1
00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:03,640
Speaker 1: Okay, So I want to start our time together today

2
00:00:03,759 --> 00:00:06,160
by having you take a little like a rapid fire

3
00:00:06,200 --> 00:00:08,439
pop quiz. Oh boy, yeah. I want you to answer

4
00:00:08,519 --> 00:00:10,519
these honestly in your head as I say them, just

5
00:00:10,560 --> 00:00:13,279
to test your your baseline assumptions about the world.

6
00:00:13,640 --> 00:00:14,880
Speaker 2: Ready, I'm ready, let's hear it.

7
00:00:15,039 --> 00:00:19,320
Speaker 1: Number one, do eggs raise your cholesterol? Number two? Do

8
00:00:19,359 --> 00:00:21,719
you really need to drink eight glasses of water a

9
00:00:21,800 --> 00:00:22,879
day for optimal health?

10
00:00:23,039 --> 00:00:24,519
Speaker 2: Standard advice right there, right?

11
00:00:25,120 --> 00:00:29,760
Speaker 1: Number three? Does milk build strong burns and teeth? Number four?

12
00:00:30,399 --> 00:00:36,600
Are diamonds actually inherently rare? And number five does depression

13
00:00:36,640 --> 00:00:38,640
come from a chemical imbalance in the brain.

14
00:00:39,200 --> 00:00:41,000
Speaker 2: It sounds like a standard trivia game you might play

15
00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:43,960
at a pub, honestly, but the reality behind those specific

16
00:00:44,039 --> 00:00:49,399
questions is, well, it's far more insidious than simple common misconceptions.

17
00:00:48,759 --> 00:00:51,439
Speaker 1: Exactly because it's a trick question. I want you to

18
00:00:51,479 --> 00:00:53,840
look closely at those answers in your mind, because none

19
00:00:53,880 --> 00:00:57,320
of those statements are true, not a single one, not one.

20
00:00:57,520 --> 00:00:59,840
And we are talking about innocent mistakes here. We aren't

21
00:00:59,840 --> 00:01:02,840
talking talking about, you know, outdated science that just naturally

22
00:01:02,880 --> 00:01:05,519
evolved over time as researchers learn more.

23
00:01:05,640 --> 00:01:11,200
Speaker 2: No, these are the results of highly coordinated psychological operationsops syops,

24
00:01:11,359 --> 00:01:16,640
carefully crafted, incredibly well funded campaigns designed to control consumer behavior,

25
00:01:17,040 --> 00:01:18,120
shape public.

26
00:01:17,879 --> 00:01:20,799
Speaker 1: Perception, dictate what you buy, exactly.

27
00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:23,879
Speaker 2: What you buy, what you think, and ultimately how you

28
00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:24,719
live your life.

29
00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:28,799
Speaker 1: Welcome to thrilling Threads Today. We're taking your sources and

30
00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:31,519
pulling on a thread that is going to fundamentally unravel

31
00:01:31,599 --> 00:01:34,280
the fabric of how you process the news, your social

32
00:01:34,319 --> 00:01:37,439
media feeds, and honestly, maybe even history itself.

33
00:01:37,959 --> 00:01:42,159
Speaker 2: And it is a fascinating, if slightly terrifying thread to pull.

34
00:01:42,280 --> 00:01:43,920
Speaker 1: Yeah, terrifying is a good word for it.

35
00:01:44,359 --> 00:01:47,280
Speaker 2: What we are exploring today, based on the intelligence documents

36
00:01:47,280 --> 00:01:50,120
and research notes we've been reviewing, is the reality that

37
00:01:50,159 --> 00:01:50,480
we are.

38
00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:52,879
Speaker 1: Being programmed every single minute.

39
00:01:52,640 --> 00:01:55,439
Speaker 2: Every minute of every day. There is a silent battle

40
00:01:55,480 --> 00:01:58,560
being waged for your attention and your foundational beliefs, and

41
00:01:58,640 --> 00:02:02,239
most people have absolutely no ideas happening because the architecture

42
00:02:02,280 --> 00:02:04,280
of the deception is invisible by design.

43
00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:07,000
Speaker 1: But there is a mathematical way to see the matrix.

44
00:02:07,159 --> 00:02:11,199
Speaker 2: Yes, there is a rigid, identifiable structure to the deception.

45
00:02:11,280 --> 00:02:14,479
Speaker 1: And that's our central mission for this exploration into the

46
00:02:14,520 --> 00:02:17,599
source material. By the time we finish unpacking this today,

47
00:02:17,639 --> 00:02:20,639
you are going to be equipped with a literal, deployable

48
00:02:20,759 --> 00:02:23,639
framework to detect manipulation in real time.

49
00:02:23,840 --> 00:02:25,360
Speaker 2: It's powerful stuff.

50
00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:27,759
Speaker 1: It really is. We are looking at the groundbreaking work

51
00:02:27,759 --> 00:02:31,560
of an intelligence expert named Chase Hughes. The source file

52
00:02:31,639 --> 00:02:35,280
details his background and man it is extensive. This is

53
00:02:35,319 --> 00:02:38,680
a guy who spent two decades, twenty full years training

54
00:02:38,759 --> 00:02:42,240
military personnel, Navy seals, the CIA, and the FBI, and

55
00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:45,879
the dark arts of influenced behavioral analysis and interrogation.

56
00:02:46,080 --> 00:02:49,199
Speaker 2: He literally trains the people who run psychological operations for

57
00:02:49,240 --> 00:02:49,879
a living right.

58
00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:53,120
Speaker 1: And out of that deep classified experience he created something

59
00:02:53,159 --> 00:02:56,159
called the NCI, the Narrative Credibility Index.

60
00:02:56,280 --> 00:02:59,879
Speaker 2: The NCI is essentially a light detector for reality, or

61
00:03:00,199 --> 00:03:03,639
maybe more accurately, it's an engineered reality scoring system.

62
00:03:03,719 --> 00:03:05,800
Speaker 1: I like that engineered reality.

63
00:03:05,439 --> 00:03:10,199
Speaker 2: Because Chase Hughes spent years studying hundreds of distinct psychological operations.

64
00:03:10,520 --> 00:03:14,439
He looked at government propaganda, corporate malfeasans, modern social media

65
00:03:14,439 --> 00:03:19,159
manipulation campaigns, and historical disinformation, all the big hits, all

66
00:03:19,199 --> 00:03:21,800
of them. And what he realized is that these campaigns

67
00:03:21,800 --> 00:03:27,240
aren't all unique, highly original snowflakes. Because human zychology is

68
00:03:27,319 --> 00:03:31,360
relatively fixed, the methods to manipulate it are also fixed.

69
00:03:31,520 --> 00:03:34,800
Speaker 1: They all rely on the exact same predictable mechanisms exactly.

70
00:03:34,879 --> 00:03:38,599
Speaker 2: So he built a twenty question diagnostic test to detect

71
00:03:38,599 --> 00:03:40,840
these patterns before they can take root in your mind.

72
00:03:41,159 --> 00:03:43,360
Speaker 1: Let's actually break down the mechanics of how this secret

73
00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:45,120
sauce works, because I really want you to have this

74
00:03:45,159 --> 00:03:47,520
in your mental toolkit right now. It's a twenty question

75
00:03:47,599 --> 00:03:49,639
test and it gives you a score from zero to

76
00:03:49,680 --> 00:03:50,240
one hundred.

77
00:03:50,520 --> 00:03:54,120
Speaker 2: Precisely, each of the twenty questions on the Narrative Credibility

78
00:03:54,120 --> 00:03:59,039
Index assesses a very specific, isolated tactic of cognitive manipulation.

79
00:03:59,280 --> 00:04:03,400
Speaker 1: We're talking about metrics like over use of novelty, tribal division,

80
00:04:03,479 --> 00:04:05,800
suppression of descent, or linguistic isolation.

81
00:04:06,639 --> 00:04:09,120
Speaker 2: When you run a news story or a corporate press

82
00:04:09,159 --> 00:04:12,400
release through the NCI, you score each of those twenty

83
00:04:12,479 --> 00:04:15,759
questions on a scale from one to five points. You

84
00:04:15,840 --> 00:04:18,240
tally it up, and you get a final score out

85
00:04:18,240 --> 00:04:18,879
of one hundred.

86
00:04:19,279 --> 00:04:22,240
Speaker 1: Now, the interpretation of that scale is where the real

87
00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:26,959
value lies. If a narrative scores below forty you are

88
00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:29,040
generally looking at legitimate information.

89
00:04:29,759 --> 00:04:32,199
Speaker 2: Right, it might be biased, I mean, all human communication

90
00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:35,040
has some bias, but it's just normal, messy reality. It's

91
00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:36,319
not a weaponized campaign.

92
00:04:36,480 --> 00:04:39,839
Speaker 1: However, if a narrative score is above a seventy, you

93
00:04:39,879 --> 00:04:42,319
are looking at a confirmed psychological operation.

94
00:04:42,639 --> 00:04:46,199
Speaker 2: The mathematical density of manipulation tactics is simply too high

95
00:04:46,279 --> 00:04:47,720
to be an organic coincidence.

96
00:04:47,839 --> 00:04:49,759
Speaker 1: But then there's the middle ground. And this is the

97
00:04:49,759 --> 00:04:52,360
concept that really shifted my perspective when I was digging

98
00:04:52,360 --> 00:04:55,800
through the materials. What happens when a story sits right.

99
00:04:55,639 --> 00:04:58,800
Speaker 2: In the middle the danger zone? The danger zone the

100
00:04:58,800 --> 00:05:03,040
score between forty and Sive Hughes argues in the historical

101
00:05:03,120 --> 00:05:05,959
data strongly supports this that this is arguably the most

102
00:05:06,079 --> 00:05:07,160
dangerous category of.

103
00:05:07,120 --> 00:05:08,279
Speaker 1: All because it's subtle.

104
00:05:08,759 --> 00:05:12,079
Speaker 2: Yes, yeah, a narrative in this range isn't complete fabrication.

105
00:05:12,759 --> 00:05:16,160
It is a story built around a very real, verifiable

106
00:05:16,279 --> 00:05:17,079
kernel of truth.

107
00:05:17,199 --> 00:05:20,680
Speaker 1: But that truth has been deliberately weaponized exactly.

108
00:05:21,079 --> 00:05:25,199
Speaker 2: It is twisted and surrounded by a hidden agenda. And

109
00:05:25,240 --> 00:05:27,800
that agenda, as the sources point out time and time again,

110
00:05:28,399 --> 00:05:30,480
is never designed to empower you.

111
00:05:30,519 --> 00:05:31,399
Speaker 1: No, definitely not.

112
00:05:31,560 --> 00:05:34,879
Speaker 2: It's designed to profit off you or to control your behavior.

113
00:05:35,439 --> 00:05:37,680
The truth is merely the bait on the hook.

114
00:05:37,879 --> 00:05:40,639
Speaker 1: The bait on the hook, that is the perfect way

115
00:05:40,759 --> 00:05:43,720
to visualize it. You see a piece of news that

116
00:05:43,839 --> 00:05:48,879
is technically factually accurate, that's the bait. But the delivery mechanism,

117
00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:53,000
the emotional framing, the omitted context, that's the hook. That's

118
00:05:53,000 --> 00:05:55,560
the hook. So to you, the person listening to this

119
00:05:55,639 --> 00:05:57,399
right now, I want to make a promise. By the

120
00:05:57,480 --> 00:05:59,480
end of this deep dive into the sources, you are

121
00:05:59,519 --> 00:06:02,000
going to be able to see these manipulative patterns everywhere.

122
00:06:02,079 --> 00:06:03,879
The veil is going to be lifted.

123
00:06:03,600 --> 00:06:05,079
Speaker 2: And we have to warn you up front. It might

124
00:06:05,120 --> 00:06:06,160
just make you a little bit angry.

125
00:06:06,240 --> 00:06:10,519
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, when you realize how often your emotions, your empathy,

126
00:06:10,560 --> 00:06:12,600
and your outrage have been played like a fiddle by

127
00:06:12,680 --> 00:06:15,000
people who do not care about you, it's a deeply

128
00:06:15,040 --> 00:06:18,680
sobering moment. It is to really grasp how the NCI

129
00:06:18,759 --> 00:06:21,920
exposes these operations. We need to look at a textbook

130
00:06:22,000 --> 00:06:25,839
historical example. We're going to start with a classic pr

131
00:06:25,959 --> 00:06:28,959
siop a masterclass in selling a war.

