WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.399 --> 00:00:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Beyond the Polls. This week we get

2
00:00:03.839 --> 00:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>into the redistricting weeds with real clear politics Sean Trendy.

3
00:00:08.599 --> 00:00:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's dive in.

4
00:00:12.720 --> 00:00:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, we just had primary super Bowl. Six states, including

5
00:00:15.960 --> 00:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the nation's largest California, un voted on Tuesday night. And

6
00:00:20.039 --> 00:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>what did we learn. Well, first of all, we are

7
00:00:23.079 --> 00:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>learning even as you're listening to this, something we already knew,

8
00:00:26.280 --> 00:00:30.719
<v Speaker 1>which is that California's vote counting system is outmoded, behind

9
00:00:30.760 --> 00:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the times, and utterly unfit for purpose. The fact that

10
00:00:34.280 --> 00:00:39.079
<v Speaker 1>we have five million votes counted as of the Wednesday

11
00:00:39.119 --> 00:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>when I'm recording this, but there's probably three to four

12
00:00:42.000 --> 00:00:45.399
<v Speaker 1>million and they're not even sure left to count and

13
00:00:45.439 --> 00:00:49.119
<v Speaker 1>it will take them weeks to do that. It defies belief.

14
00:00:49.240 --> 00:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>The fact is that there are countries that don't count

15
00:00:53.280 --> 00:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>all of their votes on election night, but there are

16
00:00:57.000 --> 00:01:01.039
<v Speaker 1>good reasons for it. In New Zealand, they have special

17
00:01:01.079 --> 00:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>ballots that have to be collected, and they count everything

18
00:01:04.799 --> 00:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>except those special ballots and then account them all once.

19
00:01:07.159 --> 00:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>In Australia they get their vote counting done in about

20
00:01:10.480 --> 00:01:13.359
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, and it's a smaller percentage of the vote

21
00:01:13.400 --> 00:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of late arriving male ballots or early cast ballots that

22
00:01:19.159 --> 00:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>hadn't been tallied on election nine. Now, the fact that

23
00:01:21.879 --> 00:01:28.359
<v Speaker 1>California takes so long is just unbelievable, and at some

24
00:01:28.519 --> 00:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>point one has to think that if you can't perform

25
00:01:32.879 --> 00:01:35.519
<v Speaker 1>your self, reform will be forced upon you. And so

26
00:01:35.560 --> 00:01:38.519
<v Speaker 1>what that means is that in California at least there

27
00:01:38.519 --> 00:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>are races that we won't know for a week or

28
00:01:41.719 --> 00:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>so who's going to make the final two in terms

29
00:01:45.959 --> 00:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of getting to the general election, because they have an

30
00:01:48.519 --> 00:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>all party primary, and you can have two Democrats or

31
00:01:51.599 --> 00:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>two Republicans or even independence. And this may happen in

32
00:01:55.280 --> 00:01:59.519
<v Speaker 1>a key congressional district that Kevin Kiley, who is a Republican,

33
00:02:00.040 --> 00:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>well he was a Republican, he switched to being an independent.

34
00:02:04.000 --> 00:02:07.519
<v Speaker 1>And as we speak, Kevin Kylie is in first place

35
00:02:07.680 --> 00:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in the sixth Congressional district and a Republican who spent

36
00:02:10.759 --> 00:02:13.159
<v Speaker 1>almost no money but was the only person on the

37
00:02:13.199 --> 00:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>ballot with a Republican after his name is in second.

38
00:02:18.439 --> 00:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>One expects that because of the large number of ballots

39
00:02:21.560 --> 00:02:24.199
<v Speaker 1>that are out and the fact that many of them

40
00:02:24.400 --> 00:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>are likely to tilt Democrat, that the highest ranking Democrat

41
00:02:28.560 --> 00:02:34.199
<v Speaker 1>will probably pass the Republican and get in the race

42
00:02:34.240 --> 00:02:38.039
<v Speaker 1>against Kylie. Probably not be a case where Kylie slips

43
00:02:38.039 --> 00:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>out of the race entirely, but the fact that we'll

44
00:02:41.280 --> 00:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>have to wait two maybe three weeks before we.

45
00:02:43.639 --> 00:02:44.479
<v Speaker 2>Know this is.

46
00:02:46.280 --> 00:02:50.439
<v Speaker 1>One of the strangest and most unacceptable things about California voting.

47
00:02:50.639 --> 00:02:55.319
<v Speaker 1>But what we know from California is that the fear

48
00:02:55.360 --> 00:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats had that there was going to be a

49
00:02:57.120 --> 00:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>lockout ended up being fictional. Steve Hill will probably finish

50
00:03:01.520 --> 00:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>second again because of the tilt of late arriving ballots

51
00:03:05.919 --> 00:03:08.199
<v Speaker 1>that tend to be more Democratic in that state. He'll

52
00:03:08.199 --> 00:03:12.759
<v Speaker 1>probably finish second to Chavier Bashera, but will also probably

53
00:03:12.759 --> 00:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>be Tom Steyer. As I'm recording this, Hilton has about

54
00:03:16.240 --> 00:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a four hundred thousand vote lead over styr Stier has

55
00:03:18.840 --> 00:03:21.319
<v Speaker 1>been getting under twenty percent of the vote. Even with

56
00:03:21.400 --> 00:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a Democratic lead. There's no reason to think that Stire's

57
00:03:24.639 --> 00:03:28.439
<v Speaker 1>suddenly going to overtake bsher and become the choice of

58
00:03:28.520 --> 00:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>all these voters who voted late, which suggests that he'll

59
00:03:32.039 --> 00:03:36.159
<v Speaker 1>narrow the gap, but he probably will not win the

60
00:03:36.280 --> 00:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>remaining three to four million votes by the fifteen percent

61
00:03:41.599 --> 00:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>margin that he would need over Hilton to surpass him,

62
00:03:45.319 --> 00:03:48.719
<v Speaker 1>particularly since he's been getting under twenty percent of the vote. Absolutely,

63
00:03:48.719 --> 00:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it justifies belief that his margin would go his share

64
00:03:53.599 --> 00:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the vote would go up so much and Hilton's wuld

65
00:03:55.280 --> 00:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>declined so much that there would be a fourteen point

66
00:03:58.039 --> 00:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>differential over the remaining vote.

67
00:04:00.159 --> 00:04:01.080
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to.

68
00:04:01.080 --> 00:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>See whether or not a Republican can win in California.

69
00:04:04.199 --> 00:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Common wisdom holes that he can't. I would say, as

70
00:04:07.560 --> 00:04:11.319
<v Speaker 1>much as I personally know Steve and like and respect him,

71
00:04:11.840 --> 00:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I would give him a minimal chance. But the fact is,

72
00:04:14.319 --> 00:04:16.399
<v Speaker 1>and this is a little known fact unless you stare

73
00:04:16.439 --> 00:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>at polls all the time. But of course that's one

74
00:04:18.600 --> 00:04:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons you listen to this podcast because I do,

75
00:04:21.480 --> 00:04:25.879
<v Speaker 1>is that majority of Californians say they're unhappy with Governor

76
00:04:25.920 --> 00:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Newsom's performance and that they're unhappy with the direction of the

77
00:04:29.600 --> 00:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>state is going on. It's not a huge majority, but

78
00:04:33.399 --> 00:04:36.399
<v Speaker 1>that would be Hilton's angle, is to say, you know

79
00:04:36.480 --> 00:04:40.399
<v Speaker 1>you're unhappy one change, why don't you elect a real

80
00:04:40.519 --> 00:04:44.439
<v Speaker 1>change agent, probably enough to maybe have him do better

81
00:04:44.680 --> 00:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>than a Republican might ordinarily do even in a bad

82
00:04:47.879 --> 00:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>year for Republicans, which is what this is shaping up

83
00:04:50.600 --> 00:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to be. But at least he gets the one on

84
00:04:54.040 --> 00:04:57.439
<v Speaker 1>one chance to make his case that he wants and

85
00:04:57.519 --> 00:05:00.879
<v Speaker 1>that is something that the primary has made clear. So

86
00:05:00.959 --> 00:05:03.439
<v Speaker 1>other than that, what do we have we learned? Well,

87
00:05:03.560 --> 00:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the first thing I'd say we've learned is that Donald

88
00:05:06.199 --> 00:05:11.079
<v Speaker 1>Trump is not invincible. That in Iowa, Donald Trump came

89
00:05:11.079 --> 00:05:14.879
<v Speaker 1>in at the last minute to endorse a Congressman, Randy Fienstra.

90
00:05:15.040 --> 00:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>There has been a poll that came out that had

91
00:05:19.399 --> 00:05:28.519
<v Speaker 1>Fienstra behind a farmer named Daklahn, and Trump came in

92
00:05:28.560 --> 00:05:31.639
<v Speaker 1>with his full and complete and total endorsement for Fienstro.

93
00:05:31.720 --> 00:05:34.879
<v Speaker 1>And since Iowa has early voting, but it's not a

94
00:05:34.959 --> 00:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>huge early voting, I think most observers and I count

95
00:05:38.040 --> 00:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>myself as one, thought, Okay, well, Fienstree may be behind

96
00:05:41.079 --> 00:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>by a couple of points, but you should expect Republicans

97
00:05:44.600 --> 00:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to hear the endorsement and get in line as they

98
00:05:48.480 --> 00:05:51.879
<v Speaker 1>have everywhere else and back Fienstrom. In fact, you found

99
00:05:52.160 --> 00:05:55.199
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. In fact, in a number of counties as

100
00:05:55.199 --> 00:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you looked, Fienstro did better in the early voting than

101
00:05:58.839 --> 00:06:01.319
<v Speaker 1>he did in the election voting and long beat him,

102
00:06:02.199 --> 00:06:08.079
<v Speaker 1>not by very much. It was by about under a point.

103
00:06:09.600 --> 00:06:14.519
<v Speaker 1>But it is telling that President's endorsement did not.

104
00:06:17.279 --> 00:06:18.199
<v Speaker 2>Carry through.

105
00:06:18.319 --> 00:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>And why do I think that might be? Well, as

106
00:06:21.160 --> 00:06:24.759
<v Speaker 1>I say in my newsletter, Margin of Victory, which comes

107
00:06:24.759 --> 00:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>out every Wednesday morning through the Washington Post, but you

108
00:06:27.839 --> 00:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be a Post subscriber to get it.

109
00:06:30.160 --> 00:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Just sign up and you will get it. Lon ran

110
00:06:33.160 --> 00:06:36.079
<v Speaker 1>a campaign where he wasn't trying to be more Maga

111
00:06:36.120 --> 00:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>than now. His campaign. Go to his website and he'll

112
00:06:39.720 --> 00:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>be talking about local issues. He talks about Maha, he

113
00:06:44.079 --> 00:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>talks about ending reducing rates of cancer, he talks about

114
00:06:49.759 --> 00:06:53.439
<v Speaker 1>preventing out of staters from buying Iowa's farmland. In other words,

115
00:06:53.480 --> 00:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>he had a very very unique Iowa focus identity, and

116
00:06:59.560 --> 00:07:02.079
<v Speaker 1>it proved to be persuasive to a lot of people.

