Speaker 1: Talk show on the planet. Do you remember Mike Lindell,
Speaker 1: the My Pillow guy. Mike Lindell had an impressive story
Speaker 1: of being a recovered drug addict who turned his life
Speaker 1: to Christ that I still choose to believe. But Mike
Speaker 1: Lindell pumped three million dollars into building a social media
Speaker 1: platform that was supposed to compete with Twitter, back before
Speaker 1: Elon Musk owned Twitter, when it was still a site
Speaker 1: of censorship and cancelation. He put three million dollars into
Speaker 1: this new social media platform. He collected hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: of names of new sign ups, and on the day
Speaker 1: that it went live, of course, it crashed. The guys
Speaker 1: who charged him three million dollars told me it had
Speaker 1: been hacked by the Chinese, but my sources tell me otherwise.
Speaker 1: Then he went on an election integrity crusade. He had
Speaker 1: a huge election integrity conference where he promised the world
Speaker 1: that he would produce definitive evidence that the twenty twenty
Speaker 1: election was stolen, paid some former intelligence as almost two
Speaker 1: million dollars. But even Steve Bannon, his buddy, criticized Mike
Speaker 1: for not being able to produce the goods. Well, now,
Speaker 1: Mike Lindell, whose Pillow Empire went bankrupt, is running for
Speaker 1: governor of Minnesota, an office that quite candidly, I think
Speaker 1: he is the one Republican who probably cannot win based
Speaker 1: on polling. But what I find interesting is that his
Speaker 1: position on immigration, when he announced his candidacy in December
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty five, said he favored strict enforcement, focusing
Speaker 1: on opposing sanctuary policies, supported border security and ICE cooperation
Speaker 1: to remove criminal illegals. He would protect resources for citizens,
Speaker 1: he said, legal residents. If you're here illegally, he said,
Speaker 1: now is the time to leave or you will be
Speaker 1: sent back. Then President Trump endorsed him about a week ago.
Speaker 1: Now suddenly Mike Lindell has a new position. Now he's
Speaker 1: saying that he favors a one time six month registration window,
Speaker 1: a moratorium for any non criminal illegal to stay in Minnesota,
Speaker 1: conditioning on expiring work of easus. You have to be
Speaker 1: fingerprinted and background checked. This is a political flip flop
Speaker 1: I would never have expected from Mike Lindell. But then,
Speaker 1: Mike Lindell has disappointed me before. When we learned that
Speaker 1: Steve Bannon was the subject of nineteen hundred emails exchanged
Speaker 1: with Jeffrey Epstein, who had been working closely with Epstein
Speaker 1: to rehabilitate his public image. Well, Mike Lindell continued to
Speaker 1: associate with Bannon, so I guess I should not be
Speaker 1: surprised anyway. The House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan has now
Speaker 1: referred Special Counsel Jack Smith. Jack Smith is the special
Speaker 1: counsel who ran the raid on mar Lago and essentially
Speaker 1: was the key man in the tsunami of law Fair,
Speaker 1: in which they tried to destroy Donald Trump. They tried
Speaker 1: to break him financially, they tried to keep him off
Speaker 1: the ballot, they tried to put him in jail. But
Speaker 1: now Smith himself has been referred to the Justice Department
Speaker 1: for criminal prosecution. I used to think that the Russian
Speaker 1: collusion hoax was the greatest single dirty trick in American history,
Speaker 1: the greatest single abuse of power in which the full
Speaker 1: authority of the United States government was utilized for strictly
Speaker 1: political purposes, utilizing, in this case, two pieces of totally
Speaker 1: fabricated evidence, the so called Steele dossier. That was a
Speaker 1: report which falsely alleged that Donald Trump, while in Moscow
Speaker 1: as a private businessman that tallied with Russian prostitutes, it
Speaker 1: was paid for by Hillary Clinton and was a complete fraud.
Speaker 1: And also the still false claim that the Democrat National
Speaker 1: Committee was hacked by Russian intelligence and that those emails
Speaker 1: were spirited over to Wiki leagues was the underlying claim
Speaker 1: of the charges against me. There's no proof of that whatsoever.
