WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.480 --> 00:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>In this episode, we look at the latest recruitment exam

2
00:00:04.040 --> 00:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>controversy in Sharkhand that has raised questions about the credibility

3
00:00:08.039 --> 00:00:11.199
<v Speaker 1>of the state's selection process. We also take a look

4
00:00:11.240 --> 00:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>at Union Minister Bhagirat Chadri, who has returned a ninety

5
00:00:14.960 --> 00:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>nine lakh rupee subsidy received under a scheme administered by

6
00:00:19.320 --> 00:00:23.679
<v Speaker 1>his own ministry, raising concerns about conflicts of interest. But

7
00:00:23.839 --> 00:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>first we talk about concerns over individual privacy that have

8
00:00:28.280 --> 00:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>emerged during the CJP protests. Hi, I'm Acha Sharma and

9
00:00:35.960 --> 00:00:38.679
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to three things. The Indian Express new show.

10
00:00:44.439 --> 00:00:47.119
<v Speaker 1>A pil has now been filed in the Delhi High

11
00:00:47.159 --> 00:00:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Court challenging the use of a permanent surveillance star and

12
00:00:51.560 --> 00:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>high tech police vans equipped with facial recognition technology to

13
00:00:56.479 --> 00:01:01.359
<v Speaker 1>monitor protesters at Juntarmant. The petition, fire by former Jawaharlal

14
00:01:01.479 --> 00:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Naheru Students' Union president Ice Coach, argues that this amounted

15
00:01:06.599 --> 00:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to continuous, indiscriminate and intrusive surveillance. So to understand the

16
00:01:11.879 --> 00:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of surveillance protesters were subjected to during the recent

17
00:01:15.560 --> 00:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>protest in Delhi and what the law says about it,

18
00:01:19.000 --> 00:01:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Michaelagueharaka Nanda speaks to the Undian expresses Vineed Pala, who

19
00:01:23.079 --> 00:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>writes on law for the newspaper.

20
00:01:25.799 --> 00:01:28.680
<v Speaker 2>So we need tell us about the kind of AI

21
00:01:28.799 --> 00:01:33.400
<v Speaker 2>and facial recognition technology that was installed at Junermantar and

22
00:01:33.760 --> 00:01:34.760
<v Speaker 2>what was it able to do.

23
00:01:35.400 --> 00:01:39.079
<v Speaker 3>So the allegation is that there is a mobile surveillance

24
00:01:39.200 --> 00:01:42.840
<v Speaker 3>van there which is called Iktioner. This van is fitted

25
00:01:42.920 --> 00:01:47.120
<v Speaker 3>with cameras that provide a three sixty degree field of

26
00:01:47.200 --> 00:01:53.159
<v Speaker 3>view that runs live footage through an AI aided facial

27
00:01:53.200 --> 00:01:57.560
<v Speaker 3>recognition software. Now, what this software does is that it

28
00:01:58.079 --> 00:02:00.879
<v Speaker 3>maps the faces of the people in the crowd and

29
00:02:00.920 --> 00:02:05.439
<v Speaker 3>then compares them against a police database of known offenders.

30
00:02:05.680 --> 00:02:09.199
<v Speaker 3>And if the system finds a match, and the police

31
00:02:09.479 --> 00:02:13.759
<v Speaker 3>has allegedly said that an eighty percent similarity is a

32
00:02:13.800 --> 00:02:17.479
<v Speaker 3>positive match, it flags the individual. So this is the

33
00:02:17.599 --> 00:02:22.319
<v Speaker 3>kind of surveillance that Coach is flagging in her petition

34
00:02:23.080 --> 00:02:23.520
<v Speaker 3>and so.

35
00:02:23.759 --> 00:02:27.400
<v Speaker 2>On what grounds has hosts challenged this and what does

36
00:02:27.439 --> 00:02:29.199
<v Speaker 2>she find most concerning about it?

37
00:02:29.960 --> 00:02:35.120
<v Speaker 3>The main concern is that this surveillance is completely arbitrary

38
00:02:35.240 --> 00:02:40.879
<v Speaker 3>and it lacks any legal safeguards. Sosts petition argues that

39
00:02:41.319 --> 00:02:45.479
<v Speaker 3>the police are collecting and storing personal data of the

40
00:02:45.879 --> 00:02:50.199
<v Speaker 3>protesters without telling and even why it's being collected, without

41
00:02:50.240 --> 00:02:54.120
<v Speaker 3>telling anyone who has access to it or how long

42
00:02:54.159 --> 00:02:57.080
<v Speaker 3>it will be kept. So, as I said, the police

43
00:02:57.319 --> 00:03:01.800
<v Speaker 3>are using this to intimidate students by telling, by threatening

44
00:03:01.879 --> 00:03:05.719
<v Speaker 3>to expose their participation to their families and their colleges.

45
00:03:05.879 --> 00:03:09.039
<v Speaker 3>Apart from this, the petition also highlights a very particular

46
00:03:09.080 --> 00:03:12.479
<v Speaker 3>impact on female protesters. What it says is that during

47
00:03:12.560 --> 00:03:16.199
<v Speaker 3>heavy rains, when there was no shelter, women were forced

48
00:03:16.240 --> 00:03:20.439
<v Speaker 3>to stay in drenched clothes to continue the protest, and

49
00:03:20.520 --> 00:03:24.680
<v Speaker 3>the police allegedly kept recording them. Cotious petition argues that

50
00:03:24.919 --> 00:03:29.280
<v Speaker 3>this recording them in such a vulnerable physical state is

51
00:03:29.400 --> 00:03:34.560
<v Speaker 3>a violation of their dignity and bodily privacy, and this

52
00:03:34.639 --> 00:03:37.879
<v Speaker 3>is why they've asked the High courte to intervene.

53
00:03:38.560 --> 00:03:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Right.

54
00:03:39.159 --> 00:03:42.639
<v Speaker 2>So what are the key legal and constitutional questions the

55
00:03:42.719 --> 00:03:44.560
<v Speaker 2>quote will have to decide in this case.

