Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 1: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the twenty sixth September.
Speaker 1: You're our lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going
Speaker 1: to take a look at a perhaps budding romance between
Speaker 1: Elon Musk and Prime Minister Maloney of Italy. And that's
Speaker 1: what the press is all about. You know, they had
Speaker 1: kind words as each other. They're smiling sitting next to
Speaker 1: each other. Who cares, I really don't care. The point
Speaker 1: is where were they. They were at the Atlantic Council.
Speaker 1: The Atlantic Council. They've got both of them who were
Speaker 1: supposed to be a conservative populist all the read this
Speaker 1: is their public image, but privately they're having an affair
Speaker 1: with the Atlantic Council, the epicenter of war and censorship.
Speaker 1: We're going to begin with that today. We have a
Speaker 1: lot to cover in the news. It's amazing what comes
Speaker 1: out of a single interview with La La Harris. She
Speaker 1: thought she was safe. That reporter actually pursued the truth.
Speaker 1: Pretty amazing the clips we got. We'll be right back
Speaker 1: by the way. I want to begin with a serious
Speaker 1: note before we get into politics, which is decidedly unserious.
Speaker 1: But like I said before, I view politics as a
Speaker 1: gathering storm that has headed your way. It's like these hurricanes.
Speaker 1: You what are you gonna do? Are you gonna move,
Speaker 1: You're gonna you know, board up and get out of
Speaker 1: harm's way. You're gonna prepare for it whether or not,
Speaker 1: what are you gonna do? But you need to know
Speaker 1: where the storm is coming. So I'm just kind of
Speaker 1: a political weatherman, not a weather vane. I don't I
Speaker 1: don't turn with the wind, but I tell you what
Speaker 1: I'm seeing coming. Uh.
Speaker 3: But uh.
Speaker 1: On a serious side, though, I got a email last
Speaker 1: night from Jason Barker and Jason who does Knights of
Speaker 1: the Storm, and and you know Jason, I mean, he's
Speaker 1: been around for from the beginning of this show. He
Speaker 1: wrote a great letter that so many people used. He
Speaker 1: was in the military, he was fighting against the vaccine mandates,
Speaker 1: and he showed his letter that he was using and
Speaker 1: it had four or five key points and said, look,
Speaker 1: you know, don't just copy this, but you know, if
Speaker 1: you believe any of these things is what I believe,
Speaker 1: and these are the points that I have used, and
Speaker 1: that type of thing. It was a great deal of
Speaker 1: benefit to many many people. I had people who were
Speaker 1: in the medical community who talked about how they had
Speaker 1: used that to fight the vaccine mandates and things like that.
Speaker 1: A strong Christian believer, and he's got a grandson that
Speaker 1: was born yesterday, Liam, And everything went well at the beginning,
Speaker 1: but then they started having problems with his grandson breathing,
Speaker 1: and they sent him to the emergency room and or
Speaker 1: not another hospital, I think, But nevertheless, he is in
Speaker 1: a very very severe condition. And so he asked for
Speaker 1: your prayers, and we'll give you a reminder of that
Speaker 1: later in the program, but please pray for Lil Liam
Speaker 1: Jason Barker's grandson at this moment. So let's talk about
Speaker 1: politics here. These people can't give us what we want,
Speaker 1: can they. So the Italian Prime Minister goes to the
Speaker 1: Atlantic Council, and all the press can talk about is
Speaker 1: whether or not there's some kind of a romantic relationship
Speaker 1: that is budding between Maloney and Musk folks. What it
Speaker 1: does is it underscores how phony the two of them are.
Speaker 1: Maloney ran as Italian Prime Minister, she ran over the
Speaker 1: border issue like Trump did, and then of course she
Speaker 1: immediately ignored all of it, immediately turned on all of
Speaker 1: it and turned toward the EU, turned away from her
Speaker 1: populist policies and so forth, and turned toward the EU.
Speaker 1: Good example, one of the worst examples of this massive
Speaker 1: migration was a little Italian island where they had six
Speaker 1: thousand people, and within a few days they brought in
Speaker 1: twelve thousand people who had no way to support themselves
Speaker 1: into this island. Where are they all going to live?
Speaker 1: The crime and all the rest of this stuff. It's
Speaker 1: the volume of this just flooded that little island. Well,
Speaker 1: she was Prime minister, she presided over that, and I
Speaker 1: guess they liked that enough that they invited her to
Speaker 1: the Atlantic Council and gave her an award. Italian Prime
Speaker 1: Minister Georgia Maloney delivered a powerful speech after receiving the
Speaker 1: Atlantic Council's Global Citizen Award in New York. She focused
Speaker 1: on the importance of Western values, democracy and the fight
Speaker 1: against authoritarianism, white hypocrisy. From these people again, you want
Speaker 1: to talk about the Atlantic Council. The Atlantic Council of
Speaker 1: Folks is first and foremost a big NATO organization. They're
Speaker 1: for war everywhere and they're for censorship everywhere. They actually
Speaker 1: created something called the Digital Forensics Lab, and I mean
Speaker 1: they've been pushing the censorship since twenty eighteen. They were
Speaker 1: at the epicenter of this massive purge, first of info
Speaker 1: Wars in twenty eighteen August, and then two months later
Speaker 1: you had eight hundred sites were shut down, and they
Speaker 1: weren't at the epicenter of all this stuff, the Atlantic Council.
Speaker 1: So where would you expect to find mister free speech
Speaker 1: elon Muskyeah? Right there, right there. So she was a
Speaker 1: ward of the prize, you know, for first of all
Speaker 1: being a woman. That's what they said, groundbreaking role is
Speaker 1: Italy's first female prime minister. Okay, so you get some
Speaker 1: points for being a woman. And then her strong support
Speaker 1: of the European Union, not of Italy. Not of Italy.
Speaker 1: She's not for Italy, She's for the European Union. She's
Speaker 1: a globalist, strong support of the European Union and the
Speaker 1: Transatlantic Alliance. Again, the Transatlantic Alliance, that's their code for NATO,
Speaker 1: and that's what the Atlantic Council is all about. Maloney
Speaker 1: urged the West to reject the idea of decline and
Speaker 1: to reaffirm its moral and democratic foundations. Well, we're going
Speaker 1: to talk about moral and democratic foundations, and maybe you
Speaker 1: don't go to every single war. Maybe you distance yourself
Speaker 1: from NATO, who's all about preemptive war, striking first. You know,
Speaker 1: we know those guys are bad, we know eventually it's
Speaker 1: going to come to the point where they're going to
Speaker 1: attack us. Let's attack them first. That was rightly called
Speaker 1: infamy when Japan did it to us, even though we
Speaker 1: had already jumped into the war, even though for practical purposes,
Speaker 1: you know, we're shipping massive amounts of supplies and arms
Speaker 1: to the declared belligerents, we were effectively in the war.
Speaker 1: And of course they looked at it and they said, yeah, well,
Speaker 1: you know, it's just a matter of time before the
Speaker 1: US sends troops and gets involved that way. So what
Speaker 1: we'll do is will strike them first. That is the
Speaker 1: logic of the US, that's the logic of NATO, that's
Speaker 1: the logic of Israel, that's the logic of the West.
Speaker 1: Now we have adopted that Hanna's practice of pemptive strike.
Speaker 1: It's in moral, it's in moral. That has never been justified, never,
Speaker 1: not even by pagan countries, let alone by Christian countries.
Speaker 1: That's not justified. And then you want to talk about
Speaker 1: decline what she doing to her country terms of opening
Speaker 1: up the border, bringing in two times the number of
Speaker 1: people with no means of support anything else that we're
Speaker 1: already in that island. So she goes on to say,
Speaker 1: we must resist the lure of authoritarianism. Oh okay, so
Speaker 1: you're saying that to the group that's been behind censorship,
Speaker 1: the group that partnered with Facebook, the group that created
Speaker 1: the digital forensic lab. We have to resist the law
Speaker 1: of authoritarianism. What hypocrisy to go to the Atlantic Council
Speaker 1: and to say that just so, because the truth is
Speaker 1: strength of democracies lies and their values and their freedoms,
Speaker 1: not in power alone. What freedom. If you don't have
Speaker 1: free speech, folks, you don't have any freedom, You really don't.
Speaker 1: That not the Second Amendment, but the First Amendment is
Speaker 1: the cornerstone of our foundations. You're not even going to
Speaker 1: know who to shoot at if you don't have the
Speaker 1: First Amendment. You're not even going to know the cause
Speaker 1: of why you are fighting if you don't have the
Speaker 1: First Amendment. And of course the First Amendment can help
Speaker 1: you to stop this before it gets to the point
Speaker 1: of shooting. The Italian premier reiterated her commitment to Ukraine.
Speaker 1: See this is a NATO organization for censorship, so she
Speaker 1: cowtows to Europe abandons her people in Italy, cowtows to
Speaker 1: NATO for censorship. And she urged the West to stand
Speaker 1: firm against Russian aggression. A pivotal moment, she said, for
Speaker 1: the West and its defense of self determination and freedom,
Speaker 1: just not freedom of speech, right, whatever freedom she's talking about.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure. She said. We must not waiver in
Speaker 1: our support for Ukraine. This is about more than borders,
Speaker 1: says the woman who ran on borders, on Italian borders
Speaker 1: and then abandon that cause. Now she's concerned about the
Speaker 1: Ukraine border, just like all of our politicians, Republican and Democrats.
Speaker 1: This is about more than borders. It's about the future
Speaker 1: of the global order and democracy. Of course, well those
Speaker 1: are two different things. Don't talking about global order and
Speaker 1: democracy at the same time. This is like the French
Speaker 1: you talked about liberty, fraternity and equality, right, brotherhood, liberty.
Speaker 1: You can have liberty and brotherhood, that's fine, but you
Speaker 1: can't have equality in the way that they talked about it,
Speaker 1: because the French, as the Jacobins, the early Marxist revolutionaries,
Speaker 1: they were about equality of results, not equality of opportunity. Yes,
Speaker 1: you can have liberty and equality of opportunity. You must
Speaker 1: have both of those. And you have to have equality
Speaker 1: of opportunity if you're going to have liberty. But if
Speaker 1: you're going to impose an equality of results, that means
Speaker 1: that you're talking you're talking about an authoritarian, dictatorial redistribution
Speaker 1: of wealth. You're talking about Marxism, socialism, collectivism, or as
Speaker 1: the Founders called it, leveling. You're going to level everybody
Speaker 1: except for yourself. Of course, you will have to be
Speaker 1: above everybody else so that you can, you know, do
Speaker 1: the leveling. Yeah, it's about what a bunch of double speak.
Speaker 1: And I don't see anybody calling them out on any
Speaker 1: of this stuff. You know, all the people who report it,
Speaker 1: it's just about, oh look at this. You know, Maloney
Speaker 1: and Musk K I S S I n G sitting
Speaker 1: in the tree.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: It's one prominent admirer that Georgio Maloney has attracted is
Speaker 1: Elon Musk, who said she's also someone who's authentic, honest,
Speaker 1: and truthful. Yeah, what I just told you, And that
Speaker 1: can't always be said about politicians. Yeah, who's courting who? Though?
Speaker 1: You know, is he courting her or or Musk and
Speaker 1: Maloney courting the Atlantic Council? Or is the Atlantic Council
Speaker 1: courting Musk and Maloney. Maloney then praised Musk's visionary leadership. Well,
Speaker 1: let me tell you something. You know, they're both in
Speaker 1: bed with a war machine. They're both in bed with
Speaker 1: a globalist agenda. They're both in bed with the censors
Speaker 1: of free speech. They're both controlled opposition. It's just that simple.
Speaker 1: When as a matter of fact, I'm not the only
Speaker 1: one that notices that must decry as the government censorship.
Speaker 1: But his x platform has been even more compliant than
Speaker 1: Twitter under Jack Dorsey. And we got the metrics. You know,
Speaker 1: this is a Washington Post and look, you can look
Speaker 1: at this and say this is mainstream media. They don't
Speaker 1: like him, but look at the metrics that they have, right,
Speaker 1: they can tell you the truth. They sometimes many times,
Speaker 1: they will tell you the truth about their enemies. They'll
Speaker 1: lie about their friends, but they'll tell you the truth
Speaker 1: about their enemies. They never attacked Musk until he started
Speaker 1: making public statements in support of populism and Trump and
Speaker 1: things like that. Fundamentally, he hasn't changed. Ex owner Elon
Speaker 1: Musk is the world's wealthiest flag bear for free speech,
Speaker 1: but under his leadership, the social media platform is acceding
Speaker 1: to government requests to take down or to withhold user
Speaker 1: content at a significantly higher rate than it did during
Speaker 1: the years leading up to his purchase. The site acted
Speaker 1: on seventy one percent of the legal request that received
Speaker 1: to remove content in the first half of this year,
Speaker 1: up twenty percent from the last time it reported the
Speaker 1: figure in twenty twenty one, and more than double the
Speaker 1: rate and pre years, according to a new transparency report
Speaker 1: published on Wednesday and a Washington Post review of past
Speaker 1: disclosure data. The findings highlight the waile Musk has decried
Speaker 1: government attempts to censor content and blasted X's previous ownership
Speaker 1: for buckling the political pressure. The platform since his takeover
Speaker 1: appears to be complying with such demands even more frequently,
Speaker 1: and the disclosures are consistent with past media reports finding
Speaker 1: higher government compliance rates under Musk. I've said it over
Speaker 1: and over again, the shadow banning is actually worse, even
Speaker 1: though I paid there is eight dollars a month. The
Speaker 1: shadow banning is even worse for me. I talked yesterday
Speaker 1: about a guy who is a big fanboy of Tesla
Speaker 1: and Elon Musk, but he has had a lot of
Speaker 1: problems with his cyber truck. He's on his third lemen.
Speaker 1: He replaced them under the women law and he just said, Elon,
Speaker 1: fix this boom your shadow band. He can't get any
Speaker 1: engagement whatsoever. He says, he's still getting the same amount
Speaker 1: of engagement on other platforms YouTube, Facebook, other things like that,
Speaker 1: but he's banned. And so Jason Barker, as a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, is also documented how he was, you know,
Speaker 1: being shadow banded on Twitter. Oh, it's very much a
Speaker 1: part of it. So it is absolute hypocrisy for these people.
Speaker 1: It's amazing to see how easily conservatives are full because
Speaker 1: they want to believe that there's going to be If
Speaker 1: somebody's made billions of dollars, well they must be a
Speaker 1: great businessman. Well, you know, that's one possibility. The other
Speaker 1: possibility is that they're crook. Could be that, you know,
Speaker 1: they are the king of crony capitalism as Muskas. That's
Speaker 1: what Eric Peters and I first talked about more than
Speaker 1: a decade ago, the King of crony Capitalism. La Times
Speaker 1: that ran one of a few rare reports criticizing Musk
Speaker 1: before he bought Twitter, started talking conservatively, when he did
Speaker 1: not talk about his politics, when he just got what
Speaker 1: he wanted in the back rooms with the politicians. They said,
Speaker 1: they called him king of crony capitalism. They said, it's
Speaker 1: got more than Look at how many billions of dollars
Speaker 1: I forget what it was now, how many billions of
Speaker 1: dollars that he's gotten of crony capitalism the name of
Speaker 1: government contracts and to push their agendas for electrification and
Speaker 1: all the rest of this stuff. But he moves to
Speaker 1: the right, and this is something we've seen with Chris Cuomo.
Speaker 1: Is something that you know, he's got a long way
Speaker 1: to go before he's been reached the center, but he's
Speaker 1: he's getting pretty close, I guess, to where the center
Speaker 1: is and being radically left. He's reinventing himself after he
Speaker 1: was fired, because you know, nobody's going to only way
Speaker 1: that he could make a living being a radical left authoritarian,
Speaker 1: as if he's working for some government subsidized organization like
Speaker 1: CNN so he's having to, in the name of self preservation,
Speaker 1: moderate his views and try to back away from the
Speaker 1: lies that he told people during the lockdown. And he's
Speaker 1: done more to back away from that stuff, quite honestly,
Speaker 1: than Trump has or in the Trump supporters have. And
Speaker 1: so this is something that a lot of them are doing.
Speaker 1: And now the other person who's turning here is Mark Zuckerberg.
Speaker 1: Mark Zuckerberg now identifies as a libertarian. Yeah, he's calling
Speaker 1: himself a classical liberal or a libertarian. He doesn't believe
Speaker 1: in big government. This guy is put in business by DARPA.
Speaker 1: You believe any of this stuff? And look at that picture.
Speaker 1: Zoom in on that picture. I think he identifies as
Speaker 1: Austin Powers. I don't think this is you know, yeah,
Speaker 1: see that, you look like Austin Bowers. And he's gonna
Speaker 1: be telling us all that's what he's been telling us
Speaker 1: on Facebook. Oh behave Well, he's gonna he's not gonna
Speaker 1: do that anymore. He's going to be a libertarian and
Speaker 1: he's got his new classes. These things that Google and
Speaker 1: Facebook come out with, these glasses. It always reminds me
Speaker 1: of that Steve Martin movie The Jerk. I mean that's name.
Speaker 1: Karen is like it's you know when when you look
Speaker 1: at have you ever seen that movie? Steve Martin is
Speaker 1: this guy who makes an unbelievable fortune because of some
Speaker 1: glasses that he sells people. But then after he gets
Speaker 1: the money and people are using the glasses for a
Speaker 1: couple of months, everybody's starting to go cross eyed, and
Speaker 1: then they off sue him and he loses everything and
Speaker 1: his words off than he was before. Of course that
Speaker 1: didn't happen with the Trump shots, did it? The mRNA?
Speaker 1: There you go the Yeah, that's the thanks, that's the picture.
Speaker 1: That's pretty good.
Speaker 3: Guys.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, the jerk, the jerk kind of like a
Speaker 1: farmer bro except there was consequences when it was done
Speaker 1: in the movies. And so now we've got Mark Zuckerberg
Speaker 1: Libertarian Men of Mystery, Austin Powers. Zuckerberg now identifies as
Speaker 1: the libertarian that feels a sense of hostility the government regulation.
Speaker 1: This is just too rich. I mean, come on, how
Speaker 1: many times are they gonna pull this? And this is
Speaker 1: I've been laughing about this with Musk, with Cuomo, Megan Kelly,
Speaker 1: Magan Kelly, remember you know, like Trump said she had
Speaker 1: blood coming out of everywhere. She's coming after him the
Speaker 1: very first debate. Of course, he now remembers that as
Speaker 1: Rosie O'Donnell. I think is what he called her, the
Speaker 1: ultimate insult those worse than things. You had blood coming
Speaker 1: out of every way to call her Rosie O'Donnell. She's
Speaker 1: nearly anorexic now, but I know she's become one of
Speaker 1: the biggest Trump cheerleaders because that's where the money is.
Speaker 1: I mean, you don't have to be a genius to
Speaker 1: see that's where the money is. People they used to
Speaker 1: do shows with they can't do shows with anymore. It's like,
Speaker 1: forget the polls. Trump's going to win. This is about,
Speaker 1: you know, I mean, just relentless Trump cheerleading. That's what
Speaker 1: everybody's doing. Everybody is hooring themselves out to this hormonger.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump just disgust me. But anyway, he now feels
Speaker 1: a sense of hostility to government regulations as well as
Speaker 1: skepticism of initiatives that claim to advance so called social justice.
Speaker 1: So Breitbart is going to try to help him along
Speaker 1: and explain his transition as being legit now considers his
Speaker 1: political views to be more libertarian or in line with
Speaker 1: classical liberalism. A position that's considered to be fiscally conservative
Speaker 1: is socially liberal. Well let me just let me just
Speaker 1: say this. You know, libertarianism has now become associated with
Speaker 1: fiscally conservative and socially liberal. But I don't know if
Speaker 1: you could say the same thing about classical liberalism. I
Speaker 1: can't imagine the people who were speaking out in terms
Speaker 1: of liberty writing essays in the eighteen hundreds, I cannot
Speaker 1: imagine them getting on board at the LGBT agenda. That's
Speaker 1: what we mean by it's socially liberal today. I also
Speaker 1: can't imagine them getting on board with abortion either. And
Speaker 1: so when we talk about classically liberal, right, we used
Speaker 1: to talk about a liberal education. What that meant was
Speaker 1: that that liberated you, right, liberty, liberal, all same root work.
Speaker 1: It was hijacked by the Marxist and the socialists in
Speaker 1: the early twentieth century that work and became something of
Speaker 1: a swear word liberal. But what it really meant was
Speaker 1: that you supported liberty. And you still have some countries
Speaker 1: where people you have liberal parties and they have policies
Speaker 1: that would be identified as conservative. But of course, just
Speaker 1: like the conservatives, they don't really pay attention to liberty
Speaker 1: is amazing. In New South Wales, Goddess Bear Jicklan was
Speaker 1: part of the Liberal Party. Now, if you looked at
Speaker 1: at her policies of tyranny, you say, yeah, she looks
Speaker 1: like it sounds like a liberal. But she was supposed
Speaker 1: to be somebody that supported individual liberty right and so
Speaker 1: a lot of people will say, well, I you know,
Speaker 1: classical liberal is what I am. But that was lost
Speaker 1: on so many people that they came up with the
Speaker 1: term libertarian. I saw the direction that the Libertarian Party
Speaker 1: was going, and while I agree with liberty, I didn't
Speaker 1: agree with the party. And that's why I created my
Speaker 1: handle twelve years ago on Twitter. I called it Liberty Arrian.
Speaker 1: But anyway, so now he is a classical liberal, he says.
Speaker 1: Sources added that Zuckerberg is also trying to repair his
Speaker 1: relationship with former President Trump, speaking to him twice in
Speaker 1: one on one cordial phone calls over the summer.
Speaker 4: Yeah, the billionaires are friends.
Speaker 1: Let's be friends. Could we share some money or something.
Speaker 1: Sometimes we get together and talk about our mansions.
