Speaker 1: I don't have to remind you all at the moment
in which we currently live is one that prioritizes the
inverse of whatever makes men strong, healthy, and capable. The
quality of our food continues to decline. Everything around us
contains plastic and the virtues of beauty and strength are
under constant attack by the spiteful mutants forced upon us
by the culture. To sustain ourselves, we have to take
physical action that cultivates and revitalizes our spirit. We must
return to being builders of culture instead of consumers of
a cheap synthetic airsats. Axios Fitness Coaching offers a pathway
to the physical discipline that is a necessary component of
that action. Axios Fitness Coaching is a premium resource for
holistic strength and conditioning services. Axios offers a standalone training
program as well as individual coaching options to meet your
specific fitness goals. Axios is best known for the Training.
Speaker 2: Club, an exclusive community.
Speaker 1: That prioritizes accountability, technique, diet, nutrition, everything you could need
to take action.
Speaker 2: Against the decay of modernity.
Speaker 1: By joining the Club, you gain access to over twenty
different programs that can be personally tailored to strength levels.
Available equipment and injury history. After taking a quick intake survey,
you can see if you are a good candidate for
the Training Club or any of the other services offered
by Axios. It is long past due that we take
control of our health back from the freaks and degenerates
that call weakness strength. Without action, there is only decay.
Speaker 3: Boy, oh boy, I hope everybody is not tired of
winning quite yet. There's gonna be a fun one tonight.
It's been looking forward to it all week, but we
are back for another episode a Pony Express Radio. And
this is the first Pony Express Radio stream where Donald J.
Trump is officially the President of the United States. So
it's a pretty important occasion that we've all gathered here for.
So welcome everyone. I'm joined tonight by mister Charlemagne. How
are you, Charlie.
Speaker 4: I've never been happier to read web page White House
dot Gov.
Speaker 3: Yeah really?
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 3: And we got mister Pequinonez.
Speaker 2: How are you, Pete total black pillared death.
Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly. Cannot be said enough in these times. Welcome
you back. Mister Paul Fahrenheit, how are you, sir?
Speaker 6: You know, normally i'd have something weighty to say, but
I don't have anything waity to say, just because of
just how happy I am for the past three days.
Speaker 3: And then we've got mister kingpil To joining us once again.
How are you, sir?
Speaker 7: I am waiting to discover uh you know, they say
if you have an erection lasting more than four hours
ago to the doctor, and I'm waiting to find out
what happens when it lasts for more than four days.
Speaker 3: Then your dick just falls right off. So hopefully it
does occur in your case. And welcoming back mister Philus missile,
how are you, sir?
Speaker 2: Doing well?
Speaker 8: Just a total c span enjoyer at the moment.
Speaker 3: Alrighty, thank you very much, gentlemen, forget here tonight. Oh man,
I'm just excited for this one. The only thing that
could have made this better is if this was episode
sixty nine opponing Express Radio. But we'll have to settle
for so all right, why don't we just get started,
fellas and going in with some of the massive executive
orders that Donald Trump was passing. Literally since the second
he took the Oval office, he was passing them, which
is fantastic. I mean, first of all, this is just
a homepage on White House doc up, which is amazing.
You know, America is back Donald J. Trump. It feels
so good.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: The other thing attached to this is they shut down
the Spanish language White House dock of site, which was azy.
It's nice to see. I don't know where do we
want to start on some of these executive orders, Fellas?
I mean, I guess you cold say from the very start,
I am so glad that they did this the last
couple of days, going right away, just signing things like crazy.
I'm surprised Trump has ran out of ink and his
pens already because he's just been signing these things like
you know, a baseball player signs autographs. Basically, it's pretty
much like the best case scenario that we were all
hoping for, you know, with watching the whole election cycle
and speculating what was going to happen when they actually
came into office. Are they going to be serious? And
I know it seems pretty damn serious to me.
Speaker 6: What do you think Thatllas to call it the best
case scenario is an understatement. This is a white Swan event.
This is I don't think in our wildest dreams we
could have imagined it. Was going to go this quickly
and this extensively.
Speaker 2: Well. Was the first executive order to repeal every Biden
executive order. I mean, that's incredible and to itself.
Speaker 8: Oh yeah, that's correct. And I've a summary that I've
used has been used by Pequinona's and others as well,
to just kind of go through initially chronologically from oldest
to newest, the appointees, which are very good, the flying
of the flag of full staff on inauguration Day, but
immediately after that the initial recisions of quote harmful executive
orders and actions. These are just to summarize super quick
the ACA stuff that was executive order, COVID stuff, DEI
all kinds of like gay whatever. I mean, it's pretty
much anything social justice related by the Biden administration was
explicitly revoked. And then throughout other executive orders Trump has
gone through and will consider policy enacted under Biden. When
going through federal guidelines and updating.
Speaker 7: Them, I've been blown away by just how thorough they are.
I mean, I don't know anybody who is more I
don't know optimistic, white pilled confident that the Trump administration
was going to hit the ground running and that some
good stuff was going to happen, and they've blown away
even my expectations. And they're they're seeming to they're hitting
they're hitting them from every possible, every conceivable angle. They're
drowning them in potential lawfare. They're attacking all of their
operations networks, they're going to war with the NGOs. Designating
the cartels as foreign terrorist organizations opens up all of
these NGOs, which is how they fund all of their operations.
It opens up all of them to charges of aiding
and abetting terrorism. And they're going after the sanctuary cities.
They're arresting people in sanctuary cities and they're threatening to
arrest They've directed the DJ that they're threatening to arrest
any politician that interferes in the sanctuary cities. They're hitting
them from every conceivable angle. And there's some rumors I've
been reading that from people who are close to the
Trump administration that they have two weeks of this planned.
We've gone through three days, I guess, I guess three
and a half days. They've got two weeks of this.
It's absolute blowtorch, like completely bludgeoning their enemies into complete submission.
Speaker 8: It's also in addition to aggressive instituting of their own policy.
They're also preempting and understanding what possible action might be
taken against them. So a lot of these executive orders
contain legal measures designed to prevent circumvention at the federal level,
and they're also revoking security clearances of over fifty high
ranking officials in the Biden administration. They're doing a bunch
of there's hundreds of these examples and the executive orders,
but they're tasking each executive agency head to partner with
other executive agency heads and cabinet officials to have like
redesignated federal missions, to have different mission parameters on different issues,
to declare strategic and emergencies about enemy energy needs, to
restore the death penalty. And they've covered their bases for
circumvention against these things within the executive orders. So this
was a very broad plan, but also with very specifical
and explicit Article two citations and US Code Title III
authority for this.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: One of one of the other things that was really
you know, white pilling for me to see was we
saw like accounts of these various like DEI positions being
reclassified as you know, other parts of the Department, and
immediately there were letters going out today saying we're watching
you doing this shit, fucking stop it, and all of
your those people are still getting fired even if though
you change the position names and all of these government agencies,
which was amazing to me to see. It's like it
really seems they're crossing their t's and dying their eyes
and watching all these people. They predicted their tactics, they
knew they were going to be slime balls about all
this stuff. It's like, no, uh huh, we're not messing around.
We're coming in.
Speaker 7: And basically Twitter as well, like people have been tweeting
about that sort of thing happening. You know, Hey, I
heard via the grapevine my cousin who works at x
y Z has said this is what they're trying to do.
It's gone viral, and Elon has replied with noted. I'm
starting to see this noted happening more and more. And
someone one of the replies told me said that that
looks to them like an AI automation that's set up
where he tweets noted at something and that populates a
database somewhere with a reference to that tweet. So I
think Elon is trawling through Twitter looking for these sorts
of things, looking for people who are reporting this and
getting it directly into the White House immediately so that
they can attack these things head on directly.
Speaker 4: Well, yeah, point basically, you can participate in this process now,
Like if you are employed at one of these federal
agencies and you can snitch on them legally obviously in
compliance with the orders that have been issued, you can
actually do that and it will get heard.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Seeing like the first thing that I noticed was
people were like black pilling over. Oh, they did three
hundred and three arrests on the first day, and that
was three hundred and three arrests of illegal aliens. Yeah,
they're going after the most violent first. That's exactly what
they're doing. And that's exactly what they said they were
going to do. Everybody was like, Oh, they're only going
to go after the most violent. Oh, you have to
you have to take care of this first. You have
to hit them before they have a chance to blend
in hid do whatever the hell they're going to do.
And just the fact that you see like they raided
the law office of some immigration attorney and I think
Providence rude one I mean, this is this is project
as much as Trump said, oh I don't know anything
about Projects twenty twenty five, this is Project twenty twenty five. Yeah,
I mean you.
Speaker 3: Best start believing in Project twenty twenty five. You're in it.
Speaker 2: YEA.
Speaker 8: The interesting thing about the policing, like, yes, you have
the triaging of the Interpol ret alert status individuals that
have murder extradition requests from other countries, but you also
have to imagine that this information was known to federal
and local authorities before the Trump administration took power. So
these guys have probably been sitting on these warrants for
these very very dangerous people and have been explicitly requested
by someone or a group of people to not follow
through on those prosecutions. So there's some very very interesting
stuff behind the scenes going on here too.
Speaker 2: What president in the past, what president in the past
would have attacked quote unquote clergy who spoke at spoke
on inauguration Day, I mean that is huge. Is basically saying,
you know, all of this fake and gay shit is
you're its open season and we're gonna shame you. And
if that doesn't work, who knows what they have planned.
Speaker 4: And this does show that there was a lot of
planned not just the orders themselves and the specificity of
the orders, but just the fact that on day one
all of these arrests were made. It's not just that
these the ICE agents and other law enforcement officers knew
that these people need to be removed, but there was
a coordinated effort prior to the inauguration to have these
guys ready to go and hit the ground running. So
the transition team absolutely pulled through on this one. Unlike
in twenty seventeen, this time they're actually they actually prepared
in all the right ways, and the agenda is going
at lightning speed. Like we mentioned earlier, you know, we've
we've touched on the diversity DEI stuff, we've touched on immigration,
but they are hitting the government so hard from every
angle with these flurries of orders coming out. There's really
no area of policy that hasn't been touched, going from
civil rights to immigration, to economics with the Central Bank,
digital currency mentioning, or the lack of what I should clarify,
the deep classification of JFK files. You know, I'm sure
I can't even remember all the ones we're about to go.
Speaker 3: Through the shrill baby drill, the restrictions on drilling in
Alaska for oil.
Speaker 4: You're reminded me of that. Also, just stuff to just
fuck with them, like rename the Gulf of mex you know,
like that's guys, that's literally in the executive order is
to instructing the Secretary of the Department of Interior, which
I think is the guy from North Dakota, to do that,
like that is happening.
Speaker 6: And then the very next week, God turns the Gulf
Coast white.
Speaker 2: And we don't. We're not. We have so much stuff,
so much material to deal with here. We're not even
talking about what he said to the World Economic for
him this morning, which was huge, and he told the
CEO of Bank of America d banking conservatives, yeah, that's
got to stop.
Speaker 8: And he told to go shove it.
Speaker 2: Yep. He basically told him, we we are a sovereign nation.
We are we are the leaders of the world. Fuck off.
Speaker 3: That was they.
Speaker 6: They always told me that Grand Battle Plan was the
worst doctrine of the four But it appears that the
Trump administration does not agree this. What absolutely stands out
about this about all of this, about what he said
to the wef what he's been saying to the banking industry,
what he's been doing, Like whole marine expeditionary groups are
being deployed to the border with live ammunition. It's as
though they are treating it as though it was a
combat deployment. I think the guards getting activated down there
in Texas and in other states to the border patrol
has been given complete free reign. What stands out about this,
about all the things that all of you gentlemen have outlined,
is the sheer deliberateness of everything. They sat and war
gained this out for four years, and they thought of
every single eventuality. Helmuton Moltke, the elder who was the
founder of the Prussian General Staff, stated once that in
the last analysis, luck goes to the most well prepared,
and in this instance, Trump and his whole administration and
whoever he pulled on had a plan four years in
the making, and luck just seems to be on their side.
Luck has seemed to be on their side since well
really for the last four years, but since definitely since Butler.
And that's that's just the one thing I want to
have emphasized above all else, is the is the sheer
deliberateness of this. You know, I'm plan trusters have been
completely vindicated.
Speaker 7: I just came across a tweet here from Marc szied
Esquire doesn't sound like an American name. He says he's
a nonpartisan, but he says it goes beyond what happened
at DHS and NASA today. CIA employees were told all
resource and affinity groups are canceled. No Black History Month,
no MLK celebration, no other ethnic recognition months. DEI folks
are to be fired rather than allowed to rotate to
former offices. CIA is also apparently banning lanyards that have
to do with affinity groups. Women's Council had to take
down website and cancel all events, including Women's History Month.
They're also compiling lists of members within affinity groups. And
then he says, because that's not reminiscent of the nineteen thirties.
So this is they're not doing like some token stuff
like just get some of these things out of our
way so we can operate. They are purging the federal
government of anything associated with any with any any pet
left issue, and by attacking them from all sides like this,
by just strangling them to death on their own, their
own arrogance. He's he's positioned himself where the Democrat Party exists,
will continue to exist at his pleasure, to the extent
that he allows them to exist, you'll maintain them as
controlled opposition. But they are being nuked from orbit and
all of their networks are being obliterated, and they're being
given very clear signals that you are not welcome here,
and we are going to hunt you down and eliminate
you from a participation in anything that's happening if you
even give a whiff of of of like an inclination
toward anything woke or DEI or ESG or Civil Rights
Act or I mean, I never imagined that it was
going to go this hard, this fast.
Speaker 4: Think, well, we should just take this moment to celebrate
ourselves a little. If you've been watching the stream for
the past you know, year or so, you know we've
been dropping some information that you know, we've received down
the grape vine that suggests, hey, uh, this is for real.
This time in the past seventy two hours have certainly
vindicated the information we've been giving people on this show.
You know, Matthew has been heavily vindicated since Vance was
selected as vice president. So you know, a rare moment
we should we should take just to uh, just to
note that.
Speaker 3: Yep, and all in the chat can fuck off.
Speaker 2: But one thing that my buddy John field House pointed
out today was another thing that was handed down is
no one can speak public No one in the government
can speak publicly, No press conferences, know nothing unless it's
run through the White House. No one can release anything
to the press. Wow, it has to be run through
the White House.
Speaker 3: That such a basically Trump's first term.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so basically you know, if you you know what
Luke Wack talks about when if you're going to have
a coup, you need to control the press, you need
to control the media. Well, this is this is kind
of the vers his version of doing that is, if
they can't talk to the media and he can, he
controls They control the narrative. The White House controls the narrative.
Speaker 4: You know, if you go back to the warfare example
that you know Paul had mentioned earlier, that's cutting off
the enemy's primary means of intelligence gathering.
Speaker 6: Go ahead, Paul, Well, and I'm the point I want
to make with this presidency. This is a level of
you know people, how it used to always talk about,
like Jarvin used to always talk about, Oh, we've got
FDR sized powers, but no one FDR sized has come
to use them. I haven't seen this violent of a
bully pulpit, of a you know, bully pulpit doesn't even
begin to describe as this is almost Andrew Jackson levels
of executive overruling of everything.
Speaker 9: And I.
Speaker 6: Really I think you Donald Trump. I think in the
in the grand analysis of American history, Trump, you know,
Trump wanted he began this. He wanted to be Reagan.
He wanted to be like Reagan. You know, Reagan was
this larger than life figure. But he ended up being
greater than Reagan. He ended up being so great that
he in American history. He's like the other side of
the Andrew Jackson coin, because Andrew Jackson was elected off
of a similar wave of support, a similar type of support,
except Andrew Jackson was pushing in the direction of global HOMA.
I Okay, I know some people may not like that,
but Andrew Jackson was elected on expanding the franchise. Donald
Trump was elected on restricting the franchise.
Speaker 3: And so.
Speaker 6: It's very highly possible that this will this will not
be the end. You know, these spirits are high and
we're very optimistic right now. But the sheer amount of
what he's done in just the past three days and
they said, hey, they have another two weeks of this,
I don't know. I firmly believed that the country would
be unrecognizable four years from now, you know, before Trump
was even elected, and I it may be for the better.
Speaker 8: It'll be unrecognizable in four months. And that's not like
idle talk. The hiring freeze that's occurring at the federal
level will be addressed within ninety days. They're going to
deliver emergency price really for American families. The assistant tasked
with this has every thirty days to update him. The
US has withdrawn from the Paris Climate Agreement from the
World Health Organization. Every Gen sixer has been pardoned. I mean,
you're if you're kind of like very immersed in the
federal apparatus and you understand what's going on with the
federal agencies here, what you'll see is that there's some
stuff that happened with reclassifying executive level agencies in twenty
nineteen to go against transnational criminal organizations. And also foreign
terrorist organizations, and that kind of like this total reconsolidation
of federal agencies is going into full effect against the cartels.
And it's a bit of a digression, but if you'll
permit me, just like one minute, what happened in twenty
nineteen when the United States decided to kick Hasbaalah off
the swift system and also to go against like Islamic
terror organizations financially, and they had to reconstitute the federal
government to do that. And what that meant was that
every NGO that was associated with this, including especially UNESCO,
they had all of their funding yanked because the terror
organizations could not funnel finances through their proxies to NGOs.
And so if you apply that same logic to the
cartels and NGOs, right, all of these immigration related NGOs
that make money off of getting whatever MS thirteen person
into the United States or somebody with a murder warrant
from Haiti or whatever or else Salvador into the middle
of nowhere in Ohio, they're now going to be complicit
in a betting an FTO, which is which puts you
under like Department and other federal agencies that have prosecutory powers,
which means it's no longer It's not just that it's
not going to be financially viable to do it, it's
that it's going to threaten the operation of your entire
end GEO for criminal charges.
Speaker 3: And you know, all of this that we're talking about.
On top of this, Donald Trump's approval ratings are the
highest that they have ever ever been. People are loving this.
Everyone is excited for the top on down. We've been
talking about the vibe shift ever since the election, you know,
on how the left really went quiet and walking around
the streets talking to normies. Everything just feels a little
bit different, like you know, the Saint Joe Biden's America anymore.
You could feel it.
Speaker 6: Man on that I like, we were all sitting there,
you know, over the past and you know the three
years that's elapsed since November the fifth, we were all
sitting there thinking was it really that easy? Because for
the past five, six, seventy eight, you can have said,
past ten years, some of us, going all the way
back to Gamergate, it's been like nothing but l after
l after l after l oh the left wins again,
The left wins again, The left wins again, and then
and then he wins the election and we're sitting there
waiting for the inevitable counter coup, the inevitable backlash, the
next J six and it it it just it just
doesn't happen.
Speaker 3: And mentioned that yet all the partying of all the
JA six people, but continue.
Speaker 6: Yeah, well yeah, we'll get to that.
Speaker 3: But but but like.
Speaker 6: I we, I don't know. I came out of the
a's fear. I think a lot of us did. And
you know, when you're when you're so inculcated in that
elite theory, you have this vision that these people who
hold onto power, they're just so hyper competent that because
they have to be. And I'm starting to wonder maybe
maybe they aren't. Maybe it really just was a nerve
that was pushing them as far as it pushed them.
And I just the one thing that flabbergasts me above
all of this is just how I don't want to
say easy, but how the left just kind of gave
it up. I don't understand it.
Speaker 8: It has to do a lot where the age demographics are.
The young people are on the right, the men literally
of action, and you have older people that are on
the left, the Boomer left is mostly the ones that
are in power in this country, and they have like
kind of minority people that fulfill subservient positions. But for
the most part, like the true power brokers on the
left are geriatrix. They're from a different time of the left,
the Bill Ayers era, the sixties and seventies and eighties
of the left.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, why don't we get into some of these eos
here there's a bunch of we're gonna be there's gonna
be a long stream tonight everyone, I'm gonna buckle up.
