Speaker 1: Welcome back to Raised by Giants Live discussion. Good to
Speaker 1: see everyone. Welcome everyone in the chat and any moderators
Speaker 1: and channel members out there. And if you're watching on
Speaker 1: YouTube or x or if you're listening on Spotify or Apple,
Speaker 1: or if you're watching the replay, welcome to the show.
Speaker 1: Thanks for joining us. Really appreciate it. All of my
Speaker 1: social media links are in the description. Also links to
Speaker 1: watch my documentaries JFKX and A Clockwork Shining on Amazon
Speaker 1: Prime and to Be are also in the description. I'm
Speaker 1: still in the process of making my upcoming documentary, Psychic Agent.
Speaker 1: This bad Boy's taking a lot of time because every
Speaker 1: single day we're learning more about the Gate programs, and
Speaker 1: what I put together last night is shocking, like mind
Speaker 1: blowing stuff. You know. As a researcher, it's always a
Speaker 1: nice treat when things kind of all fit together and
Speaker 1: you discover something new leads you to something else. But
Speaker 1: the entire story keeps unraveling and unraveling, and I'm doing
Speaker 1: my best to get it all together in the most
Speaker 1: understandable way possible. And it's a lot, trust me, but
Speaker 1: it's going to be worth it because I believe that
Speaker 1: what I am uncovering is the story of the decade. Also,
Speaker 1: moving has put a hold on some of the work
Speaker 1: that I've been doing. But I hope you guys enjoy
Speaker 1: the new setup back here. Hopefully the audio sounds okay.
Speaker 1: I haven't had time to really test it. I can
Speaker 1: make arrangements and figure out where I want to put
Speaker 1: this banner, but I can change it and evolve it
Speaker 1: over time, just like how our reality is changing and
Speaker 1: evolving every day and new stuff gets revealed. And here
Speaker 1: to talk with us about the coming changes is David Dubaian,
Speaker 1: the creator of ADP twenty thirty channel on YouTube, discussing
Speaker 1: energetic changes on Earth as the Sun repeats this four
Speaker 1: hundred year cycle of low activity, affecting global crop production,
Speaker 1: the economy, and everyone on our planet, with a timeline
Speaker 1: with what you can expect from now to twenty thirty.
Speaker 1: David Dubai, welcome.
Speaker 2: Back to the show, Thank you, and beyond twenty thirty
Speaker 2: because I planned to still be around in twenty thirty
Speaker 2: one and twenty thirty two. I think that Race by
Speaker 2: Giants large banner in the back. If we put a
Speaker 2: bunch of baby harp seal pelts in there and then
Speaker 2: wrap ourselves. We could protect ourselves from the Arctic cold.
Speaker 2: Just wanted to be politically incorrect right off the bat.
Speaker 2: Why not, they're gonna be shadow banning talking about Grand
Speaker 2: solar minima as well. Just add another layer in the
Speaker 2: cake there forbidden topics.
Speaker 1: Well, do you think that these record breaking cold fronts
Speaker 1: and storms that are currently happening across the US as
Speaker 1: a part of like a cyclical cycle. I mean, some
Speaker 1: parts of the UAU in the Midwest and the East
Speaker 1: Coast haven't had temperatures this low and nearly when it
Speaker 1: was some of the cold like early nineteen hundreds. Is
Speaker 1: this due to the grand solar minimum where things are
Speaker 1: actually getting colder, not warmer, when they've you know, essentially
Speaker 1: been das lighting us into believing in global warming and
Speaker 1: how everything's heating up.
Speaker 2: You know, that's the age old question that I wish
Speaker 2: we had all answers for. So the records go back
Speaker 2: to the eighteen eighties, and that's the official beginning of
Speaker 2: what you consider the official temperature records. So when you
Speaker 2: look at these records broke and they broke it back
Speaker 2: to eighteen eighty eight, eighteen eighty three, eighteen eighty seven.
Speaker 2: I want the records going back to sixteen fifty. I
Speaker 2: want the records going back to thirteen hundred and twenty
Speaker 2: eight Y. I want the records at eight hundred and
Speaker 2: twelve AD. I want the records from five thirty five AD.
Speaker 2: We get these proxy data temperature sets blow anything away
Speaker 2: that we have on established science on how they can
Speaker 2: recalculate temperature based on like rainfall patterns, different types of
Speaker 2: isotopes that are within rocks or stalagtites, or pollen count
Speaker 2: in lake core drilling sediments. You know, how much extra
Speaker 2: pollen was blown in the air and landed in the
Speaker 2: water and sunk to the bottom that they find undisturbed lakes.
Speaker 2: They can go back, you know, a couple thousand years.
Speaker 2: If there's more plants, it's warmer. If there's less plants
Speaker 2: in this certain type of pollen, then there's less of that.
Speaker 2: A mistemperture cooled tree rings. You know, you can go
Speaker 2: back three four hundred years, some trees two thousand years.
Speaker 2: A lot of stuff's been buried in disasters that were
Speaker 2: calculated to a certain year, and they could find, you know,
Speaker 2: five hundred year old trees that were ripped up in
Speaker 2: that disaster, and if they know what it was, they
Speaker 2: can you know, trace things back at a few years.
Speaker 2: The temperatures we're seeing right now, in the grand context
Speaker 2: of things, they're nothing. We talk go through ice ages
Speaker 2: and come back out again. What we're seeing now is
Speaker 2: that's a rounding era in an ice age, right. So,
Speaker 2: I mean it depends on what kind of length of
Speaker 2: time you're looking at, and who has the information about
Speaker 2: the cycles recurring and how these temperatures really ebb and flow.
Speaker 2: We have good data back to the early eighteen hundreds,
Speaker 2: We've got mediocre data back you know. Further, depending on
Speaker 2: what types of research and associated sciences you want to
Speaker 2: overlap on that. So is it related directly to this?
Speaker 2: You can't really ping one single event on a grander mechanism.
Speaker 2: Could it show you something maybe trending toward it? Possibly?
Speaker 2: I would err on the side of a depleting magnetic
Speaker 2: field in addition to magnetic punch through and re establishment,
Speaker 2: knocking the polar air masses off continuously now as an
Speaker 2: energetic influence. That's where I would leave it. Let's take
Speaker 2: it everyone there. I mean, well, what we're seeing is
Speaker 2: a new magnetic establishment, a new north pole trying to
Speaker 2: be established that doesn't have enough frequency and intensity to
Speaker 2: re establish a magnetic pole, not geophysical, geomagnetic, but it's
Speaker 2: trying to and when it does and those electrified currents
Speaker 2: comes in, that's what's causing these sudden stratospric warming events
Speaker 2: and knocking the polar vortex off. The battle of the
Speaker 2: polls is upon us.
Speaker 1: Just and I kind of want to go gloves off
Speaker 1: right now because some of this stuff is completely ridiculous
Speaker 1: that people don't understand how global warming predictions have been
Speaker 1: made for the past fifty years. I want everyone right
Speaker 1: now to type into Google or whatever search engine you use,
Speaker 1: or even into your GPT and just type in how
Speaker 1: do scientists predict global warming? Okay, and just take a look,
Speaker 1: and right here you'll see that how do we predict
Speaker 1: climate change? Okay?
Speaker 2: To explore let me let me interrupt. If I could interrupt,
Speaker 2: it's how much funding they're receiving to say that climate
Speaker 2: change exists, because if they say it exists, they get
Speaker 2: funding the following years. So I would say it's determinant
Speaker 2: upon the dollar amount received in grants to say that
Speaker 2: global warming exists. That's my answer. I'd like to see yours.
Speaker 1: Well, yes, I agree with that too. But to explore
Speaker 1: and predict how climate change will change, researchers create computer
Speaker 1: models of the real world. Okay, so it's a computer
Speaker 1: simulation model. Okay. So a bunch of scientists and engineers
Speaker 1: put together a computer simulation model with a bunch of data,
Speaker 1: and the computer spits off the predictions. It's a damn
Speaker 1: computer simulation, Dave. When it says model or models, that
Speaker 1: means computer simulation. Okay. And this is very important to
Speaker 1: understand because it doesn't mean that the model is correct
Speaker 1: or even true, because it can only work within the
Speaker 1: information that's fed into it. And once you understand that
Speaker 1: the entire global warming narrative has been based upon computer
Speaker 1: simulation models, things start to make sense. Go to any
Speaker 1: website about global warming, go to NASA's website. It'll tell
Speaker 1: you the exact same thing, that global warming is based
Speaker 1: off of computer simulation models. And you can even take
Speaker 1: this a step further into COVID or into cancer predictions. Okay,
Speaker 1: type this into Google right now. Actually, let's just do
Speaker 1: this ourselves here, I'd let me get this off of
Speaker 1: the screen. Okay, let's type into Google. How do we
Speaker 1: predict the rate of cancer increasing in the coming years. Okay.
Speaker 1: Scientists predict increasing cancer rates by analyzing demographic shifts, aging
Speaker 1: and growing population, lifestyle factors, obesity, diet and smoking, and
Speaker 1: cancer registries. Models project seventy seven percent increase in new
Speaker 1: cases by twenty fifty. This is the key term right here.
Speaker 1: Models Models mean a computer simulation. Okay. And once you
Speaker 1: understand that all of this stuff is done through computer simulations, okay,
Speaker 1: you can and how scientists predict anything is all through
Speaker 1: computer simulation. Here, let's do one even better. Here, let's
Speaker 1: go to Let's go to Phiser's website Mathematical sandbox how
Speaker 1: quantitative systems pharmacologe you steer safer and faster drug development. Okay,
Speaker 1: So then if you scroll down your predicting patient outcomes
Speaker 1: from the onset. Quantitative systems pharmacology is a high tech
Speaker 1: branch of biomedical research that aids drug development from discovery
Speaker 1: through clinical trials and beyond. In this field, scientists build
Speaker 1: mathematical models to simulate interactions among medications and their targets. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's a computer simulation model. This is how Phizer tests
Speaker 1: its medications is computer simulation models and It pisses me
Speaker 1: off that people don't understand this. I know you remember
Speaker 1: Event to a one tabletop exercise Dave that was done
Speaker 1: by the Gates Foundation a few months before COVID hit
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty to simulate how the public would react
Speaker 1: to a global pandemic. That was also a computer simulation model,
Speaker 1: and that one was just a tip of the iceberg.
Speaker 1: This is how every company, organization, government, and scientists did
Speaker 1: their information is through computer simulation models. My rant's over.
