Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's the twenty first of August.
Speaker 2: If our Lord twenty twenty five, they were going to
Speaker 2: take a look at a mixed bag of good and
Speaker 2: bad news about the climate. Mcguffin. Yes, they are still
Speaker 2: our grid apart like grimlins on a plane, but there's
Speaker 2: a couple of positive moves that are happening with it.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a look also at more politics.
Speaker 3: It is now.
Speaker 2: Rumored that there is a rampant hypocrisy about the LGBT
Speaker 2: within the GOP. Who would have thought that the party
Speaker 2: that protects pedophiles, whether it's Jeffrey Epstein or whether it's
Speaker 2: Israeli cybersecurity guy, who would have thought that they would
Speaker 2: be closeted. So we're going to be right back, stay
Speaker 2: with us. Well, I want to wish Travis happy birthday.
Speaker 2: Yet today is his birthday and he's working.
Speaker 3: On his birthday. Thank you, Travis. Where would you like
Speaker 3: to start here? I'll give you the choice. Make a wish.
Speaker 4: Let's go with the green agenda stuff.
Speaker 3: That's all same, Okay, that's why I started. I guess, yeah,
Speaker 3: we have.
Speaker 2: The USDA Secretary, Brooke Rawlins was in Tennessee for the
Speaker 2: State Fair and she made an announcement that they're going
Speaker 2: to stop funding solar panels all over fertile farmland. Did
Speaker 2: you know they were doing that? The USDA was actually
Speaker 2: subsidizing solar panels to destroy farmland. Yeah, feed the AI,
Speaker 2: but don't feed the humans. That's really what this is
Speaker 2: all about. Who knew they were doing this? And I
Speaker 2: talked about this in the UK and we showed pictures
Speaker 2: of the massive numbers of solar panels there that are
Speaker 2: just covering everything. It's truly amazing. So the USA will
Speaker 2: no longer subsidize that putting solar panels on productive farmland
Speaker 2: to destroy it, or allow solar panels manufactured by foreign
Speaker 2: adversaries to be used in department projects. They're still going
Speaker 2: to be subsidizing it, but they'll be subsidizing it with
Speaker 2: taxpayer money for American crony capitalism.
Speaker 3: That's what they'll be doing. So that's the good news
Speaker 3: from Broke.
Speaker 2: Rawlin, noting how solar panels on farmland nationwide have increased
Speaker 2: nearly fifty percent since twenty twelve.
Speaker 3: Let's see who the president has been since twenty twelve.
Speaker 2: Trump was one of them, and he didn't do anything
Speaker 2: to stop the solar farms replacing food farms.
Speaker 4: I mentioned this for but my wife and I go
Speaker 4: back to Texas to visit her family fairly frequently, and
Speaker 4: along the side out of the road a lot of
Speaker 4: the time, there's just these giant farm fields and I've
Speaker 4: seen so many solar panels in them.
Speaker 3: Now, Yeah, you know.
Speaker 4: Things I never used to se when we were a kid.
Speaker 4: We took quite a few cross country trips when we
Speaker 4: were younger, and just something you didn't see. You'd occasionally
Speaker 4: see those giant windmills because they've been around a long time.
Speaker 2: And that really does create the strange illusion when you're dry,
Speaker 2: because they're so large, it creates a strange per sey.
Speaker 4: Am I getting any closer to this at all? Don
Speaker 4: Quixote's mind would have boggled at them.
Speaker 3: Yeah, this is when you look at it.
Speaker 2: It's yet another cost that people have not really factored
Speaker 2: into it, solar panels, in the fact that they are
Speaker 2: getting rid of farmland, getting rid of trees, forests and
Speaker 2: things like that, cutting them down in order to put
Speaker 2: solar panels up. It's another one of these things that
Speaker 2: really hasn't gotten sufficient exposure.
Speaker 5: And that's the cost everyone has to pay, the increase
Speaker 5: in food costs as they replace these fields.
Speaker 2: Food costs are exploding. The thing is that when you
Speaker 2: look at all these different things, even the fact that
Speaker 2: the wind and solar does not have the kind of
Speaker 2: inertia that power generators did, and that's created a whole
Speaker 2: new level of problems. If they're concerned about warming, getting
Speaker 2: rid of trees is the wrong thing to do, but
Speaker 2: of course that's now starting to become the new fashion.
Speaker 2: We have to cut down the trees and bury them.
Speaker 2: I wonder why they made that switch. Could it be
Speaker 2: because they want to support putting solar panels out in various.
Speaker 4: Places having funerals for trees.
Speaker 2: Now, well, Bill Lee made a statement the governor Tennessee
Speaker 2: saying yeah, we're going to stop doing this. But what
Speaker 2: he really needs to do is he really needs to
Speaker 2: tell the TVA, the Tennessee Valley Authority to stop going
Speaker 2: down this renewable These are people who the upper echelon
Speaker 2: of the TVA are getting paid literally millions of dollars.
Speaker 2: The CEO got paid like eight or nine million dollar salary.
Speaker 2: It's seen the kind of money that this power company
Speaker 2: that is part government and part private. It's this weird thing,
Speaker 2: kind of like the Federal Reserve and the CDC. But
Speaker 2: they're moving very quickly to put in battery energy storage
Speaker 2: sites best. This is what Elon Musk is selling. And
Speaker 2: these are massive conglomerations of batteries which, guess what, they
Speaker 2: can spontaneously combust and burn all of our homes and
Speaker 2: forest land and farms down all at the same time.
Speaker 2: But they're taking a victory lamp for the USDA, saying
Speaker 2: it's a testament to Department's determination and taxpayer support for unaffordable,
Speaker 2: unreliable green energy sources and ensure that this pie chain
Speaker 2: consists of American products and manufacturing. Well, we'll see if
Speaker 2: they can still manufacture them with a tariffs in place.
Speaker 2: But just like the UK, the US is imposing renewable
Speaker 2: energy and charges consumers for creating unreliable and costly energy supply.
Speaker 2: And the largest regional transmission organization in the United States
Speaker 2: is one that involves Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland Interconnection. It
Speaker 2: began with just those three states, but now it provides
Speaker 2: the power for thirteen states. All are part of the
Speaker 2: power for thirteen different states. They call it PJM as
Speaker 2: in Pennsylvania, Jersey, and Maryland. And now what is happening
Speaker 2: with it part is seems kind of like, you know
Speaker 2: the tariff issues that Trump had, where there's this additional
Speaker 2: layer of problems that are brought on by the indecision
Speaker 2: as to whether or not he's going to move forward
Speaker 2: to the tariffs of what level it's going to be.
Speaker 2: That's what they're coming up with with the renewables, they said,
Speaker 2: it's a reliance on renewables. It's created a juggling act
Speaker 2: with a backlog or projects waiting for transmission lines, waiting
Speaker 2: for grid storage to that wonderful battery energy storage system
Speaker 2: that must wants to do, and higher costs and reduced
Speaker 2: reliability for consumers. See one of the things is when
Speaker 2: you start building these remote power generation areas like the
Speaker 2: solar farms or the windmill farms, you got to run
Speaker 2: the power lines out to it. And when they did
Speaker 2: that in Texas to make the grid unreliable there, it
Speaker 2: costs billions of dollars that were paid for by the
Speaker 2: state to subsidize these formerly oil rich billionaires who then
Speaker 2: jumped over into the quote unquote renewable. They wanted to
Speaker 2: run the power lines out to them so they could
Speaker 2: sell power and make profits.
Speaker 3: So it's an amazing grift.
Speaker 4: Labor green scam is what caused the massive Texas freeze.
Speaker 4: Well not the freeze itself, but the problems with it.
Speaker 4: There are these windmills up and relying on them for power. Yeah,
Speaker 4: and they play these word games like, oh, well, technically
Speaker 4: the windmill didn't freeze. It was the pro pane that
Speaker 4: would defrost the windmill that froze.
Speaker 2: Or we didn't pay for the option that would have
Speaker 2: defrosted it because we didn't think we'd need it, you
Speaker 2: know that type of thing.
Speaker 4: Yeah, either way, it's an issue with the windmills themselves.
Speaker 4: You don't have these issues with the power plants.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: When we first moved to Texas, they were real busy
Speaker 2: shutting down power plants that were fully functional, had a
Speaker 2: lot of life left in them. But they were using
Speaker 2: coal and oil, which Texas has in abundance of the oil.
Speaker 2: But this is something This is an article from the
Speaker 2: UK and they point out that as much as they've
Speaker 2: seen this in the UK. It's also happening in the US.
Speaker 2: It's happening everywhere. They said, a similar plans being followed
Speaker 2: on both sides Atlantic. Are we seeing the rollout of
Speaker 2: a global plan or is it just a coincidence? I
Speaker 2: think it's a conspiracy. Frankly, the media has been taking
Speaker 2: extensive talking extensively about New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy's energy plan,
Speaker 2: saying it will do little, if anything, to quote unquote
Speaker 2: save the planet, and it's a bad idea and will
Speaker 2: in fact unnecessarily raise electricity prices for millions. Here's a
Speaker 2: headline example, a green new headache. Democrats flee Governor's green
Speaker 2: energy master plan as election approaches. Insane energy policies are
Speaker 2: set to burn Democrats in New Jersey and New York. Also,
Speaker 2: what makes Jersey run Your growing energy bill is a
Speaker 2: growing issue in the governor's race. The question is when
Speaker 2: are people going to push back against this. PHAM doesn't
Speaker 2: generate power. It's actually a regional transmission organization. It doesn't
Speaker 2: have any power lines, it doesn't have any power plants,
Speaker 2: it has no substations. It's kind of like an air
Speaker 2: traffic controller of the grid, coordinating the flow of electricity
Speaker 2: across eighty eight thousand miles of high voltage transmission, managing
Speaker 2: more than fourteen hundred power generators, and pulling the levers
Speaker 2: of gigantic energy marketplaces where you're told he is buy
Speaker 2: the electricity delivered to your living room. And part of
Speaker 2: why this is exploding so quickly in cost, and it
Speaker 2: has exploded. It's gone from twenty nine to ninety two
Speaker 2: per megawat per day to three hundred and twenty nine
Speaker 2: megawatts per day at three hundred twenty nine dollars megawatts
Speaker 2: per megawat day for twenty twenty six, so it's gone
Speaker 2: from twenty nine dollars to three hundred and twenty nine dollars. That, folks,
Speaker 2: is an elevenfold increase. And what is causing that is
Speaker 2: not that the cost of electricity has gone up, but
Speaker 2: it's a lot of uncertainty costs. As I said before,
Speaker 2: it's very much like the tariffs that are out there.
Speaker 2: We have a government that's going to operate by FIAT
Speaker 2: and tell people do this, make this happen, and do
Speaker 2: it now whether or not it can happen, and it's
Speaker 2: created chaos and confusion throughout our economy from the tariffs
Speaker 2: to the power generation. They said, suddenly one fifth of
Speaker 2: your bill is just capacity, meaning a backup for things
Speaker 2: that don't work when it's cloudy, when it's calm, or
Speaker 2: when it's dark. Right, so if the wind is not
Speaker 2: blowing or the sun is not shining, you've got to
Speaker 2: have backup. And that's where Musk comes in. He's going
Speaker 2: to make tremendous amounts of money for his backup capacity.
Speaker 2: So New Jersey, like every other Green leader, is retiring
Speaker 2: gas plants and nuclear units as a matter of policy.
Speaker 2: I thought they had just given their new seal of
Speaker 2: approval to nukes so that they could have AI power,
Speaker 2: but that's still not they haven't gotten the memo in Jersey.
Speaker 2: I guess they're pinning their hopes on renewables that still
Speaker 2: don't have transmission lines or grid storage. There is one
Speaker 2: hundred and forty three gigawatt backlog, like.
Speaker 3: The professor would say, jigawats Marty.
Speaker 2: That's huge, and their project queue, most of it wind
Speaker 2: and solar, waiting for approval and to even get started
Speaker 2: building it. And so there's lawsuits, there's bureaucrats, there's regulatory
Speaker 2: things that have to be done before they can get
Speaker 2: this stuff moved, and that's that kind of indecision, that expense.
Speaker 2: And even without that stuff there, they have jumped the
Speaker 2: electricity prices by eleven times higher. Now tell us in
Speaker 2: the wildcard the AI Data Center gold Rush, what used
Speaker 2: to be a footnote on the demand page now accounts
Speaker 2: for four percent of total load with a straight trajectory
Speaker 2: to twelve percent by twenty thirty. In other words, it's
Speaker 2: going to triple as well. And so you've got to
Speaker 2: pull out all the stops and rush this stuff through,
Speaker 2: grease it with extra money so that we can have
Speaker 2: a sufficient capacity for AI to grow. That's only going
Speaker 2: to increase the cost as you try to do it
Speaker 2: faster and faster.
Speaker 4: It's truly just amazing, because it'd be bad enough it
Speaker 4: was simply going to be sucking up all the energy
Speaker 4: for non nefarious purposes. But these things are going to
Speaker 4: be used to track us and control us at all times.
Speaker 4: So not only are they going to deny you air conditioning,
Speaker 4: but what they're going to deny you for is also
Speaker 4: going to restrict your freedoms. They're going to crush you
Speaker 4: in multiple ways. The AI Data centers are going to
Speaker 4: be such a burden and a blight on the American people.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the average bill there in that area that's served
Speaker 2: by PJAM is now twenty percent higher than the national average.
Speaker 3: It's going to soar even more.
Speaker 2: And business owners are seeing twenty eight hundred dollars monthly
Speaker 2: charges for mid size operations. All the while billions and
Speaker 2: clean energy projects, offshore wind storage farms, hydrogen pilots are
Speaker 2: being canceled nationwide. Fourteen to twenty two billion dollars and
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five alone were canceled due to political uncertainty
Speaker 2: and people looking hard at the real cost of these renewables,
Speaker 2: as well as the vanishing tax credits and the politics.
Speaker 3: Involved in it.
Speaker 2: These things would never exist if it was market driven,
Speaker 2: if it was driven by efficiency and competition, they would
Speaker 2: never exist. And it is all based on a phony crisis.
Speaker 3: That's the worst thing.
Speaker 2: What is the worst thing about this The fact that
Speaker 2: they're going to use the AI stuff. It's going to
Speaker 2: really ramp us up to surveil us in the fact
Speaker 2: that this is all just a phony mcguffin.
Speaker 4: The energy is used to spy on us, and in
Speaker 4: such small portions too.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's the joke about the two old ladies came
Speaker 2: out of the restaurant and one said the food was
Speaker 2: horrible and the other one said yes, and then such
Speaker 2: small portions as yeah, the electricity is unreliable and yes,
Speaker 2: and it's so expensive as well. So this is the
Speaker 2: state of where we are right now. We see that
Speaker 2: they're bragging about pulling back the green mcguffin, and yet
Speaker 2: not all of that is under the troll the federal government.
Speaker 2: Much of it is happening because the federal government has
Speaker 2: subsidized and pushed that, and so just pulling back some
Speaker 2: of the subsidies as the Trump administration is doing is
Speaker 2: a positive thing because if he subsidizes the stuff, as
Speaker 2: he did with the COVID so called pandemic, that is
Speaker 2: what really makes it happen. And it was these subsidies
Speaker 2: from Biden and from Congress with their you know what
Speaker 2: was their acronym. It wasn't the big beautiful bill.
Speaker 4: It was build back Better.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Anyway, it was like IRS or something like that. Anyway,
Speaker 2: these these bills that they put in there, if they
Speaker 2: subsidize it, it will be built one way or the other,
Speaker 2: even if it never gets finished. They will pour that
Speaker 2: money into it and they will do a lot of damage.
Speaker 2: In the UK, people are starting to get concerned about
Speaker 2: Tesla's battery energy storage sites as well. Thousands are objecting
Speaker 2: to Tesla's bid to supply energy to UK homes. Now
Speaker 2: they're not so much worried about the true issues, which
Speaker 2: are an astronomical cost and a massive fire rist there.
Speaker 2: They are just opposing it because they don't like Elon
Speaker 2: Musk anymore. The company applied for a license last month
Speaker 2: to the Energy Regulator to start supplying power to homes
Speaker 2: and businesses in England, Scotland, Wales as in as next year,
Speaker 2: and they have online polls where people are pushing back
Speaker 2: demanding that do not be built. Well, we're going to
Speaker 2: take a quick break and when we come back, we're
Speaker 2: going to talk about how much energy does do these
Speaker 2: AI programs actually use. You'll be surprised actually, and it
Speaker 2: turns out that they're not getting more efficient, they're getting
Speaker 2: more power hungry.
Speaker 3: So it's going to be even worse with the later generations. Comments.
Speaker 4: If you want to get to the most, sure, we've
Speaker 4: got North American house hip. But thank you very much,
Speaker 4: that is very generously appreciate it, he says. There's an
Speaker 4: electric bus fire at the Universal Bus yard last month.
Speaker 4: Fortunately it happened in the middle of the day, so
Speaker 4: other than the diesel bus next to it, all other
Speaker 4: buses were on the road. Because there were no nearby
Speaker 4: buses for the fire to spread to. It never got
Speaker 4: to the be the best out buildings. It would have
Speaker 4: been unfortunate. Nevertheless, the fire was spectacular. That was a
Speaker 4: near miss right there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's there have been so many of these entire
Speaker 2: bus stations that have burned down in Germany and France
Speaker 2: that they pulled back on that stuff. And by the way,
Speaker 2: you know you're talking about having a fire there, there
Speaker 2: was a fire of a tractor trailer that was pulling
Speaker 2: several electric vehicles to the marketplace. And that was a
Speaker 2: big mass. I mean not as big a mass as
Speaker 2: the massive transport ships. We have hundreds of millions of
Speaker 2: dollars worth of luxury car to go down the drain
Speaker 2: literally because they can't put the fire out electric fire.
Speaker 2: Some of the electric cars caught fire. But this was
Speaker 2: a tractor trailer eighting wheeler towing a lot of electric
Speaker 2: cars and one of them caught fire and they all
Speaker 2: caught fire, and we'll see that over and over again.
Speaker 4: It keeps happening. It's one of those things where anyone
Speaker 4: that's actually paying attention knows about it, but you don't
Speaker 4: really hear about it on the news. It seems like
Speaker 4: they don't mention it. Well, it's something that at least
Speaker 4: not connect the dots. It is a tremendous flaw in
Speaker 4: the technology. And if they're going to have battery driven cars,
Speaker 4: they need to wait until.
Speaker 2: They got a reliable, safe battery to put it in there.
Speaker 2: And the problem is these battery energy storage sites that
Speaker 2: they're attaching to the grid are even worse than the
Speaker 2: cars because they're much much much larger. I mean, even
Speaker 2: just the little electric scooters in New York are burning
Speaker 2: down buildings.
Speaker 4: Yeah, electric bikes as well. That's the thinking. You know,
Speaker 4: if everything else to do with an electric car, you
Speaker 4: can turn off autopilot, you can avoid the other issues
Speaker 4: with it. But this is simply just it's a grenade.
Speaker 4: You don't know when it's going to go off or
Speaker 4: if it's going to go off. You might get one
Speaker 4: and it's perfectly fine and it never has any issues,
Speaker 4: or maybe you get one and it burns your house
Speaker 4: down the first night you bring it home. It's whatever
Speaker 4: the flaw is, they haven't figured it out and they
Speaker 4: don't know.
Speaker 2: And it can be a slight injury. You can have
Speaker 2: like a small little fender bender and that might compromise
Speaker 2: the battery. And this is why the insurance rates are
Speaker 2: going sky high now have to replace all that stuff
Speaker 2: because if there's some small flaw introduced because of that
Speaker 2: fender bender, that's when you get the kind of spontaneous
Speaker 2: combustion that you see.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and then you have to actually trust that they
Speaker 4: were able to figure out where the flaw was, to
Speaker 4: trust that your mechanic knows exactly what to look for
Speaker 4: in all of these spots. It's you know, you have
Speaker 4: a minor issue with a gasoline car and chances are
Speaker 4: you'll be fine. You know, maybe you need to take
Speaker 4: it back in get some more work done. Maybe it's
Speaker 4: leaking oil or something like that, but it's not going
Speaker 4: to explode in the middle of an and burn your
Speaker 4: house down.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, you know, and that's the other thing too.
Speaker 2: A lot of these flaws in this new technology, like
Speaker 2: range issues and the high cost, those are things that
Speaker 2: the person wants to buy it can make that decision
Speaker 2: whether they want that or not, because there are some
Speaker 2: advantages to the electric cars. Yeah, and so they can
Speaker 2: make that trade off. That's where they want to do it.
Speaker 2: But this whole thing about spontaneous combustion and the uncontrollable
Speaker 2: fires that affects everybody, and it also, by the way,
Speaker 2: affects the environment.
Speaker 4: And dumping all those chemical gases into the air and
Speaker 4: then the liquids into the top soil.
Speaker 3: But they don't care about that.
Speaker 2: They don't care about the rockets, and they just do
Speaker 2: the lockets go up, the lockets come down.
Speaker 4: They got to escape to Mars because they're you know,
Speaker 4: we're poisoning the planet. We're going to Mars though, don't worry.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, the Trump administration just relaxed the rules for
Speaker 2: rockets going up in terms of you know, whatever emission
Speaker 2: rules that they had with it. I guess some more.
Speaker 4: KWD sixty eight says, save the Earth. We'll have a
Speaker 4: silent spring, another ice age, or the ozone layer will fail,
Speaker 4: or we will have acid rain, or we will have
Speaker 4: global warming. It goes on and on and on.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they'll come up. I got one mcguffin after the other.
Speaker 5: So.
Speaker 4: She also says parts of Kentucky set up for wildfires.
Speaker 4: No rain in weeks. Later day could be rough day,
Speaker 4: Labor Day, my apologies. Then we have some happy birthday wishes. Well,
Speaker 4: it's very kind. Denver Adaway says, happy birthday, Bil Houghton,
Speaker 4: be my Valentine, KWD sixty eight. Brandon Bennett Mama c.
