Speaker 1: All right, welcome to sixty agenda. I'm your host, Andrew.
Speaker 1: Thanks for being patient here to talk about what they
Speaker 1: won't as always, hopefully everybody's hearing me good through here.
Speaker 1: I was trying to get all my settings all together.
Speaker 1: All right, let me get started. Yeah, So you may
Speaker 1: have seen, based on the thumbnail that we had going
Speaker 1: on and also the title, what we're gonna be talking
Speaker 1: about here, it's gonna be the MAD program Medical Assistance
Speaker 1: in Dying, and we're gonna talk about people cleaning your house.
Speaker 1: What this is, you know, I almost call it medical
Speaker 1: assistance in debt because it seems, you know, as you
Speaker 1: look into this that if you want to, you know,
Speaker 1: if you feel like a burden into society, if you
Speaker 1: you know, you may just be able to, you know,
Speaker 1: if you have a debt that you just feel like
Speaker 1: you just can't pay it, and you know, maybe you
Speaker 1: could just go get some medical assistance with that and die.
Speaker 1: You know, obviously I'm being facetious, but it's really just
Speaker 1: a slippery slope. Guys. I really disagree with this kind
Speaker 1: of program, and as you look into it, it's already
Speaker 1: becoming kind of what you would imagine it to become.
Speaker 1: Of course, it's starting off with terminal illnesses. We just
Speaker 1: want to, you know, take care of people that just
Speaker 1: just can't handle life anymore because they're literally about to
Speaker 1: die anyway. Sounds great, of course, but once you open
Speaker 1: that door, it turns into a dark, dark place, as
Speaker 1: we'll get into. Also, what are they not telling us
Speaker 1: about the detention centers in neuralink? We're going to get
Speaker 1: into that. Is it possible that there is some kind
Speaker 1: of non consent neuralink testing going on with ICE detainees.
Speaker 1: We will be getting into that as well, So strap up,
Speaker 1: get ready. It's gonna be a fun episode. Dark episode,
Speaker 1: but very fun, very informative. As always on six G.
Speaker 1: We kind of mix it all together, don'tly. But you know,
Speaker 1: a big part of this what kind of Right before
Speaker 1: I started this show, I've talked a lot about Curtis
Speaker 1: Jarvin on the show, And right before I started this,
Speaker 1: I read Patchwork and it's just something I fell into
Speaker 1: and I found and I was reading it Mensius Moldbugs Patchwork,
Speaker 1: which is his like writer's name, Mensius mold Bug. So
Speaker 1: Curtis Jarvin writes about this idea, and I'm gonna just
Speaker 1: tell you about this kind of give an introduction and
Speaker 1: then we'll get into the you know, say hi to
Speaker 1: everybody and do some housekeeping. But Curtis Jarvin talked about
Speaker 1: the underclap and what can we do with this underclass
Speaker 1: when we create this patchwork system, which we've talked about
Speaker 1: that a lot on the show. And you know this
Speaker 1: CEO king technique and all the CEO monarchy, AI monarchy,
Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera, we talk about it all the time.
Speaker 1: So he kind of says, he goes, what do we
Speaker 1: do with this underclass? Right, as a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: let me just show it to you. I don't want
Speaker 1: to butcher it. I'd love for you to see it.
Speaker 1: So yeah, Mensius Moldbug aka Curtis Jarvin talks about what
Speaker 1: are we going to do with the underclass? Well, we
Speaker 1: could virtualize them, we could turn them into we could
Speaker 1: turn him into biodiesel fuel for our trolleys for this
Speaker 1: new technique system that we're creating. Right, So he had
Speaker 1: all these ideas and you know, honestly, while I was
Speaker 1: reading this, I got like emotional. I was like, Wow,
Speaker 1: this is so dark. You know, I couldn't imagine that
Speaker 1: somebody would actually think this way. Hold on, my camera
Speaker 1: keeps messing up here, So I couldn't. I just couldn't
Speaker 1: imagine that somebody would actually think about these things this
Speaker 1: way with such a lack of care. And so anyway,
Speaker 1: so as I got into it, I was like, all right,
Speaker 1: well let me look into this, and it seems that
Speaker 1: they're creating the tech that he was talking about, you know,
Speaker 1: the idea of virtualizing and all these things. So let
Speaker 1: me go ahead and add this to stage here. This
Speaker 1: is it right here, so in patchwork, I'd just save this,
Speaker 1: so this is perfect. He talks about virtualizing is the
Speaker 1: most humane alternative to genocide, and a lot of this
Speaker 1: stuff we'll get into today kind of talks about this
Speaker 1: exact technology Curtis Jarvin, talks about the utter dystopian techno
Speaker 1: monarch ideology that Curtis Jarvin has. That's what this post
Speaker 1: is about. And it's funded by Peter teel he Is,
Speaker 1: and so's jd Vance. Of course, they're just kind of
Speaker 1: given an intro to who Curtis Jarvin is. It says here,
Speaker 1: as the delegate of San Francisco, what should you do
Speaker 1: with these people? I think the answer is clear alternative
Speaker 1: energy since wards are liabilities. There's no business case for
Speaker 1: retaining them at their present so their present andbulatory form.
Speaker 1: So he's talking about the underclass, the people that you
Speaker 1: just can't really they don't work, They just kind of
Speaker 1: suck off the state, et cetera. So the most profitable
Speaker 1: disposition for this dubious form of capital is to convert
Speaker 1: them into biodiesel, which can help power them unibuses. Now,
Speaker 1: he says, okay, just kidding, sort of a naive Randian
Speaker 1: thing which appeals instantly to a geek like him, but
Speaker 1: of course has nothing to do with real life. The
Speaker 1: trouble with biodiesel solution is that no one would want
Speaker 1: to live in a city with public transportation that was
Speaker 1: fueled even partly by the distilled remains of its late underclass.
Speaker 1: It's just dark. You know, when you read somebody's idea
Speaker 1: of a you know, being a funny be to not
Speaker 1: to liquidate the words metaphorically or literally, but to virtualize them,
Speaker 1: a virtualized human in a permanent solitary confinement, waxed like
Speaker 1: a bee in larvae in a cell. I mean, this
Speaker 1: guy's sick, dude. He's talking about people essentially sealed except
Speaker 1: for emergencies. But this would drive him insane, except that
Speaker 1: the cell contains an immersive virtual reality interface which allows
Speaker 1: him to experience a rich, fulfilling life in a completely
Speaker 1: imaginary world. So anyway, this guy's courting favor with people
Speaker 1: like JD. Vans, et cetera, et cetera. So it's people
Speaker 1: like this, you know that. I'm just like, dude, it's
Speaker 1: just insane, you know. But hold on a second, let
Speaker 1: me get this out. So anyway, yeah, it's people like
Speaker 1: Curtis Yarb and they kind of got me going. So also,
Speaker 1: I saw this and this is what just made me decide, Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna do this show today. And here it is.
Speaker 1: So this is all. Let me make sure I got
Speaker 1: sound on here. This is a it's a made program advertisement,
Speaker 1: and it's probably the weirdest ad I've ever seen in
Speaker 1: my life, honestly. So hold on, let me go ahead
Speaker 1: and pull this up.
Speaker 2: All right, ready, kay, press are sacred and I imagine
Speaker 2: my final days.
Speaker 3: I see bubbles, I see the ocean, I see musical.
Speaker 3: Even now as I seek help to end my life,
Speaker 3: there is still so much beauty. You just have to
Speaker 3: be brave enough to see it.
Speaker 1: Okay, So yeah, that's just dark, you know. I mean
Speaker 1: she's talking about all the beauty she sees in life
Speaker 1: as she goes to end her life. Uh, I don't
Speaker 1: understand how, Like why somebody I don't understand how that's
Speaker 1: an advertisement? Somebody like, uh, what's his name? Somebody like
Speaker 1: Tim Dillon should make jokes about that. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: almost writes its own jokes. That thing is that advertisements
Speaker 1: so messed up it almost makes its own jokes. That's insane.
Speaker 1: But yeah, I just think it's crazy. Hold on one second,
Speaker 1: all right, got my camera back up, So anyway, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I just think it's absolutely nuts. All right, what's up, guys?
Speaker 1: How are we doing? How we doing? So that's just
Speaker 1: kind of an intro. So you know, you see those
Speaker 1: two things together. You know, obviously the Curtis Jarvin patchwork
Speaker 1: thing of virtualizing people and doing those things. I just thought,
Speaker 1: you know, it was just such an inhumane way to
Speaker 1: look at people in such an inhumane way to treat
Speaker 1: them doing that. But whatever, So, anyway, how we doing,
Speaker 1: how we doing? Caking a cup? What's up? How we're doing?
Speaker 1: Net Hunter? Welcome in? Everybody, Welcome in? Hey, we'll go
Speaker 1: ahead and do the you know the same you know deal,
Speaker 1: you know, super chapps five people, get that shit up
Speaker 1: and you get free Patreon for a couple of months.
Speaker 1: How we doing, orb Man made in the Shade, baby?
Speaker 1: You know? Hopefully not? What's this? There was a scene
Speaker 1: like that in Silet Green. Really that's crazy? Yeah, man,
Speaker 1: it's freaky, dude. I just think that, you know, I
Speaker 1: think of bubbles as I'm gonna kill myself. Did you
Speaker 1: hear her? She's like, as I go to kill, as
Speaker 1: I go, you know, to enter to this death, I
Speaker 1: think about bubbles. I'm just thinking about bubbles, think about
Speaker 1: the beauty alike. What's up, still, Prill? How we doing?
Speaker 1: Oh here, hold on, let me fix my mic man, Dude,
Speaker 1: I honestly don't like this app. I think I'm gonna
Speaker 1: get to get off this app. I gotta get off
Speaker 1: this app. Gotta get off this app anyway. Streamyard sucks, dude.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be honest with you. Maybe I need to
Speaker 1: start using a restream or something. Inside your bones. Welcome in.
Speaker 1: How we doing? Hopefully we're done with these technical difficulties.
Speaker 1: Let's get back to it. You know, I'm gonna I'm
Speaker 1: gonna just one more time because I don't think we
Speaker 1: could do that enough. I mean, it's really crazy to me,
Speaker 1: just this concept that like we're looking at here just
Speaker 1: one more time. I just think it's worth it to
Speaker 1: look at this, uh this ad again? Man, I mean,
Speaker 1: come on, dude. I saw this ad and I just thought, Dude,
Speaker 1: this is such an inverted world we live in today.
Speaker 1: I just don't get it.
Speaker 3: Press are sacred, and I imagine my final days. I
Speaker 3: see bubbles, I see the ocean, I see music. Really,
Speaker 3: even now as I seek help to end my life,
Speaker 3: there is still so much beauty. You just have to
Speaker 3: be brave enough to see it.
Speaker 1: Press, even as I seek to end my life, I
Speaker 1: see so much beauty in the world. So how do
Speaker 1: you So why would you end your life if you
Speaker 1: see all this beauty? And how is that? It just
Speaker 1: almost defeats the purpose? So this is just kind of
Speaker 1: like what's been running through my head. All right, we'll
Speaker 1: get into all the details of this and everything. I'm
Speaker 1: just kind of giving you a little intro to this.
Speaker 1: So we've got a lot of stuff on the Mad Program,
Speaker 1: a lot of stuff on the detention centers and ec
Speaker 1: on Ice. I think that that's very important as well.
Speaker 1: We're going to get into that here. Let me show
Speaker 1: you this. So we got neuralink labs near ice detention camps, Miami, Florida.