Speaker 2: Sorry, well, I'm just wondering, without the model and Event
Speaker 2: two to one, how closely it replicated the outcome of
Speaker 2: how people behaved on the planet during that time, or
Speaker 2: you know, you know, at the end of the model run,
Speaker 2: they had to have known that there would have been
Speaker 2: a pushback effect where people would have seen through the
Speaker 2: illusions said hey, enough's enough. These guys are asking too much.
Speaker 2: Now there's never going back to normal. You're just disrupting
Speaker 2: the lives, like to the uber, Now this isn't gonna
Speaker 2: work anymore, Like it doesn't make sense, Like that had
Speaker 2: to have been built in the model too. I'm wondering
Speaker 2: how closely it ran with that until the disruptive phase
Speaker 2: where they knew they had to turn it off because
Speaker 2: it wouldn't it would generate too much social unrest of
Speaker 2: people pushing back against their policies that they just said, Okay,
Speaker 2: it's over, everybody go back to normal again. We're all
Speaker 2: good bye. Thanks for the data.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's just unbelievable that this is the way that
Speaker 1: everything is ran and you can do this with anything.
Speaker 1: Type anything into Google and how science scientists predict whatever.
Speaker 1: This is how they do it.
Speaker 2: This is how we do it. Get this is how
Speaker 2: scientists do it.
Speaker 1: I had to get that off my chunt. I've been
Speaker 1: holding onto that one for a long time. Dave yet
Speaker 1: me too.
Speaker 2: I've been wanting to dance for a long time. I'm
Speaker 2: glad I could you know, let a little let a
Speaker 2: little loose here on the on the show. And there's
Speaker 2: another virus that's coming out of India that now they're
Speaker 2: starting to clamp down in airports across Thailand and Lao
Speaker 2: and Malaysia as of today and Singapore if you haven't read,
Speaker 2: I forget the name of it. Came out of India
Speaker 2: as some kind of animal came jumped into a human
Speaker 2: or whatever. Now they're starting to not lock the airports
Speaker 2: like they did before, but they're setting up all these
Speaker 2: screeners and all these kinds of crazy things like they
Speaker 2: didn't in the beginning of COVID. It's starting again, but
Speaker 2: it's see in Southeast Asia as of two day, so
Speaker 2: the airports are being frightened and paralyzed. Expect delays because
Speaker 2: you're gonna have to go through extra health screening. I
Speaker 2: kid you not. It's begun again. I forget the name
Speaker 2: of it. It specifically started in India this time.
Speaker 1: Well, there seems like there's a new one every couple
Speaker 1: of months around flu season. Whenever winter hits too, there's
Speaker 1: something new. I mean, how many variations of COVID do
Speaker 1: we have? We had like five or six different variations
Speaker 1: that all happened back to back to back to back.
Speaker 1: There's the delta, the beta, theta, Like.
Speaker 2: What and how easily were people led to see that
Speaker 2: fear factor too? Again, if you're looking into long term
Speaker 2: climate variability and you understand that crops are going to
Speaker 2: be lost up to twenty thirty percent lower yields globally
Speaker 2: than we have now, it becomes simple math, like how
Speaker 2: much do we have in the warehouses and silos and
Speaker 2: barges and grain storage along like riverbanks or whatever. How
Speaker 2: much are we going to produce every year? And then
Speaker 2: there's that Okay, we're going to produce this. Oh that's
Speaker 2: ten percent less than we did. Okay, we got to
Speaker 2: dig into ten percent of the carryover stocks or ten
Speaker 2: percent of the of the you know, like the warehouse stocks. Okay, well,
Speaker 2: how much of that do we have left? Cause I
Speaker 2: have been following this since like about twenty twelve, and
Speaker 2: I remember that when the World Grain Assessment from the
Speaker 2: USDA will come out, we were around seven hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty million tons of grain. Now we sit at around
Speaker 2: two hundred and fifty million tons of storable grain or
Speaker 2: carryover stocks. Do the simple math on that. That was,
Speaker 2: you know, a little over twelve years ago, thirteen years ago.
Speaker 2: So if we're at that rate and the declining crop
Speaker 2: yields are really starting to kick in now, you know,
Speaker 2: you might be told in the American news, oh we
Speaker 2: got lots of grain. Oh yeah, we do, because a
Speaker 2: lot of people stopped importing from America. So we're sitting
Speaker 2: on piles of it here. But I side of the
Speaker 2: rest of the world and it's not like that prices
Speaker 2: are higher. There's disruptions outside of where we sit. Why
Speaker 2: do you think China is scrambling so much to go
Speaker 2: get grain anywhere and everywhere they can. Well, they understood
Speaker 2: through history that these four hundred year lows in solar
Speaker 2: activity disrupt tremendously their production of grains. That's why the
Speaker 2: dynasties collapsed. So now they're in the modern era where
Speaker 2: they can go buy it, get it traded, do whatever
Speaker 2: they you know, and give the loans out, do whatever,
Speaker 2: give us the grains. But it's tight out in the
Speaker 2: rest of the world. It's surplus here because nobody wants
Speaker 2: our grains because of this tip for tat trade thing.
Speaker 2: So it might appear as if in America we got
Speaker 2: a lot of extra, but are we going to be
Speaker 2: able to hold that and keep it for twenty years
Speaker 2: in a silo if nobody wants to buy it. Nope.
Speaker 2: Carryover stocks are only good for a couple of years
Speaker 2: past and then once they get past that they get
Speaker 2: downgraded into like animal feed that sort of thing. Generally,
Speaker 2: human consumed grains are in the same year or the
Speaker 2: following year. So if we're continuing declining, it yields and
Speaker 2: then the big bread baskets of the world like Ukraine
Speaker 2: that took thirty million tons of actual real production offline.
Speaker 2: So Africans were scrambling for where they're going to import
Speaker 2: grains from because their predominant export market from Ukraine was
Speaker 2: down to Africa. So now Africa is like out on
Speaker 2: the world market. So there's a thirty million ton minus
Speaker 2: from the two hundred and fifty million tons we already had.
Speaker 2: Plus the declines are coming in. We got all the
Speaker 2: you know, trading bargains with all the fertilizers, the herb sides,
Speaker 2: pesticides that are not manufactured in America, and you start
Speaker 2: to look around the imbalance is occurring currently. If you
Speaker 2: were modeling this out, you would scratch your head and say, hmm,
Speaker 2: I wonder when we really need to wait to tell people.
Speaker 2: Because I was super clean after doing the research and
Speaker 2: speaking with all those experts that were like one hundred
Speaker 2: x above me, understanding all of this for those years
Speaker 2: on end doing end interviews and reading you know, tent
Speaker 2: doing like you do, like ten thousand hours of research
Speaker 2: to understand what this thing is and how it is
Speaker 2: going to affect us. Here came to the conclusion that well,
Speaker 2: you know, maybe you wouldn't want to tell everybody because
Speaker 2: they're going to panic in advance. But at some point
Speaker 2: we're going to come to that rollover period. And you know,
Speaker 2: and I kept saying, okay, just on like a fifty
Speaker 2: thousand foot view napkin math, prices are going to go double,
Speaker 2: and then they're going to go triple. And at some
Speaker 2: point they're going to get into the runaway where you're
Speaker 2: spending a huge amount of money on food and basics,
Speaker 2: and it's going to disrupt the economy, and that in
Speaker 2: itself will disrupt happiness or harmoniousness how they turned it
Speaker 2: in China, and that would set off a whole you know,
Speaker 2: chain of events and uh, you know, you get the
Speaker 2: political you get the population migration, and the economy heading
Speaker 2: into you know, greatly inflated prices. And I was saying,
Speaker 2: you're going to look for a two to three x
Speaker 2: increase in food prices, and sure enough, we sit here today.
Speaker 2: I would challenge anybody, I'd go back to twenty thirteen
Speaker 2: to fourteen and look at what your grocery bill was
Speaker 2: compared to today. This is going to continue into the future
Speaker 2: the same It's not going to pull back to like
Speaker 2: twenty thirteen prices again. We're just going to continue to
Speaker 2: go up and up and up, and the more than
Speaker 2: a dollar de values and they'll higher the price of
Speaker 2: all the precures, metals, go and all the commodities, coppers, zinc, whatever,
Speaker 2: you never name anything, it's going up. And the food prices.
Speaker 2: I really believe this is the last year they can
Speaker 2: control the food prices, because if the COMEX can't control
Speaker 2: the silver price, and they're not gonna be able to
Speaker 2: control the gold price anymore, which is the entire base
Speaker 2: of the monetary system globally, they were not gonna be
Speaker 2: able to press that on paper anymore. Do you think
Speaker 2: they're gonna be able to suppress the price of say
Speaker 2: corn and soy on an international market. I'm gonna say
Speaker 2: no way. COMEX is gonna have difficulty holding through the
Speaker 2: next six months or year of even holding together silver
Speaker 2: not only pricing, but delivery. And once Humpty dumpty breaks,
Speaker 2: it breaks, it ain't coming back together. And I would
Speaker 2: imagine that the suppression of grain prices is also going
Speaker 2: to get let loose, and on the real world market,
Speaker 2: you know, grain prices should be substantially higher than they
Speaker 2: are today, which rolls back into where's the farm financing
Speaker 2: come if we come into an economic contagion event, Because
Speaker 2: an enormous amount of our grains grown in America are
Speaker 2: subsidized to the hilt. You know, so much money goes
Speaker 2: to these farmers, which I love that we can still
Speaker 2: produce food here. But if there was some sort of
Speaker 2: disruption in the government providing that service, your grains would
Speaker 2: easily double plus maybe even to be tripled, just for
Speaker 2: them to come to the break even point. You realize
Speaker 2: the amount of inputs farmers need to go. They're getting
Speaker 2: upwards at three to four dollars just for corn, you know,
Speaker 2: and you look at that, you'd have to actually add
Speaker 2: that price on top of what it is now, and
Speaker 2: that would be at least more than double the price.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure exactly what it is today. I don't
Speaker 2: haven't been following the grain markets exactly minute by minute
Speaker 2: like I am on the metal markets. More or less,
Speaker 2: metals markets come first, everything else moves after that. They've
Speaker 2: been pressing down metals and grains and everything for so long,
Speaker 2: but now the CAP's getting let loose, so that pressure
Speaker 2: valve is no longer contained. So what would a doubling
Speaker 2: of like warehouse grains do to the end price of
Speaker 2: you getting something out of the supermarket is the question.