132
00:06:29,439 --> 00:06:32,040
Speaker 2: We need to go back to a very specific moment

133
00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:36,879
in geopolitical history. The date is October tenth, nineteen ninety.

134
00:06:36,839 --> 00:06:39,800
Speaker 1: Set the stage for us. What is the context of

135
00:06:39,800 --> 00:06:43,040
the world on that specific day in nineteen ninety.

136
00:06:42,839 --> 00:06:46,319
Speaker 2: Well, the impending Gulf War is dominating the political landscape.

137
00:06:46,680 --> 00:06:50,439
A few months prior, in August, Saddam Hussein's Iraqi forces

138
00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:54,639
invaded and occupied the neighboring nation of Kuwait. The George H. W.

139
00:06:54,800 --> 00:06:58,000
Bush administration in the United States is strongly advocating for

140
00:06:58,079 --> 00:07:01,079
a massive military intervention to push your rock out. They

141
00:07:01,120 --> 00:07:04,199
are massing troops in Saudi Arabia for Operation Desert Shield.

142
00:07:04,319 --> 00:07:08,160
Speaker 1: But there is a massive, seemingly insurmountable hurdle standing in

143
00:07:08,199 --> 00:07:10,360
the way of the administration's.

144
00:07:09,600 --> 00:07:12,519
Speaker 2: Goals, A huge hurdle. The American public by and large

145
00:07:12,600 --> 00:07:14,519
has absolutely no appetite for a war in the.

146
00:07:14,480 --> 00:07:16,879
Speaker 1: Middle East, and you have to remember the historical hangover

147
00:07:16,920 --> 00:07:20,040
at play here. The shadow of Vietnam is still incredibly

148
00:07:20,079 --> 00:07:21,800
heavy over the American consciousness.

149
00:07:22,000 --> 00:07:26,000
Speaker 2: Exactly. The public is highly skeptical. They are completely unsupportive

150
00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:30,120
of sending American troops overseas to die for what many

151
00:07:30,279 --> 00:07:33,079
explicitly viewed as a regional conflict over oil.

152
00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:36,399
Speaker 1: Interests, and in a democratic system, you simply cannot sustain

153
00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:40,360
a major protracted war without robust public backing.

154
00:07:40,480 --> 00:07:43,000
Speaker 2: You can't. The administration was hitting a brick wall. They

155
00:07:43,040 --> 00:07:44,040
needed a catalyst.

156
00:07:44,360 --> 00:07:48,160
Speaker 1: They needed an event so visceral and so morally clarifying

157
00:07:48,199 --> 00:07:51,600
that it would shift public consciousness overnight and render all

158
00:07:51,720 --> 00:07:53,959
geopolitical debate utterly obsolete.

159
00:07:54,040 --> 00:07:56,680
Speaker 2: And the administration found their catalyst in a fifteen year

160
00:07:56,680 --> 00:07:57,120
old girl.

161
00:07:57,319 --> 00:08:00,720
Speaker 1: She appeared before the United States Congressional Human Rights its Caucus.

162
00:08:01,160 --> 00:08:05,079
She was introduced only by her first name, Niira, supposedly

163
00:08:05,120 --> 00:08:07,839
to protect her family, still trapped in occupied Kuwait.

164
00:08:08,160 --> 00:08:10,920
Speaker 2: The testimony she delivered that day is something straight out

165
00:08:10,920 --> 00:08:12,439
of a dystopian horror script.

166
00:08:12,639 --> 00:08:15,120
Speaker 1: Just reading the transcript of that testimony in your source

167
00:08:15,160 --> 00:08:16,560
files makes my stomach turn.

168
00:08:16,879 --> 00:08:20,600
Speaker 2: The details of her testimony were specifically designed for maximum

169
00:08:20,639 --> 00:08:25,160
psychological impact. She tearfully informed the lawmakers that she'd had

170
00:08:25,199 --> 00:08:28,600
been volunteering at the Aladan Hospital in Kuwait City when

171
00:08:28,639 --> 00:08:31,160
a rocky soldiers stormed the medical facility.

172
00:08:31,319 --> 00:08:34,919
Speaker 1: She claimed on the official Congressional record, under oath, with

173
00:08:35,080 --> 00:08:39,120
national television cameras rolling, that she personally watched these soldiers

174
00:08:39,360 --> 00:08:40,759
enter the neonatal ward.

175
00:08:40,879 --> 00:08:44,120
Speaker 2: She described them taking premature babies out of their incubators,

176
00:08:44,159 --> 00:08:47,200
stealing the incubators to ship back to Iraq, and leaving

177
00:08:47,200 --> 00:08:49,759
the infants to die on the cold hospital floor.

178
00:08:49,919 --> 00:08:52,799
Speaker 1: And the impact on the country was instantaneous, wasn't it?

179
00:08:52,799 --> 00:08:56,080
Speaker 2: It was seismic. Senators immediately cited her testimony as the

180
00:08:56,080 --> 00:09:01,480
primary moral justification for military action. The public was completely outraged.

181
00:09:01,519 --> 00:09:05,480
Speaker 1: The debate over oil interests or regional stability vanished instantly.

182
00:09:05,720 --> 00:09:09,080
Speaker 2: Within a matter of months, the United States Congress authorized

183
00:09:09,120 --> 00:09:11,759
the use of military force and we were formally at

184
00:09:11,799 --> 00:09:14,639
war with Iraq. The narrative had completely flipped.

185
00:09:14,679 --> 00:09:18,559
Speaker 1: Sadam Hussein was no longer just a problematic foreign dictator, right.

186
00:09:18,919 --> 00:09:22,279
Speaker 2: The incubator story framed him in the public consciousness as

187
00:09:22,279 --> 00:09:27,399
an existential, monstrous evil directly comparable to Adolf Hitler.

188
00:09:27,480 --> 00:09:30,480
Speaker 1: Okay, so let's take this incredibly pivotal historical event and

189
00:09:30,559 --> 00:09:34,440
run it through Chase uses NCI framework. How does a

190
00:09:34,519 --> 00:09:38,159
tool designed to detect manipulation process the NAIRA testimony.

191
00:09:38,399 --> 00:09:41,879
Speaker 2: The results are staggering, and they highlight the predictive power

192
00:09:41,879 --> 00:09:44,639
of the framework. Let's look at how Hughes scores this.

193
00:09:44,759 --> 00:09:47,639
First look at the metric of timing. Okay, the NCI

194
00:09:47,679 --> 00:09:50,879
gives this a flawless five out of five. The scoring

195
00:09:50,919 --> 00:09:54,600
criteria for timing asks, does the revelation of this information

196
00:09:54,799 --> 00:09:58,120
perfectly align with the immediate strategic needs of the entity

197
00:09:58,159 --> 00:09:58,799
delivering it.

198
00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:00,759
Speaker 1: And in this case her testimon he landed at the

199
00:10:00,799 --> 00:10:04,759
exact desperate moment the administration needed to manufacture consent for

200
00:10:04,799 --> 00:10:06,039
a war nobody wanted.

201
00:10:06,159 --> 00:10:09,960
Speaker 2: Yes, it wasn't a random journalistic investigation. The timing was

202
00:10:09,960 --> 00:10:12,759
perfectly synchronized with a political deadline.

203
00:10:12,840 --> 00:10:15,440
Speaker 1: Then we moved to the NCI metric of emotional manipulation,

204
00:10:15,679 --> 00:10:17,840
again a five out of five, and it's easy to

205
00:10:17,840 --> 00:10:20,879
see why the source material refers to this specific tactic

206
00:10:20,960 --> 00:10:22,919
as psychological napalm.

207
00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:24,840
Speaker 2: That is the most accurate phrase possible.

208
00:10:25,200 --> 00:10:29,279
Speaker 1: Nothing overrides human logic. Nothing shuts down the critical thinking

209
00:10:29,320 --> 00:10:33,039
and analytical centers of the prefrontal cortex faster than the

210
00:10:33,080 --> 00:10:35,840
mental image of innocent infants being brutally murdered.

211
00:10:35,960 --> 00:10:40,639
Speaker 2: It's an evolutionary hack. Human beings are biologically hardwired to

212
00:10:40,679 --> 00:10:44,840
protect the vulnerable. When you trigger that specific protective instinct,

213
00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:47,159
it bypasses the intellect entirely.

214
00:10:47,440 --> 00:10:49,799
Speaker 1: You hear that story, and you aren't asking for a

215
00:10:49,879 --> 00:10:52,919
nuanced breakdown of Middle Eastern geopolitics anymore.

216
00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:55,919
Speaker 2: No, you aren't questioning the logistical supply chains of the

217
00:10:55,919 --> 00:10:59,879
Iraqi army. You are just seeing read you are primed

218
00:11:00,120 --> 00:11:02,879
for violence to stop the perceived threat.

219
00:11:02,960 --> 00:11:04,600
Speaker 1: But wait, let me push back on the framework for

220
00:11:04,639 --> 00:11:07,360
a second. Here, let's play Devil's advocate. Just because something

221
00:11:07,440 --> 00:11:10,840
is highly emotional and perfectly timed doesn't automatically mean it's

222
00:11:10,840 --> 00:11:14,039
a psio right right, Terrible things happen in war, and

223
00:11:14,159 --> 00:11:16,799
victims speak out when they get the chance. How does

224
00:11:16,840 --> 00:11:20,720
the NCI differentiate between a genuinely horrific event and a

225
00:11:20,799 --> 00:11:22,120
manufactured narrative?

226
00:11:22,320 --> 00:11:24,840
Speaker 2: That is the exact right question to ask, and it's

227
00:11:24,840 --> 00:11:28,240
why the NCI relies on a clustering of twenty different metrics,

228
00:11:28,279 --> 00:11:30,759
not just one or two. The real tell comes when

229
00:11:30,759 --> 00:11:33,440
we look at the structural delivery of the narrative. The

230
00:11:33,559 --> 00:11:37,200
NCI metric for uniform messaging and authority pressure scores another

231
00:11:37,240 --> 00:11:38,080
five out a five.

232
00:11:38,320 --> 00:11:41,320
Speaker 1: This wasn't a rumor circulating on a bulletin board exactly.

233
00:11:41,480 --> 00:11:46,799
Speaker 2: This was official congressional testimony. The inherent institutional authority of

234
00:11:46,799 --> 00:11:50,919
the United States Congress was weaponized to validate the story

235
00:11:50,960 --> 00:11:51,679
without question.

236
00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:56,480
Speaker 1: Furthermore, every single major news outlet repeated the exact same story,

237
00:11:56,919 --> 00:12:00,720
using the exact same emotional language and approved talking points.

238
00:12:00,960 --> 00:12:05,240
Speaker 2: There was virtually no independent journalistic verification taking place. It

239
00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:09,080
was a closed loop echo chamber of state sanctioned outrage.

240
00:12:08,720 --> 00:12:12,120
Speaker 1: And that leads directly into the NCI metric of missing information,

241
00:12:12,240 --> 00:12:14,519
which also hits a five out of five. When you

242
00:12:14,559 --> 00:12:17,480
actually look back at the historical record, there are no

243
00:12:17,600 --> 00:12:21,480
other witnesses brought forward to corroborate Naira's account none.

244
00:12:21,759 --> 00:12:23,879
Speaker 2: There were no follow up interviews allowed with her by

245
00:12:23,879 --> 00:12:27,320
the press. Independent verification on the ground in Kuwait was

246
00:12:27,399 --> 00:12:29,720
conveniently blocked due to the occupation.

247
00:12:30,080 --> 00:12:33,840
Speaker 1: The entire justification for a massive global conflict rested on

248
00:12:33,879 --> 00:12:36,679
the unverified word of a single fifteen year old girl.

249
00:12:36,960 --> 00:12:39,720
Speaker 2: When you tally all of these structural red flags upon

250
00:12:39,759 --> 00:12:44,039
the NCI scale, this event scores an incredible eighty eight

251
00:12:44,159 --> 00:12:45,519
out of one hundred.

252
00:12:45,279 --> 00:12:46,080
Speaker 1: And eighty eight.

253
00:12:46,399 --> 00:12:48,879
Speaker 2: That is wild and eighty eight out of one hundred

254
00:12:48,919 --> 00:12:53,320
is a screaming siren. It is an overwhelming, mathematically dense

255
00:12:53,399 --> 00:12:58,840
signature of a highly coordinated psychological operation. The system flags

256
00:12:58,879 --> 00:13:02,519
it not just as biased, but is entirely manufactured information.

