Speaker 1: What is happening and what is a Hold out your
Speaker 1: glass because we're about to feel it.
Speaker 2: All things continually lead back to serpents, dragons, fairies, nepheline,
Speaker 2: and fallen angels. In the distance looms a mystical mountain.
Speaker 2: As Mike Kaiser used to say, if it's in the
Speaker 2: Bible and it's weird, it's probably important. At its peak,
Speaker 2: a great fire burns, concealing the Prometheus lens.
Speaker 1: This development of this knowledge that's being talked about within
Speaker 1: the mystery schools.
Speaker 2: An ancient artifact said to reveal the hidden truth within
Speaker 2: a deliberately darkened world.
Speaker 3: There is a hidden history that's been deliberately obscated from
Speaker 3: the people's little world.
Speaker 2: Join us as we travel and explore the vast unknown.
Speaker 2: It's a hero's journey, with dragons to slay, damsels to save,
Speaker 2: and innumerable treasures to hoard. Torches high the Smithsonian they
Speaker 2: call end of the Giants Belt.
Speaker 1: We would send their agents out to get.
Speaker 2: It, but it takes courage to move forward, to move
Speaker 2: out of the shadows, out of the unreality that we
Speaker 2: think of his reality.
Speaker 1: We are all on the hero's journey.
Speaker 2: Mankind has been in contact with and influenced by extraterrestrials.
Speaker 3: Leave the citient mound of bull feathers out of it.
Speaker 2: You know, look at it from a different perspective, different perspective,
Speaker 2: different perspective.
Speaker 3: Everybody, were having a fantastic time wherever you are in
Speaker 3: the world. I've got Doc Brown with us, who's come
Speaker 3: on the channel. He's got a lovely accent out of Tennessee.
Speaker 3: And we're going to be discussing the history of elite
Speaker 3: and royal bloodlines because Dark has explored the serpent seed
Speaker 3: theory from multiple perspectives, including biblical parables where Jesus may
Speaker 3: be referencing an ancient seed war, which also touches on
Speaker 3: the dragon legacy, which presents the serpent seed concept through
Speaker 3: a secular ends, connecting it to elite and royal bloodlines.
Speaker 3: We're going to be delving into the topic of elongated schools,
Speaker 3: of which Dark has a prop But a huge thank
Speaker 3: you for joining us and what got you into all
Speaker 3: of this in the first place.
Speaker 1: My friend, first off, Sean, thank you for having me man.
Speaker 1: But yeah, I guess kind of. It was next day
Speaker 1: and I stumbled into it. I was joking around with
Speaker 1: some friends one day we were talking about Bigfoot and
Speaker 1: Genesis twenty five. Twenty five just kind of popped into
Speaker 1: my head. There it's unfamiliar. That's the birth of Esau,
Speaker 1: and it says the first one came out red, covered
Speaker 1: in hair from head to toe, like a hairy cloak.
Speaker 1: And I was like, man, that sounds pretty squatchy to me.
Speaker 1: Phil As, what do you think? And so it's just
Speaker 1: kind of like that little inside Joe. But then I
Speaker 1: started stumbling across other things, Like I was going through
Speaker 1: the Book of Jashure and you'd find more of these
Speaker 1: harry wild men in there. And Esau supposedly battles King
Speaker 1: Nimrod and they fight to the death for the supernatural
Speaker 1: garments from the Garden of God, and then they Gilgamesh.
Speaker 1: I thought that looked like just a mirrored parallel of
Speaker 1: Esau and Nimrod, and so I just started researching this guy,
Speaker 1: and I started going through all the extra biblical books
Speaker 1: and texts, and all of them point to Esau being
Speaker 1: a serpent seed. So then I started going down the
Speaker 1: trail of the serpent Seed, going back to Genesis and Kane,
Speaker 1: and it just kind of branched off from there. Honestly,
Speaker 1: And I got introduced to Nicholas de Vere the Dragon legacy,
Speaker 1: and that honestly just runs parallel with the Genesis narrative.
Speaker 1: And even the elites they claimed to be stemmed from
Speaker 1: this dragon court, going back to Kane and claiming they
Speaker 1: have the divine right to rule.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And we had David Aikon and he was talking
Speaker 3: about the history of the elite and royal bloodlines. So
Speaker 3: if you get started then with the history of this,
Speaker 3: how far back does it go? What's the earliest we
Speaker 3: can talk about?
Speaker 1: Yeah? For me, I think it goes back to the
Speaker 1: very beginning. If you go to the Biblical narrative and Genesis,
Speaker 1: you have this Garden of Eden scene, And growing up,
Speaker 1: I was always just taught that Adam and Eve bid
Speaker 1: into this apple and it was that tree of forbidden
Speaker 1: fruit of good knowledge, good and evil knowledge, and that
Speaker 1: they were kicked out of the garden for it, and
Speaker 1: that was the first that kicked off the world basically.
Speaker 1: And like I said, when I had read that about
Speaker 1: this serpent seed with these saw I went back to
Speaker 1: Genesis and got to reading it and I actually had
Speaker 1: an interview with this woman named doctor Joy Pugh and
Speaker 1: she honestly, she's the one that red peeled me in
Speaker 1: this because I'd heard about the serpent seed theory before,
Speaker 1: but I never looked into it. I had some highly
Speaker 1: respectable guys that I really enjoyed their work would scoff
Speaker 1: at it and say, there's no water to be held
Speaker 1: in that cup. So I just kind of took their
Speaker 1: word for it and never looked into it. And when
Speaker 1: I had her on the show, she brought it up,
Speaker 1: and I'm not gonna lie. When she brought it up,
Speaker 1: in my head, I was like, oh, no, here we go.
Speaker 1: This is gonna be some crazy serpent seed stuff. I
Speaker 1: didn't want to go here, but I listened with an
Speaker 1: open mind, and I'm not gonna lie. She totally changed
Speaker 1: my paradigm and I've been reading this Bible totally different
Speaker 1: ever since. But she was a southern woman. She was
Speaker 1: from Georgia, so she might have you got to me
Speaker 1: a little better. She had that southern accident. Reminded me
Speaker 1: of my grandma, you know. But she was talking, she said,
Speaker 1: I was always talking about this apple, she said. I
Speaker 1: went back and read she said there is no apple,
Speaker 1: and I said what And sure enough, y, I went
Speaker 1: back here, there's no apple there. And she said, if
Speaker 1: we look and just says, they partake. Eve partakes of
Speaker 1: this tree, and that after she partakes of this tree,
Speaker 1: what happens, She said, they immediately cover their reproductive organs.
Speaker 1: And then she said, then look at the cursings. She said,
Speaker 1: every single one of the cursings has something to do
Speaker 1: with sexual reproduction. She said, if you look at the Bible,
Speaker 1: all of God's curses correlate to the crime. She said,
Speaker 1: So the curses were that he would put enmity between
Speaker 1: her seed and thy seed talking to the serpent. So
Speaker 1: it says plainly right there that she's going to have
Speaker 1: a seed humanity and the serpent is going to have
Speaker 1: a seed, and there's going to be an enmity at
Speaker 1: war with one another. And that he would increase her menstruation,
Speaker 1: and he would increase her pain in child bearing and labor.
Speaker 1: And so yeah, every single one of these curses is
Speaker 1: correlated to sexual reproduction. And then she said, and then
Speaker 1: if you go into the etymology of the name, she said,
Speaker 1: the names are important. Words mean things. She said, came,
Speaker 1: his name means acquired. She said, what loving mother would
Speaker 1: name their child acquired? She said, this is something that
Speaker 1: you know, parents think about for months in advance and
Speaker 1: debate and have a whole list of names. She said,
Speaker 1: why would any loving mother name their child acquired? She said,
Speaker 1: because he was acquired by Adam. And she said, and
Speaker 1: if you look at Abel his name, when you go
Speaker 1: into the etymology of that name, that means breath. She said,
Speaker 1: why did they name him breath? She said, because Adam
Speaker 1: was a lifeless being until the breath of God was
Speaker 1: given to him. So he was named after his father
Speaker 1: because he was of his similitude. And then she said,
Speaker 1: soon as you get out of the guard, what happens
Speaker 1: came kills Abel. There's war, there's enmity between the two
Speaker 1: seeds and the two lines. And I was like, oh, man,
Speaker 1: you know, and she said she pulled.
Speaker 4: Out all these other verses too, where afterwards Seth was born,
Speaker 4: and it says that Seth was in the similitude of
Speaker 4: Adam because the other wasn't he was, And his name
Speaker 4: actually means replacement.
Speaker 1: He was the replacement seed. And as you go through
Speaker 1: the book, I think that I found just all of
Speaker 1: these micro and micro and micro narratives telling the same story.
Speaker 1: I found that I kind of just went down the
Speaker 1: trail and I had a bunch of people. When I
Speaker 1: started talking to my friends about this, they were like, uh,
Speaker 1: Satan's not a tree. You know. How you getting that?
Speaker 1: And when you go through the scripture, there's several verses
Speaker 1: that compares Satan to a tree. Allegorically, when he's talking
Speaker 1: to the Pharaoh of Egypt, you know, he's talked to
Speaker 1: the pharaoh, condemned him and all this stuff, but then
Speaker 1: the language changes. He's no longer talking to the king.
Speaker 1: He's talking to the spiritual entity behind the king, and
Speaker 1: he's saying that, you know, you were in the garden
Speaker 1: of Eden. You're the most beautiful tree, and all the
Speaker 1: other trees of Eden, you know, looked at you with
Speaker 1: jealousy for your beauty. And it says that you know
Speaker 1: you'll be cast down. You get to the Isaiah fourteen
Speaker 1: passage talks about you know, this is the famous verse
Speaker 1: where how art thou falling from heaven old day star?
Speaker 1: It says that you will be cut down, and it
Speaker 1: talks about the branches. It says that the Satan de
Speaker 1: Haasatan is the abominable branch. And you get this same
Speaker 1: genealogical language with the righteous branch also because it talks
Speaker 1: about the coming of the Messiah and it says that
Speaker 1: he would be of the root of the seed of Jesse,
Speaker 1: and he would be the righteous branch. So when you
Speaker 1: get the lingo of trees, it's always talking about genealogies
Speaker 1: and family trees, and you have all these examples of
Speaker 1: Satan being compared to this tree, this beautiful, the most
Speaker 1: beautiful tree in the garden of Eden. So when I
Speaker 1: show people that and they're like, oh, well, he's talking
Speaker 1: to that king. That's not Satan. Well, this king was
Speaker 1: not in the garden of Eden. You know, the angels
Speaker 1: and angela coast didn't look at this guy and gloria
Speaker 1: and envy of all his beauty. And then when you
Speaker 1: go to Ezekiel twenty eight, that is the same exact
Speaker 1: same thing there. This is a condemnation to the King
Speaker 1: of Tire And yeah, he's clearly talking to this king.
Speaker 1: But part way through, once again the language changes. He's
Speaker 1: no longer talking to this king. He's talking to the
Speaker 1: spiritual entity, the Hasatan behind the king and the ruler.
Speaker 1: And he says, you were in the garden of Eden
Speaker 1: once again perfect in all your ways, until iniquity was
Speaker 1: found in you, and you were cast from the mountain
Speaker 1: of God as a profane thing. And it says every
Speaker 1: precious stone was your covering. It says barrel onyx, topaz jasper.
Speaker 1: It names all these stones, and this is a polaroid
Speaker 1: picture of the priestly ethought. So it's painting Satan in
Speaker 1: a priestly role. And then not only is it painting
Speaker 1: him in a priestly role, just to remove any out whatsoever.
Speaker 1: When you go on down just a couple of verses,
Speaker 1: it says that you profaned your sanctuaries and that you
Speaker 1: walked amongst the stones of fire. So they're painting him
Speaker 1: as like the high priest over all creation. And when
Speaker 1: I started digging into the story of Genesis a little deeper,
Speaker 1: and once I talked to my friend doctor Joy Pugh,
Speaker 1: she was talking about some of the Hebrew language and
Speaker 1: how these words are just like any other language. You
Speaker 1: have one word that can have multiple meanings, so it's
Speaker 1: important to go back and insert those different meanings and
Speaker 1: see which one fits better in the context. And so
Speaker 1: the nakash is that the Hebrew word that we get
Speaker 1: in the garden for this serpent. Well, nakash can mean serpent,
Speaker 1: but at the same time it can also mean the
Speaker 1: shining one or the one who practices dim a nation.
Speaker 1: So if you ask yourself, what makes more sense, a
Speaker 1: talking snake deceived Adam and Eve on the holy Mountain
Speaker 1: of God or a divine being a shining one deceived
Speaker 1: Adam and Eve because number one, you know, snakes don't talk,
Speaker 1: and if a snake talked, you know, we would see
Speaker 1: the context that Eve and Adam would have been taken
Speaker 1: back by it. But they weren't. And not only were
Speaker 1: they not taken back, they were very receptive to what
Speaker 1: this entity said to them and didn't even second guessing.
Speaker 1: You know that they believed him and they trusted him.