Speaker 2: And that's where we sit right this second well, which
Speaker 2: was all all you know forecasts, not through using computer models,
Speaker 2: using history as a crystal ball into the future, because
Speaker 2: I believe historical records far more than I do anything
Speaker 2: now writer, if you were able to look up GISP
Speaker 2: two ice core data set, this used to be the
Speaker 2: gold stander. This is the Greenland ice core datus that
Speaker 2: they before global warming really got kicked into high gear.
Speaker 2: It's called the GIS two your GISP, that's a Greenland
Speaker 2: Ice Survey Project two GISP two ice core temperature reconstruction
Speaker 2: last ten thousand years. This was the unequivocal gold standard
Speaker 2: nothing that they reconstructed the entire temperature from the exit
Speaker 2: out of the younger dryest era by using Greenland and
Speaker 2: then equivalently Antarctic ice cores and what they found in
Speaker 2: Antarctica they stopped drilling, or did they, But they ended
Speaker 2: up bumping into a bunch of stuff under the ice there,
Speaker 2: and that could be a whole different show. But anyway,
Speaker 2: we'll keep it just on this here GISP two ice
Speaker 2: core data set last ten thousand years of temperature, and
Speaker 2: what it showed was it was far warmer eight thousand years,
Speaker 2: and they had a subsequent drop off in temperature. They
Speaker 2: call it eight point two k or years prior cooling event,
Speaker 2: Manolan warming, Roman warming, Medieval Holocene climate, optimal warming, and
Speaker 2: we are subsequently dropping off. We're cooler today than we
Speaker 2: were in several chapters of history going back to the
Speaker 2: last twelve thousand years. Now, that was cool and everything
Speaker 2: was good with it until we started to need the
Speaker 2: excuse of global warming. Then that data set got totally
Speaker 2: thrown out. I think it was the IPCC's second report
Speaker 2: that they quit using that chart and data. In the
Speaker 2: beginning they did. They were trying to prove something, but
Speaker 2: it disproved what they were trying to prove. So that
Speaker 2: got thrown out with the baby in the bathwater, whole thing,
Speaker 2: a whole tub. It just got tossed out of the
Speaker 2: fiftieth floor, all of it. So what were they trying
Speaker 2: to mask? Well, if you understand, history leaves a lot
Speaker 2: of clues of rises and falls of empires, rises and
Speaker 2: falls of civilization, kingdoms, fiftoms emperors. Then you're just like, well,
Speaker 2: what caused that? That's not a computer model, that's what happened.
Speaker 2: Now you can't really model anything. And I think this
Speaker 2: is very important to go into as well models computer models.
Speaker 2: If you were going to run a computer model of
Speaker 2: our climate, you would have to take into consideration every
Speaker 2: square meter on the planet of atmosphere and ocean as well,
Speaker 2: Like you would have to do every square meter of
Speaker 2: ocean surface temperatures and then go down let's say a
Speaker 2: couple of one hundred meters or four to five hundred
Speaker 2: feet down, And there's no way you can model that
Speaker 2: in real time and tell me that you know every
Speaker 2: temperature of everything with the knock on effect to the
Speaker 2: next thing, like every butterfly effect mapped out by the
Speaker 2: square meter. I'll live in degener say square kilometer square
Speaker 2: mile six foot all the way up to like say
Speaker 2: eighty thousand feet, every square mile mapped in real time,
Speaker 2: every square mile of the ocean surface. Then you'd have
Speaker 2: to start to get real granular and cut it down
Speaker 2: like six you know, six inches below foot below, because
Speaker 2: the water temperature drops much more precipitously off into the
Speaker 2: cooler than air temperatures do, right, Like, you'd have to
Speaker 2: get down to that kind of granular modeling to really
Speaker 2: get some sort of analysis on this thing. They're nowhere
Speaker 2: even close. They're not even remotely. I mean, it's absurd
Speaker 2: to think that you can model the climate on having
Speaker 2: a couple of temperature stations every few miles away only
Speaker 2: on the ground surface, and you're putting them in the cities.
Speaker 2: It's a few like rural stations left. But then that's
Speaker 2: supposed to be a homogenous like there's a whole bunch
Speaker 2: of areas across the ocean. They don't even have buoys
Speaker 2: out there to measure temperature. They just estimate it based
Speaker 2: on the things around it, and they just like color
Speaker 2: it in whatever color they think it should be for
Speaker 2: this month. To try to push the agenda, because you've
Speaker 2: got to realize this all moves to in the end
Speaker 2: here ultimate control of tracking and tracing. You might have
Speaker 2: to say, why are they doing it now? Well, they
Speaker 2: want to know where every grain of every I should
Speaker 2: say grain of grains is going. They want to know
Speaker 2: where every kernel of wheat is inbound or outbound from.
Speaker 2: They want to know the consumption. They want to know
Speaker 2: what you're consuming, what they're going to allow you to consume.
Speaker 2: Can you imagine the global food production drops thirty percent,
Speaker 2: there's going to be rationing, and they're going to want
Speaker 2: to know where the food is. The food's going to
Speaker 2: be the most valuable thing. So if you already have
Speaker 2: a mechanism in place to track the food from the field,
Speaker 2: that's going to be the first thing. And then we've
Speaker 2: already set that up over the last thirty years or so,
Speaker 2: and now it's coming into the human consumption domain of
Speaker 2: what you're going to be allowed to consume or not.
Speaker 2: I don't know if they're really going to try to
Speaker 2: give everybody food equally. I think it's just going to
Speaker 2: be you're on your own. And that's why I'm so
Speaker 2: heavily into not prepping in terms of like oh the
Speaker 2: grid down for the rest of your life kind of thing,
Speaker 2: but just supplementary into your daily needs, like make that
Speaker 2: a habit of life. Like you have to think as
Speaker 2: if the entire system of centralized delivery is just going
Speaker 2: to fail and food, water, secure, medicine. You're living a
Speaker 2: pioneering lifestyle in addition to the high tech you're kind
Speaker 2: of in that blended middle there. So it's all about
Speaker 2: the food, always has been, always will be. And they
Speaker 2: do these tricksters are trying to say it's about CO
Speaker 2: two and it's not. Did you find that ice court
Speaker 2: at a set?
Speaker 1: I've been looking for it and there's a bunch of
Speaker 1: fact checked ones that are seeing the opposite, and then
Speaker 1: there's like all the it's just difficult to find one.
Speaker 2: If you can find a Lincoln, just certainly share the
Speaker 2: screen like you did before on a Google and just
Speaker 2: put in GISP two ten thousand year temperature reconstruction. I
Speaker 2: will point the one out to you. That's the true one,
Speaker 2: the original one. Doctor Lapie was also on that. You
Speaker 2: might see something where says Lapie on the bottom l APPI.
Speaker 2: But there was a These were the top notch, top
Speaker 2: of the field scientists that had put this together, and
Speaker 2: it was a collaboration of them from multiple nations drilling
Speaker 2: the cores, putting together they found all the volcanic eruption
Speaker 2: where that lined up with previous accounts of youreruptions because
Speaker 2: at last left ash layers in there were commentary debris
Speaker 2: trails coming through. Yeah, can you go into that, go
Speaker 2: into the images.
Speaker 1: On that images. Got it?
Speaker 2: Oh, there you go top left, right there with the red. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's it right there.
Speaker 1: That's probably the one, the one that I was looking
Speaker 1: for about. It couldn't on any link.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they're really difficult to find on websites. You have
Speaker 2: to go right up to the images because they are
Speaker 2: obscuring this information and what's considered like a regular website.
Speaker 2: So everyone of those spikes up that you see, that's
Speaker 2: a red spike upward. That's a spike up in temperature.
Speaker 2: We're only in the modern era in say the far
Speaker 2: right where the blue is, say last three hundred years,
Speaker 2: when we even had steam engines to deal with. So
Speaker 2: I would like you to explain how we had these
Speaker 2: up and downs in temperature. The eight point two k
Speaker 2: event is what you can see that really deep drop
Speaker 2: off off the left side of the chart there, But
Speaker 2: what subsequently caused those temperatures to rise too far above
Speaker 2: where they sit today? And this chart was the gold
Speaker 2: standard that was there to show what human history was
Speaker 2: in terms of why things collapsed in the past, and
Speaker 2: because it disproved what the new CO two was trying
Speaker 2: to tell you. In the way it works is like
Speaker 2: CO two drives climate it's warmer now than ever. But
Speaker 2: this is the very best set they had from you know,
Speaker 2: the beginning of ice core drilling was this. They could
Speaker 2: reconstruct it by seeing the CO two in it, and
Speaker 2: the CO two levels were actually lower when the temperature
Speaker 2: was warmer in all of these spike events. So that
Speaker 2: disproved right there, and they're like, oh, we can't. I
Speaker 2: mean the CO two is way alone and it was
Speaker 2: warmer than that. Way, we can't that excuse everybody, even
Speaker 2: a kindergartener will see through it.
Speaker 1: That's my yes, right, because they're blaming CO two highest
Speaker 1: CO two levels on global warming. But if it was
Speaker 1: lower whenever it was hotter, then it doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 1: The whole thing falls apart.
Speaker 2: Are you able to wind that out there on the
Speaker 2: chart there? Can you make it a little bit wider screen?
Speaker 2: Are you unable to? Yeah? I know some of it's
Speaker 2: tricky with the image.
Speaker 1: When I click on it and go to this fact
Speaker 1: check thing.
Speaker 2: Oh you have to go right click, opening a new tab,
Speaker 2: and then share that tab. They got all the tricks, man,
Speaker 2: they're trying to stop you from finding this different information.
Speaker 2: And I'll tell you a story I was running through Grok,
Speaker 2: and I was asking GROC. I was saying, hey, man,
Speaker 2: I'm completely shadow band everywhere. Why is that? And he
Speaker 2: got into or it did. It was like, well, you're
Speaker 2: sharing things that might not be exactly factual. They're factual,
Speaker 2: but they're not exactly factual like they should be factual today.
Speaker 2: And I'm like, what the hell does that mean. He's like, well,
Speaker 2: this data set here, it's a regional data set. It's
Speaker 2: only good for Greenland. I'm like, bro, this thing was
Speaker 2: used to show global temperatures for like thirty plus years.
Speaker 2: Come on now. And he's like, well, it's a regional thing.
Speaker 2: And then I showed them all these other charts of
Speaker 2: these regional like the Northern End Glynn or the English temperatures.
Speaker 2: That's the longest running data set in all of our
Speaker 2: temperature records, goes back to the middle sixteen hundreds from England.