Speaker 1: Neuralink's clinical site at the University of Miami is located
Speaker 1: near the Chrome Detention facility to twenty twenty five noted
Speaker 1: detainee deaths involving neurological symptoms, prompting calls for investigations. We're
Speaker 1: going to get deeper into this, but I just want
Speaker 1: to give it intro to this topic as well. So
Speaker 1: there's a Neuralink research site based at Barol Neurological Institute,
Speaker 1: situated near ice facilities where, according to reports, solitary confinement
Speaker 1: times increased significantly, So they're trying to keep people away
Speaker 1: from everybody so that they don't know the symptoms possibly
Speaker 1: and then Hawaii as well, So allegations have suggested potential
Speaker 1: connections to Honolulu involved transferred detainees, questions about logistical proximity
Speaker 1: to the medical facilities in Neuralink. So I got a
Speaker 1: lot of stuff on this shit, so welcome in. Let's
Speaker 1: do it. So hopefully, hopefully we're all good. Technical difficulties
Speaker 1: are over and we could get going. I've got a
Speaker 1: lot of shit to go to, so we're gonna start
Speaker 1: with this. It's a cautionary tale of euthanasia in Canada.
Speaker 1: Pull this up, okay, So youth and asia becomes more
Speaker 1: prevalent in Canada, death is increasingly seen as an escape
Speaker 1: for the suffering. What role do Christians play and nurturing
Speaker 1: advocates for life affirming care? Look at this life affirming care.
Speaker 1: That's like what they're calling if you want to live,
Speaker 1: We're gonna affirm your life. How about I don't know, man, whatever,
Speaker 1: Maybe I'm looking too far into it, but it seems
Speaker 1: like they give less to the life aspect and more
Speaker 1: like to the other I don't know, so let's look
Speaker 1: at slippery slope. MADE was first legalized in twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: for Canadians whose deaths was reasonably foreseeable. At the time,
Speaker 1: a person had to be have a grievous, your remediable
Speaker 1: medical condition which caused enduring physical or psychological suffering. Think
Speaker 1: of someone with terminal cancer. In twenty twenty one, five
Speaker 1: years later, MADE was expanded to include those whose death
Speaker 1: is not reasonably foreseeable. With this expansion, people with disabilities
Speaker 1: or non terminal illnesses could choose to have a doctor
Speaker 1: in their lives. I think it's someone who is wheelchair abound,
Speaker 1: or somebody who has debts or homeless or you know,
Speaker 1: feels like a burden to society. That's a new statistic
Speaker 1: that people that are feeling like a burden to society
Speaker 1: are the ones, like if they just can't pay their
Speaker 1: medical bills. So now doctors can say, look, man, you
Speaker 1: don't have insurance, you can't pay your medical bills, Like
Speaker 1: I mean, what are we doing here, We're not going
Speaker 1: to treat you, or they just kind of push it,
Speaker 1: you know, it's kind of don't say it, but they
Speaker 1: just I don't know how they would do it, but
Speaker 1: I'm sure there's some weird thing that they do with
Speaker 1: their like apprehensive to help let you kind of suffer
Speaker 1: more than you should, and then you finally say, okay,
Speaker 1: look I just want to end it anyway. The next
Speaker 1: expansion has already passed into law, implementation has been delayed
Speaker 1: until March seventeen, twenty twenty seven. This could allow Canadians
Speaker 1: suffering solely from a mental illness to be eligible for
Speaker 1: euth in asia. Somebody's suffering from depression, anxiety, panic attacks.
Speaker 1: Since legalization, the number of euthanized eight euthanasia deaths in
Speaker 1: Canada has steadily grown every year and showed little sign
Speaker 1: of slowing down. Twenty sixteen and twenty twenty three, sixty
Speaker 1: thousand Canadians have been euthanized. Fifteen thousand and twenty twenty
Speaker 1: three alone, Euthanasia now accounts for four point seven percent
Speaker 1: of all deaths in the country, a rate second only
Speaker 1: to the Netherlands, and euthanasia is now the fifth most
Speaker 1: cause of death in Canada. Wow, these numbers. With Oregon
Speaker 1: the first state to legalize assisted suicide in nineteen ninety
Speaker 1: seven and twenty twenty three, three hundred and sixty seven
Speaker 1: people died by assisted suicide in Oregon, It's only zero
Speaker 1: point eight percent of the deaths in the state. Either way,
Speaker 1: I don't like the fact that it's in the states.
Speaker 1: We're going to get into that as well. I think
Speaker 1: that obviously we have state by state action. So therefore,
Speaker 1: you know, Oregon may be good, but Washington may decide
Speaker 1: to go for the depression aspect. So I just think, again,
Speaker 1: the slippery slope always applies, so of course Oregon and
Speaker 1: other American states only permit assisted suicides where doctor gives
Speaker 1: the patient the means to end their own life, and
Speaker 1: generally they need two doctors to sign off on it,
Speaker 1: et cetera. A Canada, assisted suicide is permitted, but nearly
Speaker 1: non existent. Made debts are almost exclusively due to euthanasia,
Speaker 1: where doctors actively actively ends a patient's life. Man, dude,
Speaker 1: that's crazy, dude. I mean, because when you think about it,
Speaker 1: they go, I've seen made ads where they go, We've
Speaker 1: helped more people this year than we have, you know,
Speaker 1: last year, And I just think that that's a bad
Speaker 1: business plan. You know, I understand that obviously every business
Speaker 1: wants to grow, but I don't think a euthanasia business
Speaker 1: should be in the business of growing. I mean, just
Speaker 1: throwing that out there. Suffering is usually behind a request
Speaker 1: for euthanasia. The most common side of reason for euthanasia
Speaker 1: requests are the loss of the ability to engage in
Speaker 1: meaningful activities or to perform activities of daily living. So anyway,
Speaker 1: it gets into this Christian you know, understanding of human dignity,
Speaker 1: et cetera. And obviously that's the thing with the cancer patients.
Speaker 1: You know this, it's funny. The only thing I can
Speaker 1: find to actually have a cautionary advertisement or article is
Speaker 1: a Christian university. So at least there's still some good
Speaker 1: Christians out there. Right, You're not gonna get anybody else
Speaker 1: telling you of the things we should worry about with this.
Speaker 1: Everybody else is just gonna do like COVID. Oh, we're
Speaker 1: just protecting people, you know, it's the polite society shit.
Speaker 1: And then that slippery slope happens because unfortunately there's the
Speaker 1: profit aspect whenever it comes to medical hospitalization, et cetera.
Speaker 1: I mean, this doesn't fall flat. I'm sure on anybody
Speaker 1: here listening. It's just like, of course there's an incentivization
Speaker 1: at some point to use the euthanasia instead of the treatment.
Speaker 1: Just saying all right, let's pull this one up now.
Speaker 1: So this PBS News some healthcare workers in Canada grappling
Speaker 1: with patients for questioning euthanasia. Homeless man refusing long term care,
Speaker 1: a woman with severe obesity, an injured worker giving me
Speaker 1: a eager government assistance, and a grieving widow. Wow, so
Speaker 1: we have somebody that's upset, we have somebody that's just
Speaker 1: a little bit hurt from I mean, I don't know
Speaker 1: how hurt he is, so they all requested to be
Speaker 1: killed under Canada's euthanasia system. Each of these sparked private
Speaker 1: debate amongst doctors nerisses struggling with ethics of one of
Speaker 1: the most the world's most permissive laws on the practice.
Speaker 1: So Canada pushes to expand euthanasia, and more controversy countries
Speaker 1: moved to legalize it. As we went into, Some doctors
Speaker 1: fear moving forward even with cases that meet Canada's legal requirements,
Speaker 1: which allow people for with people with irremediable suffering from
Speaker 1: non fatal medical conditions and disabilities. So the doctors ain't
Speaker 1: feeling right about it because there's some doctor. I mean,
Speaker 1: doctors aren't inherently evil. I'm sure that this doesn't fall
Speaker 1: flat on him either. Now I wonder, you know, when
Speaker 1: Trump talks about med beds. Let's see Trump med beds.
Speaker 1: See because I wonder what these med beds really really are?
Speaker 1: You know what I mean? Trump posted about a medical
Speaker 1: conspiracy theory called med beds. September twenty seven, Trump shared
Speaker 1: Jesus apparently AI generate a video of himself promoting a
Speaker 1: cure all medbed It's a medical conspiracy theory. The video,
Speaker 1: which has since been to lead it from a shrill
Speaker 1: account resembling Fox News segment on the show hosted by
Speaker 1: the president's daughter in law Laura Trump, but it never
Speaker 1: aired on the network. Laura Trump seems to be seems
Speaker 1: to be like the conspiracy theorist of the family. In
Speaker 1: Trump's family, actually, I think they all have hands in
Speaker 1: creating conspiracy theories. I think Trump obviously he's got handing
Speaker 1: QAnon with Epstein, et cetera. Uh, Steve Bannon, all these
Speaker 1: people connections with conspiracies. I'm getting the fuck out of here. Dude,
Speaker 1: USA just wants to run up a bunch of ads
Speaker 1: and shiit on me. But yeah, dude, I would never
Speaker 1: get into a med bed because the thing is like
Speaker 1: that just seems like a slippery slope. As well. You know,
Speaker 1: we put too much trust, trust into a pharmaceutical industry
Speaker 1: that has clearly been shown to not mind killing people
Speaker 1: for profit. Mmkay, So we can move on from that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I just think that it's some crazy shit out here, dude.
Speaker 1: So there's not too much on med beds yet. I
Speaker 1: mean there's some statistics that there is, like, uh, like
Speaker 1: we could look up like race is using MADE program
Speaker 1: in Canada. I wonder if they have some kind of statistic. Uh,
Speaker 1: so here we go. Let's see here, twenty two three
Speaker 1: of those who received MADE under track two, we're female,
Speaker 1: fifty percent we're male. Yeah, but it's not doing race.
Speaker 1: So talker Carlson puts out this idea that they're disproportionately
Speaker 1: killing white people. I don't sign off on that. I'm
Speaker 1: just curious that there's any statistic to back that up
Speaker 1: and why he would say it unless it's true. And
Speaker 1: I'm not entirely sure if it is, you know, but
Speaker 1: let's find out. So what do we got here? Ooh,
Speaker 1: it's not the easiest to find you know, they don't
Speaker 1: just got that statistic out there. He probably dug a
Speaker 1: little or he's just making it up white race statistic
Speaker 1: for me program. Sorry, guys, all right, this is gonna
Speaker 1: be the only thing I like, look up live. I'm
Speaker 1: just really curious about this. Also, what the fuck did
Speaker 1: you guys see this graph? It's just hooking hooking up.
Speaker 1: Look at that ticking up? So we got Oregon. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know they're saying that there's not any I mean,
Speaker 1: we definitely got more people doing it though, So all right, anyway,
Speaker 1: so let's see here, if we could get some kind
Speaker 1: of statistic, Okay, race, non white eighty five, not Hispanic
Speaker 1: white ninety five percent. Wow, not Hispanic white ninety five percent.
Speaker 1: That is this proportionate. I mean that's a lot. Ninety
Speaker 1: five percent of everybody is non Hispanic white. So that's
Speaker 1: eighteen hundred and sixty five versus eighty five non white people.
Speaker 1: So I guess I get what he's doing there. I
Speaker 1: mean he's right. Wow. Medication, let's see here. Sedatives. Yeah,
Speaker 1: sixty seven percent of the people had sedatives. Well, no shit,
Speaker 1: they're just ready to check out, dude. Uh, eighty seven
Speaker 1: percent palwative care. All right, Well, just curious look at
Speaker 1: little statistics there about it. But we will be tracking that.
Speaker 1: You know, of course in our states, we care more
Speaker 1: about America when it comes to this. But it's definitely
Speaker 1: a slippery slope, as we said. So we got Cacario
Speaker 1: pulling up about the Civil War, wearing the Civil War.