257
00:13:03,039 --> 00:13:06,240
Speaker 1: And the tragic irony here is that the NCI system,

258
00:13:06,399 --> 00:13:09,159
had it existed and been widely used by the public

259
00:13:09,159 --> 00:13:12,240
in nineteen ninety, would have predicted the lie a full

260
00:13:12,320 --> 00:13:14,200
decade before the truth actually came out.

261
00:13:14,279 --> 00:13:18,480
Speaker 2: Because ten years later, the full, unvarnished story was finally revealed.

262
00:13:18,519 --> 00:13:20,639
Speaker 1: And it is sickening. The entire thing is a.

263
00:13:20,600 --> 00:13:25,399
Speaker 2: Fabrication, complete fiction. Naiia was not a random, brave hospital volunteer.

264
00:13:25,519 --> 00:13:28,200
She was Naira al Saba, the daughter of the Kowhiti

265
00:13:28,279 --> 00:13:29,720
ambassador to the United States.

266
00:13:29,759 --> 00:13:32,159
Speaker 1: Unbelievable. She was not even in Kuwait during the invasion.

267
00:13:32,279 --> 00:13:34,559
Speaker 2: No, she was living comfably in Washington, d C. She

268
00:13:34,639 --> 00:13:36,840
was never at the Ala Dahn Hospital. There were no

269
00:13:37,000 --> 00:13:39,639
babies thrown on the cold floor by Iraqi soldiers.

270
00:13:39,799 --> 00:13:44,360
Speaker 1: Amnesty International and other human rights organizations later investigated the

271
00:13:44,399 --> 00:13:48,799
hospital and found the entire narrative was a calculated, written script,

272
00:13:48,960 --> 00:13:51,840
A script written by who. That's the part that really

273
00:13:51,840 --> 00:13:54,480
gets me. Who sits in a boardroom and comes up

274
00:13:54,519 --> 00:13:58,360
with something this dark? Who engineer's psychological napalm?

275
00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:04,000
Speaker 2: A public relations agency, specifically a massive, highly influential pr

276
00:14:04,080 --> 00:14:06,919
firm called Hill and Nolton. Hill in Nolton, a group

277
00:14:06,960 --> 00:14:10,159
called Citizens for a Free Kuwait, which was essentially a

278
00:14:10,200 --> 00:14:13,679
front group heavily funded by the exiled Kuwaiti government, hired

279
00:14:13,759 --> 00:14:17,279
Hill and Nolton to orchestrate a massive lobbying and public

280
00:14:17,320 --> 00:14:20,039
relations campaign to ensure the United States entered the war.

281
00:14:20,200 --> 00:14:23,600
Speaker 1: Hill and Milton understood the behavioral psychology of the American public.

282
00:14:23,720 --> 00:14:27,879
Speaker 2: Intimately, they knew that you couldn't sell this war on strategy, logic,

283
00:14:28,000 --> 00:14:29,960
or oil. You had to cheat to win.

284
00:14:30,240 --> 00:14:34,159
Speaker 1: You had to manufacture an atrocity so horrific, so emotionally

285
00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:37,840
paralyzing that rational debate became socially unacceptable.

286
00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:38,480
Speaker 2: Exactly.

287
00:14:38,519 --> 00:14:40,320
Speaker 1: So what does this all mean for you, the listener?

288
00:14:40,559 --> 00:14:42,759
Why should you care about a PR stunt from over

289
00:14:42,799 --> 00:14:43,600
thirty years ago.

290
00:14:43,879 --> 00:14:46,159
Speaker 2: You have to look at the real world cost of

291
00:14:46,200 --> 00:14:52,879
this manufactured reality. We are talking about severe generational consequences.

292
00:14:52,159 --> 00:14:55,559
Speaker 1: Over one hundred Americans dead and nearly five hundred wounded

293
00:14:55,559 --> 00:14:59,080
in action and estimated thirty thousand to one hundred thousand

294
00:14:59,080 --> 00:15:00,440
Iraqis killed, and.

295
00:15:00,399 --> 00:15:03,600
Speaker 2: A direct financial bill to the United States taskpayers of

296
00:15:03,679 --> 00:15:07,840
roughly sixty one billion dollars at the time which when

297
00:15:07,879 --> 00:15:10,120
you factor in long term veteran care and the interest

298
00:15:10,159 --> 00:15:13,159
paid on the borrowed money, stretches into the trillions.

299
00:15:13,360 --> 00:15:16,480
Speaker 1: Over the decades, all of that blood, all of that treasure,

300
00:15:16,799 --> 00:15:19,720
mobilized not by a genuine threat to the homeland, but

301
00:15:19,759 --> 00:15:23,120
by a pr agency operating in the shadows, pulling the

302
00:15:23,200 --> 00:15:24,759
levers of human psychology.

303
00:15:24,840 --> 00:15:29,399
Speaker 2: It highlights the terrifying, almost unchecked power of these agencies.

304
00:15:30,279 --> 00:15:33,000
When you have an entity that understands human emotional triggers

305
00:15:33,039 --> 00:15:35,679
better than the public understands their own minds, they can

306
00:15:35,759 --> 00:15:38,120
quite literally conjure a war out of thin air.

307
00:15:38,399 --> 00:15:41,080
Speaker 1: They use the media infrastructure not as a check on power,

308
00:15:41,159 --> 00:15:44,480
but as a passive delivery mechanism for their psychological payload.

309
00:15:44,679 --> 00:15:45,960
Speaker 2: It's incredibly dark.

310
00:15:45,879 --> 00:15:48,720
Speaker 1: It really is. But as we transition to the next

311
00:15:48,720 --> 00:15:52,120
piece of this puzzle, the source material reveals something even

312
00:15:52,159 --> 00:15:57,120
more unsettling. Hilen Nelton's playbook wasn't some new, desperate invention

313
00:15:57,159 --> 00:16:00,120
of the nineteen nineties. Now, the incubator story wasn't a

314
00:16:00,159 --> 00:16:03,639
one off phenomaly. They had been perfecting this dark art

315
00:16:03,720 --> 00:16:06,559
of corporate and political syops for decades.

316
00:16:06,759 --> 00:16:11,320
Speaker 2: They absolutely had. The architecture of deception is iterative. To

317
00:16:11,399 --> 00:16:15,080
trace the lineage of this specific type of high level manipulation,

318
00:16:15,440 --> 00:16:18,080
we have to travel back even further in the timeline.

319
00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:20,240
Let's go to the winter of nineteen fifty three.

320
00:16:20,320 --> 00:16:21,200
Speaker 1: He guess there, to.

321
00:16:21,159 --> 00:16:23,639
Speaker 2: The luxurious Plaza hotel in New York City.

322
00:16:24,080 --> 00:16:27,159
Speaker 1: This is such a cinematic moment in the notes. Picture

323
00:16:27,360 --> 00:16:31,200
a smoky room, heavily draped full of men in tailored suits.

324
00:16:31,480 --> 00:16:34,960
The chief executives of America's major tobacco companies, the heads

325
00:16:34,960 --> 00:16:38,039
of American Tobacco Philip Morris, R. J. Reynolds, have all

326
00:16:38,080 --> 00:16:39,279
gathered in one room.

327
00:16:39,240 --> 00:16:41,799
Speaker 2: And they are in a state of absolute existential panic.

328
00:16:41,879 --> 00:16:44,720
Speaker 1: And they had phenomenal reason to panic. Their own highly

329
00:16:44,720 --> 00:16:48,080
funded internal scientists had just confirmed that the broader medical

330
00:16:48,080 --> 00:16:52,679
community was beginning to strongly suspect cigarettes cause lung cancer.

331
00:16:53,000 --> 00:16:57,000
Speaker 2: The internal research was unambiguous, the correlation was clear, and

332
00:16:57,039 --> 00:16:58,279
the data was damning.

333
00:16:58,399 --> 00:17:01,480
Speaker 1: The public was starting to ask questions. Articles were beginning

334
00:17:01,480 --> 00:17:03,759
to pop up in magazines like Readers Digest.

335
00:17:03,840 --> 00:17:07,119
Speaker 2: The executives knew that if this definitive scientific link became

336
00:17:07,200 --> 00:17:11,039
widely accepted as established fact, their entire industry would collapse

337
00:17:11,119 --> 00:17:15,519
virtually overnight. Billions of dollars in annual revenue, millions of jobs,

338
00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:18,799
entire supply chains completely wiped out.

339
00:17:18,960 --> 00:17:22,359
Speaker 1: They are staring down the barrel of total corporate annihilation.

340
00:17:22,599 --> 00:17:26,160
So who do they call to save them? A specialist,

341
00:17:26,319 --> 00:17:27,400
a man named John W.

342
00:17:27,559 --> 00:17:29,519
Speaker 2: Hill, the co founder of Hill and Knowlton.

343
00:17:29,680 --> 00:17:32,200
Speaker 1: Yes, the exact same PR firm that would go on

344
00:17:32,240 --> 00:17:35,480
to sell the Gulf War decades later. And John W.

345
00:17:35,640 --> 00:17:38,319
Hill comes into this panicked meeting at the Plaza Hotel

346
00:17:38,640 --> 00:17:41,839
with a strategy that is simultaneously brilliant from a business

347
00:17:41,839 --> 00:17:45,079
perspective and profoundly evil from a human perspective.

348
00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:47,279
Speaker 2: He tells these executives, listen, we don't need to prove

349
00:17:47,319 --> 00:17:49,920
that cigarettes are safe. That is a losing battle. The

350
00:17:49,960 --> 00:17:52,200
science is against us. All we need to do is

351
00:17:52,279 --> 00:17:53,799
prove that the science isn't settled.

352
00:17:53,920 --> 00:17:58,039
Speaker 1: It's a subtle but devastating shift in strategic communication. They

353
00:17:58,079 --> 00:18:00,000
move from denial to obviously.

354
00:18:00,799 --> 00:18:03,279
Speaker 2: This brings us to a quote from a later infamous

355
00:18:03,319 --> 00:18:07,960
tobacco industry internal memo that perfectly encapsulates this entire era

356
00:18:08,079 --> 00:18:10,960
of corporate manipulation. Doubt is our product.

357
00:18:11,200 --> 00:18:13,720
Speaker 1: Doubt is our product. I want you to really let

358
00:18:13,720 --> 00:18:16,880
the weight of that sink in. They recognized that they

359
00:18:16,880 --> 00:18:19,960
weren't just selling tightly rolled tobacco leaves anymore. They were

360
00:18:20,039 --> 00:18:22,319
selling the psychological comfort of doubt.

361
00:18:22,599 --> 00:18:26,400
Speaker 2: Because doubt, historically speaking, is the duct tape of corporate crime.

362
00:18:26,519 --> 00:18:28,039
Speaker 1: Doctape of corporate crime.

363
00:18:28,119 --> 00:18:32,319
Speaker 2: Wow. John W. Hill understood human psychology deeply. He knew

364
00:18:32,319 --> 00:18:36,000
that people genuinely liked smoking. It was culturally ingrained, and

365
00:18:36,039 --> 00:18:39,519
more importantly, they were chemically addicted to nicotine. Right If

366
00:18:39,559 --> 00:18:42,759
the public was sold definitively, with a unified scientific voice

367
00:18:42,920 --> 00:18:45,720
that smoking would absolutely kill them, a large portion would

368
00:18:45,720 --> 00:18:47,759
go through the pain of quitting out of self preservation.

369
00:18:48,000 --> 00:18:50,440
Speaker 1: But if it only might be dangerous, if there was

370
00:18:50,480 --> 00:18:54,200
a manufactured controversy, a lingering sense that the experts disagree

371
00:18:54,319 --> 00:18:57,960
or more research is needed, then the addiction would win out.

372
00:18:58,079 --> 00:18:59,319
Every single time.

373
00:18:59,440 --> 00:19:03,200
Speaker 2: Smokers would cling to that manufactured doubt as a psychological

374
00:19:03,240 --> 00:19:04,759
excuse to maintain their habit.

375
00:19:05,160 --> 00:19:08,920
Speaker 1: So let's run this multi decade campaign through the NCIS

376
00:19:08,920 --> 00:19:12,680
scoring system. How did they actually manufacture this doubt in

377
00:19:12,720 --> 00:19:14,599
a way that fooled the world for so long?

378
00:19:15,039 --> 00:19:18,720
Speaker 2: When you apply the NCI to the tobacco industries communications

379
00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:21,559
from the nineteen fifties through the nineteen eighties. They score

380
00:19:21,599 --> 00:19:25,279
a massive eighty two out of one hundred and eighty two.