Speaker 2: That and then was it what Grox say to me, Well,
Speaker 2: that's a regional okay. And then I showed them one
Speaker 2: from New Zealand. I show the one from America. I
Speaker 2: showed them one from Germany, showed them one from over
Speaker 2: in China. And then he kept saying, well, the regional
Speaker 2: regional regional. I'm like, well, how many regionals does it
Speaker 2: take to make a global and the answer was, well,
Speaker 2: it's just regional. And again, even the AI engines are
Speaker 2: built in to try to dissuade you from connecting on
Speaker 2: these small dots apart. Yeah, so anybody that's out there
Speaker 2: looking that you can look this up as a GISP two. Now,
Speaker 2: the ones in Antarctica also have their own data sets
Speaker 2: too that are very similar to this. But there was
Speaker 2: a disruption in their drill core or their core drilling,
Speaker 2: and nobody can really explain why they just kind of
Speaker 2: stopped doing it down there. I'm sure you have more
Speaker 2: information about that than I do. But wherever you look,
Speaker 2: you can look at the Antarctic ice core drilling data
Speaker 2: as well. A little bit deeper inca. But for some reason,
Speaker 2: ice is supposed to be so much thicker down there,
Speaker 2: but they never really got to the bottom like they
Speaker 2: should have. And I'm just asking why, like why didn't
Speaker 2: why didn't you guys reach rock layer down there? What
Speaker 2: did you touch or see or experience that made you
Speaker 2: stop drilling down there? That was the whole question about
Speaker 2: their drilling on some of the stations, was like why'd
Speaker 2: you stop. I thought the thing about science was to
Speaker 2: keep going, keep going. I thought you were going to
Speaker 2: hit bedrocks somewhere down there and prove that the world
Speaker 2: was this, that or the other. And they just locked
Speaker 2: it up, threw away the key, never to go drilling
Speaker 2: another core down there. Man. I don't know what happened, but.
Speaker 1: Well, according to this Reader's Digest Antarctica edition, there is
Speaker 1: a two hundred and sixty square kilometers one hundred square
Speaker 1: miles that has lakes, lush forest greenery in the middle
Speaker 1: of Antarctica. In this readers Here's that came out in
Speaker 1: I think around two thousand and three.
Speaker 2: Oh that recently.
Speaker 1: Okay, yep, it's somewhere here. But I think that that
Speaker 1: is the real mystery of Antarctica is that there's a
Speaker 1: one hundred square miles of lush greenery, lush forests and
Speaker 1: lakes in the center of Antarctica, and they don't know why,
Speaker 1: they don't know how, and they've been studying it for
Speaker 1: a long time. I mean, on a supposedly frozen continent. Further,
Speaker 1: it to be one hundred square miles of lush greenery
Speaker 1: and forested areas and trees and Lakes is an anomaly, right.
Speaker 2: The only two possibilities I could think that would make
Speaker 2: sense for that is a magnetic field line has established
Speaker 2: itself for an incredibly long time highly electrified that raised
Speaker 2: temperatures in that area, or there is a volcanic breakthrough
Speaker 2: that allows heat to escape through that on multiple areas.
Speaker 2: Or perhaps the magnetic field line caused the volcanic breakthroughs,
Speaker 2: and those two are intertwined to allow a heated spot
Speaker 2: to exist within the ice that has some sort of
Speaker 2: barrier around it because the positive pressure coming out can
Speaker 2: push away that cold air. Those neutrinos coming out of
Speaker 2: there too, is a whole other thing that you know,
Speaker 2: this intense neutrino emission coming out doesn't make sense either
Speaker 2: unless there's some energy source down there, so you start
Speaker 2: to look at it, you know. Admiral Bird, I do believe,
Speaker 2: also talked about that on a couple of reconnaissance flights.
Speaker 2: Several pilots that had talked about seeing this green area,
Speaker 2: So it didn't surprise me. It's not the first one.
Speaker 1: Way that was connected to the Admoral Bird operation high Jump.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's only one of many, you know, that's probably
Speaker 2: the most famous, but you know, there's been others.
Speaker 1: The readers is actually from nineteen ninety, so I was
Speaker 1: wrong from two thousand and three. But that is connected.
Speaker 1: That paragraph that I just read from there is connected
Speaker 1: to the operation High drump Admoral Bird. That was a
Speaker 1: big discovery that they found in Antarctica, was this one
Speaker 1: hundred square miles of lush greenery and forest.
Speaker 2: Now, if I could throw another thing out there about
Speaker 2: that related directly to this. When we get into a
Speaker 2: more we can magnetic field, we get more cosmic rays
Speaker 2: come in. These cosmic rays energetic particles, they excite these
Speaker 2: different types of magma chambers. It depends what the magma
Speaker 2: is comprised of, what it's made of. So it's made
Speaker 2: of silica, which everybody knows silica, you know, crystals, this
Speaker 2: sort of thing, it's called silica rich magma. When the
Speaker 2: cosmic rays come in, it gets excited for some reason
Speaker 2: that on that specific type of magma has like an
Speaker 2: amplified effect above any other types of you know, liquid
Speaker 2: rock magma in our Earth's crust. Now all along, if
Speaker 2: you look at a map of Antarticle, you see that
Speaker 2: large peninsula out there, well underneath those ice shelves, the
Speaker 2: volcanic activity is just ramped up tremendously, and say the
Speaker 2: last five years more or less. It did start around
Speaker 2: ten twelve years ago, and it was getting warmer, and
Speaker 2: people are going to look at these punch throughs. They're
Speaker 2: starting to get like from beneath surface melting, not above surface,
Speaker 2: beneath the surface. Right, it was changing water currents because
Speaker 2: the warm water was circulating at a different speed than
Speaker 2: the cold water, and they started to get these gyres
Speaker 2: and different things happening. Icebergs will break off and they
Speaker 2: would just spin and like that doesn't make sense. They
Speaker 2: should be moving with the current, not spinning and just
Speaker 2: stuck there. And there was a huge amount of ice anomalies.
Speaker 2: And I'm not going to say just like more or
Speaker 2: less sea ice. I'm just talking about a part of
Speaker 2: an ice shelf will break off. It didn't behave remotely
Speaker 2: close to where they thought it would or how it
Speaker 2: would move after it broke off. Subsurface heating did that.
Speaker 2: So just remember warm water and cold water move the
Speaker 2: density is different and they move at different speed. So
Speaker 2: there's a lot of things in that, like cold air
Speaker 2: and warm air, foggy air or clear air. You know,
Speaker 2: you get all these different density differences in the way
Speaker 2: that things behave and move amongst themselves. So think about
Speaker 2: that for a second. What is going What are they
Speaker 2: seeing or finding as these areas of ice are melted
Speaker 2: from beneath Are they creating giant cavity and pockets? Because
Speaker 2: you got to think, Okay, so Greenland ice is, you know,
Speaker 2: a mile and a half thick. If you had a
Speaker 2: volcano that was beneath that and melting away for let's
Speaker 2: say a thousand years, but it was still colding off
Speaker 2: to the top to keep the roof of it always frozen,
Speaker 2: so that it'd be that boundary layer, that equilibrium point,
Speaker 2: Like how large could that cavern become heated from beneath
Speaker 2: the earth? And you gotta suspect that the same thing
Speaker 2: would be happening in Antarctica, And that's maybe the real
Speaker 2: positive pressure is coming because if that was an air
Speaker 2: filled void, it would push out under the path of
Speaker 2: least resistance, but it would have more pressure than just
Speaker 2: the ambient atmosphere around it, you know, because if it
Speaker 2: levorti vortices or you know Schauburger vortex principles, you can
Speaker 2: speed water up to make it spin faster by just
Speaker 2: putting it in a circular motion with the same with air.
Speaker 2: And you think like her or tornadoes spin slower, why
Speaker 2: do they spin so fast? Well, Schauburger principles. So that
Speaker 2: pressure difference could be the reason you have the green.
Speaker 2: But if the volcanoes are really kicking because of more
Speaker 2: cosmic rays because we have a weakened magnetic field, then
Speaker 2: what is being melted and shown down there? Because before
Speaker 2: they're finding you know, way back in the day when
Speaker 2: this is another thing that was when they were doing
Speaker 2: the initial ice core drilling, like they came into some
Speaker 2: areas that weren't really that deep, that were you know,
Speaker 2: a thousand feet deep, fifteen hundred feet deep, and they
Speaker 2: did hit bedrock, but they were finding you know, tropical
Speaker 2: fossils down there, things that were growing on the equator previously, right,
Speaker 2: So that's stunned them anyway, Like how in the what
Speaker 2: and the heck? Then we started to find all the
Speaker 2: same things in the Arctic as well as they started
Speaker 2: doing more research. But that's nothing because all the tales,
Speaker 2: all of the stories, all of the accounts tell us
Speaker 2: that this has happened through history, that somehow they just
Speaker 2: found like oh, there's our Well wait, if you would
Speaker 2: have look at the old tales going back some seven
Speaker 2: thousand or eight thousand years through most cultures, we've they've
Speaker 2: talked about this, the repeating cycle of when it does this.
Speaker 2: So that's your first history. I was going somewhere with
Speaker 2: the point, but I lost it, so back to you.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that it's just very anomalous that on
Speaker 1: a you know, a supposedly frozen continent, you can have
Speaker 1: one hundred square and one hundred square miles is nothing
Speaker 1: to scoff at. That's a lot. That's a big amount
Speaker 1: of land that has lakes. And whenever they flew into
Speaker 1: this part, they actually landed on the lake. So the
Speaker 1: lake was big enough for a plane to land on
Speaker 1: the lake. That's a pretty big lake.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it would be. And it just backs up validation
Speaker 2: that other processes are at work, whether the greenery is there,
Speaker 2: whether there's cave melting from beneath, just the thing about
Speaker 2: the whole volcanic ranges in ridges inside all around the planet,
Speaker 2: anywhere there's silica ridge magma are just going off the hook.
Speaker 2: Like these slow eruptions like Christine and kill Away, which
Speaker 2: is starting to fountain off at Now. That's another one,
Speaker 2: like we're really starting to see a lot of effects
Speaker 2: now of these what we're previously wouldn't say dormant but
Speaker 2: slow oozing or barely or they would take decades off
Speaker 2: at a time, or they're barely a smidgen, you know,
Speaker 2: coming out, and now they're just roaring three thousand foot
Speaker 2: tall fountains of lava, when before it was barely eking
Speaker 2: out of the ground, you know, like pencil with just
Speaker 2: kind of creeping along there, and oh, there hadn't been
Speaker 2: any activity for two decades and then woosh to three
Speaker 2: thousand foot fountain. You know, something is really upticked in
Speaker 2: the last year too. Specifically that's causing a lot more
Speaker 2: pressure in the crust of earth to make these mud volcanoes.