Speaker 1: I'm taking him burlap sack so I can blend into
Speaker 1: the garbage. Yeah, dude, you wouldn't be hard, especially with Antifa,
Speaker 1: black black anything to blend right in with Antifa. Maybe
Speaker 1: don't do that actually, So anyway, let's get into this
Speaker 1: other thing I was looking at. So there's this. Let
Speaker 1: me look into this alone surgeon malpractice as well. I
Speaker 1: forgot about that. So because again this just kind of
Speaker 1: just back up my claim with not trusting the MADE
Speaker 1: program and not trusting these kind of medical things. Check
Speaker 1: this out. There's a surgeon. Let's see if I can
Speaker 1: pull this up real quick. Okay, all right, ready for this.
Speaker 1: This ship's crazy, dude. This is all right if you're not,
Speaker 1: if you're just if you're just listening to this. There's
Speaker 1: a lady that's dancing with a scalpel in her hand,
Speaker 1: and she's a surgeon and she's just jiving right now.
Speaker 1: YEAHO waste nice snash. You got a body looks now
Speaker 1: to bro, that's like, that's a surgeon, dude. So this
Speaker 1: GOT Community noted, you know, just disclosure, full disclaimer. This
Speaker 1: got Community noted that this story is from twenty eighteen
Speaker 1: and the practitioner was a dermatologist, not a certified board surgeon,
Speaker 1: but the patient underwent lifel suction suffered cardiac arrests during
Speaker 1: the procedure due to lack of emergency equipment and was
Speaker 1: left with permanent brain damage. Now that community note doesn't like, Okay,
Speaker 1: this is still fucked up? Right? Am I wrong? Here? Like,
Speaker 1: it's still what are we doing? This person sedated and
Speaker 1: you're over here dancing. Just come on, wow, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: get copyrighte from that. I'm just kidding. Her voice ain't
Speaker 1: that good? I mean, come on, dude, this is crazy.
Speaker 1: Oh man, cake and a cup goes Jesus, Cake and
Speaker 1: a cup. I don't think there's many female black surgeons.
Speaker 1: Cake it a cup asserts, Well, you said that, not me.
Speaker 1: I have no idea. I mean I'm sure, and Kenya
Speaker 1: they got plenty. Female surgeons are pretty rare, you know.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you though, there's a lot of female anesthesiologists.
Speaker 1: And then they really make all the money if you
Speaker 1: think about it. I mean they get like one hundred
Speaker 1: k p per pump. Like every time they go do
Speaker 1: a quick put somebody out, they get like one hundred
Speaker 1: kde didn't motherfuckers make money? And I've met a lot
Speaker 1: of women that were anesthesiologists. Okay, so this is also yeah,
Speaker 1: So my point is we can't trust the medical system.
Speaker 1: Come on, guys, I mean these people are psychopaths. You
Speaker 1: remember during COVID all the nurses dancing, and apparently those
Speaker 1: were all AI videos. Let's see if we can find that,
Speaker 1: because that is intriguing, you know, if that's true, because
Speaker 1: I remember seeing all those nurses dancing and shit, and
Speaker 1: I thought it was real. But that was before AI
Speaker 1: came out the way it is today. So let's see
Speaker 1: we could pull that out. All right, Happy Sunday, How
Speaker 1: are we doing today? All right? AI nurses dancing during COVID,
Speaker 1: I'm almost positive that that was Yeah, look at this,
Speaker 1: Look at this. So they're saying this is all AI,
Speaker 1: and honestly, now that we have AI, I'm pretty sure
Speaker 1: that's exactly They're right. I think they're right. So these
Speaker 1: are all the nurses videos from them during COVID. Let's
Speaker 1: see if we agree if there is this AI or not.
Speaker 1: Let me turn off the music because they're gonna be
Speaker 1: playing music. Yeah, it's hard to tell, but that looks
Speaker 1: like AI. Come on, that does too. There's like five
Speaker 1: or six people in one room. Yeah, I don't know. Man,
Speaker 1: very likely could have been all just a big AI hoax.
Speaker 1: Why would they do that though? Why would they make
Speaker 1: AI videos of people dancing during COVID while people are
Speaker 1: stuck in their house. Well, I have an answer, and
Speaker 1: I'll be getting into it with William Ramsey in the
Speaker 1: first week or two of April. We're gonna be doing
Speaker 1: mind Wars, a mind Wars series together. I believe, maybe
Speaker 1: at least more than one episode talking about mind Wars.
Speaker 1: Michael Achino's Mind Wars. You know, he also created another book.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you've heard about it. It's called
Speaker 1: Mind Stars by Michael Achino. And this is a less
Speaker 1: less known book. This this one more tak It's called
Speaker 1: Mind Star Michael Aquino. Here, I'll show it to you.
Speaker 1: This is a less known book by Michael Lequino, the
Speaker 1: guy who's the you know that created the Temple to
Speaker 1: set connected to a lot of dark things. He created
Speaker 1: a book called Mind Wars, and I think that they're
Speaker 1: using that as a blueprint for psychological operations today. But
Speaker 1: he also created a book called Mind Star. It explores
Speaker 1: the mystery of the human soul. But you got to remember,
Speaker 1: this is a delving into the mystery of the human
Speaker 1: soul from somebody who believes in the you know, Satanic Bible,
Speaker 1: et cetera. By the way I read the Satanic Bible
Speaker 1: a little bit of it yesterday after praying for protection,
Speaker 1: and uh, I'll tell you what, man, it really opened
Speaker 1: my eyes. Don't understand what they believe in. I I
Speaker 1: kind of it is a Luciferian yet, like I get it,
Speaker 1: the Luciferian doctrine, the whole thing, Like I, yeah, it's fucked.
Speaker 1: I don't agree with any of it, I hope. Let
Speaker 1: me make that perfectly clear. It is a dark you know.
Speaker 1: It's all about uh, indulgence. It's it's all about indulgence,
Speaker 1: and it's all about this idea that that Lucifer gave
Speaker 1: us thought on a level where we could choose whether
Speaker 1: we want to go to heaven or be here in
Speaker 1: the material hell forever. And I choose the first. So anyway,
Speaker 1: just with that being said, this is from a person
Speaker 1: who believes in, you know, the Luciferian doctrine. And so
Speaker 1: he talks about the human soul, what it is, and
Speaker 1: how it can be detected and how it can be
Speaker 1: creatively and productively activated. So there's a historical survey that
Speaker 1: he includes of misapprehensions, misuses, and outright rejections of this
Speaker 1: crucial metaphysical core of human existence, the soul or mind
Speaker 1: star he calls it as redefined is the key to
Speaker 1: individual conscious immortality, which is addressed and prescribed clearly and coherently.
Speaker 1: So again, it's the Luciferian doctrine, the key to individual
Speaker 1: conscious immortality. I can't wait to get into Mystery Babylon.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna revamp Mystery Babylon by Bill Cooper. And the
Speaker 1: reason why is he literally laid all this out that
Speaker 1: this is just that man wants to become God. You know,
Speaker 1: they worshiped the sun, but the sun represents intellect, Luciferian
Speaker 1: principles of light, the false light, all that shit, Venus
Speaker 1: and all that. Yes, yes it plays a role. But
Speaker 1: the Pagan ra, all that shit, that's definitely the intellect
Speaker 1: from the divine being. So anyway, I'm gonna try to
Speaker 1: get this book so we could get into this as well.
Speaker 1: That's what I was getting at. But me and William
Speaker 1: Ramsey are gonna get into Mind Wars together, do a
Speaker 1: nice series on it. Welcome, Welcome, everybody. Yes, Bill Cooper,
Speaker 1: baby the Goat. I've listened to you know, my History
Speaker 1: babble on a few times and read it a few times.
Speaker 1: I've taken notes on it a few times. I'm about
Speaker 1: to do it again. So I'm gonna listen to each episode.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna break down each episode. I'm gonna do a
Speaker 1: show on it. I'm gonna try to do it kind
Speaker 1: of like I'm literally gonna like revamp it. So what
Speaker 1: I what I plan to do is lay it out
Speaker 1: just like he did, not in a plagiarized way, but
Speaker 1: like lay it out just like he did, and then
Speaker 1: add some modern context to what we see today. Because
Speaker 1: as I listened to it before, I remember having that
Speaker 1: the modern context to what he's talking about. I think
Speaker 1: it'd be great. With all that being said, California is
Speaker 1: using virtual reality on people in prison and it's working.
Speaker 1: Curtis Jarvin virtualized them. It looks like they're practicing this technology.
Speaker 1: So in California, the birth plays much of the world's
Speaker 1: technology innovation. Virtual reality is being used in an unexpected
Speaker 1: setting prisons. Forard facilities, Incarcerated people put on meta donated
Speaker 1: headsets pardon to help prepare for them for re entry
Speaker 1: into society and the experiences they may have encounter after release.
Speaker 1: These include exiting prison on release day, attending job interviews,
Speaker 1: navigating public spaces, paying for groceries, and even participating in
Speaker 1: family gatherings. For those hold in solitary confinement, virtual reality
Speaker 1: offers scenes from the outside world, such as Paris, Thailand.
Speaker 1: Program organizers claim that the use of VR in solitary
Speaker 1: confinement has coincided with sharp reductions and disciplinary infractions. Wow, dude,
Speaker 1: look at this. Hold on, let me get back up here.
Speaker 1: Let's look at this all well.
Speaker 4: For those behind bars, freedom is no longer just about
Speaker 4: opening the gates. It's also about surviving a world that
Speaker 4: has moved on without them.
Speaker 5: Inside a California prison, virtual reality is being used as
Speaker 5: a bridge between incarceration and reintegration, from learning basic life
Speaker 5: skills to rediscovering hope and purposes.
Speaker 6: In routines nights in silence. For the men and women
Speaker 6: incarcerated in prisons, the world outside goes from being distant
Speaker 6: to one that they can't relate to surprisingly even resolving
Speaker 6: a conflict, skills most of us take for granted. For some,
Speaker 6: the experience is also way to escape the mental strain
Speaker 6: of incarceration. The program combines immersive experiences with practical training.
Speaker 6: Participants move through virtual cities, natural landscapes and everyday scenarios
Speaker 6: designed to mirror the challenge.
Speaker 1: Hey that shivell on the beach they will face once released.
Speaker 6: The activity is aimed at building confidence by teaching essential
Speaker 6: lives skills, all within a safe, controlled environment.
Speaker 1: That's a wild shit. That's a wild shit. Uh. Somebody said, well, yeah,
Speaker 1: I have to look into the Exodus two and six
Speaker 1: and how it pertains the Trump getting shot in the ear. Yeah,
Speaker 1: techno prison. Hell, that's exactly right, bird man. And you know,
Speaker 1: it's that's some crazy shit right there. And then they're
Speaker 1: like just chilling there. Everybody's just sitting next to each
Speaker 1: other in virtual reality. That's just wild. It's probably better
Speaker 1: than just sitting there and all the shit they got
Speaker 1: to deal with without the virtual reality. I mean, I'll
Speaker 1: give them that, you know, it's definitely better than that.
Speaker 1: I can give them that. So but yeah, so, I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, these virtual prisons. You know, this is the
Speaker 1: beginning of the idea of virtualizing people. You know, it's
Speaker 1: the beginning of the idea of putting people in a
Speaker 1: virtual oasis so they can enjoy this life that they
Speaker 1: really they don't actually do anything real, tangible, right, I
Speaker 1: guess speaking to that, we should talk a little bit
Speaker 1: about since we're talking about this, I mean, how this
Speaker 1: all kind of interacts with each other in a weird way?
Speaker 1: Is the robot? Now, you guys know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: By now, I'm sure you've seen that a robot named
Speaker 1: Neo was walked through the White House with Vanka Trump
Speaker 1: or Millennia. Where fucked guys? I mean, come on, man,
Speaker 1: this is crazy. So let's check this out. You know.
