WEBVTT

1
00:00:04.360 --> 00:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Recently, jade Iron Sam Schmun debated some Muslims on the

2
00:00:07.000 --> 00:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Fresh and Fit podcast. They did an excellent job. The Muslims,

3
00:00:10.240 --> 00:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, were entirely inconsistent in their reasoning.

4
00:00:13.839 --> 00:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>They use a lot of facious arguments, and they even

5
00:00:15.560 --> 00:00:17.879
<v Speaker 1>went for personal attacks. And I want to show some

6
00:00:17.879 --> 00:00:20.359
<v Speaker 1>clips from that debate, but first I want to talk

7
00:00:20.399 --> 00:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>about why I'm not a Muslim, and this debate was

8
00:00:23.280 --> 00:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a great example of that because in the debate we'll

9
00:00:26.160 --> 00:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>hear the Muslims claim that the Bible is corrupt. It

10
00:00:28.800 --> 00:00:31.239
<v Speaker 1>actually doesn't say that anywhere in the Koran that the

11
00:00:31.280 --> 00:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Bible is corrupt. It says that people will twist the scriptures.

12
00:00:34.560 --> 00:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>It does not say that the Bible is corrupt anywhere

13
00:00:36.920 --> 00:00:40.039
<v Speaker 1>in the Koran. Muslims are so inconsistent about the Bible

14
00:00:40.079 --> 00:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>being corrupt. They'll say the Bible prophesizes Muhammed. But wait,

15
00:00:43.640 --> 00:00:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I thought you just said it was corrupt. They just

16
00:00:45.600 --> 00:00:49.119
<v Speaker 1>arbitrarily pick what parts of the Bible they're going to

17
00:00:49.159 --> 00:00:53.359
<v Speaker 1>interpret in their chronic Islamic lens and reinterpret the Bible.

18
00:00:53.520 --> 00:00:56.479
<v Speaker 1>The Bible does not prophesize Muhammed. They'll say that the

19
00:00:56.520 --> 00:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Bible doesn't teach a trinity that actually the Bible teaches tahed.

20
00:01:00.799 --> 00:01:03.759
<v Speaker 1>They will claim that the Bible is cruped, then cite

21
00:01:03.799 --> 00:01:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the Bible. So which one is it the Bible corrupt

22
00:01:05.959 --> 00:01:06.159
<v Speaker 1>or not?

23
00:01:06.439 --> 00:01:08.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I've got the Gospel of John pulled up

24
00:01:08.319 --> 00:01:10.239
<v Speaker 2>right now we can start going into the text. Let's

25
00:01:10.239 --> 00:01:13.120
<v Speaker 2>start with John one about the trinity, eternal generation of

26
00:01:13.159 --> 00:01:14.560
<v Speaker 2>the Son. In the beginning was the Word. The Word

27
00:01:14.640 --> 00:01:15.879
<v Speaker 2>was with God. The Word was God. He was in

28
00:01:15.879 --> 00:01:18.680
<v Speaker 2>the beginning with God. All things were through him. Nothing

29
00:01:18.799 --> 00:01:22.439
<v Speaker 2>was made that was not made by him. Jesus is

30
00:01:22.480 --> 00:01:25.959
<v Speaker 2>the creator of the world. There's nothing that exists that

31
00:01:26.000 --> 00:01:28.640
<v Speaker 2>he didn't create. Therefore, the Son of God is not

32
00:01:28.680 --> 00:01:29.200
<v Speaker 2>a creature.

33
00:01:29.719 --> 00:01:30.359
<v Speaker 1>John one.

34
00:01:30.879 --> 00:01:34.239
<v Speaker 2>He was in the bosom of the Father even when

35
00:01:34.280 --> 00:01:40.040
<v Speaker 2>he was on earth, walking around eternal generation, omnipresence. After this,

36
00:01:40.159 --> 00:01:43.040
<v Speaker 2>John said, I saw the Holy Spirit descending like a

37
00:01:43.079 --> 00:01:47.439
<v Speaker 2>dove and remaining upon him. It is he who baptizes

38
00:01:47.480 --> 00:01:51.359
<v Speaker 2>with the Holy Spirit. This is the Son of God,

39
00:01:51.680 --> 00:01:54.959
<v Speaker 2>the Father. Right there in John one, verses thirty two

40
00:01:54.959 --> 00:01:57.560
<v Speaker 2>to thirty four, the entire Trinity is revealed to you.

41
00:01:58.319 --> 00:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And also in the Quran it says that you can

42
00:02:00.719 --> 00:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>judge the Koran on the prior revelation. You know, Muslims

43
00:02:03.959 --> 00:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>think that the Torah and they say the Angel or

44
00:02:06.920 --> 00:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Gospel that Jesus was given book. But if we actually

45
00:02:09.960 --> 00:02:12.639
<v Speaker 1>go to the prior revelation, the Torah and Bible, it

46
00:02:12.680 --> 00:02:15.319
<v Speaker 1>makes Islam an impossibility and shows that Islam has no

47
00:02:15.439 --> 00:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>continuity with the prior revelation. And why would the Koran

48
00:02:19.000 --> 00:02:21.719
<v Speaker 1>say to go to the prior revelation of the prior

49
00:02:21.759 --> 00:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>revelation is corrupt. It doesn't make any sense the Qoran

50
00:02:24.719 --> 00:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>either way, it is refuting itself because the prior revelation

51
00:02:28.000 --> 00:02:30.479
<v Speaker 1>contradicts the Koran. And if the Koran says that to

52
00:02:30.520 --> 00:02:32.759
<v Speaker 1>go to the prior revelation, but the prior revelation is corrupt,

53
00:02:32.800 --> 00:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it makes no sense. For example, in the worship that

54
00:02:36.280 --> 00:02:38.439
<v Speaker 1>we read about in the Old Testament, and we see

55
00:02:38.439 --> 00:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>how Christians worship, it was liturgical, with a sacrifice with

56
00:02:42.919 --> 00:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the Lamb, with the Eucharist.

57
00:02:44.960 --> 00:02:45.120
<v Speaker 3>All.

58
00:02:45.240 --> 00:02:48.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, these principles exist in Second Temple, Judaism and

59
00:02:49.120 --> 00:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Orthodox Christianity. It does not exist in Islam. It has

60
00:02:52.479 --> 00:02:57.039
<v Speaker 1>no continuity. The worship, the entire theology of how God

61
00:02:57.120 --> 00:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>manifests himself, all these theophanies that I want to further

62
00:03:00.560 --> 00:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>later in the video. And so when you bring up

63
00:03:02.520 --> 00:03:04.599
<v Speaker 1>to a Muslim that the Koran in Islam has no

64
00:03:04.680 --> 00:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>continuity with the Old Testament, it's completely arbitrary about the

65
00:03:07.520 --> 00:03:11.199
<v Speaker 1>prior revelation being corrupt. They say, oh, the Koran is

66
00:03:11.240 --> 00:03:15.599
<v Speaker 1>the perfect revelation from Allah. But it's a circular argument.

67
00:03:15.639 --> 00:03:17.599
<v Speaker 1>You're just referring to the Koran, You're not actually using

68
00:03:17.639 --> 00:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the prior revelation. It is very important to understand that

69
00:03:20.039 --> 00:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in the prior revelation it is leading up to the Messiah,

70
00:03:23.039 --> 00:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and the Islam believes in the Messiah, but they don't

71
00:03:24.960 --> 00:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>really understand what the Messiah is. That Second Temple Judaism

72
00:03:29.120 --> 00:03:32.719
<v Speaker 1>in Christianity understands that the Messiah is going to be

73
00:03:32.800 --> 00:03:35.879
<v Speaker 1>God incarnate and he's going to bring salvation to all people,

74
00:03:36.199 --> 00:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a salvation to the gentiles as its promise in Genesis.

75
00:03:40.080 --> 00:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>The Messiah is Jesus Christ, and it's prophesied before in

76
00:03:43.319 --> 00:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Zachariah thirteen that there's not going to be any more

77
00:03:46.000 --> 00:03:49.879
<v Speaker 1>prophets after the Messiah comes. This automatically counsels out anything

78
00:03:49.919 --> 00:03:53.199
<v Speaker 1>like Mormonism or Islam that claims that it's new public

79
00:03:53.240 --> 00:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>divine revelation in Zachariah. In Jude it talks about how

80
00:03:56.719 --> 00:04:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the faith was once for all delivered to the saints. Jesus,

81
00:04:00.719 --> 00:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>who Muslim's claim was actually a Muslim says that John

82
00:04:04.800 --> 00:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the Baptist was a last prophet. There are no prophets.

83
00:04:08.120 --> 00:04:11.039
<v Speaker 1>And also in one Galatians eight it says that even

84
00:04:11.080 --> 00:04:13.639
<v Speaker 1>if an angel comes from in heaven, if he preaches

85
00:04:13.680 --> 00:04:16.079
<v Speaker 1>a different gospel, let him be a curse. And what

86
00:04:16.160 --> 00:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>do you know, That's exactly how the Koran was revealed

87
00:04:19.120 --> 00:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to Muhammad from a quote unquote angel. So why would

88
00:04:22.160 --> 00:04:26.639
<v Speaker 1>we trust this later revelation that contradicts the worship of

89
00:04:26.720 --> 00:04:29.959
<v Speaker 1>the theology of the prior revelation. We have specific warnings

90
00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>against it. There's no reason to trust the Quran that

91
00:04:34.319 --> 00:04:37.399
<v Speaker 1>comes six hundred years after the events of the Bible.

92
00:04:37.600 --> 00:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Why would we trust that to say what actually happened.

93
00:04:40.600 --> 00:04:44.240
<v Speaker 4>You're just a cheap knockoff. Oh no, I'm the upbring.

94
00:04:46.120 --> 00:04:50.639
<v Speaker 1>With Jesus. The Qoran says that Jesus wasn't actually crucified,

95
00:04:50.639 --> 00:04:53.319
<v Speaker 1>he was switched out at the last second. So why

96
00:04:53.360 --> 00:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>would you trust their version of God? Allah, who is

97
00:04:56.879 --> 00:04:59.759
<v Speaker 1>deceiving at everyone because that is essential. That is a

98
00:04:59.800 --> 00:05:04.879
<v Speaker 1>q piece of Christianity is Jesus's death, burial, and resurrection,

99
00:05:05.279 --> 00:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and Islam takes that out and says he's just a prophet.

100
00:05:07.959 --> 00:05:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Another huge fact that disproves Islam is that Jesus was

101
00:05:11.040 --> 00:05:15.959
<v Speaker 1>not a Muslim. They'll quote verses like Jesus doing prostrations. Well,

102
00:05:16.000 --> 00:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>in Judaism and in Christianity, we still do prostrations, and

103
00:05:19.319 --> 00:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he's prostrating towards God the Father. Allah is no father.

104
00:05:24.759 --> 00:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So this whole entire theology of the trinity of the Father.

105
00:05:29.439 --> 00:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Allah is not a father. It doesn't make any sense.

106
00:05:32.120 --> 00:05:34.639
<v Speaker 1>So how can you cite that verse? And I thought

107
00:05:34.680 --> 00:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bible was corrupt? So it's just entirely inconsistent about

108
00:05:37.360 --> 00:05:40.399
<v Speaker 1>how Muslims will cite the Bible. And all throughout the Bible,

109
00:05:40.439 --> 00:05:43.639
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of verses that show that Jesus is all knowing.

110
00:05:43.759 --> 00:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Even in the Qoran, it gives attributes to Jesus that

111
00:05:46.399 --> 00:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>only God, that only Allah can have. Because the Quran

112
00:05:49.639 --> 00:05:53.160
<v Speaker 1>just took so much from Christianity and Judaism's that's what

113
00:05:53.199 --> 00:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it ultimately did.

114
00:05:54.199 --> 00:05:56.240
<v Speaker 2>So the doctrine in trinity is a doctrine that is

115
00:05:56.279 --> 00:06:00.319
<v Speaker 2>not derived from philosophy, It's not derived from Saint Paul. Early,

116
00:06:00.439 --> 00:06:02.920
<v Speaker 2>is not derived from the Council of Nicia. The Doctor

117
00:06:03.000 --> 00:06:05.959
<v Speaker 2>the Trinity is taught in the Law and the Prophets.

