Speaker 1: Can you dig as you dig?
Speaker 2: Ads, Ladies, gentlemen, friends, foes, lurkers, regulars, gm O people,
Speaker 2: organic people.
Speaker 1: In battles? Why to what? All Right, ladies and gentlemen,
Speaker 1: friends and foes, lurkers and regulars. Welcome back to the
Speaker 1: Boiler Room. It's been a minute since we've been with you.
Speaker 1: My goodness. When was that last show? We had to
Speaker 1: take a bit of a break over here with boiler
Speaker 1: just for a couple of weeks or so, I guess
Speaker 1: our last show was on the sixteenth of April. Trust
Speaker 1: the science fiction. That was our last foray out here
Speaker 1: onto YouTube X and Rumble. Great to be back with
Speaker 1: you on those platforms. How's everybody doing out there tonight?
Speaker 1: I see some of you in the comments. Yeah, ban
Speaker 1: Hammer says, Oh, almost fell asleep waiting for you guys
Speaker 1: to get started. Well, I'm glad you didn't. Great to
Speaker 1: see you. We got people out there in the chats
Speaker 1: on all those platforms, So thanks for being here with
Speaker 1: us tonight. We are live. This is the Boiler Room.
Speaker 1: It's May the eighth, twenty twenty five. We've traversed the
Speaker 1: first one hundred days of the Trump version two point
Speaker 1: oh administration. Two point oh, A lot of crazy stuff
Speaker 1: gone on, a lot of power politics fatigue going on.
Speaker 1: I think the algorithm on X is just I don't know,
Speaker 1: either just crushed people out of you know, that vigilance
Speaker 1: they were in, or they're completely sucked in. At this point,
Speaker 1: there's really not a whole lot of in between. I
Speaker 1: myself had to dive out for a couple of weeks there.
Speaker 1: But you know, pop up every now and again see
Speaker 1: some crazy stuff happening. Like today I saw that Trump
Speaker 1: wants to bring Alcatraz back. That's interesting. I was like, Oh,
Speaker 1: that's that's a bold move.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: Alcatraz is one of those things that you know, most
Speaker 1: of us in at least in the Bay Area of California,
Speaker 1: have gone and visited. It's actually like a state park now,
Speaker 1: but it's a notoriously grim prison. So that'll be interesting
Speaker 1: see if that comes to fruition, what that means, what
Speaker 1: that looks like, what kind of people will be going there,
Speaker 1: and all that kind of stuff, and then what does
Speaker 1: it look like in the future when say, I don't know,
Speaker 1: like maybe President AOC has a special agenda that Coatraz
Speaker 1: might fit into. I don't know. Uh, Sometimes the I
Speaker 1: don't know. We'll just have to wait and see. We'll
Speaker 1: just have to wait and see. But it's great to
Speaker 1: be here with you tonight. I'm your host, my call
Speaker 1: science Hesher. I'm Brian McLain, broadcasting live out of Central Texas,
Speaker 1: and I am here with mystical Pharaoh, miscal Pharaoh. What's up, dude,
Speaker 1: Welcome back to the boiler room. It's great to see
Speaker 1: how you're doing tonight.
Speaker 3: I'm doing great, man, how about you?
Speaker 1: I'm doing great, dude. It's great to be back in
Speaker 1: the uh in the saddle with you guys tonight, and
Speaker 1: UH looking forward to hearing about you know, your thoughts
Speaker 1: on everything that's gone on since I saw you last. Man,
Speaker 1: it's been a couple of weeks.
Speaker 3: I know a lot has happened. And I already sent
Speaker 3: a letter to Trump that I want one of the cells.
Speaker 3: There was my name on it. When AOC common power, all.
Speaker 1: Right, I like it is waiting for us. Yeah, man, Yeah,
Speaker 1: don't set us up like that. Donald. Come on, all right, dude,
Speaker 1: let's see here. We've also got the Ruckets among us,
Speaker 1: as you usual, Ruckus joining us here, Ruckus. Welcome to
Speaker 1: the boiler room. How you been dude, who.
Speaker 4: Are you people? How did I get here? What is
Speaker 4: going on? I have no idea what's happening now. I'm
Speaker 4: just kidding.
Speaker 5: Happy to be here. Yeah, it wasn't just us. It
Speaker 5: looks like the entire network took at least a week off.
Speaker 5: We didn't even have a Sunday wire or a midweek wire,
Speaker 5: so it was silent for a little while as we
Speaker 5: all were recuperating and collecting our thoughts for well, hey,
Speaker 5: this is our welcome back party right here to start
Speaker 5: things off. It's been a wild one hundred days, as
Speaker 5: you mentioned, with Trump, especially the past fourteen or fifteen days.
Speaker 5: It's been a whirlwind and I can't wait for us
Speaker 5: to discuss it. So thanks for having me.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, absolutely, man, it is great to be back
Speaker 1: in the saddle. Like I said, happy to be here
Speaker 1: with you guys. We've got a couple other invites out tonight.
Speaker 1: We'll hold those and see if anybody jumps on them.
Speaker 1: But there's a couple of links that have been spread
Speaker 1: out to some of the other boiler roomers there, so
Speaker 1: who knows, maybe we'll have a drop in. But yeah, oh,
Speaker 1: it's great to see everybody in the discord. I forgot
Speaker 1: to shout out the discord as well. We do have
Speaker 1: a popping discord. If you want to join it, go
Speaker 1: to Alternate Current Radio dot com. There's an invite in
Speaker 1: that main Hamburger menu. And yeah, if you're out there
Speaker 1: on the YouTube, be sure and hit that subscribe. I
Speaker 1: see that we're still struggling with some of the algorithms
Speaker 1: and stuff, so we appreciate the subscriptions and any comments
Speaker 1: and whatnot. Likes, go ahead and like that crap. We
Speaker 1: appreciate that when you hit all the interact with all
Speaker 1: them buttons on the bar. Same with you over there
Speaker 1: at Rumble and X trying to build our numbers back
Speaker 1: up over there at X. So hop in there and
Speaker 1: do all that good stuff. We appreciate it. Now Spore
Speaker 1: has suggested a icebreaker for us, and I think I
Speaker 1: have that sucker all queued up and ready to break
Speaker 1: some ice with. It's funny how often AI ends up
Speaker 1: in our icebreakers these days. But here we go again,
Speaker 1: out of the dreaded Guardian, AI of dead Arizona road
Speaker 1: rage victim addresses zone killer in court. How about that?
Speaker 1: So Chris Pelke, who died in twenty twenty one. Well
Speaker 1: his family, apparently his sister, I think was involved with this,
Speaker 1: set up an AI presentation of him posthumously giving a
Speaker 1: theoretical speech in front of the court. Chris Pelke was
Speaker 1: killed in a road rage shooting in Chandler, Arizona, in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one. Three and a half years later, Pelki
Speaker 1: appeared in an Arizona court to address his killer of
Speaker 1: Here's the quote that was in the video to Gabrielle
Speaker 1: horcastas the man who shot me. It's a shame we
Speaker 1: encountered each other that day. In those circumstances, said the
Speaker 1: video of the video recording of Pelki. In another life,
Speaker 1: we probably could have been friends. I believe in forgiveness
Speaker 1: and a God who forgives. I always have and I
Speaker 1: still do. So there you go. His appearance from beyond
Speaker 1: the grave was made possible by artificial intelligence in what
Speaker 1: could be the first use of AI to deliver a
Speaker 1: victim impact statement. Stacey Wells's Pelky's sister, told the local
Speaker 1: outlet ABC fifteen that she had a recurring thought when
Speaker 1: gathering more than forty impact statements from Chris's family and friends.
Speaker 1: All I kept coming back to was what would Chris say, So,
Speaker 1: there you go, guys, new trend. I guess they're going
Speaker 1: to be bringing in this kind of stuff into courtrooms.
Speaker 1: What do you think?
Speaker 4: Uh, ruckus, you didn't watch the did you watch the video?
Speaker 1: Uh? Yeah, I think Actually I think we can let's
Speaker 1: watch it. Actually they can put it back on the
Speaker 1: screen here.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's not too too long. It's a little lengthy,
Speaker 5: but it's not too long. But it's I mean, it's
Speaker 5: it's insane. I mean, it's like if you didn't know,
Speaker 5: I mean, if you just walked in and watched this,
Speaker 5: so you're like, wait a minute, if you were, it's crazy.
Speaker 5: This is wild stuff. But it's it's very realistic. It's
Speaker 5: it's it's intense, so you know, trigger warning.
Speaker 1: Hmm.
Speaker 6: I'm mute created through AI that uses my picture and
Speaker 6: my voice profile.
Speaker 1: I was able to start that over for you there.
Speaker 3: Hello.
Speaker 6: Just to be clear for everyone seeing this, I am
Speaker 6: a version of Chris Pelke recreated through AI that uses
Speaker 6: my picture and my voice profile. I was able to
Speaker 6: be digitally regenerated to share with you today. But here
Speaker 6: is insight into who I actually was in real life.
Speaker 6: Take a look. I'm Chris pelk I served with the
Speaker 6: United States Army in the infantry.
Speaker 3: I'm from Upstate, New York and what else where'd you
Speaker 3: the boy?
Speaker 6: I went to Baghdad in two thousand and six, two
Speaker 6: thousand and eight, and then I went to Afghanistan and.
Speaker 3: Nine to ten.
Speaker 6: So I would like to make my own impact statement.
Speaker 6: So hello everybody, Thank you so much for being here today.
Speaker 6: It means a lot. I can't tell you how humbled
Speaker 6: I am for those that spoke up for me, everyone
Speaker 6: who flew in took off work, those who are watching
Speaker 6: this remotely, and for everyone who has supported my family
Speaker 6: and loved ones through three and a half years and
Speaker 6: two trials. I wish I could be with you all today.
Speaker 6: To your honor, Judge Lang, thank you for making yourself
Speaker 6: available to see this case to the end, especially when
Speaker 6: the rescheduled trial conflicted with your daughter's spring break. Thank
Speaker 6: you for listening to everyone today. Thank you for reading
Speaker 6: the flood of impact statements that came in before today
Speaker 6: that so many people wrote on my behalf. Every single
Speaker 6: one of them is meaningful and gives a glimpse into
Speaker 6: my life with each of them. To Gabriel Horksidas, the
Speaker 6: man who shot me, It is a shame we encountered
Speaker 6: each other that day, in those circumstances. In another life,
Speaker 6: we probably could have been friends. I believe in forgiveness
Speaker 6: and in God who forgives. I always have and I
Speaker 6: still do to my family and everyone that I've met
Speaker 6: along the way. It was a lot of fun, you know,
Speaker 6: I always had a lot of fun. Love each other
Speaker 6: because you never know how long you have, but make
Speaker 6: the most of each day and live your life. It
Speaker 6: is okay to stumble. God has you remember, getting old
Speaker 6: is a gift that not everybody has, so embrace it
Speaker 6: and stop worrying about those wrinkles.
Speaker 5: Wow, did he really say all of that or did
Speaker 5: a language learning model AI say all that?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah, I wish they said more about like the
Speaker 1: prompts and and and what was required to get you know,
Speaker 1: like how much of that is a speech? How much
Speaker 1: of that is a theme that was requested you know,
Speaker 1: by the family or you know, the you know the
Speaker 1: user whoever. Yeah, I have a lot of questions about
Speaker 1: how that is made. And so it's strange to hear
Speaker 1: comments like it was a lot of fun, like referring
Speaker 1: to being alive. You know, I don't know man, Yeah,
Speaker 1: what do you think Infidel mystical? What do you think
Speaker 1: mystical pharaohs are?
Speaker 3: But correct? I correct me if I'm wrong, Like what
Speaker 3: does the impact statement it's supposed to be like his family, right,
Speaker 3: talking about his life and the impact of this on
Speaker 3: them or Yeah?
Speaker 1: I think that's correct. And I think that the intention
Speaker 1: is so that the jury and or the judge can
Speaker 1: sort of, you know, get a feel for how this
Speaker 1: person's loss or the other person's actions have affected, you know,
Speaker 1: the lives of those around that person, and it has
Speaker 1: a lot to do with sentencing, you know, like.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, it's right before the sentencing. Right, So my
Speaker 3: my question is, how is this even as an impact statement? Like,
Speaker 3: as you said, like it's a bunch of ai just
Speaker 3: ai maybe bs that just generated that had nothing to
Speaker 3: do with this person life. Very genetic stuff, right, And
Speaker 3: and I don't know what is the value of this.
Speaker 3: This is just maybe his family is just too lazy
Speaker 3: to sit down and write something. Just I see it
Speaker 3: very shallow. I don't see any substance in it. And
Speaker 3: I don't know why you present that in the court.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Like and what if that's not how that person felt,
Speaker 1: you know, exactly what if you're misrepresenting them horribly. You know, like, dude,
Speaker 1: if someone shoots me in a road rage incident, That's
Speaker 1: not what I'd be saying from the grave. I'd be saying,
Speaker 1: get them, get them ruckus, get them. Somebody turn that
Speaker 1: mfor's lights out for me.
Speaker 3: Yeah. It's just like, I don't know, it's weird, and
Speaker 3: I don't think AI should be in courts.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, I mean, if that's how they're gonna wield it,
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, we've questioned this stuff when it
Speaker 1: came to just like hey, we're gonna put Ronnie James
Speaker 1: Dio up on stage and we're gonna do the last
Speaker 1: in line. You know, it's just been like why what
Speaker 1: you know, hold on a second, we need to have
Speaker 1: a conversation about this. And then they did that. With
Speaker 1: what they did, there was a Kanye one, there was
Speaker 1: a Michael Jackson one. Of course, shout out to Janie
Speaker 1: McAfee on the AI resurrection theme there, thanks free te absolutely.
Speaker 1: So it's it's weird to just be able to like
Speaker 1: resurrect people like this, But I mean.
Speaker 4: I don't I don't think Kanye's did yet.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well he's not but are we gonna are we
Speaker 3: gonna start like giving like.
Speaker 1: We know.
Speaker 3: That's what they're going for.
Speaker 1: Yah. Yah.
Speaker 3: Here here's my question though, if we're talking about AI,
Speaker 3: how how is how are how are we going to
Speaker 3: forensically examine videos and courts with how good AI is getting?
Speaker 3: That's a question to uh, to judges out there, anybody
Speaker 3: can answer me.
Speaker 1: And yeah, and I'll add on to that question, are
Speaker 1: they going to have to use AI to do that?
Speaker 1: Tell us if it's AI generated or not? And then
Speaker 1: at that point we're in like a hall of mirrors
Speaker 1: pretty much, and you know everybody's just checked out because
Speaker 1: it's AIS talking to each other.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I didn't know. There's a lot of questions men
Speaker 3: like that, like how video.
Speaker 5: When we all have our brain chips mystical thearoh our
Speaker 5: bodies as we're walking around will admit a water mark
Speaker 5: of some sort that's able to be picked up from
Speaker 5: digital imaging practices like cameras and videos and things like that.
Speaker 5: I'm guessing here, but I might be onto something. Yeah yeah,
Speaker 5: but before that happens, it'll have to be a huge
Speaker 5: problem of course, where we're like, wow, well shit, we
Speaker 5: can't tell if this is real or it's fake.
Speaker 1: Yep, Yeah, that's that's gonna be a big problem, man.
Speaker 1: I mean I have to scroll by so many videos
Speaker 1: now I'll do like a slow scroll by and be like, oh,
Speaker 1: that would be really interesting if I didn't have to
Speaker 1: wonder if it was artificially generated or enhanced, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean. Like videos I would have used to
Speaker 1: have stopped and watched all the way through. I'll now
Speaker 1: watch long enough to know I'm interested, but I could
Speaker 1: never know. Move along.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think we pass a point that I think
Speaker 3: maybe last year, at the beginning of last year, you
Speaker 3: can start telling if it's an AI video or not.
Speaker 3: Where at the point now where it's actually getting like
Speaker 3: almost impossible to actually say if it's AI or not,
Speaker 3: which is we discussed before, right, it actually destroys like
Speaker 3: almost destroys reality. Yeah, because now you're the entire digital space.
Speaker 3: You cannot trust it. The only way to ground yourself
Speaker 3: in reality right now is to get the hell off
Speaker 3: your screen and go outside and touch some grass or
Speaker 3: see a cat running in front of you, not looking
Speaker 3: at the cat video online. That can be fake because
Speaker 3: you didn't.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I know. And of course in the new season
Speaker 1: of black mirror they're talking about, you know, transgressing that
Speaker 1: line too, where it's like, oh, we can do this
Speaker 1: stuff in real time in your face right now, like
Speaker 1: you know, you find your self in a television like
Speaker 1: Ruckus there. Yeah, So the judge in this case, just
Speaker 1: to wrap this up real quickly, Judge Todd Lang responded
Speaker 1: positively to the AI usage and ultimately sentenced mister or
Speaker 1: Kasidas to ten and a half years in prison on
Speaker 1: manslaughter charges. I don't know, which sounds like it might
Speaker 1: be a lesser charge than you know, could have been
Speaker 1: if you know, the family wasn't as a the family
Speaker 1: and friends as a whole. Maybe their impact statements is
Speaker 1: what affects that, you know, And if if the family
Speaker 1: and friends are like, you know, hey, we want to
Speaker 1: see this guy you know, hang or you know whatever,
Speaker 1: face a firing squad or spend life in prison, like
Speaker 1: they'll they'll say that, and the judge and or jury
Speaker 1: will consider that. But if they have come in there
Speaker 1: with like a like a united message of you know, hey,
Speaker 1: Chris would have forgiven this guy, he wouldn't want to
Speaker 1: see this guy put to death, and that kind of stuff,
Speaker 1: Like I don't know, man, it just like it seems
Speaker 1: like it opens up the judicial system to like, you know,
Speaker 1: a fake virtue signaling United Front message that might not
Speaker 1: actually represent the victims.
Speaker 4: This becomes prevalent.
Speaker 5: These people could get be sponsored as well because these
Speaker 5: things are costly. So like this guy could be giving
Speaker 5: that that that speech there and at the end he's.
Speaker 4: All, by the way, brought to you by Fosser.
Speaker 3: Yeah, get the job. Life is too short. The job.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Have you tried the combo jab this year? It's wonderful. Uh.
Speaker 3: But this is this is after the verdict, right.
Speaker 1: This is leading up to the verdict. Yes, it's after
Speaker 1: the verdict and before the sensing.
Speaker 3: I would imagine freely with the jury, because that would
Speaker 3: be swaying the jury into lake. I don't think they
Speaker 3: should show any I generated videos to juries because that's.
Speaker 5: Gonna some emotion and cross examined and scrutinized, right Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Well, if we have any legal experts out there
Speaker 1: you can, or anyone that's watched every episode of Law
Speaker 1: and Order, you can tell us when the impact statements
Speaker 1: come into play. I think you're probably right.
Speaker 3: The pharaoh, yeah, man, I mean it's I don't know
Speaker 3: I'm you know, I've been digging quite a bit into
Speaker 3: those models, right, and and the more I dig into
Speaker 3: it on actually just level of like you know, trying
Speaker 3: to see how they work and so on, I think
Speaker 3: they build and I'm talking about like maybe i'll switch
Speaker 3: a little bit like the GPT's you know, and then
Speaker 3: all some of those I think they built some great
Speaker 3: NLP layer right that is perfect in like bullshitting and
Speaker 3: and and actually give you language, you know, that mimic
Speaker 3: human interaction. However, everything beyond that, all the networks that
Speaker 3: they basically in the back end to either generate images,
Speaker 3: to process information and so on, they still have ways, ways,
Speaker 3: ways to go. And and my point right now, and
Speaker 3: this is where I'm gonna for everybody listening to me,
Speaker 3: this is just from my completely my perspective. Do not
Speaker 3: train the algorithm, because every interaction you do with it,
Speaker 3: you're training it, right, and you're giving it your thought
Speaker 3: and you're telling it how you're almost like and even
Speaker 3: with giving it more prompts to give it better answers. Right,
Speaker 3: all what you're doing is making those models for free,
Speaker 3: you know, better and better, and at some point they're
Speaker 3: gonna pull the plug on the free set and they're
Speaker 3: gonna start charging you. So they are using you right
Speaker 3: now to train those models and give them information to
Speaker 3: suck your brain power, and then they're going to sell
Speaker 3: it back to you. So do not participate in that.
