speaker 6: hadn't thought about. One or two might disagree with, but
Speaker 6: it's always well reasoned and definitely well documented.
Speaker 2: And that's why.
Speaker 1: And especially if we happen to disagree on something, I
Speaker 1: love say listening to him go through it on the podcast,
Speaker 1: because then I can test, you know, my point of view,
Speaker 1: and if I'm right in the end, is I believe
Speaker 1: I usually am that I'm better prepared to address the
Speaker 1: best arguments.
Speaker 2: On the other side.
Speaker 1: But all I'm saying is the guy is very very
Speaker 1: often right in this McCarthy report. Because it's long formed.
Speaker 1: They're usually about an hour an hour ten. You know,
Speaker 1: you can really become very quickly the smartest gal in
Speaker 1: the room, the smartest guy in the room on that subject,
Speaker 1: or very close to it.
Speaker 2: So strongly recommend it.
Speaker 1: Hey, we were talking, I think just yesterday about is
Speaker 1: the left in Colorado going to do something that is
Speaker 1: obviously so far over the line, so obscene, so just
Speaker 1: wrong on its face in every way that it can
Speaker 1: cut through the noise and be a tipping point in
Speaker 1: Colorado for people to finally start electing Republicans stay wide. Well,
Speaker 1: arguably they've already done that, but they just did it again.
Speaker 2: You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 7: And now back to the Dan Tapla Show podcast.
Speaker 4: If they were to go and arrest these members, or
Speaker 4: if they would try to sanction them through a house
Speaker 4: for find out, what would you do?
Speaker 2: I mean find out recourse? I mean it does not
Speaker 2: bro say find out definitely. I love this a team, Jeffries.
Speaker 1: Now the gift that keeps on giving, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: this is what we've been talking about since over a
Speaker 1: year ago, which is, yeah, we needed Trump to win,
Speaker 1: and we need the left to expose itself and we
Speaker 1: need the left to lose its mind openly and publicly.
Speaker 2: And it's doing that. It's hard to even.
Speaker 1: Keep up with how often and how many places it's
Speaker 1: doing that. But now it's it's yeah, now it's it's
Speaker 1: defending Democrat House members who want to storm and ice
Speaker 1: facility in New Jersey that houses largely MS thirteen and
Speaker 1: other gang members.
Speaker 2: I please have that, but you got to start throwing
Speaker 2: these people in jail.
Speaker 1: I mean, you cannot have these two standards of justice.
Speaker 1: I don't care if somebody is a congressman, I don't
Speaker 1: care who they are. If they're going to violate the law,
Speaker 1: and they're going to trespass into a facility they don't
Speaker 1: have a legal right to be in, and they're going
Speaker 1: to start pushing ice agents around. You gotta put the
Speaker 1: cuffs on them. And Ryan, aren't you a little surprised
Speaker 1: we haven't seen that arrest already.
Speaker 6: I'm surprised that Democrats don't want that visual.
Speaker 7: I think it plays well to their hard left base.
Speaker 6: It would paint them as the victim, which they love
Speaker 6: to do, and it would paint the Trump administration as
Speaker 6: these hardline fascists they're looking to arrest Congress people. I
Speaker 6: think it's a political ploy and a play by them,
Speaker 6: and a keing. Jeffery's playing the fake tough guy, just
Speaker 6: as the icing on the cake.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but I think it's suicidal politically, right if you're
Speaker 1: talking if you're talking about your little bitty base there, right, yeah,
Speaker 1: but if you're talking about.
Speaker 2: The people you need to win elections exactly right. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Now here is one of the really fun problems the
Speaker 1: Democrats have right now. Is there little bitty base that's
Speaker 1: way out of touch with most of America, including many Democrats.
