Speaker 1: It looks like we're ready. Good evening everyone. Yesterday I
Speaker 1: was extremely tired, so I apologize for it's. You know,
Speaker 1: it's not easy to try to explain multiple things, especially
Speaker 1: with the necessity of having some background information in order
Speaker 1: for it to all make sense. That's the issue can
Speaker 1: run into when you're trying to convey something that's not
Speaker 1: the orthodox traditional already beat into our heads conditioned and
Speaker 1: programmed values, meaning the value that you assessed to certain things.
Speaker 1: So when I'm looking at history, the Little Timebook, or
Speaker 1: trying to define an alternative meaning or show evidence of
Speaker 1: something that goes against what traditionally is understood, and I
Speaker 1: have to continue to he fall back to the information
Speaker 1: that I've conveyed on this show previously. If you're not
Speaker 1: privy to that information, it's going to not make a
Speaker 1: whole lot of sense if I have to rush it,
Speaker 1: meaning if I don't have to, if every episode is
Speaker 1: the same and I say the same things all over again,
Speaker 1: it would be an endless loop. So what I've put
Speaker 1: out here before and you'll find is still on the
Speaker 1: YouTube and a rumble is the British EDA and let's
Speaker 1: just take it from here, says it celebrates the establishment
Speaker 1: of civilization in the early world by our Nordic ancestors,
Speaker 1: the forebears of the Britons Bretons, over five thousand years ago,
Speaker 1: with the institution of civilized government, civilized government protectors what
Speaker 1: was government and originally intended to do? Protect the people,
Speaker 1: be the guardians. And in an uncorrupted pure form. It
Speaker 1: is a necessity because it's organized, because it's created for
Speaker 1: that purpose and mission. And it's not a necessary evil
Speaker 1: if it's not corrupted to your start oppressing its own people.
Speaker 1: So civilized government, settled domestic and national life, free parliamentary institutions.
Speaker 1: This is five thousand years ago, our ancestors and industrialism
Speaker 1: on much the same model as has continued down to
Speaker 1: the present day. Apart from the mechanized developments we're talking about.
Speaker 1: The EDA. It discloses the mainsprings of our civilization and
Speaker 1: the indomitable personalities and names of its consummately gifted originators.
Speaker 1: It vividly describes the stirring struggles of its fair complexioned,
Speaker 1: Titanic tall heroes of Gothic breed against the ravaging, lawless
Speaker 1: hordes of primitive savage dusky cave dwellers of the Old world,
Speaker 1: steeped in debasing superstition, saturn cult, sorcery, witchcraft, torture, terrorism,
Speaker 1: and incited and led by their vicious wizard priests Woden
Speaker 1: Elu Balder. Those are the top three and weird priests
Speaker 1: and weird of the widespread cult of the Serpent Dragon
Speaker 1: with its dark sorcery and cruel human and animal sacrifices.
Speaker 1: Oh that's not kowsher. And who furiously opposed the rise
Speaker 1: of ordered civilized government. That's what they furiously opposed, ordered
Speaker 1: civilized government with it's benign And what do you what
Speaker 1: do Marxist do? What do anarchists do? They want to
Speaker 1: tear everything down? Who creates those people? Fucking fly one
Speaker 1: for the swear dar Who creates and funds that chaos?
Speaker 1: Who furiously opposed the rise of ordered civilized government with
Speaker 1: its benign, benign son worship and abolition of blood sacrifice?
Speaker 1: Who did that? We did that, We abolished blood sacrifice.
Speaker 1: We were the benign, benevolent creator worshippers singular, not polytheistic.
Speaker 1: That's where we came from. That's who introduced all those
Speaker 1: ideas that were then co opted and hijacked to create
Speaker 1: the Veneer of three Abrahamic death cults, the Veneer, the
Speaker 1: thin layer, the lie, the thing that which you sell
Speaker 1: to people. They took good ideas examples from us and
Speaker 1: made them ugly. Underneath the thrilling adventures and exploits of
Speaker 1: the heroes, both protagonists and antagonists are no less full
Speaker 1: of dramatic pathos and passion, comedy and tragedy, courage and devotion, humor,
Speaker 1: grim and otherwise, sportsmanship and chivalry, melodrama and villainy then
Speaker 1: modern romantic fiction, and it has its heroines and its
Speaker 1: love interests. Hitherto, the confused heap of disordered and disjointed
Speaker 1: lays and their fragments, known as the Eda or the
Speaker 1: poetic Eda, has been universally supposed to be merely a
Speaker 1: miscellaneous collection of lays and legends of sc Scandinavian gods
Speaker 1: and heroes, and the individual lays regarded as separate entities.