Speaker 4: Nineteen ninety six. Maluten Milankovic OCCULTI sim mister palm and
Speaker 4: for the love of the Road says anniversary or the
Speaker 4: first show too? A happy eight years? Was it really?
Speaker 4: I didn't realize it was on my birthday?
Speaker 2: Actually I wasn't sure, but Karen had said the other
Speaker 2: day when I said we're getting close to the eight
Speaker 2: year anniversary of the show, she said it began on
Speaker 2: Travis's birthday.
Speaker 3: I said, yeah, I remember, I thought it was to it.
Speaker 3: But yeah, Ryan would know. He keeps up with that.
Speaker 4: Better than y'all are better at keeping track of this
Speaker 4: stuff than we are.
Speaker 2: But yeah, here we are. It's pretty close to having
Speaker 2: an eight year anniversary. When we went to two people
Speaker 2: in the show.
Speaker 4: It's almost a show is going to be ten years
Speaker 4: old soon.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, Well we're going to take a quick break, folks.
Speaker 3: And we will be right back. Stay with us.
Speaker 6: Oh to look all round at the patch of round
Speaker 6: the illness, mother Najersey.
Speaker 1: Oh, it's all.
Speaker 4: All to be busy.
Speaker 6: It's a miserable place to live.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Just alm Travis. His son really likes that song there Pladio.
Speaker 2: Whenever that comes on, he sets up and takes notice.
Speaker 2: It might be because uh, he I kind of I've
Speaker 2: played a lot of string orchestras for him. I got
Speaker 2: Mozart's in a klina, not music. I thought it's funny.
Speaker 2: I thought, let me get this is a little night.
Speaker 2: Let me give him some little light music.
Speaker 4: He's getting, he's getting cultured here, making sure that he's
Speaker 4: well better taste than I do.
Speaker 2: It does grab his attention, especially if he's got a
Speaker 2: video that shows that people actually playing it.
Speaker 3: You know, he really likes that.
Speaker 4: So I also want to apologize. Apparently I misspoke and
Speaker 4: I called KDBD sixty eight a she sorry, my apologies.
Speaker 4: I got not much sleep last night. The little guy
Speaker 4: has been going through some sleep regression. He's been making
Speaker 4: it kind of difficult. So he's got my apologies, he's.
Speaker 3: Got mozart playing in his mind.
Speaker 2: Okay, so how much energy does a chat GPT consume
Speaker 2: when it's doing processing a prompt. It turns out the
Speaker 2: energy consumption for the newest version of chat GPT is
Speaker 2: significantly higher than previous models. It could be up to
Speaker 2: twenty times more energy intensive than the first version.
Speaker 3: Here we go.
Speaker 2: I mean, we're seeing stuff growing by leaps and bounds.
Speaker 2: Electricity rates are going up by a factor of eleven,
Speaker 2: the energy requirements for the chats are going up by
Speaker 2: a factor of twenty. It's amazing. Prices of things are
Speaker 2: going up, but our salaries are not. There is a
Speaker 2: severe lack of transparency regarding energy use and environmental impact
Speaker 2: that the AI models. Isn't that amazing because these are
Speaker 2: the people who are so freaked out about it all,
Speaker 2: but they want to keep that hidden. That should tell
Speaker 2: you something as well. So we can have the government
Speaker 2: have energy standards for everything from cars to air conditioning,
Speaker 2: but they're not going to have any energy standards for AI.
Speaker 2: They don't even want you to know what these things use.
Speaker 2: So it's not going to have that little sticker on
Speaker 2: it legacy for your refrigerator or your washing machine or something.
Speaker 3: How much energy does it use?
Speaker 2: The answer is, well, a whole lot is about the
Speaker 2: closest they can go, they said. Academics are trying to
Speaker 2: quantify the energy use or queries, but it is considerably
Speaker 2: higher than it was for previous models. There are no
Speaker 2: mandates coming from the Department of Energy or the EPA
Speaker 2: that would force AI companies to disclose their energy use
Speaker 2: or their environment impact. No, it's all just going to
Speaker 2: be swept under the carpet for their purposes, because understand,
Speaker 2: the government wants what AI brings to the tables, surveillance
Speaker 2: and control. It blows my mind that you can buy
Speaker 2: a car and know how many miles per gallant consumes.
Speaker 2: Yet we use all these AI tools every day and
Speaker 2: we have absolutely no efficiency metrics, no emission factors, nothing,
Speaker 2: said one person. It's not mandated, it's not regulated. Given
Speaker 2: where we are with the climate crisis, said one of them,
Speaker 2: it should be the top agenda the regulators everywhere. This
Speaker 2: is a person who hasn't clim under the fact that
Speaker 2: the climate crisis is not real, and that's one of
Speaker 2: the things I think really.
Speaker 3: Sticks out about this.
Speaker 2: Clearly, the government is not worried about this. Clearly, the
Speaker 2: government doesn't see this as an existential crisis, the climate
Speaker 2: part of it is. But you should see AI as
Speaker 2: an existential crisis because it is.
Speaker 5: It shows that the government doesn't believe it, and it
Speaker 5: shows that these people that are pushing for more regulation
Speaker 5: about it don't believe it. And what does that tell you.
Speaker 5: It's kind of like how so many billionaires are socialists.
Speaker 5: Clearly they don't think socialism is going to be bad
Speaker 5: for them. And clearly these billionaires don't think the green
Speaker 5: agenda is going to hurt them.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 2: And it's not just electricity, it's the water that uses
Speaker 2: as well. And we said this the longest time about
Speaker 2: NSA when they built their bluffed deal Utah facility to
Speaker 2: store all this information until they were able to come
Speaker 2: around with data mining to be able to make sense
Speaker 2: of it. You know, for the longest time, the federal
Speaker 2: government has been saving everything that you do, the lifelog
Speaker 2: if you will, project or Facebook or whatever. But they're
Speaker 2: saving everything on the Internet so they can at some
Speaker 2: point in the future, when the computers are fast enough
Speaker 2: and the software is smart enough, they can go back
Speaker 2: and collate all that data, mine it and tag you.
Speaker 2: Experts moutside the open AI fold have estimated that chat
Speaker 2: GPT five may use as much as twenty times more
Speaker 2: energy as the first version of chat GPT. At the
Speaker 2: very least, it would be several times more, they've said.
Speaker 2: And while all that is happening, and electricity prices are soaring,
Speaker 2: vegetables are up nearly forty percent, coffee is up twenty
Speaker 2: five percent, and electricity prices arising twice as fast as inflation,
Speaker 2: the question is why, And there's a lot of different
Speaker 2: theories about this. Some of this is due to the tariffs,
Speaker 2: some of it in terms of vegetables. Many people are saying, well,
Speaker 2: we're having fewer vegetables come in because we don't have
Speaker 2: the people to harvest them because of the immigration enforcement.
Speaker 2: So there's a lot of different things that are happening here.
Speaker 2: But the reality is is that as we all know,
Speaker 2: prices are going up, well not the government will admit it,
Speaker 2: with its phony numbers or not. They're trying to hide that,
Speaker 2: just like chat GPT is trying to hide its energy usage.
Speaker 2: And in the face of all of that, Trump is
Speaker 2: manically trying to get the Federal Reserve to drop interest rates.
Speaker 2: I think it's kind of interesting to see his latest
Speaker 2: his latest move to try to get rid of a
Speaker 2: FED governor that was put in by Biden, who has
Speaker 2: turned out to be a real hawk, which is probably
Speaker 2: more political than it is from an economic standpoint. I mean,
Speaker 2: this person is probably so it's they're pointed.
Speaker 3: By by Biden.
Speaker 2: They're probably a modern monetary theorist that doesn't which is
Speaker 2: Keynesianism on steroids. But they will set there very carefully
Speaker 2: say no, no, no, we can't lower interest rates because
Speaker 2: it would politically be what Trump points now, it's not
Speaker 2: going to help us if they lower the interest rates.
Speaker 2: It's going to kick inflation into higher gear. And it's
Speaker 2: going to not lower the interest rates on things like
Speaker 2: homes and cars because those are going to be put
Speaker 2: out there by people who have to make a profit.
Speaker 2: They can do fiat interest rates and the federal reserve
Speaker 2: that they charge to banks, They can do that by
Speaker 2: fiat and just raise it or lower it. But the
Speaker 2: other people are looking at what they think inflation is
Speaker 2: going to be, and they're going to offer you rates
Speaker 2: on homes and cars and other things like that based
Speaker 2: on their perception of the inflation rate, so the real
Speaker 2: figure is thirty eight point nine percent. Trump's stats are lying.
Speaker 2: They don't include electricity because electricity is only weighed in
Speaker 2: as three percent of the costs I pointed out the
Speaker 2: other day. So they have all these different tricks that
Speaker 2: they've put in to manipulate the price of are the
Speaker 2: costs they should say various things and manipulate the overall
Speaker 2: inflation rate. Coffee exports from Brazil were already were hit
Speaker 2: with a fifty percent tariff, even though they were already
Speaker 2: up by twenty five percent. They just hit them with
Speaker 2: a fifty percent tariff and that has not kicked in
Speaker 2: yet because they have contracts that are there, so that
Speaker 2: tariff rate has not kicked in, and the tiff this
Speaker 2: teophone coffee is simply to protect Trump's friend Bolsonario. And look,
Speaker 2: I disagree with the idea that you're going to lock
Speaker 2: up your opponents if you win the election, and that's
Speaker 2: what's going on there in Brazil. But nevertheless, when you
Speaker 2: look at the way these things are being set up,
Speaker 2: they don't help the American consumer. Coffee prices rose sharply
Speaker 2: twenty five percent of the past three months, about two
Speaker 2: thirds of US adults drink coffee, one of the most
Speaker 2: basic things that Americans buy. And then when you look
Speaker 2: at electricity, like I said before, you look at Pennsylvania,
Speaker 2: New Jersey, Maryland, down into d C where there's massive
Speaker 2: amount of data centers that are there outside of Washington, DC.
Speaker 2: But in another area down in Florida, people are complaining
Speaker 2: because they've got power bills that are going up to
Speaker 2: five hundred dollars a month. And when you start looking
Speaker 2: at what the median family income is, it turns out
Speaker 2: that that's a pretty big part of the budget. If
Speaker 2: you take a look at the medium family income and
Speaker 2: I think it's still around fifty thousand roughly, somebody's paying
Speaker 2: five hundred dollars a month. That's twelve percent of their budget.
Speaker 2: That's not three percent, which is what the government uses
Speaker 2: to calculate that. But the thing is when we look
Speaker 2: at the cost of food skyrocketing and cost of electricity skyrocking,
Speaker 2: as I said before, the only thing that they're interested
Speaker 2: in feeding is AI. They're interested in feeding their power
Speaker 2: and their tyranny, and they're not interested in feeding people.
Speaker 2: This is all set up to come after people, and
Speaker 2: so MSN News is saying, well, after AI replaces most
Speaker 2: humans jobs, then what do we do. Well, of course
Speaker 2: the answer is universal basic aygom, that's where these people
Speaker 2: have been for the longest time. Elon Musk as well
Speaker 2: as Bloomberg talking about that. You know, it sounds like Marxism,
Speaker 2: and the technocracy is not Marxism, but it shares many
Speaker 2: of the same components as a matter of fact, so
Speaker 2: much so that George Gilder in his book said that
Speaker 2: he called the people in Silicon Valley, he called them
Speaker 2: neo Marxists because he said they have the same fundamental
Speaker 2: flaw that Carl Marx did, which was to imagine that
Speaker 2: because of the Industrial Revolution, Karl Marx said, well, we
Speaker 2: have infinite capacity.
Speaker 4: We're post scarcity.
Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, no more scarcely. All we have to do
Speaker 2: is justly allocate these resources. I'm going to let government
Speaker 2: allocate these resources. That's the basic premise of communism. And
Speaker 2: George Gilder said, that's the same thing that these idiots
Speaker 2: in Silicon Valley think. They think that they have infinite
Speaker 2: capacity to produce material goods, and all they have to
Speaker 2: do is just allocate that to you with universal basic income.
Speaker 2: It's a very arrogant and arrogantly dangerous and stupid idea truly,
Speaker 2: as we have a clip actually while we're talking about
Speaker 2: Karl Marx, Karl Marx and Satan, the connection between the
Speaker 2: two of them. This is an interview that was connected
Speaker 2: by Jordan Peterson. And I want you to hear just
Speaker 2: how satanic the person Carl Marks was. And we have
Speaker 2: seen this over and over again from people who have
Speaker 2: dedicated their book. Solensky dedicated his book to Satan, The
Speaker 2: Original Rebel. Another communist authoritarian.
Speaker 7: Poems that he wrote that were pans to Mephistopheles, is
Speaker 7: that after he becomes an atheist, no, he's writing so
Speaker 7: the first one was eighteen thirty seven, wrote another in
Speaker 7: eighteen forty one. He wrote a bunch of them.
Speaker 3: He did.
Speaker 7: He did a just a chilling play called Ulanem ou l.
Speaker 8: A n E M.
Speaker 7: And people that are watching this, if they now type
Speaker 7: into their computer Ulanem even in Google, it'll pop up
Speaker 7: play by Karl Marx even has a Wikipedia entry. And
Speaker 7: let me warn people, you might not want to do this,
Speaker 7: but if you click the images button, you will see
Speaker 7: I mean you will, I mean there's some satanic stuff
Speaker 7: up there. From like not heavy.
Speaker 1: Metal, but like black metal groups.
Speaker 7: So Ulanem is an anagram for a manual or Manuelo.
Speaker 7: So Marx takes a Manuel, which is the name given
Speaker 7: to Christ, or Manuelo, and he flips it into this
Speaker 7: anagram called ulinem. And it's this chilling play. The main
Speaker 7: character is Lucindo, Lucindo, l uci nd O, and you
Speaker 7: just can't believe what you're reading with with with this play.
Speaker 7: So that that was written later in the eighteen forties.
Speaker 7: So really the prime of his writing, including the decade
Speaker 7: when he wrote the Communist Manifesto, is also the same
Speaker 7: decade when he was writing these these these these poems
Speaker 7: and pa and place and place, and throughout his life
Speaker 7: his kids and others would say, uh yeah, he had
Speaker 7: a favorite line always from Mephistop Everything that exists deserves
Speaker 7: to perish, So that remains a part of him through
Speaker 7: throughout his life. Edgar has a letter where.
Speaker 4: You or at least be tracked and trace continually.
Speaker 3: Which I don't know.
Speaker 7: Maybe it's playful, I don't know, although I would never
Speaker 7: you know, call my dad my dear devil. His wife
Speaker 7: called him, uh my wicked knave. I quote Henry Heinesen,
Speaker 7: referring to him as a goblin to try to get
Speaker 7: take me under under his spell. Other cases, of of where,
Speaker 7: of where he's using that kind of language. When Ingles
Speaker 7: first met him, he describes him as this dark man
Speaker 7: from Trier who hops and leaps and springs on his heels,
Speaker 7: the monster of ten thousand devils, he describes him. And
Speaker 7: the letter from his father is which was written in
Speaker 7: eighteen thirty seven, a year before before his before his
Speaker 7: father died. So his father writes to him March second,
Speaker 7: eighteen thirty seven, Karl, at times my heart delights in
Speaker 7: thinking of you and your fortune, and yet at times
Speaker 7: they cannot rid myself of ideas which arouse in me
Speaker 7: sad forebodings and fear when I am struck as if
Speaker 7: by lightning by the thought. Is your heart in accord
Speaker 7: with your head your talents has a room for the earthly,
Speaker 7: begentler sentiments, which, in this veil of sorrow it's a
Speaker 7: beautiful letter in any ways, are essentially consoling for a
Speaker 7: man of feeling. And then this question from the father
Speaker 7: of Karl Marx to his at this point eighteen year
Speaker 7: old son. And since that heart Carl is obviously animated
Speaker 7: and governed by a demon not granted to all men.
Speaker 7: Is that demon heavenly or Faustian?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Have you sold your soul? That's very amazing. Yeah, such
Speaker 2: darkness there, and that philosophy. You know, these philosophies really
Speaker 2: do matter. That's how they take captive our mind. And
Speaker 2: that really is where the war is. The secularists called
Speaker 2: it a mind war. Christians call it a spiritual war.
Speaker 2: It's a fight for your mind and what you think.
Speaker 2: And we know which side Karl marx As followers have embraced.
Speaker 2: The interesting thing is as we look at this and
Speaker 2: people are seeing something that is kind of a hybrid
Speaker 2: of a lot of these different aspects, and that is technocracy. Now,
Speaker 2: so a lot of people look at it and say,
Speaker 2: is technocracy fascism? Is it communism? And many others have
Speaker 2: been calling themselves now saying it's communitarianism. You know, in
Speaker 2: the same way this is a These labels are used
Speaker 2: to confuse people. I mean, the communists will call themselves
Speaker 2: socialists or progressive, and yet you know, you can't really
Speaker 2: see any difference that is there.
Speaker 5: Isn't it.
Speaker 4: Vladimir Lenin that said, the end goal of socialism is communism,
Speaker 4: you know, it's a stepping stone. That's how you get there.
Speaker 4: You sell them on this light version of it, Yeah,
Speaker 4: and then you work your way towards the full deal.
Speaker 2: Well, it's authoritarianism that culminates into tolitarianism. And that's why,
Speaker 2: you know, you can talk about fascism versus communism. The
Speaker 2: difference is the path that you take to get to tolitarianism.
Speaker 4: An order of operations sort of deal, you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, So you have technocracy. News has an article
Speaker 2: about the difference in this new label. But they're using
Speaker 2: to try to confuse people, is what we're talking about.
Speaker 3: He says.
Speaker 2: When technocrafts want a shield their technocratic policies, they intentionally
Speaker 2: do so in the language of communitarianism. So yeah, we're
Speaker 2: not communists, we're socialists, or we are progressives.
Speaker 3: He says.
Speaker 2: One example of this is smart cities. The technocratic policy,
Speaker 2: of course, is urban planners who lock you into a small,
Speaker 2: controlled area, restricting your movements and that type of thing. Surveillance,
Speaker 2: digital id algorithmic resource allocation made by unlikeed, unaccountable technical
Speaker 2: experts and private sector consultants. That's the reality. So how
Speaker 2: did they frame this to say, this is about communitarianism,
Speaker 2: because you know, we like communities, we want to have communities. Well,
Speaker 2: policy makers will frequently describe these initiatives as advancing inclusive
Speaker 2: urban communities. Yes, inclusive, it's like inclusive, like a you're
Speaker 2: going to be included in a prison or open their prison,
Speaker 2: or something as empowering local groups, or as in building
Speaker 2: public trust through collective digital transformation. The emphasis is on
Speaker 2: community driven sustainability, shared public spaces, and strengthening community ties.
Speaker 2: And going back to the very beginning of this, when
Speaker 2: they were going around when it was still Agenda twenty one,
Speaker 2: they would use a tactic that was developed by the
Speaker 2: Rand Corporation, and they would go into a community tell people,
Speaker 2: come in, we want to have your input on the
Speaker 2: things that we want to do. It's going to help
Speaker 2: the community. So they gave it kind of this. They
Speaker 2: didn't call it specifically communitarianism, but they would come in,
Speaker 2: they already had their agenda set and they would have
Speaker 2: the facilitators would be the people who are actually in control.
Speaker 2: They would ask you for your input, but they already
Speaker 2: had the conclusion was pre written, and so it was
Speaker 2: just a beard, a facade to try to get people
Speaker 2: think that even if they didn't agree with the conclusion,
Speaker 2: that was what was agreed to by the rest of
Speaker 2: the g is called the Delphi principle. And so they've
Speaker 2: been doing this communitarianism for quite some time. Another issue,
Speaker 2: another example of this.
Speaker 3: Of course, is public health.
Speaker 2: We're going to do this all to you to help
Speaker 2: the community, right, and we know exactly how that worked
Speaker 2: in the twenty twenties.
Speaker 4: Help you ride into your cell, yeah.
Speaker 3: He said.
Speaker 2: If you've ever read Walden two by B. F. Skinner,
Speaker 2: you know everything about communitarianism that you need to know.
Speaker 2: The story, by the way, ended very horribly. Communitarianism is
Speaker 2: a political and social philosophy that places primary emphasis on
Speaker 2: the importance of the community. Just as we saw with
Speaker 2: the public health scam. Right, you have to take the
Speaker 2: inject the kool aid poison for the good of the community,
Speaker 2: the common good. Social relationships all shape individual identity, values,
Speaker 2: and moral judgments. It asserts that people's identities are molded
Speaker 2: by their social environment and their community ties, rather than
Speaker 2: by individualism. Forget about individuality, your personhood, even your soul.
Speaker 2: Communitarianism sees the community as an end of itself, and
Speaker 2: so the reality is is they don't care about consensus,
Speaker 2: they don't care about the common good or about social
Speaker 2: adhesion adhesion, they have their own agenda. And again probably
Speaker 2: you know, the best way that we can understand this
Speaker 2: is by what was rolled out on us under Trump
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty with a fake pandemic and so Volunteer
Speaker 2: Peter Tiel, co founder of Pollunteer and Alex carp as
Speaker 2: he points out, Volunteer is the master of these tactics
Speaker 2: on the battlefield and in civilian life.
Speaker 3: And so the.
Speaker 2: If you say that technocracy, if you talk about it
Speaker 2: in a negative way, they will turn it towards communitarianism.
Speaker 2: But it's not the same thing technocracy. It is not
Speaker 2: even in his reality, is not even concerned with the
Speaker 2: good of the community. It's only concerned with the good
Speaker 2: of a few oligarchs who are running this whole thing.
Speaker 2: So they will always come up with their labels in
Speaker 2: order to see people, and they will hide it as well.