Speaker 1: I think because they were familiar with him, they seen
Speaker 1: him in the garden of God because he was the
Speaker 1: high priest. And if you look at it, like I said,
Speaker 1: with the original languages too, everybody wants to argue with
Speaker 1: me and say, what says that they ate that's not
Speaker 1: a sexual act? I said, well, yeah, once again, if
Speaker 1: you go into the Hebrew, that same word multiple times
Speaker 1: throughout the text is translated to enjoys. So Adam, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Eve partook of the tree and she enjoyed, and then
Speaker 1: she goes to her husband and he too enjoyed. And
Speaker 1: I started looking at this and formulating this idea and opinion.
Speaker 1: And then once I said, once I went through the
Speaker 1: extra Biblical books, this was the belief of the ancients,
Speaker 1: so it was kind of like a confirming thing for me.
Speaker 1: But I was like, Okay, if we look at this
Speaker 1: as a family, we have the angelic host, and they
Speaker 1: are the elder brothers. They're the elder race. Like Timothy
Speaker 1: Alberino likes to say, and the Book of Job tells
Speaker 1: us when he finally condemns Job, he says, where were
Speaker 1: you when I hung them the stars? Where were you
Speaker 1: when I laid the foundations? You know, answer me these
Speaker 1: things if you know. He said, where were you when
Speaker 1: the morning stars, the sons of God, the beneha Eloheen
Speaker 1: shouted for joy at the side of creation. So that
Speaker 1: shows you that they were there first. They are our
Speaker 1: elder I'm sorry, our elder brothers. So we are the
Speaker 1: younger brother. So imagine the elder brother who helped run
Speaker 1: the family business, was the high priest. All of a
Speaker 1: sudden he's run the company, and then Dad shows up
Speaker 1: with the little little brother says, okay, hey, I know
Speaker 1: you've done a real good job thus far, but here
Speaker 1: your younger brother is going to take over the company
Speaker 1: and have dominion over the company. Now. Of course he
Speaker 1: was like, hell, no, I'm not bound down to this
Speaker 1: little twerp. I'm greater than him. I've been here since
Speaker 1: the beginning. I helped build all this. No, so that's
Speaker 1: the reason for the rebellion, I believe. And it says
Speaker 1: in there that after this happens, that God provides for
Speaker 1: them a covering. And I was always taught that, once again,
Speaker 1: something that's not in the text. I mean, it's a
Speaker 1: beautiful picture, but it's just not in the text. But
Speaker 1: I was always taught that this was like a foreshadowing
Speaker 1: of Christ, that when they sinned, something had to die,
Speaker 1: and once it died, the blood that was shed, they
Speaker 1: took the skins of this animal, and that was to
Speaker 1: cover their nakedness. And like I said, I mean, that's
Speaker 1: a beautiful thought, but the text doesn't say that. It
Speaker 1: says that when you go to the Hebrew, that he
Speaker 1: provided them a connonent. And many times that this word
Speaker 1: is translated to Tunic, and so I was like, well,
Speaker 1: the extra Biblical books say that Adam and Eve's coverings
Speaker 1: were the skins of the nakash. And you remember Ezekiel
Speaker 1: twenty eight, every precious stone was your covering barrel on
Speaker 1: itx topaz Jasper. He would definitely be a shining one
Speaker 1: with this breastplate on. I mean, it kind of fits
Speaker 1: the description of his name, but it says that was
Speaker 1: his covering. So if his covering was taken from him
Speaker 1: and given to Adam, this is the priestly ephod and
Speaker 1: so this is like the crown or the scepter that
Speaker 1: shows authority of the king and priest of creation, and
Speaker 1: that is where dominion was given to Adam. So this
Speaker 1: seed war, you have younger brother elder brother, and they're
Speaker 1: fighting and battling over the birthright. Who's going to have
Speaker 1: dominion over the earth and the serpent seed where they
Speaker 1: are the quote unquote elder brothers. They feel like they
Speaker 1: were screwed out of their birthright and their inheritance, so
Speaker 1: they reveled and they're fighting the younger brother, which is humanity,
Speaker 1: for the dominion of earth. And I think we see it,
Speaker 1: like I said, like micro and macro cosms all through
Speaker 1: the texts, and you had mentioned it in pre role.
Speaker 1: The Parables of Jesus even tells the same story. Guys,
Speaker 1: they're trying to beat it into your head, but it's
Speaker 1: there for those with eyes to see and ears to hear.
Speaker 1: When Jesus is talking, he gives a parable about the
Speaker 1: good tenant. In this story, he says, a landowner God
Speaker 1: leases out a piece of land to some farmers, the
Speaker 1: angelic host, and they had an agreement that he would
Speaker 1: let them use the land and farm it and work it.
Speaker 1: But when it come time for harvest, that the owner
Speaker 1: would get the first fruits. Harvest time comes and they
Speaker 1: don't want to pay up. So he sends his messenger,
Speaker 1: aka the prophet. And what they do. They beat the
Speaker 1: prophet and send him away. So then he sends another prophet,
Speaker 1: another messenger. They killed this one. And then he says,
Speaker 1: why I'll send my son. They will not harm my son.
Speaker 1: And when the sun shows up, they plot and they say,
Speaker 1: we'll kill the son. Then there's no one to inherit
Speaker 1: this land and it'll be ours, and he'll know that
Speaker 1: we mean business. So they kill the son. That son
Speaker 1: is Jesus, and it's the story of the dominion of
Speaker 1: Earth and the birth right, the battle of the birth
Speaker 1: right and the seed wars. Another one, the parable of
Speaker 1: the sowing of the seeds. Okay, it's the same context.
Speaker 1: It's a landowner with land, he sows some seed, and
Speaker 1: it says that in his absence, the adversary, and when
Speaker 1: you go into the Hebrew, that is the Hacaiton, the
Speaker 1: Satan sown his seed and seeds, always talking about genealogies
Speaker 1: and children. Okay. Then it says that the workers come
Speaker 1: back to the owner and say, sir, did you not
Speaker 1: plant good seed? But behold, there's tars growing amongst the wheat.
Speaker 1: Shall we pull them up? And he says, no, least
Speaker 1: you harm the wheat in pulling up the tars. He said, no,
Speaker 1: let them grow together, and come harvest time, we will
Speaker 1: pull them all up, and we'll separate the wheat from
Speaker 1: the tars, and bind up the tars and throw them
Speaker 1: into the fire, and we will bound up the wheat
Speaker 1: to store into my barns. I think he's clearly talking
Speaker 1: about the seed war. The tars were sown amongst the wheat,
Speaker 1: and we have the serpent seed amongst us today. I
Speaker 1: do believe.
Speaker 3: There would that be.
Speaker 1: That's that's all your ruling classes, you know. Uh, you
Speaker 1: have the the Marivingians, you have the Divairs, and they've
Speaker 1: tried their best to obfuscate you know, their identities and
Speaker 1: who they are, but that's who they are, that they're
Speaker 1: amongst us. And if you go back through the Bible,
Speaker 1: it's uh, you have Genesis six. Also it says the
Speaker 1: beneha Elohem, the sons of God came down and praid
Speaker 1: with the dollars of men and made Nephelom giants. They
Speaker 1: were the mighty men of old to give bore. And
Speaker 1: I think science shows us that the theory of entropy
Speaker 1: very well, nothing gets better over time, everything gets worse.
Speaker 1: And I think that's what we see with these bloodlines.
Speaker 1: It's like over time that that DNA string weaker and weaker,
Speaker 1: and through inner breeding, they really deluded down the bloodline.
Speaker 1: And that's why you have so many royals that resulted
Speaker 1: into incest breed with each other trying to keep that
Speaker 1: bloodline pure because it was starting to fade away and
Speaker 1: delude away. So they're trying everything they can to try
Speaker 1: and preserve this bloodline and not working out too well
Speaker 1: for them. You know, they're having reproductive issues, and we
Speaker 1: also know after incests so many years you have birth
Speaker 1: defects and brain abnormalities and things like that. So it's
Speaker 1: not really working out in their favor. But they're trying
Speaker 1: everything that they can. And when I got into Nicholas
Speaker 1: Diver his book that give me the whole secular side
Speaker 1: of it, and these devoirs that they claim to be
Speaker 1: from this Dragon court, and I thought it was really
Speaker 1: fascinating how they come at you with a non biblical perspective,
Speaker 1: but every single bit of it references back in points
Speaker 1: to it. It's like that's the starting point, because they
Speaker 1: even point back to Cain and that's where they draw
Speaker 1: their beginnings from. But in the beginning of the book,
Speaker 1: de Ver was talking about how you have all these
Speaker 1: wickens and witches and sorcerers and stuff practicing all this
Speaker 1: kind of magic. He says that these Marivngiins and these
Speaker 1: ancient bloodlines that are the real deal, sit back and
Speaker 1: laugh at these people, he said, because they could have
Speaker 1: the perfect spell books, they could have the ancient grimoires
Speaker 1: with all the spells and stuff that worked. You know,
Speaker 1: back in the day. He said, they could follow it
Speaker 1: to a t, but they're not going to get the
Speaker 1: same results because the power is in the blood. And
Speaker 1: the Bible even tells you that, you know, it says
Speaker 1: how many times it says, do not drink the blood
Speaker 1: the life force, the power is in the blood. And
Speaker 1: so he talks about how all this stuff through culture
Speaker 1: just kind of really aggravates this dragon court, how these
Speaker 1: people are trying to imitate them and do the things
Speaker 1: that they could do, but they're just not bred for it.
Speaker 1: They don't have the power. And he even talked about
Speaker 1: their struggle in breeding and reproducing also, and he said
Speaker 1: that what they had resulted in doing was to interbreeding
Speaker 1: with the mud blood so to speak, as Harry Potter
Speaker 1: likes to put it, and to bring in people into
Speaker 1: their family like as an adoption. They would do blood
Speaker 1: letting and they would drink and consume the blood of
Speaker 1: the royale, and that way they had their blood in them.
Speaker 1: So whether it's true or not, we can debate, but
Speaker 1: we cannot debate that this is what they believe. And
Speaker 1: if they believe it, I think we owe it to
Speaker 1: ourselves in the very least to study out what they
Speaker 1: believe and why they do what they do, because these
Speaker 1: are the people in control. These are the people with
Speaker 1: the money and with the power and the status. So
Speaker 1: I think it's so very important that we know what
Speaker 1: they think they know or believe.
Speaker 3: So how does all this time in them with other
Speaker 3: ancient civilizations such as the Egyptians, Babylonians, Assyrians.
Speaker 1: Yeah, see, I think it's the same story that just
Speaker 1: told through different lenses and different perspectives. Because there's a
Speaker 1: reason why all these stories rhyme, I think, because they
Speaker 1: all stem from the same ancient source. You know, when
Speaker 1: you get to the Anonachi and their stories, what happens
Speaker 1: there these gods that came down and tried to domesticate
Speaker 1: the earth, and they make this garden, and they get
Speaker 1: tired of doing the work, so they create this human
Speaker 1: class as like worker bees. And then Inky, who is
Speaker 1: basically a mirrored image of the Hacitan, what does he do?
Speaker 1: He goes and genetically modifies a new race, and this
Speaker 1: race has intelligence and can rebel against the creators. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is the same story I've been talking about toy
Speaker 1: ines tonight, folks, It's just told from a different lens
Speaker 1: of different perspective. And for those that you want to
Speaker 1: try to pooh poo on the Bible and say, ah,
Speaker 1: these texts outdate the Bible, so therefore this is I
Speaker 1: did it again. But they copy from the Bible. So
Speaker 1: if we follow the biblical story, it says in there
Speaker 1: that Genesis six, when the angels came down and bred
Speaker 1: with the dollars of men, they were kicked out for it.
Speaker 1: So of course you're going to get their story first
Speaker 1: because they were here first. So even that the timeline
Speaker 1: makes sense to me. And when we go to all
Speaker 1: these other texts and these other legends and stories, they're
Speaker 1: they're all the same. I mean, the caveats are a
Speaker 1: little different, the names change a little bit, but overall,
Speaker 1: I mean it's the same story, right word.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you're back, all right, So viewers, your audio was fine.
Speaker 3: Here we've Doc Brown. I just wanna let the viewers
Speaker 3: know if you want to support Doc's work. We've got
Speaker 3: all of his links in the description box on YouTube,
Speaker 3: and I'm going to put them all the live chat now, YouTube,
Speaker 3: Twitter podcast. If you've got any questions for dot while
Speaker 3: we are live, put them in the chat right now.
Speaker 3: I see that a few questions have already come in,
Speaker 3: but please, by all means keep them coming and we
Speaker 3: will keep going with this. So my question is if
Speaker 3: these bloodlines, like you said, create these the defects, the incest,
Speaker 3: et cetera, as we saw with the royal family bringing
Speaker 3: in Princess Dana's that's what David like said, that was
Speaker 3: a genetic thing. Why do they kind of try to
Speaker 3: keep these bloodlines going then if they've got all of
Speaker 3: you know, if they can create defects of defects.
Speaker 1: Yeah, because which I'm no genericist, but I mean I've
Speaker 1: listened to some people talk on these things, and I've
Speaker 1: heard them talk about how any mutation in your DNA
Speaker 1: is random, it's our random mutation. So it's kind of
Speaker 1: like a Russian ru lay it. So it's like they
Speaker 1: know they run the chance of these defects and it
Speaker 1: not working, but it's they're so desperate to try to
Speaker 1: hold onto the power and I think even the magic,
Speaker 1: if you want to call it that, of their blood.
