Speaker 1: Time for the nine verst Wetherforcass wind advisory begins at
Speaker 1: ten am. It's going to be a windy day to day,
Speaker 1: extremely so seventy eight for the high The rain shows
Speaker 1: up around nine pm. A floodwatch begins at eight pm.
Speaker 1: The lasts all the way through Sunday, along with that
Speaker 1: heavy rain in Torrential Downpourse fifty nine. The overnight low
Speaker 1: rain will continue tomorrow with the highest sixty eight. Scattered
Speaker 1: showers overnight with the lower fifty three. Friday, more storms
Speaker 1: and rain at a highest sixty. It's forty nine degrees
Speaker 1: right now. It's time for a traffic update. Chuck Ingram Highway.
Speaker 2: Traffic continues to improve, although there is a new accident.
Speaker 2: He's found two seventy five at seven forty seven. The
Speaker 2: right wing is blocked off. Traffic backs up a bit
Speaker 2: towards Winton southbound seventy five. Heavy get is through Walkland
Speaker 2: southbound seventy one at an extra eight minutes between Fields
Speaker 2: Thirdle and the Reagan Highway northbound seventy five. Heaviest out
Speaker 2: of erl Linger into the cut in the hill coming
Speaker 2: up next. It's one of my most favorite days of
Speaker 2: the year. It's P B and J Day, So why
Speaker 2: not celebrate today with a couple of peanut butter and
Speaker 2: jelly sandwiches. I can't wait at a tall glass of
Speaker 2: milk or but Judges next Chuck Ingram on fifty five KRC,
Speaker 2: the talk station.
Speaker 1: Sometimes better than others.
Speaker 3: Where he really outdoes him himself.
Speaker 1: Judge, Yeah, you're the only person in the world. He
Speaker 1: tailors his traffic reports too. You have to understand that.
Speaker 1: And as I mentioned before, it's such.
Speaker 3: A letdown when he said my favorite I thought he's
Speaker 3: gonna say my favorite day of the week, and it's
Speaker 3: his favorite day of the year peanut butter and jelly
Speaker 3: sandwich in the news room.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, I can always say it's my favorite
Speaker 1: day of the week. I always love our conversations. I
Speaker 1: love your fundamental, profound appreciation for the founding document of
Speaker 1: our country, the Constitution United States of America, and of
Speaker 1: course the Bill of Rights, God given and rights not
Speaker 1: created by government, but given to us by virtue of
Speaker 1: our being. That government did not give to us, but
Speaker 1: the document protects us from government having trying to take
Speaker 1: them away. But that pesky constitution, you'r honor that pesky Constitution,
Speaker 1: Your honor is not expedient politically. It requires you to
Speaker 1: go through certain hoops in order to preserve and protect
Speaker 1: those fundamental rights. And when you have to do nothing,
Speaker 1: Congress and does nothing but bicker and argue and can't
Speaker 1: get things accomplished by way of legislation, it empowers the
Speaker 1: executive brand to do exactly what we're talking about today.
Speaker 1: Your column Taking the Constitution Seriously, which comes out tonight
Speaker 1: that I'm lucky enough to get an advanced copy of
Speaker 1: Judge Annapolitano.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, I was furious at the comments of
Speaker 3: Caroline levittlate and forceful defender of the president, she's his
Speaker 3: press secretary, saying that because an individual is a bad person,
Speaker 3: he can be deported. Well, we don't operate that way,
Speaker 3: and we haven't operated that way since seventeen seventy six
Speaker 3: when we struck a match that started a war against
Speaker 3: Great Britain based on the Declaration of Independence, and then
Speaker 3: again in seventeen eighty nine when we ratified the Constitution.
Speaker 3: A person is not worthy of punishment of any sort
Speaker 3: until after due process. This government doesn't seem to care
Speaker 3: about that. That's problem number one. Problem number two much
Speaker 3: of these punishments, and they are severe, sending someone to
Speaker 3: a hellhole in El Salvador, which would be illegal and
Speaker 3: unconstitutional in the United States based on speech which is
Speaker 3: protected from federal evalue eation or insulation or interference or
Speaker 3: retribution by the First Amendment. These are very dangerous times
Speaker 3: when the government thinks it can get away for it.
Speaker 3: And thank God for federal judges who are doing their
Speaker 3: best to interfere with it. I say doing their best.
Speaker 3: This administration doesn't even follow the orders of federal judges.