Speaker 2: One of the examples we have is Doge and this
Speaker 2: AI tool is now going to take a buzz saw
Speaker 2: to federal regulations. Now I would have always cheered any
Speaker 2: buzz saw being taken to federal regulations. Remember when we
Speaker 2: did that video that had a congressional candidate who was
Speaker 2: going to he did a stunt and basically want to
Speaker 2: take the income tax Code and feed it through a
Speaker 2: wood chipper. And he contacted the IRS and they couldn't
Speaker 2: tell him how many pages it was, and they couldn't
Speaker 2: send him as many pages as it was their best
Speaker 2: estimate that was at the time of something like seventy
Speaker 2: thousand pages of regulations.
Speaker 4: It's great to know that even the people there don't
Speaker 4: know what's on the books.
Speaker 2: And so way did was he He took the approximate
Speaker 2: number that they could come up with, and he got
Speaker 2: the equivalent in phone books, and he fed it through
Speaker 2: a wood chipper.
Speaker 3: And actually we filmed it for him.
Speaker 2: It was at a candidate's meeting, and it truly was amazing.
Speaker 2: And I would be all in favor of taking a
Speaker 2: bus saw. All these regulations are growing by leaps and
Speaker 2: bounds every year and have been for many many Republican
Speaker 2: and Democrat administrations, including Trumps. But the problem is what
Speaker 2: they're going to replace it with. DOGE actually has a
Speaker 2: successor called RAGE, which stands for Replace All Government Employees,
Speaker 2: and that's what I said, this was about from the
Speaker 2: very beginning. I've never seen this acronym before, but you
Speaker 2: could tell from what Musk wanted to do. He wanted
Speaker 2: to fire government employees and replace them with what when
Speaker 2: to replace them with AI? And so I said, he's
Speaker 2: going to minimize government employees, and he is going to
Speaker 2: maximize government. AI is going to be able to glean
Speaker 2: the details of your life far more comprehensively than any
Speaker 2: group of people could do. And so I don't see
Speaker 2: this as an improvement. I see this as a trumping
Speaker 2: out of the frying pan and end of the fire.
Speaker 4: Quite frankly, Yeah, As I said before, my biggest concern
Speaker 4: is the fact that when you get rid of the
Speaker 4: human element, there's no longer a single there's no longer
Speaker 4: a chance for mercy at all.
Speaker 9: That's right.
Speaker 4: Sure, the people who work in the government are generally
Speaker 4: not going to give it to you, but there's a
Speaker 4: small chance. There's always the potential that you'll come across
Speaker 4: somebody that may empathize with you and be able to
Speaker 4: look at you and say, okay, Well.
Speaker 2: Joe Banister's case is a good example of that. He
Speaker 2: worked for the IRS as a criminal investigator and he
Speaker 2: started asking some questions as he was investigating some of
Speaker 2: these people, but they were coming after as criminals because
Speaker 2: they looked at the IRS code and said, but wait
Speaker 2: a minute, you haven't done this legally. He came across
Speaker 2: some arguments they thought were pretty valid, and so he
Speaker 2: asked his supervisor. Supervisors, is, don't talk about that, you know,
Speaker 2: shut him down. So that got his curiosity even more.
Speaker 2: As he looked at it more and more, he got
Speaker 2: to ask him more questions. But you know, he eventually
Speaker 2: left and they eventually attacked him. But before that happened,
Speaker 2: there was an IRS agent and again this is the
Speaker 2: human element. The guy didn't like Joe Banister because as
Speaker 2: a criminal investigator, he got to carry a gun, he
Speaker 2: got paid more, he got to get out of the
Speaker 2: office and you know dry outsides that are being bound
Speaker 2: into a cubicle or whatever and so and every year
Speaker 2: the criminal investigators had to be audited. When this guy
Speaker 2: audited him, he came up with a big number of
Speaker 2: under payment that he said Joe needed to pay plus
Speaker 2: penalties plus interest in all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 2: And he knew he didn't know that, so he appealed
Speaker 2: it and he got some other people who didn't have
Speaker 2: an issue with him and looked at it objectively. And
Speaker 2: yet you know, when we look at it, you would
Speaker 2: think they're going to sell to you. Oh, well, this
Speaker 2: is AI. It's going to be objective. It's not going
Speaker 2: to have vendetta to come after you. No, I don't
Speaker 2: have a vendetta that is that is built in there
Speaker 2: based on your political or religious background.
Speaker 4: Whoever is in control of the AI at that moment
Speaker 4: can make it do whatever it wants. Whatever data they
Speaker 4: put in is whatever data it will come out if
Speaker 4: they tell it. We believe this guy is a threat
Speaker 4: to our security, make sure that he is punished in
Speaker 4: an acceptable way. However they phrase it. They'll be able
Speaker 4: to get whatever kind of output they want. And the
Speaker 4: AI won't give you its training data. It's you're not
Speaker 4: gonna be able to audit it.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 2: Well, they have a new AI program. The guy who
Speaker 2: led this is his name is Sweet, and he is
Speaker 2: someone who just got out of college. Actually I don't
Speaker 2: know if you even graduated until recently. He was a
Speaker 2: third year student at the University of Chicago, so he
Speaker 2: may have left early. And but very young guy and
Speaker 2: Christopher Sweet has put this project together and it's going
Speaker 2: to be an AI review. They call it the DAIP,
Speaker 2: the Suite Rex DAIP, which stands for Deregulation AI Plan Builder. Again,
Speaker 2: as I said, we would all support deregulation. It is
Speaker 2: like a bulk instrictor and it's choking everything. Except when
Speaker 2: you look at what the long term goal of these
Speaker 2: people are. They said they're likely to use this tool
Speaker 2: to eliminate up to fifty percent of federal regulations by
Speaker 2: January the twenty sixth. So again, we should feed these
Speaker 2: regulations in the wood chipper. But I'm afraid they're going
Speaker 2: to feed us into the wood chipper if we get
Speaker 2: rid of humans in the process and move to a
Speaker 2: ruthless AI. That's that's the kind of terminator I'm worried about.
Speaker 2: The terminator's got built in biases from our human masters.
Speaker 4: And one of the things is also part of the
Speaker 4: reason one of the only arguments for AI is the
Speaker 4: sheer number of laws and the complexity of them. If
Speaker 4: you're able to pair these down, if you're able to
Speaker 4: send fifty percent of them to the woodchipper, and then
Speaker 4: maybe another fifty percent and pare it down to a
Speaker 4: reasonable level, then you can actually have a reasonable state
Speaker 4: where a human being can look through these things and
Speaker 4: make judgments on them. If we've got two hundred thousand
Speaker 4: federal regulations, no, there's no way any amount of human
Speaker 4: beings can actually know what's on the books and give
Speaker 4: you a fair reasoning on any of it. So, yeah,
Speaker 4: the AI would be better at scanning through these and
Speaker 4: actually cataloging what's there. But if you pare it down again,
Speaker 4: you could actually have a reasonable bureaucracy that.
Speaker 2: You've got a government created problem, Okay, that they're then
Speaker 2: going to exacerbate with their quote unquote solution rather than
Speaker 2: fixing reaction problem. Yeah, we didn't have that, you know,
Speaker 2: when we had Jefferson others. That's a government that was
Speaker 2: small enough to actually be legitimate and fit in the constitution.
Speaker 2: We have a massive, illegitimate government that resembles a byzantine empire.
Speaker 3: With it's bureaucracy.
Speaker 4: I coletally wonder, I wonder what Jefferson or Washingt would
Speaker 4: say if you were telling them we had two hundred
Speaker 4: thousand regulations.
Speaker 3: They would say we're slaves, And they would be right,
Speaker 3: wouldn't they.
Speaker 2: Well, before we take a break, we've got some comments
Speaker 2: here if you want to read them.
Speaker 4: Sure. Sam Miller one two three, thank you. That is
Speaker 4: very very generous. Really really do appreciate it. Great day
Speaker 4: to celebrate. Welcome back David, Happy anniversary, Happy birthday, Travis. Well,
Speaker 4: thank you, blessings to all. My big reveal. I'm a
Speaker 4: she Well.
Speaker 3: It's not Sam Miller, it's I think, yeah.
Speaker 4: Or maybe it's short for Samantha. Oh okay, maybe I
Speaker 4: don't know, but skun callo Rose Gardens two dollars one
Speaker 4: hundred awesome. Yes, thank you very much. Sprumford, Thank you
Speaker 4: very much. Strumford. We appreciate it. I've been away from
Speaker 4: the show for a while. It's so great to see
Speaker 4: you back. Mister night love the new setup make Christ
Speaker 4: continue to bless you and your family. Well, thank you, nice,
Speaker 4: thank you.
Speaker 3: And Guard.
Speaker 4: Good to see you.
Speaker 3: Guard.
Speaker 4: I hope you're doing well. The book The Devil and
Speaker 4: Karl Marx is excellent. That sounds like an interesting read.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Karen Carpenter twk abtably probably kind of like The Devil
Speaker 2: and Daniel Webster, right, or maybe.
Speaker 4: Even they seem like they were the best of friends.
Speaker 4: Karen Carpenter twenty seven says also cameras for surveillance don't
Speaker 4: like trees. That's true. Trees get in the way of things.
Speaker 4: A Syrian girl. Another thing about the electric cars, a
Speaker 4: lot of mechanics around here won't touch them. They bring
Speaker 4: in specialized teams to service those babies. I imagine. It's
Speaker 4: a completely different system than what you have in a
Speaker 4: combustion engine, and as such you probably need specific tool
Speaker 4: sets and specific skill sets.
Speaker 2: Well, I've been going in that direction for a very
Speaker 2: long time, complicating it so that you can't be a
Speaker 2: shade tree mechanic.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 2: They long ago left the world where everything was mechanical,
Speaker 2: and now there's so much electronics and everything that you've
Speaker 2: got to have special equipment to diagnose it. Even if
Speaker 2: you've got an internal combustion engine, so.
Speaker 4: You have to have one of those things you plug in,
Speaker 4: you know.
Speaker 3: That's one of the interesting things with Miatas. There's four
Speaker 3: different generations.
Speaker 2: Of Miatas, and they had a company that called Flying Miata,
Speaker 2: and what they would do is they would say they
Speaker 2: would squeeze in an eight cylinder engine.
Speaker 3: Into these things, usually like a Corvette engine. The first
Speaker 3: generation it was a piece of cake.
Speaker 2: Second generation was still fine. Third generation, they started having
Speaker 2: some issues because now there was a lot of electronics
Speaker 2: in it, and now the fourth generation. They struggled with
Speaker 2: that for more than a year. They had to bring
Speaker 2: in special people to help them to do that. Because
Speaker 2: everything was connected. They said, you know, we would, we
Speaker 2: would put this in, and we thought we had all connected.
Speaker 2: Now all of a sudden, the winchil wipers are running
Speaker 2: all the time. Everything was interconnected to the electronics.
Speaker 4: And whenever I shipped into fourth my hornhawks. For some reason,
Speaker 4: I don't get it. Coal three sixty forms are so
Speaker 4: last century. That's why we need lab grown meat and
Speaker 4: produce from AI bought farms, running new quarter to feed
Speaker 4: the plants and production. That's right, we need all these things.
Speaker 4: We can't live without them. Tunnel Lord one three three seven.
Speaker 4: Communism is just a cover for central control that is
Speaker 4: indistinguishable from monarchical rule. Both have central controllers telling everyone
Speaker 4: how else to live. Sprumford, I think communism is at
Speaker 4: the end. It's the means sa Miller. We're going to
Speaker 4: assume essay now one two three. Communitarianism says slash socialism
Speaker 4: was practiced in biblical times. A big difference was that
Speaker 4: people were filled with the Holy Spirit and volunteered, not forced,
Speaker 4: and that's a huge distinction. If people want to form
Speaker 4: their own community and voluntarily work together towards their own
Speaker 4: common goals and engage in these sorts of practices, that's
Speaker 4: absolutely fine. I have no issue with that. It becomes
Speaker 4: an issue when you send in the men with guns
Speaker 4: and say you're giving us this and we're going to redistribute.
Speaker 3: It, and it's a it's a heavy left for Christians
Speaker 3: even to do. Sorry, lance, I.
Speaker 5: See people conflate the who, and it's just a false
Speaker 5: equivalence because it's just the difference between theft and charity.
Speaker 5: It's the force of government taking it from people versus
Speaker 5: giving freely.
Speaker 2: Yes, it makes all the difference in the world. And
Speaker 2: it's a difficult thing to do. It was done in
Speaker 2: the early Church and they were filled with the Holy Spirit,
Speaker 2: and it is something that is very, very difficult for
Speaker 2: humans to be able to execute. And we have seen
Speaker 2: this over and over again. Through the eighteen hundreds, you
Speaker 2: had a lot of utopian communities that were based on
Speaker 2: what sounded like Christian principles and things like that. As
Speaker 2: a matter of fact, I remember somebody did a survey
Speaker 2: and they asked a lot of people, you know, men
Speaker 2: on the street, type of thing you know about, from
Speaker 2: each according disability and to each according disney, and ask
Speaker 2: them where that was from. Large number of people thought
Speaker 2: that was from the Bible. And you're right, that does
Speaker 2: fit if it is voluntary, right, But if you got
Speaker 2: a gun to your head, that's not what we're talking about.
Speaker 2: And that's one of the things that we need to
Speaker 2: always keep in mind when we look at keeping separate
Speaker 2: state and church, and I say that I know that's
Speaker 2: not in the constitution, but I don't want to merge
Speaker 2: the two. Whenever we do that, it always harms Christian life.
Speaker 2: Whenever you merge it with politics, what happens is you
Speaker 2: wind up with politics. It kills the Christian side of it.
Speaker 2: And that's what happens with a forced welfare state. It
Speaker 2: kills the Christian side of the voluntary giving and the
Speaker 2: joy of doing that is now compulsory, and the people
Speaker 2: who are getting the stuff demand it because they say
Speaker 2: they're entitled to it. They don't want to see it
Speaker 2: as charity. They find that to be an offense.
Speaker 4: It robs both parties. One of the party of being
Speaker 4: able to experience the joy of giving, as you said,
Speaker 4: the other of the joy of thankfulness for that of being.
Speaker 4: You know, entitlement is such a nasty, grasping emotion. You know,
Speaker 4: you feel that you deserve this and you should be
Speaker 4: allowed to take it, whereas being thankful, being able to
Speaker 4: really sit down and be thankful for what you have
Speaker 4: been given, is such it's if you can do that,
Speaker 4: it's a wonderful, wonderful blessing to be able to see
Speaker 4: that people have given that to you, and that God
Speaker 4: is the one that inspired them to do that. It
Speaker 4: can be a very very wonderful thing for both parties.
Speaker 2: That was really driven home to me, Like I said,
Speaker 2: when I got up and spoke against Hillary Care and
Speaker 2: boy did they get up. So I talked about charity,
Speaker 2: you know, and there is there was I don't know
Speaker 2: why it is today with the corporation's taking over the
Speaker 2: medical profession, but back in the day, there were doctors
Speaker 2: would donate a lot of their time to help people
Speaker 2: who were poor, and you know, various things like that,
Speaker 2: and we had a society that was built around that.
Speaker 2: That's what Alexis to Tokyo talked about. When it came
Speaker 2: to America and we talked about democracy in America. The
Speaker 2: central difference between that and the socialism that he left
Speaker 2: in France was the fact that the Americans would voluntarily
Speaker 2: come together and build what was needed.
Speaker 4: So sorry, I was just looking for that book. It's
Speaker 4: in this room somewhere. I saw it just the other day.
Speaker 3: Maybe it's fine.
Speaker 4: I don't know, I know I saw it. Democracy in
Speaker 4: America is somewhere in here. It exists.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, it is. Well, we're going to take a
Speaker 3: quick break.
Speaker 2: We're not going to look for the book, but we're
Speaker 2: gonna take a quick break and we will be right back.
Speaker 3: Stay with us.
Speaker 5: It's on one of the shelves right behind dad.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, okay, Well, we'll see if we can find
Speaker 2: it there. When we come back, we're going to talk
Speaker 2: about Trump's move again to the Federal Reserve and why
Speaker 2: he's doing these things. But this is not an illegitimate
Speaker 2: move that he's talking about with this Fed governor. There
Speaker 2: really is fraud, corruption, and illegal activities. We'll talk about
Speaker 2: that when we come back.
Speaker 10: You're listening to the David Night Show. You're listening to
Speaker 10: the David Knight Show.
Speaker 11: Wait a minute, where am I?
Speaker 3: Sorry? Jefferson.
Speaker 8: The scoundrels who put America on Central bank fiat currency
Speaker 8: used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy. Despicable.
Speaker 11: This is outrageous, Washington. I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Speaker 11: Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
Speaker 11: monopoly money. Tell me there's some good news to all this.
Speaker 8: Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
Speaker 8: isn't backed by the FED, but backed by the FED.
Speaker 3: Up the All.
Speaker 8: New David Night Show Commemorative coin. Now patriots can support
Speaker 8: a show that won't sell out with a limited edition
Speaker 8: coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
Speaker 12: They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth
Speaker 12: listening to. The truth doesn't need inflation only support.
Speaker 2: Well, Tony's going to be joining us at the bottom
Speaker 2: of the hour and we're going to be talking about
Speaker 2: the Fed and monetary policy. But it's kind of interesting
Speaker 2: to watch the moves that Trump is making against the
Speaker 2: Federal Reserve people. He would like to get rid of
Speaker 2: the FED chair Jerome Powell, but he cannot remove him
Speaker 2: at will. In other words, he can't just fire him
Speaker 2: because he doesn't want him there anymore. He has to
Speaker 2: have a reason, and so we saw this back and forth,
Speaker 2: and the Trump surrogates were also complaining about statements that
Speaker 2: Powell had made to Congress about their exorbitant remodeling that's
Speaker 2: going on. That is yet another example of the kind
Speaker 2: of corruption and a luxury that we see out of Washington.
Speaker 2: They have this incredibly expensive guilding that's going on with
Speaker 2: their building, and they said, he reported that incorrectly, so
Speaker 2: we need to come after him for perjury. And some people,
Speaker 2: I think actually one member actually recommended him for charges,
Speaker 2: you know, coming at perjury. And I looked at them
Speaker 2: as I said, you know, James Clapper lied to the
Speaker 2: American people under oath when he was talking to Congress,
Speaker 2: and they never filed charges for him. The whole thing
Speaker 2: ended after five years with statute limitations. Nobody ever came
Speaker 2: after him about that. But they want to because they said, well,
Speaker 2: there's some differences and the reality and the way that
Speaker 2: you portrayed this remodeling, and so we want to come
Speaker 2: after you with that. They would like to be able
Speaker 2: to remove him. They can do that for cause. So
Speaker 2: if they can come up with some criminal charges, they
Speaker 2: could remove Powell. But he can't just do it because
Speaker 2: he wants to get rid of him. The same thing
Speaker 2: is true of the Federal Reserve boarding governors, and so
Speaker 2: it is kind of interesting. I think they're setting up
Speaker 2: to remove this federal governor, Lisa Cook, and it turns
Speaker 2: out that she actually has committed a crime. It was
Speaker 2: a mortgage fraud, and she has responded after Trump tweeted
Speaker 2: this out and said she needs to resign, she tweeted
Speaker 2: this out said I have no intention of being bullied
Speaker 2: to step down from my position because of some questions
Speaker 2: raised in a tweet. I do intend to take any
Speaker 2: questions about my financial history seriously as a member of
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve, and so I am gathering the accurate
Speaker 2: information to answer a legitimate questions and provide the facts.
Speaker 2: So zero Head says, well, here's one quick question, did
Speaker 2: you break the law or not? Because she did, and
Speaker 2: there is a paper trail.
Speaker 3: That shows that she did.
Speaker 2: They've produced the documents that she signed basically what she did,
Speaker 2: which she f also high bank documents and property records
Speaker 2: to get more favorable loan terms, potentially committing mortgage fraud
Speaker 2: under a criminal statute. So here's your cause. He can't
Speaker 2: get rid of a lot of these people. But this
Speaker 2: is one person who, as I said at the beginning
Speaker 2: of the program, was appointed by Joe Biden. You could
Speaker 2: look at her as a DEI pick, first black woman
Speaker 2: to be put in the reserve, and that's where the
Speaker 2: people are going to draw the line to defend her.
Speaker 2: But what she did was actually indefensible because it was
Speaker 2: a criminal fraud that she committed. With this, she has
Speaker 2: now become a hawk against interest rates, and so Trump
Speaker 2: would like to get her removed. So she took out
Speaker 2: two loans almost at the same time, one of them
Speaker 2: in Michigan, another one in Atlanta on a condo. On
Speaker 2: both of these she said they were going to be
Speaker 2: her primary residence. You can only have one primary residence
Speaker 2: to start with. And then two weeks after she got
Speaker 2: the property in Atlanta, she sorry two weeks apart with
Speaker 2: these two mortgages, and then she put the property in
Speaker 2: Georgia up for rental, showing that it was not going
Speaker 2: to be her residence. But by making the declaration that
Speaker 2: it was going to be her primary residence, of course
Speaker 2: that gets her better terms on her loan than she
Speaker 2: would if it was going to be an investment property.
Speaker 3: So they have a clear record for her.
Speaker 2: The letter that was sent out as part of the
Speaker 2: criminal referral letter includes copies of mortgage documents in her name,
Speaker 2: as well as an apparent rental listing a little over
Speaker 2: a year after she bought the Georgia property. So she
Speaker 2: buys these two properties two weeks apart, two different states,
Speaker 2: and then after one year she starts renting the Georgia property.
Speaker 2: So she was nominated to the Fed by Biden, as
Speaker 2: I said before, and her term does not expire until
Speaker 2: twenty thirty eight. But she wants to stay there, she
Speaker 2: better be ready to fight some criminal charges. I think
Speaker 2: it is they want somebody that they can They want
Speaker 2: to remove some of these people, and so they are
Speaker 2: going through their lives so they find tooth Comb. This
Speaker 2: is what it's like now in Washington. You know, you
Speaker 2: get into office and both the Democrats and the Republicans
Speaker 2: will look over your life and find tooth Comb and
Speaker 2: try to put you in jail. Musk has had pledged this.
Speaker 2: This came out yesterday. We talked about this said, whatever
Speaker 2: happened to a third party that Musk was talking about.