118
00:06:05.959 --> 00:06:08.560
<v Speaker 2>In fact, if you go back to my Daniel Hikikachu

119
00:06:08.560 --> 00:06:10.759
<v Speaker 2>debate in the first ten minutes, I hold up a

120
00:06:10.800 --> 00:06:14.199
<v Speaker 2>whiteboard that shows all the passages from the Torah and

121
00:06:14.240 --> 00:06:17.319
<v Speaker 2>in the Prophets that we derive the doctrine the Trinity from,

122
00:06:17.720 --> 00:06:21.920
<v Speaker 2>mainly from Jewish extragesus of the Old Testament. This might

123
00:06:21.959 --> 00:06:24.639
<v Speaker 2>sound surprising because people think that the doctor in Trinity

124
00:06:24.680 --> 00:06:28.040
<v Speaker 2>is something that's unique to Christianity, or that Jews don't

125
00:06:28.079 --> 00:06:30.720
<v Speaker 2>believe in this nowadays, so therefore Jews could not have

126
00:06:30.720 --> 00:06:33.399
<v Speaker 2>taught it back then. In fact, many Jewish scholars today

127
00:06:33.560 --> 00:06:38.319
<v Speaker 2>eve In Summer, Alan Siegel, Schaeffer, etc. Boyar, and all

128
00:06:38.360 --> 00:06:42.319
<v Speaker 2>of those scholars admit that the Early Church's view is

129
00:06:42.360 --> 00:06:45.079
<v Speaker 2>not that distinct from the Judaism of the time of

130
00:06:45.160 --> 00:06:49.079
<v Speaker 2>Christ in recognizing more than one person in the Trinity.

131
00:06:49.279 --> 00:06:52.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that Jews necessarily except trinitarianism. I'm saying

132
00:06:52.879 --> 00:06:56.199
<v Speaker 2>that these scholars prove that in the time of Christ,

133
00:06:56.519 --> 00:06:59.800
<v Speaker 2>there was not a generic unitarianism that characterize what it

134
00:06:59.839 --> 00:07:02.480
<v Speaker 2>is to be quote monotheist. They didn't see a contradiction

135
00:07:02.560 --> 00:07:05.839
<v Speaker 2>or a problem between the idea of quote monotheism and

136
00:07:05.879 --> 00:07:09.160
<v Speaker 2>the recognition of the Father as the archae cause and fount,

137
00:07:09.399 --> 00:07:11.240
<v Speaker 2>the Angel of the Lord as his messenger, which we

138
00:07:11.240 --> 00:07:13.360
<v Speaker 2>see through all throughout the Old Testament, who is called God,

139
00:07:13.399 --> 00:07:15.959
<v Speaker 2>who is called Divine, who is called the Messenger of

140
00:07:15.959 --> 00:07:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the Covenant, who is called Yahweh in Exodus three, Exodus

141
00:07:19.639 --> 00:07:23.079
<v Speaker 2>twenty three, throughout the Psalms and the Mini Theophanes passages,

142
00:07:23.639 --> 00:07:25.959
<v Speaker 2>and many times in the Prophets, Jesus predicted, especially in

143
00:07:26.040 --> 00:07:29.240
<v Speaker 2>latter Isaiah to be a divine Nosiah that would be worshiped.

144
00:07:29.519 --> 00:07:30.560
<v Speaker 5>So a lot of these.

145
00:07:30.639 --> 00:07:34.279
<v Speaker 2>References to the Trinity are primarily grounded rooted in the

146
00:07:34.279 --> 00:07:38.839
<v Speaker 2>Torah and the Prophets. Islam, however, when it argues against

147
00:07:38.879 --> 00:07:41.399
<v Speaker 2>the Trinity, does so on the basis of it not

148
00:07:41.480 --> 00:07:43.839
<v Speaker 2>being aware of or not being informed, typically on what

149
00:07:43.879 --> 00:07:47.439
<v Speaker 2>the actual texts teach. In terms of the Jewish texts

150
00:07:47.480 --> 00:07:50.439
<v Speaker 2>that we as Christians also refer to. Also when it

151
00:07:50.480 --> 00:07:53.240
<v Speaker 2>comes to the text of the Gospel and the texts

152
00:07:53.279 --> 00:07:55.800
<v Speaker 2>of the New Testament. They're not aware of the fact

153
00:07:55.879 --> 00:07:59.240
<v Speaker 2>that Jesus throughout the Gospel John in every chapter, refers

154
00:07:59.279 --> 00:08:02.600
<v Speaker 2>to himself as divine and or a member of the triad.

155
00:08:02.720 --> 00:08:05.560
<v Speaker 2>John one talks about Jesus being the Logos. John one

156
00:08:05.600 --> 00:08:09.279
<v Speaker 2>talks about him being eternally begotten monogyne staeos, So the

157
00:08:09.319 --> 00:08:11.399
<v Speaker 2>eternal beginning. All of that is already at the beginning

158
00:08:11.439 --> 00:08:13.680
<v Speaker 2>of the Gospel of John, and again every chapter, whether

159
00:08:13.720 --> 00:08:16.199
<v Speaker 2>it's John five through nine, where Jesus identifies himself as

160
00:08:16.199 --> 00:08:18.519
<v Speaker 2>the one at Mount Sinai talking to Moses, the one

161
00:08:18.519 --> 00:08:20.639
<v Speaker 2>that gave the law. Jesus fors to himself as the

162
00:08:20.639 --> 00:08:22.600
<v Speaker 2>son of God many times over, which means that his

163
00:08:22.639 --> 00:08:25.600
<v Speaker 2>God is not Allah, because Allah has no sons. So

164
00:08:25.720 --> 00:08:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Jesus many many times over throughout the Gospel says he

165
00:08:28.000 --> 00:08:29.639
<v Speaker 2>is the son of God and that he makes us

166
00:08:29.720 --> 00:08:32.200
<v Speaker 2>by grace sons of God. This proves that there is

167
00:08:32.240 --> 00:08:34.879
<v Speaker 2>not the same God of Muhammad and the same God

168
00:08:35.279 --> 00:08:38.399
<v Speaker 2>of Jesus. Jesus is not referring to Allah as his father.

169
00:08:38.919 --> 00:08:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Allah has no sons. So when we come to the

170
00:08:42.200 --> 00:08:45.120
<v Speaker 2>time of the early Church fathers, they unanimously teach the

171
00:08:45.120 --> 00:08:48.120
<v Speaker 2>deedy of Christ, the triad as well the deed of

172
00:08:48.120 --> 00:08:50.720
<v Speaker 2>the Holy Spirit. This becomes codified by the time of Nicea.

173
00:08:50.759 --> 00:08:52.799
<v Speaker 2>It's not invented at the time of Nicea. You can

174
00:08:52.840 --> 00:08:56.039
<v Speaker 2>read the church fathers from Irenaeus to Ignatius to Clement.

175
00:08:56.360 --> 00:08:59.600
<v Speaker 2>You can read Cyril, Si Chimi, Cyprian, you can read

176
00:08:59.600 --> 00:09:02.559
<v Speaker 2>a name all these church fathers. Alexander writing prior.

177
00:09:02.440 --> 00:09:02.960
<v Speaker 4>To the time.

178
00:09:03.000 --> 00:09:04.840
<v Speaker 2>And I see the teach the due to Christ and

179
00:09:04.960 --> 00:09:06.720
<v Speaker 2>what would become the doction or known as the Doctor

180
00:09:06.799 --> 00:09:09.039
<v Speaker 2>with trinity. So the Trinity is not something foreign to

181
00:09:09.080 --> 00:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>the scriptures. It's rooted in the Torret's rooted in the Prophet's,

182
00:09:11.360 --> 00:09:12.600
<v Speaker 2>root in the New Testament, root in the teaching of

183
00:09:12.639 --> 00:09:15.639
<v Speaker 2>Christ himself. And I would add that when we compare

184
00:09:15.639 --> 00:09:18.240
<v Speaker 2>it to what's in the Koran, the Koran makes many stakes.

185
00:09:18.240 --> 00:09:20.919
<v Speaker 2>First of all, about what the Christians teach. They say

186
00:09:20.919 --> 00:09:22.440
<v Speaker 2>that we take our monks as lords.

187
00:09:22.480 --> 00:09:22.840
<v Speaker 5>We do not.

188
00:09:22.960 --> 00:09:25.320
<v Speaker 2>They take They think that the Koran thinks that we

189
00:09:25.519 --> 00:09:26.919
<v Speaker 2>take Mary as part of the Trinity.

190
00:09:26.960 --> 00:09:27.279
<v Speaker 5>We do not.

191
00:09:27.919 --> 00:09:31.159
<v Speaker 2>The Koran also is itself confused in two areas that

192
00:09:31.200 --> 00:09:33.320
<v Speaker 2>I always like to highlight, which is that it claims

193
00:09:33.360 --> 00:09:36.360
<v Speaker 2>that prior revelation confirms it and backs it up and

194
00:09:36.440 --> 00:09:39.399
<v Speaker 2>many times over. Like in A five, it says that

195
00:09:39.440 --> 00:09:41.440
<v Speaker 2>you can look to the previous revelation to confirm the

196
00:09:41.440 --> 00:09:44.399
<v Speaker 2>new revelation, but the old revelation contradicts it. And when

197
00:09:44.440 --> 00:09:47.039
<v Speaker 2>Muslims see the contradictions, they do the same move of

198
00:09:47.080 --> 00:09:50.279
<v Speaker 2>ajaws and the debate to say, well, we reject all

199
00:09:50.320 --> 00:09:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the times that it contradicts, but we accept all the

200
00:09:52.240 --> 00:09:54.799
<v Speaker 2>time that it is with our revelation. Well, that is

201
00:09:54.840 --> 00:09:58.559
<v Speaker 2>a circle that's arguing for the thing that's in question.

202
00:09:58.639 --> 00:10:01.639
<v Speaker 2>We want to know, how do the prior revelation confirmed

203
00:10:01.639 --> 00:10:04.440
<v Speaker 2>the new revelation, which the Quran says it can do

204
00:10:05.159 --> 00:10:07.919
<v Speaker 2>if the prior revelations are corrupt, And how a foolish

205
00:10:07.960 --> 00:10:09.679
<v Speaker 2>it would be to look to a corrupt book to

206
00:10:10.159 --> 00:10:12.799
<v Speaker 2>supposedly prove an incorrupt book. So it makes no sense

207
00:10:12.840 --> 00:10:15.080
<v Speaker 2>on the face of it. I would also then argue

208
00:10:15.120 --> 00:10:18.600
<v Speaker 2>that the doctrine of Tanzi that's derived from the passages

209
00:10:18.600 --> 00:10:20.840
<v Speaker 2>that talk about all of being nothing like creation forty

210
00:10:20.840 --> 00:10:23.600
<v Speaker 2>two and I think around one ten somewhere in there

211
00:10:23.720 --> 00:10:26.120
<v Speaker 2>it says that Allah is absolutely nothing like creation, and

212
00:10:26.200 --> 00:10:29.080
<v Speaker 2>yet Muslims many times over will utilize terminology, language and

213
00:10:29.120 --> 00:10:32.320
<v Speaker 2>so forth to liken Allah to a created thing, to

214
00:10:32.399 --> 00:10:34.360
<v Speaker 2>say that Allah is merciful, that he is just, he

215
00:10:34.399 --> 00:10:37.159
<v Speaker 2>has all these things. Allah has a hand, has a shen,

216
00:10:37.279 --> 00:10:42.120
<v Speaker 2>and so forth. Things that come up in the accepted hadiths. Well,

217
00:10:42.200 --> 00:10:44.159
<v Speaker 2>all of those things are contradictory to the notion of

218
00:10:44.200 --> 00:10:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Talhed that God is a pure unity or pure oneness.

219
00:10:46.840 --> 00:10:49.240
<v Speaker 2>This is why Muslims for centuries have debated amongst themselves

220
00:10:49.399 --> 00:10:52.039
<v Speaker 2>whether the attributes are really distinct. And you have people

221
00:10:52.080 --> 00:10:54.600
<v Speaker 2>like Jake Slafis and others who say, no, oh, yes,

222
00:10:54.919 --> 00:10:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Allah has a foot, has a shin, We don't know

223
00:10:56.480 --> 00:10:58.799
<v Speaker 2>the modality, but he really has these things. They're really attributes.

