WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello everybody, ladies, gentlemen, brothers, sisters, comrades, friends. We're back

2
00:00:04.280 --> 00:00:09.359
<v Speaker 1>again with another very special episode of History Impossible, another conversation,

3
00:00:10.400 --> 00:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>this time with the host, the pseudonymous host. I should

4
00:00:14.199 --> 00:00:17.039
<v Speaker 1>say that's a first for me here, as I say

5
00:00:17.039 --> 00:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in this conversation, but with the pseudonymous host of the

6
00:00:21.079 --> 00:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Crackpot History podcast. This is actually Crackpot Histories, if I

7
00:00:26.440 --> 00:00:29.559
<v Speaker 1>guess I can call him that first interview that he

8
00:00:29.600 --> 00:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>has done since starting his podcast earlier on in twenty

9
00:00:33.520 --> 00:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. We cover a lot of ground. We cover

10
00:00:37.079 --> 00:00:40.799
<v Speaker 1>some potentially controversial ground where we talk about his critiques

11
00:00:41.119 --> 00:00:45.079
<v Speaker 1>of Darryl Cooper's first series for the Martyr Made podcast,

12
00:00:45.159 --> 00:00:48.079
<v Speaker 1>Fear and Loathing in the New Jerusalem. We also discuss

13
00:00:48.119 --> 00:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>his current project working on a critique of Scott Horton's

14
00:00:53.320 --> 00:00:57.159
<v Speaker 1>book Provoked, in which Horton tries to make the case

15
00:00:57.200 --> 00:01:01.399
<v Speaker 1>that NATO expansion and just generally speaking, Western influence is

16
00:01:01.479 --> 00:01:05.439
<v Speaker 1>what caused or provoked the Russi Ukrainian War. So we

17
00:01:05.519 --> 00:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>cover a lot of ground in this. We also talk

18
00:01:07.280 --> 00:01:11.239
<v Speaker 1>about the deeper issues at play involving being a history

19
00:01:11.319 --> 00:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>content creator, or really any kind of content creator that

20
00:01:14.040 --> 00:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>purports to be giving accurate information, and how important it

21
00:01:17.599 --> 00:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>is to do that, make it accurate, make it transparent,

22
00:01:21.159 --> 00:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and all that good stuff. Quick note, we actually recorded

23
00:01:24.879 --> 00:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this conversation back in January of twenty twenty six, so

24
00:01:30.079 --> 00:01:32.879
<v Speaker 1>any references to world events at that point that might

25
00:01:32.920 --> 00:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>seem a little dated or feel a little jarring, that

26
00:01:36.040 --> 00:01:40.159
<v Speaker 1>explains it. So that's what you have in store for

27
00:01:40.239 --> 00:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you today. I want to thank everybody for listening and

28
00:01:44.239 --> 00:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>for supporting the show, like my very kind and generous

29
00:01:48.120 --> 00:01:51.879
<v Speaker 1>supporters of History Impossible at the executive producer level, John

30
00:01:51.920 --> 00:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Andre Sather and Mike Mayleban, who have been with me

31
00:01:54.359 --> 00:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>four years now, and I cannot tell you enough how

32
00:01:57.079 --> 00:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>much I appreciate them. And I encourage all of you,

33
00:02:00.079 --> 00:02:02.359
<v Speaker 1>who you know have a couple bucks to throw my

34
00:02:02.439 --> 00:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>way every month, to please do so. If you feel

35
00:02:05.560 --> 00:02:07.239
<v Speaker 1>so inclined, If you like what I'm doing and you

36
00:02:07.319 --> 00:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>want to support it, head over to Patreon dot com,

37
00:02:09.439 --> 00:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>slash History Impossible or just History impossible dot com and

38
00:02:12.599 --> 00:02:15.759
<v Speaker 1>become a paid subscriber today. I hope you enjoy this

39
00:02:15.840 --> 00:02:18.879
<v Speaker 1>conversation that I had with Crackpot History as much as

40
00:02:18.919 --> 00:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed having it with him, So please sit back

41
00:02:22.039 --> 00:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and relax and let's get into some impossible history.

42
00:02:26.759 --> 00:02:28.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me to tell you what you would have

43
00:02:28.240 --> 00:02:29.039
<v Speaker 2>seen and heard.

44
00:02:29.360 --> 00:02:31.800
<v Speaker 3>I will not be pleasant listening if you were at lunch,

45
00:02:31.960 --> 00:02:33.080
<v Speaker 3>or if you have no appetite.

46
00:02:33.120 --> 00:02:34.759
<v Speaker 4>Knowledge A good time to switch author radio.

47
00:02:40.599 --> 00:02:43.960
<v Speaker 3>An ancestor of mine maintain that if you eliminate the impossible,

48
00:02:44.120 --> 00:02:56.879
<v Speaker 3>whatever remains, however improbable. BANDI you don't know that. I

49
00:02:56.960 --> 00:03:00.240
<v Speaker 3>wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace in.

50
00:03:01.120 --> 00:03:04.319
<v Speaker 4>I don't feel the anocking dream. I feel a mocking light.

51
00:03:08.879 --> 00:03:13.240
<v Speaker 3>If we share for issues to kill, if we share

52
00:03:13.280 --> 00:03:16.879
<v Speaker 3>for hue to kill. Some say the world.

53
00:03:16.639 --> 00:03:19.599
<v Speaker 2>Will end empire. Some say an I, from what.

54
00:03:19.680 --> 00:03:22.879
<v Speaker 3>I've tasted of desire, I hold those of favor fire.

55
00:03:23.599 --> 00:03:26.280
<v Speaker 2>But if it had to perish twice, I think I

56
00:03:26.360 --> 00:03:27.800
<v Speaker 2>know enough of hate.

57
00:03:27.960 --> 00:03:30.840
<v Speaker 4>To say that the destruction ice is also great and

58
00:03:30.919 --> 00:03:31.759
<v Speaker 4>look sufficed.

59
00:03:38.599 --> 00:03:40.639
<v Speaker 3>This is history or possible.

60
00:03:45.479 --> 00:03:48.479
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody, I am here, and I'm really happy to

61
00:03:48.479 --> 00:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>be joined by my first anonymous subject, that is Crackpot History.

62
00:03:53.039 --> 00:03:56.240
<v Speaker 2>The host of Crackpot History, who I think at this one.

63
00:03:56.240 --> 00:03:58.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to say, hey, man, hey dude, because

64
00:03:58.400 --> 00:04:02.199
<v Speaker 1>I I want to keep its anonymous here. So I

65
00:04:02.199 --> 00:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>want to just first of all, say thank you for

66
00:04:04.039 --> 00:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>joining me on History Possible.

67
00:04:06.520 --> 00:04:08.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thanks for having me excited to be here. Didn't

68
00:04:08.639 --> 00:04:09.840
<v Speaker 3>know I was the first.

69
00:04:09.639 --> 00:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>For of course.

70
00:04:11.759 --> 00:04:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

71
00:04:12.039 --> 00:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's appropriate too because of not just the stuff

72
00:04:14.800 --> 00:04:17.759
<v Speaker 1>that I, you know, have been covering lately and sort

73
00:04:17.759 --> 00:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of what I see as being an interesting sort of

74
00:04:20.759 --> 00:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that I want, a theme that I've been sort

75
00:04:23.160 --> 00:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of focused on lately that we'll be getting into with

76
00:04:26.639 --> 00:04:29.759
<v Speaker 1>this episode. But I do think that there is something

77
00:04:29.800 --> 00:04:32.199
<v Speaker 1>to be said about crackpots in history.

78
00:04:31.879 --> 00:04:34.519
<v Speaker 2>These days and the use of history.

79
00:04:34.279 --> 00:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>And I guess we'll say a weaponized way, which is

80
00:04:37.040 --> 00:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>partly what you're going after. But you know, I'm not

81
00:04:39.160 --> 00:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>going to define your show for you. I kind of

82
00:04:41.720 --> 00:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to start out by asking you to just sort

83
00:04:44.720 --> 00:04:48.399
<v Speaker 1>of just just sort of explain what is crackpot history,

84
00:04:48.560 --> 00:04:52.439
<v Speaker 1>what's your mission with this broadly speaking, and what And

85
00:04:52.519 --> 00:04:55.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually curious, like, what is the sort of story,

86
00:04:55.480 --> 00:04:58.079
<v Speaker 1>if there is one, of how you got into this

87
00:04:58.120 --> 00:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and what made you decide to make this or project

88
00:05:01.160 --> 00:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in the history content creation space.

89
00:05:03.199 --> 00:05:04.920
<v Speaker 2>I guess we could call it. Sure.

90
00:05:05.000 --> 00:05:08.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, happy to provide some additional color. So crackpot History,

91
00:05:09.040 --> 00:05:10.680
<v Speaker 3>and this is kind of in the tagline of the

92
00:05:10.720 --> 00:05:14.720
<v Speaker 3>show is all about separating history from hysteria. And so

93
00:05:14.759 --> 00:05:17.279
<v Speaker 3>I think when you look at at the landscape today,

94
00:05:17.879 --> 00:05:20.879
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of what I would call pop influencers

95
00:05:21.000 --> 00:05:24.480
<v Speaker 3>or pop historians or faux historians that are that are

96
00:05:24.519 --> 00:05:30.000
<v Speaker 3>basically looking at history and applying a narrative driven lens

97
00:05:30.040 --> 00:05:32.040
<v Speaker 3>to it. And I think that there's a few different

98
00:05:32.079 --> 00:05:34.199
<v Speaker 3>reasons why people might do that. Right. One could be

99
00:05:34.800 --> 00:05:37.360
<v Speaker 3>maybe you have a bias or an animus toward a

100
00:05:37.399 --> 00:05:40.759
<v Speaker 3>particular subject. Right. One could be maybe you want to

101
00:05:40.800 --> 00:05:43.480
<v Speaker 3>win hearts and minds for causes that you believe in.

102
00:05:43.879 --> 00:05:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Another could be maybe there are state based geopolitical bad

103
00:05:47.800 --> 00:05:50.639
<v Speaker 3>actors that are supporting you and want you to push

104
00:05:50.720 --> 00:05:53.360
<v Speaker 3>your particular narrative. And so think I think that there's

105
00:05:53.399 --> 00:05:56.000
<v Speaker 3>all of these different elements to this, And when you

106
00:05:56.040 --> 00:05:59.720
<v Speaker 3>throw in the virality of social media of the internet,

107
00:06:00.160 --> 00:06:04.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, those beliefs and that pop history can spread

108
00:06:04.279 --> 00:06:08.240
<v Speaker 3>very quickly and influence the real world and influence geopolitical

109
00:06:08.279 --> 00:06:12.519
<v Speaker 3>hotspots and influence policy. And so I think, more than

110
00:06:12.519 --> 00:06:15.319
<v Speaker 3>anything else, the reason why I chose to name crackpot

111
00:06:15.319 --> 00:06:17.160
<v Speaker 3>History is because there's a lot of crackpots out there,

112
00:06:17.199 --> 00:06:18.639
<v Speaker 3>and there's a lot of people that kind of need

113
00:06:18.680 --> 00:06:22.000
<v Speaker 3>to be fact checked, and so the podcast is all

114
00:06:22.040 --> 00:06:24.319
<v Speaker 3>about really looking at their claims, not making it but

115
00:06:24.439 --> 00:06:27.399
<v Speaker 3>personal attacks or mud slinging or anything like that, but

116
00:06:27.519 --> 00:06:30.399
<v Speaker 3>looking at their claims and going claim by claim and saying,

117
00:06:30.920 --> 00:06:33.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, is this true, what is the evidence for this?

118
00:06:33.120 --> 00:06:34.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, what are the sources say, what do they

119
00:06:34.959 --> 00:06:37.720
<v Speaker 3>say about it? Going into their footnotes and really trying

120
00:06:37.720 --> 00:06:41.160
<v Speaker 3>to dive deep into the claims and invalidate them or not.

121
00:06:42.399 --> 00:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And in the case of some you know people, have

122
00:06:45.079 --> 00:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to where you have to actually try to discern what

123
00:06:47.439 --> 00:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>their you know, so to speak, footnotes are when they

124
00:06:50.079 --> 00:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>don't provide them. I mean, that's in a lot of

125
00:06:52.360 --> 00:06:55.759
<v Speaker 1>ways the one of the biggest challenges I think of critiquing.

126
00:06:57.199 --> 00:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll say, we'll just call it online history.

127
00:06:59.600 --> 00:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I can't think of any other way

128
00:07:01.720 --> 00:07:04.319
<v Speaker 1>to put it. Because some creators out there, I do

129
00:07:04.439 --> 00:07:07.319
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate this, I see this on YouTube especially, will

130
00:07:07.360 --> 00:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>provide their list of sources in their notes. I actually, will,

131
00:07:11.240 --> 00:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, be the first admit I don't put my

132
00:07:13.079 --> 00:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>sources in my episode notes, and maybe I should, but

133
00:07:17.680 --> 00:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I do try to post a blog posts, you know,

134
00:07:21.199 --> 00:07:23.839
<v Speaker 1>periodically saying here's the list of sources I use for

135
00:07:23.879 --> 00:07:26.079
<v Speaker 1>this particular episode. I haven't done that in a bit so,

136
00:07:26.199 --> 00:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and I just released the big episode of the Muslim

137
00:07:29.120 --> 00:07:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Nazis about the handshar, so I probably should put together

138
00:07:31.920 --> 00:07:35.079
<v Speaker 1>a nice comprehensive list of the sources I used, of course,

139
00:07:35.120 --> 00:07:37.639
<v Speaker 1>But point being is that that's really hard to do

140
00:07:37.800 --> 00:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>when those are not provided. So I think that that's

141
00:07:41.319 --> 00:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>like in I would imagine, and maybe you can correct

142
00:07:43.240 --> 00:07:46.079
<v Speaker 1>me on this, that's the hardest part of what you've

143
00:07:46.079 --> 00:07:48.639
<v Speaker 1>been doing is trying to figure out what sources are

144
00:07:48.639 --> 00:07:49.519
<v Speaker 1>being used.

145
00:07:49.360 --> 00:07:51.839
<v Speaker 2>Or not being used. Am I on the right track there?

146
00:07:52.040 --> 00:07:53.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's a big part of it. Yeah,

147
00:07:53.879 --> 00:07:55.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean some of the folks that I've covered. So

148
00:07:55.720 --> 00:07:57.639
<v Speaker 3>I'm in the middle of my second series right now.

149
00:07:57.720 --> 00:08:00.639
<v Speaker 3>My first series was on Darryl Cooper, covering his fear

150
00:08:00.639 --> 00:08:02.680
<v Speaker 3>and loathing in the New Jerusalem History of the Israeli

151
00:08:02.680 --> 00:08:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Palestinian Conflict, currently covering Scott Horton's book Provoked in the

152
00:08:06.639 --> 00:08:09.079
<v Speaker 3>History of the Russo Ukrainian War. So I've only done

153
00:08:09.079 --> 00:08:11.480
<v Speaker 3>two series in the middle of my second But yeah,

154
00:08:11.480 --> 00:08:14.639
<v Speaker 3>in some cases, the sources in you know, in Horton's case,

155
00:08:15.639 --> 00:08:20.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm using the ebook and there are sources in the footnotes,

156
00:08:20.560 --> 00:08:22.240
<v Speaker 3>but a lot of those are websites, and some of

157
00:08:22.279 --> 00:08:24.519
<v Speaker 3>those links are dead because they're from old sources. Right

158
00:08:24.879 --> 00:08:29.240
<v Speaker 3>in Cooper's case, there really aren't sources in some cases,

159
00:08:29.240 --> 00:08:30.399
<v Speaker 3>and then you have to go kind of on this

160
00:08:30.439 --> 00:08:33.080
<v Speaker 3>scavenger hunt looking for them and trying to figure out, well,

161
00:08:33.080 --> 00:08:34.639
<v Speaker 3>where did he pull this quote from? And in some

162
00:08:34.679 --> 00:08:37.519
<v Speaker 3>cases I've been successful and been able to find sources

163
00:08:37.519 --> 00:08:39.440
<v Speaker 3>that he doesn't name. I also, by the way, I'm

164
00:08:39.440 --> 00:08:41.360
<v Speaker 3>guilty of this. I don't actually list the sources that

165
00:08:41.360 --> 00:08:43.720
<v Speaker 3>I refer to in my episodes, but when I'm quoting

166
00:08:43.720 --> 00:08:46.159
<v Speaker 3>from them, I do say who is I'm quoting from,

167
00:08:46.200 --> 00:08:47.879
<v Speaker 3>and typically what the title of the work is?

168
00:08:47.960 --> 00:08:48.799
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Same same here.

169
00:08:48.879 --> 00:08:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's I mean, that's honestly the at least in

170
00:08:51.720 --> 00:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the case of you know, long form, you know, narrative

171
00:08:54.240 --> 00:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>history podcasters. But I think in your case too, I mean,

172
00:08:56.759 --> 00:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's a tradition laid down by Dan

173
00:08:58.679 --> 00:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Carlin years ago at this point, I mean twenty years

174
00:09:01.440 --> 00:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>ago actually, now that I think about it. It's a

175
00:09:03.440 --> 00:09:05.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a twentieth anniversary of hardcore history, and

176
00:09:05.799 --> 00:09:07.879
<v Speaker 1>he's always been really good at that. But I think

177
00:09:07.919 --> 00:09:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Carlin has kind of turned into more of a historiographical storyteller,

178
00:09:11.399 --> 00:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>if that makes sense, where he's very dedicated to the

179
00:09:13.960 --> 00:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to the sourcing, and he very rarely makes any assertion

180
00:09:17.399 --> 00:09:19.799
<v Speaker 1>of his own at least I mean, he'll say if

181
00:09:19.840 --> 00:09:21.759
<v Speaker 1>it's his opinion, and I think that's a really good

182
00:09:21.799 --> 00:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>model to follow. But yeah, so I think the scavenger

183
00:09:25.759 --> 00:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>hunt of sources, on the one hand, is actually kind

184
00:09:28.399 --> 00:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of fun. I think if you're a certain level of autistic,

185
00:09:30.559 --> 00:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>like I think I am, and I don't want to

186
00:09:32.480 --> 00:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>speak for you, but it maybe you are.

187
00:09:34.919 --> 00:09:36.440
<v Speaker 2>But it's kind of fun.

188
00:09:36.519 --> 00:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>It's like a scavenger hunt, like you said, and that's

189
00:09:38.600 --> 00:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of satisfying. But but yeah, like trying to

190
00:09:41.440 --> 00:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>figure that out, I would imagine, like I said, is

191
00:09:43.200 --> 00:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the hardest part. But at the same time, it can

192
00:09:45.240 --> 00:09:47.799
<v Speaker 1>be really rewarding because then you can find new information

193
00:09:47.919 --> 00:09:50.519
<v Speaker 1>you might not have otherwise found, you know, So in

194
00:09:50.559 --> 00:09:53.519
<v Speaker 1>a sense there's you know, some value in that as well.

195
00:09:53.559 --> 00:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>But excuse me, I guess we should probably get into it.

196
00:09:57.600 --> 00:10:01.039
<v Speaker 1>I'd be remiss not to mention or to repeat the

197
00:10:01.080 --> 00:10:04.639
<v Speaker 1>fact that your very first subject was, you know, of

198
00:10:04.759 --> 00:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Daryl Cooper, somebody who I have collaborated with and spoken

199
00:10:08.679 --> 00:10:13.159
<v Speaker 1>highly of and increasingly more critically of. And you know, honestly,

200
00:10:13.200 --> 00:10:14.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the critiques are going to stop anytime

201
00:10:14.960 --> 00:10:19.559
<v Speaker 1>soon at this point, for various reasons, especially given the

202
00:10:19.600 --> 00:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>waters he's decided to wade into when it comes to

203
00:10:22.000 --> 00:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>World War II history, which, funny enough, I don't think

204
00:10:24.639 --> 00:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is really much we can say about that, at least

205
00:10:27.240 --> 00:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, because, like you said, your focus was on

206
00:10:30.360 --> 00:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Fear and Loathing in The New Jerusalem, his first series, which,

207
00:10:33.799 --> 00:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>as I'll just say that, I after listening to your

208
00:10:37.000 --> 00:10:39.759
<v Speaker 1>series on that, I can see a lot of issues

209
00:10:40.200 --> 00:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>with what he did with that series. Now, I still

210
00:10:43.360 --> 00:10:45.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's a very good series as far as storytelling goes.

211
00:10:45.960 --> 00:10:48.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that you yourself have said, whatever

212
00:10:48.840 --> 00:10:52.279
<v Speaker 1>one thinks of him, his politics or his you know,

213
00:10:52.480 --> 00:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>his quality of his analysis, he's a very good storyteller.

214
00:10:56.360 --> 00:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>He's good at what he does, and I think that

215
00:10:58.000 --> 00:11:02.039
<v Speaker 1>that's always something we need to acknowledge. But he plays

216
00:11:02.039 --> 00:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a little fast and loose, and you made that very

217
00:11:04.360 --> 00:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>clear with this first series of yours, which, if I

218
00:11:06.679 --> 00:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>remember right, you called Manufactured Martyr. I believe is what

219
00:11:09.480 --> 00:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you titled that series. Yeah, it's a good title, and

220
00:11:13.759 --> 00:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say it's probably his most

221
00:11:16.360 --> 00:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>well known series. You know, I will say that I

222
00:11:19.720 --> 00:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>was one of those people for a while, and I

223
00:11:21.600 --> 00:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you know that I that really loved that series, and

224
00:11:24.759 --> 00:11:28.039
<v Speaker 1>I did defer to his judgment with that series a

225
00:11:28.080 --> 00:11:30.039
<v Speaker 1>fair bit longer than I think I should have. I

226
00:11:30.039 --> 00:11:31.639
<v Speaker 1>think he did play fast and loose in a lot

227
00:11:31.679 --> 00:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of in a lot of cases. And my only sense

228
00:11:35.279 --> 00:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is that as I did my own parallel research as

229
00:11:38.519 --> 00:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>part of my own series on the Muslim Nazis that

230
00:11:40.759 --> 00:11:43.919
<v Speaker 1>touched on the same subject. My criticism of him, and

231
00:11:43.960 --> 00:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this before we're recording, was really how

232
00:11:46.559 --> 00:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>he treated the character of the Mufti of hajaminaw Husseini,

233
00:11:50.240 --> 00:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was, like i'll characterize it now as

234
00:11:53.639 --> 00:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>far to kid gloves, I guess maybe hands off i'd

235
00:11:57.600 --> 00:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>be a better word to. And there's probably various reasons

236
00:12:01.000 --> 00:12:03.879
<v Speaker 1>for that, but I always felt that he was a

237
00:12:03.879 --> 00:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>little too credulous with that character, and I think that

238
00:12:05.960 --> 00:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that might have been, like, you know that that was

239
00:12:09.039 --> 00:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a good instinct for me to follow, because if I

240
00:12:11.120 --> 00:12:13.159
<v Speaker 1>think I had followed it further, I probably would have

241
00:12:13.159 --> 00:12:15.399
<v Speaker 1>found a lot of what you found in this. So

242
00:12:16.559 --> 00:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess like it always bothered me how he didn't

243
00:12:19.759 --> 00:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>really give the Mufty his due, and like I.

244
00:12:22.320 --> 00:12:24.759
<v Speaker 2>Said, there's more to it than that.

245
00:12:24.960 --> 00:12:29.519
<v Speaker 1>So when your series came along, I mean, honestly, I

246
00:12:29.519 --> 00:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't call what your series was it was a scalpel.

247
00:12:31.559 --> 00:12:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Of fear and loathing in the New Jerusalem, but it

248
00:12:33.279 --> 00:12:33.480
<v Speaker 2>was a.

249
00:12:33.399 --> 00:12:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Full set of surgical tools, like That's why I would

250
00:12:35.960 --> 00:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>characterize it. And so I figured we'd just start with

251
00:12:38.759 --> 00:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that and I can let you describe in broad strokes

252
00:12:41.399 --> 00:12:44.159
<v Speaker 1>what you came away with when talking about that series.

253
00:12:44.159 --> 00:12:45.759
<v Speaker 2>You already kind of started to talk about it a

254
00:12:45.799 --> 00:12:46.200
<v Speaker 2>little bit.

255
00:12:46.200 --> 00:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>So I want to let you, you know, go through

256
00:12:48.759 --> 00:12:52.679
<v Speaker 1>what you found with the with the with your Manufactured

257
00:12:52.720 --> 00:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Martyr series, and maybe you can linger on whatever details

258
00:12:55.960 --> 00:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that you found particularly significant with that.

259
00:13:00.519 --> 00:13:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Sure, yeah, I can. We can definitely start there. So

260
00:13:03.039 --> 00:13:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I think you know, at the beginning of Fear and

261
00:13:06.080 --> 00:13:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Loathing in the New Jerusalem, it's in the first episode,

262
00:13:08.960 --> 00:13:12.159
<v Speaker 3>at the very opening in the introduction, you know, Cooper

263
00:13:12.720 --> 00:13:18.919
<v Speaker 3>tells the audience that he's not going to tell us

264
00:13:19.000 --> 00:13:21.279
<v Speaker 3>who's right from wrong. He's just going to tell us

265
00:13:21.279 --> 00:13:24.120
<v Speaker 3>the history. And I'm this is verbati, this is I'm

266
00:13:24.159 --> 00:13:27.799
<v Speaker 3>paraphrasing here, basically what he said. And when you hear that,

267
00:13:27.879 --> 00:13:30.159
<v Speaker 3>as a member of the audience, you're basically kind of

268
00:13:30.200 --> 00:13:32.360
<v Speaker 3>priming yourself and saying, Okay, this is going to be

269
00:13:32.399 --> 00:13:35.399
<v Speaker 3>a telling of the history. There's no bias, there's no animis.

270
00:13:35.399 --> 00:13:37.480
<v Speaker 3>He's just going to ping pong back and forth between

271
00:13:37.840 --> 00:13:40.320
<v Speaker 3>what was going on with the Jews, what was going

272
00:13:40.320 --> 00:13:43.080
<v Speaker 3>on with the Arabs, the Palestinians, and we're going we're

273
00:13:43.080 --> 00:13:45.559
<v Speaker 3>going to get a forth right telling. And I think

274
00:13:45.600 --> 00:13:49.399
<v Speaker 3>that as you go through the series, there are these moments,

275
00:13:49.440 --> 00:13:52.799
<v Speaker 3>these kind of inflection points where you say, well, that

276
00:13:53.279 --> 00:13:55.759
<v Speaker 3>sounds like there's some animis there, right, And then there

277
00:13:55.799 --> 00:13:59.080
<v Speaker 3>are things that are just flat out a historical incorrect

278
00:14:00.399 --> 00:14:04.279
<v Speaker 3>Pinprick remarks that he makes really just punching down on

279
00:14:05.000 --> 00:14:07.919
<v Speaker 3>the Jews in Israel as it relates to this conflict.

280
00:14:07.919 --> 00:14:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Things that go far beyond the scope I think of,

281
00:14:11.399 --> 00:14:13.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, this is just the history of the Israeli

282
00:14:13.440 --> 00:14:17.039
<v Speaker 3>Palestinian conflict. You know, there's this one. There's this one

283
00:14:17.120 --> 00:14:19.159
<v Speaker 3>comment that he makes that he stands out and I

284
00:14:20.039 --> 00:14:23.360
<v Speaker 3>go comment by comment, you know, point by point, where

285
00:14:23.360 --> 00:14:26.000
<v Speaker 3>he says something to the effect of it was, it

286
00:14:26.039 --> 00:14:29.000
<v Speaker 3>was a wonder that Jews were allowed to live and

287
00:14:29.120 --> 00:14:32.240
<v Speaker 3>persist in Europe at all, given that they, you know,

288
00:14:32.320 --> 00:14:35.360
<v Speaker 3>had fought against the Christians in Spain, given that they

289
00:14:35.399 --> 00:14:39.039
<v Speaker 3>had been responsible for all of these crimes, historical crimes

290
00:14:39.879 --> 00:14:43.039
<v Speaker 3>decide I believe he refers to in terms of, you know,

291
00:14:43.120 --> 00:14:46.080
<v Speaker 3>the killing of Jesus. Just all of these pieces that

292
00:14:46.120 --> 00:14:51.320
<v Speaker 3>are very ahistorical or kind of leaning on clear animates

293
00:14:51.360 --> 00:14:53.960
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to the Jews specifically, and go, I

294
00:14:54.000 --> 00:14:57.240
<v Speaker 3>go point by point and kind of correct the record

295
00:14:57.240 --> 00:14:59.240
<v Speaker 3>as to why those things aren't the case. Right there

296
00:14:59.279 --> 00:15:03.480
<v Speaker 3>are there are many, many, many historians that study these

297
00:15:03.480 --> 00:15:06.919
<v Speaker 3>things and publish on them. And so that's just you know,

298
00:15:06.960 --> 00:15:09.399
<v Speaker 3>one example. But another one that I think is even

299
00:15:09.440 --> 00:15:12.159
<v Speaker 3>that really stands out and really grinded my gears at

300
00:15:12.159 --> 00:15:15.200
<v Speaker 3>the time, and I mentioned this to you previously, was

301
00:15:15.240 --> 00:15:18.039
<v Speaker 3>that there are just things that are factually wrong, regardless

302
00:15:18.039 --> 00:15:21.120
<v Speaker 3>of whether you have a favorite or pick a side

303
00:15:21.159 --> 00:15:23.919
<v Speaker 3>in the sports game, as people kind of think of

304
00:15:24.120 --> 00:15:26.960
<v Speaker 3>this conflict these days as things that are just wrong.

305
00:15:27.080 --> 00:15:30.279
<v Speaker 3>You know. He says that the Hashermites liberated Jerusalem in

306
00:15:30.360 --> 00:15:32.559
<v Speaker 3>nineteen seventeen. No, that was the British and Allen be

307
00:15:32.720 --> 00:15:34.879
<v Speaker 3>actually right. And so there are just things that are

308
00:15:34.919 --> 00:15:38.120
<v Speaker 3>really basic that when I'm going through my episodes and

309
00:15:38.200 --> 00:15:40.519
<v Speaker 3>I'm fact checking and I'm making sure that I'm holding

310
00:15:40.559 --> 00:15:44.120
<v Speaker 3>myself accountable. If you're going to position yourself as a historian,

311
00:15:44.120 --> 00:15:46.279
<v Speaker 3>which I believe he now does. You know, there's always

312
00:15:46.279 --> 00:15:48.360
<v Speaker 3>there was this whole debate as to you know, does

313
00:15:48.399 --> 00:15:51.279
<v Speaker 3>he consider himself a historian? Do these guys doing pop

314
00:15:51.399 --> 00:15:54.320
<v Speaker 3>history label themselves as a historian. If you're going to

315
00:15:54.360 --> 00:15:57.039
<v Speaker 3>embrace that label, then you really need to get it right.

316
00:15:57.639 --> 00:15:59.759
<v Speaker 3>And I think that there's just a tremendous amount of

317
00:16:00.559 --> 00:16:02.799
<v Speaker 3>and animus in this series. And then when you combine

318
00:16:02.840 --> 00:16:07.200
<v Speaker 3>that with his current tweets on the subject on the conflict,

319
00:16:07.240 --> 00:16:09.879
<v Speaker 3>I think you bring those two pieces together. I think

320
00:16:09.879 --> 00:16:12.080
<v Speaker 3>it's very clear where he stands and whether he was

321
00:16:12.120 --> 00:16:15.080
<v Speaker 3>being truthful in the introduction of his series as to

322
00:16:15.440 --> 00:16:17.320
<v Speaker 3>whether he was going to be giving us a forthright,

323
00:16:18.200 --> 00:16:19.679
<v Speaker 3>unbiased telling of the history.