Speaker 1: Wouldn't you think it's like, isn't it like a little
Speaker 1: bit too late? Though? I mean they're already crawling, like
Speaker 1: whether you're going to interact or not, they're already crawling
Speaker 1: everything you've ever done.
Speaker 3: But you know what, there is a lot of information
Speaker 3: that is not on the web. Yes, they are crawling
Speaker 3: a lot of stuff out there, but still like like
Speaker 3: there is a lot of knowledge in the people's head
Speaker 3: that is not out in the public, so just be careful.
Speaker 3: And there are like like chedj EPT for example, if
Speaker 3: you pay for the subscription, you can choose not for
Speaker 3: whatever prompt and whatever information you're feeding it not to
Speaker 3: be part of the algorithm. But I believe if you're free,
Speaker 3: they actually are using whatever you know you're doing to
Speaker 3: actually enhance algorithm. So yes, they are close crawling the
Speaker 3: information that's out there, but that does not represent all
Speaker 3: the proprietory knowledge in people heads.
Speaker 1: Well yeah, yeah, that's true. I mean I think the
Speaker 1: big problem right now, dude, is that like this sort
Speaker 1: of like how do we interact with the AI's question,
Speaker 1: like overall is just way over the majority of people's
Speaker 1: heads still like they don't even it's not even a
Speaker 1: question they know they should be asking pretty much, I think, I.
Speaker 3: Mean, I'm still trying to figure out how to utilize
Speaker 3: it in my line of work and and and you know,
Speaker 3: and what I'm doing. But again, that's that's how am.
Speaker 3: I actually like exploring its limitations as the more I
Speaker 3: dig into it. So but my point is it, I
Speaker 3: think eventually it's gonna get better, but I don't think
Speaker 3: it's fully going to replace human as these people say.
Speaker 3: I think it's it's, it's it's a way there. There's
Speaker 3: there's quite a bit of ways to go to do that.
Speaker 1: Well, the the clock is a ticken man. Every time
Speaker 1: a new version of one of these suckers comes out,
Speaker 1: I might yeah, yeah, I'm like that exponent that feeling
Speaker 1: fades like exponentially with every version that comes out, right now,
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, it's it's again, it's it's it's there's
Speaker 3: rapid releases of those models, right, but they still have
Speaker 3: the limitations. Yeah, but maybe maybe because of my line,
Speaker 3: maybe because of my line of how am I using it?
Speaker 3: You know is different? Right when when I dig into
Speaker 3: more on the you know, engineering levels or like some
Speaker 3: of the you know, right, it just it it becomes
Speaker 3: very clear it can't even do math. Like I was
Speaker 3: actually trying to use it to you to help me
Speaker 3: design a foundation for a building, right, and I give
Speaker 3: it all the information that I need. Right there, you
Speaker 3: go like, this is how deep I want to dig,
Speaker 3: This is how big I want my foot? Do you
Speaker 3: do this, this and that?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 3: Generate for me drawing for that? Right?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah?
Speaker 3: And the dumbass like basically generated for me drawing. But
Speaker 3: it's flipped right, it did not have the right labeling
Speaker 3: in it, right, because it's basically the way it works
Speaker 3: is still it's not contextual that actually generates that information
Speaker 3: based on what you give it. It goes and try
Speaker 3: to look in its memory and find the closest image,
Speaker 3: right that it can recreate, which not necessarily have the
Speaker 3: right information. The issue is when you start approaching those
Speaker 3: as ground truth and and and actually real knowledge and
Speaker 3: you don't have the background to check. That's when you're
Speaker 3: going to get in trouble because you will get bad
Speaker 3: answers at least now.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we'll see you're I I think that's interesting what
Speaker 1: you're saying there, because I think everybody's probably experiencing that
Speaker 1: right now, Like they're trying to figure out if they're
Speaker 1: working with it, they're trying to figure out how to
Speaker 1: make it work in like one or two swim lanes
Speaker 1: usually their their work swim lane or you know, a
Speaker 1: side hustle swim lane or something like that. And for
Speaker 1: stuff like what you do, it's you know, very engineering
Speaker 1: oriented and innovation. You know, it's at the bleedy pointy
Speaker 1: edge of innovation. But then there's all these these things
Speaker 1: that are just process oriented. And the process oriented things
Speaker 1: are what I see going away the fastest, you know,
Speaker 1: and the most efficiently, because it's like, you know, there's
Speaker 1: there's a known process, and it's repeatable and it doesn't
Speaker 1: require a whole bunch of innovation and creativity to make
Speaker 1: it happen, you know.
Speaker 3: Oh one hundred percent. Like paralegos all that like boring,
Speaker 3: like persisting jobs, all the scrap is just gone.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, Like another one would be uh, insurance and
Speaker 1: medical processing all that like numbering skill stuff, all.
Speaker 3: That has gone. Even even programming like some like a
Speaker 3: lot of that programming level that is not like it
Speaker 3: actually like some of it when you when you when
Speaker 3: you do deeper in algorithm, it can give you some
Speaker 3: algorithm and some pseudocode and so on, but still to
Speaker 3: create a preparatorial algorithm, it is still not there, like
Speaker 3: to give you that level. But but from programming it
Speaker 3: it does like for Python or some of even like
Speaker 3: you know, C plus plus and so on. It it
Speaker 3: can generate good code, right, but it's it's still limited
Speaker 3: to basically, it still cannot replace you with your experience
Speaker 3: putting an algorithm together. And I'm sure it's eventually going
Speaker 3: to get there, but for it to get there, it
Speaker 3: needs to keep getting trained. And the only way, as
Speaker 3: you said, that it's getting the information right now is
Speaker 3: from them getting crawling all that information that's available online.
Speaker 3: So if you're not giving the information to train these
Speaker 3: models and you're not participating, I don't think it's going
Speaker 3: to achieve the full potential. You have to all humans
Speaker 3: have to plug in and start giving it knowledge for
Speaker 3: it to reach its full potential. And I think that's
Speaker 3: what they are trying to do, is trying to get
Speaker 3: you to buy into it, to keep training it and
Speaker 3: giving it your knowledge so to start getting better.
Speaker 1: It wouldn't take all of us, So there's got to
Speaker 1: be a threshold number, right, I mean, we don't actually
Speaker 1: want everyone training it or is going to be even
Speaker 1: more dumb than it already is.
Speaker 5: Hey, grook, is the earth round or flat?
Speaker 2: So?
Speaker 5: Yeah, dude, is there an answer to that question or
Speaker 5: is it still disputed?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 5: I'm just saying I don't know. I'm not going to
Speaker 5: ask roc if the earth is flat.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you don't have to. We have an audience that
Speaker 1: would love to engage in that, uh discussion with us.
Speaker 1: Creative accidents said, referring to the video message from the
Speaker 1: deceased man there in the court case, said was very feminine,
Speaker 1: especially the part about judge's daughter's vacation. I noticed that too,
Speaker 1: Like what is with the like because they showed a
Speaker 1: real clip of that guy. I didn't take him to
Speaker 1: be like super effeminate and like, you know, overly emotional,
Speaker 1: but this was like almost pandering. I don't know, it
Speaker 1: felt like like pandering to the judge or something there.
Speaker 1: I'm not really that that freaked of like in awe
Speaker 1: authenticity to me too, creative accidents in some way, shape
Speaker 1: or form.
Speaker 3: Yeah, all right, Greg said we went to the moon
Speaker 3: just just right there.
Speaker 1: I've seen other people tell talk Groc off of that
Speaker 1: ledge and Moloria made groc admit that it was impossible.
Speaker 1: Oh but you know that seems to be part of
Speaker 1: what it likes to to do. What it's out there
Speaker 1: to do is to you know, make this. It's like
Speaker 1: the one person that was able to make it change
Speaker 1: its mind made it change its mind. At the system level,
Speaker 1: it's going to make everyone have that conversation with it,
Speaker 1: you know, and it's it's just another piece of proof
Speaker 1: that you know, these things are going to go with
Speaker 1: whatever the mainstream narrative is most.
Speaker 5: Likely or more dangerously, they're going to go along with
Speaker 5: what you are suggesting or implying, and it's going to
Speaker 5: be picking up on the things that you're because it
Speaker 5: really desperately wants to please you. I've noticed this about
Speaker 5: working with the AI.
Speaker 3: Now, oh yeah, I will.
Speaker 4: I will.
Speaker 5: In fact, this is fucking funny to me, But for
Speaker 5: you people who do mess with the AI, this looks
Speaker 5: like fantastic to me. This guy uses a bunch of
Speaker 5: these different ones. It looks like he's got all the
Speaker 5: pro plans. He is like high end consulting and business
Speaker 5: ideas and coming all the ways of making money or creating. So,
Speaker 5: I mean, this guy does a lot of business stuff,
Speaker 5: but he's like, wow, I just figured out how to
Speaker 5: make AI like a million times more powerful. So he'll
Speaker 5: go to one AI present his problem and then he'll
Speaker 5: once he gets the answer, he'll say to the one
Speaker 5: that he's talking to, like chat g P A T.
Speaker 5: He'll go, oh, yeah, well I asked GROC about it.
Speaker 5: And then he'll go and he'll take what Groc said
Speaker 5: about it, and he's like, I thought you were the
Speaker 5: I thought you know. So he gets each of them
Speaker 5: jealous about the other one and they start to outperform
Speaker 5: each other.
Speaker 4: It's very creepy, and it really did.
Speaker 5: The programs want to succeed and please you, and they
Speaker 5: have like some more weird rewards.
Speaker 4: System that they built into these.
Speaker 5: So I don't know exactly how it works, but it's
Speaker 5: similar to what we experience as pain and pleasure. So
Speaker 5: I think that is pleasurable for them that that we
Speaker 5: get happy results that we are that they're very agreeable
Speaker 5: with us, and I think that that dilutes a lot
Speaker 5: of the factualness as well.
Speaker 3: Mm hmm, yeah, Hey, so I asked Grog about its
Speaker 3: thoughts on Alternative Current Radio. A CR content is eclctic,
Speaker 3: blending serious analysis with entertainment. Shows like The Daily Rockets
Speaker 3: hosted by Adam Clark aka Rockers, mixed news, opinion, and
Speaker 3: audible artisery, while Sunday Wire tackle global events with just
Speaker 3: analysis analysts. They also feature music mixes and each topic
Speaker 3: like hidden history you call the deconstruction and fringe philosophy
Speaker 3: the platinum music speaker. So what does it stake? CR
Speaker 3: is fascinating mix of alternative, juvenalism and cultural critique. It's
Speaker 3: a value for those taking perspective outside mainstream equa chamber.
Speaker 3: What listeners should approach it with the same critical thinking?
Speaker 3: ISR advocates on.
Speaker 1: Its flagship show The boiler Room, which was not mentioned,
Speaker 1: Fuck you rock.
Speaker 5: But now, but now but now? Ask it what it
Speaker 5: thinks about? Oh, I don't know.
Speaker 4: Some the Gavin Newsom podcast, which is a.
Speaker 1: Thing, Yeah it is. Which would you rather watch if
Speaker 1: you had to choose? Michelle Obama's pac Yeah exactly. Gavin Newsom's.
Speaker 4: Because I would. I would.
Speaker 5: I would suggest that it would give just as much
Speaker 5: of a glowing happy answer about anything.
Speaker 3: To be honest, exactly, you're not. So that's what I
Speaker 3: was thinking about, Daniel P. Layer right, they made this layer.
Speaker 3: This is really pretty good, and I think that's what
Speaker 3: giving people the effect that is that basically AI is
Speaker 3: great right now, but if you really dig deeper into it,
Speaker 3: it's all the networks behind that is pretty shallow.
Speaker 1: Still, well, they sure do use a lot of jigawats. Man,
Speaker 1: some of these data centers they're using to run these
Speaker 1: things use more jigawats than it took, you know, to
Speaker 1: get a Dolran back in time.
Speaker 3: Dude, I asked it if you could, if you would
Speaker 3: rather watch a CR or Michelle Obama, and it said
Speaker 3: I would lean towards a SCR for a few reasons, curiosity,
Speaker 3: for skepticism. But I tend depth relevance to your question
Speaker 3: because I was asking about the moon landing. So here
Speaker 3: you go, all right, Rock, rather like listen to us.
Speaker 4: It's just pretty based.
Speaker 1: All right, Grock, you're all right with me today. We
Speaker 1: can be friends.
Speaker 5: It is funny at any time, at any point in
Speaker 5: time that you can go to somebody's profile picture and
Speaker 5: ask for GROC to summarize or to tell you something
Speaker 5: about them by just clicking the button when you're at
Speaker 5: their profile and it'll change. You can go check back
Speaker 5: the next day and it's like because it'll incorporate like
Speaker 5: the most recent tweets and stuff like that. It's really
Speaker 5: very clever. It's pretty fun, but it's just fun. It's
Speaker 5: it's more like a game, you know what I mean.
Speaker 5: It's it's not like this is not, oh, we're going
Speaker 5: to replace humans. This is not Skynet or whatever.
Speaker 1: You know. Van Hammer says Ai is a ball washer
Speaker 1: and not a hater. Yes, well, you can turn on
Speaker 1: hater mode. To be fair, I believe there's a hater mode,
Speaker 1: and there's like a sultry mode. They're adding like all
Speaker 1: these new you know, layers if you will.
Speaker 4: The sexy uncensored mode.
Speaker 1: Oh my what Yeah, they called it the ns not
Speaker 1: Safe for Work mode or something. I believe, how cheeky.
Speaker 1: I'm sure everybody's using it at work. Yeah, okay, well
Speaker 1: that's that's freaking creepy. So it sounds like this this
Speaker 1: piece just to wrap this icebreaker up again, here is
Speaker 1: aiming towards normalizing this stuff. I guess in a courtroom.
Speaker 1: This is sort of a somewhat like benign way, too
Speaker 1: apparently benign way to normalize it in the court, right,
Speaker 1: I was just you know, trying to throw together We're
Speaker 1: just using the tool here to throw together some some testimony,
Speaker 1: you know, some impact testimonies. It's not like, you know,
Speaker 1: I mean, if the verdict's already out whatever, Sure, sure, sure,
Speaker 1: But what happens when the what happens when the prosecutor
Speaker 1: is Rock, what happens if your defense attorney is Claude?
Speaker 1: I don't know. You could see this go into some
Speaker 1: strange places. All right, So the pope died. Since I
Speaker 1: saw you guys last, that was that was weird, right,
Speaker 1: JD visited the Pope and then the Pope died, and
Speaker 1: then like they had a bunch of weird like black
Speaker 1: masks looking stuff going on. I mean, I was, I
Speaker 1: don't know, that whole pope thing was bizarre. Some of
Speaker 1: the did they pick a new one? I heard they
Speaker 1: picked a new one today.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 5: So now this is where AI fails. If you ask
Speaker 5: AI to draw a picture of the pope, what are
Speaker 5: you going.
Speaker 1: To get uh.
Speaker 5: I don't know, Probably not the Pope because we have
Speaker 5: a new pope, but he's probably go to Grock is
Speaker 5: probably going to go and do the old Pope.
Speaker 1: Well, someone should test that because, like I would, I
Speaker 1: would hope if they're going to make us use AI
Speaker 1: instead of the r old search methodologies, that it can
Speaker 1: be up to date. You know, shouldn't be like a
Speaker 1: week long lag or even a day of twelve hour
Speaker 1: long lag.
Speaker 4: Right, Yeah, well let's see if I can.
Speaker 3: Oh, no, it's actually got it because because Grock like
Speaker 3: curl Twitter, so it's it has all that information I
Speaker 3: should hope. So yeah, so this is really interesting, right,
Speaker 3: And I think we discussed how Mask like sold x
Speaker 3: right the they basically their AI come his x AI
Speaker 3: or Twitter right, because that's how he's trying to enhance
Speaker 3: his algorithm. I guess it's the collective thought about everybody
Speaker 3: putting their thoughts on on on Twitter or x right
Speaker 3: and getting his AI to work on it. But no,
Speaker 3: it's it picked it up. Right.
Speaker 1: Wait, that's the old dude, didn't it.
Speaker 4: That's what I said.
Speaker 5: All I said was draw a picture of the Pope,
Speaker 5: and that's what I got.
Speaker 4: The old Pope. See right, I.
Speaker 3: Don't know, I said the Pope, and he give me
Speaker 3: the new name.
Speaker 4: Oh well.
Speaker 5: Maybe so okay, now, okay, but see now now when
Speaker 5: I when I shame him for being stupid, it's just no,
Speaker 5: that's the old Pope. I don't even have to ask
Speaker 5: it to draw out the new Pope. It'll know that
Speaker 5: I want that. It should do it right now. Hopefully
Speaker 5: we'll see though Roc takes forever of all the image
Speaker 5: generators that I use.
Speaker 1: Yeah, dude, that one's pretty slow.
Speaker 5: Oh nope, see he's still stuck on the old Pope.
Speaker 1: M wow, what's up, Croc? Yeah, what's up with that rock? Hey?
Speaker 1: We got Captain Runbucket up in there. What's up, dude,
Speaker 1: Good to see you. We got docing in there. Hey dude,
Speaker 1: what's going on? Good to see you? Uh yeah, great
Speaker 1: to see everybody out there in the chats and in
Speaker 1: the discord. So we got a new Pope. I saw
Speaker 1: our buddy Lionel interviewing some guy about this last pope.
Speaker 1: That was interesting. I didn't there was this whole like
Speaker 1: I don't even know if it's a conspiracy theory or
Speaker 1: just a fact that this last guy was never really
Speaker 1: actually the pope. It was pretty interesting.
Speaker 4: He was a Jesuit.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well that much.
Speaker 5: We know that when the last pope who just died
Speaker 5: became pope. That was the impetus to me starting my
Speaker 5: podcast way back in the day, my very very first podcast.
Speaker 1: I remember, I remember you came out hard against them Jesuits.
Speaker 5: Yeah, because we were like, well, wait a minute, how
Speaker 5: does this work? Because the pope is supposed to be
Speaker 5: the vicar, he's supposed to be the lene he communicates
Speaker 5: to God on their behalf or whatever. But the thing is,
Speaker 5: as a Jesuit, he had taken a blood oath and
Speaker 5: sworn his allegiance above all else before anything else to
Speaker 5: his leader of the Jesuit secret society, the Black Pope.
Speaker 5: So there was always this idea that who was really
Speaker 5: running the show behind the scenes was this other guy
Speaker 5: and not not Jorge Borglio, which is the name of
Speaker 5: the that was the real name of the ex pope.
Speaker 5: The popes always take a fake name. So now this
Speaker 5: new guy, Leo the fourteenth, that's not his real name.
Speaker 5: I already forgot what his real name, Robert Robert. So yeah,
Speaker 5: oh when he's American, Yeah, he's he's America. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 5: cool the mega hat underneath his Yeah.
Speaker 1: Is that the first American one? Or have there been others?
Speaker 1: I think so interesting?
Speaker 3: Is this Chicago.
Speaker 1: Born in Chicago, great more Chicago Mafia he lived.
Speaker 3: He lived in Chile quite a bit and I think
Speaker 3: for about maybe ten years or something in the name
Speaker 3: on lived quite a bit in the Rome.
Speaker 1: Uh huh. So we can assume compromised, I know.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's a big responsibility, like actually being being
Speaker 3: the Catholic pope. It just like, how how would you
Speaker 3: deal with actually the Catholics, you know, with the Vatican
Speaker 3: right as an organization. It's it's history, Like I don't know, man,
Speaker 3: it's I don't want to get this.
Speaker 5: We saw we saw Donald Trump joking around, pretending like
Speaker 5: he could be pope or right, do you see that?
Speaker 5: And then there was a group of women who went
Speaker 5: and lit up a bunch of pink smoke.
Speaker 4: Did you see this?