Speaker 1: And whilst the Edda complex is now proudly cherished by
Speaker 1: the Scandinavians, who rescued its numerous ancient manuscripts from the
Speaker 1: remote fastness of Iceland shortly after the introduction of Christianity,
Speaker 1: into the ultimate Thule it has, presumably owing to its
Speaker 1: supposed foreign character, been compared inheritively unknown to the educated
Speaker 1: general reader. In England, Christianity almost destroyed the remnants of
Speaker 1: our true history, calling it pagan, calling it polytheistic, calling
Speaker 1: it a bunch of non Christian writings which certainly were
Speaker 1: not allowed. Gee who was behind that? Who were the
Speaker 1: first quote unquote Christians who swarmed the church? Though from
Speaker 1: its obvious intrinsic literary importance as a noble ancient Nordic
Speaker 1: classic of the Dark Ages, intimately related to early English
Speaker 1: literature and poetry, the Eda poems have been noticed at
Speaker 1: considerable length by the late Professor W. P. Kerr of Oxford,
Speaker 1: who thinks them the noblest work of the Northern Faith,
Speaker 1: in the current belief that they were allegorical and that
Speaker 1: the most grudging pendant might be forced to acknowledge the
Speaker 1: technical skill of the rhetoric. The so called Scandinavian gods
Speaker 1: of the Eda, however, are always strictly human heroes, subject
Speaker 1: to death, and nowhere supernatural. They were only deified or canonized,
Speaker 1: as we shall see in later mythology, long after their death,
Speaker 1: on account of their great benefactions to the Aryan or
Speaker 1: Nordic race and mankind in general. In writing the human
Speaker 1: wrongs of the Old World. They were moreover equally the
Speaker 1: deified heroes or gods of the ancient Britons and Anglo Saxons,
Speaker 1: with the same identical names, legends, and functions as in Scandinavia,
Speaker 1: the Scandinavians being the same kindred racial stock as the
Speaker 1: Britons and Anglo Saxons, with racial affinity in their language, writing,
Speaker 1: and community in their pre Christian religion and legendary tradition. Thus,
Speaker 1: for example, four of the leading deified heroes and heroines
Speaker 1: of the Eda still give their names to our current
Speaker 1: days of the week from Tuesday to Friday. The three
Speaker 1: chief Eda heroes, namely Thor, his invincible warrior son, Dio
Speaker 1: or Tiatzi, and Wodin, give us, respectively the names of
Speaker 1: our Tuesday Anglo Saxon, Tuesday, Iig, Wednesday Anglo Saxon, Wolden's
Speaker 1: Daig and Thursday Anglo Saxon. Thorsday and Friday preserves the
Speaker 1: name of Thoris heroic queen Freya or Frieda of the
Speaker 1: Eda and not of frig Or Virago, the wife of Woden,
Speaker 1: as was adopted by the later Anglo Saxons, whilst the
Speaker 1: first day of the week, Sunday, was named after that
Speaker 1: luminary which was worshiped by Thor and his Goths in
Speaker 1: the Edda as the light of the world. Isn't wow?
Speaker 1: That sounds like a familiar What is wow? Light of
Speaker 1: the world? I am the light of the world and
Speaker 1: the kindler of life in this world, an idea which
Speaker 1: is still held by modern scientists. The substantial identity also
Speaker 1: of the language of the Eda with early English, is
Speaker 1: disclosed in the faithfully literal English translation of that epic,
Speaker 1: now given for the first time in the present work.
Speaker 1: That the Edda in its existing medieval version was composed
Speaker 1: in Britain is now admitted by the leading authorities on
Speaker 1: the language of the Edic texts in Scandinavia as well
Speaker 1: as Britain, as detailed to the no on the Home
Speaker 1: of the Edda in the appendix, where also is summarized
Speaker 1: the new evidence from many other directions for the British
Speaker 1: origin of this epic and for the British custody of
Speaker 1: the ancient ancestral tradition upon which it is based. The
Speaker 1: leading heroes of the Eda are regularly called therein Goths,
Speaker 1: whilst the scene of the Edda is conclusively located in
Speaker 1: Asia Minor, centering at Troy and Cappadocia. Isn't that interesting?
Speaker 1: Troy and Cappadocia, That's where Thor first established. Right there,
Speaker 1: Troy first established a culture, community and kingdom, and then
Speaker 1: proceeded to Cappadocia and into Karshemesh, where they encountered this
Speaker 1: disgusting tribe of murderous assholes. Basically same as, if ever,
Speaker 1: was the traditional home of Saint George of Mary, England
Speaker 1: with his red Cross, who also gave his name to
Speaker 1: our great western waterway of the early Britons. Saint George's
Speaker 1: channel and his cross became the Admiral's flag of the
Speaker 1: British Navy, and was for long the badge of every
Speaker 1: English soldier. The Runic or Gothic type of writing, which
Speaker 1: is referred to in the Edda and in a form
Speaker 1: of which the texts are written, is found at an
Speaker 1: earlier period in Britain than in Scandinavia. The Runic monuments
Speaker 1: significantly are entirely absent in Germany, for which some of
Speaker 1: the at alays have been claimed. While it's common in
Speaker 1: Britain and found also in sits outside the Viking area.
Speaker 1: The mixed Runic and Old Gothic or Old English black
Speaker 1: letter writing of the oldest existing EDA texts in their
Speaker 1: vellums or parchments is almost indistinguishable from that current in
Speaker 1: England in the reign of Henry the first eighty eleven
Speaker 1: hundred to eleven thirty five. The early Britons also were Goth,
Speaker 1: as I have demonstrated in former works, and their language
Speaker 1: was British Gothic. The Custodian ship, therefore, by the Britons
Speaker 1: of the heroic ancestral, edict or Edic tradition of the
Speaker 1: Goths was only natural. This British Custodian ship also confirms
Speaker 1: the old tradition of Jeffrey of Monmouth that Britain was
Speaker 1: colonized by King Brutus and his Britons from Troy in
Speaker 1: Asia Minor by way of the Mediterranean about eleven eleven
Speaker 1: o three VC, a tradition which I have fully established
Speaker 1: by historical evidence in previous works. The currency therefore of
Speaker 1: the etic poems in Britain during the so called Dark Ages,
Speaker 1: which include the period of King Alfred Affords an earlier
Speaker 1: instance of what Shelley proudly sings, Posey's unfailing river which
Speaker 1: through Albion wind for ever wind winds sorry wines forever.
