Speaker 1: I have a great many things to share with you today.
Speaker 1: Good morning. It is Tuesday, October eighth, twenty twenty four today,
Speaker 1: yet right around twelve thirty Pacific, depending on what time
Speaker 1: his appointment is completed, doctor Alfonso Manzo will be on
Speaker 1: with us. I'm not sure how long it'll go for,
Speaker 1: but that'll be posted up so you'll be able to
Speaker 1: see the thumbnail of on Rumble. Because I don't pay
Speaker 1: for Rumble, I can't put more than one live stream
Speaker 1: up at a time. So there you go. If we're
Speaker 1: gonna look at again, I mean this is to me
Speaker 1: because it's true. One of the greatest web bins of
Speaker 1: a governing body. Should they choose to fly like this,
Speaker 1: should they choose to rule by this man? Or is fear? Now?
Speaker 1: Fear could be direct or it could be indirect by
Speaker 1: pointing at a boogeyman, pointing at a boogeyman virus, and
Speaker 1: over time, with this idea that Dwayne has brought to us,
Speaker 1: this idea of the rise of the expert, this reality
Speaker 1: that is that we have come to surrender our minds
Speaker 1: and our thoughts and our own personal observations over to
Speaker 1: people who we already assume are smarter than us and
Speaker 1: are more reputable, and they wouldn't lie about it. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is science, this is the doctor. They're here to
Speaker 1: help us when you understand the origins of these establishments
Speaker 1: and the hijacking that took place, and the hidden hand
Speaker 1: involved in all of this, And you know, hey, I
Speaker 1: wish it wasn't true that they all follow the Kabbalah.
Speaker 1: I wish it wasn't true. That's assault Jewish mysticism and
Speaker 1: other types of mysticism, sufi and all this other stuff.
Speaker 1: I wish it wasn't true, because then I wouldn't have
Speaker 1: to come on point in the same people all the time.
Speaker 1: Come next reign of terror that's going to be made illegal,
Speaker 1: and apparently people will be deported or killed under Trump
Speaker 1: for even suggesting such a thing. So I better get
Speaker 1: it in now, and then I don't know, do one
Speaker 1: of those face off movies after the fact. I don't know.
Speaker 1: It is what it is, and unfortunately the truth is
Speaker 1: what it is too. Like I said, it's an unfortunate truth.
Speaker 1: But I'm not the one misbehaving. I'm not the one
Speaker 1: causing tremendous catastrophe everywhere I've gone for the last six
Speaker 1: thousand years so, and when you know that's at the
Speaker 1: root of everything that we trust, that's where the breaking
Speaker 1: point is. This the deprogramming starts to have to occur
Speaker 1: because there's no reason for us to be trusting these people.
Speaker 1: And we have to understand the true nature of our government.
Speaker 1: It's not a constitutional republic, not anymore. We lost that
Speaker 1: in eighteen sixty five. Slowly they corporatized us. They've installed
Speaker 1: their weapon of control, the Federal Reserve. Anything that has
Speaker 1: said Federal audit since then has been a corporate entity
Speaker 1: of the IMF Rothschild Banking conglomerate. So the Federal Viewer
Speaker 1: of Investigations works for the IMF, works for the Federal
Speaker 1: Reserve to protect their interests, not yours. Okay, FEMA Federal
Speaker 1: Emergency Management Agency there to protect their interests, not yours.
Speaker 1: And what are their interests? Reset? Depopulation and control. That's
Speaker 1: it and submission. They want us to bow down, take
Speaker 1: the shots, take the transhumanism, die when they ask us to,
Speaker 1: and do it indirectly. So, now, what's the best way
Speaker 1: to attack a people without arousing the suspicion of others? Well, heck,
Speaker 1: if you have a lot of technology and maybe something
Speaker 1: that's quite ancient. When you start looking back at it.
Speaker 1: You can wipe people out with weather. They don't even
Speaker 1: have to ever think that it was you. That way,
Speaker 1: you keep the rest of the sheep not stirred around
Speaker 1: like in their cages. Right us free range chickens just
Speaker 1: keep bobbing around, peck pecking on the ground, waiting for
Speaker 1: our turn, not knowing that it's happening. And Florida, last
Speaker 1: we checked one hundred and eighty mile parroweds on the
Speaker 1: way and I think something, if I remember correctly, is
Speaker 1: bringing off the coast of California too. I don't know
Speaker 1: if that's true or not. But Florida Disney World hasn't
Speaker 1: even closed out. But Tampa, it was nice knowing you,
Speaker 1: and surrounding date cities, Zephyr Hills, all that stuff. It
Speaker 1: was nice knowing you. They were a police state twenty
Speaker 1: years ago. The police were there, complete savage assholes. Not
Speaker 1: so much as bad as as California, where they have
Speaker 1: people who are actual cadets and young young police officers
Speaker 1: and playing clothes at the bars at Mission Beach who
Speaker 1: monitor people at the bar, wait for them to get
Speaker 1: into the car and then they send police after them
Speaker 1: to get them for a dui. Pieces of shit. That's
Speaker 1: not entrapment, right. Oh, and if that doesn't work, they
Speaker 1: act like a bunch of rowdy mid twenties gentlemen and
Speaker 1: they offer you a drink in the parking lot. This
Speaker 1: happened to someone I know. And then they tailed them,
Speaker 1: pulled them over, waited, waited longer, made them do a
Speaker 1: bunch of tests, then took a blood test and they
Speaker 1: found something in there because they knew they put it there,
Speaker 1: and he got a dui. So this is the world
Speaker 1: that we live in. We are the prey and if
Speaker 1: you run, you are prey too. So turn and face it. Now.
Speaker 1: We're gonna look at a few things here. We're gonna
Speaker 1: get back into what we were talking about before. But
Speaker 1: there is something here. I got to figure out which
Speaker 1: pot it was in. Kind of came out in the
Speaker 1: middle of the night, so I'll be like, oh, he's
Speaker 1: not prepared again, Well, then watch something else then if
Speaker 1: it's so upsetting to you. But there, I can't remember
Speaker 1: what time it came in. Maybe it's on my Instagram too.
Speaker 1: It might be in my Instagram as well. It'll be
Speaker 1: easier to find there our telegram group just like it's
Speaker 1: on fire, so many people sharing stuff. So oh well
Speaker 1: this might be interesting. Huh huh huh. So the way
Speaker 1: that they're showing you with an airplane, I'm gonna show
Speaker 1: you this. I'm not sure if it's crap or not,
Speaker 1: but we'll just look at it, because before I begin
Speaker 1: into this the thing I was actually gonna show you.
Speaker 1: Let's look at this real quick. This is pretty interesting, interesting,
Speaker 1: very interesting. I had a stupid bar on the bottom,
Speaker 1: so let's here it with some audio.
Speaker 2: In northwestern Tennessee.
Speaker 3: I'm not saying that the government created Hurricane Helene.
Speaker 2: What I am saying is that the government has been
Speaker 2: manipulating the weather since nineteen forty seven. What first caught
Speaker 2: my attention with Helene was the shift in the storm's
Speaker 2: projected path. One day, it looked like it would hit
Speaker 2: my town. The next day it had shifted east. I
Speaker 2: then noticed an odd flight path of NOAA forty two,
Speaker 2: the aircraft being flown a lockeyed Martin O'Ryan P three.
Speaker 2: This prompted me to look at previous uses for the
Speaker 2: P three, where I discovered that they were used in
Speaker 2: the nineteen sixties to manipulate Hurricane Camille in a quote
Speaker 2: weather war on Cuba.
Speaker 3: Now, I know this sounds out there, but as we
Speaker 3: begin to see more and more.
Speaker 2: The terrible things our government has done in the past,
Speaker 2: is it really so far fetched? Productions from the twenty
Speaker 2: third of September a large spread traveling the Alabama Georgia
Speaker 2: line and ending up in Illinois. On the twenty fourth,
Speaker 2: the projection is shipped slightly east and the storm is projected.
Speaker 3: I'm not saying that the government created the evening of
Speaker 3: the twenty sixth the same path.
Speaker 2: Three ducks operations throughout Hurricane or Lean as it makes
Speaker 2: landfall in the storm's actual path, tipt further finishing in
Speaker 2: northeast Tenant. What would the government's motivations.
Speaker 3: Possibly be to modify its storm.
Speaker 2: That I don't know, but I do believe that if
Speaker 2: we can maintain our republic long enough, time.
Speaker 3: Will eventually tell.
Speaker 4: Anybody who's listened may be thinking of looting something here,
Speaker 4: Just know that the business owners are staying in their stores.
Speaker 4: They're very well armed, they're protecting their property. Us as
Speaker 4: well as the corner's office, will be glad to come
Speaker 4: deal with that, because you certainly won't need e because
Speaker 4: people are protecting what is theirs right now, they're about
Speaker 4: five hundred calls behind. So I don't advise anybody obviously
Speaker 4: you know doing that, anybody who.
Speaker 5: So it is alone the FEMA seven to fifty that
Speaker 5: they're giving all the people in western North Carolina. It's
Speaker 5: alone FEMA to advance you some money to help pay
Speaker 5: your costs while your insurance is delayed. You'll need to
Speaker 5: pay the money back to FEMA after you receive your
Speaker 5: insurance settlement.
Speaker 1: I imagine a picture.
Speaker 3: You can see I had a woman.
Speaker 1: I think that's about enough for that. And we know
Speaker 1: that the stipulations of that loan is they take your property.
Speaker 1: So somewhat up here we have this is the horrible
Speaker 1: shit that I wanted to show you right here here
Speaker 1: it is. We're doomed. Just so you know, in case
Speaker 1: you didn't already figure that out, here you go. So
Speaker 1: the question would be, well, if not him, then who Kimala. No,
Speaker 1: we're either way. Yeah, yeah, get used to it, because
Speaker 1: that's the ship that's happening. Our lives are in a
Speaker 1: very short time frame. We are we could tick away
Speaker 1: the days before something else is gonna happen. Don't make
Speaker 1: don't make long term plans, That's all I'm saying. And
Speaker 1: if you do, you're very optimistic. They're at Schneersons with
Speaker 1: freaking Shapiro, who I hate already for taking an Italian
Speaker 1: name like that and desecrating it, and a bunch of
Speaker 1: small hats. You know, you got these little rabbi freaking
Speaker 1: Hasidic shith heads here, and look when he's Byron, Yeah,
Speaker 1: yep yeah, and who else was there? Who else was there? Elon,
Speaker 1: motherfucking musque. This is kind of boring because it's he's
Speaker 1: being he's but but the but it shows what a
Speaker 1: puppet he is. They're like, here, this is our little
Speaker 1: ritual that we're doing here. You take this, you read that,
Speaker 1: you touch this, you put this over here, you do
Speaker 1: this over here, you do the macarena, and you turn
Speaker 1: yourself around. That's what we're all about. Jew style or
Speaker 1: hokey pokey, whichever one. So there, there, there's our illustrious
Speaker 1: future leader and past leader. Right. I have yet to
Speaker 1: burn my Jump twenty twenty shirts because I use them
Speaker 1: to work out in and I don't even do that anymore.
Speaker 1: I won't even put them on my skin. But I
Speaker 1: did it, well, I did one day last week when
Speaker 1: the laundry was not done. All right, now let's jump
Speaker 1: into here. Oh well, hold on, I just remembered I
Speaker 1: can do this and then it won't be echoing on
Speaker 1: your side. Hold on one second. Hopefully this still does it.
Speaker 1: My computer sometimes, just because of this h piece witch
Speaker 1: that likes to sabotage, my computer changes up what my
Speaker 1: mic settings are and my other audio settings just randomly
Speaker 1: in the middle of night, and then I go back
Speaker 1: online because I don't I didn't change anything, and then
Speaker 1: everything's wrong either. Stream Yard says, we can't figure out
Speaker 1: what the hell is happening, and I have to figure
Speaker 1: out then or something jacks up on the board here.
Speaker 1: So all right. I hate this computer. It was a
Speaker 1: lie from the beginning. It boasted things that it could
Speaker 1: never do with the two gigabyte freaking GPU. What the
Speaker 1: fuck is that? When I'm getting is at least a
Speaker 1: twelve gig So yeah, five and thirty dollars later, but
Speaker 1: it's gonna be a it's gonna be a good graphics card. Okay,
Speaker 1: So let me scroll the oli over here. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: First of all, let me ask you this so today
Speaker 1: I told you right that right, right right? How do
Speaker 1: they ext it or with the hat? What do you
Speaker 1: think with the hat or without the hat? You guys
Speaker 1: can tell me in the comments or in the in
Speaker 1: the in the lias in las in comments, in the
Speaker 1: in the live chat. So this is doctor Alphonse, momso
Speaker 1: the third are good friend. He's going to be at
Speaker 1: the Red Pill Expo, hence the name Red Pilling with Nutrition,
Speaker 1: all right, and he is a help gangsta. So I
Speaker 1: figured it would make it a little bit of fun
Speaker 1: at least that will attract more eyes to the thumbnail,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, a little click baity, but
Speaker 1: it's funny and it's entertaining, and you know, I may
Speaker 1: as well have a sense of humor, laugh all the
Speaker 1: way to hell. Right, that's what we're gonna do. So
Speaker 1: that one or this one without the hat, I'm thinking
Speaker 1: maybe I'm theion towards without the hat. Pre says no hat,
Speaker 1: but it is kind of I mean, if that gets
Speaker 1: the point across that these gangster then that's fine, that's
Speaker 1: by itself. But I don't know. With the hat kind
Speaker 1: of looks cool too, right, And we'll get into that
Speaker 1: at twelve thirty. We'll talk to him. But there was
Speaker 1: something here. So yeah, Disney under the fire for keeping
Speaker 1: Orlando Park open despite Hurricane Milton warnings. Now we're talking
Speaker 1: about Milton because we have to memory. Hold the last one, right,
Speaker 1: it's pretty pretty castle. I was there when it was
Speaker 1: a giant birthday cake. That was a long time ago.
Speaker 1: They've draggrated it like a giant pink ass birthday cake.
Speaker 1: So I don't buy this. Right here, I'm looking at
Speaker 1: this thing. You don't even have to have the audio.
Speaker 1: But because look how it shifts when he gets here,
Speaker 1: It like switches into something else. We don't know exactly
Speaker 1: if this is exactly over the top of what they're
Speaker 1: saying it is. We don't know, because then it just
Speaker 1: turns to the left like that like that that may
Speaker 1: or may not be accurate, or it's an editing, or
Speaker 1: it's some other AI bullshit. Right, But all this over
Speaker 1: here they don't need to have. They're saying that this
Speaker 1: is some kind of weather weapon, like this is some
Speaker 1: kind of harp thing or whatever. Right, I don't think
Speaker 1: that needs to be localized for that to happen, like
Speaker 1: things in Alaska didn't just happened in Alaska when you
Speaker 1: know HARP was running a long time ago, when HARP
Speaker 1: was actually active. So I don't know if that would
Speaker 1: be necessary. I don't know if this is really under
Speaker 1: the water or not. I would have to I mean,
Speaker 1: if it's possible. It's all that radar off the coast,
Speaker 1: or isn't it. And it looks like it's been there
Speaker 1: for a while. I mean it has growth on that already.
Speaker 1: Those little time things here, these are remnant of something
Speaker 1: like a pylon that was stuck, you know, like for
Speaker 1: a pillar or something. But I don't know. I don't
Speaker 1: know there was something else in here. I wanted to
Speaker 1: show you. Here's this again, yep. Oh yeah, let's remember this.