381
00:19:25,599 --> 00:19:28,000
Let's look at the specific components of how they achieved

382
00:19:28,000 --> 00:19:31,599
that score. The NCI metrics of cherry pick data and

383
00:19:31,680 --> 00:19:35,519
authority overload both score a flawless five out of five.

384
00:19:35,599 --> 00:19:38,319
Speaker 1: How did they do it? Hill and Knowlton advised the

385
00:19:38,319 --> 00:19:41,759
creation of an entity called the Tobacco Industry Research Committee.

386
00:19:41,960 --> 00:19:45,880
Speaker 2: Just the name itself sounds incredibly official, very academic, very objective.

387
00:19:46,079 --> 00:19:49,000
Speaker 1: Exactly, it was designed to sound like a neutral scientific body,

388
00:19:49,240 --> 00:19:52,519
but it was a complete front. Its sole operational purpose

389
00:19:52,640 --> 00:19:55,480
was to fund and aggressively promote any studies that muddied

390
00:19:55,480 --> 00:19:56,000
the waters.

391
00:19:56,359 --> 00:20:00,880
Speaker 2: They hired credentialed scientists doctors with impressive degree ease whose

392
00:20:00,880 --> 00:20:04,079
only real job was to testify before Congress and speak

393
00:20:04,119 --> 00:20:08,079
to the media, constantly repeating the mantra that more research

394
00:20:08,200 --> 00:20:08,599
was needed.

395
00:20:08,920 --> 00:20:12,559
Speaker 1: They flooded medical journals with industry funded papers to create

396
00:20:12,599 --> 00:20:16,480
the artificial illusion of a deeply divided scientific community.

397
00:20:17,000 --> 00:20:19,720
Speaker 2: To the average citizen reading the newspaper, it looked like

398
00:20:19,720 --> 00:20:23,559
a legitimate scientific debate was raging, when in reality, the

399
00:20:23,680 --> 00:20:27,640
consensus was already formed and the debate was entirely fabricated.

400
00:20:27,720 --> 00:20:31,359
Speaker 1: Oh wait, surely there were independent doctors and scientists trying

401
00:20:31,359 --> 00:20:34,200
to sound the alarm. How did the tobacco companies deal

402
00:20:34,240 --> 00:20:35,160
with the truth tellers?

403
00:20:35,359 --> 00:20:38,599
Speaker 2: That brings us directly to the ncimetric of suppression of descent,

404
00:20:38,839 --> 00:20:41,680
which is another five out of five. The industry didn't

405
00:20:41,720 --> 00:20:45,960
just promote their own fake science, they actively destroyed real science.

406
00:20:46,319 --> 00:20:50,400
Speaker 1: Scientists who published genuine, rigorous research linking smoking to cancer

407
00:20:50,440 --> 00:20:51,640
were ruthlessly harassed.

408
00:20:51,759 --> 00:20:54,759
Speaker 2: The industry used their massive legal and financial weight to

409
00:20:54,839 --> 00:20:58,720
attack these researchers' reputations, tie them up in frivolous litigation,

410
00:20:59,119 --> 00:21:02,119
and frequently pure universities to pull their grant funding.

411
00:21:02,319 --> 00:21:06,400
Speaker 1: They aggressively and systematically silenced the truth tellers to maintain

412
00:21:06,440 --> 00:21:07,599
the illusion of doubt.

413
00:21:07,920 --> 00:21:10,680
Speaker 2: And finally, we have to look at the financial gain metric,

414
00:21:10,759 --> 00:21:12,960
which is obviously a five out of five. What was

415
00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:14,480
the result of all this manipulation?

416
00:21:15,200 --> 00:21:21,200
Speaker 1: By manufacturing doubt, they successfully delayed meaningful government regulation, warning labels,

417
00:21:21,240 --> 00:21:24,720
and public health interventions for roughly forty years.

418
00:21:25,079 --> 00:21:29,799
Speaker 2: Forty years. Every single year of delay meant billions upon

419
00:21:29,920 --> 00:21:34,279
billions of dollars in continued uninterrupted profits.

420
00:21:33,920 --> 00:21:37,279
Speaker 1: They knew their product was lethal. Their own internal memos

421
00:21:37,319 --> 00:21:40,720
proved they knew nicotine was highly addictive, and they coordinated

422
00:21:40,759 --> 00:21:43,000
a lie to the public for four decades.

423
00:21:43,079 --> 00:21:45,759
Speaker 2: And again, the NCI system, had it been applied to

424
00:21:45,799 --> 00:21:48,400
their press releases and funded studies at the time, would

425
00:21:48,400 --> 00:21:51,240
have predicted this deception instantly. With that score of eighty two.

426
00:21:51,440 --> 00:21:55,000
Speaker 1: It is the perfect historical encapsulation of the corporate sye up.

427
00:21:55,200 --> 00:21:57,880
And what's crucial for you to understand is that this strategy,

428
00:21:58,000 --> 00:22:01,400
the doubt is Our Product playbook pioneered by Hill and Nolton,

429
00:22:01,720 --> 00:22:03,599
did not die with the tobacco settlements.

430
00:22:03,960 --> 00:22:07,000
Speaker 2: No, it became the gold standard. It became the foundational

431
00:22:07,000 --> 00:22:11,440
playbook for virtually every major industry facing public backlash or

432
00:22:11,680 --> 00:22:13,559
existential regulatory threats.

433
00:22:13,759 --> 00:22:15,960
Speaker 1: I want you to think about the modern equivalents that

434
00:22:16,000 --> 00:22:19,559
affect your life today. The sources draw a very clear

435
00:22:19,759 --> 00:22:22,599
direct line from that smoky room in the Plaza hotel

436
00:22:22,920 --> 00:22:26,759
to controversies we've all lived through. Think about the fossil

437
00:22:26,799 --> 00:22:27,519
fuel industry.

438
00:22:27,680 --> 00:22:30,680
Speaker 2: They use the exact same PR tactics and in some

439
00:22:30,759 --> 00:22:34,559
cases the exact same legacy PR firms to rebrand the

440
00:22:34,599 --> 00:22:38,559
scientific consensus of global warming into the softer, more ambiguous

441
00:22:38,640 --> 00:22:40,079
term climate change.

442
00:22:40,200 --> 00:22:43,359
Speaker 1: They funded fringe think tanks to frame the entire issue

443
00:22:43,359 --> 00:22:46,440
as an unsettled debate, because again, it doesn't matter to

444
00:22:46,480 --> 00:22:49,160
them if the climate is actually changing. What matters to

445
00:22:49,160 --> 00:22:51,480
the bottom line is that the public keeps arguing about it,

446
00:22:51,519 --> 00:22:54,240
effectively paralyzing any policy changes that would.

447
00:22:54,039 --> 00:22:57,680
Speaker 2: Hurt profits or Consider the food and beverage industry, specifically

448
00:22:57,759 --> 00:23:00,440
the sugar industry in the mid to lay twentieth century,

449
00:23:00,880 --> 00:23:04,640
when early credible research started clearly linking high sugar consumption

450
00:23:04,720 --> 00:23:06,759
to the rise in heart disease and type two diabetes,

451
00:23:07,200 --> 00:23:10,880
the industry didn't just deny it. They actively shifted the blame.

452
00:23:11,079 --> 00:23:14,519
Speaker 1: Using the exact same playbook. They funded studies out of

453
00:23:14,559 --> 00:23:19,599
prestigious institutions like Harvard that specifically pointed the finger away

454
00:23:19,599 --> 00:23:22,759
from sugar and toward dietary fat.

455
00:23:23,000 --> 00:23:27,680
Speaker 2: This manufactured narrative sparked the entire low fat dietary craze

456
00:23:27,759 --> 00:23:29,359
of the nineteen eighties and nineties.

457
00:23:29,400 --> 00:23:32,440
Speaker 1: Oh Man, I vividly remember that if you were alive

458
00:23:32,480 --> 00:23:35,640
in the nineties, everything in the grocery store was suddenly

459
00:23:35,720 --> 00:23:40,519
plastered with neon low fat labels, aggressively marketed as health food.

460
00:23:40,720 --> 00:23:43,400
Speaker 2: There's a biological catch. When you take the natural fat

461
00:23:43,440 --> 00:23:46,720
out of food, it tastes like absolute cardboard. It's inedible.

462
00:23:46,839 --> 00:23:49,759
Speaker 1: So what did the food companies do to fix the taste?

463
00:23:49,839 --> 00:23:53,200
They loaded all those low fat products with massive, unnatural

464
00:23:53,200 --> 00:23:54,640
amounts of refined sugar.

465
00:23:54,880 --> 00:23:59,319
Speaker 2: It was a complete, mathematically engineered, manufactured reality that made

466
00:23:59,359 --> 00:24:03,039
millions of people significantly sicker, all while enriching the sugar

467
00:24:03,079 --> 00:24:04,799
industry under the guise of public health.

468
00:24:04,839 --> 00:24:08,440
Speaker 1: And perhaps the most devastating lethal recent example mentioned in

469
00:24:08,480 --> 00:24:11,960
the source files is Purdue Pharma and the opiard crisis.

470
00:24:12,039 --> 00:24:15,480
Speaker 2: The foundationally claim that oxyconton was an effective painkiller but

471
00:24:15,559 --> 00:24:20,759
crucially not addictive was a highly coordinated, intentional psychological operation.

472
00:24:21,160 --> 00:24:25,160
Speaker 1: They used pr agencies and marketing firms to ghostwrite scientific studies,

473
00:24:25,359 --> 00:24:27,839
which were then rubber stamped by doctors they had on

474
00:24:27,880 --> 00:24:32,000
the payroll. They didn't rely on actual independent scientific inquiry.

475
00:24:32,279 --> 00:24:36,599
Speaker 2: They paid key opinion leaders to act as authoritative mouthpieces

476
00:24:36,720 --> 00:24:42,519
at medical conferences. It is the exact same NCI playbook, authority, overload,

477
00:24:42,680 --> 00:24:45,279
suppression of descent, and massive financial gain.

478
00:24:45,640 --> 00:24:48,799
Speaker 1: The patterns of manipulation remain identical, whether it's nineteen fifty

479
00:24:48,799 --> 00:24:51,960
three or twenty ten. The only thing that changes is

480
00:24:52,000 --> 00:24:53,039
the product being sold.

481
00:24:53,119 --> 00:24:57,279
Speaker 2: The playbook never changes. The psychological vulnerabilities of the human

482
00:24:57,359 --> 00:24:58,359
mind remained.

483
00:24:58,119 --> 00:25:01,319
Speaker 1: Constant, but the delivery mechanism, I'm sure has evolved, and

484
00:25:01,359 --> 00:25:04,119
this brings us to a terrifying, almost sci fi evolution

485
00:25:04,200 --> 00:25:07,680
in our deep dive today. Corporate syops historically relied on

486
00:25:07,720 --> 00:25:12,960
print media, television advertisements, corrupted medical journals, and congressional testimony.

487
00:25:13,079 --> 00:25:16,880
Speaker 2: They were slow, they were expensive, and most importantly, they

488
00:25:16,920 --> 00:25:19,599
required constant human orchestration and oversight.

489
00:25:19,920 --> 00:25:23,880
Speaker 1: But then the digital age happened. Social media arrived. Social

490
00:25:23,920 --> 00:25:28,079
media took these highly refined weapons of psychological manipulation and

491
00:25:28,119 --> 00:25:31,160
put them directly into the pocket of every single person

492
00:25:31,200 --> 00:25:33,599
on earth. Running twenty four to seven.

493
00:25:34,559 --> 00:25:38,119
Speaker 2: This represents a pivotal paradigm shifting change in how information

494
00:25:38,200 --> 00:25:41,960
warfare is conducted. We are moving from human directed, top

495
00:25:42,039 --> 00:25:45,880
down manipulation to algorithmic emergent manipulation.

496
00:25:46,119 --> 00:25:49,119
Speaker 1: To truly understand the gravity of what this means for society,

497
00:25:49,200 --> 00:25:51,640
we have to look at a highly documented incident from

498
00:25:51,680 --> 00:25:54,039
November twenty twenty one in Ethiopia.

499
00:25:54,079 --> 00:25:56,400
Speaker 2: This is a really heavy, tragic story in the notes,

500
00:25:56,440 --> 00:25:58,759
but it is essential to understand we are talking about

501
00:25:58,799 --> 00:25:59,839
Professor Marrigamari.

