Speaker 1: Oh wow, I don't here.
Speaker 2: Okay, So here's my warning to you. There will be
Speaker 2: offensive statements coming up if you haven't been offended already.
Speaker 2: So Robert Reisch, you might remember him, You know, a
Speaker 2: guy who was involved with our federal reserve, involved with
Speaker 2: the federal government. Uh, pretty interesting figure. Do you know
Speaker 2: who that guy is? Honey? Do you know who Robert
Speaker 2: Reich is? Yes?
Speaker 1: I do.
Speaker 2: Okay, So I'm gonna go ahead and you know, go see.
Speaker 2: Uh what should we remember? We had to remember that
Speaker 2: Ted Cruz is a you know, constitutional scholar and lawyer. Okay.
Speaker 2: But Robert Reich, right, was under Bill Clinton? Okay, because
Speaker 2: here we go with the middle of the road. Definitely
Speaker 2: not totally liberal. Although people now remember Bill Clinton as liberal,
Speaker 2: he was seen as the middle of the road guy.
Speaker 2: And Robert Reich, if I remember correctly before I can
Speaker 2: get to it, was what the he was part of
Speaker 2: Clinton's cabinet, right, And he's pretty pretty interesting guy who
Speaker 2: was a part of the political establishment. He was the
Speaker 2: Secretary of Labor under Clinton and so on and so forth,
Speaker 2: and he's a guy they go to quite often when
Speaker 2: wanting to talk about labor and the economy and all that. Anyway,
Speaker 2: he's still alive, and I did not think he was.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying. He also worked in the you know,
Speaker 2: the Ford and Carter administrations, all right, but he might
Speaker 2: have been and been some some kind of a position
Speaker 2: with Obama at a certain point. So a Democrat, but
Speaker 2: not a Democrat like we see today, Okay, like an
Speaker 2: older school Democrat, not you know, somewhere in between when
Speaker 2: they were racist clan members and when they became you know,
Speaker 2: woke at some point here and really really culturally diverse.
Speaker 2: Before that, there was this other time period in democratic
Speaker 2: history where you know, Bill Clinton's politics and actions and
Speaker 2: behaviors do not match the Democrats of today. And also
Speaker 2: I don't see him putting a hood on, you know.
Speaker 2: So and you got to admit it is weird that
Speaker 2: the Democrats at one point were the party of you know,
Speaker 2: the Klan. But anyway, yeah, all these things are relevant.
Speaker 2: But Robert Reich is an interesting guy and always seen
Speaker 2: as pretty conservative, but also somebody who has an idea
Speaker 2: about you know, like he was educated at Dartmouth and
Speaker 2: Yale and okay, so he's not the Princeton and what's
Speaker 2: the other one over there, Harvard guy right. He's a
Speaker 2: Yale guy, among the most elite universities in again, highly educated,
Speaker 2: et cetera, et cetera. Right, and as far as I know,
Speaker 2: a lifelong Democrat. Okay, So why is he interesting to
Speaker 2: the conversation today. He hasn't been, you know, working in
Speaker 2: the cabinets or anything in a long time. He's certainly
Speaker 2: not giving advice to President Trump. But he did want
Speaker 2: to comment on something that was sent to him by
Speaker 2: a guy you do know Hunt, and you will probably
Speaker 2: recognize his voice right away. But I'm just going to
Speaker 2: play this and let the commentary roll. Somebody sent me
Speaker 2: this clip. Let's take a look.
Speaker 3: My new perspectives. There's nothing wrong with being a billionaire.
Speaker 3: But if somebody is working forty hours a week, one
Speaker 3: hundred and sixty hours a month and they can't make
Speaker 3: their rent, you're not paying them enough money. Maybe you
Speaker 3: should just be worth nine hundred million, Like, how does
Speaker 3: the CEO take a eight figure bonus and none of
Speaker 3: your employees have dental insurance? They can't even go out
Speaker 3: and get a filling. Because these nerd billionaires out there
Speaker 3: saying I want my employees to come to work terrified,
Speaker 3: go to bed, terrified, Wake up terrified. I mean, you
Speaker 3: don't think it's that, you know, then they're terrified to
Speaker 3: go out and spend any money.
Speaker 2: You know, it's absolutely right.
Speaker 4: There are billionaires now, seven hundred eight hundred billionaires in America,
Speaker 4: and they are not only dominating the economy, they are
Speaker 4: dominating politics. They are actually running as oligarchs so much
Speaker 4: of this country. And at the same time, you got
Speaker 4: seventy percent of Americans living paycheck to paycheck, barely making it.
Speaker 2: This is the kind of distortion that.
Speaker 4: Donald Trump exploited in becoming president. Twice he promised average
Speaker 4: working people'd be on their side and the Democrats if
Speaker 4: they knew what they needed to do in order to
Speaker 4: become a dominant party again and to get the White
Speaker 4: House back and the Senate and the House, they have
Speaker 4: got to talk about the irresponsible and abusive behavior and
Speaker 4: abusive power and money of billionaires and large corporations.
Speaker 2: Okay, so there's the full statement, uninterrupted. And again this guy,
Speaker 2: you know, okay, well he's a Democrat, of course, that's
Speaker 2: the way he's gonna think. But uh yeah, again, not
Speaker 2: the woke democrat of today. And you do know who
Speaker 2: he was listening to right, huh.
Speaker 1: Who he was listening to?
Speaker 2: Yeah, he played a clip and then he commented on
Speaker 2: the clip. You know the guy who was saying, you know,
Speaker 2: billionaires and they want of their workers to wake up terrified,
Speaker 2: go to work, terrified, go home terrified. That was somebody
Speaker 2: else's voice, you know who that was? No Bill Burr.
Speaker 1: Oh I'm kidding, Okay.
Speaker 2: Okay, So somebody sent him a Bill Burr clip and
Speaker 2: Robert Rice said, yeah, Bill Burr's kind of nailed it.
Speaker 2: And here's the just so we understand there's a different
Speaker 2: reality and there's no sense in arguing about it, because
Speaker 2: they'll tell you that things don't exist when you try.
Speaker 2: Like Charlie Kirk had been asked several times, and this
Speaker 2: is me just talking about what he had to say.