Speaker 1: In fact, I wanted to introduce expert testimony and forensic
Speaker 1: evidence which would approved definitively that the Democrat National Committee
Speaker 1: was never hacked by the Russians or anyone else for
Speaker 1: that matter. In any event, we now have evidence that,
Speaker 1: in a letter that Chairman Jim Jordan wrote to the
Speaker 1: Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, that Smith made knowingly false
Speaker 1: statements under oath before Congress. In his December twenty twenty
Speaker 1: five Congressional des positions, Smith was grilled about the Biden
Speaker 1: era Arctic Frost operation that unconstitutionally subpoened the phone records
Speaker 1: from more than a dozen Republican members of Congress, complete
Speaker 1: with gag orders so that the targets wouldn't even know
Speaker 1: that the Deep State was watching them. When asked whether
Speaker 1: he or members of his prosecution team ever accessed the
Speaker 1: content of those privileged text messages. Smith claimed they had not,
Speaker 1: but the new DOJ documents proved that claim is false.
Speaker 1: This wasn't a paperwork era. This was a calculated effort
Speaker 1: by a Biden appointed special council to spy on elected
Speaker 1: Republicans and associates to the President, including yours truly, to
Speaker 1: then stonewall Congress, and to cover his tracks. Now they
Speaker 1: charged me with making false statements to Congress. But although
Speaker 1: I did make misstatements, none of them were material. In
Speaker 1: other words, I had no motive to lie. I made errors,
Speaker 1: but there was no Russian illusion to lie about. There
Speaker 1: was nothing to cover up. That was definitively proved when
Speaker 1: a federal judge ordered that Robert Muller's final report, long
Speaker 1: redacted maiden from my lawyers during trial by the judge
Speaker 1: and the American public, but released on November third of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, proved definitively that they had found no evidence
Speaker 1: of Russian collusion, Wiki League's collaboration, or any other crime
Speaker 1: on my part. Any misstatement I made was inadvertent and immaterial.
Speaker 1: Not so in the case of Smith. Smith's team just
Speaker 1: didn't just dig into January sixth, the infamous fed surrection
Speaker 1: on January sixth served as a dastardly honeypot to ensnare
Speaker 1: Trump supporting election integrity activist. Then they went after the
Speaker 1: private communications of the people's elected representatives. That is, by
Speaker 1: the way, the very definition of lawfare, using the justice
Speaker 1: system as a political weapon against the opposition. These details
Speaker 1: prove that the weaponization of the DOJ under Biden was
Speaker 1: an assault on the constitution itself. When a prosecutor lies
Speaker 1: under oath to Congress about spying on lawmakers, isn't just
Speaker 1: committing perjury. He's undermining the separation of powers, the very
Speaker 1: foundation of self government. In other words, one branch of
Speaker 1: government should not be allowed to spy on another branch,
Speaker 1: particularly the elected branch of government. In any other era,
Speaker 1: targeting the political opposition with secret surveillance and then lying
Speaker 1: about it under oath would be treated as a betrayal
Speaker 1: of the highest order. So I believe the appropriate charge
Speaker 1: here is treason and that Jack Smith has abused his
Speaker 1: authority and what was now I think the greatest single
Speaker 1: abuse of power in American history. Will anybody be held accountable? Well,
Speaker 1: that remains to be seen. Jim Jordan sends a lot
Speaker 1: of letters. The Republicans are very good at sending hot letters.
Speaker 1: I remember FBI agents stormed my home at six o'clock
Speaker 1: in the morning to arrest me for the first time
Speaker 1: nonviolent crime, allegedly lying to Congress. The late Lindsay Graham
Speaker 1: got huge headlines by firing off a letter to the
Speaker 1: FBI director demanding to know who had approved this rate
Speaker 1: on my home. The FBI never answered the letter, but
Speaker 1: the late Senator Graham got his headline. Republicans seemed to
Speaker 1: be very good at launching letters, strongly worded letters. They
Speaker 1: don't seem to be too good at keeping people holding
Speaker 1: people responsible. Meanwhile, the Democrats already eyeing the twenty twenty
Speaker 1: eight presidential field, and the early numbers are not good
Speaker 1: for the chances of ending MAGA and retaking the country.