56
00:03:45.280 --> 00:03:50.800
<v Speaker 3>So a coach has raised the question of three intersecting

57
00:03:50.879 --> 00:03:54.280
<v Speaker 3>fundamental rights, which is the right to equality, the right

58
00:03:54.319 --> 00:03:57.479
<v Speaker 3>to free speech and peaceful assembly, and the right to

59
00:03:57.599 --> 00:04:02.599
<v Speaker 3>privacy and dignity. Equality is guaranteed by Article fourteen. Free

60
00:04:02.599 --> 00:04:06.280
<v Speaker 3>speech and peaceful assembly by Article nineteen to one, and

61
00:04:06.800 --> 00:04:11.439
<v Speaker 3>privacy and dignity by Article twenty one. The biggest landmark

62
00:04:11.719 --> 00:04:14.800
<v Speaker 3>here is the Supreme Courts, or rather the biggest legal

63
00:04:14.879 --> 00:04:19.279
<v Speaker 3>standard here is the Supreme Courts twenty seventeen Putaswami judgment,

64
00:04:19.360 --> 00:04:22.920
<v Speaker 3>which held privacy to be a fundamental right. That judgment

65
00:04:23.120 --> 00:04:27.439
<v Speaker 3>established a triple test for state surveillance. That is, a

66
00:04:27.519 --> 00:04:31.879
<v Speaker 3>state's intervention or infringement of the right to privacy, so

67
00:04:32.000 --> 00:04:35.480
<v Speaker 3>that can be allowed only if it is a backed

68
00:04:35.480 --> 00:04:39.240
<v Speaker 3>by a valid law, b serves a legtimate state interest,

69
00:04:39.519 --> 00:04:43.959
<v Speaker 3>and c is a proportionate response to whatever that state

70
00:04:44.040 --> 00:04:48.199
<v Speaker 3>interest is. Gosh has argued that this surveillance by the

71
00:04:48.240 --> 00:04:52.240
<v Speaker 3>police it fails all three tests. And on the other end,

72
00:04:52.279 --> 00:04:55.639
<v Speaker 3>the government has argued that this kind of videography is

73
00:04:55.639 --> 00:04:58.639
<v Speaker 3>a standard law and order measure. Last week, during the

74
00:04:58.680 --> 00:05:02.000
<v Speaker 3>hearing of this in High Court, the Solicitor General had

75
00:05:02.040 --> 00:05:05.240
<v Speaker 3>actually told the court that claiming privacy in a public

76
00:05:05.319 --> 00:05:09.800
<v Speaker 3>gathering is ironical because the protesters themselves are recording videos.

77
00:05:10.040 --> 00:05:13.160
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, those are the questions that the court will

78
00:05:13.199 --> 00:05:14.879
<v Speaker 3>have to decide, and.

79
00:05:14.759 --> 00:05:18.319
<v Speaker 2>We need what kind of an impact can such surveillance have?

80
00:05:18.439 --> 00:05:21.959
<v Speaker 2>On people's right to protest to what extent can discourage

81
00:05:22.000 --> 00:05:24.120
<v Speaker 2>people from showing up for protests.

82
00:05:24.720 --> 00:05:27.680
<v Speaker 3>That is the central argument in the petition. It says

83
00:05:27.759 --> 00:05:30.439
<v Speaker 3>that this kind of surveillance has a chilling effect on

84
00:05:30.560 --> 00:05:33.600
<v Speaker 3>people's right to protest, which is to say that people

85
00:05:33.680 --> 00:05:36.399
<v Speaker 3>will choose not to go to the protest, even if

86
00:05:36.399 --> 00:05:40.439
<v Speaker 3>they're legally allowed to do it, because they fear that

87
00:05:40.720 --> 00:05:45.439
<v Speaker 3>the state will profile them and they will then face

88
00:05:45.519 --> 00:05:49.720
<v Speaker 3>disciplinary action in college or they will deal with police

89
00:05:49.720 --> 00:05:52.959
<v Speaker 3>scrutiny later in life. So this is what the petition argues.

90
00:05:53.000 --> 00:05:57.240
<v Speaker 3>That such kind of a chilling effect makes citizens stay

91
00:05:57.279 --> 00:06:01.680
<v Speaker 3>at home out of fear and undermines their freedom of

92
00:06:01.720 --> 00:06:02.639
<v Speaker 3>speech and assembly.

93
00:06:03.279 --> 00:06:07.920
<v Speaker 2>But does India currently have a clear legal framework governing

94
00:06:07.920 --> 00:06:09.959
<v Speaker 2>the use of facial recognition technology.

95
00:06:10.680 --> 00:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't. Actually, we have a massive regulatory vacuum in

96
00:06:14.959 --> 00:06:18.839
<v Speaker 3>that space right now. We did pass the Digital Personal

97
00:06:18.879 --> 00:06:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Data Protection Act a few years back, but the problem

98
00:06:22.120 --> 00:06:26.480
<v Speaker 3>is that law grants very wide exemptions to government and

99
00:06:26.720 --> 00:06:30.560
<v Speaker 3>law enforcement agencies. As a result, there are no clear

100
00:06:31.040 --> 00:06:36.120
<v Speaker 3>guidelines on how the police can use facial recognition technology

101
00:06:36.199 --> 00:06:39.360
<v Speaker 3>and how is that data to be then stored by

102
00:06:39.360 --> 00:06:42.600
<v Speaker 3>the police. There are also no rules on where they

103
00:06:42.639 --> 00:06:46.759
<v Speaker 3>retain this footage, who accesses it, and what are the

104
00:06:46.800 --> 00:06:50.959
<v Speaker 3>consequences of any misuser leaks. And this is what the

105
00:06:51.000 --> 00:06:56.399
<v Speaker 3>petition argues that without any independent oversight, the police have

106
00:06:56.720 --> 00:07:02.560
<v Speaker 3>unfettered discretion, which makes the survey in gentlemen the arbitrary

107
00:07:02.639 --> 00:07:03.759
<v Speaker 3>as well as opaque.

108
00:07:04.360 --> 00:07:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, looking ahead, if the court rules either way, what

109
00:07:08.199 --> 00:07:12.040
<v Speaker 2>president could it set for surveillance in other public spaces

110
00:07:12.079 --> 00:07:12.920
<v Speaker 2>across in there.

