Speaker 1: Well, the CIA helped to pinpoint a gathering of Iranian leaders.
Speaker 1: Then Israel struck and of course the CIA is using Pallenteer,
Speaker 1: which is using Anthropic and so forth. The CIA had
Speaker 1: been tracking Commandee for months, gaining more confidence about his
Speaker 1: locations and his patterns. That's called geospatial intelligence, folks, and
Speaker 1: so to point out, that's what they've been working on.
Speaker 1: The fastest growing part of the intelligence agencies going back
Speaker 1: to the late nineteen nineties. That's where James Clapper made
Speaker 1: his mark and rose through the intelligence agencies, was with
Speaker 1: Jeo's facial intelligence. And this is what they do in
Speaker 1: terms of tracking our politics and our opinions as well.
Speaker 1: The agency learned that a meeting of top Irani officials
Speaker 1: to take place on Saturday morning at a leadership conpound
Speaker 1: in the heart of Tehran. The CIA learned that the
Speaker 1: Supreme Leader would be at the site as well. Well.
Speaker 1: The US military used Anthropic and Iran Strike despite a
Speaker 1: ban order by Trump, says the Wall Street Journal think
Speaker 1: about this and all the lead up up to this,
Speaker 1: warpete went on the war path with Anthropic because they said,
Speaker 1: you know, we've got some standards and we don't want
Speaker 1: our system to be used for this, and they goes,
Speaker 1: you'll use it for whatever we want to do. Right,
Speaker 1: if I've got something that's illegal and moral, unethical, you'll
Speaker 1: still work with us, Right They said, no, we won't.
Speaker 1: And so it's like, okay, you got to get out
Speaker 1: of here, and we're going to punish these people, said
Speaker 1: people in the Pentagon. So it's going to be a
Speaker 1: real problem to extract them out of all these different things,
Speaker 1: and we're going to make them pay a price. We're
Speaker 1: going to try to put them out of business. We're
Speaker 1: going to declare that they are a security risk, and
Speaker 1: anybody who does any business with the American government can't
Speaker 1: use them in any way possible. Well, they are doing this,
Speaker 1: and again I said, it's not geopolitics, it's not some
Speaker 1: grand scheme of what they want to do. Instead, even
Speaker 1: as they are setting up their sneak attack, right, and
Speaker 1: they know they're going to do this, they anathematize anthropic
Speaker 1: and try to shut them down on the eve of
Speaker 1: going to war. This is like changing horses in the
Speaker 1: middle of a stream. Right, what is the matter with
Speaker 1: these people? They're the gang that can't shoot straight? Quite frankly,
Speaker 1: they're idiots. It's a ship of fools. The US military
Speaker 1: reportedly used Anthropic during a major air strike and Iran,
Speaker 1: only hours after Trump ordered federal agencies to halt use
Speaker 1: of the computer systems. Sentcom used Anthropics Claude AI model
Speaker 1: for operational support going to people familiar with the matter,
Speaker 1: cited by The Wall Street Journal. It's reportedly assisted with
Speaker 1: intelligence analysis, identifying potential targets like Comanie, and running battlefield simulations.
Speaker 1: The incident shows how deeply advanced AI systems have become
Speaker 1: embedded in defense operations. Even as the administration moved to
Speaker 1: sever ties with the company, Claude remained integrated into military workflows.
Speaker 1: So even as they have this completely embedded there and
Speaker 1: they want to go to war, it's Trump's ego that
Speaker 1: is really the thing that we have to be concerned about.
Speaker 1: Right on Friday, the Trump administration instructed agencies to stop
Speaker 1: working with the company, directed the Department of Defense to
Speaker 1: treat it as a potential security risk. Anthropic refusing to
Speaker 1: grant unrestricted military use of its AI for any lawful scenario.