Speaker 1: And of course, what's the main thing that they want
Speaker 1: to do with this robot. They want to come for
Speaker 1: your kids. They just want to come for your kids.
Speaker 1: That's all. We could trust these people with our kids, right.
Speaker 1: If there's one thing I can trust them with, it's
Speaker 1: my kids, you know. I mean that's what That's one
Speaker 1: thing I do trust the government? Uh, these private companies
Speaker 1: Elon Musk, right, I trust them with my children. Crazy?
Speaker 1: All right? Well, what's going on here? I gotta type
Speaker 1: it in again. Robot at the White House? All right,
Speaker 1: let's check this out. Human building the United States of America.
Speaker 5: I agreeful to be part of the history of the
Speaker 5: movement of powerful Yoman technology and education.
Speaker 1: Well, then we'll be of it. Dude, I don't like
Speaker 1: the way Mlanie has been looking the whole time that
Speaker 1: she's displaying this robot. She's giving the same kind of
Speaker 1: look whenever she first brought the robot out too. It's
Speaker 1: just weird. Let's see if I can find uh, the
Speaker 1: other one of her bringing him out see here. Well
Speaker 1: I can't, but you know, I'll tell you what the
Speaker 1: White House app. I hope. I don't want to get
Speaker 1: off tangent here, but ope, nobody got the white House app.
Speaker 1: They dropped an app recently, and this app has it
Speaker 1: runs foreground services. It can appear on top of other apps.
Speaker 1: It runs at startup, Google Play, license check. It also
Speaker 1: can view network connections, prevent phone from sleeping, view Wi
Speaker 1: Fi connections, use fingerprint hardware, receive data from the Internet,
Speaker 1: control vibration, have full network access, and use your biometric hardware.
Speaker 1: So the White House app is really just a spyware
Speaker 1: service that they're trying to get you to put on
Speaker 1: your phone, just so you know, you know, I mean,
Speaker 1: this is just we're on another level here right now,
Speaker 1: and people are just I mean eating it up, you know.
Speaker 1: All right, let me see robout at the White House.
Speaker 1: Let's see if I can find the other video where
Speaker 1: she walks down Uh, here we go, she's walking down here.
Speaker 1: We'll let me pause it. All right, Well, people were
Speaker 1: talking about how she wasn't walking like, uh, like a
Speaker 1: woman the whole time. She was kind of walking like
Speaker 1: a man a little bit. Let's back it up, see
Speaker 1: if we can see. All right, so she walks like
Speaker 1: woman woman. Hold on here, let me let me open
Speaker 1: it up for you. All right, we're good, We're good.
Speaker 1: We're good. Nope, nope, we're good. So I know what
Speaker 1: they're saying. She kind of changes her gate while she
Speaker 1: walks as if she's like unnaturally walking like a woman.
Speaker 1: I don't know, dude, I mean whatever, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean, who gives a shit? I can't really tell.
Speaker 1: So this is what she had to say about it.
Speaker 1: Let's see see here what she hunt she's talking about. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, in the comfort of your home, you can
Speaker 1: have these robots teaching you.
Speaker 4: Imagine a humanoid educator named Plato. Access to the classical
Speaker 4: studies is now instantaneous literature, science, art, philosophy, mathematics.
Speaker 1: And did you notice they called this robot Plato. They
Speaker 1: call it Plato because the neo Platonic era that they're
Speaker 1: trying to enter with this new age of Atlantis, the
Speaker 1: Golden Age, the Golden era. And so why didn't they
Speaker 1: name this robot Aristotle? You know, Aristotle was more of
Speaker 1: a philosopher if you want to talk Greek philosophers, right, No,
Speaker 1: but Plato was initiated in the temple of the King's
Speaker 1: chamber with the pyramids and etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. He talked
Speaker 1: to He's the guy who is famous for speaking about Atlantis,
Speaker 1: the god kings of old, the new Atlantis. This technique,
Speaker 1: the Coeo king patchwork system, it all ties together. So
Speaker 1: this does tie in with what we're talking about today.
Speaker 1: Check this out history.
Speaker 4: Humanity's entire corpus of information is available in the comfort
Speaker 4: of your home. Plato will provide in.
Speaker 1: The confinement of your prison. As I say, I don't
Speaker 1: think the comfort of your home sounds good, but the
Speaker 1: lockdowns from COVID just makes me look at it different.
Speaker 4: A personalized experience, adoptive to the needs of each student.
Speaker 4: Plato is always patient and always available. Predictably, our children
Speaker 4: we develop deep critical thinking an independent reasoning abilities. The
Speaker 4: AI powered Plato will boost analytics skills and problem solving
Speaker 4: and adopt in real time to a students space.
Speaker 1: I just don't think you're gonna get more critical thinking
Speaker 1: from using a robot for doing your thinking. I mean,
Speaker 1: I guess one could argue it's a tutor based system.
Speaker 1: But either way, we should not be h we should
Speaker 1: not be giving off I'm trying to think of the
Speaker 1: word but segmenting off our critical thinking to these machines
Speaker 1: and these systems. So anyway, Plato, the robot, you know,
Speaker 1: bringing back the bringing it back. Can you imagine asking
Speaker 1: your Plato? Can you imagine asking your Plato about the
Speaker 1: three thousand years that we'll call in a drone strike.
Speaker 1: That's hilarious, you know, Hey, what up? Biblical? What up?
Speaker 1: Steve Steven Steven. Yeah, Plato is definitely a weird one.
Speaker 1: You know, No Plato as in the toy I'm pretty
Speaker 1: sure it's Plato as in the Philosopher New robot Plato.
Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure it's called Plato. Yes, Plato, like the Philosopher,
Speaker 1: a patient's always available educator, capable of adapted to each
Speaker 1: student's need, promoting critical thinking and fringing up time for
Speaker 1: other activities. Milannia Trump says, So, yeah, buddy, Plato is
Speaker 1: gonna come teach your kids for you in your house,
Speaker 1: and it's gonna make sure you're doing your doing what
Speaker 1: you're supposed to be doing. And so anyway, just moving
Speaker 1: on from that, let's talk more about neuralink, right, Let's
Speaker 1: get into the idea of this prison system, digital prison system.
Speaker 1: It kind of leads into neuralink. This weird shit going
Speaker 1: on with that. There is stuff brewing up with this.
Speaker 1: So technology is turning immigration detention into an invisible leash.
Speaker 1: Let's start off with this and then we'll get into
Speaker 1: the next aspect of this. This is a multifaceted situation.
Speaker 1: We got here. So mary Ella crossed in Arizona just
Speaker 1: after dawn, her daughter Isabella pressed tightly in her chest,
Speaker 1: both of them shivering despite the desert. Okay, I don't
Speaker 1: want the SOB story. They crossed over here legally, Border
Speaker 1: patrol picked them up. Okay. Mary Ellen Isabella were separated
Speaker 1: that night just for processing. Okay, she cannot sleep, YadA, YadA.
Speaker 1: Mary Ellen Isabella were moved to a privately run facility
Speaker 1: detention center in Texas. Maryella had no idea what that meant.
Speaker 1: The facility looked like a warehouse. Cameras tracked her every
Speaker 1: move and a heavy bracelet was clasped to her ankle.
Speaker 1: It buzzed softly every few hours. She later learned it
Speaker 1: logged her location, steps and even patterns of restlessness, restlessness night.
Speaker 1: Every call to her brother costs nearly a dollar a minute,
Speaker 1: medical care required or request followed by a long wait. Okay,
Speaker 1: but what matters is that they have this app that
Speaker 1: called smart Link, which would use the phone camera to
Speaker 1: scan her face. So Ice is kind of testing out
Speaker 1: this biometric system tracking system. Palaenteer style may then style Gotham.
Speaker 1: These are all the different data services for Palenteer like Gotham.
Speaker 1: Here let's show you so you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: So Gotham has talent or talent here has Gotham. Gotham
Speaker 1: is a flagship data analytics platform designed for government and
Speaker 1: defense agencies, enabling them to integrate, analyze, and visualize vast
Speaker 1: amounts of data for actionable insight. Now this is for
Speaker 1: police officers, emerging threats, operational challenges. But pretty much it's
Speaker 1: a fucking police state system that can can watch everything
Speaker 1: you do and YadA YadA. So then they also have MAVEN,
Speaker 1: which is more for war and drones. But this is
Speaker 1: kind of what they're using like in the military current
Speaker 1: currently Pentagon expands use to volunteer AI in the new
Speaker 1: Defense contract. It's a long thing. But MAVEN itself, oh
Speaker 1: here it is. MAVEN uses artificial intelligence processes imagery century
Speaker 1: data collected from drones, satellites, and other surveillance systems. So
Speaker 1: like the apps that this border patrol service is giving
Speaker 1: out probably has the same type of data system. The
Speaker 1: goal is to reduce the workload of human analytics speed
Speaker 1: decision making. But in practice what does it do? I'm
Speaker 1: trying to get to They just got so much bullshit,
Speaker 1: like just say what it does? So okay, data center, warfare,
Speaker 1: dependence and oversight, you guys get the point. They're just
Speaker 1: fucking using the AI so they could track everything and
Speaker 1: kill everything. That's what they're doing. And so the point
Speaker 1: is that they're using the same thing for these ice
Speaker 1: detention centers to try and smart Link Let's see who
Speaker 1: owns smart link? Is this connected to anybody important? See
Speaker 1: a polenteer is connected to smart link? Or Peter Teal
Speaker 1: maybe the Teal, maybe the Fellowship Teal, Fellowship maybe I
Speaker 1: wouldn't be surprised. Uh nope, smart link ice, Huh, they
Speaker 1: really have nothing about it inside look at smart links. Okay,
Speaker 1: let's get some information on this smart link. What is this? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't Yeah, I don't know who created it. It
Speaker 1: could be a government app. I'm not really entirely sure.
Speaker 1: I was just curious if it has anything to do
Speaker 1: with these same tech bros that we always see. So anyhow,
Speaker 1: one night, she woke up in a panic, convinced that
Speaker 1: the app had recorded her face incorrectly. Her phone had died.
Speaker 1: She cried silently so because the smart app would set
Speaker 1: alarms if she didn't check in on time. So she
Speaker 1: wasn't in physical detention. But Mariella's freedom existed within the
Speaker 1: boundaries of an app. It's a digital prison, guys, That's
Speaker 1: what we're getting at here. They created digital prison. So
Speaker 1: Mariella's story is a caposite drawn from real accounts and
Speaker 1: people caught up and increasingly digitized immigrant detention. So they're
Speaker 1: just practicing this data tracking in this surveillance state police
Speaker 1: state digital prison tracking system. The report examines the rise
Speaker 1: of digital technologies and immigrant reenforcement enforcement like ankle monitors
Speaker 1: GPS enable watches and biometric reporting apps. That's the big
Speaker 1: one to worry about. Let's look into those a little
Speaker 1: bit more. The use of phase recognition app for people
Speaker 1: facing deportation. So this is yeah, I mean, they're just
Speaker 1: going to be bringing that out. I wonder if anybody's
Speaker 1: trying to use this for civilians yet, Like, is there
Speaker 1: a state that's trying to do this? Please? Let's see here,
Speaker 1: smart Lily because a mobile app developed by bi incorporated,
Speaker 1: a subsidiary of the private prison company Geo Group. Great,
Speaker 1: so it's a private prison app monitors certain migrants. The
Speaker 1: app allows for real time communication, Okay, but it doesn't
Speaker 1: say anything about using it on domestically yet they will.