Speaker 2: Now he's telling people that he wants to get behind
Speaker 2: JD Vance. Well, of course he does. Because JD. Vance
Speaker 2: is a technocracy dude that they put in there. He's
Speaker 2: going to be more compliant probably than Trump is for
Speaker 2: the technocracy.
Speaker 4: Yeah, he's Peter Tiel's boy.
Speaker 1: He's this guy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's part of the Peter Till mafia. TiAl made JD.
Speaker 3: Vance.
Speaker 2: So this is what we're saying. Yesterday there's been crickets
Speaker 2: about third parties. Well, now you know later that day
Speaker 2: they spoke about it. Musk has told allies that he
Speaker 2: wants to focus his attention on his companies and he's
Speaker 2: reluctant to alienate powerful Republicans by starting a third party
Speaker 2: that could siphon off GOP votes. So now he's going
Speaker 2: to play nice and he's going to get behind JD.
Speaker 9: Vans.
Speaker 2: That's probably gonna hurt Jdvance Trump. But yeah, so as
Speaker 2: we look at this robot as we moved to our
Speaker 2: robot world in the factories and everything. In China, they
Speaker 2: just had a robot arm that nearly decapitated a man
Speaker 2: and they said it's probably the surgeons who did up
Speaker 2: patting themselves on the back. It sounds like it was
Speaker 2: a horrific thing and essentially internally did decapitate him. The
Speaker 2: only thing that was still connected with some soft tissue.
Speaker 2: It severed his spinal cord and his.
Speaker 3: Neck.
Speaker 2: There his cervical vertebrae completely severed. Critical arteries were damaged.
Speaker 2: Only soft tissue held his head to his body, and
Speaker 2: so he came in That also caused him to have
Speaker 2: a heart attack. Came in an unbelievably bad condition. They
Speaker 2: talked about how complicated it was for the human surgeons
Speaker 2: to be able to fix him, and this article was
Speaker 2: kind of interesting. On zero head they immediately go from
Speaker 2: the dangers of a robotic arm to the dangers of
Speaker 2: arming robots, and they started talking kind of using militarized robots.
Speaker 3: That was kind of an interesting cycultar.
Speaker 2: I think robot nearly decapitates man and grewsome surgery fail
Speaker 2: and it actually wasn't. The headline is not accurate. It
Speaker 2: was when I first looked at that, I thought they
Speaker 2: had robotic surgery that was going.
Speaker 4: I thought the same thing too until I read the article.
Speaker 2: But it was actually it was an amazing success in
Speaker 2: terms of surgery, and it was not robotic surgery. It
Speaker 2: was a guy who was injured in in the factory there.
Speaker 4: If you are online at all the factory conditions in China,
Speaker 4: there's tons of videos of people being mangled and killed,
Speaker 4: and just the conditions they work in are horrific. There
Speaker 4: is no safety standard at all, and people are continually
Speaker 4: being grievously harmed or just as I said, killed.
Speaker 3: They have no regard for people in China.
Speaker 4: They have people a massive population base. So if one
Speaker 4: of them falls into the you know whatever it is
Speaker 4: and gets absolutely torn to pieces, well, there's another guy
Speaker 4: that's waiting for the job right well.
Speaker 2: And there's a long history of the Chinese elite being
Speaker 2: ruthless and brutally cruel in terms of the people that
Speaker 2: they govern, and it's only become worse when they mix
Speaker 2: it in with communism.
Speaker 4: It's also amazing China has always had, or seems to
Speaker 4: have always had a massive, massive population base. You'll read
Speaker 4: about these small battles that they'll say are small battles
Speaker 4: that barely have a footnote in history, and it'll be like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 4: one hundred thousand people died, and it's just what one
Speaker 4: hundred thousand dead, ten thousand cannibalized. What are you guys
Speaker 4: doing there? Yeah, it's part of it's baked into their culture,
Speaker 4: this disregard for human life, disregard for life in general.
Speaker 4: You can just kind of see it through. It permeates
Speaker 4: everything they have. This just kind of apathy towards existence.
Speaker 4: You know, someone dies, well whatever.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, So it's been there for a very long time.
Speaker 2: And just real quickly, while we're talking about politics, the
Speaker 2: Trump administration has announced who the new number two the
Speaker 2: FBI is going to be. And the question is what
Speaker 2: happened to Bongino, And there's actually no word about Bonginos.
Speaker 2: They have announced his successor before they have announced that
Speaker 2: he is going to be leaving. I thought that was
Speaker 2: kind of funny, but that's the way it is in
Speaker 2: Washington right now. This I thought was incredibly interesting. The
Speaker 2: lawsuit between Smart Mattic and Fox Corporation. Now, you know,
Speaker 2: Fox already paid a massive settlement of like three quarters
Speaker 2: of a billion dollars to the other voting machine company,
Speaker 2: Dominion that Fox was talking about. And now the lawsuit
Speaker 2: between Smart Mattic and Fox has started up, and as
Speaker 2: part of discovery, they're getting documents, and some of the
Speaker 2: documents that were internal conversations and Fox News have been
Speaker 2: released to the public, and I think it gives us
Speaker 2: an interesting insight. These are memos from Janine Pirot, Jesse Waters,
Speaker 2: Maria Bartiromo. They all seem to have different motivations but
Speaker 2: the same goal. They all wanted to help President Trump.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, this one I thought was
Speaker 2: very interesting. This is a memo from Jesse Waters sent
Speaker 2: to Greg Guttfield, and he said, think about how incredible
Speaker 2: our ratings would be if Fox went all in on
Speaker 2: stop the steel. Stop the steal was Alex Jones's thing,
Speaker 2: you know, it was basically it was kind of interesting
Speaker 2: to see that Fox News was so much.
Speaker 1: Like, think about how hard we could grift.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's so much like Info Wars.
Speaker 2: It's all about the audience, and it's about the money,
Speaker 2: and it's about their ratings, and so you know they're
Speaker 2: going to this is what Jesse Waters was saying. You know, hey,
Speaker 2: we could our ratings would soar if we jumped in
Speaker 2: on this stop the Steel stuff. And that was exactly
Speaker 2: the calculates that was going on with Alex Jones and
Speaker 2: the rest of this stuff. And Janine Pierrot, who has
Speaker 2: now been put in as the attorney for the district
Speaker 2: of Columbia said, I worked so hard for the president
Speaker 2: and party. And she was also mentioned her husband who
Speaker 2: had been convicted of tax fraud and some other things,
Speaker 2: and she did get a pardon for him, and she
Speaker 2: got a position, as you know, federal attorney there in
Speaker 2: DC from Nowlex Jones, but from Donald Trump. Hundreds of
Speaker 2: pages of documents, largely newly unredacted versions of previously released ones,
Speaker 2: filed on Tuesday in the New York State Supreme Court.
Speaker 2: Smart Mattic has accused Fox News of knowingly implicating the
Speaker 2: company and false claims of vote rigging in between twenty
Speaker 2: elections for ratings, and these comments going back and forth
Speaker 2: seem to support that. But of course, on the other side,
Speaker 2: Fox News is getting records of the history of Smartmatic,
Speaker 2: and as I said before, Smartmatic has a long history
Speaker 2: of helping Hugo Chavez. They've been questioned and there's been
Speaker 2: hearings and massive controversy in other countries like the Philippines
Speaker 2: and in Brazil where they were accused of fraud in
Speaker 2: those areas. That's all a matter of fact and history,
Speaker 2: and Fox could have portrayed it that way, but they
Speaker 2: decided they were going to make this about just you know,
Speaker 2: sucking up to Trump. Another thing that has come out
Speaker 2: is the fact that even in the Biden Department of Justice,
Speaker 2: they were going to indict Smartmatic for bribery of elected
Speaker 2: officials to put their machines in at a higher price.
Speaker 2: So there's not any good guys in any of this stuff.
Speaker 4: You give us a premium and well maybe we make
Speaker 4: sure the votes flip a certain sort of way here
Speaker 4: for you.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Now, the way that smart Matic is portraying this is
Speaker 2: they're saying that after the MAGA people got mad with
Speaker 2: Fox for calling Arizona for Biden, they started passing these
Speaker 2: memos around saying things like, hey, if we got on
Speaker 2: Trump's side, we could be number one in ratings and
Speaker 2: all the rest of the stuff. And they have a
Speaker 2: memo from Murdoch to the Fox News chief executive at
Speaker 2: the time, Suzanne Scott, in the days after the election.
Speaker 2: He said, we're getting creamed by CNN. Guess our viewers
Speaker 2: don't want to watch it, meaning the election returns. And
Speaker 2: you know, there is evidence that that was what was
Speaker 2: going on. But last August, when Biden was an office,
Speaker 2: the Biden Department of Justice charged three current and former
Speaker 2: executives at Smartmatic with bribing an election official from the
Speaker 2: Philippines so the company could win a contract providing voting
Speaker 2: machines for the country's twenty sixteen elections.
Speaker 3: So this is a company that.
Speaker 2: Has a very very storied past of corruption and reaking
Speaker 2: elections and bribery and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 2: It's going to be an interesting trial as the dirty
Speaker 2: laundry comes out against both sides. I think we're going
Speaker 2: to see just how corupt this all. Maybe the good
Speaker 2: news is the solution, of course, is paper ballots, and
Speaker 2: maybe that will be something that will come out of this.
Speaker 2: People just have had it with the voting machine stuff, and.
Speaker 4: I'm incredibly surprised they actually went ahead with the lawsuit,
Speaker 4: just given what both parties have to lose in discovery,
Speaker 4: the amount of dirty info that has to be out
Speaker 4: there on these Well.
Speaker 2: That's what people said about Trump. You know, if Trump
Speaker 2: wants to sue people because what they reported about him
Speaker 2: and Jeffrey Epstein, it's like, do you realize what discovery
Speaker 2: is going to look like for you?
Speaker 4: You got to turn over everything.
Speaker 2: Yeah, same thing with Milania and her threats of billion
Speaker 2: dollar lawsuits against these Democrats, from Hunter Biden to James Carvill.
Speaker 2: You know they want to threaten them with these large lawsuits.
Speaker 2: Guess what Discovery's going to look like. But of course,
Speaker 2: if you take the attack that Alex did, you just
Speaker 2: don't comply with discovery. And that's what he did. And
Speaker 2: then they found the the evidence that he said he
Speaker 2: didn't have was sent by his lawyer to the opposing counsel,
Speaker 2: and yet everybody seemed to ignore that. I thought that
Speaker 2: was a pretty big issue. It was kind of, as
Speaker 2: Alex said at Perry Mason moment, you.
Speaker 3: Usually get those in real life. Fact check this crap. Said.
Speaker 2: One of the emails that was there, in addition to
Speaker 2: the ones I've talked about where they were going back
Speaker 2: and forth talking about how they could be number one
Speaker 2: and ratings, you had an email from Brett bar He
Speaker 2: urged Fox News executive Jay Wallace to express dismay at
Speaker 2: the election coverage provided by Maria Bartiromo. He said, none
Speaker 2: of that is true as far as we can tell.
Speaker 2: He said, we need to fact check this crap. Well,
Speaker 2: that would have gotten them fired at Info Wars, but
Speaker 2: evidently that's the difference of Fox News. They did not
Speaker 2: fire Brett Baar.
Speaker 4: But who knows why that guy is dull and uninteresting.
Speaker 2: Well, at least he was focused on what was true.
Speaker 2: He was on the right side of that issue. That
Speaker 2: was there, I gotta say. And then finally we have this.
Speaker 2: We have this is from the Daily Mail. A secret
Speaker 2: gay sex scandal has exploded in the Republican Party. It's
Speaker 2: kind of interesting when you look at the Republican Party
Speaker 2: and how they close ranks around the pedophiles. As I
Speaker 2: said before, GOP stands for guarding our pedophiles. And they said,
Speaker 2: this is a guy who has gone to the press.
Speaker 2: He is a male prostitute in DC. And he wouldn't
Speaker 2: name any names, but he said, you wouldn't believe how
Speaker 2: many Republican officials there are here that are closeted and
Speaker 2: living this secret double life.
Speaker 4: I believe it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean you go back and look jaygar Hoover.
Speaker 3: We have.
Speaker 2: Roy Cohen, who was allied with Joe McCarthy and allied again.
Speaker 2: He was a mentor of Donald Trump, people like Dennis Aster.
Speaker 2: They got a long history of that. What I thought
Speaker 2: was interesting is they said when the Republicans had their
Speaker 2: convention in Minnesota last year, the big Republican convention that
Speaker 2: was there, Grinder, which is a homosexual hookup app as
Speaker 2: traffic one and sixty percent, that's kind of all.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: So, as they pointed out, the twenty twenty four platform
Speaker 2: from the GOP last year dropped their concerns about homosexual marriage,
Speaker 2: or as many of us call it, same sex mirage,
Speaker 2: that was done at the behest of Don and Milania
Speaker 2: because they have embraced that very heavily. As we pointed
Speaker 2: out before when he ran in twenty twenty his merchant
Speaker 2: that he was selling a lot of rainbow merchandise. I
Speaker 2: think it's amazing. You know, when you have corporations do that,
Speaker 2: you have people organized the same maga people organize a
Speaker 2: boycott against them. But when Trump and Milania do it,
Speaker 2: there's silence about that. And when they use mar Lago
Speaker 2: as an award ceremony for log Cavin Republicans, there's no
Speaker 2: talk about that at all, And there is no memory
Speaker 2: of the fact that Trump was at the very forefront
Speaker 2: of pushing male transgenders. He wanted one of them in
Speaker 2: his beauty contest that he owned Miss Universe. House speaker
Speaker 2: Mike Johnson has called same sex mirage the dark harbinger
Speaker 2: of chaos and sexual anarchy, and he once described homosexuality
Speaker 2: as quote inherently unnatural and a dangerous lifestyle.
Speaker 3: I finally agree with Mike Johnson on something. I don't
Speaker 3: know that he would do anything about it.
Speaker 2: Trump himself is widely considered personally tolerant, even welcoming towards
Speaker 2: gay people, and they welcome him and Milania as well.
Speaker 2: As I said, with the Pride merchandise and the awards
Speaker 2: that are held in mar Lago. Life site news is
Speaker 2: about the only site that I saw report what was
Speaker 2: happening with that. Everybody else pretty much ignored it. Trump
Speaker 2: is also a megafan of the Village People, the gay
Speaker 2: disco group. They say the homosexual hookup ad as I said,
Speaker 2: had a hundred than sixty percent increased Grinder did and
Speaker 2: they say this is coming from Daily Mail. And they
Speaker 2: talk about some state representatives that have been caught in
Speaker 2: massive hypocrisy, but you know, interestingly, they do not talk
Speaker 2: about the big cases and national cases. Dennis Hastert, who
Speaker 2: was Speaker of the House for a very long time,
Speaker 2: Mark Foley, who he also covered for, who had the
Speaker 2: page scandal, the congressional pages these were people who were
Speaker 2: in both these cases, Dennis Aster and Mark Foley were pedophiles,
Speaker 2: and I'm assuming that that's the reason why the left
Speaker 2: here in this publication did not want to talk about that,
Speaker 2: because they didn't want to draw any connection between pedophilia
Speaker 2: and homosexuality except that was there in both of their cases.
Speaker 2: And these guys are both living this secret life that
Speaker 2: is in contradiction not only to the law, but to
Speaker 2: what they publicly say.
Speaker 9: And so.
Speaker 2: They then preceding this thing to pat Democrats on the
Speaker 2: back because they're not hypocrites.
Speaker 4: For once, you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well anyway, yeah, they cheer this kind of stuff.
Speaker 2: They have a quote from George Santos, of course, who
Speaker 2: said you can be gay and conservative, and of course
Speaker 2: George Santos and Charlie Kirk agree on that. Yeah, that's
Speaker 2: that's the problem I have with Charlie Kirk. This guy
Speaker 2: can go around and he can suck up to Trump
Speaker 2: and Trump Junior and all the rest of them as
Speaker 2: much as he wants. That's politics, right, But when he
Speaker 2: goes around and presents himself as a Christian apologist and
Speaker 2: he's going to tell people about God and about Christ,
Speaker 2: and then he does that at his conventions, he appears
Speaker 2: and defends a homosexual guy that's there. Oh, you can
Speaker 2: be conservative and be gay.
Speaker 9: You know.
Speaker 3: I have a big problem with that.
Speaker 4: And this is a problem that has been infesting the
Speaker 4: GOP for decades at some point.
Speaker 2: Recidal problem. And if Charlie Kirk wants to embrace Christ
Speaker 2: publicly for these types of things, he needs to not
Speaker 2: be a hypocrite about some of these issues.
Speaker 4: I mentioned before, but Shady five brought it up in
Speaker 4: chat as well, about the Franklin savings and loans scandal. Yes,
Speaker 4: and this is something that has largely disappeared from the internet.
Speaker 4: If you google it, you're not going to find much
Speaker 4: info on And that.
Speaker 2: Was largely the Bush administration and Republicans around him as well.
Speaker 4: The guy who was largely involved at Larry King, he's
Speaker 4: still alive, lives somewhere around DC.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 4: They got him on some kind of you know, fraud
Speaker 4: when it comes to banking or whatever. Never charged for
Speaker 4: any of this. But he's saying at the RNC the
Speaker 4: National Anthem twice, you know, four years you know later
Speaker 4: after the first time. Yeah, this is the type of people.
Speaker 4: The GOP is filled up with. This is the guy
Speaker 4: that was supplying you know, young boys to people that
Speaker 4: were in the White House.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, that's true.
Speaker 2: Well, I pointed out I did not know this. In
Speaker 2: the late nineteen Seventieslifornia conservatives pushed what they called the
Speaker 2: Briggs Initiative that would bargay and lesbian teachers from government schools,
Speaker 2: and they said Ronald Reagan opposed that as governor.
Speaker 3: So this goes for a very long time.
Speaker 2: You are not going to get any real reform of this,
Speaker 2: of this cancer on our society. You're going to have
Speaker 2: to take your kids out of school. There is no
Speaker 2: Republican saviors that are going to be there. There's nobody
Speaker 2: that really stands for Christian principles, that includes Charlie Kirk
Speaker 2: and these people who are on the side. And it
Speaker 2: was during that period log Camn Republicans formed and now
Speaker 2: they are closely connected to the to the Trump family.
Speaker 3: There was.
Speaker 2: Also just the same same issue here you have in
Speaker 2: the Utah state legislature. You have the guy who was
Speaker 2: head of the Utah Senate. Let's see, let me see
Speaker 2: if I can find this thing here. He was head
Speaker 2: of the Utah Senate and he suggested this is kind
Speaker 2: of interesting. The Senate President J. Stewart Adams inspired a
Speaker 2: change in state law that reduced the penalty for cases
Speaker 2: in which an eighteen year old who was still enrolled
Speaker 2: in high school has consensual sex with a thirteen year
Speaker 2: old and they put consensual and air quotes.
Speaker 3: Because it should be there. That's the whole point.
Speaker 2: The reason that we have these laws is because when
Speaker 2: you're that young, you can't consent to it, which means
Speaker 2: that you also can't consent to having your body mutilated
Speaker 2: with chemicals or surgery and that type of thing. You
Speaker 2: just don't have the judgment to be able to consent.
Speaker 2: And so this is a situation again, an eighteen year
Speaker 2: old high school boy and a thirteen year old girl.
Speaker 2: Turns out that this Senate President J. Stuart Adams had
Speaker 2: a relative who was the eighteen year old boy who
Speaker 2: had been charged with coming after a thirteen year old girl,
Speaker 2: which is kind of interesting.
Speaker 3: And they noticed that and the local papers at the.
Speaker 2: Time the law was changed, he reportedly had an eighteen
Speaker 2: year old relative who was facing charges of child rape
Speaker 2: for having sex with a thirteen year old, they said.
Speaker 2: The Salt Lake Tribune published an article said Utah's Senate
Speaker 2: President prompted law change that helped eighteen who was charged
Speaker 2: with child rape. The law was not retroactive, meaning that
Speaker 2: his relative still faced the original charges of child rape
Speaker 2: and not a reduced charge. However, the judge, the prosecutor,
Speaker 2: and the defense attorney and Adams's relative's case reportedly all
Speaker 2: agreed that the legislative change did impact how the charges
Speaker 2: were resolved in the relatives plea deal. So here we
Speaker 2: have some legislation that just happens to look exactly like
Speaker 2: his eighteen year old relative who's in a lot of trouble.
Speaker 2: It lessened the penalty, but the age of consent was
Speaker 2: not changed by this law. That's the kind of corruption
Speaker 2: that we see in politics, whether we're looking at the
Speaker 2: state level or whether we are looking at the federal level.
Speaker 3: We're going to take a quick break and we will
Speaker 3: be right back.
Speaker 1: Stay with us, Liberty, it's your move, and now the
Speaker 1: David Night Show.
Speaker 10: If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis
Speaker 10: and the news, they say.
Speaker 7: You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download
Speaker 7: our app or listen now at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 4: Welcome back. We've got a lot of comments.
Speaker 2: Here.
Speaker 4: We're currently waiting on Tony Rderburn and we'll be joined
Speaker 4: by him shortly. But ratisbro thank you very much for
Speaker 4: the tip. It's very generous and very kind, says. Most
Speaker 4: people don't know Waters and Owen Shroyer are good friends,
Speaker 4: and so that push was from Alex Jones to get
Speaker 4: mainstream to stop get in on Stop the Steal.
Speaker 2: Didn't know that, Yeah, I didn't know they were knew
Speaker 2: each other either, but of course to me, Stop the Seal.
Speaker 2: The interesting thing about Stop the Steal, and you know,
Speaker 2: Roger Stone came up with that name from the twenty
Speaker 2: sixteen campaign because there was going to be a move
Speaker 2: to try to stop Trump at the Republican Convention, if
Speaker 2: you remember, and so that's why he started calling it
Speaker 2: Stop and Steal. Brought that back up, and he had
Speaker 2: some people were following him around at the time in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty who were doing a documentary and they got
Speaker 2: it on a camera that he said.