Speaker 5: Yeah, you've got a very nice house, Mark, very nice.
Speaker 5: Mine is better, of course, yours are nice.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So Yeah. Actually, Mark's got more money than.
Speaker 2: He's That's what I tell him.
Speaker 1: Gold that's kind of guild everything. Yeah, that's like when
Speaker 1: they did the movie The Apprentice, they said that the
Speaker 1: sets needed to look expensive but tasteless. That's Trump for sure,
Speaker 1: expensive but tasteless, gilded with gold everywhere. You maybe melting
Speaker 1: that down before long if the price of gold keeps
Speaker 1: going up anyway. So I just here's one thing. When
Speaker 1: I look at this, and I look at this movement
Speaker 1: of all these people to Trump, I wonder, have they
Speaker 1: gotten word on the inside. You know, these guys know
Speaker 1: what's going on with the global governance and all the
Speaker 1: rest of the stuff, and the inside clubs at Bilderberg
Speaker 1: and all the rest of stuff. Have they gotten word
Speaker 1: that Trump is going to be the selection this time?
Speaker 1: If they're moving that far clost to him, I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, would they be going in the other direction
Speaker 1: because he's made a very strong move towards Trump and
Speaker 1: not anything at all toward Law. A few weeks later
Speaker 1: after he said a few weeks later after the shooting
Speaker 1: where he praised Trump called him a badass, Zuckerberg called
Speaker 1: Trump a second time to apologize after Meta erroneously took
Speaker 1: down iconic images of the assassination attempt the U and
Speaker 1: then Zuckerberg said that he has yet to forge a
Speaker 1: relationship with Vice President Laala Harris said the newspaper he
Speaker 1: doesn't call her La La I do. Zuckerberg has decided
Speaker 1: not to engage with Washington unless necessary, and is instead
Speaker 1: working on his relationships with politicians behind the scenes. Yeah,
Speaker 1: let's get together, you know, the Davos, Let's do that
Speaker 1: Davos launch thing. Let's let's schmooze at Builderberg, you know,
Speaker 1: because that's all just about building relationships. It's not about
Speaker 1: making any plans about taking over as the Karen tell
Speaker 1: the story again, when we were at Builderberg in Copenhagen
Speaker 1: twenty fourteen. That was the best and actually really the
Speaker 1: only time that the press was able to get close
Speaker 1: to the hotel where they were staying. I was right
Speaker 1: smack dab in the middle of the city, and the
Speaker 1: only thing that separated the press from them was a
Speaker 1: four lane road, and so you could see everybody that
Speaker 1: was going into the building and so forth and so on,
Speaker 1: and some of them tried to go into the side exits,
Speaker 1: and Karen was over on a side exit one day
Speaker 1: and had a guy who was a high official in
Speaker 1: the Labor Party's name was Ed Balls, and he was
Speaker 1: trying to come in on the side and he didn't
Speaker 1: have he forgot his ID stuff and he just had
Speaker 1: his role rolling luggage with him and the guards would
Speaker 1: not let him in. You know me, I'm at Balls,
Speaker 1: I'm the shadows Secretary of the Exchequer and all the
Speaker 1: rest of this stuff, right, and they were not impressed.
Speaker 1: The wouldn't let him. So he goes to look through
Speaker 1: his luggage and he unzips it and when he does,
Speaker 1: the contents fall out, and it was a suitcase filled
Speaker 1: with paper. That's it. That's it. No no clothes, no toothbrush,
Speaker 1: no ID, just papers. But you know, hey, it's just
Speaker 1: no business work is being done there. We're operating under
Speaker 1: Chatham House rules, so nobody can say anything. And you know,
Speaker 1: it's a it's just a friendly and formal thing like
Speaker 1: Zuckerberg does behind the scenes with Trump and other people,
Speaker 1: these relationships that they formed. He was in the next election.
Speaker 1: It was the highest dranking official to lose his seat
Speaker 1: and h anyway, good job Karen hiring. He's hired. Zuckerberg
Speaker 1: has hired a prominent Republican strategist, Brian Baker, to improve
Speaker 1: his status with conservative media and with Republican lawmakers, you know,
Speaker 1: just like Chris Cuomo is doing Megan Kelly and ol.
Speaker 1: People close to Zuckerberg and his wife told the newspaper
Speaker 1: that the couple was caught off guard when their activism
Speaker 1: and their philanthropy backfired on them. After the summer of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, George Floyd riots a Chan Zuckerberg Initiative employee
Speaker 1: because she still goes by her last name, so her
Speaker 1: name is Chan. So the Chen Zuckerberg Initiative that's kind
Speaker 1: of like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. An employee
Speaker 1: there reportedly asked Zuckerberg during a staff meeting to resign
Speaker 1: from Facebook. He claimed that Zuckerberg had been unwilling to
Speaker 1: censor Trump on social media. If you're not going to
Speaker 1: censor Trump, what's your social media about? Anyway? Didn't they
Speaker 1: give you the order at DARPA you're supposed to control this,
Speaker 1: sources told The New York Times at the incident, another
Speaker 1: similar to it upset Zuckerberg and ultimately pushed him away
Speaker 1: from political work. So that's the that's being fed to
Speaker 1: you by Breitbart. I don't think it's about that all.
Speaker 1: So he suddenly became a conservative because he was criticized
Speaker 1: by super woke employee. Yeah right. Zuckerberg is not the
Speaker 1: only tech titan who appears to have changed over the
Speaker 1: years with regards to politics. Notably, Elon Musk, says Breitbart,
Speaker 1: who was once relatively apolitical, has now turned x into
Speaker 1: the protector of free speech. According to Breitbart, Wow wow,
Speaker 1: Bill Owens, Breitbart, that's the question, why are these people
Speaker 1: are shilling for this? And they are absolutely shilling for Trump.
Speaker 1: It's absolutely amazing. Well, Wikipedia is paying groups to embed
Speaker 1: feminism and racial ideology into articles. Well, that's true, and
Speaker 1: it is reprehensible, but it is nothing, nothing compared to
Speaker 1: what is going on with the chat AI chat programs.
Speaker 1: I mean, they've got entire companies, big companies making lots
Speaker 1: and lots of money. Their sole purpose is to embed
Speaker 1: bias into the chat programs, the AI chat programs. And
Speaker 1: coming up, we're going to talk about the AI energy
Speaker 1: Grift and how they are clearing the decks. I mean,
Speaker 1: from the Governor of Pennsylvania to the Energy secretary, everybody's like,
Speaker 1: we got to get this right away. We've got to
Speaker 1: get power to these people right away, because that electrical
Speaker 1: power to run these AI stations is going to be
Speaker 1: the basis of their power, their political power over you.
Speaker 1: And that's the real fascism that is coming towards us.
Speaker 1: The artificial intelligence is going to be there, not just
Speaker 1: to propagandize as like Wikipedia, artificial intelligence will also be
Speaker 1: used to identifying, to censor you. It's about surveillance and censorship,
Speaker 1: not just propaganda. It also will include a course propaganda,
Speaker 1: but it's about all those things. And that's why they
Speaker 1: have to remove all obstacles for them to push this through.
Speaker 1: That is their key path to power coming up. And
Speaker 1: so when you look at some of the things that
Speaker 1: have surfaced about Wikipedia. For example, according to documents, Wikipedia
Speaker 1: paid a group called art plus Feminism three hundred and
Speaker 1: eighty two thousand dollars to support work to further its mission.
Speaker 1: They say. The organization says when cysts and trans women,
Speaker 1: they don't spell that, it's not abbreviation as sister. That's
Speaker 1: the CIS. That's their invented word that they've used to
Speaker 1: label people who are normal normal. When cis and trans women,
Speaker 1: non binary people, black, indigenous people of color communities are
Speaker 1: not represented in the writing and the editing on the
Speaker 1: tenth most visited side in the world. Information about people
Speaker 1: like us get skewed and misrepresented. That's the problem, you know,
Speaker 1: people like the rest of us, the rest of us.
Speaker 1: Information about the rest of us, besides this tiny vocal
Speaker 1: Marxist minority, the information about the rest of us is
Speaker 1: getting skewed and misrepresented. They say they have to decolonize
Speaker 1: the Internet. Know what they're doing is they've colonized the Internet.
Speaker 1: They have colonized the internet's culture. They've used it now
Speaker 1: and they're using it to colonize our history, our culture,
Speaker 1: our society, our values. It is a struggle. It is
Speaker 1: a struggle. And you know, just as Scott sha was
Speaker 1: talking about the other day, that's really part of our
Speaker 1: rual war. We don't struggle with flesh and blood. We
Speaker 1: struggle with ideas, ideas that are put there by principalities
Speaker 1: and powers that you don't see. They're further behind the
Speaker 1: scenes than Builderberg, and they're higher up than the people
Speaker 1: who meet at Builderberg. But it's those satanic ideas that
Speaker 1: are pushed out that's where the fight is. That's where
Speaker 1: the fight is, so they gave them there.
Speaker 5: I just want to break in. This sort of stuff
Speaker 5: is pushed everywhere. We use a website called we Transfer
Speaker 5: to send files, and every single day there is some
Speaker 5: horrifying piece of feminist black queer propaganda that they're pushing
Speaker 5: on the front page, like this is how someone is
Speaker 5: decolonizing arts, like a shut up.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, it's really bad. And of course we don't
Speaker 1: pay them folks, just so that you know, it's free.
Speaker 5: So we're using their bandwidth and taking stuff from them.
Speaker 5: But every single day I get this stuff shoved in
Speaker 5: my face and it drives me insane.
Speaker 1: By the way, that's one of the reasons why. And
Speaker 1: I apologize because you know, when we send when I
Speaker 1: would transfer the Christmas album to people, I would use
Speaker 1: it as a free service. If you don't pay them,
Speaker 1: it disappears after a short period of time. They used
Speaker 1: to give us a week. I think they have shortened
Speaker 1: it to three days. We're probably going to have to
Speaker 1: find it a different way to send stuff to people.
Speaker 1: I mean, for us, it's okay, we get it right
Speaker 1: away when we send files, you know, but when Travis
Speaker 1: is out of town and that type of thing. But yeah,
Speaker 1: it is, you know, for something like giving people the
Speaker 1: album or something, we may have to find something else
Speaker 1: because they've shortened it up because we use the free
Speaker 1: service there, but they still push those those vile pictures.
Speaker 1: It is really beyond grief. There is anything like it.
Speaker 1: Wikipedia co founder calls Wikipedia shameless. In twenty twenty one,
Speaker 1: Wikipedia co founder Larry Sanger slammed the company for its bias.
Speaker 1: He wrote in a blog that quote Wikipedia openly repudiates
Speaker 1: new tral and is shamelessly hypocritical on how it continues
Speaker 1: to pay lip service to its neutral point of view policy.
Speaker 1: Well that's all of this stuff, right, all of it.
Speaker 1: I mean, if you're not cynical yet about the press
Speaker 1: in the same way that the Ritian people when they
Speaker 1: had two media outlets, Pravda and Asvestia truth and News,
Speaker 1: they said there's no truth in Pravda, no news in Vestia.
Speaker 1: If you haven't reached that level of cynicism yet, oh
Speaker 1: you're not paying attention. We're way beyond that. And it's
Speaker 1: going to get much much worse as AI gets to
Speaker 1: be a much much more powerful tool. And then, of
Speaker 1: course Wikipedia has been a tool of vaccine propaganda, especially
Speaker 1: especially AI. My immediate contempt for chat gpt in rest
Speaker 1: is because I started asking questions about the germ game
Speaker 1: mcguffin and about the climate mcguffin, and I saw right
Speaker 1: away how this thing had been programmed. So on Brownstone.
Speaker 1: David Bell has an essay the Right to Speak Evil,
Speaker 1: and we're going to talk about that when we come back.
Speaker 1: In light of what is going on with InfoWars as
Speaker 1: the last twenty four hours, forty eight hours or whatever,
Speaker 1: there's been a statement that info Wars is going to
Speaker 1: be liquidated. Well, I have some ideas about what I
Speaker 1: think is going to really happen with that, a little
Speaker 1: bit different from the people who were reporting on it,
Speaker 1: who were never on the inside. And I have some
Speaker 1: statements that I want to make about free speech and
Speaker 1: how this is not about free speech in spite of
Speaker 1: what you've been told. We're going to take a quick
Speaker 1: break and we will be right back making sense common again.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show, all right, Don
Speaker 1: rock fand Greg Talent, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: The tip and Dustin Helm, thank you, and Marky Mark
Speaker 1: new Jersey says as Balzac once said, behind every great
Speaker 1: fortune is a crime. Yeah, I know what the crime
Speaker 1: is behind Bill Gates's fortune. Copyright violation, intellectual property theft.
Speaker 1: He stole that operating system from Digital Research, and perhaps
Speaker 1: one of the biggest times is the fact that he
Speaker 1: hasn't fixed it for over fifty years.
Speaker 3: Still.
Speaker 1: The whole thing is built on a core that was
Speaker 1: something that was put out in the nineteen seventies or
Speaker 1: early nineteen seventies Digital Researches CPM. He stole it from
Speaker 1: them and got away beat him in court, but he
Speaker 1: uses all of the didn't even change the syntax, still
Speaker 1: calls it bios. And the whole thing is built on
Speaker 1: a soundation. All of Windows is built on a foundation
Speaker 1: of sand.
Speaker 4: It.
Speaker 1: Really, it's quite as awful.
Speaker 5: No one fixes anything in a technology anymore, No.
Speaker 4: I know.
Speaker 5: In gaming that they run with a policy of if
Speaker 5: a game ships with a bug and people don't complain
Speaker 5: about it and it's not game breaking, they will ship
Speaker 5: the next version with the same bug. They have to
Speaker 5: fix other new bugs.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and what's even worse is the planned obsolescence. Right,
Speaker 1: I've got an old laptop. I will not update it
Speaker 1: because if I update it it'll break my machine. I
Speaker 1: just know it'll break my You know, I've gone down
Speaker 1: that road. I updated this thing here that I use
Speaker 1: because they seem to be very connected to their user community,
Speaker 1: supernoe Dead and took a lot of feedback with it,
Speaker 1: and I'd had I you know, well, let me try.
Speaker 1: And it's kind of worried about. So I did the
Speaker 1: first update and it's like, oh great, they added some
Speaker 1: new features that are very useful. Did that a second time?
Speaker 1: That was good too. This last time, no, no, broke
Speaker 1: a bunch of stuff. Anyway, Let's talk about the right
Speaker 1: to speak evil. That's really what free speech is. If
Speaker 1: you don't support speech that you disagree with, speech that
Speaker 1: you don't like, then you don't support free speech. This
Speaker 1: is from Brownstone David Bell, and I say this in
Speaker 1: light of what is going on with Sandy Hook, right
Speaker 1: because Sandy Hook, first of all, I'll tell you a
Speaker 1: moment why it was not about free speech. It's not
Speaker 1: about info wars free speech. But it did become a
Speaker 1: rallying cause for saying that we have to punish people
Speaker 1: if they hurt somebody's feelings. Because Sandy Hook is really
Speaker 1: more about Sandy hurt or how to hurt feelings. And
Speaker 1: I tell you you know, my problem with Alex is
Speaker 1: the people that were really hurt, The people that were
Speaker 1: really hurt his own supporters January sixth, the people that
Speaker 1: were really hurt when he pushed the lockdown and told
Speaker 1: people that it was forty chests, when he pushed the
Speaker 1: jab and told people sugar water, and when he made
Speaker 1: record profits doing both of those things. That's reprehensible. But
Speaker 1: that's not what he is being punished for. He's being
Speaker 1: punished because he supposedly hurt somebody's feelings. Well, David Bell
Speaker 1: Brownstone says words can harm the childhood. Saying sticks and
Speaker 1: stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt
Speaker 1: me is obviously untrue. Words bring ruin and despair. They
Speaker 1: drive people to suicide, They've emit me massacres in war.
Speaker 1: They're used to justify the enslavement of nations and the
Speaker 1: genocide of entire ethnic groups. And he says, but this
Speaker 1: is exactly why we must all always be free to
Speaker 1: speak them. Yeah, the way it's put in the Bible,
Speaker 1: the tongue is a fire. It is a world of evil.
Speaker 1: It corrupts the whole body, It sets the course of
Speaker 1: one's life on fire, and it itself is set on
Speaker 1: fire by hell. We have to be careful what we say,
Speaker 1: you know, we have to look at it. We have
Speaker 1: to always look at what our motives are, you know,
Speaker 1: are we trying to It's not enough even really just
Speaker 1: to say, well, I want to say the truth. But
Speaker 1: if we're saying it to stop people from being hurt
Speaker 1: is where I believe this is my personal book, that
Speaker 1: even if you say something that other people might consider
Speaker 1: to be slanderous or harm harmful, if you're doing it
Speaker 1: to save people from being harmed, save people from being robbed,
Speaker 1: save people from losing their life, being put in jail,
Speaker 1: being disabled for life, that type of thing. We have
Speaker 1: to expose those kind of lies, just like we have
Speaker 1: to expose the kind of lies that are going to
Speaker 1: lead us into a war. And if that means that
Speaker 1: we point out the lies and the hypocrisy of the liars,
Speaker 1: so be it. That's my understanding of it, and that's
Speaker 1: how what I go by. Though in the world in
Speaker 1: which we live does David Bell Lies and deceit exist
Speaker 1: in all of us. They drive us to speak evil,
Speaker 1: and the more we can isolate ourselves from harm from
Speaker 1: our words do the more evil we are able to speak.
Speaker 1: A holocaust could happen because people built a structure within
Speaker 1: which only they could speak as they wished, whilst preventing
Speaker 1: others from talking back. Tyranny and programs thrive in one
Speaker 1: way conversations. The hallmark of a tyrant is to come
Speaker 1: after free speech when war begins. First casualty is truth
Speaker 1: and speech, and it is a war against us, war
Speaker 1: against our values or against our spiritual beliefs, our society
Speaker 1: or culture. Everything. It is a war, and they seek
Speaker 1: to make sure that only one side is going to
Speaker 1: be heard. The safe spaces of censorship currently enable countries
Speaker 1: to bomb children while convincing themselves that they're making things better.
Speaker 1: Or if you want to get dangerous, you can talk
Speaker 1: about Trump. You can say you could poison people by
Speaker 1: the millions, and then still like Trump, tell people that
Speaker 1: you saved tens of millions of lives, and exactly the
Speaker 1: opposite is true. Bad things can happen both as a
Speaker 1: result of free speech and due to a lack of
Speaker 1: free speech. Free speech is not about truth, but it's
Speaker 1: about putting limits on power. That's key. Free speech is
Speaker 1: not about truth, but it's about putting limits on power.
Speaker 1: Like I said before, you know, the many people understand
Speaker 1: that the answer to a bad man with a gun
Speaker 1: is a good man with a gun. The answer to
Speaker 1: a bad man with speech is a good man with speech.
Speaker 1: And if you start controlling guns and you start controlling speech,
Speaker 1: we've got much bigger problems. So on rumble Anona Moose.
Speaker 1: Thank you for the tip, he says, I'm writing. I'm
Speaker 1: looking for a job in it. I just turned down
Speaker 1: an offer from public health job in BC Canada one
Speaker 1: hundred and five thousand a year. Critical race theory and
Speaker 1: vaccine nazis helping the Indigenous victims, the first vaxed Canadians. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they went after them first, didn't they. Wow, well, good
Speaker 1: for you. Yeah. As I've said, I think, yeah, you
Speaker 1: can't be bought. That's good. That's good. And so many people.
Speaker 1: You know, I was talking about yesterday that the consumer
Speaker 1: confidence is down at the lowest level it's been since
Speaker 1: August of twenty twenty one. What was happening in August
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one. Everybody was looking at this and saying,
Speaker 1: I don't know if I'm going to have a job
Speaker 1: or career because they're going to force this vaccine on me,
Speaker 1: They're going to coerce it. And you want to talk
Speaker 1: about something's going to kill your confidence is when you
Speaker 1: and I think I'm going to lose everything. We're at
Speaker 1: that point now, though, because there's other things that mainstream
Speaker 1: media is not telling you. What's damaging consumer confidence, Well,
Speaker 1: what we actually see happening in the economy, what we
Speaker 1: see happening in wars and other things like that. And
Speaker 1: then of course this downward spiral as the entire country
Speaker 1: is being drugged down by politics and presidential candidates, and
Speaker 1: we can't think of what we're going to do without
Speaker 1: Washington fixing it for us, and without having the right
Speaker 1: person in Washington, we're lost. So we just might as
Speaker 1: well have a civil war at this point, right. That's
Speaker 1: the other thing that I want people. I'm trying to
Speaker 1: tell people, Well, you want to talk about somebody being
Speaker 1: black pilled. It's all of these maga media people saying, well,
Speaker 1: this is it. This is the most important election of
Speaker 1: our lifetime, and if we lose this election, that's it.
Speaker 1: There'll never be another election. Democracy has finished. Blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: We might as well just pull out the guns and
Speaker 1: start shooting people. And you've got people on the left
Speaker 1: who do that as well, but mainly it's people on
Speaker 1: the right. And this is what this cult leads to.
Speaker 1: You know, you think everything can be fixed by this
Speaker 1: miss Siah like figure, and he's a phony messiah. He's
Speaker 1: a false messiah. He can't fix it even if he
Speaker 1: wanted to. He can't fix it alone. But free speech
Speaker 1: is not about truth, but it's about putting limits on power.
Speaker 1: That's the key thing, and that's why we have to
Speaker 1: defend free speech in general. But see, the problem is
Speaker 1: is that this lawsuit, the lawsuit never got to the
Speaker 1: point of defending free speech because free speech systems that
Speaker 1: owns info wars is about making money. That's his first
Speaker 1: and foremost goal is to make money, not about free speech.
Speaker 1: And that's why you had the kind of things like
Speaker 1: this said, so that he could have record profits in
Speaker 1: the spring of twenty twenty.