Speaker 2: And also these slow moving eruptive events fountain out, not explosive,
Speaker 2: but founting events. The fountaining pressures are just fire hosing off,
Speaker 2: you know, they call it fire hose lava emissions. Well
Speaker 2: that just just you had some before, yeah, and they
Speaker 2: would be maybe three not three thousand feet tall. These
Speaker 2: latest emissions coming out of Kilauea. Some of these fountain
Speaker 2: hoses were coming out three thousand feet vertical. They burned
Speaker 2: the cameras. All around the rim of the crater where
Speaker 2: they had for observation posts got all covered in tufa.
Speaker 2: I'm sure you've seen those two. It was all blown
Speaker 2: away and the drying and hot, the heated lava drying
Speaker 2: as it turned into that, you know, sort of airborne
Speaker 2: form came down and covered all the cameras. I mean,
Speaker 2: there's an upjet going on tremendously. So be government. You're
Speaker 2: going to put in your continuity of government protocols for sure?
Speaker 2: What does that entail? Well, perhaps that's why the world
Speaker 2: is completely considered in most people's minds broken and fracturing further.
Speaker 2: But perhaps it's not. Perhaps that's a distraction. The supply
Speaker 2: chains were meant to redivert everything into government for continuity,
Speaker 2: and then just the average person's left for what they're
Speaker 2: left for, and the excuses will always have to be
Speaker 2: given why things aren't operating smoothly. So choose from You
Speaker 2: can almost put your you know, your hand in a
Speaker 2: hat and just pull out another piece of paper like
Speaker 2: Chinese fortune cookie. Okay, today we'll tell them it is. Oh,
Speaker 2: it's a trade dispute between China and America. Okay, this
Speaker 2: will be the one for this month, for these two months,
Speaker 2: that will explain away why you can't buy something like
Speaker 2: they used to be able to. Okay, two more months.
Speaker 2: They put their hand in another that okay, this time,
Speaker 2: what is it? It is? Oh, there's an oil disruption
Speaker 2: because okay, let's use that one for a little while.
Speaker 2: You know, they've got this hat full of different excuses
Speaker 2: that they pull out because you can't tell me that
Speaker 2: something's not not right at the moment, and you have
Speaker 2: to have youself why is it not? Everybody can sense
Speaker 2: it's different too. That would be an energetic difference, so
Speaker 2: you can feel it and you're on that sort of
Speaker 2: things like how many people do you talk to writer
Speaker 2: where they just feel like something's awesomething's different energetically.
Speaker 1: I can think of another excuse to the ever Green
Speaker 1: ship got stuck in the canal.
Speaker 2: The oh, we can on use that one for a week.
Speaker 2: We got to draw again real quick.
Speaker 1: A ship hit a bridge in Brooklyn, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. Like, there's been so many of these over
Speaker 1: the past three to four years, and it seems like
Speaker 1: one is happening all the time. And you know, train,
Speaker 1: the train d Relman in Ohio. You know, it's like
Speaker 1: all this stuff and all the transportation is being hit.
Speaker 1: The submarine implosion, planes crashing, helicopter crashes, Kobe Bryant helicopter crash.
Speaker 1: That kind of kicked off the whole twenty twenty thing.
Speaker 1: It's really really strange, and we are now what do
Speaker 1: you think we should be on the lookout for in
Speaker 1: the next year's leading up to twenty thirty? What are
Speaker 1: you most worried about? You just mentioned in continuity of
Speaker 1: government and how that may be put in place. Is
Speaker 1: there any and we've been talking about food and stuff
Speaker 1: like that, is there anything else that people should be
Speaker 1: worried about before we get to that twenty thirty date.
Speaker 1: Because we all know about the Agenda twenty thirty, sustainable
Speaker 1: development plans, smart cities, surveillance state AI grids, own nothing
Speaker 1: and be happy stuff. But the question is that it
Speaker 1: really seems like that people don't necessarily have the answer
Speaker 1: for is how do we get to that point? Okay,
Speaker 1: how do we get to the point of everywhere's a
Speaker 1: smart city, We're all herded into these surveillance state AI grids,
Speaker 1: you know, and owning nothing and being happy, right, something
Speaker 1: has to happen in order for that type of draconian
Speaker 1: totalitarian reality to take place. Or do you think it's
Speaker 1: going to be a slow rollout like it kind of
Speaker 1: has been moving and operating with sort of big jumps
Speaker 1: you're in there. Do you think it's going to continue
Speaker 1: like that, the slow rollout with the big jumps every
Speaker 1: ten to fifteen years, maybe even twenty years in between.
Speaker 2: Incrementalism is not incrementalism anymore. They've sort of soft drip
Speaker 2: trained us to incrementalism is now a five minute jump,
Speaker 2: a ten minute jump, a thirty minute, a one hour jump,
Speaker 2: and you accepted that wottle have been a one minute
Speaker 2: to the next one minute equivalent move in whatever it
Speaker 2: is that you're following. Now it's like one equals one hour,
Speaker 2: like a sixty x increase, you know, and it's going
Speaker 2: to be like this, and you know it's nothing to
Speaker 2: be You don't have to be worried about it. It's
Speaker 2: just to be aware of it so you can protect
Speaker 2: your I mean sitting around with high quarters all levels
Speaker 2: because you're worried about everything all day. That's not helpful
Speaker 2: for anybody. But you do need to be aware of
Speaker 2: the changing environment. Around you, and it would stem back
Speaker 2: to why is it changing? It would be my first thing.
Speaker 2: And once you can get the Rubik's cube solved on
Speaker 2: that and you get the why, like you mentioned in
Speaker 2: the beginning of the show, like once you unlock that
Speaker 2: one grand piece that brings you to the next Rubik's
Speaker 2: cube to start on the why is that whole cycles
Speaker 2: in time collapse of food production, and then it just comes.
Speaker 2: You've heard this saying a million times, like hungry people
Speaker 2: are angry people. That's the main number one thing that
Speaker 2: has collapsed governments through history is just lack of food.
Speaker 2: It's really not a magical anything. It's just they couldn't
Speaker 2: feed the people, and people who can't get fed get angry.
Speaker 2: They might start amongst themselves first fighting, but eventually they
Speaker 2: find their way looking up, not laterally at each other
Speaker 2: as the thing to fight, which our news media is
Speaker 2: great laterally, go get them, Go get them. They never
Speaker 2: want you to look up, do they, But looking up
Speaker 2: hungry people look up. They don't look laterally. This is
Speaker 2: the thing that every time I would encourage you anywhere
Speaker 2: in history, unless it was a commentary impact or some
Speaker 2: sort of like massive tidal wave disaster generally, if it's
Speaker 2: not a natural cataclysmic event like let's say one of
Speaker 2: the biggest volcanic eruptions that you can remember, POMPEII or something.
Speaker 2: If it's not that kind of wipeout, it's always food.
Speaker 2: Food leads to everything else. It leads to the economic collapse,
Speaker 2: it leads to the population migration, it leads to the
Speaker 2: overthrow of the governments, it leads to the pitchforks coming out.
Speaker 2: So if you knew that was coming because of a disruptive,
Speaker 2: just natural cycle that does this every four hundred years,
Speaker 2: just more powerful ones every two thousand years, if you
Speaker 2: just knew that was then that was the cycle that
Speaker 2: just drives through history. Great year, we go to twelve
Speaker 2: of those, we roll through the zodiac, boom back at
Speaker 2: it again, takes four of those great years. We're in
Speaker 2: an ice age cycle. Like once you understand the cyclicity
Speaker 2: of it all, and I do want you to step
Speaker 2: back and take that wide view of interglacial glacial on
Speaker 2: one hundred thousand year timeframe, that is a known cycle
Speaker 2: for millions of years it happens, and we are in
Speaker 2: this ten thousand years of warmth that is quickly ending
Speaker 2: you know global warm clo. I would say, we oh no,
Speaker 2: because we have so so much CO two, We're gonna
Speaker 2: stave off glaciation. I'm like, that's obliquity things we have
Speaker 2: nothing to do with on it. But that has berkeling
Speaker 2: currents rolling into our star firing it off in its plasmasphere.
Speaker 2: That has nothing to do with us. I don't care
Speaker 2: how you make this planet. When that star, that yellow
Speaker 2: thing to the left, decides to do something differently in
Speaker 2: terms of output, we have nothing to say about it.
Speaker 2: But there's a cycle within that too. Now, once you
Speaker 2: start to know these cycles, then that's where you get
Speaker 2: back into that Rubi's cube got solved. Like it's all
Speaker 2: based on solar activity and the ability to grow food,
Speaker 2: and then that's kind of the base thing. Oh wow,
Speaker 2: I figured that out. Okay, only took me ten years,
Speaker 2: and you know, all those interviews and all those other
Speaker 2: people to put this together and then doing a bunch
Speaker 2: of research, and you know, like you do, you go
Speaker 2: out and do a huge amount of research and eventually
Speaker 2: you click on something. You know, like that leads to
Speaker 2: the next thing. What's the next thing? How are you
Speaker 2: going to control the populacet once you know that this
Speaker 2: cycle has started and it's intensifying. Now, you can throw
Speaker 2: a million excuses at the wall here and then eventually
Speaker 2: like those aren't going to work because people with their
Speaker 2: own eyes, they're going to see it. And then what
Speaker 2: then You're gonna have to do what you just describe.
Speaker 2: You're gonna have to start to control the people with
Speaker 2: an iron fist. Like the awareness phase of this whole
Speaker 2: transition is where we sit right now. People are becoming
Speaker 2: very aware. Energetic changes are coming. People's minds are firing
Speaker 2: off information differently, but at the same time they're noticing
Speaker 2: that these food prices they're never coming down. Our economy
Speaker 2: is shifting into something hyperinflative. And the governments are also
Speaker 2: very very aware, much more than you think they are,
Speaker 2: about every single minute, microscopic change. That's what they're modeling.
Speaker 2: They're modeling the changes of the awareness of humanity until
Speaker 2: that becomes a problem where there's safety becomes a problem.