Speaker 4: We will remove the Jihadis sympathizers.
Speaker 1: And so anybody who recognizes the problem that we face
Speaker 1: and who's trying to kill us, they're going to remove them.
Speaker 1: What does that mean? Remove? This is October seventh as
Speaker 1: your attack me. Okay, no, that's not true. Is this says?
Speaker 1: Remember in case anyone has hasn't archived this yet because
Speaker 1: this was a while back. This is just because it's
Speaker 1: you know, being replaced or whatever. Jew haters. We're going
Speaker 1: to remove the jew haters. We're going to remove the
Speaker 1: jew haters. Well, here's the thing. Jews hate everybody else,
Speaker 1: the ones that are hiding behind reality do. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying all of them do. And people get mad at
Speaker 1: me like that you're not extreme enough. Well, I'm not
Speaker 1: going to be the same problem that they are. I'm
Speaker 1: not going to become what I hate or dislike or
Speaker 1: find offensive and repulsive to just hate blindly. I'm not
Speaker 1: that person. Okay, So tough fucking shit. If you don't
Speaker 1: like that these people are Francis. There's this whole orchestrated,
Speaker 1: acrobatic bullshit that people say, and the history says, well,
Speaker 1: the Rabbis were frightening to Francis and the Strawbertyrans and
Speaker 1: they were right odds with them. So therefore one million
Speaker 1: of them converted when Sabatai declared he was the Messiah,
Speaker 1: and Nathan of Gaza was like his don king promoter. Right,
Speaker 1: And now I worried about this in my book, which
Speaker 1: you should already have, priest Craft Beyond Babylon Friday, I
Speaker 1: won't be here, but maybe tomorrow I will give away
Speaker 1: one copy Kindle style. Yeah, I want to do that,
Speaker 1: all right, cool. You gotta you gotta do a backflip though,
Speaker 1: or do these things? Can you do this? If you
Speaker 1: can do that, you're in the you're in the running. Okay.
Speaker 1: So yeah, this is a This is a lie because
Speaker 1: you don't think out of one half of all the
Speaker 1: Jews that were on in the on the planet at
Speaker 1: that time, none of them were Rabbis that all converted
Speaker 1: over there they won whatever pretend struggle they had because
Speaker 1: these Sabatans and these Francis are just extremists, but they're
Speaker 1: following the exact you know, mindset philosophy of the Talmud,
Speaker 1: the Kabbala specifically, and the Torah, So how could they
Speaker 1: really be at os with it? It's just they don't
Speaker 1: think that the method is the same because they don't
Speaker 1: think they should this is the this is the thing
Speaker 1: we shouldn't force God's hand. Yeah, that that kind of
Speaker 1: melts away when you start talking about supremacy and winning
Speaker 1: this battle against the quote unquote gentiles slash nations, They
Speaker 1: kind of forget about all that. So what would idealism
Speaker 1: I what idealism do you think? One ideology? What ideology
Speaker 1: do you think one? So whatever? Whatever do they consider themselves.
Speaker 1: They are acting as Frankists. It doesn't matter what else,
Speaker 1: and the reason why I use Frankest and they're like, oh,
Speaker 1: that's really early, that's that's kind of new in history
Speaker 1: comparative all the whole time that they've been on the
Speaker 1: planet screwing people over. Yeah, no shit, But it actually
Speaker 1: personifies all and said less unless you want to read
Speaker 1: ten thousand pages of Talmut and then try to decipher
Speaker 1: the Kabbala, which is pretty freaking long too. You could
Speaker 1: just say, hey, these people kind of like bullet point
Speaker 1: it for us, and you can you can describe the
Speaker 1: whole mindset and outlook of these people by studying the Frankests.
Speaker 1: So this is a shortcut to not reading the Talmut
Speaker 1: and being stuck into that grimoire to well, now your
Speaker 1: mind's poisoned too. I don't mess with the certain books
Speaker 1: what I'm gonna be in the Torah because it's a
Speaker 1: partial grimoire, total bullshit. On top of that, very symbolic,
Speaker 1: and it's obviously a deception. Do nothing to help our country.
Speaker 1: They only want to destroy our country, do they do?
Speaker 1: They want to destroy their country. They want to preserve
Speaker 1: the country. You know why he says that because our
Speaker 1: country is Israel, we are Israel satellite. Any place of
Speaker 1: the one hundred and ninety three nations in the United Nations,
Speaker 1: any of every place that has a central bank that's
Speaker 1: being controlled by the same god family of the Jews
Speaker 1: or the pretend Jews, or the it's convenient to call
Speaker 1: themselves that these are Francis. They converted. They converted in
Speaker 1: the seventeen eighties to Frankism, the Rosschild family specifically, but
Speaker 1: you had the Coons, Lobes, all these people. Oppenheimer a
Speaker 1: Roppenheim was a bank back then too. I don't know
Speaker 1: if this still exists, these families, these massive banks that
Speaker 1: have control and interest in the Federal Reserve. They are Frankests,
Speaker 1: regardless if they declare it or not. And if you
Speaker 1: understand what the Francis are, they will never declare it
Speaker 1: out loud in public anyway. That's the cold point of
Speaker 1: being clandestine and being not what you are internally outwardly.
Speaker 1: That's one of their decrees. Just like a spy, right
Speaker 1: and the Jesuits. They are two peas in a pod,
Speaker 1: and they were also founded by cryptos. And if anybody
Speaker 1: wants to argue with that they're just being silly. I
Speaker 1: can tell you the whole history of that region of
Speaker 1: the Iberian Peninsula, and then you can try to argue
Speaker 1: with me that that that that nobility of the family,
Speaker 1: the family of course being uh, what's Ignatius? The Loyolas,
Speaker 1: The of Loyola family was Morano. He himself was put
Speaker 1: out inquisition inquiry two to three times for his involvement
Speaker 1: in the Alambrado, and of course he was exonerated. Sure
Speaker 1: that makes it better. No, the only way that you
Speaker 1: could be Alambrado is if you already were a Morano,
Speaker 1: which is a crypto Jew pretending to be a Christian.
Speaker 1: So one implies the other. So they were already and
Speaker 1: his second in command was also a crypto crapto. So
Speaker 1: what are we talking about here. There's been an ancient
Speaker 1: since Rome has begun. There's been a a unity between them,
Speaker 1: working together, just like any other place else where. You
Speaker 1: have the the ruling class, and then you have the priesthood.
Speaker 1: You have the advisors to the king, advisors to the Caesar,
Speaker 1: the ones with their you know, their mouth to the ear,
Speaker 1: the whispers casting doubt and inspiring them to go after
Speaker 1: their enemies. Pretending that they're the Caesar's enemies, even if
Speaker 1: it's their own people. This happens. A lot happened with Persians,
Speaker 1: happened with Samerians, happened with all these people leading up
Speaker 1: to here. And Rome felt the same way. Egypt felt
Speaker 1: the same way. They seem to always be. Oh and
Speaker 1: by the way, the Assyrians when they took over Babylon
Speaker 1: and it was still in the possession and power and
Speaker 1: control of what some will call Scythians. Some will call
Speaker 1: it goth Guti if you understand what la Woodell's research
Speaker 1: will show you. Others will call it the big a word.
Speaker 1: Oh God, don't say that aryan word. It's even even
Speaker 1: though that's what it is. They were hunted as they
Speaker 1: were fleeing and going into the Indus Valley. They call
Speaker 1: it the gangetic because it ganges right, gangetic in this
Speaker 1: valley area. They were chased, hunted, hunted like animals. Our
Speaker 1: ancestors were hunted like animals, that's right. And the Chaldean
Speaker 1: Semites with their mooncult have never left. Some of them
Speaker 1: became Christian. I don't know how much I buy that.
Speaker 1: Some of them may be, But what does that mean?
Speaker 1: They're still following the fucking Torah.
Speaker 3: And we will never let the horrors of October Savage
Speaker 3: be repeated here on Americans.
Speaker 1: We will is that even a threat, is that even
Speaker 1: people just want to be left alone. And if you're
Speaker 1: antagonizing them to the point where they can't just live
Speaker 1: in peace, and they strike back, like puking a lion
Speaker 1: enough times to where it claws you, it's the lion's fault.
Speaker 1: It's the dog that you beat. It's fault for biting
Speaker 1: you after you've already you know, murdered its puppies, because
Speaker 1: that's what they like to do. They like to kill children.
Speaker 1: They like to eat and drink your children after they're
Speaker 1: done sodomizing them. This is a rabbinical right. Actually you
Speaker 1: can you can use that in two different ways. Our
Speaker 1: i gac or our it as an a ritual no lies.
Speaker 1: Look up the New History of the Jews, the book
Speaker 1: that I was reading for you a while back by
Speaker 1: Euseless Mullens. Or look up World Order, not New World Order,
Speaker 1: World Order another use of Smullens book. But you can
Speaker 1: find the you can find the references there. If you
Speaker 1: don't believe me, not let that happen. And we will
Speaker 1: solve the problem that we have. And how will we
Speaker 1: do that? Mister? How will you solve that problem? Because
Speaker 1: I noticed you said a while back that anti Semitism
Speaker 1: should carry the death penalty. This is who we're going
Speaker 1: to be ushering in while you're standing next to the
Speaker 1: biggest psychopath on the planet, fucking Shapiro. What does he represent?
Speaker 1: And who does he wo? Who can? Who has brought
Speaker 1: him up? Shapiro? How deep is his family go? You know,
Speaker 1: I thought when I was going to rent a Talks
Speaker 1: many years back that Shapiro meant it was an Italian joint.
Speaker 1: I guess it wasn't. So this guy says, when the
Speaker 1: human body is hungry, it eats itself. It doesn't it
Speaker 1: does a cleansing process. Well, he's it's kind of not
Speaker 1: saying without saying it. He says, I'm moving all sick cells, cancer,
Speaker 1: aging cells and Alzheimer's and toxins. Don't forget that that's
Speaker 1: the whole point of the bacteria. He's kind of pointing
Speaker 1: towards microzeima, but he's not saying it. It's not the
Speaker 1: it's not the body. It's the little tiny grnules that
Speaker 1: when the conditions changed and nutrition is jacked up or
Speaker 1: you're being loaded with toks whether you're aware of it
Speaker 1: or not through bad eating habits or poisoned food or
Speaker 1: radiation also is a toxin, right, It messes with your body.
Speaker 1: It causes things to mutate. And this whole idea of
Speaker 1: genetics being static is a complete farce. And when they
Speaker 1: talk about epigenetics, they're missing the point. Epigenetics is still
Speaker 1: in the wrong mindset. This is the microzyma that they're
Speaker 1: referring to. They become whatever it is they need to
Speaker 1: be to live in the environment that they are in,
Speaker 1: so they can be symbiotic, or they can sometimes have
Speaker 1: to transform into whatever the food is being available to them.
Speaker 1: So if it's a bunch of toxins, sometimes their secretions
Speaker 1: are toxic. But it's all about fermentation, it's all about digestion,
Speaker 1: so we control we have the first day. You are
Speaker 1: what you eat, You are what your micros I may eat. No,
Speaker 1: I don't know how much of this I believe, because
Speaker 1: I don't know how much. I mean, I get all
Speaker 1: this and I'm not denying the thing, but I don't
Speaker 1: know if HARP is even active. But there's like eight
Speaker 1: other ones on the planet, and they don't need to
Speaker 1: be like if that is off the coast of Florida,
Speaker 1: for real, it doesn't need to be I hones spheric cuter.
Speaker 1: They can point it, they can energize it. It's like
Speaker 1: taking a rubber band and pulling it up and letting
Speaker 1: it go. And that's how they can create earthquakes. How
Speaker 1: they do the weather stuff, they have to do other
Speaker 1: things in the air in order to direct it and
Speaker 1: guide it and mess with the pressures and all that stuff.
Speaker 1: But right now, it's like they said, it's the strongest
Speaker 1: hurricane possible. Here here it is right here, eight pm
Speaker 1: Eastern daylight time. This is nothing short of astronomical. I'm
Speaker 1: guessing he is a meteorologist. Looks like and berg ooh,
Speaker 1: briggin bergrin. This isn't ye know that I was commenting
Speaker 1: on the name of Obviously, this is nothing short of astronomical.
Speaker 1: I am a loss for words to meet a rage
Speaker 1: to meteorologia media meteorologically Did I get that? Metiora logically
Speaker 1: meta rolla world, you say it? You say it, meteor
Speaker 1: ohlegolically describe you the storm's small eye and intensity eight
Speaker 1: and ninety seven. I don't know it's that megabarrus. I
Speaker 1: don't know what it is or I don't know pressure.
Speaker 1: With one hundred and eighty mile per hour max sustained
Speaker 1: whims and gusts two hundred plus miles per hour, this
Speaker 1: is now the fourth strongest hurric cane ever recorded by
Speaker 1: pressure on this side of the world. The eye is tiny,
Speaker 1: at nearly three point eight miles wide. If the that
Speaker 1: to me seems pretty big. So how big is the
Speaker 1: freaking outside of the storm? What's the diameter of that
Speaker 1: thing or radius? I guess from the eye to the
Speaker 1: out right. This hurricane is nearly is nearing the mathematical
Speaker 1: limit of what Earth's atmosphere over this ocean water can produce.
Speaker 1: It's almost maxed out. Oops. So there's that hipuld be
Speaker 1: happy hoeah oh yeah. If you guys want to sneak
Speaker 1: peak as to what's gonna happen to us, here you go.
Speaker 1: It says over nine million Russians died during the civil
Speaker 1: war that followed the Bolshevik Revolution. So this is what
Speaker 1: they're said up for us right now? Right yeah, oh no,
Speaker 1: that's an Jews made up. Well, I've heard eighty five,
Speaker 1: but ninety whatever ninety percent of the first Bolshevik governments.
Speaker 1: And you know, Putin has mentioned that by the way,
Speaker 1: mass executions, man made famines, gulags, Jews murdered more than
Speaker 1: sixty million Europeans in the USSR alone. See the children's bodies.
Speaker 1: Do you want to get up and do something about
Speaker 1: this because someday that might be your family? All right,
Speaker 1: there's that. Now that I've secured my fate, let's get
Speaker 1: on with it. How is everybody doing this morning? Is
Speaker 1: there really needed? Right? Yeah? Exactly.
Speaker 4: So.
Speaker 1: Like my friend, like I said, he knows he's supposed
Speaker 1: to be a Russian Jew. He came over and his
Speaker 1: family came over in the like the eighteen fifties, and
Speaker 1: it's a great person. His daughter and my daughter play together,
Speaker 1: we're friends. He's not religious. I think that's the big
Speaker 1: difference there. And they use that as a tool anyway.
Speaker 1: It's people within this ambition for supremacy and rule and
Speaker 1: control and greed and all this other stuff that they utilize.
Speaker 1: I don't think any of them actually believe in half
Speaker 1: the bullshit. And some of them that do, those are
Speaker 1: what I call the rabid rabbis. They're there to make you,
Speaker 1: make you disgusted. It's part of the Lila game. You
Speaker 1: don't know. If you don't know what you're supposed to
Speaker 1: be afraid of, how do you know what to be
Speaker 1: afraid of? Right? They gotta they gotta drive that point
Speaker 1: home with you. That's why they have this, you know,
Speaker 1: idea of disclosure, right, controlled disclosure, because they have to.