502
00:26:00,000 --> 00:26:02,440
Speaker 1: He as a sixty year old university chemistry teacher, a

503
00:26:02,480 --> 00:26:05,119
respected academic, and a father of for he belonged to

504
00:26:05,160 --> 00:26:07,519
the Tagrain ethnic group and he was living in the

505
00:26:07,519 --> 00:26:10,920
Amhara region during the intensely brutal Ethiopian Civil War.

506
00:26:11,119 --> 00:26:13,839
Speaker 2: His ethnicity in his location made him incredibly.

507
00:26:13,519 --> 00:26:16,960
Speaker 1: Vulnerable, extremely vulnerable. The political and ethnic tensions were at

508
00:26:17,000 --> 00:26:20,880
a boiling point during this conflict. A localized Facebook page

509
00:26:20,880 --> 00:26:24,000
with roughly fifty thousand followers actively targeted him.

510
00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:27,759
Speaker 2: They didn't just criticize his politics. They posted his photograph.

511
00:26:28,000 --> 00:26:32,920
They repeatedly labeled him with a specific, highly charged ethnic

512
00:26:33,000 --> 00:26:34,920
slur that translates to hunter.

513
00:26:35,359 --> 00:26:38,319
Speaker 1: They publicly accused him of being an enemy of the state,

514
00:26:38,400 --> 00:26:42,160
an act of combatant, and most dangerously, they posted his

515
00:26:42,400 --> 00:26:45,240
exact home address and the routes he took to work.

516
00:26:45,480 --> 00:26:47,799
Speaker 2: Now, his son, who was living out of the country,

517
00:26:48,240 --> 00:26:50,799
saw this happening in real time on his feed. He

518
00:26:50,880 --> 00:26:54,039
knew immediately, given the context of the civil war, that

519
00:26:54,119 --> 00:26:56,599
this post was a literal death sentence for his father.

520
00:26:56,880 --> 00:27:00,200
Speaker 1: He reported the post to Facebook multiple times, practically begging

521
00:27:00,279 --> 00:27:03,400
them to take it down. He utilized all the standard

522
00:27:03,440 --> 00:27:07,160
reporting tools the platform provides. He flagged it for hate speech,

523
00:27:07,240 --> 00:27:09,519
for inciting violence, for dosing.

524
00:27:09,480 --> 00:27:11,880
Speaker 2: And what was the response from the tech giant.

525
00:27:11,839 --> 00:27:15,000
Speaker 1: Absolute silence. Nothing happened. Three weeks went by, the post

526
00:27:15,119 --> 00:27:17,559
remained live, The algorithm kept feeding it to more and

527
00:27:17,599 --> 00:27:20,640
more people, going viral, whipping the local populace into a

528
00:27:20,720 --> 00:27:21,480
violent frenzy.

529
00:27:21,640 --> 00:27:23,160
Speaker 2: And then the inevitable happen.

530
00:27:23,400 --> 00:27:26,440
Speaker 1: Armed men followed the professor home from his chemistry class.

531
00:27:26,480 --> 00:27:29,039
They assassinated him right in front of his house, and

532
00:27:29,119 --> 00:27:32,880
as they walked away, witnesses heard them chanting the exact

533
00:27:32,880 --> 00:27:37,200
same slurhunter that had been popularized and amplified by that

534
00:27:37,279 --> 00:27:38,519
specific Facebook post.

535
00:27:38,680 --> 00:27:42,720
Speaker 2: It is a profound, senseless tragedy. And what elevates this

536
00:27:42,799 --> 00:27:46,039
from a local crime to a massive systemic failure is

537
00:27:46,039 --> 00:27:50,240
that Facebook finally responded to the Sun's frantic reports and

538
00:27:50,359 --> 00:27:53,519
removed the post eight days after the murder had taken.

539
00:27:53,240 --> 00:27:55,799
Speaker 1: Place, eight days too late. Now you have to ask

540
00:27:55,839 --> 00:27:59,480
yourself the critical analytical question, how does a multi billion

541
00:27:59,519 --> 00:28:02,920
dollar tech company with thousands of content moderators allow this

542
00:28:03,000 --> 00:28:03,480
to happen?

543
00:28:03,839 --> 00:28:06,039
Speaker 2: Was there a malicious human sitting at a desk at

544
00:28:06,039 --> 00:28:10,519
Facebook headquarters actively deciding to target this specific chemistry professor

545
00:28:10,640 --> 00:28:11,400
in Ethiopia.

546
00:28:11,480 --> 00:28:13,960
Speaker 1: The answer is no, it was the algorithm, and.

547
00:28:13,839 --> 00:28:16,279
Speaker 2: We know exactly how this mechanism works behind the scenes

548
00:28:16,559 --> 00:28:19,279
because of the explosive testimony of a whistleblower.

549
00:28:19,599 --> 00:28:23,279
Speaker 1: Francis Hogan, a former product manager on the Civic Misinformation

550
00:28:23,400 --> 00:28:27,240
team at Facebook, testified before the United States Congress about

551
00:28:27,240 --> 00:28:30,920
exactly what was happening in the code, specifically referencing how

552
00:28:30,960 --> 00:28:35,559
the platform fueled ethnic violence in places like Ethiopia and Mannar.

553
00:28:35,720 --> 00:28:39,400
Speaker 2: She explained the cold, mathematical reality of how the platform operates.

554
00:28:40,240 --> 00:28:43,599
Hagen's testimony was a watershed moment. She explained that the

555
00:28:43,599 --> 00:28:47,559
Facebook algorithm was inherently causing ethnic violence, not because it

556
00:28:47,640 --> 00:28:49,799
was programmed to be racist, but because of how its

557
00:28:49,839 --> 00:28:51,559
core engagement metrics were optimized.

558
00:28:51,720 --> 00:28:55,279
Speaker 1: The algorithm's primary overarching goal is to keep users on

559
00:28:55,319 --> 00:28:58,640
the platform for as long as possible. Why because user

560
00:28:58,680 --> 00:29:02,400
attention equals AD and pre R and AD impressions drive revenue.

561
00:29:02,720 --> 00:29:05,240
Speaker 2: And what did the machine learning models figure out drives

562
00:29:05,279 --> 00:29:09,880
engagement better than anything else? Anger, outrage, hate.

563
00:29:09,720 --> 00:29:12,759
Speaker 1: The algorithm figured out entirely on its own, without any

564
00:29:12,880 --> 00:29:16,240
human engineer explicitly coding it to do so that posts

565
00:29:16,240 --> 00:29:19,480
that made people furious, fearful, or hateful got the most clicks,

566
00:29:19,519 --> 00:29:21,599
the most shares, and the longest red times.

567
00:29:21,839 --> 00:29:25,319
Speaker 2: So to fulfill its prime directive of maximizing engagement, it

568
00:29:25,440 --> 00:29:29,440
actively promoted hate speech and incendiary content. It wasn't designed

569
00:29:29,440 --> 00:29:33,119
to be evil. It was designed to maximize profit at

570
00:29:33,160 --> 00:29:33,880
all costs.

571
00:29:33,960 --> 00:29:36,920
Speaker 1: The violence was just an externalized cost of doing business.

572
00:29:37,200 --> 00:29:41,319
Speaker 2: Let's apply Chase Hughes' narrative credibility index to this algorithmic behavior.

573
00:29:41,880 --> 00:29:45,599
When you score the algorithmic amplification of this specific event,

574
00:29:45,960 --> 00:29:47,960
it comes out to an alarming seventy eight out of

575
00:29:47,960 --> 00:29:48,480
one hundred.

576
00:29:48,720 --> 00:29:51,519
Speaker 1: A seventy eight for an algorithm. Let's look at why

577
00:29:51,519 --> 00:29:54,359
a piece of code scores so high on a Syoup matrix.

578
00:29:54,599 --> 00:29:58,680
Emotional manipulation scores a five out of five. The algorithm

579
00:29:58,720 --> 00:30:02,400
was literally identifying and weaponizing ethnic hate and existential fear

580
00:30:02,519 --> 00:30:03,759
during an active civil war.

581
00:30:04,200 --> 00:30:07,359
Speaker 2: Uniform messaging another five out of five, as the algorithm

582
00:30:07,440 --> 00:30:10,920
ensured the exact same false claims and slurs spread virally

583
00:30:10,960 --> 00:30:13,640
across multiple interconnected pages and echo chambers.

584
00:30:13,799 --> 00:30:16,559
Speaker 1: Missing information a five out of five because The system

585
00:30:16,559 --> 00:30:20,359
provided absolutely zero friction, zero fact checking, and zero context.

586
00:30:20,359 --> 00:30:23,200
It was just a pure, unfiltered pipeline of outrage.

587
00:30:23,519 --> 00:30:26,839
Speaker 2: And we can't forget financial gain, which scores a four

588
00:30:26,880 --> 00:30:31,839
out of five here, because the entire foundational reason the

589
00:30:31,880 --> 00:30:35,720
algorithm behaves this way is to generate profit for the corporation.

590
00:30:36,319 --> 00:30:38,079
Speaker 1: When you step back and really look at this, it

591
00:30:38,160 --> 00:30:41,960
is pure philosophical horror. We aren't talking about a government

592
00:30:42,000 --> 00:30:45,160
trying to sell a geopolitical war or a pr firm

593
00:30:45,200 --> 00:30:46,920
trying to sell toxic cigarettes.

594
00:30:47,160 --> 00:30:51,519
Speaker 2: We are talking about literal lines of code, an automated

595
00:30:51,599 --> 00:30:55,079
machine learning system that accidentally scored a seventy eight on

596
00:30:55,160 --> 00:30:58,839
a psychological warfare index just by doing its job efficiently.

597
00:30:59,039 --> 00:31:02,039
Speaker 1: That is the chilling reality of the modern information landscape

598
00:31:02,079 --> 00:31:04,640
that you navigate every single day. The algorithm doesn't know

599
00:31:04,640 --> 00:31:06,079
what a civil war is, It doesn't know what a

600
00:31:06,160 --> 00:31:06,839
human life is.

601
00:31:07,039 --> 00:31:09,759
Speaker 2: He has no ethical framework. It only knows that outrage

602
00:31:09,759 --> 00:31:13,000
equals engagement, and engagement equals money. It is an automated,

603
00:31:13,240 --> 00:31:15,240
self optimizing sciot machine.

604
00:31:14,920 --> 00:31:16,640
Speaker 1: And we are all permanently plugged into it.

605
00:31:16,759 --> 00:31:18,599
Speaker 2: Okay, we need to take a deep breath here, because

606
00:31:18,640 --> 00:31:21,480
we are about to move into the most complex, nuanced,

607
00:31:21,599 --> 00:31:25,440
and frankly contentious part of the NCI framework outlined in

608
00:31:25,480 --> 00:31:26,039
the sources.

609
00:31:26,240 --> 00:31:28,839
Speaker 1: We've looked at the government manufacturing consent, We've looked at

610
00:31:28,880 --> 00:31:33,880
corporations manufacturing doubt, and we've looked at algorithms manufacturing outrage.

611
00:31:34,200 --> 00:31:36,160
Speaker 2: Now we have to look at what happens when the

612
00:31:36,200 --> 00:31:39,880
waters get truly muddy. We have to look at information

613
00:31:40,039 --> 00:31:43,880
warfare where both sides of a massive public debate are

614
00:31:44,039 --> 00:31:44,880
playing dirty.

615
00:31:45,319 --> 00:31:48,279
Speaker 1: This is a crucial concept for understanding the modern world.

616
00:31:48,720 --> 00:31:52,519
Psychological operations are not always a simple binary case of

617
00:31:52,559 --> 00:31:55,400
black and white or good versus evil.

618
00:31:55,519 --> 00:31:59,000
Speaker 2: The most dangerous moments for public comprehension, the moments where

619
00:31:59,079 --> 00:32:02,759
society truly breaks down, occur when an issue becomes highly

620
00:32:02,799 --> 00:32:07,720
polarized and both factions deploy manipulation tactics simultaneously to win

621
00:32:07,759 --> 00:32:08,480
the narrative war.

622
00:32:08,640 --> 00:32:11,079
Speaker 1: And to clearly illustrate this dynamic, we're going to look

623
00:32:11,079 --> 00:32:13,799
at the massive global debate surrounding the origins of the

624
00:32:13,799 --> 00:32:16,680
COVID nineteen pandemic. Now, before we dive into this, I

625
00:32:16,720 --> 00:32:19,440
need to pause right here and speak directly to you,

626
00:32:19,680 --> 00:32:20,200
the listener.