Speaker 2: And I watched a lot of his stuff as best
Speaker 2: I could, his clips and the clips other people put
Speaker 2: out about him and everything else. You know. Part of
Speaker 2: his business model was to put out short clips making points.
Speaker 2: One of his points, which was made on more than
Speaker 2: one occasion for sure, was when somebody would say, what
Speaker 2: about Americans living paycheck to paycheck? His response was, get
Speaker 2: another job. That's not my problem. That's not the government's problem,
Speaker 2: and you know what, you just need to get another job.
Speaker 2: Problems solve. And when asked, well, what about hungry kids?
Speaker 2: Don't you want to give him like, you know, school
Speaker 2: lunch or school breakfast or anything like that, he said, no,
Speaker 2: I don't agree with your premise. There are no hungry
Speaker 2: kids in America. Doesn't exist. Well wait a minute, no,
Speaker 2: it doesn't exist. We have an obesity problem in America,
Speaker 2: not a hunger problem. There are fat kids out there,
Speaker 2: that's what that because Charlie kirk as opposed to recognizing
Speaker 2: there's difference between well fed and over fed, a bunch
Speaker 2: of crap that just does add fat and uh, you know,
Speaker 2: unnecessary waste to your body, which will wind up making
Speaker 2: you fat and still hungry. Okay, because I'm not going
Speaker 2: to be politically correct about it. Instead of recognizing that,
Speaker 2: he just said hungry children don't exist in America.
Speaker 4: Period.
Speaker 1: Well that's why I'm so blown away by how how
Speaker 1: beloved this guy was. He's a glorified podcaster who is
Speaker 1: an asshole, who is so out of touch with the
Speaker 1: basic reality of a good percentage of the American population.
Speaker 2: Okay, So, just for the record, I want people to
Speaker 2: know that that was missus Oo's opinion, not mine. Uh
Speaker 2: and you know, because yeah, it's my opinion. I can't Yeah,
Speaker 2: I can't stand but yeah, but I can't take another
Speaker 2: hit to anything else or getting kicked off another platform
Speaker 2: or demonetized in any other way, shape or form, because
Speaker 2: I can't at this point. So I just want to
Speaker 2: say that is not necessarily how I would have put
Speaker 2: it anyway. It is what it is. I'm not going
Speaker 2: to stifle or muzzle her, but that's not how I
Speaker 2: would have put it anyway. The thing is this not
Speaker 2: saying that. You know, I'm making no comment about your comment.
Speaker 2: You said what you said. But here's the thing about it. Realistically,
Speaker 2: I'm going with the words and the ideas that a
Speaker 2: lot of these guys have because this is what they
Speaker 2: think is real.
Speaker 1: But they're completely out of such.
Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, maybe so, but not to them as far
Speaker 2: as they're concerned, that is their reality. You don't have
Speaker 2: enough money, it's because you are too lazy to go
Speaker 2: make more money. Just go work another job. There's jobs,
Speaker 2: there's plenty of jobs. Go get them. You know your
Speaker 2: kids are hungry, they're not they're fat and a story
Speaker 2: when you have oversimplified understandings of the solutions, or you
Speaker 2: simply say there is no need for a solution because
Speaker 2: the problem is actually something else. I mean, according to
Speaker 2: again Kirk's logic here, the fat kids need to be
Speaker 2: fed less anyway, that's what the problem is. Okay, that's literally.
Speaker 1: Well, here's your counter argument with that. If you have
Speaker 1: a person that you're saying doesn't make enough money and
Speaker 1: you have to go out and get two jobs or
Speaker 1: maybe three, who's whom feeding these kids their nutritious meals?
Speaker 2: No one?
Speaker 1: So the kid's gonna go grab that pack of cookies.
Speaker 1: He's such a fat little how's he gonna eat healthy
Speaker 1: when there's nobody there to feed them?
Speaker 2: Well? Or you know, and again if I say, and also,
Speaker 2: you can't afford the better food because it costs way
Speaker 2: too much. And by the way, I can't afford the
Speaker 2: bad food at this point, realistically, I mean, I'm not
Speaker 2: making that up and trying to whine about it. And
Speaker 2: I don't mean to interject my own problems here, but
Speaker 2: I got to speak from my perspective. We're having trouble
Speaker 2: just having food, forget about the quality of it. Uh,
Speaker 2: And that, you know, is what well, Trump made everything better,
Speaker 2: So we're just complaining to complain because we're lazy and
Speaker 2: and and obviously you know, if our sun is not
Speaker 2: getting enough food and he looks a little thicker, then
Speaker 2: maybe you know, standard exact body type should be that,
Speaker 2: you know, body mass index. If that's off a little bit,
Speaker 2: that's our fault because we're overfeeding him, et cetera. So
Speaker 2: you know, I'm just saying, when you're confronted with that,
Speaker 2: can you imagine that some people might get angry when
Speaker 2: people deny that you have a problem. You're not really
Speaker 2: in pain, that's all in your head. No, my arm
Speaker 2: is busted, No I have an injury. Yeah, well you
Speaker 2: know I don't see it, so it's not happening. That's
Speaker 2: literally how you what, maybe make somebody angry if they're
Speaker 2: in the midst of suffering and you tell them they're
Speaker 2: not really suffering and if they are suffering in any
Speaker 2: way it's because they're too lazy. Well, it is what
Speaker 2: it is, right, So I got one more dead thing
Speaker 2: to play with if you want. And it's a slightly
Speaker 2: different point here, and it's not about Republican or Democrat,
Speaker 2: or maybe it is, but it is probably the most
Speaker 2: offensive clip I've ever played on this show, and definitely
Speaker 2: going to have to mark things I don't know, I
Speaker 2: guess explicit, because who knows what's offensive anymore or explicit
Speaker 2: or I mean, I know I'm not on the FCC's
Speaker 2: target list because I'm not involved with stuff that the
Speaker 2: FCC should be involved with. But you know what, I
Speaker 2: have to have these thoughts out loud as I go,
Speaker 2: and we've already been on proper hours, so maybe I
Speaker 2: should get to it. Are you ready for the third
Speaker 2: dead thing? And this would be hearing from a dead man?
Speaker 5: Yep?
Speaker 2: Okay, Kepler had a dog? Now you think of that.
Speaker 2: I'm no fan of Hitler.
Speaker 1: I never liked him.