324
00:16:20.080 --> 00:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>M hmm. Yeah.

325
00:16:21.120 --> 00:16:23.559
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting you bring up his tweets too, because

326
00:16:23.600 --> 00:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like what you kind of showed is very

327
00:16:26.120 --> 00:16:28.759
<v Speaker 1>interesting because a common thing that a lot of people

328
00:16:28.799 --> 00:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>always said to me, and I always deflected, how do

329
00:16:32.120 --> 00:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you reconcile this guy's ability to tell such a careful story,

330
00:16:37.000 --> 00:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>like a nuanced story. The word nuance came up a

331
00:16:39.039 --> 00:16:41.399
<v Speaker 1>lot when people would say this and the person he

332
00:16:41.480 --> 00:16:43.679
<v Speaker 1>is on Twitter, and I always said because it was

333
00:16:43.720 --> 00:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>what he said and what he and I talked about.

334
00:16:46.279 --> 00:16:47.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was one time I told him my

335
00:16:47.840 --> 00:16:50.799
<v Speaker 1>method of not tweeting from the hips, so to speak

336
00:16:51.279 --> 00:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>for me at the time, it was more Facebook posting.

337
00:16:53.240 --> 00:16:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Now I do more Twitter, doesn't matter.

338
00:16:54.759 --> 00:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>The point is what I always what I told him

339
00:16:57.200 --> 00:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>was like the method that I've always used to keep

340
00:17:00.399 --> 00:17:02.639
<v Speaker 1>me from getting in trouble is write what I want

341
00:17:02.639 --> 00:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to say in the heat of the moment, but then

342
00:17:04.480 --> 00:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>don't post it, and then like wait an hour, and

343
00:17:07.200 --> 00:17:09.079
<v Speaker 1>then if you still feel that way, then post it,

344
00:17:09.079 --> 00:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and nine times out of ten you're not going to

345
00:17:10.519 --> 00:17:11.079
<v Speaker 1>want to post it.

346
00:17:11.119 --> 00:17:13.319
<v Speaker 2>And he thought it was a good idea. Obviously he

347
00:17:13.359 --> 00:17:14.279
<v Speaker 2>never stuck to that.

348
00:17:15.519 --> 00:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, what I thought was really interesting though, is

349
00:17:18.160 --> 00:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that people always said, including people who really like him

350
00:17:21.000 --> 00:17:23.640
<v Speaker 1>like personally too, like he's just two different people on

351
00:17:23.680 --> 00:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and on his podcast or on Twitter and when

352
00:17:25.880 --> 00:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you talk to him in person. And I would also

353
00:17:27.519 --> 00:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>agree with that, but I think what you kind of

354
00:17:30.720 --> 00:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>showed with your show, especially I think in light of

355
00:17:34.039 --> 00:17:38.839
<v Speaker 1>how he's been increasingly more defensive after his blow up

356
00:17:38.880 --> 00:17:41.599
<v Speaker 1>and fame from his Tucker Carlson appearance in late twenty

357
00:17:41.640 --> 00:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, I think you're kind of showing that there's

358
00:17:44.319 --> 00:17:48.839
<v Speaker 1>less daylight between the Twitter persona and the podcast. And

359
00:17:48.880 --> 00:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>that was I think what was so striking to me

360
00:17:51.640 --> 00:17:54.839
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who vaguely knows Daryl and has known him

361
00:17:54.839 --> 00:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>for a while and has supported his work and in

362
00:17:57.680 --> 00:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>a weird way still kind of do because I we

363
00:18:00.119 --> 00:18:02.079
<v Speaker 1>can get We'll circle back to that if you want

364
00:18:02.119 --> 00:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>about the about why I think it's fine to have

365
00:18:05.000 --> 00:18:07.319
<v Speaker 1>people like that saying what they're saying on the internet.

366
00:18:07.319 --> 00:18:09.000
<v Speaker 2>It's just that you need to have people there to

367
00:18:09.079 --> 00:18:09.599
<v Speaker 2>challenge them.

368
00:18:09.640 --> 00:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I guess what I'm saying is I think

369
00:18:11.960 --> 00:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that that disconnect was kind of connected with what you

370
00:18:15.279 --> 00:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>did in your series, and I think that that's important

371
00:18:18.640 --> 00:18:19.559
<v Speaker 1>to notice.

372
00:18:19.240 --> 00:18:22.519
<v Speaker 2>And I guess, yeah, Like that's.

373
00:18:22.960 --> 00:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>The thing that I don't want to gloss over too much,

374
00:18:25.079 --> 00:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is for somehow if there's anyone listening who has not

375
00:18:28.799 --> 00:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>also listened to Darryl series about Israel and Palestine, and

376
00:18:32.440 --> 00:18:34.839
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned how he kind of glossed over Hajamin al

377
00:18:34.920 --> 00:18:37.039
<v Speaker 1>Husseini's role, and I, you know, because it's, you know,

378
00:18:37.119 --> 00:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of my hobby horse. I was thinking we can

379
00:18:38.960 --> 00:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe hone in on that a little bit. And I'm

380
00:18:42.160 --> 00:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>working off memory that's much more distant than yours, because

381
00:18:45.920 --> 00:18:49.079
<v Speaker 1>you looked at the Haja mean aspect of the story

382
00:18:49.160 --> 00:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>much more recently than I did. But we talked about

383
00:18:51.440 --> 00:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit before recording, Like I was saying

384
00:18:53.319 --> 00:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that he kind of just ends the story of Hajajamin

385
00:18:57.000 --> 00:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>al Husseini in the Israeli Palestinian conflict at around the

386
00:19:00.680 --> 00:19:04.039
<v Speaker 1>Arab revolt. He doesn't really even touch on the McDonald

387
00:19:04.039 --> 00:19:07.039
<v Speaker 1>white paper Shenanigans. He doesn't talk about the far Hood

388
00:19:07.079 --> 00:19:09.799
<v Speaker 1>at all in Iraq. He doesn't really even talk about

389
00:19:10.319 --> 00:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Haja Mean in like teaming up with the Access. He

390
00:19:13.279 --> 00:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>gives it like one throwaway mention if memory serves, and

391
00:19:15.759 --> 00:19:19.519
<v Speaker 1>he basically dismisses the Mufty as having just gone insane

392
00:19:20.000 --> 00:19:24.039
<v Speaker 1>instead of looking at him more seriously like he has

393
00:19:24.119 --> 00:19:26.279
<v Speaker 1>been throughout the previous part of the series and a

394
00:19:26.319 --> 00:19:29.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of other figures. Because that's the thing is that

395
00:19:29.599 --> 00:19:32.279
<v Speaker 1>omission is what I thought was so weird, is because

396
00:19:32.680 --> 00:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to tell the story of this conflict,

397
00:19:35.599 --> 00:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to give agency to people like hajaminaw who's

398
00:19:39.000 --> 00:19:41.319
<v Speaker 1>saying that they don't just go insane and stop mattering.

399
00:19:41.799 --> 00:19:45.480
<v Speaker 2>They have significance. And so yeah, I think.

400
00:19:45.359 --> 00:19:48.799
<v Speaker 1>That that lack of I guess you could say, you

401
00:19:48.799 --> 00:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>could call it too much credulity or lack of credulity,

402
00:19:51.720 --> 00:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>depending on what you're talking about. But his lack of

403
00:19:54.279 --> 00:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>coverage of Hajamen always bothered me in that sense because

404
00:19:57.799 --> 00:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it felt like he was not giving him or his

405
00:20:01.799 --> 00:20:04.839
<v Speaker 1>side of the conflict they're real due. He was kind

406
00:20:04.880 --> 00:20:07.319
<v Speaker 1>of treating them, like I said, with kid gloves and

407
00:20:07.359 --> 00:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>not giving them the responsibility that they might otherwise have

408
00:20:11.039 --> 00:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>while putting all the responsibility on the Zionis side of

409
00:20:13.400 --> 00:20:14.039
<v Speaker 1>the conflict.

410
00:20:14.960 --> 00:20:17.000
<v Speaker 2>And that, like I said, that always bothered me.

411
00:20:17.440 --> 00:20:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I felt like that kind of helped crystallize why I

412
00:20:20.799 --> 00:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>thought your series was so effective.

413
00:20:22.279 --> 00:20:24.319
<v Speaker 2>So do do you have any thoughts in that regard.

414
00:20:24.759 --> 00:20:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I think that there is I think

415
00:20:27.920 --> 00:20:31.640
<v Speaker 3>that there is a misallocation of agency when it comes

416
00:20:31.680 --> 00:20:35.079
<v Speaker 3>to when it comes to Husseini specifically, I think that

417
00:20:35.960 --> 00:20:40.519
<v Speaker 3>he is portrayed as being a and this is you know,

418
00:20:40.599 --> 00:20:45.759
<v Speaker 3>this is Horton's I'm paraphrasing Horton here, but he's basically

419
00:20:45.839 --> 00:20:49.880
<v Speaker 3>portrayed as a moderating force in the series that was

420
00:20:49.920 --> 00:20:53.000
<v Speaker 3>trying to quell the violence, trying to work with the British,

421
00:20:53.160 --> 00:20:56.680
<v Speaker 3>trying to make sure that peace was possible between the

422
00:20:56.720 --> 00:21:01.480
<v Speaker 3>competing national movements that were urging in the Mandate of

423
00:21:01.519 --> 00:21:05.319
<v Speaker 3>Palestine in at the time. And I think that that

424
00:21:05.440 --> 00:21:09.880
<v Speaker 3>is just simply incorrect and ahistorical when you actually dive

425
00:21:09.920 --> 00:21:12.039
<v Speaker 3>into things, and specifically, I think one of the most

426
00:21:12.400 --> 00:21:15.960
<v Speaker 3>egregious moments in Fear and Loathing in the New Jerusalem

427
00:21:16.279 --> 00:21:19.240
<v Speaker 3>is surrounding the as you know, the Pogrim of nineteen

428
00:21:19.279 --> 00:21:23.799
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine, which was in Hebron and is labeled Hebron Pogrim,

429
00:21:23.799 --> 00:21:27.279
<v Speaker 3>but also was in other areas of the Mandate, and

430
00:21:28.039 --> 00:21:32.519
<v Speaker 3>Husseini and his acolytes were the ones that kind of

431
00:21:32.599 --> 00:21:36.680
<v Speaker 3>fanned the flames of this transpiring. So they handed out

432
00:21:37.119 --> 00:21:41.559
<v Speaker 3>materials that were said things to the effect of, you know,

433
00:21:41.599 --> 00:21:45.079
<v Speaker 3>the Jews are coming to seize Alaxa, right and things

434
00:21:45.119 --> 00:21:48.880
<v Speaker 3>along those lines, which are just completely incorrect, and just

435
00:21:49.440 --> 00:21:52.240
<v Speaker 3>that wasn't part of the plan. And so there's this

436
00:21:52.319 --> 00:21:55.599
<v Speaker 3>kind of deferral of agency where oh he was there,

437
00:21:55.680 --> 00:21:58.000
<v Speaker 3>he was trying to make sure that a lid was

438
00:21:58.079 --> 00:22:02.079
<v Speaker 3>kept on on the tempers and the potential for chaos,

439
00:22:02.119 --> 00:22:05.880
<v Speaker 3>while he was actually behind the scenes wanting to instigate

440
00:22:05.920 --> 00:22:09.279
<v Speaker 3>the violence. And that piece just isn't portrayed at all.

441
00:22:10.000 --> 00:22:12.920
<v Speaker 3>The other piece that I think is really missing is

442
00:22:13.599 --> 00:22:20.319
<v Speaker 3>the Husseinis, the more extremist elements of Palestinian Arab society

443
00:22:20.359 --> 00:22:24.279
<v Speaker 3>in the Mandate at the time. They weren't just operating unopposed, right,

444
00:22:24.319 --> 00:22:27.440
<v Speaker 3>there was a counterbalancing force in the form of the

445
00:22:27.519 --> 00:22:32.039
<v Speaker 3>Nashashibies and the Nashashibi family, who were much more moderate,

446
00:22:32.200 --> 00:22:34.960
<v Speaker 3>who wanted to work with the British, who wanted to

447
00:22:35.200 --> 00:22:39.440
<v Speaker 3>find a diplomatic solution with the Zionists, with the Jews

448
00:22:39.480 --> 00:22:43.920
<v Speaker 3>in the Mandate at the time, and I personally believe

449
00:22:44.079 --> 00:22:50.000
<v Speaker 3>that if they were given enough support this conflict, the

450
00:22:50.000 --> 00:22:51.640
<v Speaker 3>one hundred plus years of it could have gone in

451
00:22:51.680 --> 00:22:53.680
<v Speaker 3>a very different way, but they were attacked and killed

452
00:22:53.680 --> 00:22:57.200
<v Speaker 3>by Husseini and his acolytes and lost their prestigion influence

453
00:22:57.319 --> 00:23:01.519
<v Speaker 3>because of it. Cooper doesn't really that at all. So

454
00:23:01.640 --> 00:23:05.039
<v Speaker 3>the mini Palestinian Civil War that happened, and the fact

455
00:23:05.079 --> 00:23:08.359
<v Speaker 3>that these people were killed and butchered in the sake

456
00:23:08.440 --> 00:23:12.720
<v Speaker 3>of for the sake of a maximalist outcome that Hussein

457
00:23:12.799 --> 00:23:13.279
<v Speaker 3>he wanted.

458
00:23:14.960 --> 00:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's something that I am also kind of

459
00:23:19.480 --> 00:23:24.799
<v Speaker 1>bristle at too with his coverage because he doesn't recognize

460
00:23:24.960 --> 00:23:28.039
<v Speaker 1>or I don't want to. I don't want to necessarily

461
00:23:28.039 --> 00:23:30.559
<v Speaker 1>impuge motive, at least not yet, because I kind of wanted.

462
00:23:30.400 --> 00:23:31.599
<v Speaker 2>To get into that a little bit later.

463
00:23:31.640 --> 00:23:36.039
<v Speaker 1>But I don't like how he minimized Haja means anti

464
00:23:36.039 --> 00:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Semitism or Jew hatred might be a better way of

465
00:23:38.400 --> 00:23:40.839
<v Speaker 1>putting it, just so we're not we don't get stuck

466
00:23:40.839 --> 00:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in that hole splitting of hairs like, oh, well they're

467
00:23:42.720 --> 00:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>all Semis that kind of thing. But uh, yeah, I

468
00:23:48.119 --> 00:23:52.319
<v Speaker 1>bristle at his inability to recognize that haja means motivation

469
00:23:53.440 --> 00:23:55.559
<v Speaker 1>was what it was, like you said, he really did

470
00:23:55.640 --> 00:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>portray him as a moderating force, and I am somewhat

471
00:23:59.720 --> 00:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>guilt of following in his footsteps earlier on in my

472
00:24:03.200 --> 00:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>own Muscle Nazi series when talking about that, I saw

473
00:24:05.960 --> 00:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>his motivation less innocently, but I did try to I

474
00:24:10.440 --> 00:24:13.079
<v Speaker 1>did try to present him as somebody who didn't want

475
00:24:13.200 --> 00:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>violence to get out of control because he was trying

476
00:24:16.000 --> 00:24:19.599
<v Speaker 1>to maintain power. I didn't have all the sources available

477
00:24:19.640 --> 00:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to me at the time. I didn't even know about

478
00:24:21.440 --> 00:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the pamphlets that you were talking about just then, So

479
00:24:24.640 --> 00:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>there is some correction needed there on my part, for sure.

480
00:24:27.680 --> 00:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>But with that said, I still think that he was

481
00:24:30.440 --> 00:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>much more interested in growing and maintaining his influence and power.

482
00:24:34.680 --> 00:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>That was one motivating plank for Haja mean that I

483
00:24:38.240 --> 00:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>don't really get the sense Daryl appreciated or noted, and

484
00:24:44.000 --> 00:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>his Jew hatred was more framed, if it was framed

485
00:24:47.480 --> 00:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>at all, And maybe you can correct me on this,

486
00:24:48.920 --> 00:24:52.319
<v Speaker 1>because again your memory is fresher on this than mine.

487
00:24:52.039 --> 00:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>He more saw it as a reaction, and that does

488
00:24:54.279 --> 00:24:56.519
<v Speaker 1>seem to be kind of Daryl's view on anti Semitism,

489
00:24:56.599 --> 00:24:58.759
<v Speaker 1>is that it's always a reaction to something that Jews

490
00:24:58.799 --> 00:25:02.759
<v Speaker 1>do or that like particularly annoying or quote unquote bad

491
00:25:02.880 --> 00:25:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Jews do, and I think that's also kind of how

492
00:25:05.319 --> 00:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>he sees how racism operates. But the difference between I'll

493
00:25:10.920 --> 00:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>just say that maybe that's true sometimes. But the thing

494
00:25:13.359 --> 00:25:17.799
<v Speaker 1>about anti Semitism Jew hatred is that it's a conspiracy

495
00:25:17.839 --> 00:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>theory before it's a bigotry. So there's always something preemptive

496
00:25:21.880 --> 00:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>about it. And I think that when you don't appreciate that,

497
00:25:26.880 --> 00:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to underrate it as a motivator. And

498
00:25:30.160 --> 00:25:33.599
<v Speaker 1>as we talked about before recording, there is very good,

499
00:25:33.640 --> 00:25:37.759
<v Speaker 1>circumstantial evidence that Hajamin al Husseini was very aware and

500
00:25:37.839 --> 00:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>very familiar with the Protocols of the Elders of Zion

501
00:25:40.440 --> 00:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>by at least nineteen twenty, if not before. He was multilingual,

502
00:25:44.440 --> 00:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>so he could have read other editions of it even

503
00:25:46.240 --> 00:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>before that the point. And also he was you know,

504
00:25:49.400 --> 00:25:52.640
<v Speaker 1>he supposedly had it memorized later in life, so clearly

505
00:25:52.680 --> 00:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>he was familiar with it. And you also spoke about

506
00:25:55.640 --> 00:25:57.079
<v Speaker 1>this with me a little bit before we were recording,

507
00:25:57.119 --> 00:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>about the sort of historical confluence of factors there. Maybe

508
00:25:59.759 --> 00:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>you can and highlight that a little bit for listeners,

509
00:26:03.599 --> 00:26:05.599
<v Speaker 1>but I guess what that's what I'm saying is that

510
00:26:05.599 --> 00:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like underrating these internal motivations in favor of

511
00:26:09.200 --> 00:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>these grand historical forces. What that ultimately does is takes

512
00:26:13.480 --> 00:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>responsibility and agency away from Haja mean, especially for events

513
00:26:17.400 --> 00:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>like the nineteen twenty nine riots. But you could even

514
00:26:19.480 --> 00:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>go back and say the Nabi Musa riots perhaps as well.

515
00:26:22.240 --> 00:26:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Though the sense I got is that that was a

516
00:26:23.599 --> 00:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>little more I think that that was definitely a situation

517
00:26:26.799 --> 00:26:29.319
<v Speaker 1>where things got a little out of control. They weren't

518
00:26:29.319 --> 00:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily meant to be that crazy. But maybe maybe I'm

519
00:26:32.160 --> 00:26:33.839
<v Speaker 1>wrong on that too, Maybe I need to update my

520
00:26:33.920 --> 00:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>understanding of all those events too. But anyway, I wanted

521
00:26:37.160 --> 00:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to let you respond to the idea of these confounding

522
00:26:41.000 --> 00:26:43.519
<v Speaker 1>motivations that Daryl just left out, or at least seem

523
00:26:43.559 --> 00:26:44.039
<v Speaker 1>to leave out.

524
00:26:44.799 --> 00:26:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think that any telling of the

525
00:26:47.799 --> 00:26:50.400
<v Speaker 3>history needs to look at both sides, right and so

526
00:26:51.440 --> 00:26:53.920
<v Speaker 3>on the one side, on the one hand, if if

527
00:26:54.000 --> 00:26:56.480
<v Speaker 3>you're Cooper and you're going to talk about some of

528
00:26:56.519 --> 00:26:59.039
<v Speaker 3>the some of the actions of the Irgun in the

529
00:26:59.119 --> 00:27:02.720
<v Speaker 3>lay hey right, which you know especially right, Yeah, so

530
00:27:03.000 --> 00:27:06.759
<v Speaker 3>if you're going to cover those in granular detail, and

531
00:27:06.799 --> 00:27:09.640
<v Speaker 3>then you're not going to account for, you know, what

532
00:27:09.759 --> 00:27:14.480
<v Speaker 3>precipitated the violence and what brought about those organizations. Right,

533
00:27:14.559 --> 00:27:18.279
<v Speaker 3>So you mentioned Nebi Musa in nineteen twenty, the Jaffa

534
00:27:18.359 --> 00:27:20.720
<v Speaker 3>riots in nineteen twenty one, you know, the battle at

535
00:27:20.799 --> 00:27:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Tel High around the same period, and then obviously culminating

536
00:27:23.680 --> 00:27:29.119
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen twenty nine. There's this decade that the Anglo

537
00:27:29.160 --> 00:27:33.720
<v Speaker 3>American Committee of Inquiry actually refers to where the Jews

538
00:27:33.759 --> 00:27:35.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of sat on their hands and really didn't do

539
00:27:36.160 --> 00:27:40.839
<v Speaker 3>much until the thirties and things started really kind of

540
00:27:40.880 --> 00:27:44.279
<v Speaker 3>coming around and they said, well, you know, we want

541
00:27:44.279 --> 00:27:47.839
<v Speaker 3>to find some kind of a diplomatic resolution here. But

542
00:27:47.920 --> 00:27:50.440
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't really seem like we have another side of

543
00:27:50.440 --> 00:27:52.400
<v Speaker 3>the aisle that's kind of willing to meet us halfway.

544
00:27:52.799 --> 00:27:57.039
<v Speaker 3>And that whole story isn't really portrayed, right, Like Cooper

545
00:27:57.119 --> 00:28:00.119
<v Speaker 3>might touch on elements of the Nebu Musa riots and

546
00:28:00.160 --> 00:28:02.559
<v Speaker 3>the jaff riots and all that stuff, but the fifty

547
00:28:02.640 --> 00:28:06.599
<v Speaker 3>thousand foot narrative isn't really given. And I think that's

548
00:28:06.640 --> 00:28:10.400
<v Speaker 3>important because these organizations, the Huguanah that you're gun the

549
00:28:10.480 --> 00:28:12.279
<v Speaker 3>lay He. You know, if you want to talk with

550
00:28:12.400 --> 00:28:14.839
<v Speaker 3>their actions, we can talk with their actions, certainly, but

551
00:28:14.960 --> 00:28:18.240
<v Speaker 3>what brought them into existence? Right would they have existed

552
00:28:18.359 --> 00:28:22.000
<v Speaker 3>if there wasn't this decade of the of the nineteen

553
00:28:22.079 --> 00:28:25.880
<v Speaker 3>twenties that really kind of shifted Jewish thinking and brought

554
00:28:25.880 --> 00:28:28.160
<v Speaker 3>about the radicals, as some people would call them today,

555
00:28:28.160 --> 00:28:30.759
<v Speaker 3>like the Jabbatinskis of the world, et cetera. With his

556
00:28:30.839 --> 00:28:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Iron Wall essay saying, we want to make peace with

557
00:28:34.240 --> 00:28:36.240
<v Speaker 3>the Arabs, but in the short term, we need this

558
00:28:36.319 --> 00:28:39.319
<v Speaker 3>iron wall of force to get us to a point

559
00:28:39.319 --> 00:28:41.279
<v Speaker 3>where a compromise can be reached, which is how he

560
00:28:41.319 --> 00:28:45.759
<v Speaker 3>concludes his essay, which most people don't actually speak to.

561
00:28:46.759 --> 00:28:49.039
<v Speaker 3>But that whole story isn't really being told there, and

562
00:28:49.079 --> 00:28:51.640
<v Speaker 3>so you know, you have to question at some point

563
00:28:52.119 --> 00:28:55.960
<v Speaker 3>when you're diving into the negative aspects of one side

564
00:28:55.960 --> 00:28:59.799
<v Speaker 3>of the conflict but not really giving the same amount

565
00:28:59.799 --> 00:29:03.000
<v Speaker 3>of detail or omitting some of the agency and the

566
00:29:03.039 --> 00:29:05.359
<v Speaker 3>animus on the other side, it kind of makes you question,

567
00:29:05.559 --> 00:29:07.799
<v Speaker 3>what is the motivating force behind that decision?

568
00:29:08.319 --> 00:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm, yeah, yeah, Well, I mean you can also

569
00:29:12.279 --> 00:29:16.039
<v Speaker 1>ask that question about like why, what's the motivating force

570
00:29:16.079 --> 00:29:20.079
<v Speaker 1>behind the decision not to include certain things or include

571
00:29:20.119 --> 00:29:21.839
<v Speaker 1>certain things, or if that's what you mean, is that

572
00:29:21.880 --> 00:29:24.759
<v Speaker 1>what you meant, yeah, that's exactly right. Yeah, Yeah, we'll

573
00:29:24.799 --> 00:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>get back to that in a little bit, uh, because

574
00:29:27.640 --> 00:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I have some questions about that too, But I do

575
00:29:30.559 --> 00:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>have a more meta question, I guess, like, how credible

576
00:29:34.440 --> 00:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>do you find Darryl's claims of having read hundreds of

577
00:29:37.240 --> 00:29:39.799
<v Speaker 1>books at over a thousand academic papers and the subject

578
00:29:39.839 --> 00:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of Israel Palestine. I mean I was always skeptical, Like

579
00:29:42.200 --> 00:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I told you earlier. I think that led

580
00:29:44.960 --> 00:29:47.799
<v Speaker 1>to him being a little miffed at me, which you know,

581
00:29:47.880 --> 00:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in which case I think has ultimately led to me

582
00:29:50.519 --> 00:29:51.559
<v Speaker 1>getting blocked by him.

583
00:29:51.880 --> 00:29:54.480
<v Speaker 3>But I've always well, welcome to the club, by the way, welcome.

584
00:29:54.200 --> 00:29:58.279
<v Speaker 1>To the exactly Yeah, which makes me a little sad,

585
00:29:58.279 --> 00:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I did consider him like something of

586
00:30:00.200 --> 00:30:01.839
<v Speaker 1>a friend for a while. But I mean, you know,

587
00:30:02.160 --> 00:30:06.559
<v Speaker 1>that's just you know, Internet debate politics for you, I guess.

588
00:30:06.559 --> 00:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, I've always been skeptical of his claims

589
00:30:10.200 --> 00:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of having read that much. But yeah, what do you

590
00:30:12.920 --> 00:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>make of his of his claims of having read that much?

591
00:30:16.079 --> 00:30:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Look, I think that I when I'm looking at

592
00:30:18.720 --> 00:30:23.319
<v Speaker 3>a series, when I'm looking at Cooper or Horton or

593
00:30:23.640 --> 00:30:26.519
<v Speaker 3>you know, Dave Smith, Tucker, Carlson, et ceter o. Insert

594
00:30:26.599 --> 00:30:29.119
<v Speaker 3>name here, Right, I'm kind of just focusing on what

595
00:30:29.160 --> 00:30:32.599
<v Speaker 3>the claims are, and so from the claims you can

596
00:30:32.680 --> 00:30:35.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of you can draw your own conclusions, right. I

597
00:30:35.720 --> 00:30:37.640
<v Speaker 3>mentioned I think I mentioned to you that, you know,

598
00:30:37.720 --> 00:30:42.599
<v Speaker 3>when he said that the Hashermites liberated Jerusalem in nineteen seventeen,

599
00:30:43.160 --> 00:30:45.960
<v Speaker 3>that raises some eyebrows, right, Like, that's a very that's

600
00:30:46.000 --> 00:30:48.559
<v Speaker 3>a very basic claim. That's a part of the story

601
00:30:48.599 --> 00:30:50.839
<v Speaker 3>as to how the British controlled the area, you know,

602
00:30:50.920 --> 00:30:53.559
<v Speaker 3>how we got to the Balfour Declaration, how the conflict

603
00:30:54.480 --> 00:30:57.319
<v Speaker 3>really started, right, that is a These are very basic

604
00:30:57.359 --> 00:30:58.960
<v Speaker 3>fundamental facts, if.

605
00:30:58.799 --> 00:30:59.759
<v Speaker 2>You don't mind me jumping in.

606
00:30:59.799 --> 00:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, where do you think the claim that the Hashemites

607
00:31:03.079 --> 00:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>liberated it came from?

608
00:31:04.680 --> 00:31:06.799
<v Speaker 3>I think it might be a geography issue, maybe a

609
00:31:06.839 --> 00:31:10.640
<v Speaker 3>little bit of confusion. You know, there's there's obviously the

610
00:31:10.680 --> 00:31:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Hashemites liberated Akaba with lawns of Arabia, and then they

611
00:31:15.000 --> 00:31:18.240
<v Speaker 3>moved north on the east side of the Jordan River.

612
00:31:18.359 --> 00:31:22.559
<v Speaker 3>But crossing into Palestine as a force, you know, with

613
00:31:22.559 --> 00:31:26.920
<v Speaker 3>with political leadership to liberate Jerusalem, I mean certainly didn't happen.

614
00:31:27.279 --> 00:31:30.519
<v Speaker 3>Neither were Hashemite forces fighting. I believe he also says

615
00:31:30.519 --> 00:31:33.200
<v Speaker 3>that they that they fought in the Sinai and there

616
00:31:33.279 --> 00:31:35.519
<v Speaker 3>might have been, you know, some troops, that it might

617
00:31:35.559 --> 00:31:38.119
<v Speaker 3>have crossed the Jordan, but there wasn't a collective effort.

618
00:31:38.160 --> 00:31:41.839
<v Speaker 3>There's nothing that really substantively documents that or as evidence

619
00:31:41.880 --> 00:31:44.680
<v Speaker 3>to that fact that there was a concerted Hashemite effort

620
00:31:44.759 --> 00:31:48.039
<v Speaker 3>in conjunction with Allen b and the British to liberate

621
00:31:48.119 --> 00:31:52.359
<v Speaker 3>the entirety of Palestine and Jerusalem. Of course. I mean, look,

622
00:31:52.359 --> 00:31:53.960
<v Speaker 3>you want to make an argument about them securing the

623
00:31:54.039 --> 00:31:56.720
<v Speaker 3>flanks with Akaba and moving up north into trans Jordan,

624
00:31:57.119 --> 00:31:59.000
<v Speaker 3>you can have that claim, but that's not what is

625
00:31:59.000 --> 00:32:01.079
<v Speaker 3>said in the podcast in his series.

626
00:32:01.319 --> 00:32:03.559
<v Speaker 1>Gotcha Okay, So it's just more of like he made

627
00:32:03.559 --> 00:32:06.279
<v Speaker 1>a fast and loose comment that he didn't really like

628
00:32:06.599 --> 00:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>linger on. So I guess it sounds that sounds more

629
00:32:09.200 --> 00:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>like an innocent mistake than anything else.

630
00:32:11.400 --> 00:32:13.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it certainly could be right, But then I

631
00:32:13.279 --> 00:32:15.240
<v Speaker 3>think you when you go through the series and you

632
00:32:15.279 --> 00:32:17.720
<v Speaker 3>listen to the number of quote, you know, innocent mistakes

633
00:32:17.720 --> 00:32:19.559
<v Speaker 3>that are made, I think you really have to take

634
00:32:19.559 --> 00:32:22.200
<v Speaker 3>a step back and say, you know, is there something

635
00:32:22.200 --> 00:32:24.960
<v Speaker 3>at play here? You know, is there animus? Is there bias?