111
00:07:13.600 --> 00:07:18.639
<v Speaker 3>So, if the High Court upholds the surveillance, then it

112
00:07:18.720 --> 00:07:23.160
<v Speaker 3>will give law enforcement agencies across the country a carte

113
00:07:23.160 --> 00:07:27.399
<v Speaker 3>blanche to deploy this kind of facial recognition and technology

114
00:07:27.439 --> 00:07:31.120
<v Speaker 3>and AI cameras at any public gathering or any protest

115
00:07:31.480 --> 00:07:36.120
<v Speaker 3>without needing a specific legal order or warrant. And this

116
00:07:36.160 --> 00:07:40.079
<v Speaker 3>would I think be a step in the direction of

117
00:07:40.120 --> 00:07:44.680
<v Speaker 3>what we see in China, where you have normalized almost

118
00:07:44.920 --> 00:07:48.839
<v Speaker 3>algorithmic policing. On the other hand, if the court rules

119
00:07:48.879 --> 00:07:52.480
<v Speaker 3>in favor of the petition, then it could force the

120
00:07:52.519 --> 00:07:58.079
<v Speaker 3>Indian government to finally establish strict procedural safeguards for this

121
00:07:58.199 --> 00:08:03.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of surveillance, and I think that would be a

122
00:08:03.160 --> 00:08:07.000
<v Speaker 3>good step for digital liberties and.

123
00:08:06.879 --> 00:08:10.199
<v Speaker 2>We need if we talk on broader terms how should

124
00:08:10.199 --> 00:08:14.160
<v Speaker 2>India balance public security with citizens privacy and the right

125
00:08:14.199 --> 00:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to dissent.

126
00:08:15.399 --> 00:08:19.240
<v Speaker 3>It's a tough balance, but other countries have already I think,

127
00:08:19.360 --> 00:08:21.199
<v Speaker 3>done a good job of it right. So if we

128
00:08:21.279 --> 00:08:24.720
<v Speaker 3>look at the European Union for example, it passed the

129
00:08:24.959 --> 00:08:29.439
<v Speaker 3>Artificial Intelligence Act recently, under which the use of real

130
00:08:29.480 --> 00:08:33.559
<v Speaker 3>time facial recognition technology by the police in public spaces

131
00:08:33.759 --> 00:08:37.759
<v Speaker 3>is banned, with very strictly defined exceptions like searching for

132
00:08:37.919 --> 00:08:41.600
<v Speaker 3>a missing child or preventing an imminent terrorist attack. And

133
00:08:41.639 --> 00:08:46.080
<v Speaker 3>even then the police need prior authorization from an independent

134
00:08:46.159 --> 00:08:49.360
<v Speaker 3>authority or from a judge. So we could look at

135
00:08:49.360 --> 00:08:54.159
<v Speaker 3>a similar framework, and I think we need a legal

136
00:08:54.200 --> 00:08:59.360
<v Speaker 3>framework which follows the guidelines established in the Putaswami judgment,

137
00:08:59.399 --> 00:09:06.240
<v Speaker 3>which ensure that surveillances targeted, proportionate and subject to judicial oversight,

138
00:09:06.600 --> 00:09:09.320
<v Speaker 3>rather than leaving it entirely to the discussion of the

139
00:09:09.360 --> 00:09:10.240
<v Speaker 3>police underground.

140
00:09:15.360 --> 00:09:18.279
<v Speaker 1>And next we take a look at jark Hunt, where

141
00:09:18.320 --> 00:09:22.279
<v Speaker 1>another recruitment exam controversy has put the state's Public Service

142
00:09:22.279 --> 00:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Commission under scrutiny. The latest row is around the fourteenth

143
00:09:26.519 --> 00:09:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Combined Civil Services Examination conducted by the Jharkhan Public Service

144
00:09:31.159 --> 00:09:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Commission or JPSC. After the preliminary results were declared, candidates

145
00:09:36.000 --> 00:09:39.759
<v Speaker 1>raised questions over alleged discrepancies in the way the exam

146
00:09:39.879 --> 00:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>was conducted. After the matter came to light, the CID

147
00:09:43.360 --> 00:09:47.759
<v Speaker 1>raided the residents of former Chief Secretary and JPSC chairperson

148
00:09:48.120 --> 00:09:51.799
<v Speaker 1>El Kan, who has now resigned, and arrested several people,

149
00:09:51.960 --> 00:09:56.039
<v Speaker 1>including JPSC officials and employees linked to the private agency

150
00:09:56.120 --> 00:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that helped conduct the exam. But this is not just

151
00:09:59.039 --> 00:10:02.279
<v Speaker 1>about one exam. Since Jharkan was formed in two thousand,

152
00:10:02.720 --> 00:10:07.759
<v Speaker 1>almost every major GPSC recruitment has faced allegations. So what

153
00:10:07.960 --> 00:10:12.559
<v Speaker 1>exactly triggered the latest controversy and why has Jharkan's recruitment

154
00:10:12.600 --> 00:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>system faced such repeated issues. To understand this, we're joined

155
00:10:17.039 --> 00:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>by the inn expresses shub Humptiga Shubum. We know this

156
00:10:20.720 --> 00:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is in the first JPSC controversy. In fact, you highlight

157
00:10:23.919 --> 00:10:26.879
<v Speaker 1>how this has become almost a recurring pattern over the

158
00:10:26.919 --> 00:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>last two decades. Talk about why does almost every major

159
00:10:31.360 --> 00:10:36.159
<v Speaker 1>recruitment examined har Khan seem to end in allegations of irregularities.

160
00:10:37.320 --> 00:10:40.679
<v Speaker 5>See, that's actually the bigger story we need to understand.

161
00:10:40.759 --> 00:10:46.240
<v Speaker 5>So whenever we see any either regularity, scam or controversy

162
00:10:46.240 --> 00:10:49.519
<v Speaker 5>in Jharkhan. So the bigger question is where did it

163
00:10:49.600 --> 00:10:52.120
<v Speaker 5>actually start? So I always try to find out the

164
00:10:52.159 --> 00:10:55.840
<v Speaker 5>origin of the controversy or any scam. So Jarkan was

165
00:10:55.840 --> 00:10:59.200
<v Speaker 5>formed in two thousand and if we go back and

166
00:10:59.240 --> 00:11:02.960
<v Speaker 5>try to find the starting point of these controversies, so.

167
00:11:02.919 --> 00:11:05.840
<v Speaker 4>You will realize that there is no clear origin point

168
00:11:06.159 --> 00:11:07.399
<v Speaker 4>of any controversy.