Speaker 6: I didn't like him before it was cool not to
Speaker 6: like him.
Speaker 2: Okay. The whole Hitler had a dog thing is a
Speaker 2: not really a clarified representation of what's what a lot
Speaker 2: of people Hitler liked dogs. I don't actually think that's true.
Speaker 2: He had a couple of dogs around him, but I
Speaker 2: don't think he was like a dog lover. It's a
Speaker 2: weird thing, the revision of history on Hitler. And we'll
Speaker 2: get into who's talking about it and why he's saying it.
Speaker 2: But you know, I'm not a fan of Hitler. Even
Speaker 2: when it was cool not to like Hitler, I didn't
Speaker 2: like Hitler, this guy says. Anyway, let's get back to
Speaker 2: the clip. I just you know, food for thought real quick.
Speaker 2: That might not be historically accurate, but then again, this
Speaker 2: guy's a comedian. And oh, by the way, sometimes comedians
Speaker 2: exaggerate or even make stuff up just to try and
Speaker 2: create an uncomfortable laugh. That used to be a thing,
Speaker 2: you know, the people that don't want to kill comedy,
Speaker 2: like like our friend mister Musk there who By the way,
Speaker 2: just another quick headline I think I missed in my
Speaker 2: quick spray of news. Elon Musk's father, Eryl Musk, is
Speaker 2: accused of child sexual abuse, according to a report in
Speaker 2: the New York Times and various other low you know publications.
Speaker 2: But anyway, just just a headline to throw in, why not. Also,
Speaker 2: Trump was at the und today and I did the
Speaker 2: pagan thing, you know, talked about all that other stuff.
Speaker 2: Let's see, everything's frozen for you, Ryan Ruth. Yeah, I
Speaker 2: think I covered most of my headlines, but I just
Speaker 2: I figured I forgot that one, so I should throw
Speaker 2: it in. Also, you know. I don't know if you
Speaker 2: caught it, but there is a new move to make
Speaker 2: censorship more organized when it comes to the Pentagon in
Speaker 2: light of what happened with the Venezuelan boat. Yeah yeah,
Speaker 2: and also Trump shifted on the Ukraine thing. I think
Speaker 2: more to come on that. But let's get back to
Speaker 2: the comedian anyway, because now I've gone in the wrong
Speaker 2: direction and we are playing with our last dead thing
Speaker 2: for the night.
Speaker 7: But there was a dog in history who loved Hitler
Speaker 7: more than anyone. He would wake up in the morning,
Speaker 7: you know, where's Hitler? Yeah, and daring or something. We
Speaker 7: go like, is that here he's doing some evil stuff.
Speaker 7: I've explained to you he spends most of the time
Speaker 7: doing evil stuff. He can't in that often he was, Okay, yeah,
Speaker 7: I know, I'm not trying to listen. Gary, I love you, you know,
Speaker 7: I love Mingler, I love everybody. All of you guys
Speaker 7: are the greatest. But it's just Hitler is the greatest
Speaker 7: man who's ever lived.
Speaker 2: Okay, So let's let's you know, not to be too
Speaker 2: stuffy here. Obviously, the conversation between various high ranking members
Speaker 2: of the Third Reich and the Dog never actually occurred. Okay,
Speaker 2: just just for the record, in case you're dumb enough
Speaker 2: to think, Hey, that guy's saying that this gift is
Speaker 2: actually talked to dogs and the dog talked back. No,
Speaker 2: this is called a joke and also an exaggerated and
Speaker 2: hyperbolic story. To make a point. Hitler was often pictured
Speaker 2: with the German shepherd, and you know it was meant
Speaker 2: to show him as a manly hunter kind of guy.
Speaker 2: And there was a dog that did seem to show
Speaker 2: some affection for Hitler, but it still doesn't make him
Speaker 2: a dog guy anyway. You have something to say about this, missus.
Speaker 1: Own No, not really.
Speaker 2: Okay, let me finish the because it's shocking enough that
Speaker 2: you know the idea that there's a dog like waiting
Speaker 2: for Hitler to return, like that's my guy. Because dogs
Speaker 2: will attract themselves to one human being sometimes and very
Speaker 2: much stick to that person. And that's like the person
Speaker 2: has a dog, the dog has a person, and we
Speaker 2: know about this, and he's playing with that idea and
Speaker 2: that experience to tie you, to drag you into, to
Speaker 2: give you a relatable entry into this story he's telling. Okay,
Speaker 2: so now that I've ruined all the joke that Norm
Speaker 2: MacDonald in case you don't recognize the voices telling you
Speaker 2: who I think was a fascinating guy. If you don't
Speaker 2: believe me, check out the clip that's out there circulating
Speaker 2: heavily where he says that he's a deeply closeted gay guy.
Speaker 2: He's deeply, deeply in the closet. That's something nobody knows
Speaker 2: about him. When he's talking to Larry King and Larry
Speaker 2: King goes, are you admitting for the first time anywhere
Speaker 2: that you're gay? And he goes, how dare you say that?
Speaker 2: I just told you I'm deeply, deeply closeted, And that
Speaker 2: back and forth continues on and on until Larry King
Speaker 2: actually gets it and it's funny. Okay, that to me
Speaker 2: is hilarious. But anyway, maybe that's over some people's heads.
Speaker 2: But Norm McDonald I thought was pretty relatable and is
Speaker 2: being pretty relatable here where imagine there's now an excited
Speaker 2: dog and we've all seen an excited dog. Was like, yeah,
Speaker 2: I'm glad you're home. Oh my god, yeah, yeah, yeah yeah,
Speaker 2: and they jump up on one person's leg in particular,
Speaker 2: and he's positing that this German shepherd that was often
Speaker 2: seen with Hitler might have been so super happy to
Speaker 2: see Hitler when he saw him. Anyway, let's continue.
Speaker 7: This is why we ask that you don't use recording devices.
Speaker 2: Dog mate. Okay, nowadays everybody brings their phones in every
Speaker 2: event and records everything. But they used to do this
Speaker 2: thing where it's like, do not bring a recording device in,
Speaker 2: and at certain times they didn't even allow you to
Speaker 2: bring cell phones into concerts or comedy performances, et cetera,
Speaker 2: for fear that you might take something out of context
Speaker 2: on a comedian when he gave you the fattest out
Speaker 2: of context thing in the world there in this little
Speaker 2: clip by making a statement that I will not even repeat.