Speaker 6: Very weak attenuated classic viruses with a very low amount
Speaker 6: of adjivant in it prompts looking at it basically sugar
Speaker 6: water for folks. Can we take a little bit of
Speaker 6: an attenuated, microwaved or radiated of a deal as a
Speaker 6: freaking legally.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I do it for Trump. Do it for Trump. Yeah, absolutely,
Speaker 1: do it for Trump please. Yeah. Yeah, Oh that was
Speaker 1: a lie. First of all, there was no virus. Secondly,
Speaker 1: had not been isolated. Third, you don't kill a virus,
Speaker 1: all right, if they were true, if they were right
Speaker 1: about all this stuff, viruses aren't live.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: And then to say that, come on, you can take
Speaker 1: the you know, for for twenty plus years, I've been
Speaker 1: telling you that these adjuvants like aluminum and mercury or
Speaker 1: what's behind autism, and he told the truth about that.
Speaker 1: Then he tells you, come on, you can take a
Speaker 1: little bit of that. You can do It's just like
Speaker 1: sugar water. Go ahead, take your aluminum. Inject your aluminum,
Speaker 1: inject your mercury. That I've been telling you for twenty
Speaker 1: years is awful. Do it for Trump. He's playing for
Speaker 1: to eaches. Support him. Support him as he's locking everything down,
Speaker 1: as he's killing main street America, as he's destroying the constitution,
Speaker 1: as he's preparing everybody for universal basic income. Follow him.
Speaker 1: He's playing forty chess. Yeah, he was playing forty chess,
Speaker 1: all right. Absolutely was playing forty chess. And he made
Speaker 1: as it came out. An interesting thing about the trial
Speaker 1: was that it came out about his record profits. But
Speaker 1: of course I was there. I knew he's making record profits.
Speaker 1: I just didn't know the magnitude of it that was
Speaker 1: happening as he was betraying his supporters, his country, the
Speaker 1: constitution so he could support Trump, who was supporting a
Speaker 1: globalist agenda that Alex had been warning people about for decades,
Speaker 1: the ultimate betrayal. And then later in the year he
Speaker 1: did this, and the.
Speaker 6: Lighthouse told me three days before, we're going to have
Speaker 6: you lead the march. The Secret Service before Trump finished
Speaker 6: the thirty minutes before, so will leads you to a point,
Speaker 6: take you out of the front row and leads you
Speaker 6: to the place where they want you to start the march,
Speaker 6: and Trump will tell people go and I'm gonna meet
Speaker 6: at the capital.
Speaker 1: Judas Cote leading the people to Solder. He instituted that
Speaker 1: along with a CIA agent, step A Trienny. How are
Speaker 1: you working for the deep state? Lies? From the very
Speaker 1: beginning they started stop to steal and all this stuff.
Speaker 1: He paid for the stop to stealing. Why did he
Speaker 1: not get punished. Why are there so many people in jail,
Speaker 1: many of them for decades he walked free. That seems
Speaker 1: suspicious to you, it does to me. So look, the
Speaker 1: Sandy Hook families suffered nothing, nothing compared to the victims
Speaker 1: of the Sugar Water. The Sandy Hook families suffered nothing
Speaker 1: compared to what happened to the j sixers, nothing compared
Speaker 1: to that. But he pays no price for that. Instead,
Speaker 1: they make it about the shooting. They make it about
Speaker 1: hurt feelings, and look, you know it is The interesting
Speaker 1: thing too, is as I said, you know, the tongue
Speaker 1: is a fire and it can destroy the path of
Speaker 1: your life. And it certainly did for Alex because Steve Pachennik,
Speaker 1: who was pushing the stop to Steel thing with the
Speaker 1: lies two days after the election, was also the one
Speaker 1: who came in with nobody died. He pulled that on
Speaker 1: an Alex, and he tried to pull it on me
Speaker 1: after that Las Vegas shooting in October. Came on and
Speaker 1: said nobody died, and I said, come on, come on,
Speaker 1: that's not true at all. But Alex started repeating that. See,
Speaker 1: if you trust the CIA, they'll kill you too, if
Speaker 1: you're part of the CIA. But of course they look
Speaker 1: after their own in certain ways as well. So, but
Speaker 1: Santy Hook families didn't suffer anything comparable to these people.
Speaker 1: That he was acting like a pied piper too, that
Speaker 1: he was a Judas goat to and his earnings during
Speaker 1: Sandy Hook were nothing compared to what he made betraying
Speaker 1: the constitution, his country, his listeners with the lockdown pandemic
Speaker 1: and the election garbage that was happening there in the
Speaker 1: spring and the fall of twenty twenty. So what is
Speaker 1: going to happen with this liquidation in bankruptcy. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: I've been through bankruptcy as a creditor, and I know
Speaker 1: how this whole corrupt system works. So we talk about
Speaker 1: our corrupt court systems and everything. Well, hope that you
Speaker 1: never get involved in bankruptcy as a creditor with that.
Speaker 1: And you know, we were told that the group in
Speaker 1: Connecticut wanted Infowar shut down. The group in Texas didn't
Speaker 1: want it. And so what was the deciding factor. I'll
Speaker 1: tell you what the deciding factor was this bankruptcy trustee
Speaker 1: who has been adamant that he wants to shut this
Speaker 1: thing down. Why, because of bankruptcy trustees make so much money.
Speaker 1: They make a percentage of everything that's liquidated and he
Speaker 1: gets his money now, He's not going to make much
Speaker 1: money or it's going to be deferred over a long
Speaker 1: period of time if they were to have a gradual
Speaker 1: payout of this judgment, which again the judgment was absurd.
Speaker 1: The judgment was assured the harm, and it was harm.
Speaker 1: There was slander and things like that, but this ridiculous
Speaker 1: amount of the amount of money was absolutely absurd. But
Speaker 1: I think that the lawyers also wanted to have this
Speaker 1: settlement and the liquidation now so they could get their money.
Speaker 1: So the lawyers and the trustees want it now. One
Speaker 1: of the groups said they want it now. The other
Speaker 1: one said no, I'd rather get more money spread out
Speaker 1: over a longer period of time. So now what they're
Speaker 1: saying is that they're going to liquidate it and sell
Speaker 1: it in November. So you know, I know how this
Speaker 1: whole system goes. But the question is now, with a
Speaker 1: lot of people, is Alex going to continue? Well, of
Speaker 1: course he would. Alex is never going to go off
Speaker 1: air never. He'll always operate, even if he operates as
Speaker 1: a as a individual. He was operating as an individual
Speaker 1: before he hired a bunch of us in twenty twelve,
Speaker 1: it was just him on the radio program, and then
Speaker 1: he decided that what he wanted to do was to
Speaker 1: you know, send reporters out on a regular basis and
Speaker 1: then to have news around the clock and that type
Speaker 1: of thing. But you know, that is a He made
Speaker 1: a lot of money with the supplements and things like that,
Speaker 1: but along with that comes a great deal of complication.
Speaker 1: So I don't know. I think he'd probably be just
Speaker 1: fine to go out and do his own podcast or something.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, he looks at Joe Rogan, and
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan's making the kind of money that Alex did,
Speaker 1: you know, twenty five thirty million dollars a year, and
Speaker 1: he's he doesn't have to have all the overhead that
Speaker 1: Alex does, So maybe he's fine with that. I think
Speaker 1: it'll be the people that work there that'll maybe have
Speaker 1: some some big issues, but not so much Alex. Maybe
Speaker 1: he'll get his fans to buy you know, there was
Speaker 1: a Musk parody site that put up yesterday got a
Speaker 1: lot of attention because a lot of people even though
Speaker 1: it says Elon Musk in parentheses parody at the top,
Speaker 1: a lot of people thought it was real. It says
Speaker 1: should I do something funny, and it retweeted that you know,
Speaker 1: shall I buy in other words, should I buy him?
Speaker 1: For word?
Speaker 3: Do it? Do it?
Speaker 1: Well, you know he's got he's already talking about how
Speaker 1: he's got, what's his fans to buy it or something
Speaker 1: like that. Well, I don't know. His dad is unbelievably wealthy.
Speaker 1: His dad was a dentist. His dad had a chain
Speaker 1: of dental places throughout Austin, Castle dentistry and everything. So
Speaker 1: he's not just a dentist, but he owns multiple dentist places.
Speaker 1: Family had a lot of money before that. The family
Speaker 1: was involved with the CIA as well, So I mean
Speaker 1: he's swimming in money. And the bottom line, the reason
Speaker 1: that this is not about free speech is because Alex
Speaker 1: never participated in that issue. They never went to try.
Speaker 1: If you remember, the trial was to determine what the
Speaker 1: damages were going to be, what the money was going
Speaker 1: to be. That's what the trial was about, and so
Speaker 1: the trial just focused on their finances and things like that,
Speaker 1: but it never focused on the issue of free speech.
Speaker 1: And the reason for that is because Alex refused to
Speaker 1: comply with discovery. And in the same way that if
Speaker 1: somebody files a lawsuit against you, and you don't reply
Speaker 1: to that lawsuit, you lose. You lose. And if the
Speaker 1: lawsuit proceeds and you don't comply with discovery, you lose. Now,
Speaker 1: Alex says that he gave them all the information and
Speaker 1: more that they wanted, and yet when his lawyer accidentally
Speaker 1: sent the phone information to the opposing council and caught
Speaker 1: Alex on the stand, and Alex's reply, who oh, this
Speaker 1: is your Perry Mason moment. It really was a Perry
Speaker 1: Mason moment. It's exactly the type of thing the way
Speaker 1: every Perry Mason episode went end. You know, you catch
Speaker 1: the guy red handed right there on the stand, and
Speaker 1: they caught him red handed right there on the stand.
Speaker 1: You know, there was a lot of information there that
Speaker 1: he claimed that he didn't have, and he didn't turn
Speaker 1: it in. They all knew they were Stonewallingham. They all
Speaker 1: knew that he wasn't complying with discovery, and then they
Speaker 1: proved it during the trial, during the Perry Mason moment.
Speaker 1: So why wouldn't he comply with it? For the same
Speaker 1: reason that he's going to continue with his broadcast. I
Speaker 1: believe that he's been stashing money all over the place,
Speaker 1: Cayman Islands, you name it. He went down to Cayman
Speaker 1: Island several times. So I think during the trial somebody
Speaker 1: sent him nine million dollars from a single donor. His
Speaker 1: audience didn't even blink about that, didn't even think about
Speaker 1: that twice. Where did that come from? Did Alex send
Speaker 1: that to himself from crypto? He made a big deal
Speaker 1: of saying, well, I lost all that crypto money that
Speaker 1: was given to me in the early days by Max Kaiser.
Speaker 1: You know, Max was an early adopter of crypto, and
Speaker 1: he gave him a lot of coins, full coins. Well,
Speaker 1: I lost all that stuff that'd be worth under million
Speaker 1: dollars or something now. So I don't know what the
Speaker 1: amount was, but a tremendous amount of money. So did
Speaker 1: he really lose it? Did he take that nine million
Speaker 1: dollars out of his crypto or did some rich benefactor,
Speaker 1: some billionaire because he's always he's got a lot of
Speaker 1: billionaire friends that he hangs around with all the time.
Speaker 1: Or was it somebody that was an intelligence agency? Did
Speaker 1: the CIA send him the nine million dollars? Because the
Speaker 1: CIA is not monolithic, and people like Steve Patchinic are
Speaker 1: part of the military intelligence. The right wing part of
Speaker 1: the intelligence agency is not the CIA. I say the CIA,
Speaker 1: but you know it's the intelligence community. People like Patinic Jack,
Speaker 1: the Soviet other people I know, they're part of the
Speaker 1: right wing intelligence agencies, pushing, still pushing war, still pushing coups,
Speaker 1: still pushing assassinations, as Pachenik was involved in the assassination
Speaker 1: of the Italian prime minister, said an Italian court that investigated,
Speaker 1: So this was not a trial over free speech. He
Speaker 1: lost a summary judgment. He lost it because he didn't
Speaker 1: want to comply with discovery. And so I think he's
Speaker 1: got more than enough resources to say that, you know,
Speaker 1: to buy info Wars himself through some you know, person
Speaker 1: that he sets up as a front and to continue
Speaker 1: on operations. And whether or not he does that, he'll
Speaker 1: can maybe if he doesn't want to continue on with
Speaker 1: info Wars, maybe he'll let it be sold off and
Speaker 1: he'll continue on as an individual. So he could have
Speaker 1: he should have defended his right to say mean things.
Speaker 1: He could have he should have defended his right to
Speaker 1: say the wrong thing. And of course everybody has the
Speaker 1: right to be wrong. If somebody contacts you and says
Speaker 1: you're wrong about this. You even have a period of
Speaker 1: time where you can make that correction and then there
Speaker 1: is no liability. But there would have been liability. But
Speaker 1: to say that it was one and a half billion
Speaker 1: dollars is just beyond absurdity. But this has really worked
Speaker 1: out for his advantage, just like it's this unjustified law
Speaker 1: fair against Trump has worked out to Trump's advantage. Both
Speaker 1: of them have fund raised off of these things tremendously,
Speaker 1: and both of them are now seen as heroes, as victims,
Speaker 1: as martyrs. And so he's not been hurt by it.
Speaker 1: He'll be fine, He'll be better than ever. And this
Speaker 1: is not about free speech. It's about money. It really
Speaker 1: is about money. It's about money on both sides. And
Speaker 1: it is also about who you can trust. It's also
Speaker 1: about being controlled opposition. And that's why I speak about
Speaker 1: this is because there's still people who trust Trump, still
Speaker 1: people who trust Alex, people who trust Musk. You cannot
Speaker 1: trust them. Congratulate them when they do or say the
Speaker 1: right thing. Fine, never trust them. Understand that they are
Speaker 1: the ones who are playing forty chess. They're the ones
Speaker 1: who have cards that they're not showing and so getting
Speaker 1: back to his essay, he says, so we can and
Speaker 1: we should hate what others do when they harm innocent
Speaker 1: people with the jabs, with the lockdown, so the January
Speaker 1: sixth and things like that. But we should recognize such
Speaker 1: tendencies also in ourselves. That does not mean that we
Speaker 1: hate the other person, just as we don't hate ourselves,
Speaker 1: but we hate what is wrong as we try to
Speaker 1: purge that out of ourselves. And so we have to
Speaker 1: engage in introspection as well and try to look at
Speaker 1: our motives. And I've thought about this, and I thought, well,
Speaker 1: should I say anything or not. I always get criticized
Speaker 1: on you. You're just a disgruntled former employment. No, I'm
Speaker 1: very very grateful to God is protected and provided for
Speaker 1: my family through you, through the audience, and we have
Speaker 1: been able to move to the area of the country,
Speaker 1: the area of the world. Actually, I've traveled extensively. I've
Speaker 1: never been anywhere that I like better than Eastern Tennessee.
Speaker 1: And it's just, you know, it's not to say that
Speaker 1: it's the best place in the world, but it's the
Speaker 1: best place in the world for me. Everybody's got to
Speaker 1: figure out where, you know, everyone gets got different different
Speaker 1: things that they're looking for. So for other people it
Speaker 1: would not be the place for them, but for me
Speaker 1: and my family it is. And so I'm grateful to
Speaker 1: God that we're here, grateful that we have been supported you,
Speaker 1: And so I'm not bitter about this. And I'm saying
Speaker 1: this because the thing that I get angry about is
Speaker 1: when people are lied to and harmed, and when it's
Speaker 1: done for money. And I'm not going to be silent
Speaker 1: about that. I can't be silent about that. Hate speech
Speaker 1: that involves stating a hatred or dislike is itself neither
Speaker 1: good nor bad. It depends on the context. It is
Speaker 1: simply stating a feeling or an emotion. I hate the
Speaker 1: way some men in the town grew up and bash
Speaker 1: their wives. I hate the child marriage an abuse are acceptable.
Speaker 1: And I hate what has done to babies being ripped
Speaker 1: apart in our society. I mean, we can think of
Speaker 1: all these different things that we can and we should hate.
Speaker 1: These are actions. But as we hate abortion, we also
Speaker 1: try to hold out an opportunity for people to change,
Speaker 1: to be forgiven. The key part of that is to
Speaker 1: admit our faults. And you know, I have not yet
Speaker 1: seen a politician who has admitted their faults for what
Speaker 1: they did in any country, in any political party. None
Speaker 1: of them have said that they were wrong for what
Speaker 1: they did in twenty twenty, not a single one. None
Speaker 1: of the people who cheered them on, like Alex have
Speaker 1: said that they were wrong about any of this stuff.
Speaker 1: None of them, none of them have repented. It's the
Speaker 1: same thing you're saying right now with Mark Robinson. You know,
Speaker 1: somebody was saying, well, he's got really a powerful testimony
Speaker 1: of how he turned around and changed, but he won't
Speaker 1: use that because he's not going to say that, yeah
Speaker 1: I did that. We all fall, but that's not me anymore.
Speaker 1: I've changed. He's not going to say that. That'd be
Speaker 1: a very important thing for him to air. You know,
Speaker 1: we don't stay sinless, but as Christians we have to
Speaker 1: stay forgiven. We have to confess our sins, and if
Speaker 1: we're public figures and our sins are public, we have
Speaker 1: to make those confessions public. And we haven't seen anybody
Speaker 1: do that. We've seen we've seen Danielle Smith as I
Speaker 1: played yesterday, she said, look at what happened. This is
Speaker 1: we're never going to let that happening. She's criticizing what happened.
Speaker 1: But she wasn't there, and so it's easy for her
Speaker 1: to criticize what her predecessor did. And the same thing
Speaker 1: with Javier Malai and Argentina. He's criticizing the lockdown. It's
Speaker 1: easy for him to do because he wasn't in power
Speaker 1: when that happened. So I guess we're going to have
Speaker 1: to wait until Trump is out of power and forgotten
Speaker 1: before we can get anything done to stop this from
Speaker 1: happening again. Because right now it's so important that we
Speaker 1: must not criticize Trump no matter what happens. Do not
Speaker 1: criticize him, don't criticize what he did. And look, this
Speaker 1: is the thing, you know, I don't really care about
Speaker 1: Trump's personality. His Trump. His personality doesn't set me on
Speaker 1: fire like it does the liberals. I really don't care.
Speaker 1: What bothers me is his character that was already on display.
Speaker 1: You know, his rapacious greed, money was about everything. That's
Speaker 1: what is whole the Apprentice. You know the beginning of it, money, money, money, money.
Speaker 1: You know that time is all about money. The love
Speaker 1: of money is the root of all evil. And guess
Speaker 1: what so is the addiction to sex that was so
Speaker 1: evident within his life. All of those speak to a
Speaker 1: character issue, and that was my issue with Trump. But
Speaker 1: we already knew what the character of Hillary Clinton was.
Speaker 1: And like Juliana Sounge, who leaked that information about Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: he says, we know the Hillary Clinton is a criminal
Speaker 1: and a warmonger. We don't know what Trump is. I
Speaker 1: guess we'll find out. Well, Trump was the guy who
Speaker 1: locked him up. This is his administration. When he put
Speaker 1: in Cia Bill Barr. Bill Barr immediately tried to kill
Speaker 1: Julian Signs, even had a scenario where they would assassinate
Speaker 1: him and that type of thing. So it's important for
Speaker 1: us to oppose these issues. And as I said, I
Speaker 1: despised the Trump presidency. I despise what he did. I
Speaker 1: think he should stand trial at a Nurrenberg trial. You know,
Speaker 1: he just had this last week. Alix shot a lot
Speaker 1: of attention because he confronted Francis Collins. Said that Francis
Speaker 1: Collins killed twenty million people. Well, Francis Collins killed twenty
Speaker 1: million people, Alex, your boy Trump was the one he
Speaker 1: was working for. Why didn't your boy Trump do something
Speaker 1: about it? And of course Trump is responsible when it
Speaker 1: happens under his administration, and so he Francis Collins doesn't
Speaker 1: say anything. He walks off, and and Alex says, Nurnberg
Speaker 1: two point oh is coming up? Nurnberg two point zero. Like, okay, well,
Speaker 1: if that comes up, then your guy Trump and Biden
Speaker 1: and Fauci and Burke's and Redfield and Francis Collins and
Speaker 1: all of them, all of them ought to be in
Speaker 1: the dock in a nun Berk two point zero, and
Speaker 1: maybe you should be there as they're Gerbels. But yeah,
Speaker 1: we're going to give it pass. This is why we
Speaker 1: can't because we can't say anything negative about Trump or
Speaker 1: negative about anything that he did. We got to pretend
Speaker 1: that everything that he did is fine. I'm not playing
Speaker 1: that game. The ability to speak freely, going back to Brownstone,
Speaker 1: the ability to speak freely enables us to call out
Speaker 1: others flaws and to acknowledge those pointed out in ourselves.
Speaker 1: A king who has a court of yes men is
Speaker 1: engraved danger of harming his people on himself. And that's
Speaker 1: the problem with Trump, and that's the problem with the
Speaker 1: maga media. It is a court of yes men. These
Speaker 1: people have made them the sells, the court gestures of Trump.
Speaker 1: They're clowns. They're clowns. And not just Alex people like
Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, on and on and on.
Speaker 1: It just they're all court gesters. They understand that in
Speaker 1: this day and age, what you do is you sell
Speaker 1: h You sell information that fits the bias of your audience.
Speaker 1: You go out, you read the room, you figure out
Speaker 1: what the audience wants to hear, and you tell them
Speaker 1: what they want to hear, and they'll love you for it.
Speaker 1: And so one of the things that you're seeing happening
Speaker 1: over and over again, both sides are playing this game.
Speaker 1: Oh look, Trump made threats against people. He said something
Speaker 1: mean and nasty against people. Say, this is the legacy
Speaker 1: of this Sandy Hook thing, but it's also the trajectory
Speaker 1: of where had been going. It wasn't you know. Sandy
Speaker 1: Hook is just one of the things along the way.