Speaker 2: All based on these cycles, and once you frame that
Speaker 2: in there, then you just look for, Okay, where's the
Speaker 2: start point. Okay, will it be super strong in the
Speaker 2: beginning or will it be sort of a gradual like
Speaker 2: you say, a gradualism incrementalism in terms of amplifying, like
Speaker 2: how much stronger is it going to get? Like through
Speaker 2: known history, how fast did these things onset and how
Speaker 2: strong did they get? And how quickly did they get
Speaker 2: strong enough to upset the apple cart, well, actually the
Speaker 2: grain cart, and then you start to look at it
Speaker 2: and then you know, you just piece it together through history. Now,
Speaker 2: what is unknown currently, at least through a lot of
Speaker 2: people I talk with, is the duration of the cycle
Speaker 2: that we're dealing with. Is it a regular four hundred
Speaker 2: year cycle or is it a two thousand year cycle,
Speaker 2: or is it something larger that's stepping us off into
Speaker 2: the first step down into the next glaciation? Like you
Speaker 2: got these different levels and more powerful cycles within cycles.
Speaker 2: So that's the unknown right now, is where do we
Speaker 2: sit in terms of overall time scape of the cycle.
Speaker 2: But one thing's for sure, these things that you're being
Speaker 2: fed in your mind that we're going to move to
Speaker 2: perhaps will never morph, metamorphize or crystallize into our reality.
Speaker 2: They're meant to keep you inactive and scared, non productive
Speaker 2: in order for government to prepare for these changes, and
Speaker 2: then they'll just lock up Noah's Ark and see y'all later.
Speaker 2: That was all a big old giant mind operation. We're
Speaker 2: never gonna get these cities. We could never build them
Speaker 2: in time. We don't have enough resources. Shit, this is
Speaker 2: another fact for anybody, the amount of data centers they
Speaker 2: want to build. Forget the AI cities. We're gonna forget this.
Speaker 2: We're super We're just way back at the baby footprint
Speaker 2: here of like building out the data centers. To even
Speaker 2: run all this, we have to mind more copper in
Speaker 2: the next twenty years than we've mined in all of
Speaker 2: human history combined in the last ten thousand. In the
Speaker 2: next twenty years. That's simple math. Simple math that's not
Speaker 2: gonna work. So then it makes you step back and say,
Speaker 2: all right, well, why are they trying to explain away
Speaker 2: all these shortages. They're trying to condition you that you're
Speaker 2: gonna have less in life. That's already a given. You're
Speaker 2: gonna have less airflies, You're not gonna own your home,
Speaker 2: which means for me, finance system is gonna get so
Speaker 2: disrupted that you're gonna not have traditional ownership of things
Speaker 2: because the financial system won't it'll collapse so completely in
Speaker 2: fragment that it won't operate in the same way, which
Speaker 2: brings me to a point. Please back everything up on
Speaker 2: paper that you own, because after this event, you're gonna
Speaker 2: have to prove ownership of what you used to own.
Speaker 2: And if you have the hard copy documents of your mortgage,
Speaker 2: of the title of your car, these types of things,
Speaker 2: ownership for artwork or anything in between, you're gonna have
Speaker 2: to prove it to get it back because the digital
Speaker 2: trail shall evaporate into the mist. And though, well, do
Speaker 2: you have any paperwork that you can prove that you
Speaker 2: owned that? No, it was all in the computers. It
Speaker 2: was all in the banks they used to send a
Speaker 2: mortgage in. Do you have any Do you have any
Speaker 2: payment stubs from when you wrote your check? No, I
Speaker 2: paid everything online. Here's the paper. Well, it doesn't show
Speaker 2: you paid anything. It just shows you had this bill due.
Speaker 2: I don't know. We don't know if you paid it
Speaker 2: or not. And there's nothing left in our computer systems.
Speaker 2: That's where we're going because the reset will be at
Speaker 2: this point, and it is a reset, but it's a
Speaker 2: reset based on natural cycles. And we've seen through history,
Speaker 2: how many times have they revalued currencies, how many times
Speaker 2: have They just completely done away with currencies. Shit, even
Speaker 2: in our modern era, the British pound they knocked out,
Speaker 2: the one hundred pound note, that knocked out, you know,
Speaker 2: the two hundred euro note gone, five hundred euro note.
Speaker 2: They're not around. Where's our one thousand dollars bill in America?
Speaker 2: You know, money just disappears. Look what they did over
Speaker 2: in India. They knocked everything out that was above like
Speaker 2: I think it was one hundred rupees like five hundred
Speaker 2: thousand rupee notes gone. They've squeezed everybody back in digital
Speaker 2: and small transactional money only they wiped everything else out.
Speaker 2: This has happened in our modern era, let alone these
Speaker 2: hyperinflationary you know Fiat collapses of five thousand of those
Speaker 2: in the last two thousand years. It just goes on
Speaker 2: and on and on. It is a cycle. We don't
Speaker 2: know the true history of our planet. We're always being
Speaker 2: lied to about even you know, what are some of
Speaker 2: these great architectural feats that can't even be replicated today?
Speaker 2: Like you put it timeline on that you dated fifteen fifty.
Speaker 2: Come on, now, something BIG's here. So if you say
Speaker 2: incrementalism and it's just a way to distract while government
Speaker 2: prepares and more control over the citizens. Is the way
Speaker 2: they do that. When you start to get angry and
Speaker 2: you get aware, people start to group together, and that's
Speaker 2: what they're terrified of. So that hard handed fist is
Speaker 2: coming down to stop your connectivity with others that might
Speaker 2: actually make a difference before everything's solidified and dark doors
Speaker 2: come up.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what I am concerned about. Now. This
Speaker 1: isn't a prediction. By my immediate concern is that Trump
Speaker 1: prize to get a third term, okay, because that seems
Speaker 1: like what he's settying up for, and he may believe
Speaker 1: that he has the grounds to do it, okay, if
Speaker 1: he can prove that the twenty twenty election was stolen.
Speaker 1: If that happens and he sues these people or he
Speaker 1: proves it all, then he can feel that he has
Speaker 1: the grounds to actually attempt to run for a third term, okay,
Speaker 1: And that will tear this country apart. And the so
Speaker 1: called predictive programming has already been set up for this
Speaker 1: in the movie Civil War. Did you see that movie
Speaker 1: that came out a few years and.
Speaker 2: Now i'd heard about it. I should watch it, but
Speaker 2: I just didn't want to bring myself into that energy.
Speaker 2: I'm just trying to as again I showed you in
Speaker 2: the beginning, I was trying to create reality this year.
Speaker 2: I'm really not. My whole purpose of living and existing
Speaker 2: this year is to create reality versus being dragged along
Speaker 2: by it. And it might not make sense to a
Speaker 2: lot of people, but I refuse to be dragged through
Speaker 2: this muck. I'm going to create my own reality.
Speaker 1: Well, in Civil War, which was the entire Civil War,
Speaker 1: happened within the movie Civil War because the president refused
Speaker 1: to leave office after a third term. That's pretty much
Speaker 1: the cliff notes of that movie. But if anything could
Speaker 1: do what we are thinking that it could do, it
Speaker 1: would be something like that. Again, it's not a prediction,
Speaker 1: just it's a possibility. And he's kind of been talking
Speaker 1: about that on his social media, is true social as well.
Speaker 1: So I'm just going to leave it there. We'll see
Speaker 1: how it ages. Come back in three years, talk about
Speaker 1: it again, bring the club out, see if anything pans
Speaker 1: out like that.
Speaker 2: But what could I add on to that thought? Yeah,
Speaker 2: I'm not really a political person, never have been, so
Speaker 2: I just kind of look at it as just static
Speaker 2: on both sides, right, But I don't like to see that.
Speaker 2: I've seen through here because I study history a lot,
Speaker 2: and one thing that I see is when secret police
Speaker 2: are put in I don't care. They're good for the
Speaker 2: first whatever that they're used for, but they always continue
Speaker 2: to grow and go awry at the end. So what
Speaker 2: you have in the beginning metastasizes into something terrifying by
Speaker 2: the end of it. Now, I'm all for getting some
Speaker 2: illegals out of here that are criminals and causing a
Speaker 2: lot of problem. I have no problem with that at all.
Speaker 2: But what I do have a problem is with these
Speaker 2: dudes running around with masks not identified, just causing all
Speaker 2: kinds of you know, unchecked chaos that you know, police
Speaker 2: officers when you ask them for the name and badge
Speaker 2: number they need to identify. I know a lot of
Speaker 2: them don't, but at least there's ways to look at
Speaker 2: their uniforms and find out at least what precinct there are,
Speaker 2: you know, badges if you can snap up. These guys
Speaker 2: are completely you know, as I've read through Stasi in
Speaker 2: history and you know, just things that go bump in
Speaker 2: the night through the last one hundred fifty years. This
Speaker 2: is a copy paste that we're beginning in America, which
Speaker 2: which currently is checked on a certain percentage targeting a
Speaker 2: minority set over here. But I tell you, through history,
Speaker 2: it's as soon as it gets into a different hands,
Speaker 2: it's re reverted to the next set over there, and
Speaker 2: then somewhere in the middle it morphs into this just
Speaker 2: giant apparatus that scoops everybody in. And you have seen
Speaker 2: it again and again and again in time. I don't
Speaker 2: care if you go from the Roman era or if
Speaker 2: you come all the way to you know, Polpot's Red
Speaker 2: Army or anywhere in between, from Stalin, and it just
Speaker 2: doesn't matter. The Russians and their whole you know. And
Speaker 2: then there's just see the secret police that run around
Speaker 2: in all these places that you've seen. We look in
Speaker 2: at that and go, how could they let that happen?
Speaker 2: How can you have secret police just run around rounding
Speaker 2: people up, making them disappear in the middle of the
Speaker 2: night because they don't believe politically what you say. You know,
Speaker 2: this is just a standard in history, and we're starting
Speaker 2: to see it. I'm really surprised that it's allowed to
Speaker 2: go like this. Dudes running around, no id covered faces,
Speaker 2: unmarked vehicles, just scooping people off the streets. And you
Speaker 2: know there's been a fairy few regular Americans rounded up.
Speaker 2: You don't have ID. Why the hell would I have ID?
Speaker 2: Why would I have papers on me? You know, And
Speaker 2: I'm looking at this from an objective view, going, you know,
Speaker 2: this is terrifying because in history it's just it gets
Speaker 2: out of control, and it'll take fifty years before it
Speaker 2: gets under control again based on the previous at least
Speaker 2: records through you know, some horrendous events. So just I'll
Speaker 2: add with you, you know, come back in five or
Speaker 2: ten years and see where this secret police force has
Speaker 2: gravitated or morphed into. After ten years, you probably won't
Speaker 2: sleep at night, whether you're an American citizen or not.
Speaker 1: Well, I personally believe that this ice stuff and all
Speaker 1: the stuff with the police is there's a few things
Speaker 1: that's going on. One of them is getting people used
Speaker 1: to the police and the military being present on our streets.