Speaker 1: They say, and yet we look at this and it's
Speaker 1: like lawful. What does that really mean to the war
Speaker 1: peat administration in the Pentagon or to the Trump regime. Right,
Speaker 1: it doesn't have any meaning left whatsoever, and so Anthropic
Speaker 1: has previously secured a multi year Pentagon contract worth up
Speaker 1: to two hundred million dollars, along with several major AI
Speaker 1: Labs partnerships involving Palanteer and Amazon. Claude became approved for
Speaker 1: classified intelligence and operational workflows. The system was reportedly also
Speaker 1: involved in earlier operations, including a January mission to Venezuela
Speaker 1: the resulted in the kidnapping of Maduro Hextath demanded that
Speaker 1: the company permit unrestricted military use of its models. The
Speaker 1: Anthropic CEO rejected the request, describing certain applications as ethical
Speaker 1: boundaries that the company would not cross. Nothing bothers or
Speaker 1: Pete more than when somebody says, don't follow illegal orders,
Speaker 1: or when somebody says, don't use my product for mass
Speaker 1: surveillance of Americans, don't use my product to power autonomous
Speaker 1: killing machines. That's kind of stuff that bothers them. Does
Speaker 1: it bother you what this guy's mentality is? I tell you,
Speaker 1: I've seen a lot of secretaries come and go with
Speaker 1: the Department of Defense. Pete Hegseth is absolutely the most
Speaker 1: criminal of any of them. He's worse than Lyon Leon Panetta.
Speaker 1: He really is. He's of the same cloth. Quite frankly,
Speaker 1: there's no ethical boundaries that he isn't demanding the people cross.
Speaker 1: And so he goes to the most unethical of the
Speaker 1: Silicon Valley technocrats, Sam Altman, and they set up a
Speaker 1: deal with Open AI. And so in an interview on Saturday,
Speaker 1: the Anthropic CEO said he opposes the use of his
Speaker 1: AI models for mass domestic surveillance and for fully autonomous weapons.
Speaker 1: So therefore the Pentagon, not just ICE, but the Pentagon
Speaker 1: is part of the domestic police state. Right, Remember when
Speaker 1: Obama was suspected of this, and now while Trump is
Speaker 1: doing it. Right, we've said Alex Jones did four documentaries
Speaker 1: about police state USA and the Obama deception all the
Speaker 1: rest of stuff. But now that Trump is actually putting
Speaker 1: this into place, wants to use the Pentagon and use
Speaker 1: artificial and this is what they're so focused on AI about.
Speaker 1: Remember I said this from the very beginning. I said,
Speaker 1: the most dangerous part of AI is mass surveillance and
Speaker 1: the intelligence that they can glean by looking at you.
Speaker 1: The way they can analyze this and figure out what
Speaker 1: you're doing. But there's another aspect of this, and that
Speaker 1: is the fact that Anthropic has been banned from federal
Speaker 1: government contracts. This is reason looking at the business side
Speaker 1: of this, the unprecedented nature of the US government, and
Speaker 1: a fit of ego of the Trump administration, again, ego politics,
Speaker 1: deciding that in the same way, if he doesn't like
Speaker 1: but Canadian mayor does, he wants to put massive tariffs
Speaker 1: on Canada. You know, this is this kind of reaction.
Speaker 1: You don't bow the knee to me, I will destroy you.
Speaker 1: Kiss my ring, kiss my foot, get down on the ground.
Speaker 1: This guy is a tyrant, a dictator, unlike any that
Speaker 1: we've ever seen in the office. We've had other people
Speaker 1: like him, but they try to hide it. Trump doesn't.
Speaker 1: He revels in it. So he's banned all federal agencies
Speaker 1: from working with him. And again, the two hundred million
Speaker 1: dollar contract is chicken feed. As I point out, it's
Speaker 1: only about one and a half percent of their gross revenue.