Speaker 1: If you don't know to be terrified, then it's not
Speaker 1: gonna work. It's not gonna it's not gonna get that
Speaker 1: ritual energized. Enough. I'm opening up kindle right now. I
Speaker 1: actually bought for five ninety nine what a steel. I
Speaker 1: bought the bay Shop or pasture. Now, this is the
Speaker 1: twenty eleven version of the of the book. And why
Speaker 1: is that important? Because there is a rewrite after Ethel
Speaker 1: Hume wrote her book. Uh this. Then there's this guy,
Speaker 1: I believe it was Levinson or Pearson, one of the two.
Speaker 1: He had written something called Bechamp Pastor, plagiss Impostor and
Speaker 1: the New The New Guy is the preface by R. Pearson. Okay,
Speaker 1: so the other guy was I think the whatever the
Speaker 1: last name of the l word is. So it's basically
Speaker 1: two books rolled in the one and the language, because
Speaker 1: you know, some of it would have been in French,
Speaker 1: some of it wouldn't have been. But the language is
Speaker 1: a little bit outdated as far as what people could
Speaker 1: recognize and flow with. So he updated the language a
Speaker 1: little bit, and he's given his commentary little bit too,
Speaker 1: So it's a It pretty much follows Ethel's original book,
Speaker 1: but it also gives you extra So if you find
Speaker 1: a copy, and I did find one that's three hundred
Speaker 1: and twenty pages long, the one that you'd want to
Speaker 1: find is three fifty two or three fifty somewhere around there,
Speaker 1: all right, because sometimes blank pages are accounted. So this
Speaker 1: gives me the opportunity to get around a little bit
Speaker 1: easier because before I had to like scroll and click
Speaker 1: the little bar and hope I landed on something that
Speaker 1: I was trying to find. But this makes it much easier. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Ethel Douglas Hume, she had a middle end of them. Man,
Speaker 1: wonderful person. Seems like she had her head on straight.
Speaker 1: She wrote this, and I think the nineteen twenties, and
Speaker 1: then the pastor Playderson Imposter the German theory exploded was
Speaker 1: RB Pearson. So yeah, says B. Schamp's or Pasture A
Speaker 1: Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by Ethel Douglas
Speaker 1: hum first published in nineteen twenty three. But what's great
Speaker 1: about this updated version is it also carries it and
Speaker 1: follows it through World War One and World War Two.
Speaker 1: And that's important. The guy who did the second book
Speaker 1: published it in nineteen forty two. So the Germ Theory
Speaker 1: Exploded or Pasture Playgist and Impostor was first published in
Speaker 1: nineteen forty two. And now here's the messed up thing.
Speaker 1: And this is how you know you're onto something right.
Speaker 1: You're on the right track AI. If you look up
Speaker 1: pasture or pasture, you will find AI doesn't seem to
Speaker 1: like him very much. I'm sorry. If you look at
Speaker 1: bay Shamp sorry I said that. In the opposite if
Speaker 1: you look at bay Shop he was a alleged blah
Speaker 1: blah blah and jealous of pasture and all this other shit.
Speaker 1: No Pastor stole and basically augmented and cherry picked data
Speaker 1: from his own from Payson's papers and try to work
Speaker 1: it into a germ theory, which completely nullified any of
Speaker 1: the meaning of it. They took the word microzymas and
Speaker 1: changed it to diastasis, and here I'll I'll read some
Speaker 1: of the stuff that I said in So if you
Speaker 1: guys are in my Telegram group or if you're in
Speaker 1: my Patreon group, you can get in it. You can
Speaker 1: get them a Patreon membership for five bucks. You get
Speaker 1: all the audios that I do without any of the
Speaker 1: commercials in it, because when I post them on podcast distribution,
Speaker 1: it's moodetized. So there's there's ads, and I'm sure the
Speaker 1: ads don't I'm sure there's a lot of times the
Speaker 1: ads would conflict with my personal views on things. But
Speaker 1: is what it is. So it says base I wrote this,
Speaker 1: I said, by Shamp, doctor Monso, doctor Glidden, it's up
Speaker 1: to us to champion the people who get it. And
Speaker 1: then I put this This Rife microscope's a little I
Speaker 1: think it's like six or seven page article on here Rife.
Speaker 1: And what I don't understand is I'm having a hard
Speaker 1: time now trying to find information on Bei Shamp. But
Speaker 1: he was able to very early on create a microscope
Speaker 1: that was far superior to everyone else's. And he could,
Speaker 1: from what I'm from what I gather, same as Rife,
Speaker 1: be able to observe living tissue and living blood. And
Speaker 1: that makes all the difference, because when you're looking at
Speaker 1: something dead and trying to understand how it operates when
Speaker 1: it's alive, it's like stupid. Right, an electron microscope came
Speaker 1: out in nineteen thirty one, you had Rife doing this
Speaker 1: without the electron microscope whatever. And that's a horrible name
Speaker 1: for a microscope, by the way, because it's it's kind
Speaker 1: of misleading electron microscope. But his his microscope that he
Speaker 1: developed himself, he could see living blood in a very
Speaker 1: very like better than the electron microscope as far as
Speaker 1: it's it's magnification. But the difference is the electron microscope
Speaker 1: you have to treat it. You have to radiate it,
Speaker 1: you have to put all kinds of crap in it,
Speaker 1: and then you have to prepare the slide so that actually,
Speaker 1: you know, the light and all those sorts of it's visible.
Speaker 1: So it's completely eradicated before you even look at it.
Speaker 1: And they're like, oh, that's a living to No, it's not.
Speaker 1: It's not natural state. So in the article, Rife says
Speaker 1: he can see viruses, but here's the thing that's not
Speaker 1: what he's looking at. He's finding the little granules he's
Speaker 1: looking at the microz iima, same as pasture, same as
Speaker 1: bay Schamp was, and that's the connection between Rife and
Speaker 1: Bey Schamp. Okay By Shamp was somehow able to do
Speaker 1: this himself, and he was able to see the pleamorphism
Speaker 1: happened where a bat. You know, these granules. The most
Speaker 1: simplest form, simplistic form of the microzyma would be the digesters.
Speaker 1: They're the digesters everywhere every tissue has a different type
Speaker 1: of one they don't have. There's some cone ones, there's
Speaker 1: some round ones or whatever, but not You can't really
Speaker 1: distinguish them by appearance. So obviously he saw them, if
Speaker 1: he could say that, but by their function. So a
Speaker 1: chemist can understand what's going on, but not somebody who's
Speaker 1: observing it in the mindset of a biologist, because they're
Speaker 1: trying to identify things based on their appearance, right, So
Speaker 1: these things will change based on their environment. Microzymas are
Speaker 1: what you feed them. So if you're feeding trash to yourself,
Speaker 1: they're going to adapt to that and they're going to
Speaker 1: start digesting or fermenting something that might be harmful. But
Speaker 1: these are the builders. They can be the most symbiotic
Speaker 1: thing for natural for good health, as long as you're
Speaker 1: taking your essential nutrients, and as long as you're not
Speaker 1: eating hit but also not getting injections because that throws
Speaker 1: everything off. And bay Shop was so so adamant about this.
Speaker 1: If you bypass the gut, the natural chemist, he said,
Speaker 1: they're laboratories down the rail from your saliva to your gut,
Speaker 1: all the way down into the capacity and intestine. Things
Speaker 1: are being checked and balanced all the way out. It's
Speaker 1: a closed system, like doctor Glennon said, where it's actually
Speaker 1: outside of your body. So if you get leaky gut
Speaker 1: and all, this is all because of the crap that
Speaker 1: you're putting in there. But if you injecting directly into
Speaker 1: your bloodstream or into your muscle, you bypass all of
Speaker 1: those defenses and you put whatever poison it is into
Speaker 1: your boody, and it's all poison if it's going that direction,
Speaker 1: because that's not how things are supposed to go into it.
Speaker 1: It's the most unnatural thing to do. Snake bites are very,
Speaker 1: very deadly because of this very thing. If you drink
Speaker 1: the snake venom, it wouldn't be as detrimental to your health.
Speaker 1: And they make drugs with it, so obviously you know
Speaker 1: that's true, as if it was going directly into your bloodstream.
Speaker 1: This is not a natural way to fight quote unquote
Speaker 1: mystery unicorn viruses. And when you realize that that's not
Speaker 1: what you're doing, and then all these tests, all these
Speaker 1: tests are testing for something that is actually produced within
Speaker 1: your body. And this is why the microzyme is so
Speaker 1: important because whatever is ailing you, So if they poison
Speaker 1: the atmosphere, or if you're eating crap and having a
Speaker 1: crazy lifestyle where you're doing all kinds of you know, drugs,
Speaker 1: and something changes in your body because the environment has
Speaker 1: changed for them and a different bacteria is formed, and
Speaker 1: they're going to test for these proteins and oh my god,
Speaker 1: you have a virus that came from over here. You
Speaker 1: got it from sexual intercourse, you got it from the air,
Speaker 1: You got it because there's an avian flu out there.
Speaker 1: And no, you didn't happened from inside you. The disease
Speaker 1: produce itself inside of you. Now if you are super healthy, well,
Speaker 1: why doesn't anybody get sick in that area? If that's
Speaker 1: the truth right with the whole contagion theory, Well, that's
Speaker 1: the reason, because it happens inside of you. The things
Speaker 1: that are being transformed are these microzyme, these pleamorphic microzyma.
Speaker 1: And when conditions improve, like I don't know, you start
Speaker 1: taking your ninety essential nutrients, you start taking the doctor
Speaker 1: Manzo equivalent in the Azure well products, or do you
Speaker 1: find some other means to get all those ninety essential
Speaker 1: nutrients that you need. Plus you're healthy, Plus you're not
Speaker 1: getting out there junk in you and you're not lining
Speaker 1: up to be injected with death and PUS and mRNA,
Speaker 1: which also is a misdirection. And that's some other stories
Speaker 1: some of their time. Half the shit that they claim
Speaker 1: is bullshit to keep their bullshit going. Do I think
Speaker 1: there's teching it? Yeah? Probably, do I think it's working
Speaker 1: the way they say this, they don't know shit about
Speaker 1: shit when it comes to biology, because they just don't.
Speaker 1: They're talking about genetics, for Christ's sake, and that they're
Speaker 1: not static. Neither's DNA and their functions, and they're talking
Speaker 1: about epigenetics. They're actually talking about the microzyma, because the
Speaker 1: microzyma do different things given the environment that they're in,
Speaker 1: So they will turn on and turn off certain functions
Speaker 1: in your body. That's the microzyma. This is the microzymic gramule.
Speaker 1: This is why it's so important to understand this, because
Speaker 1: everything else makes sense afterwards. This is why the law
Speaker 1: of similars works. This is why law of portantization makes sense,
Speaker 1: because you don't need to overl load on something and
Speaker 1: poison your system with something when a tiny, tiny amount
Speaker 1: will suffice. Because the only people that you're addressing are
Speaker 1: the little teeny tiny builders of life. There are friends
Speaker 1: because without this digestion and this fermentation process, no life
Speaker 1: on the planet Earth would exist. So you can't hate
Speaker 1: them for turning to something that might be you know,
Speaker 1: you're making them sick, so they're making you sick. And
Speaker 1: I said, Rife didn't understand what he was looking at.
Speaker 1: They were microSIM and graminiles, not a virus. But his filter,
Speaker 1: meaning his thought process was that of mainstream science at
Speaker 1: the time. And I'm going to read you this article
Speaker 1: that I read in a previous video two years ago,
Speaker 1: called who had their Finger on the Magic of Life?
Speaker 1: And he says, Rife, could I think I went over
Speaker 1: there and I said, even Ai speaks disparagingly about bay
Speaker 1: shomp Ai must be working for the eaves and their
Speaker 1: medical death cult mafia, and I said the world haas, okay,
Speaker 1: where is this one? And yeah, this is this is
Speaker 1: the point that I made. The whole power structure could
Speaker 1: come crashing down should the truth be widely known. We
Speaker 1: are lab rats, and so to our children until that day,
Speaker 1: this is the one way to deflate their whole What
Speaker 1: do you prefer hot air balloon or zeppelin? Because what
Speaker 1: is the what is the function of government to protect
Speaker 1: us from dangers that they pretend exist? And they convince
Speaker 1: us are and sell us and market us all these things.
Speaker 1: But if they're harming us, and we start to understand
Speaker 1: that that's all they're doing is lying to us low points,
Speaker 1: low points or lolls in the time l U l
Speaker 1: l s l o ls lolls in the time that
Speaker 1: they're aggressively attacked as to where we think everything is
Speaker 1: pretty and fun and great and wonderful like the fifties
Speaker 1: after the bores. No, they're constantly one percent, all the time,
Speaker 1: without fail. The medical establishment is constantly poisoning you and
Speaker 1: killing your family, and your family is getting sicker and
Speaker 1: sicker up until that day. So let's get out of
Speaker 1: this matrix of medical nonsense. And I have doctor Peter
Speaker 1: Gliddon's book here today. I was reading a little bit
Speaker 1: of it last night that my daughter gymnastics, and he
Speaker 1: talks about the epigenetics, which again I'm gonna say, this
Speaker 1: is your it's very close close, because it's it's without
Speaker 1: the understand it's without the the data available of the microzyma,
Speaker 1: and this is why lots of people are describing the
Speaker 1: same phenomenon. But once you understand the microzyma, what Beshamp
Speaker 1: was doing and already showing us long long ago, Yes,
Speaker 1: the tooth fairy is faked too, Karen, I'm sorry, then
Speaker 1: it all starts to make sense and we can make
Speaker 1: progress and this research and people who are in the
Speaker 1: know and people who are of the faculties to carry
Speaker 1: that research further. Once they know what they're looking for
Speaker 1: and what they're looking at, we can see we'll be
Speaker 1: able to call out the bullshit better or they will,
Speaker 1: and they can lead lead the charge against this stuff.
Speaker 1: All right. So I just learned this new thing called
Speaker 1: med crave. I guess it's not new because two years
Speaker 1: ago I found an article back when the Internet wasn't
Speaker 1: so suppressed and you could just type in search results
Speaker 1: type in something and search results with a curve without
Speaker 1: it at all, han't dot gov or dotty at the
Speaker 1: end of it. I'm sure you've noticed that too. Excuse me,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have to jump back over. Nope, see I
Speaker 1: thought that was gonna happen. So this is medcraveonline dot com.
Speaker 1: And I couldn't find this article when I typed in
Speaker 1: the exact r L that I used two years ago
Speaker 1: when I wasn't looking for and just found it on
Speaker 1: on you know, happenstance. It didn't. I couldn't find it.
Speaker 1: But then I just went to medcrave online and I
Speaker 1: typed in bay shop and that's just how I found it.