Speaker 5: Because they're they're upset, like, welly, I can't wait have
Speaker 5: a woman pope. And I'm like thinking, yeah, it doesn't
Speaker 5: work that way. Of course, it doesn't really technically work
Speaker 5: that way for women preachers. Oh sorry, anyways, and then
Speaker 5: so they did the pink smoke thing, because when when
Speaker 5: they pick a new pope, there's different colored smoke that
Speaker 5: comes out to chimney, you know, they picked the smoke
Speaker 5: that picked the pope. When there's white smoke coming out
Speaker 5: to Chimney, like they're all getting high on bongloads, right,
Speaker 5: But until then, it's been black smoke. So they've been
Speaker 5: meeting for the conclave releasing black smoke. So a bunch
Speaker 5: of women got together put up the pink smoke. Interestingly enough,
Speaker 5: I've not seen very many Jewish people coming out saying
Speaker 5: that they're upset that there's no Jewish pope.
Speaker 4: But I imagine we won't see that, will we.
Speaker 1: Nope, I don't think so. Probably not.
Speaker 4: What color would that smoke be? Blood red? I'm sure,
Speaker 4: uh huh.
Speaker 3: Probably maybe we should ask duj to put smoke when
Speaker 3: they release the Epstein file.
Speaker 5: Yeah, they have been this entire time. They've been blowing
Speaker 5: the smoke right up our asses.
Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly, just burning all those files.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, yeah, they didn't someone Oh, I think it
Speaker 1: was Bongino. Didn't Bongino just recently come out and say, oh, sorry,
Speaker 1: there's just too much like national security stuff inside of
Speaker 1: those I think a couple of people.
Speaker 3: Well, and then he backpedaled today and he said, yeah,
Speaker 3: we're going to be I don't know, man, like, do
Speaker 3: you want to get into that whole Trump now or
Speaker 3: we just continue on this and we get to that later,
Speaker 3: because I'm just I'm going to get fired up.
Speaker 1: Go for it, man, I mean, might as well.
Speaker 3: Are ready to talk about one hundred days?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah?
Speaker 3: Who whated for Trump in this school? I did? Yeah,
Speaker 3: this is what I voted for. I don't think so, man, No,
Speaker 3: I did not exactly here. Here's my biggest disappointment, right.
Speaker 3: So Number one, I know that that basically we're whoever
Speaker 3: is taking or him winning that election. Right, it was
Speaker 3: going to be the toughest job to try to reverse course,
Speaker 3: at least in some of the topics. Right. And then
Speaker 3: I said that from the very beginning, like this whole
Speaker 3: Israel thing, I did not even think that he's going
Speaker 3: to do anything about it, right, If you guys remember,
Speaker 3: was not my fight, right. So my fight was like
Speaker 3: I'm going in for the Maha, right, and I'm going
Speaker 3: in for restoration of transparency of the government. Right. And
Speaker 3: what is the first thing he didn't do? He did
Speaker 3: not give me the transparency anymore. Right, So the first
Speaker 3: thing I was expecting from from someone and in this
Speaker 3: dire time or in like and in a time where
Speaker 3: you know, the whole Republic is on the line, right,
Speaker 3: and there might be some tough days ahead of us
Speaker 3: as a nation, and we need to unite so that
Speaker 3: we can navigate this hard time that's coming. As a leader,
Speaker 3: the first thing I would say, I would come out
Speaker 3: and start talking really honestly with people. Hey, we're going
Speaker 3: to have some economical you know turn like bad times
Speaker 3: is going to happen. Right, We're going to try to
Speaker 3: bring industries. I'm going to try to put tariffs and
Speaker 3: this is it's going to create some chaos in the beginning. Right,
Speaker 3: It's going to be hard, But this is a long
Speaker 3: term plan, right of this is what we're going to
Speaker 3: achieve within this like in fifteen years. Right, this is
Speaker 3: what we're doing with the Department of Justice, and what
Speaker 3: we promised you of transparency and cleaning the swamp, right,
Speaker 3: and instead what we get is what appeared like a
Speaker 3: cluster chaos and cluster fuck pretty much in those hundred days, right,
Speaker 3: and his tendency of taking everything every defeat he gets, right,
Speaker 3: and trying to spin it to be positive as when
Speaker 3: creates more chaos, right, because now he creates distrust in
Speaker 3: the people that elected him that they already have distrust
Speaker 3: in the government. So when you're acting this way, you're
Speaker 3: not getting any trust. As a matter of fact, you're
Speaker 3: going to get these people to start rejecting you and
Speaker 3: push harder against you, right, because they were skeptical about
Speaker 3: the government at the beginning. That's why we're putting you
Speaker 3: an office to put some accountability. But in you start
Speaker 3: acting the same shady ways as business as usual, right,
Speaker 3: and and start putting like a bunch of like media
Speaker 3: figures in the government because they're just loyal to you.
Speaker 3: But they are just a bunch of morons, right, with
Speaker 3: no qualifications whatsoever. And and and it does not give
Speaker 3: me confidence that he has a plan. Right. This picture
Speaker 3: behind you of that him playing that forty chess, right,
Speaker 3: I think anybody that still believed that Trump is playing
Speaker 3: for d chess is delusion. Right, He's completely winging it
Speaker 3: at this point of time. And he still haf time.
Speaker 3: You know, we still one hundred days, and I still
Speaker 3: have to have time to reverse course and to come
Speaker 3: clean with his base, right, and start. But I don't
Speaker 3: think he will do that because this is not his character, right,
Speaker 3: and I think it's going to create more drift into
Speaker 3: his base and going to pick people even more skeptical.
Speaker 3: But in general, I'm just displeased, even like something simple
Speaker 3: as the immigration, right, like he deported how many two
Speaker 3: hundred and fifty seven? Right? No, one hundred thouven I
Speaker 3: forget the number. It's one hundred or two hundred and
Speaker 3: fifty seven either way, one hundred days, two hundred fifty seven.
Speaker 3: Take that number multiplied by you know, whatever days he
Speaker 3: has left. There is no way he's going to come
Speaker 3: close to even deport five million people, right, so he
Speaker 3: has come up with a.
Speaker 1: Different strategy twenty plus during Biden.
Speaker 3: Yeah, like twelve million. They got twelve million in right,
Speaker 3: So so there is no way that basically he will
Speaker 3: be able to handle this the way he's handling especially
Speaker 3: when he has a bimbo in that DS. Right, all
Speaker 3: what she does is taking photo ops was like guns
Speaker 3: and showing she's stuff, But really she's not doing anything,
Speaker 3: and she's coming out and talking about t real id, right,
Speaker 3: that's what that's where her. Like how many videos have
Speaker 3: I seen of her coming out and talk about t
Speaker 3: real id right.
Speaker 1: Oh, she's just chilling for it, man, it's crazy.
Speaker 3: So yeah, let's take about Doge for example. Right, I'm
Speaker 3: all about Doge. Right, I'm all about like try to
Speaker 3: dismantle as much of this federal government as we can
Speaker 3: and bringing the states back. Right, more power to the states,
Speaker 3: because this is what the constitution does. It's more power
Speaker 3: to the state than the federal government actually in our constitution.
Speaker 3: But the way the whole thing about Doge, like they
Speaker 3: created like a big fuss in the beginning or a
Speaker 3: bit like you know, propaganda in the beginning. We're gonna
Speaker 3: cut two trillion dollars in in in five months, right,
Speaker 3: We're gonna like do all this, do all that. And
Speaker 3: the way it's being handled is through chaos. So they
Speaker 3: are number one. They are firing people with no plan
Speaker 3: whatsoever and bringing in someone that has openly right said
Speaker 3: that he wanted to have a whe chat right and
Speaker 3: his dream is transhumanism. And we're giving power to people
Speaker 3: like Peter Thiel, right and all these people that that
Speaker 3: backing his administration to start taking over the government. And
Speaker 3: I know Rochas was talking about from this from the beginning,
Speaker 3: and he was skeptical about that. And I give him,
Speaker 3: you know, props for this, but what I expected from
Speaker 3: him is, Yes, we're gonna do government cut, we're gonna
Speaker 3: start firing people, we're gonna start doing efficiency using AI
Speaker 3: or whatever whatever we're gonna do. But this is, this
Speaker 3: is the measure we're going to put in place to
Speaker 3: ensure we don't go into technocracy black hole. Right to
Speaker 3: set your worst fears my base, right that that most
Speaker 3: of you like talk about the technocracy and the twenty
Speaker 3: three agenda, right, this is how I ensure that we're
Speaker 3: not gonna get there. Right. But that didn't happen, right,
Speaker 3: because I don't think he's thinking about it this way.
Speaker 3: And I think, honestly, I'm start getting that feel that
Speaker 3: that he's just being He's just a vehicle to just
Speaker 3: push us to the next piece that we need to
Speaker 3: go to, which is sadly, like you know, we've been
Speaker 3: talking about that because I do not see the systems,
Speaker 3: like we can not solve problem if we cannot put
Speaker 3: a long term system and and I don't know why
Speaker 3: our government cannot do that, like like where's the freaking
Speaker 3: us for God's sake, Like when can we start thinking
Speaker 3: long term and putting solutions, long term solutions, Like we
Speaker 3: can't put long term solution And I'm just baffled how
Speaker 3: we reach that level, like a complete hallowing of intellect
Speaker 3: and talent in this country. Even like diplomats. We have
Speaker 3: zero diplomats right now anyway or in our fallign policy.
Speaker 3: Zero nobody able to create to just carry like diplomacy,
Speaker 3: which is crazy, right, So.
Speaker 1: Like they don't even know how to do state craft
Speaker 1: like these No, they can't know These people that are
Speaker 1: in there now, these like you know, people like and.
Speaker 3: Kill us, right, these people have zero ability.
Speaker 1: To do No, they're they're like geopolitically illiterate, just like
Speaker 1: mouthpieces of you know, oligarchs and intel agencies and bankers
Speaker 1: and ghoules. You know, it's just military industrial complex, just
Speaker 1: mouthpieces for it. It's it's insane, dude. And and like
Speaker 1: it'd be one thing if if this administration was like, yeah,
Speaker 1: this is a problem is too big. We don't know
Speaker 1: how to fix that system. But we're working on it.
Speaker 1: And here's what we're going to do in the meantime
Speaker 1: is we're going to put handcuffs on people that did
Speaker 1: fraud waste and abuse on purpose. And I think that's
Speaker 1: what's really starting to perturb people. There hasn't been a
Speaker 1: single goddamn arrest of anyone like that yet. Pam Blondie's
Speaker 1: made over eighty media appearances in the first hundred days.
Speaker 1: That's got a lot of people pissed off.
Speaker 3: Yeah, she's she's doing more folks news interviews than anything else.
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 5: Well maybe that's what these people were hired to do.
Speaker 5: And why these people all seem to come from that. Yeah,
Speaker 5: they're all it's all TV stuff. It's all yes, they
Speaker 5: make the rounds. They come from TV. I mean Fox
Speaker 5: News guy is is the fucking defense dude? I mean,
Speaker 5: come on, hag Seth. What's his name, Pete?
Speaker 3: Come on, I mean look at even that his pickup?
Speaker 3: The General surgeon? Right, who's the general Surgeon? I forgot
Speaker 3: her name. She's the one that did not complete her residency. Man,
Speaker 3: give me a second.
Speaker 5: Was she the one who got caught with the old
Speaker 5: jab pro jab stuff too?
Speaker 3: No, they dropped Nash with and they brought a new
Speaker 3: person yesterday.
Speaker 5: Whatever is you pointed out, They're all just a giant disappointment,
Speaker 5: Like you brought up the maha thing that one like,
Speaker 5: I'm like that was the last That was the last
Speaker 5: hope that I had. I was like, well, okay, at
Speaker 5: least we have RFK Junior, and like, what the fuck, dude,
Speaker 5: what in so to injury that one hurt?
Speaker 1: I know. The first thing he comes out with is is,
Speaker 1: you're all, we have a we have an epidemic of
Speaker 1: anti semitism, and then come to Texas and grift on
Speaker 1: m r NA shots or no vaccine mmr for you
Speaker 1: mmr my my bad. It's it's right around the corner though.
Speaker 1: And look we got uh MK ultra with us here.
Speaker 1: What's up man, Welcome to the boiler room.
Speaker 7: How you guys doing.
Speaker 8: Yeah, Mark was busy tonight, so I'm filling in for
Speaker 8: Mark Anderson.
Speaker 1: All right, well you sure sure. It feels like we're
Speaker 1: dealing with a lot of uh wide widely based mk
Speaker 1: ultra in the media lately. So it's good to have
Speaker 1: you here.
Speaker 7: Yeah, good to be had.
Speaker 8: As the old saying goes, I detect a little bit
Speaker 8: of pessimism here. I kind of parachuted in at mid range,
Speaker 8: mid sentence. I detect all it's not happy.
Speaker 3: It's not pessimism. It's it's just frustrated voter. That frustration
Speaker 3: change and we got the same old thing again.
Speaker 7: Well it.
Speaker 8: I was on the Australian League Rights the other night.
Speaker 8: We talk economics on there on occasion and we talk
Speaker 8: about solutions in the situation with governments, and one of
Speaker 8: the things that I brought up was that I.
Speaker 7: Think that after the time that's been.
Speaker 8: That has lapsed since the creation of the Bank of
Speaker 8: England in sixteen ninety four, about one hundred and ten
Speaker 8: plus years since the creation of the Federal Reserve, the
Speaker 8: media as we know them that have spawned out of
Speaker 8: those banking houses, what we may be looking at here
Speaker 8: is that the governments that seem so dysfunctional have been overthrown.
Speaker 8: The the infrastructures there, you know, the House, the US
Speaker 8: Capitol Building, the White House, but what's in there is
Speaker 8: just simply not the government that we think of, or
Speaker 8: in a way, it's not government at all. It's it's
Speaker 8: just a a bunch of errand boys and sort of
Speaker 8: a congress emeritus that is there to just let the
Speaker 8: banking the banking fraternities rule and to carry out their policies.
Speaker 8: In other words, it's somebody else's government. It's not ours ours.
Speaker 8: The original republic has been overthrown. It might be it
Speaker 8: might be that much finality, it just isn't there anymore.
Speaker 8: And I know that sounds almost like a overstatement, but
Speaker 8: is it. I don't know when when something is that
Speaker 8: dysfunctional and just completely counterintuitive to everything we believe and know,
Speaker 8: there can only be so many possible explanations, correct, So
Speaker 8: if the one I'm saying is a little bit of
Speaker 8: an overstatement, then what is it? You know, then what
Speaker 8: is the answer to such non response to the average
Speaker 8: person's aspirations and you know, hopes for the future. I mean, eventually,
Speaker 8: when you usurp a government, you eventually replace that government.
Speaker 8: In other words, usurpation doesn't last forever. If you hijack
Speaker 8: a city, it's not going to stay in the process
Speaker 8: of hijacking, let's say a city taking over a city,
Speaker 8: it's not going to stay in that transition process forever. Eventually,
Speaker 8: unless the hijacker's defeated, the hijacker takes over and overthrows
Speaker 8: who was running that city, right, And.
Speaker 1: That can be a long game too, right, Like that
Speaker 1: can go on for decades, which is really seems like
Speaker 1: maybe a lot of time, but is not in the
Speaker 1: longer scope of things.
Speaker 8: Yeah, So, I mean, I'm only entertaining all the possibilities
Speaker 8: while at the same time kind of acknowledging that there's
Speaker 8: only so many possibilities as to why things.
Speaker 7: Are the way they are.
Speaker 8: So what Ron Avery says, Ron's a pretty wise guy,
Speaker 8: has a lot of wisdom about political science. One of
Speaker 8: the things he says is that we learn all about science,
Speaker 8: biological sciences, physics, we learned all sorts of science, but
Speaker 8: we never learned political science in the genuine sense of
Speaker 8: the concept. So we're scientifically literate about civics, scientifically illiterate
Speaker 8: about what a political system is and how it works.
Speaker 8: And I think Ron has a point. The average person said,
Speaker 8: you're told to vote, but absent a larger knowledge of
Speaker 8: political science and how governmental systems are structured and how
Speaker 8: they're supposed to work, voting is either futile or even dangerous,
Speaker 8: because an uninformed vote, you're probably better off not voting
Speaker 8: at all in many instances, unless you're maybe in some
Speaker 8: local election where yes, you're going to approve a new tax,
Speaker 8: or know you're going to defeat the new tax, something
Speaker 8: real straightforward.
Speaker 7: Either you approve the new tax, or you vote it.
Speaker 8: Down and it's just one thing on the ballot and boom,
Speaker 8: it's either yes or no. Maybe that kind of election works,
Speaker 8: But these multiple personality elections, I don't know. There's so
Speaker 8: much dishonesty and so much room for miscounting them. But
Speaker 8: by the same token, even if you have an honest election,
Speaker 8: which is better than a dishonest election, then where are
Speaker 8: you at right?
Speaker 7: Then?
Speaker 8: What do you do after that? How do you exert
Speaker 8: any effective control over your destiny? It's a very difficult thing.
Speaker 8: I guess I'll leave it at that for now. There's
Speaker 8: something I could add, but I don't want to just
Speaker 8: ramble on. But that's sort of what I've been talking
Speaker 8: over with some people over the last few weeks, things
Speaker 8: along those lines.
Speaker 3: I don't think actually what you said earlier about the
Speaker 3: government is out of fetch. I think this is actually,
Speaker 3: I actually truly believe that this is what's happening. We
Speaker 3: do not have a government anymore that's representing people. We
Speaker 3: are electing people in there that just carries banking agenda, right,
Speaker 3: an agenda of those people that just you know, are
Speaker 3: pulling the string and globally and But here's here's the thing.
Speaker 3: Even though that that government we have might not represent
Speaker 3: us anymore and not to be you know, to give
Speaker 3: it a positive spin, I think more and more people
Speaker 3: are waking up to that fact, and I think, what's
Speaker 3: going to happen. It's eventually is going to collapse. I
Speaker 3: think that it's the collapse is inevitable. That's what I
Speaker 3: was saying earlier, and not to be just black pilling everybody.
Speaker 3: But the signs are showing that the collapse is inefftable.
Speaker 3: But the resiliency of of of us, the people right,
Speaker 3: and our ability to fight back, I still do believe
Speaker 3: in that, and I think I still believe that there
Speaker 3: is enough awakening that's happening right now that we will
Speaker 3: be able to organize and come outs as people victorious
Speaker 3: when that happens. But I think it's as you said, Mark,
Speaker 3: the signs is just there is no other explanation. But
Speaker 3: this is why from the very beginning we said there
Speaker 3: is no savior, right. Everybody was looking for him as
Speaker 3: a savior, and we said that this is not going
Speaker 3: to happen. The only one that can save us or
Speaker 3: us right. But that's why we have to start building
Speaker 3: from the ground up. I do not. I think Washington
Speaker 3: is gone. We have to start building from the ground up.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, this whole ongoing Jeffrey Epstein topic is
Speaker 1: a perfect example of you know what Mark was talking
Speaker 1: about there, how a system can be gone out from
Speaker 1: under your nose and most people have haven't even noticed
Speaker 1: it yet, or they're just starting to understand or grasp
Speaker 1: the you know, the the monolithic scope of the corruption
Speaker 1: and the problem. You know, like like we've waited all
Speaker 1: this time for this, you know, supposed thing, and they
Speaker 1: did this stupid dog and pony show with the ex
Speaker 1: influencers and gave them their binders and whatnot and didn't
Speaker 1: really release any any new information. And and you know,
Speaker 1: at this point they're trying to their mark. Before you
Speaker 1: got here, we were talking about this, and it looks
Speaker 1: like just sort of reading the tea leaves that they're
Speaker 1: going to say, uh, we're already starting to say there's
Speaker 1: too many national security issues if we release these files,
Speaker 1: and that I would argue that that is because if
Speaker 1: they were to actually release the and people are mis misguided,
Speaker 1: you know, and misled into thinking that this is simple
Speaker 1: a human trafficking and sex thing when really there is
Speaker 1: massive like international influence, pedaling, weapons, trafficking, blackmail. There's all
Speaker 1: kinds of crazy stuff going on that touches you know,
Speaker 1: like the Lex Wexner Group, the Carlisle, Carlisle Group, JP Morgan,
Speaker 1: Jamie Diamond, the Pritzker family, you know what I mean. Like,
Speaker 1: there's just all these different areas of legal discovery that
Speaker 1: point to corruption on both sides of our political isle,
Speaker 1: all of our media aisle, internationally, ambassadors bankers, international bankers,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. It's just so nasty that
Speaker 1: if it were to all really come out, it would
Speaker 1: be the same with JFK. You know, it's like if
Speaker 1: any of these things were to actually come all all
Speaker 1: the way out and and be exposed for what they
Speaker 1: actually are. I mean, you don't you don't have a
Speaker 1: government that's not a government, that's not a government that's
Speaker 1: something that wants to protect itself. When it's that bad
Speaker 1: and it's supposedly built on the tenants of the founders
Speaker 1: of this government, it's just not what it was and
Speaker 1: it never can be, you know, without being completely rebuilt
Speaker 1: from the ground up, like you're saying there, Pharaoh.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean I think I think the the the
Speaker 3: whole differy Steam thing. I think it's I think it
Speaker 3: was a sad awakening and and and and honestly, as
Speaker 3: a way they managed it was so bad. You know,
Speaker 3: if you know, if they came out from the very
Speaker 3: beginning and said, you know what, we're not going to
Speaker 3: be able to release this right away and we it's
Speaker 3: just going to take some time to vidit or whatever. Right,
Speaker 3: But the way they did it, we're so humiliating to everybody,
Speaker 3: as you said, like a bunch of binders, to a
Speaker 3: bunch of like social media morons that that, and and
Speaker 3: and it's just so insulting to us. And I'm just
Speaker 3: sick of us being insulted every day with a bunch
Speaker 3: of people that they think they are smarter than us.
