WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.070 --> 00:00:03.350
<v Speaker 1>Hey, wanted to give you an update, quick one, about

2
00:00:03.390 --> 00:00:06.919
<v Speaker 1>my lawsuit against Attorney General Todd Blanch seeking the release

3
00:00:07.049 --> 00:00:11.019
<v Speaker 1>of the unredacted Epstein files. At this point, there has

4
00:00:11.039 --> 00:00:14.060
<v Speaker 1>been a flurry of activity that has happened, and you

5
00:00:14.080 --> 00:00:17.039
<v Speaker 1>can at any time check out the docket and look

6
00:00:17.120 --> 00:00:19.179
<v Speaker 1>at it. Not all the documents you're able to see,

7
00:00:19.239 --> 00:00:22.339
<v Speaker 1>some of them are paywalled, but most of them are

8
00:00:22.359 --> 00:00:26.609
<v Speaker 1>available for public access. And more importantly... If you subscribe

9
00:00:26.649 --> 00:00:28.750
<v Speaker 1>here at Katie Fang news, you'll get all of the alerts,

10
00:00:28.809 --> 00:00:32.009
<v Speaker 1>including if you click to get notifications, you'll know when

11
00:00:32.049 --> 00:00:35.229
<v Speaker 1>a new episode has dropped like, and subscribe, please. As

12
00:00:35.270 --> 00:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I've been explaining on my other episodes and on a

13
00:00:38.020 --> 00:00:41.100
<v Speaker 1>sidebar live, we have a campaign to hit 1 million

14
00:00:41.119 --> 00:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>subscribers before the end of 2026. It is exciting. And

15
00:00:44.500 --> 00:00:46.340
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we can do that. So anyway, let's get to

16
00:00:46.380 --> 00:00:50.179
<v Speaker 1>the important stuff. On August 24th, just on Monday late,

17
00:00:50.659 --> 00:00:53.570
<v Speaker 1>there was a notice of appeal. that was filed by

18
00:00:53.689 --> 00:00:55.689
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General Todd Blanch. And I want to spend some

19
00:00:55.729 --> 00:00:57.570
<v Speaker 1>time on it because it is one of the most

20
00:00:57.630 --> 00:01:00.549
<v Speaker 1>bizarre things that I have seen in my decades of

21
00:01:00.590 --> 00:01:03.490
<v Speaker 1>practicing law in both state and federal courts. I checked

22
00:01:03.530 --> 00:01:07.969
<v Speaker 1>with other people who are actual appellate lawyers because, look,

23
00:01:08.170 --> 00:01:10.689
<v Speaker 1>every lawyer, you know you got a good one when

24
00:01:10.709 --> 00:01:13.609
<v Speaker 1>they realize what their wheelhouse is. I am not an

25
00:01:13.650 --> 00:01:16.109
<v Speaker 1>appellate attorney. I have done appellate arguments. I have written

26
00:01:16.150 --> 00:01:18.230
<v Speaker 1>appellate briefs. But I wanted to make sure that what

27
00:01:18.310 --> 00:01:20.489
<v Speaker 1>I was seeing was what my gut was telling me,

28
00:01:20.689 --> 00:01:24.790
<v Speaker 1>just bizarre and wrong. So look at your screen. It's

29
00:01:24.849 --> 00:01:27.489
<v Speaker 1>the defendant's notice of appeal filed August 24th, 2026. And

30
00:01:27.569 --> 00:01:30.890
<v Speaker 1>it says this, the defendant, Todd Blanche, as we know,

31
00:01:31.250 --> 00:01:35.420
<v Speaker 1>respectfully files its notice of, okay, well, first of all,

32
00:01:35.439 --> 00:01:39.239
<v Speaker 1>there's no of, appeal to the United States Court of

33
00:01:39.299 --> 00:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Appeals for the DC Circuit of this court's June 25th,

34
00:01:42.120 --> 00:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>2026 order. Now let's stop there. If you go to

35
00:01:45.340 --> 00:01:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the docket and you look at the June 25th order,

36
00:01:48.980 --> 00:01:51.019
<v Speaker 1>what is he talking about? Well, Todd is talking about

37
00:01:51.060 --> 00:01:56.299
<v Speaker 1>the order granting my motion for preliminary injunction. Now, this

38
00:01:56.340 --> 00:01:59.700
<v Speaker 1>is important. This is important because the language, as you

39
00:01:59.719 --> 00:02:03.129
<v Speaker 1>can see on your screen, is very clear. Ordered that Ms.

40
00:02:03.230 --> 00:02:10.509
<v Speaker 1>Fang's motion for preliminary injunction is granted. Okay, it's really

41
00:02:10.650 --> 00:02:13.150
<v Speaker 1>no confusion there, right? And we've covered that here extensively

42
00:02:13.210 --> 00:02:16.069
<v Speaker 1>because there's been a lot of litigation. I've gone to court.

43
00:02:16.110 --> 00:02:20.659
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that order granting preliminary injunction was telling Todd

44
00:02:20.680 --> 00:02:25.699
<v Speaker 1>Blanch to produce unredacted documents and to actually do things

45
00:02:25.759 --> 00:02:27.759
<v Speaker 1>he was required to do pursuant to the Epstein Files

46
00:02:27.780 --> 00:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Transparency Act, pretty much saying, hey, Todd, you've been violating

47
00:02:33.659 --> 00:02:37.020
<v Speaker 1>the law. Get your ass into gear and don't do

48
00:02:37.060 --> 00:02:41.199
<v Speaker 1>it anymore. OK, so let's move on. It then says,

49
00:02:41.580 --> 00:02:44.199
<v Speaker 1>in the view of the United States, whether the district

50
00:02:44.259 --> 00:02:51.750
<v Speaker 1>court's June 25th, 2026 order is appealable is inconclusive. Accordingly,

51
00:02:52.280 --> 00:02:59.659
<v Speaker 1>The Unites, not United, Unites States submits this protective notice

52
00:02:59.860 --> 00:03:02.930
<v Speaker 1>of appeal. To the extent that any aspect of the

53
00:03:03.090 --> 00:03:07.669
<v Speaker 1>order grants plaintiff injunctive relief, it is immediately appealable under

54
00:03:07.669 --> 00:03:15.009
<v Speaker 1>28 U.S. Code Section 1292A1. Signed by Andrew J. Block.