Speaker 1: Also happens to house some of their biggest donors. Right,
Speaker 1: So you got people like Diamond, Mike Johnston and all
Speaker 1: these other Democrats running around saying and doing these looney,
Speaker 1: looney things, the way out of step with America in
Speaker 1: Colorado because a disproportionate number of the big money donors
Speaker 1: are on that truly looney radical secular far left three
Speaker 1: at three eighty someone three eight two five, five of
Speaker 1: the number.
Speaker 2: Techs d an five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 1: Hey, speaking of that stuff, you know how we've been
Speaker 1: talking about, Okay, is there anything the left can do
Speaker 1: that will cause a real tipping point in Colorado and
Speaker 1: cause people to start electing Republicans statewide? I do think
Speaker 1: there's a form, and I do think they've done some
Speaker 1: of those things already, right. I Mean, we had Representative
Speaker 1: Bradley on the show the other day and we were
Speaker 1: talking about just the outpoint at the legislature. She said,
Speaker 1: even bigger than the two A issues, you know against
Speaker 1: the left at this point, you know, making it now
Speaker 1: a violation of our civil rights statutes, etc. For somebody
Speaker 1: to refuse to call a man a woman, thinking goofiness
Speaker 1: like that, and you know the run they made at saying, hey,
Speaker 1: you're going to lose your kids unless you say your
Speaker 1: boys a girl. So they're already doing that some of
Speaker 1: that stuff, but there's a fresh one that I think
Speaker 1: is really going to capture the attention to people if
Speaker 1: the media will report it. Now, one of the problems
Speaker 1: we have in Colorado, and we have a lot of
Speaker 1: good people in the media, and I consider a lot
Speaker 1: of them friends, but the media as a whole, I
Speaker 1: think is so obviously aligned with the Democratic Party. A
Speaker 1: lot of these stories they either don't report, or they
Speaker 1: soft pedal or downplay. There are some very noble exceptions
Speaker 1: to that, but here's one of them. If everybody in
Speaker 1: Colorado could find out about what's going on in this case,
Speaker 1: I'm going to tell you about.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think a.
Speaker 1: Lot of people would shift their voting preferences in a hurry.
Speaker 1: But here's the latest, really kind of obscene, literally idiocy.
Speaker 1: This is the State of Colorado has now stepped in
Speaker 1: to say that this Christian camp, it operates a Christian
Speaker 1: summer camp, and it's got an acronym for I'd rather
Speaker 1: have Jesus. So I'll quote from the lawsuit. I pulled
Speaker 1: the lawsuit document because one thing I like to do
Speaker 1: is I read these stories, these news stories and see
Speaker 1: something real interesting. I love to dig deeper and just
Speaker 1: pull the lawsuit document and really start to get you
Speaker 1: some details that you can't get from the story. So
Speaker 1: I'll just read to you from a few of the
Speaker 1: first key paragraphs in this lawsuit that has been filed
Speaker 1: against the state of Colorado. The civil rights action seeks
Speaker 1: to prevent the government from forcing a Christian summer camp
Speaker 1: to surrender its religious character, beliefs, and exercise to maintain
Speaker 1: a license to operating Colorado just like everything else. Camp
Speaker 1: I'd Rather Have Jesus is a children's resident camp that
Speaker 1: operates Christian summer camps in Colorado for children ages six
Speaker 1: two seventeen. Ryan, Why is the Colorado Democratic Party so
Speaker 1: determined to sexualize these young kids?
Speaker 2: What is that obsession all about?
Speaker 1: The lawsuit goes on to say Colorado requires children's residents
Speaker 1: like Camp I'd Rather Have Jesus to obtain and maintain
Speaker 1: a childcare license to operate in the state. Founded in
Speaker 1: nineteen forty eight, Camp I'd Rather Have Jesus believes in
Speaker 1: the power of Camp ministry to win souls to Jesus Christ.
Speaker 2: It exists so that all.
Speaker 1: Who enter its Gates would experience God in a new
Speaker 1: way and would say, I'd rather have Jesus more than anything,
Speaker 1: the words of the hymn for which the camp is named.