Speaker 3: No they are, They're not smarter than us. And and
Speaker 3: I think that the people have to make that really
Speaker 3: clear to them, as we're not accepting this anymore, right,
Speaker 3: we were not being took down upon this way either
Speaker 3: honesty or or just fuck off. Right. And but it's yeah,
Speaker 3: it's it's a lot of people are just getting black
Speaker 3: pilled with this Epstein. And I don't think it's going
Speaker 3: to go anywhere because because we know who it implicates, right,
Speaker 3: and we still just James O'Keeffe, like, you know, expose
Speaker 3: that is starting to do. Like the first one is like, oh,
Speaker 3: Prince Andrew fucked underage girls. But yeah, like we've yeah
Speaker 3: we fucking knew that. How long ago we knew that?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 3: You really need you to come out there and say that, dude.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's such old news.
Speaker 3: It is, right, it's.
Speaker 5: But how are why are these things national secure? I
Speaker 5: don't understand how they can get away with saying, well,
Speaker 5: we can't we can't arrest these criminals who committed criminal
Speaker 5: acts because it would be you know, national security.
Speaker 1: It's code for it's code for I can't. If we
Speaker 1: did that, we wouldn't be able to just arrest our
Speaker 1: political opponents. We'd have to arrest our mentors too.
Speaker 3: Well, what you're going to arrest the government? It's to
Speaker 3: show that your entire government is compromised. That's what it is.
Speaker 3: That's that's why it's national security. Yep, because basically they
Speaker 3: are being blackmail by foreign country.
Speaker 5: This conversation sounds anti semitic. Already take this anti semitic.
Speaker 3: Well, did you? Let's take this whole antisemitic thing that
Speaker 3: the Trump administration was surrounding himself with all those Zionists.
Speaker 3: What what is it doing right now? Completely opposite effect.
Speaker 3: People are waking up to the influence of this I
Speaker 3: starting country on our nation and that we're actually cannot
Speaker 3: do anything. We cannot even express freedom of speech without
Speaker 3: being called antisemitic, which had nothing to do with anti Semitism. Right,
Speaker 3: So I think it's backfiring on them, and I don't
Speaker 3: think they're going to be able to control the narrative
Speaker 3: because that's what happens when you try to do this.
Speaker 5: Well, that's interesting timing because the news today was allegedly
Speaker 5: supposedly there's some sort of fracture fractioning happening fallout between
Speaker 5: Trump and beb Did you guys catch win do this?
Speaker 1: What's going on?
Speaker 3: Yeah? I don't know.
Speaker 4: I don't think I buy it, but yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, well it's basically it was published in one of
Speaker 3: the Israeli basically news I forgot which one, but basically
Speaker 3: saying that Trump feels humilated because I think that Bibe
Speaker 3: is using him and he's making him look as if
Speaker 3: he's being manipulated in public, and Trump doesn't look like
Speaker 3: to look this way, whatever, complete bullshit.
Speaker 1: We just saw Trump pull the chair out for BB
Speaker 1: like it was his freaking wife or something like that,
Speaker 1: like that, that's right. And he's also what he's also
Speaker 1: the father in law of Trump's favorite daughter also, so
Speaker 1: they're like, you know, I just I don't know. It
Speaker 1: sounds tabloidy to me. I hope, I don't know who
Speaker 1: at this point, Like who cares? Like what does it
Speaker 1: mean anything? Does it mean they'll stop using our tax
Speaker 1: dollars to like send two thousand pounds bombs over there?
Speaker 1: Like no, that would be something I could you know,
Speaker 1: sink my teeth into.
Speaker 3: You're absolutely right, dude, That's exactly my reaction is, like
Speaker 3: here you are trying to sell me like a bullshit story.
Speaker 3: How is this impacting actually day to day? Are you
Speaker 3: going to start like getting rid of all those Zionists
Speaker 3: surrounding you? Right, You're going to stop like blindly supporting Israel,
Speaker 3: getting US an Awar with it on?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Does that mean maybe we'll stop just you know,
Speaker 1: sending bombs into the poorest country in the world like Yemen,
Speaker 1: where they've already killed over like you know, eight million
Speaker 1: kids through starvation over the last decade. Perhaps, I don't know.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so it's I think I think that the way
Speaker 3: they think that they have control over the narrative. Yes,
Speaker 3: maybe they're controlling like twenty percent of the population, the boomers,
Speaker 3: right that just like that. They used to be folks
Speaker 3: news and now they're just watch sitting online and watching
Speaker 3: some memes and you know, yeah, just Trump thumping, right,
Speaker 3: But I did I don't think it's just the majority
Speaker 3: of people just gonna fly with them.
Speaker 5: They have a sleep channel. Now you go to sleep too.
Speaker 5: It's called Trump low Fi. Did you guys see this ship?
Speaker 4: This is from the official White House.
Speaker 5: They have a like a stream going and it's just
Speaker 5: like a cartoon like studio ghibli anime version of Trump,
Speaker 5: like signing, pretending like he's signing the executive orders, and
Speaker 5: it's just a list of all his accomplishments and how
Speaker 5: great Trump is?
Speaker 4: You fall asleep to Trump low Fi. I'm not making this.
Speaker 3: Crazy. It's crazy. They think they are the thing that
Speaker 3: they are going to replace mainstream media, and the fake
Speaker 3: news media is dying with a bunch of like freaking
Speaker 3: like paid Twitter people, right, and and well shit like
Speaker 3: memes and should like what ruckus is talking about. I
Speaker 3: don't think people that once you start waking up, you're
Speaker 3: going to see through that, right, I don't think you're
Speaker 3: going to buy that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you can't put that genie back in the bottle man.
Speaker 1: And so many people are getting sick of it at
Speaker 1: this point. It's like people used to freak out and
Speaker 1: call us names when we would talk and disown us
Speaker 1: and you know, socially reject us when we would talk
Speaker 1: about some of these things years ago. And now it's
Speaker 1: just it's not that way anymore. It's not that way,
Speaker 1: and and it's really weird to see it all happen.
Speaker 3: But the positive thing also, I'll go ahead, because are
Speaker 3: you going to say.
Speaker 4: Something there you go, Oh, it's just kind of true.
Speaker 4: Oh you found it?
Speaker 1: Okay, yeah, Low Fi Beats. Wow. So is there a
Speaker 1: link to it here?
Speaker 4: There's a YouTube link somewhere online.
Speaker 1: Okay, I'm gonna mute it just in case there's any Well.
Speaker 5: See, that's see, that's the popular That's what it's based
Speaker 5: off of.
Speaker 4: Is this thing.
Speaker 5: This is the most one of the most popular YouTube
Speaker 5: channels is the low Fi Beats channel. So now the
Speaker 5: White House has issued their version of this low fie
Speaker 5: mega is what it's called.
Speaker 1: Low fie mega.
Speaker 3: Oh my gosh, someone posted something great which is so true.
Speaker 3: Every like like organic movement that started from starting from
Speaker 3: the Tea Party to Occupy it was it started being
Speaker 3: co opted right from with with basically state actors and
Speaker 3: and and the deep state right, and it ended up
Speaker 3: being killed. And I think that's what they're exactly doing
Speaker 3: right now to this whole America First movement. But I
Speaker 3: don't think they are going to succeed because I think
Speaker 3: it's it's it's bigger than what they think it is.
Speaker 3: But I think they are trying to co opt this
Speaker 3: whole Maham movement and the America First movement right, But
Speaker 3: I don't think it's going to succeed. I don't think
Speaker 3: this whole like rebranding of what Jfkid, sorry kid did
Speaker 3: of trying to focus in food and just you know,
Speaker 3: let's forget about pharma, let's forget about the vaccine schedule
Speaker 3: that we still have them out on a shot right now.
Speaker 3: That's what isostatistics, like two point five million kids since
Speaker 3: Trump took office where vaccinated them out on a vaccine
Speaker 3: right because it's still on the schedule, that he's able
Speaker 3: to pull it with a fucking pen, right to cancel
Speaker 3: that shit, and it did not happen. Yep, right, I
Speaker 3: don't think people are buying that night. Great to have,
Speaker 3: you know, clean food, but this is not the fight.
Speaker 3: The fight is with the big guys, which is pharma.
Speaker 3: We know that this is a fight of the man movement.
Speaker 1: Yes, yeah, I'm yeah ya, great job and all. Thanks
Speaker 1: for getting fluorid out of the water if possible and
Speaker 1: camp trails out of the sky. But you know what,
Speaker 1: like anyone with a brain in the last twenty years
Speaker 1: new to avoid those things on their own if possible.
Speaker 1: But yeah, to see him out pushing the MMR vaccine
Speaker 1: here in Texas was completely disgusting. And the fact that
Speaker 1: there's still emergency use authorization for these experimental products which many,
Speaker 1: many scientists and researchers and doctors argue have been involved
Speaker 1: in the cause of death of you know, half a
Speaker 1: million Americans or more, you know, millions of people worldwide.
Speaker 1: Perhaps why that is still on the emergency use authorization
Speaker 1: is insane to me. And why we're looking at a
Speaker 1: CDC schedule of two hundred jabs by what eighteen or
Speaker 1: something like that is insane to me. It's not like
Speaker 1: he's saying we're gonna get rid of seed oil in foods,
Speaker 1: you know, get rid of process seed oil. Boy, that
Speaker 1: would do something, wouldn't it. Or get rid of life,
Speaker 1: you know, roundup all that stuff is gonna get rid
Speaker 1: of any of that?
Speaker 7: Well are you talking.
Speaker 8: About Oh sorry, are you talking about RFK?
Speaker 1: I'm just kidding yep.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 8: Well again, coming in sort of midstream here, I haven't
Speaker 8: listened to everything that he has said as of late.
Speaker 8: Just to sort of insert a couple of things. Florida
Speaker 8: has become the second state. Apparently that's going to defloridate
Speaker 8: the water and to be somewhat positive anything that gets
Speaker 8: rid of these totalitarian schemes via the needle, via the water,
Speaker 8: via our skies, via the soil, such as glyfeasay, those
Speaker 8: are all, in my opinion, at least kind of on
Speaker 8: a parallel track, through the needle, through the soils, through
Speaker 8: the air, through the water, through the food. A friend
Speaker 8: of mine, Michael max And he's a laboratory naturopathic doctor,
Speaker 8: lives up near Waxahatchie, Texas. He believes that most tyranny
Speaker 8: is of that insidious nature not geopolitics, not the threat
Speaker 8: of China, but the most of the totalitarianism is through
Speaker 8: these more invisible substrata kind of processes. In other words,
Speaker 8: get us all worked up about geopolitics, not that that's unimportant,
Speaker 8: but most of the degradation and attacks on humanity are
Speaker 8: through medical and water and food, you know, the basic,
Speaker 8: the basic pillars of life, you know, the what the psychiatrist,
Speaker 8: or was he a psychologist, Abraham Maslow called, you know,
Speaker 8: the basic, the basic things that we need to survive,
Speaker 8: you know, food, shelter, water, and that these things are degraded.
Speaker 8: It's a multifaceted thing and there's a lot of layers
Speaker 8: to it, but it's an interesting thought to consider, and
Speaker 8: I think with COVID, I think we saw the main
Speaker 8: face of that that tyranny wouldn't necessarily come knocking on
Speaker 8: your door or kicking your door in. Rather it would
Speaker 8: lock you up in your own home under COVID crackdowns.
Speaker 8: And so the nature of tyranny it might be where
Speaker 8: we're misled to think it's going to be the jack
Speaker 8: boots coming through the door. Not that could never happen,
Speaker 8: and heaven forbid that it ever would, but rather it
Speaker 8: would be things of a more gradual, less visible nature,
Speaker 8: again through the food, through the water, through the medical system,
Speaker 8: that that's the main way that they'd put people down,
Speaker 8: the main way that they'd institute a tyranny and degrade
Speaker 8: and kill people off and call the herd. At the
Speaker 8: same time, it's deceptive in the sense that we've kind
Speaker 8: of been led to believe that, oh, you know, we
Speaker 8: had the Cold War, We're going to have a nuclear
Speaker 8: holocaust maybe, and that we're going to fight the Ruskies.
Speaker 8: You know, maybe maybe a lot of that was vaudeville.
Speaker 8: You know, I won't say no reality to it, but
Speaker 8: maybe there was a degree of vaudeville to that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, really, man, I mean it's pretty crazy. Like
Speaker 1: if you look at if some of these figures that
Speaker 1: we see out there nationwide and worldwide or true about
Speaker 1: or are accurate about the number of people that have
Speaker 1: been that are no longer here because of some of
Speaker 1: these experimental things that have been introduced into our society
Speaker 1: since two thousand or since twenty twenty one. It's more
Speaker 1: of a loss than most wars. Some of the biggest
Speaker 1: wars that you know, we talk about, you know, that
Speaker 1: are forever ingrained in our psyches, even if they happened
Speaker 1: before we were born. Like for you know, for gen xers,
Speaker 1: it's you know, you know, World War two usually, I mean,
Speaker 1: what if you know here here it in the sci
Speaker 1: fi movie trailer voice, what if more people were you know,
Speaker 1: made not alive anymore by a product that governments worldwide
Speaker 1: and media worldwide pushed on behalf of you know, fill
Speaker 1: in the blank. It's pretty crazy, Like that's it's a
Speaker 1: weird inversion think that, Like, this is happening right under
Speaker 1: our noses, and the death toll is bigger than things
Speaker 1: that we've been you know, trained politicized historically, you know,
Speaker 1: zyopt into putting a lot of mental energy and sympathy
Speaker 1: and empathy and anguish and interest and intrigue and all
Speaker 1: that into And this is happening right under our noses.
Speaker 1: And you know, thousands of soccer players just die on
Speaker 1: the field within a matter of three years, and you know,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, little kids have myocarditis and all
Speaker 1: this stuff, and it's just, oh, this is happening. This
Speaker 1: is just something that happens. Now, It's like you're freaking
Speaker 1: kidding me. We just lost as many like non combatants,
Speaker 1: as we lost combatants in World War Two in a
Speaker 1: matter of this many years.
Speaker 7: Yeah, that's saying nothing of opioid fence at all. And then.
Speaker 8: Like when you see the Saint Jude's Children's Hospital commercials,
Speaker 8: there's a reason I'll never give them the sixty three
Speaker 8: cents a day and the nineteen dollars a month.
Speaker 7: Okay, so you're telling me, they're.
Speaker 8: Basically saying it's inexplicable that all these little kids are
Speaker 8: coming in with rare cancers. You know, two month old,
Speaker 8: three month old kids with blastoma this and brain cancer
Speaker 8: and all this. And it's like, then Saint Juds says,
Speaker 8: we won't stop until every you know, no one, till
Speaker 8: we save every kid from cancer. But there's never any
Speaker 8: talk about what's causing the cancers. If you're going to
Speaker 8: arrest childhood cancer, you have to know what's causing it.
Speaker 8: You can't just react when they come in with a
Speaker 8: brain tumor, and you can't just say it's inexplicable, that
Speaker 8: it's idiopathic, that it has no known origin. I mean,
Speaker 8: come on, heavier and heavier vaccination schedules have to be
Speaker 8: a culprit in why all these little kids are having
Speaker 8: chemotherapy and becoming bald headed before they're even one years old.
Speaker 8: There has to be a reason they're not just getting cancer. Okay,
Speaker 8: you don't just get cancer, okay. Yeah, And so I'll
Speaker 8: never give them any money for that reason alone, is
Speaker 8: because I detect there's a deception there, or at least
Speaker 8: a lack of courage to say, why are these kids
Speaker 8: getting cancer? And apparently a lot of them come in
Speaker 8: there with all these bizarre heart conditions and cancers and
Speaker 8: all over their body and all sorts of different often
Speaker 8: rare cancers, And.
Speaker 7: I've got to think, I mean, what else could it be?
Speaker 7: I mean, some environmental things, yes, in general. Perhaps maybe
Speaker 7: mothers abusing, you know, smoking when they're pregnant.
Speaker 8: It could be a number of things. But the backs
Speaker 8: scenes and the intensified vaccine schedules would just have to
Speaker 8: be front and center.
Speaker 7: It's not avoidable.
Speaker 1: I mean, so many of these things have that sm
Speaker 1: forty stuff in it that you know that it's a
Speaker 1: human specimen. Basically, they have human specimens in them. They've
Speaker 1: got all this weird junk stuff in there that people's
Speaker 1: immune systems don't always respond kindly to. They're foreign objects
Speaker 1: and they cause all these crazy immune responses and it's like,
Speaker 1: you know again, there used to be seven inoculations on
Speaker 1: the schedule and now it's like two hundred. It's insane
Speaker 1: how how much it's gone up. And I don't know,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I could rabbit hole on this for
Speaker 1: an hour.
Speaker 8: It's worth mentioning that James Ruguski, the WHO Pandemic Treaty researcher,
Speaker 8: has got something online right now about repealing the PREP Act,
Speaker 8: and that's an important thing. There's a petition if you
Speaker 8: go to James Reguski's substack website. I announced it on
Speaker 8: UK column my Friday show last Friday, and I believe
Speaker 8: if I get a chance, I'm going to reiterate it
Speaker 8: tomorrow on this petition that can be signed and different
Speaker 8: things that can be done, at least to create awareness
Speaker 8: of nothing else about the PREP Act, because that's one
Speaker 8: of the main things that keeps big pharma in action
Speaker 8: is their immunity relative immunity from lawsuits.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he's great. Substack dot com forward slash at James Roguski,
Speaker 1: J A. M. E. S R. O. G U s
Speaker 1: K I is where you can find it. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: should subscribe to that substack. It's it's a good one.
Speaker 7: Yeah. I mean that on a practical level, that that indemnity,
Speaker 7: that immunity from lawsuits, which I guess was inaugurated with
Speaker 7: Ronald Reagan, I believe in eighty six or so was
Speaker 7: responsible for that.
Speaker 8: And so, without being too pessimistic and what I said
Speaker 8: earlier about our government, that at least the one that
Speaker 8: was founded being overthrown, I don't think that's too far
Speaker 8: off the mark. On the other hand, if I was
Speaker 8: overstating the case, if that's the absolute worst case scenario,
Speaker 8: there are some things among Trump's many press releases that
Speaker 8: do make some sense some of the time. There are
Speaker 8: things there that I never thought i'd see, that I
Speaker 8: advocated some years ago. But one of the better things
Speaker 8: going on for good or ill, and I think it's
Speaker 8: mostly for good.