55
00:03:15.469 --> 00:03:18.610
<v Speaker 1>You know, the guy who went to the status hearing

56
00:03:18.909 --> 00:03:24.009
<v Speaker 1>and got his ass whooped by... Judge Sullivan, although Judge

57
00:03:24.030 --> 00:03:27.250
<v Speaker 1>Sullivan was incredibly professional and polite about it. But yeah,

58
00:03:27.650 --> 00:03:32.020
<v Speaker 1>it was embarrassing for Block. But what's interesting is signed

59
00:03:32.060 --> 00:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>by Andrew Block, but under Stanley Woodward's name. And we

60
00:03:37.159 --> 00:03:39.780
<v Speaker 1>know all about Stanley Woodward, who was gunning to get

61
00:03:39.819 --> 00:03:43.659
<v Speaker 1>the deputy AG job, as we've heard. All righty. So

62
00:03:43.680 --> 00:03:45.750
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to this notice of appeal, because I

63
00:03:45.990 --> 00:03:50.430
<v Speaker 1>want to say the following. The fact that the United

64
00:03:50.469 --> 00:03:54.289
<v Speaker 1>States government through, and more importantly, the attorney general of

65
00:03:54.330 --> 00:03:57.229
<v Speaker 1>the United States, who is the top lawyer for the

66
00:03:57.289 --> 00:04:02.129
<v Speaker 1>federal government, is telling the district court of appeal that

67
00:04:02.150 --> 00:04:05.469
<v Speaker 1>they're not sure if they can appeal this order from

68
00:04:05.610 --> 00:04:08.889
<v Speaker 1>Judge Sullivan. And let me be more accurate, please, because

69
00:04:09.349 --> 00:04:11.750
<v Speaker 1>I don't want you to labor under something that's not

70
00:04:11.840 --> 00:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>accurate here. This was filed in Judge Sullivan's court. So

71
00:04:16.959 --> 00:04:20.660
<v Speaker 1>The federal government is telling Judge Sullivan in a not-so-subtle way,

72
00:04:21.420 --> 00:04:23.959
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what the hell you're doing because whatever

73
00:04:24.060 --> 00:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>order you enter granting my preliminary injunction motion, it's not clear.

74
00:04:30.560 --> 00:04:36.209
<v Speaker 1>So they're now saying, we're not sure if we should appeal,

75
00:04:36.689 --> 00:04:38.670
<v Speaker 1>but we're going to do something called a protective notice

76
00:04:38.689 --> 00:04:41.550
<v Speaker 1>of appeal. Let me be clear. There is nothing in

77
00:04:41.589 --> 00:04:44.290
<v Speaker 1>the law or in the rules of procedure, appellate, civil,

78
00:04:44.329 --> 00:04:47.939
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise, that acknowledges something that's called a, quote, protective

79
00:04:48.500 --> 00:04:51.899
<v Speaker 1>notice of appeal. You're either doing the notice of appeal

80
00:04:52.040 --> 00:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>or you're not. It's kind of like being pregnant. You

81
00:04:54.639 --> 00:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>can't be a little bit pregnant. You're either pregnant or

82
00:04:56.620 --> 00:04:58.790
<v Speaker 1>you're not. So you're either filing a notice of appeal

83
00:04:59.149 --> 00:05:01.949
<v Speaker 1>or you're not. A protective notice of appeal is a

84
00:05:02.050 --> 00:05:04.329
<v Speaker 1>huge red flag that you don't know what the hell

85
00:05:04.350 --> 00:05:11.180
<v Speaker 1>you're doing. So I've said this. It's pretty much Todd

86
00:05:11.199 --> 00:05:14.100
<v Speaker 1>Blanche saying, I got a 50-50 chance that I'm right,

87
00:05:14.139 --> 00:05:17.300
<v Speaker 1>that I should be appealing. Judge Sullivan's order granting Katie

88
00:05:17.319 --> 00:05:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Fang's motion for preliminary injunction. So I'm going to file

89
00:05:19.339 --> 00:05:23.389
<v Speaker 1>this notice of appeal. Now, it's 60 days. And let's

90
00:05:23.430 --> 00:05:25.769
<v Speaker 1>check this out, right? Because if you look at the

91
00:05:25.810 --> 00:05:29.589
<v Speaker 1>section in the law that deals with this, 28 U.S.

92
00:05:29.629 --> 00:05:34.250
<v Speaker 1>Code 1292, you will see that this is them doing a, quote,

93
00:05:34.490 --> 00:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>interlocutory appeal. Let's go to law school. So normally, you

94
00:05:38.600 --> 00:05:41.199
<v Speaker 1>go through the entirety of the case, get to the conclusion,

95
00:05:41.259 --> 00:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you appeal it. There are certain opportunities, albeit limited ones,

96
00:05:45.079 --> 00:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that during the course of a case, you're allowed to

97
00:05:46.959 --> 00:05:50.250
<v Speaker 1>do something called an interlocutory appeal. That means while the

98
00:05:50.259 --> 00:05:53.329
<v Speaker 1>case is pending, you're allowed to appeal specific decisions that

99
00:05:53.370 --> 00:05:56.310
<v Speaker 1>are made along the way. And if you see here,

100
00:05:57.370 --> 00:06:03.310
<v Speaker 1>it includes the granting of an injunction. So listen. If

101
00:06:03.389 --> 00:06:06.750
<v Speaker 1>Todd Blanche takes umbrage with the granting of my injunction, okay.

102
00:06:07.029 --> 00:06:09.730
<v Speaker 1>And then here's the thing. When you're suing the federal

103
00:06:09.769 --> 00:06:13.029
<v Speaker 1>government or an officer of the government, like the Attorney

104
00:06:13.069 --> 00:06:16.050
<v Speaker 1>General of the United States, the federal rules gives the

105
00:06:16.089 --> 00:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>government even extra time to do a notice of appeal.

106
00:06:18.269 --> 00:06:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Normally it's 30 days, but they actually get 60 days.

107
00:06:22.379 --> 00:06:24.860
<v Speaker 1>And this is another thing that is, I think, another

108
00:06:24.939 --> 00:06:26.959
<v Speaker 1>red flag that shows that Todd Blanche doesn't know what

109
00:06:26.980 --> 00:06:28.379
<v Speaker 1>the hell he's doing or what the hell is going on.

110
00:06:28.379 --> 00:06:30.879
<v Speaker 1>60 days from June 25th, 2026, which is the date

111
00:06:30.920 --> 00:06:37.810
<v Speaker 1>of the granting of my preliminary injunction, that order, was Monday,

112
00:06:38.129 --> 00:06:43.069
<v Speaker 1>August 24th, 2026. So a couple of things here. One,

113
00:06:43.129 --> 00:06:46.199
<v Speaker 1>they either truly didn't even realize that they needed to

114
00:06:46.240 --> 00:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>be dealing with this appeal. And so they were like,

115
00:06:48.459 --> 00:06:51.300
<v Speaker 1>oh shit. And they did it at the last minute. Two,

116
00:06:52.019 --> 00:06:54.779
<v Speaker 1>they really legitimately have no idea if they should be

117
00:06:54.819 --> 00:06:56.339
<v Speaker 1>filing an appeal because they don't know what the hell

118
00:06:56.360 --> 00:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. So then they said, eh, like I said,

119
00:06:58.819 --> 00:07:00.579
<v Speaker 1>I got a 50-50 chance of getting this right. Let

120
00:07:00.600 --> 00:07:04.850
<v Speaker 1>me appeal it. Or three, They full-on knew that that