169
00:11:07.440 --> 00:11:11.159
<v Speaker 5>If you'll trace the history of fourteenth GPSC controversy that

170
00:11:11.600 --> 00:11:14.799
<v Speaker 5>recently it's going on, so you will eventually reach the

171
00:11:14.840 --> 00:11:19.840
<v Speaker 5>first and second GPSC examinations where the CBI investigation is

172
00:11:19.879 --> 00:11:23.960
<v Speaker 5>still going on and trial is still continuing. Even that

173
00:11:24.120 --> 00:11:27.840
<v Speaker 5>isn't really the beginning. Before Jharkan was created, this region

174
00:11:27.879 --> 00:11:30.960
<v Speaker 5>was part of Behart and there were controversies there as well,

175
00:11:31.039 --> 00:11:33.879
<v Speaker 5>So honestly, it's difficult to say where it all begins.

176
00:11:33.960 --> 00:11:37.440
<v Speaker 5>This isn't just about the recent issue. So almost every

177
00:11:37.480 --> 00:11:41.799
<v Speaker 5>major GPSC examination in Sharkan's history you will see from

178
00:11:41.879 --> 00:11:46.919
<v Speaker 5>first to now, I think all of the GPS exams,

179
00:11:47.039 --> 00:11:51.039
<v Speaker 5>recruitment exams have faced some kind of controversy, whether it's

180
00:11:51.080 --> 00:11:55.879
<v Speaker 5>about revised result uns, a key disputes, interview, or anything

181
00:11:55.960 --> 00:11:59.559
<v Speaker 5>reservation issue, anything, quote cases and all. So something or

182
00:11:59.600 --> 00:12:02.919
<v Speaker 5>the other kept coming up. So for many experience, this

183
00:12:03.360 --> 00:12:07.240
<v Speaker 5>latest controversy doesn't feel like an exception, but it's a

184
00:12:07.440 --> 00:12:10.879
<v Speaker 5>huge one now and it feels like a continuation of

185
00:12:10.919 --> 00:12:14.759
<v Speaker 5>a pattern that's been there for more than two decades now.

186
00:12:15.360 --> 00:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>And so what has triggered this recent controversy?

187
00:12:18.519 --> 00:12:23.440
<v Speaker 5>So I think it all started after the preliminary test

188
00:12:23.759 --> 00:12:27.320
<v Speaker 5>result of fourteenth the JPSC exam, which is officially called

189
00:12:27.360 --> 00:12:29.720
<v Speaker 5>the Combined Civil Service Examination here.

190
00:12:30.000 --> 00:12:31.240
<v Speaker 4>So the first.

191
00:12:31.039 --> 00:12:34.240
<v Speaker 5>Issue was that the Commission did not release the category

192
00:12:34.240 --> 00:12:37.720
<v Speaker 5>wise cutoff MARS. So now that's important because we need

193
00:12:37.720 --> 00:12:41.000
<v Speaker 5>to understand that it's important for any experience because once

194
00:12:41.039 --> 00:12:44.679
<v Speaker 5>a candidate who knows the cutoff, they can roughly estimate

195
00:12:44.759 --> 00:12:48.240
<v Speaker 5>whether he or she'll qualify for the main's exam or not,

196
00:12:48.519 --> 00:12:50.759
<v Speaker 5>and if they think they have a chance, they will

197
00:12:50.759 --> 00:12:54.360
<v Speaker 5>immediately start preparing for the mains joint coaching or begin

198
00:12:54.480 --> 00:12:58.600
<v Speaker 5>answer writing practices. So, since the cutoff was not released,

199
00:12:58.720 --> 00:13:00.279
<v Speaker 5>candidates started question.

200
00:13:00.000 --> 00:13:01.519
<v Speaker 4>In the overall process.

201
00:13:01.759 --> 00:13:05.039
<v Speaker 5>And then the second issue was the merit list. So

202
00:13:05.200 --> 00:13:09.519
<v Speaker 5>some candidates I think pointed out that it didn't carry

203
00:13:09.519 --> 00:13:14.159
<v Speaker 5>the signature of the Commission's GPS constitutional members and recently,

204
00:13:14.200 --> 00:13:17.840
<v Speaker 5>in response, the GPS chairperson, while he was responding to

205
00:13:17.840 --> 00:13:21.000
<v Speaker 5>this question to media, he talked about something Commissions two

206
00:13:21.000 --> 00:13:24.279
<v Speaker 5>thousand and two rules or guidelines, so he cited those

207
00:13:24.320 --> 00:13:29.039
<v Speaker 5>guidelines and said that those signatures of members actually were

208
00:13:29.080 --> 00:13:34.679
<v Speaker 5>not mandatory. And then the controversy really intensified when the

209
00:13:35.080 --> 00:13:38.960
<v Speaker 5>reportedly one OMR sheet of a candidate from another state

210
00:13:39.360 --> 00:13:41.559
<v Speaker 5>started circulating on social media.

211
00:13:41.759 --> 00:13:45.240
<v Speaker 4>So in that candidates OMR sheet, the candidate.

212
00:13:44.799 --> 00:13:49.679
<v Speaker 5>Had actually qualified despite attempting very fewer questions required to

213
00:13:49.799 --> 00:13:55.720
<v Speaker 5>qualify the exam. So that sparked widespread discussions and debate,

214
00:13:55.960 --> 00:13:59.799
<v Speaker 5>and now the protests among his parents. So eventually, as

215
00:13:59.840 --> 00:14:03.919
<v Speaker 5>the protests or the discussions grew and pressure mounted, the

216
00:14:04.000 --> 00:14:07.840
<v Speaker 5>state government directed the CID to investigate the matter.

217
00:14:08.519 --> 00:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So Shuaman, at the stage what has actually been verified

218
00:14:11.519 --> 00:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>by investigators and what still remains only an allegation.

219
00:14:15.840 --> 00:14:20.399
<v Speaker 5>We cannot make that distinction between the verified and the allegation.