So in most recent going backwards. So this one just
came out today, the declassification of records concerning the assassinations
President John F. Kennedy, Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and Reverend
doctor Martin Luther King Junior. This one's been talked about
since twenty seventeen, when it was they were supposed to
be a released at the case in the JFK files
in seventeen, and they've been, you know, just dragging ass
about doing this for forever. I mean, to the person,
I'll tell you what, who's gonna be hurt most by
the JFK files being declassified, Like the entire kochsphere. You know,
people who've been making movies and streams about this for
years are about to take a serious torpedo to the side.
Speaker 2: They're not going to believe it. They'll just say it's
all lies and it's all made up.
Speaker 3: And yeah, probably, yeah, that's fair. Yeah.
Speaker 8: I think one thing to point out is, I mean,
I'm I'm a younger guy. I'm in my twenties, but
if you're an older if you're older than me, if
you're in your like between thirty and sixty, the kind
of JFK cover up is the most solidly fleshed out
idea that's been published, kind of on whatever alternative sphere
that you prefer. I mean, this is the boomer moment, right,
the truth about the JFK stuff. For a long time,
before nine to eleven, it was the only whatever you
want to call it, conspiracy theory that it was socially
acceptable to believe. And so this is going to vindicate
a generation, two generations of people that have been trying
to find out the truth about the JFK assassination, long
after everyone involved is dead. And I think it is
an intense sense of poetic justice that the person tasked
with you know, following up on this. The reason this
is happening is because the man's nephew is in the
executive administration. For this to happen, I mean, it doesn't
get more fun circled in that in terms of closure,
and I think some very interesting facts are in there.
I'm not an expert on it, but you have to
consider that it was supposed to be released several years ago,
and each consecutive year twenty twenty one, twenty two, and
twenty three, Biden went ahead and deliberately delayed declassifying these
documents for another year. So there is some very damning
stuff in there. Hopefully we'll get all of it. But
I would say like this is going to provide a
lot of fuel for like the Boomer Waffen among us.
Speaker 7: Also relatedly, Trump has said that Pompeo was the one
who convinced him not to do it in his first administration,
and just today he removed Pompeo's security details.
Speaker 3: It was hilarious. I saw that going around remove John
Boltons too, and a bunch of other people. He also,
in another cool gesture to RFK, Trump gave him the
pen that he used to sign this executive order, which
which is pretty cool. That's a good souvenir go go
frame that RFK.
Speaker 2: Didn't you remove? Also the all the security clearances of
the I mean, he's been removing security clearances left and right.
It's insane that there are people who don't even work
for the government anymore that have security clearances.
Speaker 8: I mean, these names are going to be these names
are going to be familiar. James Clapper, Leon Panetta, who
I think was Obama's sect f John Brennan, and John Bolton,
and those are just the names that like readily come
front of mind. Is like face to name association, and.
Speaker 3: Every one of those guys are like the worst scumbags,
all of them.
Speaker 8: And you have to consider like the tactical implications of this, right,
this means that if they're retired, they're not going to
be able to go to the media with any kind
of active TS clearance and hidden information. But if you're
familiar with the structure of the FED, what you'll also
understand is that like any kind of tamper ring is
now done by these people in this agency if they're
still active, and that a security clearance like denies them
a political future in the intelligence community and their credibilities
toast as well, because a clearance is you know, kind
of a cinecure of how to get shipped done.
Speaker 4: Yes, we should detail real quick specifically what's in here
is he said that I have now determined that the
continued reaction and withholding of information from records is not
consistent with the public interest, and within fifteen days of
this order, the DNI and AG will present him with
a full and complete plan to release the records for JFK,
and then forty five days of the other two so
there's not going to be any more redactions that aren't legal,
and within fifteen days from now there's going to be
a plan on his desk to release these completely. So
that's the target date.
Speaker 3: Well, we'll definitely be watching for this one, and no
doubt when these things are finally out there, it's just
gonna be all over Twitter non stop. This is gonna
be one of those stories that the day of breaks,
there's no way you're gonna get away with that.
Speaker 4: I mean practically too. If they have two weeks of
these orders lined up, and this is basically the plan
is hitting about two weeks after right, and then they
execute on that plan. If what is in these documents
implicates even intelligence agency or law enforcement involvement for it,
or law enforcement involvement in these assassinations, which no doubt
they will, that's going to be a serious blow to
exactly the people who are most dangerous to Trump is
the intelligence agencies, law enforcements agencies who aren't on side.
Speaker 6: Well, that's why he's doing everything he can right now
to cut off as much of their power and influence
as possible. That's why he put Tulsi as the Director
of National was it, Director of National Intelligence DNI?
Speaker 3: Is that right?
Speaker 2: That's right?
Speaker 4: Yet, so the current d and I will be uh
proceeding with this order.
Speaker 6: Okay, yeah, yeah, but but but but this is this
is what he's doing. This is why he's controlling all
information through the White House, is that he is cutting
off any of the intelligence agencies, you know, only form
of power and influence against him, which is intelligence, which
is you know, as as was said earlier in the stream,
leaking things to the media, manipulating stuff like that. And
I think I'm probably not the only one on this
panel who would like to see the dismantling of any
intelligence Frankly, I'm gonna I'm gonna be very radical here.
I don't think any intelligence agency that employees civilian should exist.
Speaker 4: I think all intelligence, I was going to give that
exact take, All intelligence should be military. Only military intelligence
should exist.
Speaker 2: Period.
Speaker 6: Yeah, that's it's it just it like everyone who's a
civilian has to go. It's it's that simple. Now, that
might create a whole other set of problems, but I
don't think anyone would shed any tears if the FBI
was just completely dismantled. I think even fewer tiers would
be shed if the CIA was dismantled and and all
the other ones. But yeah, no, these are absolutely Trump's enemies,
and I think he's doing He's made a tactically brilliant move,
and I think the intelligence agencies don't know how to
deal with it because they're not used to fighting someone
this competent.
Speaker 8: If you're on the left and it's two weeks from
now to the day and you have to choose between
looking at the mass deport I'm dead serious.
Speaker 4: If you're choosing between, it looks like two weeks to
stop the eos.
Speaker 8: What do you what do you report on? Because the
left is known for like Okay, I'm going to take
a story in a narrative and I'm going to run
with it for a week. If I'm on short notice
seventy two hours, this is going to be the singular
story that dominates all media sources for like a short
amount of time to distract from another narrative, right Edward
Burnet's style. But let's extrapolate, like, what are you going
to choose two weeks from now the mass deportations, all
of the other executive orders, all of the other PR stunts,
all of the exposes on Twitter that are going to
come out of like these federal employees complaining about getting canned.
That are your loyal constituents on the left. Or are
you going to consider like this very damning stuff that's
going to come out about the JFK assassination sixty years ago.
And you can only captivate public attention with maybe two
of these stories, right, So which do you give priority to?
You can't juggle everything that's being thrown at you, and
you can't also suppress any of this information. You have
no realistic ability to censor any of it.
Speaker 3: This is also in light of all of these major
companies laying off hundreds of more people. CNN just announced
today they're firing what is it like, five hundred more
people in their office because they're taking a raise to Again,
it's like the legacy media really really is completely dead
at this.
Speaker 2: Point, and they can administration and go ahead.
Speaker 4: And there's time pressure on these orders too, for the
disloyal people in the government they have, they have very
little time to decide if they're going to attempt to
break the law or not. And Trump's administration has made
it clear that if you try to go around these uh,
We're coming for you. So there's that time pressure to
an addition to what's on the media.
Speaker 3: But yeah, go ahead, Matt.
Speaker 7: Yeah, I was going to say, with the media, they
are the administration can really completely break their backs permanently
by the way they handle communications out of the White House.
They've already signaled like they've added the some of the
alternative media. I think they did, like Daily Wire or whatever.
But like alternative media people who are there getting the
press briefings now, and the way that the momentum is
picking up, they can easily just get start getting real
choosy about who they even allow in there. I saw
Trump basically telling the CN in person go fuck themselves,
and he wasn' going to answer any of their questions
on a clip just a minute ago. Yeah so news next,
Yeah so they can Like these these news agencies are
already like on their last legs, barely holding it together,
can barely maintain any any market share. They're laying people
off like crazy. They're going to have to basically completely
reimagine their entire business model. And if he starts cutting
them off from the White House, from the press briefings
and they're not the ones getting leaks, everyone else is
getting leaks, then even the even the quote unquote legacy
press world is going to get recycled. There's gonna be
you know, like Newsmax. I see now Newsmax has a
deportations counter on the achiron of counting up the deportations,
and I just tweeted last night that they need to
do something like this because it's gonna make the legacy
press people completely chimp out. They're going to strike sand
it and then streysand affect it, and then you're going
to get number go up mania. That just kind of
takes over people's monkey brains and they just want to
see the number go up, which which provides even more
cover for Stephen Miller to just do everything he could
possibly imagine.
Speaker 8: Did you know that right now, this stream, this moment
has more viewers at time of airing than the interview
of the Episcopalian bishop on Good Morning America that was
released slightly earlier. I'm not kidding. I'm not kidding like
that's funny, but I mean you also you have to
consider it. Good Morning America has five million subscribers allegedly,
But that bears like an interesting point. Who is putting
out the information? Where where did the Trump administration get
their ideas from for a lot of these managerial revolutions
and changes and alterations. Who broke down Curtis Yarvin and
all of these other theorists from the eighteenth, nineteenth, and
twentieth centuries to be able to pose it a different
vision of how this country should wield its executive Where
are these people tuning in? It's not the legacy media,
I'll give you that much.
Speaker 3: I think we can go back to talking more about
these eos in a moment. But this is topical because
we're talking about the media. But one of the things
that's very interesting to see is the immediate one to
eighty shift in all the leg of like the written
legacy media outlets over the last couple of days, as
it relates to a couple of huge things, the first
one being Elon throwing a Roman. I mean even the
fucking eighty l was pulling cover for him, which is
amazing to think about. There's no way in a million
years any of us would have thought that was the
case during like the Biden years, but did a complete
heel turn so like Rolling Stone like basically turned into
the Daily Wire by having a headline saying something to
the effect of the dangerous far right on Twitter is
trying to claim that Elon Musk threw a Roman at
a rally. It's like they're trying to gatekeep the radical right,
like from a conservative right position as opposed to a
left wing position. It's really amazing to see.
Speaker 2: One of the things that lets me know that they
listen to people are listening to our side of the
sphere is there was a comment the other day about Wikipedia.
Who ever talked about who talks about how Wikipedia is
basically a CIA up and how it's propaganda for the
for the existing regime. Other than our side and maybe
someone else can tell me.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's it's you know. I mean Charlie mentioned earlier
like almost like taking a pat on the back. And
I know none of us don't really like the self
congratulatory type, but man, it really feels good, like these
past couple of days to see a lot of the
stuff that like we've been reading the signs, we've been listening,
we've been uh, it'll work it hard all these years
and to see this stuff come to fruition is really
really cool to be honest, like I'm I'm excited. I'm
having a fun time. It is fun time to be
a white man in America again.
Speaker 6: Let me tell you, it won't come to complete fruition
until he fixes the military. That's the one thing he
hasn't yet done. And I get that's a big ask
and he's gonna need HEGSEF for that, But it won't
come to complete fruition until the two biggest things are
the base names are going to have to be restored,
and any soldier separated over COVID will have to be
reinstated that wants it at least and at the very
least everyone who is separated, and they were all given
general discharges, which is like a career killer. Good luck
getting any job with a other than honorable discharge.
Speaker 8: I think, sorry to interrupt, I think he said in
his inaugural addresser one other it was the speech shortly
after to the overflow a lot that he said, We're
going to reinstate every soldier who's discharged for COVID stuff.
Speaker 6: Yeah, of course, and I'm very hopeful he will. It's
just it's just it's a it's a it's a promise
until it occurs, but that will be really restoring the
Confederate generals to the base names. That's I think that's
going to be one of the biggest signs that a
lot of the damage has been undone and restored real quick.
Speaker 7: Regarding heg Seth, I saw numbers. I haven't been able
to follow everything really closely today, but I saw some
numbers coming through that looks like he's either going to
barely have the votes as it is, or he may
need JD to step in. And I think, really it's
like hinging on McConnell, like whether or not Mitch McConnell
actually votes for him. And there was a little thing
that dropped earlier this week that said that there's a
prominent Democratic senator who's planning on changing parties, and everyone
assumed Fetterman, and so someone asked him about that, and
Fetterman denied that it was him. And so I wonder,
as I kind of sort of think about the game
theory here, if I'm some sort of Democratic senator who
smells the way the wind is blowing and I want
to make my move, I want to to make the
power move here, which is to be the person who moves,
who's gets all the oh yay, he came to our
side sentiment from the magabase. If someone's going to do that,
and they're planning on doing it this next week then
or or it was it was in the future, in
the very near future. If they're planning on doing that,
well I don't expect that they're going to do that
to piss off the mega base immediately and be like
a turncoat. If they're going to make that move, I
would suspect that they want to make that move and
they want to make be be like a tie breaking
vote immediately that advances Trump's agenda and ingratiates themselves to
the base. So I wonder if if hag Seth winds up,
there's like some jockeying happening here where McConnell is getting
him through to this point, and then he's going to
turncoat on him and vote against him. And you get
a Democratic Senator who turns against the party and votes
for him, and that's what gets him through its sulation.
Speaker 6: If Fetterman, if John Fetterman is the tie breaking flip
vote to confirm Pete Hegseth, you can mail the check
to my house.
Speaker 3: That's all I'm gonna say. All Right, Well, we do
have a lot more of these eos to get through
that we want to talk about, So roll the next one, Doug,
thank you, all right. Strengthening American leadership in digital finance
and technology. This is that big five hundred billion investment
over the next four years in Austin to encourage AI research.
I don't know, King Bild, you've been watching these guys
like a hawk. What can you say on this?
Speaker 7: I don't know the details of this particular EO because
I haven't seen it yet, been away for about a
day or so. But with the the Doge thing is
kind of related here, and it's interesting seeing the angle
that they're they're taking on that were they they renamed
the United States Digital Service, which was an agency that
was created in twenty fourteen. I believe that was basically
kind of tasked with like maintaining it services and it.
They renamed it to the United States Doge Service. So
there's the agency DOGE and then there's the United States
Doge Service, and DOGE it has a sunset date, but
the USDs pre existed has been around for a decade,
and I presume that the intent would be for it
to continue being the United States Doge Service. But I
saw that they were talking about part of the DOGE
mandate being something related to software modernization, and they the
structure that they're using is teams of at minimum four people,
which is a team lead, an engineer, an HR person,
and an attorney. And each of these each agency is
going to have this like strike team basically that goes
in and they're using I think that kind of the
cover the auspices of the u U s d S
to be able to have access to everything. I think
that said explicitly that they're going to get everything that's
non classified. They're going to get access to all of
that data. And so with within that UH, within those auspices,
I suppose they're going to have access to everything. They're
going to be able to coordinate with o PM and
om B to UH to basically be able to see
where all the money flows have been going, who who
they've been going to, and effectively performing a gigantic audit
of the federal government. Now I'm very curious to know
what sort of software modernization? What is that? So we're
updating some of the software, you know that what what
what software is getting?
Speaker 2: Is this?
Speaker 7: Is this just updating existing software? Is this bringing in
new software?
Speaker 6: You know?
Speaker 2: Well, I won't.
Speaker 8: I I have personal knowledge, but I won't. I'll be
like extremely obtuse. Look at the three people that stood
next to him when he had this in the Oval office.
It was Larry Ellison of Oracle, Sam Altman of open AI,
and I forget the other one. But in the private sector,
corporate world right now, there is a moment where you
are being told you can either get on the train
or it's going to leave the station with this stuff.
And companies are either over the moon about this or
they're scared shitless. That's what's going on right now in
the corporate world for the AI stuff.
Speaker 4: Should also mention the previous one we had up just
on digital financial technology. That was the order in which
Trump ordered that there would be no usage or development
of any kind of central bank digital currencies within the Okay,
that's that one, which is an interesting thing in the
order as well. I didn't want to cover on that.
People just bring that up.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I've already heard people black pilling on that one,
saying that in the same order it talks about like
tether and USDC and everything, and that will just be
the central bank digital currency. So yeah, we're getting already
getting black pills on.
Speaker 3: I'm so, I'm just so fucking dumb with crypto people.
I'm sick of it. I'm sick of hearing it. All
these promises they've been made for years and years have
just not come to fruition, and I'm done with it.
So all right, carrying on because we've still got plenty
more of these to go through. So granting pardons and
communication com commutation of sentences for certain offenses related to
the events at or near the United States Capitol on
January sixth, twenty twenty one. This is the second one
he signed, right he did the first one, getting rid
of all the Biden once and this is theff like
first one he actually did himself, referring to his administration. Right,
so like promises made promises, act right.
Speaker 4: Yes, lots of black pillars said this would never happen,
and it happened basically immediately. I think everyone listening knows
about this already. But I mean, all I have to
say to the haters and losers is go fuck yourselves.
Speaker 2: Apparently, apparent Apparently what happened was that they sat him
down and told them, well, we're going to go through
all these people, and he's like, ah, I'm not doing that.
Just pardon them all, just pardon them all.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he said, yeah, that is that is absolutely the
right move as well with all this stuff, I mean,
like I don't want to waste too much time about this,
like I'm talking about black pillars and stuff. But anyone
who was saying that like oh, these people, like like
anyone who's counter signaling this release is just like enemy that.
Speaker 2: Is fay hey hey, no, no, hey hey, it would
be much better for them to stay in prison because
then that will radicalize the normies. And don't you know
that Hitler was radicalized in prison to do what he
can't a matter of person. He said, well, we're gonna
have to do this legitimately, I'm gonna have to get elected.
Speaker 4: No books, of course, which is what we all love,
is publishing books.
Speaker 6: Yeah, there's there's there's two things on this, on these
J six prisoners, and actually not one thing on the
J six prisoners, but one thing is to Yeah, I know,
red Hawk, you said, we don't want to, we don't
want to take too much time on the Black pillars.
But actually I I disagree with that, and I'll tell
you why. I think this stream needs to be Daddy's
built for the for the Black Pillars. It's unfortunately, you're
all wrong, and you all need to you all need
to have your faces rubbed and how wrong you are,
and you all need to be laughed at and humiliated
and scorned because you've done nothing but backbite and naysay
and doubt and and drag down this group of people
that has worked tirelessly to ensure that we have a future,
that you have a future. And so you know they
need if you see black pillars, they need to be mocked,
they need to be derided, They need to be insulted
and made fun of because their lack of faith has
been proven wrong on the J six prisoners itself. Have
they been so true on the J six prisoners themselves?
Have they actually been released yet? Because from what I understood,
the Mayor of d C was doing everything in her
power and all of the future astrophysicist guards were doing
everything that they could to get their last digs in
on these men before they were released. Where the marshals
have they been released yet?
Speaker 4: Basically, I've retweeted every confirmation of individual releases I can find,
so I don't think we can confirm that every single
person was released. I believe Musk himself tweeted something about
you know, if it's not happening, you know, get in
touch or something like that, So I don't I suppose
we'd have to go look at every all the lift
lists of all fifteen hundred people by finding their their
legal documents and checking Twitter for confirmation. So it would
be very difficult to confirm that every single one of
them has been released. But I doubt that if there
are any that have been haven't been released, it's going
to be ignored up until this point.
Speaker 2: Just remember Black Pillar being a black pillar means you
never have to say, you never have to admit you
are wrong. You can always find an excuse. Oh well
he said he was going to do that, and he
did it. But this is the reason why he's doing it.
I mean, it's the fuck you.
Speaker 4: And like, if there is if someone knows anyone or
has seen anything about a January sixth prisoner who hasn't
been released who is set for release, like just freaking
email us or something, you know, is it the Old
Glory Club at gmail dot Yes, yes, that is correct.
Just email us, Like, well, we will ensure that that
message gets out there.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: I don't think that's the case, but but there are
ways of people for people to address this, so I
don't I don't think they're going to be able to
pull any anything like that.