121
00:07:04.970 --> 00:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>order granting the preliminary injunction was legit, and they waited

122
00:07:08.860 --> 00:07:10.819
<v Speaker 1>until the very last minute to do it because all

123
00:07:10.839 --> 00:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they want to do was delay, delay, delay. They want

124
00:07:13.040 --> 00:07:18.180
<v Speaker 1>to continue the cover-up. They want to continue to obstruct

125
00:07:19.279 --> 00:07:23.779
<v Speaker 1>the justice that is being sought by not only the

126
00:07:23.879 --> 00:07:31.329
<v Speaker 1>Epstein survivors' victims, Ghislaine victims, any of the facilitators, enablers, co-conspirators,

127
00:07:31.750 --> 00:07:34.910
<v Speaker 1>you know, the people that helped this sex trafficking of

128
00:07:34.970 --> 00:07:38.089
<v Speaker 1>children occur, because that is exactly what Tom Blanche is

129
00:07:38.110 --> 00:07:44.069
<v Speaker 1>doing here, let's not mince words. My lawsuit is an

130
00:07:44.110 --> 00:07:48.170
<v Speaker 1>absurdity in that I shouldn't have to sue to get

131
00:07:48.350 --> 00:07:52.269
<v Speaker 1>access to these files. I shouldn't have to sue to

132
00:07:52.300 --> 00:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>get access to these records. But I was forced to

133
00:07:56.639 --> 00:08:02.170
<v Speaker 1>do so because the Department of Justice, led by And

134
00:08:02.189 --> 00:08:06.290
<v Speaker 1>more accurately, the rollout of these files, led by Todd Blanch,

135
00:08:06.589 --> 00:08:10.470
<v Speaker 1>controlled by Todd Blanch, handled by Todd Blanch, is illegal

136
00:08:10.949 --> 00:08:13.329
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the redactions and the withholdings. It's preventing

137
00:08:13.350 --> 00:08:16.129
<v Speaker 1>me from doing my job. But more importantly, it's preventing

138
00:08:16.149 --> 00:08:21.269
<v Speaker 1>the survivors from getting justice. Party holding the information almost

139
00:08:21.470 --> 00:08:24.230
<v Speaker 1>never volunteers it. That's true in a courtroom, and it's

140
00:08:24.269 --> 00:08:26.350
<v Speaker 1>true in your mailbox. So I want to be very

141
00:08:26.370 --> 00:08:29.069
<v Speaker 1>clear about something. Most Medicare agents get paid more for

142
00:08:29.110 --> 00:08:31.509
<v Speaker 1>putting you in certain plans over others. They have an

143
00:08:31.560 --> 00:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>incentive to steer you and most people have no idea

144
00:08:34.379 --> 00:08:36.899
<v Speaker 1>it's happening. A woman in Indiana went to the company

145
00:08:36.960 --> 00:08:39.519
<v Speaker 1>she'd worked with for years and asked for a lower price.

146
00:08:39.940 --> 00:08:43.039
<v Speaker 1>They ran her through medical underwriting and denied her. What

147
00:08:43.059 --> 00:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>they never mentioned was a rule in her state that

148
00:08:45.240 --> 00:08:47.519
<v Speaker 1>would have let her switch with no medical questions at all.

149
00:08:48.059 --> 00:08:52.100
<v Speaker 1>A chapter advisor found it. Same coverage, about half the price.

150
00:08:52.519 --> 00:08:56.700
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly why chapter exists. Independent Medicare advisors, the only

151
00:08:56.740 --> 00:09:00.269
<v Speaker 1>Medicare advisors that compare every plan nationwide. They look at

152
00:09:00.289 --> 00:09:03.100
<v Speaker 1>your doctors, your prescriptions, your life to show you what

153
00:09:03.129 --> 00:09:05.639
<v Speaker 1>plan fits best. If you're already on the right plan,

154
00:09:05.799 --> 00:09:08.259
<v Speaker 1>they'll tell you directly. If you're not, they'll help you switch.

155
00:09:08.740 --> 00:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Seniors who found better fitting plans or chapter last year

156
00:09:10.980 --> 00:09:16.919
<v Speaker 1>saved an average of $ 1, 100. Free. Under 20 minutes, call 628-289-0726.

157
00:09:17.059 --> 00:09:25.190
<v Speaker 1>Get the Medicare information and support you need today. So

158
00:09:25.789 --> 00:09:28.789
<v Speaker 1>the DOJ waiting to the last minute to do this

159
00:09:28.850 --> 00:09:32.659
<v Speaker 1>notice of appeal. of the order granting preliminary injunction. And

160
00:09:32.700 --> 00:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I want to talk about this is,

161
00:09:35.840 --> 00:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>as you see on your screen, there was an order

162
00:09:39.580 --> 00:09:42.919
<v Speaker 1>that was entered by the judge in this case. And

163
00:09:42.940 --> 00:09:46.799
<v Speaker 1>this is what the judge said. On August 21st, Judge

164
00:09:46.879 --> 00:09:52.450
<v Speaker 1>Sullivan said, in light of Katie Fang's notice of proposed order,

165
00:09:52.950 --> 00:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>which was submit the unredacted handwritten FBI notes by August 25th,

166
00:10:01.340 --> 00:10:06.340
<v Speaker 1>which was yesterday, as well as Ms. Fang's notice to

167
00:10:06.379 --> 00:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the court. And as I walked through these documents with you,

168
00:10:09.419 --> 00:10:12.500
<v Speaker 1>the notice to the court was me giving examples to

169
00:10:12.580 --> 00:10:18.669
<v Speaker 1>Judge Sullivan, calling out Blanche, or more accurately, Andrew Block,

170
00:10:19.070 --> 00:10:25.139
<v Speaker 1>a federal attorney, a USDOJ attorney, telling the court that

171
00:10:25.200 --> 00:10:28.759
<v Speaker 1>there aren't any other handwritten FBI interview notes that have

172
00:10:28.779 --> 00:10:31.210
<v Speaker 1>been turned over in the Epstein files that correlate to 302s.

173
00:10:31.820 --> 00:10:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Not true. Judge Sullivan said, whoa, in light of what

174
00:10:36.419 --> 00:10:39.789
<v Speaker 1>this thing has submitted, Blanche, you got to give me

175
00:10:39.830 --> 00:10:42.649
<v Speaker 1>a response no later than August 27th, which is tomorrow,

176
00:10:43.009 --> 00:10:45.529
<v Speaker 1>and then I can do a reply by no later

177
00:10:45.730 --> 00:10:50.809
<v Speaker 1>than September 3rd, which is next week. So, I'm not

178
00:10:50.830 --> 00:10:53.129
<v Speaker 1>a believer in coincidences when it comes to Blanche and

179
00:10:53.149 --> 00:10:58.350
<v Speaker 1>this DOJ. So the day before we're supposed to be

180
00:10:58.370 --> 00:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>getting unredacted, handwritten FBI interview notes from Blanche, he files

181
00:11:03.299 --> 00:11:08.460
<v Speaker 1>a notice of appeal. And three days before he's supposed

182
00:11:08.559 --> 00:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to file a response to me calling him out for

183
00:11:11.360 --> 00:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, he files a notice of appeal. Why? Why?