Speaker 1: So they're like, yeah, we know it runs risks, but
Speaker 1: the risk is worth the reward, I believe, is their mindset.
Speaker 1: And like we talked about, just throughout the years, these
Speaker 1: well what's the word mutations. They manifest in different ways,
Speaker 1: I believe. I think that's why we have not only
Speaker 1: in the Bible, but throughout the world these legends about
Speaker 1: these giants. I think it manifested in gigantic giganticism. Sometimes
Speaker 1: I think the elongated skulls that we see is another
Speaker 1: one of those random mutations from the fallen angel DNA
Speaker 1: the serpent seed. We get to looking at hairy men
Speaker 1: like Esau how I talked about. Even science recognizes this.
Speaker 1: They call it hypertrixosis, and they even admit that it's
Speaker 1: a malfunction in the DNA. And I did not know
Speaker 1: this until I got to looking into the research for
Speaker 1: my book. Was we are all covered in hair in
Speaker 1: the womb, and they call it legano hair. I believe
Speaker 1: it's how it's pronounced. But at a certain point in
Speaker 1: the third trimester, your DNA tells your body to shed
Speaker 1: this hair and then you come out, you know, looking normal.
Speaker 1: But in these cases where you hear about the wolfman,
Speaker 1: you know, or even the sasquatch or the wild men,
Speaker 1: the wood wafts you know in your neck of the woods,
Speaker 1: is these people that had a genetic malfunction and was
Speaker 1: born covered in hair from head to toe like Esau was.
Speaker 1: And it's just it's wild to look at because once again,
Speaker 1: all those things that I mentioned are worldwide. It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter what culture you go to, what continent, language, people group,
Speaker 1: they all have similar stories. The names may be a
Speaker 1: little different, but it's just wild to see. And when
Speaker 1: I got to looking through Esau, that was, honestly so
Speaker 1: mind blowing from me because I grew up in church
Speaker 1: my whole life and never heard of this stuff, And
Speaker 1: so I got to looking through him. He come out,
Speaker 1: you know, covered in hair. It's a polaroid picture of
Speaker 1: Genesis three fifteen in the Seed War. Then when I
Speaker 1: got to looking through the extra Biblical books, it just
Speaker 1: says flat out that Michael was the guardian angel of Jacob.
Speaker 1: But Esau had a guardian angel, and his guardian angel
Speaker 1: was Sama l And according to the Jewish legends and texts,
Speaker 1: this is the name of Satan before the fall, and
Speaker 1: he was known as the Angel of Death, the viper
Speaker 1: of God. And it says that he even came out
Speaker 1: with a serpent's branding, and that while his mother was pregnant,
Speaker 1: that when she would walk by a house that was
Speaker 1: devoted to Yahueh, the worship of Yahweh, that Jacob would
Speaker 1: stir with excitement. But when she would walk by a
Speaker 1: house and service to a pagan deity, that Esau would
Speaker 1: stir with excitement, and that she was in such travail
Speaker 1: that she asked around to the other women, is this normal?
Speaker 1: Did you guys have the same kind of pain and
Speaker 1: complications dune your pregnancy? And they all told her no,
Speaker 1: But there was one that they had heard of that
Speaker 1: had similar pregnancies, and it was Nimrod's mother. And once
Speaker 1: I got into the book of Jasher, it says that,
Speaker 1: and of course the me back up the trading of
Speaker 1: the birthright, that is like the most famous thing that
Speaker 1: Esau's known for, and that's why I have it depicted
Speaker 1: on the front of my book too. I have this
Speaker 1: hairy looking wild man walking away with a bone. He's
Speaker 1: back and then the bowl of bowl of red stew
Speaker 1: underneath him and he's walking away from it. But as
Speaker 1: a kid, that never made sense to me. I was like,
Speaker 1: you know, modern context, your your father's Donald Trump, You're
Speaker 1: the eldest son. You're about to inherit billions of dollars.
Speaker 1: The company business, the real estate. I mean, the keys
Speaker 1: to the kingdom are yours. And you come in from
Speaker 1: trading stocks all day and your younger brother sitting on
Speaker 1: a couch eating a bag of Dorito's, and you're like,
Speaker 1: oh man, I'm hungry. Could I get some of those Dorito's?
Speaker 1: And he's like, yeah, sure, just sign over the company
Speaker 1: and everything you're going to inherit and they're yours. Oh yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: you know. And even Esau says, what use is a
Speaker 1: birthright to me? When I am dead? Take it? I
Speaker 1: was like, that makes absolutely no sense to me. There's
Speaker 1: something that we're missing here. And even his name, you know,
Speaker 1: he was known as the mighty hunter Esau. If this
Speaker 1: man was hungry, he could have went and got a lion,
Speaker 1: had lion's sake for supper. This Mighty Hunter wasn't starving,
Speaker 1: I don't think. But the text just says that he
Speaker 1: comes in from the field exhausted. But when you go
Speaker 1: into the Book of Jesure, it says that Nimrod his name,
Speaker 1: was also the mighty hunter the gibel reim It says
Speaker 1: that he built up hatred and envy and jealousy against
Speaker 1: Esau all of his days and so it's kind of
Speaker 1: like the Highlander. You know, there can only be one baby.
Speaker 1: So they was going to show each other who the
Speaker 1: real mighty man was. And it words it like Nimrod
Speaker 1: is going out and hunting for this hairy beast of
Speaker 1: a man named Esau, and he takes a hunting party
Speaker 1: with him, and so they split off. One party goes
Speaker 1: one way, and him and two other gibl reem the
Speaker 1: same word used time and time again to describe the
Speaker 1: Nephelum giants in the Bible, and go off looking for Esau.
Speaker 1: But it says that Esau spots them and he hides hisself,
Speaker 1: and that at the opportune time, he jumps out and
Speaker 1: he cuts off the head of Nimrod and then fights
Speaker 1: the other two gilbelrim to the death. And it says
Speaker 1: that once he kills him, the hunting party that broke
Speaker 1: off heard the commotion and come running. But he takes
Speaker 1: the time to remove Nimrod's garments, and it says these
Speaker 1: garments were the reason that Nimrod was a gibble ring,
Speaker 1: why he was able to prevail over all the nations,
Speaker 1: and it says that he runs home hides those garments
Speaker 1: in his tent, and then here's the tint of his
Speaker 1: brother Jacob where he's preparing red stew. So it duve
Speaker 1: tells perfectly into the Book of Genesis. Yeah, he come
Speaker 1: in from the field exhausted. All right, he just killed Nimrod,
Speaker 1: the king and two other giants. You know, so modern context,
Speaker 1: you just killed the president and the Feds are after you. You're
Speaker 1: on the run. He probably sustained some life threatening injuries
Speaker 1: and during this exchange, and he was desperate, and that's
Speaker 1: why he traded it. I think the red stew is
Speaker 1: allegorical for give me sustenance, sew me up, hide me.
Speaker 1: And if you take that viewpoint, how Esau responds makes
Speaker 1: perfect sense. Now when he says, yeah, sure, I'll help you,
Speaker 1: but you're going to trade me the birth right, he says,
Speaker 1: what use is a birthright to me? When I am dead?
Speaker 1: Take it? And I was like, no, that makes a
Speaker 1: lot more sense. But then my next question was what
Speaker 1: are these garments and why are they so special? Why
Speaker 1: did he take the time to steal them, and then
Speaker 1: on the run, bleeding out, takes the time to hide
Speaker 1: him before he goes to get life saving care. And
Speaker 1: it ties into what I just spoke about earlier. This
Speaker 1: was the supernatural garments from the Garden of God, Adam's coverings,
Speaker 1: which was the symbol of kingship and priesthood. This I
Speaker 1: found out through all the extra biblical writings. This is
Speaker 1: the birthright. This is what the seed war is all over.
Speaker 1: This is basically the crown. So people that's into Game
Speaker 1: of Thrones, man, the Game of Thrones ain't got nothing
Speaker 1: on the Bible. I mean, that's the story of the Bible.
Speaker 1: And what I thought was really cool because like I said,
Speaker 1: I'm forty year old, thought I knew the Bible really
Speaker 1: well up until probably around twenty twelve, and just seeing
Speaker 1: a whole new text and these extra biblical books and legends.
Speaker 1: Lewisburg Legends of the Jews is a great like six
Speaker 1: book series that I highly suggest anybody's need of this stuff.
Speaker 1: Check those out. But in there it traces the passing
Speaker 1: down of these garments and this birthright. And I'm a
Speaker 1: Southern man, so the only kind of context I got
Speaker 1: is like your grandpa's old rifle, it's a family heirlom.
Speaker 1: It gets passed to the eldest son on down the line.
Speaker 1: It's an important family heirloom. That's what these garments were.
Speaker 1: And it traces them, you know. It says that Adam
Speaker 1: had them, Eanoch HadAM, Methusalam had Noah ends up with
Speaker 1: them and takes them over the flood, and it says
Speaker 1: that in Ham's going out, Ham steals the garments and
Speaker 1: then Han gives them to cush. It says Cushion his
Speaker 1: old age had Nimrod and give it to Nimrod. And
Speaker 1: when it said when Nimrod turned twenty years old, he
Speaker 1: put on the garments and then he became a gibble ring.
Speaker 1: And once again, here's another story that made absolutely no
Speaker 1: sense to me, was Noah's the uncovering of Noah's nakedness.
Speaker 1: You know, the story that I taught was basically Ham
Speaker 1: comes in and Noah is pissed, drunk and naked, landing
Speaker 1: the floor, and that he happens to seem or maybe
Speaker 1: even makes a you know, a remark about him or
Speaker 1: something making fun of him. Then he wakes up and
Speaker 1: his genealogy's cursed. And I was like, man, that's harsh.
Speaker 1: You know. If I was at school all day and
Speaker 1: I get off the bus and my dad's pissed drunk
Speaker 1: landing the floor naked. That ain't my fault, that's his
Speaker 1: fat And like I mentioned earlier with the garden, the
Speaker 1: curses always correlate to the crime, and it's usually the
Speaker 1: opposite of what the person's trying to achieve. So if
Speaker 1: we look at that story, it says that Ham uncovered
Speaker 1: his father's nakedness. Well, when you go to Leviticus seventeen,
Speaker 1: you know, if you let scripture interpret scripture, it says
Speaker 1: there to sleep with thy father's wife is to uncover
Speaker 1: thy father's nakedness. It is your father's nakedness. And I
Speaker 1: found out that this is an active rebellion in the
Speaker 1: ancient world. We see it time and time again in
Speaker 1: the Bible. Absolom David's son, when he runs David out
Speaker 1: of the kingdom and tries to usurp the throne. The
Speaker 1: first thing he does is he pitches a tent on
Speaker 1: top of David's house and he goes into all of
Speaker 1: David's concubines in the sight of all of Israel. Ruben
Speaker 1: does the same thing when he's trying to usurp his dominance.
Speaker 1: He sleeps with all his father's concubines. Is an active
Speaker 1: rebellion to take over the household. So this was an
Speaker 1: active rebellion. So Ham slept with his mother and then
Speaker 1: when he goes outside, I think he tells his brothers.
Speaker 1: He's like, hey, dad's a drunk, he's depressed, he's unfit
Speaker 1: to rule. I just did this deed. You guys go
Speaker 1: do it too. And he can't take on all three
Speaker 1: of us. You know, the world is ours, will divide
Speaker 1: it amongst ourselves. It's our time to rule. And it
Speaker 1: says that they refuse the rebellion. But in that story,
Speaker 1: it says they take a garment place upon their shoulders
Speaker 1: and walk backwards and cover their father's nakedness. And I
Speaker 1: was like, is that the garments from the Garden of God?
Speaker 1: And then when you get to looking at the original Hebrew,
Speaker 1: they don't say a garment. It says they took the garment,
Speaker 1: placed it on their shoulders, walk backwards, and covered their
Speaker 1: father's nakedness. So I was like, okay, even theologically this
Speaker 1: makes sense. They took he was trying to take the crown,
Speaker 1: so they took the symbol of priesthood and kingship and
Speaker 1: placed it back upon their father. And it also had
Speaker 1: a whole lot more sense when the cursing comes, because
Speaker 1: he curses Canaan, not Ham. And it's like, well, if
Speaker 1: you're reading this chronologically, cana is not even born yet,
Speaker 1: so why is he cursing Canaan. Because he says that
Speaker 1: when he recovered from his wine, you know, it doesn't
Speaker 1: give you a time. We assume it's a day. I
Speaker 1: think it was probably several months down the road. Once
Speaker 1: he drunk all the grapes dry, there was no more
Speaker 1: to drink, so he come off the wagon, so to speak.
Speaker 1: And when he did, he noticed a baby bump that
Speaker 1: his wife was rocking, and it wouldn't he his, and
Speaker 1: that they were going to name it Canaan. And he
Speaker 1: heard about the rebellion, so he said, cursed be Canaan.
Speaker 1: He said, a servant to thy brother Shem and Japos
Speaker 1: he shall be. And I was like, oh, man, that's
Speaker 1: the only way he could be Shem and Ham Shem
Speaker 1: and Japi's brother is if yeah, they got the same
Speaker 1: mother brok.
Speaker 3: People are really fascinated by this. You've got tons of
Speaker 3: questions coming in. I'll stop hugging you and start to
Speaker 3: put some of these questions forward to you. John wants
Speaker 3: to know do blood groups have relevance.