627
00:32:20,279 --> 00:32:21,000
Speaker 2: This is important.

628
00:32:21,119 --> 00:32:24,400
Speaker 1: I want to be crystal unequivocally clear about our parameters.

629
00:32:24,720 --> 00:32:26,799
We are not taking a side here on thrilling threads.

630
00:32:26,920 --> 00:32:29,319
We're not endorsing the natural origin theory, nor are we

631
00:32:29,400 --> 00:32:30,640
endorsing the lab leak theory.

632
00:32:31,039 --> 00:32:34,759
Speaker 2: We don't have the definitive biological proof, and more importantly,

633
00:32:35,319 --> 00:32:39,359
the NCI framework doesn't care about the underlying biological truth.

634
00:32:39,799 --> 00:32:42,839
Speaker 1: Our only mission right now, as explicitly outlined in the

635
00:32:42,880 --> 00:32:47,000
source material, is to impartially analyze the communication tactics used

636
00:32:47,000 --> 00:32:49,200
by both factions during the height of the debate.

637
00:32:49,559 --> 00:32:52,160
Speaker 2: That is exactly right, and it requires a suspension of

638
00:32:52,200 --> 00:32:56,000
your own bias to evaluate. We are strictly analyzing the

639
00:32:56,039 --> 00:33:00,200
delivery system of the narrative, not the package itself. Cast

640
00:33:00,240 --> 00:33:03,480
our minds back to the chaotic landscape of early twenty twenty.

641
00:33:03,599 --> 00:33:07,920
Speaker 1: The world is rapidly shutting down. There is massive, unprecedenting

642
00:33:07,960 --> 00:33:12,680
global fear and uncertainty, and two primary competing narratives emerge

643
00:33:12,720 --> 00:33:15,400
regarding where this novel virus actually came from.

644
00:33:15,599 --> 00:33:18,319
Speaker 2: Side A is the natural origin theory. This is the

645
00:33:18,359 --> 00:33:21,559
idea that the virus jumped naturally from animals to humans

646
00:33:21,599 --> 00:33:23,319
at a wet market in Wuhan, China.

647
00:33:23,480 --> 00:33:27,880
Speaker 1: This is a known, well documented biological phenomenon called zoononic spillover.

648
00:33:27,960 --> 00:33:30,119
It happened previously with stars, it happened with mers. It

649
00:33:30,160 --> 00:33:31,839
is highly scientifically plausible.

650
00:33:32,079 --> 00:33:35,319
Speaker 2: Side B is the lab leak theory. This is the

651
00:33:35,359 --> 00:33:39,720
idea that the virus, whether natural or modified, accidentally escaped

652
00:33:39,720 --> 00:33:43,000
from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a facility which happens

653
00:33:43,000 --> 00:33:44,799
to be located just a few miles from that same

654
00:33:44,839 --> 00:33:48,640
seafood market and was known internationally to be actively studying

655
00:33:48,960 --> 00:33:50,119
that coronaviruses.

656
00:33:50,200 --> 00:33:54,680
Speaker 1: An accidental lab breach also highly plausible. Both of these

657
00:33:54,720 --> 00:33:59,599
theories desperately needed rigorous, open, transparent scientific investigation.

658
00:34:00,200 --> 00:34:04,319
Speaker 2: Open investigation the vital scientific discourse was almost immediately and

659
00:34:04,440 --> 00:34:08,840
forcefully short circuited. On February nineteenth, twenty twenty, the Lancet,

660
00:34:09,079 --> 00:34:11,480
which is arguably one of the word's most prestigious and

661
00:34:11,519 --> 00:34:14,119
influential medical journals, published a statement.

662
00:34:14,400 --> 00:34:17,480
Speaker 1: It was a letter signed by twenty seven prominent credential

663
00:34:17,559 --> 00:34:21,880
public health scientists. This letter unequivocally declared that anyone who

664
00:34:21,920 --> 00:34:23,960
even suggested the virus might have leaked from a lab

665
00:34:24,000 --> 00:34:26,840
was promoting a dangerous conspiracy theory and the.

666
00:34:26,920 --> 00:34:30,559
Speaker 2: Chilling effect of that single letter was massive. It effectively

667
00:34:30,639 --> 00:34:34,480
shut down all rational debate. Overnight, the mainstream media ran

668
00:34:34,559 --> 00:34:38,320
with it as gospel truth. Major tech platforms started algorithmic

669
00:34:38,360 --> 00:34:43,119
flagging and removing lab leak discussions as harmful misinformation, and

670
00:34:43,320 --> 00:34:46,639
credential scientists were banned from social media for simply asking

671
00:34:46,679 --> 00:34:47,119
the question.

672
00:34:47,239 --> 00:34:50,559
Speaker 1: So, let's run SIDEA the natural origin campaign through the NCI.

673
00:34:51,039 --> 00:34:54,159
Speaker 2: When you apply the metrics, side A scores a seventy

674
00:34:54,159 --> 00:34:56,880
out of one hundred. It sits right on the absolute

675
00:34:56,880 --> 00:35:00,320
border of a confirmed coordinated psychological operat.

676
00:35:00,679 --> 00:35:03,480
Speaker 1: Let's look at the specific tactics. The metric of authority

677
00:35:03,519 --> 00:35:06,159
overload scores a massive five out of five. You have

678
00:35:06,239 --> 00:35:10,000
twenty seven elite scientists using the immense institutional weight and

679
00:35:10,079 --> 00:35:13,800
legacy of the Lancet to essentially claim they represent science itself.

680
00:35:14,239 --> 00:35:17,239
Speaker 2: The framing was deliberate. Anyone disagreeing with them isn't just

681
00:35:17,280 --> 00:35:20,920
factually wrong. They are inherently anti science.

682
00:35:20,760 --> 00:35:23,320
Speaker 1: And that leads directly to suppression of dissent, which is

683
00:35:23,360 --> 00:35:26,920
another five out of five. The letter created an incredibly

684
00:35:26,960 --> 00:35:30,599
toxic environment where other virologists and scientists were terrified to

685
00:35:30,639 --> 00:35:36,000
publicly discuss the Labliku possibility because it equated to professional suicide.

686
00:35:36,320 --> 00:35:41,519
Speaker 2: You'd be instantly labeled a xenophobic conspiracy theorist by your peers,

687
00:35:42,039 --> 00:35:43,639
and your funding would be at risk.

688
00:35:44,000 --> 00:35:46,440
Speaker 1: But wait, let me play Devil's Advocate again. Couldn't you

689
00:35:46,559 --> 00:35:49,679
argue that these twenty seven scientists weren't running a malicious

690
00:35:49,679 --> 00:35:53,079
sigh up. Maybe they were just panic public health officials

691
00:35:53,159 --> 00:35:55,800
desperately trying to stop a wave of anti Asian hate

692
00:35:55,840 --> 00:35:59,719
crimes by shutting down rumors. How does the NCI differentiate

693
00:35:59,760 --> 00:36:02,320
betwe between good intentions and actual manipulation.

694
00:36:02,679 --> 00:36:05,400
Speaker 2: The beauty and the ruthlessness of the NCI is that

695
00:36:05,440 --> 00:36:09,800
it doesn't measure intent. It strictly measures methodology. Even if

696
00:36:09,840 --> 00:36:12,239
their intent was noble, the tactics they used to achieve

697
00:36:12,280 --> 00:36:13,920
their goal were manipulative.

698
00:36:14,199 --> 00:36:16,480
Speaker 1: And this becomes glaringly obvious when we look at the

699
00:36:16,519 --> 00:36:18,880
missing information metric, which gets a four out of five

700
00:36:18,960 --> 00:36:21,960
for SADAY. This is a critical point in the source material.

701
00:36:22,320 --> 00:36:25,599
Speaker 2: It was later revealed through FIA request that the Lancet

702
00:36:25,639 --> 00:36:28,920
letter was organized, drafted, and quietly pushed by a man

703
00:36:29,039 --> 00:36:31,760
named Peter Dazak. He is the president of the Eco

704
00:36:31,800 --> 00:36:32,440
Health Alliance.

705
00:36:32,639 --> 00:36:36,480
Speaker 1: This is an organization that had massive, previously undisclosed financial

706
00:36:36,519 --> 00:36:40,480
ties and was actively funneling US government grant money to

707
00:36:40,639 --> 00:36:43,719
fund research at the exact Wuhan lab in question.

708
00:36:44,079 --> 00:36:47,360
Speaker 2: Wow, that is a massive, massive conflict.

709
00:36:46,920 --> 00:36:51,000
Speaker 1: Of interest exactly, and that critical context, that financial relationship

710
00:36:51,360 --> 00:36:54,000
was intentionally hidden from the public when the letter was

711
00:36:54,000 --> 00:36:56,840
published to shut down the debate. That is the definition

712
00:36:56,920 --> 00:36:59,719
of omitting vital information to control a narrative.

713
00:37:00,159 --> 00:37:04,679
Speaker 2: So Side A is utilizing incredibly heavy manipulation tactics. But

714
00:37:04,880 --> 00:37:08,079
as we mentioned, modern information warfare is a two way street.

715
00:37:08,400 --> 00:37:11,119
What's good SIDEB the proponents of the lab leak theory

716
00:37:11,199 --> 00:37:13,920
during that same time period, how do they communicate their

717
00:37:14,000 --> 00:37:14,840
narrative to the public?

718
00:37:15,039 --> 00:37:17,440
Speaker 1: SIDEB scores a sixty six out of one hundred on

719
00:37:17,480 --> 00:37:20,840
the NCI still firmly embedded in the danger zone. Let's

720
00:37:20,840 --> 00:37:24,239
break their specific tactics down. Authority overload gets a five

721
00:37:24,280 --> 00:37:25,719
out of five for SIDEB as well.

722
00:37:25,960 --> 00:37:29,920
Speaker 2: Many politicians, pundits, and commentators on this side began claiming

723
00:37:30,000 --> 00:37:33,199
on national television that the Lab leak was obvious, common

724
00:37:33,239 --> 00:37:36,559
sense or settled fact, long before any actual on the

725
00:37:36,559 --> 00:37:39,760
ground investigations or intelligence community reviews could be completed.

726
00:37:39,840 --> 00:37:43,719
Speaker 1: They spoke with unearned absolute certainty to project authority.

727
00:37:43,920 --> 00:37:46,480
Speaker 2: They also score a five out of five on tribal division,

728
00:37:46,639 --> 00:37:49,519
and honestly, this is perhaps the most destructive tactic used

729
00:37:49,519 --> 00:37:53,119
by SIDEB. They took a complex public health mystery, a

730
00:37:53,159 --> 00:37:57,920
novel virus of unknown origin requiring nuanced investigation, and immediately

731
00:37:57,960 --> 00:38:01,800
weaponized it into a deeply partisan, rag radioactive political issue.

732
00:38:01,880 --> 00:38:05,519
Speaker 1: If you believe the natural origin theory, Side B framed

733
00:38:05,519 --> 00:38:08,639
you as a naive trader or a literal shill for

734
00:38:08,639 --> 00:38:11,360
the Chinese Communist Party. If you believe the lab leak,

735
00:38:11,599 --> 00:38:14,760
Side A framed you as a racist conspiracy theorist. The

736
00:38:14,800 --> 00:38:17,400
actual science was completely lost in the crossfire.

737
00:38:17,639 --> 00:38:20,360
Speaker 2: And finally, emotional manipulation scores a four out of five

738
00:38:20,400 --> 00:38:24,079
for SIDEB. They actively weaponize public anger, fear in some

739
00:38:24,079 --> 00:38:27,000
cases of xenophobia, turning a vital scientific question into a

740
00:38:27,039 --> 00:38:28,480
geopolitical loyalty test.

741
00:38:28,880 --> 00:38:31,239
Speaker 1: So if we pulled back, what is it? So? What

742
00:38:31,320 --> 00:38:34,599
insight here? What does it actually mean for you the citizen?

743
00:38:35,000 --> 00:38:38,039
When Side A scores a seventy and Side B scores

744
00:38:38,039 --> 00:38:39,079
a sixty six.

745
00:38:39,119 --> 00:38:42,239
Speaker 2: This is the profound takeaway that the source material drives home.

746
00:38:42,800 --> 00:38:46,599
The NCI doesn't care who is factually correct. When both

747
00:38:46,719 --> 00:38:49,559
signs of a major societal debate are scoring high in

748
00:38:49,599 --> 00:38:53,639
the danger zone or psyop range, honest debate simply dies.