Speaker 1: So Posey's unfailing river, which through Albion winds forever. And
Speaker 1: it is in keeping with Professor Kerr's conclusion that it
Speaker 1: was the Gothic influence which took a leading part in
Speaker 1: the formation of modern Western European literature in reference to
Speaker 1: its essential differences from the Latin. Indeed, the vastly remote
Speaker 1: currency of the Aryan or early Gothic words in Britain
Speaker 1: might have been suspected from on. Then yep, we're good
Speaker 1: what we know of how poetic associations become attached and
Speaker 1: cling tours through long usage, and that the rapid and
Speaker 1: enormous progress in literature, with the revival of letters and
Speaker 1: the word magic that characterizes the best poetry of Shakespeare
Speaker 1: and Milton, have been due in a hitherto unsuspected degree
Speaker 1: to the long life and world prevalence of the Aryan language,
Speaker 1: which resulted from the enterprise of the Aryans or Sumerians
Speaker 1: Arians equal sign Sumerians. How the Eda texts appear to
Speaker 1: have become lost in Britain and preserved in the remote, inaccessible,
Speaker 1: frozen fastness of inhospitable Iceland is referred to in the appendix,
Speaker 1: the main cause being the notorious wholesale destruction of ancient
Speaker 1: Britain manuscripts, stigmatized as pagan by the fanatical early Christian
Speaker 1: missionaries in Britain. Oi Vay Iceland, where the Eta texts
Speaker 1: were discovered in the eleventh century. A d and now
Speaker 1: a Danish province since thirteen eighty four, derived its writing
Speaker 1: and its earliest colonists from Britain. In Ireland, it first
Speaker 1: appears in history as visited by a party of Irish
Speaker 1: scott hermits of the Coldi or Khalidi order with their
Speaker 1: wives and families about eighty seven ninety five, and they
Speaker 1: appear to have found no inhabitants there. Other parties of
Speaker 1: these hermits and hebrides pirates settled at intervals until eight
Speaker 1: seventy four, when the island was first permanently colonized by
Speaker 1: larger numbers of refugees from the Hervides or Orkney, along
Speaker 1: with the Norsemen let's see from Orkney and Norway fleeing
Speaker 1: from the Tyranny of Harald Fairhair of Norway who raided
Speaker 1: the Hebrides. I'm sorry and Orkney, and these immigrants found
Speaker 1: the Irish books quote unquote. The Coldes a married Christian
Speaker 1: sect in North Britain and regarded as pre Columbian, with
Speaker 1: headquarters at Saint Andrews, and diffused over the west of Scotland.
Speaker 1: And Herbides or Hebrides formed a settlement in Orkney in
Speaker 1: the sixth century AD. So were the Irish books among
Speaker 1: the people they founded there a small Commonwealth republic into
Speaker 1: which Christianity was introduced about the beginning of the eleventh
Speaker 1: century AD. Fortunately for us, a patriotic Icelandic farmer who
Speaker 1: studied for a time at Paris Semlund, son of Sigfus,
Speaker 1: and surnamed the Learned. According to the reports of many
Speaker 1: later Icelandic writers, collected into one bundle the scattered floating
Speaker 1: manuscripts of individual at Alais, current in his time and
Speaker 1: dating to the tenth or ninth century or earlier. That
Speaker 1: collection was called by later icelanders Simon's eda Ata Seimandar,
Speaker 1: and a copy of it on parchment sheets dating from
Speaker 1: the twelfth or thirteenth century was brought in Iceland, was
Speaker 1: bought in Iceland in the seventheenth century and is now
Speaker 1: enshrined in the Royal Library at Copenhangen and is known
Speaker 1: as the Codex Regius. It contains only the texts of
Speaker 1: the chief lays, without any title, and it does not
Speaker 1: mention either Salmon's name or Eda, a word which seems
Speaker 1: first applied to its collection only about the middle of
Speaker 1: the seventeenth century, and on the supposed meaning of that name.
Speaker 1: Much regrettable confusion in the title for this collection of
Speaker 1: the Eda poems by Seimund, which forms the only true Eda,
Speaker 1: has lately been introduced by European writers, calling this collection
Speaker 1: the elder Eda or the poetical Eda, in order to
Speaker 1: distinguish these poems from the prose from a prose fantastic, mythological,
Speaker 1: fairy tale and Icelandic vernacular concocted from some of the
Speaker 1: Edalays about a century after Selund by the Icelander of
Speaker 1: Norse ancestry named Snorri Sturluson as Snorri, an unscrupulous, freebooting
Speaker 1: adventurer and writer of sagas on the Iceland chiefs of
Speaker 1: his time and their ancestors, cites in his tale or
Speaker 1: romantic or romance, many extracts from Edalays. He is referred
Speaker 1: to by later Icelanders as having put together the Eda
Speaker 1: and his vernacular tale, becoming popular amongst the Icelanders and
Speaker 1: better known as the Edda itself, the language of which
Speaker 1: was scarcely intelligent to these Icelanders. His tale laterally came
Speaker 1: to be known as Eda at a period when that
Speaker 1: title was supposed to denote any old mythological tale. Hence,
Speaker 1: modern European writers on the Edda, who all have credulously
Speaker 1: accepted Snorri's tale, he didn't even know how to read
Speaker 1: it properly or what order or arrangement it went in.