220
00:14:20.759 --> 00:14:23.480
<v Speaker 5>But what we know for sure is that the CID

221
00:14:23.600 --> 00:14:27.480
<v Speaker 5>has registered a case, formed an sit and carried out

222
00:14:27.600 --> 00:14:31.960
<v Speaker 5>rates at the GPSC former office and the GPS chairperson's

223
00:14:32.000 --> 00:14:35.519
<v Speaker 5>residence as well, and arrested some several people. So these

224
00:14:35.559 --> 00:14:40.120
<v Speaker 5>include GPS staff, the examination controller, and people linked to

225
00:14:40.159 --> 00:14:44.320
<v Speaker 5>the private agency that was given the responsibility to conduct

226
00:14:44.320 --> 00:14:47.519
<v Speaker 5>the exam. So those are the verified development we know

227
00:14:47.799 --> 00:14:51.519
<v Speaker 5>and the artists have happened that we know, and this

228
00:14:51.759 --> 00:14:55.399
<v Speaker 5>investigation is officially underway, and the agency's involvement in the

229
00:14:55.559 --> 00:14:59.039
<v Speaker 5>examination is also almost established.

230
00:14:59.159 --> 00:15:02.120
<v Speaker 4>But beyond that, the investigation is still going on.

231
00:15:02.399 --> 00:15:05.320
<v Speaker 5>One of the major allegations is that the GPS chairperson

232
00:15:05.399 --> 00:15:09.039
<v Speaker 5>knew about the concerns regarding the private agency and still

233
00:15:09.080 --> 00:15:13.440
<v Speaker 5>allowed it to continue. That has not been verified yet.

234
00:15:13.799 --> 00:15:17.279
<v Speaker 5>But the CIDs is still questioning those who have been

235
00:15:17.360 --> 00:15:21.279
<v Speaker 5>arrested and it is also interogating the formal GPS chairperson.

236
00:15:21.519 --> 00:15:25.080
<v Speaker 5>So the CID has not reached any final conclusion yet.

237
00:15:25.200 --> 00:15:28.679
<v Speaker 5>That's why it's important not to treat every allegation as

238
00:15:28.720 --> 00:15:31.799
<v Speaker 5>an established fact. We'll have to wait and see what

239
00:15:31.840 --> 00:15:34.200
<v Speaker 5>the investigation finally reveals.

240
00:15:34.759 --> 00:15:37.799
<v Speaker 1>And you spoke of the concerns about the private agency

241
00:15:37.919 --> 00:15:41.639
<v Speaker 1>conducting the examination, and we understand that it had reportedly

242
00:15:41.679 --> 00:15:45.559
<v Speaker 1>been blacklisted earlier, So how did it end up conducting

243
00:15:45.600 --> 00:15:48.559
<v Speaker 1>one of Jharkhan's biggest recruitment exams?

244
00:15:49.120 --> 00:15:53.399
<v Speaker 5>So this agency was actually blacklisted by the Jharkan government

245
00:15:53.440 --> 00:15:57.159
<v Speaker 5>itself last year May by the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission

246
00:15:57.200 --> 00:16:00.919
<v Speaker 5>or jsc SO. JSSE had black lily did this company

247
00:16:01.000 --> 00:16:04.120
<v Speaker 5>for non compliance with its agreement and the same company

248
00:16:04.240 --> 00:16:07.679
<v Speaker 5>was blacklisted in Uttar Padesh and other estates. But despite

249
00:16:07.720 --> 00:16:10.840
<v Speaker 5>all that, it was later given the responsibility of conducting

250
00:16:10.840 --> 00:16:14.120
<v Speaker 5>one of Jharkan's important exam. Now, if we go by

251
00:16:14.200 --> 00:16:18.159
<v Speaker 5>what the former GPSC chairperson told the media, he said

252
00:16:18.240 --> 00:16:20.639
<v Speaker 5>he had no idea that the company had been blacklisted.

253
00:16:20.679 --> 00:16:23.000
<v Speaker 5>And that's a very i mean vague answer and naturally

254
00:16:23.039 --> 00:16:25.879
<v Speaker 5>it has raised even more questions. So candidates and opposition

255
00:16:25.960 --> 00:16:28.399
<v Speaker 5>parties are asking how a company with that background was

256
00:16:28.600 --> 00:16:31.799
<v Speaker 5>entrusted with such an important examination. And the CID is

257
00:16:31.840 --> 00:16:34.360
<v Speaker 5>also looking into the role of the agency along with

258
00:16:34.399 --> 00:16:37.480
<v Speaker 5>the role of GPSC officials. And there's one more important

259
00:16:37.480 --> 00:16:41.080
<v Speaker 5>point here. In January this year, a person from Karanataka,

260
00:16:41.240 --> 00:16:45.080
<v Speaker 5>he wrote a formal complain letter to GPS chairperson this

261
00:16:45.200 --> 00:16:50.840
<v Speaker 5>year complaining about the irregularities involving this agency, this private agency.

262
00:16:50.879 --> 00:16:53.960
<v Speaker 5>And when the letter surfaced everywhere on social media recently

263
00:16:54.039 --> 00:16:56.799
<v Speaker 5>after the investigation started by the CID. So when the

264
00:16:57.000 --> 00:16:59.519
<v Speaker 5>chairperson was asked about it by the media, he said

265
00:16:59.559 --> 00:17:03.440
<v Speaker 5>that he generally response to complaints and the GPS often

266
00:17:03.799 --> 00:17:07.920
<v Speaker 5>address the issues or the concerns coming from anyone. But

267
00:17:07.960 --> 00:17:10.680
<v Speaker 5>he was saying that it's possible that this particular complaint

268
00:17:10.759 --> 00:17:13.599
<v Speaker 5>was not properly looked into or may have been overlooked.

269
00:17:13.599 --> 00:17:17.759
<v Speaker 1>That was his response, right, And investigators now say one

270
00:17:17.799 --> 00:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>into which will Abhetivari is at the center of the investigation,

271
00:17:21.839 --> 00:17:25.559
<v Speaker 1>talk about why has his alleged rule become so significant.