224
00:10:59.159 --> 00:11:02.440
<v Speaker 2>And yet were said to be only a religion of

225
00:11:02.480 --> 00:11:05.559
<v Speaker 2>perfect unity and perfect oneness. Yet he's many. Well, the

226
00:11:05.639 --> 00:11:08.559
<v Speaker 2>same problem that you have with the attributes and the

227
00:11:08.600 --> 00:11:11.679
<v Speaker 2>dependence relationship of the attributes on Allah's essence and amongst

228
00:11:11.720 --> 00:11:14.000
<v Speaker 2>themselves is no different than the question that we have

229
00:11:14.080 --> 00:11:16.159
<v Speaker 2>about the persons of the Trinity. It's just simply that

230
00:11:16.240 --> 00:11:17.960
<v Speaker 2>you say that we have a problem that you don't

231
00:11:18.000 --> 00:11:20.240
<v Speaker 2>have to answer when you have the exact same problem

232
00:11:20.559 --> 00:11:23.960
<v Speaker 2>in relationship to the attributes in Allah's essence and their

233
00:11:24.039 --> 00:11:27.360
<v Speaker 2>dependence relationship. And if you don't think there's a dependence relationship,

234
00:11:27.399 --> 00:11:28.840
<v Speaker 2>then I will just simply say, do you believe that

235
00:11:28.879 --> 00:11:32.120
<v Speaker 2>they are then assay or self existent? If they're self existent, then.

236
00:11:31.960 --> 00:11:34.279
<v Speaker 5>You have what ninety nine gods?

237
00:11:34.440 --> 00:11:37.200
<v Speaker 2>So you have the same problem, but a double standard

238
00:11:37.600 --> 00:11:39.879
<v Speaker 2>as to how you answer that. I'm not saying note

239
00:11:39.879 --> 00:11:42.759
<v Speaker 2>that you believe that the attributes of persons. I know

240
00:11:42.840 --> 00:11:45.279
<v Speaker 2>you don't believe that. But the same problem of the

241
00:11:45.279 --> 00:11:48.480
<v Speaker 2>one and the many and the dependence status between the

242
00:11:48.480 --> 00:11:50.919
<v Speaker 2>attributes and the essence is a problem that you cannot

243
00:11:50.960 --> 00:11:54.639
<v Speaker 2>answer because within Islam there are countless multiple contradictions.

244
00:11:56.120 --> 00:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Many Christians are lured into Islam without actually understanding it.

245
00:12:00.399 --> 00:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>For example, they may say the Trinity is too hard

246
00:12:02.600 --> 00:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>to understand. You know, one God in three persons. I

247
00:12:05.559 --> 00:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>can't believe in the trinity. It's too hard. But when

248
00:12:07.480 --> 00:12:10.879
<v Speaker 1>you actually look at Islamic theology, their version of God

249
00:12:10.879 --> 00:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>that Allah has two hands, he has a shin, and

250
00:12:13.600 --> 00:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>they believe these are real unless you're subverting the Kuran.

251
00:12:17.559 --> 00:12:23.159
<v Speaker 4>Says that a Lah has one eye two.

252
00:12:23.039 --> 00:12:25.799
<v Speaker 2>The shin of a nizedlation described in the Purun, that

253
00:12:25.840 --> 00:12:27.919
<v Speaker 2>he has a face allot describing in the pun that

254
00:12:27.960 --> 00:12:28.600
<v Speaker 2>he has.

255
00:12:28.480 --> 00:12:32.679
<v Speaker 4>Two hands, and both of Allah's hands are right hands.

256
00:12:33.159 --> 00:12:36.000
<v Speaker 5>We believe that both of the hands of Allah unlock.

257
00:12:37.080 --> 00:12:41.360
<v Speaker 6>Huh say is very clearly that both his hands are right.

258
00:12:41.639 --> 00:12:44.559
<v Speaker 4>The self here refers to a law's shine.

259
00:12:44.799 --> 00:12:47.399
<v Speaker 1>It isn't simpler, and they haven't actually read the Quran.

260
00:12:47.440 --> 00:12:50.799
<v Speaker 1>It's just people having a romanticized version of Islam. That's

261
00:12:50.840 --> 00:12:53.759
<v Speaker 1>just so, it's just so simple, and it's just so unified. No,

262
00:12:53.840 --> 00:12:56.919
<v Speaker 1>it isn't. There's lots of diversity of thought within Islam,

263
00:12:57.240 --> 00:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of what we see online is a

264
00:13:00.279 --> 00:13:05.879
<v Speaker 1>very new modern kind of restorationist sect of Slaviism. Many

265
00:13:05.919 --> 00:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>people also don't know about Islam, that music is haram,

266
00:13:09.000 --> 00:13:11.919
<v Speaker 1>that dogs are haram, that an angel won't enter your

267
00:13:12.000 --> 00:13:28.039
<v Speaker 1>house if you have a dog. But the number one

268
00:13:28.120 --> 00:13:31.399
<v Speaker 1>reason why people leave Islam is seeing the gross immorality

269
00:13:31.440 --> 00:13:35.159
<v Speaker 1>of the prophet Muhammad. In Christianity, we see progressive revelation

270
00:13:35.279 --> 00:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>with Jesus the god Man, the perfect person. He's fully

271
00:13:39.039 --> 00:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>god fully maned, he lives a morally perfect life, he

272
00:13:42.080 --> 00:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>was sinless, versus in Islam, it's a downgrade after with Muhammad,

273
00:13:47.960 --> 00:13:51.759
<v Speaker 1>is he has sexual relations with a six year old Ayesha,

274
00:13:51.840 --> 00:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is the number one reason that people leave

275
00:13:54.159 --> 00:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is learning about this. They're great at Prophet does this.

276
00:13:57.799 --> 00:14:00.639
<v Speaker 1>Also when they learn that the Koran has many historical

277
00:14:00.679 --> 00:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and scientific errors, that it was not perfectly preserved, they

278
00:14:03.639 --> 00:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>think that Muhammad had it revealed, but he was illiterate,

279
00:14:07.120 --> 00:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's part of the miracle. They can't answer the

280
00:14:09.799 --> 00:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>is a Kuran created or uncreated? If you have something

281
00:14:12.639 --> 00:14:15.399
<v Speaker 1>uncreated that's not a Llah, how do they account for

282
00:14:15.399 --> 00:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that on their theology. The point is is that a

283
00:14:18.000 --> 00:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are intrigued by Islam, but they haven't

284
00:14:20.480 --> 00:14:23.519
<v Speaker 1>actually studied it in depth. There are so many problems

285
00:14:23.559 --> 00:14:25.159
<v Speaker 1>that we could get into. One last one I want

286
00:14:25.159 --> 00:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to mention is Islam's iconoclasm being against religious icons and veneration.

287
00:14:29.919 --> 00:14:32.559
<v Speaker 1>And we see this in the Sunnies versus Shia is

288
00:14:32.559 --> 00:14:35.799
<v Speaker 1>a Shiahs are are more okay with you some level

289
00:14:35.799 --> 00:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of veneration and tradition versus the Sunnis are very They're

290
00:14:40.879 --> 00:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>like the Calvinists of Islam. They just want to get

291
00:14:44.080 --> 00:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>rid of at all, especially a lot of the modern

292
00:14:46.960 --> 00:14:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Sunnis that we see. Even though veneration happens at the Kaba,

293
00:14:50.759 --> 00:14:54.519
<v Speaker 1>So why are they allowing idolatry? There's all these contradictions

294
00:14:59.000 --> 00:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to interact with his peace. He interacted in Theophanes in

295
00:15:03.039 --> 00:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a direct manifestations of God, where he is tangible and

296
00:15:07.399 --> 00:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>often visible to humans. But how can we make sense

297
00:15:10.639 --> 00:15:13.559
<v Speaker 1>of this? Just based off the Old Testament, we can

298
00:15:13.600 --> 00:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>see from the very beginning that God said, let us

299
00:15:17.200 --> 00:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>make man in our image after our likeness. We can

300
00:15:21.240 --> 00:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>read in Genesis that the Lord appeared to Abraham. How

301
00:15:24.840 --> 00:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>does the Lord appear to Abraham? How does Jacob wrestle

302
00:15:29.279 --> 00:15:32.279
<v Speaker 1>with God? In Genesis, Jacob not only wrestles with God,

303
00:15:32.279 --> 00:15:35.559
<v Speaker 1>but he also says, I have seen God face to face.

304
00:15:35.840 --> 00:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>When Moses goes to the burning bush, God calls out

305
00:15:38.759 --> 00:15:41.679
<v Speaker 1>of it. God himself is in the burning bush. How

306
00:15:41.679 --> 00:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>do we make sense of this? How do we make

307
00:15:43.759 --> 00:15:47.879
<v Speaker 1>sense of Moses talking face to face with God in Exodus?

308
00:15:47.919 --> 00:15:50.519
<v Speaker 1>All throughout the Old Testament there are these theophanies. There

309
00:15:50.519 --> 00:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>are these things that we read about in Isaiah. When

310
00:15:52.720 --> 00:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>God is referring to himself in plural and manifesting himself

311
00:15:56.879 --> 00:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the spirit of God, the Word, his breath, his glory.

312
00:16:01.159 --> 00:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>We read about all these scenarios where God interacts with

313
00:16:04.080 --> 00:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>his people in a very unique way, and I will

314
00:16:06.759 --> 00:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>cover these in depth later in the video. One of

315
00:16:09.080 --> 00:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting things in the Old Testament is the

316
00:16:11.399 --> 00:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Angel of the Lord. The Angel of the Lord is

317
00:16:13.879 --> 00:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>not only an angel who appears continually throughout the Old Testament,

318
00:16:17.320 --> 00:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>referring to himself as Lord, as God in the first

319
00:16:20.399 --> 00:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>person and not in the second person. Three other angel

320
00:16:23.679 --> 00:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>refers to himself as a third person. But who is

321
00:16:26.399 --> 00:16:29.799
<v Speaker 1>this Angel of the Lord. From the very beginning in Genesis,

322
00:16:29.799 --> 00:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the Angel of the Lord refers to himself as God

323
00:16:33.360 --> 00:16:36.519
<v Speaker 1>in the first person. All these examples in Exodus numbers

324
00:16:36.600 --> 00:16:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Judges Zachariah of the Angel of the Lord talking in

325
00:16:40.200 --> 00:16:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the first person, that this is God, that this is

326
00:16:43.200 --> 00:16:46.399
<v Speaker 1>a manifestation of God. This is no accident. This is

327
00:16:46.440 --> 00:16:50.039
<v Speaker 1>exactly why concepts like this were debated in ancient Judaism

328
00:16:50.200 --> 00:16:53.519
<v Speaker 1>and are still debated to this day in rabbinical Judaism

329
00:16:53.720 --> 00:16:56.519
<v Speaker 1>of who is the Angel of the Lord. Even before

330
00:16:56.639 --> 00:16:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Christ became incarnate, there was talk of the Angel of

331
00:16:59.559 --> 00:17:03.559
<v Speaker 1>the Lord, about God's Word, the logos, the Spirit, God's wisdom,

332
00:17:03.639 --> 00:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>God's glory. They struggled to make sense of this, and

333
00:17:06.759 --> 00:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>so when Christ becomes incarnate. The early Church fathers picked

334
00:17:10.200 --> 00:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>up on this. They weren't inventing anything new. That's who

335
00:17:13.200 --> 00:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this is all along. It's Christ. No longer do we

336
00:17:16.240 --> 00:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>have to wonder of how to make sense of these

337
00:17:17.759 --> 00:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Old testament Theophanes, of how Jacob wrestled with God, of

338
00:17:21.200 --> 00:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>how Moses saw God face to face. It's just in

339
00:17:25.039 --> 00:17:28.759
<v Speaker 1>their mind that the full revelation was giving. That gets

340
00:17:28.839 --> 00:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>us into this debate that Sam and Jay recently did.

341
00:17:32.119 --> 00:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there are some of the best Christian apologists

342
00:17:35.720 --> 00:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>against Islam.

343
00:17:36.920 --> 00:17:39.240
<v Speaker 7>I mean the Bible affirms of the prophet Muhammad is

344
00:17:39.279 --> 00:17:41.200
<v Speaker 7>a true prophet and first John Ter.

345
00:17:42.680 --> 00:17:43.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm reading it.

346
00:17:43.480 --> 00:17:45.759
<v Speaker 7>Yes, it's falls on his fig but it says something's

347
00:17:45.799 --> 00:17:47.319
<v Speaker 7>occasionally invites broken.

348
00:17:47.839 --> 00:17:48.440
<v Speaker 3>The rights.

349
00:17:54.880 --> 00:17:56.559
<v Speaker 7>You say we never made.

350
00:17:58.799 --> 00:18:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Praise be the Father some way spirit to one true God,

351
00:18:01.119 --> 00:18:03.160
<v Speaker 3>and glory to the Son of God who became flesh

352
00:18:03.319 --> 00:18:05.799
<v Speaker 3>for our salvation. May the Lord Jesus be magnified and

353
00:18:05.880 --> 00:18:09.119
<v Speaker 3>the falsehood of Toheed exposed. Notice what Daniel did. Instead

354
00:18:09.160 --> 00:18:11.440
<v Speaker 3>of focusing on what it means for Alla to be one,

355
00:18:11.720 --> 00:18:14.480
<v Speaker 3>he spent the bulk of his time criticizing the Trinity.