Speaker 1: Along with his fantastic mythological speculations, and its misapplied title
Speaker 1: of Eda, term his tale Snorri's Eda, or the younger
Speaker 1: Eda or the prose Eta. But we shall find that
Speaker 1: Snorri's fiction, fictitious tale is no Eda at all, and
Speaker 1: that his purported translations of the Eda extracts which he
Speaker 1: cites so often, completely travesty the sense of his text,
Speaker 1: as to show that he did not understand many of
Speaker 1: the critical words in the Edda, which are British and
Speaker 1: non Icelandic. They're trying to translate in the wrong language.
Speaker 1: His purported translations and interpretations abound with absurd perversions, inconsistencies,
Speaker 1: and extravagant anachronisms. So that's why you get like an
Speaker 1: Odin father, they do magic and they don't. That was Wodin.
Speaker 1: Thor and Odin are the same person. There's all kinds,
Speaker 1: and there's there are gods, and you know, Valhalla is
Speaker 1: someplace where the dead gut in dissolibuleshit. So inside the
Speaker 1: head of the mythmonger. Thus he makes Wodin to be
Speaker 1: a lineal descendant of King Thor. Right, they were bitter enemies,
Speaker 1: and one was of the Serpent cult and the other
Speaker 1: of the Son cult. The Gothic king not related whatsoever
Speaker 1: in the eighteenth generation, removed by arbitrarily stringing together mere
Speaker 1: titles of Thor and his son as separate personages. And
Speaker 1: this notwithstanding that the Eta proper everywhere makes Thor a
Speaker 1: contemporary of Woden and very much his junior, and no
Speaker 1: blood relation of Wodin at all. Yet the citations by
Speaker 1: Snory of Stanzas from the Edda are important in confirming
Speaker 1: that old texts from the other manuscript's copies, and it
Speaker 1: is significant that even snorri Ill, informed as he was, presumably,
Speaker 1: had heard in Iceland some floating echoes of the genuine
Speaker 1: old British tradition regarding the Eda. For he states that Thor,
Speaker 1: now disclosed as the leading hero of the Edda, so
Speaker 1: far from ever having been in Iceland or Scandinavia, was
Speaker 1: a king of Troy in Asian minor, and such in
Speaker 1: fact we shall find that he really was. The collection
Speaker 1: of the Eda lays and their fragments a mass by Simond,
Speaker 1: and as existing in its copy, the Codex Regis, forms
Speaker 1: a heterogeneous gathering without any coherent sequence or order, with promiscuit.
Speaker 1: This promiscuous and disordered condition is now seen to be
Speaker 1: merely due, obviously to the accidental way in which the
Speaker 1: antiquarian collector Segmund had stitched together the individual parchments containing
Speaker 1: the lays and their fragments as he picked them up
Speaker 1: piecemeal from time to time for preservation. This incoherent sequence
Speaker 1: of the lays, coupled with the use of different titles
Speaker 1: for the heroes and heroines in some of them, has
Speaker 1: led all modern writers on the subject unpossessed of any
Speaker 1: key to the Eda epic as a whole, to believe
Speaker 1: that the Edda is a great complex composition of several
Speaker 1: different cycles of heroes of different ages, and has led
Speaker 1: them to attempt to attempt at regrouping of the lays
Speaker 1: on this hypothesis, with the result of adding still further
Speaker 1: to the existing confusion. I was first led to observe
Speaker 1: so all this Nordic Scandinavian mythology of Thor and this
Speaker 1: is all where that came from Snorri. But now we're
Speaker 1: going to demystify all this, and we're going to demystify
Speaker 1: the tales of the Old Testament as well, and what
Speaker 1: they maybe even some of the new as to what
Speaker 1: was already described in the past. And now we can
Speaker 1: through the ed see whose perspective we're learning this Old
Speaker 1: Testament from. It's not from these people. It's not from
Speaker 1: the Sun cult. It's not from the the good in
Speaker 1: the world. That's from those whom they've defeated. Those are
Speaker 1: the people telling you who good and bad is in
Speaker 1: the Old Testament. You're hearing it from the devil itself,
Speaker 1: from their perspective. I was first led to observe the
Speaker 1: truly epic character and historical basis of the Edda and
Speaker 1: its connection with Eastern tradition by recalling Thor and his exploits.
Speaker 1: When I was studying Hindu history and mythology in India
Speaker 1: in my early days, there I noticed how very similar
Speaker 1: was the Edic name Iandri for Thor, with his bolt
Speaker 1: or mace and his edic exploits, to the name and
Speaker 1: exploits of the god Indra of the eastern branch of
Speaker 1: the Aryan or Nordic race. Indra is described in the
Speaker 1: Indian Veda as tall, fair, invincible, armed with a bolt,
Speaker 1: some sort of tech and or something electrical, and having
Speaker 1: the form and attributes of the European Zeus or Jupiter.
Speaker 1: And he was regarded by the more enlightened Sanskrit scholars
Speaker 1: as identical with Jupiter and as having been originally a
Speaker 1: heroic human king who led the early Aryans to victory,
Speaker 1: and had laterally been deified a man, not a god
Speaker 1: in heavens. They believed in a god in the heavens,
Speaker 1: they believed in a benevolent creator, for Zeus was not it.