272
00:17:26.359 --> 00:17:29.960
<v Speaker 5>So Abbatari or Manostivari is at the center of the

273
00:17:30.000 --> 00:17:32.880
<v Speaker 5>investigation because according to the CID, he is one of

274
00:17:32.920 --> 00:17:35.240
<v Speaker 5>the key links in the entire case. Now we have

275
00:17:35.559 --> 00:17:40.079
<v Speaker 5>no idea how CID directly went to Abbativari, or it

276
00:17:40.200 --> 00:17:43.799
<v Speaker 5>might be possible that CID may have asked the chairperson

277
00:17:43.799 --> 00:17:47.599
<v Speaker 5>and chairperson might have given the name of Abbetiari because

278
00:17:47.680 --> 00:17:51.759
<v Speaker 5>there was a complaint letter submitted by someone from Karnataka recently,

279
00:17:51.880 --> 00:17:55.279
<v Speaker 5>so that might be the reason how Abbatiari entered into

280
00:17:55.319 --> 00:17:59.599
<v Speaker 5>the scene. So, according to the investigators, this person Abativari,

281
00:17:59.799 --> 00:18:03.960
<v Speaker 5>he cleared the jsc cgial examination and became a block

282
00:18:04.000 --> 00:18:07.160
<v Speaker 5>supply officer in GODA district and at the same time,

283
00:18:07.680 --> 00:18:09.799
<v Speaker 5>they say that he was also working as the marketing

284
00:18:09.839 --> 00:18:13.400
<v Speaker 5>manager of this private testing agency that like now based agency.

285
00:18:13.599 --> 00:18:17.039
<v Speaker 5>So in the complaint letter that we discussed earlier, his

286
00:18:17.160 --> 00:18:21.079
<v Speaker 5>name was specifically mentioned along with two other names, and

287
00:18:21.359 --> 00:18:23.440
<v Speaker 5>that is one of the reasons why the investigation is

288
00:18:23.480 --> 00:18:26.119
<v Speaker 5>now focusing so much on him. So the CID is

289
00:18:26.160 --> 00:18:30.559
<v Speaker 5>also trying to find out his own recruitment history because

290
00:18:30.759 --> 00:18:33.160
<v Speaker 5>it is said that he had also cleared four other

291
00:18:33.240 --> 00:18:36.839
<v Speaker 5>exams government exams conducted by JPSC and JSC and his

292
00:18:36.960 --> 00:18:41.359
<v Speaker 5>close family members also were in good position in government job.

293
00:18:41.519 --> 00:18:41.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

294
00:18:41.799 --> 00:18:44.640
<v Speaker 5>So there are also allegations that he acted as a

295
00:18:44.920 --> 00:18:48.200
<v Speaker 5>middleman by demanding money from candidates.

296
00:18:48.559 --> 00:18:51.359
<v Speaker 4>So those allegations are still under investigation.

297
00:18:51.519 --> 00:18:54.759
<v Speaker 5>But that's why this person of Ativari has become such

298
00:18:54.799 --> 00:18:58.000
<v Speaker 5>an important person in this entire investigation.

299
00:18:58.759 --> 00:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>A shubam as someone who has been reporting on these

300
00:19:01.279 --> 00:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>discrepancies and how recurring they are. Talk about how exactly

301
00:19:06.359 --> 00:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>does someone manipulate a public recruitment examination, Like at what

302
00:19:11.279 --> 00:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>stages would you say such a system is actually vulnerable.

303
00:19:15.880 --> 00:19:19.119
<v Speaker 5>See, the investigation is still in its initial phase, so

304
00:19:19.160 --> 00:19:22.079
<v Speaker 5>it's very difficult for me to say exactly what happened

305
00:19:22.119 --> 00:19:25.400
<v Speaker 5>in this particular case, but generally, if there's manipulation in

306
00:19:25.440 --> 00:19:29.759
<v Speaker 5>a recruitment or something like this examination process, I think

307
00:19:29.839 --> 00:19:34.119
<v Speaker 5>it can happen at different stages. If there isn't enough transparency,

308
00:19:34.359 --> 00:19:38.079
<v Speaker 5>it's hard to pinpoint where things may have gone wrong.

309
00:19:38.519 --> 00:19:41.640
<v Speaker 5>It could happen during the conduct of the examination, or

310
00:19:41.839 --> 00:19:45.599
<v Speaker 5>while handling the OMR sheets, or during the evaluation process,

311
00:19:45.680 --> 00:19:48.519
<v Speaker 5>or even while preparing and publishing the final results. One

312
00:19:48.599 --> 00:19:52.519
<v Speaker 5>question that I personally have is who prepares the question

313
00:19:52.599 --> 00:19:56.480
<v Speaker 5>papers in exam in Jharkan In many other states, as

314
00:19:56.559 --> 00:19:59.960
<v Speaker 5>far as I know, for civil services examinations, that responsibility

315
00:20:00.200 --> 00:20:04.559
<v Speaker 5>usually goes to professors from different universities from different fields.

316
00:20:04.599 --> 00:20:07.519
<v Speaker 5>But if you look at question papers from several recruitment

317
00:20:07.559 --> 00:20:09.799
<v Speaker 5>exams in Jharkhand over the years, you will find a

318
00:20:09.839 --> 00:20:13.240
<v Speaker 5>lot of very basic and sealy mistakes. So that raises

319
00:20:13.279 --> 00:20:16.480
<v Speaker 5>another serious question that who is actually preparing these papers

320
00:20:16.519 --> 00:20:19.559
<v Speaker 5>and what kind of system is in place to ensure

321
00:20:19.640 --> 00:20:23.200
<v Speaker 5>quality and accountability. So as far as this particular case

322
00:20:23.240 --> 00:20:25.559
<v Speaker 5>is concerned, the investigators are looking into the role of

323
00:20:25.599 --> 00:20:28.839
<v Speaker 5>the private agency as well as GPS officials to understand

324
00:20:28.839 --> 00:20:30.640
<v Speaker 5>whether there were any lapses or not.

325
00:20:31.440 --> 00:20:34.839
<v Speaker 1>But are these controversies unique to Sharkhun or do we

326
00:20:34.960 --> 00:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>see these across recruitment systems.

327
00:20:38.240 --> 00:20:40.400
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't think so that this is very unique

328
00:20:40.440 --> 00:20:40.960
<v Speaker 4>for Jharkhan.