Speaker 3: All yeah, they're not going to be able to keep
these people locked up forever. I mean, number one, there
were so many people that were locked up. I can't
imagine every one of them was gonna be released on
day one here and Paul, you are right, I did
see a bunch of despicable characters. We're trying to hold
on to these people for you know, as long as
physically possible, right, and then people were tweeting about it
and raising hell and then more people got released, and
more people after that got released. I'm sure there are
still like that. There's still probably like a warm body
in a cell like somewhere who had something to do
with January six. But the way the winds are blowing,
I do not see anyone on that day like being
locked up for much longer?
Speaker 6: Can I can? I go on a very small rant,
real quick about the existence of the District of Columbia.
Speaker 2: D C.
Speaker 6: Exists as this fiefdom that is perpetually controlled by the
Democratic Party that they can basically do whatever they want
with with no accountability, And it has all of these
special law enforcement agencies and all of these special prisons
and all of these other things that they can just
disappear people to and it's a perpetual three electoral votes
and it's this it's this eternal fiefdom. And frankly, I
think that is one of the best arguments to move
the capital the capital if we're getting really radical. Trump
already basically governs from mar A Lago. I don't care
where you move the capitol to, but you need to
get it out of d C. The capital of this
country cannot continue to be in that town, and it
cannot continue to be in that district. As long as Washington,
d C remains a district, as long as it remains
a jurisdiction, you will have outsized inflame ruens is from
fifth columnists in this country who.
Speaker 3: Seek to destroy it.
Speaker 6: You you know, if we're in a radical mood, that's
what we need. That's the kind of thing that we
need to think. DC needs to be broken up and
its constituent territory needs to be given back to the
state of Maryland. I that's probably one of my most
radical anyway.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, just move it somewhere else in DC can
become monuments town or something like that, like just a
historical like a historical park or something. At this point, well,
but you're right, Paul, it cannot be there. It would
certainly be an effective way of removing a bunch of
government bloat, for sure.
Speaker 8: He already moved once capital.
Speaker 2: Move it to an island in the Gulf of America.
Speaker 6: Yeah really, you know, on that, on that he said,
it's not our fight.
Speaker 3: Oh oh yeah, haven't it. We'll get there, but we
must continue with the eos because we haven't even reached
the drop of the pocket. Yeah, and Rory like an
hour and plush in. So we must continue holding former
government officials accountable for election interference and improper disclosure of
sensitive government information.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: This was just the one where he revoked fifty experiences.
Speaker 8: And a parallel executive order to that. A different one
coming up here a few orders ahead is the removing
the back log of security clearances for all of the
personnel physically staffing his administration. So that means they're granted
a temp sc S t s SI clearance not to
exceed six months. So everyone's starting out that needs to
access classified information for the Trump administration is going to
have a temporary ts clearance and that's going to enable
them to make a in my thing that I wrote
a rapid and dynamic decisions very very quickly.
Speaker 3: Alrighty, since we already talked about this one, I was
waiting for this one to come up. Charlie, about this
one when we were talking about in the chat return
to in person work, All right, go off, Charlie.
Speaker 4: Go well, these government pieces of shit have to go
back to the office instead of sitting at home and
in coffee shops or whatever the hell they do all
day blow each other. Uh, now you have to go
to the office.
Speaker 3: Fuck you no more.
Speaker 8: Project Veritas Gay Bar Interviews with James O'Keefe.
Speaker 7: Yeah, there's two like maybe underappreciated aspects of this. One
of it is is it's and it's being used as
a way to get people to quit so that they
don't have to try to figure out how to fire them.
And exactly it also serves the purpose of having all
of these quote, these federal employees who sit at home
and drink coffee and post on Twitter or whatever all day.
So you're actually by forcing these people back into the office,
you're actually undermining the regime's activist class because now have
to come back to the office and work, and they
don't have the ability to just you know, wiggle their
mouse every so often and sit there posting on social
media or or organizing with people and doing activisms. So
there's a you know, it sticks a finger in their eye.
It actually makes sure that they're going to be productive
on working or whatever needs to be produced there.
Speaker 2: It's going to.
Speaker 7: Force a whole bunch of people to quit because they
don't want to come back, which then means you don't
have to pay them any longer, which begins reducing some
of these costs, and you undermine the activist class as well.
Speaker 8: And finally, DC is extremely expensive. So if you are
physically commuting to your office in DC from a local place,
if you have moved out of state or several states
away in the Biden administration, it is not going to
be feasible for you to return to the office. You
have to relocate and up end your entire life. I've heard, actually, Matt,
I think it was I'd have been one of your
things where you said they would give them some kind
of like pay separation, like they might just pay him
out to retire for sibly early. That's the ideal that
they would take.
Speaker 7: That was something that Vivek has talked about when he's
gone into detail and interviews in the past, talking about
what the Doejeffort is going to do. And I think
Andreasen echoed this recently, or at least Andresen has echoed
a lot of what Vivek said, So I'm inclined to
believe that he was being serious when he said this,
that they'll for some of the people who remain, So
they're going to fire whoever they can. They're going to
force people to quit by making will come back to work,
and they don't want to, so they quit. And then
for some of the remaining ones, they're going to offer
them something like a two year severance package where they
get paid extremely well to go away and quit their job,
do whatever they want for two years, and then re
enter the private sector after they've done all of the
reshoring and reindustrializing in everything. Is that all these new
jobs open up. That would be the selling point on it,
and which I mean.
Speaker 4: Exactly what Jarvin said to do way back when, by
the way.
Speaker 7: Exactly yes, And and honestly, when you're dealing with the
types of the amount of money that's flowing around, if
you took I don't know, five hundred thousand of them
and you offered them all, you know, one hundred thousand
dollars a year for two years to do nothing, you're
still dealing with with functionally chump change. And you're also
clearing out all of the all of the additional obligations
and stuff that they would have had to them in
the long run. So it's more than worth it to
pay them extremely handsomely to just go away.
Speaker 8: Put them in the Federal Bureau of Copper minds out
in like fucking Utah, and just have them go for
two years.
Speaker 3: I mean, I'm just happy about this more than anything
because it just slaps everybody in the face that we
all hate so for that reason alone, to do it,
regardless of all the other amazing things that the gentlemen
I've talked about.
Speaker 6: Sorry, real quick. An underappreciated aspect of this, too, is
the fact that this will result in a large sale
of federal office space, the majority of which is in
northern Virginia. And I hear a giant sucking sound coming
from the Northern Virginia real estate market. I want them
all out. I want them to leave. I want them
to go home. I want them to stop bulldozing the
woods and building subdivisions.
Speaker 3: I want everyone out.
Speaker 6: I want everyone out of Northern Virginia. I want them
all gone.
Speaker 3: Wait, you are never going to end your quest to
turn off Virginia read, are you, mister Fahrenheit?
Speaker 7: So someone said yesterday I can't find it right now,
but someone said yesterday that Trump has been floating the
idea of selling off I think it was two thirds
of federal office space. And of course all the Libs
were replying and freaking out because they were saying, well,
he ordered them all to come back to work, but
then he's going to sell off their office space, and
it's like yeah.
Speaker 3: Good, yeah good. It's like all these people who are saying,
in wake of all the mass deportations and the shutting
off of the Biden administration app now it's like this
place isn't safe to settle as Americans anymore. They're gonna
miss us. I'm like, no, I won't buy So moving
on to the next one, all right, Restoring accountability to
police influencing positions within the federal workforce.
Speaker 8: So influencing, Oh I can. I can go on about
this one for a little bit. Uh provides easier mechanisms
to terminate federal employees and additionally revokes other Biden administration
executive orders which provide explicit protections for federal employees from firings. Interestingly,
the Biden executive order established a fifteen dollars an hour
minimum wage, so technically the Fed no longer has a
wage floor for their minimum wage. Couldn't Oh yeah, someone
mentioned schedule F I'd have to look more into it,
but it's it's pretty technical.
Speaker 7: There's also explicit references to Article two Power and the
president's the executive power being vested absolutely in the president,
which is a case throughout a lot of these executive orders.
Over and over again, they're explicitly referencing Article two and
appealing to it for many of the things that these
executive orders are related to.
Speaker 4: Yeah, let me just read it opens with Section one purpose.
Article two of the United States Constitution vests the President
with the sole and exclusive authority over the executive branch,
including the authority to manage the federal workforce.
Speaker 2: So there you go. Nice, yes, and.
Speaker 4: Yeah, this this one is modifying a lot of other
legal code. It's the Schedule F executive order. I haven't
looked deep into everything that this is moving, but you've
seen the whole Schedule F idea talked about a lot.
So I don't think we need to dwell on this one.
Speaker 2: Nope.
Speaker 3: And anyway, as I keep saying, we got plenty more
as well. Oh, this one's great. I love this one.
Hiring freeze. They put an immediate was in a ninety
day freeze on hiring anybody in the federal government.
Speaker 8: That's right and interesting, so very interestingly. Not affected by
this hiring freeze are military, immigration, enforcement, national security, or
public safety like cops or.
Speaker 2: Firefighters or whatever.
Speaker 8: That also that also like very like I can't say
on a stream, but no like quoting directly from the
executive thing, no federal civilian position vacant when Trump took
office maybe fit at all, and no new position may
be created after this point. Within three months of twenty January,
the DOGE shall submit a plan to address efficiency improvements
and attrition. And there's also a clause at the very end,
which is if you're going to try to be a
dick and use contracting to get around this hiring freeze,
so instead of someone being an explicit federal employee, they're
like they're a contractor outside of whatever formal playskill that
is no longer in effect. And if you've been paying
attention to Twitter lately, you'll see like NASA, CIA, like
a few other federal agencies have been this internal email
is already going around saying like don't even try to
do this or make any kind of changes or get
around it or with the DEI stuff. And there's one
other thing about this it's the oh sorry, I'm not
going to remember that at the moment.
Speaker 4: Like you said, though, they thought of everything, including especially
with that bit about contractors at the end, and yeah,
the little bit of infailure just dropped. I mean, this
is having the exact effect that the administration was going for,
where these people are far too scared of the consequences
of disobeying these things to try to put everything on
the line to try and subvert them. So these executive
orders are having the exact intended effect on the entire
government apparatus.
Speaker 8: The other shoe dropping here is that after this hiring freeze,
once all the disloyal or politically opposed people are forced
out of this, they're going to have the Trump administration
is going to have to hire on a whole bunch
of our guys to manage and run all of these
different things and to participate in this. This is like
the other side of the coin that people are struggling
to think a couples ahead because so much is happening,
there's going to be a huge need for loyal right
wing people in this administration. I'm not saying it's something
anyone should do or not. I'm just saying like this
is the other side of the coin of the hiring
freeze to stop like a lot of the lib stuff
going on in the bloat. There has to be quality
people if you're forcing out the bad ones.
Speaker 4: Yeah, And this is the timeline here, the ninety days, this,
this sort of gift was the timeline for this this revolution.
I suppose we're basically looking at a first one hundred
days complete change in the government. The fact that that's
the freeze window suggests to be that they're going to
have everything basically set up for you know, ninety percent
of their victory condition after this first one hundred days.
Speaker 7: I just realized looking through this that it says within
that first ninety days, the Director of O and B
and OPM and the Administrator of the usdshall submit a
plan to reduce the size the Federal Government's workforce through
efficiency improvements and attrition. Upon issuance of the OMB plan,
this memorandum shall expire for all executive departments and agencies,
with the exception of the Internal Revenue Service. This memorandum
shall remain in effect for the IRS until the Secretary
of the Treasury, in consultation with the Director of OMB
and the Administrator of USDs determines that it is in
the national interest to lift the freeze. So this is
that's been a hiring freeze for the IRS because.
Speaker 8: Of the eighty three thousands or whatever agents. Remember if
you all remember that one.
Speaker 3: Well, I will say this as an accountant, the additional
hiring of IRS agents. So it was actually kind of
nice for my business because you can actually get a
hold of the I R S when you were finding
tax forms. But if they get rid of the IRS
and income tax anyway, I will be more than fine.
I will happily give up my career, you know, if
they get rid of the income tax, I will be
very very happy with this.
Speaker 2: Well, that was that. That was one of the things
when I saw that they were creating that external revenue
service that I thought was, I mean, are they looking
to scale back the IRS or eliminate it completely? I mean,
I know that this is you know, wish casting and everything,
but that's the first thing they came into my mind was, well,
I mean, if they were going to create a brand
new department, a brand new department for that, and they're
looking to scale back and not hire anyone new in
the IRS, something could be going on. I don't know.
Speaker 3: Well, I wouldn't even call it a wishful thinking pete
in the sense of I remember we talked about this
the week after Trump actually won the election, in the
sense that we were talking. I don't want to hear
anybody for the next four years say the phrase they
can't do that. It's like, no, we just like it's
like total Trump victory all across the board. I mean,
we like good, we could literally ask for whatever the
fuck we want at this point, like nothing is off
the table.
Speaker 8: There's so much happening behind the scenes, and like I
don't it's an interesting thesis if you've heard. And I
can't speak on his behalf, but Stormy mentioned that, like
Jamie Diamond is on board with the World Economic Forum
and just going there dropping a bomb last year and leaving,
he did the exact same thing today. Trump spoke at
the World Economic Forum. Things are going to start changing
for Europe. They want to ump up the defense payment
from two percent to five percent, which doesn't sound like
a lot, but that already is going to like totally
blow over a lot of European budgets which are already
stretched to limit. And if you know, I don't have
an economics background, but there it's not just that Trump
has a bunch of political people on house with him.
It's that he has the full corporate business igo and
kind of banking and financial interests are kind of gearing
up behind him as well. And I think there was
some other thing that Jimmy Diamond, I mean, you're kind
of advising Trump for two years.
Speaker 2: Well he knows, he knows that if they have central
bank digital currency, wall Street disappears. I mean, central bank
digital currency just basically takes Wall Street out of the away.
You can't you can't operate Wall Street on a central
when there's a central bank digital currency. So I mean
that's why there's a lot of self interest in these
guys too. You know. But Jamie Diamond talking today about what,
what do you say tariffs were going to be really
important because of national security? That's right, and he's he's
basically representing the Pentagon. And if you want to know why,
go down and look at the board of JP Morgan Chase.
There's going to be there'll be one thing you'll notice
or only there's only two or three on there, and
there they're lawyers, they have no decision making at all,
and most of the people on there are either intelligence
or former military. That's right.
Speaker 8: And one other. You know, a lot of people don't
know this, but one of the biggest kind of leaders
in national security policy for this country, especially at the
end of the Trump administration the last time was the
Treasury Department. So all of these, I think the Treasury appointment,
I think it was Scott Bessont very very interesting stuff
about his confirmation Like these these are very you know,
I don't want to call it radical because this is
going to be the new normal here very very shortly.
But this is a significant departure from anything the United
States has done for the last like several decades in
terms of its like national security and economic policy.
Speaker 6: Well, for you know, as all of you know, as
a as a former banker, I am a part of
the Banker's Guild that all bankers in the United States
are a part of. And I just got off the
phone with Q and Jamie Diamond and they are currently
liquidating all Rothshield assets in the United States as we speak.
Speaker 7: Scott is a is a guy to keep keep an
eye on. He's a stone cold killer, and he's been
talking for I've gone back and listened to some of
his interviews over the last couple of last several months,
and he was part of the George Soros team that
beat against the pound and crashed it in the nineties.
He's a he's been a what would you call it,
like his Stan Jarckon Miller is basically like his his mentor,
and he's been talking about the necessity for a Breton
Woods two point zero and just completely changing the entire
global monetary system. And he's also just recently he was
they were talking about about immigration, and he said, he
basically said, in not so many words, GDP is a
bullshit metric, like it doesn't who cares if if immigrants
helped GDP. He's like, well, if that's the case, then
why don't we just set up a road from Tiaro
del Fuego to the United States and bring in the
entire world. The GDP would go through the roof, but
the wealth per capita would go through the floor. So
he's he's a we've got a sovereigntist immigration restrictionist in
the at Treasury along with a sovereigntist FED. And this
is the first time that this has basically ever happened.
Shout out to Longo for doing a lot.
Speaker 2: Of You have a seventh generation American at the head
of the FED, and Besson is a ninth generation American
French Huguenot too. Yep, nice, All.
Speaker 3: Right, we must carry on to the next one, reforming
the federal hiring process and restoring merit to government service.
This is slashing all the DEI shit.
Speaker 2: Yes, this man they want.
Speaker 4: Yeah, this one is one of the de orders. And
it also mentions DOGE and here as well. You go
ahead with your thought while I skim this.
Speaker 2: Well. I was one thing I noticed was that the
they what did they do? They basically closed down every
DEI office in in the government, in any government agency.
And like you could see, there were some people on
on Twitter today who were showing that like they had
some like some woman was head of DEI and then
they like changed they had her she had somebody change
her title on a website and everything, and people were
calling that out and going no, no, no, no, no, no,
you can't change your title now. Yeah, no, you can't
do that. And yeah, I mean they're they're going hard
after this. I mean, you know, we already talked about
how the Spanish white The Spanish White House website is gone,
and there's a bunch of other DEI apartment departments in
on government website said if you try to log onto them,
you get a four to ZHO four.
Speaker 4: So this order is interesting. So this is about developing
a federal hiring plan that prioritizes people committed to improving
the efficiency of the government, are loyal to the constitution
and willing to serve and faithfully serve the executive branch.
That's mentioned specifically reduce time to hire to under eighty days.
Also it ties in DOGE. It says the Federal Hiring
Plan shall provide specific best practices for the human resources
function in each agency. This is me talking now obviously
that is an enemy castle. Human resource is right back
to the text, which each agency head shall implement with
advice and recommendations as appropriate from DOGE. So basically DOGE
gets to insert itself into the functions of every single
HR department in the entire federal government in terms of
making recommendations.
Speaker 3: That's huge.
Speaker 8: I want to float something here that you guys might
not know and I can't say too much for conflict
of interest, but the AI stuff that Trump's pushing. It's
part of that is Larry Ellison an Oracle, and what
does Oracle do? Human resources Software Salesforce might merge with them.
All these other human resources SaaS companies are in a
position to gain tremendous amounts of power here and they're
all on board with it. And if you notice, they're
fronting their own money for the five hundred billion dollars
this is going to take. That's very exceptional. Why would
you do that when you can get you know, I
don't know, five hundred billion in federal funding. Well, it's
because you will control everything that happens if it's your
money going into this process. And if you look at
the hiring mechanisms, like in the private sector, you would
never wait for two years to get your application processed
and to have every background check and to go through
all the legalisms and to relocate, to go through everything else.
But that's not commensurate with the private sector practices. Right
the public there's a concept that you're going to hear
a lot in the next six months. That's the concept
of the public private partnership between private corporations and the
federal government. That's what the sole DOGE thing is about.
That's what the hiring reforms are about as well, and
that's the merit stuff too.
Speaker 7: There's an additional element here as well, with the DOGE
being intimately involved in hiring. That an under talked about
part of the Project twenty twenty five platform or whatever
you would call it, was the Presidential Personnel Database, where
they've been for I don't know a year and a
half now, they've been recruiting people. You can send me
your application and go through their training program basically teaching
you how to be a federal employee, like how to
do it. And from a conservative perspective, there's it's very clear.
I've been saying this for a year now that I
don't care how many times Trump disavows Project twenty twenty five.
It's obvious the Project twenty twenty five is a go
because all of the people that he's surrounding himself with
are all Project twenty twenty five people, most notably Russ Vote,
who is the head of OMB and he was the
deputy director of OMB the last time around. He's very close.
Like the entire setup here is that you have the
DOGE effort, and then you have the head of OPM
on the Office of Personnel Management, and then you have
the head of OMB. And going back again to what
Vivek was talking about when he was describing these in
detail on the Sean Ryan Show like a year and
a half ago, he called out the head of OPM
and the head of OMB is two of the most
important roles to make the entire got the executive branch
bureaucracy and eliminated all like those are two of the
most important roles. Now you're seeing the way that DOGE
is set up. It's set up to interface directly with
both of those roles. And russ Vote is at OMB
and I forget the guy's name, but a former andreasen
Horowitz guy original Andreson Horowitz guy is at o PM.
So they very clearly are making a top priority of
this DOGE effort. And if DOGE is going to be
involved in all of the hiring going forward, I would
suspect that they're going to be drawing heavily from this
presidential personnel database of people who have been trained by
the Heritage Foundation. And some of our friends have gone
through this and they have reported back that it's incredibly rigorous.