Speaker 1: I had early become familiar with the Etic literature while
Speaker 1: it's a young student at college attracted to its perusal
Speaker 1: through the references to it by Carlyle in his Heroes
Speaker 1: and hero Worship, in which he took Thor and Odin
Speaker 1: as types of heroes who were subsequently deified as gods,
Speaker 1: and not only as gods but also as heroes in
Speaker 1: our British nursery tales. Thus the Chelsea a us, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Thus the Chelsea Sage with rare acumen declared in his
Speaker 1: dogmatic way that Thor, the giant Slayer of the Eda,
Speaker 1: was the source of the hero in our modern nursery
Speaker 1: tale of Jack, the giant killer Jack of the Beatingstock.
Speaker 1: He would doubtless have been surprised as well as gratified,
Speaker 1: had he lived to learn that his lucky guests had
Speaker 1: proved to be strictly and literally literally true. In fact,
Speaker 1: for one of the usual titles of Thor in the
Speaker 1: Eda is sig or eg Ygg, which is spelled in
Speaker 1: the Old Samerian inscription of his great grandson and others
Speaker 1: in Mesopotamia as zag or z sac where you get
Speaker 1: Zeus from, and it is similarly so spelt at thors
Speaker 1: Or Saint George's old capital in Hittite Cappadocia in Asia Minor,
Speaker 1: and is now disclosed as the source of our modern
Speaker 1: name Jack. It thus now transpires that the mighty name
Speaker 1: and dowdy deeds of the world, famed heroic king of
Speaker 1: the Aryan, Gothic or Nordic race, who slew the destructive
Speaker 1: giants whose cruel cults oppressed the early world and opposed
Speaker 1: his establishment of civilization, as celebrated in the Eda, has
Speaker 1: been preserved in the British Isles down to the present
Speaker 1: day in this infantile version, even after the EDA manuscripts
Speaker 1: themselves had become destroyed and lost in Britain. Besides the
Speaker 1: essential identity in the name and achievements of Thor as
Speaker 1: Eenduri in the eddas with Indra of the Eastern Aryans,
Speaker 1: the bodily form of these two and the direction in
Speaker 1: which they were deified were observed to be the same
Speaker 1: in both cases, and like Zeus or Jupiter, in both,
Speaker 1: he was of a giant build and reddish bearded, placed
Speaker 1: in heaven in the sky. In both he was armed
Speaker 1: with a bolt and made the god of thunder. The
Speaker 1: Jupiter tonas Tonans of the Romans, and both he led
Speaker 1: the Aryans to victory and warred against the serpent's dragons
Speaker 1: of the Abyss. So taking the totem of a cult
Speaker 1: and taking the literal meaning of it is where you
Speaker 1: get a lot of these misunderstandings when people read it afterwards.
Speaker 1: Oh there was fighting dragons, It's like, well, essentially he
Speaker 1: was fighting a cult that was messing around with snakes
Speaker 1: for their venom, doing witchcraft and sorcery and poisoning people
Speaker 1: with all types of wicked concoctions, a lot of them
Speaker 1: having to do with snake venom, same as as ever
Speaker 1: was really because that is our allopathy today that they
Speaker 1: refounded here. So as I was saying, in both, he
Speaker 1: led the Aryans to victory and ward against the serpent
Speaker 1: dragons of the Abyss, and the name of his chief
Speaker 1: adversary was the same in both versions, Indian, Vedic and Etic.
Speaker 1: This discovery of the identity in the name, representation and
Speaker 1: exploits of thor or injury also called andavara and in
Speaker 1: the Edda literally sorry in the Eda literary tradition of
Speaker 1: the European Aryans or Nordics with those of Indra. In
Speaker 1: the Vedic literary tradition of the Eastern branch of the
Speaker 1: Aryans in India, implies that that that heroic king had
Speaker 1: been originally the common ancestral human king of the united
Speaker 1: Aryan race before the separation of the Eastern and Indian
Speaker 1: branch from the Western or European branch of that race.
Speaker 1: I also observed that Thor's achievements and grail legend were
Speaker 1: substantially identical with those of the world Emperor King Arthur
Speaker 1: of the older British legends, and distinguished from his leader
Speaker 1: unhistorical namesake of the Christian period, and that Thor's attic
Speaker 1: title of air Thor equated with Arthur, her or, er
Speaker 1: and r being dialectical or dialectic forms of the same
Speaker 1: rue and meaning meaning Aryan, so ar as a prefix
Speaker 1: or h er is Aryan meaning ruler. This then placed
Speaker 1: in my hands a new and promising key for the
Speaker 1: discovery for the recovery of the hitherto wholly unknown origin
Speaker 1: of the Western or European branch of the Aryans by
Speaker 1: correlation of Western and Eastern literary traditions. And like Keats
Speaker 1: on his Homeric discovery, then felt I some watcher of
Speaker 1: the skies when a new planet swims into his can.
Speaker 1: How this key was utilized is told al along with
Speaker 1: its startling, far reaching historical results in my previous works,
Speaker 1: and more fully as regards the agreement with ancient European
Speaker 1: literary tradition in the present pages. The identity of Thor
Speaker 1: Eendr of the Edda with the Indian Indra was further
Speaker 1: strikingly confirmed and established by my observation about a quarter
Speaker 1: of a century ago that the first historical king of
Speaker 1: the Sumerians of ancient Mesopotamia, Tamia, the oldest civilized people
Speaker 1: in the world, and the introducers of civilization into Asia
Speaker 1: minor Mesopotamia, Egypt, Crete India, and the prehistoric Danube Valley
Speaker 1: of Europe, who called themselves Goots, Gut or Goth. The
Speaker 1: age was added by the Romans and wore the horned
Speaker 1: headdress of the Goths, whose non inflecting language was radically
Speaker 1: identical with the non inflecting Gothic and English, and who
Speaker 1: were the early Aryans or early Goths, as established in
Speaker 1: my former works, bore in Sumerian the personal name of
Speaker 1: Indhara in Dur or Inter or King Terror, a name
Speaker 1: now disclosed as the source of Thor and of Thursday.