Speaker 1: This agenda existed before Sandy Hook, independent of Sandy Hook.
Speaker 1: Sandy Hook helped to reinforce it, though, And this idea
Speaker 1: that you can't say anything that would hurt somebody's feelings
Speaker 1: or you're responsible for the violence, right if you hurt
Speaker 1: their feelings it's the same as if you kill the kids, right,
Speaker 1: and Alex has said I didn't kill the kids. Everybody's
Speaker 1: as acting like I killed the kids. He didn't kill
Speaker 1: the kids. But that's what they're doing, and they're playing
Speaker 1: that game. The left plays that game with Trump and
Speaker 1: Trump and the maga media court gestures play that game
Speaker 1: with the other side. Here's an example. Okay, this is
Speaker 1: from info Wars site itself. They focused on this, and
Speaker 1: of course a lot of different Trump maga media did.
Speaker 1: They said, look at this. Biden went on with the
Speaker 1: view and as they're comparing him to a bug, Biden, yeah,
Speaker 1: I would smash him like that, he's trying to kill Trump.
Speaker 2: Then he just wouldn't go, who's like a bug?
Speaker 1: He just kept being there, Who's like a like a bug?
Speaker 3: Right there?
Speaker 4: Zoo?
Speaker 1: So you felt, yeah, okay, it's like a bug. And
Speaker 1: so he smacks the thing and they are peeing in
Speaker 1: their pants at info Wars. And by the way, it's
Speaker 1: the same writer who when I somebody sent that sugar
Speaker 1: water clip to me when I played that and I
Speaker 1: posted it, that same writer who did an article about
Speaker 1: how horrible this is. Look at this. Biden wants to
Speaker 1: kill Trump. That same writer when I put up that
Speaker 1: sugar water stuff, mocks me as a whining, crying baby
Speaker 1: because it bothers me that Alex told people sugar water,
Speaker 1: that he told them to go ahead and take the
Speaker 1: adjuments that have been causing autism for decades, and they
Speaker 1: told them about that. Go ahead and take the sugar
Speaker 1: water vaccine. It's harmless. You can do it for Trump.
Speaker 1: How pathetic These people have become sold out, prostituted themselves
Speaker 1: or their job for their political goals or whatever. It's
Speaker 1: mostly for their job. And then when you look at
Speaker 1: what Trump does on the other side, they were very brave,
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court very brave, and they take a lot
Speaker 1: of hits because of it.
Speaker 4: It should be illegal what happens.
Speaker 1: You know, you have these guys like playing the ref
Speaker 1: like the great Bobby Knight.
Speaker 4: These people should be put in jail.
Speaker 2: The way they talk about our judges and our justice history.
Speaker 1: Yeah, anybody that criticizes Trump, jail them, Okay, lock them
Speaker 1: up or whatever. And we've heard I've played the clips.
Speaker 1: I won't play them again for you. Lala Harris. I
Speaker 1: don't like what must did. He violated his violate his privilege.
Speaker 1: He should have his privilege taken away. And Jake Tapper's like,
Speaker 1: but he shouldn't have a privilege to speak. Free speech
Speaker 1: is not a privilege, it's right. And then Trump said
Speaker 1: the same thing about ABC. He didn't like the way
Speaker 1: he was treated and he wasn't treated fairly. I agree,
Speaker 1: But his response to that was to say that they've
Speaker 1: got a license and their license should be taken away. No,
Speaker 1: we should never license free speech. We should never jail
Speaker 1: people because we don't like what they say. And yet
Speaker 1: the MAGA media is out there saying, oh, look at this,
Speaker 1: they made this guy. Look, we have always had metaphors
Speaker 1: like that. We should go back and take a look
Speaker 1: at what people were saying about each other when Jefferson
Speaker 1: was running against John Adams. Or look at what they
Speaker 1: said about Abraham Lincoln. I mean, there's a great deal
Speaker 1: to criticize about Abraham Lincoln, but they went way over
Speaker 1: to the calt is his father a nutmeg addict or
Speaker 1: something like that, the spices.
Speaker 5: It was hatchet faced son of a nutmeg dealer.
Speaker 1: That's even better. Yeah, thank you, I know it's correctly.
Speaker 1: He remembers that better than I do. Hatchet faced son
Speaker 1: of a nutmeg dealer. He's a dealer. He's a drug dealer.
Speaker 1: Those drug dealers selling nutmeg, they ought to be executed,
Speaker 1: that's Trump. Yeah, absolutely, yeah. Our drugs because we had prohibition,
Speaker 1: our drugs have gotten a lot stronger than nutmeg, now,
Speaker 1: haven't they. No, there is not going to be any
Speaker 1: criticism that allowed of whoever they like. So the left
Speaker 1: is going to complain when when Trump criticizes one of
Speaker 1: the that's out of bounds. This guy needs he's dangerous,
Speaker 1: he needs to be locked up, because we've got a
Speaker 1: lock up free speech and the right, the MAGA people
Speaker 1: Info Wars does the same thing. How dare them say
Speaker 1: they're all about free speech and the wake of the
Speaker 1: Sandy Hook thing and then say that Biden is guilty
Speaker 1: of trying to get Trump killed? What hypocrisy on their website?
Speaker 1: What hipocrisy? Defend the lies about January the sixth and
Speaker 1: the vaccines. There's no excuse for that, So there's no
Speaker 1: criticism of no debate. You just got to followup a leader.
Speaker 1: I was never really very good at playing that game.
Speaker 1: I wasn't very good at playing the game. As Simon says,
Speaker 1: either that vouch you tried to run on us to
Speaker 1: finish up the Brownstone article. He said, it is the
Speaker 1: comfort of serving those who have adopted a right to
Speaker 1: control them, clucking at the misfits pulled out for slaughter.
Speaker 1: This is simply feudalism and oppression, and it's being sold
Speaker 1: by the MAGA people just as much as it's being
Speaker 1: sold by the others. And so when you look at
Speaker 1: Thomas Massey yesterday I talked about January sixth, Thomas Massey
Speaker 1: in a hearing says, I personally think that this is
Speaker 1: a sleeper story. The day so many lawmakers and pundits
Speaker 1: were decried as crazy for suggest that there could be
Speaker 1: quote confidential human sources involved in January sixth, and it
Speaker 1: looks like there might have been. I said from two
Speaker 1: days after the election, when info Wars and Steve Pachennik
Speaker 1: started selling the stop the Sting thing, I stopped the steal,
Speaker 1: said that, oh yeah, Trump's already got twenty thousand soldiers
Speaker 1: National Guard out there, They're arresting people. The whole thing
Speaker 1: was a sting. We marked the ballots, we got blockchain
Speaker 1: watermark ballots, and we got quantum computing, and we know
Speaker 1: exactly who rigged this election and they're resting them right now.
Speaker 1: Well that didn't age too well. I knew it wouldn't,
Speaker 1: but Alex kept having him on and he kept spinning
Speaker 1: these lines in different directions, and so I opposed it
Speaker 1: and was fired. I was fired for that. Of course,
Speaker 1: Alex said he was fired. He fired me because he
Speaker 1: needed more money, of course, and Daily Beast picked that
Speaker 1: up and said, look at Info Wars is going out
Speaker 1: of business. They had to fire one of their guys
Speaker 1: and all the reisa's stuff. Well, the only people that
Speaker 1: were fired were Travis and I a week before Christmas.
Speaker 1: But yeah, that's fine. I mean, God, God immediately blessed us.
Speaker 1: We had people started sending donations and support and so
Speaker 1: you know, we started a program the following Monday. It
Speaker 1: was a really rough thing. We had no cameras, we
Speaker 1: had an iPhone that Whistler held up, and I had
Speaker 1: lost a tooth over the weekend. We talked about it's like,
Speaker 1: I don't know, we got to start this show and
Speaker 1: I'm missing a tooth up front, and so it was
Speaker 1: it was it's crazy bad, but we're really blessed by
Speaker 1: you and by God, and so we did that. But
Speaker 1: I told people all the way up to January sixth,
Speaker 1: I said, don't go, because there's going to be I
Speaker 1: didn't call it confidential human sources, as Thomas Massey did.
Speaker 1: I said they're going to be agent provocateurs. And I
Speaker 1: said it all the way through and right up to
Speaker 1: the morning of January the sixth, don't go. There's going
Speaker 1: to be agent provocateurs. They're going to entrap you, they're
Speaker 1: going to weaponize us. They're going to claim that you
Speaker 1: did things that you didn't do, and then they're going
Speaker 1: to use it to demonize the entire movement and the
Speaker 1: Constitution and all the rest of this stuff. But people
Speaker 1: went anyway. I told him. I said, the time to
Speaker 1: show up in mass and protest was when Trump locked
Speaker 1: us down. But Alex was telling you he was on
Speaker 1: your side. He said, don't follow him into this. I said,
Speaker 1: this is a trap. Well I was four and a
Speaker 1: half years ago. Now Thomas Massey is saying the same thing.
Speaker 1: And it wasn't just that I was decried for it.
Speaker 1: I was fired for it. I'm fine, I'm fine. It's
Speaker 1: a badge of honor to be fired for that. Alex
Speaker 1: said it was because he needed the money and people
Speaker 1: didn't buy that. So then when they started saying that, no, no,
Speaker 1: we're financially we're saying on all this, then he started
Speaker 1: coming up with all different kinds of excuses, and I said,
Speaker 1: when I got on air, I said, he's got more
Speaker 1: excuses and explanations for what he did than Hillary does
Speaker 1: for Benghazi. And he changes him about as frequently as
Speaker 1: she did. So you know, when we look at this,
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna you know, Mitt Romney is saying, and
Speaker 1: just like a lot of leftists, if Trump is elected,
Speaker 1: I'm leaving the country. Michael Cohen has said that Mitt
Speaker 1: Romney said that a lot of people. Look, I'm I'm
Speaker 1: opposed to Trump. I'm not leaving the country good or bad.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna stick this thing out. I'm not going to
Speaker 1: be intimidated by him or by anybody else. And so
Speaker 1: this is actually from PJ Media and they were actually
Speaker 1: sympathetic to Alex. But this is what they put up
Speaker 1: at the saw this and what in the world They've
Speaker 1: got Alex doing his shticks. You know, he loves to
Speaker 1: do performances, and so they got him there as dressed
Speaker 1: up as a frog and they say prediction Info Wars
Speaker 1: go down in history as the next Drudge Report. I
Speaker 1: don't think so. I don't think he's going to go away.
Speaker 1: And as a matter of fact, I don't even think
Speaker 1: that Matt Drudge went away. But that's the basis of
Speaker 1: his article. He thinks that Matt Drudge solved the site
Speaker 1: and somebody switched it, and he thinks that same thing
Speaker 1: is going to happen with info Wars. He said, will
Speaker 1: somebody buy Info Wars, hire Alex Jones as his on
Speaker 1: air talent, and then try to rebuild a platform as possible.
Speaker 1: Jones has some deep pocketed fans, like his dad, like
Speaker 1: his bankers in the Cayman Islands, I mean, like the CIA. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he could have any of those people could buy it
Speaker 1: and keep him and keep him going, And so he said.
Speaker 1: I suspect, however, that a number of Alex Jones critics
Speaker 1: greatly dwarfs the number of fans. The ultimate fate of
Speaker 1: Info Wars will early be similar to the fate of
Speaker 1: the Drudge Report, he said. He says, at one point,
Speaker 1: Drudge was the biggest alternative platform in the world. He
Speaker 1: scooped the mainstream media on the most important monumental story
Speaker 1: of the entire nineties the Clinton Lewinsky sex scandal, and
Speaker 1: for decades it followed. All Drudge had to do was
Speaker 1: to post a link to an article and traffic would
Speaker 1: shoot through the stratosphere. That's right. He was the preeminent
Speaker 1: king maker in independent journalism wherever Rushlanbaugh turned. Whenever Rushlanbaugh
Speaker 1: turned on his Ditto cam, you almost always saw his
Speaker 1: monitor tuned to Drudge. Today, of course, the Drudg Report
Speaker 1: is like southern California, a place we used to visit
Speaker 1: and enjoy that has gotten so bad that nobody goes
Speaker 1: there anymore. The Drudg Report has become a zombie aggregator,
Speaker 1: an undead, lumbering presence in the digital media, coasting on
Speaker 1: its past laurels, hemorrhaging reader's influence and credibility. So question,
Speaker 1: why would an investor purchase a brand like the Drudge Report,
Speaker 1: a site with an established, successful business model, and then
Speaker 1: toss that model out the window? He says, well, my
Speaker 1: answer is because they weren't primarily motivated by profits. Instead,
Speaker 1: they bought the site the silence into control of the
Speaker 1: around position. I completely disagree with his assessment of the
Speaker 1: Dredge Report and what he thinks will happen with Alex Jones.
Speaker 1: Dredge report became big reporting on the Clinton Lewinsky scandal.
Speaker 1: Where did Drudge get that information? Does this guy know?
Speaker 1: He got the information from George Conway, who was a
Speaker 1: lawyer involved in it, from Monica Lewinsky, George Conway, Kelly,
Speaker 1: and Conway's husband George Conway, who lows Trump with a passion.
Speaker 1: In case you've not noticed, I mean you talked about
Speaker 1: somebody with Trump arrangement syndrome, who was Matt Drudge seen
Speaker 1: with most often? And Coulter who, after she called him
Speaker 1: God Emperor blasphemously, then flipped another one hundred and eighty
Speaker 1: degrees since when he didn't do anything about the border
Speaker 1: and started attacking him because again he didn't follow through.
Speaker 1: He didn't do anything about the border. In spite of
Speaker 1: what Maga thinks, he did nothing about the border. So
Speaker 1: Matt Drudge's friends, as a matter of fact, you know
Speaker 1: he's very close with George Conway, going back to California
Speaker 1: when he was friends with Briibart what was his first
Speaker 1: name now can't you remember, but you know the guy
Speaker 1: that bright Bart's named after who died suddenly mysteriously Andrew,
Speaker 1: thank you Andrew Bribart who died under I think suspicious circumstances.
Speaker 1: So Matt was friends with Andrew Bribart, he was friends
Speaker 1: with Ant Colder, he was close friends and with George Conway,
Speaker 1: who made his career. I don't think that Matt Drudge
Speaker 1: sold the website. I think he's still doing it, and
Speaker 1: I think it's not.
Speaker 5: Just because he just sold something else.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't think it's just because his friends don't
Speaker 1: like Trump. Drudge came to info wars in it was
Speaker 1: it twenty fifteen, fall of twenty fifteen.
Speaker 3: And yeah, that sounds about right.
Speaker 1: He came to info Wars. I was able to meet
Speaker 1: him and talk to him for a while, and he
Speaker 1: went on air and said, I've been told by a
Speaker 1: Supreme Court justice that the hammer is really going to
Speaker 1: drop on free speech and it's going to get really,
Speaker 1: really bad. That was in twenty fifteen. Within less than
Speaker 1: about three or four months, antline Scalia was found with
Speaker 1: a pillow over his head under strange circumstances. And I
Speaker 1: went out there that that motel, actually stayed at that
Speaker 1: motel to look at it. What a I mean, that
Speaker 1: place is just It is the most I've never been
Speaker 1: in a place that had that kind of satanic vibe
Speaker 1: to it. And of course there was nobody at all
Speaker 1: there when I was staying there. I mean, there was
Speaker 1: a crew of US form MENFO Wars that went out
Speaker 1: to take pictures and stuff, and it was unbelievably strange
Speaker 1: out in the middle of nowhere in West Texas and
Speaker 1: all this cultic artwork and everything all over the place.
Speaker 1: I mean, it was like some kind of Agatha Christie
Speaker 1: novel where everybody goes to some weird haunted mansion they
Speaker 1: start disappearing one at a time. I mean, it was
Speaker 1: creepy beyond belief, and the fact that Scalia would go
Speaker 1: there or vacation was really strange. I mean, there's nothing
Speaker 1: else anywhere around there except the Mexican border where they
Speaker 1: can bring in prostitutes and stuff like that. I don't
Speaker 1: know what was going on with all of that stuff,
Speaker 1: but Matt Drudge was told everybody believes it was Scalia,
Speaker 1: strongly hinted. He wouldn't say it strongly hinted it with Scleia,
Speaker 1: Scalia turns up dead, right, Bart is dead, and he
Speaker 1: knows that this crackdown a free speech is coming. Is
Speaker 1: he going to ally with Is he going to ally
Speaker 1: with Trump? For a little bit, he did, but then
Speaker 1: he could kind of see the handlight writing on the
Speaker 1: wall there. He's either going to lose his website by
Speaker 1: having it taken down and being the brunt of that attack,
Speaker 1: or he's going to switch sides and start cheering for
Speaker 1: the other side. And I think that's exactly what he did.
Speaker 1: I don't. I think it's about money. And I you know,
Speaker 1: when I talked to him, I've said this before. I
Speaker 1: thanked him for showing the picture of baby Samuel. They
Speaker 1: got him kicked out of Fox News when he had
Speaker 1: his program there. He said, Oh, I just wanted to
Speaker 1: get out of my contract, and so you know, but
Speaker 1: God can use that of whatever his motives were. Bait
Speaker 1: doesn't really he didn't really care about a pro life issue.
Speaker 1: He doesn't care about these others. So yeah, I don't
Speaker 1: think And as far as Alex goes, I think that
Speaker 1: he is most likely gonna somehow find some donor who
Speaker 1: just sends them mysteriously nine million dollars buys a thing
Speaker 1: or something eventually, and for Wars to share the same
Speaker 1: fate as Drudge report says PJA Media, a conservative site
Speaker 1: that anti conservatives co opted. No, I don't think so.
Speaker 1: I think it was co opted a long long time
Speaker 1: ago by the right wing of the intelligence community. And
Speaker 1: I'll just finish up with this one thing would be
Speaker 1: a Trump assassin has ties to the CIA, says a
Speaker 1: former official. I said this the first day when I
Speaker 1: came back. It happened over the weekend. It happened on
Speaker 1: a well, no, that's the other shooting in Pennsylvania. But
Speaker 1: also said that about that, but about this, this, this
Speaker 1: gollf thing. I said that right away. I said, look
Speaker 1: at this guy has been all over the world and
Speaker 1: he's been interviewed by the New York Times, all this
Speaker 1: pushing the Ukraine war and everything. I said, how does
Speaker 1: a roofer get to do that? A roofer from North Carolina.
Speaker 1: How's a roofer from North Carolina get a actually pretty
Speaker 1: nice house in Hawaii? And he doesn't stay in Hawaiian said,
Speaker 1: he's going to Ukraine and doing all these and holding
Speaker 1: court with a press and everything. So it's got CIA
Speaker 1: written all over it. And Ryan Wesley Ralph, fifty eight
Speaker 1: year old Democrat, arrested last week after reportedly trying to
Speaker 1: assassinate Trump. The golf course has ties to the CIA,
Speaker 1: according to a former US State Department official. Last week,
Speaker 1: former State Department official and Foundation for Freedom Online executive
Speaker 1: director Mike Bens shed some light on Ruth's mystique, saying
Speaker 1: he has links to the CIA. He said, you can
Speaker 1: almost spend the globe and find a place where there
Speaker 1: was paramilitary activity, and somehow Ryan Ruth was just waltzed
Speaker 1: his way through almost a dozen of them. And so
Speaker 1: you know, when you look at the money, you look
Speaker 1: at the fact that he goes to Ukraine and he's
Speaker 1: trying to say, hey, I know all of these people
Speaker 1: from Afghanistan and everything coming in here. He's like, wait
Speaker 1: a minute, Afghanistan, Ukraine, this North Carolina roofer. He said,
Speaker 1: he's got CIA written all over him.
Speaker 5: We lived in North Carolina and I knew guys of
Speaker 5: were in construction. None of them ever seemed to express
Speaker 5: any interest in the Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Yeah, or Afghanistan. They didn't know Afghanistan terrorists, right, They
Speaker 1: didn't know people on Afghan fighters and ISIS. Yeah. So
Speaker 1: you know, if you're going to use CIA operatives and
Speaker 1: criminals like Steve Achinik, who the Italian government said in
Speaker 1: Operation Gladio was sent by Kissinger and executed, told the
Speaker 1: terrorists to execute Aldo Moor. And of course a terrorist
Speaker 1: actually worked for NATO. Right, so called communist terrorists actually
Speaker 1: worked for NATO, so whole thing was NATO Operation Kissinger,
Speaker 1: Steve pachink NATO. They kidnapped and killed the Italian prime
Speaker 1: minister is part of their reign of terror anyway. Ever
Speaker 1: since Crimea joined the Russian Federation twenty fourteen, Bins explained,
Speaker 1: the CIA began working to arm the Kiev government to
Speaker 1: take western Ukraine back from Russia. Part of this capacity
Speaker 1: building emission involved importing fighters, including ISIS and al Qaeda
Speaker 1: soldiers to bolster Ukraine's forces. Well, again, the you know
Speaker 1: go back and talk about how the CIA engineered the
Speaker 1: coup that caused Crimea to say we want to go
Speaker 1: to Russia. But he says he has an entire website
Speaker 1: dedicated this supposed roofer Right has an entire website dedicated
Speaker 1: to military recruiting of afghanany, Pakistani and Iranian militants to
Speaker 1: come to Ukraine. He explicitly tells him multiple times on
Speaker 1: his website and big all caps bold lettering as well
Speaker 1: as in hundreds of Facebook posts, quote, do not tell
Speaker 1: your local embassy that you're coming to Ukraine. Don't say anything.
Speaker 1: Just send me your passport information and take a plan
Speaker 1: into Ukraine. Or take a plane to Poland and ride
Speaker 1: a bus into Ukraine. He says what Ryan Ruth was
Speaker 1: doing was that he was collecting thousands, literally thousands of
Speaker 1: passports of terrorists in foreign countries and CIA war zones
Speaker 1: and telling them not to tell their local embassy that
Speaker 1: they're traveling. They said to go directly through him as
Speaker 1: a middleman, because he can secure them visas. I mean
Speaker 1: that part of all of this. How suspicious is that?