749
00:38:54,119 --> 00:38:57,159
Speaker 1: You are no longer participating in a rational pursuit of truth.

750
00:38:57,519 --> 00:39:01,079
You are trapped in a crossfire of information war. Both

751
00:39:01,159 --> 00:39:04,440
factions are aggressively trying to bypass your critical thinking skills

752
00:39:04,440 --> 00:39:06,719
and trigger your primal tribal instincts.

753
00:39:06,840 --> 00:39:09,559
Speaker 2: That is exactly the point when you recognize that those

754
00:39:09,599 --> 00:39:12,320
manipulation patterns are coming from all directions, you have to

755
00:39:12,360 --> 00:39:15,239
mentally step back. You have to realize that the communication

756
00:39:15,360 --> 00:39:18,280
environment itself has become toxic to the truth. You cannot

757
00:39:18,360 --> 00:39:21,199
find reality while you are being actively manipulated by the

758
00:39:21,199 --> 00:39:22,440
people claiming to deliver it.

759
00:39:22,679 --> 00:39:26,199
Speaker 1: That is such a crucial lens to view the news through. Okay,

760
00:39:26,239 --> 00:39:29,719
we've covered the government's selling a war, corporations selling tobacco,

761
00:39:30,079 --> 00:39:34,639
algorithms pushing hate, and the polarized pandemic debate. Now we

762
00:39:34,679 --> 00:39:36,639
are going to pivot to a topic that might seem

763
00:39:36,679 --> 00:39:39,599
totally out of left field, but it perfectly illustrates how

764
00:39:39,599 --> 00:39:43,239
the NCI pattern can be applied to literally anything. We

765
00:39:43,320 --> 00:39:44,880
are going to talk about UFOs.

766
00:39:45,320 --> 00:39:48,159
Speaker 2: It's a sudden shift in subject matter, but the phenomenon

767
00:39:48,199 --> 00:39:51,840
of UFO disclosure is actually a fascinating textbook case study

768
00:39:52,079 --> 00:39:55,719
in narrative manipulation. We can apply the exact same mathematical

769
00:39:55,719 --> 00:39:58,960
metrics to a story involving non human intelligence that we

770
00:39:59,000 --> 00:40:02,000
apply to the tobacco industry. The tactics remain the same.

771
00:40:02,239 --> 00:40:05,559
Speaker 1: Let's look at a very specific near future incident detailed

772
00:40:05,599 --> 00:40:08,119
in your sources to illustrate this. We are fast forwarding

773
00:40:08,199 --> 00:40:11,599
slightly to January twenty twenty five. A man named Jake

774
00:40:11,639 --> 00:40:14,119
Barber steps forward into the public eye.

775
00:40:14,159 --> 00:40:17,480
Speaker 2: He's a former Air Force Special ops pilot, highly credentialed.

776
00:40:17,760 --> 00:40:20,159
He goes on the news Nation Network for an explosive,

777
00:40:20,239 --> 00:40:22,880
highly promoted interview with journalist Ross Kolfar.

778
00:40:23,039 --> 00:40:26,199
Speaker 1: Barber claims on national television that he was part of deep,

779
00:40:26,239 --> 00:40:30,199
black secret UFO retrieval missions for the US government. He

780
00:40:30,239 --> 00:40:33,039
says he personally got within one hundred and fifty feet

781
00:40:33,079 --> 00:40:37,360
of a retrieved crashed craft. He describes it in vivid detail,

782
00:40:37,920 --> 00:40:41,119
an egg shaped, white metallic object about the size of

783
00:40:41,119 --> 00:40:45,360
an suv, completely smooth, with no engine, no flight surfaces,

784
00:40:45,400 --> 00:40:46,679
and no thermal signature.

785
00:40:47,039 --> 00:40:51,599
Speaker 2: It is an incredible paradigm shifting story back by verified

786
00:40:51,840 --> 00:40:55,440
high level military credentials. It's exactly the kind of story

787
00:40:55,440 --> 00:40:56,719
that sets the Internet on fire.

788
00:40:57,159 --> 00:40:59,360
Speaker 1: But before we allow ourselves to get swept away by

789
00:40:59,360 --> 00:41:01,840
the profound sign i fi implications of the claim, we

790
00:41:01,920 --> 00:41:04,719
must forcefully run the delivery of the story through the NCI.

791
00:41:05,079 --> 00:41:08,079
When we evaluate the Jake Barbara disclosure event, it scores

792
00:41:08,159 --> 00:41:09,480
a sixty three out of one.

793
00:41:09,360 --> 00:41:11,880
Speaker 2: Hundred sixty three, right smack in the middle of the

794
00:41:11,960 --> 00:41:14,599
danger zone. Let's unpack exactly why it scores so high.

795
00:41:14,920 --> 00:41:17,599
First up timing a massive five out of five y

796
00:41:17,840 --> 00:41:19,480
because you have to look at what else is happening

797
00:41:19,519 --> 00:41:19,960
in the world.

798
00:41:20,119 --> 00:41:24,880
Speaker 1: This explosive reality altering whistleblower story dropped exactly during a

799
00:41:24,920 --> 00:41:29,559
period of massive, unexplained and highly concerning drone sightings swarming

800
00:41:29,599 --> 00:41:34,199
over sensitive US military bases, specifically Langley Air Force Base.

801
00:41:34,840 --> 00:41:38,039
Speaker 2: The timing for maximum public distraction from a real world

802
00:41:38,079 --> 00:41:39,880
security failure was impeccable.

803
00:41:40,360 --> 00:41:42,800
Speaker 1: Then we look at the metric of financial game, another

804
00:41:42,920 --> 00:41:46,000
five out of five. Right around the exact time Barber

805
00:41:46,000 --> 00:41:49,599
goes public with these universe altering claims, public records show

806
00:41:49,639 --> 00:41:53,719
he forms a private aerospace consulting company called Skywatchers LLC,

807
00:41:54,800 --> 00:41:58,239
and perhaps predictably, it is revealed during the media tour

808
00:41:58,400 --> 00:41:59,639
that he is writing a book.

809
00:42:00,159 --> 00:42:01,199
Speaker 2: There is always a book.

810
00:42:01,239 --> 00:42:03,000
Speaker 1: I mean, it's almost a running joke at this point.

811
00:42:03,280 --> 00:42:06,480
If you literally have the classified secrets of the universe,

812
00:42:06,480 --> 00:42:08,840
if you have proof that we are not alone, why

813
00:42:08,880 --> 00:42:11,480
is the very first step in your disclosure plan always

814
00:42:11,519 --> 00:42:13,480
securing a lucrative publishing deal.

815
00:42:13,760 --> 00:42:16,840
Speaker 2: The NCI also gives high scores for overuse of novelty

816
00:42:17,119 --> 00:42:20,000
a five out of five for the hyperbolic, breathless language

817
00:42:20,079 --> 00:42:23,199
used by the network constantly claiming this single interview will

818
00:42:23,239 --> 00:42:24,519
change the world forever.

819
00:42:24,480 --> 00:42:27,719
Speaker 1: And uniform messaging a four out of five, as every

820
00:42:27,760 --> 00:42:31,559
single media outlet repeating the story uses the exact same,

821
00:42:31,760 --> 00:42:35,840
clearly approved specific buzzwords like non human biologics.

822
00:42:36,119 --> 00:42:39,440
Speaker 2: So a score of sixty three tells us definitively that

823
00:42:39,480 --> 00:42:42,239
we are being manipulated. But we must be very careful

824
00:42:42,280 --> 00:42:45,880
with our extrapolation here. A high NCI score does not

825
00:42:46,039 --> 00:42:50,000
definitively mean aliens aren't real. It doesn't mean Jake Barber

826
00:42:50,159 --> 00:42:52,360
is entirely lying about what he saw.

827
00:42:52,760 --> 00:42:55,119
Speaker 1: What it means is that the delivery of the information

828
00:42:55,280 --> 00:42:59,239
is heavily intentionally engineered by someone behind the scenes. When

829
00:42:59,239 --> 00:43:01,760
a UFO story hits the danger zone, the source material

830
00:43:01,760 --> 00:43:05,159
suggests it generally points to one of three underlying realities.

831
00:43:05,320 --> 00:43:08,320
Speaker 2: Let's go through these three realities. This framework completely changed

832
00:43:08,320 --> 00:43:10,480
how we look at these types of new cycles. Reality

833
00:43:10,559 --> 00:43:13,679
number one package disclosure. This is the scenario where the

834
00:43:13,679 --> 00:43:17,159
core phenomenon is entirely real. The government actually has these

835
00:43:17,199 --> 00:43:18,480
non human craft, but.

836
00:43:18,719 --> 00:43:21,559
Speaker 1: They are terrified of the ontological shock and public panic

837
00:43:21,559 --> 00:43:24,159
that would ensue, so they don't just dump the raw

838
00:43:24,199 --> 00:43:25,760
classified files online.

839
00:43:25,920 --> 00:43:30,320
Speaker 2: Instead, the use syoptactics, trickling out information slowly through controlled,

840
00:43:30,480 --> 00:43:34,000
vetted assets like Barber, managing the narrative pacing, and using

841
00:43:34,039 --> 00:43:37,400
emotional manipulation to slowly acclent the public to the reality

842
00:43:37,400 --> 00:43:40,400
over years without causing a sudden societal melting.

843
00:43:40,599 --> 00:43:44,360
Speaker 1: Exactly, the truth is real, but it is being aggressively managed.

844
00:43:44,760 --> 00:43:49,039
Reality number two, the cover story in this scenario, The

845
00:43:49,199 --> 00:43:54,400
entire UFO narrative is a complete manufactured psychological operation designed

846
00:43:54,400 --> 00:43:58,039
specifically to hide terrestrial classified military testing.

847
00:43:58,480 --> 00:44:01,960
Speaker 2: If major aerospace contract actors like Lockheed Martin or Raytheon

848
00:44:02,039 --> 00:44:06,000
are testing next generation leap ahead drone technology or propulsion systems.

849
00:44:06,280 --> 00:44:09,840
They absolutely want foreign adversaries and the American public looking

850
00:44:09,920 --> 00:44:10,480
the wrong way.

851
00:44:10,760 --> 00:44:13,400
Speaker 1: A UFO frenzy is the perfect cover. As long as

852
00:44:13,400 --> 00:44:15,719
the public and the media are breathlessly debating whether a

853
00:44:15,800 --> 00:44:18,880
craft is from another star system, they aren't asking hard

854
00:44:18,880 --> 00:44:23,039
investigatory questions about unacknowledged defense budgets, secret weapons platforms, or

855
00:44:23,079 --> 00:44:24,119
black project funding.

856
00:44:24,440 --> 00:44:28,599
Speaker 2: And then there's reality number three, the distraction, a shiny

857
00:44:28,639 --> 00:44:32,079
object deliberately dangled in front of the public to make

858
00:44:32,159 --> 00:44:36,400
us forget about a very real, very immediate, very terrestrial problem.

859
00:44:36,559 --> 00:44:41,360
Speaker 1: Remember the NCI metric of timing massive unidentified drone swarms

860
00:44:41,400 --> 00:44:45,840
penetrating restricted airspace over US military bases for weeks on end.

861
00:44:46,360 --> 00:44:50,400
That is a colossal, unacceptable national security failure. Heads should

862
00:44:50,480 --> 00:44:51,000
roll for that.

863
00:44:51,480 --> 00:44:54,519
Speaker 2: But the exact moment that Jake Barber UFO story drops,

864
00:44:54,960 --> 00:44:58,559
the media cycle completely vaporizes the drone story. We stop

865
00:44:58,639 --> 00:45:01,360
asking why our billion dollars b are vulnerable to off

866
00:45:01,400 --> 00:45:04,519
the shelf drones, and we start arguing about aliens on Twitter.

867
00:45:04,800 --> 00:45:06,760
The distraction work perfectly.

868
00:45:06,679 --> 00:45:09,760
Speaker 1: Which brings us to a brilliant, vital distinction highlighted in

869
00:45:09,800 --> 00:45:13,480
your source material regarding these prominent UFO figures, we constantly

870
00:45:13,480 --> 00:45:15,679
hear from people like David Grush or Louis Alazano or

871
00:45:15,719 --> 00:45:18,239
Jake Barber who are almost universally labeled by the media

872
00:45:18,280 --> 00:45:21,480
as whistleblowers. But we need to define our terms carefully

873
00:45:21,719 --> 00:45:24,239
because language matters in information warfare.