Speaker 1: While it is a christ centered organization, the camp welcomes
Speaker 1: children of all faiths and backgrounds to its camp. And
Speaker 1: then it goes on a little bit more about the camp,
Speaker 1: and then it goes to say, but the Colorado Department
Speaker 1: of Early Childhood is requiring religious children's camps like Camp
Speaker 1: I'd Rather have Jesus to forego their religious character, beliefs
Speaker 1: and exercise to operate in Colorado. The Department does so
Speaker 1: through regulations that require children's resident camps to allow campers
Speaker 1: to use restrooms, shower facilities, dressing areas, and sleeping facilities
Speaker 1: designated for the opposite sex. Those regulations would require the
Speaker 1: camp to violate its religious beliefs by altering its policies
Speaker 1: in operation that are based upon religious beliefs about sexuality
Speaker 1: and gender, including its policies of separating restrooms, shower facilities,
Speaker 1: dressing areas, and sleeping facilities based on biological sex rather
Speaker 1: than quote gender identity. The regulations would also force the
Speaker 1: camp to allow campers to share a tent or room
Speaker 1: with members of them the opposite sex on camp. I'd
Speaker 1: rather have Jesus off site camping and backpacking trips. No, right, yeah,
Speaker 1: there can't be ten living people in Colorado who think
Speaker 1: this is anything other than perverted and obscene for the
Speaker 1: State of Colorado to be I don't care what the
Speaker 1: camp is in this case. Yeah, this is a slam
Speaker 1: dunk win right for religious liberty. But I don't care
Speaker 1: whether it's a religious camp, whether it's a non religious camp.
Speaker 1: For the State of Colorado to tell these camps that
Speaker 1: host these little kids, oh no, you got to let
Speaker 1: those naked boys in with the naked girls.
Speaker 2: That's just perverted.
Speaker 6: Well, Dan, isn't there such thing as a nuisance case?
Speaker 6: And in this particular instance, this has been adjudicated by
Speaker 6: the Supreme Court of the United States and Masterpiece Cake
Speaker 6: Shop a case has been cited as precedent by.
Speaker 2: Justice Neil Gorsuch and others.
Speaker 7: This has already been decided.
Speaker 6: How can they continue to go down this road when
Speaker 6: it's been adjudicated by the highest court in the land.
Speaker 1: Well, the technical term within the law is a double
Speaker 1: middle finger. I mean, so what Colorado does with stuff
Speaker 1: like this is say we know this is illegal, sue us.
Speaker 1: The punishment is the process, right, just like with Jack Phillips,
Speaker 1: the punishment is the process.
Speaker 2: You got a choice.
Speaker 1: You can let those naked little boys in with the
Speaker 1: naked little girls because for some reason, the Colorado Democratic
Speaker 1: Party wants to sexualize all these kids. You can either
Speaker 1: do that or you can go out and you can
Speaker 1: spend millions of dollars and all this time and all
Speaker 1: this distraction by.
Speaker 2: Suing us take us to the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: I mean that that is the punishment, right. So you
Speaker 1: either do what we want you to do, even though
Speaker 1: it's obviously illegal, or we punish you even if you win.
Speaker 1: You're on the dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 2: Ibby next.
Speaker 7: You're listening to The dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 1: Podcast talks about walking in the song and it fits
Speaker 1: our guests perfectly. Abby Johnson one of the great heroes
Speaker 1: of the pro life movement, formally a planned parenthood director,
Speaker 1: clinic director, and now a champion for life. Abby, welcome
Speaker 1: back to the dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 8: Hellow so good to be on with you.
Speaker 1: Well, I was so happy to hear that you wanted
Speaker 1: to come on and done this topic because I understand
Speaker 1: that you're justifiably very upset about Wait a second, why
Speaker 1: have some Planned parent who had been defunded yet?