117
00:07:03.160 --> 00:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's an interesting counter cultural, counterintuitive factor,

118
00:07:09.160 --> 00:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>which is that so many Republicans are running as more

119
00:07:12.680 --> 00:07:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Magi than Now or running as Magalite. And it may

120
00:07:15.879 --> 00:07:18.439
<v Speaker 1>very well be that if you've defined that you're playing

121
00:07:18.480 --> 00:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the Maggie game, and the Maga Master lays down the

122
00:07:21.439 --> 00:07:24.079
<v Speaker 1>laws to which of the contenders he likes, that the

123
00:07:24.120 --> 00:07:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Maga Master wins the Maggi game. But if you're not

124
00:07:26.439 --> 00:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>playing the Maggie game, maybe you can win the bigger game.

125
00:07:29.879 --> 00:07:32.959
<v Speaker 1>It'll be interesting to see whether other candidates begin to

126
00:07:33.120 --> 00:07:35.839
<v Speaker 1>try and do that, which is to think outside the box.

127
00:07:36.000 --> 00:07:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it has to be authentic and it has

128
00:07:37.800 --> 00:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to be real. Zachlon has a very persuasive biography as

129
00:07:41.959 --> 00:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody who came from a farm, longtime family farm. The

130
00:07:46.759 --> 00:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>family had to sell and after he made his money,

131
00:07:50.040 --> 00:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>he went back and bought the family farm. So he

132
00:07:53.199 --> 00:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>has a very authentic Iowa story to tell. I don't

133
00:07:57.120 --> 00:08:01.279
<v Speaker 1>think you can make a silk out of a sow's ear,

134
00:08:01.480 --> 00:08:05.879
<v Speaker 1>But for people who can find something that's unusual and

135
00:08:06.000 --> 00:08:11.079
<v Speaker 1>different and sell that to Republican voters, it may very

136
00:08:11.079 --> 00:08:13.639
<v Speaker 1>well be that there's room even in this Republican party.

137
00:08:13.720 --> 00:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>But as it is, all we know is that Donald

138
00:08:16.759 --> 00:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump took his first loss in his endorsement. He won

139
00:08:19.959 --> 00:08:24.199
<v Speaker 1>many other endorsements. His endorsed choice in Montana won easily

140
00:08:24.240 --> 00:08:27.839
<v Speaker 1>defeated the secretary of State and a former state senator

141
00:08:28.439 --> 00:08:31.959
<v Speaker 1>to get the nomination in the Montana's first congressional district.

142
00:08:32.159 --> 00:08:35.399
<v Speaker 1>But the fact is the king can be beaten, and

143
00:08:35.519 --> 00:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>zach Long perhaps has given us a Roadmack. What's the

144
00:08:41.279 --> 00:08:44.159
<v Speaker 1>other thing that we've learned along. What we've learned is

145
00:08:44.159 --> 00:08:48.399
<v Speaker 1>that the civil war or the insurgency in the Democratic

146
00:08:48.480 --> 00:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Party between an establishment and the progressives is nowhere near

147
00:08:53.279 --> 00:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>in them. You had battlefront after battlefront, and in most

148
00:08:57.720 --> 00:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>cases the establishment candidate came out on top. But of

149
00:09:02.159 --> 00:09:05.759
<v Speaker 1>course the Democratic establishment candidate tends to be on the

150
00:09:05.840 --> 00:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>left anyway. And so when you had somebody like Karen

151
00:09:10.279 --> 00:09:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Bass defeat Nithia Rahman's battle to win a spot in

152
00:09:15.320 --> 00:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the runoff in LA's mayor race, it's not because Karen

153
00:09:18.720 --> 00:09:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Bass is some screaming centrist. It's that she's liberal enough

154
00:09:23.000 --> 00:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>or progressive enough to prevent a progressive from unseeing her.

155
00:09:29.440 --> 00:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>But what we're seeing is, first of all, progressives do

156
00:09:32.519 --> 00:09:39.159
<v Speaker 1>breakthrough sometimes. The Bernie AOC choice defeated the establishment choice

157
00:09:39.200 --> 00:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in Montana one, which may be disturbing to Democrats because

158
00:09:44.039 --> 00:09:47.279
<v Speaker 1>that is the more democratic seat and it is just

159
00:09:47.399 --> 00:09:50.279
<v Speaker 1>democratic enough that this is a way year they can

160
00:09:50.360 --> 00:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>think about carrying it. It's the sort of seat that

161
00:09:52.600 --> 00:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>John Tester, for example, could have carried, or Steve Bullock

162
00:09:56.360 --> 00:09:59.519
<v Speaker 1>could have carried. But you're not running John tester or

163
00:09:59.559 --> 00:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Steve b Look, now you're running AOC Bernie left wing

164
00:10:02.960 --> 00:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>candidate in that seat. You had a case in New

165
00:10:07.679 --> 00:10:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Jersey where Adam Hammawe is the nominee and the putative

166
00:10:12.440 --> 00:10:16.879
<v Speaker 1>congressman in his very safe Democratic seat in central New Jersey, Trenton,

167
00:10:17.000 --> 00:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Princeton and some areas going into the southern parts.

168
00:10:21.159 --> 00:10:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Of the Newark area.

169
00:10:23.440 --> 00:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>And he's a person who was endorsed by Bernie Democratic

170
00:10:27.720 --> 00:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Socialists AOC, and it wasn't really closed. You know, he

171
00:10:32.480 --> 00:10:35.759
<v Speaker 1>was the only candidate who ran well in all parts

172
00:10:35.799 --> 00:10:37.919
<v Speaker 1>of the district. He got twenty eight percent of the vote,

173
00:10:38.000 --> 00:10:41.559
<v Speaker 1>nearly double what the second place candidate. That's a thirteen

174
00:10:41.639 --> 00:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>way primary, and one guy got twenty eight percent of

175
00:10:44.080 --> 00:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the vote, but nobody else there wasn't even a strong challenger.

176
00:10:47.399 --> 00:10:50.639
<v Speaker 1>So the fact is that you've got examples where the

177
00:10:50.759 --> 00:10:54.639
<v Speaker 1>establishment candidate did well, but you've got these examples where

178
00:10:54.679 --> 00:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the progressors breakthrough. And another example is in California where

179
00:10:58.159 --> 00:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you had a progressive backed challenger, Randy Viegas, who is

180
00:11:04.600 --> 00:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>not yet clear he is running against State Senator jez

181
00:11:10.320 --> 00:11:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Meet Baines to take on David Valadeo in California's twenty

182
00:11:14.399 --> 00:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>second district he has had, but there's so many ballots

183
00:11:17.240 --> 00:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>out he could lose that lead. And of course, again

184
00:11:20.879 --> 00:11:28.039
<v Speaker 1>in a moderate too moderately conservative, but Democratic leaning farm area,

185
00:11:28.960 --> 00:11:33.039
<v Speaker 1>the argument would be, you'd rather face as a Republican

186
00:11:33.440 --> 00:11:36.879
<v Speaker 1>valade would clearly rather face the extremists than the person

187
00:11:36.960 --> 00:11:43.159
<v Speaker 1>who can't be as caricatured in an ad. And then

188
00:11:43.159 --> 00:11:45.919
<v Speaker 1>you had the eighty one year old Doris Matt Suey,

189
00:11:46.279 --> 00:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>who is right now leading with about a third of

190
00:11:50.120 --> 00:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the vote, and it looks like she will face another

191
00:11:53.159 --> 00:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Democrat in the general election, a young Sacramento City councilwoman

192
00:11:59.720 --> 00:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>who is running as an unabashed progressive as well as

193
00:12:02.879 --> 00:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>being somebody who is forty years younger than the incumbent,

194
00:12:06.320 --> 00:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and may very well win in the fall. But at

195
00:12:08.440 --> 00:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the very least, even when the establishment wins, they have

196
00:12:11.519 --> 00:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to look over their shoulder and see where the progressives are.

197
00:12:14.840 --> 00:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Because even when the progressives are losing, as they have

198
00:12:17.320 --> 00:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in most of their challenges, they're running strongly. It's not

199
00:12:21.200 --> 00:12:23.799
<v Speaker 1>like you can say, well, here's this DSA back candidate

200
00:12:23.840 --> 00:12:26.039
<v Speaker 1>and they get eight percent of the boat. There are

201
00:12:26.279 --> 00:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of examples of that there was, but you

202
00:12:30.559 --> 00:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>see many more examples of a progressive candidate either winning

203
00:12:35.120 --> 00:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>or coming close or doing and getting doing well. And

204
00:12:39.039 --> 00:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>when you have that consistent fire, even victories by the establishment,

205
00:12:44.200 --> 00:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>if they're unimpressive, victories means that they escape not by

206
00:12:49.080 --> 00:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the skin of their teeth, but they escape without ease.

207
00:12:54.320 --> 00:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And every victory for an insurgent encourages more insurgents. The

208
00:12:57.879 --> 00:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>fact is Homawe was endorsed by virtually every member of

209
00:13:01.879 --> 00:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the squad. Chris rab Even, who had been elected or

210
00:13:07.559 --> 00:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>nominated and will be elected in November in the most

211
00:13:09.879 --> 00:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>democratic seat in the country in Pennsylvania, was also a

212
00:13:14.240 --> 00:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>squad endorsed candidate, and he endorsed HOMOWI. When you take

213
00:13:18.639 --> 00:13:21.759
<v Speaker 1>a look at who's being ded the squad or squad

214
00:13:21.799 --> 00:13:24.639
<v Speaker 1>adjacent people are going to be doubling this time in

215
00:13:24.679 --> 00:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the House. And that's even under a worst case scenario.

216
00:13:28.120 --> 00:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>For that, there's so many progressive challengers that are on

217
00:13:31.600 --> 00:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the ballot in the next month well have much better sense.

218
00:13:34.320 --> 00:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So if the Democratic establishment wins three quarters of these battles,

219
00:13:38.720 --> 00:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's a good sign for the Democratic establishment.

220
00:13:42.519 --> 00:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>But for people who.

221
00:13:44.080 --> 00:13:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Had virtually no representation in the House of Representatives ten

222
00:13:48.000 --> 00:13:51.799
<v Speaker 1>years ago. To be adding two five eight members to

223
00:13:51.960 --> 00:13:56.279
<v Speaker 1>their ranks every two years is a sign of particular growth.

224
00:13:56.440 --> 00:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is going to be particularly important going to

225
00:13:58.840 --> 00:14:02.519
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty eight because you look and then it was

226
00:14:02.519 --> 00:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>one name I haven't mentioned. I'm going to mention him now,

227
00:14:05.519 --> 00:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's Roe Connell. Rocanna is a congressman from the

228
00:14:10.039 --> 00:14:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley. He originally ran as a business friendly candidate,

229
00:14:14.720 --> 00:14:19.799
<v Speaker 1>but once in office, became one of the nation's leading progressives.