Speaker 2: But the discomfort and the disquiet within the person, that
Speaker 2: kind of cringe element here is what makes it so
Speaker 2: funny to me. But here's the thing. This is comedy
Speaker 2: and this isn't Oh my god, how dare you make
Speaker 2: a joke out of the Holocaust. Although I'm sure there
Speaker 2: were people that made that complaint the second they heard
Speaker 2: about this guy saying it, mcconne, goold you were saying,
Speaker 2: missus ough, Oh, I'm sorry. I must have heard a
Speaker 2: feedback or something. But the point I'm trying to make
Speaker 2: here is a pretty simple one, and that is that comedians, comedians,
Speaker 2: my friends, are not news reporters or teachers. They're comedians.
Speaker 2: So whether it's a mild joke or it's making a
Speaker 2: completely ludicrous, uncomfortable, counterintuitive statement to make you squirm in
Speaker 2: your seat, there are many styles of comedy. Okay, and
Speaker 2: Norm McDonald talking about how happy a dog was to
Speaker 2: see Hitler sounds like and could be taken out of context.
Speaker 2: Do mean a lot of things. But if you accept
Speaker 2: comedy for comedy's sake, you understand that when they show
Speaker 2: you a Superman comic where a guy can fly, they're
Speaker 2: not trying to encourage children to jump off of buildings
Speaker 2: and try to fly themselves. If you can understand, the
Speaker 2: comedians are not there to educate you, but they are
Speaker 2: there to provoke thought and to provoke reactions, because that
Speaker 2: is literally what they're paid for. You got to put
Speaker 2: things in slightly different context, That's all I'm saying. When
Speaker 2: people freak out about what was intimated, suggested, and not
Speaker 2: even bother to read what was said or to hear
Speaker 2: actually what was said, your outrage is ahead of even
Speaker 2: your ability to absorb the final syllable in a statement.
Speaker 2: A lot of times you've been conditioned to react without
Speaker 2: any critical examination or even forget about critical objective observation
Speaker 2: or absorption of the sounds that you think are words.
Speaker 2: You already have the intent in your minds. A lot
Speaker 2: of times, is all I'm trying to say. And it's
Speaker 2: by design, you know. And when I look at what
Speaker 2: it was that Kimmell said, right, and you know, now
Speaker 2: he's back on air. He probably already aired by now,
Speaker 2: or he's gonna air tonight whatever on your local thing
Speaker 2: that you don't really watch when it's broadcast, but later
Speaker 2: on you'll be able to see the clips.
Speaker 1: Uh not everywhere?
Speaker 2: Oh really?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, we won't be able to see it. Sinclair
Speaker 1: is refusing to broadcast it.
Speaker 2: Well, we don't have we don't have broadcast TV anyway,
Speaker 2: we don't have cable of broadcast TV. So irrelevant, but.
Speaker 1: I'm saying equally, yeah, Claire, No people in central Georgia, Yeah,
Speaker 1: won't be able to see it if they want to.
Speaker 1: He says, they refused to air it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but there's there's lots of things like YouTube and
Speaker 2: TikTok and everything else. We'll be able to see plenty clips,
Speaker 2: and if you are paid to a subscriber service, you
Speaker 2: can just watch the show tomorrow, so a lot of
Speaker 2: people will be able to see it, regardless of location
Speaker 2: or what Sinclair or Next Star or whoever the hell
Speaker 2: else says anything, because they're not as relevant in the
Speaker 2: equation as maybe all those people that were canceling their
Speaker 2: Who's subscriptions and Disney vacations because no shock, and no
Speaker 2: shock should be had by anybody who went, oh my god,
Speaker 2: I can't believe a corporation crumbled when it was going
Speaker 2: to cost him money. I can't believe they had money
Speaker 2: in mind over principle because that's not a real thing.
Speaker 2: And you know, it wasn't Disney, like the super woke
Speaker 2: company that they wanted to destroy not too long ago.
Speaker 2: But now they want to take control of it and
Speaker 2: tell them what they can say. That's kind of a
Speaker 2: change in attitude. You know, I don't want you to
Speaker 2: be my enemy. I want you to work for me.
Speaker 2: Dun dund dunk, I own you. Yeah, so okay, But anyhow,
Speaker 2: enough of my confusion. I'm just making the point that
Speaker 2: comedians are not educators or news reporters and if you
Speaker 2: objectively looked at, Okay, what Jimmy Kimmel actually said. Seriously, no,
Speaker 2: you know none of this I speculate about what he
Speaker 2: meant or none of that. I mean, just go to
Speaker 2: what he actually said and you examine it for a moment.
Speaker 2: And I had a transcript here of his exact words,
Speaker 2: but now I've lost it. And you know, I gotta say, first,
Speaker 2: wasn't exactly as you know, harsh and insane as what
Speaker 2: many other people said. It wasn't a celebration. It wasn't,
Speaker 2: you know, doing an end zone dance over Kirk's corpse.
Speaker 2: None of that happened during this discussion. Was he mildly disrespectful,
Speaker 2: slightly abrasive, and actually overly polite, Again for a guy
Speaker 2: who has Italian blood in him. And it is also
Speaker 2: supposed to be a left wing wacko, can't you know?
Speaker 2: Who is so irrelevant and makes such crazy sick statements
Speaker 2: and everything else. I gotta say, wasn't all that extreme?
Speaker 2: I'm sorry? Did you want to add to this?
Speaker 1: It wasn't extreme at all. It was an observation and
Speaker 1: it was quite on the mark. If you actually watch
Speaker 1: what he was commenting on.
Speaker 2: Well you know, because the complaint about he was saying
Speaker 2: that he was a right winger, not actually what the
Speaker 2: man said, Because what he said is the right wing
Speaker 2: in a new low is pointing fingers at anybody else
Speaker 2: but themselves. Now is that not accurate? Were they not
Speaker 2: trying to say that it was anybody else except us?
Speaker 2: It sounds to me almost like kim lagreed with the
Speaker 2: right wing campaign that was going on there where this
Speaker 2: is definitely anybody but us. Now they wanted to particularly
Speaker 2: target it as a lefty. But Kimmel didn't say that part.