Speaker 1: The second thing is is to get the population in
Speaker 1: an uproar about this so that they can start implementing
Speaker 1: this robot style police state. Right. The humans can't do
Speaker 1: this anymore. They're too emotional and they kill people, you know,
Speaker 1: what doesn't kill people Dave robots.
Speaker 2: I saw that. I saw there was a memorandum that
Speaker 2: was allowing them to operate autonomously or in the future
Speaker 2: using AI to target self target things. And I was like, yep,
Speaker 2: that just taking it to AI age, isn't it. You know,
Speaker 2: you look at these things. I thought it would never
Speaker 2: happen in our country, and it's not. You know, I
Speaker 2: am an all support absolutely of people that are criminals
Speaker 2: and getting them out of here because they are wrecking
Speaker 2: our country and are ripping it to pieces. But once
Speaker 2: they're all gone, that apparatus is still in place, then
Speaker 2: who do they focus on next? Because it doesn't just
Speaker 2: stop and disband and everybody goes back into the night.
Speaker 2: What happened with DHS, what happened with the TSA? Like,
Speaker 2: they're still here multiple years after nine eleven, it's been
Speaker 2: twenty six years, twenty five years, and they're still here.
Speaker 2: They're larger than ever, more technology than ever. I thought
Speaker 2: that was only for a little time until we saw
Speaker 2: this whole terrorism thing and they were gone. But no,
Speaker 2: it's still dragging on. And again, this is exactly the
Speaker 2: point I am talking about. Once these things start, they
Speaker 2: just grow in size, and when they run out of
Speaker 2: their first initial targets, they look to something else to target.
Speaker 2: Every time in history, every single time. That's what I'm
Speaker 2: trying to say. It's not specific just to the United States.
Speaker 2: Every single time. I encourage you to go back to
Speaker 2: the last two hundred years and see it's probably occurred
Speaker 2: in eighty countries or more. That it's the commonality. It's
Speaker 2: not the exception. Unbelievable. I'm just saying, be careful what
Speaker 2: comes next? You know, great, it's targeted right now, But
Speaker 2: what comes next after they need new targets or what after? Okay,
Speaker 2: they round up the secondary or whatever it is. Okay, great,
Speaker 2: what's that tertiary target? Because they're going to go for
Speaker 2: another one.
Speaker 1: Yep, that's what it's about, I think. And do you
Speaker 1: remember that. I know I'm gonna have to let you
Speaker 1: go here soon, but do you remember that? Program sist
Speaker 1: in like twenty ten. You're going to remember the name
Speaker 1: of it as soon as I explain it. It was
Speaker 1: this military exercise that spanned for like three states. It
Speaker 1: was like Arizona, New Mexico, and then into Texas where
Speaker 1: they had military on the streets knocking on people's door
Speaker 1: jade helm.
Speaker 2: Is that right, I've heard of that one. Yeah, they
Speaker 2: were all like mock up and they were telling people
Speaker 2: if you see like special ops guys in your neighborhood,
Speaker 2: don't be nervous because they're part of the exercises. Was
Speaker 2: that the same thing?
Speaker 1: That's the one?
Speaker 2: Yeah, well again, you know, if you have a secret
Speaker 2: police force, you can definitely control people to make them
Speaker 2: work in you know, national workforce. You're gonna grow food.
Speaker 2: They're gonna be the enforcers of the imagine if you
Speaker 2: had to guard supermarkets. You get little snitches everywhere, always
Speaker 2: like that. Look at China's a perfect example. Like you
Speaker 2: got your social credit score, and if you decide that
Speaker 2: to go outside that they have other battalions of police that'll,
Speaker 2: you know, take care of these people themselves. But it's
Speaker 2: all about controlling the food. And if we can't produce
Speaker 2: enough food, you're not just still gonna sit at home
Speaker 2: and watch Netflix. You're to be forced to go out
Speaker 2: and produce food for the state. It's just that simple.
Speaker 2: I would encourage anybody to look. You know, history is
Speaker 2: a crystal or your crystal ball is a history book. Basically,
Speaker 2: this happens again and again. When countries can't feed themselves,
Speaker 2: the first thing they do is round up all the
Speaker 2: able bodied people, men, women, young adults and make them
Speaker 2: and push them into the fields. Now, generally it's disorganized
Speaker 2: because most of the people who have that knowledge have disappeared.
Speaker 2: And then you've got a bunch of people who are
Speaker 2: trying a half asset going through and their results really
Speaker 2: aren't the best, or their outcomes their production levels aren't
Speaker 2: really the best. But still it's tried again and again
Speaker 2: and again. When the famines come or when the failures
Speaker 2: and crops come, they round up. And I'm not saying
Speaker 2: round up and put it in the middle of the
Speaker 2: night kind of prison, but I really they just knock
Speaker 2: on everybody's door and like you're coming to the workforce
Speaker 2: with us. There's no other choice. It'll be very much
Speaker 2: like Ukraine. They come around and grab everybody and you're
Speaker 2: going to work to grow food. You're going to get
Speaker 2: the fields. You know, there's a lot of mechanize things now,
Speaker 2: but you're gonna have to be the guy who fills
Speaker 2: the fills the diesel tanks in the combine. You're gonna
Speaker 2: have to be the one that you know, helps change
Speaker 2: the tires. They'll train you to do something, but you're
Speaker 2: gonna be forced into the agricultural production sector, or minerals
Speaker 2: or some sort of mining, that sort of thing. All
Speaker 2: the critical things that are needed for a country to continue,
Speaker 2: you're going to be forced into one of those. You're
Speaker 2: not just gonna sit at home anymore. When things start
Speaker 2: to fail, people are gonna come and request that you
Speaker 2: go help, and if you don't, then that's going to
Speaker 2: be a big problem. Again, that's stuffing more than looking
Speaker 2: at every single failure of nations when they hyperinflate and
Speaker 2: their currency collapses and people can't afford food. They're like,
Speaker 2: we don't need to buy it. We got all these
Speaker 2: able bodies, lazy acid just sitting around. Go make them
Speaker 2: grow food. And that's the way it is. So please
Speaker 2: prepare yourself. That's why I always talk about if you
Speaker 2: grow your own food, then a you're going to be
Speaker 2: the leader of those work crews because you'll have more
Speaker 2: knowledge than almost anybody because very few people grow and
Speaker 2: that you know, not being like yeah, then you can
Speaker 2: be the leader of you know, making everybody else do it.
Speaker 2: But I'm saying if you just know how to garden,
Speaker 2: They're going to look at you as a community leader
Speaker 2: far you know, before any people start to get forced
Speaker 2: into labor for the you know, national workforce or whatever
Speaker 2: it is, the people in your local communities will be
Speaker 2: looking to you for advice, and then there'll be other
Speaker 2: people who grow food too. Then then, you know, then
Speaker 2: you become the community leaders of how to produce food,
Speaker 2: and that is such a valuable skill like old Blacksmith's
Speaker 2: people who still know how to do that. People know
Speaker 2: how to save seed people and how to can or
Speaker 2: process foods to make it storable for longer periods of time,
Speaker 2: like that's old grandma stuff. Very few people know how
Speaker 2: to do that today comparatively to what it was in
Speaker 2: nineteen forties, when I mean almost one hundred percent of
Speaker 2: the population. You how to do that? Like those kind
Speaker 2: of trips, trips or tips and tricks that should be
Speaker 2: part of your lifetile. Well, anyway, if there is a
Speaker 2: workforce that's required that you have to go to work,
Speaker 2: they're going to want to know what your skill sets are.
Speaker 2: And you're like, well, I have a farm, we got
Speaker 2: an acre garden, and you know, we do all this,
Speaker 2: and they're gonna be all right. You're right over here.
Speaker 2: You're in charge of all those people there. Now, go
Speaker 2: get to work, you get your tools, get them or whatever.
Speaker 2: I mean, what do you think comparatively it is to
Speaker 2: nineteen forty or nineteen forty five, how many people really
Speaker 2: know how to can store, dry, save seeds, fixed tools,
Speaker 2: do all this stuff right now? Percentage wise, I would
Speaker 2: say it was almost one hundred percent in nineteen forty
Speaker 2: or nineteen forty five. Today less than one percent. Probably.
Speaker 1: I think it's a little bit more than one percent,
Speaker 1: because some of these things are really starting to come
Speaker 1: back from what I'm seeing, but not much more than
Speaker 1: one percent, maybe two to three.
Speaker 2: Percent, two to three ninety seven other people that don't
Speaker 2: know how to do a single thing. Now just be
Speaker 2: the government. Now, do you think you could take ninety
Speaker 2: seven people and train them or would you put like
Speaker 2: three people that knew how to do it and say
Speaker 2: you're in charge of this work crew here, or would you,
Speaker 2: as the government itself, take the time to retrain ninety
Speaker 2: seven people, or would you have just other people like
Speaker 2: we do with teachers, teach somebody else how to do it.
Speaker 2: I think the latter myself they're not going to spend
Speaker 2: the time to retrain a bunch of people. It's like
Speaker 2: they're going to put people in charge of retraining and
Speaker 2: training and having these crews work out. And that's the
Speaker 2: way it's going to move. And if you think you're
Speaker 2: going to own something during that time, see that's where
Speaker 2: that comes from, is you will own nothing. So this
Speaker 2: whole shift in society, if you haven't seen, silver went
Speaker 2: up to one hundred and seventeen dollars in an afternoon. Subsequently,
Speaker 2: the CME came in and just smacked the comac smash
Speaker 2: that price back down by putting out like five times
Speaker 2: the world's silver production this afternoon in short contracts. But
Speaker 2: that didn't work very long because it's already bouncing back up.
Speaker 2: Like we're coming into a hyperinflationary phase right now. Once
Speaker 2: hyper inflation comes in and people can't afford to purchase food,
Speaker 2: this is at the point when they're going to put
Speaker 2: out they're going to put work programs in play. Here.
Speaker 2: Government can't feed everybody. You understand that what feeds everybody
Speaker 2: is free commerce and the ability for your company to
Speaker 2: make a profit, to actually move those trucks and those
Speaker 2: factories and all these things in play to make food
Speaker 2: that you can eat. Nobody does it for free. If
Speaker 2: it gets so expensive and nobody's buying it, then those
Speaker 2: companies aren't going to do it for free anymore. Hence,
Speaker 2: you're going to be required to take up that slack
Speaker 2: at least in the product means of production that companies
Speaker 2: used to pay for. But since they'll no longer pay
Speaker 2: for it, because the medium of exchange will have broken
Speaker 2: and fragmented, you will be that medium of a change
Speaker 2: for a minute. You're gonna be the ones that are
Speaker 2: going to be required to do that means of production.