Speaker 1: At brand newpole from the University of New Hampshire shows
Speaker 1: that radical New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortes, better known
Speaker 1: as AOC, is actually leading the Democrat primary with twenty
Speaker 1: two percent, with former Transportation Secretary Pete Boudajez behind her
Speaker 1: say that lightly at twenty one. Meanwhile, former Vice President
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris comes in at a pathetic five percent. When
Speaker 1: you consider that she spent literally billions of dollars running
Speaker 1: for president in the last cycle, that's really extraordinary. Party's
Speaker 1: two top prospects seem to be AOC, the self described
Speaker 1: democratic socialist who once declared capitalism irredeemable, compared Ice attention
Speaker 1: centers to concentration camps and said America is governed by fascists.
Speaker 1: And Pete Boudajez, the LGBT star, wars to claims racism
Speaker 1: is physically built into some of our highways. He said
Speaker 1: that is Transportation secretariyly floated gender equity crash test dummies,
Speaker 1: and on national television refused to draw a clear line
Speaker 1: against late term abortions that I think you could call infanticide.
Speaker 1: These are not mainstream leaders. This is the far left
Speaker 1: dream ticket, which will alienate swing voters. I think in
Speaker 1: crucial battleground states who still believe in borders, energy, independence,
Speaker 1: and plain old common sense. While Democrats chase these socialist
Speaker 1: fantasies and take identity politics to extremes. I think Republicans
Speaker 1: are consolidating around serious contenders like Vice President J. D. Vance,
Speaker 1: who leads the Republican side in that same New Hampshire
Speaker 1: poll with thirty six percent of the vote, and Secretary
Speaker 1: of State Marco Rubio who runs strong at twenty eight
Speaker 1: after years of open borders, inflation and cultural chaos, it
Speaker 1: is a time for the American people to show they
Speaker 1: have no tolerance for the radical left and their toxic, unpopular,
Speaker 1: self destructive policies. If AOC and Buddhajes are the best
Speaker 1: the Democrats can offer in twenty twenty eight, I would
Speaker 1: say their prospects look bleak and dealed. But the old
Speaker 1: Democratic Party, the Democratic Party of John F. Kennedy, Democratic
Speaker 1: Party of Harry Truman, the party that believed in capitalism,
Speaker 1: free enterprise, a strong national defense, an anti communist Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: a party that believes in God. That party literally no
Speaker 1: longer exists, and the takeover of the Democrat Party by
Speaker 1: the radical socialists is complete. This is the other point
Speaker 1: I guess here is the AOC may op not to
Speaker 1: run for presidents. You may run for the United States
Speaker 1: Senate in the Empire State, in which case, well, I
Speaker 1: think Chuck Schumer would be toast in the Democrat primary.
Speaker 1: I'm Roger Stoner to listen to the stone Zone. We'll
Speaker 1: be right back with more on the other side us.
Speaker 1: Welcome back into the Stone Jone. You know, everyone who
Speaker 1: is my age knows exactly where they were and what
Speaker 1: they were doing when they heard that President John F.
Speaker 1: Kennedy had been shot and killed in the streets of
Speaker 1: Dallas on November twenty two, nineteen sixty three. I would
Speaker 1: go on to write a New York Times best selling
Speaker 1: book about it. Right now, I'm working on a book
Speaker 1: about the attempted assassination on President Reagan, because well, if
Speaker 1: you file a freedom of information request with the federal government,
Speaker 1: everything you get back is completely and totally redacted, telling
Speaker 1: you nothing whatsoever about John Hinckley Junior and the attempted
Speaker 1: assassination on Ronald Reagan. I've learned much about that, and
Speaker 1: I'm going to release the book shortly. The United States
Speaker 1: Secret Service is warning that the threat environment surrounding President
Speaker 1: Trump and other protected officials is the worst that the
Speaker 1: agency has ever experienced. Officials say that roughly ten thousand
Speaker 1: threat cases have already been logged into twenty six That's
Speaker 1: a forty percent increase from the same period last year.
Speaker 1: This is why I have added the Safety of President
Speaker 1: Donald Trump to my Rosary every night. There have been
Speaker 1: not one, not two, but I count actually four attempts
Speaker 1: on the President's life. I'm still not satisfied with the
Speaker 1: official explanation that Thomas Matthew Crooks acted alone in Butler, Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: But I do recall that same feeling in the pit
Speaker 1: of my stomach that I felt when Kennedy was shot.