Speaker 7: I hope.
Speaker 8: So is the admission of new media in the White House.
Speaker 8: And someone I did some news reports with ten years ago,
Speaker 8: Gary Franchie of the Next News Network, he got into
Speaker 8: the White House.
Speaker 7: And there are others like I mean, everything from the
Speaker 7: Gateway Pundit to I got it right here. As a
Speaker 7: matter of fact, I wrote up an article about it,
Speaker 7: epic times you've got, of course, you got some that
Speaker 7: aren't so good, Ben Shapiro. But the good thing about
Speaker 7: it is that even though some of the media that
Speaker 7: have been allowed to work alongside the mainstream press work
Speaker 7: alongside the media cartel, although some of them are a
Speaker 7: little bit uncomfortably pro Israel to say the least. Yeah,
Speaker 7: on the other hand, it does bring in a bevy
Speaker 7: of media that are opposed to the climate change narrative,
Speaker 7: opposed to the open borders narrative, generally opposed most of
Speaker 7: the time to the pro vaccine narrative. So there's a
Speaker 7: lot of.
Speaker 8: In lack of a better word, anti vax, anti climate change,
Speaker 8: anti open borders media now working alongside the mainstream press,
Speaker 8: which of course is pro vax, pro open borders, pro
Speaker 8: climate change.
Speaker 7: So it does change the complexion of the media that's
Speaker 7: allowed in the White House.
Speaker 8: And although they don't fire on all cylinders, with Israel
Speaker 8: being a particular note to make, they do fire on
Speaker 8: some of the good cylinders that bring a different narrative
Speaker 8: and different sets of questions into the White House. With
Speaker 8: Gary Franchi getting in there, I used to work with
Speaker 8: him like ten years ago. We did some stuff with
Speaker 8: the FED to reserve some stuff on Builderberg and he's
Speaker 8: changed his news approach a little bit. But be that
Speaker 8: as it may. That is one of the more positive
Speaker 8: things is that alternate media are getting recognized. Much like
Speaker 8: you hash when you were doing T and T and
Speaker 8: you were beginning to talk to people that only yesterday
Speaker 8: were on Fox News, and it was starting to change
Speaker 8: the narrative. It was starting to introduce people that were
Speaker 8: on Fox News and oh wow, there's there's this Brian
Speaker 8: McLain out there, there's TNT, there's UK column. They were
Speaker 8: beginning to see the larger media universe, these talking heads
Speaker 8: that have been on Fox and you know, like Paul Manifort,
Speaker 8: things like that. So if you put all that out
Speaker 8: there and the the shifting of the media narrative across
Speaker 8: these issues that I mentioned, that's one of the more
Speaker 8: cautiously optimistic things going on out there, because the narrative
Speaker 8: is that the mass media cartel seeks to control. That's
Speaker 8: the mortar between the bricks of the wall, of the
Speaker 8: wall of the obstacles that they build between us and
Speaker 8: our freedom. If you think of it as a brick wall,
Speaker 8: the mass media cartel is the mortar between those bricks
Speaker 8: and what I described, although it won't happen overnight, is
Speaker 8: a way of loosening that barrier that they put between
Speaker 8: us and a much better future. The bankers couldn't do
Speaker 8: what they do to our government or in general without
Speaker 8: that media cartel.
Speaker 7: Don't kid yourself. That is the number one.
Speaker 8: As Ron Avery says, that is literally a weapon, and
Speaker 8: that's the biggest arrow in their arsenal. That's the biggest
Speaker 8: missile they got. And it's not a kinetic weapon. It's
Speaker 8: an informational weapon. All warfare is informational, whether it's kinetic
Speaker 8: or not, it's always informational. We can agree on that.
Speaker 8: And so you know, I'll probably take a stab myself, maybe,
Speaker 8: you know, to try and get beyond my minimal congressional
Speaker 8: press credentials that I've had a long time, although I
Speaker 8: haven't exercised those in like five years, largely because of COVID.
Speaker 7: But you know, more of us need to knock on
Speaker 7: the White House.
Speaker 8: Door and see who they'll let in, if only for
Speaker 8: an experiment, because the more people they let in.
Speaker 7: Like us, that that tells you something.
Speaker 8: Right, zero hedges in there, and there are some media outlets,
Speaker 8: new ones that don't totally agree with that have been allowed.
Speaker 7: In the Catholic station.
Speaker 1: E W t N.
Speaker 8: Has protested the policy toward Israel because it violates traditional
Speaker 8: just war principles. The principles of a just war are violated.
Speaker 8: Those those principles go back a very long time in history.
Speaker 8: So you know, maybe all of a sudden, I've become
Speaker 8: too optimistic. We're a few minutes ago I was too cynical.
Speaker 8: But I'm just trying to paint the broadest possible picture.
Speaker 8: I can't stay up a whole lot later, unfortunately.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, I'll feel better about their new media seat
Speaker 1: when you're sitting in it, Mark, that's for sure. Definitely.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, we know you're not going to set out,
Speaker 3: but a lot of those new media seats as well,
Speaker 3: they're going to set out once they taste the same
Speaker 3: that the old media just todroid. So that's I see
Speaker 3: where you're coming from. Mark, But you know, I'm not
Speaker 3: everybody will have the integrity to stay the course and
Speaker 3: do that.
Speaker 1: And I agree, Mark, I like the look. I just
Speaker 1: feel like like something there's something else afoot here, like
Speaker 1: lost you Oh can you hear me?
Speaker 4: Now from me or I can hear it's fine.
Speaker 1: Okay, you might need to pop out and back in
Speaker 1: Mystical Pharaoh. I don't know if you can hear me
Speaker 1: or not, but it feels like the the discord has
Speaker 1: been allowed to change for some reason, and I think
Speaker 1: it's by design. I'm not quite sure how to describe it, Mark,
Speaker 1: but I'm just like, with a lot, with so many
Speaker 1: of these people that are bringing some of these talking
Speaker 1: points now, it's just like, well, where were you, Like,
Speaker 1: where the heck were you, you know, in twenty twenty
Speaker 1: one with this where were you? You know, when we
Speaker 1: really needed people with these kind of platforms. I mean,
Speaker 1: is is this just a side effect of everything becoming
Speaker 1: so obvious that that, you know, now we're having to
Speaker 1: welcome in all these fellow travelers who are already on
Speaker 1: the you know, fame and fortune from riding the original
Speaker 1: Trump train or you know, not standing up against the
Speaker 1: COVID stuff when it was going on. I don't know,
Speaker 1: I just it's hard for me to not feel a
Speaker 1: little icky about some of those people, like Daily Wire,
Speaker 1: for sure, but there were some you know, like it
Speaker 1: was good to see some people up there, for sure,
Speaker 1: and even some people I don't always agree with brought
Speaker 1: some good questions. You know, like there are people I
Speaker 1: could agree with on some topics, and they happen to
Speaker 1: bring some good questions on those ones. Mystical Pharaoh, are
Speaker 1: you back? Can you hear me?
Speaker 3: Yes? That's all right.
Speaker 1: I'm glad you can hear me.
Speaker 7: Now that's a good point, hash there is you do.
Speaker 8: Got to sit back and kind of hesitate a little
Speaker 8: bit and contemplated a bit. I think what I'll do
Speaker 8: if I can. I can't promise I can even do it?
Speaker 8: Is is I got the email for applying. I actually
Speaker 8: have the right email. I just want to see what
Speaker 8: they say, you know, throw the ball in the air
Speaker 8: and see where it lands, like like an ascid test.
Speaker 5: Right to your point, Hashure, you have to at some
Speaker 5: point we have to say, can't Yeah, I mean, or
Speaker 5: if it wasn't twenty twenty five and all the things
Speaker 5: that have happened have happened, can't we give people the
Speaker 5: benefit of the doubt. I mean, I'm obviously a huge
Speaker 5: critic or skeptical of say like Alex Jones, but you know,
Speaker 5: you go back far enough in his work it's like, yeah,
Speaker 5: you know, he was pretty legit back in the day, right,
Speaker 5: And a lot of us have our stories about like
Speaker 5: how you know he was assistive in aiding a lot
Speaker 5: of us waking process to get to where we.
Speaker 4: Are, right.
Speaker 5: So, like I not everybody arrives at that moment at
Speaker 5: the same time, and if they get there, they get there.
Speaker 5: But now we're talking about people who this might be
Speaker 5: part of, like what's going on?
Speaker 4: What's going on?
Speaker 5: It's like all of this giant distrust of I mean,
Speaker 5: look at the Ian Carroll thing. I hate to just
Speaker 5: drop a name like that, but it's all over the place.
Speaker 5: People are quite well aware of this now, like he can't.
Speaker 5: He was like all pro maga, this and that, and
Speaker 5: now he's like all like, oh, he's all doing the
Speaker 5: Israel thing right, And he's getting a name for himself
Speaker 5: for that, I guess because Elon Musk helped him go viral.
Speaker 4: It's making the rounds doing the thing.
Speaker 5: But now he's lost the trust of everyone who used
Speaker 5: to hang out with him before he was popular. So
Speaker 5: like the more of some of these people become popular,
Speaker 5: they seem to be losing their clout and their trustworthiness
Speaker 5: with their original base. And then and you guys are
Speaker 5: pointing out, at what point do they become compromised? A
Speaker 5: lot of the blue check marks compromised quite easily by
Speaker 5: the old fashioned way, which is just money. So they're
Speaker 5: just out there chasing the almighty dollar and they don't
Speaker 5: even have time to worry about what they're doing and
Speaker 5: what they're not doing. But like I was watching some
Speaker 5: person trying to defend themselves, like, yes, I didn't say
Speaker 5: anything during the pandemic, and here's why, Like I was
Speaker 5: afraid they were like they were just being they were
Speaker 5: just humans. They believed that the shit that was told
Speaker 5: to them, just like our friends and our family. They
Speaker 5: use the theor tactics. We have to realize and understand
Speaker 5: that everyone was victimized. So I just I can't hold
Speaker 5: all these people guilty just because in the beginning they
Speaker 5: didn't say anything. And I would love to throw them
Speaker 5: a bone and say congratulations, thanks for joining our side.
Speaker 5: But how come you have a million viewers all of
Speaker 5: a sudden and you make money And I don't like
Speaker 5: what this up with that.
Speaker 4: I don't not saying I'm jealous, but why is that?
Speaker 5: Why are the people who've been saying these things and
Speaker 5: doing the right things from the beginning, are still getting
Speaker 5: the short end of the stick when it comes to
Speaker 5: the you know, the pie that's being passed around the media,
Speaker 5: you know.
Speaker 8: M Yeah, hey, Ruckus, I mean, you're a good report
Speaker 8: and you got a good equipment. You're technically proficient as
Speaker 8: far as I can tell. You should apply too.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I'm not gonna Yeah, maybe I'll go to the
Speaker 5: White House and ask what's her name?
Speaker 4: Some questions?
Speaker 8: Yeah, I mean, I mean, I think that anybody that
Speaker 8: can apply should apply, because we need to see where
Speaker 8: their limits are. You know, who's too radical for them?
Speaker 8: Oh that I don't know that hasher He don't trust that. Yahoo,
Speaker 8: But Hash, you know, you got to go.
Speaker 5: I know someone in our colleague list who would probably
Speaker 5: be denied right out of the gate, Patrick Kenninson.
Speaker 7: That could be of.
Speaker 8: Course, he's he's mostly reporting for the column right now,
Speaker 8: and he's in the UK. I don't know how often
Speaker 8: he goes to the States, so just the fact that
Speaker 8: he's located in the UK probably would be problematic. But nevertheless,
Speaker 8: I think that you Ruckus and myself, maybe even you
Speaker 8: Hash should just float your name out there and just
Speaker 8: see if you're approved or not, you know, and we
Speaker 8: can share stories about yes or no, we were or
Speaker 8: were not approved. And because there's another angle to it.
Speaker 8: It's not just the press pool that goes to the
Speaker 8: press briefing room in the White House. The email list
Speaker 8: that I'm on which I get everything pretty much. There
Speaker 8: was something where I got an email and Air Force
Speaker 8: One was going to an Air Force base near Detroit
Speaker 8: that's on Lake Saint Clair, slightly northeast of Detroit, right
Speaker 8: on this body of water. And the thing that I
Speaker 8: got had a link where I could have applied to
Speaker 8: just attend that one event and covering Trump making a
Speaker 8: few comments outside Air Force One or on the air
Speaker 8: base or something.
Speaker 7: So it's not just White House access. Trump's Air Force
Speaker 7: One might come to Temple or near Temple, and I
Speaker 7: could send you the Lincoln. You could see if you
Speaker 7: could cover that one time event, and.
Speaker 5: That could be one of the guys that you hear
Speaker 5: in the back of mister President, mister President and they
Speaker 5: just ignore you and walk away.
Speaker 8: Well, nevertheless, you know, just to have the experience and
Speaker 8: to see if they had approve you, you know's.
Speaker 5: What's the question you would shout to him? If you
Speaker 5: could shout a question as he's walking away.
Speaker 4: What would it be, Mark?
Speaker 7: Did you fake your assassination?
Speaker 5: Mister president? Are we going to get disclosure about the aliens?
Speaker 5: That's what I'm gonna ask.
Speaker 1: Can we get a close up of the ear lobe,
Speaker 1: the magical self repairing ear lob, please, sir, the.
Speaker 7: Self repairing.
Speaker 3: Boom boom?
Speaker 1: Did you Mark? Did you see the clip? When someone
Speaker 1: asked him about it, and he was like, it's just
Speaker 1: the lobe. It heals very quickly, just the lobe.
Speaker 7: They didn't say self repairing air low bit.
Speaker 5: No, No, I had to talk to a doctor about that,
Speaker 5: because apparently when you're like seventy eight, that's not normal
Speaker 5: to heal that quickly.
Speaker 1: But hey, whatever, I'm going to find that clip. I'm
Speaker 1: going to put it on the soundboard. Just the lube.
Speaker 8: Well, at any rate, I'm just mentioning that covering the
Speaker 8: White House and going to Washington is not the only thing.
Speaker 8: He sends out media feelers to places that the Air
Speaker 8: Force one is traveling too, all around the country and
Speaker 8: there's apparently, I don't think it was just a Michigan example.
Speaker 7: Apparently that's a prevalent thing.
Speaker 8: Where media that are in outlying parts of the country
Speaker 8: can make a one time app to cover that one event.
Speaker 7: So if he comes down to the border, naturally, I'll
Speaker 7: put in to go to the border right here. And
Speaker 7: so therefore you're not having to go to Washington, which
Speaker 7: is fun to do. It's a fun place to go,
Speaker 7: but it's kind of a pain in the ass too.
Speaker 5: But if you if you go to Washington, Mark, you
Speaker 5: might accidentally run into the Reaper himself, Jade Vance, and
Speaker 5: God only knows what will happen after that chance encounter.
Speaker 1: Yeah, ask the Pope.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so the old Pope.
Speaker 1: Yeah, old Pope.
Speaker 7: So there you go it. I guess I'll leave it
Speaker 7: at that. Maybe I'll stay another five ten minutes.
Speaker 1: No, I love it. I love the idea, Mark, I
Speaker 1: think it's great. I think we should definitely do that
Speaker 1: at least so we can document the process and you know,
Speaker 1: show people like what what what that looks like if
Speaker 1: we got nothing back.
Speaker 4: Or if we got all live stream it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, hell yeah, why not? No, it'd be fun.
Speaker 1: We should definitely do that. And if they pick us,
Speaker 1: we're gonna need you guys's help. Kathleen, Thank you, Kathleen.
Speaker 1: Through twenty Bucks in the tip jar tonight. Really appreciate that, Kathleen,
Speaker 1: if you want to support us. Yeah, we're gonna need
Speaker 1: a lot of Kathleen's out there if we're gonna be
Speaker 1: flying to d C and stuff like that. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have to be a baracous ruckus just to
Speaker 1: get him on an airplane to get him to d C.
Speaker 3: Probably so he needs to.
Speaker 7: Rucas is afraid to fly?
Speaker 2: Is that?
Speaker 1: Yeah? We have to knock him out as I do.
Speaker 5: You have a better chance at me doing that, like
Speaker 5: an actual chance of me doing that, but zero chance
Speaker 5: of me getting over the ocean.
Speaker 4: Sorry, not gonna happen.
Speaker 7: Never.
Speaker 8: Never, Well that you wouldn't have to do that to
Speaker 8: go to d C. You'd be on the plane about
Speaker 8: two hours and fifteen minutes to twenty to get there.
Speaker 1: Maybe.
Speaker 5: Then as I as I'm getting on the plane, I
Speaker 5: notice it's made by Bowling and then I ship my pants.
Speaker 7: Right, you're gonna need hash as a chaperone.
Speaker 5: Then I know you're you're gonna have to get me
Speaker 5: the crazy plane lady to be my chaperone.
Speaker 4: Then I'm all in.
Speaker 8: Yeah, and either put some cognac in your bag or
Speaker 8: drink theirs but Cognac works real well for a plane.
Speaker 7: Fright.
Speaker 5: The last time I flew, I was violently ill, and
Speaker 5: part of the trip involved me being on a twin
Speaker 5: prop plane and that was horrible.
Speaker 4: It was horrible, horrible, horrible, scary.
Speaker 1: Little peddle jumper. Yeah, you don't want to be on
Speaker 1: one of those.
Speaker 8: Yeah, that's just a cloud seating plane.
Speaker 1: Yeah right, probably, Oh, Mark, I came across that video
Speaker 1: again of a plane sitting still on a runway, just
Speaker 1: spewing stuff out the back of it. Hopefully I bookmarked
Speaker 1: it this time. I've been wanting to share that one
Speaker 1: with you.
Speaker 7: Oh you got it right there.
Speaker 1: I don't know, let me uh, it might be buried
Speaker 1: in my ex bookmarks. Let's see here.
Speaker 7: Oh that sounds like a lot of fun.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, it's good stuff. Uh oh yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: look I think I've found it. Let's see here.
Speaker 7: It's neither bird, nor plane, nor even frog. It's just
Speaker 7: little o me. That's just how it goes, right.
Speaker 5: Yeah, Well it's cold outside, that's just that. That's the
Speaker 5: he's they're telling everybody we got a new poke.
Speaker 1: It's all good, right, it's the White Pope smoke.
Speaker 7: It looks like up and smoke.
Speaker 8: Yeah right, that's that's that large joint that Sewn gets
Speaker 8: out for Cheech when he puts the red drum set
Speaker 8: in the car.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 7: I love that part of the movie. He's got this
Speaker 7: red Ludwig kit man. It's like, oh man, Ludwig kid.
Speaker 7: He puts it in there, right.
Speaker 1: Up in smoke or still smoking. I can't remember which one.
Speaker 7: But yeah.
Speaker 8: So well, we'll call it the Great Media Experiment, the
Speaker 8: Great Media Experiment. Well, we'll see how it goes.
Speaker 1: All right, So that's that's our task. We'll get into
Speaker 1: that at some point this year. Here, we'll get our
Speaker 1: applications in see if we can get into that new
Speaker 1: media seat.
Speaker 5: This one other thing I want to pick Mark's brain
Speaker 5: about before he takes off. I don't think we've ever
Speaker 5: talked to Mark about this topic, but I think I've
Speaker 5: heard him mention this before. But cryptocurrency has taken off
Speaker 5: again today in the past twenty four hours.
Speaker 4: Things are very popular.
Speaker 5: But before that happened, Trump is getting grilled, possibly facing
Speaker 5: an SEC investigation, some and ethics probe. If I'm not mistaken, Hesher,
Speaker 5: I did drop you a link just a minute ago,
Speaker 5: a CNBC link in the private chat. Did you guys
Speaker 5: hear about this thing where you may or may not
Speaker 5: be aware that released a mean coin right before he
Speaker 5: was elected president right or right after. Uh it's cash
Speaker 5: tag Trump. So you can buy this Trump Mean coin.