Speaker 2: You know, That's the thing what he actually said and
Speaker 2: where it actually gets, you know, a little bit insulting,
Speaker 2: is saying that if you don't also think this is
Speaker 2: an accurate observation that Donald Trump mourns things like a
Speaker 2: four year old mourns its goldfish, he mourns his friend
Speaker 2: that way because of what his observation about Trump's own
Speaker 2: words and actions in a clip and here we go,
Speaker 2: so clip reaction and clip context is the new world?
Speaker 2: I mean we are on Planet Clip. Okay, it's no
Speaker 2: longer Earth. It's Planet Clip, and it's big. It's the
Speaker 2: hottest planet in the universe. It's Planet clip, because you
Speaker 2: live and die? Now buy the clip. What are your
Speaker 2: thoughts on that you're.
Speaker 1: Getting into the area that has me so infuriated?
Speaker 2: Well, there you go, take it away.
Speaker 1: He gets canceled. But you got that guy from Fox
Speaker 1: News saying that we should basically just murder homeless mental people,
Speaker 1: mentally ill homeless people and then offer an apology that
Speaker 1: was so lame that it was so forced and it
Speaker 1: makes me sick. But not that content's okay?
Speaker 2: Well figure yeah? Is that okay? Interesting?
Speaker 6: Build on some dollars some mental health and the homeless
Speaker 6: population a lot of them don't want to take the programs,
Speaker 6: a lot of them don't want to.
Speaker 2: Get the help that is necessary.
Speaker 6: You can't give them a choice. Either you take the
Speaker 6: resources that we're going to give you and or you
Speaker 6: decide that you're got to be.
Speaker 2: Locked up in Okay, So it's set up by it
Speaker 2: to lock them up in jail. Now, that's not kill me.
Speaker 2: That's you know, one of his try hosts, right, But
Speaker 2: he's saying, either take what the government gives you, or
Speaker 2: you're going to jail. Don't give them a choice. Okay,
Speaker 2: I'm just using their words here. I'm not even reading
Speaker 2: into it, and they are talking about homeless and mentally people.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's coming from a black man talking about throwing
Speaker 1: them in jail, where the population of our jails are
Speaker 1: so uneven.
Speaker 2: But it's a little ironic that, you know, people that
Speaker 2: were unfairly targeted by mass incarceration as run by the
Speaker 2: Democrats initially in the nineties, that mass incarceration program successfully
Speaker 2: increased the prison population exponentially and disproportionately for people that,
Speaker 2: you know, if we're being tribal, look a lot more
Speaker 2: like him then look like either one of his co
Speaker 2: hosts just saying, but he's making the point that people
Speaker 2: that are a problem should either take what the government
Speaker 2: gives them or go to jail. Not right that they
Speaker 2: committed a crime, but just that their problem.
Speaker 1: Oh, the crime is they're homeless and they're mentally ill.
Speaker 2: Right, that's their right. So this isn't we're targeting the
Speaker 2: bad ombres, the criminals or none of that. And Brian
Speaker 2: Kilmead follows it up with, well, let's hear from him,
Speaker 2: that's the way it has to be. Or involuntary lethal
Speaker 2: injection or something. Just kill them, something involuntary lethal injection
Speaker 2: or something. Just kill them. I just kill him, I can. Okay,
Speaker 2: so cavalier or something, just kill him. I mean, you know,
Speaker 2: we can't lock him up because they won't take whatever
Speaker 2: it is we hand them from the government. Here's your resources,
Speaker 2: take it, or you're going to jail. If not that, hey,
Speaker 2: look let's just kill them or something.
Speaker 1: Not you We want to talk about insensitive comments, but
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter that the comments were made about a
Speaker 1: homeless person who might be mentally ill, or a group
Speaker 1: of them, because they don't matter, you see. But we're
Speaker 1: going to cancel a guy's show because he refers to
Speaker 1: the way he observed the president of our country mourning.
Speaker 1: This man who has been put up on some gold pedestal.
Speaker 2: Well, he's being lionized as a nash figure, a representative
Speaker 2: of America because they hold the sacred flag at half staff.
Speaker 2: A lot of things had to stop. I mean, broadcasters
Speaker 2: like Sinclair. Initially we're going to force every one of
Speaker 2: any of the stations they owned to run a program.
Speaker 2: You know, that whole memorial service to him was supposed
Speaker 2: to be run on all the Sinclair stations. They backed
Speaker 2: off and put it on YouTube because of the controversy
Speaker 2: that took place. But Nonetheless, this is the reaction and
Speaker 2: that's what came of these people, those people.
Speaker 1: And now if we are not we because I'm certainly
Speaker 1: not talking about making a national holiday for this man,
Speaker 1: are you serious?
Speaker 2: Well, you know, Kenny, who's who's wee white lady? You know,
Speaker 2: just saying and at the same time, no, I got
Speaker 2: you caliday. Well look the reason he well the holiday.
Speaker 2: Let's put it in context, because they're saying that he
Speaker 2: was like Martin Luther King junior, that he was a
Speaker 2: civil rights activist, that he was I mean, they have
Speaker 2: put a lot of labels on this guy. Hey, I'm
Speaker 2: just telling you what's what. You know, he disagreed with
Speaker 2: how civil rights should be because he thought that civil
Speaker 2: rights you know that broke Jim Crow were actually negative
Speaker 2: because they made it worse for dark skinned Americans in general,
Speaker 2: uh than it was before they broke Jim Crow in
Speaker 2: the country. So that's you know, these are all things
Speaker 2: that Kirk said. I'm not mischaracterizing or taken He said
Speaker 2: him several times during debates. These were the main points
Speaker 2: he made internationally as a representative of his organization. But
Speaker 2: he has gone from being the representative of an organization
Speaker 2: that people following tarily joined to now being put forth
Speaker 2: as part of the true representation of America.
Speaker 1: So you know, Christ when convenient America?
Speaker 2: No, okay. But but here's the thing that some people
Speaker 2: would say, right, Charlie Kirk was nonviolent. He never inspired
Speaker 2: any violence. And uh, you know what, only only Antifa
Speaker 2: in the left inspired violence. So you know the fact
Speaker 2: that Brian Kilmead said this, so what it didn't do
Speaker 2: anything or did it?