Speaker 1: When they tried to kill Reagan, and they attempted to
Speaker 1: kill Donald Trump. There have now been multiple violent episodes
Speaker 1: that protected sites instigators have also acknowledged many serious security failures.
Speaker 1: During the Butler, Pennsylvania rally, one attendee, Corey Compentory, a firefighter,
Speaker 1: was killed. Others were wounded. What really aggravates me when
Speaker 1: I go online is when some people say, well, this
Speaker 1: was all staged, staged by Trump, or some people say
Speaker 1: staged by Roger Stone. That's particularly offensive. A man was killed,
Speaker 1: that is indisputable. How it is that the state, local,
Speaker 1: and federal law enforcement were all on different radio frequencies
Speaker 1: and could not communicate with each other. How they missed
Speaker 1: more than one hundred individual reports of a man on
Speaker 1: the roof of the rifle and a range fighter is
Speaker 1: a little hard to understand also their failure to conduct
Speaker 1: a drone surveillance. The local police actually offered to do
Speaker 1: it for the Secret Service. Secret Service declined, but then
Speaker 1: the Secret Service couldn't figure out how to get the
Speaker 1: drone technology that they had licensed to work. There was
Speaker 1: actually a Secret Service agent on the eight hundred number
Speaker 1: with the manufacturer of the drone technology trying to figure
Speaker 1: out how to get it to work. I think America
Speaker 1: has to confront this political climate that helped produce this danger.
Speaker 1: For years a Trump derangement. Media culture has portrayed one
Speaker 1: man and tens of millions of his supporters like me,
Speaker 1: as fascists or extremists, white supremacists, or existential threats to democracy.
Speaker 1: When public figures relentlessly demonizes in this kind of apocalyptic language,
Speaker 1: unstable people can interpret political hatred as a license for violence.
Speaker 1: This doesn't excuse any attacker in my view. Responsibility, of
Speaker 1: course belongs to the criminal, but responsible journalism requires recognizing
Speaker 1: that messaging shapes the national atmosphere. The pressuould stop treating
Speaker 1: inflammatory rhetoric as if it was harmless when it targets
Speaker 1: President Trump, Republicans, or or anyone in our political society.
Speaker 1: Political disagreement is legitimate, but dehumanizing is not. The Secret
Speaker 1: Service must receive the power, technology, counter drone authority, and
Speaker 1: institutional reforms needed to prect our national leaders, regardless of party,
Speaker 1: and that includes building the secure White House Ballroom. It's
Speaker 1: not incidental that there have now been two attempts on
Speaker 1: presidents at the Hilton Hotel in Washington, d C. Fake news.
Speaker 1: I'm afraid beyond redemption, they must be disposed of completely
Speaker 1: in terms of their monolithic ability to set the stage
Speaker 1: for the national dialogue. But in the meantime, the threats
Speaker 1: against our president are really real. There are at a record,
Speaker 1: and therefore I urge you to join me in praying
Speaker 1: for our president, our vice president, all of our leaders,
Speaker 1: regardless of party. I'm Roger Stone. You're listening to the
Speaker 1: Stone Zone. Don't go away, because we'll have more hot
Speaker 1: politics on the other side. You are diving headfirst right
Speaker 1: back into the Stone Zone, the hottest political talk show
Speaker 1: on the planet today. The US House of Representatives has
Speaker 1: narrowly passed a one point one five trillion dollar defense
Speaker 1: policy bill, but they attached the Save America Act to
Speaker 1: a package that funds the military, nuclear security and a
Speaker 1: three point six percent pay raise for our military. They
Speaker 1: attached the Save Act. That is the simple provision that
Speaker 1: requires it one be a citizen of the United States
Speaker 1: and have a photo ID before you're allowed to vote
Speaker 1: in a federal election. Polls show that some eighty seven
Speaker 1: percent of the American people support this simple provision, which
Speaker 1: has now passed the House attached to the Defense appropriations,
Speaker 1: but is yet to pass the Senate. The final vote
Speaker 1: in the House was two sixteen to two twelve, and
Speaker 1: from a common sense perspective, there's a lot there to support.