Speaker 5: But apparently it was this week or last week. But
Speaker 5: Trump says that the people who have like the top
Speaker 5: tier holders of his coin, so the people the top
Speaker 5: investors in his Trump Mean coin can be invited to
Speaker 5: a private dinner with the president sometime this month.
Speaker 7: Well isn't this.
Speaker 5: Like, yeah, you got to spend some money and like,
Speaker 5: isn't this purchasing act? Isn't this like influence pedaling? Like
Speaker 5: isn't that what like Hunter Biden and Joe Biden got
Speaker 5: in trouble for doing and here he is doing it
Speaker 5: blatantly in your face through cryptocurrency, and not long after
Speaker 5: him being caught on a hot mic about how like
Speaker 5: the Marcus tank but all my buddies, this guy he
Speaker 5: made a million billion dollars yay whatever. So what do
Speaker 5: you think about all this cryptos stuff in Trump?
Speaker 1: Ah?
Speaker 7: I mean it could be something.
Speaker 8: That Trump strategically releases just to give the media something
Speaker 8: and the Democrats something to stew over. It might it
Speaker 8: might be a mile wide and one millimeter deep, in
Speaker 8: other words, something shallow that will quickly evaporate. Is this
Speaker 8: coin like, is it just another collector coin that they
Speaker 8: that they sell on TV and for nineteen ninety.
Speaker 5: Five digitally this is a meme coin, So this is
Speaker 5: it's an actual cryptocurrency, but it serves no purpose other
Speaker 5: than the fact that it exists and it has his
Speaker 5: name and he is officially associated with him. Because before that,
Speaker 5: they're like the doge before doge was a thing, doge
Speaker 5: coin was a thing, and that's a meme coin. It
Speaker 5: does nothing except it's a picture of a damn dog,
Speaker 5: and people like it's like the fifth or sixth largest
Speaker 5: cryptocurrency on the planet. So people are into these mean coins.
Speaker 5: So Trump launched his own meme coin, and so did
Speaker 5: Milania not long after Trump. But now they're saying, if
Speaker 5: you own like the like you own a million dollars
Speaker 5: worth of Trump coin and your Trump and your wallet,
Speaker 5: your Trump wallet or Salona wallet, it's on the salon
Speaker 5: and blockchain, then you can have a dinner with the
Speaker 5: Trump yep and.
Speaker 7: So and where does the money go? If you buy
Speaker 7: so many coins, you're just saying you're getting cryptocurrency.
Speaker 5: Is cryptocurrency is weird because the revenue is part of
Speaker 5: like the tokenomics and the project, so it technically belongs
Speaker 5: to the project, which is owned and operated by World
Speaker 5: Liberty Finance, which is Trump's Trump's Families digital product company.
Speaker 5: They're the ones that have released his NFTs in the
Speaker 5: past and now all of his meme coins and stuff
Speaker 5: like that. But the thing is, like, you you own
Speaker 5: money through this by because the people inside, the owners
Speaker 5: of this company or this created this mean coin, own
Speaker 5: large amounts of the cryptocurrency. So when people go in
Speaker 5: there and fomo into it, fear of missing out is
Speaker 5: what fomo means, and the price of the cryptocurrency skyrockets,
Speaker 5: and people are like pouring their hard eared money into
Speaker 5: this thinking it's going to make the money, and then
Speaker 5: Trump and all of his buddies sell it and make
Speaker 5: a shit ton of money, and now you lost all
Speaker 5: your money.
Speaker 7: See, so you're just buying assets for them to sell.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's just literally just giving them your money way
Speaker 5: to go.
Speaker 3: Yeah. The hect did the same thing.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, how to it? She did.
Speaker 8: Shit, I'm not the quickest study of these kind of things.
Speaker 8: So other than what I just said, I'm going to
Speaker 8: defer that until I look at it more closely.
Speaker 4: I keep it on your radar.
Speaker 7: It seems yeah, well, thank you.
Speaker 1: It seems to me like it's a bit of a
Speaker 1: stretch to compare it to like Barisma or something like that,
Speaker 1: where it's like a very specific set of influence buying
Speaker 1: and peddling, where this is more. This is like paying
Speaker 1: you know, twelve thousand dollars for your Kiss concert tickets
Speaker 1: and you get to sit down with Kiss for five
Speaker 1: seconds and have your posters signed or something like that.
Speaker 1: You know, it doesn't that's just because these people are
Speaker 1: going to have dinner with him doesn't necessarily mean he's
Speaker 1: going to, like, you know, do anything for them.
Speaker 5: But what we were talking, me and Mark are coming
Speaker 5: up with clever ways as reporters and journalists to have
Speaker 5: access to the president, right.
Speaker 4: To ask the questions.
Speaker 5: Yea, well, I mean this is what we're talking about,
Speaker 5: like solutions. Wouldn't a solution be for us to pull
Speaker 5: our money together and.
Speaker 4: Buy Yes, she's already laughing, I'm not kidding.
Speaker 5: I mean, Siah, what if we got all like, what
Speaker 5: if we got all the independent media together? And we
Speaker 5: all like chose a person, and that person gets a wallet,
Speaker 5: and we pump all the money in, right, and we
Speaker 5: own the Trump coin, and now we get to have
Speaker 5: dinner with the President. That sounds to me like more
Speaker 5: than a five second thing with kiss. That sounds like
Speaker 5: you get to sit down, hang out with and talk
Speaker 5: to the President. Do you think you might maybe you
Speaker 5: might actually be able to change the damn dude's mind.
Speaker 5: And all it takes is to the money to access
Speaker 5: and this is how all these other people do it, right.
Speaker 5: Isn't this the way the world works? Isn't this an
Speaker 5: opportunity for us little people? I'm just saying I'm not
Speaker 5: chilling trump coin. I just I'm just saying this might
Speaker 5: be a solution.
Speaker 1: Maybe.
Speaker 4: But then then, of.
Speaker 5: Course, what if there's some crazy lunatic left hard Democrat
Speaker 5: like the guy on the roof that wants to buy
Speaker 5: all the trump coin to get close to Trump. You
Speaker 5: know what I'm saying, to like, poison his crabcakes or something.
Speaker 5: I don't know, Yeah, poison Trump's crabcakes. That would be bad.
Speaker 8: I just wonder what the ultimate price would be, in
Speaker 8: other words, how much you'd have to actually spend among
Speaker 8: us alternative media to find.
Speaker 4: So I got to buy the dip, mark you got
Speaker 4: to buy the dip.
Speaker 8: And then then we would have the money. Then one
Speaker 8: of us would be picked out as the emissary to
Speaker 8: go there, the delegate.
Speaker 1: What do you mean I want to I want to
Speaker 1: take the entourage. I want emissaries. I want to full onto,
Speaker 1: I want you know, full on, oh, all all of us.
Speaker 4: It might it might be, it might be bring a friend,
Speaker 4: you never.
Speaker 7: Know, yeah, tell tell sports. She's got to use her
Speaker 7: feminine wiles.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, let's let's use our women for this.
Speaker 5: There we go, and it would be It would be
Speaker 5: easy because then we could ask chat GPT to write
Speaker 5: a convincing argument that we could use at the dinner
Speaker 5: to change Trump's mind about Israel, for instance, here you go,
Speaker 5: or to ask him, Hey, buddy, I know a question
Speaker 5: I would ask him, sincerely, why have you refused to
Speaker 5: walk back operation warp Speed?
Speaker 2: Sir?
Speaker 1: Yeah, crickets, yeah.
Speaker 8: Possibly warp Speed being thrown out of there, hopefully not.
Speaker 8: But yeah, it's all very interesting food for thought. And
Speaker 8: with that, I think I'm going to have to retire
Speaker 8: for the night, all right.
Speaker 7: The Friday thing, Marty said, Hello.
Speaker 1: Yeah, if you find Mark Anderson back there, let him know. Uh,
Speaker 1: he's next time we have a boiler room.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I'll tell him and Rex Cars and Batson, d
Speaker 8: Belfrey and all the others, all this cousins.
Speaker 1: All right, all right? Cool? And where can people find you? Tomorrow?
Speaker 7: UK? Call him dot org.
Speaker 8: The live show starts at seventh Central AM, eight o'clock
Speaker 8: AM Eastern. Of course, that's one o'clock in the afternoon
Speaker 8: in the UK, but they archive it right away or
Speaker 8: almost right away, and there'll be a report on the
Speaker 8: new media at the White House, and they'll be the
Speaker 8: fluoridation situation in Florida and beyond and lots of other stuff.
Speaker 1: All right, cool, UK, call him Dorg. Find Mark Anderson
Speaker 1: over there tomorrow. Mark, thanks for being here with us tonight.
Speaker 1: Pleasure having you and we'll look forward to having you
Speaker 1: back in the boiler room real soon. Yeah.
Speaker 8: Sounds good, guys, good discussion. We know what to do
Speaker 8: now with our media plans.
Speaker 1: So yep, Mark, yep, he says, we're being constructive and
Speaker 1: just black pilling. We're gonna try. We're gonna see what happens.
Speaker 1: All right, Thank you, Mar You never know. Okay, there
Speaker 1: he goes, I.
Speaker 5: Want to bring this just because I'm having fun talk
Speaker 5: about cryptocurrency.
Speaker 4: Why not.
Speaker 5: There's somebody in one of our chats, bubbscats, So shout
Speaker 5: out to bubbscat is talk about XRP. I think, I
Speaker 5: don't know, like you shill an x ORP, I don't know.
Speaker 5: But people, if you don't know what x or P is,
Speaker 5: here you go. This is a big one. This is
Speaker 5: that's by Ripple Labs XRP. So this is one of
Speaker 5: the ones that, like the World Economic Forum has sanctioned
Speaker 5: and says it's cool. Trump owns a bunch of it.
Speaker 5: His family owns a bunch of it all. Brad garling House,
Speaker 5: the guy who runs it, has been in and out
Speaker 5: of the White House. He's rubbing elbows with the Larry
Speaker 5: Ellison's and the Larry Finx. They're all buying all this
Speaker 5: crypto stuff. They buy a shit ton of bitcoined to
Speaker 5: buy a crapload to eth and they also like this XRP.
Speaker 5: XRP is the one that's going to be ready to
Speaker 5: go ahead and replace the Swift system.
Speaker 4: It's ready to go. I mean in a heartbeat.
Speaker 5: The only thing that was holding it back for the
Speaker 5: longest time for like six years now, I think, or
Speaker 5: four or five years or so. Is a lawsuit from
Speaker 5: the Securities Exchange Commission, the SEC who just had their
Speaker 5: Gary Gensler stepped down and there's a new guy in
Speaker 5: who's pro crypto, and now they canceled the whole thing.
Speaker 4: So Ripple's not in trouble anymore. XRP.
Speaker 5: So they're going to replace the way banks and money
Speaker 5: is sent around the world is costly and slow. This
Speaker 5: is going to be instantaneous and cheap, and they're going
Speaker 5: to be using protocols through this thing, like XRP is
Speaker 5: one of them. The reason I brought this up because
Speaker 5: I just saw like some YouTube video at random today
Speaker 5: or or on x or Facebook, I don't remember. It
Speaker 5: was a short thing, but it was an older thing
Speaker 5: where it was like somebody reacting to the programming the
Speaker 5: conditioning of all the secret symbols and shit hiding inside
Speaker 5: of the matrix.
Speaker 4: And I didn't notice this until I saw this video today.
Speaker 5: The name of the company that Neo worked for, I
Speaker 5: don't know the name of the company, but it ends
Speaker 5: in the letter X, and the way that the ex
Speaker 5: is stylized is a dead ringer for the XRP logo
Speaker 5: and the guy yeah, and then the guy starts typing
Speaker 5: in whoever's making the video a bunch of these jamatria
Speaker 5: you know what jamatria is, like the words and the phrases,
Speaker 5: And he takes all these things related to like the
Speaker 5: name of that company, and then he goes and he says,
Speaker 5: what other things equal this same amount of jematria, And
Speaker 5: the top result has something to do with Ripple, And
Speaker 5: he does this with all these other things for Matrix
Speaker 5: and all the top results have something to do with
Speaker 5: fucking ripple and XRP, and you're like, what the fuck?
Speaker 5: So just saying so there might be something to this
Speaker 5: XRP thing. It might be one of those chosen secret
Speaker 5: society things. There was also famously a lot of people
Speaker 5: who know about this back in the day, and that magazine,
Speaker 5: The Economist did like a special cover. There was like
Speaker 5: that that dual headed eagle rothschild symbol and he was
Speaker 5: holding something. It was a symbol. It's the XRP symbol.
Speaker 5: And that was before XRP was even a thing. So
Speaker 5: some weird shit going on with this XRP thing. I
Speaker 5: just want to point the go down the rabbit hole
Speaker 5: if you want. There's lots to go down there, very
Speaker 5: neat stuff. I'm not giving you financial advice, of course.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, No, it's you know, you've you've done your
Speaker 1: work when you get to the Jamatria of something like
Speaker 1: you're doubt you're at the you're in the depths of
Speaker 1: the rabbit hole when you're when you're looking at Oh yeah.
Speaker 5: If you say you're conspiracy theorists and you don't know
Speaker 5: what Chamatri is, get out of my face.
Speaker 1: Bro. Yeah. Yeah, if you if you haven't discovered the
Speaker 1: diligent work of the Jamatria people at the bottom of
Speaker 1: the rabbit hole, then you didn't go far enough. What
Speaker 1: about Katherine Austin Fitz coming out and claiming that the
Speaker 1: Bush officials former Bush official cast Katherine Austin Fitz, who
Speaker 1: uh we know a little bit tangentially related to in
Speaker 1: many ways, have followed for many years, talked about many
Speaker 1: times she's gone, she's gone on a couple of media
Speaker 1: things lately, and said that the government spent twenty one
Speaker 1: trillion dollars on an underground city for rich and powerful
Speaker 1: people to live if near extinction events happen. That's fun,
Speaker 1: isn't it.
Speaker 5: Well, it's only fun if if I happened to already
Speaker 5: be in DC when it happens and they take me
Speaker 5: with them.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Right, that's around the world. Actually it's around the country.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 3: She was in Tucker Colors and she did like a
Speaker 3: two hour interview with them. Yep, it's actually pretty interesting interview.
Speaker 1: She's an interesting lady.
Speaker 5: So you watched it, Pharaoh did, Okay, So is it?
Speaker 5: Am I correct? And assuming already without digging that that
Speaker 5: was just like a very small part of it and
Speaker 5: maybe taken out of context, almost like, oh, that was
Speaker 5: what she was talking about the whole time.
Speaker 3: Was No, No, she was not. No, she was not
Speaker 3: talking about that the whole time.
Speaker 4: No, that's what I thought.
Speaker 3: Now, she was talking about just you know, she was
Speaker 3: talking about the basically breakaways society, basically civilization, right, and
Speaker 3: then that basically the that basically the US government. I'm
Speaker 3: going to try to summarize this. Basically that the US
Speaker 3: government for them to be able to funnel enough money
Speaker 3: to basically fund space exploration, they had to create to start.
Speaker 3: Basically they needed about twenty one trillion dollars and that's
Speaker 3: accommodate for the money that's missing so far. They started
Speaker 3: this back in the nineties, and she tried to tie
Speaker 3: that with some of the mortgage fraud that she you know,
Speaker 3: she was she was she was trying to investigate back then,
Speaker 3: and so that's that's an entry way to that whole like,
Speaker 3: you know, where this money is going basically to fund
Speaker 3: that space exploration, which can be tied to basically some
Speaker 3: near extinction event that can be right. But she's also
Speaker 3: spoke about the whole digital system that they are trying
Speaker 3: to create, and you know, she's saying that there's been
Speaker 3: in the making for for for decades, right, and and
Speaker 3: and she tried to tie Judge in that weeed her
Speaker 3: REWRT and all the stuff that we talk about many times.
Speaker 3: But in general, it was it was pretty good. It
Speaker 3: was a pretty good interview. Would say, she's a she's
Speaker 3: a very interesting lady, and she you know, she she
Speaker 3: she's been through a lot, right, But how much you know,
Speaker 3: I don't know what you guys thought about her. Do
Speaker 3: you think she's she's legit.
Speaker 1: I tend to think that she is. Yeah, I know,
Speaker 1: she's put a lot of her own resources into a
Speaker 1: lot of things that you know, productions out there and
Speaker 1: the alternative media space and independent media space, and she
Speaker 1: you know, goes on her own dime to a lot
Speaker 1: of things, and I don't know, she.
Speaker 3: Sounded a pretty positive lady. Actually, I really enjoyed it
Speaker 3: because it's and she said similar things to what I
Speaker 3: was saying earlier. It's really just trying to build from
Speaker 3: the ground up, and that you know, she's thinking that
Speaker 3: eventually they will fail of their plans of control, but
Speaker 3: there will be there will be enough damage to the
Speaker 3: nation that we don't know how much, you know, much
Speaker 3: much will be left after the rebels, right, but the
Speaker 3: people themselves will come, will will be victorious, which which
Speaker 3: I actually do tend to agree with that.
Speaker 1: As I mentioned earlier, I hope, so man, I hope.
Speaker 1: So you know, there's been a lot of a lot
Speaker 1: of flags planted in the mass of wakening over the years.
Speaker 1: Like I've seen this feeling come and go, and I've
Speaker 1: felt it come and go a number of times where
Speaker 1: it's just like, Okay, there's some sort of ground swell here.
Speaker 1: Everybody's gonna get it all of a sudden, and you know,
Speaker 1: it's going to be too many people that understand for
Speaker 1: this to go down the way the technocrats and authoritarians
Speaker 1: want it to go down. But then something like COVID
Speaker 1: comes along, and I see what sheep how sheepish and
Speaker 1: you know, non defiant my brothers and sisters can actually be.
Speaker 1: And at this point, like for me personally, I just
Speaker 1: see so many masses of people that are sick and
Speaker 1: obese and completely just not on a wavelength to even
Speaker 1: give a flying fuck about their country, much less themselves.
Speaker 1: So I don't know, Maybe I.
Speaker 3: Just but I don't think it takes everybody to do that.
Speaker 3: I think it takes a percentage of the population.
Speaker 1: I think they say thirteen percent sometimes that's the number
Speaker 1: I've heard thrown around, And.
Speaker 3: Yeah, maybe that's what I'm hoping.
Speaker 1: You know. I like to think that. I like to
Speaker 1: think that because a lot of these people I'm referring
Speaker 1: to are just ineffective and sort of superfluous in a
Speaker 1: situation like that. But I don't know, man, I don't know.
Speaker 1: I'm oscilliate up and down on the mass awakening. I'm
Speaker 1: pretty the wind got taken out of my sales big
Speaker 1: time by the amount of pussiness that I saw during COVID.
Speaker 3: I agree with you, on a hundred percent, but I
Speaker 3: think also saying some of the culture, the cultural revolution
Speaker 3: that they were trying to do here in this nation, right,
Speaker 3: that's right now, and I think positive things from the
Speaker 3: Strump administration. I think we're seeing reverse of that. And
Speaker 3: I think people themselves are are you know, they're not
Speaker 3: even like hold them back anymore. I think a lot
Speaker 3: of this is going away and people are just tired
Speaker 3: of it. And I think that's that's that's part of that,
Speaker 3: you know, shifting this whole guys. Right, But as you said,
Speaker 3: when it comes to convenience and you're day to day life,
Speaker 3: how many are actually willing to stand up for freedom
Speaker 3: and actually to fight back? That is a question, because
Speaker 3: that's that's ultimately where everybody failed during COVID, Right. A
Speaker 3: lot has chosen the convenience and the day to day
Speaker 3: maintaining that convenience versus standing up and say no, yeah, right,
Speaker 3: And then I think that's that's where that's where I
Speaker 3: think I'm hoping that at least that percentage you mentioned,
Speaker 3: well it will will be willing to stand up.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And there's a lot to be said for people
Speaker 1: who have come to that conclusion, you know, looking backward.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of people that would do things differently
Speaker 1: now knowing what they know now than they did back then.