Speaker 3: This is going to be we're going to raise money
Speaker 3: on this so easily.
Speaker 2: It's going to be like falling off a log, and
Speaker 2: that was what it was all about, folks. And to me,
Speaker 2: it's amazing that the people who organize this thing, the
Speaker 2: people who promoted it so heavily that even fox Knews
Speaker 2: everybody was talking about stop the steal. The dog that
Speaker 2: did not bark is the fact that there was no
Speaker 2: indictment for them when there was an indictment for all
Speaker 2: these other J sixers. It's pretty clear they wanted to
Speaker 2: protect certain people and that the system wanted those people
Speaker 2: to continue to mislead their followers.
Speaker 4: But yeah, s A Miller one two three. Trump is
Speaker 4: a very confused individual, doesn't know what religion he is
Speaker 4: and is trying to negotiate peace talks to get him
Speaker 4: into heaven.
Speaker 2: Shaking my head, that's yeah, that's I saw. Franklin Graham
Speaker 2: responded to that and he said, yeah, Trump is right.
Speaker 2: We are saved by works. It's not our work, so
Speaker 2: it's Christ's works. And that's the difference between Christianity and
Speaker 2: every other religion. Every other religion, they come up with
Speaker 2: a series of things for you to do. Sometimes it's
Speaker 2: kind of vague and ill defined. Sometimes it's incredibly specifically detailed.
Speaker 2: That's the way it is with the rabbis and the
Speaker 2: laws that they rules that they come up with. They're
Speaker 2: incredibly detailed about what you're allowed to do or not
Speaker 2: do on Sabbath and things like that. But the Christian
Speaker 2: religion is about the free gift of grace coming from
Speaker 2: the Lord Jesus Christ, what he did on our behalf
Speaker 2: and what he gave to us. That's the big difference
Speaker 2: with it. And we have people even within the Christian
Speaker 2: religion that have difficulty accepting and understanding that as well.
Speaker 4: I just got a text from Tony says he's going
Speaker 4: to have to reschedule. They're doing construction in front of
Speaker 4: his house and it is just so loud that the
Speaker 4: audio would not be acceptable.
Speaker 2: Okay, that's fine. Well, we'll continue on with what we had.
Speaker 2: We had some interesting things one of them.
Speaker 4: But we do have one more comment though, if you
Speaker 4: don't mind sure, As Syrian Girls says, I was reading
Speaker 4: a book on Chinese history and had to stop. The
Speaker 4: viciousness of the Chinese governments to their people has always
Speaker 4: been way beyond all the evils perpetrated by Western governments.
Speaker 4: Chinese history versus Western history shows the value of Christianity
Speaker 4: when it is only half heartedly adhered to.
Speaker 3: We may have a situation where christian we're trying to
Speaker 3: maybe a more Christian nation than the United States and
Speaker 3: not too distant future, they are building really strong people
Speaker 3: in their house churches and they are you know, whenever
Speaker 3: you have.
Speaker 2: Christianity suffering and a persecution like that, it builds some
Speaker 2: really you get the dead wood. That is, typically they
Speaker 2: are under soft circumstances like we have, and you only
Speaker 2: have people who are truly committed, people who are true believers.
Speaker 2: And that's really what's happening in China. You may have
Speaker 2: already had more christ in China than you do in
Speaker 2: the US in terms of sheer quantity, yeah, but in
Speaker 2: terms of quality, you probably have much stronger Christians in
Speaker 2: China than you do in the US.
Speaker 4: Yes, it's a It is a value Christianity and shows
Speaker 4: the softening effect it can have on people. I also
Speaker 4: think it has to do with a lot of Western
Speaker 4: philosophy and the fact that a lot of other countries
Speaker 4: have never even sat down and considered you know, rights
Speaker 4: at all. It is simply you exist, and whoever has
Speaker 4: more power than you is in control. They don't give
Speaker 4: any thought to what your duty is to your fellow
Speaker 4: man and what it.
Speaker 3: Is might makes right.
Speaker 4: M Do you see that very very much in Eastern philosophy.
Speaker 2: And I'm afraid you're seeing that in the West now.
Speaker 2: They don't really care about principles. Nobody on either side
Speaker 2: of this thing cares about free speech. They just want
Speaker 2: to get the other side, you know. That's that's the
Speaker 2: thing we keep coming back to.
Speaker 4: We got one more here, Skunk Collo Rose Garden, thank
Speaker 4: you for the tip, says best chat this side of Marl.
Speaker 4: I'll go, well's is that high praise? I don't know,
Speaker 4: bt Taylor two four six. The fact that pedos get
Speaker 4: off with such light sentences, it's proof our government is
Speaker 4: run by pedos, I would agree.
Speaker 2: Well, this is kind of an interesting story. This is
Speaker 2: the Women's NBA. The w NBA players have turned down
Speaker 2: a pay boost that would have raised a minimum salary
Speaker 2: for players in the league from sixty six thousand to
Speaker 2: two hundred and fifty thousand.
Speaker 3: And the thing that makes.
Speaker 2: Us interesting is the fact that the league has never
Speaker 2: made money and they're losing money at a bigger rate.
Speaker 4: They're subsidized by the NBA. This is again, they.
Speaker 2: Want to be paid what they're worth. I think probably
Speaker 2: they would be paid nothing because.
Speaker 4: I truly do not I don't follow sports in general,
Speaker 4: but at least with the NBA, you can kind of
Speaker 4: make a case for it, like, oh, they're at the
Speaker 4: top of their skill level. These guys are the best
Speaker 4: at what they do. You know, they're very cool, they're
Speaker 4: very fast, it's very fast paced.
Speaker 3: Calls people. Yeah, yeah, they get points for.
Speaker 4: That, and so you know, there's there's something to be
Speaker 4: said for that. The WNBA has none of that. Being
Speaker 4: the best, you know, female basketball player, you're probably gonna
Speaker 4: get outdone by some you know, varsity maybe junior varsity team,
Speaker 4: and you might get outdone just you know, by a
Speaker 4: standard high school team.
Speaker 2: Well, they considered this offer to be a quote, slap
Speaker 2: in the face, I said, even though the proposed numbers
Speaker 2: would have represented the largest salary leap in league history.
Speaker 2: I said, for context, the WNBA has never turned a
Speaker 2: profit it's twenty nine year history. Annual losses hovered around
Speaker 2: ten million dollars before Caitlin Clark, but now they have
Speaker 2: ballooned to nearly fifty million dollars in twenty twenty four,
Speaker 2: even as revenues grew past two hundred million. So they
Speaker 2: got revenues of two hundred million, and yet they have
Speaker 2: lots losses of fifty million. I mean, that's a tremendous
Speaker 2: per you know, that's like twenty five percent of their
Speaker 2: net gross is their loss That is that is a
Speaker 2: pretty poorly run But evidently they're giving Caitlin and some
Speaker 2: other celebrities really really big salaries that have run up
Speaker 2: the red ink. The league survives because the NBA owns
Speaker 2: roughly sixty percent of it and has consistently subsidized operations
Speaker 2: since nineteen ninety.
Speaker 4: Seven, so they very generous.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they've done that, I think to avoid criticism of
Speaker 2: sexism and things like that. But it's not paying its
Speaker 2: way now. The players said this is a slap in
Speaker 2: the face because they said, it's not the money. We
Speaker 2: want a percentage of the profits, like the NBA players
Speaker 2: do you have to generate profits first?
Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly, that's my thing.
Speaker 2: What is the percentage of profits if you've got negative
Speaker 2: profits to pay? Yeah, exactly, that would pay us. Yeah,
Speaker 2: the wn BA players need to pay to play.
Speaker 3: And that would be the reality of it.
Speaker 2: I guess you could say that their profit sharing is
Speaker 2: net and zero because you gotta have some bads to
Speaker 2: point out profits before they can do it. Critics say
Speaker 2: that point out that the WNBA has a shorter schedule
Speaker 2: than the NBAA.
Speaker 3: They have forty four.
Speaker 2: Games, and they only have ten minute quarters instead of
Speaker 2: fifteen minute quarters. They have limited playoff rounds, and they
Speaker 2: say that's one of the reasons why their salaries shouldn't
Speaker 2: scale anywhere near NBA levels. But of course it's amazing
Speaker 2: to me to see that this anything you can do,
Speaker 2: I can do better attitude is still there in the
Speaker 2: era that we have seen what happens when you have
Speaker 2: just mediocre men pretend that they're women and compete in
Speaker 2: a sport.
Speaker 4: And blow out the records.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean when I was growing up, they did
Speaker 2: everything they can to try to deceive people. And I remember,
Speaker 2: you know Billy Jean King, and you have Bobby Riggs
Speaker 2: that staged match, and people that time who knew Bobby
Speaker 2: Riggs said that he threw that for the money because
Speaker 2: he had already had matches with other he was retired.
Speaker 2: He was an older male guy who again was not
Speaker 2: at the top of the league when he was at
Speaker 2: his prime, and now he's retired.
Speaker 3: And older, but he was still able to beat some
Speaker 3: of these.
Speaker 2: Current women's professionals, and they staged that and made a
Speaker 2: big deal out of the fact that he threw the
Speaker 2: game to her, because Jimmy Carner also did one after that,
Speaker 2: and he skunked another tennis pro, female tennis pro, who
Speaker 2: was again at the top of her game at the time,
Speaker 2: and there have been others that were out there. So
Speaker 2: they took this one match and they focused on that
Speaker 2: almost exclusively, ignoring all the rest of the stuff. But
Speaker 2: now that we've had this outrage from women about women
Speaker 2: being women in sports being skunked by men trainees, you know,
Speaker 2: it's amazing that we still have this type of thing happening. Yeah.
Speaker 5: I really thought that was going to be the one
Speaker 5: good thing to come. But no, I underestimate the power
Speaker 5: of their double think. They can simultaneously hold that, you know,
Speaker 5: tranies are destroying them in sports, which they were, of
Speaker 5: course and are to some extent still. Uh, and also
Speaker 5: that women are just as good as men.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's like the MAGA people who hate the m RNA,
Speaker 2: they hate the lockdowns, they hate the mask, but they
Speaker 2: can't connect the dots and will not connect the dots
Speaker 2: to Trump.
Speaker 4: So real clearly also see able sort of thing with
Speaker 4: feminists and the fact that they want to portray and
Speaker 4: have all men viewed as you know, potential rapists and threats,
Speaker 4: and they're evil and violent, you have to be continually
Speaker 4: scared of them. But also women are just as strong
Speaker 4: and powerful. And you can't have it both ways. If
Speaker 4: you need to be afraid and you need to be
Speaker 4: fearful of men, that means that what men are bigger, faster,
Speaker 4: stronger and a danger to you. You can't have it
Speaker 4: both ways. You have to pick one at least, which
Speaker 4: again I don't think the average man is out there
Speaker 4: trying to be heinous to women.
Speaker 2: I think Orwell was onto something when he came up
Speaker 2: with a term double think, don't you truly? We see
Speaker 2: it everywhere. And Nova Scotia, the government there has approved
Speaker 2: glyphaset spraying on three five and seventy seven acres of
Speaker 2: drought stricken, fire prone forest. Now, glyfasset is sprayed under
Speaker 2: these forests and it kills deciduous trees, and it kills
Speaker 2: pretty much everything except the pine trees that are there,
Speaker 2: and so it doesn't create. It kills the forest essentially,
Speaker 2: and you wind up with just one specie of tree
Speaker 2: that grows there. But it also creates a fire hazard
Speaker 2: even for those trees. And so you've got the press
Speaker 2: there that found out about this and engage the premiere
Speaker 2: of Nova Scotia and asked them some questions about it,
Speaker 2: and he just com pleaded ignorance about it. Premier Tim
Speaker 2: Houston had in exchange with the Halifax Examiner. They asked him,
Speaker 2: they said, herbicide spraying has been ended, but because the
Speaker 2: concern is that obviously the herbicides kill growth and add
Speaker 2: to the fuel burden potential fireburden. Is it spraying on
Speaker 2: now or has that been stopped? And he says, well,
Speaker 2: I don't know if there's any spring that's going on
Speaker 2: at the moment. Certainly not banned for all time, not
Speaker 2: in our province. If it's been temporarily ceased, I'm not
Speaker 2: sure really what's going on. So he doesn't know. And
Speaker 2: the interesting thing about this was that they were doing
Speaker 2: this in the forests previously, and they would report and
Speaker 2: tell people the areas where they were doing this, so
Speaker 2: people could stay out and not be sprayed themselves and
Speaker 2: not come into direct contact with it. As I've said before,
Speaker 2: we had a dog that died in particular type of
Speaker 2: leukemia that is associated strongly with Glycassett, and I believe
Speaker 2: that it was from one of these chemical lawn spraying
Speaker 2: companies that our neighbors use. They would come out and
Speaker 2: spray their lawn and then put signs up keep pets
Speaker 2: and dogs off of it. And our particular dog was
Speaker 2: a master of escape who was able to get out,
Speaker 2: and he did get out, and he got into that grass.
Speaker 2: He liked to roll into it and to eat it
Speaker 2: more than any other dog I've ever seen, and so
Speaker 2: he got the same kind of cancer that you saw
Speaker 2: farm workers getting from using roundup. But they have taken
Speaker 2: the approach to not ban the spring, but to ban
Speaker 2: citizens from the forests. It looks like robin Hood yet again.
Speaker 2: They even call it the Crown's forests, and I say,
Speaker 2: you're not allowed into these forests period. So you've got people.
Speaker 2: I think it's in the article Lands you could show
Speaker 2: the pictures of people putting large signs on the ground
Speaker 2: saying do not spray us, don't spray. They've got it
Speaker 2: down on the ground, really large signs, and they're very
Speaker 2: concerned about They said there is no consumptions to be
Speaker 2: no consumption of berries and fruit within the spray sites.
Speaker 2: Remainder of the growing season. And as I said before,
Speaker 2: what was interesting about this was that prior to the
Speaker 2: last couple of years, going back to twenty twenty three,
Speaker 2: prior to that, they would always list the areas that
Speaker 2: they were going to be spraying with They had it online.
Speaker 2: But the people of the industry group that is selling
Speaker 2: the glyphis at spray asked that that be taken down
Speaker 2: and so they deep sixed it. They memory hold so
Speaker 2: that people can't see the areas that they're going to
Speaker 2: be spraying or no when they are going to be
Speaker 2: spraying it there. Aerial spraying on private land would not
Speaker 2: fall under the wildfire travel restrictions as they now stand,
Speaker 2: but it's not clear whether herbicide spraying would be allowed
Speaker 2: on crown land as industrial forestry uses it as a
Speaker 2: form of Sylvie culture, which I don't know what that is.
Speaker 2: They say it is permitted at night.
Speaker 3: So there you go.
Speaker 2: Where we are going back into a feudal system, aren't
Speaker 2: we You know you're not allowed to go onto the
Speaker 2: Crown's land.
Speaker 4: No, this is our forus.
Speaker 3: You may not nsweries.
Speaker 4: That's right, these are the Kings Dea.
Speaker 2: Well, we know that it is going into a kind
Speaker 2: of a feudal system and a system of tyranny. The
Speaker 2: EU has got a so called media freedom law that
Speaker 2: it is about to take effect. And this European Media
Speaker 2: Freedom Law which take effect last Friday, they said, it's
Speaker 2: a debate over which media is going to get the safeguards,
Speaker 2: and they openly came out Reuters and others said, we're
Speaker 2: very concerned about the fact that you have a very
Speaker 2: large online platforms, and so they create an acronym out
Speaker 2: of that called velops vlops such as YouTube, face book, Instagram, TikTok,
Speaker 2: those types of things. They said, people are getting their
Speaker 2: news from that, and so you need to make sure
Speaker 2: that you punish YouTube if they don't promote mainstream media.
Speaker 2: That was the mainstream media approach, and so what they
Speaker 2: what they did was they said that they had to
Speaker 2: not put any restrictions algorithmic or otherwise to downgrade the
Speaker 2: reports coming from mainstream media. So in order to avoid
Speaker 2: the appearance of that, of course YouTube and Facebook and
Speaker 2: others will make sure that they promote mainstream media if
Speaker 2: they didn't before, under penalty of financial penalty. And so
Speaker 2: the quote from Reuters was that it has contributed to
Speaker 2: a fragmented alternative media environment that is filled with podcasters,
Speaker 2: YouTubers and ticcongers.
Speaker 3: Don't worry. They've done their best to exclude me, so you.
Speaker 4: Know, we're only one out of those three.
Speaker 2: It's right, and it's not just making sure that you're
Speaker 2: getting the mainstream mockingbird press promoted to you. The EU
Speaker 2: is going to be scanning your chats by this October. Again,
Speaker 2: the paranoia of the tyrants that is there now. They
Speaker 2: say that they're doing this because they want to cut
Speaker 2: down on child sexual abuse, so they want to scan
Speaker 2: all the chats. This is all happening the same week
Speaker 2: that the Trump administration sent this Israeli cybersecurity guide back
Speaker 2: to Israel, who was doing exactly this. So they always
Speaker 2: use this stuff and they talk about it as being
Speaker 2: chat control. Big push coming out of Denmark to do this.
Speaker 2: Some of the European countries are not fully on board
Speaker 2: with this, but they will be. And when we look
Speaker 2: at the pedophilia that is rampant in all of these
Speaker 2: different governments, you know that they're just using that as
Speaker 2: a figly to do the kind of surveillance that they
Speaker 2: always wanted to do.
Speaker 3: That's what this is ultimately about it's just another mcguffin.
Speaker 4: It's always the same end gold matter which tack they're
Speaker 4: coming at it from. Is it for the kids, is
Speaker 4: it for to save the environment. Either way, you're losing freedom.
Speaker 4: As you're losing your liberty. Is they're going to lock
Speaker 4: you down the fifteen minute city agenda.
Speaker 2: Well, they're not locking down their borders. And you see
Speaker 2: the massive numbers of people that are being brought into
Speaker 2: the UK, Germany and France that type of thing. Show
Speaker 2: the video of how some of these farmers have handled
Speaker 2: the massive number of migrants that have come in and
Speaker 2: squatted on their land. They gave them some of They
Speaker 2: call it the honey truck.
Speaker 4: Oh no, yeah, look at this.
Speaker 2: They got all these people just moved onto their land
Speaker 2: and decide they're going to live on the land of
Speaker 2: the farmers.
Speaker 3: So the farmers go.
Speaker 2: Out and get the the trucks that spray manure.
Speaker 3: They use that to great effect there in the Netherlands too.
Speaker 2: I think when you had Mark ru to try to
Speaker 2: shut down the farms, they brought out Winnie the Pooh
Speaker 2: and the honey tree, I guess. But this is the
Speaker 2: fight that's going on between farmers and squatters. And this
Speaker 2: is in France. They really do want to shut down
Speaker 2: our farms, don't they. That's truly amazing. Well, we're going
Speaker 2: to take a quick break, folks, and we will be
Speaker 2: right back. And when we come back, we're going to
Speaker 2: talk about some financial issues, so stay with.
Speaker 1: Us analyzing the globalists. Next move now the David Nutshell.
Speaker 3: Well, welcome back.
Speaker 2: We're gonna talk about the fact that Trump has snapped
Speaker 2: up more than one hundred million dollars in bonds since
Speaker 2: taking office. We'll talk about what that means and maybe
Speaker 2: perhaps why he is doing that, as well as what
Speaker 2: is happening with stable coins. But before we do, I
Speaker 2: want to thank the people who support this program. These
Speaker 2: are some of the August checks that we just got in.
Speaker 2: Let me read off their first names and their last
Speaker 2: initial Scott C. HD from n C North Carolina, David
Speaker 2: and Anne, Marie N.
Speaker 3: Aaron W.
Speaker 2: John R. Monica, s Helen T. Minor Mike and I
Speaker 2: have a letter from Minor Mike. I want to talk
Speaker 2: about here.
Speaker 3: Peter G.
Speaker 2: Charles, Larry P. Charles with APS Radio and Z, Timothy W. Margaret,
Speaker 2: Mary T. Marty of I'm Marty T. K from Ohio,
Speaker 2: Sylvia D James F. William G. David and Deborah W.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for your support. And these are
Speaker 2: mostly people who have supported us continuously. I want to
Speaker 2: give you this information from Minor Mike because he's asked
Speaker 2: for prayers as well as Audi Modernature Radio. They're both
Speaker 2: facing issues with their businesses. Here, he says, I apologize
Speaker 2: not sending more money sooner, but my small mining company
Speaker 2: has been sued in federal court by an organized crime group.
Speaker 2: They're trying to steal my property and equipment with the
Speaker 2: help of a complicit federal judge. These criminals have been
Speaker 2: running a fraudulent stock selling mining scam since two thousand
Speaker 2: and nine. They want me gone because I have shined
Speaker 2: light on their sixty plus million dollar scheme. There are
Speaker 2: many servants of the dark side in this world. I'm
Speaker 2: confident that in the end the truth will prevail and
Speaker 2: God will win over evil, and so please keep Minor
Speaker 2: mic in your prayers. He has been someone who has
Speaker 2: been very generous and kind and his support of us.
Speaker 2: But we're going to see more and more issues. Of course,
Speaker 2: this is not about the economy in general, but I
Speaker 2: think we're going to see more and more issues of
Speaker 2: people that are going to be having issues because of
Speaker 2: the economy. We certainly saw that back in twenty and
Speaker 2: twenty and twenty one, so many people that were faced
Speaker 2: with losing their job because they didn't want to take
Speaker 2: the job. And so please keep them in your prayers.
Speaker 2: Audi Mrir Modern retro radio and minor.
Speaker 9: Mic as well.
Speaker 2: When we look at Trump, he has been accumulating bonds extensively.
Speaker 2: They don't know exactly how much of this is an
Speaker 2: estimate that it is one hundred million dollars in bonds.
Speaker 2: It's been six hundred and ninety transactions that had taken
Speaker 2: place since he took office, about seven hundred transactions in
Speaker 2: about six months. That's several a day. The documents were
Speaker 2: made public on Tuesday. According to CNBC calculations, the purchases
Speaker 2: had a total value of at least one hundred million dollars.