Speaker 1: So this is it right here PDF you can download
Speaker 1: it for yourself. And this is the actual article. And
Speaker 1: what is this an alternative? Is interim there alternative? They
Speaker 1: say it like it's a There's Royal Raymond Wright, Rife,
Speaker 1: William WILLELM. Reich, all the all the cool dudes right
Speaker 1: will have Raich was the claudbuster guy with there we're
Speaker 1: going ron So let's read this real quick. Who had
Speaker 1: their finger on the magic of life? Antoine Beschamp or
Speaker 1: Louis Pasturer, The magic eraser. There have been several notable
Speaker 1: occasions in history when persons offering invaluable contributions to the
Speaker 1: advancement of human understanding have been ignored, ridiculed, and even
Speaker 1: persecuted in their time. In most cases, however, their work
Speaker 1: has subsequently been given a deserved measure of recognition. Some
Speaker 1: great ones, though, have not enjoyed such rejuvenation and have
Speaker 1: suffered the slings of obscurity. And the reason for that
Speaker 1: is because the power structure demands, it demands this portion
Speaker 1: of history and this man to be suppressed because their
Speaker 1: entire house of cards on what they tell you health
Speaker 1: is and what they tell you medical, everything is is
Speaker 1: based on this big ass lie because they can't have
Speaker 1: an excuse to poison you with a shot that bypasses
Speaker 1: your if they give up this idea of germ theory,
Speaker 1: of virus theory. This is there. This is not only
Speaker 1: a very huge money maker for them. So there's that,
Speaker 1: But you'll be able to look right past the curtain,
Speaker 1: straight through it like X ray evasion and see the
Speaker 1: Rothschild banking conglomerate, you know, Hebrew National whatever you want
Speaker 1: to call it, All of the things that personify the
Speaker 1: same idea right in front of your face, because those
Speaker 1: are the ones with their fingers on the button board, right,
Speaker 1: and they're not going to have it. They're the ones
Speaker 1: who brought Rockefeller up to basically hijack the entire medical establishment,
Speaker 1: the idea of medicine and health in general in this
Speaker 1: country and over the world world. So it was this
Speaker 1: is why this is so important, because this guy disproves
Speaker 1: all their bullshit. So it is with Base Champs, So
Speaker 1: it is with Base Schamps. Had he had the profound
Speaker 1: voice of his science not been silenced, much of humankind
Speaker 1: may have been spared the worst aspects of infectious or
Speaker 1: virtual stresses of the twentieth century. Since the case can
Speaker 1: be made that the approved but improper and dangerous treatment
Speaker 1: of infectious diseases over the last century has in large
Speaker 1: part given rise to the present epidemic wave of degenitive disease,
Speaker 1: including cancer, age, syndrome, or ebola, we might have been
Speaker 1: spared these miseries as well. At the at the least
Speaker 1: we would have understood much more clearly why we have them. Fortunately, however,
Speaker 1: Beachamp's work has been kept alive by small successive bands
Speaker 1: of truth seekers into what he says, at least we
Speaker 1: have would have understood much more clearly why we have them,
Speaker 1: the disease and how. When you know the why or
Speaker 1: the how, you can figure out how to reverse that.
Speaker 1: And it all comes down to what doctor Peter Glindin
Speaker 1: has been telling us with homeopathy that he does has
Speaker 1: been telling us what doctor Glinnen and doctor Manzo have
Speaker 1: been showing us. And it's really that simple. It's not
Speaker 1: so simple to stay away from toxins because they're everywhere,
Speaker 1: but it's very simple to neutrify your body and make
Speaker 1: it strong so that your microzyma are eating what they're
Speaker 1: supposed to be eating and you know, improving your health
Speaker 1: rather than potentially and not by their fault. They don't.
Speaker 1: They're not they're not malicious intent. But if you get
Speaker 1: them sick, they're going to get you sick. They're going
Speaker 1: to have to adapt to the new food that's available
Speaker 1: to them, and if that food is toxin, they might
Speaker 1: secrete toxin in their fermentation. The adoption by science of
Speaker 1: Louis Prasstewur's germ theory as the whole truth without regard
Speaker 1: to the sub subtleties and deep insight of bas Champs
Speaker 1: microzimon principle represents one paraphrase. There is no medical doctrine
Speaker 1: as potentially dangerous as a partial truth implemented as the
Speaker 1: whole truth by biomission. Any medical professional, scientist, healthcare practitioner,
Speaker 1: or layperson for that matter, who wishes to gain insight
Speaker 1: into the origins and nature of infectious and chronic illness
Speaker 1: against the backdrop of a marvelous view of the life
Speaker 1: process must consider base Shop and they must entertain one
Speaker 1: of the most important concepts to come out of his
Speaker 1: illustrious career, microbiological pleomorphism as it relates to diseases and
Speaker 1: its symptoms. There are four books written about him, of
Speaker 1: which his writer is aware, although there are likely They're
Speaker 1: very likely more and many works published by him. But
Speaker 1: you know here, I was trying to find lay microsimas,
Speaker 1: but it's all. There is no English translation that I've
Speaker 1: been able to find. If anybody else finds it, find
Speaker 1: it from me, I'll read it. I would love to
Speaker 1: read the last micros imas, and I think, well, I
Speaker 1: came across one of them that was one thousand pages long.
Speaker 1: I'll read it. I'm down, I'll do it. Fortunately, his
Speaker 1: last book, The Blood in its third and the Anatomical Element,
Speaker 1: was translated into English in nineteen eleven by mont Montague, MDPHDMA.
Speaker 1: Although it has been difficult to obtain. Got it. We're
Speaker 1: reading it alread. I read it. Of the two major
Speaker 1: books about him, we've read some of it together. One
Speaker 1: is in French and the other is also rare. The
Speaker 1: other two books are about base. The other two books
Speaker 1: about Bechamp are by RB. Pearson. The Human Book, one
Speaker 1: Pierson Book, and The Blood are once again available as
Speaker 1: reproductions in the US after a hiatus of several years.
Speaker 1: That's why I'm bringing it to you. Besechamp considered the
Speaker 1: Blood his crowning work, and there, well, yeah, this is
Speaker 1: what this one component and the fermentation. Understanding the fermentation
Speaker 1: and how it works was the why you might think, oh,
Speaker 1: that's not relevant to anything. No, that actually was so
Speaker 1: relevant to everything else, because once he identified the actual
Speaker 1: smallest unit of life, and it's a living entity that
Speaker 1: as best as we can tell, doesn't even die, but
Speaker 1: it just can regress back to its granule form and
Speaker 1: then come right back to life and eat again. If
Speaker 1: something's eating on digesting, it's alive. And it changes and
Speaker 1: adapts to conditions and can go dormant and then come
Speaker 1: right back. And as we saw with the chalk that
Speaker 1: he was breaking, the organic chalk, not something that was
Speaker 1: lab created. He found microzyme isn't there that created bacteria
Speaker 1: and was able to ferment when he was doing his
Speaker 1: experiments showing that something that was in eleven million year
Speaker 1: old rock or was it only six thousand dustin nemos, right,
Speaker 1: because everything's only six thousand years old, right, whatever? Eleven
Speaker 1: million year old, but it's still alive, and that's dormant.
Speaker 1: It's the life, the granules of life from beings that
Speaker 1: are no longer with us to da nothing dies, we
Speaker 1: as a as a collective due but our little microzyme
Speaker 1: is don't They built us? And they'll build another one
Speaker 1: of us or something similar. Beiseean considered the blood croning
Speaker 1: work in there, and he describes an amazing micro and
Speaker 1: anatomical entity and its participation in the clotting process. He
Speaker 1: also because when people talk about fribriant egen, that's part
Speaker 1: of something that's being created by the microzeyima. So there's
Speaker 1: a lot of things that doctor Artists and I were
Speaker 1: discussing long ago it's off, so are so is this
Speaker 1: ACE two receptor shit? If you can't see it, you
Speaker 1: can never identify it. It's a theoretical and it's a
Speaker 1: theoretical part, as are most of the cell models and
Speaker 1: everything else too. So He also includes details of his
Speaker 1: work and his experiences with the plagiarisms and pettifogging ratiocinations
Speaker 1: of Holy Pasted Or. The French book about him, which
Speaker 1: author Christopher praised highly to this writer is by Mary
Speaker 1: Nanclerc entitled by Champ. It's just entitled Beschamp Okay Okay
Speaker 1: loan the okay, al right, blah blah blah, the latter,
Speaker 1: the later little, the man and the scientist. The originality
Speaker 1: and productivity of his work is what it's called in English.
Speaker 1: According to Christopher in an account given at a nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety one fact At a nineteen ninety one facts, what
Speaker 1: the fuck is this person's problem? Everything I've been trying
Speaker 1: to correct as they go. They can't write, they can't spell,
Speaker 1: and they can't write facts that did not sell sitwell
Speaker 1: with rating theory. Many questions arose as I read essays
Speaker 1: and books of a heretical nature. One could say, written
Speaker 1: by researchers whose names I'd never heard mentioned in my classes.
Speaker 1: Twenty years ago, the World Health Organization probably declared the
Speaker 1: recent discover recently the discovery that the single greatest factor
Speaker 1: in heart disease is a vitedin deficiency. Also, perversely, all
Speaker 1: inspiring is the fact that a person of Bechamp's extraordinary
Speaker 1: accomplishments had been written out of history books, textbooks, and
Speaker 1: all encyclopedias. It is sobering to consider the required degree
Speaker 1: of authoritarian control over key academic elements in our culture.
Speaker 1: It is not my intention to labor the politics. But
Speaker 1: as the wonders of bay Shops work unfold to the mind,
Speaker 1: the question simply arises, why is this not common knowledge?
Speaker 2: Yet?
Speaker 1: We must be grateful that his erasure was far from complete.
Speaker 1: It is difficult to do full justice to bey Schamp
Speaker 1: without recourse to a book. His work was incessant and prodigious.
Speaker 1: I mean, he was very smart. They called him the master.
Speaker 1: He didn't call himself that. It is very horible, and
Speaker 1: his observation is prolific. It would I will attempt to
Speaker 1: convey some essentials of his biological work, only a part
Speaker 1: of the picture, as the total output includes chemistry, medicine,
Speaker 1: and pharmacy. He left the remarkable legacy of scientific insight
Speaker 1: that borders on the spiritual, yet died in a relative
Speaker 1: obscurity with virtually no recognition by peers or the public.
Speaker 1: Having outlived his wife, his beloved associate Professor Esther, and
Speaker 1: his four children, he had to endure those hard lessons
Speaker 1: of light in addition to the one of professional anonymity. However,
Speaker 1: in keeping with his extraordinary mind, we never lost conviction
Speaker 1: that the truth would come to light, as would his
Speaker 1: role in its revelation. I'm not sure why when his
Speaker 1: life touched mind through eBay Shamp is known among a
Speaker 1: courtier of modern and contemporary miners, and his work has
Speaker 1: been followed up knowingly or not by perhaps a total
Speaker 1: of fifty scientists. This group includes such names as Gunter
Speaker 1: and Wilhelm Reich, Royal, Raymond Rife, and I say the
Speaker 1: courageous Australian team of Collo Careernos MD, who for many
Speaker 1: years published information in the who cares Yeah, blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: All right, it is at least sorry. It is at
Speaker 1: once unbelievable and understandable that the superficial dogma Pastor could
Speaker 1: could have prevailed over Beashap's insight in the nineteenth century
Speaker 1: French Academy of Science. Unbelievable because of the meticulous documentation
Speaker 1: and presentation bo made of his prolific work. Understandable because
Speaker 1: Pastor is still enough of the truth to make it pass,
Speaker 1: while having on his side upper class connections and a
Speaker 1: doctrine that more suited the culture, especially religious moods of
Speaker 1: the time. Hey, you know what else he had Freemasonic connections.
Speaker 1: He was one of the boys working for the dark side,
Speaker 1: betting if not creating an atmosphere representative to truth was
Speaker 1: a mood of impassioned ignorance among the Ecchilees ecclesiastic authorities
Speaker 1: at the University of Lily, where beay Shop had moved
Speaker 1: in eighteen seventy five to teach in a manner similar
Speaker 1: to that which devastated Galileo, They vigorously opposed the heresy
Speaker 1: of the micro Zimon view. Heightening the poignancy of this
Speaker 1: tragedy was the death of that ignorance which was unable
Speaker 1: to realize that the view was not heretical at all.
Speaker 1: In fact, be Schamp was a devout Christian who felt
Speaker 1: his inquiries merely to be revealing the creator's modus. But
Speaker 1: it is perversely awe inspiring to see such bias having
Speaker 1: persisted for a century, supported by the structure of authority
Speaker 1: in bioscience, so that Besmp's principles have not yet in
Speaker 1: twenty fifteen, when this was written, been given fair examination
Speaker 1: in the mainstream. Things may soon change for a number
Speaker 1: of reasons, not the least of which is that re
Speaker 1: search in the medical literature. Is that research in the
Speaker 1: medical literature is now burning a raging blaze below the
Speaker 1: lofty suite in which that the few powerful controllers lurk.
Speaker 1: They will soon have to surrender themselves out the window
Speaker 1: or be consumed by the flames. Of course, one way
Speaker 1: in which they surrender is to rediscover the truth, that is,
Speaker 1: claim credit for making scientific discoveries about matters long ignored
Speaker 1: or repressed by them and long held as principal in
Speaker 1: alternative venues. Or they staged an event to wake it
Speaker 1: looked like they were right, like COVID, like using shots
Speaker 1: that are full of inert stuff, and one like they
Speaker 1: did with this would like Pastor did with the sheep.
Speaker 1: When Anthractu was still killing all the sheep he did
Speaker 1: this inoculation experiment quote unquote, and half survived and half died.
Speaker 1: And you know it's because he wasn't giving them the
Speaker 1: actual stuff that he had in his back scene. So
Speaker 1: the ones that he wasn't poisoning survived and like, look,
Speaker 1: see it works.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: The inert substance probably water that you injected in them,
Speaker 1: or you had something that pissed it out to the
Speaker 1: side when you were spraying it. That's what it was.
Speaker 1: It was a parlor trick anyway. For example, science has
Speaker 1: just discovered that antioxidants are good for asthma, especially vitamin
Speaker 1: C and E, and after the tireless definitive work on
Speaker 1: vitamin E by the Shoot Brothers probably twenty years ago,
Speaker 1: the World Health Organization probably probably declared recently discovery that
Speaker 1: the single greatest factor in heart disease is a vitamin
Speaker 1: E deficiency twenty years later. Also perversely awe inspiring is
Speaker 1: the fact that a person of bas Champ's extraordinary accomplishments
Speaker 1: has written has been written out of the history books, textbooks,
Speaker 1: and all encyclopedias. It is sobering to consider the required
Speaker 1: to get thor didn't we just read this, why is
Speaker 1: why is it? Hear it again? Wow? This guy just
Speaker 1: totally added to the same thing again. It is difficult
Speaker 1: to do full justice today, schamp without this is the
Speaker 1: same thing again. Okay, let's I think this might be new.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure why when his life touching you out
Speaker 1: through Douglas see this is this is a different sentence
Speaker 1: but board grammatically correct. Wow, this thing's all jacked up.
Speaker 1: All right, Let's go back to principles of micro micro
Speaker 1: morphology because that's just threw me. For what the hell?
Speaker 1: This is actually a paper. While some of the ideas
Speaker 1: by shamp Address predated him, they had not been so
Speaker 1: clearly described, fully developed. They're strongly supported by experimentation. It
Speaker 1: is said there is nothing new under the sun. If true,
Speaker 1: it may be because all things or situations exist at
Speaker 1: once in the creation. It is a matter of perspective.
Speaker 1: Much like looking at a tapestry. Bason's perspective allows us
Speaker 1: to step back from the tight focus and see the
Speaker 1: loose threads of the germ theory amidst the harmonious and
Speaker 1: astounding pattern of the life process. He had his finger
Speaker 1: on the magic of life. According to Hume Ethel Hume
Speaker 1: the woman who wrote the book. The essence of what
Speaker 1: he brought to us was as follows. First, he demonstrated
Speaker 1: that the air is filled with microscopic organisms capable of
Speaker 1: fermenting any suitable medium, on medium on which they happen
Speaker 1: to land. He showed that suitable suitable medium, right, it
Speaker 1: doesn't happen if if the environment isn't supportive of it.