230
00:14:20.120 --> 00:14:25.039
<v Speaker 1>He has been active nationally. You will see Rocanna's endorsement

231
00:14:25.080 --> 00:14:28.919
<v Speaker 1>behind virtually every progressive challenger in the country, and that

232
00:14:29.039 --> 00:14:31.639
<v Speaker 1>means he's been rumored to want to run for president,

233
00:14:32.120 --> 00:14:34.879
<v Speaker 1>and he is making the sort of moves one would

234
00:14:34.919 --> 00:14:37.399
<v Speaker 1>expect if one is going to run for president, and

235
00:14:37.440 --> 00:14:40.399
<v Speaker 1>he's making friends across the country, just as you would

236
00:14:40.440 --> 00:14:42.399
<v Speaker 1>need to if you're planning is to run for president.

237
00:14:43.000 --> 00:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>When I take a look at the Democratic primary, I

238
00:14:45.559 --> 00:14:48.519
<v Speaker 1>look at the three people leading every pole, Kamala Harris,

239
00:14:48.559 --> 00:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Newsom, and people to judge, and I see people

240
00:14:51.240 --> 00:14:55.639
<v Speaker 1>who are generally trying to straddle the lane between center,

241
00:14:55.720 --> 00:15:01.519
<v Speaker 1>left and left. And that's probably the name strategy. But

242
00:15:02.240 --> 00:15:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I've been following politics all my life, and typically the

243
00:15:07.000 --> 00:15:11.279
<v Speaker 1>surprise candidate in the raids is the candidate who captures

244
00:15:11.320 --> 00:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the imagination of what I call the unserved constituency. That is,

245
00:15:16.559 --> 00:15:18.519
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people in a party, but they

246
00:15:18.519 --> 00:15:22.759
<v Speaker 1>don't have anyone who's competing for them. They will flock

247
00:15:22.879 --> 00:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to somebody who competes for them.

248
00:15:24.799 --> 00:15:24.960
<v Speaker 2>You know.

249
00:15:25.000 --> 00:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump was somebody who ran that to the nomination

250
00:15:28.279 --> 00:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>because there was a massive unserved constituency that we would

251
00:15:31.799 --> 00:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>now call maga. It was this accumulation agglomeration of economic

252
00:15:36.279 --> 00:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>populace and cultural nationalists at the time, and he wrote

253
00:15:41.000 --> 00:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it to victory. Mike Huckabee and Rick Santoum wrote the

254
00:15:44.759 --> 00:15:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Evangelicals to victory. When everyone was trying to be some

255
00:15:47.799 --> 00:15:52.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of Tea party person or or moderate moderate business

256
00:15:53.080 --> 00:15:59.799
<v Speaker 1>establishment or Republican. Howard Dean ran up almost looked as

257
00:15:59.840 --> 00:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the in November of two thousand and three by being

258
00:16:04.720 --> 00:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the Then we would call it the liberals, but now

259
00:16:07.639 --> 00:16:09.759
<v Speaker 1>it would be the progressive wing running. As he said

260
00:16:09.759 --> 00:16:13.279
<v Speaker 1>that I'm running as the Democratic for the democratic wing

261
00:16:13.320 --> 00:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party, and he captured the imagination or

262
00:16:17.240 --> 00:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>people wanted full throated liberalism. Well, there's a significant constituency

263
00:16:21.879 --> 00:16:25.039
<v Speaker 1>that wants full throated progressivism. That's what we're seeing every

264
00:16:25.639 --> 00:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>primary or we have that challenge. And how the Democrats

265
00:16:29.559 --> 00:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>navigate this in twenty twenty seven and they'll run up

266
00:16:32.480 --> 00:16:35.559
<v Speaker 1>to twenty twenty eight is going to be fascinating and

267
00:16:35.679 --> 00:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>potentially determinative of the outcome. Millions of things determined the

268
00:16:40.639 --> 00:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>presidential election outcomes, but this is probably one of the

269
00:16:44.480 --> 00:16:48.799
<v Speaker 1>known unknowns that is least discussed. And every week when

270
00:16:48.799 --> 00:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a primary, we get scorecard as to who's ahead

271
00:16:52.639 --> 00:16:54.639
<v Speaker 1>and what the strength of the insurgency is.

272
00:16:54.679 --> 00:16:57.360
<v Speaker 2>And let me tell you, the insurgency is not going

273
00:16:57.399 --> 00:16:58.200
<v Speaker 2>away any terms.

274
00:17:04.640 --> 00:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, twenty twenty six mid term cycle may be known

275
00:17:07.519 --> 00:17:09.079
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of things. That may be known for

276
00:17:09.160 --> 00:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a blue wave, that may be known for an incredible

277
00:17:11.519 --> 00:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Republican co recovery after they looked like they might be

278
00:17:14.920 --> 00:17:17.599
<v Speaker 1>hit by a blue wave. But what it will certainly

279
00:17:17.640 --> 00:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>be known for is the at least in the last

280
00:17:20.240 --> 00:17:26.559
<v Speaker 1>few decades, unprecedented scope and sweep of mid decatal redistricting.

281
00:17:26.799 --> 00:17:28.759
<v Speaker 1>And here to talk to us about that and talk

282
00:17:28.799 --> 00:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to us especially about how we can draw districts so

283
00:17:31.759 --> 00:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have partisan jerry mandering skewing the House

284
00:17:35.599 --> 00:17:39.799
<v Speaker 1>is redistricting expert and political analyst Sean Trendy, who is

285
00:17:39.839 --> 00:17:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the senior elections analyst at Real Clear Politics. Sean, welcome

286
00:17:43.920 --> 00:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>back to be.

287
00:17:44.480 --> 00:17:45.039
<v Speaker 2>On the polls.

288
00:17:45.400 --> 00:17:46.519
<v Speaker 3>Hey, thanks for having me.

289
00:17:47.480 --> 00:17:50.599
<v Speaker 1>Well, most people know you through your political analysis. You

290
00:17:50.640 --> 00:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>know you do write and have written for many, many years,

291
00:17:53.000 --> 00:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>excellent pieces at RCP and also with your visiting scholarship

292
00:17:59.279 --> 00:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>or professorship.

293
00:18:01.680 --> 00:18:03.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure scholarship.

294
00:18:03.400 --> 00:18:06.599
<v Speaker 1>You're the visiting scholar since you have a PhD at

295
00:18:06.599 --> 00:18:10.839
<v Speaker 1>the American Enterprise Institute. But you have drawn plans and

296
00:18:11.000 --> 00:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you were one of the two architects of the reinstated

297
00:18:15.559 --> 00:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Plan that those of us in the Commonwealth of

298
00:18:18.519 --> 00:18:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Virginia will be voting under in the ELECTIONSYS November. Can

299
00:18:23.319 --> 00:18:26.759
<v Speaker 1>you tell us a little bit about your experience and

300
00:18:27.240 --> 00:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>first how you came to that position and secondly how

301
00:18:30.559 --> 00:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you approached the problem.

302
00:18:33.920 --> 00:18:36.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was. It was a lot of fun actually,

303
00:18:37.839 --> 00:18:43.200
<v Speaker 3>but it was eye opening because you know election Twitter,

304
00:18:43.440 --> 00:18:45.200
<v Speaker 3>I did a lot of what they do right, just

305
00:18:45.319 --> 00:18:47.039
<v Speaker 3>drew maps. I was like, hey, look you can do

306
00:18:47.079 --> 00:18:49.119
<v Speaker 3>this or this or why did those fools do this.

307
00:18:50.480 --> 00:18:53.519
<v Speaker 3>It's a nothing to sit down and get into the

308
00:18:53.640 --> 00:18:56.559
<v Speaker 3>nitty gritty of how a district will actually be drawn

309
00:18:56.720 --> 00:18:59.720
<v Speaker 3>when you know it's going to actually be used in

310
00:18:59.680 --> 00:19:03.920
<v Speaker 3>an election. And we were fortunate because we were insulated

311
00:19:03.960 --> 00:19:06.400
<v Speaker 3>from political concerns, so we didn't even have to deal

312
00:19:06.440 --> 00:19:10.559
<v Speaker 3>with like, you know, Representative Bubba who wants his cousin's

313
00:19:10.599 --> 00:19:13.839
<v Speaker 3>gas station in this district just because and.

314
00:19:13.920 --> 00:19:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Just to jump that's because you were appointed along with

315
00:19:16.839 --> 00:19:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat Bernie Groffman, to be the two special Masters

316
00:19:22.319 --> 00:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>by the Virginia State Supreme Court once every other avenue

317
00:19:26.039 --> 00:19:31.519
<v Speaker 1>of redistricting had been exhausted in inability to do anything.

318
00:19:32.000 --> 00:19:36.559
<v Speaker 3>That's right, The Virginia Constitution now has an independent commission.

319
00:19:36.960 --> 00:19:40.279
<v Speaker 3>It deadlocked, and when it's deadlocked, it throws it to

320
00:19:40.279 --> 00:19:43.079
<v Speaker 3>the Supreme Court. Well, the Supreme Court justices didn't want

321
00:19:43.079 --> 00:19:47.079
<v Speaker 3>to draw the maps themselves, and so they had each

322
00:19:47.160 --> 00:19:51.079
<v Speaker 3>party nominated a special Master. The first thing, well, the

323
00:19:51.200 --> 00:19:53.680
<v Speaker 3>nominated three in the court selected one from each. Listen,

324
00:19:53.720 --> 00:19:55.440
<v Speaker 3>the first thing they told us is, okay, you are

325
00:19:55.480 --> 00:19:58.240
<v Speaker 3>no longer the nominees of the Republican or the Democratic Party.

326
00:19:58.279 --> 00:20:01.440
<v Speaker 3>You are special Masters of the Commonwealth in Virginia, and

327
00:20:01.480 --> 00:20:05.960
<v Speaker 3>so we sat down and the first thing we would

328
00:20:05.960 --> 00:20:08.359
<v Speaker 3>have wanted to do would have been to, you know,

329
00:20:08.440 --> 00:20:14.880
<v Speaker 3>do a complete VRA analysis Voting Rights Act, which is

330
00:20:14.920 --> 00:20:18.559
<v Speaker 3>a very complex, time intensive analysis, and as it turned out,

331
00:20:18.559 --> 00:20:20.920
<v Speaker 3>we just didn't have time to do that. We were

332
00:20:20.920 --> 00:20:25.079
<v Speaker 3>appointed shortly before Thanksgiving and we had to draw something

333
00:20:25.119 --> 00:20:29.599
<v Speaker 3>like one hundred and seventy districts, get public comment, and

334
00:20:29.680 --> 00:20:32.200
<v Speaker 3>draw them again. So, long story short, we took that.

335
00:20:32.400 --> 00:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Because you weren't just doing congressional district right, the legislature

336
00:20:36.799 --> 00:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>at both houses of the legislature as well, that's.

337
00:20:39.279 --> 00:20:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Right, the state Senate, which is forty in the state House,

338
00:20:42.240 --> 00:20:46.400
<v Speaker 3>which I think is one hundred, Yeah, it's one hundred.

339
00:20:46.400 --> 00:20:50.720
<v Speaker 3>North Carolina is one hundred and twenty. So so it

340
00:20:50.759 --> 00:20:54.839
<v Speaker 3>was a challenging task, but we started. We said instead,

341
00:20:54.920 --> 00:20:57.319
<v Speaker 3>and I'm given how things went, I'm glad we did this.