Speaker 1: And of course he could just be doing that as
Speaker 1: you know, a frontman for the CIA. Maybe they just
Speaker 1: wanted to find get the passports for these terrorists, right
Speaker 1: you know, maybe he really wasn't about sending them to Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Who knows what the motivations of the CIA are at
Speaker 1: any given point, but you could look at this and
Speaker 1: you could tell right away is there? Can you tell
Speaker 1: right away? When you get CIA known operatives spreading unbelievable
Speaker 1: lies that create a January the sixth movement and you
Speaker 1: get millions of dollars sent to you anonymously, and you've
Speaker 1: got family in the CIA. Can you tell a controlled
Speaker 1: opposition CIA guy like Alex Jones? Am I being too harsh? Now?
Speaker 1: Another odd fact about Ruth is said, although he had
Speaker 1: a criminal record boasting at least seventy four arrests and
Speaker 1: one hundred charges, he didn't spend a day in jail
Speaker 1: prior to his alleged attempted assassination of Trump. Yeah, neither
Speaker 1: did Alex for January the sixth, I wonder if Ryan
Speaker 1: ruth has got some CIA family members like Alex. Well,
Speaker 1: we're going to take a quick break and we're going
Speaker 1: to be right back with Tony Harderman. Stay with us.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back and I'll get to your comments
Speaker 1: after we have. Tony and I've got a lot of
Speaker 1: people who have commented about this, and we'll get back
Speaker 1: to those comments when we come back. Stay with us.
Speaker 3: We'll be right back analyzing.
Speaker 2: The globalist next move and now the Deevid nutshell.
Speaker 1: All right, welcome back and joining us now as Tony
Speaker 1: Ardeman of Wise Wolf Gold. Tony has set up David
Speaker 1: Knight not Gold, and that'll take you to his site.
Speaker 1: You can get gold and silver. You know, it's starting
Speaker 1: to really ramp up. We're just talking during the break.
Speaker 1: It is really starting to ramp up. But you can
Speaker 1: get gold, silver larger, small amounts, and of course, if
Speaker 1: you want to gradually accumulate things on a regular basis,
Speaker 1: on a monthly basis, set up your budget. You can
Speaker 1: pick a level that you want to contribute each month.
Speaker 1: And if you're part of the wolf Pack, the buying club,
Speaker 1: you get the advantage of a group buy as if
Speaker 1: you're buying a larger quantity that type of thing. So
Speaker 1: take a look at that at wise Wolf Gold and
Speaker 1: thank you for joining us, Tony. Always great to have
Speaker 1: you on one of the things that you always talked about.
Speaker 1: You said, what's going to be difficult is going to
Speaker 1: be as this mania kicks off, It's going to be
Speaker 1: difficult to find product. And we're seeing that from Goldman Sachs.
Speaker 1: Their commodity desk is saying that the buying has been
Speaker 1: relentless and silver is starting to move.
Speaker 4: To you seeing that absolutely, and I appreciate you bringing
Speaker 4: that up because I've been talking about that for a
Speaker 4: long time. It's not something that made the headlines and
Speaker 4: the financial networks about the lack of actual physical supply
Speaker 4: of precious metals because of the ETFs. And as a
Speaker 4: matter of fact, I was reading an article from Reuters.
Speaker 4: Major banks are predicting this, this is the beginning of
Speaker 4: the bull run for gold, and it's not the end.
Speaker 4: It's not the bubble like they're looking for higher prices
Speaker 4: into three thousand and so on and for gold, and
Speaker 4: they were saying that one of the things that they're
Speaker 4: counting is not just central bank buying that we've talked about,
Speaker 4: but the inflows now of ETFs. Yes, so what they're doing,
Speaker 4: they're putting clients into ETFs, but again that's not physical gold.
Speaker 4: That's an IOU. If you cash out in an exchange
Speaker 4: traded fund, they don't send you precious metals, they send
Speaker 4: you fiat currency. So it is driving the price, I mean,
Speaker 4: because there is a massive amount of inflows now after
Speaker 4: that rate cut. But what I found, especially being a
Speaker 4: dealer in two different states, is a supply is not
Speaker 4: what it was when I started this business, not anywhere near.
Speaker 4: It is the selection, the timing now we do have.
Speaker 4: I think the selection is decent right now. It has
Speaker 4: somewhat stabilized. But if anybody of any substance came along
Speaker 4: and started buying up physical silver. For example, like the
Speaker 4: lady that was a billionaire here in East Texas a
Speaker 4: couple of years ago that placed a major trade for
Speaker 4: ninety percent silver, and it took I think like ten
Speaker 4: dealers across the country just to fill the order, and
Speaker 4: it took six weeks for delivery, so it wasn't instantaneous
Speaker 4: and they had to source it from several other brokers.
Speaker 4: So again I'm seeing the same thing here on the ground,
Speaker 4: just in supply. And of course silver's up forty percent
Speaker 4: in terms of dollars this year. Wow. So there's a
Speaker 4: lot going on in the metals markets day.
Speaker 3: Wow.
Speaker 1: And gold as well, you know, really going up about
Speaker 1: that amount I think from last September. I think last
Speaker 1: September was around like nineteen hundred or something like that.
Speaker 1: But you know, you're talking about the ETFs and paper gold,
Speaker 1: and that was a thing that was the eye opener
Speaker 1: for me. They had pretty much tracked, you know, along
Speaker 1: with each other. As gold would go up or down,
Speaker 1: so would the paper gold until twenty twenty two. And
Speaker 1: I talked about this yesterday, and at twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: what happened is gold starts going up and the ETF
Speaker 1: start going down. I did not track, and so that's
Speaker 1: what they're looking at. It said, look at this. It
Speaker 1: kind of D couples. And when I saw that D coupling,
Speaker 1: I was like, why is that? And then I realized
Speaker 1: what the ets were. You know, it's just an iou
Speaker 1: as you point out for what is supposedly gold that
Speaker 1: is supposedly being held on the Shanghai Gold Exchange, and
Speaker 1: it's like, oh wait, this is looking too much like
Speaker 1: the securitized mortgages of the mid two thousands. I want
Speaker 1: to get out of the paper gold and paper silver stuff.
Speaker 1: But now you know, they could wind up being a buyer.
Speaker 1: Who knows, but they've used that to manipulate the price.
Speaker 1: And what he was saying was a couple of different articles.
Speaker 1: They were saying the central banks have been the ones
Speaker 1: that have been boosting us up. As you and I
Speaker 1: talk about every week central bank buying. All the central
Speaker 1: banks are buying gold except for the United States, and
Speaker 1: they're not buying any more gold because again an opposition
Speaker 1: to the dollars you've pointed out many times, but that
Speaker 1: has been driving it along with a little bit more
Speaker 1: retail trade in Indian places like that. But this one
Speaker 1: guy said, hey, look, I'm not I'm not getting anybody.
Speaker 1: I'm not getting any taxi drivers or uber drivers telling me, hey,
Speaker 1: you need to buy gold or silver. Right, So it
Speaker 1: hasn't hit the retail area yet, right, And even though
Speaker 1: you've got stock tips all the time and you should
Speaker 1: get this stock and should get that, nobody's talking about
Speaker 1: gold or silvery. Said, when that happens, it's going to explode.
Speaker 1: And he thought that it would happen when it got
Speaker 1: to like three thousand dollars. And we're getting there pretty quickly,
Speaker 1: aren't we.
Speaker 4: Well, yeah, And it's interesting because in my business, I've
Speaker 4: been tracking this just on a personal level. Like when
Speaker 4: I started out in San Antonio, I noticed when the
Speaker 4: price goes up, I get more customers. And when I
Speaker 4: moved the shop to Branson into the twenty twenties, I
Speaker 4: saw the same thing. It's just been strange. You really
Speaker 4: can't even track these buying patterns now. I don't. I
Speaker 4: can't count on the same kind of volume that I
Speaker 4: used to for this for the reasons I used to
Speaker 4: get the volume. And you're absolutely right, when when the
Speaker 4: when regular people, when you're taxi drivers, are just anybody running.
Speaker 4: Have you you talkt about buying some gold. I was
Speaker 4: thinking about buying some silver. It's too late. If you're
Speaker 4: already plugged in or remember a wolf pack and you've
Speaker 4: been following us for a while, you're like part of
Speaker 4: the one percent. There's not a lot. There's not a
Speaker 4: lot of people. I mean, I have great customers, and
Speaker 4: I'm thankful for the people that do come in. But
Speaker 4: it's not you know, your standard retail location with a
Speaker 4: line out the door. It's not how any of this
Speaker 4: really works. When that does happen, there won't be supply.
Speaker 4: I mean it'll it'll the price will it'll be price
Speaker 4: shock like we've never seen before. And we're on the
Speaker 4: edge of that. I really believe we're on the edge
Speaker 4: of a price shock when it comes to gold, because
Speaker 4: the world's de dollarizing, and like you and I were
Speaker 4: saying off air, we're is surprised it's happening as fast
Speaker 4: as it is. I mean, I'm usually, you know, very
Speaker 4: cautious to make predictions like oh, you know it's going
Speaker 4: to be in six months, we're going to have such
Speaker 4: and such price, or in two months or whatever is
Speaker 4: going to happen, and you know there's going to be
Speaker 4: a you know, a supply drain. But I really don't
Speaker 4: know anymore. Just the headlines continue to build up, especially
Speaker 4: with bricks and these cross border payments and these countries
Speaker 4: dumping the dollar holdings. You know, the reserve asset of
Speaker 4: the US dollar in central banks is the lowest it's
Speaker 4: ever been. It's continuing to tense nineteen forty four, it's
Speaker 4: it's declining, and we're just seeing the rapid de dollarization,
Speaker 4: which is going to have huge impact on the strength
Speaker 4: and purchasing power of the dollar in our own economy
Speaker 4: here at home. And so all this stuff's going to
Speaker 4: add up when people start running toward the door to
Speaker 4: get to get some precious metals or to hedge against inflation.
Speaker 4: I don't know that the supply is going to be there.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I don't know who said that it was right.
Speaker 1: I think it was a great depression. It was some
Speaker 1: guy who said, you know, when he was getting stock
Speaker 1: tips from the shoeshine boy, from his barber and from
Speaker 1: the guy driving the taxi and everything, he goes directly
Speaker 1: and sells and gets out of the market. You know,
Speaker 1: maybe you remember who that was. I couldn't remember who
Speaker 1: that was yesterday and I forgot to look it up.
Speaker 1: But yeah, that is that is the key thing. It's
Speaker 1: going to hit some point point which everybody's going to
Speaker 1: go woo, and you're going to see all the mainstream
Speaker 1: articles then talking about de dollarization, talking about the deficit
Speaker 1: and the debt and all the rest of this stuff,
Speaker 1: and it's going to be everybody's going to be running
Speaker 1: to the wolf pack to try to get their gold
Speaker 1: and silver or the Goldman Sachs or whatever. They're not
Speaker 1: going to have it. So that's that's the key thing.
Speaker 1: You know, now is still still time for people to
Speaker 1: be able to get in and look, all the fundamentals
Speaker 1: are still there. It's just a question of when it's
Speaker 1: going to happen. Like Gerald Slinty says all the time,
Speaker 1: he says, well, I don't make predictions. I look at trends,
Speaker 1: and so it's a given that this is going to happen.
Speaker 1: When it's going to exactly happen, I don't know a
Speaker 1: lot of people are saying twenty seven hundred by you know,
Speaker 1: the beginning of the year or whatever. I don't know.
Speaker 1: It could happen sooner, you know, and so who knows.
Speaker 1: You got these psychological barriers every time that it goes over,
Speaker 1: you know, another goes from twenty six to twenty seven
Speaker 1: or whatever, that's our twenty five to twenty six. That
Speaker 1: is a bit of a psychological be People have to
Speaker 1: get used to that before people will buy more, you know.
Speaker 1: So there's that aspect of it. But if something if
Speaker 1: there's some kind of shock that goes to the system,
Speaker 1: it'll happen incredibly fast. And then I think once it
Speaker 1: gets to a certain point, and I really do think that,
Speaker 1: you know, if you start to turn over, it's like
Speaker 1: turning over the odometer in your car. You'll sit there
Speaker 1: and watch when it goes from ninety nine thousand nine
Speaker 1: U niney nine hundred thousand, and you tell all the
Speaker 1: kids watch this, you know. But when something like that
Speaker 1: happens and all the digits flip and it goes to
Speaker 1: three thousand, I think that's going to be something that's
Speaker 1: going to wake everybody up.
Speaker 4: Well, if you look at the global markets, and I've
Speaker 4: said this before, gold has a sixteen trillion dollars market cap,
Speaker 4: sixteen trillion or so in the face of hundreds of
Speaker 4: trillions supposed and supposed assets around the globe, whether that's currency,
Speaker 4: sovereign debt, stock markets, and if you really drill down
Speaker 4: into what these markets around the world, what they traffic in,
Speaker 4: they traffic and fake. I mean, we're a wash in
Speaker 4: fiat currency, fake fake currency with no backing, you know,
Speaker 4: full faith and credit of whatever government, and when they
Speaker 4: inflate their way out of problems. That's what we're doing
Speaker 4: right now. Just you know, right on the eve of
Speaker 4: an election, we cut the interest rate by fifty basis points,
Speaker 4: which is extremely aggressive given the fact that they've been
Speaker 4: raising interest rates faster than any time in history. So
Speaker 4: it's a a onein eighty course correction at fifty basis points,
Speaker 4: and they're supposed to cut all the way down to
Speaker 4: a full point here by the end of the year.
Speaker 4: So you know, the markets are responding to that and
Speaker 4: not the way that you would think a lot of
Speaker 4: times when the stock market was proclaimed healthy or the
Speaker 4: economy was healthy, gold just goes down. I know, I've
Speaker 4: been in this business, it doesn't correlate this way. But
Speaker 4: now you're seeing the exact opposite, and the inflows and
Speaker 4: the ETFs are up, the central bank gold buying is up.
Speaker 4: I think just getting this the general mood out there.
Speaker 4: You see the with bitcoin, the same thing with bitcoin people.
Speaker 4: It's a speculative asset, but it's finite, and I think
Speaker 4: that's another reason the inflows of the ETFs have been
Speaker 4: strong there and individual buying and adoption is up there
Speaker 4: and bitcoin as well. It's because we're in the throes
Speaker 4: of a system change. And this we're eighty years on
Speaker 4: from Breton Woods and this is a cycling room, right,
Speaker 4: this is what the Romans called and this is the
Speaker 4: fourth turning. You mentioned it all the time, eighty two,
Speaker 4: one hundred years and we're right at eighty years since
Speaker 4: Breton Woods in New Hampshire, nineteen forty four, the New
Speaker 4: Economic World Order, the IMF, the World Bank gold at
Speaker 4: thirty five dollars an ounce. We're inside of an experiment
Speaker 4: too that you know since nineteen seventy one, fiat currency
Speaker 4: is what we have, and we used to have a
Speaker 4: dollar as good as gold. But now you can be
Speaker 4: your own bank thanks to thanks to Gerald Ford in
Speaker 4: nineteen seventy four Executive Order overturning FDR, you can be
Speaker 4: your own bank. And we're outside of that system, So
Speaker 4: they're going to continue to inflate, They're going to continue
Speaker 4: to pay for the welfare warfare state. I think I
Speaker 4: kind of chuckle sometimes when people ask me about to
Speaker 4: be on a gold standard again, I'm like, well, I
Speaker 4: don't know, I am, I'm on a gold You should
Speaker 4: be on a gold standard. I'm on a gold everybody
Speaker 4: should be on a gold whatever the government does let
Speaker 4: them do. So I really think that so many paradigms
Speaker 4: are going to change. And looks like David and neither
Speaker 4: one of us are alarmists, but it's happening faster than
Speaker 4: either one of us thought. I mean, if you'd have
Speaker 4: told me at the beginning of the year, hey, gold's
Speaker 4: going to be up five hundred and seventy dollars an
Speaker 4: ounce no problem by September, I thought, that's a I
Speaker 4: think that's a big of a bit of a leap.
Speaker 4: I'm not going to go that far. I wouldn't have
Speaker 4: gone it that far, and I'm usually not that way.
Speaker 4: I'm like, well, cause it's been pretty steady, you know.
Speaker 4: And we remember going back to twenty and twenty, it
Speaker 4: was what two thousand, in August sixth that broke like
Speaker 4: twenty and ten dollars or two thousand and fifty dollars,
Speaker 4: and you know, and then it came back down and
Speaker 4: fell below nineteen hundred. And when you and I were talking,
Speaker 4: not just you know, year and a half ago, gold
Speaker 4: at sixteen hundred dollars. Now, yeah, now we're at twenty
Speaker 4: six hundred and climbing futures, by the way, are pegged
Speaker 4: at twenty seven hundred. So really unprecedented moves in the
Speaker 4: metals markets.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, as you point out, you know, we're
Speaker 1: to fourth turning. When you go back and you look
Speaker 1: at when they the characteristic of fourth turnings is strauss
Speaker 1: and how pointed out is that there's always major economic
Speaker 1: unrest and usually war, right, and so you go back
Speaker 1: and you look at the previous one, World War two
Speaker 1: and the Great Depression, and then we've been under the
Speaker 1: new worldwide financial system that was created in the wake
Speaker 1: of that now for about eighty years, and so that's
Speaker 1: what they're looking at. They all know that the financial
Speaker 1: system is going to be reset. They've got their ideas
Speaker 1: of what they would like to do, and of course
Speaker 1: there's limited amount that we can do about that. We
Speaker 1: can protest it and of course in Canada you've got
Speaker 1: Mark Carney, one of the biggest banker insider is ever.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's connected to everything. But as I pointed
Speaker 1: out yesterday, you know World Economic Forum and and you
Speaker 1: know the big bankers Goldman Sachs and the and the Rockefellers,
Speaker 1: I think maybe the Rothschilds. Anyway, he was the head
Speaker 1: of the Bank of Canada and then goes to the
Speaker 1: Bank of England. He was the first person out who
Speaker 1: was not British who was head of the Bank of England.
Speaker 1: This guy is the ultimate insider, and he's saying, well,
Speaker 1: you know, we're not going to do the CBDC anymore.
Speaker 1: I don't think you can believe that. I think that's
Speaker 1: going to be a part of the new financial system.
Speaker 1: And that's even beyond all of the other stuff that
Speaker 1: would be pushing gold, all the financial issues. There's that
Speaker 1: control issue that's there because in this fourth turning, we
Speaker 1: not only have the concern about a world war, but
Speaker 1: we also have a kind of financial turning like what
Speaker 1: was happening with a civil war, both here and in
Speaker 1: Italy and in many other places. The industrial revolutionists created
Speaker 1: the nation states were created. Now we've got a technocracy
Speaker 1: revolution that is coming, as well as a global state
Speaker 1: that is coming. That's what they're trying to establish, and
Speaker 1: that's what this financial system is going to be a
Speaker 1: part of. So yeah, you're right, we got to have
Speaker 1: our own personal goal standard to be outside of that
Speaker 1: as much as we can do.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's really the only thing that explains our current situation.
Speaker 4: If you look at the powers that be not trying
Speaker 4: to save the current system, they're certainly not trying to
Speaker 4: prop it up for any long term usage. It looks
Speaker 4: like golden parachutes all around, David. I mean, they didn't
Speaker 4: save the petro dollar. They're printing into oblivion. There is
Speaker 4: no fiscal sanity or responsibility. There's no fiscal hawks anymore.
Speaker 4: Nobody talks about the deficit. It just seems to be
Speaker 4: the elephant in the room that everybody ignores. And that's
Speaker 4: the only thing I can think. The only thing that
Speaker 4: explains this is that they know, at least the top
Speaker 4: upper echelon knows that there will be a new system
Speaker 4: introduced and the backbone of that system will be a
Speaker 4: control grid, the central bank, digital currency, which is what
Speaker 4: they want. I mean, if you look at whether it's
Speaker 4: you know, Davos, the World Economic Forum, they were crowing
Speaker 4: about ninety seven percent of countries on board with a
Speaker 4: CBDC or have some sort of plan for that. And
Speaker 4: then the Bank of International Settlements figuring out their you know,
Speaker 4: system to distribute and the collection house and all that stuff,
Speaker 4: and I just I think that what's what we're watching
Speaker 4: happen is the rolling out of central bank digital currency
Speaker 4: and the plans for that. Luckily, I see so much
Speaker 4: decentralization and the attitude of adopting things that you know,
Speaker 4: like gold and silver or bitcoin or crypto in general.
Speaker 4: I see a lot of that, the attitude. And maybe
Speaker 4: it's just my wheelhouse and what I study and all
Speaker 4: the people that I follow, but I'm not never before,
Speaker 4: and I've been in this game for a while. The energy,
Speaker 4: the intellect is all on the side of the people
Speaker 4: with the mindset of freedom and decentralization that the CANDE
Speaker 4: overlords of finance, the FIAT overlords, they really don't have
Speaker 4: a lot of helf. I was reading the other day
Speaker 4: there there's like four hundred.
Speaker 7: PhDs that work at the Federal Reserve, and I thought
Speaker 7: something about, you know, the there's got to be a
Speaker 7: joke in there about the collection of brain power, kind
Speaker 7: of like JFK talked about with the Nobel laureates that
Speaker 7: came to the White House, and you know, you said,
Speaker 7: this is the most collection of brain power and and
Speaker 7: uh intellects since Thomas Jefferson dined alone. There's got to
Speaker 7: be some kind of joke there in that, in that
Speaker 7: line of logic about all these supposed smart people, all
Speaker 7: the smart set and look at the damage that they've done.