Speaker 1: So if you're looking for, oh, a bad bacteria or
Speaker 1: something like that, you know, microssignment in the form of
Speaker 1: a bacteria, well, it would have to have something there
Speaker 1: to eat. And usually these types of bacteria that are
Speaker 1: going to be harmful to you are going to be
Speaker 1: eating toxins. So if you're not loaded with toxins, they're
Speaker 1: not going to do anything inside you. They're going to
Speaker 1: regress to a different form. They'll morph and make something
Speaker 1: better inside of you rather than something worse. It's all
Speaker 1: up to you. First, you demonstrated there where they go okay.
Speaker 1: He has showed that the chemical change is carried out
Speaker 1: by a soluble ferment produced by the organism, and this
Speaker 1: ferment is analogous to the digestive juices of the stomach. Thus,
Speaker 1: he identified fermentation as a digestive process. Young theorizes that
Speaker 1: all decomposition, even the rusting of steel, is mediated by ferments.
Speaker 1: It is known, for example, that was actually be Shampa
Speaker 1: said that too before I'm guessing before going, for example,
Speaker 1: that bacteria decomposed rock into soil. Microorganisms are at or
Speaker 1: near the foundation of all life and life processes on Earth.
Speaker 1: For example, fungal forms are indispensable parts of the roots
Speaker 1: of most plants, including the largest trees right symbiotic relationship. Secondly,
Speaker 1: the most profound conclusion to which shop untiring and painstaking
Speaker 1: research Bechamp's untiring and painstaking research led him is that
Speaker 1: there is an anatic, independently living, micro and anatomical element
Speaker 1: in the cells and fluids of all organisms. This element
Speaker 1: precedes life at the cellular level, precedes life at the
Speaker 1: subcellular level. That's what it should say, because the cell
Speaker 1: is not the smallest unit of life. It's the microsimus,
Speaker 1: even the genetic level. That would be careful not to
Speaker 1: throw that word or out if you don't tell you're
Speaker 1: talking about and is the foundation of all biological organization.
Speaker 1: What originally peaked Antoine's pro creative curiosity was the discovery
Speaker 1: somewhat by accident that pure chalk from geological deposits at
Speaker 1: least eleven million years old would lookify stars and ferment
Speaker 1: sugar solutions, while man made chalk would not. After years
Speaker 1: of work tracking down the cause fermentation was not understood
Speaker 1: at the time, he attributed the action to the living
Speaker 1: remains of organism. What the fuck was that? Shut up?
Speaker 1: Shut up, long out of that crap. What was I
Speaker 1: now before I was interrupted by that garbage? After years
Speaker 1: of work tracking down the cause fermentation was not understood
Speaker 1: at the time, he attributed the action to living remains
Speaker 1: of organisms long dead. The organisms dead, microscyamis are not.
Speaker 1: He called this tiny living element a microsignment or a
Speaker 1: small fermat. Actually little bodies, because it would be another
Speaker 1: way to say it, and I say that in a
Speaker 1: funny tone so that it's remember, it's reminded, you know,
Speaker 1: it sticks in your head. Little bodies. And also because
Speaker 1: when I was listening to the book with archived dot,
Speaker 1: the most horrible thing you could actually listen to a
Speaker 1: book being you know, read to you audio style, because
Speaker 1: it's robotic, it's you can't change the gender of the
Speaker 1: voice anymore. You used to be able to choose a
Speaker 1: male voice or a female voice, and they say minute
Speaker 1: means when it's minute. They say all kinds of words incorrectly,
Speaker 1: and it drives you nuts and yeah, but which every
Speaker 1: time it was, you know in italic, the thing that
Speaker 1: go little bodies, And it's just stuck in my head
Speaker 1: like that. Thirdly, he claimed that microzymas routinely become forms
Speaker 1: normally referred to as bacteria, and that bacteria can revert
Speaker 1: or devolve to the microzymon state. This is the principle
Speaker 1: of pleomorphism, which is central to understanding the appearance of
Speaker 1: infectious and degenitive disease symptoms in the body. Fourth Ly,
Speaker 1: he explained that atmospheric germs are not fundamental species, but
Speaker 1: are either microzymas or their evolutionary reform set free from
Speaker 1: their form vegetable or animal habitat by the death of
Speaker 1: that medium. Bey Schamp explained that microzyma is at the
Speaker 1: beginning and the end of all organization. It is a
Speaker 1: fundamental anatomical element whereby the cellules, the tissues, the organs,
Speaker 1: the whole of an organism are constituted. He referred to
Speaker 1: microzymas as the builders and destroyers of cells, meaning they
Speaker 1: eat the garbage. If something is poisoned, it's either repair
Speaker 1: it because they can do that too, or get rid
Speaker 1: of it. And when you see the bacteria, oh, the
Speaker 1: bacteria is causing the illness. Germ theory. Oh that's a
Speaker 1: virus on there. We can kind of see it. Germ theory.
Speaker 1: Virus theory. No, they're either getting rid of the bad cell,
Speaker 1: the toxin, the diseased and no longer useful thing before
Speaker 1: it poisons the rest of the system, or the repairing it.
Speaker 1: The quotation emphasizes the whole of the organism of the
Speaker 1: constant he refer to microzyme is that the builders and
Speaker 1: destroyers of cells. The quotation emphasizes the constructive aspect of
Speaker 1: microzyme and activity and purpose, but it is the destructive
Speaker 1: aspect or the end of all organization, which concerns us
Speaker 1: in disease. He always found microzyme as remaining after the
Speaker 1: complete decomposition of a dead organism and concluded that they
Speaker 1: are the only non transitory biological elements they don't die.
Speaker 1: In addition, they carry out the vital function of decomposition
Speaker 1: necessary or they are the precursors of beings. Beat bacteria
Speaker 1: yeast and fungui which do so, so they become these things.
Speaker 1: It's not coming from somewhere else, it's coming from you.
Speaker 1: It's coming from them. And they can revert back depending
Speaker 1: on the conditions and the environment, meaning their surroundings. Right,
Speaker 1: whatever is needed. Hey, we need the ferrymen here, but
Speaker 1: we need the police chief over there, right, get it. Thus,
Speaker 1: he clearly clearly presented the idea that the physical life
Speaker 1: of higher biological forms arise from, is independent upon and
Speaker 1: is recycled by microscopic beings. Simple immediate proof of the
Speaker 1: dependence is the indispensable bacterial population and the human GI tract.
Speaker 1: And it adds peak And what do they always attack
Speaker 1: with drugs, the drugs, the prom pharmaceuticals. They're always changing
Speaker 1: the fluora, fauna, whatever the hell it is inside your gut.
Speaker 1: They're paralyzing the little field what do they call it,
Speaker 1: vili or whatever they are that are actually there to
Speaker 1: grab your nutrients and use them. That's what those drugs do.
Speaker 1: They also poison and contry change the conditions of your
Speaker 1: guts so that you know, they always say, oh, you
Speaker 1: have to rebuild your healthy gut flora if you have
Speaker 1: to take this thing or take that thing. You just
Speaker 1: have to be healthy and your microz iima will change
Speaker 1: back to those things because the only thing that's in
Speaker 1: there now that's bad back to here is also the
Speaker 1: mic zima's product. So if you want it to be
Speaker 1: something different, change the environment, you don't need to take
Speaker 1: something or I mean, I guess you could add you know,
Speaker 1: maybe some I don't know what is it acidophilus? But
Speaker 1: is that the right way to do it? Or is
Speaker 1: it just to recondition the system so that the bad
Speaker 1: bacterior as they call it, doesn't have a place to
Speaker 1: be anymore, it's no longer suitable for its for its
Speaker 1: uh sustenance, so that it reverts back to something that
Speaker 1: is symbiotic and helpful to you. Right, you can change
Speaker 1: its mood basically, And it adds you can because it's
Speaker 1: only acting on Hey, this is something that is dying
Speaker 1: or decaying. We need to get rid of it. And
Speaker 1: if that thing happens to be you, because the damage
Speaker 1: is done so badly, then they're going to continue to
Speaker 1: keep eating. They don't eat, they don't eat living healthy cells.
Speaker 1: They only eat dead or dying or diseased ones. And
Speaker 1: it adds he can see to the whole matter to
Speaker 1: consider that are digestive and metabolic associates are plants. A
Speaker 1: crucial catabolic aspect of microzyme and behavior enters the picture
Speaker 1: when the body becomes diseased. For according to be shamp
Speaker 1: and the state of health, the microzymis act harmoniously, harmoniously
Speaker 1: and our life is in every meaning of the word,
Speaker 1: a regular fermentation. In a condition of disease, the microzymas
Speaker 1: which have become morbid because determined in the organisms special changes. Okay,
Speaker 1: so let me read that again. In a condition of disease,
Speaker 1: microzymes which have become morbid determined in the organism of
Speaker 1: special changes right, which lead alike to this organization of
Speaker 1: the tissues, to the destruction of the cellules, and to
Speaker 1: their vibrionian evolution during life. That microzyma is an organized,
Speaker 1: insoluble ferment a living element. Controlled fermentation is a vital
Speaker 1: physiological process. For example, it is utilized as a means
Speaker 1: of breaking down toxins in intercellular fluid and the lymphatics. Also,
Speaker 1: some commercial dietary fiber products contain acacia and slippery elm.
Speaker 1: These soluble fiber fibers ferment in the gut, resulting in
Speaker 1: short chain fatty acids such as rate and acetate, which
Speaker 1: are highly beneficial to the colon oil. Be Shomp published
Speaker 1: the paper still in Front about the role of microzymas
Speaker 1: to the production of the salivary diastase. That's the way
Speaker 1: that they added instead of saying microzyma salivary mea okay.
Speaker 1: Since there our microzyme is in every cell in the
Speaker 1: blood and intercellular miru, it is likely that many vital substances,
Speaker 1: mostly enzymes, are produced by them or by their complexes.
Speaker 1: Complexes meaning either by them as the granule or them
Speaker 1: as in one of their evolutions. Bichamp said that the
Speaker 1: process of cellular breakdown is mediated by microzyme in fermentation.
Speaker 1: This is like metamorphosis, right, like in the same life,
Speaker 1: going whatever way backward forward, completely something different, but always
Speaker 1: serving a certain function no matter what, having a purpose
Speaker 1: is important in life, you see. B Schamp said that
Speaker 1: the process of cellular breakdown is mediated by American design
Speaker 1: infermentation even in a healthy body, though there is renewal
Speaker 1: happening as well. Right, you have to get rid of
Speaker 1: the dead cells and get that junk out of the way.
Speaker 1: There's something to eat, bro, it's not gonna eat the bad.
Speaker 1: But if you start becoming poisoned, then there's gonna eat
Speaker 1: those cells too, and then depositing poisons perhaps perhaps depending
Speaker 1: on how it's secreting and fermenting, and then you get
Speaker 1: little bubbles they call numers and shit. Right though, there
Speaker 1: is a renewal happening as well, breakdown fermentation. Aging eventually
Speaker 1: takes over greatly, increasing in intensity upon death. Yeah, but
Speaker 1: we don't really know what the actual human natural process
Speaker 1: would be and how much and how quickly we would age.
Speaker 1: If it wasn't for all the poison toxics in our
Speaker 1: environment and our food, would we actually age that bad
Speaker 1: Or if we were fully nutrified all the time, would
Speaker 1: we age as much or as at least as quickly.
Speaker 1: When ox dative metabolism ceases and the body dies, negative
Speaker 1: surface charges are lost and the terrain goes acid. Microzymas
Speaker 1: respond to biochemical signals, the most important being pH The
Speaker 1: condition of disease is a meliu, which presents to the
Speaker 1: microzymas a premature biological signal that the organism is dead.
Speaker 1: They consequently change their function and evolve into forms capable
Speaker 1: of more vigorous fermentative breakdown forms that reflect disease what
Speaker 1: Beshamp called morbidly evolved in microzymas. If the host pays
Speaker 1: no attention while it is still feasible to adjust, he
Speaker 1: she will be recycled sooner than would be otherwise the case.
Speaker 1: So get your shit in order and stop just taking
Speaker 1: drugs to mitigate symptoms. You got to get yourself healthy
Speaker 1: or the problem's going to persist, and it's going to
Speaker 1: be microzymmes because they got the chemical signal. And what
Speaker 1: would you think is going to happen when you get
Speaker 1: a poison that you're shooting down your throat twice a
Speaker 1: day or whatever. The pill is in addition to the
Speaker 1: other problem that is going on in your body, this
Speaker 1: deficiency or whatever, or a food poison that you're continuing
Speaker 1: to eating or drinking bad water or whatever. But in
Speaker 1: addition to that, taking this drug too, that's only going
Speaker 1: to expedite the process of your of your decline and health.
Speaker 1: And it's going to trigger because it's chemical, right, A
Speaker 1: drug is going to trigger these microzymas into doing more
Speaker 1: damage because it's responding to the chemical signal. And I
Speaker 1: think they know this, and I think this is why
Speaker 1: they do it this way, because it's all a death cult.
Speaker 1: And further and further, in disease, it is the elementary
Speaker 1: tissues or cellular cellules that are affected. It should result therefrom,
Speaker 1: therefrom that tissue and cellular pathology are in reality microzimement pathology.
Speaker 1: Let's say that again. It should result therefrom that tissue
Speaker 1: and cellular pathology are in reality microzyme in pathology. They're
Speaker 1: flipping the switches, you know what I mean. In your
Speaker 1: body in disease, the cellular cellules have been seen to change.
Speaker 1: The cellules have been seen to change be altered. And
Speaker 1: this is another Oh man, this is another thing like
Speaker 1: oh well, this looks tubercular. No, this looks like it's
Speaker 1: blah blah blah fever. No, now it looks like it's
Speaker 1: immune deficiency blah blah blah. Why do you think that
Speaker 1: is Number one? It could be because they're injecting you
Speaker 1: with shit that's actually causing the very thing that they
Speaker 1: say that they're trying to prevent. That's one way. And
Speaker 1: like during the Spanish influenza, people were getting infant paralysis
Speaker 1: in the twenties because they were soldiers getting shot when
Speaker 1: injected with a bunch of crap they were getting and
Speaker 1: that was a condition of being shot. With the months
Speaker 1: mules rebell or whatever the fuck, they were shooting up
Speaker 1: with vaccines and then other vaccines for this and that
Speaker 1: and the other thing. We're producing polio, producing all kinds
Speaker 1: of crap whatever. I don't know if it's polio, but
Speaker 1: you understand it mean like proalysis or all kinds of crap.
Speaker 1: And they were getting multiple of these things at the
Speaker 1: same time. But in addition to that, another way that's
Speaker 1: going to happen is that with these conditions changing in
Speaker 1: your body and getting worse and worse and worse without
Speaker 1: being addressed, and in the addition to drugs, that these
Speaker 1: things start to take different forms because the micro designs
Speaker 1: are being triggered to become different things. So it manifests
Speaker 1: different types of symptoms as it progresses. Haha. Another indication
Speaker 1: that it's fucking true anyway, in disease, the cellules have
Speaker 1: been seen to change, be altered and destroyed, and these
Speaker 1: facts have been noted. But if the cellule were the
Speaker 1: vital unit of but if the cellule where the vital
Speaker 1: unit living per se, it would know neither destruction nor death,
Speaker 1: but only change if then the cellule can be destroyed
Speaker 1: and die, while the microzyma can only change. It is
Speaker 1: because the microzeima is really living per se and physiologically
Speaker 1: imperishable even in its own evolutions. For physiologically, nothing is
Speaker 1: the prey of death. On the contrary, experience Daily proves
Speaker 1: that everything is the prey of life, that is to say,
Speaker 1: of what can be nourished and can consume. Yes, pretty nice.