636
00:32:25.319 --> 00:32:27.799
<v Speaker 3>Why isn't this full story being told? Why is the

637
00:32:27.839 --> 00:32:30.359
<v Speaker 3>context missing? And I just I think that there's just

638
00:32:30.400 --> 00:32:32.319
<v Speaker 3>a lot of smoke there, which is why I made

639
00:32:32.319 --> 00:32:34.880
<v Speaker 3>the decision to start with this series, because as I

640
00:32:34.880 --> 00:32:38.119
<v Speaker 3>started listening to it, I started pointing out and recognizing

641
00:32:38.240 --> 00:32:40.279
<v Speaker 3>there were a lot of things that needed some additional

642
00:32:40.279 --> 00:32:41.240
<v Speaker 3>context in color.

643
00:32:41.680 --> 00:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, and yeah, actually we should linger on the I

644
00:32:44.519 --> 00:32:48.599
<v Speaker 1>remember the thing that really the thing that actually caused

645
00:32:48.839 --> 00:32:50.599
<v Speaker 1>you to be in the club that I now also

646
00:32:50.640 --> 00:32:53.519
<v Speaker 1>occupy of being blocked by him, it was what was

647
00:32:53.559 --> 00:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the sourcing issue with that? It was he took issue

648
00:32:57.160 --> 00:33:00.519
<v Speaker 1>with you saying that you could not find it rearticular

649
00:33:00.599 --> 00:33:03.799
<v Speaker 1>source for his claim of what what was that?

650
00:33:04.000 --> 00:33:04.599
<v Speaker 2>Do you recall?

651
00:33:05.200 --> 00:33:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so the claim was and there was a big

652
00:33:08.519 --> 00:33:11.519
<v Speaker 3>Twitter blow up back and forth about this, and so

653
00:33:11.599 --> 00:33:13.119
<v Speaker 3>the claim what it gained.

654
00:33:12.839 --> 00:33:15.039
<v Speaker 2>You like five thousand followers if I remember, right.

655
00:33:15.920 --> 00:33:18.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So it's funny I started. I started the account

656
00:33:18.960 --> 00:33:23.000
<v Speaker 3>in April of now last year, twenty twenty five, and

657
00:33:23.200 --> 00:33:25.880
<v Speaker 3>is today I think I'm sitting close to fifty five

658
00:33:25.920 --> 00:33:27.839
<v Speaker 3>hundred followers or something, And people say, oh, do you

659
00:33:27.839 --> 00:33:29.039
<v Speaker 3>know how did you get that many? If you must

660
00:33:29.079 --> 00:33:30.640
<v Speaker 3>be with Masad or something crazy with that.

661
00:33:30.880 --> 00:33:32.640
<v Speaker 2>We got the seven thousand dollars check.

662
00:33:33.160 --> 00:33:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Seven seven thousand dollars. Yeah, seven thousand dollars check.

663
00:33:35.319 --> 00:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Per post or Massad is listening, I will take seven

664
00:33:38.279 --> 00:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. I would love seven thousand dollars. I'm in

665
00:33:41.000 --> 00:33:42.319
<v Speaker 1>debt for grad school guys.

666
00:33:42.319 --> 00:33:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Come on.

667
00:33:44.400 --> 00:33:49.400
<v Speaker 3>So the whole thing was there's this conversation that he

668
00:33:49.480 --> 00:33:55.720
<v Speaker 3>refers to that is a conversation between Usishkin, who was

669
00:33:55.720 --> 00:33:58.759
<v Speaker 3>a Jewish leader, and Ronald Stores, who was the British

670
00:33:58.799 --> 00:34:03.000
<v Speaker 3>military of ji Islam at the time. And at the

671
00:34:03.160 --> 00:34:07.400
<v Speaker 3>end of the conversation, the way that it's framed by

672
00:34:07.480 --> 00:34:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Cooper is that Usishkin basically threatened Ronald Stores by saying,

673
00:34:14.360 --> 00:34:16.960
<v Speaker 3>and I believe this was in correct me if I'm mistaken,

674
00:34:17.000 --> 00:34:19.800
<v Speaker 3>I believe this was in the context of the aftermath

675
00:34:19.880 --> 00:34:23.480
<v Speaker 3>of the nineteen twenty nine program, where they were basically

676
00:34:24.360 --> 00:34:27.039
<v Speaker 3>Usishkin was saying, this is a program. You know, the

677
00:34:27.039 --> 00:34:30.159
<v Speaker 3>British bear responsibility for this. I know what a program

678
00:34:30.199 --> 00:34:33.320
<v Speaker 3>looks like. I've experienced or seen them myself, or you know,

679
00:34:33.360 --> 00:34:37.079
<v Speaker 3>read enough material on them. Given what happened in Tsarist Russia?

680
00:34:37.280 --> 00:34:39.239
<v Speaker 3>This was a program. And then at the end of

681
00:34:39.280 --> 00:34:45.199
<v Speaker 3>the conversation, Cooper basically says that Usishkin threatened stores by

682
00:34:45.280 --> 00:34:47.960
<v Speaker 3>saying something of the effect of you saw what happened

683
00:34:47.960 --> 00:34:51.519
<v Speaker 3>to the Tsar, you know, watch your back, basically something

684
00:34:51.559 --> 00:34:53.679
<v Speaker 3>to that effect. And so there was a whole there

685
00:34:53.719 --> 00:34:55.519
<v Speaker 3>was a hole back and forth. But you know, is

686
00:34:55.559 --> 00:34:58.719
<v Speaker 3>that what happened in the quote or was that? Is

687
00:34:58.719 --> 00:35:00.639
<v Speaker 3>that an accurate quote? Is that an you're telling of

688
00:35:00.679 --> 00:35:04.280
<v Speaker 3>the story, and when you dive into the sources that

689
00:35:04.360 --> 00:35:08.239
<v Speaker 3>refer to it, that part of the quote isn't mentioned.

690
00:35:08.719 --> 00:35:11.360
<v Speaker 3>And then somebody actually on X and I was going

691
00:35:11.440 --> 00:35:14.360
<v Speaker 3>to do this myself, somebody actually dove into the archives

692
00:35:14.400 --> 00:35:19.480
<v Speaker 3>in Israel and posted a telling in the archives that

693
00:35:20.519 --> 00:35:23.639
<v Speaker 3>are the basis for this conversation being referred to in

694
00:35:23.800 --> 00:35:28.639
<v Speaker 3>various historical works, and that isn't there. And so that

695
00:35:28.760 --> 00:35:30.360
<v Speaker 3>was kind of the end of the back and forth

696
00:35:30.400 --> 00:35:35.800
<v Speaker 3>when I highlighted that, and some some very well read

697
00:35:35.840 --> 00:35:38.320
<v Speaker 3>follower on X pulled that up and that was that

698
00:35:38.400 --> 00:35:39.239
<v Speaker 3>was basically the end of.

699
00:35:39.199 --> 00:35:43.519
<v Speaker 1>It, right, Yeah, And I remember somebody also pulled a

700
00:35:44.519 --> 00:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the origin of that quote. If I remember right, it

701
00:35:47.039 --> 00:35:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was a I am blanking on the name of the website,

702
00:35:49.320 --> 00:35:52.199
<v Speaker 1>but they did find a version of that. But I

703
00:35:52.239 --> 00:35:54.119
<v Speaker 1>think if I remember right, it was just a scanned

704
00:35:54.159 --> 00:35:57.519
<v Speaker 1>page of another secondary source. But it was on a

705
00:35:58.000 --> 00:36:00.760
<v Speaker 1>site that is that like has a reputable sounding name

706
00:36:01.159 --> 00:36:01.679
<v Speaker 1>something about it.

707
00:36:01.760 --> 00:36:03.519
<v Speaker 3>There was there was like a site there was like

708
00:36:03.519 --> 00:36:07.000
<v Speaker 3>a Jewish encyclopedia site or something that's it that, yeah,

709
00:36:07.320 --> 00:36:10.039
<v Speaker 3>And so that came up and they had they also

710
00:36:10.039 --> 00:36:12.760
<v Speaker 3>don't have a source for it. And so the basis

711
00:36:12.800 --> 00:36:15.480
<v Speaker 3>the basis of this conversation, and I think I don't

712
00:36:15.480 --> 00:36:17.800
<v Speaker 3>want to, you know, be misattributing here, but I believe

713
00:36:18.360 --> 00:36:23.880
<v Speaker 3>that Cooper pulls this from Tom Segev's book One Palestine Complete. Yes,

714
00:36:24.360 --> 00:36:27.079
<v Speaker 3>it was a history, yes, which is a history of

715
00:36:27.199 --> 00:36:30.760
<v Speaker 3>man of the Mandate. And so when you go in there,

716
00:36:30.880 --> 00:36:35.719
<v Speaker 3>Segev doesn't refer to that ending part of the conversation, right,

717
00:36:35.760 --> 00:36:40.119
<v Speaker 3>And that's what I highlight in my critique of Cooper here.

718
00:36:40.480 --> 00:36:43.559
<v Speaker 3>And then again, you know, the Twitter follower kind of

719
00:36:43.599 --> 00:36:46.280
<v Speaker 3>beat me to it and pulled up the archive in

720
00:36:46.480 --> 00:36:49.119
<v Speaker 3>Israel that refers to the conversation that I believe Segev

721
00:36:49.159 --> 00:36:51.559
<v Speaker 3>refers to. And it also isn't there. And so that

722
00:36:51.639 --> 00:36:53.400
<v Speaker 3>was the basis of the of the back and forth

723
00:36:53.519 --> 00:36:56.400
<v Speaker 3>and what ultimately I think got me blocked by Cooper

724
00:36:56.400 --> 00:36:57.559
<v Speaker 3>as well.

725
00:36:57.719 --> 00:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, and that's just kind of his his MO

726
00:37:00.079 --> 00:37:02.280
<v Speaker 1>has been liberal with the block button, I mean, and

727
00:37:02.360 --> 00:37:04.559
<v Speaker 1>that's something that I think a lot of people have

728
00:37:04.880 --> 00:37:07.559
<v Speaker 1>like come to do, especially when they have high follower

729
00:37:07.559 --> 00:37:11.119
<v Speaker 1>accounts and are, yeah, getting questioned, especially when.

730
00:37:11.000 --> 00:37:13.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, my rule for that is my rule for

731
00:37:13.960 --> 00:37:16.840
<v Speaker 3>that is, if you're gonna like personally insult me, you're

732
00:37:16.880 --> 00:37:19.280
<v Speaker 3>probably gonna get blocked. But if you're if you're focusing

733
00:37:19.320 --> 00:37:22.199
<v Speaker 3>on the claims or the arguments or having a back

734
00:37:22.239 --> 00:37:25.280
<v Speaker 3>and forth, like it doesn't make sense, you're not you're

735
00:37:25.320 --> 00:37:26.639
<v Speaker 3>not getting you're not getting blocked.

736
00:37:26.760 --> 00:37:27.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly.

737
00:37:27.599 --> 00:37:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, and and again, I mean this gets into

738
00:37:29.920 --> 00:37:32.519
<v Speaker 1>sort of more broadly like what you you know, what

739
00:37:32.559 --> 00:37:35.199
<v Speaker 1>you're doing essentially and well again another thing to come

740
00:37:35.239 --> 00:37:39.159
<v Speaker 1>back to, but you're engaging in critique. So and what

741
00:37:39.280 --> 00:37:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a peer review. And the thing about peer

742
00:37:41.400 --> 00:37:43.639
<v Speaker 1>review and critique is that the peer review and the

743
00:37:43.639 --> 00:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>critique can be critiqued and reviewed and then you review

744
00:37:46.960 --> 00:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the review with I mean, it's like it's and that

745
00:37:49.159 --> 00:37:51.559
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people don't understand the value

746
00:37:51.559 --> 00:37:54.519
<v Speaker 1>of that, because like the value of being wrong, I guess,

747
00:37:54.599 --> 00:37:55.599
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm trying to say.

748
00:37:56.239 --> 00:37:56.679
<v Speaker 2>I resent.

749
00:37:56.760 --> 00:37:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Actually this is something I get to pat myself on

750
00:37:59.039 --> 00:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the back here, so I'm I'm going to But somebody,

751
00:38:02.920 --> 00:38:05.679
<v Speaker 1>a very nice Polish listener, pointed out to me that

752
00:38:05.800 --> 00:38:10.679
<v Speaker 1>in my most recent episode I made a booboo in

753
00:38:10.719 --> 00:38:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the sense that I interchangeably used the term Warsaw ghetto

754
00:38:14.360 --> 00:38:18.480
<v Speaker 1>uprising and Warsaw uprising. Those are two distinct events, and

755
00:38:18.519 --> 00:38:21.599
<v Speaker 1>I conflated them, at least in passing. And I didn't

756
00:38:21.599 --> 00:38:23.199
<v Speaker 1>get the dates wrong or anything like that with what

757
00:38:23.239 --> 00:38:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about, but I did make a conflation,

758
00:38:26.000 --> 00:38:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and that is an error. That's you know, it's even

759
00:38:28.400 --> 00:38:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a major error, especially for you know, someone to make

760
00:38:31.880 --> 00:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>who is trying to be authoritative on a particular subject,

761
00:38:34.519 --> 00:38:36.280
<v Speaker 1>as you know, I am trying to do, at least

762
00:38:36.280 --> 00:38:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to a certain degree, as Darrel's trying to do, as

763
00:38:39.079 --> 00:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>as you're trying to do. And I think that that's

764
00:38:41.000 --> 00:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a valuable impulse, is to correct yourself. And I will

765
00:38:44.480 --> 00:38:48.599
<v Speaker 1>be fair to Daryl, especially after his initial defensive thread

766
00:38:48.880 --> 00:38:51.480
<v Speaker 1>about making Churchill the villain of World War Two. He

767
00:38:51.559 --> 00:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>did correct himself a couple times. Credit where it to do.

768
00:38:55.440 --> 00:38:58.039
<v Speaker 1>But I think that self correction is a very vital skill,

769
00:38:58.119 --> 00:39:02.039
<v Speaker 1>and blocking is the opposite of self correction. It's a

770
00:39:02.079 --> 00:39:03.800
<v Speaker 1>way of saying I have nothing to correct.

771
00:39:04.360 --> 00:39:04.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

772
00:39:04.639 --> 00:39:08.079
<v Speaker 3>I mean so, you know, Dave Smith, I think once

773
00:39:08.440 --> 00:39:12.519
<v Speaker 3>he either quote tweeted me or quote tweeted Cooper referring

774
00:39:12.519 --> 00:39:15.039
<v Speaker 3>to me and say something of the effect of, you know,

775
00:39:15.119 --> 00:39:16.840
<v Speaker 3>look at all the people ganging up on Cooper. There's

776
00:39:16.840 --> 00:39:19.920
<v Speaker 3>a reason they're coming after his claims, or something that effect.

777
00:39:19.960 --> 00:39:23.800
<v Speaker 3>And I replied to Dave and I basically said, you know,

778
00:39:24.000 --> 00:39:26.920
<v Speaker 3>you're clearly not familiar with this study of history, because

779
00:39:26.920 --> 00:39:30.760
<v Speaker 3>if you were, peer review is an intrinsic part of this, right,

780
00:39:30.800 --> 00:39:33.199
<v Speaker 3>and it's not something that people shirk from or are

781
00:39:33.280 --> 00:39:37.480
<v Speaker 3>scared of. You know, you need to be open to critique,

782
00:39:37.559 --> 00:39:39.400
<v Speaker 3>you know. And I think they would probably say, oh,

783
00:39:39.440 --> 00:39:41.760
<v Speaker 3>this isn't this isn't peer review, this is really bad faith, right,

784
00:39:41.800 --> 00:39:44.039
<v Speaker 3>because you're disagreeing with the narrative that they believe in.

785
00:39:44.079 --> 00:39:48.599
<v Speaker 3>From a geopolitical standpoint. That furthers there. I think some

786
00:39:48.599 --> 00:39:51.880
<v Speaker 3>would say political objectives, which is as I said earlier.

787
00:39:51.920 --> 00:39:53.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think a lot of this is if

788
00:39:53.840 --> 00:39:56.519
<v Speaker 3>you can influence the past and impact the past and

789
00:39:57.079 --> 00:39:59.119
<v Speaker 3>change people's beliefs and win hearts and minds, and you

790
00:39:59.159 --> 00:40:00.800
<v Speaker 3>can impact the press and in the future, and I

791
00:40:00.800 --> 00:40:02.360
<v Speaker 3>think that there might be a little bit of that

792
00:40:02.920 --> 00:40:06.000
<v Speaker 3>at play here as well, when it comes to the

793
00:40:06.039 --> 00:40:08.599
<v Speaker 3>telling of the history here. But all that is to say,

794
00:40:09.079 --> 00:40:12.880
<v Speaker 3>peer review is intrinsically a part of the study of history,

795
00:40:12.920 --> 00:40:15.440
<v Speaker 3>and so if you're going to accept the label of historian,

796
00:40:15.599 --> 00:40:18.840
<v Speaker 3>you're going to allow people to refer to you to that.

797
00:40:19.320 --> 00:40:22.719
<v Speaker 3>Just because you're not writing an academic paper doesn't mean

798
00:40:23.119 --> 00:40:26.519
<v Speaker 3>you should or want to escape critique.

799
00:40:26.719 --> 00:40:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

800
00:40:27.039 --> 00:40:28.880
<v Speaker 1>No, And again, this is something I wanted to talk

801
00:40:28.920 --> 00:40:30.599
<v Speaker 1>to you about more towards the end of the conversation,

802
00:40:30.639 --> 00:40:32.119
<v Speaker 1>but this is a good preview for it, because I

803
00:40:32.119 --> 00:40:37.840
<v Speaker 1>think that we're both aligned on that idea. You reminded

804
00:40:37.880 --> 00:40:40.039
<v Speaker 1>me also of I think the first thing that made

805
00:40:40.079 --> 00:40:42.719
<v Speaker 1>me a little put off by Darrel's reaction to your

806
00:40:42.920 --> 00:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>existence really, which.

807
00:40:44.159 --> 00:40:46.159
<v Speaker 2>He also, by the way, I thought was very funny.

808
00:40:46.400 --> 00:40:49.039
<v Speaker 1>He thought that it was a podcast just dedicated to him,

809
00:40:49.320 --> 00:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>which it's not. Yes, you've made that very clear already.

810
00:40:52.519 --> 00:40:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Though technically I don't know if you knew this. The

811
00:40:54.920 --> 00:40:57.199
<v Speaker 1>book Provoked was originally going to be co written by

812
00:40:57.320 --> 00:41:00.079
<v Speaker 1>Daryl and Scott Horton. I don't know what happened with that,

813
00:41:00.159 --> 00:41:02.559
<v Speaker 1>but that was the original plan. So in a sense,

814
00:41:02.559 --> 00:41:06.159
<v Speaker 1>I guess you are making a show just about him.

815
00:41:06.239 --> 00:41:08.199
<v Speaker 3>Interesting. I actually I wasn't aware of that. Actually, I

816
00:41:08.199 --> 00:41:09.960
<v Speaker 3>didn't know that it was going to be jointly authored

817
00:41:09.960 --> 00:41:10.599
<v Speaker 3>by the both of them.

818
00:41:10.960 --> 00:41:13.239
<v Speaker 1>It was just like an initial coll I don't think

819
00:41:13.280 --> 00:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that lasted very long, honestly.

820
00:41:15.079 --> 00:41:15.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, though.

821
00:41:15.559 --> 00:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe honestly, given that Scott Horton has eight thousand footnotes

822
00:41:20.400 --> 00:41:22.480
<v Speaker 1>he loves to brag about, Daryl might be in those

823
00:41:22.480 --> 00:41:23.320
<v Speaker 1>footnotes somewhere.

824
00:41:23.360 --> 00:41:25.559
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea, but there are.

825
00:41:25.679 --> 00:41:28.920
<v Speaker 3>There are a lot of footnotes in Provoked, many many footnotes.

826
00:41:29.000 --> 00:41:31.599
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay, cool, yeah, no, we'll jump back to that though.

827
00:41:32.000 --> 00:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>But the thing that really put me off was when

828
00:41:35.159 --> 00:41:38.039
<v Speaker 1>Darrel was getting mad at you for that, and he

829
00:41:38.119 --> 00:41:40.760
<v Speaker 1>saw that I was, you know, praising your you know,

830
00:41:40.800 --> 00:41:43.519
<v Speaker 1>your work, and you know, being skeptical of the amount

831
00:41:43.519 --> 00:41:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of sources he'd read. He used words as something to

832
00:41:46.920 --> 00:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the effect of, I can't believe you don't see what's

833
00:41:49.480 --> 00:41:52.280
<v Speaker 1>going on here, which is to imply that I'm falling

834
00:41:52.320 --> 00:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for some kind of grand conspiracy theory, which that was

835
00:41:56.039 --> 00:42:00.039
<v Speaker 1>when I was like, what is this? What am I

836
00:42:00.079 --> 00:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>falling for here? I'm falling for critique or am I

837
00:42:03.280 --> 00:42:09.039
<v Speaker 1>falling for somebody daring to question you? Because that seems

838
00:42:08.840 --> 00:42:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the latter seems to be really what the issue is,

839
00:42:12.119 --> 00:42:14.119
<v Speaker 1>because there's nothing wrong with being critiqued.

840
00:42:14.159 --> 00:42:17.000
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing wrong with having your.

841
00:42:16.880 --> 00:42:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Work subject to criticism, even harsh criticism. Is there a

842
00:42:21.719 --> 00:42:24.519
<v Speaker 1>level of bad faith, it doesn't matter if the criticism

843
00:42:24.559 --> 00:42:27.159
<v Speaker 1>is sound, that's all that matters. You know, bad faith

844
00:42:27.199 --> 00:42:29.119
<v Speaker 1>does matter at a certain point, but you know, when

845
00:42:29.119 --> 00:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to it, if there's things that you

846
00:42:31.519 --> 00:42:34.079
<v Speaker 1>can't account for in your own work, that means you

847
00:42:34.400 --> 00:42:36.639
<v Speaker 1>made a mistake and that needs to be accounted for.

848
00:42:36.920 --> 00:42:40.039
<v Speaker 1>In his case, and anyway, I didn't want to make

849
00:42:40.079 --> 00:42:43.800
<v Speaker 1>this too much about internet drama, but it's kind of

850
00:42:43.880 --> 00:42:46.559
<v Speaker 1>unavoidable because a lot of this kind of stuff happens

851
00:42:46.639 --> 00:42:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in social media, and as much as I don't like

852
00:42:49.400 --> 00:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to admit it, I think that we need to do

853
00:42:51.039 --> 00:42:53.400
<v Speaker 1>away with the idea that social media is not real

854
00:42:53.440 --> 00:42:56.360
<v Speaker 1>life when it comes to things like politics, history and

855
00:42:56.360 --> 00:42:56.760
<v Speaker 1>so forth.

856
00:42:56.800 --> 00:42:58.599
<v Speaker 2>It is real life. It's been real life for a

857
00:42:58.599 --> 00:43:00.159
<v Speaker 2>lot longer. I think that we want to add.

858
00:43:00.559 --> 00:43:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I look, I think that that's first of all,

859
00:43:03.159 --> 00:43:06.239
<v Speaker 3>the world revolves around internet drama, so it don't worry,

860
00:43:06.320 --> 00:43:10.039
<v Speaker 3>It's fine. But I think I think you're one hundred

861
00:43:10.039 --> 00:43:12.800
<v Speaker 3>percent right, Like I think that we need to be

862
00:43:12.880 --> 00:43:16.719
<v Speaker 3>open to feedback and critique, right, and again, it really

863
00:43:16.719 --> 00:43:21.559
<v Speaker 3>comes down to labels, right, So I mean it should

864
00:43:21.559 --> 00:43:24.880
<v Speaker 3>the bar be higher for somebody like a Darryl Cooper

865
00:43:25.079 --> 00:43:28.599
<v Speaker 3>or Scott Horton versus a Dave Smith. Yes, absolutely. I

866
00:43:28.639 --> 00:43:31.960
<v Speaker 3>mean if you accept the label of historian, if you're

867
00:43:31.960 --> 00:43:35.039
<v Speaker 3>going to publish works with sources and footnotes, and you're

868
00:43:35.039 --> 00:43:37.880
<v Speaker 3>going to position yourself in that way, then you need

869
00:43:37.920 --> 00:43:40.920
<v Speaker 3>to be open and receptive to the fact that people

870
00:43:40.920 --> 00:43:43.119
<v Speaker 3>are going to critique your work. I think that part

871
00:43:43.119 --> 00:43:45.760
<v Speaker 3>of this issue is that we're in this and I

872
00:43:46.119 --> 00:43:48.920
<v Speaker 3>speak to this in the very in the first episode

873
00:43:48.920 --> 00:43:50.920
<v Speaker 3>of Crack About Histor, which is actually episode zero, where

874
00:43:50.920 --> 00:43:54.320
<v Speaker 3>I talk about the justification for the show, where you know,

875
00:43:54.480 --> 00:43:56.719
<v Speaker 3>I think that a lot of these people are kind

876
00:43:56.719 --> 00:43:59.880
<v Speaker 3>of living in these bubbles where they're surrounded by people

877
00:43:59.880 --> 00:44:02.400
<v Speaker 3>that think like them, because this is the popular thing

878
00:44:02.480 --> 00:44:08.400
<v Speaker 3>right now. Right, you have revisionists, contrarian history. You spoke

879
00:44:08.440 --> 00:44:10.880
<v Speaker 3>to this yourself before. You know Churchill, it was the

880
00:44:10.960 --> 00:44:13.800
<v Speaker 3>chief villain of World War two, you know, as an example, right,

881
00:44:13.800 --> 00:44:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Hodjaminal Husseini was a moderating influence things like this, and

882
00:44:17.920 --> 00:44:21.519
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of the popular shiny thing right now. And

883
00:44:21.559 --> 00:44:23.880
<v Speaker 3>so I think that a lot of these people that

884
00:44:23.920 --> 00:44:27.960
<v Speaker 3>are kind of telling these historical narratives maybe surround themselves

885
00:44:27.960 --> 00:44:33.360
<v Speaker 3>with people that think similarly, right, and maybe they don't

886
00:44:33.519 --> 00:44:35.960
<v Speaker 3>encounter pushback. You know. My whole thing, and I speak

887
00:44:36.000 --> 00:44:38.679
<v Speaker 3>to this again in episode zero, is that it needs

888
00:44:38.719 --> 00:44:42.039
<v Speaker 3>to be long form. The pushback needs to be substantive,

889
00:44:42.079 --> 00:44:44.440
<v Speaker 3>because what you see on x or Twitter, whatever you

890
00:44:44.440 --> 00:44:47.159
<v Speaker 3>want to call it, is a lot of people kind

891
00:44:47.159 --> 00:44:50.280
<v Speaker 3>of reacting to the claim saying, oh, they're ridiculous. And

892
00:44:50.280 --> 00:44:53.280
<v Speaker 3>it's a bit of a handwave right when you say, oh,

893
00:44:53.320 --> 00:44:55.320
<v Speaker 3>of Churchill was a villain of World War two. Okay,

894
00:44:55.440 --> 00:44:59.119
<v Speaker 3>this guy's clearly off his rocker. But where's the follow up? Right,

895
00:44:59.239 --> 00:45:03.320
<v Speaker 3>where is the substance? Because his followers, you know, Horton,

896
00:45:03.400 --> 00:45:06.800
<v Speaker 3>the Coopers of the World, et cetera, their followers always say,

897
00:45:07.519 --> 00:45:11.320
<v Speaker 3>stop attacking him, address the claims, and so that's kind

898
00:45:11.320 --> 00:45:14.679
<v Speaker 3>of underpinning the entirety of Cracklawn history. Okay, we're not

899
00:45:14.719 --> 00:45:18.440
<v Speaker 3>attacking him, we're only addressing the claims. Yeah, and I

900
00:45:18.480 --> 00:45:21.119
<v Speaker 3>was gonna say the other I wonder if he's a listener.

901
00:45:21.599 --> 00:45:24.800
<v Speaker 3>The only person I've seen, really like high profile person

902
00:45:24.800 --> 00:45:26.719
<v Speaker 3>I've seen really try to do that so far as

903
00:45:26.760 --> 00:45:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Coleman Hughes with his what was it seventeen hour conversation

904
00:45:30.519 --> 00:45:34.119
<v Speaker 3>with Dave Smith, whatever it was, it was very good

905
00:45:34.119 --> 00:45:36.119
<v Speaker 3>and he was very they were respectful to each other.

906
00:45:36.159 --> 00:45:39.119
<v Speaker 3>And I haven't even finished listening to it, honestly, but

907
00:45:39.239 --> 00:45:41.079
<v Speaker 3>just listening to the first hour of it, it's like, yeah,

908
00:45:41.119 --> 00:45:43.320
<v Speaker 3>it got tedious, Like I heard a lot of people

909
00:45:43.320 --> 00:45:46.400
<v Speaker 3>critique it, but that's the point, Like you have to

910
00:45:46.440 --> 00:45:48.719
<v Speaker 3>be tedious, especially with people who are going to be,

911
00:45:48.880 --> 00:45:52.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, making claims like that. Yeah, Oh, I wanted

912
00:45:52.480 --> 00:45:55.199
<v Speaker 3>to ask before I forget you said that Daryl has

913
00:45:55.239 --> 00:45:58.679
<v Speaker 3>no longer at least stopped people from referring to him

914
00:45:58.679 --> 00:46:01.639
<v Speaker 3>as a historian, or is he started calling himself a historian.

915
00:46:01.679 --> 00:46:03.159
<v Speaker 3>I have not seen him do that, but I also

916
00:46:03.199 --> 00:46:06.079
<v Speaker 3>haven't really been looking into him and his statements for

917
00:46:06.119 --> 00:46:09.199
<v Speaker 3>a while. So, first of all, very much big fan

918
00:46:09.239 --> 00:46:11.639
<v Speaker 3>of Coleman, Hugh. I thought the conversation with Dave Smith

919
00:46:11.679 --> 00:46:13.880
<v Speaker 3>was phenomenal. I watched the whole thing, and I thought

920
00:46:13.920 --> 00:46:17.679
<v Speaker 3>it was just a Coleman did in that episode what

921
00:46:17.760 --> 00:46:21.199
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm trying to do via podcast and Crackpot

922
00:46:21.239 --> 00:46:25.559
<v Speaker 3>History Live, and probably much more eloquently and more skillfully

923
00:46:25.599 --> 00:46:27.159
<v Speaker 3>than I could do in the same setting.

924
00:46:27.199 --> 00:46:29.480
<v Speaker 2>So very much to be in his position, yeah, that

925
00:46:29.519 --> 00:46:30.239
<v Speaker 2>would be yeah.

926
00:46:30.159 --> 00:46:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Very much, very much respect what Coleman is doing and

927
00:46:32.880 --> 00:46:37.400
<v Speaker 3>is trying to do. So the historian reference. In I

928
00:46:37.400 --> 00:46:43.800
<v Speaker 3>think the most recent Tucker Carlson interview, Carlson refers to

929
00:46:43.800 --> 00:46:48.280
<v Speaker 3>to Darryl as the most august historian and he does that,

930
00:46:48.320 --> 00:46:50.880
<v Speaker 3>I believe, in front of him, and there's no there's

931
00:46:50.880 --> 00:46:54.280
<v Speaker 3>no pushback there. So my take on that is the

932
00:46:54.360 --> 00:46:58.559
<v Speaker 3>label has now been accepted, and the amount of pushback

933
00:46:58.639 --> 00:47:01.159
<v Speaker 3>that is commensurate with accept that label by way of

934
00:47:01.159 --> 00:47:04.679
<v Speaker 3>you now labeling yourself or accepting others labeling you as

935
00:47:04.679 --> 00:47:07.800
<v Speaker 3>a historian, should be commensurate, right that should it should

936
00:47:07.800 --> 00:47:10.679
<v Speaker 3>There should be an appropriate level of pushback to accepting

937
00:47:10.719 --> 00:47:13.840
<v Speaker 3>that label and then making making claims that I think

938
00:47:13.880 --> 00:47:15.760
<v Speaker 3>are deserving of that pushback.