Speaker 4: It's it's absolutely unforgivable. It's criminal.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, uh and uh. And of course you
Speaker 1: get back to the thing, is it intentional? Is it
Speaker 1: malicious or is it incompetence? And thank you, yes, I
Speaker 1: think it's both. Let's hope it's all they're malicious. Let's
Speaker 1: hope that they're incompetent as well. That's that's where I
Speaker 1: hope is. And I thought it was funny, you know
Speaker 1: when you I laughed and he said golden parachutes, because
Speaker 1: I thought, you know, nobody ever grabs a Fiat parachute,
Speaker 1: gotta I gotta use that. Nobody, Nobody ever jumps out
Speaker 1: of a plane with a piece of paper.
Speaker 4: Because they say so. It plays because they say, we
Speaker 4: say it will and it doesn't exactly right.
Speaker 1: I got a question here from a listener d G
Speaker 1: eight for he says, can you ask Tony if cryptocurrency
Speaker 1: has played a role in strangely lowering gold and silver prices.
Speaker 4: Yes, I believe if there was no such thing as bitcoin,
Speaker 4: then gold would be way over three thousand dollars. I
Speaker 4: think it has had a role in somewhat of the
Speaker 4: not it hasn't stalled gold. I think it's just and
Speaker 4: they sometimes complement each other. There's room for both, folks.
Speaker 4: I mean when you hear people say there's an unlimited
Speaker 4: supply of gold or something, No, there's not. It's like
Speaker 4: the more steel is poured in one hour, then all
Speaker 4: the gold has ever been mined in history. It's a finite,
Speaker 4: finite real even if you you know, they say, well
Speaker 4: there's on dick, gold could be on asteroids or whatever.
Speaker 4: You know. I mean these hypothetical things like there's a
Speaker 4: there's a limited supply of gold and silver. They're very
Speaker 4: hard to get. They're very hard. It takes a lot
Speaker 4: of resources to refine them and all the rest. But
Speaker 4: gold and I think crypto have especially since the you know,
Speaker 4: adoption of bitcoin. The good thing about bitcoin is that
Speaker 4: it's it's it's taken a lot of people and the
Speaker 4: younger generation who might not have gotten into gold or
Speaker 4: silver or learned about fiat currency or the Federal Reserve,
Speaker 4: they learned about it through bitcoin, through what you call,
Speaker 4: you know, orange pilling, which I think is great because
Speaker 4: I have bitcoin too and ideal in it. So, but
Speaker 4: I do think that that's a good question. I do
Speaker 4: think that the rise of cryptocurrency has somewhat taken off
Speaker 4: a little bit of the the monetary gain of precious metals.
Speaker 4: But there's there's tons of room out there. Like I said,
Speaker 4: you know, silver's got a one point four trillion dollar
Speaker 4: market cap. Bitcoin has a one point two trillion market cap,
Speaker 4: and there's hundreds of trillions in supposed wealth around the world.
Speaker 4: So we got a long way to go for real assets.
Speaker 1: Well, just the fact that bitcoin talks about it in
Speaker 1: terms of mining, right, using that paradigm, and so that
Speaker 1: helped to get people to understand the difference between something
Speaker 1: that has intrinsic value that is real money or whatever,
Speaker 1: like gold, and that you've got to mine it. What
Speaker 1: they're saying is that the intrinsic value of the cryptocurrency
Speaker 1: is the process of doing the calculations for the transactions.
Speaker 1: They call that mining, but the bottom line is that
Speaker 1: it's based on work. And what the governments are trying
Speaker 1: to do with CBDC is to change it over from
Speaker 1: instead of proof of work, which would limit it, they're
Speaker 1: trying to change it over to proof of what was
Speaker 1: a stake, Yeah, thank you, basically proof of authorit right,
Speaker 1: it's worth this because I say so. And so what
Speaker 1: they were trying to do was establish that and say,
Speaker 1: you know, you're limited in these physical assets because you've
Speaker 1: got to mine it. We're going to limit this because
Speaker 1: you got to work to get it. And so that's
Speaker 1: where they came with that paradigm. And that's very useful
Speaker 1: because that educated the younger generation. I think that has
Speaker 1: gotten into crypto more than most. It helped educate them
Speaker 1: about FIAT currency and why you don't like that. I
Speaker 1: think what's going to happen is, you know, most of
Speaker 1: the people. When I was talking to Aaron Day, he said,
Speaker 1: the older generation values privacy, but they don't like the technology.
Speaker 1: The younger generation likes the technology, but they don't like privacy,
Speaker 1: and they don't value privacy, right, and so perhaps a
Speaker 1: bitcoin has a role there for the younger generation. But
Speaker 1: also we need to understand most of the assets are
Speaker 1: skewed towards the older generation when they get scared and
Speaker 1: they're notn't really paying that much attention for the most part.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: And so we said before, once it starts, once everybody
Speaker 1: starts talking about it, once mainstream media starts talking about
Speaker 1: gold and denollarization, then the older generation is going to
Speaker 1: take the assets that they have more of and they're
Speaker 1: going to start pouring it into gold. I think it's
Speaker 1: that's when we're going to start seeing it there. But
Speaker 1: of course, you know the fact that people who don't
Speaker 1: trust FIAT have a choice of where they can put it,
Speaker 1: that has siphoned off a lot of wealth that would
Speaker 1: have gone into gold. I think, yeah, yeah, absolutely. I
Speaker 1: guess you know, when we talk about the asteroids, instead
Speaker 1: of people used to say I'm waiting till my ship
Speaker 1: comes in, I guess it could be your spaceship comes
Speaker 1: in from the asteroid and like all of the loot.
Speaker 1: Maybe that's why Elon Musk wants to go to the
Speaker 1: stars so badly. There's gold out there golden then the
Speaker 1: are stars.
Speaker 4: There's golden them. There's stars. Got to get out there.
Speaker 4: If you just take a look at the big picture here,
Speaker 4: we're going through a monetary reset. That's what the planet's
Speaker 4: doing right now. And the elites came out a long
Speaker 4: time ago and said, hey, this is what we're going
Speaker 4: to do. We call it a great reset, and that's
Speaker 4: a conspiracy theory. Now they're resetting the monetary system. There's
Speaker 4: going to be winners and losers here too. By the way, folks,
Speaker 4: there's going to be those who who gain and there's
Speaker 4: going to be those who just really get caught flat footed.
Speaker 4: As I say all the time, quoting our Buckminster Fuller,
Speaker 4: people can't get out of the way of what they
Speaker 4: don't see coming. You know. People just think it's going
Speaker 4: to be, you know, tomorrow is going to be like yesterday.
Speaker 4: That's not how this works. History is unfolding before us,
Speaker 4: and uh it's the prices are an indicator of that.
Speaker 4: I don't think we're just getting started. These are these
Speaker 4: are I think. And we'll see some dips, there'll be
Speaker 4: some pullback in the precious metals markets, but that's only
Speaker 4: because it's selloffs and things like that and people getting liquidity.
Speaker 4: But we're on a we're in a general trend here
Speaker 4: with the dollar and decline. David, that's that's what we're watching.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's that's it. That's the trend. We can't predict
Speaker 1: when it's going to happen, but we can see that
Speaker 1: it is accelerating. As we're laughing about. You know, it's
Speaker 1: like this is having a lot faster than I thought.
Speaker 1: I find myself saying that all the time as I
Speaker 1: get older, everything in life is coming at you faster.
Speaker 1: But look, we are at the you talk about a lifespan, right,
Speaker 1: you know, that's the fourth turning seventy or eighty years,
Speaker 1: just like a human lifespan. And when you get to
Speaker 1: the end of a lifespan of the system that we're in,
Speaker 1: each time the you know, things start to go pretty fast.
Speaker 1: They start to fall apart really fast, just like your
Speaker 1: body when you get to a certain age and it
Speaker 1: starts to fall apart really quickly and starts to accelerate
Speaker 1: as it's about to die. And that's what the system
Speaker 1: is going to do. As it's about to die, it's
Speaker 1: going to start accelerating. Its deconstruction is decomposition or whatever
Speaker 1: you know. So it's a dying system. And we can
Speaker 1: all see that it's a dying system. The question is,
Speaker 1: you know, how how are you going? This is a
Speaker 1: storm that's coming. What are you going to do to
Speaker 1: protect for the storm? That's that's the key thing. Well,
Speaker 1: tell us a little bit about what's going on at
Speaker 1: wise wolf other than trying to cover the.
Speaker 4: Interesting, trying to get supplied. That's the daily mission. I
Speaker 4: wake up every day. It's funny we talked about airs.
Speaker 4: I don't know what date it is. I know it's Thursday.
Speaker 4: I'm going to talk to David on Thursday. I do
Speaker 4: my shows. I have to remember that at least you're
Speaker 4: right just getting supply, and we've been real fortunate to
Speaker 4: the two locations. I'll always help. I'm here in North Texas.
Speaker 4: I'll be back in the Ozarks next week in Branson.
Speaker 4: But just really just supplying wolf Pack. I mean, we
Speaker 4: just continue to grow that and thanks to your listeners,
Speaker 4: David Night dot Gold folks, go check that out and
Speaker 4: you can hit the tab joined. Wolf Pack start as
Speaker 4: little as fifty dollars a month, and we're about to
Speaker 4: add I can't really announce it yet what it's going
Speaker 4: to be. But we're coming up with something called wolf
Speaker 4: Picks and it's going to be on the wolfpack dot
Speaker 4: Gold site. And what we're doing is every day we're
Speaker 4: going to set the price for an ounce of silver
Speaker 4: or an ounce of gold. Now you don't know what
Speaker 4: it's going to be. It could be a coin, could
Speaker 4: be a round, could be a bar, and I'm going
Speaker 4: to set that as the most competitive price I can.
Speaker 4: It's going to be like from noon to six, like
Speaker 4: every day, and then we're going to stop it like
Speaker 4: every day at the end of the close of business.
Speaker 4: I'll stop it when I can't lock a trade, so
Speaker 4: you could check that out. We'll have no fees on
Speaker 4: that as well, no credit card fees. We're just going
Speaker 4: to take a bank a h and then we're going
Speaker 4: to have blocks of five hundred and one thousand for
Speaker 4: just gold or silver, and it's like first come, first serve,
Speaker 4: best deal. You can lock that in all silver or
Speaker 4: all gold through the wolf Picks at the beginning of
Speaker 4: the day and then we'll give you a detailed invoice
Speaker 4: and let us shop and it could be anything that
Speaker 4: comes in. So it's just going to be from what
Speaker 4: we're buying and putting over the counter and then we
Speaker 4: build your invoice. So gotch we're looking forward to that.
Speaker 1: That's great. So look out for the blue light there
Speaker 1: and the blue light special limited time each day You're
Speaker 1: going to have a special that's going to be there
Speaker 1: so people can take a look at it. And again
Speaker 1: it is wise Wolf Golden. You can get there through
Speaker 1: David Knight dot gold Let Tony know that you're coming
Speaker 1: through us. And you've got a program that's following immediately
Speaker 1: after this one noon Eastern time, eleven Central time. Tell
Speaker 1: everybody where they can find your program and what's coming out.
Speaker 4: Yeah, please please come over. We'll be over on Rockfin
Speaker 4: on the America Unplugged Channel, my my ex at Tony Ardeburn.
Speaker 4: I'll be broadcasting there in Rumble America Unplugged Channel Artoburn
Speaker 4: Radio Transmission. Well we'll have some fun. Go join the stream.
Speaker 1: That's great, And I got another comment here. Actually this
Speaker 1: is a thank you rumble from Atomic Dog. He said, David,
Speaker 1: thanks to Tony for insisting Silver was going to be
Speaker 1: a solid investment. I increased my position last month and
Speaker 1: it has paid off very good. Yeah, I know to
Speaker 1: hear that yeah, you saw that coming and you called
Speaker 1: it and so good. I'm glad that worked out for you, Tommy.
Speaker 4: And when you're up, when the market's up, you like
Speaker 4: a genius. And then when you have a sell off
Speaker 4: and correction, I don't look so great. But thank you
Speaker 4: so much for that.
Speaker 1: Well, we know what the long term trend is going
Speaker 1: to be. That's the key thing. And there's going to
Speaker 1: be a lot of noise up and down. It's not
Speaker 1: going to be I don't think as much of a
Speaker 1: roller coaster ride as the bitcoin has been, but it's
Speaker 1: it's going to vary. You know, it's going to go around,
Speaker 1: so it's not going to be just always straight up
Speaker 1: into the right, you know. It's all of this stuff
Speaker 1: jumps around and there's many things that affect it. But
Speaker 1: we know what the fundamentals are. We know what's going
Speaker 1: on with the deficit. We know that the financial system
Speaker 1: is at its natural end of life, and these people
Speaker 1: have got grand designs of what they want to build,
Speaker 1: and what they want to build is going to be
Speaker 1: very tyrannical. We don't want to have that dominating us.
Speaker 1: We want to have something that is going to be
Speaker 1: outside of that. So for all those reasons have some
Speaker 1: wealth insurance and have some tyranny insurance as well. I
Speaker 1: don't think that these maybe I could said yesterday, I
Speaker 1: don't believe them for a moment that Canada is going
Speaker 1: to pull back from the CBDC. I think that's just
Speaker 1: the headfake before an election. That's all that's happening with that.
Speaker 1: This is that's the long term plan. They're in lockstep
Speaker 1: with the World Economic Form and all the rest of
Speaker 1: these things. Immediately at this picture of Christia Freeland this year,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm looking at it while I got the article
Speaker 1: pulled up. She looks just like Herman Munster's wife.
Speaker 6: I mean, she.
Speaker 1: Looks like Lily Munster and black and white. I mean
Speaker 1: it truly is amazing. And except that Lily Munster was nice,
Speaker 1: you know, she had life, Christia Freeland is not nice.
Speaker 1: So we're gonna take a quick break. Thank you so much,
Speaker 1: Tony for supporting the program and for all that you do,
Speaker 1: and it is it's great to have somebody that we
Speaker 1: can trust. I would hate to have to be mind
Speaker 1: my golden silver from Goldman Sachs. So great to have
Speaker 1: you there. Thank you so much. We're gonna take a
Speaker 1: quick break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 2: Folks, you're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Well, before we get back to the news here, and
Speaker 1: we've got we've got a lot of very light news
Speaker 1: about Lala Harris. We'll have a few lawls about Laala
Speaker 1: because it's really crazy what she's saying, and she got
Speaker 1: called out on it. She made the mistakes. You finally
Speaker 1: did a one on one interview with an honest journalist.
Speaker 1: It is pretty amazing. But before we get to that
Speaker 1: and have some laughs, I just wanted to remind you
Speaker 1: I mentioned at the very beginning of the program Jason
Speaker 1: Barker Praier request for his grandson, and I want to
Speaker 1: thank all you for the prayers for my son. I
Speaker 1: got this last night and I told him that I
Speaker 1: would mention it today. He said, please do. He said,
Speaker 1: I know Whistler needs all the prayers he can get
Speaker 1: right now, but we also desperately need some tonight. My
Speaker 1: younger stepdaughter had her third child today, my fifth grand baby.
Speaker 1: She was overdue and they ended up inducing labor. She
Speaker 1: had the baby just fine, but he soon started having
Speaker 1: trouble breathing. He was flown to Mercy Hospital in Saint
Speaker 1: Louis where he's struggling. They're about to put him put
Speaker 1: in a tricheometry tricky otomy, and he is in really
Speaker 1: bad shape. His name is Baby Liam. Can you please
Speaker 1: pray for God to place his healing hand on him
Speaker 1: and to comfort his mother? And so we have been
Speaker 1: praying for Tony, would like please pray for him yourself,
Speaker 1: And he says, I'll continue to keep Whistler Travis all night,
Speaker 1: faiming in my prayers. There's times like this, so we
Speaker 1: need each other more than ever. This is why I think,
Speaker 1: you know, God, these things happen in our life so
Speaker 1: that we see God working in our life and so
Speaker 1: that we can pray for each other and lift each
Speaker 1: other up to Him. And you know, if you, if
Speaker 1: you need to, you look at this and you wonder
Speaker 1: about this. It was an excellent book.
Speaker 2: You have.
Speaker 1: Lee Strouble did a book called The Case for Christ,
Speaker 1: and I thought an even better book that he did
Speaker 1: because I'd seen, you know, the the arguments that he made,
Speaker 1: the you know, the he addressed issues and things that
Speaker 1: skeptics would have. And I also have had on the
Speaker 1: show a couple of times a guy who wrote Cold
Speaker 1: Case Christianity. Excellent book as well, Uh for skeptics. A
Speaker 1: guy who was a cold case detective and he was
Speaker 1: not a believer, and he read the Bible because his
Speaker 1: wife became a Christian. Same type of thing I believe
Speaker 1: that happened to Lee Strouble, and he applied the same
Speaker 1: types of things. You want cold case, you've got some
Speaker 1: written testimony that was taken, some written evidence that was
Speaker 1: taken at the time, but now pretty much everybody is dead.
Speaker 1: In a cold case, you might have some people that
Speaker 1: you could go back and interrogate, but you know, the
Speaker 1: evidence is called most of the people, witnesses and things
Speaker 1: like that are dead. So you go back and you
Speaker 1: look at the evidence. He said, applying those same standards
Speaker 1: to what he found in the New Testament. Was it
Speaker 1: convinced him? Absolutely convinced him. But of course we know
Speaker 1: that it is and he understands as well that it
Speaker 1: is God who ultimately convinces us and opens our mind
Speaker 1: to this. But we see this type of thing happening
Speaker 1: so that we can see God working in our lives.
Speaker 1: And I was starting to say that Least Trouble did
Speaker 1: a book, The Case for Miracles, and so he went on.
Speaker 1: He talked to people who are skeptics. He talked to
Speaker 1: people who had done scientific studies about it. Let's have
Speaker 1: this group over here pray about something. Another group will
Speaker 1: have a control group do it like a scientific experiment,
Speaker 1: and things like that. And what he found was that
Speaker 1: more than any other segment of the population, doctors and
Speaker 1: medical staff believed in miracles more than anybody else because
Speaker 1: they had seen this answered so many times. Now. It
Speaker 1: is always a situation where sometimes God's answer is no
Speaker 1: to what we want, and there will come a time
Speaker 1: where all of us will die, but it is in
Speaker 1: the interim it is great for us to pray for
Speaker 1: each other so that we can see God's work. And
Speaker 1: I've seen that so many times in my life. That's
Speaker 1: why I kept telling people. Look at the biography, the
Speaker 1: autobiography of George Mueller and his diary. Truly an amazing
Speaker 1: life of faith that he lived. And Jason says, well,
Speaker 1: I'm already thanking God for the miracle that he will provide,
Speaker 1: and if the worst happens, then I will take comfort
Speaker 1: in the fact that baby Liam will be in paradise
Speaker 1: with our Lord. Absolutely true, and that in and of
Speaker 1: itself is a miracle. Isn't it a miracle that God
Speaker 1: would save sinners like us? There's a sent to me
Speaker 1: by a listener. I won't get into a lot of details,
Speaker 1: but basically he was just asking me. He said, I'm
Speaker 1: not a religious man, but I hear you weaving Christianity
Speaker 1: and to what you're talking about. It made me want
Speaker 1: to buy a Bible and investigate it. And so I
Speaker 1: told him, I said, well, I didn't tell him that,
Speaker 1: but I'll just say to people out there. I've always
Speaker 1: believed that the best translation is going to be the
Speaker 1: one that you read. And so if there is something
Speaker 1: that really clicks with you, and you can look at
Speaker 1: different Bible translations at Biblegateway dot com. I think in
Speaker 1: terms of claire and clearness and modern language, I think
Speaker 1: new living translation is good. If you want to get
Speaker 1: more detailed in your understanding of things, you can look
Speaker 1: at the Bible Gateway and you can see why does
Speaker 1: one translation use this word or that phrase and the
Speaker 1: other one uses something different? But it really you can
Speaker 1: get more clarity, but you can still see the picture.
Speaker 1: Analogy that I've heard somebody use is that the Bible
Speaker 1: is like a hologram. You know, you can break off
Speaker 1: pieces of the hologram, you'll still get the image. It
Speaker 1: may not be as clear, but you're still going to
Speaker 1: get that image. And I think that's true. I think
Speaker 1: that's true of any of these translations. We had my
Speaker 1: mother in law as Catholic, and we had a neighborhood
Speaker 1: Bible study that we did. We got her to come
Speaker 1: and she was really reluctant. I don't know, I have
Speaker 1: a completely different Bibles that would just bring you along
Speaker 1: and read along with us as we're reading. And you know,
Speaker 1: she had the Catholic due Rheim's Bible, which is an
Speaker 1: English translation of a Latin translation of the Greek and Hebrew,
Speaker 1: so it's two levels direct. But she said, well, it's
Speaker 1: basically the same thing. You know, she's looking at it,
Speaker 1: and I think you'll find that if you look at
Speaker 1: the Bible Gateway that even though this is a copy
Speaker 1: of a copy, essentially a translation of a translation, it
Speaker 1: was still the difference. And the Catholic Bible and the
Speaker 1: Protestant Bibles are what it's called the apocrypha, the books
Speaker 1: in between Malachi and Matthew, between what we call the
Speaker 1: Old Testament the New Testament that inter period. They've got
Speaker 1: some books there that they put in, But you're going
Speaker 1: to understand if you read the Bible, you're going to
Speaker 1: understand who Christ is, and you're going to understand his
Speaker 1: importance to us, what he did for us. You're going
Speaker 1: to see that. You're going to see that any Bible
Speaker 1: that you look, and if you want to look to
Speaker 1: the same resources that I mentioned before, if you've got
Speaker 1: concerns about particular things skeptics that brought up, or you've
Speaker 1: got concerns about the Bible passage that's there, you can
Speaker 1: find that. Just make the Bible your key source. Let
Speaker 1: it speak for itself. You can always not wrong to
Speaker 1: find out other things, but always you don't treat them
Speaker 1: at the same level that you would. This was put
Speaker 1: up on Subscribe Star. This it's from Docu Garden who says,
Speaker 1: there's a great interview with Scott Schera the other day,
Speaker 1: our Amazing Grace. He mentioned that hospitals refusing to discharge
Speaker 1: patients and holding them hostage. When I heard that, I
Speaker 1: thought of amm And Bundy. I remember you interviewed him
Speaker 1: and he had some kind of a group or posse
Speaker 1: around his area to fight back against stuff like the
Speaker 1: medical kidnapping. If I remember right, his group was successful
Speaker 1: a couple of times, standing up to hospitals and demands
Speaker 1: that they least the person's being medically kidnapped. At the
Speaker 1: time of the interview, he was starting this group. And yeah,
Speaker 1: the group was called People's Rights. So it was back
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty, as all the lockdown stuff was happening.