Speaker 1: Honestly, I don't know. But I've heard a lot of
Speaker 1: people talk about like the rh negatives and things like that.
Speaker 1: But honestly, I really don't know. But there's two groups
Speaker 1: with this serpent seed, and I guess I want to
Speaker 1: tell you where mine is, where my flag is. There's
Speaker 1: some people that think that there's two seed lines and
Speaker 1: one is irredeemable and they're destined and born to go
Speaker 1: to Hell, that they're unredeemable. I don't take that stance.
Speaker 1: I take the stance of we're basically, if you go
Speaker 1: back far enough, we're all MutS. I mean, we all
Speaker 1: got some muddy genealogies. We probably got all a little
Speaker 1: touch of you know, nepheline or something in us. But
Speaker 1: I think at the Cross, he shed his blood for
Speaker 1: all it tells you, you know, to uh, preach the Gospel
Speaker 1: into all creatures, all of creation. So I think that, yes,
Speaker 1: the blood can set you up for for for failure
Speaker 1: and for damnation, but I think we all have a
Speaker 1: free will choice. So I just want to say that
Speaker 1: because there are a lot of people that hold to
Speaker 1: the serpency theory, that use it for what am I
Speaker 1: looking for mm hmm, ulterior motives, for racist motives, because
Speaker 1: there's been plenty of people like the klu Klux Klan
Speaker 1: they adopted. I do not take that standpoint, all right.
Speaker 3: So a Baker, why do you think e s a
Speaker 3: u as that? Yeah? Why why did he hate his birthright? Please?
Speaker 1: Yeah? And that's the thing is, that's what I was
Speaker 1: always taught. I was always taught that he just hated
Speaker 1: his birthright and he was just so eager to give
Speaker 1: it away, and that he was a man of the flesh.
Speaker 1: You know, he didn't think of the long game. He
Speaker 1: just thought of the now. So whatever would please his
Speaker 1: eyes or flesh of the now, that's what he was
Speaker 1: going to go for. But I think he didn't despise
Speaker 1: it because when you look at that story, he was
Speaker 1: bleeding out, dying and desperate. So he told his brother
Speaker 1: whatever he wanted to hear so he could get that
Speaker 1: life saving care. I believe, and I think we see
Speaker 1: that as a matter of fact, because later when Isaac
Speaker 1: goes to bless them, because this is basically like a
Speaker 1: verbal agreement. If I tell you, Sean, I'm like, hey,
Speaker 1: we're good friends. I want you to have my twenty
Speaker 1: ten Dodgs Challenger. That's a verbal agreement when I die.
Speaker 1: You know, you could go up to my family and
Speaker 1: be like, hey, justin to me. I could have his car,
Speaker 1: and I'll be like, well, we just got back from
Speaker 1: the lawyer's office. Here's the will signed, and that ain't
Speaker 1: going to you. So I looked at Isaac's deathbed. Blessing
Speaker 1: is kind of like the logger's office, you know, getting
Speaker 1: that stamp of approval. It's final, and he calls in
Speaker 1: Esaul to give him his blessing and the birthright. And
Speaker 1: if he intended on honoring his agreement, that would have
Speaker 1: been the perfect time to say, you know, hey, father,
Speaker 1: I appreciate it, but I traded it to my younger brother.
Speaker 1: You need to bless him. But he doesn't do that.
Speaker 1: He's like, okay, yep, I'll go out and get you
Speaker 1: some prepare you some food, and i'll come back and
Speaker 1: you can bless me. So I think that shows that
Speaker 1: he didn't despise it. He wanted it. And when he
Speaker 1: comes back and realizes that the fix is in. Because
Speaker 1: if we pay attention to what happens in that story, Rebecca,
Speaker 1: here's the conversation tells Jacob to go out and kill
Speaker 1: what a goat and bring the meat to her and
Speaker 1: she would prepare delicious meal, and that they would wrap
Speaker 1: him in this goat's fur and he would pretend to
Speaker 1: be Esau and steal the birthright and blessing. So where
Speaker 1: Esauce talked about being this Harry, that's not poetic language.
Speaker 1: I mean he was literally that Harry. But the garments
Speaker 1: are there too, because it's like the cherry on top.
Speaker 1: A lot of people miss it. Before he sins, before
Speaker 1: she sends Jacob in, it says that she goes to
Speaker 1: Esau's hent and takes his quote unquote special garments. So
Speaker 1: I think she took those garments from the Garden of
Speaker 1: God and placed it on Jacob, and when he walked in,
Speaker 1: deceived him. After everything was done, esau comes back. He's mad,
Speaker 1: He screams out in anger, and he threatens to kill
Speaker 1: Jacob for stealing his birthright. And Jacob ends up happening
Speaker 1: to leave and hide out in the land of Haran
Speaker 1: for many years to his you know, his brother Wrath subsided,
Speaker 1: So I don't think he despised it at all. I
Speaker 1: mean he was fighting like hell to keep it and
Speaker 1: was even willing to kill his brother to try to
Speaker 1: get it back.
Speaker 3: So is this why the royal families are so worshiped
Speaker 3: and called blue bloods and think they're so special. Does
Speaker 3: it relate these bloodlines of the stript, these boodlines.
Speaker 1: Yes, I think that the whole blue bloods is going
Speaker 1: back to this dragon court or in the biblical lends
Speaker 1: this serpent seed. And they were the elder brother dominion,
Speaker 1: and the right to rule was supposed to be in theirs,
Speaker 1: but they were quote unquote screwed out of their birthright.
Speaker 1: And so you see this with Jacob and Esau, you
Speaker 1: see it with canaan Abel. You even see it with Abraham.
Speaker 1: When Abraham him and Sarah can't have a child. Well,
Speaker 1: Sarah's freaked out thinking that she's going to be replaced
Speaker 1: by a younger woman. So she takes Hagar and gives
Speaker 1: Hagar to Abraham and says, sleep with her, you know,
Speaker 1: have a lineage with her, and he does, and he
Speaker 1: has Ishmael. Ishmael is the oldest son. He was supposed
Speaker 1: to get the birth right in the inheritance. But what happens.
Speaker 1: Rebecca miraculously gets pregnant and the younger brother gets the
Speaker 1: birth right. So I mean, I think we just see
Speaker 1: this time and time again, even the parable of the
Speaker 1: prodigal son. This is the same story. And that story.
Speaker 1: What happens. You have an older son that is always
Speaker 1: there by the father's side, but the younger son wants
Speaker 1: his birthright and inheritance now, so he gets it and
Speaker 1: he goes off and he squanders it away. That's us, folks,
Speaker 1: the younger brother. And then what happens. The younger brother
Speaker 1: comes back and begs for forgiveness and to be taken
Speaker 1: back into the home, into the family. But the father
Speaker 1: is waiting by the gate with open arms, and it
Speaker 1: says they put a signet, ring of authority and a
Speaker 1: cloak of authority back on the younger brother and restores
Speaker 1: him back to his position. Well, what happens. The older
Speaker 1: brother's hissed. He pulls his father aside and he said,
Speaker 1: you know, basically, I've been here the whole time, father,
Speaker 1: I've never left you, I've never soiled our family name,
Speaker 1: I've not squandered my inheritance. I've been the good child.
Speaker 1: But you know, this big party for this joke of
Speaker 1: a son where's my party? You know, where's my celebration
Speaker 1: and love feast that you've thrown for him? I've been
Speaker 1: here the whole time. I think that's once again another
Speaker 1: microcosm of the overall story of the Bible and of
Speaker 1: God's family, the elder Brother, the angelic race, and the
Speaker 1: younger brother humanity.
Speaker 3: So with Bohemian Grove, then you've got all these world
Speaker 3: leaders getting together to do this mock blood sacrifice. How
Speaker 3: does that tie into this?
Speaker 1: I think that these type of grews and things like
Speaker 1: that are kind of like the Freemasons, you know, I
Speaker 1: tell people, do I think every person that's a part
Speaker 1: of the Freemasonry is a lucifery and a cult member
Speaker 1: that worships Satan. No. I think that for the most part,
Speaker 1: they're in it for just a good old boys club
Speaker 1: to get away from the wife, have some drinks and
Speaker 1: you know, I have a club and a hobby and camaraderie.
Speaker 1: But the higher ups, you go, those are the ones
Speaker 1: like Albert Pike talks about in his book Morals and Dogma,
Speaker 1: that once they get to the thirty second, thirty third degree,
Speaker 1: that's when it's revealed to them that the Grand architect
Speaker 1: is Lucifer the Light Bearer. So and I kind of
Speaker 1: use this analogy. I've used it before. It kind of
Speaker 1: shows my age. But the original Ninja Turtles, you remember
Speaker 1: when they're in New York and the Foot Clan starts
Speaker 1: this little group for all the wild teenagers to come
Speaker 1: to and play video games. You know they have this
Speaker 1: big warehouse. Well that warehouse is full of thousands of kids.
Speaker 1: They go there smoke and party and play video games.
Speaker 1: They know nothing about the Foot Clan, even though the
Speaker 1: Foot Clan runs it, but there's a select few that
Speaker 1: they see promise in that they walk up to discreetly
Speaker 1: and say, hey, come back here at the back room
Speaker 1: with us. We're going to show you what we really do.
Speaker 1: I think that's the same thing, and I think it's
Speaker 1: so muddy, and I'm not going to pretend to say
Speaker 1: that I know everything. But my opinion is that you
Speaker 1: have these groups. Some are just kind of like side
Speaker 1: of hand, like look over here at this while we
Speaker 1: are over here doing this, you know, deception type things.
Speaker 1: Or there are groups where they pretend to bring in
Speaker 1: people and make them feel important and use them as
Speaker 1: like foot soldiers and cronies. But the higher ups that
Speaker 1: are never seen at these things are the ones behind
Speaker 1: the scenes, pulling the strings, kind of like the Ezekiel
Speaker 1: twenty eight King of Tire and the Pharaoh of Egypt.
Speaker 1: How there's this entity in the year of the world
Speaker 1: leader pulling the strings and nudging them to do their bidding.
Speaker 1: I think that's the same thing we see today.
Speaker 3: All right. So the next question then is from Bunny,
Speaker 3: who do you know and thoughts about Astana also called
Speaker 3: the City of the Fallen Angels.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm not familiar with that.
Speaker 3: You're also getting about asked about Lilith.
Speaker 1: Oh, Lilith. See. I think with Lilith is the Jewish
Speaker 1: legends in ways of basically splitting off of Eve into
Speaker 1: two personalities basically, and this dragon court, this dragon lineage,
Speaker 1: takes a lot of Biblical history and a lot of
Speaker 1: world history and kind of morph them and spin them
Speaker 1: into each other. And I'm of the opinion that like
Speaker 1: the Jewish mysticism, the Kabbalah, they to like basically preserve
Speaker 1: the innocence of Eve, like split her into two personalities,
Speaker 1: and Lilith is the one that gets the blame for
Speaker 1: being the evil one and for propagating the serpent Seed,
Speaker 1: and so from people that I've talked to and read,
Speaker 1: I think that sounds feasible to me because she was
Speaker 1: one of the original patriarchs. And if this serpent seed
Speaker 1: thing is true, and I think they believed it. Whether
Speaker 1: it's true or not, they believed it. This was a
Speaker 1: way of them preserving the innocence of one of the patriarchs.
Speaker 3: Gotcha, all right, You've got a question from ancient Orange
Speaker 3: the only links that head towards the ancient America's bloodline.
Speaker 1: Well, me, I take the position of La Marzouli, and
Speaker 1: I try to give credit where credit is due. I've
Speaker 1: never really had an original idea in my life, but
Speaker 1: I love to read and I love to get different
Speaker 1: perspectives on subjects and kind of compile the pieces together
Speaker 1: and try to form an overall opinion. But La Marzouli,
Speaker 1: he's got a pretty good theory that he has worked
Speaker 1: out with Fritz Zimmerman that I kind of hold to.
Speaker 1: And they basically say that when you get Joshua and
Speaker 1: Caleb coming into the Holy Land and cleansing the Holy Land,
Speaker 1: this is where a lot of people want to say, well,
Speaker 1: you know, your God's the genocidal god. He called for
Speaker 1: the the devastation of entire people groups, you know, mass genocide.
Speaker 1: Well when you read into that, all the clans that
Speaker 1: he tells them to do that too, to devout to destruction,
Speaker 1: were known Nephlum giant clans. You know, he was trying
Speaker 1: to purge the land of this hybrid race. And he
Speaker 1: says that he believes that during this conquest, the smart
Speaker 1: Ones anyway, seeing how they just rolled through Ai like
Speaker 1: it wasn't nothing. They got to Jericho and they just
Speaker 1: marched around the city and collapsed the walls without even
Speaker 1: swinging the first sword. I think the smart Ones were
Speaker 1: like a hell, nah, we're out of here. We ain't
Speaker 1: looking to die. So they started migrating north. And then
Speaker 1: you had this certain group that was later known as
Speaker 1: the Phoenicians. They were known seafaring people. I think that
Speaker 1: they loaded up their boats and they sailed to the Americas.