Speaker 1: Don't worry, don't you worry. So as we get into this,
Speaker 1: Neuralink implanet ice to tens without consent. So in July
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, Elon Musk announced that Neuralink needs to
Speaker 1: scale from seven brain implants to one thousand implants by
Speaker 1: the end of twenty twenty six, nine hundred and ninety
Speaker 1: three additional people over fifteen months, sixty patients per month
Speaker 1: receiving experimental brain surgery. Given the pace at which they
Speaker 1: completed the first seven implants. This timeline is very ambitious,
Speaker 1: but unless, of course, you solved some very specific problem
Speaker 1: about recruitment. Neuralink has FDA approval for two sites in
Speaker 1: the United States. The first is the Baro Neurological Institute
Speaker 1: in Phoenix, Arizona. Okay, that is the one that we showed.
Speaker 1: Let me go ahead and pull that up, because I
Speaker 1: feel like that's important that we have a side by
Speaker 1: side as we talk about this. That's the one that
Speaker 1: we talked about a little bit ago that talks about
Speaker 1: Neuralink and how there was somebody with brain damage. Really,
Speaker 1: there's somebody with brain damp Oh dude, come on, it's
Speaker 1: like right here, I'll find it. Maybe I got so
Speaker 1: many things, so many things, so many things, got angels
Speaker 1: in the sky, we got all kinds of shit. So anyway,
Speaker 1: it's the one I showed you a little bit ago.
Speaker 1: You guys know what I'm talking about. But the guy
Speaker 1: had brain aneurysms or whatever that was right near the
Speaker 1: Arizona location that he has all right, fuck it? Uh.
Speaker 1: This Ukrainian here legally on humanitarian patrol parole after fleeing
Speaker 1: the war. According to his wife, he had no pre
Speaker 1: existing health conditions, wasn't on any medical medications and past
Speaker 1: medical screenings, but sixteen days after arriving at Chrome, he
Speaker 1: was found dead with from a massive brain hemorrhage. The
Speaker 1: CT scan show catastrophic into cranial breeding bleeding. Sixteen days
Speaker 1: from intake to brain death, a healthy man in his forties.
Speaker 1: No explanation that anyone's offered publicly. The kind of thing that,
Speaker 1: under different circumstances might warrant investigation, So it makes you
Speaker 1: wonder what else might be not being investigated. Phoenix presented
Speaker 1: a different pattern. Near the borough In Neurological Institute, you'll
Speaker 1: find major ice facilities at Eloy and Florence. According to
Speaker 1: advocacy groups, the average time spent in solitary confinement at
Speaker 1: these Arizona facilities jumped from fourteen days in twenty twenty
Speaker 1: four to thirty eight days in twenty twenty five. That
Speaker 1: is kind of weird. Thirty eight days is a long
Speaker 1: time to be alone, long enough that if something happens
Speaker 1: to you, if you woke couple gaps in your memory
Speaker 1: or unexplained symptoms, it would be difficult to establish when
Speaker 1: or how long. Yeah, that's crazy. Long enough to make
Speaker 1: a person wonder if their own memory is reliable. So
Speaker 1: if you look at the USA spinning dot gov website
Speaker 1: and investigating further, the drey Dotsier identified other potent sites
Speaker 1: in Honolulu, which is consistent with the beginning of the
Speaker 1: detainee transfer from Florida, Arizona and Arizona detention facilities to Hawaii. Wow,
Speaker 1: so we're gonna get into what she said on her substack. Actually,
Speaker 1: but I could go ahead and just copy this even
Speaker 1: though I have it on my other page. But it's
Speaker 1: probably just easier just to pull it up now. Great
Speaker 1: follow Dredatier really is all right. So this was sent
Speaker 1: to me by the way, a long time ago, and
Speaker 1: I just didn't get into it yet. It was by
Speaker 1: who sent this to me. Bag lady. She came on
Speaker 1: tech bro whistleblower. She's a gangster, has some very good fines.
Speaker 1: So Dredasier says, she's starting a new series today. For months,
Speaker 1: she'd been watching Neuralink Elon mus brainship company. Not enough
Speaker 1: people are watching the company as closely as they should be. Okay,
Speaker 1: so here's the timeline. Twenty five, Elon Musk announced that
Speaker 1: Neuralink Okay, well, we talked about all that. This is
Speaker 1: what she talked about. Okay, Neuralink has FDA approval for
Speaker 1: two sites. We talked about all that. Miami has a
Speaker 1: notorious chrome detention facility. That's where the Ukrainian man was
Speaker 1: found with brain hemorrhages sixteen days out. Yeah, yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: same story. Phoenix presents a different pattern. You'll find major
Speaker 1: ICE facilities at Elo Inflightce.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 1: Do they just copy and pasted everything she said already? Okay,
Speaker 1: Honolulu mystery. These patterns have been bothering her for months,
Speaker 1: so tonight she dug into it deeper. USA Spending dot
Speaker 1: com on website tracks federal contracts. It makes them publicly searchable.
Speaker 1: She started looking for anything connected to the Department of
Speaker 1: Defense with neurological surgery. So Honolulu was appearing over and
Speaker 1: over again, multiple DD contracts for neurological services, neurological procedures
Speaker 1: in neurological surgery practices. Now remember this is a place
Speaker 1: where he got the FDA approval to do his research
Speaker 1: at and all. This ramped up in twenty twenty five,
Speaker 1: which makes sense because Trump took office and they ran
Speaker 1: this new ICE program. So this isn't routine military care.
Speaker 1: But when she looked it up, she found nothing, no
Speaker 1: company website, no physicians for medical contractor performing neurological surgeries
Speaker 1: with federal money. Having zero online presence is unusual, not impossible,
Speaker 1: she asserts. So that's kind of where we're at with
Speaker 1: that the LinkedIn receipts, she decided to start searching LinkedIn
Speaker 1: for anyone listed Neuralink as their current employer. Hawaii isn't
Speaker 1: in on Neuralink's official list of FDA approved trial sites. Oh,
Speaker 1: it isn't. But absence of evidence isn't always evidence of absence.
Speaker 1: She found two people. The first is a clinical project
Speaker 1: manager who works at Neuralink and lives in Honolulu. Her
Speaker 1: listed responsibilities include trial site management, inflemation of clinical trials,
Speaker 1: management of oversight of external vendors, and negotiating relationships with organizations.
Speaker 1: But she worked, I mean she would have to work
Speaker 1: inside the place if she's doing clinical trials and stuff.
Speaker 1: The second person runs something called hang ten x Capital,
Speaker 1: a private equity firm that invests in fintech and food startups.
Speaker 1: Their portfolio in Neuralink was listed as one of their investments.
Speaker 1: First knowing the ground and anyway, so the missing piece.
Speaker 1: If her thesis is that something deeply wrong is happening
Speaker 1: with neuralink operations near ice detention facilities, then Hawaii might
Speaker 1: fit the pattern too, So she got deeper into it,
Speaker 1: started asking around. In February twenty twenty five, I signed
Speaker 1: an agreement to start housing detainees at FDC Honolulu. That's
Speaker 1: a nine hundred and ninety two bed facility. Wow. Holy shit.
Speaker 1: Then an article in twenty twenty five of July explained
Speaker 1: that detainees were being transferred to Hawaii from Florida and
Speaker 1: Arizona detention facilities. So these are the exact two sites
Speaker 1: where neuralink trials had already officially started. So there's definitely
Speaker 1: a correlation. I don't know about for sure if everything's
Speaker 1: one hundred percent, but it's very close to connected. So
Speaker 1: she has a doze connection. In February twenty twenty five,
Speaker 1: I signed an agreement with the FDC Honolulu for detainees
Speaker 1: to use there. It's also whenn Elon Musk Department of
Speaker 1: Government Efficiency was operating inside the White House. Those fired
Speaker 1: twenty FDA employees that same month. Wow. And then the
Speaker 1: exact offices that oversaw neuralink's clinical trials. So she removed
Speaker 1: the people's whose job it is to ask uncomfortable questions,
Speaker 1: and then you established the infrastructure that might generate uncomfortable
Speaker 1: question This is crazy. So then teenees were transferred to Hawaii,
Speaker 1: apparently go through five to seven different facilities. One detainee
Speaker 1: was arrested in Florida in May. So they just moved
Speaker 1: people around as a shell game. So a month of
Speaker 1: unaccounted time ends up happening when they arrive at Hawaii
Speaker 1: and they're forty five hundred miles away from anyone who
Speaker 1: might advocate for them. If something happened to you during
Speaker 1: that month, you try to explain it later, you'd have
Speaker 1: to account for your location across multiple sites and facilities.
Speaker 1: You'd have to remember everything, which obviously wouldn't happen with
Speaker 1: neurological things going on. This is insane, holy shit. So
Speaker 1: you need test subjects, and obviously they're finding them through
Speaker 1: this whole ice situation. So the Tuskegee study is a
Speaker 1: thing that we've done before. Guatemala syphilis experiment. The history
Speaker 1: of gynecology itself built on its slaved women who couldn't
Speaker 1: consent weren't an anesthetized, they can't talk. Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: she's very right here, and yeah, this is not the
Speaker 1: first time, so what's to follow that series? She's doing
Speaker 1: some good work. Amazing. Holy shit, dude, that blew my mind.
Speaker 1: That's a lot to get into. Sorry, guys, that was
Speaker 1: a deep dive right there. It is becoming a horror movie, absolutely, dude.
Speaker 1: This is insane. Dude. Man, Yeah, hit the like button
Speaker 1: for sure. Hit the like button. Get us going Fallout
Speaker 1: season two, just saying caking the cup says, can't make
Speaker 1: it neuralink without cracking a few eggs. You're right, You're
Speaker 1: exactly right. Yeah, man, I mean this is it's scary
Speaker 1: to tell you that, Kyle, what up? Yeah, So anyway,
Speaker 1: very crazy, We're gonna We're not done yet, by the way,
Speaker 1: I just had to take a breather. And that's crazy, dude.
Speaker 1: She was really just fucking She's got probably a lot
Speaker 1: more since then, because that was sent to me months ago.
Speaker 1: All right, let's get this going here, get a lot here,
Speaker 1: all right, First one, we sharing, yes, okay, this is
Speaker 1: the International Journal of Law, Management and Humanities, and this
Speaker 1: is about AI brain implants on prisoners. As it means
Speaker 1: to a team reformative justice versus neuro rights. Oh boy,
Speaker 1: this is I mean a horror movie's right, it really is.
Speaker 1: We're on the verge of a new revolution right now.
Speaker 1: Devices and methods aimed at accessing, evaluating, simulating, and influencing
Speaker 1: brain systems are rapidly expanding in the field of neurotechnology,
Speaker 1: propelled by recent advancements in artificial intelligence. These devices can
Speaker 1: be employed for therapeutic objectives regaining mobility for paralyzed individuals,
Speaker 1: as well as neurostimulation for brain activity. Researchers from all
Speaker 1: around the world are even attempting to interface our mind
Speaker 1: with computers. When it comes to protecting our mental privacy,
Speaker 1: this is where ethical boundaries come into play. So for
Speaker 1: this reason, neuro rights are crucial. So this gets into
Speaker 1: all that according to a recent developed prison concept, AI
Speaker 1: brain implants have the potential to transform prisoners completely by
Speaker 1: placing more emphasis on rehabilitation than punishment. This prison of
Speaker 1: the future seeks to lower long term incarceration costs reoffending rates,
Speaker 1: and then this novel method has the potential to alter
Speaker 1: the way society views criminals. Doesn't it sound like a
Speaker 1: science fiction film? From the future. It's more than just
Speaker 1: an idea, can completely change the way we think about
Speaker 1: crime and punishment. Are you curious how this will function
Speaker 1: in the legal implications lie ahead? Very crazy? So anyway,
Speaker 1: it talks about neurotechnology, which includes tools and processes that
Speaker 1: aim to access, evaluate, a mimic and influence neurological systems.