Speaker 1: He was the traditional founder of the world's civilization and
Speaker 1: was afterwards deified by the Sumerians, and he is represented
Speaker 1: as slaying the destructive, terrorizing terrorism, terrorists, demons and serpent
Speaker 1: dragon totems of the Old world, the demons from which they, oh,
Speaker 1: I don't know conjure and serpent dragon totems of the
Speaker 1: Old World. His other Sumerian titles are also identical in
Speaker 1: the Sumerian and in the Eda, and his date was
Speaker 1: three thousand, three hundred and eighty BC the Sumerian record.
Speaker 1: The Sumerian records regarding him date continuously back to the
Speaker 1: s description on his sacred trophy bowl or holy grail
Speaker 1: by his great grandson about three two hundred and forty
Speaker 1: five BC, all earlier supposed dates for the Sumerians and
Speaker 1: ancient Egyptians before Thor's being merely imaginary. They contained fairly
Speaker 1: full details of the personality and exploits of himself, his
Speaker 1: queen and sun champion Knight, and his warrior clan of
Speaker 1: Goots or Goths, with their portraits chiseled on stone and
Speaker 1: graved on their sacred seals, representing them as wearing horned
Speaker 1: hats like the European Goths, Ancient Britons and Anglo Saxons,
Speaker 1: and like the etic heroes in medieval art, the goat
Speaker 1: and deer metaphor. Remember we were talking about furfer the deer.
Speaker 1: Why I would pick that and why they would because
Speaker 1: remember they basardize everything, these this cult they make. They
Speaker 1: make goats into their little demon tudes, and so too
Speaker 1: with the deer. As I was expressing with the furfur
Speaker 1: that we were looking at the go and deer metaphor.
Speaker 1: Pictographic of his name is freely applied to him by
Speaker 1: the Sumerians and hit Tights, just as it is to
Speaker 1: Thor in the Edda, and his capture and consecration of
Speaker 1: the Sacred Bowl or Holy Grail is in agreement with
Speaker 1: that by Thor or Airthor Arthur in the Edda. That
Speaker 1: story is way older than medieval times dark ages told
Speaker 1: in their contemporary time, but of a much earlier period.
Speaker 1: His sacred Rowan tree, now here's where it gets interesting.
Speaker 1: His sacred Rowan tree with his with its guardian goats,
Speaker 1: is also freely pictured by the Sumerians and Hitto Kappadocians,
Speaker 1: exactly as it is described as Thor's ig drazil rowan
Speaker 1: apple tree in the Edda, as we shall see. Indeed,
Speaker 1: no more striking ocular demonstration of absolute proof for the
Speaker 1: identity of King Thor or Eendr of the Edda and
Speaker 1: his exploits with the first Sumerian or early Aryan king
Speaker 1: tur or Indhara could possibly be had than in the
Speaker 1: fact that I use in the present pages over one
Speaker 1: hundred ancient Sumerian and Hitto Sumerian seals and sculptures to
Speaker 1: illustrate the scenes described in the Eda. So working from
Speaker 1: the artifacts from five thousand years ago, four thousand years
Speaker 1: ago and three thousand years ago. As they were carrying
Speaker 1: this story, you know, along with them very big on
Speaker 1: history are people and preserving it illustrate the scenes described
Speaker 1: in the Eeda and trouble the number might be used
Speaker 1: were space available for them. And significantly, all these ancient
Speaker 1: Sumerian and Cappadocian sculptures and engravings agree with the Edic
Speaker 1: descriptions of the scenes down to the minutest details, thus
Speaker 1: establishing unequivocally with the map, with the mass of other proofs,
Speaker 1: the genuine historical basis of the Edda tradition and the
Speaker 1: identity of King thor or Arthur with the first historical
Speaker 1: Sumerian king who established civilization in the early world. On.
Speaker 1: Thus finding the substantial agreement in the historical Sumerian records
Speaker 1: regarding king Anddhara dur or Ter and the Indian Indra
Speaker 1: with the etic accounts of thor Orri, injury Or Andvara,
Speaker 1: I began to a careful quote began a careful collation
Speaker 1: of the leading English, French and German translations coalition of
Speaker 1: the Eta. I then observed what they all differed from
Speaker 1: each other, more or less seriously and important details. Whilst
Speaker 1: credulously following Snorri's mythological concept and travesty of the Eeda's
Speaker 1: and his mistranslations, and whilst giving generally similar sense, they
Speaker 1: all differed more or less markedly in the words and
Speaker 1: phrases they employed in translating and paraphrasing the self same
Speaker 1: verses and stanzas. As the Eeda, however, was now disclosed
Speaker 1: to be a historical traditional text and not a mere
Speaker 1: mythological one, as all those translators hypnotized by Snory imagined,
Speaker 1: it became necessary for me to make an entirely fresh
Speaker 1: and strictly literal translation direct from the EDA texts themselves.