939
00:47:15.840 --> 00:47:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And without like you know, just leaving it open so

940
00:47:18.400 --> 00:47:21.239
<v Speaker 1>that you can later say I never called myself a historian,

941
00:47:21.480 --> 00:47:22.159
<v Speaker 1>for example.

942
00:47:22.719 --> 00:47:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

943
00:47:23.199 --> 00:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So, now, not to jump the gun with your future plans,

944
00:47:25.960 --> 00:47:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but just because we've been talking about Daryl's work, are

945
00:47:28.800 --> 00:47:32.519
<v Speaker 1>you planning on approaching Daryl's other series, including his as

946
00:47:32.519 --> 00:47:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Best I Can Tell, Superior and better research follow up

947
00:47:36.039 --> 00:47:37.280
<v Speaker 1>series God's Socialist.

948
00:47:37.519 --> 00:47:39.119
<v Speaker 3>It's a good question. I mean, a lot of people

949
00:47:39.159 --> 00:47:41.719
<v Speaker 3>really liked my coverage. If you're and loathing in the

950
00:47:41.760 --> 00:47:44.000
<v Speaker 3>New Jerusalem, you know there's a lot of content to

951
00:47:44.079 --> 00:47:48.440
<v Speaker 3>cover with uh provoked in Scott Wharton's current book, and

952
00:47:48.480 --> 00:47:50.719
<v Speaker 3>so I just released part two. There's a number of

953
00:47:50.800 --> 00:47:53.239
<v Speaker 3>chapters leading up to the present day. So I'm kind

954
00:47:53.239 --> 00:47:55.440
<v Speaker 3>of I'm kind of just focused on that. Will I

955
00:47:55.480 --> 00:47:59.320
<v Speaker 3>will I go back to Cooper I think at some point, certainly,

956
00:47:59.360 --> 00:48:01.360
<v Speaker 3>But I think there's a lot of claims being made

957
00:48:01.800 --> 00:48:04.639
<v Speaker 3>by a lot of influencers, a lot of pop historians

958
00:48:04.639 --> 00:48:07.119
<v Speaker 3>that are deserving of attention. So there's just to say

959
00:48:07.199 --> 00:48:10.119
<v Speaker 3>there's not a lack of content that deserves coverage.

960
00:48:10.159 --> 00:48:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Sure, Yeah, And I'll just say, just to put my

961
00:48:12.559 --> 00:48:15.639
<v Speaker 1>opinion out there, I have seen criticism that with God's

962
00:48:15.639 --> 00:48:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Socialist at least, that Darro was just pulling from a

963
00:48:17.960 --> 00:48:21.480
<v Speaker 1>handful of books and stretched it out into, like, you know,

964
00:48:21.519 --> 00:48:25.159
<v Speaker 1>a forty hour series or something, And that would probably

965
00:48:25.199 --> 00:48:28.239
<v Speaker 1>align with my skepticism of his having read literally hundreds

966
00:48:28.239 --> 00:48:31.039
<v Speaker 1>of books about Israel, Zion as a mara of nationalism

967
00:48:31.079 --> 00:48:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and all that. But generally what I already knew and

968
00:48:34.440 --> 00:48:36.760
<v Speaker 1>what I've come to know about the People's Temple and

969
00:48:36.800 --> 00:48:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the radical meltdowns of the seventies that aligns with most

970
00:48:40.800 --> 00:48:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of what he said and reported in that series. So

971
00:48:43.840 --> 00:48:46.159
<v Speaker 1>I can, I mean, just based on my memory and

972
00:48:46.239 --> 00:48:47.840
<v Speaker 1>just based on you know, what I know, I can

973
00:48:47.880 --> 00:48:50.400
<v Speaker 1>speak to the quality of that series for the most part.

974
00:48:51.320 --> 00:48:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And I would actually say the same goes for his

975
00:48:53.159 --> 00:48:56.519
<v Speaker 1>one offs, like that one he did called The Anti Humans,

976
00:48:56.519 --> 00:48:59.159
<v Speaker 1>which I still think is a very powerful episode. Though

977
00:48:59.199 --> 00:49:01.559
<v Speaker 1>that did have a couple of moments that made arch

978
00:49:01.599 --> 00:49:05.079
<v Speaker 1>and eyebrow, particularly when he started referencing things about Yugoslavia,

979
00:49:05.119 --> 00:49:07.320
<v Speaker 1>which has kind of been my wheelhouse as well for

980
00:49:07.360 --> 00:49:11.079
<v Speaker 1>a while. And I'll just mention on one in that episode,

981
00:49:11.079 --> 00:49:12.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've listened to it.

982
00:49:12.320 --> 00:49:12.920
<v Speaker 2>He just kind of.

983
00:49:12.840 --> 00:49:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Omitted consciously or otherwise of just who the Ustasia and

984
00:49:16.719 --> 00:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>wartime Croatia were, that the Partisans were killing at the

985
00:49:19.519 --> 00:49:21.159
<v Speaker 1>end of the war, like he made it sound like

986
00:49:21.159 --> 00:49:24.440
<v Speaker 1>they were just innocent nationalists getting victimized by communists, and

987
00:49:24.440 --> 00:49:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I remember just wrinkling my nose of that and being like,

988
00:49:27.480 --> 00:49:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think and I saw it at the time,

989
00:49:29.360 --> 00:49:31.199
<v Speaker 1>and maybe I still do. I don't really have any

990
00:49:31.239 --> 00:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>reason to see otherwise, but at the time I was

991
00:49:34.039 --> 00:49:36.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, I don't think you know much about

992
00:49:36.639 --> 00:49:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the Ustasia if you're talking about them as innocent victims regardless.

993
00:49:42.480 --> 00:49:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess yeah, I'll broaden my question a little bit here,

994
00:49:45.920 --> 00:49:49.880
<v Speaker 1>because after seeing all these problems with his Fear and

995
00:49:49.880 --> 00:49:52.519
<v Speaker 1>Loathing series that you highlighted, and not to mention his

996
00:49:52.599 --> 00:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>extremely reckless and low quality errors with his current World

997
00:49:55.480 --> 00:49:58.440
<v Speaker 1>War II series, which I'm sure you've been following that

998
00:49:58.480 --> 00:50:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a fair bit too, at least online, I guess what

999
00:50:01.000 --> 00:50:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering is, how are we supposed to trust anything

1000
00:50:04.119 --> 00:50:06.199
<v Speaker 1>that he says, even though I do think that his

1001
00:50:06.320 --> 00:50:09.960
<v Speaker 1>God's Socialist series stacks up. I'm now much more skeptical

1002
00:50:10.360 --> 00:50:13.320
<v Speaker 1>because of what you highlighted in fear and loathing, And

1003
00:50:14.639 --> 00:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess, putting aside the motive for now, even if

1004
00:50:17.039 --> 00:50:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's all accidental, let's just say that demonstrates at best

1005
00:50:21.880 --> 00:50:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in competence, right. I mean, I guess the broad question

1006
00:50:24.880 --> 00:50:26.079
<v Speaker 1>is for me here where do we.

1007
00:50:26.119 --> 00:50:27.599
<v Speaker 2>Draw the line? Where do we draw the.

1008
00:50:27.559 --> 00:50:33.599
<v Speaker 1>Line where incompetence meets calculation or where incompetence becomes calculation?

1009
00:50:33.800 --> 00:50:35.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, does it depend from person to person or

1010
00:50:35.639 --> 00:50:38.039
<v Speaker 1>is there just a certain point where that just doesn't

1011
00:50:38.039 --> 00:50:40.239
<v Speaker 1>matter anymore? So that's what I mean by a broader question.

1012
00:50:40.280 --> 00:50:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's more philosophical in that sense.

1013
00:50:43.119 --> 00:50:45.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it is a broad question. And I think

1014
00:50:46.039 --> 00:50:49.599
<v Speaker 3>to zoom out fifty thousand foot view here. So I

1015
00:50:49.639 --> 00:50:52.679
<v Speaker 3>know I've referred to this previously, but I speak to

1016
00:50:52.719 --> 00:50:57.960
<v Speaker 3>this in episode zero of Crackpot History. The motivation behind

1017
00:50:57.960 --> 00:51:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the show, and the motivation behind the show. The thing

1018
00:51:02.000 --> 00:51:04.559
<v Speaker 3>that kind of lit a light bulb for me was

1019
00:51:04.800 --> 00:51:06.559
<v Speaker 3>and you probably saw this, Do you remember this the

1020
00:51:06.559 --> 00:51:09.519
<v Speaker 3>episode of Joe Rogan between Douglas Murray and Dave Smith,

1021
00:51:09.519 --> 00:51:10.159
<v Speaker 3>that whole debate.

1022
00:51:10.760 --> 00:51:14.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's the debate that no one won. We all lost.

1023
00:51:15.000 --> 00:51:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's it's it kind will kind of set

1024
00:51:16.840 --> 00:51:19.559
<v Speaker 3>the Internet on fire, right, and it fried everybody's brains.

1025
00:51:19.599 --> 00:51:23.119
<v Speaker 3>But I think it was asking a really good question.

1026
00:51:23.679 --> 00:51:25.480
<v Speaker 3>And even though Murray was kind of being t V

1027
00:51:25.599 --> 00:51:29.800
<v Speaker 3>one there, it was this question of who can you trust? Right,

1028
00:51:30.039 --> 00:51:34.719
<v Speaker 3>and it was the experts versus the influencers. And that's

1029
00:51:34.719 --> 00:51:37.280
<v Speaker 3>my language, I'm kind of paraphrasing, but that's kind of

1030
00:51:37.320 --> 00:51:40.440
<v Speaker 3>the gist of it, right, And I think that I

1031
00:51:40.440 --> 00:51:45.239
<v Speaker 3>think that we live in this period where to a degree,

1032
00:51:45.320 --> 00:51:48.679
<v Speaker 3>there's a large segment of people that look at the

1033
00:51:48.760 --> 00:51:52.519
<v Speaker 3>experts on a variety of different subjects that typically revolves

1034
00:51:52.559 --> 00:51:56.559
<v Speaker 3>around politics, or history or generally the humanities. Right, these

1035
00:51:56.840 --> 00:52:01.079
<v Speaker 3>these softer, less quantitative subjects compared to you know, civil

1036
00:52:01.119 --> 00:52:04.239
<v Speaker 3>engineering or being a pilot or something like that, where

1037
00:52:04.280 --> 00:52:05.840
<v Speaker 3>you either land the plane or you don't, and the

1038
00:52:05.840 --> 00:52:09.199
<v Speaker 3>bridge either stands or the bridge collapses. But these softer

1039
00:52:09.320 --> 00:52:12.000
<v Speaker 3>subjects that are more narrative driven or open to interpretation,

1040
00:52:12.880 --> 00:52:16.440
<v Speaker 3>where people have a lack of trust for what, you know,

1041
00:52:16.480 --> 00:52:19.480
<v Speaker 3>the quote unquote experts. And I think that that's for

1042
00:52:19.519 --> 00:52:22.440
<v Speaker 3>a variety of different reasons. You know, some of them political,

1043
00:52:22.519 --> 00:52:24.679
<v Speaker 3>some of them social, some of them given recent events,

1044
00:52:26.039 --> 00:52:28.599
<v Speaker 3>and that results in a large segment of people looking

1045
00:52:28.639 --> 00:52:32.199
<v Speaker 3>at the experts and saying, I don't trust the experts.

1046
00:52:32.280 --> 00:52:36.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, I don't trust the typical historical narrative. I

1047
00:52:36.960 --> 00:52:39.559
<v Speaker 3>trust that guy because you know, he's telling me that

1048
00:52:39.679 --> 00:52:43.559
<v Speaker 3>the esoteric undercover history that nobody's really told me before

1049
00:52:44.000 --> 00:52:47.039
<v Speaker 3>because it's been censored from me. And I'm actually now

1050
00:52:47.039 --> 00:52:49.880
<v Speaker 3>a part of this special little in group audience, and

1051
00:52:49.960 --> 00:52:53.320
<v Speaker 3>I actually feel very important because I'm a part of this,

1052
00:52:53.880 --> 00:52:56.719
<v Speaker 3>and now it's on me to share this esoteric knowledge

1053
00:52:56.760 --> 00:52:59.559
<v Speaker 3>with other people so that I can feel special disseminating it.

1054
00:52:59.559 --> 00:53:03.719
<v Speaker 3>It's this, it's this whole psychological I think flywheel of

1055
00:53:04.440 --> 00:53:08.679
<v Speaker 3>audiences and influencers, and this isn't really just about about

1056
00:53:08.880 --> 00:53:12.559
<v Speaker 3>uh Cooper here, right, This is about more people that

1057
00:53:12.719 --> 00:53:16.199
<v Speaker 3>do this, and I think there's a there's a there's

1058
00:53:16.239 --> 00:53:20.840
<v Speaker 3>a motivating force behind it that's really kind of insular,

1059
00:53:21.400 --> 00:53:23.159
<v Speaker 3>and it's all about them saying, you know, if you

1060
00:53:23.239 --> 00:53:25.280
<v Speaker 3>come to me, I will tell you the truth. I

1061
00:53:25.320 --> 00:53:27.960
<v Speaker 3>will distill this hidden knowledge for you. I will make

1062
00:53:28.000 --> 00:53:30.840
<v Speaker 3>you feel special. I will tell you what's been hidden

1063
00:53:30.840 --> 00:53:34.559
<v Speaker 3>from you for decades. If you just listen to me.

1064
00:53:35.039 --> 00:53:37.639
<v Speaker 3>And I think that there's something psychologically triggering there for

1065
00:53:37.679 --> 00:53:38.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people.

1066
00:53:39.800 --> 00:53:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like a cult leader.

1067
00:53:41.159 --> 00:53:43.840
<v Speaker 3>That's your that's your language, not mine. But I definitely

1068
00:53:43.920 --> 00:53:45.840
<v Speaker 3>think that. Look, I think I think that there's I

1069
00:53:45.840 --> 00:53:47.719
<v Speaker 3>think that there is an aspect to this, right, and

1070
00:53:47.760 --> 00:53:50.079
<v Speaker 3>when you when you really dive deep into it and

1071
00:53:50.119 --> 00:53:52.280
<v Speaker 3>you you ask people, you know, what is it about

1072
00:53:52.280 --> 00:53:56.239
<v Speaker 3>what is it about Horton or Cooper or these these

1073
00:53:56.239 --> 00:53:59.519
<v Speaker 3>different narratives that you that are that are really just

1074
00:54:00.239 --> 00:54:03.920
<v Speaker 3>in some cases out there that that interests you. And

1075
00:54:03.960 --> 00:54:06.760
<v Speaker 3>people say, well, you know, I just don't trust the experts,

1076
00:54:06.840 --> 00:54:08.880
<v Speaker 3>or it's been it's been hidden from me, it's been censored,

1077
00:54:09.119 --> 00:54:10.639
<v Speaker 3>and they come up with a way to kind of

1078
00:54:10.840 --> 00:54:14.599
<v Speaker 3>justify listening to these alternative versions of history. And it starts,

1079
00:54:14.639 --> 00:54:17.039
<v Speaker 3>maybe a little bit innocently, and then you end it,

1080
00:54:17.079 --> 00:54:19.119
<v Speaker 3>well Churchill, you ended a place where you say, well

1081
00:54:19.199 --> 00:54:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Churchill was the chief villain of World War two, and

1082
00:54:21.320 --> 00:54:23.519
<v Speaker 3>that has alongside, yeah, all that stuff, but on the

1083
00:54:23.559 --> 00:54:27.239
<v Speaker 3>wrong side, deconstructing the foundation midst of the modern West, right,

1084
00:54:27.280 --> 00:54:30.679
<v Speaker 3>and that has the potential to have real impact in

1085
00:54:30.719 --> 00:54:31.440
<v Speaker 3>the present day.

1086
00:54:31.800 --> 00:54:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and and yeah, obviously I'm being a little facetious.

1087
00:54:35.000 --> 00:54:37.159
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, if you listen to God's Socialist,

1088
00:54:37.159 --> 00:54:39.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a point where Cooper does a very good job

1089
00:54:40.039 --> 00:54:41.719
<v Speaker 1>explaining the cult leader psychology.

1090
00:54:41.800 --> 00:54:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's just put it that way. I'm giving him shit.

1091
00:54:44.280 --> 00:54:49.559
<v Speaker 1>But but uh yeah, I do think that you're you're

1092
00:54:49.599 --> 00:54:52.159
<v Speaker 1>definitely speaking to something, and I think that really, you know,

1093
00:54:52.199 --> 00:54:54.079
<v Speaker 1>we can't talk too much about it, obvious because you're

1094
00:54:54.199 --> 00:54:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you only released a second episode, but with your second

1095
00:54:56.400 --> 00:54:59.719
<v Speaker 1>series Fields of Gold, Fields of Red, that that does

1096
00:54:59.760 --> 00:55:02.840
<v Speaker 1>seem to be really what you're getting at with Horton's

1097
00:55:02.840 --> 00:55:04.039
<v Speaker 1>work is that he's.

1098
00:55:03.840 --> 00:55:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Really getting at this idea that.

1099
00:55:07.079 --> 00:55:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Russia was, as the title suggests, provoked into committing an

1100
00:55:12.360 --> 00:55:18.360
<v Speaker 1>act of flagrant territorial imperialism and annexation and shocking violence

1101
00:55:18.400 --> 00:55:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on the European continent. More shocking than anything that's happened.

1102
00:55:21.440 --> 00:55:23.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't want to overstate it, but probably

1103
00:55:23.159 --> 00:55:25.639
<v Speaker 1>since World War Two in terms of scale, because as

1104
00:55:25.639 --> 00:55:28.280
<v Speaker 1>bad as it was with the crackup of Yugoslavia in

1105
00:55:28.320 --> 00:55:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the nineties, I mean, the scale was nothing like this.

1106
00:55:31.639 --> 00:55:34.519
<v Speaker 1>So the point being is, I guess what I'm saying

1107
00:55:34.559 --> 00:55:36.519
<v Speaker 1>is there's only two episodes of this series you're working on.

1108
00:55:37.119 --> 00:55:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But what are your takeaways from that project so far.

1109
00:55:40.039 --> 00:55:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's pivot towards Horton a little bit here, because you've

1110
00:55:42.320 --> 00:55:43.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned him a couple of times.

1111
00:55:43.920 --> 00:55:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that there is you know, I found

1112
00:55:47.440 --> 00:55:51.039
<v Speaker 3>in the first two chapters. I'm going chapter by chapter,

1113
00:55:51.119 --> 00:55:53.840
<v Speaker 3>and the way that Horton breaks up the book is

1114
00:55:54.360 --> 00:55:58.880
<v Speaker 3>by presidency. So he starts with Bush Senior and then

1115
00:55:58.920 --> 00:56:02.079
<v Speaker 3>he goes basically from and So what I found is,

1116
00:56:02.079 --> 00:56:04.239
<v Speaker 3>and I say this in the series, I think that

1117
00:56:04.400 --> 00:56:09.239
<v Speaker 3>starting in the eighties is problematic because you're basically missing

1118
00:56:09.960 --> 00:56:14.280
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of years of context that basically takes you to

1119
00:56:14.360 --> 00:56:17.800
<v Speaker 3>the collapse of the Soviet Union. And you know, I

1120
00:56:18.360 --> 00:56:21.559
<v Speaker 3>in his defense, there might be a very valid reason

1121
00:56:21.679 --> 00:56:23.599
<v Speaker 3>for doing that, Right, you can only fill so many

1122
00:56:23.599 --> 00:56:25.960
<v Speaker 3>pages of a book you have to publish at some point,

1123
00:56:26.400 --> 00:56:28.679
<v Speaker 3>and maybe you know, he wanted to focus on the

1124
00:56:28.760 --> 00:56:31.840
<v Speaker 3>role of US foreign policy. But when you actually dive

1125
00:56:31.880 --> 00:56:35.199
<v Speaker 3>into the history of the region, right, hundreds of years

1126
00:56:35.400 --> 00:56:39.639
<v Speaker 3>of trying to quash Ukrainian nationalism and it just popping

1127
00:56:39.760 --> 00:56:42.000
<v Speaker 3>back up, you're missing a lot of that, right, And

1128
00:56:42.320 --> 00:56:45.599
<v Speaker 3>there's this moment in the book and I speak to

1129
00:56:45.639 --> 00:56:49.719
<v Speaker 3>this where Horton actually does this deep dive. He really

1130
00:56:49.760 --> 00:56:53.639
<v Speaker 3>focuses on the Yugoslav Wars because that's used as basically

1131
00:56:53.679 --> 00:56:57.440
<v Speaker 3>a poster child to basically point, in his opinion to

1132
00:56:57.559 --> 00:57:03.039
<v Speaker 3>the malpractice of the West in provoking Russia. So a lot,

1133
00:57:03.119 --> 00:57:06.119
<v Speaker 3>there's a big deep dive on Serbia and the Yugoslav Wars,

1134
00:57:06.159 --> 00:57:08.440
<v Speaker 3>and he does this whole oh, go ahead, go ahead.

1135
00:57:08.559 --> 00:57:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Oh. I was just gonna say, he's following the lead of.

1136
00:57:11.599 --> 00:57:13.679
<v Speaker 1>What I used to consider sort of the quote unquote

1137
00:57:13.679 --> 00:57:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Occupy Wall Street position on that. And I say that

1138
00:57:17.039 --> 00:57:21.760
<v Speaker 1>specifically because I remember when the Occupy website cited the

1139
00:57:21.800 --> 00:57:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Bosnian War as like another example of rapacious US intervention

1140
00:57:26.519 --> 00:57:31.039
<v Speaker 1>in imperialism, where supposedly the genocide of Bosnian Muslims by

1141
00:57:31.119 --> 00:57:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Bostian Serbs only happened because of NATO bombing. And the

1142
00:57:34.760 --> 00:57:37.000
<v Speaker 1>more you look into that, they it's obviously not true,

1143
00:57:37.039 --> 00:57:39.159
<v Speaker 1>first of all, but second of all, their logic is, well,

1144
00:57:39.480 --> 00:57:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they only started killing them after the bombing happened and

1145
00:57:42.079 --> 00:57:46.280
<v Speaker 1>forced them closer into closer proximity with the Muslims. And

1146
00:57:46.840 --> 00:57:48.719
<v Speaker 1>if all it takes is a cursory look at some

1147
00:57:48.719 --> 00:57:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of the shit that Melosovich and his underlings were saying

1148
00:57:51.320 --> 00:57:55.639
<v Speaker 1>about the Bossian Muslims, to say nothing of the regional

1149
00:57:55.679 --> 00:57:58.559
<v Speaker 1>tensions that had existed at that point for going on

1150
00:57:58.639 --> 00:58:01.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty years, you know, well more than that really, just

1151
00:58:01.880 --> 00:58:04.360
<v Speaker 1>since the formation of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. Like those

1152
00:58:04.440 --> 00:58:08.239
<v Speaker 1>ethnic tensions, they weren't ancient. That's another canard from that era,

1153
00:58:08.320 --> 00:58:11.480
<v Speaker 1>from the nineties. They weren't ancient hatreds, but they were old,

1154
00:58:11.760 --> 00:58:14.159
<v Speaker 1>they were multi generational, and there was a lot of

1155
00:58:14.320 --> 00:58:18.000
<v Speaker 1>unfinished business that it started in the nineteen twenties. So

1156
00:58:18.000 --> 00:58:20.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming that's like that was like the sort of

1157
00:58:20.280 --> 00:58:23.320
<v Speaker 1>trajectory he was taking was like, oh, well, none of

1158
00:58:23.320 --> 00:58:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that stuff matters. It was only because America involved itself

1159
00:58:26.920 --> 00:58:29.440
<v Speaker 1>or NATO involved itself. Am I remembering that correctly?

1160
00:58:29.800 --> 00:58:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I think that's that's directionally correct, right. But there's

1161
00:58:33.360 --> 00:58:37.000
<v Speaker 3>just there's all these at a fifty thousand foot view,

1162
00:58:37.159 --> 00:58:40.800
<v Speaker 3>they just is that if the US can be wrong,

1163
00:58:41.400 --> 00:58:45.800
<v Speaker 3>it's wrong, right, And if Russia, if Russia was aggrieved,

1164
00:58:46.119 --> 00:58:49.559
<v Speaker 3>Russia was aggrieved. That's that's kind of my takeaway having

1165
00:58:49.599 --> 00:58:51.679
<v Speaker 3>been two chapters through this. But there's just there's a

1166
00:58:51.760 --> 00:58:54.599
<v Speaker 3>number of claims that are incredibly problematic. Right, There's there's

1167
00:58:54.639 --> 00:58:58.039
<v Speaker 3>genocide denial or minimalism as it relates to as it

1168
00:58:58.039 --> 00:59:01.199
<v Speaker 3>relates to Srebenitza. There's uh, there's.

1169
00:59:01.119 --> 00:59:04.039
<v Speaker 2>Claim the lead of he's found the lead of Noam Chomsky.

1170
00:59:04.119 --> 00:59:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Then, yeah, Noam Chomsky who famously, by the way, and

1171
00:59:07.880 --> 00:59:10.280
<v Speaker 3>his and is published on the record on this denying

1172
00:59:10.320 --> 00:59:13.119
<v Speaker 3>the genocide in Cambodia and the killing fields as well

1173
00:59:13.239 --> 00:59:15.000
<v Speaker 3>at the time while it was happening.

1174
00:59:15.400 --> 00:59:17.599
<v Speaker 1>And even though people don't really care about that stuff,

1175
00:59:18.039 --> 00:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that stuff as much, it's worth mentioning. Also pals with

1176
00:59:20.599 --> 00:59:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein, and it looks like so.

1177
00:59:23.679 --> 00:59:25.920
<v Speaker 3>There's there's a there's a there's just a lot of these.

1178
00:59:26.079 --> 00:59:28.639
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of these minimalism, there's a lot of minimalism,

1179
00:59:28.679 --> 00:59:31.480
<v Speaker 3>a lot of denialism has related to this stuff. There's

1180
00:59:31.559 --> 00:59:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the claim that that the US support for the for

1181
00:59:38.920 --> 00:59:41.719
<v Speaker 3>the Bosnians or or he makes his sorry, he makes

1182
00:59:41.760 --> 00:59:46.239
<v Speaker 3>his claim basically saying that the actions of the US

1183
00:59:46.440 --> 00:59:52.119
<v Speaker 3>in Yugoslavia and then in Czechshniya uh and attacks against

1184
00:59:52.159 --> 00:59:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Saddam were basically the basis of bin Laden's grievances against

1185
00:59:57.960 --> 01:00:00.639
<v Speaker 3>the United States, and that the United States in a

1186
01:00:00.679 --> 01:00:04.920
<v Speaker 3>way then provoked nine to eleven, as opposed to it

1187
01:00:05.039 --> 01:00:08.599
<v Speaker 3>just being a flagrant act of unprovoked terrorism. And I

1188
01:00:08.880 --> 01:00:11.360
<v Speaker 3>go in part in a part two of Fields of Gold,

1189
01:00:11.400 --> 01:00:15.159
<v Speaker 3>Fields of Red, I dive into what bin Laden actually said,

1190
01:00:15.239 --> 01:00:19.760
<v Speaker 3>and his claim was that you know US forces in Iraq,

1191
01:00:19.920 --> 01:00:21.320
<v Speaker 3>he puts it, you know the land of the of

1192
01:00:21.360 --> 01:00:24.800
<v Speaker 3>the two Holy Mosques. He basically saw them as crusaders, right,

1193
01:00:25.280 --> 01:00:29.320
<v Speaker 3>and for that reason uses that as justification to leap

1194
01:00:29.320 --> 01:00:31.880
<v Speaker 3>frog to jihad, to leap frog to nine to eleven,

1195
01:00:32.119 --> 01:00:35.480
<v Speaker 3>when in reality, the Saudis invited the US there, right,

1196
01:00:35.519 --> 01:00:38.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean right, like the US army was there at

1197
01:00:38.360 --> 01:00:42.800
<v Speaker 3>the invitation of King Fod and Saddam actually briefly in

1198
01:00:42.920 --> 01:00:45.760
<v Speaker 3>January of ninety one, beginning of end of January, beginning

1199
01:00:45.760 --> 01:00:49.400
<v Speaker 3>of February invaded Saudi Arabia for a hot second. He

1200
01:00:49.480 --> 01:00:52.360
<v Speaker 3>actually took They took the city of Kafji, occupied it

1201
01:00:52.400 --> 01:00:55.639
<v Speaker 3>and then were pushed out by coalition forces. And so

1202
01:00:55.760 --> 01:00:59.159
<v Speaker 3>all of this context, similar to you know, my critique

1203
01:00:59.199 --> 01:01:03.000
<v Speaker 3>of Cooper, there's a lot of context there behind these

1204
01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:05.719
<v Speaker 3>stories that's missing. And again you have to ask the

1205
01:01:05.800 --> 01:01:06.880
<v Speaker 3>question why.

1206
01:01:06.840 --> 01:01:08.159
<v Speaker 2>Which we will get to in a second.

1207
01:01:08.239 --> 01:01:10.719
<v Speaker 1>But there is something that we've kind of we've referenced

1208
01:01:10.719 --> 01:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it a couple times. The issue of citations in Horton's

1209
01:01:15.360 --> 01:01:19.159
<v Speaker 1>case seems to be the opposite of Cooper's issues and

1210
01:01:19.639 --> 01:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>with citation, because.

1211
01:01:21.599 --> 01:01:23.559
<v Speaker 2>Again, he loves to bring it up.

1212
01:01:23.639 --> 01:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I remember I've seen him, on two separate

1213
01:01:26.039 --> 01:01:28.119
<v Speaker 1>occasions bring up the fact that his book has over

1214
01:01:28.159 --> 01:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand citations. And you pointed out earlier that many

1215
01:01:32.800 --> 01:01:35.199
<v Speaker 1>of these citations are things that don't always stand up

1216
01:01:35.239 --> 01:01:37.559
<v Speaker 1>to scrutiny because in some cases they don't even seem

1217
01:01:37.599 --> 01:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>to exist anymore because they're broken links or whatever. So

1218
01:01:41.320 --> 01:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess, yeah, That's what I'm wondering is, how would

1219
01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:46.639
<v Speaker 1>you characterize the overuse of sources or citations in contrast

1220
01:01:46.679 --> 01:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to the misuser outright neglective sources and citations in works

1221
01:01:51.400 --> 01:01:51.639
<v Speaker 1>like this?

1222
01:01:51.960 --> 01:01:55.000
<v Speaker 2>And to what extent are all those methods of a.

1223
01:01:54.960 --> 01:01:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Piece in your opinion ext I personally, I see it

1224
01:01:57.639 --> 01:02:01.199
<v Speaker 1>as all kind of like different methodology towards the same end,

1225
01:02:01.239 --> 01:02:02.079
<v Speaker 1>if that makes sense.

1226
01:02:02.559 --> 01:02:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I would say that, you know, and again

1227
01:02:05.079 --> 01:02:07.199
<v Speaker 3>this is only my second series, but I would say

1228
01:02:07.199 --> 01:02:12.079
<v Speaker 3>that Cooper Cooper sometimes sources sometimes doesn't, which then puts

1229
01:02:12.079 --> 01:02:14.000
<v Speaker 3>you on that scavenger hunt chase that I was kind

1230
01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:17.880
<v Speaker 3>of referring to earlier. Horton does use a lot of sources,

1231
01:02:17.880 --> 01:02:19.920
<v Speaker 3>and to you know, to his credit, a lot of

1232
01:02:19.960 --> 01:02:23.920
<v Speaker 3>them are are fine. Right. There's there's references to you

1233
01:02:23.960 --> 01:02:30.079
<v Speaker 3>know NSA archive documents, you know, unclassified documentation, academic papers,

1234
01:02:30.440 --> 01:02:34.800
<v Speaker 3>or you know, thought pieces from historians or regional experts.