Speaker 1: So anyway talks about neuro rights being important because of
Speaker 1: our mental privacy. But of course prisoners don't have mental privacy,
Speaker 1: so the brain implants done on such people have led
Speaker 1: to ethical concerns as well. There's a great possibility of
Speaker 1: misuse of this power. To what extent the brain implants
Speaker 1: must be done. I mean they literally admit like we
Speaker 1: could really be opening up a Pandora's box. Here. The
Speaker 1: UNESCO report report our Neurotechnology is warned that neurotechnologies developments
Speaker 1: hold profound applications for human eye identity, autonomy, privacy, behavior
Speaker 1: and well being, i ea, the very essence of what
Speaker 1: it means to be human. Do we need to legislate?
Speaker 1: Do we need legislation to protect our brains? This is
Speaker 1: a significant and fascinated question to consider. Not really, I
Speaker 1: think we just leave it alone. I would like to
Speaker 1: just leave it alone. Every saint has a pass and
Speaker 1: every sinner has a future. Never write off the man
Speaker 1: wearing the criminal attire, but remove the dangerous degeneracy in him,
Speaker 1: restores retarded human potential, violistic healing of his fevered, fatigued
Speaker 1: or frustrated inside, and by repairing the repressive though hidden
Speaker 1: in justice of the social order, vicariously guilty of the
Speaker 1: criminal behavior of any innocent comics. This was a book
Speaker 1: quote from a book death Sentence on the death sentence. Anyway,
Speaker 1: these people are crazy, So anyway, Jesus. One close analysis,
Speaker 1: it would seem as that there's a possibility that we
Speaker 1: are God's robots, as somebody said. Recent advances and artificial
Speaker 1: intelligence have been heralded as a game changer because of
Speaker 1: their capacity to produce speech that sound humans from vast
Speaker 1: amounts of data. So AI implants like neuralink or devices
Speaker 1: implanted in the brain, enabling direct communication between the brain
Speaker 1: and computers, helping with medical conditions and enhancing human capabilities.
Speaker 1: The implants ultrafine threads helped transmit signals to participate participants' brains.
Speaker 1: Allen Musk has stated that spikes will enable control of
Speaker 1: our phone or computer and through them almost any device
Speaker 1: just by thinking. Spikes are active activity by neurons, which
Speaker 1: the National Institute of Health describes as cells that use
Speaker 1: electrical and chemical signals to send information around the brain
Speaker 1: and to the body. So this neuralink crime study used
Speaker 1: as a robot to surgically place the brain computer interface
Speaker 1: implant in a region of the brain that controls the
Speaker 1: intention to move. So the initial goal is to enable
Speaker 1: people to control a computer cursor or keyboard alone. All right,
Speaker 1: So let's get past all this. So, so this talks
Speaker 1: about cognifying AI generated memories. Cognify use AI, use AI
Speaker 1: to produce realistic, vivid memories of the crime from the
Speaker 1: viewpoint of the victim. So sequently inserted into the prisoner's brain.
Speaker 1: I mean, they do empathy and remorse. This intention is
Speaker 1: to arouse deep empathy and regret for the victim, which
Speaker 1: may result in a shift in the prisoner's perspective and conduct. Dude,
Speaker 1: this shit is a nightmare. I mean it's a nightmare.
Speaker 1: If you can imagine, like, you know, doing this like
Speaker 1: without an implant and doing this wirelessly, and you could
Speaker 1: create this whole idea of like creating empathy and remorse.
Speaker 1: You could like really turn that up and crank it
Speaker 1: up and make somebody go insane because of putting a
Speaker 1: nightmare in their head. You know, I mean, I know
Speaker 1: it sounds like a horror movie, but every really fast
Speaker 1: trek rehabilitation Cognify provides a brief, intense rehabilitation period, possibly
Speaker 1: lasting only minutes instead of long jail terms. So anyway,
Speaker 1: there's brain mapping, AI generated memories, memory implantation, and then
Speaker 1: time compression. There's abuse potential given the ability to alter memories.
Speaker 1: There's a chance that this technology will be abused. Data privacy,
Speaker 1: serious privacy issues with the gathering of archiving of brain data,
Speaker 1: and then of course unexpected repercussions. It is unknown how
Speaker 1: artificial memory implantation may affect the inmate's mental and emotional
Speaker 1: health in the long run. All things considered, it is
Speaker 1: an intriguing idea that seeks to transform the criminal destiny.
Speaker 1: We're like, you know what, we're fucking doing it anyway,
Speaker 1: But it's appeared to control the moral dilemmas, et cetera. Yeah,
Speaker 1: well we've seen that. You know, humans do a great
Speaker 1: job of controlling the dilemmas. Whenever they have power, they
Speaker 1: get real time adjustments to hormones and neurotransmitters would simultaneously
Speaker 1: cause emotional states like regret and guilt. I don't love that.
Speaker 1: Even though they may believe they've spent years in a hellish,
Speaker 1: ultra violent prison environment suited to their individual personalities, in
Speaker 1: psychological states, they will not have aged at all. While
Speaker 1: all of this may seem theoretical, it is actually grounded
Speaker 1: in true science. Scientists have previously been able to successfully
Speaker 1: create false memories and mice and transform their dreadful recollections
Speaker 1: into joyful ones. Wow. So right here it says that
Speaker 1: scientists were able to transmit in twenty eighteen a memory
Speaker 1: from one marine snail to another. So the current prison
Speaker 1: system encompasses several issues, including insufficient rehabilitation, et cetera. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we know that. So, yeah, that's kind of what we're
Speaker 1: looking at. Obviously, that's a great rundown of the technology
Speaker 1: that's behind some of this stuff that they're looking into.
Speaker 1: So with that being said, let's get into this. Oh
Speaker 1: we already did this one. Okay, let's check this out.
Speaker 1: I this one's good, this one's going to be real good.
Speaker 1: I'm excited for this one, all right, So just to
Speaker 1: back up the drade Icia thing, I guess this is
Speaker 1: going to have some of the drade icier shit in it.
Speaker 1: What is this? What is this from Ice being investigated
Speaker 1: for noncondentual neuralink testing on detainees. This was written in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five. This might be the drade I CIA,
Speaker 1: but this person's reporting on it. So let's see how
Speaker 1: much new stuff we can get out of it. I'm
Speaker 1: not really sure we will. Maybe we need to just
Speaker 1: go to her series because it seems like people just
Speaker 1: report on her stuff. They're not really She's like the
Speaker 1: one doing actual, investigated, investigatory work on it. So there's
Speaker 1: a growing body of evidence reviewed by the dred Dots
Speaker 1: channels suggesting Elon Mus's brain implant company, Neuralink, may be
Speaker 1: involved in experimental activities extending far beyond it's publicly approved
Speaker 1: clinical trials, including possible testing your immigration detention centers and
Speaker 1: undisclosed federal medical facilities. These revelations, now under preliminary review
Speaker 1: by independent journalists and legal experts, echo historical abuses in
Speaker 1: the medical research and raise urgent questions about oversight and
Speaker 1: informed consent. So this is everything she did. We can
Speaker 1: kind of get past that. Let's see if they got
Speaker 1: anything to add. It doesn't seem like they do. Okay, cool,
Speaker 1: nothing to add. Then moving on, So this is another
Speaker 1: thing that's kind of coming up. Brain deaths at the
Speaker 1: chron detention center. So it seems that there's been more
Speaker 1: than one at that detention center. So wait, how do
Speaker 1: we get to the Oh shit? All right, here we go. Okay,
Speaker 1: so yeah, there's multiple people here. Three men died at
Speaker 1: Miami's Chrome Detention Center between December and February. All three
Speaker 1: deaths involved the same thing. Their brain stopped working correctly.
Speaker 1: The cause of death wasn't disclosed. One person at Caesar's dizziness, headache.
Speaker 1: One man obviously had no medical condition. The one we
Speaker 1: talked about, he's had the brain injury. Brain dead within hours.
Speaker 1: One brain death might be tragedy. Two coincidence, threes many
Speaker 1: months all the same facilities starts to look like something else.
Speaker 1: Elon Mus' brain implant company needs test subjects desperately. As
Speaker 1: we talked about, the FDA employees who were supposed to
Speaker 1: oversee everything got fired. Must announce in twenty twenty four
Speaker 1: that Neuralink need to scale it up. Okay, dude, everybody's
Speaker 1: just repeating what she did, so let's look up. Okay,
Speaker 1: so I've got the drede dossier substeck, I do follow her.
Speaker 1: Let me go ahead check that out. See what we
Speaker 1: can find some more about this neuralink situation past that
Speaker 1: one article, because it seems like she should have more
Speaker 1: than one. All right, let's figure this out. Guys. Can
Speaker 1: we search inside of the dred dossier or do I
Speaker 1: got to sit here and go through every one of them.
Speaker 1: It looks like we're gonna have to go through every
Speaker 1: one of them. All right. I don't want to log
Speaker 1: in right now, but oh I got an idea, so
Speaker 1: I'll just look it up. First of all, we'll go
Speaker 1: to the chat. How's everybody doing today? What do you
Speaker 1: guys think about this shit? It's pretty crazy. Let's see
Speaker 1: what's in my head? Drey dossier? Is that what it's called?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, let's go dude,
Speaker 1: all right, cool, cool, cool, Give me a second here,
Speaker 1: I've got him. She's got like six parts to this.
Speaker 1: Hell yeah, let's go all right, give me a second.
Speaker 1: It's part one, it's part six. What is this trying
Speaker 1: to find part two. Here we go part two. All right,
Speaker 1: let me see here. Okay, okay, the great cyberpunk Riders
Speaker 1: are the twentieth cent Maybe I should just send this
Speaker 1: to myself. I'll just do that. That'd be more kind
Speaker 1: to the listeners. Thanks for being patient. But dude, we're
Speaker 1: about to get into it. Dude, she's got a lot.
Speaker 1: She's got like six parts. I mean, holy shit, I
Speaker 1: wish I could just find everyone quickly individually so it's
Speaker 1: not taking so much time because it seems hard to
Speaker 1: find on substack. She shows like one random one and
Speaker 1: one random one. You know how it be. You know
Speaker 1: how it be people over here trying to people over
Speaker 1: here trying to promote my shit. Dude, I don't need
Speaker 1: to promote my shit, promote my own shit. Need anybody
Speaker 1: promote my shit? Oh I'll take you just can be
Speaker 1: forty percent get out of here. Sorry guys, anyway, all right,
Speaker 1: thinking out loud. Okay, so let's pull this up. The
Speaker 1: great cyberpunk riders of the twentieth century understood something we've forgotten.
Speaker 1: The most dangerous moment in the dystopian world isn't when
Speaker 1: the technology arrives fully formed. It's in the messy, unregulated
Speaker 1: space where it's being built. That's a fact, dude. So
Speaker 1: BCI technology and companies like Neuralink, people like Musk fixated
Speaker 1: on dystopian possibilities like these technologies might bring. Let's get
Speaker 1: into it. Part one was a lot about the detention facilities,
Speaker 1: et cetera. So what she's gonna get into first time?
Speaker 1: Me say something that might surprise you. Brank computer interfaces
Speaker 1: aren't far Okay, So she's gonna get deep into stuff
Speaker 1: we've talked about on the show for a while now.