Speaker 3: The guy who was living peacefully with his American wife
Speaker 3: and American born children in Maryland, working several jobs and
Speaker 3: paying taxes was just swooped up off the streets by
Speaker 3: massed men who were agents of the Department of Homeland
Speaker 3: Security in defiance of the order of a federal immigration
Speaker 3: judge not to deport this person. The federal immigration judge
Speaker 3: held a hearing and concluded that he is a valid
Speaker 3: recipient of asylum escaping gangs in El Salvador, whereas he
Speaker 3: now he's surrounded by a gang in El Salvador, in
Speaker 3: a prison where people are stocked in like sardines.
Speaker 1: Lawful resident of the United States not a citizen, but
Speaker 1: a lawfully here person. Now, you know, many of my
Speaker 1: listeners probably completely and wholeheartedly disagree with the words he uttered.
Speaker 1: But you know, I have to listen to words being
Speaker 1: uttered on national news that I wholeheartily disagree with every
Speaker 1: single day. Because you get a one sided journalistic perspective,
Speaker 1: and I am a libertarian minded person and disagree with
Speaker 1: their big government approach to life. They can say whatever
Speaker 1: they want. We talked about Brandenburg multiple times over the
Speaker 1: years with you about you can say some terrible, hateful
Speaker 1: things in public, but it doesn't subject you to arrest.
Speaker 3: You know, to our conservative Republican friends, which is probably
Speaker 3: the base of your listening audience, a listening audience that
Speaker 3: I respect and admire and enjoy the privilege of appearing
Speaker 3: in front of on Wednesday mornings, this is very dangerous stuff.
Speaker 3: Just think if Kamala Harris had been elected president and
Speaker 3: began locking people up because of the speech that your
Speaker 3: audience loves. We now have a president who's locking people
Speaker 3: up because of the speech that your audience hates. Which
Speaker 3: is why the speech we love needs no protection. The
Speaker 3: speech we hate needs protection, And that's why the First
Speaker 3: Amendment keeps the government out of the business of evaluating speech.
Speaker 3: Whether the president is Donald Trump or Kamala Harris, George W.
Speaker 3: Borshow Barack Obama, none of them has any right to
Speaker 3: evaluate and punish speech in America. You can say whatever
Speaker 3: you want, and the First Amendment protects everyone here, even
Speaker 3: those unlawfully here. In the case we're talking about, he's
Speaker 3: lawfully here.
Speaker 1: Haven't we been down this road before the McCarthy era,
Speaker 1: for example, I mean, they were hauling people in front
Speaker 1: of Congress and accusing them of being communists And you know,
Speaker 1: no communist to my no supporter of the Communist Party
Speaker 1: am I. But you know what, if you want to
Speaker 1: be a commune the United States of America, you're free
Speaker 1: to do that.
Speaker 3: Correct. We have not seen punishment for speech, or, in
Speaker 3: the case of my alma mater, Princeton University, punishment for
Speaker 3: silence the refusal to condemn the anti Semitism to satisfy
Speaker 3: the executive branch of the government. We have not seen
Speaker 3: this level of interference with speech in America in nearly
Speaker 3: seventy five years since the McCarthy era, which is early
Speaker 3: nineteen fifties.
Speaker 1: Well, pivot over to speech versus conduct. And I understand
Speaker 1: the point about free speech, and you can have you
Speaker 1: can go scream free Palestine or you know, get rid
Speaker 1: of Israel all day long, and that is protected. But
Speaker 1: the minute you start engaging in acts of violence or
Speaker 1: interference against your perceived foe, in this case Jewish students,
Speaker 1: that can be something that is worthy of stopping or protecting.
Speaker 1: So there's sort of a fine line between what's protecting
Speaker 1: and what isn't.
Speaker 3: Well, you're exactly you're exactly correct. No one unless you're
Speaker 3: in the business of starting a revolution, would defend violence
Speaker 3: against people. If you're going to engage in violence, you
Speaker 3: better win because if you don't win, you're going to
Speaker 3: go to jail, because violence is a crime. Now, some
Speaker 3: violence has a happy ending, like the American Revolution, but
Speaker 3: if we had lost that, Jefferson and his buddies would
Speaker 3: have been hanged. Yes, so when you strike at the king,
Speaker 3: you must kill him. But speech that encourages and succeeds
Speaker 3: in encouraging violence is not protected under Brandon birth. None
Speaker 3: one of these people has been accused of that. None.