184
00:11:17.610 --> 00:11:19.889
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what you're appealing. I don't know if

185
00:11:19.929 --> 00:11:23.490
<v Speaker 1>Blanche thinks that we're all not paying attention or if

186
00:11:23.529 --> 00:11:25.149
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't know what the fuck is happening here.

187
00:11:25.330 --> 00:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>But as recently as August 5th, the Department of Justice,

188
00:11:29.860 --> 00:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in its motion to stay all filing deadlines nunc pro

189
00:11:34.639 --> 00:11:41.470
<v Speaker 1>tunc pending resolution of the motion for preliminary injunction, Todd

190
00:11:41.500 --> 00:11:47.350
<v Speaker 1>Blanche tells Judge Sullivan... the matter of my motion for

191
00:11:47.409 --> 00:11:52.750
<v Speaker 1>preliminary injunction is before the court for decision. And throughout

192
00:11:52.970 --> 00:11:55.909
<v Speaker 1>its filings, up until this notice of appeal that they

193
00:11:55.929 --> 00:12:00.279
<v Speaker 1>filed on Monday, Blanche took the position that Judge Sullivan

194
00:12:00.559 --> 00:12:05.139
<v Speaker 1>had yet to rule on my motion for preliminary injunction.

195
00:12:06.240 --> 00:12:09.179
<v Speaker 1>And we all know that that is an absurdity and

196
00:12:09.240 --> 00:12:12.379
<v Speaker 1>stupid because there is an order that clearly states on

197
00:12:12.419 --> 00:12:14.820
<v Speaker 1>June 25th that my motion for preliminary injunction was granted.

198
00:12:15.580 --> 00:12:21.039
<v Speaker 1>So what is it, Todd? You've made these representations as

199
00:12:21.080 --> 00:12:23.539
<v Speaker 1>an officer of the court and, more importantly, as the

200
00:12:23.580 --> 00:12:26.860
<v Speaker 1>top lawyer of the United States government. You've made representations

201
00:12:26.980 --> 00:12:30.330
<v Speaker 1>multiple times to the court in written filings as well

202
00:12:30.389 --> 00:12:32.610
<v Speaker 1>as in oral arguments to the court through your lawyers.

203
00:12:33.399 --> 00:12:36.929
<v Speaker 1>that my motion for preliminary injunction has not been granted.

204
00:12:37.330 --> 00:12:40.049
<v Speaker 1>It is not concluded. You have used it also as

205
00:12:40.090 --> 00:12:43.590
<v Speaker 1>an excuse to not have to answer my lawsuit. You

206
00:12:43.629 --> 00:12:46.549
<v Speaker 1>had a deadline, you blew it, and then you had

207
00:12:46.570 --> 00:12:48.190
<v Speaker 1>the nerve to go to the court and say, Judge,

208
00:12:48.610 --> 00:12:50.789
<v Speaker 1>wind back the hands of time and give me another

209
00:12:50.850 --> 00:12:53.629
<v Speaker 1>chance to be able to respond. Why? Because, Judge, you

210
00:12:53.690 --> 00:12:59.899
<v Speaker 1>haven't resolved the injunction issue yet. That's the position you've

211
00:12:59.919 --> 00:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>taken until Monday. And then on Monday, you file a

212
00:13:06.159 --> 00:13:10.019
<v Speaker 1>notice of appeal stating that you were appealing the judge's

213
00:13:10.179 --> 00:13:14.970
<v Speaker 1>order that granted my motion for preliminary injunction. So which

214
00:13:15.570 --> 00:13:20.409
<v Speaker 1>is it? Which is it? He either granted the motion

215
00:13:20.769 --> 00:13:25.009
<v Speaker 1>or he didn't. If he didn't grant the motion, right,

216
00:13:25.210 --> 00:13:30.279
<v Speaker 1>then what the fuck are you appealing? If he granted

217
00:13:30.299 --> 00:13:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the motion... then you have been violating all sorts of

218
00:13:35.200 --> 00:13:40.399
<v Speaker 1>canons and ethics and rules by pretty much trying to

219
00:13:40.620 --> 00:13:43.149
<v Speaker 1>snow the court, which, trust me, Judge Sullivan has got

220
00:13:43.190 --> 00:13:48.970
<v Speaker 1>your fucking number, or you're so damn stupid you don't

221
00:13:48.990 --> 00:13:50.529
<v Speaker 1>know what the hell is going on. I don't really

222
00:13:50.590 --> 00:13:52.950
<v Speaker 1>care what it is, but what I care is you

223
00:13:53.029 --> 00:13:58.980
<v Speaker 1>are delaying the progress of my lawsuit. So, I'm going

224
00:13:59.000 --> 00:14:02.779
<v Speaker 1>to say it again in really, really basic terms for you,

225
00:14:02.840 --> 00:14:10.220
<v Speaker 1>Todd Blanche. Judge Sullivan granting the motion for preliminary injunction,

226
00:14:10.659 --> 00:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you are appealing it, fine. But here's the problem, too.

227
00:14:16.250 --> 00:14:19.330
<v Speaker 1>If you don't get a stay from Judge Sullivan or

228
00:14:19.350 --> 00:14:24.889
<v Speaker 1>from the appellate court, it's not stopping shit. Here's some

229
00:14:25.049 --> 00:14:30.809
<v Speaker 1>free legal advice. Okay? Okay? But if you're saying, which

230
00:14:30.830 --> 00:14:34.389
<v Speaker 1>you've been saying and writing, that Judge Sullivan never granted

231
00:14:34.429 --> 00:14:36.429
<v Speaker 1>my preliminary injunction and that's the reason why you haven't

232
00:14:36.470 --> 00:14:39.129
<v Speaker 1>responded to my lawsuit, which is just dumb too, because

233
00:14:39.149 --> 00:14:41.759
<v Speaker 1>those are two entirely separate issues, my lawsuit and the

234
00:14:41.779 --> 00:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>preliminary injunction, because it's kind of a subset of my lawsuit,

235
00:14:45.419 --> 00:14:47.879
<v Speaker 1>then you blew the deadline and you're basically in default.

236
00:14:49.440 --> 00:14:51.350
<v Speaker 1>So you don't have any defenses. Not like you ever

237
00:14:51.419 --> 00:14:54.289
<v Speaker 1>raised any defenses. Even Judge Sullivan months ago said that

238
00:14:54.330 --> 00:14:58.049
<v Speaker 1>you failed to substantively respond to the allegations and and

239
00:14:58.080 --> 00:15:01.740
<v Speaker 1>that you have basically conceded that you have violated the law.