342
00:20:58.599 --> 00:21:04.039
<v Speaker 3>We said, I bet that if we constrain ourselves to

343
00:21:04.119 --> 00:21:08.599
<v Speaker 3>good government traditional redistricting principles, we're going to draw a

344
00:21:08.640 --> 00:21:11.400
<v Speaker 3>map that maybe has a touch of a Republican bias,

345
00:21:11.440 --> 00:21:13.759
<v Speaker 3>but not much of one in Virginia, and that is

346
00:21:13.799 --> 00:21:17.519
<v Speaker 3>still going to elect a lot of minority members to

347
00:21:17.880 --> 00:21:21.759
<v Speaker 3>the state legislature, and so it was a pretty straightforward

348
00:21:21.960 --> 00:21:25.319
<v Speaker 3>set of guidelines we had. We said, we aren't going

349
00:21:25.359 --> 00:21:29.000
<v Speaker 3>to split counties more than we have to. When we

350
00:21:29.039 --> 00:21:31.480
<v Speaker 3>go into a municipality, we're going to draw within that

351
00:21:31.599 --> 00:21:34.759
<v Speaker 3>municipality before we exit it. We're going to fill it

352
00:21:34.799 --> 00:21:37.319
<v Speaker 3>up before we exit it. So don't split towns and

353
00:21:37.359 --> 00:21:41.160
<v Speaker 3>cities unless you have to. We made a rule that

354
00:21:41.200 --> 00:21:44.039
<v Speaker 3>we weren't going to cross the Blue Ridge more than

355
00:21:44.039 --> 00:21:46.359
<v Speaker 3>we had to, because A it's kind of a community

356
00:21:46.359 --> 00:21:50.079
<v Speaker 3>of interest in the Shenandoah, and b that was kind

357
00:21:50.119 --> 00:21:53.319
<v Speaker 3>of a trick that the parties had been using for gerrymandering.

358
00:21:54.440 --> 00:21:58.960
<v Speaker 3>It's heavily Republican, so you can either make blue districts

359
00:21:59.039 --> 00:22:02.519
<v Speaker 3>red using it, or you can make red districts blue

360
00:22:02.680 --> 00:22:06.599
<v Speaker 3>by diluting it. So that's how we approached it, and

361
00:22:06.640 --> 00:22:10.079
<v Speaker 3>it worked out great. We ended up with good looking districts.

362
00:22:10.119 --> 00:22:14.519
<v Speaker 3>The the basic Republicans and Democrats liked it. The partisans

363
00:22:14.519 --> 00:22:17.160
<v Speaker 3>on either side didn't like it. But that's a feature,

364
00:22:17.200 --> 00:22:21.359
<v Speaker 3>not a bug, and it's it's a it's an illustration

365
00:22:21.839 --> 00:22:26.319
<v Speaker 3>of how this sort of conception that you have to

366
00:22:26.440 --> 00:22:31.559
<v Speaker 3>draw extreme gerry manders to kind of make up for

367
00:22:31.920 --> 00:22:34.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, if you if you use kind of good

368
00:22:34.720 --> 00:22:37.480
<v Speaker 3>government principles, you're going to skew the maps so badly

369
00:22:37.680 --> 00:22:39.359
<v Speaker 3>that you're either not going to get minority groups or

370
00:22:39.359 --> 00:22:41.599
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna get too many Republicans or Democrats. It's just,

371
00:22:41.839 --> 00:22:45.119
<v Speaker 3>at least in Virginia just wasn't true. We ended up

372
00:22:45.160 --> 00:22:46.680
<v Speaker 3>with pretty good maps.

373
00:22:46.960 --> 00:22:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

374
00:22:47.240 --> 00:22:50.599
<v Speaker 1>I read a column of the bull Disclosure supporting your

375
00:22:50.720 --> 00:22:53.599
<v Speaker 1>plan when it was drafted because I liked it so much.

376
00:22:53.640 --> 00:22:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And for people who don't listen to every episode, I

377
00:22:58.279 --> 00:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>learned the black arts and cage and had my own

378
00:23:02.759 --> 00:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>experience with the redistricting in nineteen eighty three when I

379
00:23:06.279 --> 00:23:09.640
<v Speaker 1>was the prime architect of a effort to replace the

380
00:23:09.720 --> 00:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Garry Mander by a ballot initiative. I drew the maps,

381
00:23:14.519 --> 00:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Supreme Court, on a six to one vote

382
00:23:17.720 --> 00:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>decided that we could not get to the vote of

383
00:23:20.480 --> 00:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>the people. And I want you to guess the partisan

384
00:23:22.160 --> 00:23:24.599
<v Speaker 1>balance of that court, and.

385
00:23:24.720 --> 00:23:26.359
<v Speaker 3>I got on Lemon say, six to one.

386
00:23:26.680 --> 00:23:29.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, bingo, bingo.

387
00:23:31.599 --> 00:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>An experience I have never forgotten, but it was one

388
00:23:34.920 --> 00:23:37.319
<v Speaker 1>of the things on the partisan aspect of it is

389
00:23:37.480 --> 00:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe and I'm doing this for a memory, is

390
00:23:39.680 --> 00:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that this was the sort of map that if you

391
00:23:42.279 --> 00:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>looked at the twenty twenty presidential results, Joe Biden would

392
00:23:46.039 --> 00:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>have carried roughly around fifty five or fifty six of

393
00:23:50.400 --> 00:23:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the one hundred House of Delegates seats, which and he

394
00:23:53.599 --> 00:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>got about fifty five or fifty six percent of the vote,

395
00:23:56.039 --> 00:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and it would have carried six of the eleven congressional seats,

396
00:24:00.160 --> 00:24:05.039
<v Speaker 1>and Glenn Young Kim would have carried the majority of

397
00:24:05.119 --> 00:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>delegate seats when he won the state. And you did

398
00:24:09.960 --> 00:24:13.559
<v Speaker 1>it without looking and of course everybody has a rough

399
00:24:13.640 --> 00:24:18.039
<v Speaker 1>sense of the partisan nature, but you didn't without looking

400
00:24:18.200 --> 00:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>at the details of politics in the sense of, oh, well,

401
00:24:22.000 --> 00:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>this is we have to move this place in this

402
00:24:23.920 --> 00:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>way so we can get one extra marginal district. That's correct,

403
00:24:27.039 --> 00:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't it that you didn't You didn't make those political ajustments.

404
00:24:30.279 --> 00:24:33.519
<v Speaker 3>So the first time, the first lines that we drew,

405
00:24:33.759 --> 00:24:37.440
<v Speaker 3>we did draw a line to politics. And then the

406
00:24:37.480 --> 00:24:40.279
<v Speaker 3>way that worked was we opened it up for public comment.

407
00:24:41.279 --> 00:24:43.720
<v Speaker 3>And what we were worried about, and there were a

408
00:24:43.759 --> 00:24:46.799
<v Speaker 3>few instances where we got taken in, but what we

409
00:24:46.799 --> 00:24:50.960
<v Speaker 3>were worried about was people coming in and saying, well,

410
00:24:51.000 --> 00:24:53.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think you need to do this because

411
00:24:53.440 --> 00:24:56.440
<v Speaker 3>it keeps the berry farm together. And it turns out

412
00:24:56.440 --> 00:24:58.319
<v Speaker 3>that if you keep the berry farm together, it flips

413
00:24:58.319 --> 00:25:02.559
<v Speaker 3>the partisanship of the district. And so like, there were

414
00:25:02.559 --> 00:25:06.680
<v Speaker 3>some people who insisted we needed to draw a community

415
00:25:06.720 --> 00:25:09.759
<v Speaker 3>of interests that took like the colleges in Roanoke can

416
00:25:09.799 --> 00:25:12.519
<v Speaker 3>link them up with Virginia Tech and one in uh

417
00:25:13.519 --> 00:25:15.920
<v Speaker 3>I can't. There's another one along the way. And if

418
00:25:15.920 --> 00:25:18.480
<v Speaker 3>you did that, lo and behold, you get another Democratic district. Well,

419
00:25:18.480 --> 00:25:20.799
<v Speaker 3>we weren't going to do that. We knew we had

420
00:25:20.839 --> 00:25:22.839
<v Speaker 3>a balanced map, so we did pay attention when we

421
00:25:23.079 --> 00:25:26.559
<v Speaker 3>redrew to whether we were being you know, whether someone

422
00:25:26.599 --> 00:25:29.000
<v Speaker 3>was using it as a pretext to get another Democratic

423
00:25:29.079 --> 00:25:34.079
<v Speaker 3>or Republican district. But at its fundamentals, you're right, we didn't.

424
00:25:35.000 --> 00:25:36.200
<v Speaker 2>So what does that tell us?

425
00:25:36.279 --> 00:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>What does your experience tell us about what single member

426
00:25:40.200 --> 00:25:44.279
<v Speaker 1>districts can be drawn as, Because one of the things

427
00:25:44.319 --> 00:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>my experience is in following this is that if you

428
00:25:51.119 --> 00:25:54.599
<v Speaker 1>can have compact if you only look at something like

429
00:25:54.680 --> 00:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>compactness and don't look at other factors, you can draw

430
00:25:57.480 --> 00:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>compact looking districts that are in fact, a disguised gerrymander.

431
00:26:02.519 --> 00:26:04.759
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at all these other things like

432
00:26:04.839 --> 00:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>counties and regions and so forth, it's much harder to

433
00:26:08.000 --> 00:26:11.559
<v Speaker 1>do that. What should redistricting look like when it's not

434
00:26:11.680 --> 00:26:13.839
<v Speaker 1>simply a naked exercise and power?

435
00:26:14.880 --> 00:26:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I would modify that a little bit. There

436
00:26:18.119 --> 00:26:22.279
<v Speaker 3>there are states like Wisconsin where basically all the Democrats

437
00:26:22.319 --> 00:26:25.759
<v Speaker 3>now are in Milwaukee or Madison. Yeah, and so it's

438
00:26:25.799 --> 00:26:29.119
<v Speaker 3>going to have a Republican lean, but it's counterbalanced by

439
00:26:29.240 --> 00:26:34.599
<v Speaker 3>states like Massachusetts or California, where the Democratic coefficient coalition

440
00:26:34.680 --> 00:26:39.160
<v Speaker 3>is incredibly efficient, and you would get that leaning democratic.

441
00:26:39.319 --> 00:26:41.200
<v Speaker 3>So it mostly counterbalances.

442
00:26:41.240 --> 00:26:45.039
<v Speaker 2>But when we're talking about congressional districts on the.

443
00:26:45.039 --> 00:26:50.880
<v Speaker 3>National level, that's right, that's right. But I think a

444
00:26:50.960 --> 00:26:55.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of people who get involved in these debates lose

445
00:26:55.480 --> 00:26:59.119
<v Speaker 3>sight of some foundational questions. You know, why do we

446
00:26:59.200 --> 00:27:02.920
<v Speaker 3>have single member districts in the first place, and what

447
00:27:03.279 --> 00:27:06.680
<v Speaker 3>are they supposed to represent? Because my basic response to

448
00:27:06.720 --> 00:27:10.880
<v Speaker 3>everyone who's like, well, that map is politically unfair, is well,

449
00:27:10.920 --> 00:27:13.240
<v Speaker 3>if you want it to be politically fair, there is

450
00:27:13.279 --> 00:27:19.119
<v Speaker 3>a well known system of elections beloved across the world.