Speaker 1: Well, they haven't quite proven yet that, which you know,
Speaker 1: even if they did, I'm pretty sure they're not going
Speaker 1: to come out and say it. With the homeless camps
Speaker 1: that were shot up in Minnesota, he had I mean
Speaker 1: it was thirteen people were shot to, two of them
Speaker 1: in the head. One lad he's died, And of course
Speaker 1: they're gonna, you know, say that was because of an
Speaker 1: argument over a drug purchase or something, because you know,
Speaker 1: you got to throw that in there too. Not only
Speaker 1: are there homeless and mentally ill, they're all drug addicts too,
Speaker 1: So there's that. Well, they haven't proven that it's you know,
Speaker 1: correlation or anything. But the point is, could we be
Speaker 1: could we have any more hypocrisy and how far is
Speaker 1: it going to be or going to take before people
Speaker 1: realize that they are doing exactly what they were designed
Speaker 1: to do, which is to separate us, cause us to
Speaker 1: argue amongst ourselves so they can go behind that curtain.
Speaker 1: And actually, I don't even have to go behind a
Speaker 1: curtain anymore because they're doing it right in our face.
Speaker 1: Things it shouldn't be done. But we're too busy arguing
Speaker 1: over what whether this guy was should be a martyr,
Speaker 1: whether we should have a holiday over the sky. Come on,
Speaker 1: what's right is right and what's wrong is wrong? And
Speaker 1: that kill me. You guys said is out right wrong
Speaker 1: and he should have been punished for it, just like
Speaker 1: Kimmel was, But he wasn't because he's on the side
Speaker 1: of the MAGA side, right, And that's okay, right, And
Speaker 1: before I'm called a left snowflake or whatever they are today,
Speaker 1: don't because I'm not on a side. What's right is
Speaker 1: right and what's wrong is wrong, and that was wrong.
Speaker 2: Period. Well yeah, and here's the other thing. If nobody
Speaker 2: bothers to even make a correlation, we have no idea
Speaker 2: what this kind of attitude. Other remarks which were less blatant,
Speaker 2: and various other messages which have been fed through the
Speaker 2: propaganda machines out there of all sorts, whether they be
Speaker 2: you know, on Twitter, and people who have undue influence
Speaker 2: over the masses because they are supposedly important, like the
Speaker 2: richest man in the world coming out about I don't
Speaker 2: know ten minutes after Charlie Kirk was confirmed dead, stating
Speaker 2: that a leftist killed him, when they had no evidence
Speaker 2: to back that up whatsoever at that time. As to
Speaker 2: whether there was an orientation of the killer in question,
Speaker 2: you know, here's the thing, right, we don't know if
Speaker 2: the hanging of a homeless man in Mississippi was necessarily
Speaker 2: due to Brian Kilmead's comments or the general attitudes toward
Speaker 2: the homeless that they're not really people, they're an inconvenience
Speaker 2: and what they are is to be treated as such
Speaker 2: because they either need to be moved or eliminated somehow,
Speaker 2: and eventually, when you take away the value on those
Speaker 2: human lives enough, they don't deserve to be able to
Speaker 2: make their own choices. Either accept what the government gives
Speaker 2: them or not, either accept death or don't. Because you
Speaker 2: are an inconvenience, that's it. It doesn't matter if you've
Speaker 2: actually committed a crime or done anything wrong, or maybe
Speaker 2: if you are actually mentally ill for real, and who
Speaker 2: wouldn't be living in a mentally ill world? But nonetheless,
Speaker 2: maybe they're more mentally ill some of them. You still
Speaker 2: have people making the argument that a lot of them
Speaker 2: want to be homeless. You still have them ignoring the
Speaker 2: fact that a lot of them are veterans. And we
Speaker 2: have no idea of how to sort of calculate exactly
Speaker 2: how many people have been encouraged by stuff like what
Speaker 2: kill Meat said and many other attitudes regarding taking away
Speaker 2: the humanity from these beings that are are no longer
Speaker 2: with a roof over their heads, and where it has
Speaker 2: actually come from, because nobody's going to bother to study it,
Speaker 2: because nobody even investigates half the time when they turn
Speaker 2: up dead, and when they do.
Speaker 1: Ye, he doesn't like the word empathy. That's not a
Speaker 1: good word to have. He can't have empathy.
Speaker 2: Well, Charlie Kirk says that empathy was something that was
Speaker 2: just invented by new ag woke moron, So okay, fine,
Speaker 2: But nonetheless we have to have empathy for him and
Speaker 2: his family or else. And again, as I'm stating about
Speaker 2: the homeless thing, because I'm off of the Charlie Kirk topic,
Speaker 2: and we should be off of it because it's no
Speaker 2: longer related to this, which is taken away other people's
Speaker 2: humanity with your rhetoric, with your attitude, with your policies.
Speaker 2: And you know what, that's just fine, because who is
Speaker 2: going to fight back on behalf of the homeless anyway?
Speaker 2: You don't see homeless activists out there, do you? So
Speaker 2: you know, and there's no way to calculate how many
Speaker 2: people have been You and I followed a series of
Speaker 2: murders here and making Georgia regarding the homeless that were
Speaker 2: completely without any sort of reason or rhyme to them
Speaker 2: except that it was acceptable basically to kill homeless people.
Speaker 2: They've been used for sport, from bum fights onto you know,
Speaker 2: the madness of just well, you know, I only killed
Speaker 2: a homeless person. You know I only killed I only
Speaker 2: killed a hooker, I only killed a you know, here
Speaker 2: we go. So if you can put them in a
Speaker 2: box where they don't have any value anyway, and that's acceptable,
Speaker 2: it can lead to people I don't know treating them
Speaker 2: that way. And I know it might not matter to
Speaker 2: anybody else, but there's still if we're all created in
Speaker 2: God's image according to a lot of people's beliefs, and
Speaker 2: we're all God's children according to a lot of people's beliefs.
Speaker 2: It seems to me as though God would not want
Speaker 2: any of his children to be murdered just because they
Speaker 2: don't count, because judgments like that are not reserved for
Speaker 2: human beings to make, but are actually the kind of
Speaker 2: thing that gods are supposed to do, or your God,
Speaker 2: if you want to be singular about it, that's fine,
Speaker 2: But either way, that's who's supposed to decide who lives
Speaker 2: and dies. Unless I misunderstand the many, many, many religious pontifications.