Speaker 1: But it wouldn't hurt to go over it a little bit. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we'll go past it a little bit because we've done
Speaker 1: a lot. I mean, we could maybe do this separately
Speaker 1: and gain do this another time. So Neuralink's different. It's
Speaker 1: not the only company working on brain computer interfaces. There's
Speaker 1: plenty of others, but these companies operate the way medical
Speaker 1: device companies are supposed to operate. They didn't initially want
Speaker 1: to register their Okay, all right, cool, she's just given
Speaker 1: a background on a lot of this shit. Okay. So
Speaker 1: Neuralink's prime registry is almost never up to date. The
Speaker 1: information is sparse, vague months behind, and major announcements about
Speaker 1: patients don't come through proper specific scientific channels. They come
Speaker 1: via ex posts. Elon is literally tweeting about brain surgery
Speaker 1: results instead of publishing peer reviewed data data that is true.
Speaker 1: You don't have to understand neural engineering and FDA filings
Speaker 1: to grabs this much. When surgeon tasks with putting devices
Speaker 1: in people's brains decided he can't stay, that means something
Speaker 1: went very wrong. And when because there's a brain surgeon
Speaker 1: he left, so that person probably seen enough and uh yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, my god. So she gets into the founding
Speaker 1: of neuralink.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: She talks about how there's just a lot of risk
Speaker 1: with it. Neuralink hadn't done one uh in twenty eighteen,
Speaker 1: they hadn't done any human trials yet, so they have
Speaker 1: moved pretty quick. So Part three will pick up inside
Speaker 1: the labs after the doors closed, animal trials, missing reports,
Speaker 1: and employees who tried to speak up and disappear behind
Speaker 1: NDA's all the evans proving rap report was right and
Speaker 1: that by the time anyone listened it was already too late. Wow,
Speaker 1: good for her, dude, this is crazy. I wish they
Speaker 1: would have the next fucking part just right here, let's see.
Speaker 1: They should make it easier just to find the next ones.
Speaker 1: All right, well, let's see we can find it. Wow,
Speaker 1: she's got a lot of parts to this and went
Speaker 1: to part seven, Son of a bitch. So now just
Speaker 1: to stud you through what the Promitt evolution is going
Speaker 1: to look like in the next three years.
Speaker 5: Today we'll be had is one thousand electros again the
Speaker 5: mortialport text the part of the small part of the
Speaker 5: brain that you see in the navation club.
Speaker 1: All right. The scientists who left Benjamin Rappaport left Neuralink
Speaker 1: in twenty eighteen, two years after COVID something.
Speaker 6: We're just doing by ourselves with that, Governor said, where
Speaker 6: we went closely with the rep leaders.
Speaker 1: My bad crazy, Yeah, we're gonna get into this. This
Speaker 1: is nuts. So the scientists who left Benjamin Rappaport left
Speaker 1: Neuralink in twenty eighteen, two years after co founding the
Speaker 1: company with Musk six. Wow, he co founded it. He
Speaker 1: went on to build Precision Neuroscience, launched it in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one with a very specific mission to prove the
Speaker 1: brain computer interfaces could be built safely without invasive on
Speaker 1: this that Neuralink was pursuing Wow twenty twenty four, there's
Speaker 1: an interview with the Wall Street Journal. Rap Report was
Speaker 1: careful but clear about why he left. Pretty much devoted
Speaker 1: my entire life to professional life, to bringing neural interfaces
Speaker 1: from the world of science to the world of medicine.
Speaker 1: But he felt that in order to move to the
Speaker 1: world of medicine and technology, safety is paramount. So clearly
Speaker 1: he didn't think safety was an issue there. The difference
Speaker 1: is simple how they interact with brains issue. Neuralink uses
Speaker 1: penetrating microelectrodes thin threads that pierced into the brain. Precision
Speaker 1: uses surface microelectrodes that slip sitting on top of the
Speaker 1: brain without penetrating it. It causes some amount of brain damage,
Speaker 1: he said. So rap Report was one of many who left.
Speaker 1: By twenty twenty, only three of the eight founding scientists
Speaker 1: remained at Neuralink. The exodus included Max Hodak, company's president
Speaker 1: and co founder, a couple other people. Years of internal
Speaker 1: conflict was reported in Rush timelines, and they class was
Speaker 1: slow incremental pace of science, so that moved fast break shit.
Speaker 1: The scientists who stayed behind or joined later found themselves
Speaker 1: under what multiple former employees described as relentless pressure. Sounds
Speaker 1: like he does that with SpaceX and Tesla too. So
Speaker 1: we got animal trials. We know that a lot of
Speaker 1: crazy shit happened with the animal trials. So first human trial,
Speaker 1: first human trial, implant the company was announced on next
Speaker 1: of course, someone underwent experimental brain surgery to have electrodes
Speaker 1: threaded into their brain tissue, and we found out about
Speaker 1: it sandwich between cryptocurrency scams and AI generated slop. She's right,
Speaker 1: the patient was recovering well, Musset. Initial results showed promising
Speaker 1: neurospike detection. So the big reveal in March twenty twenty
Speaker 1: four we all saw this. Neuralink didn't mention during the
Speaker 1: March demonstration was that something had already gone wrong. There
Speaker 1: was a reporting that came out that after his surgery,
Speaker 1: a number of threads had retracted from his brain tissue,
Speaker 1: and these threads are tiny electrode wires that Neuralink robot
Speaker 1: inserts into the brain to detect neurosignals. Eighty five percent
Speaker 1: of the threads had pulled away from the tissue that
Speaker 1: were supposed to be monitoring. This was a major hardware
Speaker 1: complication and the threads retracting meant the implant was receiving
Speaker 1: significant fewer signals than intended, which would make it far
Speaker 1: less effective. So neuralink solution, according to the company, was
Speaker 1: to modify the algorithm to make the device more sensitive
Speaker 1: to the remaining threads. Wow, so this is very musk
Speaker 1: approach the problem solving. Yeah, yeah, this is just insane.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't trust him a mile within a mile of
Speaker 1: my brain, dude. So after years of complaints from animal
Speaker 1: rights groups, fifteen dead monkeys, after all the reports of
Speaker 1: rush timelines and shoddy experiments, multiple federal agencies were finally
Speaker 1: scrutinizing Neuralink's practices. In twenty twenty five, Trump was inaugurated
Speaker 1: for his second presidential term, and seems this was the
Speaker 1: saving grace for Elon's Neuralink. Within his first weekend office,
Speaker 1: Trump appointed Elon to lead the Department of DOGE and
Speaker 1: then he got rid of the FDA agents who would
Speaker 1: have been overseeing the regulatory assets for Neuralink. So seven
Speaker 1: days after he had got rid of him, systematically, those
Speaker 1: investigations that had been opened began to disappear. Trump's first
Speaker 1: week in office he fired seventeen of the inspectors. So
Speaker 1: the firings continued through March and into April, and of
Speaker 1: course after that his job was done and he left,
Speaker 1: so the conflict of his interest was impossible to miss. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So oh and then of course, by April twenty twenty five,
Speaker 1: the first patient had been implanted at the Miami site
Speaker 1: and he was paralyzed US veteran and the procedure was
Speaker 1: reported successful. Now it's expanded into Canada, and we know
Speaker 1: how Canada feels about people's lives, so so pretty much
Speaker 1: everybody left, all right, So now we can do part four.
Speaker 1: You guys enjoying this. I'm enjoying this. It's crazy. She's
Speaker 1: got some good shit. And there's It's wild Man, who
Speaker 1: is patient number four.
Speaker 4: What happens immediately?
Speaker 1: You can tell that a lot? All right? Okay, Mike
Speaker 1: has advanced als. So someone claims to his friend created
Speaker 1: an emergency fundraiser because Mike was in there where it's
Speaker 1: ready to give up on life. A Neuralink executive donated
Speaker 1: three thousand. Someone posted the video game integration and then yeah,
Speaker 1: so this person joins, Oh, she just gets into like
Speaker 1: transparency the patient that we can't find. Oh wow. So
Speaker 1: there's like a patient that we just don't really know
Speaker 1: what's going on. The language stopped cold. He's ready to
Speaker 1: give up on life. Yeah, yeah, okay, so let's get
Speaker 1: down here. Hm. She really gets Every article is just
Speaker 1: a deep dive. It's like, shit, we ain't got all
Speaker 1: that time. So yeah, I mean there's a lot to it.
Speaker 1: You guys definitely followed Dre dossier. Dude, she's fucking got
Speaker 1: that shit going. I highly recommend love to have her
Speaker 1: on sometime. She'll come on Love to see some of
Speaker 1: her research. We'll go to the chat little bit and
Speaker 1: then you know, probably get out of here. Super chats welcome.
Speaker 1: Super chats are welcome. If you guys appreciate the research,
Speaker 1: appreciate the love. Either way, go ahead and follow, like,
Speaker 1: subscribe and go hit up the Patreon if you wants
Speaker 1: three bucks one tier and otherwise, thanks for being you,
Speaker 1: thanks for coming and hanging out with me. Either way,
Speaker 1: we love it all right, So what do we got here?
Speaker 1: Made it late? How we doing though? Evil Glare mk,
Speaker 1: Ultra World is here, Alquium, You're very right. Science Fiction
Speaker 1: is Reality nineteen eighty four and Overdrive Welcome in, Craig,
Speaker 1: What up Craig exactly right, buddy, next pandemic will be
Speaker 1: chipped out. Yeah, no, shit, dude, it's gonna be the
Speaker 1: little small censor chips. If they're not already getting into
Speaker 1: your bloodstream just by spraying the airs, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: they're brand the error and doing shit. So humans have
Speaker 1: been here before. This is why they taught ethics once
Speaker 1: grave robbing was not a crime. My next phone is
Speaker 1: going to be a Nokia from the old times. Damn right,
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, evil glare. This shit was crazy, dude. Elon's
Speaker 1: out here. He's a mad sciencest dude. He doesn't give
Speaker 1: a fuck. He really seems to be just pursuing everything
Speaker 1: that Epstein was pursuing at Zoro Ranch. I mean, that
Speaker 1: is one of the things that Dre dot ca a like.
Speaker 1: She seemed to be talking about, Uh Elon's ranch. Hold
Speaker 1: on here, I'm pretty sure she times one. Give me
Speaker 1: in second here because I'm almost positive she had something
Speaker 1: in here and that was like Elon's ranch. Because I'm
Speaker 1: curious about that. All right, let's see here, come on,
Speaker 1: Well that's weird. It won't even pull up now anyway,
Speaker 1: all right, cool, So the best thing about Nokia is
Speaker 1: you can slam a shut slide across the table and
Speaker 1: not care if it slides off. Yeah, that's right, dude,
Speaker 1: How we do enjoy welcome? Welcome? These people are bloody vampires,
Speaker 1: especially Peter Teel. There's an interesting cyberpunk novel called The
Speaker 1: Metamorphosi is the Prime Intellect written in nineteen ninety four. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the nineties were the prime time for a lot of
Speaker 1: the cyberpunk, cybernetic all. This transhumanist movement kind of started
Speaker 1: to kick up around and then crazy pure black mirror shit.
Speaker 1: You're exactly right. Before long, it's gonna be like putting
Speaker 1: earbud in your ear and just linking to it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: pretty much. You need to roll up ALCOA might hear you? Dude,
Speaker 1: I'm over here. I'm packing a little one. Dude. Uh,
Speaker 1: testing on humans for years without disclosure? Yeah, honestly inside
Speaker 1: your bones. I think that that's kind of what this
Speaker 1: is showing, is that this guy's been doing some fuck
Speaker 1: shit for a while, and now, you know, with Trump
Speaker 1: in office, he's definitely able to just do all those things.