Speaker 2: And again it's very communist style talk, isn't it. Well,
Speaker 2: that's exactly what is going to be tried. Again. It
Speaker 2: hasn't really worked through history, but they always try it.
Speaker 2: They're always trying the same old failed playbook because it
Speaker 2: works in the beginning. It gives people hope. We're gonna
Speaker 2: put together a national workforce. We're all gonna get you're
Speaker 2: gonna get retrained, we're all gonna do all the farming.
Speaker 2: Everybody will eat next year, just one more year, one
Speaker 2: more season, rider, just one more a month in the
Speaker 2: gross season in the summer, and we guarantee your family'll
Speaker 2: get food. Just hold on, man, just hold on. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: they're preparing for another whole month for continuity, taking all
Speaker 2: the resources and squirreling them underground. It's all about distraction.
Speaker 2: And I think we truly are at sort of an
Speaker 2: end end era here. Not the end of the world,
Speaker 2: just the end of the way the world currently runs
Speaker 2: and works. It's got to be a reset. It can't
Speaker 2: go any further. It just can't. I mean, you look
Speaker 2: at everything, the way the debt system structure. There's no
Speaker 2: more debt to issue. There's no way we're paying anything
Speaker 2: back on forty trillion dollars. Nah, there's nobody.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I saw today that only forty percent of the bond
Speaker 2: issues was bought up. The other sixty percent had to
Speaker 2: be bought back by ourselves. Forty percent, that's all the
Speaker 2: world would take from American bond sales. Treasury bonds. Now
Speaker 2: everybody wants super short duration because they know that the
Speaker 2: American dollars deflating so quickly that nobody wants like a
Speaker 2: ten year, thirty year bond anymore. They all want like
Speaker 2: one month t bills or something like. The whole way
Speaker 2: that economy even functions on how we sell debt. We
Speaker 2: have to instantly pay it back in one month, six
Speaker 2: months or less than a year, or else nobody wants
Speaker 2: to buy it. So the buyers are coming in on
Speaker 2: super short term debt. Anything long. We're buying it back ourselves,
Speaker 2: because nobody in the right mind is going to buy
Speaker 2: a thirty year treasury note? Are you kidding me? Oh yeah,
Speaker 2: I'll pay you back in thirty years and I'll give
Speaker 2: you a four percent on that. And you're like, wait,
Speaker 2: you guys are running it like what percent per year?
Speaker 2: Can you imagine trying to buy some sort of debt
Speaker 2: issuance out of Argentina or out of Venezuela. They're running
Speaker 2: six hundred percent inflation in Venezuela, and what are you
Speaker 2: going to give me a four percent return on a
Speaker 2: thirty year note out of Venezuela. That's exactly what they're
Speaker 2: seeing starting to happen here. So we had to buy
Speaker 2: our own debt back, and everybody else out wants short
Speaker 2: term stuff because they know they can roll it next
Speaker 2: month and get some money back. It's not going to
Speaker 2: inflate that quickly that I can still get my percentage
Speaker 2: back within a month or two six months or whatever.
Speaker 2: And that's that's the way it's gravitating. And that system
Speaker 2: is completely broken. So the only way to bring a
Speaker 2: new system in is bring a new system in. And
Speaker 2: we're seeing it evolve in front of you. If you
Speaker 2: haven't heard about cryptocurrency yet, that is part of the
Speaker 2: new system. Oh you see golden silver running, All the
Speaker 2: metals are running, all the hard commodities are running. That's
Speaker 2: what I'm saying. Food is going to start to follow
Speaker 2: the metals in terms of pricing. Everything hard and physical
Speaker 2: is going to skyrocket in price, and everything is going
Speaker 2: to be based off that production for the new base
Speaker 2: of the money supply, in addition to the precious metals,
Speaker 2: in addition to the cryptocurrencies and things. Everything's going to happen.
Speaker 2: Why do they keep talking about tokenization. Tokenization is just
Speaker 2: simply looking at this and go, all right, I was
Speaker 2: out measuring because we're putting up some new shelves. This
Speaker 2: has a value on it, and I can somebody will
Speaker 2: take a contract that says this is worth twenty bucks,
Speaker 2: and this is as signed of value, and now there's
Speaker 2: a contract written against it that says this is where
Speaker 2: twenty and it's swappable and they're going to tokenize everything.
Speaker 2: But that contract for twenty dollars can now have debt
Speaker 2: issued against it. This is going to be the restart
Speaker 2: of the new money system. It's going to have to
Speaker 2: have a hard current. He's gonna have something physical asset
Speaker 2: behind it. We are absolutely in a reset becauseal system
Speaker 2: won't work. And this piece of candy here, this sorghum
Speaker 2: and black and brown sugar treat with the almonds in it,
Speaker 2: how much would you pay for that if you're starving?
Speaker 2: Just a question. We're in the set. We're in the
Speaker 2: midst of the reset. So coming back to the very
Speaker 2: first part here to kind of wind up, you're asking
Speaker 2: incrementalism through twenty thirty. Yes and no. I mean they're
Speaker 2: going to drag us through this thing and they're going
Speaker 2: to reset there. We're in the process of resetting the
Speaker 2: money supply right now. It's just you're not knowing it
Speaker 2: while it's happening through the distractions. But the base of
Speaker 2: everything is going to be set on a new physical
Speaker 2: product at the end of it, So you won't be
Speaker 2: able to issue new debt unless you have a physical
Speaker 2: product to issue against. Five million tons of iron ore
Speaker 2: that is worth this much money, but for a country,
Speaker 2: it's worth that much that they can then issue debt
Speaker 2: to another buyer against. There's some from physical behind it,
Speaker 2: not just a promise that will pay you back in
Speaker 2: the future. So the reset is going to be about
Speaker 2: who has the most the hard assets, who has the factories,
Speaker 2: who has the means of production, who has the minds,
Speaker 2: who has the machinery to mine, who can get the
Speaker 2: metals out of the ground. Everything has a price to it,
Speaker 2: and that whole chain of everything is where the new
Speaker 2: value will be derived. Bankers will still be included in this,
Speaker 2: but the way we derive things like opening a restaurant
Speaker 2: and paying workers, that's just not in the picture. In
Speaker 2: the future, hard assets will be and your apartment building
Speaker 2: will be confiscated under some bail in program and that
Speaker 2: will be assigned to value. You won't own it anymore.
Speaker 2: That right will be stripped away from you unless you
Speaker 2: have the papers to prove you've already paid it off
Speaker 2: in full. At that point, that entire building will be
Speaker 2: assessed to value, and that will be written a contract
Speaker 2: against it two million, five million, and that will be
Speaker 2: issued as debt A five million out to somebody who
Speaker 2: will buy it in a different nation. But thing different
Speaker 2: that there's a physical thing behind it. It's not just
Speaker 2: me printing off money from the Federal Reserve, and then
Speaker 2: you know it's something very different. So when you hear
Speaker 2: tokenization assets, these sort of thing tokenized economy, that's what
Speaker 2: it's all based on. We're in the middle of the
Speaker 2: reset right now. Just I don't know whether it's going
Speaker 2: to be a runaway event or whether it's going to
Speaker 2: be How many years is it going to take because
Speaker 2: so far at crypto in twenty seventeen, until this point
Speaker 2: they've kind of brought it into the mainstream. But how
Speaker 2: long before the full turnover into it becomes the new
Speaker 2: banking system, it becomes a new operation of how goods
Speaker 2: and values of assets are traded amongst the planet and
Speaker 2: issues for debt. That is the question. I don't know
Speaker 2: if it's going to be run away or not. That's
Speaker 2: kind of where we get into the incrementalism. But then
Speaker 2: that's a whole that's just a whole different layer than
Speaker 2: food production. So everything we're seeing is resetting at the
Speaker 2: same exact time. That's it. I don't know, happy.
Speaker 1: I definitely agree, it's some very valuable information. I hope
Speaker 1: people were really listening to all that. Yeah, let's wrap
Speaker 1: up your no, you're you're in a kind of a
Speaker 1: time cruncher. Can you let people know where they can
Speaker 1: find you online? Give your two YouTube channels? You got
Speaker 1: two YouTube channels now, and you have a website. Plug
Speaker 1: that for everyone.
Speaker 2: The website and the podcast are connected together, the Civilization
Speaker 2: Cycle podcast, So the name says it all Civilization cycle.
Speaker 2: That's what I talk about through the podcast as these
Speaker 2: seemingly disconnected dots in time that show a larger picture
Speaker 2: if you put them all together, and it's just cycles.
Speaker 2: How did this happen or that happen? And you can
Speaker 2: kind of see some of the same things repeating again
Speaker 2: through history. And since the same people have been in
Speaker 2: control pretty much of the money system for the last say,
Speaker 2: six thousand years, a lot of things are just like
Speaker 2: rinse and repeat of the solutions offered as the problems occur. So,
Speaker 2: I mean, that's pretty much the easiest way to look
Speaker 2: at it. So there's nothing new under the sun. That's
Speaker 2: another thing. There's really nothing new under this It really
Speaker 2: isn't They're just going to rinse and repeat the same.
Speaker 2: So once you start to look at these civilization events
Speaker 2: and problems and you just see how it all works
Speaker 2: and flows together, and that's a Civilizationcycle dot com. Civilizationcycle
Speaker 2: dot com got a newsletter there you can pop up.
Speaker 2: We do bullet points on the show notes and that
Speaker 2: sort of thing. Adapt twenty thirty channels where you can
Speaker 2: find most of this video production, which will be I'm
Speaker 2: going to take writers and our interview and throw it
Speaker 2: up on the Adapt twenty thirty channels, so you'll see
Speaker 2: it there too, and both places. So thanks for letting
Speaker 2: me come on. Please join us on Civilization cycle dot
Speaker 2: com and continue the conversation because we all have to
Speaker 2: be in the conversation. Although I hogged the whole time
Speaker 2: here talking tonight, thanks Rider for letting me hog the mic.
Speaker 1: I like it. I like it. I like it would
Speaker 1: let people talk and get everything out that they want
Speaker 1: to say. And I appreciate your time this evening, Dave,
Speaker 1: and I appreciate everyone in the chat. Please be sure
Speaker 1: to hit the thumbs up button out the channel in
Speaker 1: the algorithm, share a subscribe, hit the belt like on
Speaker 1: as well for notifications. The links to all of my
Speaker 1: information will be in the description of this video as well.
Speaker 1: Have Dave's information and we'll see you guys next time.
Speaker 1: Bye bye,