240
00:15:02.220 --> 00:15:07.500
<v Speaker 1>I mean, either way, you look dumb. So, folks, that's

241
00:15:07.539 --> 00:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the latest. We're going to watch everything carefully. We're going

242
00:15:09.980 --> 00:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to see, are they going to seek a stay? Are

243
00:15:12.100 --> 00:15:15.379
<v Speaker 1>they not? Blah, blah, blah. Either way, you know what?

244
00:15:16.159 --> 00:15:20.139
<v Speaker 1>As American citizens, technically, Todd Blanche is our lawyer. I mean,

245
00:15:20.159 --> 00:15:22.730
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know. He's the personal lawyer for convicted

246
00:15:22.750 --> 00:15:27.629
<v Speaker 1>felon Donald Trump. But, you know, I'd be nervous. Because...

247
00:15:27.850 --> 00:15:32.049
<v Speaker 1>If he's setting the tone for competency, I'd be really nervous.

248
00:15:33.610 --> 00:15:36.090
<v Speaker 1>Be mad, be outraged, man accountability. I am off to

249
00:15:36.129 --> 00:15:39.149
<v Speaker 1>rattle some more cages. Katie Fang here. We launched the

250
00:15:39.169 --> 00:15:41.740
<v Speaker 1>Katie Fang News Channel in partnership with the Midas Touch

251
00:15:41.769 --> 00:15:43.899
<v Speaker 1>Network so we could bring you the latest in legal

252
00:15:43.960 --> 00:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and political news. Straight, no chaser. So if you're a

253
00:15:47.220 --> 00:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>fellow truth teller, hit that subscribe button and share the

254
00:15:50.159 --> 00:15:52.860
<v Speaker 1>word about this channel so we can build a high

255
00:15:52.960 --> 00:15:58.370
<v Speaker 1>information America together. Brand new lawsuit. filed by survivors of

256
00:15:58.570 --> 00:16:03.309
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Epstein. And it's an unusual case because it is

257
00:16:03.350 --> 00:16:07.710
<v Speaker 1>being brought pursuant to New York City law, not New

258
00:16:07.750 --> 00:16:12.039
<v Speaker 1>York State law, not federal statutes, but New York City law.

259
00:16:12.500 --> 00:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>And the defendants? Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, both whose

260
00:16:17.419 --> 00:16:20.799
<v Speaker 1>names are very familiar to a lot of us that

261
00:16:20.840 --> 00:16:25.230
<v Speaker 1>have been following along. Darren Indyke, longtime lawyer for Jeffrey Epstein.

262
00:16:25.929 --> 00:16:31.019
<v Speaker 1>and Richard Kahn, longtime accountant for Jeffrey Epstein, both men,

263
00:16:31.600 --> 00:16:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. And the lawsuit sues

264
00:16:36.720 --> 00:16:40.090
<v Speaker 1>them in their capacities as the co-executors of that estate.

265
00:16:40.789 --> 00:16:44.889
<v Speaker 1>And they are also being sued in their individual capacities,

266
00:16:45.250 --> 00:16:48.090
<v Speaker 1>brought in the Supreme Court of the state of New

267
00:16:48.129 --> 00:16:51.789
<v Speaker 1>York and the county of New York. It's a verified complaint.

268
00:16:52.759 --> 00:16:56.779
<v Speaker 1>And what's interesting is they're bringing this lawsuit pursuant to

269
00:16:56.820 --> 00:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>this New York City law that was recently amended to

270
00:17:01.759 --> 00:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>expand that window of statute of limitations to allow them

271
00:17:06.480 --> 00:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to bring these claims. The law is

272
00:17:09.759 --> 00:17:16.109
<v Speaker 1>called Gender Motivated Violence Act, GMVA, New York City's Gender

273
00:17:16.150 --> 00:17:21.769
<v Speaker 1>Motivated Violence Act. It lets survivors of gender-motivated violence to

274
00:17:21.809 --> 00:17:27.279
<v Speaker 1>bring civil lawsuit against people, institutions, businesses. And it doesn't

275
00:17:27.299 --> 00:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>require a criminal prosecution, doesn't require a criminal conviction. It's

276
00:17:31.680 --> 00:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>a civil case, so it also has a different burden

277
00:17:34.160 --> 00:17:37.089
<v Speaker 1>of proof than a criminal case. The law was originally

278
00:17:37.130 --> 00:17:41.349
<v Speaker 1>enacted in 2000. In 2022, the New York City Council

279
00:17:41.450 --> 00:17:45.619
<v Speaker 1>amended it to create a temporary two-year look-back window. between

280
00:17:45.700 --> 00:17:49.589
<v Speaker 1>March 1st of 2023 to March 1st of 2025 that

281
00:17:49.630 --> 00:17:53.589
<v Speaker 1>allowed survivors of gender-motivated violence to be able to sue

282
00:17:54.109 --> 00:17:59.309
<v Speaker 1>no matter how long ago that abuse had occurred. Then

283
00:17:59.329 --> 00:18:02.150
<v Speaker 1>they tried to expand it even further. But then, of course,

284
00:18:02.269 --> 00:18:06.569
<v Speaker 1>then-Mayor Eric Adams vetoed it. But the city council said, eh,

285
00:18:06.650 --> 00:18:11.349
<v Speaker 1>we're going to override that veto. And in 2026, they

286
00:18:11.630 --> 00:18:16.069
<v Speaker 1>reopened the look-back window And it now is valid through

287
00:18:16.130 --> 00:18:20.250
<v Speaker 1>July of 2027. So there's a year of time. And

288
00:18:20.289 --> 00:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it explicitly allows claims for conduct that actually predates the

289
00:18:25.140 --> 00:18:30.099
<v Speaker 1>Gender-Motivated Violence Act's original 2000 enactment. It lets survivors whose

290
00:18:30.180 --> 00:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>claims were filed and dismissed between that 2023 and 2025 window,

291
00:18:35.140 --> 00:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it allows them to amend and to refile during this

292
00:18:38.240 --> 00:18:41.009
<v Speaker 1>new window that will expire next year in July of 2027.

293
00:18:41.009 --> 00:18:44.609
<v Speaker 1>And so what an incredibly thoughtful move by the New

294
00:18:44.630 --> 00:18:47.289
<v Speaker 1>York City Council to do this. It's a city law.

295
00:18:48.190 --> 00:18:50.970
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, there is some litigation over whether or not

296
00:18:51.109 --> 00:18:54.500
<v Speaker 1>it is in conflict with some state statutes that we've

297
00:18:54.539 --> 00:18:58.019
<v Speaker 1>covered here at Katie Fang News. For example, the Child

298
00:18:58.039 --> 00:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Victims Act and the Adult Survivors Act. The Adult Survivors

299
00:19:01.779 --> 00:19:06.670
<v Speaker 1>Act was a statute in New York that allowed E.