356
00:18:14.680 --> 00:18:17.119
<v Speaker 3>But we will answers objections in a rebuttal period. But

357
00:18:17.119 --> 00:18:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm now going to turn against him because not so

358
00:18:19.400 --> 00:18:21.880
<v Speaker 3>fast when he says he believes in Tohed, what exactly

359
00:18:22.000 --> 00:18:24.640
<v Speaker 3>does it mean for Alla to be one? Because I'm

360
00:18:24.680 --> 00:18:28.240
<v Speaker 3>aware that Daniel does believe the fact that Kron is uncreated,

361
00:18:28.440 --> 00:18:32.039
<v Speaker 3>and therefore we now have two distinct eternal entities that

362
00:18:32.119 --> 00:18:34.559
<v Speaker 3>are not identical. Because I'm going to show Daniel, from

363
00:18:34.599 --> 00:18:36.839
<v Speaker 3>his authentic sources that the Churn and the chapters of

364
00:18:36.880 --> 00:18:39.880
<v Speaker 3>the Churn actually one to receive and debate with a law.

365
00:18:40.079 --> 00:18:42.640
<v Speaker 3>So now we have a paradox because if the Koran

366
00:18:42.720 --> 00:18:44.400
<v Speaker 3>is the speech of a law and that's all us speaking,

367
00:18:44.640 --> 00:18:46.759
<v Speaker 3>is all us speaking to himself? So is Daniel actually

368
00:18:46.759 --> 00:18:48.759
<v Speaker 3>a mobilist or is the apolotheist? Or does he have

369
00:18:48.839 --> 00:18:51.279
<v Speaker 3>a phone with Trinity? But his is even worse because

370
00:18:51.319 --> 00:18:53.839
<v Speaker 3>it's not three persons, because each chapter of the Kron

371
00:18:54.160 --> 00:18:56.200
<v Speaker 3>has the potentiality of speaking with a law. So that

372
00:18:56.359 --> 00:18:58.519
<v Speaker 3>means his God consists of at least one hundred and

373
00:18:58.519 --> 00:19:01.799
<v Speaker 3>fifteen divine persons, divine beings who can interact with one

374
00:19:01.799 --> 00:19:03.880
<v Speaker 3>another and appear separately. And this is all from his

375
00:19:03.960 --> 00:19:07.119
<v Speaker 3>authentic narrations Secondly, the second problem he has is that

376
00:19:07.319 --> 00:19:10.240
<v Speaker 3>according to the Koran, the Spirit of Allah is not Gabriel.

377
00:19:10.400 --> 00:19:12.240
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to now press him. There's not a

378
00:19:12.319 --> 00:19:14.119
<v Speaker 3>single verse in the chron it says the spirit to

379
00:19:14.200 --> 00:19:17.799
<v Speaker 3>Ruj is Jibidir. He's now dependent on the very scholars

380
00:19:17.839 --> 00:19:21.240
<v Speaker 3>of Islam to come centuries later to bail out Alana's messenger,

381
00:19:21.319 --> 00:19:23.799
<v Speaker 3>because that's what he accused the Lord Jesus, that Jesus

382
00:19:23.920 --> 00:19:26.319
<v Speaker 3>wasn't clear enough to articulate to Trinity. But he did

383
00:19:26.440 --> 00:19:28.319
<v Speaker 3>make an admission which is not going to come and

384
00:19:28.359 --> 00:19:31.200
<v Speaker 3>bite him. He admitted Paul taught the Trinity. It's now recorded.

385
00:19:31.200 --> 00:19:33.079
<v Speaker 3>I want everyone to hear it. Paul taught to Trinity,

386
00:19:33.160 --> 00:19:34.799
<v Speaker 3>because when we come to the scriptures, I'm going to

387
00:19:34.839 --> 00:19:37.240
<v Speaker 3>show that even the Koran acknowledges that Paul was used

388
00:19:37.240 --> 00:19:39.119
<v Speaker 3>by Allah to spread the truth of the Gospel of

389
00:19:39.160 --> 00:19:41.279
<v Speaker 3>Jesus Christ. The Spirit, according to the Koran, is the

390
00:19:41.359 --> 00:19:43.559
<v Speaker 3>sinc from Alah. He appears as a man, he speaks

391
00:19:43.599 --> 00:19:45.839
<v Speaker 3>and creates. So now if we add the spirit to

392
00:19:45.960 --> 00:19:48.359
<v Speaker 3>the Koran and a Lah he's got about one hundred

393
00:19:48.359 --> 00:19:50.559
<v Speaker 3>and sixteen divine persons or beans, then we can go

394
00:19:50.640 --> 00:19:52.839
<v Speaker 3>a little further and adjust the issue of the fact

395
00:19:53.240 --> 00:19:56.920
<v Speaker 3>that according to our friend here, Allah has well, he

396
00:19:56.920 --> 00:19:58.480
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't use the term body parts. I don't want to,

397
00:19:58.480 --> 00:20:01.519
<v Speaker 3>mister present him. Allah has as a foot, he has

398
00:20:01.559 --> 00:20:03.839
<v Speaker 3>a shin, he even has loins, and he has at

399
00:20:03.920 --> 00:20:06.480
<v Speaker 3>least two eyes, if not more, in two right hands. Now,

400
00:20:06.680 --> 00:20:08.440
<v Speaker 3>for the life of me, if All is the creator

401
00:20:08.440 --> 00:20:10.240
<v Speaker 3>of the heavens and the earth, how does he exist

402
00:20:10.359 --> 00:20:14.480
<v Speaker 3>as an embodied being without him dwelling in space? Because

403
00:20:14.599 --> 00:20:17.440
<v Speaker 3>if he's a temporal, he's timeless. That means his God

404
00:20:17.519 --> 00:20:20.160
<v Speaker 3>supposedly exists when there was no time, space in place.

405
00:20:20.279 --> 00:20:22.240
<v Speaker 3>But if you have a foot, and you have a shin,

406
00:20:22.400 --> 00:20:24.359
<v Speaker 3>and you have two right hands, I don't know what

407
00:20:24.400 --> 00:20:26.319
<v Speaker 3>happened to the left one, but we'll get into that,

408
00:20:26.559 --> 00:20:28.559
<v Speaker 3>two right hands, at least two eyes. In fact, the

409
00:20:28.559 --> 00:20:30.599
<v Speaker 3>Arabic says three or more. We'll get into that. Then

410
00:20:30.680 --> 00:20:33.240
<v Speaker 3>that means his God is an body being who is

411
00:20:33.319 --> 00:20:36.279
<v Speaker 3>temporal and finite, which means that his God did not

412
00:20:36.400 --> 00:20:39.119
<v Speaker 3>create all space or place in time, because there's a

413
00:20:39.200 --> 00:20:42.039
<v Speaker 3>space that his body parts need to occupy in order

414
00:20:42.079 --> 00:20:44.240
<v Speaker 3>for him to be his God. So the problem is

415
00:20:44.319 --> 00:20:46.839
<v Speaker 3>actually worse for Daniel than for us. So he's going

416
00:20:46.920 --> 00:20:48.680
<v Speaker 3>to have to explain how is it that he's a

417
00:20:48.759 --> 00:20:52.559
<v Speaker 3>polytheist pagan masquerading as a monotheist.

418
00:20:52.839 --> 00:20:53.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

419
00:20:53.039 --> 00:20:56.039
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to point out that in Daniel's opening statement

420
00:20:56.039 --> 00:20:58.400
<v Speaker 2>he also committed a fallacy, which is a form of

421
00:20:58.960 --> 00:21:01.599
<v Speaker 2>Oukham's razor foul. He kept appealing to the fact that

422
00:21:01.799 --> 00:21:04.480
<v Speaker 2>because it's simple, that it must be obvious, it must

423
00:21:04.519 --> 00:21:06.599
<v Speaker 2>be the case's just to go something scenes or appears

424
00:21:06.640 --> 00:21:09.000
<v Speaker 2>to be simpler or more obvious, or because it was

425
00:21:09.079 --> 00:21:11.839
<v Speaker 2>only for short and simple sentences, has nothing to.

426
00:21:11.839 --> 00:21:13.119
<v Speaker 5>Do with whether it's true false.

427
00:21:13.160 --> 00:21:15.519
<v Speaker 2>In fact, as we're going to see the Muslims amongst

428
00:21:15.519 --> 00:21:19.599
<v Speaker 2>themselves and their various schools all compete and disagree.

429
00:21:19.200 --> 00:21:22.839
<v Speaker 5>And fight not only over the attributes, but also over jurisprudence.

430
00:21:22.960 --> 00:21:25.279
<v Speaker 3>Daniel, I want to hear from your own mouth, the

431
00:21:25.559 --> 00:21:27.759
<v Speaker 3>yah of a law. Is it a metaphor for his power?

432
00:21:28.839 --> 00:21:31.000
<v Speaker 8>It can be a metaphor for his power. It can

433
00:21:31.119 --> 00:21:34.720
<v Speaker 8>be interpreted in many different ways. It does not contradict,

434
00:21:34.799 --> 00:21:37.839
<v Speaker 8>It does not contradict, or hete that does not contradict monotheism.

435
00:21:38.359 --> 00:21:41.440
<v Speaker 8>You can have any position and interpret it as a metaphor,

436
00:21:41.640 --> 00:21:46.319
<v Speaker 8>or you can have a position, and differently to your position.

437
00:21:46.440 --> 00:21:48.559
<v Speaker 4>What what do you have studied?

438
00:21:51.960 --> 00:21:54.680
<v Speaker 5>You've studied it. You won't see your position, are you what?

439
00:21:54.839 --> 00:21:56.960
<v Speaker 4>I have? You studied all of them? It's irrelev.

440
00:21:59.519 --> 00:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Your position.

441
00:22:00.039 --> 00:22:06.839
<v Speaker 6>Study the topic, stick to the topic on explain to me, So, moderator, moderator,

442
00:22:06.920 --> 00:22:09.440
<v Speaker 6>he doesn't let me answer the question, doesn't let me

443
00:22:09.440 --> 00:22:10.160
<v Speaker 6>answer the question.

444
00:22:10.400 --> 00:22:13.119
<v Speaker 3>No, because you're not. You're you're doing a dodgeball your Koran.

445
00:22:13.279 --> 00:22:18.279
<v Speaker 3>All right, I'm gonna have created right Daniel, Yes, okay,

446
00:22:18.400 --> 00:22:22.079
<v Speaker 3>So the headis that I say when it says will

447
00:22:22.079 --> 00:22:26.599
<v Speaker 3>appear as flocks of birds interceeding for those that recited them.

448
00:22:26.759 --> 00:22:28.759
<v Speaker 3>Do you take that metaphorically or do you take it actually?

449
00:22:29.759 --> 00:22:33.160
<v Speaker 8>This is a personification of the Quran, just like the

450
00:22:33.279 --> 00:22:36.680
<v Speaker 8>Bible verses that I mentioned about rivers plopping their hands

451
00:22:37.039 --> 00:22:38.759
<v Speaker 8>their stones speaking.

452
00:22:39.119 --> 00:22:40.519
<v Speaker 4>In the psalms. I'll read them again.

453
00:22:40.640 --> 00:22:45.559
<v Speaker 8>And yeah, you're making the claim that if the Qoran

454
00:22:45.839 --> 00:22:48.119
<v Speaker 8>is personified, that means it has a separate mind.

455
00:22:48.240 --> 00:22:50.880
<v Speaker 4>And I find the point. And I see now you're interrupting.

456
00:22:51.799 --> 00:22:53.240
<v Speaker 4>Can I answer? Can I answer the question?

457
00:22:53.440 --> 00:22:54.319
<v Speaker 3>Good? Good?

458
00:22:54.960 --> 00:22:58.480
<v Speaker 8>So I pointed out that just because there's personification, that

459
00:22:58.599 --> 00:23:01.680
<v Speaker 8>doesn't imply that there's a separate mind, and I cited

460
00:23:02.039 --> 00:23:05.319
<v Speaker 8>versus the Bible. Your response. Your response was that no,

461
00:23:05.640 --> 00:23:08.680
<v Speaker 8>this is just personification in the Bible. So personification is

462
00:23:08.759 --> 00:23:11.359
<v Speaker 8>okay in the Bible. That doesn't imply that the Bible

463
00:23:11.799 --> 00:23:14.240
<v Speaker 8>stones have mines and that rivers have mines.

464
00:23:14.759 --> 00:23:17.960
<v Speaker 4>That's fine. But if the bar does it, or if

465
00:23:18.039 --> 00:23:18.680
<v Speaker 4>he do it?