Speaker 1: I like the fact that he says nothing is the
Speaker 1: prey of death. Everything is the prey of life. Further
Speaker 1: conclusions by Beham that there is a that there is
Speaker 1: produced in the organisms of all living beings, including man,
Speaker 1: in some part and a given moment, alcohol, acetic acid,
Speaker 1: and other compounds that are natural products of the activity
Speaker 1: of organized ferments, and that there is no other natural
Speaker 1: cause of this production that the microzyma is of the
Speaker 1: than the microzymens of the organism says there. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: say that again, that there is a that there is
Speaker 1: produced in the organizations of all living beings, including man,
Speaker 1: in some part and at a given moment, alcohol, acetic acid,
Speaker 1: and other compounds that are the natural products of the
Speaker 1: activity of organized ferments, and that there is no longer
Speaker 1: natural causes, not no, and that there is no other
Speaker 1: natural cause of this production than the microzymas of the organism.
Speaker 1: Now microzymas are creating the fermentation that brings and produces alcohol,
Speaker 1: acetic acid, and others utric acid. Emphasis added. Here is
Speaker 1: where in a compromised terrain the culminate forms? Is that
Speaker 1: what it says?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Here is where in a compromised terrain the culminate forms
Speaker 1: where I describe in my main text of my book
Speaker 1: Sick at All could play a role as described by
Speaker 1: Beshamp in an apparently healthy organism, it would likely be
Speaker 1: the initial development phase. The presence of alcohol, acetic acid,
Speaker 1: et cetera and tissues reveals one of the causes independent
Speaker 1: of the phenomenon of oxidation. What do we talk about
Speaker 1: with doctor Manso oxidative stress, too much iron in your
Speaker 1: body and them telling you that you're iron deficient because
Speaker 1: it's in the wrong place. It's in the tissue. Oxidation
Speaker 1: comes from heating the oils that you're cooking with that
Speaker 1: you shouldn't be cooking with. Oxidation comes from drinking the
Speaker 1: dam oil straight from the bottle. It's aredioxidized and by
Speaker 1: the way, also rant it if it's olive oil. Of
Speaker 1: the of the disappearance of sugar in the organism and
Speaker 1: the yes, so hey, I wonder if there's a because
Speaker 1: this is all fermentation. I wonder if people who have
Speaker 1: problems regulating the sugar have something wrong with the microzyma,
Speaker 1: like in diabetes type one in two, and of the
Speaker 1: disappearance of glucogenic matters, and that which Dumas called the
Speaker 1: respiratory foods that without the concurrence of any outside influence
Speaker 1: except that of the suitable temperature, fermentation will go on
Speaker 1: in a part withdrawn from an animal, such as the egg, milk, liver, muscle,
Speaker 1: et cetera, or in the case of plants, in a
Speaker 1: germinating seed, or in a fruit which ripens when detached
Speaker 1: from the tree, et cetera. The fermentable matter that disappears
Speaker 1: earlier in the organ after death is the glucose sugar
Speaker 1: gets eaten glucogenic matter or some other of the compounds
Speaker 1: called carbohydrate, that is to say, respiratory food, and the
Speaker 1: new compounds that appear are the same as produced in
Speaker 1: the alcoholic lactic acid and butteric fermentations of the laboratory
Speaker 1: or during life alcohol, acetic acid, lactic acid, and sacylactic acid.
Speaker 1: You see sachroids, saccharides, sugar rate that the microozymas after
Speaker 1: or be that the microzyme is after or before their evolution,
Speaker 1: and bacteria into backfucking motherfucker that the microzymas after or
Speaker 1: before their evolution into bacteria attack albuminoid or gelatinous matters
Speaker 1: only after the destruction of the carbohydrates that the microzyme is,
Speaker 1: and bacteria having affected the transformations before mentioned, do not
Speaker 1: die in enclosed apparatus in the absence of oxygen. They
Speaker 1: go into a state of rest, as does the er
Speaker 1: yeast in an environment of the products of the decomposition
Speaker 1: of the sugar, which which products it formed. So when
Speaker 1: the fermentation processes all over all the sugar is used,
Speaker 1: the yeast go that the necessary destruction of the organic
Speaker 1: matter of an organism is not left to the chance
Speaker 1: of causes foreign to that organism. Right, it's happening from
Speaker 1: me withinside you. You can't prevent it because it's already inside.
Speaker 1: The change is going to happen. And what then and
Speaker 1: what and that when everything else has disappeared, bacteria and finally,
Speaker 1: the microzyme is resulting from their reversion, going back to
Speaker 1: microzyme and granules remain as evidence that there was nothing
Speaker 1: primarily living except themselves in the perished organism. Woo, holy crap,
Speaker 1: what is that?
Speaker 4: Well?
Speaker 1: Hear of that again, that the necessary destruction of the
Speaker 1: organic matter of the organism is not left to chance
Speaker 1: of cause a foreign causes, a foreign Ah fucking fuck
Speaker 1: my face. That the necessary destruction of the organic matter
Speaker 1: of an organism is not left to the chance of
Speaker 1: causes foreign to that organism, And that when everything else
Speaker 1: has disappeared, bacteria and finally, microzymas resulting from the reversion
Speaker 1: remain as evidence that there was nothing primarily living except
Speaker 1: themselves in the parish organism. And these microzymis, which appear
Speaker 1: to us as the zidum residue of what lived, still
Speaker 1: possess some activity of the specific kind that they possessed
Speaker 1: during the life of the destroyed being microzymas unique to
Speaker 1: each organism and organ The microzymas were two minute to
Speaker 1: differentiate with the microscope, even for today's equipment, and Bechop
Speaker 1: knew he was not going to see them in detail.
Speaker 1: His brilliant shows again, however, the naturalist will not be
Speaker 1: able to distinguish them by the description, but the chemist
Speaker 1: and also the physiologists will characterize them by their function.
Speaker 1: Having masterful skill in chemistry, he utilized that ability, accompanied
Speaker 1: by ingenious use of a polar polarimidia the polar polarimeter
Speaker 1: to draw many of his conclusions. He was led to
Speaker 1: conclude that an organism's microzymas are unique to it. So
Speaker 1: the polarimeter is like, it'll say, okay, it's it's blah
Speaker 1: blah blah degrees this way. It's bla. It's turning this way.
Speaker 1: It's pretty interesting that there. And it's like it changes,
Speaker 1: it changes nature or its function, or its or its
Speaker 1: attributes because it's giving off a different uh right, it's
Speaker 1: making a different turn or whatever. It's pretty it's pretty interesting.
Speaker 1: I remember reading that when I was reading the an
Speaker 1: it would blood in the blood in its third atomical
Speaker 1: elemet having is kind of like thinking like a plumb bob,
Speaker 1: it's kind of weird, or like a compass. Having masterful
Speaker 1: skill in chemistry, he utilizes the ability accompanied by ingenious
Speaker 1: use of the ployma. We saw that he was led
Speaker 1: to conclude that an organisms microzymas are unique to it
Speaker 1: and are not interchangeable with those of another. So stop
Speaker 1: injecting shit from some other people inside you or some
Speaker 1: other animal that confuses them, that drives them nuts, that
Speaker 1: causes really bad things to happen inside your body. And
Speaker 1: death is more it should be more common than it is.
Speaker 1: You shouldn't be injecting yourself with anything. He went further
Speaker 1: to say, especially don't get no get your flu shot
Speaker 1: because Albertson said so, and I get tempers of off
Speaker 1: my groceries if I try to commit suicide today. He
Speaker 1: went further to say that even within a single organism,
Speaker 1: each organ and tissues has functionally unique microzymis. Each organi
Speaker 1: tissue has functionally unique microzymis, and that, for example, those
Speaker 1: of the kidney do not belong in a liver. What therefore,
Speaker 1: did he have to say about inoculation? Thank you. The
Speaker 1: most serious, even fatal disorders may be provoked by the
Speaker 1: injection of living organisms into the blood. Organisms which existing
Speaker 1: in the organs proper to them fulfill necessary and beneficial
Speaker 1: functions chemical and physiological, but injected into the blood into
Speaker 1: a medium not intended for them provoke redoubtable manifestations of
Speaker 1: the gravest morbid phenomenon. Microzymas morphologically identical may differ functionally,
Speaker 1: and those proper to one species cannot be introduced into
Speaker 1: another animal of another species, or even into another center
Speaker 1: of activity in the same animal without serious danger. Remember
Speaker 1: this forever. It doesn't matter what's in it, but it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter what other poisons are in it. This is
Speaker 1: enough to never ever ever do this. Parents, Now you're
Speaker 1: responsible for this information, don't fail them. How much more
Speaker 1: foolhardy is it than when vaccinal marker zimers are Now
Speaker 1: what the fuck? I can read words? I don't know
Speaker 1: why my bouth doesn't say them. How much more fool hearted?
Speaker 1: How much more fool hardy is it than when vaccinal
Speaker 1: vaccinal microzymes are not only from another species, but are
Speaker 1: already morbidly evolved, and you are accompanied by preservatives, formaldehyde
Speaker 1: and other chemicals. There is no sanity whatever to this practice.
Speaker 1: The best that can be said about it is that
Speaker 1: it may prevent, against the odds, the appearance of varying
Speaker 1: sets of symptoms, But this is at the price of
Speaker 1: weakening the immune system, toxifying the body and possibly setting
Speaker 1: the stage for degenerative symptoms later in life, all the
Speaker 1: while doing absolutely nothing for except perhaps worsening the underlying
Speaker 1: disease condition, thank you, and also setting off a fucking
Speaker 1: domino effect in your body. As indicated in the above
Speaker 1: quotation concerning granulations of the protocolasm, it would seem that
Speaker 1: microzymers are also closely related to and perhaps precursors of,
Speaker 1: genetic molecules. In in August eighth, nineteen seventy seven address
Speaker 1: to the now defunct International Cavity of Preventive Medicines, doctor
Speaker 1: Dettman and Calogero Carinos had this to say. It became
Speaker 1: increasingly apparent to us that the problems relating to infection
Speaker 1: and immunization were, to say the least, overcivilified by organized medicine.
Speaker 1: Perhaps base Shamp was thinking in advance of our modern
Speaker 1: molecular biologists that referred to genes controlling enzymes. We wondered
Speaker 1: whether Bechamp's writing anticipated, in some respects the discovery of
Speaker 1: RNA and DNA. It now appears to us that the
Speaker 1: experimental data described in by Shop's work has in part
Speaker 1: been independently and unknowingly repeated by Professor Bayev of the
Speaker 1: USSR Academy of Sciences, Bishop and pasture here we go.
Speaker 1: Bishop never denied that the so called germs of the
Speaker 1: air or other causes may be contributory either by decomposition
Speaker 1: or illness, but the only, but only, that these have
Speaker 1: not been expressly created, nor are they needed for these purposes.
Speaker 1: As noted, the germs of the air are nothing other
Speaker 1: than microzymas of their evolved forms from fermented, fermentatively destroyed organisms.
Speaker 1: Their destructive or morbid influence may be added to that
Speaker 1: already faced by the organisms, indogenous microzymas which may or
Speaker 1: may not have initiated morbid evolutions. So if you're already
Speaker 1: screwed up inside, then the things from the outside will
Speaker 1: affect because they'll see a breeding ground for them to
Speaker 1: eat what's messed up in you. This is a crucial
Speaker 1: departure from the germ theory, that is, without the predisposition
Speaker 1: of inherent microzymas, which conditions is it? Which condition is
Speaker 1: engendered primarily by a faulty internal environment, The germs of
Speaker 1: the air or those of other sick bodies will not
Speaker 1: produce illness. A person one can see how this holistic
Speaker 1: view confers responsibility and power on the individual as opposed
Speaker 1: to the individual, as opposed to making him a victim
Speaker 1: to be saved. Right. They want you like that, the dependency.
Speaker 1: They don't want you to think that you have control
Speaker 1: over anything, including your own health. Nothing can fix this,
Speaker 1: Nothing can solve this, nothing of those cures well by
Speaker 1: a medical science, science powerless to do so. In addition
Speaker 1: to microzyme is in the atmosphere, the spores of the
Speaker 1: entire microscopic flora may intrude, as well as all the
Speaker 1: molds that may be born of these spores. But it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter if the microzymes are freaking kicking ass for you.
Speaker 1: Doesn't matter when you start screwing them up, you start
Speaker 1: compromising yourself with shots, then any little thing can do it.
Speaker 1: In the earlier phase of his career as professor of
Speaker 1: medical chemistry and Pharmacy faculty at Montpellier University, Bishop and
Speaker 1: his tireless colleague, Professor Ester cool Dude, had many opportunities
Speaker 1: to test microzimon theory and practice, examination of an amputated arm,
Speaker 1: and many examinations of frozen plants. During a particularly cold
Speaker 1: winter convinced them that upon injury, bacteria develop internally without
Speaker 1: any outside influence. Bruising an apple without breaking this its
Speaker 1: skin is an example of broken cells with auto ferment.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 1: And I've made this analogy before. When it hits the
Speaker 1: ground and it gets the bruised, that's the trigger system
Speaker 1: for it to say, Okay, start fermentation, start decomposing. Then
Speaker 1: you get the little the spot turns brown and gets
Speaker 1: and it grows, and it grows and it grows. You
Speaker 1: peel one and it starts to do the same thing.
Speaker 1: Apples go fast. This is one basis for the surgical
Speaker 1: cleaning of wounds pasture. On the other hand, a non
Speaker 1: physician and proponent proponent of the well pasture, okay, we're
Speaker 1: talking about pastor. Pastor. On the other hand, a non
Speaker 1: physician and proponent of the germ theory, seems to have
Speaker 1: lacked a certain understanding of living systems. He considered the
Speaker 1: body to be a collection of inur chemicals. Remember what
Speaker 1: doctor bomb, Oh my god, what does doctor Gluden said say?
Speaker 1: You're just there's no there is no vital force, there
Speaker 1: is no soul, there is no god. You're just a
Speaker 1: bag of chemicals waiting to break. There's no such thing
Speaker 1: as a cure. You're inherently broken. You're inherent there's something
Speaker 1: wrong with you. It's all genetic. Dada da da da.
Speaker 1: And life is just a bag. You're just a bag
Speaker 1: of chemicals. Consciousness is nothing. This is pasture atheism, the
Speaker 1: humanist mindset of the Freemasons and the frankest Jesuit Freemasons,
Speaker 1: the ones that happened after seventeen eighties. So, he says,
Speaker 1: he considered the body to be a collection of innert chemicals,
Speaker 1: and therefore after death he expected nothing living in it.
Speaker 1: When life would inevitably appear in dead organisms, he had
Speaker 1: to draw the conclusion that it resulted from invasion from
Speaker 1: without by the beings who exist, whose existence had been
Speaker 1: taught to him and the world by bay Shop. Either
Speaker 1: he saw but would not admit, or he simply could
Speaker 1: not fathom that microorganisms are already inherent to humans and
Speaker 1: every other organized medium on the planet, all of which contain,
Speaker 1: are composed of, and have developed from microzymas. We wouldn't
Speaker 1: be here without him. Unfortunately, the persuasiveness of Pasteur's superficial
Speaker 1: conclusions held sway over the deeper, rather elusive complex, profound,
Speaker 1: even mystical workings of life and pathology. So what's the
Speaker 1: answer to what came first, the chicken or the egg?