Speaker 1: And during this time frame, they speculate that the waters,
Speaker 1: you know, were like two hundred foot higher, and there
Speaker 1: was a direct path like from around New England straight
Speaker 1: into the Great Lakes area. And here at this Great
Speaker 1: Lakes area around the island Royale is the one of
Speaker 1: the largest and most purest copper mines in the world.
Speaker 1: And this copper, mind, they scientists have guestimated of the
Speaker 1: removal of the copper to be like hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: of tons of copper missing from this place. And that
Speaker 1: copper tests at ninety eight point eight percent purity. It's
Speaker 1: the purest copper in the world. So they can pinpoint
Speaker 1: it and they find that copper all over the world.
Speaker 1: So I think these giants come to North America, went
Speaker 1: into the Great Lakes mind all this copper, and they
Speaker 1: were seafaring people going back and forth, fueling the Bronze Age.
Speaker 1: I believe that's why we find this ninety eight point
Speaker 1: eight percent pure cross opera in China, Europe, South America, Africa, everywhere.
Speaker 1: It's everywhere because it was from these Nephelin giant tribes
Speaker 1: that escaped during the Great Diaspora, and then from there
Speaker 1: they took the Ohio River Valley straight down and got
Speaker 1: deeper into North America. And I think that's why we
Speaker 1: see all these mountains in North America. You have Serpent Mound,
Speaker 1: you have Kahokiah, Innon, Miamisburg, just all these huge you
Speaker 1: know Newark, these huge megalithic earthworks, and it's all concentrated
Speaker 1: in this Ohio River Valley, I think because that's where
Speaker 1: they traveled up and down through the North American continent.
Speaker 3: So the next question then is from a baker, how
Speaker 3: does the Ark of the Covenant play into this?
Speaker 1: The Ark of the Covenant. I think that the ark
Speaker 1: was basically not something that they were like fighting over
Speaker 1: as much. I think that that was basically the covenant
Speaker 1: symbol given to God's chosen people that held the tablets
Speaker 1: and that held the staff or the Rod of Moses.
Speaker 1: But we do see another supercharged relic, whether it's legend lore,
Speaker 1: you know, factor fiction, but the Holy Grail, and we see,
Speaker 1: you know, the occult symbolism with that, and how the
Speaker 1: occult chased after that, Adolf Hitler and the Nazis went
Speaker 1: off looking for these relics because they believed them to
Speaker 1: be powerful, supercharged relics. And I think they were after
Speaker 1: this big time. And that's why you have the Knights
Speaker 1: of the Round Table and you have all these legends
Speaker 1: in the Lord King Arthur, the Knights of the Round
Speaker 1: Table looking for the Holy Grail, Perceval all that stuff
Speaker 1: in there about them having these fisher kings, you know,
Speaker 1: these divine right to rule, people guarding, you know, this
Speaker 1: supernaturally charged relic. And I think that is a pretty
Speaker 1: pivotal piece to the puzzle. And I love how Graham
Speaker 1: Hancock and his book The Sign and the Seal talked
Speaker 1: about how the Nebra forgive me because I'm a Southern man.
Speaker 1: I can barely speak English or these big words that
Speaker 1: I have trouble with. But the Nobra Hagast, which was
Speaker 1: basically the Ethiopian legends, how they line up perfectly parallel,
Speaker 1: just different names. With the story of Perceval and how
Speaker 1: the Nebra Hanagast says that Sheba when she came up
Speaker 1: to see King Solomon, that they got together and she
Speaker 1: left and was pregnant and didn't realize it's she got
Speaker 1: back and according to their legends, she gives birth to
Speaker 1: Menelek the First and this is a righteous seed line
Speaker 1: from Solomon and Percival tells a story about a white
Speaker 1: ear piano aristocrat comes down to Ethiopia, finds a black woman,
Speaker 1: falls in love with her, that they have a child.
Speaker 1: I think his name was Frienitz or something like that
Speaker 1: in the Percival story, but all these things line up
Speaker 1: perfectly with these Ethiopian legends, and Graham Hancott traces that
Speaker 1: and thinks that it's like basically a hidden treasure map
Speaker 1: for the Ark of the Covenant, and he thinks that
Speaker 1: the Ark of the Covenant. I'm sorry, that the Holy
Speaker 1: Gril was code for the Ark of the Covenant, and
Speaker 1: that it wound up in Ethiopia, and that's the last
Speaker 1: time that they had any kind of traces of it
Speaker 1: because this Menelik, supposedly, according to the legends, went to
Speaker 1: see Solomon when he was an adult and said, hey,
Speaker 1: you know you're you're my dad basically, and he taked
Speaker 1: him in. But then Menelik steals the arc and smuggles
Speaker 1: it down into Ethiopia. So if there is any kind
Speaker 1: of like supernatural relic in this seed war, I think
Speaker 1: it would be this Holy Grail.
Speaker 3: You got some quite esoteric questions coming in, but I
Speaker 3: don't keep going with them. All right, So, Professor Hamimoto,
Speaker 3: can you comment on current bloodline merging between the Han
Speaker 3: Chinese ku Jin and the ash Nazi Jews.
Speaker 1: Larry Summers, Yeah, that, honestly, guys, I've not got that
Speaker 1: deep into it. I just finished this book in January
Speaker 1: and released it, and so I'm just basically got my
Speaker 1: toes dipped into the deep end of this pool. And
Speaker 1: this is a deep pool. But what I found so
Speaker 1: far is very compelling, and I'm starting to dig down
Speaker 1: through it. But I think we see hints of it
Speaker 1: with even the mythology. When you go to China, you
Speaker 1: have I can't remember what they're called now, but these
Speaker 1: serpent people all depicted in these dragons, and then you
Speaker 1: go into India these I can't remember the name that
Speaker 1: it starts with the N, but there's the serpent people.
Speaker 1: You just have all these esoteric stories throughout the world
Speaker 1: of this serpent lineage and the serpent gods. I think
Speaker 1: that's echoing all back to this thing that we're talking about.
Speaker 3: So does this tie into David Iike's theories then of
Speaker 3: reptilians and shape shifters and other royal bloodline? Is Reptilian?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think so, because whether they're like true physical
Speaker 1: reptilion you know what I mean, like green scales and stuff,
Speaker 1: I don't know, or if it's they have this bloodline
Speaker 1: in them that originates to a serpentine type entity. Because
Speaker 1: the Nakash, according to which scriptures you read and stuff.
Speaker 1: He's compared to a serpentine angel, you know, a dragon angel,
Speaker 1: and they called him an anointed guardian cherub in the Masoretics.
Speaker 1: But when you get into the septuagen stuff, it talks
Speaker 1: about he was a serophim, you know, a fiery one.
Speaker 1: And that's another thing you go down into the Egyptians,
Speaker 1: the Africans up in your neck of the woods too,
Speaker 1: the Druids, they all talk about these shining ones.
Speaker 3: All right, well, viewers, thank you for the questions that
Speaker 3: are coming in with fast approaching Too Fi and watching
Speaker 3: live across all the platforms and CJ's wondering did the
Speaker 3: giants mate with earthly women?
Speaker 1: Yeah, according to some of the writings and stuff, that
Speaker 1: they did. And uh the ones that had successful births
Speaker 1: almost died in the birthing process. But they were larger
Speaker 1: than normal, I believe. But I don't think that they
Speaker 1: come out just so huge that they couldn't, you know,
Speaker 1: even deliver them. But I think that's kind of like
Speaker 1: maybe they just had like really rapid growth and grew
Speaker 1: to this height, you know, after the fact.
Speaker 3: But uh, uh so was it the size of the
Speaker 3: babies then that that caused some of the mothers to
Speaker 3: die birth.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that that was the the word or the legends
Speaker 1: of it. And uh, it's like saying, I don't know
Speaker 1: how much time that you got left, but I definitely
Speaker 1: wanted to kind of show this off and talk about
Speaker 1: this a little bit it because.
Speaker 3: As much as much time as you want, doc keep going.
Speaker 1: Because I think this ties into it too. And this
Speaker 1: was another one of my fascinations man giants and these
Speaker 1: elongated skulls. Yeah, and for those that's not familiar, and
Speaker 1: this is from Perracas, this is a parocas skull, but
Speaker 1: this is a juvenile. This is not a full grown
Speaker 1: adult male. And you have this elongated skull in which
Speaker 1: I got a bunch of signatures on it. I've had
Speaker 1: all my frenzy friends like you know, Timothy Alberino, Tony Merkle,
Speaker 1: and Georgio sign it. Anytime I go to a conference,
Speaker 1: I take it with me and have people sign it.
Speaker 1: But uh, modern day you know, anthropologists and archaeologists, I
Speaker 1: want to say that this is from headbinding. And I'm
Speaker 1: not going to argue with them that some were headbinding,
Speaker 1: but I don't think all were. And when you are
Speaker 1: a child. I think they start once they become a
Speaker 1: year old or two years old. They wrap or bind
Speaker 1: or board their head and force it to grow out
Speaker 1: elongated like this. So you can imagine the pain, the headaches,
Speaker 1: the discomfort that you would be putting yourself and your
Speaker 1: children through to achieve this aesthetic look. And I'm a
Speaker 1: firm believer in why, Okay, they did this? Well why
Speaker 1: did they do this? Because they were emulating something else
Speaker 1: that they seen. And I know you're from Europe, but
Speaker 1: here in the United States, the mullet is a big
Speaker 1: thing and it's making a comeback, and it started a
Speaker 1: few years ago, and one of the main proponents was
Speaker 1: this guy named Morgan Wallen, this country music artist that
Speaker 1: showed up rocking the mullet, and then everybody else started imitating
Speaker 1: him and trying to copy his look because he was
Speaker 1: an important icon, you know, in American culture. And I
Speaker 1: think that's what we have here. There was somebody or
Speaker 1: a group of people that had this elongated head that
Speaker 1: was an important icon in their culture, and they wanted
Speaker 1: to emulate and look like them. And when we look
Speaker 1: through the ones that are known from headbinding, that none
Speaker 1: of the features of the skull. Besides the elongated portion change,
Speaker 1: they still have their sadrisseutral lines. The brain case volume
Speaker 1: has not increased. The eye orbits are the same. I
Speaker 1: mean everything you know, as far as a normal human
Speaker 1: skull is exactly the same. It's just it's been elongated
Speaker 1: because it's been stretched and compressed. Well, some of these
Speaker 1: that they found, including this one, if you look, there's
Speaker 1: no sadrisutral line. And for those that's not familiar, you
Speaker 1: can Google search and look, it's basically a peace sign
Speaker 1: crack that's on your skull and it separates these different
Speaker 1: skull caps. Well, all the ones they find from headbinding,
Speaker 1: they still have their sadresutral lines. But there's a large
Speaker 1: handful that they find, like this guy that has no
Speaker 1: sadrisutral line. So we know by the large amounts of
Speaker 1: proving elongated skulls from headbinding, that doesn't erase that sadrisutral line.
Speaker 1: So that's a really distinct factor in some of these.
Speaker 1: Another thing is if you look at the eye orbits,
Speaker 1: they're about twenty five to thirty percent larger than a
Speaker 1: normal skull. When La Marzouli and his group of anthropologists
Speaker 1: and scientists and archaeologists went down there and studied these things.
Speaker 1: I mean, they did DNA samples on these things, measured
Speaker 1: every little thing, brought up toometrists with them that they
Speaker 1: were really thorough. But the optometrist examining these eye orbits,
Speaker 1: he says that they were twenty five to thirty percent larger,
Speaker 1: he said, so we can assume safely that the pupillaries
Speaker 1: were twenty five to thirty percent larger also, he said.
Speaker 1: And the distance between the eyes right here, he said,
Speaker 1: it's a lot more narrow than a normal skull. He said,
Speaker 1: all the elongated ones we find it doesn't increase the
Speaker 1: eye sockets or any of that stuff. It doesn't decrease
Speaker 1: the width between them. So this is a genetic thing,
Speaker 1: he said. So I think he said that these hybrid
Speaker 1: beings had night vision like a predatory animal, like an owl,
Speaker 1: because how the eyes are set up, and it kind
Speaker 1: of goes with the legends around the world. All of
Speaker 1: these nephelum or giants, they were famed to be cave dwellers,
Speaker 1: so it kind of makes sense if they had night
Speaker 1: vision because they were cave dwellers. They were in the
Speaker 1: dark constantly, and they drilled a hole in the top
Speaker 1: of one of these and filled it with rice to
Speaker 1: measure the brain case volume. Well, in a handful of
Speaker 1: these the same things. Ones with the large eye sockets
Speaker 1: and with no Sadrisutra line, those guys had like a
Speaker 1: fifteen percent larger brain case volume. And then if you
Speaker 1: go to underneath this hole is where the spine connects
Speaker 1: to the skull. If you Google search, I think they
Speaker 1: call it the foraming magnum. But if you look, all
Speaker 1: skulls mount right here in the center for balance. All
Speaker 1: the ones they find that they say is from head
Speaker 1: boarding still have this mount right here in the center.
Speaker 1: But these guys, they're all the way at the back
Speaker 1: because help it balance. If that thing was in the center,
Speaker 1: it would just be looking up at the sky all
Speaker 1: the time. So by mounting it further back, it better
Speaker 1: balances this elongated head. So all the ones that they
Speaker 1: find from headbinding, it doesn't change the anchor point of
Speaker 1: the skull. So once again it shows you that this
Speaker 1: was genetic. It was built in the DNA. And there's
Speaker 1: even in stories from Spanish explorers and things in their
Speaker 1: journals that they found mummies in caves down in Peru
Speaker 1: that still had unborn infants in the womb with elongated heads.