466
00:23:20.680 --> 00:23:22.160
<v Speaker 5>Your position is that question?

467
00:23:22.799 --> 00:23:25.319
<v Speaker 3>You ask your position? Are you going to rant and

468
00:23:25.440 --> 00:23:27.519
<v Speaker 3>rate because you want to eat up time? Stop attacking

469
00:23:27.720 --> 00:23:30.279
<v Speaker 3>straw man in the palm? You will not find where

470
00:23:30.319 --> 00:23:33.279
<v Speaker 3>it says, and the moon will come and intercede for

471
00:23:33.440 --> 00:23:36.640
<v Speaker 3>those that look to it and venerated it. The headiates

472
00:23:36.759 --> 00:23:40.279
<v Speaker 3>I cited is about the day of resurrection. It's about intercession.

473
00:23:40.440 --> 00:23:42.200
<v Speaker 3>So I want to know what do you mean by

474
00:23:42.279 --> 00:23:46.200
<v Speaker 3>personification when in those headiates it's talking about the surahs

475
00:23:46.319 --> 00:23:50.039
<v Speaker 3>interceding with a law. Will there be intercession? Is that true?

476
00:23:50.640 --> 00:23:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Will people need intercession before a lot? Is that true?

477
00:23:54.079 --> 00:23:57.519
<v Speaker 3>So what exactly do you mean by personification? Because your

478
00:23:57.559 --> 00:24:00.640
<v Speaker 3>appeal to the songs shows that you you don't understand

479
00:24:00.640 --> 00:24:01.680
<v Speaker 3>what a personification is.

480
00:24:02.039 --> 00:24:05.519
<v Speaker 7>Sim of a question, why did those scribes omits for

481
00:24:05.640 --> 00:24:07.960
<v Speaker 7>the in the vulgate that Jesus doesn't to day or

482
00:24:08.000 --> 00:24:10.480
<v Speaker 7>the hour when it addresses him as this son, speaking

483
00:24:10.519 --> 00:24:12.440
<v Speaker 7>of the person, not speaking of natures.

484
00:24:12.880 --> 00:24:16.640
<v Speaker 3>You said about scribes changing the text, so that is

485
00:24:17.079 --> 00:24:19.640
<v Speaker 3>referring to the veracity of the scriptures. But even if

486
00:24:19.680 --> 00:24:23.519
<v Speaker 3>we go with your very imbalanced approach to textual criticism,

487
00:24:23.680 --> 00:24:26.680
<v Speaker 3>they must have done a very poor job because they

488
00:24:26.799 --> 00:24:30.200
<v Speaker 3>left intact the Father loan. So even your argument buries

489
00:24:30.240 --> 00:24:32.400
<v Speaker 3>you because whatever the scribes did, if they inserted the

490
00:24:32.440 --> 00:24:34.960
<v Speaker 3>word son or omitted it, because there's a debate among

491
00:24:35.000 --> 00:24:38.400
<v Speaker 3>textual critics, that passage still has the father loan, So

492
00:24:38.440 --> 00:24:40.319
<v Speaker 3>they must have done a very poor job because they

493
00:24:40.359 --> 00:24:42.720
<v Speaker 3>didn't remove the word alone, and they left Mark thirteen

494
00:24:42.839 --> 00:24:44.640
<v Speaker 3>thirty two intact. Because I know what you're referring to,

495
00:24:45.039 --> 00:24:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Matthew twenty four to thirty seven, the grace of the

496
00:24:46.880 --> 00:24:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Lord Jesus Christ, Muhammed's God in judge, I'm now going

497
00:24:49.240 --> 00:24:52.000
<v Speaker 3>to show the Muslims the dilemma they're in because I'm

498
00:24:52.000 --> 00:24:54.960
<v Speaker 3>not debating a bark Erman who doesn't care about Muhammad.

499
00:24:55.039 --> 00:24:57.839
<v Speaker 3>I'm debating Muslims or supposedly take the position of Muhammad.

500
00:24:57.880 --> 00:24:59.920
<v Speaker 3>So I'm appealing to Muhammad because they believe in them.

501
00:25:00.119 --> 00:25:02.079
<v Speaker 3>I pray they repent and turn away from him because

502
00:25:02.079 --> 00:25:03.839
<v Speaker 3>he's under the feet of Jesus Christ. But coming to

503
00:25:03.960 --> 00:25:07.279
<v Speaker 3>that point, any time a Jazz attacks the Bible, he

504
00:25:07.440 --> 00:25:10.240
<v Speaker 3>shows that he's smarter than Muhammad, better than Muhammad, knows

505
00:25:10.279 --> 00:25:12.839
<v Speaker 3>more than Muhammad. Why because the consistent teaching of the

506
00:25:12.920 --> 00:25:15.079
<v Speaker 3>Koran and the sound narrations we're going to get into

507
00:25:15.119 --> 00:25:17.920
<v Speaker 3>this is that Muhammad confirmed the very scriptures that the

508
00:25:18.000 --> 00:25:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Jews and Christians had in their possession at his time.

509
00:25:20.839 --> 00:25:23.200
<v Speaker 3>And the Koran says that Jesus confirmed the very scriptures

510
00:25:23.279 --> 00:25:25.960
<v Speaker 3>between his hands at his time. Unless now he just

511
00:25:26.079 --> 00:25:28.200
<v Speaker 3>wants to come up with some new set of scriptures,

512
00:25:28.400 --> 00:25:30.440
<v Speaker 3>the only scriptures that would have been in existence time

513
00:25:30.480 --> 00:25:32.799
<v Speaker 3>of Jesus up to Mhammad are the very scriptures that

514
00:25:32.880 --> 00:25:35.559
<v Speaker 3>have variations, just like the Koran does. Let me just

515
00:25:35.640 --> 00:25:37.839
<v Speaker 3>go through a slow versus for the sake of time,

516
00:25:38.039 --> 00:25:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Chapter two, verses forty to forty four, Chapter two, verse

517
00:25:40.960 --> 00:25:44.000
<v Speaker 3>eighty nine, Chapter two vers ninety one, Chapter two verses

518
00:25:44.119 --> 00:25:46.839
<v Speaker 3>one oh one, Chapter two verse one thirteen, Chapter two

519
00:25:46.920 --> 00:25:49.440
<v Speaker 3>verse one twenty one, Chapter two verse one thirty six,

520
00:25:49.720 --> 00:25:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Chapter three, Verses three to four chapter three, verse fifty,

521
00:25:53.200 --> 00:25:55.359
<v Speaker 3>Chapter four, verse forty seven, and then we go to

522
00:25:55.480 --> 00:25:58.160
<v Speaker 3>chapter five and we ead verses forty three to forty eight,

523
00:25:58.240 --> 00:26:02.519
<v Speaker 3>sixty six, six sixty eight aaghos and then the sound narration.

524
00:26:02.680 --> 00:26:05.680
<v Speaker 3>So a Jazz make my day attack the Bible for

525
00:26:05.839 --> 00:26:08.359
<v Speaker 3>variations because you show that you know more than Muhammad.

526
00:26:08.640 --> 00:26:10.559
<v Speaker 3>That means you expose him as a false prophet. But

527
00:26:10.599 --> 00:26:12.960
<v Speaker 3>if you believe in Muhammad, you have to accept the Bible.

528
00:26:13.000 --> 00:26:15.319
<v Speaker 3>And he's still a false prophet because Muhammad was an Umi.

529
00:26:15.480 --> 00:26:18.319
<v Speaker 3>He did not know that his kron contradicts the Bible. Now,

530
00:26:18.599 --> 00:26:21.079
<v Speaker 3>the same arguments that they're gonn level against scripture, I

531
00:26:21.119 --> 00:26:24.039
<v Speaker 3>will use to bury their belief in scripture because Ajazz

532
00:26:24.160 --> 00:26:26.039
<v Speaker 3>is going to have to come clean and talk about

533
00:26:26.079 --> 00:26:29.000
<v Speaker 3>the aharuf. What are they exactly? What are the seven

534
00:26:29.079 --> 00:26:32.640
<v Speaker 3>aharuf over thirty five opinions given by scholars? And we

535
00:26:32.759 --> 00:26:35.359
<v Speaker 3>know it cannot be dialectal because I'm going to show

536
00:26:35.400 --> 00:26:39.079
<v Speaker 3>from a hadith in Bukhati that Olmar heard Hasham recite

537
00:26:39.160 --> 00:26:42.319
<v Speaker 3>chapter twenty five of the Koran so differently he dragged

538
00:26:42.359 --> 00:26:44.880
<v Speaker 3>him to Muhammad and Mahmad said, yes, I taught it

539
00:26:44.920 --> 00:26:47.599
<v Speaker 3>to him this way, and Olmar recited, I taught the

540
00:26:47.839 --> 00:26:50.559
<v Speaker 3>chapter to you this way. But they were both Croatians

541
00:26:50.559 --> 00:26:53.599
<v Speaker 3>spoke the same dialects, so it cannot be dialectal differences.

542
00:26:53.880 --> 00:26:55.920
<v Speaker 3>And then we're going to add to the problem the

543
00:26:56.039 --> 00:26:59.279
<v Speaker 3>missing versus and surahs found in the codeses of Abullah

544
00:26:59.279 --> 00:27:01.519
<v Speaker 3>ibn Masud uh by bin kapp two of the four

545
00:27:01.559 --> 00:27:04.200
<v Speaker 3>men that Muhammad said learned the Koran from, He didn't say,

546
00:27:04.279 --> 00:27:07.000
<v Speaker 3>say it ibbin Tabit. He said, learn the Koran from

547
00:27:07.119 --> 00:27:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Abdilabin Masud Ouh by Binkop. And yet they contradicted each

548
00:27:10.200 --> 00:27:13.920
<v Speaker 3>other and your Othmanic codex mosaf because they're missing versus

549
00:27:14.039 --> 00:27:16.720
<v Speaker 3>and missing service. So much for the perfectly preserved chron

550
00:27:17.000 --> 00:27:20.440
<v Speaker 3>But then add to insult injury, your oathman decided to

551
00:27:20.519 --> 00:27:23.319
<v Speaker 3>burn copies of the Koran that were in conflict to

552
00:27:23.440 --> 00:27:25.720
<v Speaker 3>the point that Muslims are about to come to blows.

553
00:27:26.000 --> 00:27:29.640
<v Speaker 3>You don't come to blows over minor differences. And he

554
00:27:29.720 --> 00:27:33.160
<v Speaker 3>had the Korans burned, and yet Abdilivan Masud refused, to

555
00:27:33.319 --> 00:27:37.200
<v Speaker 3>the point that your sources say that Othman instigated a

556
00:27:37.359 --> 00:27:40.839
<v Speaker 3>mob reaction against Abdlivered Masud, who got beat and his

557
00:27:40.960 --> 00:27:43.880
<v Speaker 3>bones broken because he thought his knowledge of the kron

558
00:27:44.000 --> 00:27:47.960
<v Speaker 3>was superior to your Saiyah ibn Tabit, who was an ansati.

559
00:27:48.240 --> 00:27:50.839
<v Speaker 3>Then we add insult injury. What do you do with

560
00:27:50.920 --> 00:27:54.319
<v Speaker 3>the different paiad? According to your Muslim sources, there were

561
00:27:54.440 --> 00:27:58.119
<v Speaker 3>twenty five paiad by the time. If the mujah had

562
00:27:58.200 --> 00:28:01.759
<v Speaker 3>came centuries later, three hundred years later after the death

563
00:28:01.799 --> 00:28:05.039
<v Speaker 3>of your prophet, he's the one who standardized seven. By

564
00:28:05.079 --> 00:28:07.519
<v Speaker 3>who's the forty? So my challenge you is show me

565
00:28:07.559 --> 00:28:11.519
<v Speaker 3>anywhere in your Qur'an or your authentic tradition where your

566
00:28:11.599 --> 00:28:16.240
<v Speaker 3>God sanctioned all these paidot and authorized Iban Mujahit to

567
00:28:16.440 --> 00:28:20.799
<v Speaker 3>standardize seventh yat and these peot are not identical. And

568
00:28:20.880 --> 00:28:22.400
<v Speaker 3>then I want you to explain to me what the

569
00:28:22.559 --> 00:28:24.559
<v Speaker 3>ahruf are. And then we're going to go into the

570
00:28:24.599 --> 00:28:27.200
<v Speaker 3>missing versus. And we're going to go into the missing that's.

571
00:28:27.119 --> 00:28:27.720
<v Speaker 5>Time the.