Speaker 1: The answer is the microzyma. It does it under the
Speaker 1: conditions that were correct developed, and it would have been
Speaker 1: the chicken, right or something. I don't know, But the
Speaker 1: microzyma came first. Beg shop long before the vein. Considered
Speaker 1: the inside of the organism to be a medium for
Speaker 1: the development of inoculated bacteria. Raspel said, the organism does
Speaker 1: not engender disease, it receives it from without. Disease is
Speaker 1: an effect of which active causes is external to the organism. Bullshit.
Speaker 1: In spite of this, the great physicians affirm, in Pedo's
Speaker 1: happy words, disease is born of us and in us.
Speaker 1: Second one is true, first one is not. But m Pasteur.
Speaker 1: Following Raspiel maintains that physicians are in error. The active
Speaker 1: cause of our maladies resides in diseased germs created at
Speaker 1: the origin of all things, which, having gained an invisible
Speaker 1: entry into us, there develops into parasites from pasteur. As
Speaker 1: for Raspail, there is no spontaneous disease. Without microbes, there
Speaker 1: would be no sickness no matter what we do. Despair
Speaker 1: despite our imprudeness, so imprudences, miseries or vices. The system,
Speaker 1: neither new nor original, is ingenious, very simple in its subtlety.
Speaker 1: And yeah, the common idiot could understand it. And as
Speaker 1: long as you tell them that there's something there's a
Speaker 1: Boogeyman virus out there, you can inject them with anything,
Speaker 1: because they want you to save them, and in consequence
Speaker 1: easy to understand and to propagate. Right, the most illiterate
Speaker 1: of human beings to whom one has shown and yeah,
Speaker 1: they might as well be describing fucking pasture when you
Speaker 1: say that the most illiterateive human beings to whom one
Speaker 1: has shown the connection between the acharus and the itch,
Speaker 1: understands that the itch is the disease of the acereus.
Speaker 1: Thus it comes about that it is that it has
Speaker 1: seduced many people who give unthinking triumph to it. Above
Speaker 1: all men of the world are carried away by a
Speaker 1: specie specious, easy doctrine, speculative right spacious, easy doctrine, all
Speaker 1: the more applicable to generalities and vague explanations. And that
Speaker 1: it is badly based upon proved and tried scientific demonstrations, right,
Speaker 1: they believe that's true. Proved and tried. Yeah, it's not much.
Speaker 1: Of Pastor's refusal to accept microzime in theory may have
Speaker 1: arisen from pure rivalry, which came into focus when be
Speaker 1: Jomp's solved under right under the nose of Pasture, a
Speaker 1: disease crisis threatening the French silkword industry. Since the two
Speaker 1: must have known each other previously, we must be open
Speaker 1: minded enough to allow that bay Shop, though concerned for
Speaker 1: his country's important industry, may have indulged himself in a
Speaker 1: little one upmanship in his embarrassment of Pasture, who gained
Speaker 1: more privilege from social connection than from earned merit. Thus,
Speaker 1: in most books, Pastures given credit for solving the crisis.
Speaker 1: If so, it may have cost Bayshop dearly because it
Speaker 1: earned him an eternal resentment in the volatile of the
Speaker 1: volical chemists. Yeah, he was a volatile chemist who took
Speaker 1: every future opportunity to oppose his tormentor. And this is wrong.
Speaker 1: Bay Shop wasn't malicious that this is all bullshit, And
Speaker 1: it was primarily the specious easiness of germ theory that
Speaker 1: allowed Pastor to get away with it because few scientists
Speaker 1: of the time were sufficiently skilled to probe deeply enough
Speaker 1: to beneath the professionalities. Few possessed enough knowledge or insight
Speaker 1: to understand the elusive complexities. And Bechamp warned against fastial
Speaker 1: judgments when he wrote in eighteen sixty nine in typhoid fever,
Speaker 1: in gangreen and anthrax, the existence has been proved of
Speaker 1: bacteria in tissue and in the blood, and one was
Speaker 1: very much disposed to take them for granted as cases
Speaker 1: of ordinary parasitism. It is evident after what we have
Speaker 1: said that instead of maintaining that the affection has had
Speaker 1: as its origin and cause the introduction into the organism
Speaker 1: of foreign germs with their consequent action, one should affirm
Speaker 1: that it only has to do with an alteration of
Speaker 1: the function of the microzymas, an alteration indicated by the
Speaker 1: change that has taken place in their form. And also,
Speaker 1: where there's disease things, there's going to be bacteria eating
Speaker 1: those dead things. Of those dying things, and those diseased things, right,
Speaker 1: they will create the bacteria that eats them. So it's
Speaker 1: not the people that come to that come to the
Speaker 1: scene of the crime that are the guilty of the crime.
Speaker 1: An egg contains nothing organized except microzymas. Everything in the egg,
Speaker 1: from the chemical point of view, will be necessary for
Speaker 1: the work of the microzymas. If in this egg its
Speaker 1: ordered procedure should be disturbed by a violent shaking, what happens.
Speaker 1: The albuminoid substances and the bodies of fat remain unchanged.
Speaker 1: The sugar and the glucagen disappear, and in their place
Speaker 1: are found alcohol, acetic acid, and beteric acid. A perfectly
Speaker 1: characterized fermentation has taken place here. We'll get there. That
Speaker 1: is the work of the microzymas, the minute ferments, which
Speaker 1: are the agents and the cause of all observed phenomena.
Speaker 1: And when the bird's egg has accomplished its function, which
Speaker 1: is to produce a bird, have the microzyma disappeared.
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 1: They may be traced in all the histological elements. They
Speaker 1: pre exist. One finds them. See they pre exist, One
Speaker 1: finds them again during the functioning of the life of
Speaker 1: the elements. One will find them yet again after death.
Speaker 1: It is by them that the tissues are made alive. Wow, right,
Speaker 1: it is by them that the tissues are made alive.
Speaker 1: We are the microzymis. That's why they don't like us.
Speaker 1: The part of the organism being, the part of organized
Speaker 1: beings essentially active and living according to the physiologists, is
Speaker 1: the granular protoplasm. The part of the organized beings essentially
Speaker 1: active and living according to physiologists, is the granular protoplasm.
Speaker 1: We went a step farther and said that it is
Speaker 1: the granulations of the protoplasm. And though for their perception
Speaker 1: a sort of spiritual insight is required, we have based
Speaker 1: our conclusion upon experimental proofs of the most varied and
Speaker 1: positive nature being shot looked upon the tissues as the
Speaker 1: elements of the bodies of higher animals. With the help
Speaker 1: of the microscope, very definitive particles cells were discovered and
Speaker 1: were regarded in their turn as elementary parts. As the
Speaker 1: last term of this analysis, we said, in our turn,
Speaker 1: the cell is an aggregate of a number of minute
Speaker 1: beings having an independent life, a separate natural history. Of
Speaker 1: this natural history we have made a complete description. Their
Speaker 1: microscope was a little bit more strong, a lot more strong,
Speaker 1: and they could see smaller things than the cell Bei
Speaker 1: Shomp apparently had a good sense of place in the
Speaker 1: scientific pursuit in our turn of the ever retreating ultimate secret,
Speaker 1: he realized that the truth of empiricism is for the
Speaker 1: time or in its process of evolving. No doubt he
Speaker 1: would willingly have given up microzyme and theory in the
Speaker 1: face of right evidence of newer observation. I am presenting
Speaker 1: science with the newer, though highly correlative observation. For as
Speaker 1: bishanp attributed all fermentation in the body to microzymes, we
Speaker 1: now are able to see that it is also carried
Speaker 1: out by higher evolutionary forms yeast and fogus. But that's what, no, idiot,
Speaker 1: that's not That's the same thing he said that they
Speaker 1: evolved into those things. You're not saying anything different. It's
Speaker 1: like this guy's trying to still a freaking shit too. Anyway,
Speaker 1: Let's go down to cosmic microsymes, because we gotta get
Speaker 1: out here soon. It is also interesting to hear the
Speaker 1: scientists speak of the spiritual insight, and it is interesting
Speaker 1: as well to consider microzymis in terms of Eastern modes
Speaker 1: of spiritual thought, such as yoga, in which it is
Speaker 1: felt that our creation is an ongoing process. That is,
Speaker 1: life was not put here and simply proceeds, but it
Speaker 1: and we are coming into being in the moment. Thus
Speaker 1: there is constant turnover or renewal and healing in this scenario.
Speaker 1: Of the microsigmen may be seen as an early, if
Speaker 1: not the primary, transmutation from the fine vibrations of the
Speaker 1: cosmic life force into a denser form or pattern of life,
Speaker 1: something not explainable by biochemistry. Certainly, due to the colloidal
Speaker 1: nature of these netscent elements, they carry high levels of
Speaker 1: energy and may also be receptive to frequencies. Hello, frequencies
Speaker 1: of light and radiation. It's activating or informational signals. During
Speaker 1: formation or once formed, they may be stimulated by cosmic energy.
Speaker 1: Oh sunlight, Oh getmory?
Speaker 2: Where is that?
Speaker 1: Before I started actings? Silly cosmic stimulated by cosmic energy
Speaker 1: which comes directly into our being, which provides energy that
Speaker 1: cannot be accounted for in the crab's cycle, which is ionizing,
Speaker 1: and which has been interpreted as carrying part of the
Speaker 1: hollographic human archetypal information. Is the microzyma colloidal intelligence, or
Speaker 1: a modus of the creative intelligence, a living transducer for
Speaker 1: the idea of in consciousness. Let me read that again.
Speaker 1: Coloidal intelligence or modis of the creative intelligence, a living
Speaker 1: transducer for the idea in consciousness which is translate which
Speaker 1: it translates into the cellular anatomy. Let me start it again,
Speaker 1: because keep tripping on my words. I'm reading them. My
Speaker 1: mind is my mouth is a fucking piece of shit.
Speaker 1: Coloidal intelligence or a modus of the creative intelligence, a
Speaker 1: living transducer for the idea in consciousness which it translates
Speaker 1: into this cellular anatomy. It was said earlier that the
Speaker 1: microzyma's respond to the pH of the surrounding medium, reforming
Speaker 1: when appropriate. However, the chemical aspect may be just as
Speaker 1: just an obvious way for us to qualify the situation,
Speaker 1: perhaps the change in pH alters, vibrations or resonant frequencies,
Speaker 1: changing the microzymon quality of reception, transmittal or transduction of
Speaker 1: the life force and cosmic rays. Doctor Bonso, energetic body
Speaker 1: touch therapy, bridging gaps, methylation. We're going to get into
Speaker 1: all that later. Be Champ said, the microzyma is imperishable.
Speaker 1: Canadian microscopist microscopist Gaston Nessens says his analogous summatid particles
Speaker 1: have survived, carbonizing temperatures, fifty thousand rems of radiation and
Speaker 1: all app If these claims are true, could such imperishability
Speaker 1: stem from being an interface of energy, matter and consciousness,
Speaker 1: i e. From an imperishability and constant materialization of life itself.
Speaker 1: It may therefore be that only the mystery of life
Speaker 1: stands prior to the American zim as patterns boom elaborate colonies.
Speaker 1: An interesting corollary to microzimon principle is the idea presented
Speaker 1: by I think We're good confirmation on Bey Shamp. There
Speaker 1: have been many modern contemporary confirmations of various aspects of
Speaker 1: Bechamp's work. One of the earliest and most piquet was
Speaker 1: reported in the article in The Times, a London newspaper,
Speaker 1: on April nineteen fourteen. A French bacteriologist, Madam Henry, had
Speaker 1: succeeded in transforming a Nanthodox basilist into a coca form
Speaker 1: having entirely different functional properties. It could easily have been
Speaker 1: explained by Professor Beachamp, who sat virtually unrecognized in the
Speaker 1: London Medical Congress in eighteen eighty one, where plagiarist the
Speaker 1: Pastor appeared amidst outbursts of cheering as his country's representative,
Speaker 1: and where as reported in the Times of August eighth,
Speaker 1: eighteen eighty one, he categorically denied the pleomorphism of be introductor,
Speaker 1: so he was proven wrong here. Pastor also jumped to
Speaker 1: the conclusion that each kind of germ produced one specific fermentation,
Speaker 1: while Bechamp proved that the micro organism might vary its
Speaker 1: fermentation effect and conformity with the surrounding medium its environment. Right,
Speaker 1: Beachamp's assertion that these microforms under varying conditions might even
Speaker 1: change their shape was proved conclusively by Laynus and Smith
Speaker 1: of the US Department of Agriculture in nineteen sixteen. And
Speaker 1: for evidence that the biological train is the determinate factor
Speaker 1: over the mere presence of a symptomogenic microform, we may
Speaker 1: return to clerical ernos who say it should come as
Speaker 1: no surprise to discover that almost every pathogen may be
Speaker 1: isolated from the majority of so called healthy people. So
Speaker 1: you hear that every pathogen may be isolated from the
Speaker 1: majority of so called healthy people, Those tests are fucking
Speaker 1: testing you for something that you inherently have in your body.
Speaker 1: So when the microzyme is changed like, oh, you test
Speaker 1: the positive, you have a virus. Here's a bunch of
Speaker 1: drugs and here's an injection. Not die, you're testing positive
Speaker 1: for yourself. Don't fall into the trap. Don't fall into
Speaker 1: the scam, the fraud. The revelation also highlights a recent
Speaker 1: example of false conclusions, to which one is led by
Speaker 1: germ theory. The news and research in ethoscyrosis is that
Speaker 1: scientists have isolated a chlamydia type organism in the plaque
Speaker 1: and have concluded that it is the cause of the symptom.
Speaker 1: The plan is to use antibiotics fucking terrible. I hate
Speaker 1: antibiotics just as much as everything else to combat this pathogen.
Speaker 1: There is only one guarantee in this volley. At the
Speaker 1: very best, they may achieve athoscorrosis without chlamydia. At worst,
Speaker 1: they will exacerbate the mounting crisis in health caused by
Speaker 1: a half century of antibiotic abuse. Perhaps the most profound
Speaker 1: confirmation of pleomorphism was executed by another nearly obliterated genius,
Speaker 1: at this time an American microscopist. I'd say this time
Speaker 1: at American microscopist with the alliterative name of Royal Raymond Rife.
Speaker 1: His story was told in an appres a piece of
Speaker 1: work called the Rife Report by investigative reporter linus See.
Speaker 1: It has been published in a book form as The
Speaker 1: Cancer Cure That Worked, which is highly recommended from several standpoints.
Speaker 1: Sort of research technology which would be astounding for these times,
Speaker 1: never mind for the late nineteen twenties and thirties, for
Speaker 1: a wonderful background on many pioneering figures in biology, for
Speaker 1: anyone interested in deeper understanding of where medicine has gone
Speaker 1: in the United States, and not least all for a
Speaker 1: wonderful foreword blah blah blah blah. Rife's extraordinary microscope with
Speaker 1: thirty one thousand diameters resolution, reported on the Great Detail
Speaker 1: in February nineteen forty four Journal of the Franklin Institute,
Speaker 1: was capable of detail and clarity, surpassing the newly emerging,
Speaker 1: surpassing the newly emerging, surpassing the newly emerging electron microscopes.