Speaker 1: America must rebuild our military readiness, to invest in modern weapons,
Speaker 1: and ensure that our troops are properly compensated. The bill
Speaker 1: also includes a welcome provision that actually imposes a modest
Speaker 1: funding penalty if the Pentagon again fails in all after
Speaker 1: eight consecutive failed audits. Tax Payers deserve accountability and the
Speaker 1: military industrial complex must not be given a free pass
Speaker 1: when it comes to our tax dollars. The Save America
Speaker 1: Act is finally addresses the concern that only American citizens,
Speaker 1: as I say, should vote in US elections, requiring proof
Speaker 1: of citizenship and fail identifications. Just common sense provided lawmakers
Speaker 1: established practical procedures for citizens who lack passports or easy
Speaker 1: access to birth records. The idea that this is somehow
Speaker 1: racist just kind of defies common sense. Now, the responsibility
Speaker 1: ultimately relies on the US Senate. The Senate should preserve
Speaker 1: the strongest part of this important military bill. I mean
Speaker 1: the military readiness, the troop pay increase, but also the
Speaker 1: election integrity portions of it as well. If Senate removes
Speaker 1: the Safe America Act provisions from the Defense bill while
Speaker 1: rubber stamping massive spending, that will be a trail of
Speaker 1: the president and its principles, and it could be a
Speaker 1: disaster for Republican chances in these upcoming midterm elections. Strong
Speaker 1: defense and secure elections are both essential. I think these
Speaker 1: issues go hand in hand. The Senate can't drop the
Speaker 1: ball on this or the consequences could very well be dire.
Speaker 1: But we're held up by something called the filibuster rule
Speaker 1: that means that in the Senate you don't need fifty
Speaker 1: one votes to pass a piece of legislation. I think
Speaker 1: there are fifty votes today for the Save America Act,
Speaker 1: and Vice President J. D Vance could then cast a
Speaker 1: tie breaking vote and it would become law. But under
Speaker 1: the filibuster rule, and this is important, this is not
Speaker 1: a law. This is a Senate rule, essentially a custom
Speaker 1: or a tradition. It requires sixty votes to bring the
Speaker 1: Save America Act to the floor. Now. Sadly, the Senate
Speaker 1: Majority Leader John Thune of Nebraska steadfastly refused to break
Speaker 1: the filibsto rule and bring this to a floor, which
Speaker 1: I think could cost the Republicans extraordinarily this November. It's
Speaker 1: time to pass the Save America Act and stop the politics. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: the Trump administration is reaching a historic achievement in terms
Speaker 1: of defending public safety. The homicide rate across all major
Speaker 1: US cities actually found eighteen percent in the first after
Speaker 1: twenty twenty six and maybe heading towards a historic low.
Speaker 1: A new Council on Criminal Justice report examined thirteen criminal
Speaker 1: categories in thirty sixties. Nine declined homicides were down in
Speaker 1: most cities studied, while carjacking dropped an extraordinary forty seven percent.
Speaker 1: Comparing that with the first half of twenty nineteen, homicides
Speaker 1: were actually down thirty one percent. The results are irrefutable,
Speaker 1: and they're a political triumph for President Trump's law and
Speaker 1: order agenda. His administration has actually restored the basic principle
Speaker 1: that the government's first duty is to protect innocent citizens,
Speaker 1: not making excuses for criminals, not undermining the police, not
Speaker 1: allowing chaos to become normal. After years of fire left prosecutors,
Speaker 1: anti police rhetoric, open border disorders, and soft on crime insanity,
Speaker 1: America seems to be moving back towards the rule of
Speaker 1: law as the public is sick of coddling criminals. Federal
Speaker 1: support for law enforcement, aggressive action against violent gangs, stronger
Speaker 1: border security, and renewed respect for police all send the
Speaker 1: unmistekable message at criminals, not law abiding families should fear
Speaker 1: the justice system. I think our leaders must continue supporting
Speaker 1: officers but prosecuting repe defenders, securing the border, and rejecting
Speaker 1: radical policies that put the far left ideology above public safety.