Speaker 3: And.
Speaker 2: What do we call those opining citizens out there that
Speaker 2: tell me all about the embracing of the people that
Speaker 2: they tell you to embrace when they're talking about how
Speaker 2: difficult it is, and even Charlie Kirk's widow and the
Speaker 2: strangeness of the activity and whatever else, even she has
Speaker 2: to virtue saying the look, I'm going to forgive my
Speaker 2: husband's murderer. But when you do that for whatever reason
Speaker 2: or how you know genuine it is or anything else,
Speaker 2: And then on the other hand, say, but you know what,
Speaker 2: not those people, not the leftists, not the homeless, not
Speaker 2: the Even if you think that every trends or gay
Speaker 2: person is mentally ill, then not the mentally ill, not
Speaker 2: the gay people, and not the people that came from
Speaker 2: somewhere else, because well, they don't deserve any human dignity
Speaker 2: or rights or anything else unless they got a million dollars.
Speaker 2: Then we can speed that up, you know, because you've
Speaker 2: got a gold card.
Speaker 1: Oh well, I'm so tired of the Christian bullshit of
Speaker 1: down my throat. I'm tired of it is.
Speaker 2: Oh, you're only.
Speaker 1: Christian when it's convenient. Period. I don't care who gets
Speaker 1: offended by that. And it is so evident that that
Speaker 1: is how it is is portrayed, because if you were
Speaker 1: truly a Christian, those thoughts wouldn't You wouldn't have them,
Speaker 1: You wouldn't think that, you know, a mentally ill person
Speaker 1: should just be euthanized like a sick dog. We treat
Speaker 1: our sick dogs better than we do our homeless people.
Speaker 1: You know what you talk about the medication, they a
Speaker 1: lot of them do need medicine. But here's the problem
Speaker 1: with that. I have medicine that I need, but I
Speaker 1: can't get it because I came to my doctor for
Speaker 1: six weeks to get my medicine refilled. Yeah, so don't
Speaker 1: talk about how easy it is for them to just
Speaker 1: go get their medicine, because it's not that easy. I'm
Speaker 1: waiting six weeks. Yeah, well, but I have to know
Speaker 1: in my own brain that I'll be okay without my hope.
Speaker 3: Maybe not.
Speaker 1: But you know, these people have no support system, nobody
Speaker 1: to turn to to help them. Yeah, we have our
Speaker 1: programs here, but there are so many any of them
Speaker 1: that need help that they just kind of go falling
Speaker 1: by the wayside. So they are mentally ill, they may
Speaker 1: be schizophrenic, they may be name any any illness in
Speaker 1: the in the d S M five thing, you just
Speaker 1: name it.
Speaker 2: They need.
Speaker 1: They need medicine. And maybe if they got the medication
Speaker 1: they needed, they would be in the right frame of
Speaker 1: mind to be able to go to some of these
Speaker 1: programs that are offered to help them get out of
Speaker 1: the situation that they're in. But that doesn't matter because
Speaker 1: they're they're they're not worth the effort, they're not worth
Speaker 1: the consideration, and they're not worth the time. And it
Speaker 1: just makes me sick.
Speaker 2: Well, cut to the chase, it's not worth it because
Speaker 2: they are not worth. It very simple. It is the
Speaker 2: value and the devaluation of human life. And I've only
Speaker 2: got a couple of minutes left before I got to
Speaker 2: go meet with somebody else and deal with something. But
Speaker 2: the point here I think has been made. Is there
Speaker 2: anything that you want to throw in before we're done?
Speaker 2: Because I didn't. I didn't hey, I didn't bother to
Speaker 2: play anything about the tailan All deal, the progress that
Speaker 2: was made by RFK Junior regarding Hey, maybe we should
Speaker 2: hold off a little bit on the vaccines for a minute,
Speaker 2: although I gotta tell you, I might have more to
Speaker 2: say about whether tiland All is killing anybody on another
Speaker 2: show and a minor update. You know, I might be
Speaker 2: able to get my YouTube channel back because now they're
Speaker 2: reversing policy. By the way, and don't tell me that
Speaker 2: this is not an influence from the government, even if
Speaker 2: it does work in my favor. Gotta tell you, I'm
Speaker 2: not feeling real great about it, although I do expect
Speaker 2: large corporations to buckle when the money's right. But weirdly
Speaker 2: YouTube is trying to backtrack and say, you know what,
Speaker 2: We're gonna give a counce back to people who got
Speaker 2: struck down for you know, the COVID misinformation or vaccine misinformation,
Speaker 2: and also people that ready for this one might have
Speaker 2: been the election deniers and all of that. And you're
Speaker 2: putting out misinformation about you know, political election and selection processes.
Speaker 2: If we took your account away for that, we might
Speaker 2: give it back to you now. And that announcement splashed
Speaker 2: across the news organizations today as well, And indeed there
Speaker 2: was an application available for me. I put it in,
Speaker 2: but I got to tell you that tells you exactly
Speaker 2: how fickle and which way the wind blows, and if
Speaker 2: you happen to catch the right money train, you might
Speaker 2: get an advantage, but it doesn't necessarily make it the righteous,
Speaker 2: constitutional or fair treatment that a lot of people think
Speaker 2: they're getting out of some of these reversals. But then again,
Speaker 2: you know, even Ted Cruz tried to tell you, maybe
Speaker 2: this isn't good if it's in somebody else's hands, But
Speaker 2: as long as we got it, it's all good, right anyway.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And you know, all of us crazy people who
Speaker 1: were you know, going against the vaccine, the mandatory vaccine,
Speaker 1: you know, the government came away out and admit it, well,
Speaker 1: didn't we didn't stop the virus no, we didn't.
Speaker 2: Know, but you weren't allowed to question it. Yeah, you
Speaker 2: weren't allowed.
Speaker 1: To question not then, but now you know it'd shamee.
Speaker 1: So you know we were wrong for doing that.
Speaker 2: Well right, But that's the thing with with a revisionist
Speaker 2: idea about you know, the truth and everything else might
Speaker 2: be a little safer to protect. I don't know everybody's
Speaker 2: free speech, whether you like it or not, because that's
Speaker 2: the only way we all get a shot at a
Speaker 2: little bit of free speech. And but but no, screw it.