Speaker 8: Yeah, I mean we just got their most recent annual
Speaker 8: report and.
Speaker 2: Numbers of number.
Speaker 8: Of federal funding going to them is the little staggering
Speaker 8: highest ever. And I mean the number of babes being
Speaker 8: killed being murdered by Planned parenthood up again, just continues
Speaker 8: to climb. And then you look at all of these
Speaker 8: you know, uh, I suppose you know, the defenders of
Speaker 8: Planned parenthood will say, oh, but.
Speaker 9: All those other services, well, you know, you look at
Speaker 9: the other services.
Speaker 8: Those continue to decline. So abortion up, federal dollars up,
Speaker 8: other services down, and Planned Parenthood still continues to be funded.
Speaker 8: You know, we do see in this new uh this
Speaker 8: Reconciliation bill, the plan is to defund them, but we
Speaker 8: still have a long way to go until that bill passes.
Speaker 8: And there are Republicans that are fighting against the defunding
Speaker 8: of Planned Parenthood in the bill. So you know, we
Speaker 8: will we will see, we will see how this goes.
Speaker 1: Abbie Johnson, our guest, it's abbyja dot com. Now, Abbie,
Speaker 1: how much is Planned Parenthood.
Speaker 8: Getting So they're getting over seven hundred million dollars of
Speaker 8: our federal taxpayer money. Now that does not include the
Speaker 8: state money that many states are giving them. Over over
Speaker 8: half of the states in the United States are funding them.
Speaker 8: You know, some states, you know, I mean millions and
Speaker 8: millions of dollars something hundreds.
Speaker 2: Of millions of dollars.
Speaker 8: So you know, for some people, people that live in
Speaker 8: you know what we say blue states, right, not only
Speaker 8: are they giving their federal tax dollars to Planned parent
Speaker 8: but then they're turning around and giving their state tax
Speaker 8: dollars to Planned Parenthood as well.
Speaker 1: Well, who are these Republicans who are helping Plan Parenthood
Speaker 1: kill these babies?
Speaker 9: Well, you know we've got them. We have them in
Speaker 9: the in Congress. There's quite a few actually, and.
Speaker 8: You know, for what reason, I don't know. And you know,
Speaker 8: we we need to uh pick up our we need
Speaker 8: to pick up our phones to our congress people, and
Speaker 8: we need to be making the phone calls and we
Speaker 8: need to just be asking the direct question, uh, you know,
Speaker 8: are you going to vote for the reconciliation? So are
Speaker 8: you going to vote to defund Planned Parenthood.
Speaker 2: I've heard from some.
Speaker 8: People they have called their their congressperson and they've just
Speaker 8: float outsaid we're not Republicans, blot out said we're not.
Speaker 9: We're not going to vote for it because we don't.
Speaker 8: Believe in defunding planned parenthout. And these were people they
Speaker 8: voted for this Congress number because they thought.
Speaker 9: They were pro life, right and.
Speaker 8: Uh and maybe they said they were pro life, but
Speaker 8: now when it comes to actually definding our country's largest
Speaker 8: abortion provider, now suddenly they don't.
Speaker 2: Want to do it.
Speaker 8: So, I mean, I'm encouraging people pick up the phone,
Speaker 8: make the phone call.
Speaker 9: You know, just make the ask, you know, vote on that.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: No, and I'm glad you're telling folks to do that.
Speaker 1: What's the timing When do you think it'll come.
Speaker 2: To a vote? You know, I don't know.
Speaker 8: I mean hopefully, you know, hopefully it won't be too long.
Speaker 8: Hopefully it won't Hopefully the process won't be you know,
Speaker 8: dragged out.
Speaker 2: For weeks.
Speaker 8: Hopefully we will have a vote within like the next
Speaker 8: week or so. Uh, and then we'll know for sure
Speaker 8: where where people are will be a record vote.
Speaker 9: So hopefully we'll know within the next.