874
00:45:24,559 --> 00:45:28,440
Speaker 2: Yes, this blew my mind. If a so called whistleblower

875
00:45:28,639 --> 00:45:32,280
goes on a popular podcast or sits before Congressional Oversight

876
00:45:32,320 --> 00:45:35,480
Committee and says, I cannot tell you X because it's

877
00:45:35,559 --> 00:45:38,480
highly classified, but I am cleared by the Pentagon to

878
00:45:38,519 --> 00:45:41,039
tell you why. They are not a whistleblower in the

879
00:45:41,039 --> 00:45:42,239
traditional sense of the word.

880
00:45:42,400 --> 00:45:45,519
Speaker 1: A true whistleblower, like an Edward Snowden or a Chelsea Manning,

881
00:45:46,079 --> 00:45:51,119
breaks the law to expose perceived wrongdoing, regardless of classification.

882
00:45:51,760 --> 00:45:52,840
They burn the ships.

883
00:45:53,320 --> 00:45:57,480
Speaker 2: If someone is operating entirely within approved talking points, maintaining

884
00:45:57,480 --> 00:46:00,440
their security clearances, and having their books reviewed by the

885
00:46:00,440 --> 00:46:04,480
Department of Defense prior to publication, they are a government spokesperson.

886
00:46:04,840 --> 00:46:08,599
They are conducting a controlled, officially sanctioned release of information.

887
00:46:08,960 --> 00:46:12,679
Speaker 1: It is a vital, necessary distinction. It means the narrative,

888
00:46:12,800 --> 00:46:16,000
however wild it seems, is still entirely under the control

889
00:46:16,039 --> 00:46:19,360
of the intelligence apparatus, And this realization brings us to

890
00:46:19,440 --> 00:46:23,840
the ultimate synthesis of everything we've discussed today, the metasiop.

891
00:46:23,360 --> 00:46:26,960
Speaker 2: The metasyop. Let's pull all these threads together. We've talked

892
00:46:27,000 --> 00:46:30,159
about pr firms selling wars and doubt. We've talked about

893
00:46:30,199 --> 00:46:35,000
algorithms monetizing ethnic violence. We've talked about political factions weaponizing

894
00:46:35,039 --> 00:46:38,760
public health, and intelligence agencies managing UFO narratives.

895
00:46:38,920 --> 00:46:41,679
Speaker 1: When you pull all the way back to the thirty

896
00:46:41,679 --> 00:46:44,119
thousand foot view and look at the big picture of

897
00:46:44,280 --> 00:46:48,639
modern American information flow, what is the ultimate goal? What

898
00:46:48,800 --> 00:46:52,760
is the point of bombarding the population with constant, overlapping,

899
00:46:53,000 --> 00:46:55,000
low level psychological operations.

900
00:46:55,159 --> 00:46:59,039
Speaker 2: The ultimate goal, the overarching meta goal of these intersecting campaigns,

901
00:46:59,360 --> 00:47:04,159
is through division. The entities holding institutional power in society,

902
00:47:04,280 --> 00:47:08,400
whether they are massive corporate conglomerates, entrenched political parties, or

903
00:47:08,480 --> 00:47:13,000
unelected intelligence agencies, benefit immensely when the populace is fractured.

904
00:47:13,239 --> 00:47:16,880
Speaker 1: They actively want an engineer an environment where citizens are

905
00:47:16,960 --> 00:47:19,239
deeply fundamentally suspicious of one another.

906
00:47:19,599 --> 00:47:21,559
Speaker 2: I want you to think about your own life right now.

907
00:47:21,920 --> 00:47:25,880
Think about your social media feeds. Every single time you

908
00:47:25,920 --> 00:47:29,960
get sucked into a vicious name calling fight about politics

909
00:47:29,960 --> 00:47:32,840
on Twitter or Facebook, every time you cut off a

910
00:47:32,880 --> 00:47:35,599
family member over a cultural issue.

911
00:47:35,239 --> 00:47:38,559
Speaker 1: You are falling for the manipulation. You are doing exactly

912
00:47:38,639 --> 00:47:41,400
what the algorithm and the unseen architects of these narratives

913
00:47:41,400 --> 00:47:44,039
want you to do, because anger gets clicks. Sure, that's

914
00:47:44,079 --> 00:47:47,559
the financial side, but more importantly, from a power perspective,

915
00:47:47,920 --> 00:47:50,559
a divided populace is a distracted populace.

916
00:47:50,760 --> 00:47:53,639
Speaker 2: Exactly if the working class and the middle class are

917
00:47:53,719 --> 00:47:57,840
endlessly fighting each other over manufactured culture wars, engineered controversies,

918
00:47:58,239 --> 00:48:01,360
or the nuances of the Lablak theory, they do not

919
00:48:01,480 --> 00:48:04,760
have the collective energy, the unity, or the focus to

920
00:48:04,840 --> 00:48:07,400
look up and question the people actually pulling the strings.

921
00:48:07,440 --> 00:48:10,679
Speaker 1: They aren't uniting to ask the difficult systemic questions that

922
00:48:10,719 --> 00:48:13,960
threaten the status quo, questions like what really happened to

923
00:48:14,000 --> 00:48:17,000
Jeffrey Epstein and his network of elite clients. Where does

924
00:48:17,039 --> 00:48:20,360
all the untraceable dark money in our political system actually go?

925
00:48:21,000 --> 00:48:24,000
Who specifically profits when the cost of living skyrockets in

926
00:48:24,039 --> 00:48:25,559
the middle class is hollowed out.

927
00:48:25,639 --> 00:48:29,280
Speaker 2: You simply cannot organize and ask those fundamental questions of power.

928
00:48:29,639 --> 00:48:32,239
If you're too busy hating your neighbor over a sye op.

929
00:48:32,760 --> 00:48:36,280
The powers that be absolutely thrive in our division. It

930
00:48:36,360 --> 00:48:37,079
is their shield.

931
00:48:37,639 --> 00:48:40,320
Speaker 1: But there is a countermeasure, There is a way out

932
00:48:40,320 --> 00:48:43,679
of the maze. The source material outlines a unifying force

933
00:48:44,000 --> 00:48:46,239
that can cut through the noise of the metasyop and

934
00:48:46,280 --> 00:48:48,559
it's grounded in basic human nature.

935
00:48:48,840 --> 00:48:51,440
Speaker 2: And this is my absolute favorite part of the notes

936
00:48:51,480 --> 00:48:54,280
you provided. It brings all of this high level intelligence

937
00:48:54,280 --> 00:48:58,039
theory back to a grounded human level. Imagine two neighbors.

938
00:48:58,480 --> 00:49:01,760
Let's say neighbor A is a staunch traditional conservative who

939
00:49:01,800 --> 00:49:05,559
watches Fox News neveror B is a bleeding heart progressive

940
00:49:05,599 --> 00:49:07,400
liberal who watches MSNBC.

941
00:49:07,639 --> 00:49:09,079
Speaker 1: If you put them in a room and ask them

942
00:49:09,119 --> 00:49:12,760
about tax policy, or the education symptom, or healthcare reform,

943
00:49:13,199 --> 00:49:15,159
they are going to argue until they are blue in

944
00:49:15,199 --> 00:49:18,760
the face. They disagree on fundamentally everything regarding how society

945
00:49:18,800 --> 00:49:19,440
should be run.

946
00:49:19,639 --> 00:49:22,079
Speaker 2: But if you strip away the partisan framing, if you

947
00:49:22,119 --> 00:49:25,719
remove the algorithmic outrage, what do both of those individuals

948
00:49:25,719 --> 00:49:27,199
fundamentally want At their core?

949
00:49:27,519 --> 00:49:30,840
Speaker 1: They both want the truth. The conservative wants the actual,

950
00:49:30,960 --> 00:49:34,159
unvarnished truth about where COVID came from. The liberal wants

951
00:49:34,239 --> 00:49:36,599
the exact same truth. They both want the truth about

952
00:49:36,599 --> 00:49:39,559
what the government actually knows about UFOs and black budget spending.

953
00:49:39,880 --> 00:49:42,000
They both want the truth about elite corruption rings.

954
00:49:42,000 --> 00:49:47,079
Speaker 2: Like Epstein's, the core burning desire for truth, unmanipulated raw

955
00:49:47,159 --> 00:49:51,360
truth is the great human unifier. It is the one

956
00:49:51,559 --> 00:49:57,559
thing that crosses every single political, socioeconomic, and cultural boundary.

957
00:49:57,639 --> 00:50:00,760
Speaker 1: And that is precisely why the Narrative Credibil Index is

958
00:50:00,760 --> 00:50:03,760
such a vital empowering tool. It puts the power back

959
00:50:03,760 --> 00:50:06,559
in your hands. You don't need a top secret security clearance,

960
00:50:06,599 --> 00:50:09,400
you don't need an investigative journalism degree. You just need

961
00:50:09,440 --> 00:50:11,760
to recognize the mathematical patterns of deception.

962
00:50:12,400 --> 00:50:14,760
Speaker 2: You can use the NCI every single day to protect

963
00:50:14,800 --> 00:50:17,800
your own mind. When you watch a primetime news broadcast,

964
00:50:18,039 --> 00:50:20,440
when you read a slick corporate press release, when the

965
00:50:20,480 --> 00:50:23,360
algorithm serves you a viral outrage video that makes your

966
00:50:23,360 --> 00:50:25,480
blood pressure spike, you can pause.

967
00:50:25,760 --> 00:50:29,639
Speaker 1: You can run the numbers. You can identify the emotional manipulation,

968
00:50:29,760 --> 00:50:33,360
the forced authority, the tribalism, the missing information. You can

969
00:50:33,400 --> 00:50:36,280
finally see the matrix for what it is. You can

970
00:50:36,320 --> 00:50:40,039
realize that your sudden surge of anger isn't an organic,

971
00:50:40,159 --> 00:50:44,360
natural emotion. It's a highly engineered response designed by someone

972
00:50:44,400 --> 00:50:45,960
else to profit off your reaction.

973
00:50:47,000 --> 00:50:49,639
Speaker 2: So we have reached the end of our exploration today

974
00:50:50,000 --> 00:50:52,480
and I have a mission for you. We want to

975
00:50:52,559 --> 00:50:55,400
know exactly where you stand now that you've seen the

976
00:50:55,400 --> 00:50:58,039
blueprint of the matrix, now that you understand the mechanics

977
00:50:58,079 --> 00:51:00,719
of the twenty questions of the NCI, what is a

978
00:51:00,760 --> 00:51:04,599
major news story, a viral debate, or a cultural controversy

979
00:51:04,599 --> 00:51:07,280
happening right now in your world that sets off your

980
00:51:07,360 --> 00:51:08,440
NCI alarm bells?

981
00:51:08,639 --> 00:51:10,199
Speaker 1: Do you think you've been caught in one of these

982
00:51:10,239 --> 00:51:13,599
algorithmic syops without even realizing it. I want you to

983
00:51:13,639 --> 00:51:15,719
really ponder that, look at the world differently today, and

984
00:51:15,760 --> 00:51:17,559
please leave a comment below to let us know what

985
00:51:17,599 --> 00:51:19,480
you think. We read them all and we want to

986
00:51:19,480 --> 00:51:20,760
know how you are applying this.

987
00:51:21,199 --> 00:51:24,800
Speaker 2: It is the crucial first step in reclaiming your cognitive sovereignty.

988
00:51:25,280 --> 00:51:28,000
Recognizing the trap is the only reliable way to avoid

989
00:51:28,039 --> 00:51:28,639
stepping in it.

990
00:51:28,920 --> 00:51:30,840
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for joining us for this edition

991
00:51:31,079 --> 00:51:33,519
of Thrilling Threads. We are going to leave you with

992
00:51:33,599 --> 00:51:37,039
one final provocative thought to chew on the next time

993
00:51:37,079 --> 00:51:39,599
you are scrolling through your feed and you feel that sudden,

994
00:51:39,920 --> 00:51:42,599
hot surge of outrage bubbling up in your chest over

995
00:51:42,639 --> 00:51:45,519
a headline, before you type an angry reply, before you

996
00:51:45,559 --> 00:51:48,239
share the post to your friends, stop, take a breath

997
00:51:48,239 --> 00:51:51,679
and ask yourself one simple question, who is profiting from

998
00:51:51,719 --> 00:51:54,639
my anger right now? Stay curious, stay sharp, and we

999
00:51:54,679 --> 00:51:55,639
will see you next time.