Speaker 1: They got drawings of them and multiple recordings of them.
Speaker 1: But of course, like the Smithsonian here in the United States,
Speaker 1: some people got their hands on them and they just
Speaker 1: mysteriously disappeared. And even the Peruvian legends go right along
Speaker 1: with these because Vericocha that that was their one of
Speaker 1: their main gods, the creator god. In their legends it
Speaker 1: says that Verraicocha was pale skinned, elongated head, long beard.
Speaker 1: These are all contradictory aesthetics from the Peruvian people. The
Speaker 1: Pruvian people were shorter, they didn't have elongated heads, they
Speaker 1: had dark skin, and they can't grow beards that well.
Speaker 1: So this screams, you know, alien or foreigner of the land.
Speaker 1: But it says that Verraicocha pulls up on this on serpents,
Speaker 1: a bed of serpents without paddles, and that he has
Speaker 1: a group of people, if you want to call him, disciples,
Speaker 1: and they called them the verako Chun, and that they
Speaker 1: show up and they civilized Peru. He gives the seven
Speaker 1: Sacred sciences, teaches them how to do math, to study
Speaker 1: the map, the stars, architecture, all of these things and
Speaker 1: the legends tell all the different towns that they go through,
Speaker 1: and they have mapped this and they call it the
Speaker 1: path of Viracocha. And without fail, every single town that
Speaker 1: he stopped at they find megalithic architecture and elongated skulls,
Speaker 1: without fail. Then when he leaves, he sells off him
Speaker 1: and his Vera coaching, and he says that he would
Speaker 1: return when they most needed him, so to be watching
Speaker 1: for him, and he would arrive just the way he
Speaker 1: came the first time. So he leaves, and what happens.
Speaker 1: The Spanish pull up. What are they own? They're on
Speaker 1: ships without paddles because they've got seals. They get off
Speaker 1: the boat. They're pale skinned, they're tall, they got long,
Speaker 1: thick beards, and they're wearing this metal armor, glistening, glowing
Speaker 1: in the sun, looking like they're God Bearcocha from their legends,
Speaker 1: so they know threw gold and silver at him and
Speaker 1: give him everything he wanted and worshiped him like a
Speaker 1: god because they thought he was Veracocha, and that's how
Speaker 1: he took over South America so easily he went along
Speaker 1: with it. And then after a certain amount of time,
Speaker 1: once they started figuring out he was no god. It
Speaker 1: was too late. He was done so far deep into
Speaker 1: South America that they couldn't fight him off anymore. But
Speaker 1: the Spaniards in their journals said that they seen a
Speaker 1: group of people different, that there was a group of
Speaker 1: people that had pale skin, beards and elongated sculls, and
Speaker 1: that they asked them who are these people? They're obviously
Speaker 1: not from here. Who are these people? And they said,
Speaker 1: these are the descendants of the very coaching. So I
Speaker 1: think these were the god kings, the hybrid race, like
Speaker 1: we've been talking about, and they were the ruling elite class,
Speaker 1: and their subjects wanted to venerate them and look like them.
Speaker 3: Well, how's fascinating. You've got a few people asking about
Speaker 3: your thoughts on the Pyramids, and I saw whether you
Speaker 3: think giants were involved in with the Pyramids.
Speaker 1: I think so. I think that that is a pre
Speaker 1: flood relic. I think it's a lot older than what
Speaker 1: they say it is, and that the what we call
Speaker 1: the Egyptians found it and settled there and built around
Speaker 1: it or maybe added to it. Because we have the
Speaker 1: same thing in North America. When Lewis and Clark and
Speaker 1: all these guys started finding these mounds and these megalithic earthworks.
Speaker 1: They started talking to the natives that lived there and
Speaker 1: asked them, you know, hey, when did you guys build this?
Speaker 1: With that fail all of them. So we didn't build this.
Speaker 1: We found it and we thought it was important, so
Speaker 1: we hung around and added to it and kept it.
Speaker 1: I think that's the same thing with the pyramids.
Speaker 3: All right, So next question is let's see the second
Speaker 3: all right, I hope these aren't too esoteric. What about
Speaker 3: the mound builders along the Natchez Trace.
Speaker 1: Not just straight network? Where is that exactly? Is that
Speaker 1: North America?
Speaker 3: Yeah, don't worry about that one. Let's let me go
Speaker 3: on to the next one. Can he comment on the
Speaker 3: Grand Canyon Smithsonian cover up and as they're being headway
Speaker 3: made in exploring the canyon in recent years.
Speaker 1: M Yeah, there's a lot of stories and documents and
Speaker 1: newspaper articles that the Smithsonian hired this man to go
Speaker 1: out and explore and he reported finding these ancient Egyptian
Speaker 1: like tombs and caverns, and they found all these artifacts
Speaker 1: and all this stuff, and it made the newspaper and
Speaker 1: then all of a sudden, it's like, nah, ain't nothing there,
Speaker 1: and don't look here, and when they try to search
Speaker 1: it out, it was in the newspaper this guy's name,
Speaker 1: that he was commissioned by the Smithsonian. And later when
Speaker 1: people tried to dig into this and question them, they
Speaker 1: said that they had no records of this expedition, so
Speaker 1: they just they scrapped it. I mean, we need to
Speaker 1: believe that this newspaper just lied and made up all
Speaker 1: these stories and made up this name and put the
Speaker 1: Smithsonian's name to it, not thinking they'd find out about
Speaker 1: it and call it a lie. I think it's the
Speaker 1: same thing as like Rosswell, that guy that found the
Speaker 1: saucer reported it and then told him that there was
Speaker 1: gonna be a press conference, and he went out there
Speaker 1: and they had this fake weather balloon laying out in
Speaker 1: front of him. And if you look at those pictures,
Speaker 1: that guy looks shocked because I don't think they told him.
Speaker 1: I think they're like, okay, coming here for this press conference,
Speaker 1: and then you just roll with whatever we say. And
Speaker 1: if you look at him pictures, that guy is looking
Speaker 1: at that captain and looking at this thing like, what
Speaker 1: the hell is this? This is not what I found.
Speaker 1: So I think it's another grand cover up. And we
Speaker 1: have even evidence in Egypt they found tombs with tobacco
Speaker 1: and cocaine, corn, all these different things that's not, you know,
Speaker 1: indigenous to Africa. So it shows they were traveling back
Speaker 1: and forth, and they even have depictions of you know,
Speaker 1: North American corn. Yeah, we were definitely diffusionists. We were
Speaker 1: not isolationists. We were selling the globe and exploring all
Speaker 1: the places in trading with other civilizations long before academia
Speaker 1: says that we were.
Speaker 3: So next question, is there a connection between Blue Blood's
Speaker 3: an Nakai and the blue Hindu gods?
Speaker 1: Yeah? I think so, one hunred percent. That's what I
Speaker 1: was talking about earlier. How the anonachy sound just like
Speaker 1: the Genesis six narrative making Nephelm hybrids and then the
Speaker 1: blue Serpent people in India. I think it's all the
Speaker 1: same story.
Speaker 3: Satan's Season is what exactly Saturn question mark?
Speaker 1: Yeah, Satan's Little Season. I've actually talked to a couple
Speaker 1: guys on my program about that. I had one guy
Speaker 1: come on and lay out the reasons why he believes
Speaker 1: we are not in Satan's Little Season, and then I
Speaker 1: had two other gentlemen that were Little seasonists that came
Speaker 1: on and laid out their explanations to why they believe
Speaker 1: that we are. But what that theory is basically is
Speaker 1: saying that were before Jesus passed away and died on
Speaker 1: the cross, he told his apostles that he would be
Speaker 1: coming soon and that some of them would not taste
Speaker 1: death before they seen him coming in all his glory.
Speaker 1: And so basically the Little seasonists believe that our timeline
Speaker 1: is all messed up, like you could add like another
Speaker 1: seven hundred to a thousand years to it, and that's
Speaker 1: why you have the Greek Dark Ages and all this
Speaker 1: timeline jumbled up stuff. And they talk about Mount Vesuvius
Speaker 1: erupting and all these different natural disasters, and they align
Speaker 1: that to the disaster is mentioned in the Book of
Speaker 1: Revelation and how in seventy a d. They destroyed the Temple.
Speaker 1: The Emperor stood in the Temple of God, proclaimed to
Speaker 1: be God and be worshiped. So they take all that
Speaker 1: and say that they believe the happenings of Revelation had
Speaker 1: already happened, and that Christ had already ruled for his
Speaker 1: thousand years, and we are now in Satan's Little Season,
Speaker 1: and basically our memory has been wiped we don't remember
Speaker 1: it because scripture says that he would be allowed to
Speaker 1: deceive the nations, so basically wipe the memory of everyone.
Speaker 1: And all this Gothic architecture that we see that's huge
Speaker 1: and beautiful and got the antennas in the air, that
Speaker 1: these are remnants of that millennial rain and these buildings
Speaker 1: were tapping into the ether and free energy. And that's
Speaker 1: how they explain all these megalithic structures, that they believe
Speaker 1: that all this stuff was constructed during the millennial reign
Speaker 1: of Christ. But me personally, I love entertaining and hearing
Speaker 1: new thoughts. I'm open to hear anybody talk about anything,
Speaker 1: you know. I try to be what they call it
Speaker 1: good berin. I like to hear everybody out and search
Speaker 1: stuff out and see if it's true. I'm just not
Speaker 1: quite there yet as me being a little seasoness. But
Speaker 1: it's definitely fascinating to research and look at.
Speaker 3: Did the Ananaki have elongated.
Speaker 1: Hats some of them If you go to some of
Speaker 1: the depictions and some of the like the hats and
Speaker 1: stuff the miters that they wore. A lot of people
Speaker 1: theorized that like these miter hats and these like Egyptian
Speaker 1: pharaoh hats how they're so elongated that they were made
Speaker 1: to fit this elongated skull ruling class. And we even
Speaker 1: see I think it's with Nephritidi and shoot, what's the
Speaker 1: other guy's name? Oconnot And if you go to Egypt
Speaker 1: and look at their depictions, they remove all doubt because
Speaker 1: they even have depictions of them without the headdress on
Speaker 1: and having this huge elongated skull, and even Nefertiti holding
Speaker 1: up her baby with a new gateds goal up to
Speaker 1: the rays of the sun.
Speaker 3: Could it be that Epstein's Zoro ranch in New Mexico
Speaker 3: was the site of a bloodlines breeding program?
Speaker 1: Could possibly be. I'm not familiar with that resort, but
Speaker 1: I mean it's definitely a possibility.
Speaker 3: Well viewers, we just interviewed Juliette Bryant Epstein Survivor Part two.
Speaker 3: A Mother's come on the podcast as well, and she
Speaker 3: will be talking about the breeding program and cloning and
Speaker 3: all the eugenic stuff that Epstein was up to, So
Speaker 3: look out for that. One next question for Dark does
Speaker 3: he think Mount a Cash is connected with God's or aliens?
Speaker 1: I think they're the same. I think we get hung
Speaker 1: up on burbage. If we take takes book definition, you
Speaker 1: know what is alien. It's something not of this world.
Speaker 1: So if we look at the Anonaki, if we look
Speaker 1: at God, if we look at Satan, we look at angels, aliens,
Speaker 1: all these different things, they are all not of this world.
Speaker 1: I think it's the saint. We're talking about the same thing.
Speaker 1: We just call it different names, and they present themselves
Speaker 1: in different lights as the generations go to be better
Speaker 1: received by the people, because it's the same, even the
Speaker 1: same agenda. If you listen to some of these abductees
Speaker 1: and you believe them, they were taken and what happens.
Speaker 1: Sperm is reported to be taken from the men of
Speaker 1: them is reported to be taken from the women, and
Speaker 1: they wind up pregnant and then miraculously the baby just
Speaker 1: disappears and is gone. So it's like they come in
Speaker 1: and take the baby. All of the cattle mulizations. They're
Speaker 1: taken stuff from cattle that biologically is the closest thing
Speaker 1: two hours our blood is almost completely interchangeable with bovine.
Speaker 1: So I mean, when it's the same exact thing that
Speaker 1: happened in Genesis six that God's you know, came down
Speaker 1: bread with the daughters of men and made Nephilim giants
Speaker 1: a hybrid race. It's nothing news under the sun. They're
Speaker 1: doing the same thing they did back then.
Speaker 3: What do you think of Jesus's lost years?
Speaker 1: I think they're lost. No, I don't know. I mean
Speaker 1: I've heard the theories, you know, people say that he
Speaker 1: you know, went out east and got you know, schooled
Speaker 1: in the mysticism and all that kind of stuff. But uh,
Speaker 1: I'm one of these people that I don't think everything
Speaker 1: is in the Bible, and I'll ruffle some feathers of
Speaker 1: some Christians, but I try to be an honest, realist person.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 1: This was not a science book. It's not a genealogy book.
Speaker 1: It doesn't have the answers, you know, I mean to
Speaker 1: every single thing. Do I think it's valuable, Oh, certainly.