Speaker 2: Week or so.
Speaker 8: But yeah, we need and that's why it's not going to.
Speaker 2: Be months and months.
Speaker 8: You know, it's not going to be months and months.
Speaker 8: We need people to be calling now and call over
Speaker 8: and over again and tell your congress person we expect
Speaker 8: you vote. They they need pressure from us. Yeah, And
Speaker 8: you know people are like, oh, well, I'm already called once,
Speaker 8: call again, you know, email again. It doesn't matter. Make
Speaker 8: the phone calls, take the time to do it.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm really glad that you're calling everybody's attention to this.
Speaker 1: I think you are right on the time. You know.
Speaker 1: I was on the phone with Congressman Gabe Evans the
Speaker 1: other day and he was telling me, if I remember right,
Speaker 1: he thinks it's it's going to get the vote before
Speaker 1: Memorial Day. Abby, appreciate all you do. What's the best
Speaker 1: way for people to follow you?
Speaker 8: Yep, Abby, jabb y j dot com.
Speaker 1: Wonderful. Well, thank you again, Abby, and keep up the
Speaker 1: great work.
Speaker 8: Thank you, thanks so much.
Speaker 1: Dan, appreciate that three h three someone three eight two
Speaker 1: five five The number takes d A N five seven
Speaker 1: seven three nine, Ryan, I thought that we by this
Speaker 1: point would have been flooded with calls asking that we at
Speaker 1: least a vote.
Speaker 2: What do you think of this idea? Maybe splitting the show, devoting.
Speaker 1: One hour to sports the other hour to news, because
Speaker 1: let's face it, I mean, it's a gift, right, and
Speaker 1: just see the things. And I called that Nuggets game
Speaker 1: last night to the tee.
Speaker 2: I love this team. I love the effort.
Speaker 1: Obviously they are a couple of pieces short, but that
Speaker 1: doesn't mean they couldn't win a ship this year. But
Speaker 1: they're exhausted because they had that seven game series with
Speaker 1: the Clippers and then the NBA screwed them.
Speaker 2: In this scheduling.
Speaker 1: So what I had said yesterday is proven exactly right
Speaker 1: last night, right, I mean to the scintilla, and what
Speaker 1: I said was this, and this team is too tired
Speaker 1: to win yesterday. I said they're too tired to win
Speaker 1: on Tuesday. So you've got to just sit your starters.
Speaker 1: The NBA would deserve that, because the NBA has been
Speaker 1: so unfair to the Nuggets scheduling. Sit your starters, because
Speaker 1: once this team gets healthy, if they had sat last night,
Speaker 1: once they're healthy, they're going to win those next two games.
Speaker 1: They are better than OKAC, but they're also exhausted. And
Speaker 1: so you saw it last night. They all played Oka See.
Speaker 1: They had hustled Oka See until literally, they just ran
Speaker 1: out of gas and then it took a minute or
Speaker 1: two for Okac to win the game at the end,
Speaker 1: simply because the Nuggets are exhausted, which is.
Speaker 2: Not their fault. So yeah, and you know with.
Speaker 1: Last night maximum effort going down to the last minute
Speaker 1: or two, Yeah, it's it's going to be a much
Speaker 1: tougher hill to climb out. Doesn't mean they can't do it.
Speaker 1: They're a better team, but going to be much tougher.
Speaker 1: So the one good thing is that they win tomorrow
Speaker 1: night's game and then at least you get an extra
Speaker 1: day of rest before Game seven. So three out three
Speaker 1: someone three eight, two, five five The number a long
Speaker 1: way of saying I told you so, and I wished
Speaker 1: I'd been wrong. I sat there last night thinking, man,
Speaker 1: I really hope I can go on air tomorrow and say, hey,
Speaker 1: I was wrong, and I'm very happy.
Speaker 6: They were ahead in the fourth quarter, but they just
Speaker 6: ran out of gas, right, not their fault.