300
00:19:06.799 --> 00:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Jean Carroll to be able to bring some claims. And

301
00:19:08.940 --> 00:19:11.950
<v Speaker 1>so this lawsuit specifically, though, that was filed on August 19th,

302
00:19:13.609 --> 00:19:17.569
<v Speaker 1>is alleging that both Indyk and Kahn played critical roles

303
00:19:17.630 --> 00:19:20.930
<v Speaker 1>in enabling Epstein's acts of gender-motivated violence against the plaintiffs

304
00:19:21.269 --> 00:19:25.109
<v Speaker 1>by providing Epstein with the necessary financial and legal support

305
00:19:25.609 --> 00:19:31.900
<v Speaker 1>for his sex trafficking operation by which the plaintiffs were victimized. Indyk, Kahn,

306
00:19:32.039 --> 00:19:35.819
<v Speaker 1>and Epstein jointly and collectively conspired with each other to

307
00:19:35.859 --> 00:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>commit acts of gender-motivated violence against the plaintiffs by creating, managing, operating, funding,

308
00:19:41.259 --> 00:19:44.509
<v Speaker 1>and recruiting victims and associates, That is from the very

309
00:19:44.569 --> 00:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this lawsuit. Now, it identifies plaintiffs. And one

310
00:19:56.700 --> 00:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of them, I have covered actually within the last week,

311
00:19:59.720 --> 00:20:05.869
<v Speaker 1>her name is Audra Christensen. Audra Christensen reported her rape

312
00:20:06.150 --> 00:20:09.940
<v Speaker 1>and her abuse by Epstein's These are the allegations. She

313
00:20:09.980 --> 00:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>reported it to Hugh Hefner. And Hugh Hefner reported it

314
00:20:15.220 --> 00:20:19.140
<v Speaker 1>to the FBI, but the FBI allegedly did absolutely nothing

315
00:20:19.160 --> 00:20:25.269
<v Speaker 1>to investigate it. So she brought her own lawsuit alongside

316
00:20:25.309 --> 00:20:28.789
<v Speaker 1>some other plaintiffs, and that is currently being litigated as

317
00:20:28.849 --> 00:20:33.339
<v Speaker 1>well against the FBI. That was interesting. I covered that

318
00:20:33.410 --> 00:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>at Katie Fang News last week. At Sidebar, where we

319
00:20:37.180 --> 00:20:41.059
<v Speaker 1>talked about the fact that a motion to dismiss that

320
00:20:41.079 --> 00:20:44.900
<v Speaker 1>was filed by the FBI had been denied. So that

321
00:20:44.920 --> 00:20:48.890
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. But getting back to this lawsuit, when you

322
00:20:49.170 --> 00:20:53.029
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the ages of these plaintiffs, it

323
00:20:53.130 --> 00:20:56.569
<v Speaker 1>is appalling. All of them. Any abuse is appalling. But

324
00:20:56.990 --> 00:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at Plaintiff Glendis Espinal, 16 years old. when

325
00:21:01.599 --> 00:21:05.529
<v Speaker 1>Epstein committed his gender-motivated violence against her on multiple occasions

326
00:21:05.569 --> 00:21:10.250
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Plaintiff Yanelith Romero, a child of approximately

327
00:21:10.250 --> 00:21:11.990
<v Speaker 1>16 years old, when he did the same, I mean,

328
00:21:12.009 --> 00:21:14.099
<v Speaker 1>the rest of them were still also so young, 20

329
00:21:14.099 --> 00:21:21.180
<v Speaker 1>years old, 19, 24, 19. It alleges in the lawsuit,

330
00:21:21.200 --> 00:21:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Darren Indyke for decades had only one client. The lawyer

331
00:21:24.380 --> 00:21:27.630
<v Speaker 1>Indyke had only one lawyer, excuse me, one client, and

332
00:21:27.650 --> 00:21:31.779
<v Speaker 1>that was Jeffrey Epstein. Kahn was the... de facto financial

333
00:21:31.839 --> 00:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>manager of Epstein's sex trafficking operation and was Epstein's longtime

334
00:21:35.680 --> 00:21:40.019
<v Speaker 1>personal accountant. As the Wall Street Journal reported, paragraph 33,

335
00:21:40.019 --> 00:21:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it was Kahn, the trusted accountant, and Indyk, the loyal lawyer,

336
00:21:43.940 --> 00:21:46.740
<v Speaker 1>who kept the engine running for years with their financial

337
00:21:46.859 --> 00:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and legal maneuvers. Epstein and Epstein-owned entities paid more than

338
00:21:51.160 --> 00:21:57.039
<v Speaker 1>$ 16 million to Indyk and $ 10 million to Kahn. far

339
00:21:57.119 --> 00:21:59.819
<v Speaker 1>more than could reasonably be attributed to the rates of

340
00:21:59.859 --> 00:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>their professional services. They also were the beneficiaries of personal

341
00:22:04.220 --> 00:22:08.210
<v Speaker 1>property being bought for them, etc. Count one, violation of

342
00:22:08.269 --> 00:22:12.650
<v Speaker 1>Gender Motivated Violence Act is against Indyk and Kahn in

343
00:22:12.690 --> 00:22:16.289
<v Speaker 1>their capacities as the co-executors of the estate of Jeffrey Epstein.

344
00:22:17.730 --> 00:22:22.099
<v Speaker 1>Paragraph 56 makes it very clear. Epstein committed gender-motivated violence

345
00:22:22.140 --> 00:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>against the plaintiffs, and those acts included but were not

346
00:22:25.000 --> 00:22:30.900
<v Speaker 1>limited to forcibly grabbing, groping, molesting, digital penetration, oral copulation, rape,

347
00:22:31.299 --> 00:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>and or other sexual acts. None of these acts were consensual.

348
00:22:35.640 --> 00:22:39.579
<v Speaker 1>They constituted a violation of the bodily autonomy of these plaintiffs,

349
00:22:40.740 --> 00:22:45.759
<v Speaker 1>and his malice toward And the gender-motivated nature of his

350
00:22:45.819 --> 00:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>conduct against the plaintiffs is apparent from the nature of

351
00:22:48.980 --> 00:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>the sexual abuse itself and the fact that all hundreds,

352
00:22:53.240 --> 00:22:57.410
<v Speaker 1>if not thousands, of his victims were female. And the

353
00:22:57.490 --> 00:23:01.730
<v Speaker 1>claim that the estate is liable for compensatory damages, punitive damages,

354
00:23:02.630 --> 00:23:05.930
<v Speaker 1>injunctive and declaratory relief, attorney's fees and costs, and other

355
00:23:05.970 --> 00:23:08.990
<v Speaker 1>relief that the court may deem just and appropriate. The

356
00:23:09.019 --> 00:23:13.609
<v Speaker 1>remaining two counts are against Indyk and Kahn individually. Again,

357
00:23:13.670 --> 00:23:17.170
<v Speaker 1>violations of the Gender-Motivated Violence Act, this New York City law,

358
00:23:17.970 --> 00:23:21.890
<v Speaker 1>and points to their individual conduct to facilitate this sex

359
00:23:21.930 --> 00:23:27.029
<v Speaker 1>trafficking operation. As a result of their violations of this act,

360
00:23:27.069 --> 00:23:31.490
<v Speaker 1>the plaintiff sustained physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional trauma,

361
00:23:32.410 --> 00:23:37.970
<v Speaker 1>severe psychological, emotional distress, mental anguish, embarrassment, and humiliation. So

362
00:23:37.990 --> 00:23:43.400
<v Speaker 1>they're seeking damages as a result of that conduct. And

363
00:23:43.700 --> 00:23:47.740
<v Speaker 1>the fourth count is against all of defendants jointly for

364
00:23:47.779 --> 00:23:51.019
<v Speaker 1>the conspiracy to commit that gender-motivated violence. So it's against

365
00:23:51.059 --> 00:23:54.819
<v Speaker 1>the estate of Jeffrey Epstein, Indyk, and Kahn individually. They

366
00:23:54.920 --> 00:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>acted collectively to conspire to do so, to allow Epstein

367
00:23:59.380 --> 00:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to have the ability to be able to do this.