It's not just some like token like answer some questions
or hears some stuff. It's like even down to things
like how to relate to the media as a conservative,
knowing that they're going to be hostile to you, how
do bills, how to actually get a pill a bill passed,
how to relate with lobbyists. It's they've gone into great
detail to train people to be career federal employees who
serve Republican presidents.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, it is nice to see all the stuff all
coming together, and then obviously, like it's been a central
part of the OGC. We've been talking about this from
the very beginning, the DEI stuff and the anti whiteism
throughout all levels of the government. It's nice to see
the stuff getting rolled back, No doubt we'll be talking
about the undermining of you know, the the branches on
the tree that is the Civil Rights Act are being
caught away, which is very, very nice to see. More
on this later though, carrying on to the next one,
ending radical and wasteful government d we just talked about
this one as well. I think a big de order,
right m hmm, yeah, yes.
Speaker 4: Yeah, terminate to the maximum extent allowed by law all
DEI and environmental justice offices and positions, including but not
limited to, chief Diversity, all officersitions, all equity action plans,
equity actions, equity related grants or contracts. Yeah, this is
one of the bigger ones. In another one that's deeply satisfying,
one of the culture war issues filos or anyone else.
Do you have anything particular you want to drop on
this one?
Speaker 8: So the big thing, there's so much nuance to all this,
it would like go on, But I just want you
all to consider that every I mean, I hesitate to
calm qualified, but like your top tier DEI grifters are
already employed at NGOs, right, They're already at tenure at
the ivy leagues. They've already filled all the other possible
elite cast positions that are out there.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 8: The ones at the FED are the ones that couldn't
make it into the lucrative areas. So you have to
consider the fact that all of these people who have
just been terminated from these federal agencies, not reshuffled, but canned,
they're going to have zero row job openings for their
you know, master's level education and focus in a regardedly
bullshit area. But you know they're not going to be
able to compete with like the clouding gaze of the
world and the uh you know, all of these other
types of people. There's not. The reason this field existed
in the government in the first place to begin with
was because it was a make work jobs program and
that the people that couldn't hack it in the other
NGOs and private sector still had an ability to make
their political loyalty bones matter in return for a paycheck
and pension and benefits. But that's done. There's no mobility
for these people. They can't go to the newspapers, they
can't go to the media, they can't go to like
think tanks, they can't go to NGOs, they can't go
to Ivy's nothing. It's done. Like the second order effects
of all of these things are very interesting.
Speaker 4: Yeah, go ahead.
Speaker 7: Reading down here a little bit more. Maybe you were
going to get to this, Charlie. I don't know, but
there's there's bullet point two here. So not only to
a MAC extent, provide the Director of the OMB with
a list of all agency or department dea dei deia
or environmental justice positions, committees, program services, activities, budgets and
expenditures in existence on November four, twenty twenty four, and
an assessment of whether these same list of things have
been misleadingly relabeled in an attempt to preserve their pre
November four, twenty twenty four function. Also a list of
all federal contractors who have provided de training or de
training materials to agency or department employees and federal grantees
who received federal funding to provide or advance all of
those things since January twenty, twenty twenty one. They're making
a list. So it's not just we're going to terminate
all of this now, we're going to make a list
of everybody who was involved in this before and you're
going to get blacklisted.
Speaker 4: Also, I was looking at a different point too. If
you go on the next section, there's there's a to
inform and advise the President. The Assistant to the President
for Domestic Policy shall convene a monthly meeting intended by
the Director of the OMB, which we just talked about,
the Director of OPM, and each deputy agency or department
head to and point two here is discuss any barriers
to measures to comply with this order. So basically there's
going to be a monthly compliance meeting on this executive order,
and by barriers to measures to comply, it means that
anyone trying to resist this order is going to be
brought up in this meeting the deputy department heads, where
agency heads are going to be grilled on complying with
this on a monthly basis.
Speaker 3: All I have to say is just remember that the
regime wanted this all along, so all part of the plank.
Speaker 4: All right, yeah, I think we can move to the
next one.
Speaker 2: I mean, she was just a job, right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, all right, carrying on ending a legal discrimination and
restoring marior based opportunity. Mary talking about this one ducks
drink at the night apparently, No.
Speaker 4: I think this is a different one. There's yeah, there's
there's a couple of different ones that kind of all
touched in the DEI policy. Let me let me see
if I can recall why why I wanted this one
in here. Let's see terminated legal discrimination. H oh. This
is the one that revoked Executive Order one one two
four six, which was the Johnson era, the order regarding
UH federal contractors and what they called affirmative action back then.
So that's that's why this one's in here. So yeah,
we should have had Executive Order one one two four
six up. But that was the order that required federal
contractors to abide by affirmative action rules, which they will
no longer have to do. And there was an interesting
discussion lasted on Twitter in the Nathaniel Green Society space,
which is one of our chapters, about this and some
of the knock on effects that's.
Speaker 2: Going to have.
Speaker 4: One of our members brought up the fact that now,
due to fiduciary responsibilities, these private corporations who are federal
contractors are going to have to make changes within their
companies to align with what the federal government is requiring
of them. So revoking that order has a pretty large
scale effect on all federal contractors.
Speaker 3: Yep, some more good stuff, slowly chipping away at that
one thing that we definitely need to get rid of
Civil Rights Act. So it's a start, all right. Moving
on the next one, defending women from gender ideology extremism
and restoring biological truth to the federal government.
Speaker 4: And that's just a great name. But this this was
interesting because it introduces definitions from male and female into
our common law tradition. Female means a person belonging at
conception to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.
Male means a person belonging at conception to the sex
that produces the small reproductive cell. So that is how
they have defined men and women in this part of
our legal framework now, which is just interesting to note definition.
Speaker 3: Biological terms at conception.
Speaker 6: Yeah, he's snuck in the he's snuck in the at
conception too, so that the federal government regards life beginning
at conception now mm hmm.
Speaker 8: If you recall from all of the Biden administration confirmation hearings,
especially like the Supreme Court justice ones, all the Republican
senators would ask like what is a man? What is
a woman? And all these fucking worms would say, oh, well,
it's really difficult to say, I'm not an expert, there's
no federal definition because it was so obvious that it
was never felt to be said. That is something that's
not going to be able to happen anymore. Another very
interesting thing, like another secondary order effect, is that all IDs, passports, visas,
global entry cards, and others have to reflect male or female.
So what this means is that if you are a
transgender you are going to get a letter from the
federal government that says that you have to make an
appointment to go back in and put down A or B,
M or F. That's like, seriously, like, that's what's going
to have to happen because they have a lot of
bullshit things right, and every federal woke agents, they're not
going to be woke anymore. Every federal agency that is
used as ID cards or global entry, which is the
US Canada, one one of these little DMV type organizations
in a blue city is going to have to look
a bunch of pink haired people in the eye and
pick the blue stamp or the pink stamp. And that's
just what's going to have to happen.
Speaker 2: Watching six foot four guys with stubble who put on
a wig every day having to go in and do
that's gonna be one of the best things. Well in
the history of this country.
Speaker 3: Well, you guys know who's gonna be affected the most
by this is Nancy Mace, So her crusade against them,
the truants can finally shut up and on to hear
about this fucking woman anymore.
Speaker 8: No more, it's ma'am. It's just it's man. That's what's
gonna happen here on out.
Speaker 3: All, right, move going on? By the way, are we
tired of winning yet?
Speaker 2: Like?
Speaker 3: All these are great?
Speaker 9: Right?
Speaker 3: Have we found any reason like bitch about any of
these yet? This is just fantastic. I just want to
take a moment again to stress how like amazed I
am of how good it's been the last couple of days.
Like it's far exceeded my expectations. This is great. Moving
on reevaluating and realigning United States Foreign Eate. This was
a great one too. The fact that we even have
foreign to begin with. It's something like what like the
United States provides foreign eight it's like one hundred and
seventy some odd of like the one hundred and ninety
sovereign nations on the planet. It's fucking stupid, all of it.
Speaker 2: Well, a lot of that. If you read I'm sorry.
Speaker 4: I was just gonna say, bring up classic Trump tweet
about I hope you don't find aliens because if we do,
the federal government, we'll start sending them money.
Speaker 2: Well, it's classic. It's what what Littwack talks about it him, kude.
He talks about, how you know, as long as big
country is providing aid to a smaller country. They have
that country over a barrel. And I mean, and that's
what the you know, are controlled government for this last however,
you know, since the war has tried to do things
just to control every single country out there. That's why
we have bases in all of those countries too. So
I mean, I remember flying into friggin Reikiyevic and being like,
this is one of the most beautiful things I've ever
seen in my life. And then you land in the
airport and there's a C one thirty right there. It's like, Okay,
well fuck, you know, I mean, and I know I
think that that I forget what they have at the
airport up there, but it's just like, geez, I just
want to go see a beautiful country. I do not
want to see the friggin I don't want to see
the empire. The first thing when I land in the airport, you.
Speaker 8: Have to consider that if the d D is the sword,
then the Secretary of State Department is the purse.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 8: So, in addition to like the offensive of the US military,
the real thing that's been roping every other country in
the planet into our vast cultural experiment is foreign aid.
That's distributed through the State Department. And this might be
something as massive as like all the money they're giving
to the Taliban, or it might be like, you know,
some bullshit arts project. This is another make work thing
for even more nameless NGOs, right, because all of this
stuff is done THROUGHNGO, Like the big thing to consider,
it's not just like you put the State Department label
on it and they fly out and drive a Cadillac
and go do their thing and go back to the embassy.
Like this money gets distributed through a federal grant to
an NGO, which is another make work apparatic job that's
no longer going to be receiving funding. So this is
another indirect action. It's also going to be stepped on
by the Trump administration. And like I'd have to check
the numbers again, but the amount of money the United
States sends overseas, like you could call this a proxy.
But since nineteen sixty, through all of the different IGOs,
through all of the different United States foreign trade things,
through all different European money, which is actually American money.
You know, America has put a trillion dollars of foreign
eight into the continent of Africa, a trillion dollars since
nineteen sixty has been spent out of this country of
its own wealth. So this is long, long overdue. And
all of the other people and agencies and NGOs that
have built up a career in existence in a mission
just giving away our tax money that is far far done.
Speaker 2: It is over.
Speaker 4: You know, it's for those organizations this is an entire quarter.
Imagine your organization not receiving money for a quarter. That's
that will devastate these organizations just with this temporary free
is alone.
Speaker 6: It's it's really possible that what you're seeing here is
something akin to Turkey declaring independence from the Ottoman Empire.
It's you know, the United States is seceding from its
own global empire that isn't really its empire, if you
know what I mean, it's someone else's, and it's going
to take the whole rest of the world with it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, just obviously the correct move. Well, even file as
you're mentioning the trillion bucks sunk into Africa, Yeah, we've
really got a lot from that.
Speaker 4: There is a waiver in here. I think the ukroids
have gotten a waiver.
Speaker 3: Yeah sure, yeah, I think yeah, I saw that.
Speaker 7: I think that's probably to maintain leverage for negotiations.
Speaker 8: Absolutely, there's been some rumors footing around that Trump and
Putin are going to meet sometime soon, and.
Speaker 7: The sound of it may have happened.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it should be. It should be interesting, all right,
onto the next designating cartels and other organizations as foreign
terrorist organizations and especially designating global terrorists. We were kind
of mentioning this a little bit more as to how
they declared it a hesblan hamas terrorist organizations. But I
would like the OGC to personally take responsibility for this one.
With our Sacario review, Steven Miller himself watched it and
we declared that we'll make this movie real. So yes,
I love it.
Speaker 6: Well, it's it's almost like we could take this massive
security state that we've developed over the last thirty years
and then use it to actually fight the huge the
security threat that's right on our borders. It actually affects
our domestic situation. Wow, it's amazing.
Speaker 3: I mean, by all rights, the only country US should
be at warwith is Mexico. I mean literally fucking place.
Speaker 2: So you know, you know what good When Ron Paul
ran for president in two thousand and eight, what did
he say, to do with the military bringing home and
put it on our borders. He was seventeen years eighteen
years ahead of this, and he was the only one
at that point saying it. Everyone else was worried about
the war on terror, you know how that bad they
were fucking up Iraq and in Afghanistan. But I mean,
he was there, gone that they should be protecting our homeland.
What jeez novel idea.
Speaker 6: Yeah, smash Like, if you even I know, I know
we did our Sacario movie review, but if you even
can gentially start looking into what these people have done
and what they continue to do and what they are
doing right now, and you you see that we have
this massively overfunded, you know, national security apparatus and they're
being used for insert Middle Eastern country. I don't know,
it's it's it's reprehensible, but it's it's going to change.
Speaker 3: I've seen a lot of pushback on this one. Oh
go ahead, Charlie, there you go. I've seen a lot
of pushback on this one, more than any of the
other ones, to be honest. A lot of people thinking, oh,
this is going to be a war on terror mixed
with a war on drugs. Right in America's backyard. This
is going to have major repercussions in the American like
in the heart land. We've talked about on the show previously,
how there are huge cartel operations in the middle of
many of our national parks and national forests. There's gonna
be blood in the streets now if we start doing
this kind of stuff basically like threatening people, It's like, well.
Speaker 4: Uh, playing what like War on Terror wasn't domestic the
whole time anyway.
Speaker 3: The resident the thing is, it's like, oh, well, you
can't stop the raping of your people. Because you try
to stop the raping, they're going to rape you more.
It's like, fuck you, mister.
Speaker 2: Was the last time we've got I was just I was.
Speaker 6: Just gonna make a joke. I was gonna be like,
I've already bought the order. You don't need to sell
it to me more.
Speaker 2: What when was the last time? When was the last
time that the government did something like this where they
actually meant it nineteen fourteen, where they actually wanted to
do what they wanted to do. I wanted to accomplish
the goal and not half ascid and you know, somehow
turn it into a away for companies and lobby groups
to make money.
Speaker 8: Well, like I mean I bring that up in Jess,
but also as a matter of truth, in that Sacaria movie,
I think there's the line that the president goes for
like to sign whatever treaty and he brings like five
thousand US troops with him, And I mean, I will say, like,
people really underestimate what it means to have something as
a foreign terrorist organization. The Trump administration at the end
of the first term went ahead and designated all these
different things, and every single organization that had any kind
of proxy was sanctioned by Treasury as a result of
being affiliated with a foreign terrorist organization. So people think
that like it's just going to be mowing down the cartel,
and yes, that will happen. That absolutely is going to happen,
and it should happen. The other element that's going to
have is that the financial might of the United States
is going to go against every single money laundering or
finance related industry that backs or relates to the cartel
in the United States and overseas. Because there are no
restrictions to foreign or domestic sanctions if that is the
end goal here, because those have already been eliminated with
the creation of what's called the OCDETF, which is a
partnership that was put together in twenty nineteen under the
first Trump administration that has Coast Guard and DEA and
DoD elements and IRS agents and any law enforcement that
wants a piece of this can get it. That infrastructure
has already been set up by previous first term policies.
And what's going to happen is what happened to Hesblah,
which is that at every single sanctioned entity or proxy
just got rolled up and obliterated by Treasury in real time.
So the one other thing is that there's two and
a half trillion dollars worth of illegal wealth that's going
around the black market of this world, and a lot
of that goes through terror groups and a lot of
it goes through the cartel. And so it's not just that,
like you know, the Homeland Security Task Forces in all
fifty states like keep a very close eye on what
they're doing. It's not just ice that's going to be
conducting these actions, right there's all sorts of federal institutions
that are getting involved, and they're going to do a
whole lot of action here and it's going to be like,
all that money that's going to get taken is going
to go right to the FED. From the cartel.
Speaker 2: There is no.
Speaker 8: There's no like piggy bank or other entity it can
be directed towards. If money is seized by the Treasury Department,
it is now the Treasury's money. So all that cartel
money is going to be going to the FED. And
there's so many interesting things that are going to happen
because of that.
Speaker 7: In the text of the executive order, they also give
a little hint as to where else they're signaling. Here
it says international cartels constitute a national security threat beyond
that posed by traditional organized crime, with activities encompassing one
convergence between themselves and a range of extra hemispheric actors,
from designated foreign terror organizations to antagonistic foreign governments, two
complex adaptive systems characteristic of entities engaged in insurgency and
asymmetric warfare, and three infiltration into foreign governments across the
Western hemisphere.
Speaker 8: Why do you think it is that, just three days
into his administration, phone call with of L Salvador.
Speaker 7: Yes and Boule made a big deal, a big show
of the big drug bust that they made one hundred
miles off shore, They busted one hundred million dollars worth
of coke, and he had a whole whole tweet thread
about it, going into great detail about it, and I thought, well,
that's very interesting. Why is he making such a big
deal out of this particular bust.
Speaker 8: Because what do you think he gets to do when
it becomes the Gulf of America and he's buddy buddies
with Trump?
Speaker 7: Now mm hmm.
Speaker 8: Who does he get to host in his country to
conduct operations? Who does who advises who in that situation?
Who looks at the prison systems that have been set
up in Al Salvador and the prosecuting efforts and the
special operations tactics on the ground and learns from them.
Speaker 2: Are guys yep?
Speaker 3: I mean one final thing I'll say on this topic,
and I guess I'm you know, you always find yourself
on checking on like previous positions and kind of fighting
back on some of the stupid shit used to support before.
I know a lot of our guys come from like
a libertarian backgrounds and very much like you know, do
whatever you please as it relates to the drug issue,
kind of deal. It's like, well, you know, clearly, just
outlawing something just doesn't work because people still want to
get it. Like that is just complete fucking bullshit. Nobody
wakes up in the morning it says I'm gonna take
some fetanoyl today, Like nobody fucking says that, you know.
And there's all this subversion that goes around trying to
say like, oh, well, you don't want to ban alcohol.
Alcohol is actually more dangerous to you than weed is.
It's like, we've tried this experiment, all right. People are
not responsible enough to have like legalized marijuana in the
United States. It's just not real. Every city you walk
around in smells of weed all the fucking time. People
are like drugged out of their brains. This is experiment
that has failed.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry this is They tried it. They tried it
inportant They tried it in Portland. How did that work?
App they decriminalize everything. Yeah, they went back on that
one pretty quick.
Speaker 3: It looked like the fucking walking dead, you know, in
your streets, and people.
Speaker 2: People are like, oh, well they did it in Portugal,
and well they did it in a small country that's
pretty much homogenous and it worked out for a while. Okay, good,
that's not what we got.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, this is ridiculous. You can just ban things
and people don't want it. This kind of brings up
another discussion, like you can just band stuff, you guys,
Like following the discussion about certain states in the United
States requiring like age verification to visit like porn sites,
and like the porn sites just like leave, it's like
you can just ban shit, all right, That's how it works.
So I'm done with this argument about like, oh, we
need to be like free willing about drugs.
Speaker 8: No, yeah, TikTok as well. I mean, you know that's
recented and it's technical, but it was banned for a
period of time.
Speaker 2: M hmm.
Speaker 7: I'll also add two to the in response to the
people who are like, oh, no, the cartels are going
to start lashing out in the United States. Those cartel
guys are very well aware of the story of Trump
going to the Taliban leader and handing him a picture
of his house and saying, if you hurt a single America,
like a single hair on an American's head, I'm going
to drop a bomb on your house and walking out.
They know full well and especially now that was that
was first term Trump. Now the way he's going nuclear
on all of these these the agenda so far, if
they start getting rowdy in the United States, Trump is
going to rain holy hell down on them. And I
think they're fully well aware of that. All of that
is it's basically like people running propaganda campaigns for cartels,
which if they're doing that, then they need to be
dealt with.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 6: Yeah, these these friggin Central Americanos. I see them on
Twitter and they're talking about, Oh, every white tourist in
Latin America is now free game. There's going to be
massive reprisals, massive reprisals. It's exactly like you said. These
people are known, their houses are known. It is no
small matter to drone strike them. You know, if this
is a game the cartels want to play, they will
find out very quickly this is not the environment that
they survive in they survive.