Speaker 2: You know, as long as we're winning, we're winning. Remember
Speaker 2: Charlie Sheen winning. And yeah, he's got a Netflix documentary
Speaker 2: out now and seems to be a lot more stable
Speaker 2: even with the HIV. But it is what it is.
Speaker 2: This is where we are. And here's the thing. It
Speaker 2: proves correct something that it was an epiphany I had
Speaker 2: years ago on this show and I said it a
Speaker 2: few times and everybody's like, ah, come on, man, you
Speaker 2: just don't like what you asked. Hey, Trump, you have
Speaker 2: derangement syndrome. And I'm like, it's not Trump that I'm
Speaker 2: saying is the only sign of this thing. But it
Speaker 2: is obvious by watching his rise but it doesn't mean
Speaker 2: that he's the only or even the main problem here.
Speaker 2: The reality is this, Americans who say they believe in
Speaker 2: freedom and they believe in choice and everything else. If
Speaker 2: given the opportunity to force their ideas on everybody else,
Speaker 2: their right way of being on everybody else, they don't
Speaker 2: believe for a second in everybody else's freedom, only their own.
Speaker 2: And their freedom is not just limited to their ability
Speaker 2: to do things freely or their ability to do whatever
Speaker 2: the hell they want. It is actually about their freedom
Speaker 2: to enforce upon you their ideas. That's what they believe in.
Speaker 2: And you know, to the winner goes the spoils, and
Speaker 2: we won. That's why we're correct. And that is not
Speaker 2: a Donald Trump issue or left or right issue. That
Speaker 2: is again another problem, along with having no value attached
Speaker 2: to human life for various reasons. It's not something that
Speaker 2: goes to one side or the other. It is like
Speaker 2: a ninety seven percent to three percent issue. Wait a minute,
Speaker 2: I sound like Trump who was saying that ninety seven
Speaker 2: percent of the press was against them and all that too. Damn,
Speaker 2: there was a lot to cover and we didn't even
Speaker 2: get to all of it in over an hour and
Speaker 2: thirty minutes. Wait a minute, almost an hour and forty
Speaker 2: five minutes here, missus. Oh, but I did my best,
Speaker 2: So anything you want to say in closing.
Speaker 1: No, I appreciate you letting me come on to vent
Speaker 1: my frustrations. And I hope I didn't get to a strike.
Speaker 1: And if I did, I.
Speaker 2: Apologize, well, who knows anymore?
Speaker 1: If you know me, I can't always.
Speaker 2: I got it.
Speaker 1: I can't always control myself.
Speaker 2: I got it, I understand, and neither can anybody else apparently.
Speaker 2: And I got to tell you, though, we really should
Speaker 2: think about the things we say, why we say them,
Speaker 2: and how we say them, because if we're saying them
Speaker 2: to anyone else other than ourselves, we might be having
Speaker 2: an effect. So there you go, and one more time,
Speaker 2: you know what, I appreciate anybody who can contribute anything.
Speaker 2: It will be helpful and it will go to our
Speaker 2: survival as we are up against plenty of things and
Speaker 2: trying to keep everything rolling. But I hope that you
Speaker 2: got something out of this, you the listener, by request,
Speaker 2: I'm doing my best to start to introduce my version
Speaker 2: of comedy into some of this, because I gotta laugh
Speaker 2: at things that make me want to scream and cry, really,
Speaker 2: because that's a better response, and that's all I can do. So, yeah,
Speaker 2: I'm cracking some jokes. And I told you guys, I'm
Speaker 2: not good at you at humor, but a few of
Speaker 2: you said, no, you should do some humor. You should
Speaker 2: do some comedies.
Speaker 5: In Denial Secret Wars with air strikes and Tanks by Larryhancock.
Speaker 5: Secret wars became a staple of US covert operations and
Speaker 5: are still happening today. Larryhancock's book In Denial rips the
Speaker 5: cover off many of them, using new files.
Speaker 8: It exposes things about the Bay of Pigs that no
Speaker 8: one has ever written about before. It shows why it
Speaker 8: really failed and why the United States did not earn
Speaker 8: from it. It also shows why other countries today are
Speaker 8: doing secret operations with more success. This is the book
Speaker 8: that puts what some want to deny into the light.
Speaker 8: In Denial, Secret Wars with air Strikes and Tanks Larryhancock.
Speaker 8: For more information, go to Larry hyphen Handcock dot com.
Speaker 8: Pick up your copy of In Denial at Amazon dot com.
Speaker 8: In digital or physical.
Speaker 2: Fi radio nuclear Holocaust.
Speaker 9: You know what uranium is right?
Speaker 10: Called nuclear weapons? And other things like.
Speaker 6: Lots of you know what uranium is, right?
Speaker 10: Bad things things are done with uranium, including some bad things.
Speaker 10: Nuclear holocaust. You know what uronium is, right, Nuclear holocaust,
Speaker 10: nuclear holocaust.
Speaker 6: You know what uonium is right? Think called nuclear.
Speaker 8: Weapons and other.
Speaker 9: Things like lots.
Speaker 6: Of you know what uranium is, rights.
Speaker 10: Things are done with uronium, including some bad things nuclear holocaust,
Speaker 10: nuclear holo Holocaust, nuclear holocaust, nuclear holocaust, nuclear holo.
Speaker 2: Uncle.
Speaker 9: Do you remember that time when Benjamin Fulford said that
Speaker 9: an Asian secret society was going to dispatch ninja's to
Speaker 9: take down the Illuminati?
Speaker 2: Ooh, that's interesting, Yeah the colatoon.
Speaker 9: Yeah did that ever work out too good?
Speaker 10: No?
Speaker 9: It didn't, did it? But here on o'chelly dot com
Speaker 9: radio network things work out a bit bitter don't much better?
Speaker 11: What I mean, it's clear and understanding about the programs.
Speaker 11: The programs are much clearer getting live people into it.
Speaker 11: They really have a good conversation going much better, much
Speaker 11: better scene.
Speaker 9: I say, forget Benjamin Fulford and his ninjas and listen
Speaker 9: to the Ochelly dot com radio network.
Speaker 11: I agree, it's straight to the point, straight talk, and
Speaker 11: I like that idea dot com
Speaker 2: Conversation