Speaker 2: They're exhausted. They're exhausted.
Speaker 1: But the other thing I recommended yesterday, then we'll get
Speaker 1: back to all this life and desk stuff. The other
Speaker 1: thing I recommended yesterday they need to sign Yokich's brother.
Speaker 2: Yokich's brother makes Yokid look like a midget.
Speaker 1: They need to sign Jokic's brother, and then you don't.
Speaker 1: He's not in the locker room, he doesn't practice with them.
Speaker 1: Anybody abuses Jokic in these ways that they're allowed to
Speaker 1: get away with it right now because the league won't
Speaker 1: call those fouls.
Speaker 2: You just put.
Speaker 1: Jokic's brother in and you have a little street encouragement
Speaker 1: and then you level things out. He has six files
Speaker 1: to give and you pick your.
Speaker 2: Spots and you do that.
Speaker 1: I mean, they must have twenty guys on that bench
Speaker 1: that they can afford a spot for Jokic's brother.
Speaker 2: That's all I'm saying.
Speaker 6: I thought you mentioned hiring him as a heavy, like
Speaker 6: as a security enforcer.
Speaker 2: No, I mean you put him on the bay. You
Speaker 2: got to put a jersey on him. He can't enforce
Speaker 2: unless he's on the court. Well, he's just on the
Speaker 2: staff though you No.
Speaker 1: No, Ryan, Sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt. I'm just
Speaker 1: excited about this idea because it's a good one. Why
Speaker 1: wouldn't you put him in uniform and you put him
Speaker 1: on the court. Somebody is going to abuse Jokic out there.
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about a typical foul, but abuse Jokic
Speaker 1: out there. You put them out on the court for
Speaker 1: a minute, and you encourage the opposing team to not
Speaker 1: engage in that kind of illegal behavior, and then you
Speaker 1: put them back.
Speaker 2: On the bench. Yeah, three out three, So one three,
Speaker 2: eight two five. I've okay.
Speaker 1: Getting back to the big news of the day we
Speaker 1: are talking about obviously, they and tell me, why do
Speaker 1: you think that the Colorado Democratic Party is so obsessed
Speaker 1: with sexualizing young children? In the latest example is what
Speaker 1: they're doing to this camp. I'd rather have Jesus as
Speaker 1: the name of the camp. And they're saying, you're going
Speaker 1: to lose your license unless you let naked boys show
Speaker 1: her with naked little girls. So they've got to know
Speaker 1: this is unconstitutional and they're going to lose in court.
Speaker 2: So why do you think they're doing it? You're on
Speaker 2: the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 7: And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 10: President Biden came into that Los Angeles fundraiser June fifteenth,
Speaker 10: and behind the scene there were little, tiny fundraisers.
Speaker 2: For the big, big donors.
Speaker 10: There was the thing the event on stage with Jimmy
Speaker 10: Kimmel and Barack Obama, but then also behind the scenes
Speaker 10: photographs and smaller speeches for big donors. And it was
Speaker 10: there that President Biden walked over to George Clooney, and
Speaker 10: Clooney realized, and other people witnessing realized that Biden did
Speaker 10: not recognize this, despite the fact that they know each
Speaker 10: other since roughly after nine to eleven. They'd had many
Speaker 10: meetings when Biden was vice president. They'd known each other
Speaker 10: for a long time. Biden awarded him a Kennedy Center
Speaker 10: Award in December twenty twenty two. And obviously, I mean
Speaker 10: Clooney was throwing this fundraiser for him, a record setting fundraising.
Speaker 2: How beautiful is this?
Speaker 8: Right?
Speaker 1: Help you what he took to get George Clooney to
Speaker 1: turn on Joe Biden was Biden insulting Clooney, right, forget
Speaker 1: the nation, forget.
Speaker 2: What's best for the nation.