451
00:27:19.960 --> 00:27:24.680
<v Speaker 3>It's called proportional representation, and if you really care about

452
00:27:24.720 --> 00:27:27.720
<v Speaker 3>making sure the districts are balanced, you don't want districts

453
00:27:27.720 --> 00:27:31.640
<v Speaker 3>who want proportional representation. The reason that we have single

454
00:27:31.720 --> 00:27:35.680
<v Speaker 3>member districts in my view, and this is why I

455
00:27:35.720 --> 00:27:38.440
<v Speaker 3>think Compactinson Counties and things like that are important. The

456
00:27:38.519 --> 00:27:42.160
<v Speaker 3>reason we have single member districts in my view, is

457
00:27:42.200 --> 00:27:47.039
<v Speaker 3>an understanding that place matters, that there are aspects of

458
00:27:47.119 --> 00:27:54.759
<v Speaker 3>representation that go beyond partisanship. You know, most people, their

459
00:27:54.920 --> 00:27:58.359
<v Speaker 3>interaction with their member of Congress is, oh, my gosh,

460
00:27:58.440 --> 00:28:01.839
<v Speaker 3>I have an overseas trip and I just realized that

461
00:28:01.880 --> 00:28:05.359
<v Speaker 3>I needed to get a passport for my kid. Can

462
00:28:05.400 --> 00:28:07.519
<v Speaker 3>we get this expedite? And so you call the member's

463
00:28:07.559 --> 00:28:10.559
<v Speaker 3>office and they have a staffer who's dedicated to this

464
00:28:10.640 --> 00:28:14.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of stuff and gets done what needs to get done,

465
00:28:15.279 --> 00:28:19.720
<v Speaker 3>and that matters. You know, the needs of someone in

466
00:28:19.799 --> 00:28:23.400
<v Speaker 3>downtown Columbus, what they need from the government is different

467
00:28:23.519 --> 00:28:28.839
<v Speaker 3>than what someone from you know, rural from suburban Ohio needs,

468
00:28:28.839 --> 00:28:31.480
<v Speaker 3>which is different from what someone from rural Ohio needs.

469
00:28:31.480 --> 00:28:35.039
<v Speaker 3>And a representative and we think of the big especially

470
00:28:35.079 --> 00:28:38.000
<v Speaker 3>if as partisans, people think of the big ticket votes.

471
00:28:38.000 --> 00:28:40.240
<v Speaker 3>How do you vote on abortion rights or gay rights,

472
00:28:40.359 --> 00:28:43.400
<v Speaker 3>or or you know, trans rights or social security reform.

473
00:28:43.519 --> 00:28:46.119
<v Speaker 3>But there is so much that goes on at the

474
00:28:46.119 --> 00:28:53.559
<v Speaker 3>federal government beyond those type of big picture issues. Now

475
00:28:53.599 --> 00:28:56.119
<v Speaker 3>the response to that is usually well, yeah, but people

476
00:28:56.200 --> 00:28:59.599
<v Speaker 3>mostly vote for the party. Now, look at what's going

477
00:28:59.640 --> 00:29:02.880
<v Speaker 3>to happen. Probably maybe I should say now to Susan Collins,

478
00:29:02.960 --> 00:29:05.880
<v Speaker 3>look what happened to John Tester, And it's like, well,

479
00:29:05.960 --> 00:29:09.079
<v Speaker 3>that's been the rule for twenty years. And the fact

480
00:29:09.119 --> 00:29:11.279
<v Speaker 3>that that's been a norm for twenty years doesn't mean

481
00:29:11.279 --> 00:29:15.240
<v Speaker 3>we should jettison a system that has existed for two

482
00:29:15.359 --> 00:29:17.960
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty or two hundred and forty at this point.

483
00:29:18.880 --> 00:29:22.839
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, there's just these kind of foundational representative representational

484
00:29:23.039 --> 00:29:26.880
<v Speaker 3>things at work, so long as you are actually drawing

485
00:29:27.000 --> 00:29:30.079
<v Speaker 3>those compact, reasonably shaped districts.

486
00:29:30.319 --> 00:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And also respecting things like city boundaries county boundaries. Like

487
00:29:36.039 --> 00:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I said, you can draw compact districts, but if you

488
00:29:38.839 --> 00:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>draw compact districts and you're splitting a minuscule city five

489
00:29:43.319 --> 00:29:46.799
<v Speaker 1>different ways, you're probably doing it for political purpose rather

490
00:29:46.880 --> 00:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>than trying to find a good government reason to take

491
00:29:50.519 --> 00:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a seventy thousand person city and give them virtually no

492
00:29:54.480 --> 00:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>ability to elect a representative on their own.

493
00:29:58.079 --> 00:30:01.039
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's funny. So for the longest in Ohio,

494
00:30:01.759 --> 00:30:07.759
<v Speaker 3>Republicans split Columbus down the middle, and people were apoplectic

495
00:30:07.799 --> 00:30:11.640
<v Speaker 3>about it. Everyone knows it's because Columbus was more democratic

496
00:30:11.640 --> 00:30:13.119
<v Speaker 3>than everything else, and so if you split it, you

497
00:30:13.119 --> 00:30:17.079
<v Speaker 3>got two Republican districts. Well, so, starting I think in

498
00:30:17.160 --> 00:30:22.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty ten, Republicans created a Democratic district in Columbus and

499
00:30:22.200 --> 00:30:25.319
<v Speaker 3>people lost their minds again because at that point, Franklin

500
00:30:25.359 --> 00:30:27.839
<v Speaker 3>County become blue enough that if you split the city

501
00:30:27.839 --> 00:30:31.640
<v Speaker 3>of Columbus you would get two Democratic districts. And it's

502
00:30:31.759 --> 00:30:35.599
<v Speaker 3>just like, okay, what, what's the actual principle here, Like,

503
00:30:36.160 --> 00:30:39.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, the actual principle is we want Democrats, just

504
00:30:39.960 --> 00:30:42.160
<v Speaker 3>like it's we want Republicans in other states. But I

505
00:30:42.480 --> 00:30:44.359
<v Speaker 3>agree with you. I think I think they have it

506
00:30:44.480 --> 00:30:47.599
<v Speaker 3>right right now, which is that the city of Columbus

507
00:30:47.640 --> 00:30:50.200
<v Speaker 3>has unique needs and it doesn't need to be in

508
00:30:50.240 --> 00:30:54.079
<v Speaker 3>a district with you know where I live in in

509
00:30:55.000 --> 00:30:57.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, Lewis Center, or least of all, with the

510
00:30:57.960 --> 00:31:00.319
<v Speaker 3>rural areas. So I think they got it right.

511
00:31:02.839 --> 00:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, one question I've wondered is I'm thinking about

512
00:31:05.680 --> 00:31:10.799
<v Speaker 1>how to constrain gerrymanderin. I wonder whether or not the

513
00:31:10.960 --> 00:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>idea that metropolitan areas are de facto communities of interest

514
00:31:15.839 --> 00:31:19.279
<v Speaker 1>because you can keep Columbus. But then if you're taking

515
00:31:19.680 --> 00:31:23.079
<v Speaker 1>the north side, because Columbus is larger, as you know,

516
00:31:23.480 --> 00:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Columbus is larger than it needs to be for one

517
00:31:25.640 --> 00:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>congressional district, and there's impacted non totally surrounded or non

518
00:31:32.759 --> 00:31:38.519
<v Speaker 1>city populations within Columbus, I believe, And so what you

519
00:31:38.559 --> 00:31:41.599
<v Speaker 1>do with the Franklin County outside of them. Republicans of course,

520
00:31:41.640 --> 00:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>will split up the Franklin County places so that some

521
00:31:45.039 --> 00:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of it get attached to Republican rural areas one hundred

522
00:31:47.920 --> 00:31:52.039
<v Speaker 1>miles away. What about adding to the traditional criteria that

523
00:31:52.160 --> 00:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>metropolitan regions have their or metropolitan areas have their own

524
00:31:56.000 --> 00:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>community of interests, so that you can't take suburban Columbus

525
00:32:00.079 --> 00:32:04.559
<v Speaker 1>that's left over after the after you make the one

526
00:32:04.599 --> 00:32:06.799
<v Speaker 1>city and then add it to all these rural areas.

527
00:32:06.799 --> 00:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>You kind of have to try and well, maybe added

528
00:32:08.960 --> 00:32:12.359
<v Speaker 1>to suburban Delaware County or whatever else is in the

529
00:32:12.759 --> 00:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>nonpartisan defined metropolitan area. And that would be another way

530
00:32:16.519 --> 00:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to limit jerrymanderer's ability to create political outcomes by ignoring

531
00:32:22.720 --> 00:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>real communities of interests.

532
00:32:24.920 --> 00:32:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that gets into the rule that Bernie and

533
00:32:29.680 --> 00:32:33.759
<v Speaker 3>I had, which was you can't leave a county until

534
00:32:33.759 --> 00:32:37.279
<v Speaker 3>you filled up the county, and you can't leave a

535
00:32:39.240 --> 00:32:43.799
<v Speaker 3>municipality until you filled the municipality. And so the idea is, okay,

536
00:32:43.839 --> 00:32:47.039
<v Speaker 3>you would draw that Columbus district. Then you would start

537
00:32:47.119 --> 00:32:50.240
<v Speaker 3>drawing the second district in Franklin County, and you would

538
00:32:50.279 --> 00:32:52.279
<v Speaker 3>have to start it in whatever's left over in the

539
00:32:52.319 --> 00:32:54.839
<v Speaker 3>city of Columbus, and then you'd have to fill up

540
00:32:54.880 --> 00:32:57.119
<v Speaker 3>Franklin County before you could go into any of the

541
00:32:57.160 --> 00:32:58.799
<v Speaker 3>adjacent kinds. At that point, you're going to have another

542
00:32:58.839 --> 00:33:03.240
<v Speaker 3>democratic district, you know. And so maybe if you're feeling

543
00:33:03.319 --> 00:33:06.319
<v Speaker 3>really aggressive, you go into Pickaway County, which is kind

544
00:33:06.359 --> 00:33:08.240
<v Speaker 3>of rural to the south, and you get some rural

545
00:33:08.279 --> 00:33:12.279
<v Speaker 3>areas that way. But you know nothing. What I think

546
00:33:12.279 --> 00:33:14.640
<v Speaker 3>people don't get is that nothing is going to get

547
00:33:14.799 --> 00:33:18.519
<v Speaker 3>rid of jerrymandering because people are smart, they're clever, they'll

548
00:33:18.519 --> 00:33:22.079
<v Speaker 3>always find a way to get around a rule. The

549
00:33:22.160 --> 00:33:24.640
<v Speaker 3>idea is to cabinet in. The idea is to say okay,

550
00:33:24.759 --> 00:33:27.000
<v Speaker 3>like people are going to be putting thumbs on the scale.