Speaker 1: But once he puts this out and bans everybody else
Speaker 1: if they have any interaction with the federal government. In
Speaker 1: other words, you're going to choose to work with the
Speaker 1: federal government or you're going to work with Anthropic. You
Speaker 1: can't do both. According to Trump, that's going to hurt
Speaker 1: them significantly. You know, the direct contract that they have
Speaker 1: is only one half percent of their revenue, But the
Speaker 1: rest of this stuff is going to really have a
Speaker 1: knock on effect. Heg Seth demanded that Anthropic equip the
Speaker 1: Pentagon and AI models free from usage policy constraints that
Speaker 1: may limit lawful military applications. Well, if you know, we
Speaker 1: look at how they're willing to disrupt all this stuff.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's going to be really difficult, as they said,
Speaker 1: to extract all this stuff. So they want to punish
Speaker 1: Anthropic because of that. But think about it, why would
Speaker 1: they go through the process of extracting all this stuff
Speaker 1: if Hegseth didn't want to use it for mass domestic
Speaker 1: surveillance and for autonomous killing weapons. At the same time
Speaker 1: he says, well, I'm not going to use it for
Speaker 1: anything unlawful. He is willing to go through all of this,
Speaker 1: hassle all of this problem in order to have the
Speaker 1: ability to do these kind of unlawful, unethical things. You
Speaker 1: do see how the guy is lying out of both
Speaker 1: sides of his mouth. Right, So the CEO of Anthropic
Speaker 1: published a public letter Thursday night explaining his constitutional, ethical,
Speaker 1: and technical concerns about unleashing AI that's capable of surveiling
Speaker 1: American citizens at home and executing people abroad according to
Speaker 1: its own judgment instead of a human beings. So again,
Speaker 1: what does this tell you about Pentagon and about Pete.
Speaker 1: The Pentagon is guilty of a glaring contradiction, says Reason.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, No, this is a guy who is at
Speaker 1: the R. Street Institute, Mark Dalton. He says they are
Speaker 1: guilty of a glaring contradiction. On the first side, they
Speaker 1: consider Anthropics technology so vital to national defense that they
Speaker 1: thought that invoking the Defense Production Act was justified to
Speaker 1: retain access earlier this week, then suddenly designating the company
Speaker 1: as a supply chain risk. The ego politics of putting
Speaker 1: them as a supply chain risk is what would keep
Speaker 1: other companies from being able to do business with them.
Speaker 1: The President is permitting a six month window during which
Speaker 1: the federal agencies, including the Pentagon, will continue to use Claude.
Speaker 1: That's how integrated it is already, That's how vital it
Speaker 1: is already. And so when you think about all of
Speaker 1: that trouble, why would they go to all that trouble
Speaker 1: if they didn't really want to use it for mass surveillance.
Speaker 1: Pete Hegseth is lying to you about this. Dean bald,
Speaker 1: the Senior Fellow of the Foundation for American Innovation, said,
Speaker 1: this designation as a supply chain risk is the most
Speaker 1: damaging policy move I have ever seen the US government
Speaker 1: try to make, because again this is mafia. Don respect
Speaker 1: me or die right. The company's usage policy is explicitly
Speaker 1: prohibited the use of its AI models for domestic surveillance
Speaker 1: purposes and to produce, modified design, market, or distribute weapons, explosives,
Speaker 1: dangerous materials, or other systems designed to create harm to
Speaker 1: or loss of life since June of twenty twenty four,
Speaker 1: when it began supporting American warfighters. These provisions are maintained
Speaker 1: in anthropics current usage policy. The company then received a
Speaker 1: two hundred million dollars Pentagon contract over a year later
Speaker 1: in July of twenty twenty five. So it was Pete
Speaker 1: Hegseth who gave them the two hundred million dollar contract.