Speaker 1: But when Biden didn't recognize Clooney, and you got to
Speaker 1: imagine a guy like Clooney, Ryan, you live this life
Speaker 1: right where people are constant and lea the groupies and
Speaker 1: kissing your behind and everything else. Imagine the beauty of
Speaker 1: that moment when a guy like Clooney, who's used.
Speaker 2: To all that, and he puts together this big fundraiser.
Speaker 2: President doesn't even know who he is. Yeah, I mean that.
Speaker 2: I wish I had been there for it.
Speaker 6: Dan, you're a fervent supporter of the Republican president, Republican candidates.
Speaker 6: I'm just trying to put myself in those shoes. And
Speaker 6: if you were, if you were like George Clooney, you
Speaker 6: got the looks if you were hosting a fundraiser like
Speaker 6: that for a president Donald Trump, who you really believed
Speaker 6: in and wanted to win. But he should have recognized you,
Speaker 6: and he didn't know who you were. Why didn't George
Speaker 6: Clooney say something?
Speaker 1: That's my point, right, because they all lied to us.
Speaker 1: So he should have come out that day. He should
Speaker 1: have come out the next morning. I said, I'm sorry America, right,
Speaker 1: because so many of us, regardless of bloke of Varady,
Speaker 1: we'd buy tickets to some of his movies and all this,
Speaker 1: and that should have come out and said, I'm sorry, America,
Speaker 1: he's not right. I want the Democrat to win, would
Speaker 1: say George Clooney, right, but he's not right, and he
Speaker 1: would get he wouldn't.
Speaker 7: They wouldn't Kamala Harris.
Speaker 6: And this is no defense of her, but any candidate
Speaker 6: she was in a difficult spot with only like one
Speaker 6: hundred days to run a campaign from scratch. If Clooney
Speaker 6: comes out and says something that was may I think
Speaker 6: of that year she's got forty more days or somebody
Speaker 6: which got were horrible for her, right, because the best
Speaker 6: thing that could have happened to Kamala Harris was a
Speaker 6: three day campaign.
Speaker 1: Right, right, And we talked about that at the time,
Speaker 1: we talked about in advance.
Speaker 2: But no, you're right in terms of the Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: And this is the beauty of it is, isn't it
Speaker 1: Ryan that they're wrongdoing. They're awful actions that they knew
Speaker 1: were going to hurt the country backfired on him.
Speaker 2: Yes, because if he had told the truth.
Speaker 1: Back then, if they had come on we've been talking
Speaker 1: about on the show for two years, if they had
Speaker 1: just told the truth back then, then they would have
Speaker 1: had some time and they would have been able to
Speaker 1: get a much better candidate and a much better campaign
Speaker 1: and all this and that. Now, in the end, I
Speaker 1: think Trump still wins, but it would have been a
Speaker 1: lot tougher race.
Speaker 6: The best ally the Democratic Party could have had would
Speaker 6: have been Dan Kaplis and listening to this show because
Speaker 6: Dan oh Man, I gotta give you immense credit for
Speaker 6: this particular prediction. You've gotten a lot of them, right,
Speaker 6: but this one. You were calling it from way far
Speaker 6: back Joe Biden will not be the candidate.
Speaker 2: But how far back does that go?
Speaker 1: It goes a long way, because I remember saying as
Speaker 1: we were heading into twenty three that he needed to
Speaker 1: get out, he needed to get out by Labor Daight
Speaker 1: twenty twenty three.
Speaker 2: I remember that, Yeah, if he gets out by.
Speaker 1: Labor Dight twenty twenty three, then he can do this
Speaker 1: whole Oh, I'm so gracious and passing the torch garbage, right.
Speaker 1: So I predicted and expected he would get out by
Speaker 1: Labor Day twenty twenty three, and thank.
Speaker 2: Goodness, he didn't.