Speaker 1: This task, though proving laborious, was comparatively simple and straightforward.
Speaker 1: With my newly found keys to the epic, thanks to
Speaker 1: the Danish scholars Wimmer and Janssen, we have a fine
Speaker 1: phototype reproduction page by page of the text of the
Speaker 1: Kodex regius copy of the Edda of about a d.
Speaker 1: Twelve seventy in the Royal Library at Copenhagen, and the
Speaker 1: text of the additional lays which were presumably on its
Speaker 1: missing sheets of eight leaves, are supplied from other manuscripts
Speaker 1: by Yigfuzen and Powell, and also in part by Neckel.
Speaker 1: The mixed Runik alphabet in which this codex regious copy
Speaker 1: of the text is written approaches closely to closely the
Speaker 1: Gothic or Old English black letter character and the language
Speaker 1: of the Eda. Evidently, the Old Briton is closely allied
Speaker 1: to the Eastern Gothic, Anglo Saxon and Old English. As
Speaker 1: a result, my new literal translation of the EDA text
Speaker 1: may made many years ago and now offered in these
Speaker 1: pages and utilizing therein the admirable collated edition of the
Speaker 1: different manuscripts text by manuscript text by Nickel furnishes for
Speaker 1: the first time a critically exact translation of the Eda.
Speaker 1: By it's strictly literal rendering, except as regards words that
Speaker 1: have become obsolete. It demonstrates the radically the radical affinity
Speaker 1: of the Etic language with the English very close because
Speaker 1: it's the roots, and it retains more fully than before
Speaker 1: the alliterative character of the original poem, upon which the
Speaker 1: assonance assonance looks like there's a word letter missing them
Speaker 1: but it's not. Of the edic verse largely depends. But
Speaker 1: most important of all, this translation, made in the light
Speaker 1: of the discovery that Thorder was identical with the first
Speaker 1: historical Samarian king of corresponding name and achievements, and with
Speaker 1: the first traditional king of the Arians before the separation
Speaker 1: of their Eastern branch, has enabled me to reconstruct the
Speaker 1: hitherto hopelessly disordered and detached at Alais back into their
Speaker 1: original and consistent sequence on their historical basis. So basically,
Speaker 1: the guy who was preserving all these texts from being
Speaker 1: destroyed by the Christians was just grabbing them as he
Speaker 1: goes and stacking them together and just binding them so
Speaker 1: that they wouldn't you know, won't lose it. And then
Speaker 1: someone took that to be the order in which it went,
Speaker 1: so everything looked like it was chaotic and fantastical. And
Speaker 1: then they tried to translate it from an Iceland language
Speaker 1: rather than from its root language, so they got a
Speaker 1: lot of things wrong, and therefore, you know, people die,
Speaker 1: and then they reappear in another scene and they think, oh,
Speaker 1: these are the dead gods. They came back and they're
Speaker 1: fighting at Valhalla. It's like, no, that's not accurate at all.
Speaker 1: That's not what happened. And then when they take the
Speaker 1: other misreadings and they say, oh, fen Rear and the
Speaker 1: giant Wolf, Well, there was a mass of people called
Speaker 1: the wolf Totem tribe that were in alliance with the
Speaker 1: Serpent Dragon Colt, who were basically their soldiers, their muscle
Speaker 1: that they sent off to fight their battles for them.
Speaker 1: And these waves are the giant wolf, you know, consuming
Speaker 1: that's what they're referring to. It just has to do
Speaker 1: with how they are translating it and how they understand
Speaker 1: the colloquial metaphors of the time. Where was I Okay?
Speaker 1: This new translation and reconstruction disclosed that the Edda was
Speaker 1: the traditional version of the Great Epic of the Northern
Speaker 1: branch of the Goths, including the Britons, celebrating the establishment
Speaker 1: of the world's civilization by King thor Or Airthor or Arthur. Now,
Speaker 1: as just remember L. A. Woodell proved a singular origin
Speaker 1: of the seeding of organized civilized civilization everywhere in the
Speaker 1: Old World, everywhere, same people, Gothic Aryan people everywhere, everywhere.
Speaker 1: There was a great kingdom everywhere. The parasite then comes
Speaker 1: in and corrupts and kills that kingdom. It was founded
Speaker 1: by Gothic Aarrians, same as it ever was. What are
Speaker 1: they doing to us right now? It moreover enabled me
Speaker 1: to recognize the and recover in the Eda the full
Speaker 1: strings of the titles of that first king, his queen
Speaker 1: and heroic crown Prince as used by the Samerians, as
Speaker 1: well as the Samearian geographical names with their identifications in
Speaker 1: Asia Minor and Mesopotamia, which have been faithfully preserved in
Speaker 1: the Eda manuscript in writing down to the present day.
Speaker 1: In writing down to the present day, this synthesis and
Speaker 1: rearrangement of the disordered Eda lays by means of our
Speaker 1: new historical and traditional keys Samerian and Indian two kings lists,
Speaker 1: two groups of histories. People saying that the Indian histories
Speaker 1: of their kings are mythological. This is what you talk about.
Speaker 1: And when we get into the makers of civilization, because
Speaker 1: they're assuming that these kings were in that territory. What
Speaker 1: they don't understand is that it was our Gothic Aryan
Speaker 1: ancestors who came in a second waved into the Indus
Speaker 1: Valley after these Assyrians that we talked about before Asher
Speaker 1: Nazerpal and you know, tried to murder each and every
Speaker 1: last one of our ancestors. They took their histories with them.