1235
01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:37.719
<v Speaker 3>There's there's a lot in there that is perfectly fine.

1236
01:02:37.800 --> 01:02:40.880
<v Speaker 3>There's also some stuff in there, like esoteric blogs from

1237
01:02:40.920 --> 01:02:44.400
<v Speaker 3>people that are kind of engaging in you know, apology

1238
01:02:44.519 --> 01:02:47.199
<v Speaker 3>of Melosovich and stuff like that. Websites that haven't been

1239
01:02:47.239 --> 01:02:49.559
<v Speaker 3>updated since the nineties. Those are few and far between,

1240
01:02:50.000 --> 01:02:51.800
<v Speaker 3>but they're in there. And then, as I said, you know,

1241
01:02:51.840 --> 01:02:54.400
<v Speaker 3>there are there are some articles that are just deadlinks

1242
01:02:54.400 --> 01:02:56.960
<v Speaker 3>that you can't really fact check because the source doesn't

1243
01:02:57.000 --> 01:02:59.119
<v Speaker 3>exist and you can't really see it on wayback Machine

1244
01:02:59.360 --> 01:03:02.000
<v Speaker 3>or Internet arts or anything like that. So, you know,

1245
01:03:02.039 --> 01:03:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't really take issue as much with his sourcing,

1246
01:03:05.800 --> 01:03:07.400
<v Speaker 3>although as again, as I said, some of them are

1247
01:03:07.400 --> 01:03:09.559
<v Speaker 3>a little bit out there. But I do think that

1248
01:03:09.639 --> 01:03:12.639
<v Speaker 3>the way that he interprets those sources is what's really

1249
01:03:12.719 --> 01:03:13.280
<v Speaker 3>an issue.

1250
01:03:13.400 --> 01:03:14.079
<v Speaker 2>Okay, gotcha.

1251
01:03:14.119 --> 01:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So so it's more on him in this particular case

1252
01:03:16.880 --> 01:03:19.119
<v Speaker 1>than on the use of sources because sometimes when I

1253
01:03:20.199 --> 01:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>because you know, obviously I'm biased in this direction because

1254
01:03:23.920 --> 01:03:26.599
<v Speaker 1>I've been stuck reading academic books for so long, but

1255
01:03:27.639 --> 01:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, they don't really go overboard with footnotes. With

1256
01:03:33.599 --> 01:03:36.079
<v Speaker 1>a large number of footnotes and sources, I mean, each

1257
01:03:36.159 --> 01:03:39.079
<v Speaker 1>chapter usually has anywhere from of like a you know,

1258
01:03:39.239 --> 01:03:41.639
<v Speaker 1>like an academic history book, each chapter has anywhere from

1259
01:03:41.639 --> 01:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>around seventy to two hundred and fifty.

1260
01:03:44.480 --> 01:03:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Sources, which is a lot, for sure.

1261
01:03:47.239 --> 01:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, when you're seeing a non

1262
01:03:50.519 --> 01:03:56.599
<v Speaker 1>academic book be flush with hundreds thousands of sources, like

1263
01:03:56.760 --> 01:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>more than you usually see in an academic book or

1264
01:03:59.280 --> 01:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a non academic book, it feels like some game of

1265
01:04:01.920 --> 01:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>obfuscation is going on. That's just my suspicion. I have

1266
01:04:04.880 --> 01:04:07.039
<v Speaker 1>not even looked at Horton's book. I have way less

1267
01:04:07.039 --> 01:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of a dog in that fight, obviously. I guess what

1268
01:04:09.519 --> 01:04:12.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying is when I see too many or too

1269
01:04:12.760 --> 01:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>few sources, I tend to have the same reaction of

1270
01:04:16.079 --> 01:04:17.199
<v Speaker 1>something's not right here.

1271
01:04:17.239 --> 01:04:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Now.

1272
01:04:17.760 --> 01:04:20.679
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm maybe I'm just asking for some reassurance here,

1273
01:04:20.920 --> 01:04:24.079
<v Speaker 1>am I like, am I seeing something that isn't there?

1274
01:04:24.280 --> 01:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>When I see that kind of thing?

1275
01:04:26.119 --> 01:04:30.960
<v Speaker 3>So look, there are hundreds of footnotes per chapter, and

1276
01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:34.519
<v Speaker 3>I say this in the series, right, that isn't necessarily

1277
01:04:35.360 --> 01:04:38.159
<v Speaker 3>a bad thing. If he wants to lean on over sourcing.

1278
01:04:38.199 --> 01:04:40.840
<v Speaker 3>It's definitely more than I'm used to, which I think

1279
01:04:40.880 --> 01:04:44.719
<v Speaker 3>you've pointed out, which is correct given the more academic

1280
01:04:45.360 --> 01:04:49.239
<v Speaker 3>history books that one would read. I don't necessarily I

1281
01:04:49.480 --> 01:04:51.599
<v Speaker 3>tried to go into this and I'm going into each

1282
01:04:51.679 --> 01:04:53.920
<v Speaker 3>chapter with an open mind as to the sourcing. But

1283
01:04:54.239 --> 01:04:58.559
<v Speaker 3>there was one instance that actually Horton Horton tweeted at

1284
01:04:58.559 --> 01:05:00.320
<v Speaker 3>me or quote tweeted me again we have some kind

1285
01:05:00.320 --> 01:05:02.840
<v Speaker 3>of interaction on on X with this. It was it

1286
01:05:02.840 --> 01:05:07.079
<v Speaker 3>was very funny because there's a reference at the beginning

1287
01:05:07.199 --> 01:05:10.360
<v Speaker 3>of the book to I think he's talking about something

1288
01:05:10.400 --> 01:05:12.639
<v Speaker 3>in relation to the Middle East. He within the first

1289
01:05:12.679 --> 01:05:14.440
<v Speaker 3>five seconds of the book, he talks he talks a

1290
01:05:14.480 --> 01:05:16.239
<v Speaker 3>little bit about US foreign policy in the Middle East in

1291
01:05:16.280 --> 01:05:19.400
<v Speaker 3>likud or something which is clearly relevant to you know,

1292
01:05:19.440 --> 01:05:23.199
<v Speaker 3>the history of the Russo Ukrainian War. And the footnote

1293
01:05:23.199 --> 01:05:26.400
<v Speaker 3>for the claim is he wrote a book on the

1294
01:05:26.400 --> 01:05:30.519
<v Speaker 3>Middle East. I think it's called Enough already, and he

1295
01:05:30.599 --> 01:05:33.599
<v Speaker 3>refers to it in the footnote, and then there's an

1296
01:05:33.760 --> 01:05:38.079
<v Speaker 3>there's a link in the footnote to Amazon for the book,

1297
01:05:38.400 --> 01:05:41.320
<v Speaker 3>which I thought was incredible. And I actually called this

1298
01:05:41.480 --> 01:05:46.639
<v Speaker 3>out in the episode and on Twitter, and Horton clapped

1299
01:05:46.679 --> 01:05:49.000
<v Speaker 3>back and said, it's not there, and he took a

1300
01:05:49.039 --> 01:05:51.599
<v Speaker 3>picture of a hard copy of the book where the

1301
01:05:51.679 --> 01:05:55.599
<v Speaker 3>link isn't there. I'm using a digital version which does

1302
01:05:55.639 --> 01:05:57.519
<v Speaker 3>have it. And I posted a screenshot of it which

1303
01:05:57.559 --> 01:05:59.400
<v Speaker 3>which does have it. And I didn't get a response,

1304
01:05:59.400 --> 01:06:02.000
<v Speaker 3>but I found that to be definitely a highlight.

1305
01:06:02.320 --> 01:06:04.679
<v Speaker 1>It's well, I mean, yeah, that's an interesting thing too,

1306
01:06:04.719 --> 01:06:07.239
<v Speaker 1>because the idea of I always kind of smile when

1307
01:06:07.280 --> 01:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I see a historian site themselves like their previous work.

1308
01:06:10.480 --> 01:06:12.679
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing wrong with doing that, of course, and there's

1309
01:06:12.679 --> 01:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>nothing wrong with advertising your own work either. But when

1310
01:06:15.920 --> 01:06:17.519
<v Speaker 1>you when you put a link in there to the

1311
01:06:17.519 --> 01:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Amazon page, that does feel kind of funny. That feels

1312
01:06:19.760 --> 01:06:21.559
<v Speaker 1>like something you would do more in like a like

1313
01:06:21.599 --> 01:06:23.679
<v Speaker 1>an opinion piece. You know, when you put hyperlinks in

1314
01:06:23.719 --> 01:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>an opinion piece, that that always happens, you know, it

1315
01:06:26.440 --> 01:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>just it does have kind of like a weird vibe

1316
01:06:29.159 --> 01:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to it.

1317
01:06:30.880 --> 01:06:32.800
<v Speaker 3>It was great. I was laughing a little bit when

1318
01:06:32.840 --> 01:06:34.960
<v Speaker 3>I when I stumbled across that. But that's a part

1319
01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:36.400
<v Speaker 3>of it, right. You got to you gotta look at

1320
01:06:36.440 --> 01:06:39.719
<v Speaker 3>the footnotes. You gotta see what are the sources that

1321
01:06:39.760 --> 01:06:43.280
<v Speaker 3>are being referred to here? And you know, are they

1322
01:06:43.320 --> 01:06:45.519
<v Speaker 3>do they really pass the smell test?

1323
01:06:45.880 --> 01:06:46.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1324
01:06:46.119 --> 01:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And I actually think I have it in my head

1325
01:06:48.960 --> 01:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of why. I think it's off putting

1326
01:06:51.000 --> 01:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>when someone over uses in my opinion, it's just my opinion,

1327
01:06:54.039 --> 01:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>but when I feel like sources are being overused, it's

1328
01:06:56.400 --> 01:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>something that I had very strongly drilled into my head

1329
01:07:01.320 --> 01:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>by my first professor my first semester.

1330
01:07:04.519 --> 01:07:07.079
<v Speaker 2>She was very harsh. She said, you're outsourcing your argument.

1331
01:07:07.760 --> 01:07:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Don't do that.

1332
01:07:09.039 --> 01:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, oh, okay, And that basically means

1333
01:07:13.079 --> 01:07:16.039
<v Speaker 1>make your argument and stand by it, use evidence of

1334
01:07:16.079 --> 01:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>course to support it, but don't outsource it. And I

1335
01:07:19.480 --> 01:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>think in a sense what I'm picking up on and

1336
01:07:21.800 --> 01:07:24.519
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's unfair. Again, I have not read provoked, but

1337
01:07:24.559 --> 01:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it reminds me of what Tucker Carlson has been doing lately,

1338
01:07:28.079 --> 01:07:32.719
<v Speaker 1>where he's essentially outsourcing his own arguments to weird radicals

1339
01:07:32.719 --> 01:07:35.519
<v Speaker 1>of all stripes. He can therefore say, well, I'm not

1340
01:07:35.559 --> 01:07:39.239
<v Speaker 1>saying this, that's my terrible Tucker Carlson impression. But it's like,

1341
01:07:39.320 --> 01:07:41.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying this, but these people seem to think this,

1342
01:07:42.159 --> 01:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, yeah, well you are saying it though,

1343
01:07:44.840 --> 01:07:47.559
<v Speaker 1>because you're not pushing back, you're getting them to say something.

1344
01:07:47.199 --> 01:07:49.719
<v Speaker 2>That you won't yourself say or assert. Though.

1345
01:07:49.760 --> 01:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he's becoming a little looser with what he's

1346
01:07:51.920 --> 01:07:54.599
<v Speaker 1>willing to assert at this point. But the point being

1347
01:07:54.639 --> 01:07:57.679
<v Speaker 1>is that that's sort of what I feel when I

1348
01:07:57.719 --> 01:08:01.599
<v Speaker 1>see someone oversight. I feel like what they're trying to

1349
01:08:01.599 --> 01:08:05.199
<v Speaker 1>do is saying is say without saying I'm not saying this.

1350
01:08:06.039 --> 01:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>All these experts are saying this, this appeal to authority,

1351
01:08:08.960 --> 01:08:11.079
<v Speaker 1>which I noted. I remember you you noted that it's

1352
01:08:11.119 --> 01:08:14.159
<v Speaker 1>like appealing to authority in order to make it clear that.

1353
01:08:14.559 --> 01:08:17.000
<v Speaker 2>You're not the one just saying this. These people are

1354
01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:19.720
<v Speaker 2>saying this thing that I'm just suggesting. Do you see

1355
01:08:19.720 --> 01:08:20.439
<v Speaker 2>what I'm getting at here?

1356
01:08:20.439 --> 01:08:22.000
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of a week I do.

1357
01:08:23.039 --> 01:08:23.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1358
01:08:23.399 --> 01:08:26.079
<v Speaker 3>I think I think that that might certainly be I

1359
01:08:26.079 --> 01:08:28.760
<v Speaker 3>think I think that that certainly might be a part

1360
01:08:28.760 --> 01:08:29.000
<v Speaker 3>of it.

1361
01:08:29.119 --> 01:08:29.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1362
01:08:29.359 --> 01:08:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, well, it's also a question of, you know,

1363
01:08:31.960 --> 01:08:34.359
<v Speaker 3>if you're gonna if you're going to have all of

1364
01:08:34.399 --> 01:08:38.359
<v Speaker 3>those citations, you know, does anybody actually have the time

1365
01:08:38.439 --> 01:08:42.840
<v Speaker 3>to read thousands and thousands of pages of material to

1366
01:08:42.920 --> 01:08:45.640
<v Speaker 3>back up the justification for those footnotes. So let me

1367
01:08:45.720 --> 01:08:49.720
<v Speaker 3>let me give you an example. In part two of

1368
01:08:49.920 --> 01:08:53.119
<v Speaker 3>Fields of Gold, Fields of Red, Horton refers to this

1369
01:08:53.840 --> 01:08:59.479
<v Speaker 3>OSCE report on on Kosovo. And I actually pulled up

1370
01:08:59.520 --> 01:09:02.800
<v Speaker 3>the report. It's nearly seven hundred and fifty pages. And

1371
01:09:02.840 --> 01:09:06.680
<v Speaker 3>in the context of that report, Horton mentions it briefly

1372
01:09:06.880 --> 01:09:10.119
<v Speaker 3>and he says, the OSSE report said that there wasn't

1373
01:09:10.119 --> 01:09:13.000
<v Speaker 3>a finding of ethnic cleansing in Kosovo. And so I

1374
01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:16.439
<v Speaker 3>went into the report and you know, command after control,

1375
01:09:16.520 --> 01:09:19.000
<v Speaker 3>a f depending on you have my macro windows, whatever

1376
01:09:19.199 --> 01:09:23.520
<v Speaker 3>ethnic cleansing, and lo and behold, it's certainly in the report,

1377
01:09:23.680 --> 01:09:28.640
<v Speaker 3>in the section on sexual violence, ethnic cleansing did occur, right,

1378
01:09:28.680 --> 01:09:30.520
<v Speaker 3>And so I say that in the episode, I say,

1379
01:09:30.560 --> 01:09:33.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, did Horton read this report?

1380
01:09:33.479 --> 01:09:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1381
01:09:33.640 --> 01:09:37.760
<v Speaker 3>He's saying something that is just clearly incorrect if you

1382
01:09:37.800 --> 01:09:40.840
<v Speaker 3>actually take the time to review the report. That he's

1383
01:09:40.880 --> 01:09:43.479
<v Speaker 3>referring to. And that goes for any of these people,

1384
01:09:43.520 --> 01:09:47.039
<v Speaker 3>you know, Horton or otherwise that are referencing or over

1385
01:09:47.119 --> 01:09:49.800
<v Speaker 3>referencing as you would put it, or just using academic

1386
01:09:49.880 --> 01:09:53.600
<v Speaker 3>sources that are clearly fine, but maybe their reading of

1387
01:09:53.640 --> 01:09:56.479
<v Speaker 3>it is a little bit slanted because maybe they haven't

1388
01:09:56.479 --> 01:09:58.479
<v Speaker 3>really given it the time of day that they actually

1389
01:09:58.560 --> 01:10:02.520
<v Speaker 3>need to to really inform the points or the arguments

1390
01:10:02.560 --> 01:10:05.399
<v Speaker 3>that they're making in their work or their output.

1391
01:10:05.600 --> 01:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, and that's something I know we didn't

1392
01:10:07.880 --> 01:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>really touch on too much, but that's something that Daryl

1393
01:10:09.960 --> 01:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>was doing a lot and fear and loath than in

1394
01:10:11.399 --> 01:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the New Jerusalem, where he was like taking stuff from

1395
01:10:13.680 --> 01:10:18.079
<v Speaker 1>perfectly find great sources like tom segives one palaestin complete anymore.

1396
01:10:17.680 --> 01:10:18.760
<v Speaker 2>As his righteous victims.

1397
01:10:18.800 --> 01:10:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Those are the only two secondary sources I can remember

1398
01:10:21.079 --> 01:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that he actually openly cited.

1399
01:10:22.680 --> 01:10:23.960
<v Speaker 2>But again it's been a while.

1400
01:10:24.439 --> 01:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>But he would like take quotes, but he would leave

1401
01:10:27.079 --> 01:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>out certain parts of them or skip certain parts of

1402
01:10:30.119 --> 01:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>them to get to another point in a way that

1403
01:10:32.239 --> 01:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>changes the meaning of what the actual quote does. And

1404
01:10:35.119 --> 01:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, that's actually another thing that I'll say

1405
01:10:36.840 --> 01:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>for Darryl.

1406
01:10:37.279 --> 01:10:39.479
<v Speaker 2>He's very good at that. That's a very hard thing

1407
01:10:39.520 --> 01:10:39.800
<v Speaker 2>to do.

1408
01:10:39.960 --> 01:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've been judicious with the quotes that you

1409
01:10:42.960 --> 01:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>use when you're doing this kind of long form podcasting.

1410
01:10:45.800 --> 01:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I struggle with that all the time because sometimes there's

1411
01:10:48.560 --> 01:10:51.119
<v Speaker 1>a big block quote and it doesn't make sense to

1412
01:10:51.119 --> 01:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>say the whole thing. So I want to cut stuff,

1413
01:10:53.920 --> 01:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and I do. I cut stuff out sometimes, but I

1414
01:10:56.960 --> 01:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>have to be very careful that what I'm cutting out

1415
01:10:59.039 --> 01:11:03.039
<v Speaker 1>is not cutting out crucial context, because sometimes somebody is

1416
01:11:03.079 --> 01:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about something very specific, or they make a very

1417
01:11:07.800 --> 01:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>specific reference, but what they're talking about is very broad,

1418
01:11:11.079 --> 01:11:14.479
<v Speaker 1>if that makes sense, And I think if you're trying

1419
01:11:14.520 --> 01:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>to get to the gist of what the subject is saying,

1420
01:11:17.960 --> 01:11:20.159
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to cut out the specific example that

1421
01:11:20.199 --> 01:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>they might give if that example is really what they're

1422
01:11:22.680 --> 01:11:26.119
<v Speaker 1>talking about. But you know, making that judgment is is

1423
01:11:26.279 --> 01:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>very hard, is what I'm trying to say.

1424
01:11:28.479 --> 01:11:33.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it that does make sense. But you know, there

1425
01:11:33.560 --> 01:11:37.039
<v Speaker 3>and there are many examples of in some of the

1426
01:11:37.079 --> 01:11:39.880
<v Speaker 3>work that I've done covering the series of you know,

1427
01:11:39.880 --> 01:11:43.119
<v Speaker 3>maybe context missing or quotes being truncated or not not

1428
01:11:43.159 --> 01:11:46.880
<v Speaker 3>necessarily referred to accurately. And I think that's certainly a

1429
01:11:46.920 --> 01:11:48.760
<v Speaker 3>part of it. You know, there's this one example, and

1430
01:11:48.920 --> 01:11:51.560
<v Speaker 3>we again you know, talked about chasing down sources, where

1431
01:11:52.920 --> 01:11:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Cooper refers to this Nazi racial scientist. He doesn't say

1432
01:11:56.720 --> 01:11:58.840
<v Speaker 3>where the quote's from or who it is, and it's

1433
01:11:58.920 --> 01:12:03.199
<v Speaker 3>it's Hans Gunther, who is as basically this Nazi genesis

1434
01:12:03.199 --> 01:12:06.159
<v Speaker 3>that you may be familiar with, and he's he basically

1435
01:12:06.199 --> 01:12:08.640
<v Speaker 3>refers to him. He and you know, Cooper does this

1436
01:12:08.680 --> 01:12:13.159
<v Speaker 3>throughout the series where he basically he always refers to

1437
01:12:13.279 --> 01:12:18.079
<v Speaker 3>Zionism adjacent to other, as he puts it, other radical

1438
01:12:18.079 --> 01:12:24.079
<v Speaker 3>ideologies like Bolshevism and Nazism to basically infer or imply

1439
01:12:24.319 --> 01:12:27.159
<v Speaker 3>guilt by association. He does this repeatedly throughout the series.

1440
01:12:27.159 --> 01:12:31.199
<v Speaker 3>But he basically says, well, you know, even Nazi racial scientists,

1441
01:12:31.199 --> 01:12:34.880
<v Speaker 3>and again I'm paraphrasing here, we're fond of or thought

1442
01:12:35.039 --> 01:12:38.840
<v Speaker 3>thought that Zionism had some kind of legitimacy because it

1443
01:12:38.880 --> 01:12:43.079
<v Speaker 3>basically separated the Jews from from Europe, from the from

1444
01:12:43.119 --> 01:12:45.960
<v Speaker 3>the Reich. And he refers to a quote from Hans

1445
01:12:45.960 --> 01:12:49.439
<v Speaker 3>Gunther where if you actually read the full quote, it's

1446
01:12:49.439 --> 01:12:53.880
<v Speaker 3>clear that Gunther isn't endorsing Zionism. If anything, it's very

1447
01:12:53.920 --> 01:12:57.640
<v Speaker 3>clear that the Nazis saw the ones that commented on

1448
01:12:57.680 --> 01:13:00.039
<v Speaker 3>this saw Zionism as a means to an end of

1449
01:13:00.239 --> 01:13:03.119
<v Speaker 3>step one, get the Jews out of Europe. Step two,

1450
01:13:03.199 --> 01:13:06.439
<v Speaker 3>have them congregate in a single place, and then step

1451
01:13:06.479 --> 01:13:08.920
<v Speaker 3>three when we get there, which we will after we

1452
01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:13.239
<v Speaker 3>defeat the British in North Africa, kill them once they're congregated,

1453
01:13:13.319 --> 01:13:15.640
<v Speaker 3>and it makes our job much easier in the end.

1454
01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:17.680
<v Speaker 3>And there's a lot of evidence for that, right. There

1455
01:13:17.720 --> 01:13:20.640
<v Speaker 3>was the formation of the Early Stages einzot Scrup in

1456
01:13:20.920 --> 01:13:23.319
<v Speaker 3>Egypt that was going to basically go into the Middle

1457
01:13:23.319 --> 01:13:26.399
<v Speaker 3>East to kill all the Jews in Palestine in the

1458
01:13:26.399 --> 01:13:28.079
<v Speaker 3>Mandate if they made it.

1459
01:13:28.039 --> 01:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>There, right, And that was also a very weird, underbaked

1460
01:13:31.520 --> 01:13:34.119
<v Speaker 1>scheme that Hajja Mein al Husseini had his fingerprints on,

1461
01:13:34.279 --> 01:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>and it just turned into like a very small commando

1462
01:13:36.319 --> 01:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>unit and they didn't do very much ultimately. But again,

1463
01:13:39.960 --> 01:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't want to spoil anything for anyone

1464
01:13:41.479 --> 01:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>who hasn't listened to it yet, and I wouldn't blame

1465
01:13:43.920 --> 01:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you because it's six hours and eighteen minutes long. But

1466
01:13:47.239 --> 01:13:51.079
<v Speaker 1>I found some very compelling, circumstantial evidence that Haja Means

1467
01:13:51.479 --> 01:13:55.119
<v Speaker 1>ambitions for the Hanshar division was to get them to

1468
01:13:55.119 --> 01:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>go to Palestine, to the Mandate after they were done

1469
01:13:57.800 --> 01:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in Bosnia, because there was a memo that gutt Lauburger

1470
01:14:01.079 --> 01:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>submitted that or I think was submitted to Guttlaberger, the

1471
01:14:04.680 --> 01:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>second in command of the SS of Offen SS, in

1472
01:14:07.920 --> 01:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>which what Haja Mean was proposing was reported on, and

1473
01:14:12.039 --> 01:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>what he was proposing was pacifying the Bossian region and

1474
01:14:16.479 --> 01:14:20.159
<v Speaker 1>then afterward other actions. What the hell else could he

1475
01:14:20.319 --> 01:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>possibly have had in mind? Is how I put it

1476
01:14:22.720 --> 01:14:27.159
<v Speaker 1>in my episode for the Handshar a waffen SS division,

1477
01:14:27.439 --> 01:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>very well trained, very well equipped at that point, early

1478
01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:33.359
<v Speaker 1>on twenty three thousand strong.

1479
01:14:33.880 --> 01:14:34.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think we can.

1480
01:14:34.960 --> 01:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we really need to do too much

1481
01:14:36.800 --> 01:14:38.279
<v Speaker 1>dot connecting, as you like to say.

1482
01:14:38.279 --> 01:14:40.279
<v Speaker 2>There's smoke there. There's a lot of smoke there.

1483
01:14:40.319 --> 01:14:43.399
<v Speaker 3>I think. Well, I mean, people don't really know this,

1484
01:14:43.520 --> 01:14:46.680
<v Speaker 3>but I mean the first and second battles of l

1485
01:14:46.800 --> 01:14:51.439
<v Speaker 3>Alamane were months apart in nineteen forty two, and in

1486
01:14:51.520 --> 01:14:55.199
<v Speaker 3>Palestine there was panic, right, I mean, the Germans were

1487
01:14:55.279 --> 01:14:59.039
<v Speaker 3>in Egypt right for a brief period of time, and

1488
01:14:59.680 --> 01:15:03.600
<v Speaker 3>that panicked people in Palestine. Because you know, they knew

1489
01:15:03.680 --> 01:15:08.479
<v Speaker 3>what was happening in Europe obviously. And I mean again,

1490
01:15:08.560 --> 01:15:10.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, the formation of this as you put it,

1491
01:15:10.640 --> 01:15:15.439
<v Speaker 3>this very early stages Einzat's commando group for Egypt, which

1492
01:15:15.479 --> 01:15:19.800
<v Speaker 3>obviously never really came to be in full in full

1493
01:15:19.840 --> 01:15:23.000
<v Speaker 3>bore because they didn't take over Palestine or Egypt for

1494
01:15:23.039 --> 01:15:26.920
<v Speaker 3>that matter, is I think indicative of what what the

1495
01:15:26.960 --> 01:15:27.600
<v Speaker 3>plans were.

1496
01:15:28.520 --> 01:15:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1497
01:15:28.840 --> 01:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh absolutely, And that's something that Matthias Kunsel I believe

1498
01:15:31.600 --> 01:15:34.359
<v Speaker 1>really helped demonstrate in his most recent book. Again, that's

1499
01:15:34.359 --> 01:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>something that unless you're really deep into this subject or

1500
01:15:37.880 --> 01:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>as autistic as you and I you're, people are probably

1501
01:15:40.039 --> 01:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>not going to be reading that stuff. But it's you know,

1502
01:15:41.680 --> 01:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it's important to talk about it, and it's you know,

1503
01:15:44.119 --> 01:15:46.479
<v Speaker 1>and it's a complete context as well. And and yeah,

1504
01:15:46.479 --> 01:15:49.039
<v Speaker 1>I think what you brought up to with Daryl citation

1505
01:15:49.119 --> 01:15:51.399
<v Speaker 1>of this guy, I'm sorry if I derailed you there.

1506
01:15:51.479 --> 01:15:54.439
<v Speaker 1>I just but you know, this is my wheelhouse when

1507
01:15:54.439 --> 01:15:56.279
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Haja means, so I tend to just

1508
01:15:56.319 --> 01:15:58.399
<v Speaker 1>like jump in whenever there's a reason to bring him up.

1509
01:15:58.479 --> 01:16:01.439
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, like it rings also of how people love

1510
01:16:01.520 --> 01:16:04.359
<v Speaker 1>to bring up the Havita agreement to describe how, oh, well,

1511
01:16:04.399 --> 01:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the Nazis were actually Zionists. Well, they, as you said,

1512
01:16:07.840 --> 01:16:10.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a means to an end. And on top of that,

1513
01:16:10.439 --> 01:16:13.279
<v Speaker 1>if you look at anything said by people I think

1514
01:16:13.399 --> 01:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>up to Adolf Hitler himself, maybe you can correct me

1515
01:16:15.640 --> 01:16:19.279
<v Speaker 1>on that they saw Zionism as an existential threat to

1516
01:16:19.359 --> 01:16:22.079
<v Speaker 1>be dealt with because a Jewish state was the last

1517
01:16:22.079 --> 01:16:24.159
<v Speaker 1>thing that they wanted. They just didn't want Jews in

1518
01:16:24.199 --> 01:16:26.479
<v Speaker 1>their country. Sure, but they didn't want Jews to have

1519
01:16:26.520 --> 01:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a country at all. They just didn't want them to

1520
01:16:28.600 --> 01:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be So, yeah, if you had anything else to say

1521
01:16:32.039 --> 01:16:35.479
<v Speaker 1>on that subject, on Daryl citation of that eugenicist and

1522
01:16:35.560 --> 01:16:37.359
<v Speaker 1>add to what I just said there, please do.

1523
01:16:37.600 --> 01:16:40.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, the Havara Agreement is something I mean,

1524
01:16:40.079 --> 01:16:44.520
<v Speaker 3>you see this in the Twitter sphere, low level discourse

1525
01:16:44.600 --> 01:16:46.720
<v Speaker 3>back and forth. I mean, it's.

1526
01:16:46.560 --> 01:16:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Always yesterday, I saw it.

1527
01:16:48.039 --> 01:16:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's always an it's always an order of operations question.

1528
01:16:51.680 --> 01:16:54.680
<v Speaker 3>It's right, It's like, okay, So thevar agreements existed, and

1529
01:16:54.760 --> 01:16:56.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think a couple tens of thousands of

1530
01:16:56.680 --> 01:17:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Jews escaped, and then what happened, right? What happened after that?

1531
01:17:01.079 --> 01:17:05.039
<v Speaker 3>What happened after the you know, the Nazis invaded Poland

1532
01:17:05.840 --> 01:17:08.600
<v Speaker 3>and you know, Britain and France declared war on them,

1533
01:17:08.840 --> 01:17:11.359
<v Speaker 3>and then millions of Jews were killed. That piece is

1534
01:17:11.439 --> 01:17:13.680
<v Speaker 3>never kind of a part of the equation, which I

1535
01:17:13.680 --> 01:17:16.319
<v Speaker 3>find very interesting to say.

1536
01:17:16.079 --> 01:17:18.079
<v Speaker 1>The least or all you got to even just point

1537
01:17:18.119 --> 01:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>out too, is what did those tens of thousands? Will say,

1538
01:17:21.760 --> 01:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember what the actual number was of Jews

1539
01:17:23.760 --> 01:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>who escaped Germany and got to Palestine. What did they

1540
01:17:26.760 --> 01:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>have to do in return? What did they come to

1541
01:17:28.199 --> 01:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Palestine with? Oh, they clothes on their backs. They gave

1542
01:17:31.039 --> 01:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>up everything. That's that's not exactly a fair trade to get.