Speaker 1: Thank goodness, because we had to have not only did
Speaker 1: we have to have a Trump victory. That's the whole
Speaker 1: point here, is not only the Trump victory, but you
Speaker 1: have to have the left expose itself. That brings us
Speaker 1: back to Colorado and that this camp. I'd rather have
Speaker 1: Cheese's lawsuit against the state now. And if you weren't
Speaker 1: with us earlier. The twenty second summary is he got
Speaker 1: this camp, Camp, I'd rather have Jesus. They've been operating
Speaker 1: since about the time of Moses, and they get a
Speaker 1: bunch of little kids in there, and they stay at
Speaker 1: the camp, and so the girls are in the girls
Speaker 1: area and the boys are in the boys area. They
Speaker 1: have their own separate showers and bathrooms and bunks to
Speaker 1: sleep in, and so that they really kind of sexually obsessed.
Speaker 1: Colorado Democratic Party with all their perversions comes in now
Speaker 1: and says, oh, oh, camp, you can't operate anymore unless
Speaker 1: those boys get to sleep with girls if they want to,
Speaker 1: and boys get to go into their showers if they
Speaker 1: want to, and boys get to go in their bathroom
Speaker 1: when oh, by the way, even if you guys take
Speaker 1: a field trip, and you're out on a field trip,
Speaker 1: boys want to sleep in the girls' bunks, they get to.
Speaker 1: They want to go in the girls showers, they get to.
Speaker 1: All they have to do is self identify as being
Speaker 1: a girl. I mean, this is weird, perverted stuff. It's
Speaker 1: also obviously illegal, obviously illegal to force that on a
Speaker 1: religious can't right to operate contrary to their core religious beliefs.
Speaker 1: And that's what the state is trying to do. It's
Speaker 1: this legal thuggery that the Colorado Democratic Party is engaging
Speaker 1: in on multiple fronts.
Speaker 2: They know it's illegal, but the point.
Speaker 1: Is, okay, okay, you want to sue us, you want
Speaker 1: to take us all the way to the US Supreme
Speaker 1: Court to enforce the law, Hey have at it, because
Speaker 1: guess what the process is the punishment because how many
Speaker 1: people can afford to do it?
Speaker 2: How many can afford the time?
Speaker 1: And the turmoil is it is legislative thuggery is what
Speaker 1: the Colorado Democratic Party is engaged. And they every time
Speaker 1: they get to the Supreme Court, they get slapped down
Speaker 1: and they lose, and they just walk away laughing because
Speaker 1: how many people are going to take.
Speaker 2: Them all the way there?
Speaker 1: And thank god, literally we have groups like Alliance Defending
Speaker 1: Freedom who stand up and sue on behalf of these
Speaker 1: innocent people who are trying to vindicate all of our rights.
Speaker 2: Right, you look at.
Speaker 1: These cases, You look at Jack Phillips, you look at
Speaker 1: three zero three Creative and this will be the next one.
Speaker 1: This will be the next one. And Colorado knows it's
Speaker 1: gonna lose this. But again, what about all the people
Speaker 1: who aren't willing to litigate it. They just have to
Speaker 1: bend the knee, sacrifice the religious beliefs and let this
Speaker 1: truly pervert it, and I mean perverted from the legislative's
Speaker 1: legal sense. Colorado Democratic Party forced them to operate contrary
Speaker 1: to the religious beliefs.
Speaker 2: That's the play.
Speaker 1: That's the play right now, and it is legislative thuggery.
Speaker 1: And again, thank god these folks and ADF helping this
Speaker 1: particular group as they do so many stepping up.
Speaker 2: A love a guest from ADF at.
Speaker 1: Five thirty six, but lots more to talk about in
Speaker 1: the meantime. Just got a text from Oriyan Groupie, it
Speaker 1: might be interesting to get inside that mindset.
Speaker 2: It's such a big.
Speaker 1: Group, though, how do you find anyone who's truly representative
Speaker 1: of the whole. Well, we'll find out. You're on the
Speaker 1: Dncapita Show.