Speaker 3: The other thing I have to laugh about is that
small hat president of Mexico who survived the other thirty
five assassinations of various political rivals of hers to become
the president of Mexico in this last election, saying that
Mexico is going to protect and defend its sovereignty from
encroachment from the United States of It's like, what fucking sovereignty?
Your country is entirely ran by criminal gangs. It's barely
even a country.
Speaker 8: A country that had thirty revolutions in thirty years. It
was so fucked up in the eighteen sixties that they
had to ship over a European aristocrat, a member of
the royalty from Austria Hungary, Maximilian In to govern them
for three years until they killed him too. So what
does that say about Cortez.
Speaker 3: Cortez didn't go far enough. That's that's what it says.
Speaker 7: But one of the journals asked Trump, uh, would you
consider sending the special forces into Mexico to go after
the cartels on Mexican soil? And uh? And Trump just
kind of smiled and said, maybe crazier things have happened.
Speaker 3: That is another thing we haven't really talked about. It's just, Uh,
it's really nice to see Trump once again with this
masterful way of dealing with journos like no other. No,
he's just taking questions left and right in the Oval
office while he's signing these things. He's just btfoing every journal,
like every CNN person saying, oh, it's it's nice to watch.
How how sorely we've missed him the last four years.
Speaker 7: Someone made an as MR for Republicans video that's just
the sound of his marker signing executive.
Speaker 3: Amazing. All right, moving on to the next one. All right,
Securing our borders. I've kind of already mentioned this some
a little bit, but yeah, in combination with the mass deportations,
authorizing a bunch of National Guard, and it was like
the troops from the Pentagon to be stationed at the
southern border, closing off the Biden. You know, after everyone
was using the end of the country. We saw the
numbers that ice at the southern border. In the last
week before like Buying left office, they had something like
ten thousand apprehensions in like a week, and then in
the three days since Trump has been in office, they've
only had like six hundred. I think they're not fucking around.
Speaker 4: Yeah, this one's interesting because it lays out specific policies
like establishing a physical wall and other barriers, removing promptly
all aliens who enter or remain in violation of federal law.
This one's interesting. The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary
of Homeland Security shall take all appropriate and lawful action
to deploy sufficient personnel along the southern border of the
United States to ensure complete operational control. Obtaining complete operational
control of the borders of the United States is laid
out of here. That's pretty interesting language, and it sounds
like they intend to do a massive operation in terms
of the number of personnel deployed along the entire border.
Speaker 2: Well, this goes to something some of us were saying
about why Rubio was selected as a Secretary of State.
It wasn't a gobble friggin you know, circumcised dick. It
was so that he could deal with Latin America. And
from what I understand, he's already being being deployed somewhere
in Latin America America to talk to talk down there.
Speaker 6: I love how housebroken Rubio is. I love how much
he's just gotten with the program.
Speaker 7: Are you guys familiar with this account on Twitter America
twenty one hundred.
Speaker 3: I might recognize the PfP how much for it with
PFPS I am with names.
Speaker 7: On titter Go check it out because I've been following
them for a while. The our ancestors settled a continent,
conquered a wild frontier, built beautiful cities, and sent mento
the moon, America deserves the future as great.
Speaker 2: As it's passed.
Speaker 7: The penned tweet is basically kind of like a hype
video with an edit of all the great American heroes, science, building, military,
et cetera, et cetera. They've been completely embedded in with
all of our guys and everything. And I just learned
recently that this is a project that was started by
Rubio's chief of staff, who he brought in as there
was some hullabaloo with the media when they brought him
in because he's like a finger in the eye of
traditional conservatives and or like the traditional Republican establishment. He
brought him in. He was his chief of staff for
like five years, and then they parted amicably for this
chief of staff guy to go start this America twenty
one hundred project. It started in June of twenty twenty three,
and Rubio has been I'd never given him any credence
at all. I thought he was just a total loser, squish,
you know, jewish cock, gobbler. And now I'm going back
and I'm looking at some of the stuff that he
said over the last couple of years, and someone reminded
me that he was the only member of Congress I
think who actually went to go visit the January six
ers in prison and was horrified that they were like
blockading him. They weren't allowing him to go see them.
And he came out and he was speaking out about it,
and nobody was doing anything. So I find this. I've
been tracking some of these things over on the Astrolabe.
I've done a couple of stories on Marco Rubio and
he maybe whether it's cynical or and it's just you know,
he knows the way the winds are blowing, and he
knows how to this game and he doesn't care either way,
or he's genuinely taken a populous turn. I'm actually much
more heartened at the thought of him as Secretary of
State than I was before I discovered this little connection here.
Speaker 4: Interesting. Yeah, I linked that in the live chat. It's
just America twenty one hundred. It's America Underscore twenty one
hundred if you want to find it on Twitter, So
I will definitely make a note of that. I think
I have seen that account's profile picture a couple of times.
Speaker 7: They've been like loudly anti mass migration, like mass deportations,
and very much into esthetics, very pro Steven Miller, very
much like we need to have esthetic architecture, and it's
been I would have never in a million years guess
that this was associated with Mark Rubio.
Speaker 4: No, And I definitely don't want to know him too excessively,
just because I am totally open to the idea of
him genuinely coming over. And I mean, as long as
people come over and perform their their duties loyally, I
have no problem with them.
Speaker 3: Al any very interesting, So definitely be on the lookout
for that. And like Joe the city LinkedIn in the chat,
So take a look, all right, Moving on to the
next one, protecting the American people against invasion. What are
the what's the fine prints on this one?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 4: Another another border one. Let's see, I'm gonna have to check.
Speaker 8: Oh, this is the one that has Homeland Security task
Forces in all states objective and the presence of criminal cartels,
foreign gangs, and transnational criminal organizations directs DHS that's Tom
Homan to efficiently remove recent entrance and other aliens. This
is huge and very very legalistic. It wasn't this one,
but one of the other border ones brought up altering
the mission of US NORTHCOMB. And it's strange to me
because you would think that the you know, the military
is divided into different formal commands and areas of operation,
and you would think that the one tasked with protecting
the sovereignty of the United States US NORTHCOMB would have
actually done something. But like, when I think about it,
I've never ever heard of the US military taking any
action to like preserve territorial integrity the United States, and
like taking that just like on its face as a
statement that's completely insane that our military has never actually
like protected you know, especially because these people coming over
the border are armed or conducting criminal activity and harming
domestic citizens. And you know, I appreciate the federal liaisoning
with the military, but like I under the fifteen hundred
Trump is sending is not. I hope that's just the
very tip of the iceberg, because you're going to need
a huge I mean, you are going to need a
military to effectively propose and conduct action kinetically against cartels.
Speaker 3: It's going to happen.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I pulled up the other order you mentioned, and
it says yes, no later than ten days from the
effective date of this order, the Secretary of Defense will
deliver a revision to the Unified Command Plan that a
science the United States Northern Command us northcomb the mission
to seal the borders and maintain the sovereignty, territorial, integrity,
and security of the United States by repelling forms of invasion,
including unlawful mass migration, narcotics traffing, human smuggling and traffing,
and other criminal activities. Yeah, so that's big. I'm glad
you picked up on that.
Speaker 8: It's just to emphasize like it's a strange attitude because
on the one hand, this is very, very radical to
all of the things that we've come to expect with
Obama and Biden. You know, I remember growing up listening
to Rush Limba on the car and you know, oh,
they renamed Mount McKinley to Mountain GNOLLI year, Oh, they
renamed this base to this you know whoever the fuck
to Fort Libbert, whatever it was. You know, we've grown
so accustomed to insanity that were like astonished by normalcy
in this administration. I mean, it's really, on the one hand,
it's very like saddening and depressing that we had to
wait so long for something approximating normal in the common
sense to come into effect. But on the other like,
it's so uplifting that we finally have an executive that
is willing to just come out and say, like, this
is an invasion, these are the actions we're going to take,
and all of these federal functions are going to serve
their intended constitutional purpose as it exists. Like someone said it,
I forget where I heard it. Whoever said that. You know,
the left is right about one thing, that the Constitution
is a living document and that if the people in
charge use it as a living document, they can make
radical change in this country.
Speaker 4: There may be some knowledge, there may be some knowledge
military people can drop. There is a there are changes
to the contingency planning guidance and the guidance for the
employment of force with Northcommon to seal the borders. And
there's also a campaign okay rules of engagement, And there's
also a campaign planning requirement for Northcom to provide steady
state security and continuous assessments of all options. So this
is actually establish wishing rules of engagement apparently, And also
this is something that they're they're basically permanently going to
be constantly assigned these duties. It's not there's not some
temporary operation happening. That's the new continuous mission for North KOM.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I go.
Speaker 2: Ahead, Py, Yeah, this is just a side thing. Isn't
it interesting that he's been in office for three days
now and basically every time we've seen him, he's been
behind the resolute talking to talking to the press, and
just signing executive orders. I mean it's truly like he
is sitting there as the king and he's ordering as
he signs these things, these orders are given out to
go and accomplish them and do them. This is exactly
what we wanted from him. This is what we wanted
from him the first time, and this is what he's
doing now. He's not I haven't seen him raise his voice,
haven't seen him act like Trump. He's just he's acting.
He's very very calm, and I think it's it's something
to keep just keep an eye on to see if
he keeps this up where it's just that I'm in charge,
I'm going to sign these things. You guys are going
to go out. Other people are going to go out
and take care of them. Boom. That's it. I mean,
And he's just answering questions from the press and you know,
being in that he's being Trump and doing that in
the way he does it and everything, having conversations with them.
But this is exactly what I wanted to see.
Speaker 8: Imagine you're in the military and like even before this,
you're probably if you're a homegrown white guy, you're a
Trump loyalist. Right now you're getting deployed domestically, and your
commander in chief that you probably voted for twice has
been shot, you know, and there have been multiple attempts
on his life. There's an element of like, you know,
I'm watching what Trump's doing, and there's a consider he
I think he really intrinsically understands at this point that
he's at war, and I think that people that he
has around him, you know, there's no I would argue
that he has very little time for bullshitters this time around.
You know, if you're just if you're it's been striking
to me, Like if you look at some of the
people that initially staffed his uh first administration, like a
lot of these people you had to be fucking crazy
to sign on to Trump for his first administration, to
get crucified in the press, and to have your career
ruined by like woke politics throughout like the first term.
But like the people signing on now, like i'd imagine
Trump has some serious discernment with everything that's been thrown
at him and like significantly more institutional back and you know,
very radical ideas like I would have met, you know,
because there's so much behind the scenes that I would
love to know, which is like, you know, when Trump
in the final months of his campaign before the election,
you know, let's say he probably knows he's going to win,
and he knows he has to start putting policy together,
and there's some serious people that come up to him
and they start saying some radical shit for a man
who's seventy eight years old, you know, and after Butler,
he's probably looking at the radical stuff and you know
his attitude, like Pete's saying behind the Resolute desk, he's like,
all right, this is what's going to happen, and there's
not going to be any questions, and this is just
how stuff's going to play out. You know, there's no doubt,
there's no consideration there's no olive branch here. I think
that's watching the manner in which he conducts himself is
just as important to watching all of these executive actions
that are coming out well.
Speaker 4: And he's also said, and I agree with this, that
he believed that God spared him from that bullet to
save America.
Speaker 2: He's on.
Speaker 4: Divinely endowed mission here, and that's I think that accounts
for the type of calmness you see, and also the
resolution to act. I think that that bullet may go
down in history as being the bullet that changed even
more than the one that hit I guess it was
a Franz Ferdinand whatever, a grenade or whatever, like somebody.
Speaker 8: Remember, some of his interests are very clearly, like you know,
especially with the Ross Ultrich thing, it's like, okay, you know,
a group of people has specifically lobbied him for this outcome,
and he finds it reasonable, so he makes it happen.
But I think this is just a theory that you know,
after after the Butler thing. That's why I think he's
looking into MLKJFK and r f K. I think it's
more than r FK Junior just pulling him aside and
being like, Joe, please find out what's going on here?
You know, I think it's I think there's like, I mean,
I think there's far more of like a damn like
if this happened to me, what else is going on
in Okay, the UFO stuff, Well, what's happening there? Like,
you know, there's no more if there's no red tape
in any of the DEI and all these other initiatives
and every other issue that we've been complaining about for
a couple of years, you know, if there's no more
red tape for that, Like in his mind, it's probably
like why should there be red tape for any of
these other assassinations? What's happening here?
Speaker 2: You know?
Speaker 6: This this really is the all the doing of the
intelligence world and the interests that went into the intelligence
world immediately after the Second World War, the past seventy
five years. You know, Blame cannot be laid at the
foot of any single group of people or any single organization, yes,
even them. Blame has to be laid the feet of
a great many organizations and people, many of whom are
dead and gone, And there's nothing you can do about it.
But this tyranny of the black Chamber of these these
agencies that have complete unaccountable power, that are unelected, that
are more or less held in perpetuity by a cabal
of interests. And you know, as we said earlier, you know,
don't have don't have even the military aspect of them,
of that kind of accountability. This is all they're doing.
This at least a large part of it is they're doing.
And I pray if Trump is willing to do radical things,
and he hasn't even I mean, it's something we haven't
even mentioned yet because it hasn't There's been such an
overwhelming amount of other things. Trump hasn't even opened up
the committee investigating his own assassination attempt. Yet he almost
certainly will. He almost certainly will. And once he investigates
his own assassination attempt and he releases the files on
JFK and you know Michael King and and and and
you know rfk's dad, these these, I think it's all
going to point to the same end goal. And I
pray pray that Cash Mattel is the last director of
the FBI and whoever he's appointing to the CIA is
the last director of the CIA, because I think more
than any other institution in the American government. These agencies
are the newest, they have the most outsized influence, and
they they just need to.
Speaker 3: Go entirely possible. But all excellent takes all around, gentlemen.
But we still must continue. So moving on guaranteeing the
state's protection against invasion. Talked about this one a little bit,
with each state having to deal with their own security,
national guardsmen and all that fun stuff. Is there any
more fine print on this one?
Speaker 8: Not this one, but one of the fine prints on
another one of the southern border ones was invoking researching
the possibility of invocation of the Insurrection Act of eighteen
oh seven and also the Alien Enemies Act of seventeen
ninety eight, which is a deportation of any male over
the age of fourteen thought to be a betting an enemy.
Speaker 3: Well, nothing more than I have.
Speaker 4: I think we can move on past the border ones.
We've kind of hit all the now.
Speaker 3: This one's spinatory, yeah, yeah, restoring the death penalty and
protecting public safety. Yes, obviously this should be a thing.
Why this was ever taken away is stupid?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 8: Yeah, I do have a thing real quick on that
is that within it there's a little clause about how
he's going to look at all thirty seven people that
had their sentences commuted by Biden and advise on further imprisonment.
The significance behind that is that a commutation is not
the same thing as a pardon, right. A pardon is
that you've been found guilty in your toast, but a
commutation of sentence is just like an alteration of like, Okay,
well we're not going to put you to death, but
there's going to be some kind of alternate or punishment
that has to be found. And that's a battle between
federal ag and state ags. And it also advocates two
interesting pursuits of the death penalty. The first is murder
of a law enforcement officer and the second is a
capital crime committed by an elite alien. And if you
look at those two crimes, and if you look at
the YouTube channel police activity, you know it's a very
dark element of our country. I mean, honestly, it's it's
totally insane on that channel what happens. But you know,
you begin to see the kind of person that this
will apply to. And I'm going so the last thing
I'll say is that this fiction that the SPLC and
all these other NGOs put out that, like, well, the
death penalty should just be a detorrent if it's ever
to be used at all. Is ridiculous. No punishment has
ever deterred anyone, except for a certain nineteenth century Western
Old West style of punishment which I don't want to
fed post. But that's just about the only type of
thing that will actually deter anyone is carrying out the sentence.
Having it on the books is not a deterrent to
its action.
Speaker 3: Well yeah, I mean you can look at all these
NGOs and all these like the Innocence Project. It's like
all these people that they get out of prison, it's
like ninety five percent of them go on to commit
more crimes afterwards. They're all like scum, almost every one
of these people that they find. I mean, the point
about putting the death penalty to illegal immigrants guilty of
a capital crime, I mean, boy, oh boy. Nothing quite
puts the fear of God in somebody like saying well,
we're going to put you to death. I mean one
thing that I really despises the fact that we have
the stuff where it's like, oh, we're going to put
you on life for twenty years, and then we're going
to execute you afterwards, like ridiculous.
Speaker 4: Justice should just let me just quote from a let
me just quote from this order, just to hammer this
point home. In addition to pursuing the death penalty where possible,
the Attorney General shell where consistent with applicable law, pursue
federal jurisdiction. Okay, so they want federal jurisdiction over crimes
and seek a death penalty regardless of other factors for
every federal capital crime involving the murder of a law
enforcement officer or a capital crime committed by an illegal
So yes, he's literally the order is basically saying, we
will execute every single one of you who murders our
law enforcement officers as we're proceeding with your deportation.
Speaker 3: Nice. I like it again, same thing movie, talk about
the whole stream. I'm not finding anything that I really
dislike about any of these. Moving on protecting the meaning
and value of American citizenship. This is the birthright citizenship one.
Speaker 4: Right, Yes, I think everyone knows about you know what's
in this one at this point where yeah, he's suspending
birthright citizenship. This has already been struck down by a
district judge, which we expect to happen. That's actually good.
This idiot is doing a exactly what uh the administration
no doubt wants to happen, which is to get this
into the court system and bring it to the Supreme Court.
So thank you idiot for immediately doing exactly what we
needed you to do.
Speaker 3: God looks like, tell my God, Jesus.
Speaker 4: I just looked at his face. That's that's him. What
the hell man?
Speaker 3: These people ten out of ten? Yeah, thank thanks, partner.
All right, yeah, but uh so the report and.
Speaker 2: I first, yeah, go ahead, throw something in there. So
Senator Jacob Howard drafted the citizenship clause of the fourteenth Amendment.
Here's what he said. It meant. This will not, of
course include persons born in the United States who are
foreigners aliens who belong to the families of ambassadors or
foreign ministers are credited to the government of the United States,
but will include every other class of persons. And his
emphasis was added on persons born in the United States
who are foreigner, who are foreigners. So this was anything.
Anyone saying that that the Fourteenth Amendment gives created birthright
citizenship is just doing what they always do, just going
around the original intent.
Speaker 4: Now, so this is the last executive order we had
lined up. I mean, there were a few more that
could be mentioned. I don't know if Filos had any
more on the executive order front. You did that big
summary that made the rounds.
Speaker 8: Yeah, the last just one really quick thing is if
you look at the history of the Fourteenth Amendment and
the way it's been used at the Supreme Court level,
the two biggest rulings that have advanced the civil rights
regime are the equal Protection Clause and the Interstate Commerce Clause.
And if the birthright citizenship component of the Fourteenth Amendment
is up for debate, I would wager that some other things,
including the executive order revocation of lbj's stuff, and that's
already been revoked as well, like that points to a
broader shift in a constitutional reinterpretation that might change the
posture of the Supreme Court on how it adjudicates on
certain Fourteenth Amendment clauses going forward, and that can have
huge ripples for the country and the way that we
consider civil rights law in this country.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 3: Oh, the only one that I wanted to mention. Also
with this we kind of touched on it a little bit.
Throughout is the cutbacks of all the various environmentalism bullshit
that has held us hostage from drilling for oil and
other natural resources in the United States, and also pulling
out of all the Paris Climate Accord bullshit, which is
just completely nonsensical, particularly when India and China are the
biggest polluters in the entire world and we all know
what those people are doing to the environment. So good
on that for rolling back all that bullshit. So well,
that's the end of the executive orders talk. Now let's
actually get into some of the highlights. You know they've
been going around clips and Sacha. First, we've got this
amazing photo of some of the ice raids and sending
them back, which.
Speaker 2: Is one of those threats.
Speaker 3: Is this illegal alien from Haiti?
Speaker 7: I says he's a gang member with seventeen criminal convictions
in recent years.
Speaker 2: You feel mean you, Biden, bro? Thank Obama put everything
that he paid for me?