1543
01:17:34.760 --> 01:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, if if all it was about was

1544
01:17:36.560 --> 01:17:39.079
<v Speaker 1>getting rid of them and giving them a home, then

1545
01:17:39.119 --> 01:17:41.079
<v Speaker 1>I would suspect they'd let them have some money.

1546
01:17:41.079 --> 01:17:42.279
<v Speaker 2>But no, it's not about that.

1547
01:17:42.680 --> 01:17:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Like that, I don't trust the people who bring up

1548
01:17:45.279 --> 01:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>the Havre agreement unless it's out of just general historical interests.

1549
01:17:49.199 --> 01:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I just I rarely have time for them. I actually

1550
01:17:51.880 --> 01:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>get really annoyed.

1551
01:17:52.600 --> 01:17:53.079
<v Speaker 2>At that part.

1552
01:17:53.159 --> 01:17:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, the other one, the other one that gets brought

1553
01:17:55.720 --> 01:18:01.000
<v Speaker 3>up is the Jewish embargo or you know, uh, what

1554
01:18:01.159 --> 01:18:05.439
<v Speaker 3>is it? The U, the boycott, the boycott of Nazi

1555
01:18:05.479 --> 01:18:10.399
<v Speaker 3>Germany in the aftermath, I believe of Crystal Knocht at

1556
01:18:10.399 --> 01:18:12.520
<v Speaker 3>the you know, the beginning stages of the Holocaust, as

1557
01:18:12.520 --> 01:18:15.239
<v Speaker 3>if you know, oh, look, the Jews deserved it because

1558
01:18:15.279 --> 01:18:18.039
<v Speaker 3>they refused to buy German products, and it was this

1559
01:18:18.119 --> 01:18:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Hodgepodge boycott that really didn't have a huge impact. I

1560
01:18:22.680 --> 01:18:26.760
<v Speaker 3>mean this, Remember, this is an industrializing Germany, building the Autobahn,

1561
01:18:26.920 --> 01:18:30.760
<v Speaker 3>ramping up wartime production, and and you know, eventually suffering

1562
01:18:30.880 --> 01:18:34.199
<v Speaker 3>economically for it, because there really wasn't any foundation upon

1563
01:18:34.239 --> 01:18:36.800
<v Speaker 3>which for them to be to be doing this. But

1564
01:18:36.960 --> 01:18:39.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, as if, as if some Jews in Brooklyn

1565
01:18:40.520 --> 01:18:44.119
<v Speaker 3>not purchasing you know, German strudel is going to have

1566
01:18:44.159 --> 01:18:49.720
<v Speaker 3>a serious impact on on Hitler's Third Reich rearming and reindustrializing. Right,

1567
01:18:49.720 --> 01:18:52.960
<v Speaker 3>It's just there's just so many holes in the story,

1568
01:18:53.239 --> 01:18:55.279
<v Speaker 3>and it just it really is just Swiss cheese at

1569
01:18:55.279 --> 01:18:55.880
<v Speaker 3>the end of the day.

1570
01:18:55.960 --> 01:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Well, and this is why it turns into denial or

1571
01:18:58.119 --> 01:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>outright skepticism, because then when you make that point, they'll

1572
01:19:01.760 --> 01:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>you can you know, they'll say well, you know, and

1573
01:19:04.159 --> 01:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>then you can say, well, also, yeah, because of course

1574
01:19:06.399 --> 01:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>those Polish and Soviet shteadl Jews.

1575
01:19:08.600 --> 01:19:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Oh all that.

1576
01:19:09.479 --> 01:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, that boycott really impacted them. They were really

1577
01:19:12.000 --> 01:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>instrumental in that boycott while they were trying to streak together.

1578
01:19:14.720 --> 01:19:18.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, people people with no people, no functioning toilets, boycotting

1579
01:19:18.439 --> 01:19:22.079
<v Speaker 3>the German economy. Yeah, in in Bello, in Bella Rossa

1580
01:19:22.199 --> 01:19:24.439
<v Speaker 3>is really gonna have an impact there for sure.

1581
01:19:24.600 --> 01:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>And because that is a very obvious and fair point

1582
01:19:27.439 --> 01:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that the vast majority of Jews that were killed by

1583
01:19:29.640 --> 01:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the Germans had little to i'd say zero power, negative

1584
01:19:33.199 --> 01:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>power in anything when it came to world affairs. That's

1585
01:19:36.760 --> 01:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>when denial starts to creep in, because that's all they

1586
01:19:38.680 --> 01:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>have left when they make that argument, right exactly. Yeah,

1587
01:19:41.800 --> 01:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>so so so I I And you know, honestly, we

1588
01:19:45.079 --> 01:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of that was just a really fun tangent there

1589
01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>because I just I love nitpicking like that against deniers there.

1590
01:19:50.960 --> 01:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>But I would be remiss if I didn't do my

1591
01:19:54.319 --> 01:19:58.319
<v Speaker 1>best to give your critics and and the ardent defenders

1592
01:19:58.319 --> 01:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>of people like Darryl and Hort and just that generally speaking,

1593
01:20:02.119 --> 01:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess we can call him the paleoconservative or visionist

1594
01:20:04.600 --> 01:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>camp that they inhabit they're due, so just to put

1595
01:20:09.159 --> 01:20:11.640
<v Speaker 1>words in their mouths. Is it not possible that you

1596
01:20:11.920 --> 01:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>are simply giving their arguments, like Darryl's, Horton's, et cetera,

1597
01:20:16.800 --> 01:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the least charitable read And if not, why not?

1598
01:20:20.479 --> 01:20:23.920
<v Speaker 3>It's a good question. And I think that I think

1599
01:20:23.960 --> 01:20:29.359
<v Speaker 3>that there comes a point where volume is substantive in

1600
01:20:29.399 --> 01:20:32.199
<v Speaker 3>and of itself. So if you know, if you're going

1601
01:20:32.239 --> 01:20:36.079
<v Speaker 3>to look at a claim in isolation, right as an example,

1602
01:20:36.119 --> 01:20:39.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, we were referring to Horton's reference to this

1603
01:20:39.880 --> 01:20:43.760
<v Speaker 3>revenita not being a genocide or genocide, denialism or minimalism, whatever,

1604
01:20:44.319 --> 01:20:46.439
<v Speaker 3>whatever you want to label it, and you look at

1605
01:20:46.439 --> 01:20:49.000
<v Speaker 3>that in isolation, and he would to present a series

1606
01:20:49.039 --> 01:20:51.239
<v Speaker 3>of points and say, well, you know, here's why the

1607
01:20:51.680 --> 01:20:54.079
<v Speaker 3>tribunals were wrong and all of that stuff. And you

1608
01:20:54.119 --> 01:20:56.279
<v Speaker 3>can say, well, you know, I think he's a little

1609
01:20:56.319 --> 01:20:58.680
<v Speaker 3>bit off of his rocker here, but it's kind of

1610
01:20:58.680 --> 01:21:02.279
<v Speaker 3>a claim in isolation. But when you look at these

1611
01:21:02.520 --> 01:21:06.520
<v Speaker 3>series in the case of Cooper or books in the

1612
01:21:06.520 --> 01:21:10.720
<v Speaker 3>case of Horton, and you see these claims that are

1613
01:21:10.760 --> 01:21:17.840
<v Speaker 3>just again frankly, just revisionist, contrarian claims that really fly

1614
01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:22.520
<v Speaker 3>in the face of the well established evidentiary record all

1615
01:21:22.560 --> 01:21:26.640
<v Speaker 3>of the serious historians agree on. Again, you have to

1616
01:21:26.680 --> 01:21:30.399
<v Speaker 3>ask the question, why is this a trend, Where is

1617
01:21:30.399 --> 01:21:33.880
<v Speaker 3>this coming from? What is the motivation? Is it really

1618
01:21:33.960 --> 01:21:36.960
<v Speaker 3>that they believe that the evidence points in the contrary

1619
01:21:37.760 --> 01:21:42.079
<v Speaker 3>or in a contrary direction, or is the starting is

1620
01:21:42.119 --> 01:21:45.079
<v Speaker 3>the starting place for the Hortons and the Coopers of

1621
01:21:45.119 --> 01:21:51.119
<v Speaker 3>the world. The West is actually the bad guy, you know, imperialism,

1622
01:21:51.159 --> 01:21:55.439
<v Speaker 3>Western imperialism is the original sin, and it's from there

1623
01:21:55.760 --> 01:21:58.760
<v Speaker 3>that the narrative is then told. Right, And I think

1624
01:21:58.800 --> 01:22:01.159
<v Speaker 3>that there's a case to be made if you actually

1625
01:22:01.159 --> 01:22:03.479
<v Speaker 3>really pay attention to these series or these books, and

1626
01:22:03.520 --> 01:22:05.399
<v Speaker 3>you read them, and you look at the sources, and

1627
01:22:05.439 --> 01:22:08.079
<v Speaker 3>you do the research like you and I do, I

1628
01:22:08.079 --> 01:22:10.520
<v Speaker 3>think that there's a case to be made that that

1629
01:22:10.640 --> 01:22:13.479
<v Speaker 3>might be the starting point here, and then the rest

1630
01:22:13.560 --> 01:22:16.000
<v Speaker 3>is just a logical conclusion that naturally follows.

1631
01:22:16.760 --> 01:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Yeah, that seems like a decent enough explanation, I

1632
01:22:20.720 --> 01:22:23.880
<v Speaker 1>would say. And I guess then at that point, if

1633
01:22:23.920 --> 01:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>someone isn't convinced by that, that that's fine because they they're.

1634
01:22:26.960 --> 01:22:28.119
<v Speaker 2>Interpreting it differently.

1635
01:22:28.159 --> 01:22:31.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you or I can disagree with that, but

1636
01:22:31.119 --> 01:22:33.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that's a fair assessment on your part,

1637
01:22:33.520 --> 01:22:36.039
<v Speaker 1>And now this might be a little less fair for

1638
01:22:36.159 --> 01:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>us to do or for you to do. I'm outsourcing

1639
01:22:39.640 --> 01:22:43.199
<v Speaker 1>this for you with my questions here, but I actually

1640
01:22:43.239 --> 01:22:46.479
<v Speaker 1>wrote this down. I called this a neo Buchananite universe.

1641
01:22:46.479 --> 01:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>It seems to orbit around Tucker Carlson. That's what I

1642
01:22:48.560 --> 01:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>like to sort of characterize this as. But I guess

1643
01:22:51.199 --> 01:22:54.439
<v Speaker 1>what I'm wondering here is what is the motivation? What

1644
01:22:54.479 --> 01:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>are we talking about here? Like, to what extent do

1645
01:22:57.520 --> 01:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you think that these projects are informed by sincere ideological

1646
01:23:00.760 --> 01:23:04.079
<v Speaker 1>priors or do you think it's calculated and part of

1647
01:23:04.079 --> 01:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a far greater far right agit prop activist kind of project,

1648
01:23:10.079 --> 01:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>or do you think it's just conspiracy theory, brain mental illness.

1649
01:23:13.000 --> 01:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess those are all possibilities in a

1650
01:23:16.159 --> 01:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of cases. But I guess really what those questions

1651
01:23:18.720 --> 01:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>are leading to is a bigger question of what, like, ultimately,

1652
01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>what end does this all serve? What does this unofficial

1653
01:23:26.800 --> 01:23:29.399
<v Speaker 1>crew of people hope to eventually achieve with all this,

1654
01:23:29.399 --> 01:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Because I don't think it's money, at least not in

1655
01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:33.479
<v Speaker 1>the case of Tucker Carlson. You know, air to the

1656
01:23:33.520 --> 01:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Swanson fortune and multimillionaire many times over from his independent

1657
01:23:38.439 --> 01:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>work and work with Fox. I mean, so I don't

1658
01:23:40.560 --> 01:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>think it's money. So I guess what I'm hoping for

1659
01:23:43.680 --> 01:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>with all the possibility throughout there is could you maybe

1660
01:23:47.720 --> 01:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>give a Steelman perspective on their efforts and then contrast

1661
01:23:51.039 --> 01:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that with maybe the least charitable interpretation, and then sort

1662
01:23:53.880 --> 01:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of way which one you see as the most likely.

1663
01:23:57.520 --> 01:24:00.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's the million dollar question. I think. I

1664
01:24:00.920 --> 01:24:04.199
<v Speaker 3>think that's the really big question behind a lot of

1665
01:24:04.199 --> 01:24:06.960
<v Speaker 3>the claims that are made. And this really isn't just

1666
01:24:07.239 --> 01:24:10.640
<v Speaker 3>a Horton or Cooper question. I think it's a broader

1667
01:24:10.800 --> 01:24:15.279
<v Speaker 3>question when it comes to, you know, pop history revisionist claims.

1668
01:24:16.920 --> 01:24:20.520
<v Speaker 3>And I speak to this in episode zero a little bit.

1669
01:24:20.560 --> 01:24:24.359
<v Speaker 3>And I think that the motivations vary. Frankly, I think that,

1670
01:24:24.479 --> 01:24:28.319
<v Speaker 3>as you said, some people are probably motivated by clicks

1671
01:24:28.720 --> 01:24:32.720
<v Speaker 3>and eyeballs and ears and making a name for themselves

1672
01:24:32.720 --> 01:24:34.760
<v Speaker 3>because at the end of the day, you know, to

1673
01:24:34.840 --> 01:24:37.520
<v Speaker 3>keep the dopamine hit going, you need to keep ratching

1674
01:24:37.600 --> 01:24:41.359
<v Speaker 3>up the craziness and the claims, and that typically means,

1675
01:24:42.560 --> 01:24:46.680
<v Speaker 3>in the context of our conversation, more a historicity, more

1676
01:24:46.720 --> 01:24:51.479
<v Speaker 3>outlandish claims to really keep that audience flywheel going. So

1677
01:24:51.560 --> 01:24:55.960
<v Speaker 3>one could certainly be financial, absolutely. I think another could

1678
01:24:56.039 --> 01:25:01.479
<v Speaker 3>be that maybe people, as I said, want to shift

1679
01:25:01.720 --> 01:25:06.000
<v Speaker 3>and win hearts and minds, and obviously there's a financial

1680
01:25:06.039 --> 01:25:08.039
<v Speaker 3>overlap to that if you're able to build and retain

1681
01:25:08.079 --> 01:25:11.000
<v Speaker 3>an audience. But I think that if you're really looking

1682
01:25:11.039 --> 01:25:14.359
<v Speaker 3>at the present day and you're looking at these geopolitical

1683
01:25:14.399 --> 01:25:19.640
<v Speaker 3>flash points, the Ukrainees, the Israels, the Taiwan's of the world,

1684
01:25:19.640 --> 01:25:23.439
<v Speaker 3>I guess as of today Venezuela as well, we're recording

1685
01:25:23.439 --> 01:25:28.359
<v Speaker 3>this on January third, So I think that I think

1686
01:25:28.399 --> 01:25:31.960
<v Speaker 3>that if you can shift people's opinions on the past

1687
01:25:32.640 --> 01:25:35.960
<v Speaker 3>and you know, in the case of Ukraine, portray Russia

1688
01:25:36.560 --> 01:25:39.680
<v Speaker 3>as aggrieved in the case of you know, Israel Palestine,

1689
01:25:40.039 --> 01:25:43.239
<v Speaker 3>make that conflict seem very one sided in terms of

1690
01:25:43.359 --> 01:25:46.520
<v Speaker 3>who the aggrieved party is. In the case of Taiwan,

1691
01:25:46.600 --> 01:25:50.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, talk about one China, one China policy, et cetera. Right,

1692
01:25:51.119 --> 01:25:55.720
<v Speaker 3>you can basically justify actions that are taken in the

1693
01:25:55.760 --> 01:25:58.920
<v Speaker 3>present or in the future as it relates to those

1694
01:26:00.039 --> 01:26:04.800
<v Speaker 3>flash points, and then you can impact policy by convincing

1695
01:26:04.880 --> 01:26:10.119
<v Speaker 3>people to vote for individuals who believe the same things

1696
01:26:10.119 --> 01:26:12.520
<v Speaker 3>that you do as it relates to foreign policy or

1697
01:26:12.560 --> 01:26:15.119
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical flashpoints, if you can kind of shift and move

1698
01:26:15.159 --> 01:26:17.560
<v Speaker 3>the needle on what the history is. And so I

1699
01:26:17.560 --> 01:26:20.079
<v Speaker 3>think that's part of it too. And the third part

1700
01:26:20.119 --> 01:26:25.439
<v Speaker 3>that I speak to is there is absolutely a bad

1701
01:26:25.479 --> 01:26:29.279
<v Speaker 3>actor part to this, right, There are bad actors in

1702
01:26:29.319 --> 01:26:35.479
<v Speaker 3>the world today, nation states or organizations that are adjacent

1703
01:26:35.520 --> 01:26:42.199
<v Speaker 3>to nation states, that have financial resources to support influencers

1704
01:26:42.279 --> 01:26:45.319
<v Speaker 3>or historians. And you know, I don't point fingers at

1705
01:26:45.319 --> 01:26:47.039
<v Speaker 3>who this is or who might be doing that, because

1706
01:26:47.079 --> 01:26:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I certainly I don't have any evidence to say that

1707
01:26:49.640 --> 01:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>that's happening. But I mean last or not last year. Now,

1708
01:26:53.000 --> 01:26:55.800
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty four, there was that whole issue with

1709
01:26:55.880 --> 01:26:59.319
<v Speaker 3>Tenant media where the Russians were kind of caught, you know,

1710
01:26:59.399 --> 01:27:02.920
<v Speaker 3>funneling to this influencer network. And so that was one

1711
01:27:02.960 --> 01:27:05.720
<v Speaker 3>instance in which that was caught, right, But think about

1712
01:27:05.720 --> 01:27:09.119
<v Speaker 3>all the instances in which you know that hasn't been caught, right,

1713
01:27:09.159 --> 01:27:12.640
<v Speaker 3>and it certainly is happening elsewhere, and you know, these

1714
01:27:12.760 --> 01:27:17.079
<v Speaker 3>nation state actors or adjacent actors certainly have the means

1715
01:27:17.119 --> 01:27:21.760
<v Speaker 3>to influence thought on a variety of these subjects because

1716
01:27:21.760 --> 01:27:23.560
<v Speaker 3>it's in their geopolitical interest to do so. And I

1717
01:27:23.600 --> 01:27:25.479
<v Speaker 3>think that's certainly a part of it. And there's kind

1718
01:27:25.520 --> 01:27:30.000
<v Speaker 3>of an overlap here between the pop historian influencer worlds

1719
01:27:30.520 --> 01:27:33.239
<v Speaker 3>and those those state actors as well.

1720
01:27:33.439 --> 01:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and when stuff like that happens, it's I mean,

1721
01:27:35.159 --> 01:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>as we saw with the Tenet media case. If I

1722
01:27:36.920 --> 01:27:39.199
<v Speaker 1>remember right, it wasn't just this. I mean, it was

1723
01:27:39.199 --> 01:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>about as direct as it could get, but it's still

1724
01:27:41.399 --> 01:27:44.279
<v Speaker 1>relatively indirect. And most of these influencers didn't even think

1725
01:27:44.279 --> 01:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>about where the money was coming from.

1726
01:27:45.600 --> 01:27:46.239
<v Speaker 2>They just took it.

1727
01:27:46.439 --> 01:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>And you know, on that from a human perspective, I

1728
01:27:49.399 --> 01:27:52.039
<v Speaker 1>don't blame them. I mean, if you're being offered, you know,

1729
01:27:52.279 --> 01:27:54.319
<v Speaker 1>five hundred thousand dollars a week, you're not going to

1730
01:27:54.399 --> 01:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>say no unless you are staking credibility on things, and

1731
01:27:58.600 --> 01:28:00.279
<v Speaker 1>you have to actually really start thinking about that.

1732
01:28:01.000 --> 01:28:03.479
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, that that has entered my mind as well.

1733
01:28:03.520 --> 01:28:04.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I and.

1734
01:28:04.680 --> 01:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, all those like possibilities I put out there, you know,

1735
01:28:08.159 --> 01:28:11.039
<v Speaker 1>like I said, outsourcing my argument, you know, they could

1736
01:28:11.039 --> 01:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they all can be true at once.

1737
01:28:12.800 --> 01:28:13.760
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's a big thing.

1738
01:28:13.760 --> 01:28:16.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like I for example, when I when I

1739
01:28:16.199 --> 01:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>said mental illness, obviously, I think everybody probably thought the

1740
01:28:19.600 --> 01:28:22.039
<v Speaker 1>same thing. At least you probably did. I'm talking about

1741
01:28:22.039 --> 01:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Candice Owens mostly, but that's pretty obvious. But like, she's

1742
01:28:27.039 --> 01:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>also very much an opportunistic person. She's very much in

1743
01:28:30.439 --> 01:28:32.279
<v Speaker 1>it for the money, in it for the influence. And

1744
01:28:32.920 --> 01:28:35.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's just like there is a psychological

1745
01:28:35.239 --> 01:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>aspect to a cognitive bias aspect. I mean, I this

1746
01:28:38.600 --> 01:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't explain the motive, but I've been using this diagnosis

1747
01:28:43.720 --> 01:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to describe people like, you know, like those in this

1748
01:28:48.760 --> 01:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Neol Buchanan, I Tucker Carlson Orbit for a while. And

1749
01:28:52.840 --> 01:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>this thing I've been calling a masochistic chauvinism, where at

1750
01:28:56.600 --> 01:29:00.399
<v Speaker 1>least in this case, an American can feel and develop

1751
01:29:00.439 --> 01:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a deep, meaningful sense of moral pride about themselves and

1752
01:29:04.119 --> 01:29:06.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, our place in the world by centering the

1753
01:29:06.479 --> 01:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>United States the same way a typical chauvinus does, but

1754
01:29:10.520 --> 01:29:13.399
<v Speaker 1>by framing us as the worst in the world rather

1755
01:29:13.479 --> 01:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>than the best. And that recognition basically implies a high minded,

1756
01:29:17.760 --> 01:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>self critical honesty and sophistication, and therefore heightened ability to

1757
01:29:22.760 --> 01:29:27.319
<v Speaker 1>recognize evil compared to those who look abroad for such forces,

1758
01:29:27.319 --> 01:29:30.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, those those neo cons they might say, they

1759
01:29:30.119 --> 01:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>are wont to say these days. So yeah, I think

1760
01:29:33.800 --> 01:29:36.119
<v Speaker 1>that there is like it's fulfilling a need. I think

1761
01:29:36.159 --> 01:29:39.199
<v Speaker 1>at a certain level too, that's like the most sincere part.

1762
01:29:38.960 --> 01:29:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Of it, I would wager. I don't know what you

1763
01:29:40.720 --> 01:29:41.239
<v Speaker 2>think about that.

1764
01:29:41.960 --> 01:29:44.079
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think I think, you know, in Canice's case,

1765
01:29:44.319 --> 01:29:46.439
<v Speaker 3>and there's I mean, you see this all over the

1766
01:29:46.439 --> 01:29:49.199
<v Speaker 3>Twitter sphere I get, or the ex sphere I always

1767
01:29:49.399 --> 01:29:50.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't I don't even know what to call it

1768
01:29:50.560 --> 01:29:53.000
<v Speaker 3>these days, honestly, yea, yeah, I mean that's kind of

1769
01:29:53.159 --> 01:29:57.239
<v Speaker 3>just Israel Israel brain right, Like that's just like the

1770
01:29:57.239 --> 01:30:00.199
<v Speaker 3>the Israelis are the Charlie Kirk got shot. You know,

1771
01:30:00.319 --> 01:30:02.760
<v Speaker 3>the Israelis are behind it, right, like Israel's basically you know,

1772
01:30:02.840 --> 01:30:06.399
<v Speaker 3>you you wake up with a hangover, it's it's Israel's fault,

1773
01:30:06.479 --> 01:30:08.560
<v Speaker 3>right Like, that's kind of like a So I think

1774
01:30:08.560 --> 01:30:11.039
<v Speaker 3>it's I think that that's kind of taken to a

1775
01:30:11.079 --> 01:30:16.159
<v Speaker 3>certain extent, that's just totally insane. But I but I

1776
01:30:16.159 --> 01:30:18.520
<v Speaker 3>also think that they're you know, and again I'm not

1777
01:30:18.560 --> 01:30:20.760
<v Speaker 3>saying this is Candice, but I certainly think there are

1778
01:30:20.800 --> 01:30:25.960
<v Speaker 3>some people that are probably working with other folks who

1779
01:30:26.119 --> 01:30:28.960
<v Speaker 3>have a geopolitical incentive to trash talk the Israelis at

1780
01:30:29.000 --> 01:30:32.159
<v Speaker 3>every given turn, right. And you know, again, I don't

1781
01:30:32.159 --> 01:30:33.840
<v Speaker 3>know who those people are. You don't know who those

1782
01:30:33.840 --> 01:30:35.960
<v Speaker 3>people are, but I think just given what we saw

1783
01:30:35.960 --> 01:30:39.439
<v Speaker 3>with the Tenet media issue, there's there's probably there's probably

1784
01:30:39.439 --> 01:30:42.000
<v Speaker 3>more of that happening. And you know, you have certain

1785
01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:44.720
<v Speaker 3>individuals who, you know, you like Tucker as an example,

1786
01:30:44.720 --> 01:30:46.199
<v Speaker 3>who say, you know, I don't want to talk about

1787
01:30:46.199 --> 01:30:48.359
<v Speaker 3>Israel on my podcast, and then every episode it's it's

1788
01:30:48.359 --> 01:30:51.279
<v Speaker 3>basically an Israel episode, right, And so I think it's

1789
01:30:51.359 --> 01:30:54.920
<v Speaker 3>just it's just there's that, there's that there's that critique

1790
01:30:54.920 --> 01:30:58.640
<v Speaker 3>of Israel that is perfectly legitimate, as one would do

1791
01:30:58.720 --> 01:31:01.000
<v Speaker 3>of any nation state if you disagree with policy, or

1792
01:31:01.000 --> 01:31:03.439
<v Speaker 3>disagree with conduct in war, whatever. But then you have

1793
01:31:03.600 --> 01:31:08.159
<v Speaker 3>like this obsessive level aspect to it that some of

1794
01:31:08.239 --> 01:31:12.319
<v Speaker 3>these influencers or podcasters or whatever engage in. And it's

1795
01:31:12.399 --> 01:31:15.159
<v Speaker 3>it's just every single day, day in, day out, and

1796
01:31:15.199 --> 01:31:17.039
<v Speaker 3>you have to ask yourself, you know, like where is

1797
01:31:17.079 --> 01:31:17.800
<v Speaker 3>that coming from?

1798
01:31:18.039 --> 01:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is it's it's also nothing new. I mean,

1799
01:31:20.960 --> 01:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we saw you know, I my my concept that I

1800
01:31:24.119 --> 01:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>just listed of the masochistic chauvinism. I I'm deriving that

1801
01:31:26.960 --> 01:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>from a Swedish sociologist named Orin Adamson who talked about

1802
01:31:30.960 --> 01:31:33.359
<v Speaker 1>something about six or seven years ago that he called

1803
01:31:33.399 --> 01:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>masochistic nationalism, where he was talking about it from the

1804
01:31:35.800 --> 01:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>European perspective in the context of the migrant crisis, where

1805
01:31:39.199 --> 01:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I think like the thing that probably set him off

1806
01:31:41.039 --> 01:31:44.239
<v Speaker 1>was when I somebody in the Swedish government said something

1807
01:31:44.319 --> 01:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it was almost verbatim. It was to the

1808
01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>effect of there's no such thing as Swedish culture, as

1809
01:31:48.880 --> 01:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>if that was a point of pride, and and so

1810
01:31:51.760 --> 01:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>he like really you know, went off on that saying

1811
01:31:54.039 --> 01:31:56.239
<v Speaker 1>like there's this psychological need being met by people who

1812
01:31:56.319 --> 01:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>say such absurd things. But his point, and he cited

1813
01:32:00.359 --> 01:32:04.199
<v Speaker 1>or well or Well describe this notion and this phenomenon

1814
01:32:04.199 --> 01:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about. Back during the lead up and

1815
01:32:06.680 --> 01:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>into the Second World War, when he talked about negative

1816
01:32:09.560 --> 01:32:13.199
<v Speaker 1>and transferred nationalism, he was very keenly aware of how

1817
01:32:13.800 --> 01:32:18.399
<v Speaker 1>there were people who got excited when Germany, you know,

1818
01:32:19.399 --> 01:32:23.239
<v Speaker 1>like struck against Britain's allies because they.

1819
01:32:23.119 --> 01:32:25.239
<v Speaker 2>Didn't like what Britain was doing now.

1820
01:32:25.560 --> 01:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>In Orwell's case, perhaps some of these people were Soviet sympathizers,

1821
01:32:29.680 --> 01:32:32.319
<v Speaker 1>because most communists and socialists were at that time. I

1822
01:32:32.359 --> 01:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think everyone was fully aware of what was going

1823
01:32:34.680 --> 01:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>on yet. But the point is is that I think

1824
01:32:37.039 --> 01:32:40.039
<v Speaker 1>that there is this There is this trend at least

1825
01:32:40.039 --> 01:32:43.279
<v Speaker 1>within Western countries, at least i'll confine it to where

1826
01:32:43.319 --> 01:32:46.479
<v Speaker 1>I know it's within British and American history. There does

1827
01:32:46.520 --> 01:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>seem to be this idea that we can do no

1828
01:32:49.039 --> 01:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>right instead of we could do no wrong. And I

1829
01:32:51.720 --> 01:32:54.319
<v Speaker 1>think that that motivates a lot of people because it

1830
01:32:54.399 --> 01:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>lets them feel good about themselves and allows them to

1831
01:32:58.119 --> 01:33:00.199
<v Speaker 1>make a name for themselves, because it makes them stand

1832
01:33:00.239 --> 01:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>out and be interesting and unique in comparison to the

1833
01:33:03.800 --> 01:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>typical you know, nationalists and chauvinists in the in the crowd,

1834
01:33:07.960 --> 01:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean.

1835
01:33:09.079 --> 01:33:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I do.

1836
01:33:09.680 --> 01:33:11.479
<v Speaker 3>But it's gone to the point there where it's not

1837
01:33:11.600 --> 01:33:16.239
<v Speaker 3>even unique, right, There's just there's this whole ecosystem that's

1838
01:33:16.319 --> 01:33:19.439
<v Speaker 3>kind of orbiting around this stuff. This you know, anti

1839
01:33:19.800 --> 01:33:27.000
<v Speaker 3>anti Western historical revisionism, where the US and the West

1840
01:33:27.079 --> 01:33:30.880
<v Speaker 3>more generally with the capital W is is again the

1841
01:33:30.960 --> 01:33:35.520
<v Speaker 3>original sin for all of these geopolitical flash points, and

1842
01:33:35.560 --> 01:33:40.319
<v Speaker 3>it's just well, it's just it's just so it's so boring, now, right,

1843
01:33:40.399 --> 01:33:42.840
<v Speaker 3>you have this, you have this, It's it's day and

1844
01:33:42.920 --> 01:33:45.960
<v Speaker 3>day out, like I said, from Tucker, from Candace, from

1845
01:33:46.039 --> 01:33:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Dave Smith, from Horton, from Cooper, it's just from Meerscheimer

1846
01:33:49.960 --> 01:33:52.600
<v Speaker 3>from Sachs, right like, it's it's just yeah, pinschafter pin

1847
01:33:52.680 --> 01:33:55.439
<v Speaker 3>schafter punch, and you know, Goebbels always said if you're

1848
01:33:55.439 --> 01:33:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Peter Lie, often enough people start to believe it. And

1849
01:33:58.840 --> 01:34:01.359
<v Speaker 3>and there's there's probably now aspect of that to this,

1850
01:34:01.640 --> 01:34:06.399
<v Speaker 3>but it's not even this unique angle anymore. It's just this,

1851
01:34:06.840 --> 01:34:09.920
<v Speaker 3>it's just basically this often repeated trope at this point

1852
01:34:09.960 --> 01:34:13.920
<v Speaker 3>that everybody's jumped on the bandwagon for. And again, I

1853
01:34:13.960 --> 01:34:15.840
<v Speaker 3>think that there's a lot of people that have a

1854
01:34:15.960 --> 01:34:18.840
<v Speaker 3>vested interest in that being the telling of the history.