551
00:33:27.400 --> 00:33:30.799
<v Speaker 3>What we don't want is what happened in California or

552
00:33:30.839 --> 00:33:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Illinois or Texas. You know, these kind of oddly shaped,

553
00:33:34.599 --> 00:33:40.319
<v Speaker 3>stretched out jerrymanders. And so that's I think the way

554
00:33:40.359 --> 00:33:42.640
<v Speaker 3>to do it, and you can put some notion. The

555
00:33:43.000 --> 00:33:47.079
<v Speaker 3>community of interest thing gets a little tricky because it's

556
00:33:47.119 --> 00:33:50.160
<v Speaker 3>such a malleable standard. I do think if we're going

557
00:33:50.200 --> 00:33:52.880
<v Speaker 3>to do that, it needs to be a clearly defined thing,

558
00:33:53.000 --> 00:33:57.000
<v Speaker 3>such as you can't leave, you have to treat un

559
00:33:58.000 --> 00:34:01.079
<v Speaker 3>metropolitan areas is defined by the sense is this the

560
00:34:01.079 --> 00:34:03.519
<v Speaker 3>same way as you would a municipality or something to

561
00:34:03.559 --> 00:34:08.079
<v Speaker 3>that effect. As long as the clear, clean, straightforward rule,

562
00:34:08.599 --> 00:34:09.800
<v Speaker 3>I am on board.

563
00:34:10.920 --> 00:34:14.599
<v Speaker 1>Now again, the partisan could argue that you know all

564
00:34:14.679 --> 00:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this stuff about place, I hear you, or I hear you,

565
00:34:17.400 --> 00:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>but the way our country is right now, we should

566
00:34:20.960 --> 00:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>sacrifice the advantages that come from place for the advantages

567
00:34:26.320 --> 00:34:30.519
<v Speaker 1>that come from balance between the competing factions. How you

568
00:34:30.599 --> 00:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>would you respond to somebody who would say, who would

569
00:34:33.280 --> 00:34:34.079
<v Speaker 1>make that argument?

570
00:34:35.360 --> 00:34:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, like I said, I think, I think first off,

571
00:34:38.400 --> 00:34:42.119
<v Speaker 3>if you're a partisan, then this jerry mandric debate is

572
00:34:42.159 --> 00:34:44.639
<v Speaker 3>kind of like if you're that partisan. This gerrymandering debate

573
00:34:44.679 --> 00:34:46.960
<v Speaker 3>is kind of beside the point. But the reason that

574
00:34:47.079 --> 00:34:50.480
<v Speaker 3>place is so important. There's actually a concept in geography.

575
00:34:50.519 --> 00:34:53.800
<v Speaker 3>If you take a spatial statistics class or get into geography,

576
00:34:54.440 --> 00:34:56.719
<v Speaker 3>the first things you learn is called Tobler's first law

577
00:34:56.719 --> 00:35:00.159
<v Speaker 3>of geography, and it basically it's straightforward. It's it's that

578
00:35:00.239 --> 00:35:02.400
<v Speaker 3>everything is related, but things that are closer to each

579
00:35:02.400 --> 00:35:04.519
<v Speaker 3>other are more related than things that are far apart.

580
00:35:05.920 --> 00:35:09.000
<v Speaker 3>And that's what place is getting to and what I

581
00:35:09.000 --> 00:35:12.880
<v Speaker 3>think single member districts are supposed to encapsulate that. Look,

582
00:35:13.519 --> 00:35:16.039
<v Speaker 3>you know, this is making sure that, to the best

583
00:35:16.079 --> 00:35:18.519
<v Speaker 3>of our ability, that people who are more or less

584
00:35:18.559 --> 00:35:22.800
<v Speaker 3>similarly situated are put in districts together. That has a

585
00:35:22.840 --> 00:35:26.719
<v Speaker 3>partisan valance to it as well. You know, it helps

586
00:35:26.840 --> 00:35:30.119
<v Speaker 3>ensure that you're not going to have people, to the

587
00:35:30.159 --> 00:35:31.719
<v Speaker 3>extent we can do it, We're not going to have

588
00:35:31.760 --> 00:35:34.639
<v Speaker 3>people along the Ohio River in a district that is

589
00:35:34.800 --> 00:35:39.800
<v Speaker 3>actually governed by the city of Columbus and vice versa.

590
00:35:39.920 --> 00:35:41.719
<v Speaker 3>Make sure the people in the city of Columbus aren't

591
00:35:42.199 --> 00:35:45.360
<v Speaker 3>really governed by people in Appalachio along the Ohio River.

592
00:35:46.000 --> 00:35:49.760
<v Speaker 3>And I think that is something that should appeal to partisans, frankly,

593
00:35:50.840 --> 00:35:53.039
<v Speaker 3>because you're going to set up some swing districts this

594
00:35:53.079 --> 00:35:57.280
<v Speaker 3>way naturally, but you're also going to ensure that like

595
00:35:57.360 --> 00:36:00.480
<v Speaker 3>these red rural areas get represented by one of their own.

596
00:36:01.400 --> 00:36:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's in fact what jerrymandering does. I mean when

597
00:36:03.960 --> 00:36:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you take a look at all the extreme forms of

598
00:36:06.400 --> 00:36:08.360
<v Speaker 1>jerry manner, when you take a look at the reason

599
00:36:08.400 --> 00:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you have these oddly shaped districts and fingers is to

600
00:36:11.480 --> 00:36:15.639
<v Speaker 1>try effectively to disenfranchise a class of voters which often

601
00:36:15.679 --> 00:36:18.760
<v Speaker 1>not only have partisan concerns, but have these regional concerns.

602
00:36:19.199 --> 00:36:21.199
<v Speaker 1>In Illinois, you've got a lot of people who are

603
00:36:21.199 --> 00:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>governed by Chicago and Chicago suburbs and not as many

604
00:36:24.840 --> 00:36:27.760
<v Speaker 1>as their population would entitle them to who are in

605
00:36:27.800 --> 00:36:31.199
<v Speaker 1>the rural regions in the outstate. And in Texas you

606
00:36:31.239 --> 00:36:33.119
<v Speaker 1>have the reverse, you know, which is that a lot

607
00:36:33.119 --> 00:36:38.039
<v Speaker 1>of urban people are being governed by Republican suburbanites as

608
00:36:38.039 --> 00:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>opposed to having as many districts as they would if

609
00:36:40.360 --> 00:36:43.679
<v Speaker 1>they weren't being chopped up and ferried out to rural

610
00:36:43.719 --> 00:36:47.039
<v Speaker 1>and suburban areas that will elect Republicans.

611
00:36:47.719 --> 00:36:50.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's the same thing with in Virginia, the map

612
00:36:50.679 --> 00:36:53.199
<v Speaker 3>that was ultimately struck down by their state Supreme Court.

613
00:36:54.800 --> 00:36:58.800
<v Speaker 3>There are people in the literal mountains, you know, probably

614
00:36:58.840 --> 00:37:01.519
<v Speaker 3>should have gone over with West Virginia in the Civil War.

615
00:37:01.599 --> 00:37:05.360
<v Speaker 3>But like rural super rural mountainous areas, there weren't a

616
00:37:05.400 --> 00:37:08.440
<v Speaker 3>district that was going to be controlled by voters in

617
00:37:08.480 --> 00:37:13.440
<v Speaker 3>one of the five slices of Fairfax County. You know,

618
00:37:13.679 --> 00:37:17.159
<v Speaker 3>I just don't. I'm not. I'm not as offended by

619
00:37:17.159 --> 00:37:19.159
<v Speaker 3>that as some just because I know what's going on

620
00:37:19.159 --> 00:37:22.719
<v Speaker 3>on a national scale. But from a good government perspective,

621
00:37:22.719 --> 00:37:24.440
<v Speaker 3>that's not how it's supposed to work. There was a

622
00:37:24.480 --> 00:37:27.719
<v Speaker 3>district that was like the Shenandoah Valley and mountain areas,

623
00:37:27.760 --> 00:37:30.000
<v Speaker 3>and then there was like Southwest Virginia got some of

624
00:37:30.079 --> 00:37:34.480
<v Speaker 3>those mountain counties as well, and so everyone got represented,

625
00:37:34.599 --> 00:37:37.079
<v Speaker 3>got represented by someone I shouldn't say everyone, but like

626
00:37:37.119 --> 00:37:41.079
<v Speaker 3>most people got represented by someone who at least had

627
00:37:41.079 --> 00:37:46.239
<v Speaker 3>a clue what their non partisan goals were or needs were.

628
00:37:47.400 --> 00:37:52.559
<v Speaker 1>And we had gary Mandering or jerrymandering has been with

629
00:37:52.679 --> 00:37:55.039
<v Speaker 1>us since the early days of the Republic. It's called

630
00:37:55.559 --> 00:37:59.119
<v Speaker 1>jerry mandering because of Elbridge. I was taught by an

631
00:37:59.119 --> 00:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Englishman that it's pronounced with a hard gie gary. But

632
00:38:03.119 --> 00:38:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to the governor of Massachusetts who created a combination of

633
00:38:06.400 --> 00:38:11.679
<v Speaker 1>counties that resembled a salamander, and hence it was labeled

634
00:38:11.719 --> 00:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the Gerrymander. But even back then you did not have

635
00:38:18.199 --> 00:38:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's take a little bit of New York

636
00:38:21.480 --> 00:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>and string it out to rural Long Island.

637
00:38:24.280 --> 00:38:27.039
<v Speaker 2>Back when it was Rhode Island rural.

638
00:38:28.199 --> 00:38:31.519
<v Speaker 1>You had all counties that are added, or you had

639
00:38:31.559 --> 00:38:35.800
<v Speaker 1>whole cities that were added, and that in itself necessarily

640
00:38:35.960 --> 00:38:42.320
<v Speaker 1>limited the partisan impact that those crude nineteenth century jerrymanders

641
00:38:42.320 --> 00:38:43.039
<v Speaker 1>could actually have.

642
00:38:44.480 --> 00:38:47.760
<v Speaker 3>That's right, I mean I think we should. You know,

643
00:38:48.039 --> 00:38:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Ohio had a whole I don't want to be pollyannish

644
00:38:50.880 --> 00:38:53.960
<v Speaker 3>about this, because Ohio had a whole county requirement. And

645
00:38:54.000 --> 00:38:57.360
<v Speaker 3>we actually redrew our maps four times in the eighteen eighties,

646
00:38:59.000 --> 00:39:02.039
<v Speaker 3>and it was little like you know, one party took

647
00:39:02.039 --> 00:39:05.039
<v Speaker 3>over the legislature, readrew the congressional district, then another party

648
00:39:05.039 --> 00:39:08.159
<v Speaker 3>won the legislature, redrew all the maps. So we've been

649
00:39:08.199 --> 00:39:11.199
<v Speaker 3>here before, and they were pretty they were reasonably effective

650
00:39:11.239 --> 00:39:13.960
<v Speaker 3>at what they did, but you know, nothing like what

651
00:39:14.039 --> 00:39:17.079
<v Speaker 3>you you have, not on a scale. I shouldn't say

652
00:39:17.119 --> 00:39:19.000
<v Speaker 3>nothing like, but on a scale, not on a scale

653
00:39:19.199 --> 00:39:22.280
<v Speaker 3>of what you have today and what you can accomplish

654
00:39:22.639 --> 00:39:25.880
<v Speaker 3>when you're drawing maps, especially with one person, one vote

655
00:39:26.440 --> 00:39:31.679
<v Speaker 3>separating you from any realistic ability to keep county lines intact.