329
00:20:41.039 --> 00:20:44.680
<v Speaker 5>We have seen controversies over recruitment examinations in different parts

330
00:20:44.720 --> 00:20:47.640
<v Speaker 5>of the country as well, even from Chattisgird, from Bihar

331
00:20:47.720 --> 00:20:51.079
<v Speaker 5>and everywhere. Even Vapam scandal in I think Madhya prad

332
00:20:51.440 --> 00:20:56.039
<v Speaker 5>Wapam scam in Chattisgird. But what's different in Sharkan is

333
00:20:56.119 --> 00:21:00.480
<v Speaker 5>the consistency of this controversy series of controversies. So it

334
00:21:00.559 --> 00:21:04.319
<v Speaker 5>almost feels like every major recruitment exam ends up facing

335
00:21:04.359 --> 00:21:07.119
<v Speaker 5>some issue. So you will see allegations in JPS, you

336
00:21:07.119 --> 00:21:11.160
<v Speaker 5>will see allegation INJSC against JSC. You will see controversies

337
00:21:11.160 --> 00:21:15.720
<v Speaker 5>in teachers recruitment exam, sometime field worker exam. So take

338
00:21:15.759 --> 00:21:20.119
<v Speaker 5>the recent example LIKEJSC fieldworker recruitment exam. So the vacancy

339
00:21:20.200 --> 00:21:22.680
<v Speaker 5>came out in twenty twenty four, but the examination was

340
00:21:22.720 --> 00:21:26.319
<v Speaker 5>conducted almost two years later, recently on July nineteen. So

341
00:21:26.480 --> 00:21:29.680
<v Speaker 5>after the exam, when the Indian Express spoke to the

342
00:21:29.799 --> 00:21:33.440
<v Speaker 5>gs C secretary, he said that around seventy five percent.

343
00:21:33.799 --> 00:21:37.720
<v Speaker 5>Minded seventy five percent of the candidates didn't appear. One

344
00:21:37.759 --> 00:21:41.359
<v Speaker 5>of the major reasons that many candidates couldn't give exam

345
00:21:41.440 --> 00:21:45.720
<v Speaker 5>because they were allotted examination centers five hundred to six

346
00:21:45.799 --> 00:21:49.519
<v Speaker 5>hundred to seven hundred kilometers away from where they live.

347
00:21:49.839 --> 00:21:53.000
<v Speaker 5>So this was the major reason that around seventy five

348
00:21:53.079 --> 00:21:57.160
<v Speaker 5>percent of students didn't appear for the exam. And then

349
00:21:57.240 --> 00:22:01.359
<v Speaker 5>there was another controversy in the same exam. Tantal students

350
00:22:01.480 --> 00:22:04.920
<v Speaker 5>complain that around forty percent of the questions in the

351
00:22:04.960 --> 00:22:07.960
<v Speaker 5>Santali language in the second paper of that exam were

352
00:22:08.000 --> 00:22:10.799
<v Speaker 5>not based on the class tense labors. They were claiming

353
00:22:10.839 --> 00:22:13.359
<v Speaker 5>that the questions were more at the level of UPSC

354
00:22:13.720 --> 00:22:18.480
<v Speaker 5>or a UGC NET. So these controversies are not unique

355
00:22:18.519 --> 00:22:22.359
<v Speaker 5>to Tarken, but in Sharkan it seems to happen so

356
00:22:22.519 --> 00:22:27.400
<v Speaker 5>frequently that unfortunately, many people have almost started accepting it

357
00:22:27.519 --> 00:22:30.319
<v Speaker 5>as a normal. So it has become so normal in

358
00:22:30.359 --> 00:22:34.519
<v Speaker 5>Sharkun that the controversy doesn't seem to be very unique.

359
00:22:34.519 --> 00:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>And Shubam, like you just highlighted, whenever an examination is questioned,

360
00:22:38.839 --> 00:22:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the impact on candidates is grave. So for lacks of

361
00:22:42.279 --> 00:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>aspirits who have spent years preparing, what does that uncertainty

362
00:22:46.759 --> 00:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>actually mean?

363
00:22:48.119 --> 00:22:51.680
<v Speaker 5>So for candidates, this is much bigger than just the

364
00:22:51.680 --> 00:22:55.559
<v Speaker 5>one examination. Take the recent Jassy field worker examination itself.

365
00:22:55.680 --> 00:22:59.920
<v Speaker 5>So around three to three point five leg candidate apply

366
00:23:00.240 --> 00:23:03.160
<v Speaker 5>for a job that is essentially a field level health

367
00:23:03.200 --> 00:23:07.279
<v Speaker 5>worker position. And that tells you how intense the competition

368
00:23:07.440 --> 00:23:10.799
<v Speaker 5>is and how desperately a young people are waiting for

369
00:23:10.839 --> 00:23:13.920
<v Speaker 5>the government jobs in Jarkun. So many of them spend

370
00:23:14.039 --> 00:23:17.480
<v Speaker 5>years preparing. They put their careers, private job opportunities, and

371
00:23:17.519 --> 00:23:20.759
<v Speaker 5>other plans on hold because they believe clearing one government

372
00:23:20.839 --> 00:23:24.279
<v Speaker 5>examination can completely change their lives. So every time there's

373
00:23:24.319 --> 00:23:28.720
<v Speaker 5>a controversy, recruitment gets delayed, courte cases began, investigation happens,

374
00:23:28.720 --> 00:23:32.839
<v Speaker 5>and the frustration keeps increasing. And the iron is that

375
00:23:33.039 --> 00:23:35.200
<v Speaker 5>Jarkun is one of the richest states in terms of

376
00:23:35.279 --> 00:23:39.160
<v Speaker 5>natural disources mineral resources. It has cold iron, ore, steel

377
00:23:39.640 --> 00:23:42.720
<v Speaker 5>and so much mineral wealth. But despite that, a huge

378
00:23:42.799 --> 00:23:46.240
<v Speaker 5>number of young people still depend on government jobs because

379
00:23:46.599 --> 00:23:50.319
<v Speaker 5>power d and unemployment remain the major issue in Sharkun.

380
00:23:50.720 --> 00:23:53.880
<v Speaker 5>And now that frustation is becoming visible on the streets

381
00:23:53.920 --> 00:23:56.519
<v Speaker 5>as well. We have seen student groups coming together and

382
00:23:56.559 --> 00:24:00.519
<v Speaker 5>holding protest over GPS ANDSSE recruitments. In fact, today was

383
00:24:00.559 --> 00:24:04.440
<v Speaker 5>the biggest protest in recent times. So the protesters today

384
00:24:04.440 --> 00:24:07.359
<v Speaker 5>they said that they will continue their editation until the

385
00:24:07.400 --> 00:24:12.240
<v Speaker 5>state government takes responsibility and addresses their concerns because ultimately

386
00:24:12.279 --> 00:24:15.720
<v Speaker 5>both GPS and JSSE function under the state government under

387
00:24:15.720 --> 00:24:16.279
<v Speaker 5>the CM.