572
00:28:29.440 --> 00:28:34.119
<v Speaker 2>Text that Sam listed presupposed that you could go and

573
00:28:34.559 --> 00:28:35.680
<v Speaker 2>confirm the new.

574
00:28:35.680 --> 00:28:37.079
<v Speaker 5>Revelation with the old.

575
00:28:37.240 --> 00:28:39.400
<v Speaker 2>So if I were to set up a hypothetical scenario

576
00:28:39.559 --> 00:28:43.640
<v Speaker 2>of a sixth seventh century you are Christian hearing this message,

577
00:28:44.079 --> 00:28:45.119
<v Speaker 2>hearing it for the first time.

578
00:28:45.200 --> 00:28:47.599
<v Speaker 5>It's being revealed seventh century, I should say, and.

579
00:28:48.240 --> 00:28:50.319
<v Speaker 2>We're told that we can go check it against the

580
00:28:50.400 --> 00:28:54.039
<v Speaker 2>prior revelation if the prior revelation is corrupt. How foolish

581
00:28:54.160 --> 00:28:56.759
<v Speaker 2>then that we're checking it against something corrupted. And in fact,

582
00:28:57.039 --> 00:28:59.799
<v Speaker 2>the texts actually don't say that the prior revelation is corrupted.

583
00:29:00.160 --> 00:29:02.440
<v Speaker 5>That's a made up thing that he's talking on.

584
00:29:02.920 --> 00:29:04.880
<v Speaker 8>Later on, can you, either of you, explain to me

585
00:29:05.039 --> 00:29:09.039
<v Speaker 8>how many Western scholars of the Bible believe that the

586
00:29:09.680 --> 00:29:12.759
<v Speaker 8>Old Testament can be traced back to Moses versus how

587
00:29:12.839 --> 00:29:15.759
<v Speaker 8>many believe that the Qur'an can be traced to the

588
00:29:15.839 --> 00:29:17.160
<v Speaker 8>life of the prophet Muhammad.

589
00:29:17.240 --> 00:29:19.720
<v Speaker 3>I have one better for you than Western scholars. I

590
00:29:19.799 --> 00:29:22.279
<v Speaker 3>have your prophet. So if Western scholars are right, then

591
00:29:22.640 --> 00:29:25.119
<v Speaker 3>join me in saying Muhammad is an antichrist, a false prophet.

592
00:29:25.319 --> 00:29:27.880
<v Speaker 3>I appeal to your prophet. You appeal to Western scholars.

593
00:29:28.000 --> 00:29:30.400
<v Speaker 3>And it depends on which Western scholars you want appeal to,

594
00:29:30.559 --> 00:29:33.920
<v Speaker 3>because not all Western scholars believe the same thing and

595
00:29:34.079 --> 00:29:36.720
<v Speaker 3>hold the same presuppositions. But I can also appeal to

596
00:29:36.759 --> 00:29:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Western scholars. I don't think that your Qur'an as you

597
00:29:39.279 --> 00:29:42.720
<v Speaker 3>have it, it's even from Othman. It's actually from Abdulmatic

598
00:29:43.079 --> 00:29:45.480
<v Speaker 3>from the eighth centuries. But I did you better. I

599
00:29:45.519 --> 00:29:47.319
<v Speaker 3>went to Muhammad. Why do you have a problem Muhammad?

600
00:29:47.359 --> 00:29:49.119
<v Speaker 3>Why are you ashamed of Muhammad? He's your prophet, right,

601
00:29:49.240 --> 00:29:53.039
<v Speaker 3>Your prophet tells me that the scriptures that Jesus had,

602
00:29:53.480 --> 00:29:56.880
<v Speaker 3>that Torah is the uncorrupt revelation of God, perfectly preserved,

603
00:29:56.880 --> 00:29:59.359
<v Speaker 3>and Jesus confirmed it. And since you believe the Torah

604
00:29:59.519 --> 00:30:02.119
<v Speaker 3>was given him, your prophet did it for me. So

605
00:30:02.200 --> 00:30:04.799
<v Speaker 3>if you give me ninety nine percent of us in scholarship,

606
00:30:05.240 --> 00:30:08.279
<v Speaker 3>then either your prophet is wrong and admit he is,

607
00:30:08.400 --> 00:30:10.440
<v Speaker 3>and I agree is but for other reasons right, or

608
00:30:10.519 --> 00:30:12.599
<v Speaker 3>the scholars are own. You can't have your cake and

609
00:30:12.640 --> 00:30:14.799
<v Speaker 3>eat it too. Why do you keep doing gihad against

610
00:30:14.839 --> 00:30:15.279
<v Speaker 3>your progress?

611
00:30:15.440 --> 00:30:20.279
<v Speaker 8>You'll find other prophets in the Bible talking about ritual purity.

612
00:30:21.599 --> 00:30:26.160
<v Speaker 8>We acknowledge that these religions were originally from God. So

613
00:30:26.319 --> 00:30:31.240
<v Speaker 8>you do find ritual purity in the Bible or in Christianity,

614
00:30:32.200 --> 00:30:36.400
<v Speaker 8>But that doesn't mean that Islam copied these traditions. The

615
00:30:36.559 --> 00:30:39.319
<v Speaker 8>source is the same, it's coming from the same God.

616
00:30:39.799 --> 00:30:41.920
<v Speaker 5>If it's from the same God, then it's continuity.

617
00:30:43.319 --> 00:30:45.640
<v Speaker 4>No, there's no no that continuity.

618
00:30:45.880 --> 00:30:47.599
<v Speaker 5>How is that good from the same God you just

619
00:30:47.640 --> 00:30:49.200
<v Speaker 5>said that, Yeah, it's the same source.

620
00:30:49.279 --> 00:30:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Where did I say continuity?

621
00:30:50.960 --> 00:30:53.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, if the religif the rituals came to our religion

622
00:30:53.839 --> 00:30:55.559
<v Speaker 2>from the same God to yours content.

623
00:30:55.640 --> 00:30:59.799
<v Speaker 8>You talked about punishment for blasphemy, punishment for adultery, execution

624
00:31:00.039 --> 00:31:02.119
<v Speaker 8>in do you condemn that or do you think that

625
00:31:02.279 --> 00:31:04.720
<v Speaker 8>that's that the morality? You might think that it's not

626
00:31:04.799 --> 00:31:08.640
<v Speaker 8>applicable today, fine, but Jesus is still commanding that for

627
00:31:08.799 --> 00:31:10.720
<v Speaker 8>that time, for a previous time. So do you think

628
00:31:10.799 --> 00:31:12.240
<v Speaker 8>that is morally justified?

629
00:31:12.240 --> 00:31:12.519
<v Speaker 3>All right?

630
00:31:12.559 --> 00:31:14.039
<v Speaker 4>That's Sam, Sam, Now let.

631
00:31:14.000 --> 00:31:16.799
<v Speaker 3>Me answer yeah. Now, if you read these laws in

632
00:31:16.880 --> 00:31:19.759
<v Speaker 3>the context from which you're quoting, Unlike your prophet who

633
00:31:19.839 --> 00:31:22.279
<v Speaker 3>didn't give any sign that his God was backing him up,

634
00:31:22.440 --> 00:31:24.920
<v Speaker 3>why don't you read these statements in context, in the

635
00:31:25.079 --> 00:31:28.759
<v Speaker 3>context you're a law who you admitted Jesus according to Crown,

636
00:31:28.839 --> 00:31:31.359
<v Speaker 3>that was Allah, which you just admitted Jesus. So Jesus,

637
00:31:31.400 --> 00:31:34.319
<v Speaker 3>as Mohammed z Allah is God. In the context of

638
00:31:34.400 --> 00:31:38.559
<v Speaker 3>those passages, God appears to the nation visibly in a

639
00:31:38.599 --> 00:31:41.079
<v Speaker 3>pillar of cloud by day and a pillar of fire

640
00:31:41.279 --> 00:31:43.880
<v Speaker 3>by night, not only in front of the Israelites, but

641
00:31:43.960 --> 00:31:47.319
<v Speaker 3>he also appears to the Egyptians, leaving them with no

642
00:31:47.480 --> 00:31:52.200
<v Speaker 3>excuse to defy his commands. In other words, unlike your Ellah,

643
00:31:52.480 --> 00:31:55.240
<v Speaker 3>the God of the Bible prove his existence. The God

644
00:31:55.279 --> 00:31:58.079
<v Speaker 3>of the Bible set up a theocracy honor. The God

645
00:31:58.160 --> 00:32:01.240
<v Speaker 3>of the Bible gave them ample proof not to doubt

646
00:32:01.279 --> 00:32:03.599
<v Speaker 3>his existence, so that when they see him in the

647
00:32:03.680 --> 00:32:06.480
<v Speaker 3>pillar of cloud, pilor fire by night, hear his voice

648
00:32:06.519 --> 00:32:09.119
<v Speaker 3>audibly and see the signs, so that even the Egyptians

649
00:32:09.200 --> 00:32:13.200
<v Speaker 3>saw the pillar of cloud Exodus fourteen nineteen to thirty one,

650
00:32:13.880 --> 00:32:16.640
<v Speaker 3>as well as Joshua two eight to eleven. He gave

651
00:32:16.720 --> 00:32:19.640
<v Speaker 3>the nations no excuse for defying him. So when God

652
00:32:19.759 --> 00:32:22.200
<v Speaker 3>shows up, then he has every right to tell you

653
00:32:22.279 --> 00:32:24.039
<v Speaker 3>how to live, and if you defy him, he has

654
00:32:24.119 --> 00:32:26.440
<v Speaker 3>every right to take away your life, because he's the

655
00:32:26.519 --> 00:32:29.960
<v Speaker 3>God over death and life. This is unlike your prophet,

656
00:32:30.240 --> 00:32:34.039
<v Speaker 3>who could not provide any proof that God was speaking

657
00:32:34.079 --> 00:32:37.400
<v Speaker 3>through him, who couldnot provide that his God even exists.

658
00:32:37.759 --> 00:32:40.599
<v Speaker 3>All he did was he borrowed the collateral of the

659
00:32:40.680 --> 00:32:43.799
<v Speaker 3>Jews and Christians, claimed to be a prophet like the

660
00:32:43.920 --> 00:32:46.839
<v Speaker 3>prophets found in the Jewish Christian tradition. But when he's

661
00:32:46.920 --> 00:32:51.400
<v Speaker 3>challenged to prove that God sent him, failed miserably. So

662
00:32:51.519 --> 00:32:54.400
<v Speaker 3>you're comparing apples and pineapples. So if God shows up

663
00:32:54.559 --> 00:32:56.880
<v Speaker 3>and I see and I know that he exists, he

664
00:32:56.960 --> 00:32:58.720
<v Speaker 3>has every right to tell me what to do, and

665
00:32:58.880 --> 00:33:02.119
<v Speaker 3>every right to inflict any punishment he deems fit, unlike

666
00:33:02.200 --> 00:33:03.400
<v Speaker 3>your e law, who doesn't exist.

667
00:33:03.519 --> 00:33:05.319
<v Speaker 2>You notice that when I brought up the line of

668
00:33:05.400 --> 00:33:07.920
<v Speaker 2>argumentation that Daniel had in our debate, he didn't want

669
00:33:07.960 --> 00:33:08.359
<v Speaker 2>to go there.

670
00:33:08.440 --> 00:33:11.640
<v Speaker 5>He immediately said that I was that he was living.

671
00:33:11.519 --> 00:33:14.039
<v Speaker 2>Rent free in my head, in other words, deflecting away

672
00:33:14.079 --> 00:33:15.480
<v Speaker 2>from the fact that I've called him out.

673
00:33:15.319 --> 00:33:16.240
<v Speaker 5>On an inconsistency.

674
00:33:16.319 --> 00:33:19.079
<v Speaker 2>Because in that debate he was arguing for Islam having

675
00:33:19.160 --> 00:33:21.680
<v Speaker 2>more continuity with the laws of the Old Testament. That

676
00:33:21.839 --> 00:33:24.519
<v Speaker 2>doesn't suit his purpose here, and so he doesn't want

677
00:33:24.559 --> 00:33:25.920
<v Speaker 2>to go to that and he has to deflect a

678
00:33:25.960 --> 00:33:29.519
<v Speaker 2>wate live in your head rent free. No, that's because

679
00:33:29.519 --> 00:33:31.559
<v Speaker 2>I just caught you in a double standard. You're using

680
00:33:31.640 --> 00:33:32.480
<v Speaker 2>two different.

681
00:33:32.240 --> 00:33:32.920
<v Speaker 5>Standards as you.