656
00:39:32.599 --> 00:39:36.119
<v Speaker 3>And so you just have more degrees of freedom when

657
00:39:36.119 --> 00:39:40.639
<v Speaker 3>you're drawing maps today. But once you start slapping on

658
00:39:40.760 --> 00:39:43.320
<v Speaker 3>those constraints, like I said, you wouldn't be able to

659
00:39:43.360 --> 00:39:47.239
<v Speaker 3>do Illinois, and you wouldn't be able to do what

660
00:39:47.320 --> 00:39:50.239
<v Speaker 3>Texas did, and you wouldn't be able to do what

661
00:39:50.280 --> 00:39:52.599
<v Speaker 3>California did. Now does that mean you're going to get

662
00:39:52.599 --> 00:39:57.079
<v Speaker 3>to perfect one to one correlation between presidential vote share

663
00:39:57.360 --> 00:40:03.400
<v Speaker 3>and districts carried by parties? Probably not, But again that's

664
00:40:03.719 --> 00:40:06.280
<v Speaker 3>as far as I'm concerned. Once you opt for single

665
00:40:06.320 --> 00:40:08.920
<v Speaker 3>member districts, that's a subsidiary consideration.

666
00:40:11.519 --> 00:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, there are two things that other countries that have

667
00:40:14.000 --> 00:40:19.079
<v Speaker 1>single member districts use that have a further impact in

668
00:40:19.159 --> 00:40:24.280
<v Speaker 1>some sense on both proportionality of the vote and constraining

669
00:40:25.159 --> 00:40:28.239
<v Speaker 1>Gary Manderin. And that is, first of all, they have

670
00:40:28.320 --> 00:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a wider variance that you will tend to see that

671
00:40:32.360 --> 00:40:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Australia or Britain don't have the narrow one person, one

672
00:40:36.440 --> 00:40:39.199
<v Speaker 1>vote that says you have to be as near as practical,

673
00:40:39.320 --> 00:40:42.400
<v Speaker 1>they'll allow you a five percent variance, and that's used

674
00:40:42.440 --> 00:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep cities in town or wards intact. And the

675
00:40:47.039 --> 00:40:51.119
<v Speaker 1>other thing that on both England and Australia do is

676
00:40:51.159 --> 00:40:55.239
<v Speaker 1>they don't draw their districts on the base of population.

677
00:40:55.320 --> 00:40:58.159
<v Speaker 1>They draw their districts on the basis of eligible elector,

678
00:40:58.280 --> 00:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>so you have one elector one vote, not one person

679
00:41:01.480 --> 00:41:05.239
<v Speaker 1>one vote, which of course, and they both have substantial

680
00:41:05.239 --> 00:41:09.960
<v Speaker 1>immigrant populations and that has an effect, which is to say,

681
00:41:10.079 --> 00:41:14.239
<v Speaker 1>highly populated areas with a lot of immigrants don't have

682
00:41:14.400 --> 00:41:19.880
<v Speaker 1>as many representatives per population unit as citizen drawing districts.

683
00:41:20.320 --> 00:41:24.320
<v Speaker 1>But of course the immigrants can't vote. So in America,

684
00:41:24.400 --> 00:41:27.280
<v Speaker 1>where we have the one person, one vote rather than

685
00:41:27.360 --> 00:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>one elector system, you have massive imbalances between the number

686
00:41:34.000 --> 00:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of eligible voters in a congressional district. You know, between

687
00:41:38.679 --> 00:41:41.079
<v Speaker 1>take a look at some of the immigrant heavy areas

688
00:41:41.079 --> 00:41:44.079
<v Speaker 1>in the Central Valley that cast like one third as

689
00:41:44.119 --> 00:41:47.119
<v Speaker 1>many votes as heavy citizen areas. And then you of

690
00:41:47.199 --> 00:41:50.280
<v Speaker 1>course got the question of children, which you know, last

691
00:41:50.320 --> 00:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>time I checked, children can't vote if you have high

692
00:41:53.960 --> 00:41:57.679
<v Speaker 1>senior areas. High senior areas have more votes per representative

693
00:41:57.719 --> 00:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>than areas with high numbers of fans. Is because the

694
00:42:01.519 --> 00:42:05.239
<v Speaker 1>kids don't vote, but they're still being allocated district What

695
00:42:05.280 --> 00:42:07.639
<v Speaker 1>do you think about one or both of those to

696
00:42:07.719 --> 00:42:13.280
<v Speaker 1>be added to the traditional systems to further permit or

697
00:42:13.360 --> 00:42:15.440
<v Speaker 1>constrain caring meander.

698
00:42:17.119 --> 00:42:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, as you know, for state legislatures, we have

699
00:42:21.559 --> 00:42:24.920
<v Speaker 3>that variance, and the bottom as far as I can tell,

700
00:42:24.960 --> 00:42:29.800
<v Speaker 3>hasn't fallen out from democracy, especially if you were to

701
00:42:29.880 --> 00:42:34.239
<v Speaker 3>part with a strict criteria that you can't split counties

702
00:42:34.719 --> 00:42:38.400
<v Speaker 3>or municipalities more than you need to, right, because that

703
00:42:38.519 --> 00:42:40.639
<v Speaker 3>kind of helps do away with the concern well, what

704
00:42:40.679 --> 00:42:44.599
<v Speaker 3>if you underpopulate the democratic districts or overpopulate the Republican

705
00:42:44.599 --> 00:42:47.760
<v Speaker 3>ones or whatever. Like, If you're going to vary from

706
00:42:47.760 --> 00:42:50.039
<v Speaker 3>the one person, one vote criteria has to be for

707
00:42:50.119 --> 00:42:54.960
<v Speaker 3>a good reason. So yeah, I think I think the

708
00:42:54.960 --> 00:42:58.960
<v Speaker 3>strict one person, one vote is actually kind of silly.

709
00:42:59.400 --> 00:43:01.559
<v Speaker 3>I get the motivation for it, but the truth of

710
00:43:01.599 --> 00:43:04.360
<v Speaker 3>the matter is a congressional district in Rhode Island right

711
00:43:04.400 --> 00:43:08.519
<v Speaker 3>now has about five hundred and fifty thousand people. Congressional

712
00:43:08.559 --> 00:43:12.039
<v Speaker 3>district in Delaware has about nine hundred thousand, almost a million.

713
00:43:13.159 --> 00:43:15.920
<v Speaker 3>We don't have strict one person, one vote. We know

714
00:43:15.960 --> 00:43:18.960
<v Speaker 3>that the census numbers aren't one hundred percent accurate, so

715
00:43:19.559 --> 00:43:23.360
<v Speaker 3>it's just a legal fiction. So yeah, I would one

716
00:43:23.440 --> 00:43:25.559
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent be in favor of adding like the plus

717
00:43:25.599 --> 00:43:29.400
<v Speaker 3>or minus five percent variants. As for doing it on

718
00:43:29.480 --> 00:43:34.719
<v Speaker 3>the basis of electors or citizens or you know, whatever

719
00:43:34.800 --> 00:43:41.119
<v Speaker 3>other basis you can imagine. Yeah, I'm completely I shouldn't

720
00:43:41.119 --> 00:43:44.199
<v Speaker 3>say completely that I see the argument, and I would

721
00:43:44.760 --> 00:43:47.039
<v Speaker 3>probably be favorably inclined to our because you do get

722
00:43:47.039 --> 00:43:50.599
<v Speaker 3>these kind of rotten boroughs where you know, a large

723
00:43:50.639 --> 00:43:55.800
<v Speaker 3>portion of the electric just is an allowed to vote,

724
00:43:56.840 --> 00:43:59.599
<v Speaker 3>And I can there are plenty of good philosophical reasons

725
00:44:01.199 --> 00:44:07.880
<v Speaker 3>not to wait the representational aspect of democracy towards the

726
00:44:07.920 --> 00:44:12.320
<v Speaker 3>people who have actually made permanent commitments towards the country

727
00:44:12.360 --> 00:44:16.039
<v Speaker 3>and become citizens. But my feelings on that aren't as

728
00:44:16.039 --> 00:44:17.960
<v Speaker 3>strong as the one person, one vote, because I do

729
00:44:18.000 --> 00:44:22.119
<v Speaker 3>think Robert Borke in Tempting of America actually had I mean,

730
00:44:22.119 --> 00:44:26.559
<v Speaker 3>obviously it's a controversial book, but I think his narrative

731
00:44:26.920 --> 00:44:32.800
<v Speaker 3>of he was on the commission for Connecticut drawing maps.

732
00:44:32.800 --> 00:44:35.840
<v Speaker 3>In the first one person, one vote reapportionment, he said,

733
00:44:36.079 --> 00:44:38.079
<v Speaker 3>it was a nightmare. Like all these things that we

734
00:44:38.119 --> 00:44:40.880
<v Speaker 3>wanted to consider and had historically considered, we no longer

735
00:44:40.920 --> 00:44:43.599
<v Speaker 3>could because we were chasing down the rabbit hole of

736
00:44:43.599 --> 00:44:47.039
<v Speaker 3>getting the population balanced. And I think in a lot

737
00:44:47.039 --> 00:44:51.519
<v Speaker 3>of perverse ways, the Supreme Court enabled the gerrymandering that

738
00:44:51.559 --> 00:44:55.280
<v Speaker 3>we have today by taking away a lot of the

739
00:44:55.320 --> 00:44:58.840
<v Speaker 3>constraints we had on what you could do with one person,

740
00:44:58.840 --> 00:44:59.400
<v Speaker 3>one vote.

741
00:45:00.440 --> 00:45:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And the thing is that in one sense, the

742
00:45:04.480 --> 00:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>one person, one vote responded to very real problems, you know,

743
00:45:09.079 --> 00:45:15.320
<v Speaker 1>like the county system in California, where Los Angeles County,

744
00:45:15.440 --> 00:45:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of multimillion people sent one member of the state Senate

745
00:45:18.840 --> 00:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and a tiny little county or a couple of counties

746
00:45:24.039 --> 00:45:26.880
<v Speaker 1>combined into one district I had under one hundred thousand

747
00:45:26.880 --> 00:45:29.079
<v Speaker 1>people and had the same representation, Or the state of

748
00:45:29.119 --> 00:45:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee that hadn't redrawn its lines in fifty years, so

749
00:45:34.920 --> 00:45:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that it was meant to prevent cities and their growth

750
00:45:40.800 --> 00:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>from dominating the royal areas and the legislatures. But it

751
00:45:44.039 --> 00:45:46.360
<v Speaker 1>strikes me that you could have gotten rid of those

752
00:45:46.800 --> 00:45:52.440
<v Speaker 1>imbalances or those injustices without jumping to the one person,

753
00:45:52.559 --> 00:46:00.159
<v Speaker 1>one vote standard that then becomes ridiculously rigorously applied, at

754
00:46:00.239 --> 00:46:04.639
<v Speaker 1>least at the congressional level, so that you have a

755
00:46:04.800 --> 00:46:08.280
<v Speaker 1>false equality that anyone who knows anything about the census

756
00:46:08.320 --> 00:46:11.280
<v Speaker 1>knows is absolutely fictional.