Speaker 4: Yes, thanks Obama? Indeed, Oh yes, this is a gentleman.
Speaker 2: This is someone who's just this is someone who's just
contributing to the tax coffers and raising the GDP.
Speaker 8: You couldn't put a better face on the policies too.
I mean that's a perfect clip. Thank you people, explicit
executives for letting a freaking lunatic like me and and
these specific guys have my back.
Speaker 3: Oh man, this is this is what the Obama phone
lady looks like right now.
Speaker 6: You know, you know the reason why these cartels have
so many military assets, and while a lot of these
gang members have so many military assets and all these
guns and all these things that they used to terrorize
and kill people and all this other stuff. Remember Eric Holder,
I'm the Operation Fast and Furious. Remember that, that's how
they have all those guns.
Speaker 3: What an idiot decision that was? We're going to give
the cartels weapons so we could track the serial numbers
to see where they go.
Speaker 6: It wasn't an idiot decision. I think they knew exactly
what they were doing.
Speaker 8: Well, yes, but do you have the other clip right
after this of they they're talking to Tom Homan. Yes,
I was gonna say that, and he goes, yeah, he's
going back to eighty.
Speaker 3: Amazing, fantastic. So uh that have been going around? I
love it? Yeah, so's there's a bunch of clips of
ice raids and deportations going around, which ah man, it
really warms my heart to see. Man, oh man, Like
we said this on like day one, that the promises
were made at how many Trump rallies into debates, you know,
every single you know, I'm a speech at the r
n C. They were all saying on day one, we're
gonna start the biggest mass deportation operation in the history
of the United States. And boy, oh boy, I'm here
for it, every minute of it.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 3: I'm glad that you mentioned King Pilda News Max is
having a live deportation calculator. Oh man. I want that
projected like on my screen in my room every morning,
so I could wake up and see that number go on.
Speaker 7: Maybe the iitter account also posted their their stats so far.
I don't know if they're going to do this every day,
but they should.
Speaker 2: They should, Yes, the you know, for those of us
who you know, like to just gamble amongst each other,
we could get a pool going for what the number
will be at midnight, Easter and every every day.
Speaker 3: That's the kind of sports betting I want to have happened,
you know on the NFL. Yeah, I want.
Speaker 4: That well actually, but before we started, I suggested What
they should have done is mint NFTs for each individual
before and then you could like you know, buy them
like Pokemon cars, collect as many deporties as you want.
Speaker 6: The problem the problem with that is you run out
of variations of Roberto Guzman.
Speaker 3: Amazing turned into like a trading card. It's like the
monster cards on the ones with face tattoos.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 7: It reminds me of when I was growing up and
you'd have like the missionary people who would come to
church and you could like sponsor a Nigerian kid and
and through school or something like that, and they'd send
you pictures periodically of like how he's doing, and here's
his textbooks and whatever else. So like you could you
could buy an n FT for a particular a particular
guy and he gets deported and then you just get
periodic updates about what he's up to.
Speaker 3: It would be so amazing. All right, let's talk about
some of the other highlights from inauguration day. What are
the the biggest one that was going around which I
was in my office on on inauguration Day. I wasn't
able to watch any of the festivities live, and I
saw the scroll cross my timeline almost immediately as it happened.
I just happened to pick up my phone and see Twitter,
and I sweared to got it. I thought I was
like having a stroke, Like when I saw this, I
just could not believe my eyes. Let's play the famous
clip of Elon.
Speaker 5: This one really matters, and I just want to say
thank you for making it happen.
Speaker 3: Thank you.
Speaker 2: My heart goes out to here.
Speaker 5: This one really matters, and I just want yeah.
Speaker 3: So perfect. Oh my god, I'm looking at everyone in
the chat. They're doing the thing in the chat that's
gonna be the new salute perfect. Good work, guys. We
kind of already mentioned this earlier when we were talking
about the media and how even the ad L had
to like pull cover for Elon on this one, which
definitely signals like huge changing of the guard. We do
not want to be pissing off the richest man in
the world or getting a defamation suit. So amazing.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 3: Do we have the clip of him and Baron next
to each other? That was that was some amazing. Yeah,
here we go, look at up so perfect. Do you
know what this reminded? Do you know what this reminds
me of? Do you guys have this like in like
in your grade school, in your high school or something like,
we're the absolute chad of the class just happens to know,
like the most autistic nerd in the entire room who
kind of like hangs out with him because they knew
each other when they were kids or something like that,
or their parents were friends, you know, and like Baron's like, God,
who's this autistic guy next to me?
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 7: I saw someone caption this as like the the executive
who just sa the big deal with the client and
the engineer who knows he's going to have to work
all night to deliver it in the next seven days.
Speaker 3: I've seen a lot of memes with this one. I
think A d tweets something about this is like the
aristocrat and the merchant or something like that, and made
the rounds. So, yeah, there's been some funny Baron edits.
There was that one going around. It was like, I've
seen this same image going around at least like ten
different times, and each time I see a baron slightly
like it's slightly taller. It's like a At one point
I saw it at the end where what used to
be like this ten foot tall baron is now just
his foot moving up to the White House like he's
just an absolute like Leviathan.
Speaker 7: Now, it's kind of like the the like medieval or
older art where they would it might even been all
the way back to like hieroglyphics and stuff, or they
would have the character they would make a guy a
lot bigger to indicate his like his spiritual size, that
there was like spiritual weight to him. He was a
very significant person, so we draw him much bigger. That's
kind of what it reminded me of that there's we're
meming Baron into this role that he's happily stepping into,
and he just carries so much weight himself that he
he just sort of is like the room is starting
to move toward him every time. There was a picture
that someone tweeted out of the inaugural ball and him
sitting at a table with he had, I don't know,
Jeff Bezos and Marco Rubio and some other like executives
and he was the one holding court. The person who's
tweeted it out said that that he'd been sitting there
talking for like thirty minutes, and you could see all
the people at the table were all leaned forward completely
focused in on him listening to him talk.
Speaker 3: Oh man, this this kid has been raised by his
mother to speak multiple languages. You know, this guy could
easily be like the Quisac Satarak in the in the
next age.
Speaker 4: So I really love that the the Trump family is
embracing the Baron meme. It's quite obvious they're doing it deliberately.
I don't know how this idea got to them exactly,
but if if Baron Trump is listening, we will make
you the emperor.
Speaker 2: You go the first emperor.
Speaker 4: Of the United States.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, and apparently apparently he has a pretty good sense
of humor considering the joke we we heard at the event.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, talk about that though, No, no, we could not,
But that was really really funny. One of the other
highlights was actually at Trump's speech, he pointed to Baron
in the audience and Baron like stood up, very like
stoic and very regal, like waving to the audience.
Speaker 4: Do we have that clip?
Speaker 3: I hope we do.
Speaker 7: He also while he was doing that, he also put
his hand up.
Speaker 2: To his ear.
Speaker 3: That's right, the yeah, yeah, And he just announced he's
earning his own like business. I forget what it was
like at State. Yeah, yeah, there you go. Yeah, and
this guy's he's just in college right now. He's like
a freshman in college, so like, good for this guy. Yes,
you could be Emperor Baron. So I know you're listening
right now. Please come to one of our events. We'd
love to have you.
Speaker 8: What do we We didn't even touch on the inauguration?
What did you guys think of that?
Speaker 3: Well, as I mentioned, I didn't get a chance to
see it live.
Speaker 4: I mean it was so I went to bed early
and slept late, so I didn't see any of it.
Speaker 8: Really, no one watched it well if I mean just
real quick, like the inaugural address, right, so they formally
transfer power, they swear Trump and he starts in his
inaugural address and he just rips into how bad the
country has gotten. Willbaida and Kamal are sitting right behind him,
and they just have to sit there and take it
for like fifteen minutes straight. Is he just goes it
really is like a beautiful thing. And there's another shot
where they have the they sing America Beautiful, I think,
or one of these patriotic songs with like the navy
or military cadets and there's this huge, fucking six or
five white dude and he just shoulder checks one of
these like frail licking congressmen and it's it's a good
clip if someone can find it.
Speaker 3: Amazing. Yeah, I did see the highlight of Carrie Underwood,
who who I am a fan of. You know, the
telepropter broke which she was going to sing America the
Beautiful and they're like, do you need the teleprompt She's like, no,
I'll just sing it no, which is kind of heartwarming
that a attractive blonde woman country music star just knows,
you know, one of the more patriotic songs of the
country by heart. She's like, yeah, I'll sing it. So
I thought that was kind of heartwarming to see. But
all right, because we were running very long tonight, let
us move on to our next thing that we must
talk about. Let's talk about cashpital here. Let's listen in.
Speaker 8: I'm living the world's American dream.
Speaker 3: I am the son of lawful immigrants. We worked our
tails off just like you all do. And I'm gonna
make you a deal. I promise you I will never
quit on your children.
Speaker 8: I will never quit on their children because this American
dream does not belong to me.
Speaker 3: It does not belong to them.
Speaker 8: This American dream belongs to the world.
Speaker 3: What yep, yep, And now we get to talk about
the thing I have been wanting to talk about all
fucking evening. Oh man, I've been geared up for this one.
So as people will know, if you're following the OGC substack,
I had quite a lot of positive things to stay
about Sam Hyde's first video that was coming out, you know,
just around the year, and wrote a wonderful substact piece
about it. If you guys haven't read it, so be
sure to check that out. And now Sam Hyde has
come out with a second address, and this time it
was to Vivak Ramaswami. So why don't we listen into
one of the best clips of the entire section of
this video. If you guys haven't seen it, you must
go see it.
Speaker 10: I don't care about what an Indian says. I'm not
willing to have a discussion about the definition of what
an American is. I'm not interested in hearing somebody else's
proposal for what an American is. Everybody knows what an
American is. If there's a degree or two of variation
between Americans, what an American is.
Speaker 2: It doesn't matter.
Speaker 10: Anytime you try to argue in good faith with somebody
who wants to steal from you. You try to argue
in good faith with somebody who is not going to
iron man your arguments, you're going to give them every
intellectual con iteration possible.
Speaker 2: They're going to give you none.
Speaker 10: Anytime you even open your mouth to do anything that's
not derision, you're losing. You're accepting their proposition that what
you know the same way you know that the sky
is blue, what an American is. When you accept that
your your your knowledge of that can be affected by
somebody's paragraph, you're already losing. So these people when they
come to you, when you see them, the only thing
you should have to say to them is, hey, faggot,
that's it.
Speaker 2: That's all you need to say. You don't need to
say anything else.
Speaker 10: Within your community, within your discord, eh, within your friend group, whatever,
you can have whatever discussion you want. But if it's
an outsider who's here telling us how to do business,
that's not in the game plan, that's not part of
the show, that's not happening, all right. So I'm not
saying you need, you need to not think about these
things and not talk about them with your friends, whatever.
But when an outsider comes here, gets in your face
and starts throwing definitions at you, and you've got a Google, Shit,
no we're not doing that. You're getting called a slur.
I don't know which one, whichever one I feel like
saying at the moment, you're getting called a slur.
Speaker 3: Wonderful, wonderful two minute clip from his forty minute video,
you guys Google watch the whole thing in combination with
the first one that he did. I mean, who would
have thought that Sam Hyde would be acting like the
elite of our time.
Speaker 4: He's a true natural aristocrat and he stepped into the
role of a philosopher king nicely.
Speaker 2: You know. When he released this video, it reminded me
of something. I was driving through Florida and the they
were doing an X space because Alex Jones was just
getting back on Twitter, just gotten back on Twitter, and
there was a space with Elon and a bunch of people,
and Vivek was on the space. The Veke in that
space went and took a piss and didn't mute out.
I mean, he just went full Jeet in a freaking
Twitter space. Absolutely amazing.
Speaker 3: I'll never get tired of that.
Speaker 4: I mean, I often refer to Sam Hyatt as the
only living comedian.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, I mean I got a chance to meet
him a couple of weeks before Christmas, and if anyone
has the opportunity to go see his show, come into
your town. He's touring all over the country this year.
I highly recommend you do so. I know a couple
of our guys and OGC chapters are going as like
a whole group to go and see him. Totally would
recommend you should go. I mean, one of the things
I really want to stray us about this one is
you kind of already saw this from a lot of
the establishment nor me conservatives around the subject of the
Elon Musk thing throwing a Roman, and basically all of
them are pulling cover in the way that you shouldn't
be pulling cover in the sense of no, this is
just a you know, a salute that goes back really ancient.
It's like, we don't have to explain ourselves anymore, we
don't have to defend our positions. What Sam hide here
is just saying you just call people f slurs like
We're not having arguments anymore. Like all these terms like
racism and sexism and bigotry and transphobia and all these
other isms and slurs that they've been using against us
to culdurl our positions for the last like several decades.
All that shit's over. Now we won. Like, fuck you,
I'm not having these discussions anymore. I don't care what
you say. What an American is. We all know what
an American is. You are trying to pull the wool
over my eyes. You're not acting in good faith, and
I don't have to argue with you anymore.
Speaker 2: I won.
Speaker 3: You lost. Out of my country, Get out of my face,
get out of my way. It's over. This stuff is done.
Speaker 8: It reminds me I.
Speaker 2: Was I was.
Speaker 4: I was trolling that retarded loser Will Stancils on Twitter
and engaging with some of his reply bots, and they're
they're just like a little bit. Trump disavoiled Project twenty
twenty five. If he's implementing it, now he's lying. You
felt fear a liar. Now fuck you. We won.
Speaker 3: You lost.
Speaker 4: We're gonna do whatever we want. I love it. You
have no say anymore. Piss off.
Speaker 8: When the modern iteration of this first started that the
whatever you want to call it, woke, lefty, progressive, the
Obama's second term kind of is when it all started
going off. It reminds me that like, initially our reaction
to this was like, well, let's we're going to debunk
this in good faith, right and we're going to show
that it's ridiculous, and you know, the Jordan Peterson's of
the world, and there was all like the you know,
the facts and logic brigades, the Ben Shapiro making fun
of college kids. Kind of the mindset at the time
was like if we just you know, logic them and
laugh at them, eventually, will you know, wake them up
and stop them. But there was never it never came
to fruition that like they ever self reflected, they ever
listen to any of the right wings arguments like to
rant for a little bit. The left, the progressives, they
had every opportunity to hear the right's arguments and to
listen to our points and to consider our opinions. They
didn't have to ban everyone off all of these platforms.
They didn't have to negate all of our ideas or
call us racists or sexists or homophobes for a decade.
They didn't have to ruin people's lives and put them
in prison. Everything that the progressives have done to put
them in this position after the Trump win, they have
done and deserved and the right, I think no one
will really acknowledged this, but the right gave them beyond
what they were doing in terms of an off ramp
or an ability to stop, or an ability to reflect
on their behavior. And like, it's not just that the
progressives have gone through and like destroyed this country, but
they've ripped apart families, they've blocked their own parents or
gone no contact. They've like completely ignored all good faith attempts.
So when Sam Hide says, like just call them a slur,
that really is all you can do at this point,
That's all anyone can do because nothing else has worked.
They they don't respond to anything else but just aspersions
at this point, that's really all right.
Speaker 4: We talked about these people, We talked about you know
a lot of these people losing their jobs and having
no means of employment at this point, with their you know,
fake master's degrees and all that. We'll just do the
other famous philosopher Sam Hyde quote he said when we win,
do not forget these people what you broke dead, your kids,
graped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny. Yeah, So
I'm utterly deaf to their cries of mercy from this
point onward. If anything, the first Trump administration should have
been that time you said to reflect in James. Course
they didn't. There is no mercy left in me. I
leave that to god.
Speaker 8: I was talking with King Pilled earlier today about this,
which is that like they're going to try to, if
not get back in, then they're going to want to
put it all behind them.
Speaker 2: They're going to want to.
Speaker 8: Just totally you know, buddy up to the current power structure.
They're going to want to move past all that, and
they're going to want to pretend like it's a bad dream.
And I think it's going to be very critical, like
dark enlightenments of this. I think to Pete, you know,
maybe a year ago or so, like that eventually he
would die on the left because he doesn't believe in
like totally eliminate. I don't even I don't want to
say anything fed post you, but like that he would
be the one calling for some form of mercy before
like the absolute brutality, and like I kind of as
I get older, I kind of agree with that because like,
on the one hand, there are going to be people
on the left that like a very tiny minority, like
three percent, that they're going to look and say, like,
oh shit, the wold was pulled over my eyes for
like ten years under Obama and Biden, and I just
wanted to fit in and I was a total sheep
and whatever. But like all of these other people, like
you should not forgive and forget, like they gleefully ruined
people's lives for a decade and eventually, like for like
trying to like weasel up to the system and the
people in power is the only recourse they're going to
have to like continue to salvage their professional careers or
like their status, right, because are things now the status thing?
Speaker 4: And even that three percent you mentioned, even if they're sincere,
it's like, well, too bad, you know, like you didn't
make the trade. Not everyone makes it. That's like a
very funny analogy nother thing about it. But not ever,
not everyone makes it, you know. That's that's just true
in general, Like not everyone's gonna gonna make it. If
you're oh you got you got caught up in the
thing because you were on the wrong side of the war. Well,
shouldn't have been doing it.
Speaker 2: Sorry.
Speaker 8: Like, if you're at the Trump administration and you have
a choice between hiring someone who claims they've totally reformed
from being a progressive type and is totally on board
with whatever it is you're gonna do, or some like
poor Appalachian kid who has just been relentlessly shipped on
by this country for ten years, I would rather have
them take the chance on the person that has actual
potential rather than like a known liar. Not to get
too like far.
Speaker 4: Like you've had a change of heart. Okay, go tell
a priest and a confessional. I don't have years for it. Yeah,
exactly like the tenor of this country attitude the administration needs.
That's the attitude people in the administration have to have.
Speaker 3: Very much reminds me of the very first press conference
that Steve Bannon gave when he got out of prison
just a couple of months ago, and he made an
address to all the Democrats, the media, left wing NGOs
all like, and his basic statement was Donald Trump's a
good man, but we're not and we're coming for you,
and that absolutely needs to be the attitude that you have.
I mean, there is no like putting anyone's foot remotely
near the breaks on this train, like we are going
full hog. Anything we want is on the table. I
don't want to hear anybody for the next four years
say well, Trump can't do that, it's raah blah blah
blah blah, or we can't do that, that's blah blah
blah blah blah. It's like, no, uh huh, not language
we're tolerating.
Speaker 8: I know we've spent a lot of time on the
like the last seventy two hours, which is felt like
an eternity because there's so much going on, But uh,
does anyone have any predictions about like what the left
is going to wind up doing? You know, might take
a couple of days or weeks to like do something,
but right now, right now, they're totally flattened. I'm just
curious what people think is going to happen.
Speaker 2: Historically, when you see a shift like this, a lot
of them just fall in line. You know, in nineteen
thirty three in Germany, a lot of people who are
running with the Communist Party became national just switched over
to national socialism overnight. A lot of them are just
looking or they're looking at the current thing. Sure, maybe
thirty percent, and I would say that's dropping more and
more each day, are like ideological They're going to be
the ones that are want to fight this and you know,
like they're you know, they're in the French resistance or something.
But I think a lot of them are just going
to fall in line. I think you're already seeing it.
You're definitely seeing what people in power. So yeah, I
think people see the shift and a lot of people
are just going to turn with it. And the ones
who don't, they'll they'll become the ones who are just
screaming all day about you know, someone seek hiling or
something like that.
Speaker 8: So I agree with it. But the question I've been
considering is like a lot of the ideological action is
mostly virtual virtue signaling to other people that are in
like a similar social cast or to their social in group.
But like what if everybody else in your like social
in group now is like a maga person or you know,
the person that you have to pander to in your
social group that actually has the power is a maga person.
You know, Well, the thing is.