Speaker 1: The direction of America's moving is clear. Trump administrations fulfilling
Speaker 1: its promise and lafe American families to once again live
Speaker 1: in peace. While we're at it, we should bring back
Speaker 1: cash bail. Cash list bail, as is done in New
Speaker 1: York State is a umongous mistake. Meanwhile, Trump accounts a
Speaker 1: new federal investment program for children, which officially launched on
Speaker 1: July fourth, has already drawn significant participation. The Secretary of
Speaker 1: the Treasury, Scott Bessen, announced that more than seven million
Speaker 1: accounts have been opened for children under eighteen, with roughly
Speaker 1: one point five billion dollar invested so far. So about
Speaker 1: one point seven million children qualify for the program's one
Speaker 1: time one thousand dollars federal contribution. In other words, seed
Speaker 1: money put in by the government under Donald Trump will
Speaker 1: be available for children born between January first, twenty twenty
Speaker 1: five and December thirty first, twenty twenty eight. The accounts
Speaker 1: function like traditional iras. Intments grow tax deferred with withdraws
Speaker 1: generally cannot begin until the channel turns eighteen. Parents, guardians, relatives, employers, governments,
Speaker 1: and qualified nonprofits may also contribute, although contribution limits and
Speaker 1: tax treatment may vary. Families, friends, Employer contributions generally cannot
Speaker 1: exceed five thousand dollars annually per account. Employer contributions are
Speaker 1: captured twenty five hundred per employee. Government and nonprofit contributions
Speaker 1: don't count towards the limit. Funds are invested in low
Speaker 1: costs diversified American stock market funds. The default option tracks
Speaker 1: the S and P five hundred, with additional index fund
Speaker 1: choices expected at age eighteen. The accounts converted to traditional iras.
Speaker 1: Early withdrawals may face taxes and penalties, though except exceptions
Speaker 1: exist for higher education, buying a first home, adoption, medical emergencies,
Speaker 1: and certain other medical costs. Trump accounts are giving children
Speaker 1: a valuable financial head start, particularly when families and employers
Speaker 1: contribute consistently. Now is the time for young families, I think,
Speaker 1: to take advantage of this revolutionary plan that will build
Speaker 1: wealth for the next generation and the culture of dependency
Speaker 1: that fuels the continuous growth of big government. This is
Speaker 1: a perfect example of the creativity of the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: It will be in Trump's legacy the way so security
Speaker 1: is in the legacy of Franklin, Delano or Roosevelt. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: a major FDA fight is going over experimental peptide treatments,
Speaker 1: is showing how the fibureaucracy is striking back against Health
Speaker 1: and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy's Make America Healthy
Speaker 1: against agenda. An FDA advisory committee is reviewing whether specialized
Speaker 1: pharmacies should again be allowed to produce seven pepside injections
Speaker 1: that were banned three years ago over safety concerns. Ceptuary
Speaker 1: Kennedy has argued that the restrictions pushed patients into a
Speaker 1: dangerous gray market that regulated compounding with proper safeguards could
Speaker 1: offer a safety path and greater healing and health. Agency
Speaker 1: scientists suppose broader access, saying that peptides lacks sufficient human
Speaker 1: data on safety and effectiveness. No final decision has currently
Speaker 1: been made. I can tell you firsthand the black market
Speaker 1: in peptides is extraordinary. I know because my inbox is
Speaker 1: constantly bombarded with clinics seeking to sell me peptides that
Speaker 1: I cannot get legally. I know people who have used
Speaker 1: peptides in their healing process. I have not chosen to
Speaker 1: do so, but that black market very much exists the contrary.
Speaker 1: The controversy here exposes a deeper battle over who controls
Speaker 1: American medicine. Secretary Kennedy's promised to challenge an FDA culture
Speaker 1: long criticized for favoring entrenched pharmaceutical interests big Pharma, limiting
Speaker 1: pats and choice, and treating innovation outside the traditional approval
Speaker 1: system as a threat. Unelected, faceless bureaucrats are clinging to
Speaker 1: what's left of their closed system that protects corporate gatekeepers
Speaker 1: to the detriment of patients. The sensible path is neither
Speaker 1: reckless free for all nor automatic deference to the bureocracy.
Speaker 1: It's a transparent science, strict disclosures, adverse event reporting, and
Speaker 1: carefully controlled access. People should be allowed to choose. The
Speaker 1: FDA should not make the best, unbiased information available to
Speaker 1: the masses. They should not be restricting treatments to protect
Speaker 1: big Farmer's bloated profit margins. Kennedy must continue to push
Speaker 1: back against the FIA because their decisions jeopardize health freedom.