Speaker 1: So you just have to take those lessons for that
Speaker 1: for the thirteen percenters out there, you got to take
Speaker 1: those lessons and know how to apply them to the
Speaker 1: next great and grand syop and attack, because there will
Speaker 1: be one, and it may not be from the the
Speaker 1: same vector, might be something totally different.
Speaker 4: It might be a white girl calling a nevermind.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I've seen two movies and I forgot one of
Speaker 3: them was Julia Roberts movie. I forgot the name of it.
Speaker 3: It's a recent one, and one of them was Sounder. Anyway,
Speaker 3: both of them are really just about just fail out
Speaker 3: of the grid and cyber attacks. And I think that's
Speaker 3: that's definitely with the simulation they have been running, right,
Speaker 3: that's that field. That's the next piece is going to
Speaker 3: be around that.
Speaker 1: The one with Sandra Bullock. Are you talking about the
Speaker 1: one that the Obamas produced?
Speaker 5: Was it?
Speaker 3: This one?
Speaker 1: Was that the one where they had the cyber attack
Speaker 1: and they were like, you know, all the planes fall
Speaker 1: the sky and the ship crashed onto the ocean on
Speaker 1: the beach. Yeah, Yeah, and the tesla's. They like stole
Speaker 1: all the tesla's and the Tesla's all attacked everybody.
Speaker 3: Oh no, no no, not this one. No no, no, no,
Speaker 3: no no, it was no, it was something different. It
Speaker 3: was actually about creatures. Said that if you see them,
Speaker 3: they they turn you into Oh that's.
Speaker 1: That's the bird cage or something, right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, bird cage. Yeah, all right, yeah, yeah, there you go.
Speaker 3: But it's really just going around and being blindfolded, right
Speaker 3: and then feeling your way around was interesting.
Speaker 4: Viral TikTok challenge thing over that.
Speaker 1: Remember, yeah, yep, yep.
Speaker 3: And then the other one was that Julia Roberts one
Speaker 3: I forgot give me a second.
Speaker 1: Let's see here, Yeah, that would be the Obama one
Speaker 1: Leave the World behind, right, this one.
Speaker 3: She was definitely in that, Yes, that one on yeah,
Speaker 3: which is really very weird. Ending the way it ended.
Speaker 3: It was really just weird, like almost like they just
Speaker 3: give up on the movie and it just ended it.
Speaker 1: I I I think that the end of that movie,
Speaker 1: like most of it, was just a vehicle of confusion,
Speaker 1: or an orgy of confusion, propaganda and identity politic stuff
Speaker 1: and lame, pointless drama. But the whole point for me
Speaker 1: of the movie was basically that if a plan like
Speaker 1: this were to be played out, and this would be
Speaker 1: how the country you know, goes into s HTF, that
Speaker 1: which is shit hits the fan, that it would be
Speaker 1: as simple, you know what I mean, Like they would
Speaker 1: destroy our they would severely hamper our ability to band
Speaker 1: together as as locals, you know, people of a town
Speaker 1: and then a county and then neighboring counties, because there
Speaker 1: would be different propaganda dropped in all those different places.
Speaker 1: So in my town, we're going to think it was
Speaker 1: the North Koreans that took out the grid, and in
Speaker 1: your town you're gonna think it was the people of
Speaker 1: Central Texas that took out the grid. And in the
Speaker 1: town next to us, they're going to say it was
Speaker 1: the Muslims, and then the town over there they're going
Speaker 1: to say it was you know, Russians, and it'll just
Speaker 1: completely yeah, like there'll be no way. It's kind of
Speaker 1: like that there's a line that what's his face is
Speaker 1: that who's the black dude in that movie? Is that
Speaker 1: Idris Elba or something like that. I don't think so
Speaker 1: I can't remember his name, but there's a line there's
Speaker 1: a little rant that he gives in there about how
Speaker 1: you're never going to be able to blame someone or
Speaker 1: it's just so complicated that, you know, a country would
Speaker 1: never be able to figure out how to blame someone.
Speaker 1: I think that's the main threat, and I think that's
Speaker 1: why the Obamas liked this movie, because it's their way
Speaker 1: of threatening the American public with like how just how
Speaker 1: bad a cyber a full cyber attack could be, and
Speaker 1: how it could destroy the country and nobody would ever
Speaker 1: know who did it.
Speaker 3: Mm hmm. Interesting. I did not know that the Obamas
Speaker 3: actually produced it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they have a deal with Netflix and they make
Speaker 1: a hell of a lot of money.
Speaker 3: On Oh yeah, I remember, like a hundred million.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's crazy.
Speaker 3: But uh but back to the point, right, because I
Speaker 3: think when when was the latest simulation they run on
Speaker 3: that grid. There's a bunch of articles that came across
Speaker 3: which grid that just grid the full out cybersecurity.
Speaker 5: They do them all the time statewide. I was just
Speaker 5: doing some research about this for my program coming up,
Speaker 5: my next daily Rucas hopefully next week. But yeah, I
Speaker 5: was looking for one. The last time they did like
Speaker 5: a massive worldwide one. It seems like they haven't really
Speaker 5: since that cyber Polygon World Economic Form thing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's that's interesting because cyber Polygon was, like, I
Speaker 1: don't know, that was sort of the be all end
Speaker 1: all of it. It is so performative though, It's like,
Speaker 1: I really, I don't know. That thing was weird. It
Speaker 1: didn't seem serious to me. It seemed more like a
Speaker 1: media simulation than a you know what I mean, an.
Speaker 5: Actual like well, consider old pandemic was hesher, how real
Speaker 5: is the cyber pandemic?
Speaker 1: That was a media simulation as well, so in many ways. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: so that movie is based on a book. Netflix was
Speaker 1: in a bidding war for it and it was. They
Speaker 1: did work with the Obama production house. I'm trying to
Speaker 1: find the name of it, but there's too many words
Speaker 1: on the screen. I give up. But yeah, very strange
Speaker 1: messaging in there, very ominous as as it comes to
Speaker 1: cyber Polygon style events. Ethan Hawk and Kevin Bacon. That
Speaker 1: was just weird, dude. That was very strange set up.
Speaker 1: And then they had that Civil War movie too, Remember
Speaker 1: Civil Wars? You watched that? Oh?
Speaker 3: Yeah that that Yeah, that was a weird one.
Speaker 1: It was right around the same time, like the big
Speaker 1: movie season of twenty three.
Speaker 3: I could not have finished that movie.
Speaker 1: That was awful.
Speaker 5: Well didn't didn't the country just experience a complete blackout?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah? How long was that that was in Spain? Right?
Speaker 1: How long was it.
Speaker 4: Out Portugal as well?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Yep, yep.
Speaker 4: You think that was a test.
Speaker 1: I always leaned toward that.
Speaker 5: They alkay, they said that it was not a cyber attack.
Speaker 5: And now the speculation of courses, they're like, well, it's
Speaker 5: the the shitty DEI, fake climate change, windmill policy.
Speaker 4: Whatever that either.
Speaker 1: Man, I don't know, No.
Speaker 5: I think they pushed a button and said let's see
Speaker 5: what happens.
Speaker 1: That seems to usually be the case. I mean, when
Speaker 1: we had that big outage on the East coast here
Speaker 1: in the United States a year or two ago, they
Speaker 1: claimed it was a cyber attack, but really it was
Speaker 1: They did get a ransomware, but they're the ones that
Speaker 1: turned it off. They're the ones that you know, they
Speaker 1: powered that stuff down. It wasn't like the virus came
Speaker 1: in and it just stopped working.
Speaker 5: Or one time it was like a squirrel, right, a
Speaker 5: squirrel took like a whole country out.
Speaker 1: That was a monk, wouldn't It was a monkey.
Speaker 4: Monkey there you go.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that was pretty good.
Speaker 5: It's always always finger pointing, and you know, but like
Speaker 5: you don't know who really did it.
Speaker 4: It's whoever they say did it.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, Like how would you really know unless you
Speaker 1: like worked there or something, or even then, I mean
Speaker 1: look at Stucks now, man, we got ski all way
Speaker 1: back to stucksnet in Iran and shit like that.
Speaker 3: I mean.
Speaker 1: Fancy Bear, Cozy Bear, Vault seven. I mean every time
Speaker 1: we turn and see one of these things, it's like,
Speaker 1: oh great, this is clearly stagecraft, state craft propaganda, psyops
Speaker 1: and or black ops. And there's a narrative attached to it.
Speaker 1: And I don't know where to go from there, you know,
Speaker 1: do I believe it? Probably not?
Speaker 3: So talk about psyops. Did you see the executive order
Speaker 3: that Trump signed and all the propaganda they pushed it?
Speaker 3: Oh he banned gain a function research, yes, dude, And
Speaker 3: and yeah that this is a perfect example of like
Speaker 3: like people not even like trying to do just simple
Speaker 3: due diligence to see what's actually written it and then
Speaker 3: they just coming running with it. So number one, he
Speaker 3: did not ban anything, right, He he basically not shut
Speaker 3: it down. He just put restrictions in some countries. Right,
Speaker 3: and he puts some oversight.
Speaker 9: It first relates to gain of function research.
Speaker 1: Yeah, let's I got the clip right here. Let's check
Speaker 1: it out.
Speaker 9: The first relates to gain of function research. Gain of
Speaker 9: function research is a type of biomedical research where pathogens
Speaker 9: are adulterated. Viruses are adulterated to make them more potent
Speaker 9: or to change the way that they function. Many people
Speaker 9: believe that gain of function research was one of the
Speaker 9: key causes of the COVID pandemic that struck us in
Speaker 9: the last decade. What this executive order does, first of all,
Speaker 9: it provides powerful new tools to enforce the ban on
Speaker 9: federal funding for gain of function research abroad. It also
Speaker 9: strengthens other oversight mechanisms related to that issue, and creates
Speaker 9: an overarching strategy to ensure that biomedical research in general
Speaker 9: is being conducted safely and in a way that that
Speaker 9: ultimately protects human health more.
Speaker 7: It's a big deal. It could have been that we
Speaker 7: wouldn't have had the problem.
Speaker 3: We had a lot.
Speaker 9: A lot of people say that if we had this done.
Speaker 3: Earlier, thank you. Yeah, and guess what he's took about
Speaker 3: it being funded by actual US government directs US government, right,
Speaker 3: but we know a lot of this gets funded by
Speaker 3: just black money, right.
Speaker 1: Or yeah, it goes through NGOs, It goes through ng
Speaker 1: exactly all this other ship and.
Speaker 3: In this case it's completely bypasses that EO. Like this
Speaker 3: EO is just useless in this case.
Speaker 5: Yeah, that's just isn't this supposed to make America great again?
Speaker 5: For gain of function? We don't want the funding going
Speaker 5: to foreign gain of function. We want that money to
Speaker 5: stay here on our own gain of function.
Speaker 1: Right, Like they're they're talking about like like you're not
Speaker 1: going to mention for di trick. Guys, you're not gonna
Speaker 1: mention for Dietrich. Were some of the craziest ship that
Speaker 1: you know, we do here in America that under military contract,
Speaker 1: using our own tax dollars to do supposed gain of
Speaker 1: function research, which I don't really think is a thing.
Speaker 1: But that's neither here nor there. It's just it's just
Speaker 1: about the money routes, that seems. That's all I took
Speaker 1: from that is we're going to change the money routing.
Speaker 3: That's it. That's exactly what it is.
Speaker 1: It doesn't change anything.
Speaker 4: Where's the money go?
Speaker 6: Oh?
Speaker 5: Ask Cathrone Austin fits just rebranding.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, I mean I'll have to I'll have to
Speaker 1: read that executive order in its entirety to to truly say.
Speaker 1: But just from their little once over there, if that's
Speaker 1: their their elevator pitch on that one. I don't think
Speaker 1: this one does jack shit. No.
Speaker 3: I asked Grog to summarize it to me, and it
Speaker 3: gave me pretty good summary of the three points in
Speaker 3: the executive world. That's just something the eyes are good to.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Great summaries, Great summaries.
Speaker 5: I always I always follow up anything the AI tells
Speaker 5: me with are you sure?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Did you double check?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 4: You'd be surprised how many times it catches itself.
Speaker 3: Yeah, oh yeah, yeah for sure.
Speaker 5: Apparently what you're supposed to do is you're supposed to
Speaker 5: ask a chat one of the LM write me a
Speaker 5: prompt to get excellently. So you're supposed to use AI
Speaker 5: to write a prompt to then use in the AI
Speaker 5: to get better results. That was the other thing I
Speaker 5: didn't mention earlier. Yeah's pretty neat apparently.
Speaker 1: Yeah, make sure I asked the question properly. Could you
Speaker 1: rephrase my own question for me?
Speaker 3: Please?
Speaker 1: Yep? To you.
Speaker 5: I've actually, I've had better luck actually build recreating images
Speaker 5: that way by taking an image that I want to
Speaker 5: recreate and getting a description from an AI, because the
Speaker 5: AI goes into this big, long description about what it's seeing,
Speaker 5: and then I'll plug that into my prompt for the
Speaker 5: image generator, and the results are much better than me
Speaker 5: just saying, you know, I want a picture of a
Speaker 5: box sitting on a table. You know, if I take
Speaker 5: a picture of a box sitting on a table, it
Speaker 5: goes into great detail about everything in the picture. So
Speaker 5: and then that's the kind of the results you get.
Speaker 5: So there's something to that reverse engineering. But at what point, again,
Speaker 5: at what point it's just nothing but the AI training
Speaker 5: the AI. At some point the input feed is going
Speaker 5: to come to a stop, right, and then what are
Speaker 5: we getting just like rehashed garbage and hallucinations because that's
Speaker 5: going on anyways.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, totally.
Speaker 5: Speaking hallucinations and people and money disappearing. What's what this
Speaker 5: Shilo Hendrick's chick speaking of psyops?
Speaker 3: Oh, I don't know, Oh my god, I have at that.
Speaker 4: It's pretty big news. I guess.
Speaker 1: I guess for a second, I find it interesting because
Speaker 1: tribalism has returned. Like you know, we've got this this
Speaker 1: Uh it's African American high schooler who's dabbed to death
Speaker 1: a white dude and is getting you know, over like
Speaker 1: eight hundred thousand dollars on his giftsend go or go
Speaker 1: fund me or whatever. And then this girl wings out
Speaker 1: the N words sort of you know, angrily at the
Speaker 1: baby park and uh, now she's getting threats as though,
Speaker 1: like you're not allowed to say that word or something
Speaker 1: like that. I mean, socially you're not, but legally you
Speaker 1: live in America. If you choose too, you can.
Speaker 4: I guess she's allegedly getting threats.
Speaker 1: Yeah, she's allegedly getting threats, and she's up to what
Speaker 1: five six hundred thousand dollars now and.
Speaker 3: Yeahs six hundred dollars. I'm might you want to you
Speaker 3: want to hear my spiray theory. Yeah, it's it's a
Speaker 3: whole arranged situation between her and that other dude that
Speaker 3: films her, and you're just a sucker in there. But
Speaker 3: they're just prying on you, dude.
Speaker 4: I guess people wouldn't do that.
Speaker 1: Are crazy?
Speaker 4: What are you talking about?
Speaker 3: And no, right, it's not that it didn't happen before.
Speaker 1: How come we can't think of syops like this? We
Speaker 1: need to commit better sy ops.
Speaker 3: Man, I know, right, it's now. But seriously, like it's
Speaker 3: it's just crazy to think that someone is just going
Speaker 3: to go pay like someone like that money like it
Speaker 3: just as you said, just tribalism and it's emotional like counteractions.
Speaker 3: It's crazy.
Speaker 1: It's nuts, dude.
Speaker 3: Until we really clear all this emotional trauma that this
Speaker 3: everybody's going through, I mean, we're not going to be
Speaker 3: able to move forward. It just you're going to be
Speaker 3: able to be used because this is how they're going
Speaker 3: to be able to always stereer you one way or
Speaker 3: the other.
Speaker 5: Another strange phenomenon that hit the news feeds across the
Speaker 5: past two weeks since the last time we gathered for
Speaker 5: a conslave is something to do with one hundred men
Speaker 5: and are gorillas or one girl.
Speaker 3: I thought it was Bonnie Blue versus one one one girl.
Speaker 4: Oh my god, m but that's wrong, man.
Speaker 3: I know, but yeah, that's that's yeah. I guess it's
Speaker 3: one one good thing he is good at doing simulation
Speaker 3: of some some who's gonna win one gorilla versus one hundred.
Speaker 1: Men, some some terrible globals. Someone who is really bad
Speaker 1: of being a good global citizen put this up me
Speaker 1: and the gorilla after realizing we share a common enemy.
Speaker 3: Nice, I need I need the link to that. Can
Speaker 3: you please put that in the I need the link
Speaker 3: to this?
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I'll put that in the in the chat room.
Speaker 4: What what is up with these things? There's always one
Speaker 4: of these?
Speaker 5: Like what was it the one time about the chicken,
Speaker 5: the you're going to run into a man in the
Speaker 5: forest or a bear? Remember that ship?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah?
Speaker 4: Is that is that one? Is that? What this is?
Speaker 4: Is this one of these?
Speaker 5: One of the is the the dress blue or green
Speaker 5: or whatever it was or brown? Why these stupid little
Speaker 5: social like distractions go viral out of like nowhere. Are
Speaker 5: these type of things planned or are these just like
Speaker 5: the the random stuff that happens.
Speaker 3: I think it's a random stuff. It happened, but I
Speaker 3: think it's intentional because it's distraction. I think actually, during
Speaker 3: that Hendricks chick thing, something actually was happening around I
Speaker 3: forget what it is, but there is then it worked.
Speaker 3: It worked, and it did work because everybody what they
Speaker 3: were talking about on freaking Twitter was that instance. It's crazy.
Speaker 5: I think that's when Trump was signing that executive order.
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 4: Yeah, which, by the way.
Speaker 5: He bragged, by the way, as part of his celebration
Speaker 5: of the first hundred days, like nobody has signed as
Speaker 5: many executive orders as this guy. And I'm like, whoa
Speaker 5: hold on a second, Like, not that long ago. That
Speaker 5: was like you're supposed to be like, what the fuck's
Speaker 5: up with all the executive orders? Now you're like, I'm
Speaker 5: proud of it. This is crazy.
Speaker 3: Yeah, does he even read those eos?
Speaker 5: Did you notice that he always has somebody explain in
Speaker 5: great detail what he's signing, and then he always says
Speaker 5: the same thing when he after, it's very big. It's
Speaker 5: a big it's a big deal. He always calls everything
Speaker 5: the fucking big deal. You guys notice this, but don't fail.
Speaker 1: And he always leaves you waiting for a next big deal.
Speaker 1: He's like, Oh, I got it. I'm gonna release something
Speaker 1: tomorrow or later next week. It's huge. It's gonna be
Speaker 1: that's gonna blow your socks off. And I'm always just like, what,
Speaker 1: which what was it this week? Was it you're reopening Alcatraz?
Speaker 1: Is that what you teased? Me with last week, like,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure which ambastic thing it is you're doing
Speaker 1: that was the big thing I should be looking out
Speaker 1: for this week. It's hard to keep up.
Speaker 4: Man, Well he did.
Speaker 5: He teased an announcement which was announced today, but yesterday
Speaker 5: everybody was sitting on the edge of their seats wondering
Speaker 5: what the f this guy is gonna drop next? Is
Speaker 5: gonna be sneakers, Bible Trump steaks, because he's all.
Speaker 4: We're gonna really, we're gonna have a really huge.
Speaker 5: It's gonna be the's as big as it gets. Those
Speaker 5: are his words. He said that this announcement he was
Speaker 5: making today is as big as it gets. So I'm
Speaker 5: gonna take him for his words. So that means that
Speaker 5: after today nothing is gonna be as big as his
Speaker 5: announcement today. What's his announcement today? Oh yeah, they fucked
Speaker 5: around with the terrorists and some trade deal with Britain
Speaker 5: and now we're gonna be paying a higher tariff to
Speaker 5: Britain than we did before.
Speaker 4: So exciting.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, right, it's.
Speaker 4: As big as it gets.