682
00:33:32.960 --> 00:33:36.440
<v Speaker 8>He's ignorant of Mosaic law because the Jews who lived

683
00:33:36.559 --> 00:33:39.680
<v Speaker 8>after the time of Cyanai, they were still bound by

684
00:33:39.799 --> 00:33:41.000
<v Speaker 8>the Old Testament law.

685
00:33:41.039 --> 00:33:43.440
<v Speaker 4>They were still bound by the Mosaic law. They were

686
00:33:43.480 --> 00:33:44.240
<v Speaker 4>still killing the.

687
00:33:44.240 --> 00:33:48.720
<v Speaker 8>Blasphemers, executing anyone who tempted you to worship idols.

688
00:33:48.759 --> 00:33:50.920
<v Speaker 4>You have to execute them. That's what Jesus says.

689
00:33:51.359 --> 00:33:55.039
<v Speaker 8>Those Jews didn't see pillars of clouds, they didn't see

690
00:33:55.079 --> 00:33:55.640
<v Speaker 8>any miracles.

691
00:33:55.680 --> 00:33:58.400
<v Speaker 4>They're living after the time of Sianai. So your biblical

692
00:34:00.119 --> 00:34:02.440
<v Speaker 4>or your exit Jesus is completely off base.

693
00:34:02.799 --> 00:34:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Daniel, to listen better. I know you're gonna embarrass yourself.

694
00:34:05.720 --> 00:34:07.920
<v Speaker 3>You just destroyed your prophet again because if you read

695
00:34:07.960 --> 00:34:10.599
<v Speaker 3>the Old Testament, God didn't stop at Sennai. And you're

696
00:34:10.639 --> 00:34:12.440
<v Speaker 3>concusing me and not reading the Bible. I think you

697
00:34:12.519 --> 00:34:14.719
<v Speaker 3>want to be an Umi like your prophet. Continue reading

698
00:34:14.760 --> 00:34:17.800
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the Old Testament. God kept sending prophets

699
00:34:17.840 --> 00:34:22.199
<v Speaker 3>with miracles and signs to keep ratifying and confirming his

700
00:34:22.440 --> 00:34:24.559
<v Speaker 3>existence and that this is his law and he has

701
00:34:24.599 --> 00:34:26.760
<v Speaker 3>a right to put to death whenever he wants. Because

702
00:34:26.800 --> 00:34:29.599
<v Speaker 3>in one King's eighteen Elijah had a shout down with

703
00:34:29.719 --> 00:34:32.519
<v Speaker 3>your spiritual ancestors because your God all love the chron

704
00:34:32.719 --> 00:34:35.599
<v Speaker 3>is bail and there God showed up miraculously that your

705
00:34:35.679 --> 00:34:38.679
<v Speaker 3>God is fake and Yahweh is true. So no, I

706
00:34:38.800 --> 00:34:41.639
<v Speaker 3>am consistent with the Old Testament narrative. All throughout God

707
00:34:41.760 --> 00:34:45.679
<v Speaker 3>shows up miraculously through prophets to confirm I am God.

708
00:34:45.800 --> 00:34:47.400
<v Speaker 3>This is my convenant. I have a right to do

709
00:34:47.519 --> 00:34:49.960
<v Speaker 3>with you as I see fit. Nothing for your prophet,

710
00:34:50.159 --> 00:34:52.639
<v Speaker 3>the prophet of bail, because your God is a fake God,

711
00:34:52.840 --> 00:34:54.639
<v Speaker 3>and the God revealed in Jesus is the true God.

712
00:34:54.960 --> 00:34:55.559
<v Speaker 4>End of story.

713
00:34:56.039 --> 00:34:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Bye bye Oh.

714
00:34:57.039 --> 00:34:59.159
<v Speaker 7>The Bible of films of the prophet Muhammad is a

715
00:34:59.239 --> 00:35:00.719
<v Speaker 7>true prophet. And first.

716
00:35:02.519 --> 00:35:03.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm reading it.

717
00:35:03.320 --> 00:35:06.519
<v Speaker 7>Yes it's false and it's fig but it says something's occasionallyvite,

718
00:35:06.880 --> 00:35:10.000
<v Speaker 7>brooken cluck, come the right, look looking the clock. Can

719
00:35:10.079 --> 00:35:10.920
<v Speaker 7>you write twice a y?

720
00:35:12.760 --> 00:35:13.320
<v Speaker 5>That's good here?

721
00:35:13.840 --> 00:35:24.440
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah, But we wanted to be courteous and not

722
00:35:24.599 --> 00:35:26.960
<v Speaker 8>bring this stuff up. But when Sam gets down and

723
00:35:27.039 --> 00:35:30.039
<v Speaker 8>dirty and starts insulting the prophet Mohammed upon then we

724
00:35:30.079 --> 00:35:32.400
<v Speaker 8>have to respond in kind. We have to insult Sam

725
00:35:32.519 --> 00:35:35.159
<v Speaker 8>and point out his vile history and the kinds of

726
00:35:35.280 --> 00:35:36.960
<v Speaker 8>filth that he puts on his channel.

727
00:35:37.079 --> 00:35:38.480
<v Speaker 4>So we're just playing fair.

728
00:35:38.719 --> 00:35:41.679
<v Speaker 8>You wanted to go down and dirty and these filthy language,

729
00:35:41.920 --> 00:35:43.440
<v Speaker 8>then we're going to bring up the fact that a

730
00:35:43.639 --> 00:35:46.519
<v Speaker 8>plumber basically stole your wife and you and you had

731
00:35:46.599 --> 00:35:47.679
<v Speaker 8>certain charges against you.

732
00:35:47.840 --> 00:35:48.159
<v Speaker 4>That's all.

733
00:35:48.320 --> 00:35:52.440
<v Speaker 3>That's all condemn Now, as far as those accusations, let's

734
00:35:52.480 --> 00:35:54.920
<v Speaker 3>assume those accusations are true. All you're proving is that

735
00:35:54.960 --> 00:35:57.039
<v Speaker 3>I'm a sinner and faithful to the teachings of Christ.

736
00:35:57.119 --> 00:35:59.320
<v Speaker 3>But I was acting like Muhammad because Mohammad did a

737
00:35:59.360 --> 00:36:01.239
<v Speaker 3>lot of plumbing a lot of women other than his

738
00:36:01.360 --> 00:36:04.800
<v Speaker 3>own wives. Because when he's sanctioned married women and selling

739
00:36:04.840 --> 00:36:07.440
<v Speaker 3>them off as chattel, that's condemned by the God of

740
00:36:07.480 --> 00:36:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Moses in Deuroonomy twenty one ten to fourteen. So Lord,

741
00:36:09.840 --> 00:36:12.159
<v Speaker 3>forgive me for acting like Muhammad, because I know acting

742
00:36:12.199 --> 00:36:14.320
<v Speaker 3>like Muhammad leads me to help, so I may have mercy.

743
00:36:14.480 --> 00:36:16.360
<v Speaker 3>And as far as violence, well, it's your chron that

744
00:36:16.440 --> 00:36:18.639
<v Speaker 3>says that you guys can beat your wives. So if

745
00:36:18.679 --> 00:36:20.559
<v Speaker 3>you want to accuse me of that, more power to

746
00:36:20.599 --> 00:36:20.800
<v Speaker 3>be so.

747
00:36:21.000 --> 00:36:22.880
<v Speaker 7>Scholars do not say it chooses back to the very

748
00:36:22.960 --> 00:36:25.480
<v Speaker 7>words of Jesus. To say it goes back to the

749
00:36:25.639 --> 00:36:28.039
<v Speaker 7>ideas about what Jesus could have said. It's called the

750
00:36:28.079 --> 00:36:31.039
<v Speaker 7>ebism of vox. So what Jesus could have said, there

751
00:36:31.119 --> 00:36:33.840
<v Speaker 7>is no way to determine that Jesus actually said anything

752
00:36:34.079 --> 00:36:36.239
<v Speaker 7>that is claimed in the New Testaments.

753
00:36:35.840 --> 00:36:38.079
<v Speaker 3>When he talks about it, of Ox sees some of

754
00:36:38.199 --> 00:36:40.199
<v Speaker 3>verbal that. Now he just destroyed the Koran even worse

755
00:36:40.280 --> 00:36:42.440
<v Speaker 3>because when we come to the case of the Gospels,

756
00:36:42.519 --> 00:36:45.239
<v Speaker 3>no Christian denies that human authors were used to communicate

757
00:36:45.320 --> 00:36:47.800
<v Speaker 3>the words of Jesus in translation in Greek. And God

758
00:36:47.840 --> 00:36:50.039
<v Speaker 3>can do that, so they're not going to quote exactly

759
00:36:50.119 --> 00:36:52.159
<v Speaker 3>the same way in the target language. But what he

760
00:36:52.199 --> 00:36:54.280
<v Speaker 3>doesn't tell you, and I did series on this, all

761
00:36:54.360 --> 00:36:57.079
<v Speaker 3>lah who supposedly speaking the Koran, will repeat the same

762
00:36:57.239 --> 00:37:00.079
<v Speaker 3>story with the same speech where they're Moses and the

763
00:37:00.159 --> 00:37:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Egyptians or Chapan it believes, and a lah or a

764
00:37:03.400 --> 00:37:06.119
<v Speaker 3>lot and he cannot get the details in the exact

765
00:37:06.199 --> 00:37:10.679
<v Speaker 3>same way. He'll quote the same speeches and often various conflicting,

766
00:37:10.840 --> 00:37:15.320
<v Speaker 3>contradictory reporting. So the kron itself is one huge apsisima vox,

767
00:37:15.440 --> 00:37:18.079
<v Speaker 3>which is surprising because I thought Allah speaking and Allah

768
00:37:18.159 --> 00:37:21.079
<v Speaker 3>knows everything and recalls speeches perfectly, So much for a

769
00:37:21.239 --> 00:37:22.719
<v Speaker 3>law and him being all knowing. And then if we

770
00:37:22.800 --> 00:37:25.360
<v Speaker 3>extend that to the Hadith, your own scholars admit that

771
00:37:25.480 --> 00:37:28.000
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to even your authentic traditions. You have

772
00:37:28.199 --> 00:37:32.519
<v Speaker 3>absisima vox of your prophet, not a sis verba. Moreover,

773
00:37:32.920 --> 00:37:36.199
<v Speaker 3>if the Bible is not preserved, you prove Muhammed is

774
00:37:36.199 --> 00:37:39.639
<v Speaker 3>an antichrist because he confirm all the scriptures. He didn't

775
00:37:39.639 --> 00:37:42.280
<v Speaker 3>make any fuss about the variant readings because if he did,

776
00:37:42.480 --> 00:37:44.519
<v Speaker 3>he would end up bearing your Koran, because he admit

777
00:37:44.639 --> 00:37:47.079
<v Speaker 3>that the Koran did not come down in one mode. Aharuf,

778
00:37:47.159 --> 00:37:49.320
<v Speaker 3>with your scholars till this day don't even know what

779
00:37:49.679 --> 00:37:52.159
<v Speaker 3>that means. That's why you have over thirty five opinions

780
00:37:52.199 --> 00:37:55.239
<v Speaker 3>about what the aharu are, which means, if you're consistent,

781
00:37:55.480 --> 00:37:58.280
<v Speaker 3>you just destroyed the Koran. You destroyed your prophet, you

782
00:37:58.360 --> 00:37:59.719
<v Speaker 3>destroyed your God stopp being a.

783
00:37:59.719 --> 00:38:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Mist there's a debate.

784
00:38:01.159 --> 00:38:04.039
<v Speaker 8>There's not no clarity in the Christian tradition because it's

785
00:38:04.079 --> 00:38:06.599
<v Speaker 8>a contradiction, that's why. But we don't have the same

786
00:38:06.679 --> 00:38:09.920
<v Speaker 8>problem in Islam. The Quran doesn't have a mind. So

787
00:38:10.039 --> 00:38:11.880
<v Speaker 8>how does it contradict monotheism?

788
00:38:12.079 --> 00:38:15.960
<v Speaker 4>No one, No one could explain that. No one could explain.

789
00:38:17.239 --> 00:38:19.679
<v Speaker 2>Because there's a debate, it's not clear. Would that mean

790
00:38:19.760 --> 00:38:21.599
<v Speaker 2>that because there's a debate in as long amongst all

791
00:38:21.599 --> 00:38:23.280
<v Speaker 2>the schools. None of it's clear about the attributes.

792
00:38:23.519 --> 00:38:29.119
<v Speaker 8>No one debates about Islam having multiple gods having attributes

793
00:38:29.800 --> 00:38:32.719
<v Speaker 8>that I have multiple attributes. That doesn't mean I'm multiple

794
00:38:32.760 --> 00:38:37.760
<v Speaker 8>people like is How is that? How does that contradict debate?