Speaker 2: By law, the US president, vice president, and some other
Speaker 2: select officials must periodically declare reportable transactions. The precise value
Speaker 2: of these dealings does not, however, have to be reported.
Speaker 2: But what is Trump buying? We can see the kinds
Speaker 2: of things that he is buying. They said that for
Speaker 2: big purchases between five hundred thousand dollars and a million
Speaker 2: dollars worth, or things like T Mobile, United Health, Home Depot,
Speaker 2: and others. Meta he put in somewhere between two hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty thousand and five hundred thousand, So he's buying
Speaker 2: commercial paper. I wouldn't read too much into what these
Speaker 2: companies do, but I think when you look at the
Speaker 2: fact that he is buying bonds and commercial paper, I
Speaker 2: think that means that he's pretty confident that he's going
Speaker 2: to be able to get interest rates lowered. Because if
Speaker 2: interest rates go down, those bonds that he got at
Speaker 2: a higher interest rate are going to become even more valuable.
Speaker 2: So it's going to be yet another incentive for him
Speaker 2: to pull out all the stops and to go for
Speaker 2: lowering interest rates. How will that affect us, Well, it
Speaker 2: will affect us because inflation is going to make things
Speaker 2: like gold go up. I'm not so sure what's going
Speaker 2: to happen with bitcoin. It's not necessarily as we saw.
Speaker 4: It doesn't retract exactly like gold does.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, gold is definitely the contrary trade to
Speaker 2: the dollar. Bitcoin it's kind of a mixed bag. It's
Speaker 2: kind of its own thing, So not really clear about
Speaker 2: what that's going to do, but that certainly does give
Speaker 2: us an insight. And as I said before, we see
Speaker 2: that he is eager to replace as many people as
Speaker 2: he can in the federal Reserve and he has to
Speaker 2: find some crimes to charge them with.
Speaker 3: It looks like he's found at least one person.
Speaker 4: Actually have a comment here from Angie Tiger about the bonds.
Speaker 4: Just invested a hundred million in government bonds. Doesn't surprise
Speaker 4: mean while he's pushing lower interest rates to a weaker dollar,
Speaker 4: he will make out like a bandit insider trading at
Speaker 4: his finest.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 4: Yeah, the richie get richer.
Speaker 2: This makes Nancy Pelosi like like a small change when
Speaker 2: he goes out and buys one hundred million dollars worth
Speaker 2: of bonds. And again, the value is going to soar
Speaker 2: on those things because they don't have a higher yield.
Speaker 2: Nervous banking lobby is now fighting to change the Genius Act,
Speaker 2: and of course it's another area where the Trump family
Speaker 2: has made a very big investment. We've had Eric Trump
Speaker 2: talk about the fact that he thinks and this was
Speaker 2: before they got the Genius Act put through, he thought
Speaker 2: that banks as we know them were going to be
Speaker 2: extinct within ten years. Why is that Well, because they're
Speaker 2: going to be replaced with stable coins, and so the
Speaker 2: banking industry was kind of caught by surprise. Here you
Speaker 2: got even people like JP Morgan CEO, Jamie Diamond or
Speaker 2: Demon I think is perhaps maybe the better pronunciation of
Speaker 2: his name. Even they are upset about what happened because
Speaker 2: they wanted to make sure that stable coains could not
Speaker 2: pay interest. But the question is what difference does it
Speaker 2: make when the banks aren't paying any interest. I mean,
Speaker 2: when you got Bank of America paying you like zero
Speaker 2: point zero zero one percent interest on your savings accounts,
Speaker 2: They're not paying any interest.
Speaker 4: They're disinterested in giving you a return on your money.
Speaker 2: Yeah, catching that's right. But anyway, this is the route
Speaker 2: that this is going to take. I don't like that
Speaker 2: idea because I like to have not that I'm a
Speaker 2: big fan of banks, but smaller local banks are very important,
Speaker 2: especially if you want to be able to buy things
Speaker 2: with cash. You're not going to be able to have
Speaker 2: any cash transactions if the banks go away, killed by
Speaker 2: stable coins. That's going to accelerate the move to digital
Speaker 2: ID and trackable permission financial statements. So banks are really
Speaker 2: kind of local. Banks are going to be essential, I
Speaker 2: think for you to be able to be able to
Speaker 2: have cash transactions. You know, if a business is going
Speaker 2: to take a cash they need to be able to
Speaker 2: take it back physically to a bank that's going to
Speaker 2: be nearby. That's the downside I see from this. Prominent
Speaker 2: members in the crypto industry have long argued that stable
Speaker 2: coin issuers should be allowed to offer users interests. So
Speaker 2: this is the big fight going back and forth. But
Speaker 2: like I said the other day, when you look at
Speaker 2: the user's interest rates that they charge you when you
Speaker 2: borrow versus the essentially zero interest rate that they pay
Speaker 2: you when you put money in the bank, I really
Speaker 2: don't understand what the fight is over this, But it
Speaker 2: is the banks that have the target get put on
Speaker 2: them stable coin issuers. They wanted to prohibit them from
Speaker 2: paying any form of interest or yield in connection with
Speaker 2: the holding, use, or attention of such payment stable coin.
Speaker 2: And again when you look at the model for tether,
Speaker 2: they buy Federal reserve notes which pay interest, and then
Speaker 2: they doll these you know, the stable coins. The users
Speaker 2: have their stuff, their funds, backed up supposedly by the
Speaker 2: Federal Reserve notes. However, the users would not get that interest.
Speaker 2: That's one of the things that made the stable coins
Speaker 2: so profitable was that tether would keep all that interest
Speaker 2: on the Federal Reserve notes. And by buying the Federal
Speaker 2: Reserve notes, they were creating an international market for the
Speaker 2: federal bonds that the other countries central banks don't want
Speaker 2: to buy because they understand how we're gaming this, but
Speaker 2: individuals in other countries would want to buy these stable coins,
Speaker 2: so that's one way they back up their worthless fiat currency.
Speaker 2: So they said, the ability for firms like exchanges to
Speaker 2: allow interest on stable coins is based on factors other
Speaker 2: than holding, use or retention, as mentioned in the Genius Act.
Speaker 2: The word solely used in the Genius Act is quote
Speaker 2: a powerful legal limitter. And it really does mean that
Speaker 2: if there is any other basis for the deals, they
Speaker 2: probably don't qualify, said one person. As things stand, customer
Speaker 2: deposits allow banks to create a significant portion of the
Speaker 2: money supply through loans and through lines of credit, incentivizing
Speaker 2: a shift from bank deposits and money market funds to
Speaker 2: stable coins would end up increasing lending costs and reducing
Speaker 2: loans to businesses and consumer households.
Speaker 3: That's the way the banking industry is fighting back on this.
Speaker 2: They say, well, you know, it's just going to mean
Speaker 2: that we're going to charge you more on loan and
Speaker 2: make the loans more difficult for you to get them.
Speaker 2: I'm seeing a lot of potential downside on this stuff
Speaker 2: in every different direction. I mean, it looks like they're
Speaker 2: setting us up for some really difficult times, and it's
Speaker 2: how they're going to make sure that we own nothing.
Speaker 2: This is a part of the real big takedown that's coming.
Speaker 3: Again.
Speaker 4: We've talked about the fact that this is going to
Speaker 4: use for tracking and tracing, and they can immediately turn
Speaker 4: your wallet off, but there's so many other different things
Speaker 4: that like this are much more hidden and harder to consider.
Speaker 4: How this interplays with the system that's already there and
Speaker 4: the ways they're going to utilize it.
Speaker 2: Well, it's this argument from zero H says, it's very
Speaker 2: unlikely that the crypto industry will accept any amendments to the
Speaker 2: Genius Act, the law that's probably been passed. And I
Speaker 2: think that is true, and I don't think that you're
Speaker 2: don't find anybody in the Trump administration that's going to
Speaker 2: want to have that happen either, because this is all
Speaker 2: about this oligarchy that Trump has around him and the
Speaker 2: money that they're going to make off of these stable coins.
Speaker 2: You know, this is going to be the new financial
Speaker 2: system that they're pivoting in. You know, Tony did a
Speaker 2: great job last Friday talking about Bretton Wood's too, that
Speaker 2: announcement that was made on August the fifteenth, nineteen seventy one.
Speaker 2: We're going to come up to I don't know if
Speaker 2: there'll be an announcement or if they'll just kind of
Speaker 2: de facto move into this new system that's going to
Speaker 2: be there, but I would expect that it's going to
Speaker 2: happen pretty quickly whether or not there is an announcement.
Speaker 2: I think even if it is something that just kind
Speaker 2: of gradually evolves as a de facto move, I think
Speaker 2: it is still going to be pretty sudden when it happens.
Speaker 2: And I think all this stuff is going to be
Speaker 2: They're going to make out like thieves that they are,
Speaker 2: and we're going to be left holding the bag.
Speaker 4: They do these things solely at first, and once they
Speaker 4: have a large enough portion of the population on board
Speaker 4: to where once they flip the switch, you're kind of
Speaker 4: forced to go along with them.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Yeah, once they get a you know, they have some
Speaker 4: number in mind. Probably someone does. Once we've got it
Speaker 4: established here, here and here, then immediately we can hammer it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right. Yeah.
Speaker 2: One of the people talking about this that's on the
Speaker 2: crypto side said people never wanted to use banks to
Speaker 2: make payments.
Speaker 3: They just had to. Now they don't have to, just
Speaker 3: like digital music.
Speaker 2: Files were better than CDs. Well that's a matter of opinion.
Speaker 2: I don't think so. They said, dis intermediated finance is
Speaker 2: better and easier than traditional banking. Well, you know, and
Speaker 2: I say that not because we're talking about necessarily whether
Speaker 2: the digital music that you download has the same quality
Speaker 2: or resolution as the CD that you had. But there
Speaker 2: is something very important about having a physical media, and
Speaker 2: that's what we're ultimately talking about with the banking thing here.
Speaker 2: What makes them important is the connection to cash. If
Speaker 2: the law local banks go away, there's not going to
Speaker 2: really be any way to manage this cash.
Speaker 4: This is an issue that's pervasive. If you do not
Speaker 4: have a physical copy of whatever it is, you don't
Speaker 4: actually own it. This has been shown time and time again.
Speaker 4: Even I bring them up because they're an exemplar. But
Speaker 4: even something is silly as video games, something like the
Speaker 4: Steam Store, you're technically kind of renting access to all
Speaker 4: the games you purchase on steams.
Speaker 2: If you don't have it physically, you're going to wind
Speaker 2: up renting it, right, That's exactly.
Speaker 4: They make it clear that, you know, if you were
Speaker 4: to die and say it, will your Steam Library to
Speaker 4: your kids? No, No, they don't get it. That's in
Speaker 4: their terms of service. They are the holders of it.
Speaker 4: You're simply renting access from them, and if they choose
Speaker 4: to take that away from you, you have no recourse.
Speaker 2: Yes, does that sound familiar everybody? You'll own nothing, right,
Speaker 2: You'll rent everything. You rent your home, you rent your music.
Speaker 2: You know, everything will be rented. That's the way they
Speaker 2: keep ultimate control of it. And that's why it is
Speaker 2: important to have something that is physical. It gives us
Speaker 2: some control and they want to divorce us from the
Speaker 2: physical in every regard. Well as gold Ready to explode,
Speaker 2: The Fear Trade says, yes, this is an article from
Speaker 2: zero Hedg. Just region the headline. But that is the
Speaker 2: key thing. You know, when you look at this and
Speaker 2: what happened was stock market. We have a little bit
Speaker 2: of an up and down this week. The stock market
Speaker 2: right now is been doing well. It's been inflated, mainly
Speaker 2: doing well because of just a handful of stocks like Nvidia,
Speaker 2: and these are stocks that are connected with the AI bubble.
Speaker 2: And now you've got even people like Sam Altman talking
Speaker 2: about how the AI bubble is like the dot com bubble.
Speaker 2: I said, from the very beginning, the dot com bubble
Speaker 2: happened because everybody got so they rushed into this thing
Speaker 2: and their minds ran away with all the things that
Speaker 2: were going to happen immediately with the Internet. Now, those
Speaker 2: things did eventually happen, but they didn't happen right away.
Speaker 2: And because you had this massive mob got all hyped
Speaker 2: up about it, they were the ones who ran in
Speaker 2: and bid the price up. And that same type of
Speaker 2: person will look at it and when it's not paying
Speaker 2: off and it's not happening because it's going to be
Speaker 2: down the road, that same type of person will then
Speaker 2: run out the exit. And when they all start running out,
Speaker 2: that's when it's going to happen. So it will first
Speaker 2: happened with the AI stocks that will take down the
Speaker 2: stock market in general, and that's when you're going to
Speaker 2: see gold and silver rally. We already saw just a
Speaker 2: little bit of that as the US stock indices sold
Speaker 2: office last week. Gold and silver prices solidly higher went
Speaker 2: near midday yesterday. And the question is, you know, when
Speaker 2: is that needle going to pop?
Speaker 3: The AI bubble?
Speaker 2: Everybody is talking about it now, even the people who
Speaker 2: are profiting from the AI bubble. UBS has raised the
Speaker 2: second quarter twenty twenty six gold price target to thirty
Speaker 2: six hundred dollars an ounce. They say they see the
Speaker 2: strongest gold demand since two thousand and eleven. So stop
Speaker 2: and thinking about that. If they're right, and we don't
Speaker 2: know if they're right, but if they're right, if it
Speaker 2: goes up from about thirty three hundred right now to
Speaker 2: thirty six hundred in about four to seven months, you're
Speaker 2: talking about a nine percent gain over those four to
Speaker 2: seven months. That's a pretty large annualized gain for something
Speaker 2: that is a very conservative investment. I still say that
Speaker 2: gold and silver is a great investment. Go to David
Speaker 2: night goldbe I'll take you to Tony Ardiman and he can.
Speaker 3: Help you to.
Speaker 2: Acquire physical goal physical silver he can also help you
Speaker 2: if you want to put gold and silver into your
Speaker 2: IRA as well. Gold prices posted steady gains and overnight
Speaker 2: trading hit a session high of thirty three fifty. So
Speaker 2: it's been solidly around the thirty three hundred level. And
Speaker 2: one person is saying, yeah it can. Gold can float
Speaker 2: to thirty six hundred, but it will not outperform silver
Speaker 2: and plan and people are still expecting a big move
Speaker 2: from silver. Goal prices are holding their gains even as
Speaker 2: the Federal Open Market Committee minutes show that the federally
Speaker 2: Serve remains very hesitant to cut rates. What they do
Speaker 2: is they meet in places like Jackson Hole, Wyoming and
Speaker 2: beautiful area. Yeah but yeah, and very very very wealthy
Speaker 2: there as well.
Speaker 3: But anyway, you know, we went there.
Speaker 2: They had these real estate offices that were like Sethaby's.
Speaker 2: You know, they're selling real estate as if it was
Speaker 2: like fine art or something in that area.
Speaker 4: Luxury real estate.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, very luxurious.
Speaker 2: Anyway, they have their meetings there and then they decide
Speaker 2: what they're going to do about interest rates, and then
Speaker 2: a month or two later, what they do is they
Speaker 2: released the minutes of that meeting so people can see
Speaker 2: what the various governors are saying. This is one of
Speaker 2: the reasons why the Trump administration is going over the
Speaker 2: history of these federal Reserve governors will fine tooth com
Speaker 2: to say if they can get any dirt on them,
Speaker 2: any crimes, so that they can remove them and put
Speaker 2: them in replace them. When people are going to be
Speaker 2: compliant with Trump and supportive of whatever he wants to do,
Speaker 2: and we know what he.
Speaker 3: Wants to do. He wants to lower interest rates.
Speaker 2: So markets are seeing an eighty two percent chance of
Speaker 2: a rate cut in September. So that's one of the
Speaker 2: reasons why gold is staying steady at this point. So
Speaker 2: that's you know, who knows what's going to happen in
Speaker 2: the future with it. I just know that we want
Speaker 2: to have some honest money. We want to have physical
Speaker 2: money that is outside of their rig system that they
Speaker 2: are creating. It's going to be a very bad system
Speaker 2: for the rest of us, and we need to think
Speaker 2: about how we're going to try to get outside of
Speaker 2: it as much as possible.
Speaker 4: It was I think about this every once in a
Speaker 4: while when it was one of the times when I
Speaker 4: think you were sick, back when we're still working Force.
Speaker 4: Tony hosted the show, and some guy called in and asked, like, well,
Speaker 4: you know, the government can just come in and take
Speaker 4: your gold and silver. That's not really could technically come
Speaker 4: in and do that to anything. They can come in
Speaker 4: and just kill you, So why do anything at all?
Speaker 4: Just again, golden silver is a good store of value,
Speaker 4: and it's something you can have on hand, and it's
Speaker 4: something you can bury in a chest out back if
Speaker 4: necessary and dig up later. The government can.
Speaker 2: You can hide it better than you can any of
Speaker 2: the stuff that is electronic ansecryptocurrencies, except for some of
Speaker 2: the ones like Manero or Zano or which.
Speaker 4: You're specifically built to be completely private.
Speaker 2: But they have a pretty steep learning curve, and if
Speaker 2: you don't know what you're doing, you can have somebody
Speaker 2: steal that from me. That's not even the government. That's
Speaker 2: my concern about all this stuff that's electronic. I've exposed
Speaker 2: myself then to all of these clever thieves worldwide, and
Speaker 2: there's some pretty smart people who spend all their time
Speaker 2: following this stuff, and you know the ins and outs
Speaker 2: and how they can hack into it. And we're constantly
Speaker 2: seeing systems being hacked into the CIA has been hacked
Speaker 2: into the NSA's been hacked in.
Speaker 4: Such thing psyographically secure system. If it's attached to the Internet,
Speaker 4: someone can find a way in and give them. It's
Speaker 4: just a matter of time. Even if it's something as
Speaker 4: simple as just a confidence attack where you send someone
Speaker 4: an email and say, oh, I need this from you
Speaker 4: or that from you. If they're not trying to break
Speaker 4: an encryption, you know, all they need is someone's log in.
Speaker 4: All they need is one person who has a lapse
Speaker 4: in judgment and they can gain entrance to assystem.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's going to be increasingly easy for them
Speaker 2: to use AI privately to to see people as well. Well,
Speaker 2: we're got to take a quick break and we're going
Speaker 2: to come right back.
Speaker 9: Stay with us.
Speaker 13: Who listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 1: Defending the American Dream. You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 4: Welcome back, folks. We've got some comments. Big Britt is
Speaker 4: back again. When we're talking about the w NBA, Assume
Speaker 4: says most of them are men, so they want men's money.
Speaker 4: I don't know about that. Sprumford says, go to the
Speaker 4: Nova Scotia forest, come back with a little cancer. That's right.
Speaker 4: Just a little cancer. At least it won't be turbo cancer, right, yeah,
Speaker 4: Tonal Lord one three three seven. Their desperation to watch
Speaker 4: us as an indication that they know they're on thin ice.
Speaker 4: They're scared, yes, hopefully.
Speaker 2: And we're gonna talk in this segment here about sort
Speaker 2: of things that you can do to get away from
Speaker 2: their virtual control.
Speaker 4: Here, yes, Alien poop evolution, EU will scan America, will
Speaker 4: buy the info, and Lance says, just trade our info
Speaker 4: for it. The five Eyes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's been one of their longest scams. Say, oh,
Speaker 2: we're not allowed to collect that information on our own citizens.
Speaker 2: How about you our partner over their collected on them
Speaker 2: and then just voluntarily turn it over to us. That's
Speaker 2: been the scam from the very beginning. Right after World
Speaker 2: War Two. We had AT and T was basically the
Speaker 2: phone company everywhere. They use them for surveillance. That's one
Speaker 2: of the reasons why they had the Church Committee hearing
Speaker 2: because from their inceptions, CIA and the NSA were spying
Speaker 2: on Americans without a warrant. And what they said was
Speaker 2: it's our data. These customers have willingly turned this over
Speaker 2: to us, so we own it. The customers don't own
Speaker 2: this information about themselves, and since we own it, we
Speaker 2: can do with it whatever we want, and if the
Speaker 2: government wants us to turn it over to them, we'll
Speaker 2: do that voluntarily because we like the fact they put
Speaker 2: us on in a monopoly situation.
Speaker 4: I can't wait for them to start minting our data
Speaker 4: packets onto the blockchain as NFTs. Imagine George Soros pulling
Speaker 4: a double sided holographic David Knight data n FT and
Speaker 4: being very excited about it. I'll trade you this, I'll
Speaker 4: trade it to Mark Zuckerberg or something. Knights of the Storm.
Speaker 4: Coffee and tobacco will be a tradable item someday, that's right.
Speaker 4: Maybe you need to start learning how to grow your
Speaker 4: own tobacco.
Speaker 2: Yeah, pretty much anything is going to be a tradable item,
Speaker 2: especially your skills. You know, get some real skills, not
Speaker 2: just real material stuff, but real skills in terms of,
Speaker 2: like you said, growing this or growing that.
Speaker 4: Now, I'm curious as to what kind of laws there
Speaker 4: are about growing tobacco. I imagine they were strict that
Speaker 4: they can't just be as simple as you're allowed to
Speaker 4: grow your own tobacco.
Speaker 2: It's big business, really is. And you know, tobacco has
Speaker 2: been one of the things that they have done more
Speaker 2: genetic modification two than anything else for whatever reason. It's
Speaker 2: so there's really really big money in big tobacco, as
Speaker 2: we've seen their control over government and media.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I remember looking that up a few years back.
Speaker 5: It's heavily, heavily regulated, and you're going to have the
Speaker 5: government all in your business if you're trying to grow tobacco.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: So I googled it right now and it says you're
Speaker 4: generally allowed to grow up for your own personal use.