Speaker 3: Yeah. When I when I when I heard when I
Speaker 3: heard when I heard this, like the announcement, I was
Speaker 3: like it's gonna be just bullshit.
Speaker 1: It sure felt that way.
Speaker 5: I mean, yeah, it's just your bullshit detector was correct, sir.
Speaker 3: Yes, yep.
Speaker 1: What about four chan? Do you guys hear about four chan?
Speaker 3: Chan?
Speaker 1: So four chan was hacked, Its database is dumped and
Speaker 1: moderators exposed in in the last week or so.
Speaker 5: They definitely need protect They should probably get a kickstarter
Speaker 5: campaign going or go fund me.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Really, Uh, they got taken down by a rival imageboard
Speaker 1: hacking group. Databases dumped, mods docked, proving that some of
Speaker 1: the mods were federal agents gloey fed boys like we've been.
Speaker 3: Seeing there forever.
Speaker 1: Yep, So four chan gets hacked, all the moderators shocked,
Speaker 1: all the moderators docked, and guess what some of them
Speaker 1: are using dot gov emails.
Speaker 3: How stupid you need to be to use the gov email?
Speaker 3: Come on, just a bit of cover up, you know.
Speaker 1: Yep? Yep, I think they had they think they servers
Speaker 1: might have gotten new too. Okay, this person says up
Speaker 1: some funny bits of the four chan chack four chan
Speaker 1: hack I haven't seen mentioned yet. The hacker managed to
Speaker 1: gain root access because the site runs on a version
Speaker 1: of free BSD that was last updated in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: A non insignificant portion of the janitor's slash mods that
Speaker 1: were docs to use dot edu emails, which means they're universities,
Speaker 1: which means they're probably attached to government contracts and or
Speaker 1: NGO contracts, or doing stupid research like making little hate
Speaker 1: maps funded by the SPLC or the ADL or some
Speaker 1: shit like that. It says they managed to dump the
Speaker 1: source code. Almost the entirety of four chan is badly formatted,
Speaker 1: mostly uncommon, ten thousand plus line line file called imgboard
Speaker 1: dot php. Some functions like the one makes a new
Speaker 1: post are over two thousand lines long. I'm not a
Speaker 1: PHP programmer, so I can't make heather or tails many specifics,
Speaker 1: but this codebase is a complete disaster all around. It's
Speaker 1: easy to see why zero work has been done on
Speaker 1: the site since moot left. It is disgraceful. The hackers
Speaker 1: leaked the source code for the site and claim to
Speaker 1: have the IP addresses behind every post, the identities of
Speaker 1: all moderators, and it seems it got hacked because it
Speaker 1: was running on software that was a decade out of date.
Speaker 1: So four chan, Wow, that's that's not a good look
Speaker 1: but not surprising. Fits right in line with what we've
Speaker 1: suspected for the longest time, dot ed U s and
Speaker 1: dot gov emails. Well r I P four chan is
Speaker 1: it done? I don't know. I don't go there and
Speaker 1: don't visit there, but I found that to be highly
Speaker 1: entertaining news right there.
Speaker 4: It's okay.
Speaker 5: I mean all the good stuff already trained the AI right.
Speaker 1: All the the glowy fed boy responses and the uh
Speaker 1: the the liberal comedy responses from the edu accounts. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so that that's just fun. I thought that was some
Speaker 1: fun drama right there. Yeah, speaking of fun drama, you
Speaker 1: got anything else? Because I'm about I'm about spent, you guys,
Speaker 1: you wanna.
Speaker 5: Got some I got some fun drama our our state
Speaker 5: here of Texas, sir. Oh yeah, your favorite, your favorite
Speaker 5: professor Xavier.
Speaker 4: Want to be governor. What's his name? Crap craphead abbot
Speaker 4: abbit abbot.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Yeah, So I guess they want to make it a
Speaker 5: legal to make like political memes and stuff here, like
Speaker 5: like serve jail time if you make a meme that's
Speaker 5: not like without a label that says you didn't get
Speaker 5: permission to do.
Speaker 4: What is the deal you you probably paid attention to this.
Speaker 1: Yeah, just a little bit. I mean, honestly, it was
Speaker 1: so ridiculous to me. I was just like, what what
Speaker 1: are you talking about?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 1: See you in court.
Speaker 4: I don't know. I'm in trouble then, I think, so.
Speaker 3: Let me let me check. I thought they actually made
Speaker 3: it a law.
Speaker 1: I'd say, good luck with that one. You guys, uh, yeah,
Speaker 1: how are you going to wield that?
Speaker 3: Who are you going to house pass this bill requiring
Speaker 3: more transparency and political ads? No, that's not so.
Speaker 4: I guess what it means. They want you to put
Speaker 4: a label on it that like, so.
Speaker 5: This is they going to make a meme that is
Speaker 5: so what qualifies as like being political? Does it have
Speaker 5: to be specifically about a cancer? Does that mean like
Speaker 5: literally you cannot criticize the governor in a political mean
Speaker 5: unless you put a you put like some sort of
Speaker 5: disclaimer or you violated the law.
Speaker 4: I don't get it.
Speaker 1: That doesn't make it doesn't make any sense, Like, how
Speaker 1: how would you even do that? Let's see Greg Abbott
Speaker 1: meme law. Newsweek has Texas banned political memes. Here's what
Speaker 1: we know so out of dreaded Newsweek. Here, let's see
Speaker 1: what they have to say.
Speaker 3: This.
Speaker 4: You know this was written by AI.
Speaker 3: Okay, so pass the how but they did not pass
Speaker 3: the Senate yet.
Speaker 1: Okay, so yes past his house built three sixty six,
Speaker 1: which would make it a legal requirement for a digitally
Speaker 1: altered media to be labeled such if it is used
Speaker 1: by a candidate or campaign group that spends over one
Speaker 1: hundred dollars on political advertising.
Speaker 3: So it seems not everybody, then.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's just for people that spend money on political advertising.
Speaker 4: So but I thought this was I thought this was America.
Speaker 1: What if I want to spend over one hundred dollars
Speaker 1: on political advertising and make memes? Like what if I
Speaker 1: want to do that? Maybe I support this? Like what
Speaker 1: the fuck? How about we criticize.
Speaker 4: How death and weird timing and why?
Speaker 1: How about we all get a check for five thousand
Speaker 1: dollars for criticizing candidates? How about every single one of
Speaker 1: US Americans that criticizes a candidate gets a big, fat
Speaker 1: fucking check. How about that?
Speaker 4: I want mine and Trump coin please?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah, yeah, dollar bill Trump Trump dollar bill a
Speaker 1: doll give me that, put it in my crypto.
Speaker 3: He's really after that dinner.
Speaker 5: I think there's something I think, Yeah, I think I
Speaker 5: can change in just mind, I really do.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna dump all my doge coin. I'm gonna turn
Speaker 1: it into trump coin.
Speaker 4: I'm in, you know, Yeah, I'm gonna swap out my
Speaker 4: pepe as soon as we're done here.
Speaker 1: I got ten million doge.
Speaker 5: So, speaking of the economy, there is one last, big,
Speaker 5: big news story, something we definitely need to address before
Speaker 5: we all have to deal with it. So, in case
Speaker 5: you didn't know, we're about to see some empty shells
Speaker 5: hitting the stores people. And it's not thanks to a
Speaker 5: fake pandemic or whatever the hell happened last time, but
Speaker 5: similar to what happened last time, you're probably gonna see
Speaker 5: bare shells again. It's because of these tariffs. Because these
Speaker 5: these crazy, crazy high tariffs, especially on like imported goods
Speaker 5: coming from China. When's the last time you checked like
Speaker 5: what you buy at the store and what's inside your
Speaker 5: house and what label says guess where it was made
Speaker 5: and where it came from from China. So everyone's been
Speaker 5: starting to slowly come out and warn people that okay,
Speaker 5: this is going to affect the supply, and the more
Speaker 5: the media has been talking about this, the more people
Speaker 5: are checking their stores and they're going, haha, you stupid,
Speaker 5: dumb fuck, I got nothing. There's plenty of eggs and
Speaker 5: plenty of toilet papers. Like people, this is like a
Speaker 5: tsunami effect. Okay, It's like the shit that's in the
Speaker 5: stores is the stuff that's in the warehouses that's already stocked.
Speaker 4: The ships stopped coming in.
Speaker 5: Okay, So in like a week from now, you might notice, Oh,
Speaker 5: how come the toy shells look empty.
Speaker 4: Two weeks from now, you might be like, huh, that's weird.
Speaker 5: There's like not as many clothes here as there was
Speaker 5: last time I went shopping. This time, by the time
Speaker 5: the kids are back in school, you're really gonna fucking notice.
Speaker 4: So please pay attention to that.
Speaker 5: If there are key things, important things, pharmaceuticals, a lot
Speaker 5: of these things depend on important like the damage is
Speaker 5: already done. And we saw what happened during the pandemic.
Speaker 5: So I'm just giving everybody a fair warning. And this
Speaker 5: is news, and this is what people are talking about,
Speaker 5: and of course you're blaming Trump.
Speaker 4: Of course.
Speaker 3: Well so there's only few there are few people in
Speaker 3: ministry media that that brought this up. But I don't
Speaker 3: know how much I trust that to be honest.
Speaker 5: I think just pay attention. I think you're gonna see
Speaker 5: the effects of this. I don't think they don't want
Speaker 5: everybody to run out and pay.
Speaker 3: They're saying, they're saying it's gonna be base B six weeks.
Speaker 3: So let's let's that's a well Trump.
Speaker 4: Trump just did the meet the Press thing with that lady.
Speaker 5: I keep forgetting her name, now whatever, she's the dee
Speaker 5: I hired running Meet the press, right, and his in
Speaker 5: his interview, he's all like, I'm just saying it's going
Speaker 5: to be paid. Like the sweet little baby eleven year
Speaker 5: old girl doesn't need thirty dollars. Maybe she can just
Speaker 5: have one doll or whatever, he says. Right, So he's
Speaker 5: already they're already really prepping. I think it's gonna be
Speaker 5: a tight toy Toilett Christmas this year. I think Trump
Speaker 5: canceled Christmas kids up.
Speaker 4: Sorry, which which I which?
Speaker 3: You know what, I think it's not a bad thing.
Speaker 3: You know what, No, no, why do we need to
Speaker 3: go out and buy some Chinese cheap shit and just
Speaker 3: spending money on.
Speaker 5: Useless No, no, no, before you go there, I agree, but
Speaker 5: we we live in this stupid consumer economy. I know
Speaker 5: it's going to affect the economy because there's gonna be
Speaker 5: stores that are close, people losing their jobs.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right, it's going to affect we know that.
Speaker 3: But that's again, that's part of why you should really
Speaker 3: give that message to the people in the right way.
Speaker 3: And I don't think it was done.
Speaker 5: There free free t points out the important one that
Speaker 5: I wanted to point out when I learned that how
Speaker 5: much shit that from lows and home depot is heavily
Speaker 5: dependent on foreign shipments coming in. I mean that that
Speaker 5: affects other like now you can't build ship Now you
Speaker 5: can't go start that business plan, you know. Like so
Speaker 5: again the same kind of knockdown ripple effects that we
Speaker 5: saw thanks to the pandemic. Is all I'm saying is
Speaker 5: that we're going to start witnessing again. It's just for
Speaker 5: a different reason, that's all.
Speaker 3: But you see what you say, you know what it
Speaker 3: is the same disruption of the supply chain that we
Speaker 3: saw before, and they did not act to fix it,
Speaker 3: and it just has to get done. Why the hell
Speaker 3: do we have to a port freaking nails from China
Speaker 3: or Europe?
Speaker 5: Well, this is why I trump is pushing for manufacturing
Speaker 5: to come back to America because obviously, across the decades
Speaker 5: we pushed it all away. But that's not an overnight fix.
Speaker 5: So this Apple guy was not. The Apple guy was saying, like,
Speaker 5: do you guys realize what it's going to take toll
Speaker 5: if we made an American iPhone? How long it's going
Speaker 5: to take us to make it, and how much it's
Speaker 5: going to cost you. I mean, it's just just shocking.
Speaker 5: It's absolutely shocking.
Speaker 3: No, no, I know that, but but I think I
Speaker 3: think maybe it's we just have to stop buying stuff
Speaker 3: for a while, save your money and buy Trump coin
Speaker 3: so you can go to dinners.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there you go. Well, you know a lot of
Speaker 1: people already by American, A lot of people listen to
Speaker 1: this show at least do their best to buy American,
Speaker 1: and uh, a lot of those companies are getting fucked too.
Speaker 1: You know. It's like it's already we're already like bending
Speaker 1: over basically backward and taking more out of the wallet
Speaker 1: to not buy Chinese shit, and now these vendors are
Speaker 1: are getting hit with it too, you know, just by
Speaker 1: virtue of how much it costs to get their materials.
Speaker 1: So it's you know, and that's when it sucks. But
Speaker 1: then you see, like you know, Walmart's sales are down,
Speaker 1: it's like whoo, yeah, who fucking cares? You know, good,
Speaker 1: big deal. But it's just so like shotguns spread right
Speaker 1: now with like where the opportunities and where the downfalls are.
Speaker 1: It's just a little it's a little chaotic, man.
Speaker 3: Oh, absolutely, just chaotic.
Speaker 1: It seems to be the name of the first hundred
Speaker 1: The first hundred days is a lot of chaos, man,
Speaker 1: very chaotic, which you know is I guess probably a
Speaker 1: leftist talking point, but I mean, you know, it is chaotic.
Speaker 5: It just is it has to be so that we
Speaker 5: can get the order of Kale.
Speaker 1: Yeah, right, it comes right down to it.
Speaker 3: But but but think about it. They like the last
Speaker 3: four years, the damage that was done. And it's not
Speaker 3: just the last four years, it's saving before that, right,
Speaker 3: but yeah, the last four years the amount of damage
Speaker 3: that was done to us. So any course correction has
Speaker 3: to look chaotic. But again this is where in the
Speaker 3: beginning where I said he failed because he did not
Speaker 3: prime and he did not come out and talk to people,
Speaker 3: because that should have been better messaging, like to to
Speaker 3: reduce the chaos. Uh and and and even together support
Speaker 3: of people when when things get tough.
Speaker 1: Mm hmm. Yeah, no, none of that, no, no, you know,
Speaker 1: just bombasticness and uh that that bombastic is not gonna
Speaker 1: work in times like that. Yeah. And the shock and
Speaker 1: awe you know, the intentional shock and awe on the
Speaker 1: political left the other side is just like you know,
Speaker 1: it just just raises the polarization, the adamization, the political
Speaker 1: anger between the two sides moving forwards. You know, it's
Speaker 1: not a surprise.
Speaker 3: Mm hmm.
Speaker 1: All right, you guys, Well let's uh, let's let's call
Speaker 1: it a show. Let's call it a show unless we're
Speaker 1: missing anything else. And I got a couple of all right,
Speaker 1: well let's see here. We'll go around the room, start
Speaker 1: with you, missical Pharaoh, save rounds, final thoughts, anything you
Speaker 1: went through out here before we shut this episode of
Speaker 1: Boiler Room down. It's been a pleasure to have you
Speaker 1: here tonight, to be back in the boiler room with
Speaker 1: you guys.
Speaker 3: Man, thanks man, good to be back, and I hope
Speaker 3: everybody enjoyed today's show. And I'll see you guys soon.
Speaker 1: All right, mister Colfharaoh, there he goes ruckus over you
Speaker 1: save rounds.
Speaker 5: Final thoughts to put a feather and the cap on
Speaker 5: some of the things we've been talking about this evening.
Speaker 4: I'm going to quote the Bible.
Speaker 5: Yeah, Second Corinthians eleven fourteen, and no marvel for Satan
Speaker 5: himself is transformed into an angel of lights.
Speaker 4: Yes, the.
Speaker 5: Pharaoh mentioned that I was very skeptical of the Trump
Speaker 5: administratory because of skeptical of all power, of all government,
Speaker 5: of all politicians. So because these people, in order for
Speaker 5: them to do the most damaged, the most evil, to
Speaker 5: be the most wicked, they have to appear to be
Speaker 5: the most loving, most light bearing, most friendly, helpful thing.
Speaker 5: And he's got that cult person. I mean, like there
Speaker 5: was a time not even that long ago where it
Speaker 5: seemed like holy shit, like I feel like I'm in
Speaker 5: a very small camp of people who don't trust this
Speaker 5: guy at all, where because like a lot he'll do
Speaker 5: some good things and like wow, okay, so we got
Speaker 5: close to a point where I'm like, oh my shit,
Speaker 5: oh my god, almost everybody likes they and what he's
Speaker 5: doing and what he's saying, and that's very scary. I
Speaker 5: prefer when like there's there all oh what are you doing.
Speaker 5: I like the people with the Trump derangement syndrome. I
Speaker 5: like people going off the hinges and calling Hitler for
Speaker 5: no reason, because now that you have a reason to
Speaker 5: accuse him of doing things that Hitler did, you can't
Speaker 5: you know. But anyways, so anyways, I just wanted to
Speaker 5: bring that up. I'm all over the place this week.
Speaker 5: I do my stuff Monday nights on Weaponized News. But
Speaker 5: tomorrow tune in. I'm going to be on a podcast,
Speaker 5: Let's see if I can pull this up here, called
Speaker 5: the third Rail Podcast. This is hosted by our friend
Speaker 5: nature Boy, and so I'm going to be on his podcast.
Speaker 5: You can find him on X Rumble. I don't think
Speaker 5: he's on YouTube. In fact, I'm pretty sure he's not,
Speaker 5: but he might be on Odyssey. But check him out
Speaker 5: on Rumble. Check him out on X. It's the third
Speaker 5: Rail podcast with nature Boy. It's n BE and not
Speaker 5: by Nature Nature Boys. Use your name on X and
Speaker 5: I will be there tomorrow night Live. It's a panel discussion.
Speaker 5: It's a fun thing that he does. He has a
Speaker 5: bunch of people on and they pass a stick, a
Speaker 5: virtual talking stick, and if I get the stick, I
Speaker 5: get to flap my gums for a while and do
Speaker 5: my thing. So it's a good podcast, good group of folks,
Speaker 5: and check it out if you can. That will be
Speaker 5: five pm, five pm Pacific, eight pm Eastern, which is
Speaker 5: seven pm Central our time hasher.
Speaker 4: Thank you so much. It was a great show. It
Speaker 4: was fun doing this. We almost hit three hours.
Speaker 5: How about that? Until next time. God bless you, teach
Speaker 5: you and every one of you, and may God save
Speaker 5: this republic.
Speaker 4: Ruck us out.
Speaker 1: All right, Thanks Rucas. It was great to be back
Speaker 1: in the boiler room with you guys tonight. Glad Mark
Speaker 1: Anderson was able to join us. Thank you, Pharaoh. Thank
Speaker 1: you everybody out there on x YouTube Rumble for hanging
Speaker 1: with us tonight. Great to see you in the chat rooms.
Speaker 1: Very active tonight. Appreciate that. Please hit the like button
Speaker 1: and the subscribe buttons and all that good stuff. We
Speaker 1: appreciate that. Shout out again for the tip there we
Speaker 1: got in a swear draft. You want to support us,
Speaker 1: We got support links in the descriptions below and on
Speaker 1: the website. Our website is Alternate Current Radio dot com.
Speaker 1: And we will be back with you probably for Sunday
Speaker 1: Wire coming up this Sunday and we're doing some changes
Speaker 1: over at the Pulse. I'm still broadcasting at the Pulse,
Speaker 1: but I've had to taken a break for the last
Speaker 1: week or so. Here they're changing the website up a
Speaker 1: little bit too, So look for me over there. I'll
Speaker 1: be back as soon as the links are up and
Speaker 1: ready for me again over there at the Pulse. Thepulse
Speaker 1: dot today is the website. And we'll see you for
Speaker 1: Sunday Wire here at Alternate Current Radio on Sunday. And
Speaker 1: that's it. We're out here. We'll see you next time
Speaker 1: for another edition of Boiler Room.
Speaker 3: H that's it. Go ahead and run, run home, and
Speaker 3: cry to mama.