Speaker 3: They've all been accused of either behavior in which they
Speaker 3: engaged before they came here, like this guy from Maryland
Speaker 3: or words that the Fed's found offensive, like the professor
Speaker 3: of medicine at Brown, the Columbia student, and the Tuft student.
Speaker 3: The Tufts student was particularly repellent because her arrest by
Speaker 3: and her screaming because she didn't know what was happening.
Speaker 3: I don't know why. Why do they show up in
Speaker 3: civilian clothes and with masks on? Why do they have
Speaker 3: to terrify you know, this is a young woman who
Speaker 3: had just fasted for a month through Ramadan, who was
Speaker 3: going to the celebratory breaking of the fast when they
Speaker 3: just whisper into a van and shipped her to Louisiana. Well, well,
Speaker 3: this is not America. This government does not care about
Speaker 3: due process. The premise of the Constitution, the premise of
Speaker 3: the Fifth Amendment is that no government can be trusted
Speaker 3: to prosecute and punish the right person, which is why everyone,
Speaker 3: everyone is entitled to a hearing before the government interferes
Speaker 3: with life, liberty, or property. Brian, you get a hearing
Speaker 3: before they take your driver's license away. You're certainly titled
Speaker 3: entitled to a hearing before they whisk you from your
Speaker 3: home to a hellhole.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well you didn't call looking for an argument. That's
Speaker 1: you and I are the eye to eye on that one. Now,
Speaker 1: let's real quick here in the remaining moments, we have
Speaker 1: the guy who went online on social media and was
Speaker 1: telling people to shoot ICE agents. Kind of get into
Speaker 1: a close call on that one. I mean we do
Speaker 1: have time as a close.
Speaker 3: Call, Brandenburg. The case that you mentioned a unanimous opinion
Speaker 3: still controlling law taking place in Hamilton County, Ohio. I
Speaker 3: think I have the county right. Yeah. Says that if
Speaker 3: there's time tim for more speech to rebut the offending speech,
Speaker 3: the offending speech is not I cannot form the basis
Speaker 3: for a prosecution. So if this nut job says shoot
Speaker 3: ICE agents and there's time for somebody else to say,
Speaker 3: wait a minute, what are you crazy? His speech is protected.
Speaker 3: If there's no time, if somebody here's that speech and
Speaker 3: shoots ICE agents, he can be prosecuted. That's the lesson
Speaker 3: of Brandenburg.
Speaker 1: It's always tough call when you're coming to the constitution,
Speaker 1: and again I think they just fall back on it's
Speaker 1: politically expedient to just violate the Constitution, and that's why
Speaker 1: it's quite often gotten away with judgent to Paul the.
Speaker 3: President, the president and I know him and like him,
Speaker 3: and to share my any of his views is out
Speaker 3: of the opinion that because he had eighty million votes
Speaker 3: for election or reelection, his words can trump the Constitution.
Speaker 3: No pun intended, trump right. Nobody can trump the Constitution.
Speaker 3: The constitutionist the supreme law of the land. He took
Speaker 3: a public oath and even signed one to preserve, protect, and.
Speaker 1: Defend it, as did every anti gun confiscating Democrat who
Speaker 1: wants to take away our Second Amendment rights. Same thing
Speaker 1: applies across the board. Judge Enna Politano, Judging Freedom's the
Speaker 1: podcast look forward. Are you going to be talking with today?
Speaker 1: Your honor?
Speaker 3: Thank you with Brian, always a pleasure. I have a
Speaker 3: Pepe Escobar from Yemen today.
Speaker 1: Oh wow, Bill.
Speaker 3: GERALDI, Max Blumenthal, Aaron mate, all of my long ball hitters,
Speaker 3: so to speak.
Speaker 1: Always a good listen Judging Freedom you can find out
Speaker 1: wherever you find your podcast, you can always find Judge
Speaker 1: Eneral Politano right here on the fifty five careasee morning,
Speaker 1: sure every Wednesday at eight thirty. Have a blessed day,
Speaker 1: my friend. I look forward to expert.
Speaker 3: I catch it Ryan, Thank you, my dear friend, all
Speaker 3: the best.
Speaker 1: Thank you, eight forty two ffty five cares of Thetalxation,
Speaker 1: Peyton's Lemonade's Coming Up Lemonade stands coming Up, great charity
Speaker 1: and just a wonderful, wonderful thing they're doing. We're gonna
Speaker 1: be talking with them in the next segment. Stick around
Speaker 1: fifty five KRC