388
00:24:16.440 --> 00:24:19.640
<v Speaker 4>So this is no longer just about one exam.

389
00:24:19.839 --> 00:24:23.440
<v Speaker 5>It's about people's trust in the entire recruitment system in

390
00:24:23.519 --> 00:24:27.039
<v Speaker 5>different states. And I think this huge protest today that

391
00:24:27.440 --> 00:24:32.519
<v Speaker 5>held in Rachi, I think that was also somewhere influenced

392
00:24:32.559 --> 00:24:36.960
<v Speaker 5>by the enthusiasm of the students protesting in Delhi.

393
00:24:37.000 --> 00:24:38.400
<v Speaker 4>So I think that comes from there.

394
00:24:38.480 --> 00:24:42.400
<v Speaker 5>And now people here are also protesting and questioning the

395
00:24:42.440 --> 00:24:43.319
<v Speaker 5>state government.

396
00:24:48.599 --> 00:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And in the end we talk about Union Minister of

397
00:24:51.519 --> 00:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>State for Agriculture, Hagirat Chadri, who has returned a ninety

398
00:24:55.799 --> 00:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>nine lakh rupee subsidy that he received for a cucumber

399
00:24:59.319 --> 00:25:03.559
<v Speaker 1>farm under a scheme administered by his own ministry. The

400
00:25:03.599 --> 00:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>subsidy was granted under a scheme promoting large scale commercial

401
00:25:08.160 --> 00:25:12.319
<v Speaker 1>cultivation of selected vegetables and flowers. It covers up to

402
00:25:12.400 --> 00:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of a project's cost subject to a ceiling

403
00:25:16.319 --> 00:25:19.319
<v Speaker 1>of one korre per family, as reported by the Indian

404
00:25:19.319 --> 00:25:23.359
<v Speaker 1>expresses Harrikish and Sharma, The Center disclosed the repayment in

405
00:25:23.400 --> 00:25:26.839
<v Speaker 1>a written response to Parliament, exactly one month after an

406
00:25:26.839 --> 00:25:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Indian Express investigation revealed that Chadrii had received the subsidy

407
00:25:31.359 --> 00:25:35.319
<v Speaker 1>through a National Horticulture Board scheme. Responding to a question

408
00:25:35.400 --> 00:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>from Tuinomul Congress MP Abishaik Banerji, Minister of State for

409
00:25:39.319 --> 00:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Agriculture ramnah Tucker said Chawdrei had informed the government that

410
00:25:43.839 --> 00:25:47.039
<v Speaker 1>he had refunded the money to the concerned bank. The

411
00:25:47.079 --> 00:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>bank has now been directed to return the amount to

412
00:25:50.000 --> 00:25:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the National Horticulture Board. Chaudri's cucumber project covers more than

413
00:25:54.839 --> 00:25:58.519
<v Speaker 1>sixteen thousand square meters and was among four hundred and

414
00:25:58.559 --> 00:26:01.559
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven projects apar roofed by the Board in twenty

415
00:26:01.599 --> 00:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. Records viewed by the Unen Express showed that

416
00:26:05.200 --> 00:26:08.839
<v Speaker 1>a capital subsidy of ninety nine point three LAC was

417
00:26:08.880 --> 00:26:12.559
<v Speaker 1>credited to his HDFC Bank loan account in March this year.

418
00:26:13.160 --> 00:26:18.319
<v Speaker 1>What makes this case particularly significant is the institutional relationship involved.

419
00:26:18.680 --> 00:26:23.519
<v Speaker 1>The National Horticulture Board is an autonomous organization operating under

420
00:26:23.559 --> 00:26:27.799
<v Speaker 1>the administrative control of the Agriculture Ministry, where Chadre serves

421
00:26:27.839 --> 00:26:32.279
<v Speaker 1>as a minister. The government also told Parliament that BJPMP

422
00:26:32.720 --> 00:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Lumbaram CHADRII had received financial assistance under the board's schemes

423
00:26:37.319 --> 00:26:41.039
<v Speaker 1>during the past five years. Separately, The Indian Express had

424
00:26:41.039 --> 00:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>reported that three family members of senior ISS officer Nareshpal

425
00:26:46.359 --> 00:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Gangwar collectively received more than one point one six crow

426
00:26:50.759 --> 00:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>rupees in horticulture subsidies. Banaji had specifically asked whether the

427
00:26:56.000 --> 00:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>scheme contained a conflict of interest or requisal policy for

428
00:27:00.279 --> 00:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>public functionaries and their relatives. The government's response was that

429
00:27:04.519 --> 00:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the existing guidelines contain no such provision. So while Chaudhry

430
00:27:08.519 --> 00:27:12.759
<v Speaker 1>has returned the subsidy, the larger issue still remains unresolved

431
00:27:13.039 --> 00:27:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that the scheme currently has no formal safeguard requiring ministers,

432
00:27:17.920 --> 00:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>MPs or senior officials to disclose conflicts or step aside

433
00:27:22.680 --> 00:27:28.759
<v Speaker 1>when their own applications are considered. You were listening to

434
00:27:28.839 --> 00:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Three Things by The Indian Express. Today's show was edited

435
00:27:32.160 --> 00:27:35.319
<v Speaker 1>and mixed BISS for ash Bavar and produced by Anaharakananda

436
00:27:35.440 --> 00:27:38.599
<v Speaker 1>and me Ichasharma. If you like the show, do subscribe

437
00:27:38.599 --> 00:27:41.079
<v Speaker 1>to us wherever you get your podcasts. You can also

438
00:27:41.119 --> 00:27:43.400
<v Speaker 1>recommend it to someone you think may like it, with

439
00:27:43.440 --> 00:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a friend or in your family. This is the best

440
00:27:45.960 --> 00:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>way for people to get to know about us. You

441
00:27:48.200 --> 00:27:51.079
<v Speaker 1>can also tweet us at Express Podcasts or write to

442
00:27:51.200 --> 00:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>us at podcasts at Indian Express dot com