368
00:24:01.769 --> 00:24:06.809
<v Speaker 1>They've demanded judgment against all defendants, and they're asking for

369
00:24:06.869 --> 00:24:09.589
<v Speaker 1>a jury trial. It's brought by Merson Law, which has

370
00:24:09.630 --> 00:24:13.269
<v Speaker 1>got A lot of these plaintiffs, they've been doing a

371
00:24:13.289 --> 00:24:14.910
<v Speaker 1>lot of this litigation, doing a lot of the work

372
00:24:14.950 --> 00:24:18.170
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of the Epstein victims and survivors, fighting very

373
00:24:18.230 --> 00:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>hard for them, for which we are grateful. As our

374
00:24:22.900 --> 00:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>daughter gets older, my husband and I talk about how

375
00:24:25.740 --> 00:24:28.980
<v Speaker 1>important it is that we have life insurance. And I've

376
00:24:29.019 --> 00:24:32.039
<v Speaker 1>spoken with you before about when we lost my father,

377
00:24:32.160 --> 00:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that issue, the life insurance became incredibly real and incredibly,

378
00:24:37.559 --> 00:24:42.769
<v Speaker 1>incredibly important. to acknowledge. And sometimes it's an uncomfortable conversation

379
00:24:42.849 --> 00:24:44.670
<v Speaker 1>and yet it's one that needs to be had. And

380
00:24:44.690 --> 00:24:47.829
<v Speaker 1>that's why when you think about something like ethos, making,

381
00:24:48.109 --> 00:24:50.549
<v Speaker 1>getting life insurance so fast and easy, you have to

382
00:24:50.630 --> 00:24:53.829
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. It's a hundred percent online. You get your

383
00:24:53.869 --> 00:24:57.349
<v Speaker 1>quote in seconds, the application minutes, and you get same

384
00:24:57.369 --> 00:25:00.109
<v Speaker 1>day coverage. There's no medical exam. You're just answering a

385
00:25:00.130 --> 00:25:02.170
<v Speaker 1>few simple health questions and you can get up to

386
00:25:02.170 --> 00:25:05.250
<v Speaker 1>$ 3 million in coverage with some policies as low as

387
00:25:05.250 --> 00:25:08.490
<v Speaker 1>$ 30 a month. So take 10 minutes to get covered

388
00:25:08.519 --> 00:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>today with life insurance through Ethos. Get your free quote

389
00:25:11.299 --> 00:25:17.740
<v Speaker 1>at ethos.com slash fang. That is E-T-H-O-S dot com slash fang.

390
00:25:17.980 --> 00:25:22.109
<v Speaker 1>My last name, it's spelled P-H-A-N-G. Application times may vary

391
00:25:22.230 --> 00:25:26.049
<v Speaker 1>and rates may vary. Just wanted to drop a quick

392
00:25:26.089 --> 00:25:30.869
<v Speaker 1>footnote here. Just recently, just a few months ago, the

393
00:25:30.930 --> 00:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Epstein estate did agree to pay $ 35 million to resolve

394
00:25:34.279 --> 00:25:39.890
<v Speaker 1>a class action lawsuit. that accused Epstein's accountant and lawyer, right?

395
00:25:40.470 --> 00:25:44.230
<v Speaker 1>In Daikin Khan, of aiding and abetting Epstein's sex trafficking

396
00:25:44.250 --> 00:25:48.859
<v Speaker 1>of young women and teenage girls. That resolved a 2024

397
00:25:48.859 --> 00:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit that was brought against them. And that is in

398
00:25:52.299 --> 00:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>addition to the restitution that was paid by the Epstein

399
00:25:55.740 --> 00:26:00.059
<v Speaker 1>estate to the tune of $ 121 million to victims. And

400
00:26:00.079 --> 00:26:02.910
<v Speaker 1>the state also paid $ 49 million in additional settlements to

401
00:26:02.950 --> 00:26:06.009
<v Speaker 1>victims I want to note that Indyk and Kahn have

402
00:26:06.029 --> 00:26:09.569
<v Speaker 1>denied through their attorneys any involvement at all, any knowledge

403
00:26:09.670 --> 00:26:11.809
<v Speaker 1>at all. I want to make sure that I, you know,

404
00:26:11.930 --> 00:26:13.890
<v Speaker 1>put that out there, that that's what they have said.

405
00:26:13.910 --> 00:26:17.990
<v Speaker 1>And the lawsuit that just got resolved for $ 35 million

406
00:26:18.029 --> 00:26:21.230
<v Speaker 1>was brought in 2024. And the plaintiff's lawyers at Boies

407
00:26:21.279 --> 00:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Schiller said that Indyk and Kahn helped Epstein create a, quote,

408
00:26:24.420 --> 00:26:27.839
<v Speaker 1>complex web of corporations and bank accounts that let Epstein

409
00:26:27.880 --> 00:26:31.039
<v Speaker 1>hide his abuses, pay victims and recruiters while leaving them

410
00:26:31.240 --> 00:26:37.690
<v Speaker 1>richly compensated for their work. Boischiller also obtained a $ 365

411
00:26:36.849 --> 00:26:41.150
<v Speaker 1>million settlement with J.P. Morgan and Deutsche Bank after they

412
00:26:41.549 --> 00:26:46.250
<v Speaker 1>missed the red flags about Jeffrey Epstein and his activity

413
00:26:46.410 --> 00:26:49.329
<v Speaker 1>at their financial institutions. I have said this and I'll

414
00:26:49.349 --> 00:26:54.309
<v Speaker 1>say it again. The judicial system, when it works, it works.