Speaker 1: My wife is a cancer survivor. In all honesty, I
Speaker 1: doubt that she would now be five years cancer free
Speaker 1: without alternative treatments for cancer. President Donald Trump and the
Speaker 1: Right to Try Act has been a pioneer in this
Speaker 1: entire area, and I think more and freer access to
Speaker 1: alternative medicine should be allowed. Meanwhile, New Jersey's non citizen
Speaker 1: voter registration scandals growing more serious as a software company
Speaker 1: blamed by the governor disputes the state's account. Governor Mikey
Speaker 1: Chryl says that a vendor error caused more than sixty
Speaker 1: six hundred people who identify themselves as non citizens to
Speaker 1: be placed on voter rolls between June of twenty twenty
Speaker 1: three and June of twenty twenty four. Fewer than four
Speaker 1: hundred of them supposedly cast ballots, but vendor id ME
Speaker 1: says its role was merely to transmit motor vehicle commission
Speaker 1: data to the state Division of Elections, which remains responsible
Speaker 1: for reviewing eligibility and approving registration. That disagreement raises an
Speaker 1: obvious question who's actually checking the voter rolls. State now
Speaker 1: says it will remove the registrations, replace the software, and
Speaker 1: conduct an independent investigation, but federal officials have also demanded
Speaker 1: detailed records, While the Department of Homeland Security says that
Speaker 1: a broader review identified thousands of additional registrations potentially matching
Speaker 1: FED non citizen records. Those larger figures remain under investigation
Speaker 1: and should be verified carefully, but the central fact is
Speaker 1: already alarming. People answered that they are not citizens still
Speaker 1: entered the voter registration system, and some of them evidently
Speaker 1: apparently voted. Election integrity cannot depend on bureaucrats, vendors, and
Speaker 1: agencies blaming one another. After illegal ballots or can states
Speaker 1: need documentation of the proof of citizenship. I think reliable
Speaker 1: database checks, transparent audits, and clear accountability. Every American should
Speaker 1: want lawful voters protected and unlawful registrations prevented. That's not
Speaker 1: motor suppression, it's basic self government. New Jersey's failures strengthens
Speaker 1: the case for the Save America Act and nationwide safeguards
Speaker 1: ensuring that only American citizens choose American leaders. Last weekend
Speaker 1: I had Chris Jersky from the People's Audit in the
Speaker 1: Stone Zone, and he made a very good case, which is,
Speaker 1: the databases of those who are deceased are readily available
Speaker 1: in all fifty states. Merely checking them against the voter
Speaker 1: roles would determine for you who was no longer with us.
Speaker 1: There was one simple way to keep the voter rolls clean.
Speaker 1: Compare the list of those who have passed away who
Speaker 1: are deceased against those who are registered to vote. Seems
Speaker 1: like common sense to me. But until we have cleaner
Speaker 1: voter rolls, then you have the opening for phone email
Speaker 1: in ballots and other abuses. Anyway, I'm Roger Stone. You're
Speaker 1: listening to the Stone Zone, don't guiet, because we'll be
Speaker 1: right back again to the stone zone. Chicago's political leadership,
Speaker 1: led by the far left socialist mayor of Brandon Johnson,
Speaker 1: is moving towards a dangerous new confrontation with federal immigration law. Now,
Speaker 1: Mayor Brandon Johnson's IQ was one point lower. I think
Speaker 1: you'd have to water him like a plant. Last time
Speaker 1: I looked, he had an approval rating at six percent.