1855
01:34:19.239 --> 01:34:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Right yeah, I mean, and it's funny you say that

1856
01:34:21.159 --> 01:34:24.039
<v Speaker 1>it's like old at this point. I mean, what like

1857
01:34:24.600 --> 01:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>tell to some I mean, you know, coming from someone

1858
01:34:27.479 --> 01:34:30.720
<v Speaker 1>myself who is very exposed to like you know, leftist

1859
01:34:30.760 --> 01:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>spaces and has a lot of leftist friends, I mean,

1860
01:34:32.640 --> 01:34:35.159
<v Speaker 1>it's really old. I mean I've been hearing these arguments

1861
01:34:35.199 --> 01:34:38.079
<v Speaker 1>for decades at this point. I mean, we brought Chomsky earlier,

1862
01:34:38.079 --> 01:34:40.800
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of him and Howard Zinn and all these

1863
01:34:40.840 --> 01:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>types that were popular in the seventies making a name

1864
01:34:43.600 --> 01:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>for themselves then by basically saying West bad like yes,

1865
01:34:48.000 --> 01:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that's where all this stuff comes from. It's it's tiresome.

1866
01:34:50.600 --> 01:34:53.119
<v Speaker 1>But I do like to point out though, and I

1867
01:34:53.199 --> 01:34:55.399
<v Speaker 1>and I know you saw because we were talking about

1868
01:34:55.439 --> 01:34:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this at one point, I have been very taken with

1869
01:34:57.840 --> 01:35:02.079
<v Speaker 1>this seemingly what I'm the green Brown alliance that seems

1870
01:35:02.079 --> 01:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to be forming, however unofficially, because it really matches the

1871
01:35:05.960 --> 01:35:09.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of tenor and in a way motivation of how

1872
01:35:09.840 --> 01:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the Nazis, especially the more esoteric minded ones like Heinrich Himler,

1873
01:35:14.199 --> 01:35:16.720
<v Speaker 1>were so taken with Muslims and with Islam. They were

1874
01:35:16.760 --> 01:35:20.159
<v Speaker 1>orientalists in that regard, and it seems to be this

1875
01:35:20.279 --> 01:35:24.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that comes up with much more radical reactionaries.

1876
01:35:24.880 --> 01:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>They are searching for something they have nothing left to

1877
01:35:27.720 --> 01:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>grab onto in their own culture, so they reach abroad

1878
01:35:30.960 --> 01:35:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and look for things that they really find fascinating and

1879
01:35:34.760 --> 01:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>compelling that also might share their values because they can't

1880
01:35:38.960 --> 01:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>find any support at home. At least for something so

1881
01:35:41.359 --> 01:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>regressive as say theocracy, or cutting off people's hands or

1882
01:35:46.960 --> 01:35:49.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, veiling women and keeping them at home, things

1883
01:35:49.520 --> 01:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>like that.

1884
01:35:50.039 --> 01:35:53.479
<v Speaker 3>You know what I mean, it's a Lawrence of Arabia

1885
01:35:53.600 --> 01:35:57.239
<v Speaker 3>level orientalism when it comes to this sometimes, right, it's

1886
01:35:57.279 --> 01:36:01.560
<v Speaker 3>falling in love with that which you surrounded yourself, which

1887
01:36:01.600 --> 01:36:05.720
<v Speaker 3>which is foreign. Because it goes back to what I

1888
01:36:05.760 --> 01:36:07.960
<v Speaker 3>was saying earlier. You know this, when it comes to

1889
01:36:07.960 --> 01:36:12.920
<v Speaker 3>the influencers and the pop historians, the esoteric being more

1890
01:36:13.039 --> 01:36:16.920
<v Speaker 3>alluring than the mundane. Right, It's about find in the

1891
01:36:16.920 --> 01:36:20.199
<v Speaker 3>case of Lawrence, finding yourself in the desert, right and

1892
01:36:20.239 --> 01:36:23.840
<v Speaker 3>falling in love with what you see there. And I

1893
01:36:23.880 --> 01:36:25.760
<v Speaker 3>think that's I think you hit the nail on the head.

1894
01:36:25.760 --> 01:36:26.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a very big part of it.

1895
01:36:26.960 --> 01:36:28.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and we'll see where it goes.

1896
01:36:28.079 --> 01:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I obviously I take a quite a bit

1897
01:36:30.680 --> 01:36:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of delight and you know, calling out this green brown

1898
01:36:34.800 --> 01:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>alliance as I call it, just because it falls so

1899
01:36:37.039 --> 01:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>directly in my wheelhouse. And I'm being very opportunistic in

1900
01:36:39.720 --> 01:36:42.279
<v Speaker 1>myself in this particular case. But at the same time,

1901
01:36:42.279 --> 01:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's very it's an interesting psychological phenomenon

1902
01:36:45.319 --> 01:36:47.199
<v Speaker 1>to a certain degree.

1903
01:36:47.399 --> 01:36:50.000
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I guess I kind.

1904
01:36:49.880 --> 01:36:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Of wanted to, like, before we I wanted to wrap

1905
01:36:51.800 --> 01:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>this all up where we talk about sort of the

1906
01:36:54.720 --> 01:36:57.119
<v Speaker 1>broad strokes of what you're doing and sort of what

1907
01:36:57.159 --> 01:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you and I have talked about, which is, you know,

1908
01:36:58.920 --> 01:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and we've touched on a little bit with the idea

1909
01:37:00.680 --> 01:37:04.119
<v Speaker 1>of peer review and fact checking and so forth. I

1910
01:37:04.119 --> 01:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>guess like this is kind of a leading question because

1911
01:37:06.880 --> 01:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I know how you feel about it, but

1912
01:37:08.600 --> 01:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I think people should hear it.

1913
01:37:10.600 --> 01:37:12.880
<v Speaker 2>How much of a problem is a lack.

1914
01:37:12.680 --> 01:37:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Of peer review in this content creation space when it

1915
01:37:15.840 --> 01:37:18.800
<v Speaker 1>comes to things like history, philosophy, the humanities as you

1916
01:37:18.840 --> 01:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>called it earlier. To what extent does it depend on

1917
01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the field itself, and to what extent does it depend

1918
01:37:24.279 --> 01:37:26.199
<v Speaker 1>on the claims being made as another distinction.

1919
01:37:26.279 --> 01:37:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I was curious if you had any thoughts on.

1920
01:37:28.520 --> 01:37:32.159
<v Speaker 3>It's a good question. I think that I think that

1921
01:37:32.239 --> 01:37:36.439
<v Speaker 3>part of the problem stems from the medium. Right, So

1922
01:37:38.159 --> 01:37:41.119
<v Speaker 3>when somebody publishes a paper, as an example, right, it's

1923
01:37:41.159 --> 01:37:43.479
<v Speaker 3>published in a journal and then peers take a look

1924
01:37:43.520 --> 01:37:47.159
<v Speaker 3>at it, and there are rebuttals or fact checks or corrections,

1925
01:37:47.800 --> 01:37:50.359
<v Speaker 3>And I think that what you see now is I

1926
01:37:50.359 --> 01:37:53.800
<v Speaker 3>mean the average person doesn't read a historical journal, right,

1927
01:37:54.800 --> 01:37:58.359
<v Speaker 3>But when you see how this information is disseminated through

1928
01:37:58.399 --> 01:38:02.640
<v Speaker 3>podcasting apps or through the internet or from whatever, a

1929
01:38:02.640 --> 01:38:04.520
<v Speaker 3>lot of people tune in and listen to that stuff.

1930
01:38:04.720 --> 01:38:12.159
<v Speaker 3>And there isn't a There isn't an academic corollary basically

1931
01:38:12.199 --> 01:38:15.199
<v Speaker 3>to the fact check in these different mediums, right, Horton,

1932
01:38:15.239 --> 01:38:17.199
<v Speaker 3>You could say it's a little bit different because he

1933
01:38:17.199 --> 01:38:18.720
<v Speaker 3>writes a book, but you know, in the case of

1934
01:38:18.760 --> 01:38:22.119
<v Speaker 3>Cooper is an example via podcast, there just isn't anything

1935
01:38:22.159 --> 01:38:25.840
<v Speaker 3>analogous to that. It just doesn't exist, right, And yeah,

1936
01:38:25.840 --> 01:38:26.439
<v Speaker 3>I think can't.

1937
01:38:26.279 --> 01:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Get someone's live debate, then at that point all you

1938
01:38:28.680 --> 01:38:31.119
<v Speaker 1>can do is really just do another podcast.

1939
01:38:30.640 --> 01:38:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Right, exactly right, And so I think that's that's the

1940
01:38:33.760 --> 01:38:36.199
<v Speaker 3>part of it. So I think that's a big part

1941
01:38:36.239 --> 01:38:38.920
<v Speaker 3>of it. And that's why I'm so I'm so adamant

1942
01:38:38.960 --> 01:38:41.880
<v Speaker 3>about the fact that you have to meet them where

1943
01:38:41.880 --> 01:38:46.239
<v Speaker 3>they're at in a medium that lends itself to digestibility

1944
01:38:46.800 --> 01:38:50.479
<v Speaker 3>from the audience's standpoint. So that's again, you know, long

1945
01:38:50.600 --> 01:38:55.640
<v Speaker 3>form podcast and taking it, breaking it down and providing quotes.

1946
01:38:55.680 --> 01:38:55.840
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1947
01:38:55.920 --> 01:38:57.760
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that I say and I've said

1948
01:38:57.760 --> 01:39:00.520
<v Speaker 3>this on on Twitter, you know, and in some of

1949
01:39:00.520 --> 01:39:04.000
<v Speaker 3>my episodes. I don't want to tell anybody how to

1950
01:39:04.159 --> 01:39:07.199
<v Speaker 3>think about a conflict. I want them to take what

1951
01:39:07.239 --> 01:39:10.920
<v Speaker 3>I have to say, Take what Horton or Cooper or

1952
01:39:10.960 --> 01:39:13.880
<v Speaker 3>any other you know, influence or historian, et cetera, whatever

1953
01:39:13.960 --> 01:39:16.600
<v Speaker 3>label you want to say, Take what I say, take

1954
01:39:16.600 --> 01:39:18.920
<v Speaker 3>what they say, and make up your own mind. I'm

1955
01:39:18.960 --> 01:39:22.560
<v Speaker 3>just giving you information that I think is missing and

1956
01:39:22.640 --> 01:39:26.000
<v Speaker 3>context that should be there that isn't to better inform

1957
01:39:26.119 --> 01:39:28.800
<v Speaker 3>you to make up a decision on how you should

1958
01:39:28.800 --> 01:39:31.079
<v Speaker 3>feel about a conflict. And I think that's what it

1959
01:39:31.119 --> 01:39:34.079
<v Speaker 3>really comes down to. It's just giving people additional context

1960
01:39:34.159 --> 01:39:38.119
<v Speaker 3>and information that should be presented that unfortunately oftentimes isn't.

1961
01:39:38.319 --> 01:39:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha.

1962
01:39:38.840 --> 01:39:41.439
<v Speaker 1>So in the sense then it's it doesn't really depend

1963
01:39:41.479 --> 01:39:45.439
<v Speaker 1>on the field necessarily. I mean, I guess if you're well, okay,

1964
01:39:45.439 --> 01:39:47.079
<v Speaker 1>maybe it does in the sense that if somebody is

1965
01:39:47.119 --> 01:39:49.399
<v Speaker 1>like making medical claims like that, it might be a

1966
01:39:49.439 --> 01:39:51.920
<v Speaker 1>little more urgent to refute those things.

1967
01:39:52.119 --> 01:39:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it's I think it goes back to

1968
01:39:54.000 --> 01:39:57.439
<v Speaker 3>the binary aspect of the of the of the nature

1969
01:39:57.479 --> 01:39:59.600
<v Speaker 3>of what's being done right Like so in the case

1970
01:39:59.640 --> 01:40:03.199
<v Speaker 3>of meta in the surgery is successful, and the patient

1971
01:40:03.359 --> 01:40:06.600
<v Speaker 3>survives or isn't and it fails and maybe they die.

1972
01:40:06.800 --> 01:40:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Right in the case of a civil engineer, the bridge

1973
01:40:09.760 --> 01:40:12.479
<v Speaker 3>is built and it either stands or collapses, and again

1974
01:40:12.560 --> 01:40:15.479
<v Speaker 3>people probably die. But when it comes to this stuff,

1975
01:40:15.560 --> 01:40:18.720
<v Speaker 3>it's much more interpretive, narrative, rich.

1976
01:40:18.720 --> 01:40:19.760
<v Speaker 2>No immediate stakes.

1977
01:40:19.920 --> 01:40:22.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, exactly.

1978
01:40:21.720 --> 01:40:24.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, And I think the thing that I tend to

1979
01:40:24.520 --> 01:40:25.039
<v Speaker 2>it's funny.

1980
01:40:25.079 --> 01:40:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I tend to really butt heads, at least in my

1981
01:40:28.399 --> 01:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>own head, I should say, because I have never spoken

1982
01:40:30.279 --> 01:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to him. But with people like Douglas Murray and people

1983
01:40:33.520 --> 01:40:35.439
<v Speaker 1>who I generally agree with in a lot of things,

1984
01:40:35.680 --> 01:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>especially in this context, I do take issue when I

1985
01:40:39.680 --> 01:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>hear them say this stuff is dangerous. And that's more

1986
01:40:43.680 --> 01:40:46.039
<v Speaker 1>because of my own political bias when it comes to

1987
01:40:46.079 --> 01:40:49.520
<v Speaker 1>things like free speech. I mean, I give Murray the

1988
01:40:49.520 --> 01:40:52.079
<v Speaker 1>benefit of being British, so he doesn't appreciate free speech

1989
01:40:52.079 --> 01:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in the same way I think as Ey as I

1990
01:40:53.640 --> 01:40:55.319
<v Speaker 1>do as a rock ribbed American.

1991
01:40:55.720 --> 01:40:59.920
<v Speaker 2>But I really do. I have such a strong.

1992
01:40:59.560 --> 01:41:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Aversion into the idea that any kind of speech is

1993
01:41:02.640 --> 01:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>dangerous unless it's directly telling people to go hurt someone.

1994
01:41:06.039 --> 01:41:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I follow the Brandon burg standard in that sense,

1995
01:41:09.199 --> 01:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it's to a point of it being absurdly literal,

1996
01:41:12.720 --> 01:41:14.479
<v Speaker 1>but I just I feel like if we're not going

1997
01:41:14.520 --> 01:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to be doing that, then we should be just throwing

1998
01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:20.119
<v Speaker 1>in the towel and saying, fine, we don't actually have

1999
01:41:20.479 --> 01:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't live up to the values that

2000
01:41:22.600 --> 01:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>are implied, if not outright stated, by the First Amendment.

2001
01:41:25.720 --> 01:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Again that's my political bias, but I think what that

2002
01:41:28.880 --> 01:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>means for me and for people who feel the same

2003
01:41:31.600 --> 01:41:34.399
<v Speaker 1>way as I do, is that we can't just rest

2004
01:41:34.399 --> 01:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on our laurels when someone makes a claim that we know,

2005
01:41:37.279 --> 01:41:41.119
<v Speaker 1>or at the very least believe to be untrue. Like

2006
01:41:41.600 --> 01:41:44.119
<v Speaker 1>this kind of gets us into something that I thought

2007
01:41:44.159 --> 01:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting. Another sort of challenge that I never

2008
01:41:47.039 --> 01:41:50.720
<v Speaker 1>really considered was what you're doing with your work seems

2009
01:41:50.720 --> 01:41:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to be refuting something that I always really loved that

2010
01:41:53.800 --> 01:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Hitchins said, where he said that what can be

2011
01:41:56.600 --> 01:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, and that's

2012
01:41:59.600 --> 01:42:02.479
<v Speaker 1>always a this is such a witty bond maw, which

2013
01:42:02.520 --> 01:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>is like what he's known for even to this day.

2014
01:42:05.399 --> 01:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>But I also am starting to think that that's very

2015
01:42:08.319 --> 01:42:12.159
<v Speaker 1>rooted in dated twentieth century thinking. And granted he was

2016
01:42:12.199 --> 01:42:15.159
<v Speaker 1>also talking about religion something very specific, but he made

2017
01:42:15.159 --> 01:42:16.039
<v Speaker 1>it sound general.

2018
01:42:16.119 --> 01:42:18.079
<v Speaker 2>So there's that. But but I think.

2019
01:42:17.960 --> 01:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Now, especially you know, more than a quarter century in

2020
01:42:23.359 --> 01:42:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to this new century, information has become so democratized and

2021
01:42:27.720 --> 01:42:31.319
<v Speaker 1>stands to become even more individualized as technology improves. I

2022
01:42:31.359 --> 01:42:34.720
<v Speaker 1>just don't think that that viewpoint really works anymore, especially

2023
01:42:34.800 --> 01:42:36.159
<v Speaker 1>if you value.

2024
01:42:35.800 --> 01:42:37.399
<v Speaker 2>Free expression and free speech.

2025
01:42:38.760 --> 01:42:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So it also seems to be a problem for a

2026
01:42:42.920 --> 01:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who find conspiratorial thinking so corrosive as

2027
01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:49.199
<v Speaker 1>I think you and I do. And I think what

2028
01:42:49.199 --> 01:42:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about is that there's actual experts being challenged

2029
01:42:51.840 --> 01:42:57.000
<v Speaker 1>or even dismissed, that these these people are not addressing

2030
01:42:57.399 --> 01:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the challenges to their expertise because they like they don't

2031
01:43:00.600 --> 01:43:03.159
<v Speaker 1>have to. We kind of talked about this a little

2032
01:43:03.199 --> 01:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>bit before with we reference Coleman Hughes's conversation with Dave Smith,

2033
01:43:07.039 --> 01:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And obviously we're talking about what you've been doing for

2034
01:43:09.880 --> 01:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a while now, which I think is what you're doing,

2035
01:43:12.720 --> 01:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is you're challenging what has happened, and what's happened, in

2036
01:43:15.640 --> 01:43:18.479
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, is that we are seeing the creation of

2037
01:43:18.680 --> 01:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>parallel worlds of reality, maybe not even parallel, just multiple

2038
01:43:22.560 --> 01:43:25.720
<v Speaker 1>worlds of reality. The multiverse theory, I guess, but apply

2039
01:43:25.840 --> 01:43:30.079
<v Speaker 1>to information. And I think when we start to speak

2040
01:43:30.119 --> 01:43:35.079
<v Speaker 1>to these contrary viewpoints on the contrarian's terms, that's the

2041
01:43:35.079 --> 01:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>only thing we can do to bring these two realities

2042
01:43:38.039 --> 01:43:42.199
<v Speaker 1>or these multiple realities back together into one. It's incumbent

2043
01:43:42.279 --> 01:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>upon the people who are the quote unquote defenders of

2044
01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:48.119
<v Speaker 1>the establishment, or just people who don't agree with the

2045
01:43:48.159 --> 01:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>anti establishment narratives in particular that are coming out. So

2046
01:43:52.079 --> 01:43:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm wondering what you think of that as

2047
01:43:53.800 --> 01:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like a sort of methodology for.

2048
01:43:55.800 --> 01:43:57.399
<v Speaker 2>Bringing things together, and.

2049
01:43:59.199 --> 01:44:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe it's just ask you, is that what you

2050
01:44:00.880 --> 01:44:02.560
<v Speaker 1>think you're doing, and to what extent do you think

2051
01:44:02.560 --> 01:44:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that that's a successful method or do you think there's

2052
01:44:04.600 --> 01:44:07.279
<v Speaker 1>another way that we can do that, And what challenges

2053
01:44:07.359 --> 01:44:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I think do we face as we try to force

2054
01:44:11.399 --> 01:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>more reality into the conversation.

2055
01:44:13.840 --> 01:44:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's again a very good question. I think that

2056
01:44:17.319 --> 01:44:20.760
<v Speaker 3>you know it's this probably sounds a little bit trite,

2057
01:44:20.800 --> 01:44:24.359
<v Speaker 3>but I think it's it's always easier to destroy than

2058
01:44:24.399 --> 01:44:27.640
<v Speaker 3>to create. And I think when it comes to established

2059
01:44:27.760 --> 01:44:31.560
<v Speaker 3>historical narratives based and evidence as you said, anybody can

2060
01:44:31.560 --> 01:44:34.840
<v Speaker 3>flippantly say anything, right, Churchill was the chief villain of

2061
01:44:34.840 --> 01:44:37.760
<v Speaker 3>World War Two as an example, Right, And then it's

2062
01:44:37.800 --> 01:44:41.640
<v Speaker 3>it's then incumbent on the fact checker to say, well,

2063
01:44:41.680 --> 01:44:45.159
<v Speaker 3>actually you're wrong, and here's all the reasons why, here's

2064
01:44:45.239 --> 01:44:48.840
<v Speaker 3>the sources, here's the evidence that takes. That's a much

2065
01:44:48.880 --> 01:44:53.039
<v Speaker 3>more extensive exercise than just tweeting out Churchill was the

2066
01:44:53.119 --> 01:44:55.439
<v Speaker 3>chief villain of World War Two or saying it or

2067
01:44:55.479 --> 01:44:58.520
<v Speaker 3>you know whatever. And so I think that it's inherently

2068
01:44:58.680 --> 01:45:03.079
<v Speaker 3>the fact checkers or the peer reviewers are always going

2069
01:45:03.119 --> 01:45:05.840
<v Speaker 3>to be behind the eight ball because they are reactive

2070
01:45:06.439 --> 01:45:09.239
<v Speaker 3>to the comments that are being made that are a

2071
01:45:09.239 --> 01:45:12.119
<v Speaker 3>revisionist in nature. So I think that's that's an important

2072
01:45:12.159 --> 01:45:14.960
<v Speaker 3>thing to understand that you're operating from from behind the

2073
01:45:14.960 --> 01:45:18.479
<v Speaker 3>eight ball. Basically from the get go. My objective and

2074
01:45:18.520 --> 01:45:20.880
<v Speaker 3>again this is just me. This is my personal take

2075
01:45:20.920 --> 01:45:23.239
<v Speaker 3>on what I think I'm doing and how I'm approaching it.

2076
01:45:24.079 --> 01:45:28.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to give people ammunition. Right. The best, the

2077
01:45:28.479 --> 01:45:31.720
<v Speaker 3>happiest that I am is when I'm you know, doing

2078
01:45:31.720 --> 01:45:34.640
<v Speaker 3>my thing and during the day I see somebody on

2079
01:45:34.880 --> 01:45:36.880
<v Speaker 3>X that's kind of getting into a back and forth

2080
01:45:36.920 --> 01:45:39.600
<v Speaker 3>with somebody about one of the subjects that I've already covered,

2081
01:45:40.119 --> 01:45:42.960
<v Speaker 3>and they'll say, well, actually, that claim isn't correct. You know,

2082
01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:46.600
<v Speaker 3>you should check out this episode of Crackpot History because

2083
01:45:46.720 --> 01:45:51.680
<v Speaker 3>he actually kind of deconstructs that claim. And so my fundamentally,

2084
01:45:51.920 --> 01:45:55.279
<v Speaker 3>it's it's all about giving people the ammunition both to

2085
01:45:55.319 --> 01:45:58.039
<v Speaker 3>better understand the context that I said, as I said before,

2086
01:45:58.159 --> 01:46:00.199
<v Speaker 3>is missing from a lot of the claims that are

2087
01:46:00.199 --> 01:46:02.720
<v Speaker 3>made in the content that I cover, but also being

2088
01:46:02.800 --> 01:46:06.600
<v Speaker 3>able to kind of use that as as something that

2089
01:46:06.640 --> 01:46:10.680
<v Speaker 3>they can spread themselves as a sword and a shield

2090
01:46:10.760 --> 01:46:12.840
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to confronting these claims directly.

2091
01:46:14.399 --> 01:46:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like that too, because I was going to

2092
01:46:17.479 --> 01:46:22.079
<v Speaker 1>point out that there are there's a lot of objections

2093
01:46:22.079 --> 01:46:25.159
<v Speaker 1>that I've heard people who you know, and to their credit,

2094
01:46:25.239 --> 01:46:27.239
<v Speaker 1>do not get involved in this stuff, are not as

2095
01:46:27.319 --> 01:46:30.520
<v Speaker 1>terminally online as you or I saying like, well, what's

2096
01:46:30.560 --> 01:46:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the point.

2097
01:46:30.880 --> 01:46:32.039
<v Speaker 2>Of debating these people?

2098
01:46:32.119 --> 01:46:35.159
<v Speaker 1>They're crazy or they'll you'll never convince them, or you'll

2099
01:46:35.159 --> 01:46:36.359
<v Speaker 1>never convince their followers.

2100
01:46:36.359 --> 01:46:38.399
<v Speaker 2>And I've gotten to the point where.

2101
01:46:38.199 --> 01:46:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I've I've kind of tried to make a concise rebuttal

2102
01:46:40.840 --> 01:46:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of that where I say it's not about convincing their followers.

2103
01:46:43.640 --> 01:46:46.319
<v Speaker 1>It's not about convincing them because you're never going to

2104
01:46:46.359 --> 01:46:49.640
<v Speaker 1>convince somebody that their belief is wrong. That's anybody who

2105
01:46:50.119 --> 01:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>thought they were a pugnacious Christopher Hitchins want to be

2106
01:46:52.760 --> 01:46:55.640
<v Speaker 1>anti theist in their early twenties, realized that very quickly

2107
01:46:55.680 --> 01:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>at Thanksgiving, you know what I mean, like with their

2108
01:46:58.279 --> 01:47:02.840
<v Speaker 1>religious family. But the point being is that what you're

2109
01:47:02.880 --> 01:47:05.079
<v Speaker 1>doing when you're doing when you when you're debunking this

2110
01:47:05.119 --> 01:47:08.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff is giving ammunition to those who are interacting with

2111
01:47:08.239 --> 01:47:10.479
<v Speaker 1>someone in that audience or just putting it out there

2112
01:47:10.520 --> 01:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>so it's available as a counter narrative for someone to

2113
01:47:13.640 --> 01:47:16.119
<v Speaker 1>pick up and use later. It's it's just about like

2114
01:47:16.199 --> 01:47:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it's about not letting something go unchallenged. And then I

2115
01:47:20.920 --> 01:47:23.800
<v Speaker 1>hear people say, well, there's not there's more people in

2116
01:47:23.840 --> 01:47:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the believing camp than the non believing camp. Well yeah,

2117
01:47:26.640 --> 01:47:29.119
<v Speaker 1>but that that's always been the case. Like it doesn't

2118
01:47:29.239 --> 01:47:32.119
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter, Like having the stuff there is what

2119
01:47:32.199 --> 01:47:34.920
<v Speaker 1>matters in and of itself. And again it lives up

2120
01:47:34.960 --> 01:47:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to you know, like what I was saying before about

2121
01:47:36.920 --> 01:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the spirit of free expression. I I do think that

2122
01:47:39.560 --> 01:47:43.600
<v Speaker 1>there's something to be said for debating Holocaust deniers if

2123
01:47:43.640 --> 01:47:46.239
<v Speaker 1>you have the ability to do so, if you know enough.

2124
01:47:46.600 --> 01:47:49.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I don't agree.

2125
01:47:48.800 --> 01:47:51.079
<v Speaker 1>With you know, Deborah Lipstadt or any of these people

2126
01:47:51.079 --> 01:47:53.000
<v Speaker 1>who say that this shouldn't be adjudicated.

2127
01:47:53.079 --> 01:47:54.319
<v Speaker 2>It should be adjudicated.

2128
01:47:54.600 --> 01:47:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I agree that it probably should not have been adjudicated

2129
01:47:56.920 --> 01:48:00.119
<v Speaker 1>in a courtroom in terms of the principle when she

2130
01:48:00.159 --> 01:48:03.359
<v Speaker 1>went to trial with David Irving. But I'm not unhappy

2131
01:48:03.399 --> 01:48:07.319
<v Speaker 1>that it did, because it roundly and appropriately discredited him

2132
01:48:07.680 --> 01:48:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and revealed him to be the fraud that he was,

2133
01:48:10.399 --> 01:48:12.399
<v Speaker 1>and that in turn revealed him to be, you know

2134
01:48:12.640 --> 01:48:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that he was as a someone motivated by a deep

2135
01:48:15.760 --> 01:48:19.920
<v Speaker 1>seated hatred of Jews, so and love of the Nazis. So,

2136
01:48:20.079 --> 01:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess what I'm saying is I think just having

2137
01:48:22.600 --> 01:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it out there is the end and of itself. It's

2138
01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:29.399
<v Speaker 1>not about convincing already convinced followers, or disabusing people, or

2139
01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:32.279
<v Speaker 1>most condescendingly, deprogramming them.

2140
01:48:32.600 --> 01:48:35.800
<v Speaker 3>You know what I mean From a principled standpoint, I mean,

2141
01:48:35.800 --> 01:48:39.239
<v Speaker 3>that's what I believe, right, I think that. Look, I

2142
01:48:39.720 --> 01:48:42.760
<v Speaker 3>I just hit a thousand subs on YouTube, right, Darryl

2143
01:48:42.800 --> 01:48:47.239
<v Speaker 3>Cooper Scott Horton. I mean, these guys have hundreds of thousands.

2144
01:48:46.840 --> 01:48:48.479
<v Speaker 2>Of following Mine might be millions.

2145
01:48:48.800 --> 01:48:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, probably right, substack all that stuff, right, millions and

2146
01:48:52.880 --> 01:48:56.520
<v Speaker 3>millions of followers. But from a principled position, I agree

2147
01:48:56.560 --> 01:48:59.319
<v Speaker 3>with you, right, I'm doing this. I don't make money

2148
01:48:59.319 --> 01:49:01.279
<v Speaker 3>doing this. I do this because I think it needs

2149
01:49:01.319 --> 01:49:03.439
<v Speaker 3>to be done by somebody. You know, I have the

2150
01:49:04.279 --> 01:49:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I think, the knowledge, the understanding, the expertise to do it,

2151
01:49:08.279 --> 01:49:10.199
<v Speaker 3>and I think it just needs to exist.