415
00:26:56.099 --> 00:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And we are seeing that there may or may not

416
00:26:58.680 --> 00:27:01.599
<v Speaker 1>be admissions of liability, fault or guilt going on here,

417
00:27:02.200 --> 00:27:05.819
<v Speaker 1>but I suspect there's a lot more money that's there

418
00:27:06.140 --> 00:27:08.980
<v Speaker 1>that has been hidden, and that that is part of

419
00:27:09.000 --> 00:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the reason why these cases are getting settled. I mean,

420
00:27:13.700 --> 00:27:16.539
<v Speaker 1>I also think they're indefensible cases, but I think that

421
00:27:16.599 --> 00:27:21.029
<v Speaker 1>that's the reason why they're getting settled. And so I applaud, one,

422
00:27:21.049 --> 00:27:23.329
<v Speaker 1>the New York City Council for doing something like the

423
00:27:23.369 --> 00:27:27.049
<v Speaker 1>Gender-Motivated Violence Act and allowing these amendments to expand windows

424
00:27:27.190 --> 00:27:29.450
<v Speaker 1>for survivors to be able to bring their claims. We

425
00:27:29.529 --> 00:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>know that victims of this type of abuse often don't

426
00:27:34.299 --> 00:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>immediately report to either law enforcement or others, and they

427
00:27:37.220 --> 00:27:40.589
<v Speaker 1>often are not in a position to sue. I mean,

428
00:27:40.609 --> 00:27:44.490
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a wild demand to make. Number one,

429
00:27:44.549 --> 00:27:47.950
<v Speaker 1>everybody reacts differently. Number two, it is an incredibly wild

430
00:27:47.970 --> 00:27:52.309
<v Speaker 1>demand to make that people have to be mindful, mindful

431
00:27:53.309 --> 00:27:55.750
<v Speaker 1>of these windows to be able to sue. I'm going

432
00:27:55.769 --> 00:27:57.769
<v Speaker 1>to read something from the lawsuit because I want to

433
00:27:57.809 --> 00:27:59.569
<v Speaker 1>leave you with this thought because I think it's important.

434
00:28:00.509 --> 00:28:03.900
<v Speaker 1>It's in paragraph nine. It says, any statute of limitations

435
00:28:04.200 --> 00:28:06.779
<v Speaker 1>that would otherwise apply to plaintiff's claims herein is told

436
00:28:06.839 --> 00:28:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in accord with the doctrine of equitable estoppel. That is

437
00:28:10.460 --> 00:28:13.890
<v Speaker 1>a legal theory that you, as a defendant, should not

438
00:28:13.930 --> 00:28:19.190
<v Speaker 1>be allowed to assert certain defenses because of your bad

439
00:28:19.230 --> 00:28:24.619
<v Speaker 1>faith conduct. So listen carefully. This doctrine of equitable estoppel,

440
00:28:24.640 --> 00:28:27.839
<v Speaker 1>when it applies to people like Indyk and Kahn, as

441
00:28:27.900 --> 00:28:32.460
<v Speaker 1>alleged in paragraph nine, is because of the deception, duress, fraud,

442
00:28:32.559 --> 00:28:35.339
<v Speaker 1>and or threats of retaliation and misconduct that Epstein and

443
00:28:35.359 --> 00:28:39.450
<v Speaker 1>his co-conspirators used to silence his victims, including these plaintiffs.

444
00:28:40.470 --> 00:28:43.190
<v Speaker 1>At a minimum, the same conduct by Epstein and his

445
00:28:43.250 --> 00:28:46.390
<v Speaker 1>associates deprived the plaintiffs of their legal rights and an

446
00:28:46.430 --> 00:28:49.329
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to commence this lawsuit prior to his death in

447
00:28:49.410 --> 00:28:53.819
<v Speaker 1>August of 2019. Accordingly, the defendants are equitably stopped from

448
00:28:53.880 --> 00:28:59.410
<v Speaker 1>asserting a statute of limitations defense. It's interesting, right? Because

449
00:29:01.230 --> 00:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense if they are intimidated, coerced, threatened in

450
00:29:06.460 --> 00:29:09.900
<v Speaker 1>any way, allegedly to not come forward, they're not going

451
00:29:09.920 --> 00:29:17.559
<v Speaker 1>to do it. How about having the ability, as this

452
00:29:17.599 --> 00:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>law is doing, for people to be able to investigate

453
00:29:20.500 --> 00:29:25.259
<v Speaker 1>their claims and bring them and not forcing an artificial

454
00:29:25.319 --> 00:29:28.450
<v Speaker 1>timeline for these things to happen? And look, you guys

455
00:29:28.470 --> 00:29:30.140
<v Speaker 1>know me, I'm rule of law. I am, you know,

456
00:29:30.180 --> 00:29:32.099
<v Speaker 1>very much a, let's look at the rules of procedure,

457
00:29:32.160 --> 00:29:34.460
<v Speaker 1>let's look at the law. But I do think, though,

458
00:29:34.960 --> 00:29:38.569
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes laws have to be amended, changed, or created,

459
00:29:38.589 --> 00:29:42.710
<v Speaker 1>a la the Epstein-Faust transition. Act, to reflect the facts

460
00:29:43.650 --> 00:29:46.019
<v Speaker 1>and the evidence. And we know the facts and the

461
00:29:46.099 --> 00:29:51.259
<v Speaker 1>evidence when it comes to Epstein, Maxwell, others, including his co-conspirators, enablers, recruiters,

462
00:29:51.799 --> 00:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and facilitators. They did a great job of helping him

463
00:29:54.920 --> 00:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>hide this. And so anyway, I wanted to share this

464
00:29:57.980 --> 00:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>news with you Like and subscribe. Share this episode far

465
00:30:01.740 --> 00:30:04.900
<v Speaker 1>and wide. Let people know what is happening. Accountability comes

466
00:30:05.359 --> 00:30:09.799
<v Speaker 1>by way of these lawsuits. It also provides avenues for

467
00:30:10.079 --> 00:30:12.809
<v Speaker 1>additional discovery. And the more that we can get out there,

468
00:30:13.589 --> 00:30:15.309
<v Speaker 1>the more that we can get our hands on publicly

469
00:30:15.349 --> 00:30:18.410
<v Speaker 1>available information through these lawsuits, the better we are in

470
00:30:18.470 --> 00:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>getting transparency. Be mad, be outraged, demand accountability. like these

471
00:30:23.920 --> 00:30:27.500
<v Speaker 1>plaintiffs are doing, these victims of Epstein and Dyke, Kahn

472
00:30:27.539 --> 00:30:30.299
<v Speaker 1>and others. I'm off to rattle some more cages. Katie

473
00:30:30.319 --> 00:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Fang here. We launched the Katie Fang News Channel in

474
00:30:32.980 --> 00:30:35.369
<v Speaker 1>partnership with the Midas Touch Network so we could bring

475
00:30:35.390 --> 00:30:38.789
<v Speaker 1>you the latest in legal and political news. Straight, no chaser.

476
00:30:39.190 --> 00:30:41.529
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a fellow truth teller, hit that subscribe

477
00:30:41.549 --> 00:30:44.410
<v Speaker 1>button and share the word about this channel so we

478
00:30:44.450 --> 00:30:47.089
<v Speaker 1>can build a high information America together.