757
00:46:11.119 --> 00:46:12.440
<v Speaker 2>From the moment that it's wrong.

758
00:46:15.400 --> 00:46:18.239
<v Speaker 1>What would you what would you say could be done

759
00:46:18.360 --> 00:46:20.679
<v Speaker 1>or should be done? Now, some of this stuff is

760
00:46:20.760 --> 00:46:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court's ruling, So it's almost like the Court if

761
00:46:24.800 --> 00:46:29.639
<v Speaker 1>you were, you know, if you could be jerrymandered into

762
00:46:29.719 --> 00:46:32.360
<v Speaker 1>being five of the nine justices and write your own

763
00:46:32.400 --> 00:46:37.280
<v Speaker 1>majority opinion, Sean, what would your majority opinion that would

764
00:46:37.480 --> 00:46:43.239
<v Speaker 1>establish fair redistricting guidelines if we're going to have single

765
00:46:43.280 --> 00:46:45.880
<v Speaker 1>member districts actually look like?

766
00:46:48.039 --> 00:46:49.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I think.

767
00:46:50.880 --> 00:46:51.920
<v Speaker 2>You know I would.

768
00:46:53.199 --> 00:46:57.559
<v Speaker 3>I would allow deviations from one person, one vote, so

769
00:46:57.840 --> 00:47:03.360
<v Speaker 3>long as those deviations clearly served some other purpose. So

770
00:47:03.599 --> 00:47:06.880
<v Speaker 3>one thing that happened when Bernie and I were drawing there,

771
00:47:07.599 --> 00:47:12.440
<v Speaker 3>there's actually kind of north of the Rappahannock, east of

772
00:47:12.480 --> 00:47:15.480
<v Speaker 3>the Blue Ridge, there's like a square of counties, and

773
00:47:15.480 --> 00:47:18.519
<v Speaker 3>if you add them all up, it is almost perfectly

774
00:47:20.039 --> 00:47:25.039
<v Speaker 3>four districts. It is off by two hundred people. And

775
00:47:25.119 --> 00:47:27.880
<v Speaker 3>yet we had to go like, find a collection of

776
00:47:27.920 --> 00:47:31.000
<v Speaker 3>census blocks in Albemarle County that added up to two

777
00:47:31.119 --> 00:47:37.719
<v Speaker 3>hundred people. So it's just ridiculous, like especially since the

778
00:47:37.760 --> 00:47:40.920
<v Speaker 3>district's probably the day those districts go into effect because

779
00:47:40.920 --> 00:47:43.039
<v Speaker 3>of population shifts, they're going to be off by more

780
00:47:43.079 --> 00:47:47.199
<v Speaker 3>than two hundred people. So you know, you can deviate

781
00:47:47.239 --> 00:47:48.840
<v Speaker 3>from one person, one vote as long as it's for

782
00:47:48.840 --> 00:47:50.760
<v Speaker 3>something like you can show like, okay, I'm keeping these

783
00:47:50.800 --> 00:47:54.639
<v Speaker 3>cities hole in order to do this, okay, And then

784
00:47:54.679 --> 00:47:59.840
<v Speaker 3>it would be the municipal and county splits rule. Once

785
00:47:59.880 --> 00:48:02.519
<v Speaker 3>you start drawing in a municipality or a city, you

786
00:48:02.559 --> 00:48:05.440
<v Speaker 3>have to finish drawing in it, and once you start

787
00:48:05.519 --> 00:48:07.679
<v Speaker 3>drawing in a county, you have to finish drawing it

788
00:48:07.719 --> 00:48:11.760
<v Speaker 3>before you can proceed to the next county over. And

789
00:48:11.800 --> 00:48:17.159
<v Speaker 3>then a compactness criteria. The compactness criteria are tough because

790
00:48:18.000 --> 00:48:20.519
<v Speaker 3>you know, we have these various measures like RIAC and

791
00:48:20.519 --> 00:48:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Polsby Popper, but they don't really mean anything, Like a

792
00:48:22.960 --> 00:48:25.800
<v Speaker 3>ReOC scorer of point three doesn't tell you much. But

793
00:48:27.000 --> 00:48:29.599
<v Speaker 3>I would spend some time figuring out exactly how I

794
00:48:29.639 --> 00:48:33.119
<v Speaker 3>wanted to do that. To give map dars some real guidance.

795
00:48:34.159 --> 00:48:36.519
<v Speaker 3>It might even be an arbitrary number, like your RIOC

796
00:48:36.559 --> 00:48:41.199
<v Speaker 3>has to be greater than point three, or you can't

797
00:48:41.199 --> 00:48:44.639
<v Speaker 3>have a deviation of more than fifteen percent in your district.

798
00:48:44.719 --> 00:48:49.880
<v Speaker 3>ReOC scores absent some compelling reason. But I think you

799
00:48:50.000 --> 00:48:53.239
<v Speaker 3>do need some sort of compactness definition in there to

800
00:48:53.320 --> 00:48:56.599
<v Speaker 3>keep people from doing what Elberts Jerry did or Gary

801
00:48:56.679 --> 00:49:00.719
<v Speaker 3>and stringing together towns in a salamtar. But I want

802
00:49:00.719 --> 00:49:04.039
<v Speaker 3>to emphasize even that would be better than what we

803
00:49:04.119 --> 00:49:07.320
<v Speaker 3>have today, where you can just kind of draw, like

804
00:49:07.360 --> 00:49:10.719
<v Speaker 3>a semiconductor, a string of census blocks to cut through

805
00:49:10.760 --> 00:49:14.360
<v Speaker 3>an area to get you over to some more democratic votes.

806
00:49:15.000 --> 00:49:18.519
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, No, I mean on Dave's redistricting app. I've

807
00:49:18.519 --> 00:49:25.159
<v Speaker 1>resisted the temptation to break the tracts into Gary manders.

808
00:49:25.199 --> 00:49:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Don't do that, so you can. You've got them splitting

809
00:49:29.199 --> 00:49:32.760
<v Speaker 1>precincts and using census blocks and using it as what

810
00:49:32.800 --> 00:49:35.159
<v Speaker 1>we call them, the business transportation to get you where

811
00:49:35.199 --> 00:49:35.719
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to be.

812
00:49:36.159 --> 00:49:36.599
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

813
00:49:37.039 --> 00:49:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So Sean, where can my listeners follow your work?

814
00:49:43.400 --> 00:49:46.960
<v Speaker 3>So there's a couple of places. I'm on Real Clear Politics.

815
00:49:47.519 --> 00:49:50.000
<v Speaker 3>You can find me on Twitter. It's just sean trendy

816
00:49:50.079 --> 00:49:54.199
<v Speaker 3>straightforward Twitter handle. You can find me at American Enterprise Institute.

817
00:49:54.239 --> 00:49:58.280
<v Speaker 3>And finally, if I can advertise myself a little bit,

818
00:49:58.280 --> 00:50:00.920
<v Speaker 3>you can find my stuff on the Stubborn Thing podcast

819
00:50:01.719 --> 00:50:05.199
<v Speaker 3>via AI with my co host j cost And.

820
00:50:05.199 --> 00:50:09.199
<v Speaker 1>What does Stubborn Things address as its regular topic or

821
00:50:09.400 --> 00:50:12.679
<v Speaker 1>does it have a focus or a theme that animates

822
00:50:13.239 --> 00:50:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the discussions?

823
00:50:14.840 --> 00:50:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Jay and I both have PhDs, but both

824
00:50:18.960 --> 00:50:21.119
<v Speaker 3>of us believe that that's one of the least interesting

825
00:50:21.159 --> 00:50:24.960
<v Speaker 3>aspects of our biographies. Not that a not to dismiss

826
00:50:24.960 --> 00:50:27.480
<v Speaker 3>a PhD, but some people with those degrees think that

827
00:50:27.519 --> 00:50:30.360
<v Speaker 3>it makes them to be all end all. We like

828
00:50:30.400 --> 00:50:34.159
<v Speaker 3>to look at these big historical and policy questions, drawing

829
00:50:34.239 --> 00:50:37.920
<v Speaker 3>upon our understanding of the literature, but letting our actual

830
00:50:38.360 --> 00:50:41.599
<v Speaker 3>kind of basic political knowledge and just common sense sometimes

831
00:50:42.039 --> 00:50:45.480
<v Speaker 3>guide the discussion. And so that's our goal. Sometimes we

832
00:50:45.559 --> 00:50:47.760
<v Speaker 3>do better than others, but we enjoy it.

833
00:50:48.719 --> 00:50:49.039
<v Speaker 2>Well.

834
00:50:49.039 --> 00:50:51.159
<v Speaker 1>It's aum's wonderful. And one of the things I know

835
00:50:51.280 --> 00:50:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you're doing is going down and ranking presidents historically. And

836
00:50:55.400 --> 00:50:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I see you've gotten to Herbert Hoover and I'm looking

837
00:50:57.800 --> 00:51:02.000
<v Speaker 1>forward to Dwight Eisenhower, Richard Nick and James Earl Carter,

838
00:51:03.039 --> 00:51:07.159
<v Speaker 1>and George W. Bush, who I personally was one of

839
00:51:07.199 --> 00:51:09.239
<v Speaker 1>the four worst presidents in American history.

840
00:51:09.280 --> 00:51:11.079
<v Speaker 2>But I think I'm an outlier.

841
00:51:11.840 --> 00:51:13.079
<v Speaker 3>Not as much as you would think.

842
00:51:13.360 --> 00:51:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Spoiler alert, Well.

843
00:51:14.719 --> 00:51:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Good, I won't be completely exiled from polite company well sewn.

844
00:51:21.440 --> 00:51:23.400
<v Speaker 1>As always, I learn a lot when I talk with

845
00:51:23.480 --> 00:51:25.639
<v Speaker 1>you and listen to you, and I'm glad that you

846
00:51:25.679 --> 00:51:28.760
<v Speaker 1>were able to make time for my listeners to learn

847
00:51:28.800 --> 00:51:30.400
<v Speaker 1>from you, and I look forward to having it back

848
00:51:30.519 --> 00:51:31.400
<v Speaker 1>on Beyond the polls.

849
00:51:32.119 --> 00:51:35.239
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for having me. That's it for

850
00:51:35.280 --> 00:51:35.719
<v Speaker 2>this week.

851
00:51:36.000 --> 00:51:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Next week we'll take a look at the Republican Senate

852
00:51:38.280 --> 00:51:42.639
<v Speaker 1>runoffs in Alabama and Georgia with Cook Political Reports Jessica Taylor.

853
00:51:43.119 --> 00:51:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Until then, let's reach for the stars together as we

854
00:51:46.800 --> 00:51:49.320
<v Speaker 1>journey beyond the polls.