Speaker 1: But we have to remember this is not something that
Speaker 1: was written in real time. You know. It wasn't like
Speaker 1: an ESPN play by play. It was written looking backwards
Speaker 1: thousands of years, so you're basically getting the highlights and
Speaker 1: high notes. So just because they're missing from the scripture,
Speaker 1: it doesn't mean that it was missing from the people
Speaker 1: of that time. It's just missing to us.
Speaker 3: Do you think the true puppet masters of America are
Speaker 3: other worldly?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I'm a firm believer in the Tower of Bible.
Speaker 1: A lot of people just think that's the tall building.
Speaker 1: But if you go to Deuteronomy thirty two, verse eight,
Speaker 1: that's a retelling of that story, and it says that
Speaker 1: not only were the tongues divided, it says the nations,
Speaker 1: the peoples were divided amongst the beneha Ilohem, the sons
Speaker 1: of God. Every time that phrase is used, it's talking
Speaker 1: about divine heavenly beings and Psalms eighty two talking about
Speaker 1: these same rebellious sons of God that was given dominion
Speaker 1: over the nations. It says, how long will you rule unjustly,
Speaker 1: show partiality to the wicked? You desire to live an
Speaker 1: eternal life, but you shall die and fall like any prince.
Speaker 1: So they're not talking about human rulers. I mean, if
Speaker 1: you're a human ruler, yeah, of course I'm going to die, duh.
Speaker 1: I know. He's talking to divine heavenly beings, rebellious sons
Speaker 1: of God, and it says that he divided the nations
Speaker 1: up amongst them to rule, and they're ruling unjustly. But
Speaker 1: he said, Jacob, Israel is my allotted portion. And that's
Speaker 1: why right after that event he called Abraham out and said,
Speaker 1: through your name all nations shall be blessed. So it
Speaker 1: goes back to that game of thrones that Deuteronomi thirty two,
Speaker 1: the sons of God were portioned out lands and people groups,
Speaker 1: and they rule from behind the scene, and that they're
Speaker 1: the puppet masters, I believe.
Speaker 3: So who are the one hundred and forty four thousand.
Speaker 1: Me The way that describes is like basically that they're
Speaker 1: you know, virgin priesthood class type people. So it's like
Speaker 1: these people are you know, unblemished, bisexual morality and things
Speaker 1: like that. So I've heard some people theorize that, you know,
Speaker 1: this is just you know, Israelite Jewish people. I've heard
Speaker 1: some people theorize that this is a mixture of all
Speaker 1: the nations. I would tend to lean toward that because
Speaker 1: I'm not a Zionist. I don't think when it talks
Speaker 1: about Israel, you know that it's talking about a political nation.
Speaker 1: It's talking about you know, God's people, and we are
Speaker 1: all you know, members of you know, God's chosen people.
Speaker 1: If we decide to be.
Speaker 3: A former person who's sent the question, and it sent
Speaker 3: some classification. The Natchez Trace is in Mississippi and Tennessee
Speaker 3: does mounds all through it? That's why I asked the question.
Speaker 3: The mound builders these same people. Does that give any
Speaker 3: classification the.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, see I think so. I mean, it's just
Speaker 1: like I was saying with the Michigan copper mines and
Speaker 1: how that Ohio River Valley runs all the way down
Speaker 1: you know, into Upper Kentucky and straight down shot you
Speaker 1: know you have Tennessee, Alabama. If you look on a
Speaker 1: map and you had the mounds and stuff stacked up
Speaker 1: on the North American continent, that's basically the line they travel.
Speaker 1: So it's kind of like this. They used rivers back then.
Speaker 1: That's why these mounds and stuff are close to these
Speaker 1: rivers because they were I believe, coming from Lake Michigan
Speaker 1: down through the Ohio River Valley and then once they
Speaker 1: got to Tennessee, they connected to the Tennessee River and
Speaker 1: then went down into Mississippi and all that type stuff.
Speaker 3: Okay, And that's about knowledge of the Kashak records and reincarnation.
Speaker 1: Yep. My knowledge on the Akasak Records is very surface level.
Speaker 1: I'd say the people in the chat probably know more
Speaker 1: than I do, if I'm being honest on it. I
Speaker 1: have a thirty thousand foot view of that. And what
Speaker 1: was the second part, I'm sorry, reincarnation. Reincarnation. A lot
Speaker 1: of Christians don't believe in that, and the Bible doesn't
Speaker 1: come right out and say that. But I got educated
Speaker 1: by a guest on my show not that long ago
Speaker 1: talking about Elijah. And there's some hints in there that
Speaker 1: there might be some reincarnation, you know. I mean that,
Speaker 1: I ain't saying that a heel I'm willing to die on,
Speaker 1: but there are there's hints to that because it says
Speaker 1: that Elijah he was taken up in a whirlwind, and
Speaker 1: then later John the Baptist is referred to as the
Speaker 1: second coming of Elijah, that he had the spirit of Elijah.
Speaker 1: And I looked over that and not noticed that, you know,
Speaker 1: my whole adult life. But this guy Ben that I
Speaker 1: had on the show from the End of the World News,
Speaker 1: he came on and did a show with me about Elijah,
Speaker 1: and he brought that to my attention, and yeah, the
Speaker 1: hints are there, whether it's true, or we're reading too
Speaker 1: deep into it, but it's definitely interesting.
Speaker 3: Do you have any thoughts on the timing of the
Speaker 3: second coming of Christ?
Speaker 1: No, I mean I'm not a date center, but of
Speaker 1: course I know every single generation since you know, his
Speaker 1: death has said, you know, the end is nigh, the
Speaker 1: end is nigh. But I think we can honestly say
Speaker 1: that we are closer now than we ever have been.
Speaker 1: I think that all the groundwork has been laid. We
Speaker 1: are now looking into this you know, surveillance state. They're
Speaker 1: going to know cameras on every corner, your smartphones, your
Speaker 1: smart TVs, your smart cars, You're you're being recorded and
Speaker 1: tracked everywhere you go. Now and look, Revelation talks about,
Speaker 1: you know, those who don't bow to the beast, you know,
Speaker 1: they will be killed. How they're going to know that
Speaker 1: because of pallunteer in this surveillance state, they're going to
Speaker 1: know everything you're doing. Now they're wanting to get rid
Speaker 1: of first, they got rid of the gold and went
Speaker 1: to the Federal Reserve, you know here in America. Because
Speaker 1: they're slowly stepping their way toward this beast system, I believe,
Speaker 1: and it's like a frog in the boiling water. You
Speaker 1: don't put the frog in there and turn it up
Speaker 1: to ten. You slowly start cranking it up and getting
Speaker 1: them closer right the way, they don't jump out, and
Speaker 1: they'll just sit right there oil to death. So they
Speaker 1: moved away from the gold, went to the Federal Reserve.
Speaker 1: Now they're starting to transition to this bitcoin in this
Speaker 1: digital currency. You've got so many countries talking about going
Speaker 1: to a blockchain system once again. They're going to where
Speaker 1: every dollar you spend and what does it say those
Speaker 1: who don't take the mark will not be able to buy,
Speaker 1: sell or trade.
Speaker 3: So they they just announced here kiss Timer that they're
Speaker 3: going to force a digital ID on us. Yes, more
Speaker 3: like a digital control grid more like Yeah.
Speaker 1: So, I mean the groundwork has been laid and we
Speaker 1: are definitely closer than we've ever been.
Speaker 3: Question from RF do you believe we are inside a
Speaker 3: firmament as the Bible says?
Speaker 1: I am a believer because I know there's some people
Speaker 1: that are what they call it the flat earth community
Speaker 1: and the glober community. I do not dispute that the
Speaker 1: Bible describes a flat stationary plane with a dot on it.
Speaker 1: I do not dispute that whatsoever. But I think that
Speaker 1: God meets people where they're at, and he talked to
Speaker 1: them in language that they could understand and something that
Speaker 1: they already had a grasp on. They already thought it
Speaker 1: was flat stationary, they already thought there was a firmament
Speaker 1: a dome over the top. So God was just meeting
Speaker 1: them basically where they were, talking to them in the
Speaker 1: language that they could understand. And I compare it to
Speaker 1: when I have this conversation with people because of me,
Speaker 1: it gets heated. There's some people that are flat Earth.
Speaker 1: There's man that get pretty heated over it and go
Speaker 1: as far asaying you're not a Christian if you don't
Speaker 1: believe in flat earth, because the Bible talks about a
Speaker 1: flat Earth. But I tell people, when you were a child,
Speaker 1: you wanted to know where babies come from? Right, So
Speaker 1: you asked your parents, Hey, where do babies come from?
Speaker 1: And you got one of two or three different variant stories.
Speaker 1: You either were told, oh, when a man loves a
Speaker 1: woman kiss and then a bump magically appears in her
Speaker 1: belly and a baby's born, or we prayed and asked
Speaker 1: for one and a stork had dropped it off at
Speaker 1: our door. You know, did your parents lie to you
Speaker 1: or did they just tell you a story that you
Speaker 1: could wrap your little mind around until you were old
Speaker 1: enough or smart enough to understand the real story. And
Speaker 1: I think that's kind of what God did there, because
Speaker 1: the shape of the plane or realm that we are
Speaker 1: on wasn't important. What was important was the story of
Speaker 1: the fall, the rebellion, and the redemption and coming back
Speaker 1: into the family of God. That was what was important,
Speaker 1: not the shape of the earth. But I do believe
Speaker 1: in the canopy theory that before the flood there was
Speaker 1: a water canopy, a vapor over the top of us,
Speaker 1: and it burst.
Speaker 3: Your opinion on the Gnostics.
Speaker 1: Gnostics, Yap the dog Commodi texts, and I think that's,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm not a coincidence, dearist. I thought that
Speaker 1: that was very significant that, you know, during this time frame,
Speaker 1: shortly after you know, Israel was even made a nation,
Speaker 1: in Egypt, they found this stash of scrolls and they
Speaker 1: call them the nag Hamadi text and it was the
Speaker 1: Gnostic Gospels and this come out, and then just like
Speaker 1: a month or two later they found the Dead Sea
Speaker 1: scrolls and they're like in direct you know, conflict with
Speaker 1: one another, and I tell people, I think it's kind
Speaker 1: of like God's perfect timing and sense of humor. It's
Speaker 1: like they put out this gnostic deception and try to,
Speaker 1: you know, lead some people astray. Then the counter move
Speaker 1: was like, oh no, no, now look over here at
Speaker 1: these Dead Sea scrolls, and we could show you all
Speaker 1: these texts were preserved and not manipulated through time. And
Speaker 1: this is the truth that they are definitely interesting. But
Speaker 1: I've looked into it, and especially the early church fathers.
Speaker 1: They that's who they were talking about, the wolves and
Speaker 1: sheep's clothing, you know, inside of their synagogues, because these
Speaker 1: people were posing as Christians, but they were drinking these kookions,
Speaker 1: you know, these psychedelic spike drinks and having these vision
Speaker 1: quests and stuff, and they were going to telling the
Speaker 1: people at church. Basically, you know, I'm just adding some
Speaker 1: creative liberties here, but basically, you know, you're talking about
Speaker 1: seeing God and visions and miracles and you know, all
Speaker 1: this stuff. You guys talk about it, but man, over here,
Speaker 1: three houses down at my buddy Ryan's house, we're actually
Speaker 1: doing it. Come on over here, we'll show you God.
Speaker 1: And was kind of leading people astray. But the early
Speaker 1: Church fathers, their number one contention with them was everything
Speaker 1: was metaphysical, nothing was physical, and they denied Christ. They
Speaker 1: said that he wasn't God in the flesh. He was
Speaker 1: just a normal man that achieved in enlightenment and was
Speaker 1: showing everyone else that you can also achieve enlightened enlightenment
Speaker 1: and be like him and get this christ consciousness. But
Speaker 1: this was during the time that the Romans were persecuting
Speaker 1: the Christians, and it was the perfect cop out to
Speaker 1: save your life. Oh no, I'm gnostic. Jesus wasn't real. No,
Speaker 1: I don't believe in that, you know. And so a
Speaker 1: lot of the early Church fathers was talking about it.
Speaker 1: Upset a lot of the Christians. Not only was they
Speaker 1: teaching false doctrine in their eyes, but they were also
Speaker 1: denying the physicality of Jesus. So therefore they wasn't persecuted
Speaker 1: and burned at the stake and threw into the lions
Speaker 1: den and all this stuff. They called them cop outs.
Speaker 3: All right, Well, thank you for the superchat question. Who
Speaker 3: are the alleged thirteen bloodlines? And what very liable historical evidence,
Speaker 3: if any, traces the influence across major empires and institutions.
Speaker 1: Well, like I said, this is something that I've just
Speaker 1: kind of first got into. So I'm not like went
Speaker 1: deep deep yet, but I'm in the process. But if
Speaker 1: you guys are interested in this type of stuff that
Speaker 1: Nicholas de Vere The Dragon Legacy is a great book,
Speaker 1: and he named some of them in there. Of course,
Speaker 1: I don't think they're gonna give out, they're gonna show
Speaker 1: all their cards. But he talked about the Davas were one,
Speaker 1: the merit Beingians were one, and even talked about the
Speaker 1: the myths and legends of the Europeans, how they talked
Speaker 1: about the Druids and the Elves, that this was the
Speaker 1: Elven race and it kind of drew back to this
Speaker 1: other family and that all these stories where you have
Speaker 1: these mythological characters, it's basically esoteric, you know, symbolism and
Speaker 1: hid in plain sight kind of talking about these bloodlines.