Speaker 4: But if you're gonna, you know, distribute it or sell
Speaker 4: it at all, you're going, I'm assuming you're gonna get
Speaker 4: involved with the ATF.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's get Proto would get his house rated in
Speaker 2: the shire.
Speaker 4: No long bottom leaf to distribute, sour man, We're coming
Speaker 4: for you, Cecilia fourteen David. Most concerning in the Genius
Speaker 4: To Act is it gives government power to punish vax
Speaker 4: mandate refusers by freezing bank accounts.
Speaker 2: That's right, all of these stable coins do. That's why
Speaker 2: I call them a trojan coin. That's what they really
Speaker 2: ought to be called instead of a stable coin.
Speaker 10: Uh.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the horses come out of the stable it's a trojan.
Speaker 4: Horse, I say, nay sa Miller one two three. The
Speaker 4: terriffs are now kicking in and threatening the existence of
Speaker 4: so many small businesses. So said, Trump has been the
Speaker 4: most devastating presidents for small businesses in that lifetime.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no one can lock down now. This all always
Speaker 2: coming after a supply supply chain and always impacting the
Speaker 2: small businesses the most.
Speaker 9: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Again, the big businesses can afford to eat the teriffs
Speaker 4: for a while. They can keep their prices low and
Speaker 4: keep you coming to them. You look at you know,
Speaker 4: your local markets. Prices go up. They have to raise
Speaker 4: prices immediately because they offer right on such razor thin margins. Yeah, like,
Speaker 4: oh look, Walmart's still cheap. Yeah, not for long. Once
Speaker 4: the small businesses are gone, then they'll raise it. Nights
Speaker 4: of the storm. Digital money is going to shut out
Speaker 4: a lot of banks that are all insolvent. They can't
Speaker 4: make it from nothing. This will centralize the banking to
Speaker 4: one entity. That's always how they operate. It's always a consolidation.
Speaker 4: I remember when we were young, and you know Bank
Speaker 4: of America and what was that one of the other
Speaker 4: ones they merged consolidated under Bill Clinton, I believe it was.
Speaker 4: And you talked about that.
Speaker 2: And we were, oh, yeah, that was. That was Bank
Speaker 2: of America. Bank of America was a California bank, and
Speaker 2: Nations Bank was Questions Bank and Charlotte and we had
Speaker 2: a bank account or a business bank account with Nations Bank.
Speaker 2: And it was a guy from North Carolina. Trying to
Speaker 2: remember his name, but he was in the Clinton administration
Speaker 2: and he ran this whole thing through and then he
Speaker 2: wound up running for Senate, although he didn't make it
Speaker 2: through the primaries. But that's when they approved that merger.
Speaker 2: And when they approved that merger, everybody said we're going
Speaker 2: to wind you know, throughout the industry, and other people
Speaker 2: were posing it and they said, we're going to wind
Speaker 2: up with just a handful of gigantic banks, and lo
Speaker 2: and behold, that's exactly what we had about a decade later,
Speaker 2: and we saw how that too big to fail thing
Speaker 2: worked out. They were the ones who were bailed out,
Speaker 2: and the small banks started collapsing, hundreds of them collapsing
Speaker 2: a year every year at that point in time. Drudge
Speaker 2: would put that kind of stuff up and you could
Speaker 2: see how several hundred and fifty one year one hundred
Speaker 2: and sixty another year, they were going out of business
Speaker 2: because the big banks were protected, but they were not,
Speaker 2: And the new regulations that they put in with the
Speaker 2: Consumer of Financial Protection Board only made things worse for
Speaker 2: the small banks and protected the big banks and some
Speaker 2: of the other things. Elizabeth Warren wants to pretend that
Speaker 2: she's on the side of the little guy, but she
Speaker 2: everything that she has done helps the big banks. That's
Speaker 2: why she's on their payroll.
Speaker 4: They get what they want out of these politicians. Yeah,
Speaker 4: Night of the Storm. Oh read that one tunnel lord
Speaker 4: win three three seven. He says, I had no idea
Speaker 4: Steam did that with inheritance. Holy smoke. Yeah, it was
Speaker 4: a fairly big deal. I remember reading about it a
Speaker 4: few years ago. They may have changed their policy since then,
Speaker 4: but I haven't heard anything about that. But I do
Speaker 4: know at the time quite a few people were up
Speaker 4: in arms about it, the fact that wait, I mean,
Speaker 4: I can't will my game library to my children in
Speaker 4: case they want to play. You know, you know, what
Speaker 4: if we played these games together since they were young,
Speaker 4: and maybe we've got memories, you know, and what if
Speaker 4: we've got like a shared server or something.
Speaker 3: Like Sorry, Travison Leias. I don't have a library, will you.
Speaker 4: I've taken all the records.
Speaker 5: I remember seeing that. Well it's kind of a you
Speaker 5: can laugh at that particular situation. It shows that you
Speaker 5: don't own the games if you can't do whatever you want,
Speaker 5: including bequeathing them to your children.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's because no matter what area of life, they
Speaker 3: want you to be a renter.
Speaker 4: Right, even something down to the silly escapisms we enjoy
Speaker 4: Skunk Collo Rose Gardens. Silver is the most reasonable value
Speaker 4: of anything in the whole world right now. As Tony
Speaker 4: points out, it's continually undervalue. Knights of the Storm has
Speaker 4: been in chat talking about it as well.
Speaker 3: As a ratio to the price of gold and everything else.
Speaker 4: Yeah, they've been playing games that keeping it low. Knights
Speaker 4: of the Storm, keep your eye on silver. It is
Speaker 4: below the cost to mine and refined because of ETFs.
Speaker 4: They played that game too long. Silver. ETFs had to
Speaker 4: have put the price down so low that silver is
Speaker 4: on sale. Eventually the bubble will pop and silver prices
Speaker 4: will go more than four times up.
Speaker 2: See, that's the whole thing. That's the kind of games
Speaker 2: that these people play. ETFs are a good example of
Speaker 2: that when they do these derivatives. It's very much like
Speaker 2: the securitized mortgages that created the mortgage bubble. It took
Speaker 2: me a while to catch on to the ETFs.
Speaker 3: At first.
Speaker 2: I looked at it and I thought, well, i'll accumulate.
Speaker 2: You know, GLD and SLV. These are a couple of
Speaker 2: ETFs that come out of supposedly there is gold and
Speaker 2: silver that is being held by these companies on the
Speaker 2: Shanghai Gold Exchange.
Speaker 3: Show me the money, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 2: What got my suspicion was that it was not tracking
Speaker 2: the price of physical gold, the spot price of physical gold.
Speaker 2: I thought, why is that? And then I realized that,
Speaker 2: you know, they're running a scam. They are not really
Speaker 2: backing it up with their purchases what they're selling you.
Speaker 2: So when they can divorce the actual whether it's real
Speaker 2: estate or whether it's gold and silver, they can divorce
Speaker 2: that and give you some kind of a token, then
Speaker 2: we lose everything. And that's the way that they're going
Speaker 2: to rob us of everything for sure, And that's this
Speaker 2: tokenization and stable coins are just another part of that
Speaker 2: as far as I'm concerned.
Speaker 4: One of the things that always talking to funny about
Speaker 4: sable coins they own. It's stable because it's tied to
Speaker 4: something like the US dollar. We have very different definitions
Speaker 4: of stable. Nothing tied to the US dollar is stable
Speaker 4: by definition.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a token that's derived from the US dollar.
Speaker 4: How stable can it be? Then we have a comment
Speaker 4: here from Marquie, Mark and Jay that just popped up says,
Speaker 4: aren't we de facto renters now with property taxes?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 4: True, as long as we have property tax you don't
Speaker 4: ever own your land. I've told this story before, fairly recently, even,
Speaker 4: but I remember you were doing taxes. I was probably
Speaker 4: about seven years old, and I wandered into your office
Speaker 4: because I was bored, and she's like, what are you
Speaker 4: doing taxes? You know what's that? And you explained taxing
Speaker 4: me and just what tax are we going to know?
Speaker 4: Property taxes? I pay the government for the lands. But
Speaker 4: I thought you bought the house. I thought you paid
Speaker 4: for the house already. I have to pay them every year,
Speaker 4: and it just blew my seven year old mind. I
Speaker 4: had to sit down and think about that for a while.
Speaker 4: I was like, wait a minute, that means you can't
Speaker 4: really own it.
Speaker 2: That's right, And you know why we have these property taxes.
Speaker 2: Almost all of it goes to supporting these schools and
Speaker 2: the harm that they do to our children. It's such
Speaker 2: a racket. So I can't understand why people are so
Speaker 2: wedded to the school system. And that's across the political spectrum.
Speaker 2: We got to get rid of this. You need to
Speaker 2: shut it down.
Speaker 4: If they're wasting our money to brainwash and propagandize our
Speaker 4: children with.
Speaker 3: Arms that they do not just financially.
Speaker 4: Yeah, which I mean if they were to say, we're
Speaker 4: going to keep taking your money, but we'll do absolutely nothing.
Speaker 4: But if you get rid of the money, we're going
Speaker 4: to keep doing it, I'd say, fine, we'll pay you
Speaker 4: to go away. I'll keep paying the taxes if it
Speaker 4: means you guys leave, I would take that trade. Karen
Speaker 4: Carpenter twenty seven. The first time we went to Jackson
Speaker 4: Hole in the seventies, there were mud streets when it
Speaker 4: snowed in places. Jackson Hole is a very different place now.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, it's still not like New York City. It's
Speaker 3: still very rustic in that. But you know these people
Speaker 3: have massive estates.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, it's you can tell. It's a cultivated rusticness.
Speaker 4: The original people that made it the way it was
Speaker 4: are no longer there. It's a bunch of people that
Speaker 4: moved there because they liked the aesthetic, who have priced
Speaker 4: the original owners far out of anything they could have
Speaker 4: ever afforded. Knights of the Storm. Copper is going to
Speaker 4: be a thing as well.
Speaker 3: Soon.
Speaker 4: They are trying to build a large collider in Texas
Speaker 4: and that will consume all the copper we have on hand.
Speaker 4: They will artificially suppress the price of copper to get
Speaker 4: the collider built. Then when it's done, the price will explode.
Speaker 4: I have to look at that too. Are they talking
Speaker 4: about a large hadron collider like they've got going on
Speaker 4: in Cern. Are they gonna be doing weird at cultic
Speaker 4: rituals like that in Texas too? That'll be fun MAV
Speaker 4: twenty twenty two. Copper has been messed with for a while.
Speaker 4: They need copper for this AI crap too. They need
Speaker 4: copper for a lot of different things. It's a metal
Speaker 4: that's heavily used in all kinds of different industries. Knights
Speaker 4: of the Storm. This is why crackheads are ripping wires
Speaker 4: and pipes out of walls. Before they did it with
Speaker 4: the CERN large collider before Tony hinted to copper being
Speaker 4: a medal to watch in the future a while back.
Speaker 4: He's right, Yeah, if they build a collider here in
Speaker 4: the United States, they're gonna have to worry about crackheads.
Speaker 4: Those people are industrious, they have a lot of energy.
Speaker 4: You're gonna have to have guards twenty four to seven.
Speaker 4: It's not as friendly and nice as it is in
Speaker 4: Switzerland here, Cecilia, Are pennies valuable for copper?
Speaker 3: Good question? Was there any copper left and pennies?
Speaker 4: That's what I was about to ask. Is there actually
Speaker 4: any copper in pennies or is this some you know,
Speaker 4: weird amalgam metal. Now they seem to have gotten rid
Speaker 4: of all the value in all of our metals, because
Speaker 4: I know for a fact that pennies cost more to
Speaker 4: manufacture than they're worth. Yeah, aren't they phasing out pennies next?
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, Trump shut it down.
Speaker 2: And as I said, I have real concern about that
Speaker 2: because that impacts the utility of cash to some degree.
Speaker 2: But you know, when you look at coins, it's not
Speaker 2: all that meaningful to talk about the cost to mint
Speaker 2: coins because they last for a very long time, unlike
Speaker 2: the paper money.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Knights of the Storm and Chat says pre eighty
Speaker 4: two pennies are pure copper. So if you find a
Speaker 4: penny from before nineteen eighty two, then you've got a
Speaker 4: pure copper penny. Might be worth holding on to. That.
Speaker 2: That's interesting, Well, I was talking about stable coins, and
Speaker 2: it's kind of interesting that you've got a guy that
Speaker 2: was part of the Trump administration earlier this year. Remember
Speaker 2: the Trump administration is only what like six or seven
Speaker 2: months old. You've already got Beau Hines leaving the White
Speaker 2: House as the White House Crypto Director and now going
Speaker 2: to Tether, which is Lucky Lutnix company that he's heavily involved,
Speaker 2: and of course you know it's a company that is
Speaker 2: linked to Tether. And his company has got a great
Speaker 2: deal of steak and Tether and they acquire the Federal
Speaker 2: Reserve notes and sell them to Tether. Heinz will work
Speaker 2: to help Tether enter the US market and cultivate relationships
Speaker 2: with policymakers and industry stakeholders. They give me a break.
Speaker 2: They've already got a rotating door here between policy makers
Speaker 2: and industry stakeholders. That's why we got the Genius Act
Speaker 2: in the first place, and it's just another example of
Speaker 2: this kind of you know, regulatory revolving door that pharmaceuticals
Speaker 2: are filled with. And of course that's what they're building
Speaker 2: right now, that with their crypto stuff. This is an
Speaker 2: article from Brownstone. It says, from Fiat everything to real everything,
Speaker 2: and he lays out some of the problems with the
Speaker 2: fiat society that they're trying to build with tokens and
Speaker 2: Larissa's stuff, and then talk us a little bit about
Speaker 2: some of the solutions that we should be focused on
Speaker 2: in each of our personal lives. Here the infrastructure is
Speaker 2: now visible to anybody who is willing to see it.
Speaker 2: The systematic replacement of natural systems with artificial ones has
Speaker 2: reached into every domain money, food, health, education, information. What
Speaker 2: began as isolated changes has revealed itself as a coordinated operation,
Speaker 2: the complete substitution of reality with decree ownership and access,
Speaker 2: competents with credentials, everything for a permission society. The mathematical
Speaker 2: engineering of ownership out of reach becomes clear. From fifty
Speaker 2: two percent of thirty year olds owning homes and nineteen
Speaker 2: fifty to a projected thirteen percent by twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: Extraction was rebranded as liberation, the subscription economy that converts
Speaker 2: your three thousand dollars monthly into someone else's equity while
Speaker 2: you build nothing. These aren't separate trends, but components of
Speaker 2: what I documented in feat Everything. He said, they didn't
Speaker 2: just lude us financially and culturally, but they rewired our
Speaker 2: psychology to make resistance impossible. That's the key thing, you know.
Speaker 2: They want to make it so that you accept all
Speaker 2: of this rental stuff rather than taking control of it yourself.
Speaker 2: And he talks about how Catherine Austin Fitz is very
Speaker 2: focused on this, and she is she worked very hard
Speaker 2: to try to make sure that there was going to
Speaker 2: be a kind of a Tennessee reserve system here in
Speaker 2: this state, so that we would not be completely reliant
Speaker 2: on stable coins. She sees the connection course between stable
Speaker 2: coins and the great pump and dump, and that's the
Speaker 2: way she sees that her article was a plunder financing
Speaker 2: the pan Opticon, and that just recently came out. He said,
Speaker 2: that was last week. It connects the dots that reveal
Speaker 2: the full scope of the operation. The surveillance infrastructure isn't
Speaker 2: just watching us, it is actively conditioning us. For compliance.
Speaker 2: She calls it the pan optagon because she said it
Speaker 2: creates the psychological substrate that makes extraction possible. Her work
Speaker 2: has long explored themes of sovereignty and financial freedom, but
Speaker 2: this latest analysis shows the endgame. We're not just being robbed,
Speaker 2: we're being participating, programmed to participate in our own robbery. Yeah,
Speaker 2: you will own nothing, and you'll be happy about that.
Speaker 2: This is the villain's masterpiece. The system is so sophisticated
Speaker 2: that it harvests not just our wealth but our very
Speaker 2: capacity for resistance. And of course a key part of
Speaker 2: that is going to be the universal basic income. Get
Speaker 2: how quickly everybody got used to a stimulus check in
Speaker 2: staying home and not working with Donald Trump, As I
Speaker 2: said before, he's an accelerationist and always said that people
Speaker 2: would get ruined by the welfare state, because we've already
Speaker 2: seen that happen in the past. But the extent of
Speaker 2: doing it universally and the extent to which people became
Speaker 2: so compliant and so dependent on this stuff really surprised
Speaker 2: me at how quickly it happened.
Speaker 4: Almost overnight. And I know we have this article in
Speaker 4: the stack. You might get to later about the sheer
Speaker 4: number of Britons that now just take permanent disability and
Speaker 4: never into the workforce.
Speaker 3: Yes, when you get people to the US as well, Yeah,
Speaker 3: when you.
Speaker 4: Get people that option, there's a large number of people
Speaker 4: that will simply take it. They look at their options
Speaker 4: and think, well, I can work, you know, I can
Speaker 4: work you know, one hundred hours a week and barely
Speaker 4: straight by, or I can do nothing and get almost
Speaker 4: as much from the government. I think I'll take it
Speaker 4: from the government.
Speaker 2: And that article they were talking about how so many
Speaker 2: young people went straight from college or whatever straight onto
Speaker 2: saying that they were disabled. And one of the things
Speaker 2: they would say is, oh, I've got PTSD.
Speaker 4: Or i'm you know, I'm stressed, I'm depressed.
Speaker 3: ADHD or whatever.
Speaker 2: I got some kind of mental issue, And so I
Speaker 2: can get on one hundred percent disability and just live
Speaker 2: off of the government. And it's very easy for people
Speaker 2: to do that. It's engineered compliance, as they say here.
Speaker 2: The recent certification of class action lawsuit for children who
Speaker 2: were MK Ultra victims demonstrates that these were not just
Speaker 2: isolated experiments. They were the prototype for mass psychological conditioning.
Speaker 2: The same techniques that once tested on unwitting subjects now
Speaker 2: reach billions of people through the devices that they carry,
Speaker 2: willingly impulsive, debt prone, and dependent on external validation, and
Speaker 2: capable of long term planning. This is what we're seeing
Speaker 2: in citizens today. The same systems that price you out
Speaker 2: of ownership simultaneously condition you to prefer access over assets,
Speaker 2: subscriptions over purchases, digital relationships over physical community. It's the
Speaker 2: own nothing, be happy idea. So Jeffrey Tucker has talked
Speaker 2: about a practical way of living with the founding father's
Speaker 2: principles in a world of smartphones and surveillance capitalism. He's
Speaker 2: not advocating retreat, but showing how to navigate this system
Speaker 2: without surrendering the character traits that made America's founders ungovernable.
Speaker 2: And of course, a key part of that is local agriculture.
Speaker 2: Jefferson said that the whole system of government that had
Speaker 2: been designed was dependent on an agrarian society, and he
Speaker 2: thought that once we moved into industrialization that we would
Speaker 2: lose it. He should see what's going on with the
Speaker 2: technocracy in a world that is drownding and manufactured complexity.
Speaker 2: This one hundred and twenty page work from Jeffrey Tucker
Speaker 2: is as efficient as it is inspiring, cutting through the
Speaker 2: noise to reach cential truth, he says. Tucker has identified
Speaker 2: specific practices that make.
Speaker 3: What is it? Oh?
Speaker 2: Okay, yeah, I don't know what that was. That was like, yeah,
Speaker 2: it makes fiat. Is there an acho in here? It
Speaker 2: changed my voice to it made FIAT systems powerless, though
Speaker 2: not through retreat from modernity, but through applied philosophy for
Speaker 2: maintaining sovereignty from within. And so he's got three or
Speaker 2: four things here. The first thing is to try to
Speaker 2: cultivate in your life a long time preference over instant gratification.
Speaker 2: So they're constantly wanting us to want it now. But
Speaker 2: he says, the mentality that you will have delayed gratification,
Speaker 2: that you can wait so that you don't have to borrow,
Speaker 2: So you save so you don't have to borrow this thing.
Speaker 2: He says, when you can plan decades ahead, you will
Speaker 2: not be manipulated by quarterly thinking. Then also, craftsmanship over
Speaker 2: disposable consumption. Real skill building creates anti fragility. The person
Speaker 2: who can fix, build, grow, or repair something valuable becomes
Speaker 2: harder to control. Craftsmanship builds the patience and the attention
Speaker 2: span that surveillance capitalism deliberately erodes. It creates real value
Speaker 2: instead of renting access to other people. And then generational knowledge,
Speaker 2: he said, over credentialed expertise, wisdom that has been passed
Speaker 2: down through families and communities doesn't require institutional validation. It
Speaker 2: cannot be revoked by authorities, It cannot be updated by algorithm.
Speaker 2: Your grandmother's knowledge of food preservation doesn't come with subscription
Speaker 2: fees or terms of service. This knowledge exists outside of
Speaker 2: their systems, making it both valuable and dangerous to those
Speaker 2: who profit from dependency. And this is one of the
Speaker 2: reasons why, you know, we talk about out a civil
Speaker 2: defense manual. That's not going to be online. It's not
Speaker 2: going to be something that can be taken away. It's
Speaker 2: in a book. And you know, that's the importance of
Speaker 2: either having a book or if you put something on
Speaker 2: a device, making sure that that device is air gapped
Speaker 2: and not on the internet where anybody can mess with
Speaker 2: that device, and to make sure that it is protected
Speaker 2: against something like an EMP. But even better than that
Speaker 2: is a book. Books are protected from EMPs.
Speaker 4: The electricity can go out and you can still read it.
Speaker 4: You can light yourself up a candle and read the
Speaker 4: Civil Defense Manual by candlelight.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's kind of interesting, you know when we
Speaker 2: look at this.
Speaker 3: This is an article.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to go into detail on it, but
Speaker 2: basically they say that goal performs more like luxury real estate,
Speaker 2: and he is an example of Manhattan, and they say,
Speaker 2: you know, there's people who want to live in Manhattan
Speaker 2: and they can afford it.