Speaker 1: He knew what their policy was. Neither the President Northern
Speaker 1: Secretary of Defense were ignorant of these usage conditions, but
Speaker 1: now they have started paying attention because a they're not
Speaker 1: only evil, but they're incompetent. Neither Trump nor Hegseth, who
Speaker 1: claimed that America that the CEO of Anthropic changed Anthropics
Speaker 1: terms of service Opened II. CEO Sam Altman claimed that
Speaker 1: the Department Offense agrees with open AI's most important safety principles,
Speaker 1: prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the
Speaker 1: use of force. If that's the case, then why the
Speaker 1: fight right again? This is the same type of stuff
Speaker 1: we're hearing about Iran's nuclear program. Well, we obliterated it.
Speaker 1: It's all gone, there's not anything left. Well, now we
Speaker 1: have to bomb them again to get it right, to
Speaker 1: stop their programs. The Trump administration doesn't even think twice
Speaker 1: when they lie to the American public. I mean, we
Speaker 1: have video footage from a gazillion different angles of ice
Speaker 1: agents murdering Alex Pretty and the woman Good, Renee Good,
Speaker 1: and yet they come out with absurd lies with the
Speaker 1: Renee Good thing. Had Christineome come out and said, yeah,
Speaker 1: they were stuck in the snow and then they got
Speaker 1: attacked by this woman and all the rest of the stuff,
Speaker 1: and it's like, no, everybody's seen the video. We know
Speaker 1: you're lying. Trump did that as well, and so they're
Speaker 1: doing that again with this. We all know why they
Speaker 1: are having this fight with Anthropic. So the Anthropic blowout
Speaker 1: with the military involved the theoretical use of Claud for
Speaker 1: an incoming nuclear strike, is what they're saying. They said
Speaker 1: that hypothetical nuclear strike scenario. According to the Washington Post,
Speaker 1: a Defense official told the Washington Post, the Pentagon's technology
Speaker 1: chief pose an extremely hypothetical would Anthropic let the military
Speaker 1: use Claud to help shoot down a nuclear armed intercontinental
Speaker 1: ballistic missile. The CEO supposedly apparently irritated the Pentagon leaders
Speaker 1: and said, well, you could call us and we'd work
Speaker 1: it out. And so that's what the Washington Post is saying. However,
Speaker 1: the CEO said that is patently I'm inclined to believe
Speaker 1: him since I don't know him, but I know that
Speaker 1: everybody in the Trump administration is an absurd liar, and
Speaker 1: we've seen it happen over and over again. So the
Speaker 1: company a degreed allowed Claude to be used for missile defense.
Speaker 1: The Trump administration figures both inside and outside the DoD
Speaker 1: have piled pressure on Anthropic that has an avowed focus
Speaker 1: on safety. The CEO has criticized administration's attempt to curb
Speaker 1: AI regulation, which included listen to this. See he's been
Speaker 1: a critic, so he has. The CEO of Anthropic has
Speaker 1: been a critic of what the Trump administration has done, saying,
Speaker 1: you're not going to have any restrictions on AI state
Speaker 1: or local for ten years, right, And I said, the
Speaker 1: reason they're doing that is because they've got some real
Speaker 1: nefarious uses for AI involved. And of course the CEO
Speaker 1: Anthropic has said that, and he's been critical of the
Speaker 1: Trump administration. I think that is what this is really about,
Speaker 1: he says, and cleared a proposed ban on state level regulation.
Speaker 1: So this is I think the essence of what is happening,
Speaker 1: and it is something that really should concern us, and
Speaker 1: it's something we don't have time to talk about more today,
Speaker 1: but we will revisit this. I'm afraid that the Pentagon
Speaker 1: and War Pete and Trump will revisit this as well.
Speaker 1: Have a good day. Thank you for joining us the
Speaker 1: common man. They created common Core and dumbed down our children.
Speaker 1: They created common past, track and control us. Their commons
Speaker 1: project to make sure the common own nothing and the
Speaker 1: communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary.
Speaker 1: But each of us has worth and dignity created in
Speaker 1: the image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 1: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 1: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 1: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 1: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 1: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 1: at the davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
Speaker 1: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 1: keep us in your prayers. Ddavidknightshow dot com to