795
00:38:38.760 --> 00:38:39.239
<v Speaker 4>Explain?

796
00:38:39.679 --> 00:38:41.519
<v Speaker 5>You know, deblame you debates.

797
00:38:42.320 --> 00:38:44.159
<v Speaker 8>I'm not saying that there are debates that there are

798
00:38:44.199 --> 00:38:48.280
<v Speaker 8>no debates in Islam. There are debates in theology, so

799
00:38:48.400 --> 00:38:51.519
<v Speaker 8>that was a bad argument. But there's debate in Christianity

800
00:38:51.559 --> 00:38:54.400
<v Speaker 8>about the nature of God. There isn't that same debate

801
00:38:54.480 --> 00:38:57.440
<v Speaker 8>about there's being three and one? What is the difference

802
00:38:57.480 --> 00:39:00.800
<v Speaker 8>between the auther and do they have the same knowledge?

803
00:39:00.920 --> 00:39:03.000
<v Speaker 8>Do they have the same will? Do they have the

804
00:39:03.039 --> 00:39:05.039
<v Speaker 8>same knowledge? Do they have the same will? We don't

805
00:39:05.119 --> 00:39:08.440
<v Speaker 8>have the same debate. We don't have that same debate

806
00:39:08.599 --> 00:39:09.239
<v Speaker 8>in Islama.

807
00:39:12.679 --> 00:39:14.679
<v Speaker 5>If there's debate that's not clear, that's a fallacy. You're

808
00:39:14.679 --> 00:39:15.559
<v Speaker 5>a fallacy machine.

809
00:39:15.960 --> 00:39:16.400
<v Speaker 4>That's fine.

810
00:39:16.480 --> 00:39:22.199
<v Speaker 8>First of all, the Quran says that the Torah and

811
00:39:22.320 --> 00:39:25.039
<v Speaker 8>the Engel, the scripture of the past has been distorted.

812
00:39:25.119 --> 00:39:28.920
<v Speaker 8>They change it with their hands. Point number two is

813
00:39:29.039 --> 00:39:33.199
<v Speaker 8>that he doesn't understand the difference between I'm versus hass

814
00:39:33.559 --> 00:39:39.679
<v Speaker 8>In Arabic means general general statement versus hass a specific statement.

815
00:39:39.760 --> 00:39:41.960
<v Speaker 8>So if I point to a book and I say

816
00:39:42.039 --> 00:39:46.199
<v Speaker 8>this is a reliable book or this book confirms what

817
00:39:46.360 --> 00:39:49.960
<v Speaker 8>I'm saying, I don't necessarily mean that they're every single

818
00:39:50.079 --> 00:39:52.679
<v Speaker 8>line of that book I agree with, or every single

819
00:39:52.760 --> 00:39:55.559
<v Speaker 8>line of that book is true. I'm making that making

820
00:39:55.639 --> 00:39:59.079
<v Speaker 8>an I'm statement a general statement that the book is true.

821
00:39:59.679 --> 00:40:03.199
<v Speaker 8>Sam can only have an uncharitable reading or an uncharitable

822
00:40:03.320 --> 00:40:06.800
<v Speaker 8>interpretation of the prophet's words in that hadith if we

823
00:40:06.880 --> 00:40:09.519
<v Speaker 8>assume that that hadith is authentic. So there is a

824
00:40:09.599 --> 00:40:12.159
<v Speaker 8>difference of opinion on the authenticity of that hadith, and

825
00:40:12.239 --> 00:40:12.679
<v Speaker 8>he knows it.

826
00:40:12.840 --> 00:40:15.159
<v Speaker 3>Chapter two versus seventy eight seventy nine shows again what

827
00:40:15.239 --> 00:40:16.719
<v Speaker 3>you've been doing in the Bible. You're doing to your

828
00:40:16.760 --> 00:40:18.920
<v Speaker 3>own Koran, and you fall under the condemnation of three

829
00:40:19.000 --> 00:40:22.440
<v Speaker 3>seventy eight. You not only have the audacity twist the scriptures,

830
00:40:22.599 --> 00:40:25.480
<v Speaker 3>you have the audacity twist the Kuran. Anyone I'm challenging here,

831
00:40:25.920 --> 00:40:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's do a debate on two seventy five cent and

832
00:40:28.079 --> 00:40:30.519
<v Speaker 3>in your proof text, Mono Imano, let's debate it. Go

833
00:40:30.760 --> 00:40:33.960
<v Speaker 3>read the context. I've done an extensive study and the

834
00:40:34.079 --> 00:40:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Muslim commentators. It's talking about a particular group identified as

835
00:40:38.400 --> 00:40:40.639
<v Speaker 3>Jews who wrote the book with their own hands. It

836
00:40:40.760 --> 00:40:44.599
<v Speaker 3>doesn't say all Jews everywhere, let alone mention the Christians.

837
00:40:44.679 --> 00:40:47.840
<v Speaker 3>You just butchered the Koran like you've been butchering the Bible.

838
00:40:47.920 --> 00:40:49.920
<v Speaker 3>But I come back to butcher you. That's number one.

839
00:40:50.079 --> 00:40:53.119
<v Speaker 3>Number two. You said that the hadith where Mohammad confirmed

840
00:40:53.119 --> 00:40:55.639
<v Speaker 3>the Torah, that there are differences of opinion. Well, you

841
00:40:55.760 --> 00:40:58.679
<v Speaker 3>probably didn't hear my recent responses to your friend Jake

842
00:40:58.840 --> 00:41:02.039
<v Speaker 3>Ibin Tayim l Jozia, which I have quoted. And if

843
00:41:02.079 --> 00:41:04.519
<v Speaker 3>you want to read Arabic because you think about reading Arabic,

844
00:41:04.639 --> 00:41:07.400
<v Speaker 3>I'll let you read Arabic and parson it Iibin km

845
00:41:07.519 --> 00:41:10.760
<v Speaker 3>l Josiah said, a group of scholars believe the Torah

846
00:41:11.000 --> 00:41:14.360
<v Speaker 3>is uncorrupt. One of the evidences they gave is the

847
00:41:14.480 --> 00:41:17.639
<v Speaker 3>hadith of Abu Dao would they quoted it, They didn't

848
00:41:17.679 --> 00:41:20.840
<v Speaker 3>question its authenticity, and even El Albani said it's Hassan.

849
00:41:21.039 --> 00:41:24.000
<v Speaker 3>But put Albani aside. Ibin km l Josiah for those

850
00:41:24.039 --> 00:41:26.159
<v Speaker 3>of you who don't know, he's the disciple of Sekhol

851
00:41:26.239 --> 00:41:30.199
<v Speaker 3>Islam Iban Tamia, his granddaddy when it comes to selfie anthropomorphism,

852
00:41:30.320 --> 00:41:32.960
<v Speaker 3>and he says, these scholars quoted this HEADI. I guess

853
00:41:33.000 --> 00:41:36.000
<v Speaker 3>they didn't know about the science of Adid classification. Thank God,

854
00:41:36.079 --> 00:41:38.320
<v Speaker 3>I'll have sent you to correct them, because they said

855
00:41:38.519 --> 00:41:41.159
<v Speaker 3>that when Muhammad saw virek Torah, he put it on

856
00:41:41.280 --> 00:41:43.199
<v Speaker 3>the cushion. He goes, I believe in you, and him

857
00:41:43.239 --> 00:41:45.480
<v Speaker 3>will revealed you. And then the scholars say he would

858
00:41:45.519 --> 00:41:48.039
<v Speaker 3>not have said it if he thought that Toro was corupted.

859
00:41:48.239 --> 00:41:51.880
<v Speaker 3>And among the people that ibink El Josiah lists as

860
00:41:51.920 --> 00:41:54.960
<v Speaker 3>saying that tour and the Gospel are incorruptible are El

861
00:41:55.079 --> 00:41:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Buchhi and Razi, which you probably don't care much about. Razzi,

862
00:41:58.880 --> 00:42:02.000
<v Speaker 3>but Imam Elbu, the one who collected it almost said

863
00:42:02.000 --> 00:42:04.599
<v Speaker 3>some technicians. According to you. That is now the final

864
00:42:04.679 --> 00:42:07.119
<v Speaker 3>thing is if variant readings in validate the Bible, it

865
00:42:07.239 --> 00:42:09.679
<v Speaker 3>varies your Koran because you have thousands of variant readings.

866
00:42:09.719 --> 00:42:11.679
<v Speaker 3>But then you explained the way as kiat, But who

867
00:42:11.880 --> 00:42:14.639
<v Speaker 3>authorized the karate? Show me one verse from your a

868
00:42:14.800 --> 00:42:17.400
<v Speaker 3>law that said that Mujahad would come and standardise seven

869
00:42:17.760 --> 00:42:19.840
<v Speaker 3>readings of the Koran. You make it up as you

870
00:42:19.920 --> 00:42:22.360
<v Speaker 3>go along. The gig is up game over free religion.

871
00:42:22.480 --> 00:42:25.079
<v Speaker 8>Now, to be fair, Mohammed pisp upon him also commands

872
00:42:25.159 --> 00:42:28.119
<v Speaker 8>war in some contexts, but the difference is Muhammed piece

873
00:42:28.159 --> 00:42:31.679
<v Speaker 8>behind doesn't command Muslims to kill women, children and babies.

874
00:42:31.760 --> 00:42:33.880
<v Speaker 3>I want to thank Daniel for proving that Jesus has

875
00:42:33.960 --> 00:42:36.880
<v Speaker 3>got a law, because according to the Koran in Chapter five,

876
00:42:37.039 --> 00:42:39.760
<v Speaker 3>verse twenty to twenty six, it was his allaw that

877
00:42:39.960 --> 00:42:43.559
<v Speaker 3>ordered Moses and Israelites tenter Kanaan and wipe it out. Also,

878
00:42:43.800 --> 00:42:46.559
<v Speaker 3>it was his a law that ordered Saal, which the

879
00:42:46.639 --> 00:42:50.159
<v Speaker 3>Koran erroneously calls Talu in chapter two, verse two forty

880
00:42:50.159 --> 00:42:52.880
<v Speaker 3>six to two fifty one, where it was his Allah,

881
00:42:52.960 --> 00:42:54.679
<v Speaker 3>whom he said was Jesus. So he just I met

882
00:42:54.800 --> 00:42:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Jesus say Allah, Mohammed's God in judge in chapter two,

883
00:42:57.599 --> 00:42:59.719
<v Speaker 3>verse two forty six to two fifty one, who ordered

884
00:42:59.760 --> 00:43:02.639
<v Speaker 3>salt on these expeditions, and there's not a word of

885
00:43:02.719 --> 00:43:06.320
<v Speaker 3>condemnation by his prophet saying that what Saal did to

886
00:43:06.440 --> 00:43:09.239
<v Speaker 3>the livestock and children was an abomination to a law.

887
00:43:09.320 --> 00:43:11.559
<v Speaker 3>That means he's better than his God and his prophet.

888
00:43:11.679 --> 00:43:13.880
<v Speaker 3>And again I want to thank Daniel for proving that

889
00:43:14.039 --> 00:43:18.119
<v Speaker 3>Jesus is Allah his God, because in Saihelbuhari volume four,

890
00:43:18.519 --> 00:43:20.599
<v Speaker 3>number three fifty three asked me to read it because

891
00:43:20.599 --> 00:43:22.159
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to end up my time there. In

892
00:43:22.239 --> 00:43:25.880
<v Speaker 3>an authentic narration, his prophet refers to a prophet who

893
00:43:25.960 --> 00:43:29.000
<v Speaker 3>went in an expedition jihad and the son stood still,

894
00:43:29.199 --> 00:43:32.559
<v Speaker 3>and his prophet narrates the injunctions of Deranmi chapter twenty

895
00:43:32.719 --> 00:43:36.480
<v Speaker 3>and also alludes to Joshua chapter seventy ten, so that

896
00:43:36.679 --> 00:43:40.039
<v Speaker 3>means Jesus is a law his God, Muhammad's judge. Because

897
00:43:40.079 --> 00:43:43.719
<v Speaker 3>according to your prophet, your God sanctioned these wars, so

898
00:43:43.800 --> 00:43:45.079
<v Speaker 3>that means you're better than your.

899
00:43:45.280 --> 00:43:49.119
<v Speaker 5>Before time began, there was the cube.

900
00:43:49.840 --> 00:43:52.039
<v Speaker 4>We know not where it comes from, only that it

901
00:43:52.119 --> 00:43:53.800
<v Speaker 4>holds the power to create worlds.

902
00:43:53.960 --> 00:43:56.519
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for watching. God bless