Speaker 4: But then there's a lot of suckers.
Speaker 2: There's a lot of people who can't and they wait
Speaker 2: on the outset skirts and they're waiting to see if
Speaker 2: they can find a deal or something like that, but
Speaker 2: they're not making more real estate there in Manhattan. He said,
Speaker 2: that's basically what you see with gold. That's that same
Speaker 2: kind of market dynamic that you see with luxury real
Speaker 2: estate in a highly competitive market like that. And so
Speaker 2: we're going to leave the financial stuff because there's some
Speaker 2: other things that I want to talk about when we
Speaker 2: come back. We're going to talk about surveillance, and so
Speaker 2: we're gonna take.
Speaker 3: A quick break.
Speaker 4: Let's roll the beach boys.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you got that, Liss. We had a request from
Speaker 2: Karen to play that, so We're going to play that
Speaker 2: if you can find it, but if you can't, I'll
Speaker 2: play something else.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: All right, welcome back. I want to talk about targeted individuals.
Speaker 2: It's not something that I've talked about before. I've had
Speaker 2: many people who have said, you need to interview so
Speaker 2: and so, and they've had experience with it. I know
Speaker 2: that William Benny has talked extensively about it. He believes
Speaker 2: that he is a target of the government. When we
Speaker 2: mean that, we don't mean he's been targeted with audience
Speaker 2: or something like that, but really targeted with the electronically,
Speaker 2: with some of the same types of tactics that have
Speaker 2: been used with the you know, so with the label
Speaker 2: of the Havana syndrome, and if you remember when they
Speaker 2: came out about ten years or so ago, I talked
Speaker 2: at the time about Alan Frye, who worked for the Navy.
Speaker 2: He's the only scientists that's ever been funded by the
Speaker 2: government to look at biological effects of electromagnetic radiation and
Speaker 2: very similar to what they found with microwave radiation, the
Speaker 2: fact that you could cook food with it. He found
Speaker 2: that different frequencies than the microwave would have effects that
Speaker 2: could be they could affect your mind. And he had,
Speaker 2: you know, with a microwave for example, they had some
Speaker 2: of the microwave technicians who were working on radar and
Speaker 2: found that if they left their coffee cup on top
Speaker 2: of the thing that wasn't shielded very well, but it
Speaker 2: would get hot. And that's why one of the very
Speaker 2: first microwave ovens was called a radar range from a
Speaker 2: man if you remember that. And because it came from radar, well,
Speaker 2: Alan Fry's assistant realized they were working on something else.
Speaker 2: It was different frequency, and he started hearing these clicking
Speaker 2: noises like crickets and things like that, and those EMFs
Speaker 2: were actually manipulating his nerve, his auditory nerves in a
Speaker 2: way that it was making him hear things. And so
Speaker 2: Alan Fry started doing research on that, and a lot
Speaker 2: of people have picked up his research and talked about
Speaker 2: it in light of five G or six G or
Speaker 2: some of these other things. So when they started talking
Speaker 2: about the Havanah effect, that was people who worked for
Speaker 2: the US Embassy and Havana and they were getting nausea, dizzeyness,
Speaker 2: and hearing clicking sounds, and I thought, I wonder if
Speaker 2: that's anything like the Fry effect, and I always believed
Speaker 2: that it was. They wound up having hearings. He had
Speaker 2: so many people who'd been affected by it, and they
Speaker 2: basically kind of poop pooed it and said, no, nothing exists,
Speaker 2: even though they're own people being hurt by it. And
Speaker 2: I think one of the reasons that they did that
Speaker 2: is they don't want you to realize that they are
Speaker 2: doing it. Our own government is doing it to people
Speaker 2: they considered to be their enemies in the same way
Speaker 2: that the communists in China were doing it. A targeted
Speaker 2: individual is a short name for a victim of government weaponization,
Speaker 2: said Puerto Rican attorney Anna Toledo.
Speaker 3: From Targeted Justice. She said.
Speaker 2: In twenty twenty three, Cash Patel, who at that time
Speaker 2: was a former top official at the White House, Department
Speaker 2: of Fence and the Intelligence Community and the Department of Justice,
Speaker 2: published his memoir Government Gangsters, the Deep State, The Truth
Speaker 2: and the Battle for Our Democracy. Well, the problem is
Speaker 2: is that he's joined the mob now, I think, and
Speaker 2: I don't think it's going to get any more truth
Speaker 2: out of him.
Speaker 3: He's gone to the other side.
Speaker 2: He discussed at that time two hundred and seventy eight
Speaker 2: thousand Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act applications against Americans two hundred
Speaker 2: and seventy eight thousand. Fiser reports, Right, so this is
Speaker 2: the star chamber where you're not allowed to know that
Speaker 2: they're coming after you. He said that. She said, that
Speaker 2: is who the targeted individuals are. These are people who
Speaker 2: were often average Americans who have been wrongly classified as
Speaker 2: domestic extremists or violent extremists. The very first report that
Speaker 2: I did when I came, when I went to info Wars,
Speaker 2: was about a guy who was the victim of this
Speaker 2: type of approach. They put him on a no fly list,
Speaker 2: and he didn't know that he was on the no
Speaker 2: fly list, and he was on his way from the
Speaker 2: continental of the United States to see his wife who
Speaker 2: was in the military in Japan, and he was flying,
Speaker 2: actually on a military plane. They stopped in Hawaii to
Speaker 2: change planes, and when he got on the second plane
Speaker 2: to take off, agents came on board and drug him
Speaker 2: off and said, you're on no fly list. It's like,
Speaker 2: I didn't know that. How'd they let me get this
Speaker 2: far to Hawaii? And he was stuck. He was stuck
Speaker 2: in Hawaii, because if you can't fly out of Hawaii,
Speaker 2: what are you gonna do.
Speaker 3: You're gonna take a slow boat out of there, and
Speaker 3: he couldn't find one. Anyway.
Speaker 2: We publicized it and he had some other people who
Speaker 2: helped him with it, and they eventually got him back
Speaker 2: to the United States. But they could not find out
Speaker 2: why he had ever been put on that list.
Speaker 3: He had been.
Speaker 2: Vetted by the FBI for concealed carry and he had
Speaker 2: also been vetted by the TSA because he worked at
Speaker 2: an airport, and so they had done extensive vetting of
Speaker 2: him and nobody had found anything whatsoever. But somebody didn't
Speaker 2: like him and put him on a bad list. And
Speaker 2: this is what they can do with the Pisa Court.
Speaker 2: It's amazing to me to see this, you know, the
Speaker 2: Pisa Court and the Pisa Act. PISA came out of
Speaker 2: the hearings that they had because the Church Committee hearings
Speaker 2: in the Senate and the Pike Committee hearings in the House.
Speaker 2: Those were held to monitor what the CIA and the
Speaker 2: NSA were doing because from their inception, they've been spying
Speaker 2: on Americans without warrants, and so they created this oversight thing,
Speaker 2: said Okay, we need to be able to spy on people,
Speaker 2: but we're going to say that they can't do it,
Speaker 2: except they're going to have to have a warrant, unless
Speaker 2: it is a foreign citizen in a foreign country. Even
Speaker 2: if it is a foreign citizen in America, you've got
Speaker 2: to get a warrant. But then they wound up using
Speaker 2: this FISA court as a star chamber process to give
Speaker 2: them legal cover to spy on anybody that they wanted
Speaker 2: to without a warrant. That's how the government operates now.
Speaker 2: They take these structures that are there to restrain them
Speaker 2: and to keep them within a system of rules and
Speaker 2: within the constitution. They take those very systems and they
Speaker 2: use them as legal cover to enable them to do
Speaker 2: what they are legally prohibited from doing. They said, they've
Speaker 2: been placed there under secret criteria. Of course, you don't
Speaker 2: have of any right to confront your accusers. You don't
Speaker 2: even know that you're accused. You're never supposed to find
Speaker 2: out that they're on this database because it's a blacklist
Speaker 2: for enemies of the state, Toledo said.
Speaker 3: Tulca.
Speaker 2: Gabbard declassified about two months ago. A December twenty twenty one,
Speaker 2: memorandum by the Biden administration that classified as violent extremists
Speaker 2: anybody who opposed the COVID mandates and the vaccines and
Speaker 2: the lockdowns. So you can bet that I'm on one
Speaker 2: of these lists.
Speaker 4: It's probably why they probably on all of the lists.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's probably why they sent to PayPal. They said,
Speaker 2: we can't find things that we got this message. I
Speaker 2: don't know who it's from, said take this account off immediately.
Speaker 2: You are subjected to government surveillance, harassment, even potentially torture
Speaker 2: with directed energy weapons referring to the Havana Syndrome hearing
Speaker 2: that was held May of twenty twenty four by the
Speaker 2: Committee on Homeland Security. And whenever they have these committees,
Speaker 2: whenever they do these things, they have an inquiry into
Speaker 2: the jfk assassination, or in the UK they had an
Speaker 2: inquiry into how they handled the so called pandemic. Whenever
Speaker 2: they do that, these things are set up to be
Speaker 2: a whitewash. They're not ever going to expose anything.
Speaker 3: She said.
Speaker 2: These directed energy weapons can cause a range of symptoms,
Speaker 2: from feeling unwell to experiencing horrific burns and attacks. They
Speaker 2: can be used to make a person believe that they
Speaker 2: are going crazy. The symptoms of Avana syndrome, such as
Speaker 2: severe headaches, dizziness, nausea, cognitive problems, and a sensation of
Speaker 2: pressure on the face was exposure to directed radio frequency energy,
Speaker 2: with psychological factors considered as a secondary contributor. I have
Speaker 2: to say that that is one thing that I've not experienced.
Speaker 2: I've not experienced any of that kind of stuff. She
Speaker 2: noted that it not only affects diplomatic, military and intelligence officials.
Speaker 2: Doctor Michael Hoffer, who said that he had been prohibited
Speaker 2: from Diagon noticing any more civilians with Havana syndrome, suggesting
Speaker 2: that there was a cover up of civilians that were
Speaker 2: being targeted. She believes that Havana syndrome is a silent
Speaker 2: epidemic in America. Neuroscientists and neuroethicist doctor James Giardano has
Speaker 2: admitted in a Catherine Herriage interview that directed energy weapon
Speaker 2: attacks are occurring in America, and he co authored a
Speaker 2: paper published in April this year stating that these weapons
Speaker 2: are likely the cause of Havana syndrome. Again, Bill Benny,
Speaker 2: who was an NSA whistleblower and he was the formerly
Speaker 2: he was the global technical head of the NSA, has
Speaker 2: gone on record in interviews saying that he believes that
Speaker 2: he is a target of a directed energy weapons. Toledo
Speaker 2: explained how to identify a weaponized cell tower. This is
Speaker 2: something you may want to know if you think you're
Speaker 2: in this category. Cell towers with a level featuring four
Speaker 2: panels facing the same direction contain a microchip, she said,
Speaker 2: patented by Ericsson company, is a beam forming chip that
Speaker 2: can fire microwave beams. She suggests that one way to
Speaker 2: stop the Hamana syndrome epidemic is to de weaponize these
Speaker 2: timers by removing or disabling the chip. Well, I don't
Speaker 2: know if this is true. All I know is that
Speaker 2: this is one of the things that concerned me about
Speaker 2: five G when I look at it. Five G can
Speaker 2: target you individually. Now, whether or not the government is
Speaker 2: doing this because of your political beliefs. I believe that
Speaker 2: if something has potential to create damage, it can be
Speaker 2: made more intense. They like to say, well, five G
Speaker 2: it's a very different frequency, which of course they've not
Speaker 2: done any safety studies to see what the biological effects
Speaker 2: of that frequency are. But what it does is that
Speaker 2: multiplex is the targeting of people who are in a
Speaker 2: given area. It can focus on one phone at a time,
Speaker 2: and you can get signals from several different antennas focused
Speaker 2: on the one and that moves to another one that
Speaker 2: does it's very rapidly to everybody in the area. Now
Speaker 2: I looked at that and I thought, just you know,
Speaker 2: that looks like that is ripe for being weaponized against people.
Speaker 3: I don't know if that's how they're doing it or not.
Speaker 2: You know, it may be that rather than the celt
Speaker 2: towers they said it began before twenty sixteen, when the
Speaker 2: Havana sentdrome became public after Canadian and US employees and
Speaker 2: diplomats and their families that were assigned to the US
Speaker 2: Embassy and Havana began experiencing similar symptoms. Mini mass shooters
Speaker 2: have also had a common thread of hearing voices due
Speaker 2: to the microwave auditory effect that Alan Frye had developed,
Speaker 2: the so Caull fry Effect the Voice to Skull technology.
Speaker 2: Toledo briefly shared her personal experience as a victim of
Speaker 2: government weaponization for twenty years and believes that she was
Speaker 2: given an implant without her knowledge or consent during a
Speaker 2: surgery that she underwent. Anyway, it's it's a very interesting
Speaker 2: thing certainly. You know, the mistakes that we make when
Speaker 2: we look at what our government is doing is to
Speaker 2: underestimate their depravity, their lack of ethics or lack of morals,
Speaker 2: and to underestimate their We overestimate those things. I should say,
Speaker 2: we don't think anybody can be that evil, and we
Speaker 2: underestimate the technology that they're capable of. I think when
Speaker 2: we look at these.
Speaker 4: Things, yeah, we want to ascribe to them some level
Speaker 4: of humanity. You know, Well, they're still humans, so obviously
Speaker 4: they share something with us, but they really don't. They
Speaker 4: have no compunction about killing anyone everyone, and that's how
Speaker 4: they managed to get away with it so frequently, because
Speaker 4: we can't believe that they would engage in evil on
Speaker 4: this kind of scale.
Speaker 2: Yes, that's absolutely right. Well, we have some interesting comments
Speaker 2: that were sent to us. Actually, I guess you pick
Speaker 2: these up off of the show the other day, and
Speaker 2: I thought it would go through some of these. One
Speaker 2: of them was I just love this hang on a second.
Speaker 2: One of them says Travis will need his own show,
Speaker 2: and I'd love to see them. I mean, we're very
Speaker 2: very busy, and Travis is very busy trying to get
Speaker 2: the show up after we do it, as well as
Speaker 2: preparing for the show before we do it. So I
Speaker 2: should do that. I don't know what's going on with
Speaker 2: your game show.
Speaker 4: I haven't had time recently. Things have just been so busy.
Speaker 4: Maybe now that we're doing this, I'll be able to
Speaker 4: do it, see if it can. It was fun. It
Speaker 4: was enjoyable just to relax and chat with you guys
Speaker 4: and still get some cool information from you. Lots of
Speaker 4: very interesting people in chat with a lot of great information.
Speaker 2: Yes, and we had a couple of things. This is
Speaker 2: sent to me. I think either you or Lance sent.
Speaker 3: This to me. I think Lance that were yesterday.
Speaker 2: This is don't Fragen me Bro said two days before
Speaker 2: Epstein's asserted death, over five hundred million dollars was transferred
Speaker 2: to an Epstein trust fund. Well, that's the key thing,
Speaker 2: you know, when they look at this. The game that
Speaker 2: they're playing now is the Trump administration is saying that
Speaker 2: we want some particular documents that were part of the
Speaker 2: deposition in the court, and the court is reluctant to
Speaker 2: ever release those kinds of documents. But that's not going
Speaker 2: to tell people what the money trail would tell them,
Speaker 2: and so Trump can play the game and say, well,
Speaker 2: we've asked for this information, but the judge is keeping
Speaker 2: it from being released. But the reality is is that
Speaker 2: what people really need to see is the money trail
Speaker 2: that would show who is being blackmailed by Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 4: Never get to see that. Never.
Speaker 2: Yeah, nice and the Storm said Angry Tiger's interview with Gregory.
Speaker 3: Marinaro was fire.
Speaker 2: Well, I haven't seen that, but I'll just pass it
Speaker 2: on to all of you if you want to see that.
Speaker 2: I'm not even sure who Gregory Marinaro was.
Speaker 4: It sounds like.
Speaker 3: Mannarino, I guess is how it is.
Speaker 5: I just saved a few comments. If it was up
Speaker 5: like a guest recommendation or someone that you might want
Speaker 5: to interview, I save them and then send them at
Speaker 5: the end of the week.
Speaker 2: That's what Okay, good, Yeah and Nicest. Storm also said
Speaker 2: the moon landing was mathematically impossible if you do the
Speaker 2: fuel calculations. There was also not enough physical space for
Speaker 2: the people for the equipment the lunar lander. I've always
Speaker 2: thought about that as well. I had a guy with
Speaker 2: a masters in advanced math. Try to convince me, and
Speaker 2: he was blown away when he looked at all the
Speaker 2: numbers and the specs from NASA's own website.
Speaker 4: Yeah, wait a minute, Wait a minute.
Speaker 5: Also save things that might be like a story lead
Speaker 5: sometimes if.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think, yeah, the more I look at it,
Speaker 2: the less I am, the more convinced that I am
Speaker 2: that that did actually not happen. You know, now the
Speaker 2: Chinese are saying they're going to go to the moon.
Speaker 3: Have at it. But so yeah, we'll see, we'll see
Speaker 3: what happens with that today.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I've got Marky, Mark and j thank you for
Speaker 4: the tip, says with fifteen minute cities being a thing,
Speaker 4: do you think bicycle repair is a good skill to have.
Speaker 4: You might be onto something there.
Speaker 3: That's right, you know, just like the Wright brothers.
Speaker 2: If you learn how to repair bicycles, pretty soon you
Speaker 2: might be able to do a flying machine exactly.
Speaker 4: Brandon Bennett, thank you very much for the tip, says
Speaker 4: Happy birthday, Travis. Well, thank you, Brandon, I really do
Speaker 4: appreciate it. BT Taylor two four to six. In the
Speaker 4: Civil War, the South was not able to get coffee,
Speaker 4: so they made coffee like drinks out of soup, potatoes
Speaker 4: and stuff like that. Interesting, but that was good. I
Speaker 4: try it. Yeah, I'm not overly skeptical. I'll try a
Speaker 4: lot of different things, not bugs, but when it comes
Speaker 4: to food, I'm pretty open minded.
Speaker 5: I wonder if that's where, like the tradition of southern
Speaker 5: super sweet tea came from.
Speaker 4: Interesting. Could be paleo armory. They tried to build the
Speaker 4: largest collider in Texas before it failed miserably. Well, that's good,
Speaker 4: I'm glad to hear that. Knights of the Storm. Fun fact,
Speaker 4: the South Korean mafia made millions making fake Nichols with
Speaker 4: a cheaper material. Wow. Industrious and genius.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and now we have our own governments doing that. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Counterfeiting used to be an act of award like sanctions,
Speaker 2: and now our own government does. The sanctions and the counterfeiting.
Speaker 4: Were beset on all sides. Ratus bro I foiled my
Speaker 4: m I failed my MK ultra courses as a child.
Speaker 4: What are the only interesting things? One of the only
Speaker 4: things I've actually done with AI is I just fed
Speaker 4: in some of the some random things I've written and asked, like,
Speaker 4: based on the psychological evaluation you'd give this person, how
Speaker 4: difficult do you think they'd beat an mk ultra And
Speaker 4: they said it'd be very difficult and very unstable, likely
Speaker 4: to lead to adverse outcomes. So there you go. I'm
Speaker 4: not likely to be mk ultred.
Speaker 3: If the chat program is correct.
Speaker 4: Yeah, who knows, angry tigers. Then one year I went
Speaker 4: to the airport with a friend of mine and put
Speaker 4: up posters about the body scanners. That year I flew
Speaker 4: to Florida. They knew who I was before I pulled
Speaker 4: out my ID. I said, welcome, mister mattee. They promptly
Speaker 4: questioned me in separate rooms and let me go on
Speaker 4: my way. Yeah, it's about intimidation. Yeah, we know who
Speaker 4: you are. You're on our radar.
Speaker 2: You've been noticed, citizen, and not always that line always
Speaker 2: stuck with me seeing you. Yeah, but that line we've
Speaker 2: noticed you, citizen, that came from doctor Shibago. You know,
Speaker 2: he comes back to his home, has been commandeered by
Speaker 2: the local communist official and everything, and the guy's watching him,
Speaker 2: you know, just waiting for him to get angry about
Speaker 2: what they've done to his family and to his possessions
Speaker 2: and everything. He keeps his cool and everything. So finally
Speaker 2: the guy just kind of gives up and looks at him, says,
Speaker 2: you've been noticed, citizen. You know that's one we're ever watched.
Speaker 4: Yeah, you've mentioned it my entire life, but we've never
Speaker 4: actually watched it.
Speaker 3: I don't like that movie. I live in a worldwide.
Speaker 4: But already kind of there. Why would we watch the movie?
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: The other thing about it my parents mentioned and they
Speaker 2: didn't like it because it was the fundamental plot was
Speaker 2: about adultery, you know. And the whole thing is that
Speaker 2: doctor Shivago leaves his wife and and uh, you know
Speaker 2: that's but I that completely went over my head when
Speaker 2: I was a child.
Speaker 3: The thing that stuck with me was the communism. I
Speaker 3: completely missed the adultery staff.
Speaker 4: I don't know what's going on there, but man, these
Speaker 4: communists are awful.
Speaker 3: I don't remember this man and woman's stuff.
Speaker 1: I was just a king.
Speaker 2: Well, thank you for joining us. That's it for today,
Speaker 2: and now we're gonna do something for Travis for his birthday.
Speaker 3: But thank you all. Have a good day.
Speaker 4: Thank you very much for the birthday wishes.
Speaker 3: God bless you all.
Speaker 2: The common man. They created common core and dumbed down
Speaker 2: our children. They created common past track and control us
Speaker 2: their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 2: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 2: unsophisticated ordinary.
Speaker 3: But each of us has worth and dignity created in
Speaker 3: the image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 3: That is what they want to take away.
Speaker 2: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 2: to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 2: It's time to turn that around and expose what they
Speaker 2: want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
Speaker 2: find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Speaker 2: Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
Speaker 2: please keep us in your prayers. The Davidknightshow dot com