Speaker 6: Here is that the reason I think the left was
able to gain so much power so quickly was that
they were the earliest adopters of the social media revolution,
and the past ten years have really just been them
coasting off of that. Everyone knows the left sucks. Everyone
knows the left is full of, you know, dysgenic freaks
who are extremely entropic to society. It's just back in
what twenty eleven, when Twitter first came online, and even
before that Tumbler, when these corporations were engaging with social
media for the first time, and these concepts that you know,
specific people groups being exposed and stuff like that weren't
as established of a thing, and corporations thought that the
people on social media were reflective of the general public,
or at least reflective enough, and those people more or
less just tended to be leftists. I mean, maybe that's
just the inertia they were cruising off of. The reason
that the left was able to go so far so fast.
And you can point at the long march through the
institutions and the and the leftist academia and things like that. Sure, yeah,
but I think the reason they were able to go
so far so fast is just because they were the
earliest adopters of this revolutionary new technology and social media,
and the Right, being locked out, was forced to simply
get qualitatively better at using it and manipulating it and
things like that. And we've we've you know, come from behind,
and now.
Speaker 3: We we we we've had complete victory.
Speaker 6: And I really I don't think that the Left as
currently constituted has a future. Their coalition broke, the Obama
coalition broke. I don't think it's going to be reassembled
anytime soon. What I think is more possible, and I
don't necessarily hold to.
Speaker 2: Matt.
Speaker 6: I think this is your your.
Speaker 3: Division here.
Speaker 6: I don't ness necessarily hold to this to the Maha
versus MAGA factional breakdown. But I think more than likely
the market share that the Left previously had will be
taken up by some breakoff faction or copycat coalition that
uses the MAGA methods. So the Left as we imagine them,
I think, will cease to exist. They will reinvent themselves,
maybe even go on the full hicclib route. Maybe they'll
become the Party of the South again, of the increasing
economic prosperity South.
Speaker 2: Yeah, my.
Speaker 7: Instinct on this is really that, like you said, there's
going to be a carve off of Maga that winds
up becoming the central part of whatever the resistance to
Trump is. And it's good. So it's I think ultimately
whatever the future quality is is going to be defined
by two factions of what you would can considered today
the right fighting each other. And my guess is the
some of the largest dividing points on that is going
to be like transhumanism. I think there's going to be
a lot of We kind of got a little hint
of it with this five hundred billion dollar AI infrastructure
bill that that he announced that involves Larry Ellison and
Sam Altman, and Elon is not happy about Sam Altman's involvement.
Someone asked Trump about what he he what he thought
of the of Elon and Sam hating each other, and
he's like, yeah, you know, there's a lot of people
I have I hold hatred for as well, So like
I understand Elon's perspective, but we're going to get the
mega movement as it is right now, the core of
the Trump ethos is going to get very very technocratic,
very fast, and a lot of it and and in
that technocracy is the dangers that are going to lie
within that are going to be different than the dangers
that we've faced in the past. We're coming out of
this age of the longhouse where we've been beset by
this malaise that is choking the life out of us.
We're being smothered to death by the spirit of the
smothering mother, and moving into this age of the vengeful
son means the dangers that lie ahead are going to
They're going to blindside a lot of people because they've
been conditioned to expect danger from a particular vector and
they're going to get blindsided by it coming from a
new angle. And that's going to be instead of the
dangers of being smothered to death, we're going to get
the dangers of chaos and explosion and uncontrolled growth and
the dangers of wealth. And I think that it's going
to be very easy for a lot of people to
get sucked into that direction. But then on the on
the other hand, like you were saying, I think it
was a red hawk. I think you were saying if
the like, there's no stopping this train, And the col
corollary to that is to use the AI the AI
Infrastructure Bill as an example. Yeah, I want nothing to
do with sam Altman uh being in charge of some
AI infrastructure thing for the country. I think sam Altman,
I probably can't say here what I think should happen
to Sam Altman. At the same time, like if if
sam Altman is not going to be there, or if
this is going to be constituted differently in some way
that's less disturbingly transhumanist, that's not really going to come
from us, Like we're not going to be able to
affect change on that level because we would be going
up against the type of entrenched, entrenched institutional interests that
have put themselves on the line, and this is what
they want in return, and what they're offering is AI
infrastructure basically means massive energy investment, and so they're willing
to trade shut down borders and get rid of DEI
and ESG and closing off immigration and investing in the
country in return for getting what they want. And what
they want is their massive AI exploration to just be
kind of untrammeled and be able to do whatever they want.
And that's going to be really frickin dangerous. Like there's
a lot of disturbing stuff that's going to come out
of that. But I think the utility for us now
is not in trying to fight them. Like we've been
conditioned that. In this world where we're constantly being held
down and suppressed and smothered to death and it feels
like we're being suffocated, we've gotten really used to just
leaning against doors. We're constantly leaning against a closed door,
and we're pulling all the people we can to try
to lean against this door and get it to open.
And suddenly the door just swings open and you go
tumbling through the doorway and then you stand up and
it's like, okay, well what do I do now? And
our instinct were conditioned to go find another door to
push on. But what has happened here in the last
you know, collectively over the last several months and then
increasingly over the last couple of days, is that a
whole bunch of doors just got flung open, and there's
a whole bunch of new territory conceptually and literally that
we need to be acquiring for our guys. We don't have.
We need to go on the offensive and we need
to start building for ourselves and the technocrats and the
transhumanists are going to do whatever they're going to do,
but we need them to do their AI infrastructure bills
so that we can get the investment in our country
and get energy costs down here and do something about
the state of the money. And that's the trade off
you're dealing in the world of the politic and that's
the trade off. And so in order to in order
to go run around trying to trying to we don't.
We don't need to run around and try to push
on closed doors anymore. A bunch of doors have just opened,
and there's a tremendous amount of energy here, and that
energy is not going away anytime soon, and we need
to direct and focus that energy on our own infrastructure projects.
There's going to be macro infrastructure projects happening. We need
to focus it on our own infrastructure projects and use
this window of energy to capitalize on it and build
ourselves up to where we are a legitimate political force
that's not just useful in a rhetorical sense through our
memes and our ship posting and our podcasts and whatever else,
but to where we actually have a capital source of
our of our own that that advocates for our own interests.
We don't need to be asking other people to advocate
for our interests now. Now we need to start defending
our own.
Speaker 2: Yeah I do. Can I be? Can I be the
one who says the thing that could really grind us
to a halt? Another nine to eleven? Hmmm? Yeah.
Speaker 8: The two things to watch out for are what's what
are the gas prices? What's our energy? What's your average
Americans income? You know, where's the money going for Joe?
Where are we also? Where are we gonna bomb? Where
is the first country we start doing foreign interference? How
do we go after them? What do we declare a
national security threat? I've been reading a good book on them,
on Roe doctrine, and I hope that is what our
general pivot is is they realize it's a lot easier
supply chain and logistics wise to just police the cartels,
maybe more judiciously than police. That's a foreign conflict I'm
okay with. But besides that, you know, there's a lot
of there's a lot of schools of thought that say,
we're going to wrap up Ukraine and we're going to
wrap up the Middle East. And I think looking at
the ceasefire days before the inauguration, and the Middle East,
and so there's some suggestions behind the scenes there that
the Middle East and the Russia Ukraine conflict are kind
of traded off, where it's like we're going to settle
with Russian the Middle East and then we're going to
just wrap up Ukraine in the same breath. Germany's bold
funding for Ukraine. There's some interesting I think bonds stuff
with Ukrainian bonds or whatever. But the big thing overall
to keep an eye on, like just to reiterate, is
you know who's going to be our first enemy and
who are going to be the first Americans that actually
benefit from what happens.
Speaker 7: It's the don Roe doctrine, by the way, is pretty good.
Speaker 2: I like it.
Speaker 3: I like it well, fellas. This has been an excellent
stream with some excellent takes all around, and we had
some jokes, some merriment. I don't think any of us
are tired of winning yet, and no doubt we'll be
covering more executive orders next week on the show. But
it is time for us to get to the super
chats if we can. So let's get started because there's
quite a few of them. So hunting counts starting to
us off for five bucks. I'm going to be disappointed
if I don't hear Trump saying I'm going to come
every time in a legal cries on the street. I
don't know, maybe we should make that a thing on
the on the soundboard every time. But amazing and there
we go. Alrighty, our good friend Harvey Wallbanger from the
Virginia Chapter of the OGC sends US twenty five bucks
and we at Vetus Vetas Dominium Club are excited to
announce our first official event. Wow, look at that our
next official event, I should say. Details found here a
tour of historic Lexington, Virginia, Friday February fourteenth, twenty twenty
five at eleven am. Sit down dinner following the event
is optional. Please RSVP no later than EOD February first,
twenty twenty five. Details are listed on our pin Twitter
post x at VA Chapter OGC. Yeah, so I get involved.
If you guys are in the Virginia area, definitely start
doing more events with fellow friends. We need you guys
out there.
Speaker 6: So yeah, Lexington is a beautiful town that's been utterly
taken over by friggin' libs.
Speaker 3: I might.
Speaker 6: I don't want to promise anything, but I will be
making an f to attend that specific event. So if
you're interested in getting involved in the Virginia people, then
come on over to the event that Harvey and the
boys are hosting.
Speaker 3: Yep, and I can personally, you know, give a thumbs
up to Harvey's character. He is quite a man, very
generous and a good friend. So definitely get involved. And
he says, this is another five bucks, you know, and
meet vouching for his character has nothing to do at
all with the money he's sending us, nothing to do
at all for five bucks. Are you Virginia. I want
to join your local OGC chapter. Vitas Dominium Club wants
to hear from you. Email us. So there you go.
There's the email on the screen there for you. Get
involved with your local chapters. Please Sali Snake nineteen sixty
four for ten bucks. Evening, gentlemen, meeting up with the
Wichita chapter members tonight. We're going to be discussing a
book to read, potentially any recommendations. I don't know how
people could be blackpilling when the illegal are crying before
they get caught, before they can get in and Elon
is throwing romans for soback boys salute the ogc Oh No,
I'm a guess. Got a book recommendations for what.
Speaker 4: Ask a little more specifically than that, you know, I
mean the Bible.
Speaker 6: Be more vague the Bible. If you haven't read the Bible,
read the Bible.
Speaker 8: You should read History of the Monroe Doctrine by Dexter Perkins.
And you also should read another book that was recommended
to me by Stormy today on Twitter, which was a
National Economy of Political Systems by h fuck a protectionist,
an economic protectionist.
Speaker 2: That's the one.
Speaker 8: Yeah, read that one protectionist guide to economics and it
will help you make you know the big thing real
quick about book recommendations. Everything that we think we know
about economics and finance and geo politics and everything else
is a very modern system that's been thought up recently.
If you want to understand what's happening with this country,
you have to look back to like the eighteen twenties
through the eighteen forties for bucks and resources. So look
at that because that's going to be more akin to
what's going to happen with the executive.
Speaker 3: Already, good recommendations from you guys, Caleb, send those twenty
bucks and a emoji with the emoji saluting so nice.
Let's see Craig Stothard for ten Canadian box sorry to
our leaves up North. Take over Canada life.
Speaker 9: I've been in love with its color. I welcome any
enterprise that will increase my stock.
Speaker 3: On the on the Google doc it said ten bucks,
not one hundred. So yes, you are indeed worthy of
some gold, sir, but take over Canada, President Trump. I
don't want to be given four made. Well there we go.
I mean I I've talked about this many times on
de swear spaces, but for my own selfish reasons, I
want the United States to take over Canada simply because
I want access to prime hunting grounds. That's it.
Speaker 7: So I don't think that's a meme either, like I
think they mean it. I think it's gonna I think
it's going to start with Alberta because I remember I
went to a boarding academy in British Columbia and not
too far from Alberta, and at the time, so this
would have been twenty twenty two years ago. At the
time I had there was some classmates of mine who
were Alberton's and they were getting somewhere in the vicinity
of like five to eight thousand dollars a year checks
from the government. And I don't mean the family was,
I mean the children were. Every single citizen was getting
a check for a somewhere in the vicinity of five
is to five to eight thousand dollars per per person.
That's how profitable the province was. And now they're paying
something and it maybe leaves in the chat can give
me the exact details of this. I don't spare a
whole lot of space in my brain for internal Canadian politics.
But they're paying something like sixteen billion dollars a year
to sustain all the other provinces that cannot sustain themselves.
Speaker 2: So they are the.
Speaker 7: I just forgot the term. They're the governor, the head
of the head of Alberta. I can't remember their term
for it. Pre the premiere, Yes, thank you. The premiere
has been meeting with Trump and it's just a match
made in heaven. It works incredibly well for both sides
and it would break the back of the rest of Canada.
None of the other provinces could support themselves without Alberta.
So I think that they're entirely serious when they're talking
about beginning to incorporate Canada into the United States.
Speaker 3: I mean on the same topic that we've talked about,
a related one with Greenland. I mean, like I intentionally
just completely avoided this story because when they were first
talking about it, I thought this was just another like
media hit job like we had in the first Trump administration,
where oh, this is some length thing that Trump set out,
contacts in the media is gonna run with it. I'm
just gonna ignore this one. This is all bullshit. But
now like that is continually being talked about in the news,
and Don Junior is going over there and people are
seriously making moves to actually do this. I mean, the
long arc of history is that as each year goes by,
there are less and less countries in the world, and
like you know, the smaller ones get eaten up by
bigger ones. Just literally how things go. I mean, just
think about in the American context. I mean, there used
to be hundreds, if not thousands, of American tribes and
now it's all just one big country. And this is
really just the case throughout the entire planet. So I mean,
the lines on the map are allowed to change. And
I just like the idea of doing this stuff. I
love the idea of taking back the Panama Canal because
handing it over to all those fucking people was stupid
from the very beginning. And a like, yeah, I'm totally
fine with America expanding its borders as long as it's
actually in our benefit.
Speaker 8: The man who purchased Alaska, mister Seward, he's a bunch
of parks and all other things named after him. He
also wanted to purchase Screenland. And why would that be
the case, Well, because in the eighteen forties they assessed
that there was very large reserves of cryo light there.
It was also in World War Two where the US
military stationed a lot of it's personnel to go the
world's largest cryo light mine, which after Denmark got it
after the nineteen eighties, it was rendered totally defunct. And
there's a whole lot of natural resources under all that ice.
And also the nir drilling was another executive order. So
all that energy stuff, you know, very interesting to keep
an eye on. And again it all has nineteenth century parallels.
Speaker 7: And the geostrategic positioning of it as well. And when
you start taking all of these things into context together
that the appointment of Marco Rubio as Secretary of State,
in the emphasis on south of the border, the withdrawal
from the Middle East, the desire to end what's happening
in Ukraine, and then Elon going after going hard, after
the after cure Starmer and the gangs. I don't know
exactly what I can say here, and then endorsing AfD.
All of these when you take when you take the
acquisition of Greenland and you put into the context of
all these other things, it's very clear that what they're
doing right now is re establishing the terms of the
West to end at Iceland. The West no longer ends
at like eastern Europe. The West ends at Iceland, and
Europe is a separate thing. And so when they when
Elon's out there leading make Europe great again, I think
the subtext here is their their plan is to position
themselves to colonize Europe and to flip the colonial relationship,
make Europe a bunch of client states for the United States,
who are defining their homeland as the Western hemisphere.
Speaker 3: Very interesting to see.
Speaker 6: Shameless shameless plug. I will actually be discussing this this
topic on Dimes's channel next Tuesday at I believe nine
pm on a panel with some other individuals. So if
you all want to hear this topic debated between a
pro and anti annexation position, you know I'll be doing
that next week.
Speaker 8: I hope you're not the anti No, I'm not.
Speaker 2: One other.
Speaker 7: One other point here, real quick, is that I think
this is also a defensive action from the perspective of
the administration, given the degree to which China has has
just infested themselves into Canada. Especially within Trudeau's party, it's
completely dominated by the CCP. Like to like, as much
as we talk about Israel with the United States, China
and Canada is bad. And so if the goal here
is to diminish the effect the influence of the Chinese
Communist Party in the Western Hemisphere, then it's well documented
what's happening with the cartels and with the bringing the
fentanyl across the border. It's well documented how involved China
is in that. But I think that this action for
moving to take control of Greenland and talking about taking
control of Canada is also a defensive action against China.
Speaker 3: Very interesting stuff is going on, and man, oh man,
do I like it? So moving on again, back to
our internally erect Yeah really yeah, well you definitely got
your money as worth. Thought of that super chat there, Craig.
That's always the goal of the super chat A right,
you want a mid max. How much discussion do you
get out of your donate? So I say he did
a pretty good job with that one. James draws everything
for five bucks, just to be on the safe side.
Fire all she boons in leadership positions. Hey, yep, I agree,
John Gordon for five bucks, we were an inch away
from losing this timeline, don't forget it. Yeah, yeah, one
hundred percent can't be said enough. Blaze twenty nineteen for
five bucks. I might slip one past the old ladies
goalie tonight. I'm so excited forgive my grass and this
fell as well. Good for you man, nice work all right.
Balero three nine three Andrew Jackson had James Polk greasing
the wheels in Congress. Trump needs to whip the gop
into doing his bidding so he can keep on winning. Yeah, absolutely,
I mean that's the thing to watchborn. I think we've
been talking about this for months. Is the gopds to
be brought to heal I've been so great tweets going
around today in light of these first three days of
the Trump administration, and it really just shows you that
the Republican Party has been controlled opposition our entire lives.
They could have done any of the stuff at anytime
they wanted to. You know, every president has access to
executive orders. They could have done this, and they did it,
So fuck them. Let's go to Hunger the die merchant,
our good friend for fifty bucks. He deserves some gold.
I love gold.
Speaker 9: The lookshman a bit dexture, I love gold.
Speaker 3: All righty, thank you very much, Hunger. Gents, It's been
a long journey since I met many of you for
the first time in twenty twenty two. This would have
been unimaginable even three short years ago. For now we celebrate,
but Trump and possibly Vance won't be around forever. The
work of the OGC is generational and this is only
the beginning. God bless you all, and God bless the OGC. Yes,
thank you very much, Hunger. We are all proud to
call you a friend and he's co Everyone needs to
get involved with the OGC. This is the time to build.
You know, the buddh has been taken off our necks
for this brief window. Let's move be foolish not to
take advantage of it. So everyone go over to the
old Glory Club dot com, take a look at the
chapters page and get involved. It's Vezda for five bucks.
Maybe this is a bit too much hopium, but maybe
we'll see suppressors off the NFA this time around. What
are your thoughts. It'd be nice, but uh, I don't know,
Like it's weird because like as it relates to, like
the gun issue, it's really like one of the few
things that the right is actually made progress on in
our lifetimes, particularly as a release like concealed carry. I'd
really love to see like national reciprocity on that because
this is a huge pain in the spo, like a
big travelers.
Speaker 2: But that's not true. That's not true. Like just fifteen
years ago, it was like three states had constitutional carry,
and it's like now or not thirty, it's like twenty five.
Now it's like half the states have it. That's a
National Association for Gun Rights NAGGER. Shout out to NAGGER.
They're pretty much they're pretty much responsible for it, like
Holly on their own. I mean the NRA is given.
It gives away your rights all the time. Nagger is great.
The N words.
Speaker 6: You know what the N word is, it's.
Speaker 3: I'll never get tired of that one. Go on filence.
Speaker 8: The biggest change that you can really see is the
may issue to shall issue for bage, which is uh
basically overrides a lot of the state ags and local
PD departments in blue states preventing it just out of
arbitrarily bs reasons are delaying it, like a shall issue
means like you have to unless they have a criminal conviction.
So that's a very interesting change.
Speaker 3: It's really just over like the stupidest stuff too. It's
like too many people play like Call of Duty video
games where you think like gun suppressors are like dead quiet,
and it's just not the case. It really just is
like it just saves your ears, it's really all it is.
Speaker 2: It's awesome to shoot to shoot suppressed. But really, when
you consider the the enormity of the problem that you know,
suppressors and NFA items and SBRs they get, that's not
at the front of the line. That can come later. Yeah,
you have to tear stuff down right now.
Speaker 3: Yeah exactly. I mean, maybe this could be done at
the end of the ministration, like they sneak this in.
You know, this is just something they do. But you know,
I mean, we're all gun guys here, but you know,
there's bigger issue. There's bigger fish to fry. Even though
this is something I would like and in all honesty
probably has a fairly decent shot of no being switched around,
So I wouldn't. I wouldn't, you know, blackpill on that
issue at all. I think we will see gains on
that one, just maybe not for some time.