Speaker 1: But the Chicago City Council has now approved a November
Speaker 1: referendum asking Chicago whether they should see compensation from Washington
Speaker 1: for the supposed economic harm caused by last year's federal
Speaker 1: immigration crackdown. Johnson has also spoken of providing reparations to
Speaker 1: residents affected by ICE enforcement, effectively subsidizing criminal activity. That
Speaker 1: policy would turn the rule of law upside down. Operation
Speaker 1: Midway Blitz reportedly resulted more than eight hundred arrests, including
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants serious criminal histories. But instead of supporting federal
Speaker 1: officers tasked with enforcing laws passed by Congress, Chicago officials
Speaker 1: want taxpayers to compensate those who violated the law. The
Speaker 1: national implications are enormous if century cities can demand payment
Speaker 1: whenever federal authorities arrest of legal immigrants, every law enforcement
Speaker 1: operation becomes a potential financial liability. Local politicians would gain
Speaker 1: a powerful incentive to obstruct Washington, encourage non compliance, and
Speaker 1: portray routine law enforcement as actionable injury. That's not an
Speaker 1: insurrection against the constitutions. What that would be. No city
Speaker 1: has the right to create its own immigration system, shield
Speaker 1: people from federal law, and then try to build American
Speaker 1: taxpayers when the government intervenes. Citizenship borders and deportation policy
Speaker 1: are national responsibilities. Congress and the courts must make clear
Speaker 1: that federal immigration law applies equally, whether in Chicago, Texas, Florida,
Speaker 1: or any other jurisdiction. Rewarding resistance to the law would
Speaker 1: invite chaos far beyond immigration. A nation cannot survive when
Speaker 1: obedience to law is optional and criminality comes with a
Speaker 1: government check. Meanwhile, Congress is considering tougher restrictions on lawmakers
Speaker 1: pursuing sexual relationships with Capitol Hill staffers. After another wave
Speaker 1: of misconduct allegations exposed the grotesque moral decay of Washington's
Speaker 1: elite political class. A new House proposal would prohibit represent
Speaker 1: them from having sexual relationships with any Congressional employee unless
Speaker 1: the Ethics Committee determines there is no conflict of interest.
Speaker 1: Existing rules already bar members from dating their own staff
Speaker 1: or committee employees, but the prop no standard would cover
Speaker 1: staff across Congress. This change is absolutely necessary. Even supposedly
Speaker 1: consensual relationship between powerful lawmakers and junior employees carrying obvious
Speaker 1: imbalance of authority. Members of Congress control access. They can
Speaker 1: influence careers, shape reputations, and operate inside a culture notorious
Speaker 1: for protecting insiders. We already know that there is a
Speaker 1: fund from which millions of dollars have been paid out
Speaker 1: against claims of sexual abuse and harassment. But today the
Speaker 1: American people are not furnished with the names of the
Speaker 1: members of Congress or both parties who have transgressed and
Speaker 1: add to have taxpayers cover their tracks. What Washington elites
Speaker 1: describe as private behavior can quickly become coercion, favoritism, retaliation,
Speaker 1: or institutional corruption. Recent scandals involving lawmakers from both parties
Speaker 1: have intensified demands for these stronger rules and meaningful accountability.
Speaker 1: Congress should require another should not require another ruined career,
Speaker 1: shattered family, taxpayer funded settlements that hide the names of
Speaker 1: the guilty or personal tragedy for taking action. American people
Speaker 1: send representatives to Washington to defend the constitution and serve
Speaker 1: their constituency not to treat public offices as a private
Speaker 1: dating pool. Congress should prohibit these relationships, strength and independent investigations,
Speaker 1: disclose conduct settlements, and release the names of those who
Speaker 1: have broken the law, and strip tax mayers funded pensions
Speaker 1: from officials convicted of serious sexual crimes. The political class
Speaker 1: constantly lectures ordinary Americans about morality and workplace conduct. They
Speaker 1: should finally live under the standards at least as strict
Speaker 1: as those they impose on everyone else. Power without repercussions
Speaker 1: for lieu or foul behavior produces career option, and we
Speaker 1: certainly have plenty of that bubbling up inside the Washington swamp. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: the artificial intelligence races struggle with whether America or Communists
Speaker 1: China will control the technological infrastructure of the twenty first century.
Speaker 1: China understands that dominance comes through widespread adoption. Chinese companies
Speaker 1: are releasing powerful open source models that developers, manufacturers, researchers,
Speaker 1: and entrepreneurs can download, modify, and operate independently. America must
Speaker 1: win this fight for open AI. Thanks for joining us today.
Speaker 1: I'm Roger Stone. You've been listening to the Stone Zone
Speaker 1: until tomorrow.
Speaker 2: God bless you and God speaks
Speaker 1: U