Speaker 1: I signed up in our area, but I never heard
Speaker 1: anything back from anybody. It was not really active. I
Speaker 1: thought it was a great idea. It's just that you
Speaker 1: have to have a certain critical mass. In Idaho, where
Speaker 1: he did have a critical mass, they were able to
Speaker 1: help someone who was again I think it was around
Speaker 1: the birth of a baby, and they were giving him
Speaker 1: a hard time because of the vaccines and the mask
Speaker 1: or something like that, and so they stood up to that.
Speaker 1: But then they actually the officials came back and charged
Speaker 1: him and charged others, and they trumped up the charges
Speaker 1: on all this stuff. So I've not heard from him
Speaker 1: for quite some time. He did put in a candidacy
Speaker 1: to run for governor, and the last time I talked
Speaker 1: to him, he was flirting with that idea, and I said, well,
Speaker 1: if you decided to run.
Speaker 3: Let me know.
Speaker 1: I never heard back from him, so but I did
Speaker 1: see that he was running, but I figured, well, he
Speaker 1: doesn't necessarily want to. I'm on the program, so that's fine,
Speaker 1: but I don't really know what's going on with em.
Speaker 1: And and I thought it was a great idea. The
Speaker 1: issue with the People's Rights was this supposed to be
Speaker 1: a network of people and if somebody had an issue
Speaker 1: where they were being attacked or there's medical kidnapping or something,
Speaker 1: that you would send a call out and this network
Speaker 1: of people would show up to film stuff. The film
Speaker 1: stuff because it's the light of truth about what is happening.
Speaker 1: That is one of our best disinfectants of these tyrants
Speaker 1: that is out there. And this is from for the
Speaker 1: Love of the Road, and thank you. The Love of
Speaker 1: the Road is a really key supporter of this program.
Speaker 1: He said he was just an Amish country and made
Speaker 1: a distribution there and made him wonder what the update
Speaker 1: is about Amos Miller, and he said, I didn't realize,
Speaker 1: and so I haven't done an update on this, but
Speaker 1: I need to look into that and find out what's
Speaker 1: going on. I interviewed a guy who was right in
Speaker 1: that area and he was one of the key reporters
Speaker 1: about that. He was Independent Media who was right on
Speaker 1: the spot. I need to contact him and find out
Speaker 1: what's going on with Amus Miller. Thomas Massey has talked
Speaker 1: about that. Frank Nicely along with Thomas Massey talking about
Speaker 1: the Prime Act that Massey has sponsored in Congress, and
Speaker 1: Frank Nicely was trying to get that in the state
Speaker 1: legislature here to say that if you own Cayle, that
Speaker 1: the US Department of Agriculture can't stop this. And of
Speaker 1: course the big problem that Amos Miller had was the
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. That was really where this was
Speaker 1: coming down. And so you know, again being supported by
Speaker 1: the US Department of Agriculture. And Ryan also says, I
Speaker 1: didn't realize that it was so bad that Whistler has
Speaker 1: been bedridden. Yes it is.
Speaker 3: It is not bad.
Speaker 1: He can only walk a short distance and he starts
Speaker 1: to get into pain as hips and and other things
Speaker 1: that we're very concerned because this FLOCKX and poisoning from
Speaker 1: the antibiotic. The fluoride antibotic is something that attacks your tendons,
Speaker 1: and a lot of people have had ruptured tendons. But
Speaker 1: he's in a lot of pain, even if he's just
Speaker 1: lying down from that. So we're trying. We've had a
Speaker 1: lot of people have sent us a lot of suggestions.
Speaker 1: We appreciate that. We're trying the detox things that have
Speaker 1: been suggestions that have been there, and charcoal and other
Speaker 1: things and castor al. We're getting infusions. We're trying to
Speaker 1: do what we can. But the key thing again is prayer,
Speaker 1: and so we really do appreciate that. Well, we're going
Speaker 1: to oh one more thing here. This is sent as
Speaker 1: an email from Handy this morning, and let me get
Speaker 1: to this before we move on. He said, I'm working tonight.
Speaker 1: I just had an encounter that I want to share
Speaker 1: before the details get foggy in my mind. Earlier, we
Speaker 1: were dispatched to a sick person call. When we arrived,
Speaker 1: we went through the open garage and on the way
Speaker 1: into her house, I noticed two surgical masks swept into
Speaker 1: the corner of her garage. I pointed that out to
Speaker 1: my partner. I told him, I bet this one took
Speaker 1: the vaccines. What we found was an adult female complaining
Speaker 1: about extreme weakness. She said she'd been too weak to
Speaker 1: even sit up in bed or to care for herself
Speaker 1: in any way for the last seven days, but her
Speaker 1: condition has been progressing since late fall of twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: she said. She says her husband has been caring for her.
Speaker 1: Upon further questioning, I found that her weakness was due
Speaker 1: to rapid progression of Parkinson's disease that did not respond
Speaker 1: to medications according to her doctor. She told me that
Speaker 1: her doctor hasn't really given her any hopeful recovery or
Speaker 1: even slowing the progression of her neurologic disease. On the way,
Speaker 1: the hospital asked if she had any prior medical history,
Speaker 1: which she denied. She told me her doctor says she's
Speaker 1: been quote disgustingly healthy unquote, and she's never had to
Speaker 1: take any prescription medications before out. That's when I asked
Speaker 1: her if she took any of the COVID vaccines. She
Speaker 1: told me she'd taken several. I took a look at
Speaker 1: her vaccine card and he sent this to me. Actually,
Speaker 1: and this is her vaccine card and you can see it. Pfizer, Peiser, Pfeiser, Peiser,
Speaker 1: four of them. Notice the last entry Pfizer bivalent flew
Speaker 1: COVID JAB on ten thirty one twenty two, just prior
Speaker 1: to the onset of her debilitating neurologic disease. He says,
Speaker 1: She's not the first that I have seen like this. Absolutely,
Speaker 1: it's such a shame too. And look, you know, we
Speaker 1: don't ever want to blame people who've had this done.
Speaker 1: Anybody can be deceived. We've been deceived in our family
Speaker 1: over the antibiotic thing, and you know we don't want
Speaker 1: to be the smoke. Well I knew it's your own
Speaker 1: fault because you take it, you know, like Laura Lumer. Right, Uh,
Speaker 1: it's not your fault. If you're poisoned, it's not your fault.
Speaker 1: If you're lied to, it's not your fault, if you're
Speaker 1: gas lit. I mean, would we say that to a child, Well,
Speaker 1: it's your fault that you had bottom surgery and you
Speaker 1: had puberty blopper blockers and all this other. No, it's
Speaker 1: not their fault. You know they were lied to. And
Speaker 1: of course you can say, well, we should have known better. Look,
Speaker 1: you can always go back on all that. You can
Speaker 1: always say, you know, well I was in a car accident.
Speaker 1: If only I had taken off a little bit sooner
Speaker 1: or later or whatever, you can always but no, no,
Speaker 1: it's it's not that these people who are doing this
Speaker 1: know what they're doing, and they're poisoning people.
Speaker 3: We know it.
Speaker 1: They know it. They need to know that we know it.
Speaker 1: We need to say to not just to Francis Collins,
Speaker 1: but to Trump and to Biden, to the Republican congressmen
Speaker 1: and senators as well as the Democrats, you need to
Speaker 1: have a Nurremberg two point zero. But we know that's
Speaker 1: not coming. We know that's not coming. We need to
Speaker 1: put the fear of God in them because something much
Speaker 1: worse than Nuremberg two point zero is coming up. And
Speaker 1: again there's forgiveness if they think they need forgiveness, but
Speaker 1: of course people like Trump doesn't think he needs forgiveness
Speaker 1: for anything. A dangerous position to be in. We're gonna well, well,
Speaker 1: before we take a break, let me I've got some
Speaker 1: comments here on Rumble d G eight. Thank you for
Speaker 1: the tip, says Alex and Trump lure you in with
Speaker 1: the real truth and false promises and then betray you
Speaker 1: controlled opposition at its finest. Praying for your family's health
Speaker 1: and recovery. Thank you. On Rumble Don't frag me, bro David,
Speaker 1: could you ask goat tree, about how much the Internet
Speaker 1: he thinks is dead. Also about the new debunk bot. Well,
Speaker 1: that's what I haven't heard of. I'll look up that
Speaker 1: as well. On rumble a non a mouse. Thank you
Speaker 1: for the tip. He says, I've been young and now
Speaker 1: I'm old, and yet I have not seen the righteous
Speaker 1: forsaken or as children begging for bread. Psalm thirty seven.
Speaker 1: Psalm thirty seven has been a very important psalm for me,
Speaker 1: not about what happened at info Wars, but about what
Speaker 1: happened when I said we were creditors in a bankruptcy case.
Speaker 1: That was that was a real trial. And I don't
Speaker 1: mean a judicial trial, I mean a trial for us personally.
Speaker 1: And the thing I remember about Psalm thirty seven actually
Speaker 1: did lyrics and a song about it, because and we
Speaker 1: talk about different words that you see in different translations,
Speaker 1: the word fret was used three times in that I
Speaker 1: remember looking at that, I thought, that's not what and
Speaker 1: that's the only place that it's used. And so that
Speaker 1: Hebrew word for fret, when you look it up, it
Speaker 1: actually comes from a situation where you take you actually
Speaker 1: kindle a fire, start a fire, and you keep pouring
Speaker 1: stuff on it. Right. I thought, what a great visual
Speaker 1: image that is of fretting. What fretting is, it's I
Speaker 1: do not fret. You're not fret when the wicked succeed.
Speaker 1: That's the message of it. And it finishes with that.
Speaker 1: I've been young and old, but I've never seen the
Speaker 1: righteous forsaken or the children begging for bread. So don't fret.
Speaker 1: God is in control, And you know that's that's what
Speaker 1: we need to understand through all this stuff. We need
Speaker 1: to be clear and not look away the things that
Speaker 1: are bad. You know, we don't want to say, well,
Speaker 1: I don't even want to read the possible effects of
Speaker 1: these drugs that I'm dispensing because it just gets me
Speaker 1: too scared and depressed. Well, you should be scared, should
Speaker 1: be depressed, and you should know about this, and you
Speaker 1: should because forewarned is forearmed. But you know, we don't
Speaker 1: want to get so afraid that we are paralyzed with fear.
Speaker 1: And we don't have to be paralyzed with fear by
Speaker 1: the way. You know, that's why I recommend the Blue
Speaker 1: Letter Bible for people. You take a look at the
Speaker 1: Bible verses like that, and it explains to you where
Speaker 1: these words like that particular word. It's only used in
Speaker 1: that psalm. It's the only time that Hebrew word is
Speaker 1: used in the Bible. That's a wonderful picture. You wouldn't
Speaker 1: know that if you didn't look it up in the
Speaker 1: Blue Letter Bible. So we're going to take a quick
Speaker 1: break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 4: They're doing what in the place they named after me.
Speaker 4: Good thing.
Speaker 6: I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed
Speaker 6: on the plots of these traders.
Speaker 1: Making sense common again.
Speaker 2: This is the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: From Guard Goldsmith. Thank you, Guardy says God, bless Whistler,
Speaker 1: Jason's Liam and family, Travis and all such fine people.
Speaker 1: Thank you God for our kinship. Yes, thank you, thank
Speaker 1: you Guard for your friendship.
Speaker 5: And so Guard he's a great guy and you should
Speaker 5: just tune into a show liberty conspiracy.
Speaker 1: Yes, yes, And we had Guard and Occupy Peace rally
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty one and yeah, a great place to
Speaker 1: go if you can go this weekend, that's when Jerald
Speaker 1: Spinty is going to be having the Occupy Peace Rally.
Speaker 1: He's got a great lineup of speakers that are there.
Speaker 1: And so if you're anywhere in the area, you can go.
Speaker 1: And of course the guard was not in the area,
Speaker 1: but he went from New Hampshire all the way to
Speaker 1: New York and it was great, great seeing him there.
Speaker 1: Let's talk a little bit about La la We need
Speaker 1: some laughs here, we need light up here.
Speaker 3: And uh.
Speaker 1: Again, if we go back and we look at the people,
Speaker 1: who are you know, freaked out about the fact that
Speaker 1: Biden goes on with a view and said he you know,
Speaker 1: Trump is just like a bug and he'll smash him
Speaker 1: and everything. Well, you know they're they're kind of freaked
Speaker 1: out about that. But you know, the worst thing that
Speaker 1: Biden said was not that he that that speech really
Speaker 1: doesn't harm Trump at all, but he really stuck the
Speaker 1: knife in lalaw. Biden also said that he delegated everything
Speaker 1: to la law. He said, from foreign policy to domestic policy.
Speaker 3: Whoa And so.
Speaker 1: That was also in the view and instead, I say,
Speaker 1: he said, many of these people that picked up on
Speaker 1: this thing, oh, look, he insulted Trump. They called Trump
Speaker 1: a bug, and he said, I'm going to swat the bug. No,
Speaker 1: he's stuck a stuck a knife in her back. The acknowledgment,
Speaker 1: says Breitbart. They did pick this up at Breitbart. The
Speaker 1: acknowledgment is significant because the contradicts Harris's talking points. She's
Speaker 1: tried multiple times to distance herself from the Biden Harris record,
Speaker 1: you know, she's going to be unburdened by what has been.
Speaker 1: I guess you could kind of rephrase that and say,
Speaker 1: we're going to be unburdened by what has been, Oh
Speaker 1: that has been, Uh, Joe Biden, that has been. We're
Speaker 1: going to be unburdened by the has been Joe. But
Speaker 1: now that has been, Joe is trying to burden her
Speaker 1: with the legacy. He said, my approach is about new
Speaker 1: or she said, rather, my approach is about new ideas,
Speaker 1: new policies that are directed at the current moment. And
Speaker 1: also to be very honest with you. You know, when
Speaker 1: anybody says that, well, I'm going to be honest with you,
Speaker 1: why would you say that unless you're you not honest
Speaker 1: with people. It always concerns me when Simon says, well,
Speaker 1: to be honest with you, Oh what you just said,
Speaker 1: or other things that you're like, you're not being honest
Speaker 1: with me.
Speaker 5: I also love how we're getting new ideas and new
Speaker 5: policies from a woman who's been in politics, what how
Speaker 5: many how many years decades at this point you implemented
Speaker 5: any of these before?
Speaker 1: Come on, yeah, or said anything about them? Yeah, because
Speaker 1: she just looked on Trump's paper. She kind of pulled
Speaker 1: them off of there. So, to be very honest with you,
Speaker 1: she said, my focus is very much in what we
Speaker 1: need to do over the next ten twenty years to
Speaker 1: catch up on the twenty first century. She isn't going
Speaker 1: to be there for ten years, even if she won
Speaker 1: this election in the next and she says, I'm obviously
Speaker 1: not Joe Biden, and you know, I offer a new
Speaker 1: generation of leadership unburdened by that has been Joe. But
Speaker 1: when she went on the View, when when Biden went
Speaker 1: on the View, he appeared to blame Harris with the
Speaker 1: administration's failure to read use inflation, for the failure to
Speaker 1: secure the border, and for responsibility to withdraw from Afghanistan.
Speaker 1: He says, as vice president, there wasn't a single thing
Speaker 1: that I did that she couldn't do, and so I
Speaker 1: was able to delegate her responsibility on everything from foreign
Speaker 1: policy to domestic policy. You see, many people said when
Speaker 1: she was declared to be the borders are many people
Speaker 1: talked about how much Jill Biden Jill hated La La,
Speaker 1: and a lot of people said, they have just tied
Speaker 1: this thing around her neck like a dead albatross. And
Speaker 1: I think they just did that again. They just reminded
Speaker 1: everybody of the albatross they put around her neck. The
Speaker 1: one thing that she is detailed about. She doesn't really
Speaker 1: have very detailed policies, as we're going to see here
Speaker 1: in a moment. But the one thing that she has
Speaker 1: a lot of detail about not so much the economy,
Speaker 1: but her economy and her campaign is based around a
Speaker 1: single issue. She's talking about one hundred billion dollar manufacturing
Speaker 1: plan and other things like that, but it's really about abortion.
Speaker 1: That's where you'll find the details, and that's really where
Speaker 1: her economy is. But she had it in reach that says, well,
Speaker 1: one hundred billion dollars in new investments in manufacturing. She
Speaker 1: said this plan will cost approximately one hundred million dollars
Speaker 1: and will be paid for by a portion of the
Speaker 1: proceeds of International tax reform, which seeks to prevent a
Speaker 1: global race to the bottom and discourage inversions, outsourcing, or
Speaker 1: international tax strategies designed by corporations to avoid paying their
Speaker 1: fair share to the United States, and so everything about
Speaker 1: global international, international, everything is globalist, right, things about taxes though,
Speaker 1: she's right on, But she's really making her pitch to
Speaker 1: the World Economic Form. And of course she's got a plan.
Speaker 1: She says, well, you shouldn't have a plan. You shouldn't.
Speaker 1: We shouldn't have a centrally planned economy. She goes on
Speaker 1: to say, I'm a capitalist. I believe in free and
Speaker 1: fair markets.
Speaker 3: No, you don't.
Speaker 1: You're just talking about how you got a plan about
Speaker 1: investments in manufacturing. Government shouldn't be investing in manufacturing. As
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, if you say that you're about
Speaker 1: free markets, and that means that you don't have government
Speaker 1: investing in manufacturing or in businesses. They're not there to
Speaker 1: pick the winners and losers. They're not there to create
Speaker 1: some grand strategy. You know, the communists have their five
Speaker 1: year plans. Well, she's got a ten year or twenty
Speaker 1: year plan. She says, that's the way these people always work.
Speaker 1: She's just a communist. Kami La La. I don't understand
Speaker 1: how you can trust someone who repeatedly lies, says a
Speaker 1: person that was interviewed by NBC News and Suburbs of Pittsburgh,
Speaker 1: and I looked at that and thought, well, are they
Speaker 1: talking about Trump or La Law. They both continually lie.
Speaker 1: I don't know who they're talking about. I think in
Speaker 1: this context, because it was NBC, I think this person
Speaker 1: was supposed to be talking about Trump. That applies to anyone.
Speaker 1: And so we see the interview that she had with
Speaker 1: MSNBC's Stephanie Rule. Stephanie Rule calls her out for dodging
Speaker 1: the questions on how she's going to raise taxes. Well,
Speaker 1: it's just going to be this global international thing, and
Speaker 1: we're going to prevent a global race to the bottom
Speaker 1: by taxing everybody. Well, that takes us to the bottom.
Speaker 1: I think Stephanie Rule says, she doesn't answer the question. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And so I think she thought that she was going
Speaker 1: to have a very very friendly interview because Stephanie Rule
Speaker 1: had been so critical of Trump and giving her excuses.
Speaker 1: And then she gets there and all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: she gets straight up questions. The liberal host had previously
Speaker 1: defended La La Harris for avoiding questions, and so Lala
Speaker 1: is giving these answers about she's got this whole thing
Speaker 1: figured out. It's all just a bunch of I don't
Speaker 1: even like to use a term word style. That's what
Speaker 1: other people do. This is the kind of speech that
Speaker 1: you see bureaucrats do when they get up and give
Speaker 1: each other, they get up on a podium and start
Speaker 1: talking to other bureaucrats or at a college or something.
Speaker 1: It's just meaningless, you know, multisyllable words or whatever. But
Speaker 1: in this particular case she's talking about, she wants to
Speaker 1: make the economy I don't know, holistic or.
Speaker 8: Something in assistance to state and local governments around transit
Speaker 8: dollars and looking holistically at the connection between that and
Speaker 8: housing and looking holistically at the incentives in the government
Speaker 8: can create for local and state governments to actually engage
Speaker 8: in planning in a holistic manner that includes prioritizing affordable housing.
Speaker 1: Today's word, folks, class is holistic. You must use this
Speaker 1: at least three times in a thirty second clip. And
Speaker 1: you don't have to know what it means. You don't
Speaker 1: have to define that. I mean, this is just petty
Speaker 1: fogging nonsense. Holistic, holistic, holistic, and so well that kind
Speaker 1: of nonsense. Stephanie Rule calls her out.
Speaker 9: She doesn't answer the question around if the GOP is
Speaker 9: controlling the Senate. If she can't raise corporate taxes, where
Speaker 9: is she going to get the money from, you know,
Speaker 9: to expand the child's ax credit and do all the
Speaker 9: things she wants to do. And she says, we just
Speaker 9: have to do it, and that's great, and that's a
Speaker 9: campaign promise. But the issue is if it means we're
Speaker 9: just going to borrow again, then what we're doing is
Speaker 9: we're just never dressing the deficit. And back in the
Speaker 9: days when you were a proud Republican, deaths and deficits mattered.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they're going to matter again because they're exploding and
Speaker 1: now they're trillion dollars every hundred days or whatever. We
Speaker 1: don't have to worry about any of that stuff. Look,
Speaker 1: La La is one of the big advocates of MMT
Speaker 1: modern monetary theory. I call it magic money tree. Deficits
Speaker 1: don't matter, and if inflation goes up, all we do
Speaker 1: is to raise the taxes of people we don't like.