Speaker 1: All right.
Speaker 3: Next question is a long one. Tom Horn, a prophecy author,
Speaker 3: refers to a primeval kiva built for scatological purposes beneath
Speaker 3: the earth, hinting it's a large underground structure tied to
Speaker 3: end Times beliefs. Any Bible reference question Mark.
Speaker 1: Now, yeah, Tom Horne, I've read quite a bit of
Speaker 1: his stuff. I've read Unearthing the Cloud Eaters. Then it
Speaker 1: was about giants popous Romanus and talking about the last Pope.
Speaker 1: He kind of predicted who the last pope was going
Speaker 1: to be. That was pretty wild, and one of his books,
Speaker 1: it's kind of relevant for this time, was Wormwood and
Speaker 1: the Messenger that he basically had a dream that he's
Speaker 1: seen this swirling dragon on fire coming through space and
Speaker 1: towards Earth, and that a calendar basically started flipping like crazy,
Speaker 1: and it stopped and a finger pointed, he said to
Speaker 1: trying to think it was September something. No way, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it was Friday the thirteenth in September or April, sorry,
Speaker 1: April April, Friday the thirteenth, I think of twenty twenty
Speaker 1: six or twenty eight something like that. I'm sorry, guys,
Speaker 1: my brain is kind of rumbling together. But anyway, he
Speaker 1: said that he had this vision and that he said
Speaker 1: the Lord told him that this was Wormwood, and he
Speaker 1: thinks that this date that was given to him was
Speaker 1: possibly Wormwood striking. And according to the Bible, this happened
Speaker 1: right dear in the middle of the Tribulation period, so
Speaker 1: it was kind of like a date set for the
Speaker 1: midpoint of the Great Tribulation. But I know he definitely
Speaker 1: talked about like the underground bunkers, the dumbs and all
Speaker 1: that kind of stuff. And that ties into the Book
Speaker 1: of Revelation where it talks about in the end times
Speaker 1: that the kings and the leaders of the great nations
Speaker 1: will hide themselves in the mountains. You know, think about that.
Speaker 1: They were talking about ancient people thousands of years ago
Speaker 1: talking about world leaders hiding themselves in mountains. I mean,
Speaker 1: I mean, I mean, surely they ate some bad pizza
Speaker 1: and just seening some crazy stuff. But to me, I
Speaker 1: think that's kind of profound. And you see it all
Speaker 1: over the news. They've been doing this stuff forever. Up
Speaker 1: there in Alaska they have that huge seed vault bank.
Speaker 1: You have the the Mormons out in Utah have that
Speaker 1: huge DNA bank. They have this inside of a mountain,
Speaker 1: this huge vault full of DNA. And you have these
Speaker 1: movies like Armageddon them, you know, this asteroid come towards
Speaker 1: Earth and they blow it up to try and save humanity.
Speaker 1: What was that other one that was thinking it was
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, where the world ends and this guy's
Speaker 1: running trying to save his kids. But there's this arc.
Speaker 1: There's these huge arcs being built in China that they've
Speaker 1: been working on for the past, you know, thirty forty years.
Speaker 1: I think they drop pints to all this stuff. They
Speaker 1: see it coming. They the writing's on the wall, and
Speaker 1: they're prepping for it. That's what I believe.
Speaker 3: What do you think of Paul Stop's nepheline looked like
Speaker 3: clown's theory?
Speaker 1: Yeah, Paul, I've had Paul on the show. He's a
Speaker 1: really smart dude, and it was definitely an out of
Speaker 1: the box thing. And if I'm just being honest and Paul,
Speaker 1: you know, I love you brother. If you see this.
Speaker 1: I mean, but when I first heard that, I was like,
Speaker 1: I kind of looked at it like doctor Joypugh talking
Speaker 1: to me about the serpent seed. I was like, ah, man,
Speaker 1: this is ridiculous. I mean, the stuff people will do
Speaker 1: for clicks and attention. But once I actually hurt him out,
Speaker 1: I was like, Okay, this makes sense. As we are.
Speaker 1: You know, when we hear clowns, we think about the
Speaker 1: modern clown with all the crazy you know, paint and
Speaker 1: how we view a clown. But he's saying that basically,
Speaker 1: the modern clown is their spin and dramatized vergin of
Speaker 1: maybe what the Nephilene looked like and what the Nephilene
Speaker 1: looked like according to a lot of the legends and
Speaker 1: lower because he kind of did like I did, he
Speaker 1: went through comparative mythology and went through all these different
Speaker 1: continents and stories and people groups and kind of compared them,
Speaker 1: and he found this common denominator that a lot of
Speaker 1: them were depicted was really pale skin, bloody, you know,
Speaker 1: red colored noses. A lot of times they were giants,
Speaker 1: and all these tribes would dress up like these you know,
Speaker 1: hybrid god kings or whatever the situation was for their story.
Speaker 1: But that was the common denominator, is that they all
Speaker 1: kind of looked like that and they were imitating them.
Speaker 3: Do you think that these elite bloodlines are about to
Speaker 3: weaponize a I to either contain or eliminate us cattle
Speaker 3: blood lines?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I mean even the Masons even talk about it,
Speaker 1: Like in Albert Pike's Morals and Dogma, he talks like that,
Speaker 1: He's like, basically the profane or cattle and we're to
Speaker 1: be bread worked, and when we serve no more purpose,
Speaker 1: be oft And I think that's exactly what's going on,
Speaker 1: because I don't want to get you in trouble on
Speaker 1: your channel. But back in the day when we had
Speaker 1: the pokey poke, if you know what I'm saying, if
Speaker 1: you go back and listen to Gates and all these
Speaker 1: different guys that are involved with the WHO and NATO
Speaker 1: and these world organizations, they were openly talking about this,
Speaker 1: you know, you know, a decade ago or so. But
Speaker 1: now recently they've gotten quiet about it. But what was
Speaker 1: their number one concern If you go back and listen
Speaker 1: to their ted talks and all this other stuff, it
Speaker 1: was population control number one concern. And it kind of
Speaker 1: goes back to the lifeboat theory. You know. There was
Speaker 1: this professor that talked about life boat theory, and he
Speaker 1: had this theory that if you've got a group of
Speaker 1: people and put them on a boat and give them
Speaker 1: a handful of you know, rations for food and supplies
Speaker 1: or whatever, and set them out, that it's a matter
Speaker 1: of time before a hierarchy is set up, he said,
Speaker 1: because they perceive a limited amount of resources and there
Speaker 1: has to be a competition for those limited resources. So
Speaker 1: immediately a hierarchy is set up. The strong takeover and
Speaker 1: bully the week and take what they need, and if
Speaker 1: they don't get in line, they're thrown off the boat.
Speaker 1: And that's what I think we see here because they
Speaker 1: talk about how, you know, we're lacking fresh water. We
Speaker 1: don't have enough fresh water to sustain humanity and the
Speaker 1: population for x amount of years, and the food and
Speaker 1: the land and all these you know, dwindling resources we're
Speaker 1: compete for. You know, all these resources. We need population control.
Speaker 1: And you have the Georgia guidestones come out and basically
Speaker 1: just set it out right. And then what happens we
Speaker 1: have the whole twenty twenty thing. Uh, basically like the Eskimos.
Speaker 1: Once the old people get too old, what do they do?
Speaker 1: They off them because they can't contribute to the hunt
Speaker 1: or the society no more.
Speaker 3: That's who they were thrown remember that program.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And that's what they do, man. And so they
Speaker 1: come after the old, the elderly, and the people with
Speaker 1: underlying health conditions, the people that are drags on the
Speaker 1: economy and the society, and their eye that wiped out
Speaker 1: a big sloth of them. And then they come up
Speaker 1: with the solution, and what happens we seen with the solution.
Speaker 1: We had twenty year old soccer players and basketball players,
Speaker 1: football players, these prime athletes falling over dead on the
Speaker 1: field from blood clots and blown arteries and heart conditions. Well,
Speaker 1: where did that come from? Folks?
Speaker 3: And then we better stop there on this subject. Let's
Speaker 3: just tell So you got asked about free I atlist
Speaker 3: to comment comment. Have you got any thoughts on that? Yeah?
Speaker 1: I thought that was pretty wild. That was another thing too,
Speaker 1: that was just like, man, what do you believe? But
Speaker 1: I've read something on social media. I'm not sure if
Speaker 1: that's correct, but they had said that they have now
Speaker 1: confirmed that it is a comet, that they've looked at
Speaker 1: it and they can confirm that it is a comet now,
Speaker 1: so they no longer believe it's a huge mother spaceship
Speaker 1: coming to destroy us.
Speaker 3: All yeah, but it's supposed to be affecting our energies.
Speaker 3: It's getting here. The closest to earth is I think.
Speaker 3: I think it's December nineteenth. And yeah, my partners into
Speaker 3: every day studying and watching videos. All right, Well, my
Speaker 3: friend Doc, you know, this has been so fascinating. We've
Speaker 3: kept you on for two hours almost huge. Thank you
Speaker 3: for being so generous of your time.
Speaker 1: Now I appreciate you.
Speaker 3: I've got all of Doc's links in the description box.
Speaker 3: If you're watching on replay, I'm going to put them
Speaker 3: in the live chat. Now. Is there anything you would
Speaker 3: like to say in conclusion to the viewers?
Speaker 1: Then I guess just take what I say with a
Speaker 1: grain of salt. I'm a nobody, but I like to
Speaker 1: study and I have my opinions on things like anybody else.
Speaker 1: But yeah, man, just hear people out, do your own
Speaker 1: research and see what you come up with. And we've
Speaker 1: got to share our ideas and our research and studies
Speaker 1: with other people. Like conversation we're having today with Sean.
Speaker 1: I call it the exchanging of puzzle pieces. I think
Speaker 1: we all have pieces to the puzzle, and the more
Speaker 1: conversations we have, the more puzzle pieces that we're going
Speaker 1: to gather and have a better thirty thousand foot view
Speaker 1: of this crazy, missed up thing that we call life.
Speaker 1: So but yeah, my show. If you guys like these conversations,
Speaker 1: I talk about this stuff on my show every week.
Speaker 1: It's the metheus Lyn's podcast. I coined it the hero's journey.
Speaker 1: You got to go into the unknown. You have to
Speaker 1: slay the drag and rescue the damsel and hoard up
Speaker 1: that treasure. But then your journey's not over. Like all
Speaker 1: great epics and heroes, you must turn around and share
Speaker 1: that wealth of knowledge with the world and save humanity.
Speaker 1: So come join us on the hero's journey.
Speaker 3: Links are in the description. And if you've got any
Speaker 3: guests that you think would come over here as well
Speaker 3: to talk about these things, we would love to hear
Speaker 3: from them. So I'm going to close the show and
Speaker 3: let you go, my friend, thank you for spending this
Speaker 3: time with us. Again.
Speaker 1: Cheers, Doc, I, thank you, brother, appreciate, thank you very much.
Speaker 3: Cheers all right, viewers yep, So, like I said, absolutely fascinating,
Speaker 3: first time to get Doc on the channel. Put a
Speaker 3: one in the chat if you'd like us to get
Speaker 3: more guess speaking of these subjects, and we will. We
Speaker 3: will arrange that and I'll let you guys know what
Speaker 3: we've got coming up this week. So my next show
Speaker 3: that's bucked in so far, We've got James Corbett Unmasking
Speaker 3: Epstein that is on the twenty fifth, and then we've
Speaker 3: got the Manhattan Madam exposing Epstein and elites. Krister Davis
Speaker 3: also on the twenty fifth, going to be a busy
Speaker 3: down the twenty fifth, and then on the twenty fifth
Speaker 3: as well, we have got inside Charlie Kirk's death. A
Speaker 3: conversation with Myron Gaines. Oh yeah, I've been trying to
Speaker 3: speak to Maron for a while. That's going to be fascinating.
Speaker 3: But I'm sure we'll have more shows between now and then,
Speaker 3: and I'm going to organize some more calling shows as well.
Speaker 3: So thank you for staying with us for two hours
Speaker 3: on Saturday night. Yeah, I did see. I've been watching
Speaker 3: Candice every night doing these massive live streams. She's had
Speaker 3: some sort of threats to life today. If you go
Speaker 3: on X and read her Twitter post, she's basically saying
Speaker 3: that the French government have got a hit on her
Speaker 3: and it's related to Israel and all this other stuff.
Speaker 3: She gives a very detailed account on her X. So yeah,
Speaker 3: go over and support Candice. She's got some balls saying
Speaker 3: the things she's saying. Whether you believe her or not,
Speaker 3: to just go out there after a mate got whacked
Speaker 3: and just be pushing all the same buttons. But then
Speaker 3: and then some. She's definitely got some balls saying what
Speaker 3: she's saying, so yeah, let's hope she doesn't get whacked.
Speaker 3: But thank you for your support. Guys, thank you for
Speaker 3: all your questions, and please don't forget to click on
Speaker 3: doc's links and support Systar star.
Speaker 1: Stone Still Start
Speaker 4: Start STI