Speaker 8: Well, and all the down ballot stuff too. I mean
everyone was paying attention to pretty much exclusively Trump, but
the down ballot stuff and a lot of local races.
Like I don't know, I just advise everyone, like check
your local political things and your regulations because there's a
lot of things that will change in blue and red
areas coming around.
Speaker 3: Based autism. Great name for five bucks. As I listened
to this, I hold my three week old daughter. Well,
congratulations man, and just remember what this is all for. Gentlemen.
I'll good for you. Thanks to hear Balero three nine
three four five bucks, CNN journals were fired. Couldn't have
happened to a nicer group of people. Maybe they can
get jobs at pand Express if the h one beers
don't get there first. I love how like Panda Express
has to become the new learn to code. Great.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Cross for.
Speaker 3: Seasider sends us ten bucks in a salute as always,
thank you very much, Sir. Scott McGrath for two bucks
PayPal Mafia equals Infinity Jeets based Hail Trump double seven.
Speaker 2: I mean.
Speaker 3: We'll see, yeah, power right in the kisser is right.
I mean, well, we'll.
Speaker 2: See fake news. It's phony stuff.
Speaker 3: It didn't happen, Yeah, exactly. We'll see what happens on
this front. But none of us are giving up any
ground on it.
Speaker 2: So uh.
Speaker 3: Scott McGrath again for two bucks, sacks all in podcast
and crew defenestrated when.
Speaker 8: You know they might just get side steps by the
more radical momentum. Like the worst thing you can be
when a radical movement is gaining power is like a
fence setter.
Speaker 4: Mm.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean we'll see what happens. CSS Virginia for
five bucks. Uh defend Arlington as petitioning Trump to restore
the Reconcileration Monument in Arlington. Please sign the petition online
or right the White House.
Speaker 6: I'm not sure that's going to happen. I mean, I
have a lot of faith in Trump restoring the Confederate names.
I highly doubt he's going to restore a whole bunch
of monuments.
Speaker 3: Alrighty, well, I mean we can help, right, I mean,
I still want that giant Robert E. Lee statue that
they melted down rebuilt.
Speaker 2: So ten times taller.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Really. A City breakdancer, man weird name for five bucks,
sends us a salute, Thank you very much, hammer Rain.
Speaker 4: That's hilarious. That's referencing. Yeah, I probably don't have to
say it.
Speaker 3: No, yeah, exactly, Yeah, yeah, thank you, hammer Rain. He's
one of our regulars. For ten bucks. Black pilling is
just ego masturbation at this point. Correct, when Trump turned
his head, some kind of mythical energy washed over the nation.
We're living in history. Also correct, Cringewalker for ten bucks,
the winning levels have hit critical. We're gonna have a
meltdown of winning. They're going to have to decontaminate us
from the winning. The winning will radiate for ten thousand years.
Let's hope said, not me, not you saying that in
the background, sound like him Ethan w Monster for two
bucks h one b money to Israel. Oh my omg,
they wanted Trump. Wait that's as two cents. How did
he do? That's two dollars on the Google doc? Yeah,
all right, well, moving on, I'm gonna try and speed
through it.
Speaker 4: I'm just that confused the hell out of me, because yeah,
let's be honest, if I could get a super chap
that cheap, I'd be doing it too.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, especially if it contains the word Israel, of course
it would, you know, be for two descents. So Darty
d Z for one hundred US bucks. Thank you very much, sir.
And some gold is coming your way.
Speaker 9: And this is gold, mister bone. All my life, I've
been in love with its color. I welcome any enterprise
that will increase my stock.
Speaker 3: Thank you very much, sir, he says, press s to
spit on black pillars. A lot of awful behavior from
people that should be on our side post election and
with these recent eos. Yep, yeah, some uh so, some
people uh really shamed themselves this week from some of
their takes, and uh it was it was sad to
see some otherwise really interesting people with a lot of
really good stuff to offer, really debase themselves in such
a way instead of admitting they were wrong on some things.
It's uh, it's unfortunate.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 3: Paul Lungsford for five bucks sends us a salute, thank
you very much, Project Pete for five bucks. There are
a ton of right wingers like us in government service
veterans and disabled veterans hiring preference. It's done to screw
them over. Instead, Trump should have a way for them
to show allegiance to the regime. Yarvard would agree. I mean,
I don't know. I mean a lot of our guys
are I don't know. I mean maybe you have to
fall on the sword a little bit on this one.
I mean, like I was mentioning before, like as an accountant,
if they get rid of the income tacts, I mean,
that's my career gone. But hey, I'll find another one.
It'll be worth it. In the end. It's going to
Jimmy Thomas, a friend from up north, for fourteen Canadian bucks.
The executive order giving temporary security clearances is an understated sleeper.
That's how the civil service grid locks the first one
hundred days. Trump's team learned from twenty seventeen's failures. Man,
it certainly does appear. So James draws everything best ka scenario.
He sends us for five bucks. Best case scenario ban
on federal DEI creates Supreme Court cases that indirectly have
to address the private sector. Goodbye HR departments, man, oh man,
wouldn't that be nice? Well, as we mentioned before, thank
you for people immediately stepping on the land mine and
sending these cases to the courts. So Scott McGrath for
two bucks, Thank your local Stephen Miller today, gig chat p,
I love it. Lutheran fascist for twenty bucks. Greetings from
the future, Steam and Steel chapter salute. I like that name.
Nice alrighty Machia Philly One.
Speaker 7: One quick point on Stephen Miller. I just learned recently
that his wife is part of the Doge project.
Speaker 3: Really yeah, interesting, let's see. You know, that guy really
does deserve a lot of credit, should be rewarded because
he was the guy who was there in the first
Trump administration, stuck his stood, stuck his neck out, and
was right on the immigration issue even back then, like
from day one. So uh, kudos to that guy.
Speaker 4: Yeah, this one goes out to Steven billy. Oh, you
probably can't hear it.
Speaker 3: No, I hear it, I hear it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, you know what that is, right, I don't.
Speaker 2: Know, Yes, yeah, I know.
Speaker 8: It was why there was no season two of m d.
Speaker 3: Oh oh really yeah, I definitely should have known that.
Dumbassuh AnyWho? Thank yeah? Uh, Machiavelli sucks. Being white is great.
Patriarchy equals women cannot be salutes. I mean not really.
I mean in the sense of, uh, They're always going
to be Madonna's and they're always going to be uh oors.
So I mean, it's just how much of it is
it going to be in the open? I guess oh?
Uh all right, yeha yinzer for five bucks, we are
so back. Yes, we are our own raging Mandill sends
us two bucks. It's not too much winning more, Yes,
definitely need more. Cliff Jaden sends us five Singapore dollars
high from Singapore. I'm cautiously optimistic about Trump, but the
sheer number, speed, and quality of executive orders is amazing.
Not to mention the trash talking well, yeah, I mean god,
I'm so excited for the Trump trash talking to return.
Did you guys see that the the one o'clock in
the morning tweets returned as well, like the tweets from
like the odd hours in the morning. You know, it's
just nice to actually have like a real president. You
know again, it's like oh wow, like that this is
actually what it's supposed to be like, you know, you
actually have somebody in the Oval office and not just
this completely dysfunctional old man. Wow wow uh And Reco
Polaso for five bucks. DeSantis was right about drone striking cartels. Yes, yes,
he was Cody Browning for five bucks. People that think
going after cartels is War on Drugs Part two don't
realize that the war was a federal spending spree. They
didn't care if it worked. Yeah, very fair point. Hermenic
hegemony for ten bucks on moving federal HQs no remote
nnsa contractor who moved from DC to North Carolina to
get away from all the flu nonsense. They couldn't pay
him enough to move back to d C. Red state
would be something else. Yeah, I mean, I know what
Trump has talked about, and he did do this previously.
Was moved some of these agencies out of DC. At
the very least you could start doing some of that stuff.
Just to not have all these bureaucrats at one place
would be nice. Moving on to our friend palad and
yy Z for twenty bucks. For years now, when it
came to crime, drugs, homelessness, the borders, all I heard
was we can't do anything about that. I'm sorry to
hear them say I could fix that. Yeah, I mean,
how long will we talk about this on the show?
Literally since day one? It just comes down to sheer
will and now there's actually will and you'll love to
see it.
Speaker 8: I wonder if I mean, we're only three days in,
but I wonder if after this point there will be
in the future, like for the rest of our lives,
people are just going to refuse to accept this answer
that we can't do anything about it when it comes
to these bigger issues like whether Trump succeeds or fails
in all of his efforts. Like what really was Keeley
refuted was this idea that the executive just can sit
on its hands and do nothing and that that's like
somehow an acceptable strategy for people to put up with.
No one's ever going to let that fly again.
Speaker 2: I think.
Speaker 3: Hope all right, it really cannot be stated enough that
we are living in history. Oh and it's really nice
to see especially if, like you know, this Greenland acquisition
actually comes through. Now nothing really say says an end
to the postwar consensus, and you know the lines on
the map moving like that. Man, oh man, wouldn't that
be nice?
Speaker 7: Speaking of living in history? Chat with jfkfiles dot com
is up. It is JFK Assassination Files fourteen thousand plus documents,
time period nineteen sixty three to sixty four. Archives unlocked
January twenty third, twenty twenty five, the classified and ready
for querying begin investigation. It's like chatting with a large
language model. And at the bottom of the site it
says National Archives and Records Administration.
Speaker 3: Oh really interesting.
Speaker 8: Linked to that in the chat here.
Speaker 2: Wow. Yeah, well someone just banked. Someone just linked me
the MLK file too.
Speaker 3: Wow. Well I will be excited to wake up tomorrow
and see all the frogs have done their digging. And well,
you know that's another thing too. I mean, it's just
so obvious at this point that Twitter is like the
only news like in town. It really is. I mean,
does anyone watch legacy media? I just go to Twitter
literally for everything. Let's see. Moving on to aspiring miss
and throw for three bucks. Most of the government needs
a colonoscope via lamp post.
Speaker 2: Yep.
Speaker 3: Jackson Walker for thirteen bucks. Deport them all, Yes, yes,
deport them all. Build that wall, deport them all. Todd
Man sixty seven for ten bucks. My dad's coal mine
was purchased by Canadian company and he was fired soon after.
I can't imagine the grudge Baron has against people. Yeahs,
I was just about to say that, damn it, you
beat me to it. It's gonna make a joke about
burden amazing. But yeah, I mean, I'll tell you what.
If I was Barren, I would certainly want to seek
revenge on all these people for what they've done to
your family.
Speaker 4: Yeah. This this relates to Sam Hide's podcast, the one
he just did on vivek. He basically takes calls from
people and it's stories like this. Definitely, if you didn't
watch that Sam Hide podcast or video whatever on Vivek
that we had up a bit earlier, definitely don't look
that up because it contains a bunch of stories like this.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, I mean both of those videos were excellent
in their own different ways, even though they were touching
on similar notes, so excellent work to Sam Hyde. And
again I will stress I know he's doing a new
England tour right now. I actually saw people in the
chat talking earlier amongths themselves. If people are going to it,
I highly recommend if you guys have the opportunity to
go see Sam Hid and his whole crew. Definitely worth
your while. Really good guys. All right, moving on to
Paladin YYZ once again for twenty bucks. Let's see if
Trump is serious about these changes, you should be able
to muster a super majority and pass an act through
Congress if he wants this movement to have teeth. Well,
I can't imagine that they're going to go so serious
with all these executive orders and then just completely drop
the ball on the legislative part of it. But we
will see. Obviously there's new considerations that come in when
you get to that part of the game.
Speaker 8: But your basic civics class is that, Okay, Trump passes
an executive order, Congress that will then look at it
out and be like, ah, well you know it's uh,
we are just gonna oppose it, and then it gets
kicked backed up to Trump, who can veto it and
then they have to have a two thirds majority in
Congress in order to overturn that presidential veto which I
would argue they are very very unlikely to get with
any of these executive orders after surviving two rounds of voting.
Speaker 3: Yep, so we'll see Adam Keeney for fifty bucks, thank
you very much, and you also are getting some gold, sir.
Speaker 9: This is old mister bone all my life, I've been
in love with its color. I welcome any enterprise that
will increase my stock.
Speaker 3: Alrighty, there we go, Thank you very much, sir for
your generous fifty bucks. Banishment is a form of mercy.
I don't know, I mean don't necessarily agree with that.
Well maybe in modern times compared to what the alternative is,
but I mean banishment like an ancient Greece was akin
to death. So I mean it certainly is like a
as a released like self deportations right now, as opposed
to get rounded up by ice. Uh yeah, I mean get.
Speaker 2: Out of here.
Speaker 3: You know, self deporting yourself is definitely better. But we'll see,
Uh Cliff jaded once again for five Singapore dollars. Pete
is right.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 3: Most are spectators who will counter signal you to the
last minute. When you win, they'll say I always knew
they were the good guys. Yeah, pretty much. Most people
just go along and get along. And then Son of
Haster from the New Ivy League up there in New
England for five bucks? Is this still? Is this show
still going?
Speaker 2: Well?
Speaker 3: What troopers? Yeah, well you're making it longer. Uh Son
of Haster, So thank you? Yeah, uh huh? And then uh,
Air make discourse for five God, God damn it, Doug.
I'm looking at the Google doc and I'm just seeing
more chats like be plopped in as I'm reading these.
So very generous some audience tonight, Thank you very much.
I don't know we have four hours. We got to
be close to it at this point or something. Air
make discourse for five bucks. The black pill is a suppository.
You don't want to take suppositories, do you?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 3: None of us do.
Speaker 6: No.
Speaker 4: I only administer.
Speaker 3: Them two Telos sends us two bucks and a I
guess we're gonna have to call it a Roman now
instead of a salute, so he sends us a Roman.
Thank you very much.
Speaker 4: K R.
Speaker 3: Harris for five bucks. I lived near a hotel, been
seeing a lot of moving trucks there lately, self deportation
or wishful thinking. I don't know. I guess we'll find out, right.
And then the final super chat of the evening from
our good friend Melon for five bucks. Reminder to report
your local immigration attorney to the ICE tip line for
human trafficking. Yes, you absolutely should be doing that. I
mean I saw tweets going around of like apparently bounties
that ICE is potentially gonna have on illegal immigrants. I mean,
wouldn't that be wonderful if that's the case. And if
that is the case, I will be writing down names
at my tax service and after April fifteenth, I will
be uh, you know, making some calls.
Speaker 8: So they raided an attorney's office in Rhode Island today, Yeah.
Speaker 3: I saw that. Yeah, so that's that's a good start.
You know, it only takes a couple of times you
do this and then everyone just falls in line.
Speaker 2: That is a good point.
Speaker 3: Yeah, all right, and then another one has yeah JG
for two bucks, love to see the constant Gunther Fillinger. Cope,
he said.
Speaker 4: Something particularly nasty all back and I finally mute at him.
So I haven't seen it. It is probably really funny though.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I have more or less the same. I haven't
paid attention to him in a while.
Speaker 4: A reminder, I'll go check it out.
Speaker 3: All right, Well, that is the end of the super chats,
so let's quickly go around and get our shillings out
of the way so I can go to bed and
have another day at the office. So Charlie the promote, sir.
Speaker 4: Well, I just published a book review on a book
on the left wing intellectuals and buy more Germany. You
can read the free preview, or you can subscribe and
go check it out. It's book review number forty three.
So there's a lot of backwell content on there. My
substack neo reactor, which is found at Charlemagne dot substack
dot com. Yeah, so subscribe to that. You know, I
think enough people have thought it is worth it over
the years. So basically what I do is, you know,
summarize and write my own thoughts on the books I read.
I'm working on another one right now, and oh yeah,
I just want to get in one last one, last joke.
I saw something going on with Vladimir Putin heading to
the Kremlin, and also Lex Friedman is supposed to be
interviewing him, I believe so this might be a last
ditch for to uh to eliminate him by a boredom.
We'll see.
Speaker 3: He is so horrible. I cannot stand that guy. Uh. God,
he really just is like a plank of wood. There's
nothing about him. He might as he actually might even
be AI, Like the first AI human being is a
Lex Reedman, Pete, You've always got stuff going on. What
do you have to promote this week?
Speaker 2: Just dropped an episode with Dimes from Blood Satellite and
his buddy Jean about their new documentary about immigration into
Canada and who did it? Who was responsible for it?
And damn it, you know the usual suspects crap. Go
check it out. Thank you?
Speaker 3: All right, sweet uh mister Fahrenheit. Anything to promote, No, I.
Speaker 6: Mean, the only thing I'm doing right now is my
is the Spain series with Pete Q, So go check
that out if you can.
Speaker 3: Other than that, support the Old Glory Club and as
you mentioned, your show you'll be doing with Dimes next
week on the Annexation of Canada.
Speaker 6: Yeah, yeah, that's right, that's right. Yeah, go tune into that.
I think Endeavor is going to be on it. There's
a gentleman who's a George Wycliff's name is political candidate,
and Ford his axe is also going to be on that.
So yeah, we're going to have the pro Canadian annexation side,
which I will be arguing, and Dimes of course is
going to be on it, and then there's going to
be the anti Canadian annexation. And let me tell you,
I am I am going to go tell those Canadians
exactly what is wrong with their country that's put them
in this in this position in the first place.
Speaker 3: Doug's just adding new stuff to the sound like every week.
I always love the surprises so well, King Build, thank
you for sticking it out for four hours. You are
a trooper, sir, and it's always a pleasure to have
you back on the show. Where can people find more
of your stuff? What do you got going on these days?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 7: Absolutely great being here. Thanks for guys. The YouTube channel
is King Pilled. I do a daily show Monday to
Friday called The Astrolabe and then I tweet a lot
at Real King Pilled on Twitter. And we have a
little project that we've been working on for a while
that will be dropping some more stuff and getting built
up toward release here shortly, so if you want to
be if you guys want to follow that, then the
Twitter handle right now it's EWBSX Cyberbully and if you're
listening to this in the future will be ewbsx. But
that's the place to go. E WBSX Cyberbully on Twitter.
Speaker 3: All righty, definitely go check that out and then Filos
always a pleasure to speak with you, sir. It's been
a while. What have you got cooking these days?
Speaker 8: Yeah, so you can check me out on my relatively
inactive YouTube channel. I've been aiming to put up more content.
I've just been working through a lot of material lately,
a lot more to go through. And I've also been
on with Pete twice recently in the past month or so.
I did an episode with him on Bernard Baruch and
also America's first Secretary Defense James Forrestall there's more in
the work for that. For more in the woodwork for that,
stay tuned. And also another quick shout out to Axios
Fitness if you are on their program or you're considering it.
I have been doing it for about fourteen weeks now.
I've gotten extremely jacked, so highly recommend getting in shape.
Speaker 3: Yes, indeed, they are good friends of ours over at Axios,
so everyone should definitely be getting involved right now. Unfortunately
for myself, my gym is the tax office for the
next three months, so big sad on my end, but
everyone be on the lookout for that. Speaking of tax
to talk about, I was on last night with my
good friend mister Chad Elkins on the Elkins Accounting Hour.
We were talking about this year's tax season and talk
about our fantastic stream that we are going to make
a yearly thing of the April fifteenth Nightly Stream. So
as soon as tax Day is over, we're gonna have
a great, big party with all of our friends to
celebrate the end of the tax season. So if you
want to listen more about getting involved into the tax industry,
definitely go listen to that one, because I gotta tell you, guys,
there is such a shortage and you can literally get
a job tomorrow if you wanted to in this business.
So it's right for you, guys, if you want a
career change. So if you're interested in that kind of stuff,
go over to my friend Chad elkins Is channel and
have a listen to that and I will be appearing
on a Post zero on Sunday with some of my
Red Pill buddies, and you know, there's there's you know,
I'll make another announcement next week when it's a little
bit closer. I've got an some outside appearance coming up
that I'm excited for, so I'll make that announcement next week.
In the meantime, you know, everyone, stay winning and we'll
see you next week.