Speaker 1: That's their economic plan. It's utter nonsense. It's even dumber
Speaker 1: than Kynesy in economics. I mean, at least in Knesy economics.
Speaker 1: Even though it was false. They tried to come up
Speaker 1: with mathematical formulas, and the people that are doing MMT
Speaker 1: don't even do math. So rule said, so do you
Speaker 1: still go forward with those plans and do borrow? She says.
Speaker 1: Lalla says, well, but we're going to raise corporate taxes.
Speaker 1: He those are the people she doesn't like. I'm going
Speaker 1: to raise their taxes. We're going to have to make
Speaker 1: sure that the biggest corporations and the billionaires pay their
Speaker 1: fair share.
Speaker 3: That's just it.
Speaker 1: It's about paying their fair share. It's always tax policy
Speaker 1: based on envy, right, And and to tell you that
Speaker 1: you're not going to have to pay the taxes that
Speaker 1: other person, that person that you don't like, they're the
Speaker 1: ones who are going to pay the taxes. Don't worry,
Speaker 1: We're not going to tax you. And yet you are
Speaker 1: going to be the one they tax. So she said,
Speaker 1: as she point out, she said, if the geope is
Speaker 1: controlling the Senate, if she can't raise corporate taxes, where's
Speaker 1: she going to get the money from. Well, she said,
Speaker 1: we just have to do it. And so she said,
Speaker 1: that's that's not an answer. But this is what Lala
Speaker 1: was also selling her. She kept referring to, you know,
Speaker 1: not just holistic holistic, holistic, But we've got the opportunity economy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the opportunity economy. Here's what how she talks about. Shouldn't
Speaker 1: define it, but here's what she says about it.
Speaker 8: The third pillar about opportunity economy is leading the world
Speaker 8: in the industries of the future and making sure America,
Speaker 8: not China, wins the competition for the twenty first century.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we don't like the Chinese. Just copying that from
Speaker 1: Trump as well.
Speaker 8: One of the recurring themes in American history is that
Speaker 8: when we make an intentional effort to invest in our
Speaker 8: industrial strength, it leads to extraordinary prosperity and security, not
Speaker 8: only for years, but for generations. Think of Alexander Hamilton
Speaker 8: having the foresight to build to do that musical facturing
Speaker 8: capabilities of our new nation. Think of Lincoln and the
Speaker 8: Transcontinental Railroad of Eisenhower and the Interstate highway system, Kennedy
Speaker 8: committing America to win the space race and spurring innovation
Speaker 8: across our society.
Speaker 1: M Yeah, okay, so yeah, we should do this because
Speaker 1: Lincoln and Hamilton did it. Can you find any more
Speaker 1: despicable characters? And then, of course, you know, we had
Speaker 1: the interstate system well, that was done for military purposes,
Speaker 1: you realized. And then then we had the Moon launch,
Speaker 1: the moon latch. Let's never forget the Moon system. You
Speaker 1: believe that anyway. Just days ago, Stephanie Rule had argued
Speaker 1: that Harris didn't have to answer tough policy questions because
Speaker 1: she wasn't running for perfect She's running against Trump. Uh oh.
Speaker 1: But then it was so vague and vacuous that you.
Speaker 3: Know she uh.
Speaker 1: She talked about price control.
Speaker 9: Prices are still hot.
Speaker 4: I agree with you.
Speaker 9: You said you want to take this on by going
Speaker 9: after those who engage in price gouging. But as somebody
Speaker 9: who supports free markets, who's a capitalist, how do you
Speaker 9: go after price gouging without implementing price controls? Because once
Speaker 9: we get in the zone, people start to get worried
Speaker 9: and they say, I don't know what she stands for.
Speaker 8: So just to be very frank, I am be honest
Speaker 8: and apologize for going after companies and corporations that take
Speaker 8: advantage of the desperation of the American people. And I
Speaker 8: as Attorney General, I saw this happen in the midst
Speaker 8: of an emergency, whether it be an extreme weather event
Speaker 8: or even the pandemic we saw it where those few companies,
Speaker 8: not the majority, not most, but those few companies that
Speaker 8: would take advantage of the desperation of people and jack
Speaker 8: up prices. Yeah, I'm going to go after them. Yes,
Speaker 8: I'm going to go after them. And that is part
Speaker 8: of a much more comprehensive plan on what we can
Speaker 8: do to bring down the cost of living, including housing,
Speaker 8: including the everyday needs of the American people.
Speaker 1: She has absolutely no idea what the free market is about.
Speaker 1: Anybody that is going to do price controls, anybody that's
Speaker 1: going to say, well, you're gouging people on this stuff.
Speaker 1: Look if if you're able to raise the price, guess
Speaker 1: what that's going to do. It's going to suck in
Speaker 1: more supplies in that area instead of rationing them. Because
Speaker 1: Laala is going to throw me in jail. I just
Speaker 1: won't sell it at all. Right, And you exacerbate the
Speaker 1: problems by saying I'm going to invest, I'm going to control,
Speaker 1: I'm going to centrally plan. She doesn't. She's just a
Speaker 1: full on communist. And of course she always prefaces these
Speaker 1: things by saying, well, to be honest with you, well,
Speaker 1: to be frank with you, to be frank with you,
Speaker 1: let me dodge and weave here and to be honest
Speaker 1: with you, going to next lie to you. Now what
Speaker 1: she is all about is she's got one hundred million
Speaker 1: dollar plan for the economy, but the abortion industry's got
Speaker 1: a hundred million dollar plan for her. See that's the
Speaker 1: way this stuff works.
Speaker 5: You.
Speaker 1: They invest millions into a candidate, and that candidate gives
Speaker 1: back these different industries billions. Uh So the abortion industry
Speaker 1: is pumping money into her campaign, like Matt one hundred
Speaker 1: million dollars, essentially planned parenthood. Think of it this way.
Speaker 1: Planned parenthood is LA law is to La law, as
Speaker 1: Miriam Adelson is to Trump one hundred million dollars. Both
Speaker 1: of them are good for one hundred million dollars. She's
Speaker 1: got one policy, and she is very specific about that policy,
Speaker 1: and she's passionate only about that policy, and she's so
Speaker 1: passionate and specific about it. That dictator that she is.
Speaker 1: Whenever she's passionate about something, whether it is abortion or
Speaker 1: gun control or whatever, she's going to do it by
Speaker 1: executive order. I'm going to dictate this. If she cares
Speaker 1: about it, she's going to dictate it. So that's what
Speaker 1: she said, I'm going to eliminate the filibuster in the
Speaker 1: Senate so that we can pass a law to ban
Speaker 1: any restrictions on abortion anywhere up to or past birth right.
Speaker 1: And she's going to get rid of the filibuster. Well
Speaker 1: wait a minute, says Mention in Cinema, you are both
Speaker 1: running for reelection. You can't come after the filibuster. You
Speaker 1: can come after those kids. You can rip the kids
Speaker 1: to shreds, but don't you dare rip the filibuster to
Speaker 1: shred which, by the way, is not even something is
Speaker 1: in the constitution. You know, it's a good thing. I
Speaker 1: think in general, I think we always have to have
Speaker 1: something that's going to be a check. We should make
Speaker 1: it difficult for government to do things, just as a
Speaker 1: rule of thumb. Otherwise, if it's he if it's quick,
Speaker 1: if it's warp speed, right, we know what's going to come.
Speaker 1: So it should be difficult for these people get things done.
Speaker 1: So I support it, but it's not in constitution, and
Speaker 1: it's not The filibuster is not more important than the babies,
Speaker 1: except to Joe Manchin and the cinema. And so because
Speaker 1: she's pushing that. Both of these people who support abortion
Speaker 1: but they don't like getting rid. They don't like aborting
Speaker 1: the filibuster. Wow, abort the baby, but don't abort my
Speaker 1: senate process to pro abortion. Senators turned on La LA
Speaker 1: over her call to end the filibuster to codify unrestricted abortion.
Speaker 1: Shame on her, says Manchin, not for wanting to abort
Speaker 1: kids what she supports, but for wanting to abort the filibuster.
Speaker 1: She knows a filibuster is the holy grail of democracy.
Speaker 1: Where was this guy when the Paris Climate Accord was
Speaker 1: self ratified by al Gore and by Obama and then
Speaker 1: when it was put back in by Biden? Where was
Speaker 1: Manchin about that? Don't we have I mean, yeah, sure, philibuster. Fine,
Speaker 1: don't you have a process for approving treaties that's actually
Speaker 1: in the Constitution. Shouldn't you care about that? No, he said,
Speaker 1: the philibuster is the only thing that keeps us talking
Speaker 1: and working together. She gets rid of that, then this
Speaker 1: would be the House on steroids. And then Cinema says
Speaker 1: the state the supremely obvious. Eliminating the filibuster to codify
Speaker 1: Roby Wade also enables a future Congress to ban all
Speaker 1: abortion nationwide. What an absolutely terrible short sighted idea. I
Speaker 1: absolutely agree with that. She's the thousand percent right on
Speaker 1: this because I've said this to the about the pro
Speaker 1: life people who want to do just the opposite. See,
Speaker 1: the pro life people want to set a limit for
Speaker 1: abortions in Washington. They want to make it a federal issue,
Speaker 1: and Cinema saying, if you make this a federal issue,
Speaker 1: then you understand when the other side gets in, then
Speaker 1: they are going to ban all abortions. I don't want
Speaker 1: to ban all abortions. I do want to ban all abortions,
Speaker 1: but I think we have to do that at the
Speaker 1: state level, because if we do it in Washington. First
Speaker 1: of all, anything that's important needs to be done at
Speaker 1: the state level. Let's not abdicate anything that's important to
Speaker 1: the federal government. It's too corrupt. It's just too corrupt.
Speaker 1: And first of all, secondly, it doesn't have the constitutional authority.
Speaker 1: What both of them should be saying as senators is that, well,
Speaker 1: if you want to codify Roe v. Wade, then you
Speaker 1: need to amend the Constitution to say that the federal
Speaker 1: government has the power to define when life begins, because
Speaker 1: you don't have that. According to the ninth and tenth Amendment.
Speaker 1: Anything that is not expressly delegated to the federal government
Speaker 1: remains the power of the states and of the people,
Speaker 1: and they have overruled that. In the same way that
Speaker 1: when the Supreme Court decided they were going to define
Speaker 1: what marriage was, they overruled state constitutions and they overruled
Speaker 1: referenda that had been done across the country. Every state
Speaker 1: had rejected homosexual marriage. Even California had rejected it. So
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court overruled the power of the states and
Speaker 1: the powers of the people and usurped that in order
Speaker 1: to define what marriage is. They have no right. Regardless
Speaker 1: of what you think about abortion and about marriage. The
Speaker 1: tenth Amendment is a tenth amendment. And so whether you
Speaker 1: want to support or abandon or deny either one of
Speaker 1: these things, you've got to change the constitution first, or
Speaker 1: just throw the constitution out. And that's a really dangerous thing,
Speaker 1: and that's been done over and over again for a
Speaker 1: very long time by all these people. And so change
Speaker 1: the constitution or shut up. We don't even have this
Speaker 1: discussion until you change the constitution and give yourself the
Speaker 1: constitutional power to make these determinations. But from a practical standpoint,
Speaker 1: Cinema is exactly right, and I agree with her one
Speaker 1: hundred percent. She is pro abortion, I'm pro life. But
Speaker 1: we need to understand that if you give that power
Speaker 1: to Congress, a future Congress is going to do exactly
Speaker 1: the opposite of what you want. And that is an
Speaker 1: absolutely terrible shortsighted idea to put these things into the
Speaker 1: federal government. So absolutely agree with or on the issue
Speaker 1: on the constitutional aspects of that, but not on these
Speaker 1: other issues. Let's take a look at another issue, and
Speaker 1: that is what does all this talk about nuclear power
Speaker 1: tell us about where these people are headed. You know,
Speaker 1: we talk all the time, we say a double standards,
Speaker 1: two faced, or this or that. They talk about it
Speaker 1: in the UK. They say, we have a two tier
Speaker 1: justice system. You have one set of rules for these
Speaker 1: people over here, a different set of rules for those
Speaker 1: right and certainly that is the case over and over again.
Speaker 1: Now we're seeing that there is a two tier system,
Speaker 1: or a hypocritical system here in terms of power. And
Speaker 1: they really do want to have a two tier system
Speaker 1: when it comes to electrical power, because the electrical power
Speaker 1: is going to give them political power over us. That's
Speaker 1: what this clim mcguffin thing is truly about. And yet
Speaker 1: we see everywhere that you have individuals like Romando I'm
Speaker 1: sorry not Romando grand Holme, who's the energy secretary. She
Speaker 1: appeared on CNBC Tuesday and Jennifer grant Home says that
Speaker 1: we need to have small, modular nuclear reactors so we
Speaker 1: can power the AI Data centers. They don't want you
Speaker 1: to have an SUV, but they want the AI Data
Speaker 1: Centers to have their own nuclear reactor, their own mister
Speaker 1: fusion BacT of the future. Whereas where's dockcointed and with
Speaker 1: the professor or whatever they you know, No, there is
Speaker 1: no mister Fusion. It's going to be quite a bit
Speaker 1: bigger than that. But they don't want us to have cars.
Speaker 1: But they do want us to have artificial intelligence, big brother,
Speaker 1: watching everything that we do, telling us eyes and stopping
Speaker 1: us from speaking the truth. That's what artificial intelligence is
Speaker 1: designed to do. And that's why you've got to clear
Speaker 1: the decks. We got to fast track this, we got
Speaker 1: to warp speed it in. You got Pennsylvania Governor saying,
Speaker 1: let's do that for three We're going to run this
Speaker 1: thing really through fast. All the electricity folks is going
Speaker 1: to go to the AI data center for Microsoft enough
Speaker 1: electricity to power seven hundred thousand homes. I wonder how
Speaker 1: many electric cars you could power that kind of electricity.
Speaker 1: But that's not going to be on the grid. That's
Speaker 1: not going to be available to you because they don't
Speaker 1: want you to have cars. They don't want you to
Speaker 1: have even electric cars. That's the whole point. The electric car.
Speaker 3: Is a lie.
Speaker 1: It's a lie. The cake is a lie. The electric
Speaker 1: vehicle is a lie. It's a lie. It's just an illusion.
Speaker 1: It's just to tag you along on this. The electric
Speaker 1: car battery operated off of the grid that they have
Speaker 1: every intention of killing. That they're in the process right
Speaker 1: now of killing. You got the EPA out there now
Speaker 1: treating these power stations as if they were a dirty
Speaker 1: car that needs to be regulated. They have absolutely no
Speaker 1: intention of us having any power. But they're going to
Speaker 1: clear the decks to get these nuclear reactors to all
Speaker 1: these data centers. So Jennifer Granholms says, seems to acknowledge
Speaker 1: that small modular reactors, we should just start calling them
Speaker 1: mister fusions. One technology that we've claimed will be the
Speaker 1: future of powering AI. They're all but a full on
Speaker 1: go for the future. She was asked about how data
Speaker 1: centers would be powered in the future. They asked her,
Speaker 1: They said, well, at the same time, we've been trying
Speaker 1: to obviously replace typical energy sources with renewables. Why let's
Speaker 1: call out that. Why anyway, but we now have this
Speaker 1: incredible potential uptick and the need for power because of
Speaker 1: data centers and the growth of generative AI. We were
Speaker 1: talking about three Mile Island, he said, how do you
Speaker 1: see this coming away? We're talking about that coming back online.
Speaker 1: How do you see this playing out? How's it going
Speaker 1: to mix out? Giving that our power needs could be
Speaker 1: twenty percent higher than right now in just a handful
Speaker 1: of years. Oh, it's going to be much more, much,
Speaker 1: much more than that. As a matter of fact, it's
Speaker 1: Goldman or Bloomberg saying we're going to have fifty percent
Speaker 1: increase in power just for the AI. And so if
Speaker 1: she comes back with an astounding why he says it's
Speaker 1: going to be twenty percent. Now, all the people who
Speaker 1: are actually looking at this thing, it's going to be
Speaker 1: at least fifty percent just for the AI. She says, well,
Speaker 1: the estimates are fifteen percent higher, not twenty percent higher,
Speaker 1: but fifteen percent higher. This Harvard educated lawyer who has
Speaker 1: obviously doesn't have anybody on her staff that can even
Speaker 1: do math or cares to look at the power requirements
Speaker 1: of this stuff, which is the other day I was
Speaker 1: talking about the fact that both Elon Musk and the
Speaker 1: CEO of Toyota or By saying there's enough there's not
Speaker 1: enough electricity on the grid for electric cars. There just isn't.
Speaker 1: Both Toyota and Tesla both the guy's name is Toyo
Speaker 1: Da and Elon must they're both saying there's not enough
Speaker 1: electricity for this. They don't plan on you having an
Speaker 1: electric vehicle that you can give electricity too. So that's
Speaker 1: not going to be a vehicle, is it. But she says,
Speaker 1: oh no, it's only going to be fifteen percent higher
Speaker 1: as a result of both AI and electrifying the transportation sector.
Speaker 1: What a bullfaced lie. I mean, she talks about electrifying
Speaker 1: the transportation sector. She's talking about cars and trains. I
Speaker 1: don't know if she's talking about planes. Some idiots have
Speaker 1: been talking about that as well. Would you get on
Speaker 1: a plane that runs on a battery worse than Boeing? Uh?
Speaker 3: But you know.
Speaker 1: I mean they're talking about planes, they're talking about trains,
Speaker 1: they're talking about semis, they're not just talking about passenger vehicle.
Speaker 5: This is your captain speaking just to let you there's
Speaker 5: going to be a slight delay as we charge the
Speaker 5: next twelve hours on the tarmac.
Speaker 1: These remain in your seats more like the next twelve days.
Speaker 1: And by the way, no air conditioning we got. We're
Speaker 1: charging this thing, so you just kinda have to sweat
Speaker 1: it out on the tarmac. So anyway, so she says, no, no,
Speaker 1: it's only going to be fifteen percent higher, and that's
Speaker 1: for the AI data centers as well as the transportations.
Speaker 1: What a lie, she says. They're committed. They're telling us
Speaker 1: to bringing that power with them, which is why they
Speaker 1: the need for nuclear small modular reactors, co locating data
Speaker 1: centers with small reactors or partnerships. Yeah, she said, we
Speaker 1: got a ton of nuclear sites in this country that
Speaker 1: have been permitted for additional reactors that could be powering
Speaker 1: data centers as well. We're working with those. Look, these
Speaker 1: are the people who are banning any kind of appliance
Speaker 1: or heating or air conditioning or stove or anything that
Speaker 1: isn't electric. We're not even going to have electricity to
Speaker 1: cook our food. But they're going to grease the skids
Speaker 1: for the AI data centers because we know how they're
Speaker 1: going to use them. Yeah, it was Blackrock. I couldn't remember.
Speaker 1: It was a bloomberg Er. It was Blackrock that says
Speaker 1: that AI is going to drive a fifty percent jump
Speaker 1: and Asian energy demand just by itself, you know, forget
Speaker 1: about the entire transportation sector, forget about all your home
Speaker 1: appliances and everything else. No, just AI alone, a fifty
Speaker 1: percent jump and demand for energy, says Blackrock. And so
Speaker 1: they're looking at this and how they can make money
Speaker 1: off of this. Every client we speak to is interested
Speaker 1: in investing in infrastructure, specifically energy transition and digital related infrastructure.
Speaker 1: This is the big grift, This is the big waalf
Speaker 1: transfer for you know, the energy transition. This is what
Speaker 1: the un is talking about. Oh, we got to accelerate
Speaker 1: these sustainable development goals. And so that means that everybody's
Speaker 1: going to have to spend trillions, tens of trillions of
Speaker 1: dollars in order to pay for this stuff. And then
Speaker 1: they're going to jack up your energy rates ten to
Speaker 1: twenty times or more. I'm not exaggerating with this stuff.
Speaker 1: We've gone through the numbers with us ten to twenty
Speaker 1: times more for your electricity if you can get it.
Speaker 1: Scarcity rationing. This is not only a product of Marxist
Speaker 1: centrally planned control economies, but it's also how they rule.
Speaker 1: They rule through austerity and through dictates. People like Jennifer Granholme,
Speaker 1: people like La La Harris. These people are as vain
Speaker 1: as they are insane, and they are as vain and
Speaker 1: insane as the gender transition people. When they talk about
Speaker 1: our energy transition stuff, they identify with wind and solar,
Speaker 1: but it's just part of their imagination. Don't believe it.
Speaker 1: They're just trying to gaslight us while they take away
Speaker 1: the gas that we light our stoves with. I Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: in the UK we have the Labor Labor Party conference.
Speaker 1: Ed Milliban is doubling down on his d industrialization strategy,
Speaker 1: says Daily Skeptic. That's exactly right. The techno feudalism is
Speaker 1: about a making sure that the poor are immobilized, that
Speaker 1: we are poor, that we're immobilized, that we're surveilled, that
Speaker 1: were lied to. You know, I guess we could say
Speaker 1: surveilled propagandas and censored the SPC agenda. You know, it's
Speaker 1: not the SDG Sustainable Development Goals, it's the SPC that
Speaker 1: they're really after. Well, we'll have more to talk about
Speaker 1: with us tomorrow. As as a matter of fact, there's
Speaker 1: an interesting story about what happened with crypto when they
Speaker 1: banned it. Everybody's in rates went up. Thanks for listening,
Speaker 1: have a good day. The common man. They created common
Speaker 1: Core and dumbed down our children. They created common past,
Speaker 1: track and control us. They're Commons project to make sure
Speaker 1: the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see
Speaker 1: the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of
Speaker 1: us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
Speaker 3: That is what we have in common.
Speaker 1: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 1: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 1: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 1: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 1: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 1: at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
Speaker 1: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 1: keep us in your prayers, Ddavidnightshow dot com