2152
01:49:10.479 --> 01:49:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and honestly I might contradict myself a little bit too,

2153
01:49:14.399 --> 01:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>but I mean it makes me think of, oh, what

2154
01:49:17.760 --> 01:49:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is that Hannah or Rent quote where she said that

2155
01:49:21.880 --> 01:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced

2156
01:49:25.119 --> 01:49:28.199
<v Speaker 1>Nazi or dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction

2157
01:49:28.279 --> 01:49:32.399
<v Speaker 1>between fact and fiction no longer exists. I think when

2158
01:49:32.439 --> 01:49:35.199
<v Speaker 1>you take that at face value, you can then see

2159
01:49:35.239 --> 01:49:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that there might be a little higher stakes involved in

2160
01:49:39.079 --> 01:49:43.680
<v Speaker 1>making sure that there is these punctures in the in

2161
01:49:44.159 --> 01:49:47.920
<v Speaker 1>widespread contrarian information that might not hold up to scrutiny,

2162
01:49:48.399 --> 01:49:51.600
<v Speaker 1>because if people don't know what's true, they're just going

2163
01:49:51.680 --> 01:49:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to give up. That's the argument, at least that a

2164
01:49:53.960 --> 01:49:56.000
<v Speaker 1>rent would make and And on the one hand, I

2165
01:49:56.000 --> 01:49:58.760
<v Speaker 1>think that there's I've read enough of funny enough of

2166
01:49:59.119 --> 01:50:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Czechoslovak history, especially during the rule of the Communists after

2167
01:50:03.960 --> 01:50:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the prog Spring, that the idea that they didn't know

2168
01:50:06.880 --> 01:50:08.760
<v Speaker 1>what was true in false is not true. There is

2169
01:50:08.800 --> 01:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>actually a lot of descent inside there. Not just from

2170
01:50:11.920 --> 01:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Charter seventy seven and all those people, but

2171
01:50:14.520 --> 01:50:17.279
<v Speaker 1>but just people were regular people, were fully aware that

2172
01:50:17.279 --> 01:50:19.199
<v Speaker 1>they're being lied to a lot of the time. So

2173
01:50:19.279 --> 01:50:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that we shouldn't overrate the individual's capacity to

2174
01:50:22.439 --> 01:50:26.279
<v Speaker 1>smell out bullshit. But at the same time, giving them

2175
01:50:26.319 --> 01:50:28.439
<v Speaker 1>tools to help them smell out that bullshit is a

2176
01:50:28.479 --> 01:50:31.680
<v Speaker 1>net positive for everybody, and it minimizes the amount of

2177
01:50:31.720 --> 01:50:34.119
<v Speaker 1>work they have to do that they might not otherwise do.

2178
01:50:34.439 --> 01:50:38.119
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So you know, I'm not I'm not gonna I'm

2179
01:50:38.119 --> 01:50:40.640
<v Speaker 3>not going to reveal any names here, but I okay,

2180
01:50:40.720 --> 01:50:43.920
<v Speaker 3>I had a couple. I had a couple fairly well

2181
01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:49.840
<v Speaker 3>known influencers that I respect their work, that have fairly

2182
01:50:49.920 --> 01:50:52.560
<v Speaker 3>large followings, that you would probably know by name, that

2183
01:50:52.720 --> 01:50:56.399
<v Speaker 3>reached out to me privately and just said, hey, you know,

2184
01:50:56.520 --> 01:50:59.359
<v Speaker 3>really really respect what you're doing, thank you for saving

2185
01:50:59.399 --> 01:51:02.600
<v Speaker 3>me the hour of needven needing to listen to to

2186
01:51:02.680 --> 01:51:05.279
<v Speaker 3>all that stuff. You really summarized it and kind of

2187
01:51:05.479 --> 01:51:09.680
<v Speaker 3>condensed it and made it more digestible for me, and

2188
01:51:09.760 --> 01:51:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I really appreciated it. And so that's kind of what

2189
01:51:13.079 --> 01:51:16.960
<v Speaker 3>the what the end objective for me is if I

2190
01:51:17.000 --> 01:51:21.720
<v Speaker 3>can take something that is rough around the edges, smooth

2191
01:51:21.760 --> 01:51:27.520
<v Speaker 3>it out, provide additional commentary, historical context and input, and

2192
01:51:28.199 --> 01:51:31.520
<v Speaker 3>provide more color so that the fuller picture is told.

2193
01:51:32.159 --> 01:51:34.479
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm putting it out into the universe. How

2194
01:51:34.520 --> 01:51:39.399
<v Speaker 3>people use it or react to that or even believe it,

2195
01:51:39.600 --> 01:51:42.079
<v Speaker 3>you know, that's kind of that's kind of up to them.

2196
01:51:42.560 --> 01:51:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I yeah, And that does really feel good to

2197
01:51:47.479 --> 01:51:51.880
<v Speaker 1>like be reminded by people, especially people of some prominence,

2198
01:51:51.960 --> 01:51:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that that what you're doing is helpful in that sense too.

2199
01:51:56.960 --> 01:51:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've gotten well, I've gotten plenty of a

2200
01:51:59.720 --> 01:52:02.439
<v Speaker 1>feed back on my own work from various perspectives and

2201
01:52:02.520 --> 01:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>including more critical ones.

2202
01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Because of the praise I've given Daryl Cooper in the.

2203
01:52:05.880 --> 01:52:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Past, I started to get the dreaded how could you

2204
01:52:09.359 --> 01:52:13.479
<v Speaker 1>possibly be friends with or recommend this quote unquote neo Nazi,

2205
01:52:13.960 --> 01:52:16.720
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think he is one for the record,

2206
01:52:16.800 --> 01:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I just yeah, what I think of him does not

2207
01:52:19.039 --> 01:52:22.039
<v Speaker 1>really matter. The point is is, you know, I've gotten

2208
01:52:22.079 --> 01:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of feedback from that and from all of that,

2209
01:52:25.560 --> 01:52:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and I do think that that can be very affirming

2210
01:52:28.079 --> 01:52:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and enlightening a lot of ways too, because it can

2211
01:52:30.920 --> 01:52:35.640
<v Speaker 1>let you believe, let you realize, like like what your

2212
01:52:35.680 --> 01:52:38.880
<v Speaker 1>impact actually is going to be, at least on a

2213
01:52:38.920 --> 01:52:41.880
<v Speaker 1>small scale. And that small scale is usually enough, whether

2214
01:52:41.880 --> 01:52:44.319
<v Speaker 1>it's positive or negative, to make you either keep doing

2215
01:52:44.319 --> 01:52:46.399
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing or maybe change what you're doing a

2216
01:52:46.399 --> 01:52:46.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit.

2217
01:52:47.640 --> 01:52:48.439
<v Speaker 2>Like in my case.

2218
01:52:48.960 --> 01:52:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, look, I mean, our our footprints are, as I said,

2219
01:52:54.800 --> 01:52:57.119
<v Speaker 3>much smaller compared to some of the folks that we're

2220
01:52:57.479 --> 01:53:02.199
<v Speaker 3>referring to here. So I'm my pro today is if

2221
01:53:02.239 --> 01:53:06.800
<v Speaker 3>I can better inform one person, if I can you know,

2222
01:53:07.560 --> 01:53:11.600
<v Speaker 3>better educate or provide additional context or color for one person,

2223
01:53:12.279 --> 01:53:14.479
<v Speaker 3>then I think that's a job well done, right. I

2224
01:53:14.560 --> 01:53:18.760
<v Speaker 3>just I'm trying to just be appreciative of the fact

2225
01:53:18.880 --> 01:53:22.279
<v Speaker 3>that people listen and people like what I'm putting out

2226
01:53:22.319 --> 01:53:25.159
<v Speaker 3>into the universe. And you know, there's a lot of

2227
01:53:25.199 --> 01:53:27.600
<v Speaker 3>creators out there that don't even have that right. They

2228
01:53:27.600 --> 01:53:30.920
<v Speaker 3>don't have a thousand followers. They don't have, you know,

2229
01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:33.439
<v Speaker 3>as many listens as I have on my podcast apps,

2230
01:53:33.439 --> 01:53:36.359
<v Speaker 3>and everything is contextual. And you know, as I said

2231
01:53:36.359 --> 01:53:39.800
<v Speaker 3>on Twitter when I thanked everybody for the thousand subs,

2232
01:53:39.840 --> 01:53:41.760
<v Speaker 3>I said, brick by brick, And that's really how I

2233
01:53:41.800 --> 01:53:42.319
<v Speaker 3>approach this.

2234
01:53:42.800 --> 01:53:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean, and yeah, somebody who's been doing

2235
01:53:45.520 --> 01:53:47.840
<v Speaker 1>this now for going on seven years, I can tell

2236
01:53:47.880 --> 01:53:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you that the only way to look at content creation

2237
01:53:50.880 --> 01:53:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in general is brick by brick. I think that there

2238
01:53:53.880 --> 01:53:58.000
<v Speaker 1>are people who think when someone blows up overnight, that

2239
01:53:58.000 --> 01:54:02.239
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be good, you know, for their product

2240
01:54:02.359 --> 01:54:06.000
<v Speaker 1>or for them. I you know, I have a bridge

2241
01:54:06.039 --> 01:54:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to sell them, you know what I mean. Like, I

2242
01:54:08.039 --> 01:54:11.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's good to like to suddenly blow up overnight.

2243
01:54:11.880 --> 01:54:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying anything about anyone in particular, no

2244
01:54:14.920 --> 01:54:16.960
<v Speaker 1>one that we've been talking about for a fair bit

2245
01:54:17.000 --> 01:54:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of this episode. But I'm just saying that that kind

2246
01:54:19.560 --> 01:54:23.479
<v Speaker 1>of thing can warp what you're doing, I guess, is

2247
01:54:23.479 --> 01:54:24.079
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying.

2248
01:54:24.159 --> 01:54:26.079
<v Speaker 2>It can warp the purpose, It.

2249
01:54:26.000 --> 01:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Can mess with the incentives, and I think that's the

2250
01:54:28.920 --> 01:54:32.199
<v Speaker 1>big thing, And it can leave you open and vulnerable

2251
01:54:32.279 --> 01:54:37.199
<v Speaker 1>to people who want to exploit your talents for certain ends.

2252
01:54:37.840 --> 01:54:41.399
<v Speaker 1>And that's all I'll say about that. But because again

2253
01:54:41.439 --> 01:54:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's all speculation, and I don't want

2254
01:54:43.600 --> 01:54:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to be called it to famer. So anyway, I think

2255
01:54:46.640 --> 01:54:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the sort of big question I had for you that

2256
01:54:49.600 --> 01:54:51.880
<v Speaker 1>actually was the one I was the very first one

2257
01:54:51.920 --> 01:54:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought of. But I was like, there needs to

2258
01:54:53.760 --> 01:54:56.000
<v Speaker 1>be a lot more scaffolding before I ask him this.

2259
01:54:56.920 --> 01:54:59.119
<v Speaker 1>Where do we go from here when it comes to

2260
01:54:59.560 --> 01:55:02.640
<v Speaker 1>making the information space better? And I mean this in

2261
01:55:02.680 --> 01:55:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a more logistical sense because I like what we're saying.

2262
01:55:04.840 --> 01:55:07.800
<v Speaker 1>We're saying a lot of good stuff about the principle

2263
01:55:08.079 --> 01:55:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of peer review of fact checking. I would add that

2264
01:55:12.279 --> 01:55:15.960
<v Speaker 1>even though this is one weakness that actually I mentioned

2265
01:55:15.960 --> 01:55:20.039
<v Speaker 1>my partner Molly, who I've actually had on my show

2266
01:55:20.119 --> 01:55:22.960
<v Speaker 1>multiple times. We do a sub series of my show

2267
01:55:23.000 --> 01:55:26.760
<v Speaker 1>about weird little stories in history. But she and I

2268
01:55:26.800 --> 01:55:30.560
<v Speaker 1>were talking about this and I was saying, well, I

2269
01:55:30.600 --> 01:55:34.279
<v Speaker 1>would love it if crackpod History took my show on,

2270
01:55:34.920 --> 01:55:37.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, looked at what I'm doing, even though he

2271
01:55:37.359 --> 01:55:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and I align on a lot of stuff, and you know,

2272
01:55:39.800 --> 01:55:42.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think he's doing good work. You know,

2273
01:55:42.359 --> 01:55:44.479
<v Speaker 1>real peer review is on people you like as well

2274
01:55:44.520 --> 01:55:46.960
<v Speaker 1>as you don't like. But then she made a really

2275
01:55:46.960 --> 01:55:51.439
<v Speaker 1>good point, and this is to me a fair point,

2276
01:55:51.520 --> 01:55:54.479
<v Speaker 1>and this might speak to the problem with the medium.

2277
01:55:54.479 --> 01:55:56.880
<v Speaker 1>As you were saying before, that's not content.

2278
01:55:56.960 --> 01:56:01.640
<v Speaker 2>People like. People don't want to hear you critique.

2279
01:56:01.159 --> 01:56:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Something that you might think is good. Now I'm being

2280
01:56:04.159 --> 01:56:06.199
<v Speaker 1>presumptuous by saying you think my work is good. I'm

2281
01:56:06.199 --> 01:56:08.279
<v Speaker 1>just making the point that because I'm having you on

2282
01:56:08.359 --> 01:56:11.680
<v Speaker 1>my show, we're obviously compasetic to a degree.

2283
01:56:11.680 --> 01:56:12.439
<v Speaker 2>But I'm just saying the.

2284
01:56:14.720 --> 01:56:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Idea of like you reviewing stuff that you think more

2285
01:56:17.840 --> 01:56:21.520
<v Speaker 1>positively of than negatively of. People don't really like that

2286
01:56:21.680 --> 01:56:25.760
<v Speaker 1>as far as content goes. They want drama. As you said,

2287
01:56:25.359 --> 01:56:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the world turns an Internet drama. That's where I think

2288
01:56:29.720 --> 01:56:34.119
<v Speaker 1>that there is an issue that I can't possibly imagine

2289
01:56:34.159 --> 01:56:37.680
<v Speaker 1>how we overcome it, because the thing about the Internet

2290
01:56:37.840 --> 01:56:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is you got to give the people what they want

2291
01:56:39.800 --> 01:56:42.479
<v Speaker 1>to a certain degree, otherwise they'll find it somewhere else.

2292
01:56:43.319 --> 01:56:45.640
<v Speaker 1>So how do we get over or let me first

2293
01:56:45.680 --> 01:56:47.680
<v Speaker 1>ask do you agree with that way of looking at

2294
01:56:47.680 --> 01:56:50.239
<v Speaker 1>things or disagree with it?

2295
01:56:50.399 --> 01:56:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Or and or how do you think we overcome something

2296
01:56:53.039 --> 01:56:53.359
<v Speaker 2>like that?

2297
01:56:53.760 --> 01:56:55.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a good again, I keep saying, all

2298
01:56:55.800 --> 01:56:58.800
<v Speaker 3>these questions are good questions. I'm blowing too much sunshine

2299
01:56:58.840 --> 01:57:03.079
<v Speaker 3>and rainbows your ways an interviewer here, It's no, it's

2300
01:57:03.119 --> 01:57:07.439
<v Speaker 3>a fair point, right. But I think that when I

2301
01:57:07.560 --> 01:57:14.199
<v Speaker 3>look at who I'm covering, I think about maximizing impact, right,

2302
01:57:14.319 --> 01:57:18.199
<v Speaker 3>And so typically that's folks that have big followings, make

2303
01:57:18.399 --> 01:57:22.560
<v Speaker 3>very big and outlandish claims and trying to confront them

2304
01:57:22.840 --> 01:57:26.920
<v Speaker 3>directly because I know that the larger the following, the

2305
01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:30.399
<v Speaker 3>larger the potential impact. Right. And there is and you

2306
01:57:30.439 --> 01:57:33.399
<v Speaker 3>said this yourself, there is a drama aspect to this, right,

2307
01:57:33.439 --> 01:57:38.640
<v Speaker 3>People like people like drama. And the reality is that,

2308
01:57:38.880 --> 01:57:40.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, if you're fact checking somebody, even if it's

2309
01:57:40.960 --> 01:57:42.960
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more academic, which I think I would

2310
01:57:43.039 --> 01:57:46.439
<v Speaker 3>consider some of my stuff to be, the reality is

2311
01:57:46.520 --> 01:57:50.920
<v Speaker 3>that you're confronting them and that gets people going. Right.

2312
01:57:50.960 --> 01:57:53.039
<v Speaker 3>They kind of like it. They like the history, but

2313
01:57:53.039 --> 01:57:56.039
<v Speaker 3>they also like the fact that you're confronting somebody that

2314
01:57:56.079 --> 01:57:59.079
<v Speaker 3>they take issue with because of the historical claims that

2315
01:57:59.119 --> 01:58:02.680
<v Speaker 3>they're making. And I think that those two pieces when combined,

2316
01:58:03.800 --> 01:58:08.640
<v Speaker 3>not making it, you know, podcast brow slop level content,

2317
01:58:08.840 --> 01:58:11.960
<v Speaker 3>really making it about the history and doing the history

2318
01:58:11.960 --> 01:58:15.159
<v Speaker 3>and doing the legwork to tell good history, combining that

2319
01:58:15.359 --> 01:58:18.600
<v Speaker 3>with the drama aspect. I think that that is a

2320
01:58:18.640 --> 01:58:21.039
<v Speaker 3>powerful combination, frankly, and I think it's a bit it's

2321
01:58:21.159 --> 01:58:22.760
<v Speaker 3>it's you know, maybe I'm giving away too much of

2322
01:58:22.760 --> 01:58:24.960
<v Speaker 3>the secret sauce here, but I think that's part of

2323
01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:26.640
<v Speaker 3>the reason that. You know, when I speak to people

2324
01:58:26.680 --> 01:58:29.039
<v Speaker 3>and they say, hey, I really like the show, that's

2325
01:58:29.199 --> 01:58:30.920
<v Speaker 3>that's part of the reason that I hear. And then

2326
01:58:31.119 --> 01:58:33.279
<v Speaker 3>the broader question that you highlight is to you know,

2327
01:58:33.279 --> 01:58:36.840
<v Speaker 3>where we go from here. Again, you know, maybe this

2328
01:58:36.880 --> 01:58:40.079
<v Speaker 3>would be to my own disadvantage, but I think that

2329
01:58:40.720 --> 01:58:45.199
<v Speaker 3>I've seen a little bit more of my type of content,

2330
01:58:45.279 --> 01:58:49.319
<v Speaker 3>not the same, not identical, different format, different substantively in

2331
01:58:49.359 --> 01:58:51.520
<v Speaker 3>terms of how it's presented. But I've seen a little

2332
01:58:51.560 --> 01:58:56.359
<v Speaker 3>bit more of it since I've spoken to some of

2333
01:58:56.399 --> 01:58:58.920
<v Speaker 3>the noteworthier folks that have reached out to me, and

2334
01:58:58.960 --> 01:59:02.840
<v Speaker 3>they've kind of taken a slightly different approach to their model,

2335
01:59:03.279 --> 01:59:06.239
<v Speaker 3>but also adopted it into some of their content or

2336
01:59:06.279 --> 01:59:09.399
<v Speaker 3>some of the shows that they've launched or recently announced.

2337
01:59:09.920 --> 01:59:12.119
<v Speaker 3>And so I think that that's great, right, Like I'm

2338
01:59:12.119 --> 01:59:15.079
<v Speaker 3>not I'm not doing this for ego. Right, So the

2339
01:59:15.079 --> 01:59:18.920
<v Speaker 3>more the more that I see these claims being confronted

2340
01:59:19.199 --> 01:59:22.439
<v Speaker 3>or addressed or you know, as as I like to say,

2341
01:59:22.439 --> 01:59:25.399
<v Speaker 3>as I said before, more context being provided where it's needed.

2342
01:59:26.079 --> 01:59:29.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a net positive thing, right. I think

2343
01:59:29.640 --> 01:59:32.800
<v Speaker 3>that people want to hear good history, and when they

2344
01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:35.199
<v Speaker 3>there's there's a segment of people, as you as you

2345
01:59:35.199 --> 01:59:38.359
<v Speaker 3>said earlier, that hear this stuff and believe it and

2346
01:59:38.399 --> 01:59:40.039
<v Speaker 3>love it, and there's a segment of people that hear

2347
01:59:40.079 --> 01:59:43.439
<v Speaker 3>this stuff and think this is ridiculous. I wish somebody

2348
01:59:43.439 --> 01:59:45.840
<v Speaker 3>would confront this. And so I think it's a volume

2349
01:59:45.920 --> 01:59:49.600
<v Speaker 3>game because as I said before, this is the new thing.

2350
01:59:49.680 --> 01:59:52.920
<v Speaker 3>There's so many people doing this anti West, anti US,

2351
01:59:52.960 --> 01:59:57.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, Western imperialism is the original sin. Volume is

2352
01:59:57.680 --> 02:00:01.000
<v Speaker 3>a quality in and of itself. And I'm one person,

2353
02:00:01.239 --> 02:00:04.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm one show. I have a certain threshold in terms

2354
02:00:04.680 --> 02:00:08.159
<v Speaker 3>of capacity, so you know, I welcome other people doing

2355
02:00:08.159 --> 02:00:09.960
<v Speaker 3>the same thing in their own way.

2356
02:00:10.239 --> 02:00:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And and that's sort of what I was like thinking,

2357
02:00:12.520 --> 02:00:15.119
<v Speaker 1>because obviously, like a more systemic approach is a more

2358
02:00:15.119 --> 02:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>effective approach when it comes to things like this.

2359
02:00:17.880 --> 02:00:21.600
<v Speaker 2>But obviously I would not want the state to have

2360
02:00:21.760 --> 02:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>anything to do with this.

2361
02:00:22.920 --> 02:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think, you know, that misses the point entirely,

2362
02:00:25.920 --> 02:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably even more dangerous as I think we

2363
02:00:28.039 --> 02:00:31.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of learned during COVID in various ways that the

2364
02:00:31.199 --> 02:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>state should just not be involved in certain things when

2365
02:00:34.039 --> 02:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>it comes to how information spreads.

2366
02:00:36.520 --> 02:00:39.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean, again again that's more of my political slant.

2367
02:00:39.319 --> 02:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>That's my that's my again rock ribbed American view is

2368
02:00:41.760 --> 02:00:45.039
<v Speaker 1>that we shouldn't be you know, outsourcing our you know,

2369
02:00:45.159 --> 02:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>credibility to state bodies. So and you know, Hollywood has

2370
02:00:49.199 --> 02:00:52.399
<v Speaker 1>been doing it for decades now, you know, to various

2371
02:00:52.439 --> 02:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>degrees of success. But self policing, you know, of content

2372
02:00:56.239 --> 02:00:58.079
<v Speaker 1>is really I think the best way to do it.

2373
02:00:58.119 --> 02:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think if more people are adopting an approach

2374
02:01:02.039 --> 02:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're helping pioneer, that's good enough for me. I

2375
02:01:04.880 --> 02:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>mean I've always thought like, okay, well there's there could

2376
02:01:07.840 --> 02:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>always be like something that people submit their own like

2377
02:01:11.840 --> 02:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>creators submit their own work to not before they release it.

2378
02:01:14.640 --> 02:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>They can release it, but then they essentially say, hey,

2379
02:01:17.800 --> 02:01:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm also making this podcast episode I'm doing eligible for

2380
02:01:22.279 --> 02:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>review on the just call it the Crackpot History review Board.

2381
02:01:25.880 --> 02:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but something along those lines where people

2382
02:01:29.640 --> 02:01:33.159
<v Speaker 1>can like basically show that they are willing to have

2383
02:01:33.239 --> 02:01:36.239
<v Speaker 1>their work checked and that and of itself could be

2384
02:01:36.319 --> 02:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a way to, you know, at least foster some sense

2385
02:01:40.399 --> 02:01:43.159
<v Speaker 1>of credibility. Now, that could also become very easily corrupted,

2386
02:01:43.159 --> 02:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>like anything does, especially when it involves self policing. But

2387
02:01:47.000 --> 02:01:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I just I feel like things like that are are

2388
02:01:50.439 --> 02:01:53.399
<v Speaker 1>just possible, like little things that can be done to

2389
02:01:53.479 --> 02:01:57.399
<v Speaker 1>help with the credibility. Because that was ultimately what prompted

2390
02:01:57.399 --> 02:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>me at least to put out a very lengthy critique

2391
02:01:59.640 --> 02:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of Dare Girl's initial appearance on Tucker and his follow

2392
02:02:03.640 --> 02:02:06.359
<v Speaker 1>up responses for Mary and West. And it was a

2393
02:02:06.479 --> 02:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>long essay. I wrote it in the span of about

2394
02:02:08.720 --> 02:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>forty eight hours. I wrote it very quickly, but it

2395
02:02:10.960 --> 02:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>was long and very detailed, and it's probably what I'm

2396
02:02:14.119 --> 02:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>most proud of that I've ever written, because it was

2397
02:02:16.920 --> 02:02:20.159
<v Speaker 1>going through the receipts, so to speak, and it allowed

2398
02:02:20.159 --> 02:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>me to, in my mind, maintain my own credibility to say, hey,

2399
02:02:25.359 --> 02:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I do recommend this guy. I do like this guy,

2400
02:02:28.800 --> 02:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>but I think he is flagrantly wrong on this particular issue.

2401
02:02:34.119 --> 02:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>And I've intensified that criticism a fair bit over the

2402
02:02:36.760 --> 02:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>last year or so. But I really do think that

2403
02:02:40.960 --> 02:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>maintaining credibility is something that I think is very important

2404
02:02:43.760 --> 02:02:48.399
<v Speaker 1>for individual creators because of the splash damage other creators

2405
02:02:48.439 --> 02:02:49.039
<v Speaker 1>can create.

2406
02:02:49.399 --> 02:02:54.159
<v Speaker 3>Well, you use the phrase crackpot history review boards. So

2407
02:02:54.199 --> 02:02:56.640
<v Speaker 3>if you can clone me or get me a team

2408
02:02:56.680 --> 02:03:00.279
<v Speaker 3>to do my editing for me, maybe one day. But

2409
02:03:00.399 --> 02:03:04.119
<v Speaker 3>my pipeline is absolutely full. But I love the idea.

2410
02:03:04.600 --> 02:03:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, and and that's something that I honestly just.

2411
02:03:08.319 --> 02:03:10.439
<v Speaker 2>Came up with the idea. Now, so you can trademarket though,

2412
02:03:10.439 --> 02:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>if you want to give you permission. But I think

2413
02:03:13.159 --> 02:03:14.840
<v Speaker 2>unless you have anything else you want to add, I

2414
02:03:14.840 --> 02:03:15.319
<v Speaker 2>think that's.

2415
02:03:15.199 --> 02:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Really all we have. I do think that we have.

2416
02:03:18.279 --> 02:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>We've covered a lot of good ground here. I've made

2417
02:03:22.159 --> 02:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>enough implications so my soul feels satisfied. So but yeah,

2418
02:03:28.560 --> 02:03:30.279
<v Speaker 1>you have anything else you want to add to what

2419
02:03:30.319 --> 02:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we've been discussing and also direct people to where your

2420
02:03:33.960 --> 02:03:37.319
<v Speaker 1>stuff is, where your where your Twitter presence is all

2421
02:03:37.319 --> 02:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that good stuff.

2422
02:03:38.399 --> 02:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Sure, well, yeah, thanks so much for having me. This

2423
02:03:40.560 --> 02:03:42.600
<v Speaker 3>has been a great conversation. If you want to find

2424
02:03:42.600 --> 02:03:46.800
<v Speaker 3>me online, you can find me on Twitter x crackpot

2425
02:03:46.920 --> 02:03:49.720
<v Speaker 3>hissed his t or just search for Crackpot History, I

2426
02:03:49.720 --> 02:03:53.199
<v Speaker 3>should come up and the series are available on my

2427
02:03:53.319 --> 02:03:57.119
<v Speaker 3>YouTube channel or wherever else you listen to your podcast Spotify,

2428
02:03:57.159 --> 02:03:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts or anywhere else as well.

2429
02:04:00.159 --> 02:04:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you again so much, man, it was good talking

2430
02:04:02.640 --> 02:04:02.840
<v Speaker 2>to you.

2431
02:04:03.119 --> 02:04:07.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thanks again for having me. If you get away

2432
02:04:07.319 --> 02:04:13.119
<v Speaker 3>with it, go get away with it. Why you can't

2433
02:04:13.199 --> 02:04:13.800
<v Speaker 3>shut up?

2434
02:04:14.239 --> 02:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Shoot?

2435
02:04:14.600 --> 02:04:23.079
<v Speaker 4>The modest, militant monatier and then may.

2436
02:04:26.199 --> 02:04:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Should all of them want you to follow them to

2437
02:04:30.399 --> 02:04:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the promised Land, Promised land.

2438
02:04:37.239 --> 02:04:45.640
<v Speaker 3>But do you know what the biggest rob problem is. Shoot?

2439
02:04:45.680 --> 02:05:10.880
<v Speaker 4>The problem is hellbody, nobody enough, not even bod e En.

2440
02:05:12.000 --> 02:05:16.840
<v Speaker 4>We all made our believe.

2441
02:05:18.039 --> 02:05:18.479
<v Speaker 2>Some of.

2442
02:05:20.039 --> 02:05:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Some true.

2443
02:05:21.920 --> 02:05:27.399
<v Speaker 4>None of them belong to you. So if you pa

2444
02:05:28.840 --> 02:05:35.079
<v Speaker 4>yourself in a long play, Shoot, I thank him about.

2445
02:05:42.119 --> 02:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, so there we have it. Thank you again for

2446
02:05:44.960 --> 02:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>listening to this long conversation that I had with the

2447
02:05:49.079 --> 02:05:52.119
<v Speaker 1>host of Crackpot History, who I basically am just calling

2448
02:05:52.159 --> 02:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>crackpot History because he does deign to stay anonymous, and

2449
02:05:57.079 --> 02:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I gotta respect him for that because it does put

2450
02:05:59.039 --> 02:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>his work first. But thank you again for listening everybody.

2451
02:06:01.800 --> 02:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope you did enjoy that conversation, wide ranging as

2452
02:06:04.920 --> 02:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it was before we go. I want to give some

2453
02:06:08.640 --> 02:06:11.239
<v Speaker 1>shout outs to the people who have been supporting History

2454
02:06:11.239 --> 02:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Impossible at the Comrades and Friends level or above on Patreon,

2455
02:06:16.239 --> 02:06:18.359
<v Speaker 1>as well as the higher levels of support over on

2456
02:06:18.439 --> 02:06:22.319
<v Speaker 1>History Impossible dot Com where they are subscribers. These people

2457
02:06:22.359 --> 02:06:28.199
<v Speaker 1>include Bob Downing, Sam Graham, Greg Hunter, Brian Joy, So, Skip, Achaco,

2458
02:06:28.479 --> 02:06:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Molly Pan, John Pisano, Ana R PJ. Raider, Matthew m Rice,

2459
02:06:33.399 --> 02:06:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rice, Emily Schmidt, Pierre Vopuni, and as always Fu So.

2460
02:06:38.359 --> 02:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you again everybody for supporting History Impossible or just

2461
02:06:42.520 --> 02:06:45.399
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Honestly, if you don't have it in your

2462
02:06:45.439 --> 02:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>budget to support the show right now, just spreading the

2463
02:06:47.520 --> 02:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>word about the show is enough to help. But if

2464
02:06:50.000 --> 02:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>you do have the money, you want to throw my

2465
02:06:51.319 --> 02:06:53.319
<v Speaker 1>way show some love. That way help me deal with

2466
02:06:53.399 --> 02:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the ever increasing student debt on accumulating becoming a quote

2467
02:06:58.039 --> 02:07:02.119
<v Speaker 1>unquote real historian, that would help immensely as well. In

2468
02:07:02.159 --> 02:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of what we have coming up next, well, we

2469
02:07:04.720 --> 02:07:07.399
<v Speaker 1>don't really have anything scheduled yet, but we have some

2470
02:07:07.560 --> 02:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>things cooking. And please subscribe to Historyimpossible dot com or

2471
02:07:12.560 --> 02:07:16.479
<v Speaker 1>to the History Impossible Patreon at any level to stay

2472
02:07:16.520 --> 02:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>up to date on what comes next. A lot of

2473
02:07:18.640 --> 02:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff tends to get written before it gets turned into

2474
02:07:20.840 --> 02:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a podcast, but it's also where you get any updates

2475
02:07:23.800 --> 02:07:27.399
<v Speaker 1>that might be coming your way. So yes, thank you

2476
02:07:27.399 --> 02:07:30.039
<v Speaker 1>again for listening, and please stay tuned for the next

2477
02:07:30.079 --> 02:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>episode of History Impossible.