Speaker 1: Its use of prismatically dispersed natural light, natural natural light
Speaker 1: frequencies rather than electronic beams and acid stains that's what
Speaker 1: kills the cells, that so kills the sample allowed clear
Speaker 1: views of living what I tell you earlier of living subjects,
Speaker 1: blood tissue, whatever, little little bodies. Weighing two hundred pounds,
Speaker 1: standing two feet high, and consisting of five six hundred
Speaker 1: and eighty two parts, the Rife Universal Microscope was an
Speaker 1: unsung wonder of the world, and the world has thus
Speaker 1: far been robbed of this absolutely elegant design. Yeah, they
Speaker 1: parted it out and have it stuck in some basement somewhere,
Speaker 1: or destroyed it or replicated it for their underground layers.
Speaker 1: Who knows. In nineteen twenty, Rife began maybe that's what
Speaker 1: they're using to freaking make their written nano. In nineteen twenty,
Speaker 1: Rife began doing research and electronic treatment of disease, specifically
Speaker 1: to find a way to destroy the tubercula of Basilis
Speaker 1: by means of radio frequency radiation. Attempts to do so,
Speaker 1: we're tryid error because the organism's resonant frequency was unknown.
Speaker 1: Linus tells us that when the frequency was finally found
Speaker 1: and the bacteria killed, it's the subjects. Poor guinea pigs
Speaker 1: died of toxicity. Rife reasoned that there was a viral
Speaker 1: form in the bacteria that survived the being because it
Speaker 1: had different frequency, but the virus was beyond the reach
Speaker 1: of the See, this is the thing. He was under
Speaker 1: the wrong impression of things, right. First of all, whatever
Speaker 1: was causing the thing wasn't that that was probably eating
Speaker 1: the illness. But just look at this, he's looking in
Speaker 1: the in the mainstream science mindset, he's still thinking he's
Speaker 1: chasing viruses though intuitive flash. He conceived first the idea
Speaker 1: that and then the method of staining the virus with light.
Speaker 1: Virus quote unquote, the idea was based on the principle
Speaker 1: of resonant frequency. Each micro organism, it has its own
Speaker 1: fundamental So listen, they want to erase this guy from history.
Speaker 1: Feed proved viruses that they wouldn't have they would have
Speaker 1: needed him, So they raised him from history because he
Speaker 1: disproved it. He just wasn't aware that he was has
Speaker 1: his own fundamental frequency of light, something base Shomp apparently
Speaker 1: took advantage of with his polarimmitror. Right. Yes, I told
Speaker 1: you they had the same type of high magnification. Told you.
Speaker 1: Rife arrived at the conclusion that that light could be
Speaker 1: used instead of fatal chemicals to stain the subject. Ah,
Speaker 1: so that's what they were did huh? This was brilliant.
Speaker 1: Equally brilliant was its execution. A brief partial description of
Speaker 1: the instrument taken from the journal's review is irresistible. And
Speaker 1: you can go find the rest of this or we'll
Speaker 1: look at it some other time, but you get it.
Speaker 1: We got through some of them, more of the bay shomp.
Speaker 1: Apparently Rife was not aware of bay Shop. He had been,
Speaker 1: had he been, he was about twenty years old when
Speaker 1: Beaychamp died on the other side of the Atlantic, a
Speaker 1: light of another frequency, he might have been thrown on
Speaker 1: his research. Am less and beneficial revelation might have arisen
Speaker 1: him with Reif's technology guided by base Shop's vision. Yeah right, well,
Speaker 1: we'd be living on a much happier plane right now
Speaker 1: and there'd be no hues killing us all. However, even
Speaker 1: though saddled saddled, but I the beginning with germ theory,
Speaker 1: what the hell is this fucking person mindset? Oh yes, So,
Speaker 1: even though saddled with in the beginning with a germ
Speaker 1: theory mindset, he managed to rise above its worst effects,
Speaker 1: demonstrating an instinctive understanding of these disease processes. Of the
Speaker 1: disease process. Rife made the falling statement, we do not
Speaker 1: wish at this time to claim that we have cured
Speaker 1: cancer or any disease for that matter, But we can
Speaker 1: say that these waves or this ray and this free
Speaker 1: and the frequent as the frequencies might be called, a
Speaker 1: wave or this ray, as the frequencies may be called,
Speaker 1: have been shown to possess the power of devitalizing disease
Speaker 1: organisms or killing them when turned to an exact wavelength
Speaker 1: or frequency for each different organism. And again, in reality,
Speaker 1: it is not the bacteria themselves that produce the disease,
Speaker 1: but the chemical constituents of these micro organisms, enacting upon
Speaker 1: the unbalanced cell metabolism of the human body, that in
Speaker 1: actuality produced disease. Did you hear that? We also believe
Speaker 1: if the metabolism is perfectly balanced or poise, it is
Speaker 1: susceptible to no disease. You can mic drop it a
Speaker 1: non internal thing here, so I can't like drop it.
Speaker 1: Plus it's expensive, so I'm not going to drop it.
Speaker 1: But you get it, So get your ass over to
Speaker 1: doctor Peter Glitten's site and do what you need to do. Yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, good, because uh yeah, between him and doctor
Speaker 1: Monso and if doctor Manso had a subscription membership thing
Speaker 1: going on, you should be on that too, and once
Speaker 1: he does, if he ever does, I would be permitting
Speaker 1: this out of that as well. But go over to here,
Speaker 1: boom share screen. Come on, let's feel some energy today.
Speaker 1: I gotta come back here and sit for another two hours.
Speaker 1: Goddamn it, all right, and not complaining, I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: so don't drag down the energy kids. All right, here
Speaker 1: we go, boom, there we are. This is us, this
Speaker 1: is you, this is me. This is the live chat
Speaker 1: all right over here. You go to where it says
Speaker 1: show more. Sometimes it doesn't say it, sometimes it does.
Speaker 1: Click it us the very first space. It puts a
Speaker 1: little show more thing in there. So giftson go dot
Speaker 1: com backslash ball bussers to help us get to the
Speaker 1: goal with about four hundred and fifty away from getting
Speaker 1: me able to start buying the computer components and putting
Speaker 1: this mofo together, and boy do we need it. Okay,
Speaker 1: you click that, but bay im you're here and then
Speaker 1: looks like we got one yesterday. Thank you Briant's GoPro guy,
Speaker 1: Thank you buddy guy. Would go pro fishing show it's
Speaker 1: on YouTube, it's on rumble I think too, and not
Speaker 1: probably a bitch. You go check him out. He's awesome.
Speaker 1: All right, So there's that gifson go dot com. All right,
Speaker 1: all right, I well deb with that one. Let's go
Speaker 1: back to what we were talking about now. Down here
Speaker 1: is where this is what matters, and this is what
Speaker 1: matters because it's going to be beneficial to you leave
Speaker 1: big Farm behind. But you need to click my affiliate
Speaker 1: link otherwise you're just a jerk. And then ball Busters
Speaker 1: B A A L B U S T E R S.
Speaker 1: All the lowercase in those spaces is your fifty percent
Speaker 1: off cupod for his membership. That means instead of paying
Speaker 1: four to eighty, you're paying or four of is it
Speaker 1: four forty forty I don't know, two forty for the
Speaker 1: year or something like that. It's like another one hundred
Speaker 1: and twenty dollars cheaper than if you go thirty dollars
Speaker 1: a month. So even though it's already fifty percent off,
Speaker 1: if you do the year, it's another one hundred and
Speaker 1: twenty hours less for the year because so it's only
Speaker 1: like twenty bucks a month, where it's like getting four
Speaker 1: months for free each year and then you're locked in.
Speaker 1: You're locked in, You're locked in the closet. We're can
Speaker 1: beat you with a shovel. It's gidding. We're actually gonna
Speaker 1: make it feel better. I mean, if we wanted to
Speaker 1: me to do the other thing too, I mean, I
Speaker 1: know some Italians. There we go and then my my
Speaker 1: website is right here, semper f llc dot com victory,
Speaker 1: because that's what we're going to be. Otherwise it's going
Speaker 1: to be dead. So there have we are, We have
Speaker 1: our options, you know, so simper fy llc dot com
Speaker 1: victory for eleven percent off my website. Click that and
Speaker 1: there you are. This is the This is for the
Speaker 1: the the masses, you know, the the common folk. They
Speaker 1: get the five percent fan favorite, but you you get
Speaker 1: the vert the victory, you get the eleven percent off.
Speaker 1: All right, all right, doctor Peter Gliddon Bam. You can
Speaker 1: just click it from my site and there you are.
Speaker 1: And then you use ball Busters for your fifty percent off.
Speaker 1: And if you want Doctor Monzo's book, and you will.
Speaker 2: Where is it?
Speaker 1: Hold on this mamba jamba right here? Yeah, thank you
Speaker 1: doctor Monso for this cover for this copy. By the way.
Speaker 1: All right, so that's the big beefy one, that big
Speaker 1: beefy one. You click this right here, you go to
Speaker 1: a TV book. It's pretty self explained why, right says
Speaker 1: the word book in it. You click it, and the
Speaker 1: very top one that has a little red blue button,
Speaker 1: that's for the one that's material right, hard hard print,
Speaker 1: and then you click that, and then you put ball
Speaker 1: Busters fifteen in there. I think they're capital here. I'll
Speaker 1: tell you in a second. Oh, there's my information on here.
Speaker 1: The fuck never mind. Ball versus fifteen gives you fifty
Speaker 1: percent off fifteen percent off on that. You scroll down
Speaker 1: here you click Purchapi PAM and that one is twenty
Speaker 1: five dollars and that's the smaller version E book, all right,
Speaker 1: and then the shop over here. The ball versus fifteen
Speaker 1: works as well. But you can only get one thing
Speaker 1: at a time. You can't like add things to a car.
Speaker 1: Karta is weird. So if you're gonna get the ATB forks,
Speaker 1: I would highly recommend you also knowing what the hell
Speaker 1: you're doing with them. I know it's not yes, And
Speaker 1: people say, well they're not the same, they're not. There's
Speaker 1: nothing talking about the If you don't know the points.
Speaker 1: You don't know why what the point is of using
Speaker 1: the tuning forks, right, So use this first and then
Speaker 1: get the forks if you're gonna get that. Basic basics
Speaker 1: and muscle testing is a like a it's a practitioner's guide.
Speaker 1: The energy iodine. You know, radiation is bad, so you
Speaker 1: can always uh. And then the magnetic sticks. I hope
Speaker 1: the cupont code works on the magnetic sticks to those things.
Speaker 1: Those things are strong. You want to kill some freaking
Speaker 1: magnetic shit inside your body. Yeah, like you know, nano
Speaker 1: things of that nature. So there you go. That's all
Speaker 1: in there, and then you go over here for the
Speaker 1: Azure whale stuff, right, BB five real the only three
Speaker 1: things that remember BB in A five right for five
Speaker 1: percent off for life at Azure well and for so
Speaker 1: because everybody asked me. The whole food multi vitamin would
Speaker 1: be supplemental to the tangy tangerine, right, and then the
Speaker 1: IP six would be the kind of like the ostium
Speaker 1: a faction center. And then the full vocumic blend would
Speaker 1: be the plant arrived minerals. So there is another way
Speaker 1: of doing it, but it gets to the same place happiness.
Speaker 1: I would also throw in the core copper and the
Speaker 1: cod liver oil. I've taken all of those things, and
Speaker 1: yay cork coppers right here. It's not that expensive, all right,
Speaker 1: and then you'd beb five, get five percent off, help
Speaker 1: a manso out, and then down here you have my book.
Speaker 1: The eleven percent off doesn't work on that because I
Speaker 1: already have like zero margin on this shit. I'm basically
Speaker 1: just transferring one thing from one hand to another so
Speaker 1: that it's being red and then the creatine bam bam.
Speaker 1: It does work on the creatine, and I don't think
Speaker 1: it works on the gallons because they're already free shipping
Speaker 1: or out of these multi packs. And then there's all
Speaker 1: the sauces here. So just so you know, if you
Speaker 1: get the multipack, this is the cutoff. So you see
Speaker 1: from the top here watch this is the original recipe.
Speaker 1: So from the original recipe, the first sauce all the
Speaker 1: way down, so it doesn't matter if it's twelve ounce
Speaker 1: or if it's the six ounds, all the way down
Speaker 1: to venom. But I'll be kind enough and say, all yeah,
Speaker 1: down to the gun singer. All I have the supplies too.
Speaker 1: Once they jump up from the ten ninety nine mark,
Speaker 1: they're not included you know, or this or this this
Speaker 1: area here, because it's different with the larger bottles. Once
Speaker 1: they jump up from this, they're not included in the
Speaker 1: twelve pack anywhere. Because there's no way that a twenty
Speaker 1: eight ninety nine dollars no one will twelve ounce bottle
Speaker 1: would be somehow in an eight pack for as low
Speaker 1: of a price as is or thirty nine. These sauces
Speaker 1: are really expensive to make, so I can't put those
Speaker 1: in a large bottle, and you know that one doesn't
Speaker 1: even come in at large. And people were trying to
Speaker 1: order form of their twelve packs, all right, So Brand
Speaker 1: X is freaking awesome. By the way, the person who
Speaker 1: ordered from the show, who's getting the A pack from me,
Speaker 1: I did put a Brand X because you guys are
Speaker 1: my viewers. I did put a twenty nine, twenty nine
Speaker 1: value bottle of Brand X in there for you. I
Speaker 1: was making it for another order that needed one, and
Speaker 1: I was like, I'm going to make this guy a
Speaker 1: twelve ounce of that, So that's on its way. Everything's been.
Speaker 1: Everything was made in a freaking day, and now I'm
Speaker 1: making the two hundred of these little three ounce of
Speaker 1: tie die sauces. They sent me the bottles. They wanted
Speaker 1: me to put special bottles in mine, our six ounces
Speaker 1: because they're bigger mouth so it's easier for me to
Speaker 1: pour into the bottles because I do everything hand poor.
Speaker 1: It's not like injected or anything. It's it's not automated.
Speaker 1: It's all old fashioned cool stuff. Right. So the tie
Speaker 1: die which is right here. These people really like this one,
Speaker 1: so they ordered a couple times a year, and they
Speaker 1: ordered two hundred bottles of the three ounce size. So
Speaker 1: I'm filling these little woozy bottles right now with that.
Speaker 1: I did twenty seven of the twenty six of them
Speaker 1: last night. I'm not gonna finish it off when I
Speaker 1: get out of here after doctor Maunzo's talk, because on Thursday,
Speaker 1: after doctor Glynn's talk, taking my daughter to California to
Speaker 1: drop off those sauces and then we're going to check
Speaker 1: into our hotel and then we're going to go to
Speaker 1: SeaWorld for whatever the rest of the day of that is,
Speaker 1: and then we're going to go SeaWorld deck day. Oh yeah, Fridays,
Speaker 1: I will not be here. Okay, that's it, and hopefully
Speaker 1: my van isn't fucked there's something going on with it.
Speaker 1: I'm not happy, and maybe it's the rare diff I
Speaker 1: get to see if there's fluid in it, and I
Speaker 1: gotta change your aiel. But anyway, yeah, tell about the show,
Speaker 1: because you know that's what really cool people do, and
Speaker 1: you want to be really cool. You don't want to
Speaker 1: be one of those guys. You know those jerks, do you?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 1: I think so. I see a twelve thirty dtr bonzo
Speaker 1: two hours subscribe to Doctor Peter Gliddon's membership. How