Speaker 1: But he seems to be getting caught right away by
Speaker 1: people like Dre Dosier. But there's not enough people really
Speaker 1: calling it out. So that's why we're trying to do
Speaker 1: our due diligence here, so you know the shit is
Speaker 1: hitting the fan. Her name Dre Dossier. Yeah yeah, I'll
Speaker 1: put it in here on substack. I'll put it in
Speaker 1: here right now for you. That's great, great, great follow
Speaker 1: on substack. She's got great deep dives. I always like
Speaker 1: to check her stuff out using the files to keep
Speaker 1: people from focusing on the ranch activities. You're exactly right, Joy,
Speaker 1: and that's what I'm talking about. Like Elon Musk. That's
Speaker 1: why I want to look at the ranch thing that
Speaker 1: he had. I'll find it for you guys. Hold on
Speaker 1: a second, bro, The Goosebumps books, you're right, those are fire,
Speaker 1: all these topics. You're right. I used to love that shit. Okay,
Speaker 1: let me see if I can find this. Hold on,
Speaker 1: we're just kicking it happy Sunday, all right. Hold on,
Speaker 1: h I don't know why I can't find it, dude.
Speaker 1: You guys are doing great. You guys are doing great.
Speaker 1: You guys are doing it absolutely great. Trying to get
Speaker 1: this pulled up.
Speaker 3: Why is this?
Speaker 1: Oh I get it, I'm d r e y oops. Okay,
Speaker 1: come on, dude, I'm sorry all this quiet time. Here,
Speaker 1: We're gonna find it. We're just gonna scroll fuck them
Speaker 1: the Neuralink ranch here it is. Thank god we found it.
Speaker 1: Thank you for your patience. Okay, So what is this
Speaker 1: Neuralink branch? So it says. In October twenty twenty five,
Speaker 1: Neuralink announced new facilities in San Francisco, a move that
Speaker 1: felt oddly out of step with the playbook we've seen
Speaker 1: from Musk other ventures, all of which have been pounding
Speaker 1: the drum for Texas in reach recent years. California is
Speaker 1: supposedly overregulated to liberal et cetera. So I go back
Speaker 1: if it's such a healthscape. By return, in Part five,
Speaker 1: she mapped out the money trails, tracing six hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty million dollars in fresh funding as it moved through
Speaker 1: a web of investors in special purpose vehicles. There's major
Speaker 1: foreign investments carefully tucked into the structure. She followed these
Speaker 1: flows to understand who was on the top and who
Speaker 1: was in the middle, et cetera. But that work left
Speaker 1: toward a different question, one that felt more concrete and
Speaker 1: potentially more revealing. If the capitol flows and ownership structures
Speaker 1: are this carefully obscured. Where is that money actually being spent?
Speaker 1: Physical infrastructure doesn't hide as easily as a Delaware LLC labs.
Speaker 1: So anyway, all these she gets into it. So her
Speaker 1: next step straightforward enough, She went into looking at the places.
Speaker 1: So there's this place called river Bottom's Ranch. She pulls
Speaker 1: up the property records and the site looks straightforward enough.
Speaker 1: Thirty seven acre parcels sitting alongside Colorado River, twenty minutes
Speaker 1: southeast of Austin, OH and right by the Texas property.
Speaker 1: The big kind of place you'd expect to see horses cattle,
Speaker 1: but instead it suggested that a high technology medical device
Speaker 1: manufacturing and certainly nothing that would implicate Okay, yeah, so wait,
Speaker 1: let's get down to it. She dug into the ownership
Speaker 1: and something didn't add up. Property was listed under a
Speaker 1: company called River Bottoms Ranch LLC. There's not any obvious
Speaker 1: Musk affiliated entity, just a ranch company with a pastoral name.
Speaker 1: So she wondered why this particular address kept showing up
Speaker 1: repeatedly whenever she searched for neuralink facilities, and so she
Speaker 1: pulled the LLC filings from the Texas office to see
Speaker 1: who actually is behind the ranch, and then that's when
Speaker 1: things came into place. The LLC's president was listed as
Speaker 1: Jared Birdshaw and member was listed as the Neuralink Corporation
Speaker 1: Must Business Dealings. Jared Birschall's name should be familiar. He
Speaker 1: runs Accession LLC, which is Elon's family office, the entity
Speaker 1: that manages Must's personal wealth and handles the paperwork. So
Speaker 1: he probably just has a ranch inside under that LLC
Speaker 1: that's like his home. And then there was Neuralink Corps
Speaker 1: listed right there as a member, not exactly hidden, but
Speaker 1: not advertised either. So this is Neuralink's facility registered under
Speaker 1: shell company structure with Must money manager running it. On paper.
Speaker 1: She looked at the construction documents and permitting paperwork and
Speaker 1: found that Scott Padilla listed as the primary contact for
Speaker 1: the project. Quick check on his LinkedIn profile shows that
Speaker 1: he's in Neuralinks Design Construction and Facilities lead. Oh wow wow,
Speaker 1: So he is building a facility on this ranch with
Speaker 1: decades of experience in medical device manufacturing regulatory compliance. So
Speaker 1: we had this clear division of labor. Burshall's running the
Speaker 1: shell company and then of course Padilla is He's running
Speaker 1: the actual construction of the facility. Crazy, so Birchall's connections,
Speaker 1: she started noticing that the pattern extended beyond the single property.
Speaker 1: There's a Horse Ranch LLC connected to Birshall adjacent to
Speaker 1: Tesla's gigafactory. And then there's also similar patterns tied to
Speaker 1: Xai's Memphis operation. And this network of pastoral or generic
Speaker 1: LLCs that names Masking. You know obviously who Musk is
Speaker 1: and if he owns it. Wow, So Neuralin Corporation Corporation
Speaker 1: was explicitly listed as a member of the LLC that
Speaker 1: she keeps finding. So the construction permits for what's labeled
Speaker 1: internally as Project at X one is a three story
Speaker 1: building designed to house offices, a machine shop, and something
Speaker 1: that permits simply called cleanroom device manufacturing. So she started
Speaker 1: researching what clean room manufacturing entails. And these are expensive,
Speaker 1: highly regulated spaces. Companies build them when they're manufacturing products
Speaker 1: that need to be sterile. There should be surgical devices,
Speaker 1: medical implants, of course, So this is what made her
Speaker 1: stop to think about the timeline. Construction on this facility
Speaker 1: began in July twenty twenty four. At that point in time,
Speaker 1: Neuralink had implanted nearly their technology and exactly two people
Speaker 1: in the entire history of the company, not two hundred,
Speaker 1: not even twenty two human beings received in plans, the
Speaker 1: company was breaking ground on this huge facility for medical production,
Speaker 1: and the site showed something even more striking when looking
Speaker 1: at it, showing that the future building was planned to
Speaker 1: be two hundred and eighty seven seventy eight thousand square feet,
Speaker 1: So this can be huge. And when you add it up,
Speaker 1: that's like four hunite thousand square feet together with the
Speaker 1: other building. So the property tax records tell the story
Speaker 1: of this transformation. So yeah, this is crazy. So she's
Speaker 1: saying that the trials are moving carefully and methodically at wait,
Speaker 1: the kind of caution that makes sense at first, But
Speaker 1: the manufacturing infrastructure tells a completely different story. This facility
Speaker 1: was design and constructed as if there's a huge volume
Speaker 1: of production. Yeah, but we know that he's starting a
Speaker 1: production with you know, neuralink, so I mean this could
Speaker 1: be that. Wow. So anyway, he hires a bunch of surgeons. Yeah,
Speaker 1: she gets deep into it. So there's a bunch of
Speaker 1: these ranches these doing it on as well. So she's
Speaker 1: seeing two completely narratives running parallel. The public narrative that
Speaker 1: Neuralink presents that they're conducting careful, limited clinical trials with
Speaker 1: rigorous FDA oversight, thirteen patients that are enrolled, and they're
Speaker 1: all approved, and they're progressing methodically through regulatory pathways. But
Speaker 1: then what you see is the evidence of the operational
Speaker 1: evidence shows industrial scale manufacturing infrastructure that was designed and
Speaker 1: built when the company had successfully implanted just two patients,
Speaker 1: twenty two million dollars in construction spending, surgical staff being
Speaker 1: recruited for a location that doesn't appear in any clinical
Speaker 1: trial registries or public regulatory documentation. So they're hiding all
Speaker 1: this infrastructure registered under shell companies built on property that
Speaker 1: sits in a FEMA designated flood zone directly adjacent to
Speaker 1: the Colorado River, the same area that flooded during the
Speaker 1: Memorial Day floods of twenty eighteen, causing extensive damage throughout
Speaker 1: Travis County, almost like it was on purpose. So there's
Speaker 1: been prepared for future growth, making smart bets on where
Speaker 1: your technology might go, building infrastructure ahead of demand. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm sure she would make some money if she did it,
Speaker 1: because she knows what she's doing. Wow, So there's ranches
Speaker 1: he's continuing all the same work that that's been happening.
Speaker 1: It's crazy. Imagine rehab which is secretly doing this. I
Speaker 1: could see that. I could totally see that. You know,
Speaker 1: you know, you're inside of a detox coming down off
Speaker 1: dope and you're sitting there and that is giving you
Speaker 1: a shit. You're just you know, give me whatever. I
Speaker 1: just want to feel better. I mean, you know you're
Speaker 1: a drug addict, so I mean, you just you probably
Speaker 1: would take the end plant if they told you it
Speaker 1: would make you feel something, just saying if you're in rehab. Yeah, man,
Speaker 1: there's some crazy shit. Guys. Yeah, get yourself a cup
Speaker 1: of coffee. Joy you guys, have a great day. Shout
Speaker 1: out Evil, shout out everybody. It's been great. It's been great.
Speaker 1: I think this was a good deep dive. We got
Speaker 1: to do a lot of things. The made beds, the
Speaker 1: med beds, prison, virtual prisons, h neuralink. I mean we're
Speaker 1: all in experiment in all the ways. Yep, it's true, Alcolm.
Speaker 1: But get yourself some sun, get yourself a nice, you know,
Speaker 1: fresh air cup of coffee. Go hang out. I appreciate
Speaker 1: you guys for hanging out with me, and uh, Yeah, man,
Speaker 1: it's been a good deep dive. I hope you guys
Speaker 1: really enjoyed this. I've been study, you know, up on
Speaker 1: this shit. It's been a lot of crazy shit whenever
Speaker 1: you look at it, you know. I just remember reading
Speaker 1: that Curtis Yarvin quote that one day, and when I
Speaker 1: saw that advertisement for the Maid program the other day,
Speaker 1: I was like, that's it, dude, I gotta do this,
Speaker 1: and I got to mix it all together with the
Speaker 1: neuralink shit. So I think it all came together under
Speaker 1: it is one cohesive kind of idea of this new
Speaker 1: system that they're really trying to create. So I'll say
Speaker 1: out of Justin, we're gonna be hanging out later. Justin's
Speaker 1: my boy. We're still fucking kicking it. We're gonna we're
Speaker 1: gonna talk a little bit about some make it some
Speaker 1: clips and whatnot. Go follow us on social media, Go
Speaker 1: give us a good sub Go give us, you know,
Speaker 1: some love, you know, whatever you need to do. You
Speaker 1: don't have to spend money, but if you do, thank you.
Speaker 1: It's appreciated. And otherwise, go follow us, do your thing,
Speaker 1: and we'll see you guys. What the this week? Next week,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be taking out. Oh I'm gonna be taking
Speaker 1: a little bit of a hiatus just this week. I've
Speaker 1: got a few episodes to drop on the free feed,
Speaker 1: so this won't matter for the free feed, but for YouTube.
Speaker 1: I just gotta take like a week so I can
Speaker 1: study up for this whole week. I gotta get into
Speaker 1: some stuff here and then we're gonna get it ready, okay,
Speaker 1: Banger episodes. I'll have a bonus episode going on Patreon
Speaker 1: only and that'll be a great time. So if you
Speaker 1: want the lookout for that, Thank you guys, and we'll
Speaker 1: see