Speaker 1: So it's people who are allegedly experts on this making
Speaker 1: the mistake thinking that these Indian manuscripts have some thing
Speaker 1: to do with their local history and it they don't.
Speaker 1: It was our people coming there with their histories intact,
Speaker 1: and that's why they have a longer kings list. And
Speaker 1: when they compare the two, it all checks out. This
Speaker 1: synthesis and rearrangement of the disordered Italy is by means
Speaker 1: of our new historical traditional key I said that whiles
Speaker 1: transforming the whole scheme of the EDA as hitherto imagine
Speaker 1: disclose the striking fact that the grossly misleading confusion and
Speaker 1: perversion hitherto current in the interpretation of the Eda were
Speaker 1: introduced by the Icelander Snory and credulously followed by all
Speaker 1: modern European writers who just picked up where he left off,
Speaker 1: or did their interpretations of his interpretations, never going to
Speaker 1: the source material to ever try to attempt to analyze
Speaker 1: it and translate it for themselves. They just piggybacked off
Speaker 1: of snory laziness. Snory, we have seen, was the author
Speaker 1: of the melodramatic mythological tale of Romance, founded on certain
Speaker 1: extracts from the Eda, mostly mistranslated, and prefaced by a
Speaker 1: statement of his notions that the the at Las were mythological,
Speaker 1: which treatises has laterally been dignified by the title the
Speaker 1: prose Eta. The serious perversions of the Eda theme thus
Speaker 1: introduced by Snorri include, amongst other things, his mistaking the
Speaker 1: mere titles of leading heroes and heroines for separate and
Speaker 1: distinctly different people, and thus fictitiously increasing the real number
Speaker 1: of the heroes and heroines and confusing the sense. And
Speaker 1: then they deified them and called us polytheists. The use
Speaker 1: by the Sumerians of titles and multiple titles for their
Speaker 1: early kings and heroes besides their personal names, has been
Speaker 1: demonstrated in my previous works. This use of multiple titles
Speaker 1: for ancient kings and heroes continued down into classic times,
Speaker 1: where Homer and other bards regularly call their heroes by
Speaker 1: their titles or cognomens as well as by their personal
Speaker 1: names in order to vary the monotony of repetition in
Speaker 1: their songs. One of the most seriously misleading instances of
Speaker 1: this mistaken use of an etic title for a totally
Speaker 1: different personage by Snorri and by all modern edic writers
Speaker 1: mechanically following him, is the mistaking of the Odin title
Speaker 1: of Thor for the name of Wodin or Woden with
Speaker 1: an E the archenemy of Thor, and thus completely I
Speaker 1: thought it was eviscerating, that it's a vitiating and perverting
Speaker 1: the whole scheme of the ed epic. Odin, as I
Speaker 1: have demonstrated in my previous work, was a title of
Speaker 1: king ur Dur or Indhara Thor in the Sumerian wherein
Speaker 1: it is spelled odo In or odo In with the
Speaker 1: shorter variant of Odo or Udu, and in the Eda text,
Speaker 1: as now literally translated, Thor bears unequivocally the repeatedly and
Speaker 1: repeatedly the titles of Odin and Odo. But Snorri in
Speaker 1: the introduction to his tale identifies Odin with Wodin. And
Speaker 1: that's why you think he's a sorcerer, because Woden was
Speaker 1: not the same dude, not even a dude. Odin wasn't
Speaker 1: even a dude. It was a title for Thor, whom
Speaker 1: he calls vodin, the letter W being absent in Icelandic
Speaker 1: and Norse and replaced by the letter by the very
Speaker 1: late letter V. Thus he says Voden whom we call Odin.
Speaker 1: This ide identification by Snorri was presumably owing to his
Speaker 1: inability to find the name Woden or Voden in the
Speaker 1: Edda manuscripts, from which it is absent in all existing copies,
Speaker 1: and partly to Woden having been, with his blood sacrifices
Speaker 1: the popular war god or war demon of the Icelanders
Speaker 1: and Scandinavians down till only two centuries before Snorri's time,
Speaker 1: they understood and recognized him as for the piece of
Speaker 1: crap that he was now Wotan or Wodin by his
Speaker 1: older name of Bodo or Bota, corresponding to his Sumerian
Speaker 1: name of Boodu, Btu or budin the Serpent Footed because
Speaker 1: he's of the Serpent cult, is throughout the Eda represented
Speaker 1: as the malignant aboriginal chieftain of the Moon and Serpent
Speaker 1: dragon cult and antagonist of King Thor. In his great
Speaker 1: reformation right, he was rehabilitating and reform and helping people.
Speaker 1: He was he was civilizing them. He was domesticating them,
Speaker 1: giving them this thing called marriage so they would have
Speaker 1: monogamous relationships and a family life. This significantly is in
Speaker 1: series with his Vedic Sanskrit name of Budnyak or the bottom, bottom,
Speaker 1: the abyss, the dweller, as the archeemy of indra Iandri
Speaker 1: or Thor, and he was represented in the Veda mythically
Speaker 1: as the great serpent of the bottom or deep, the
Speaker 1: python or python of the Greeks. Similarly, in some later
Speaker 1: at LA's Woden or Bodo is also represented mythologically as
Speaker 1: the great Serpent. Moreover, Budh is still the name for
Speaker 1: him surviving in modern Indian weekday nomenclature, wherein Wednesday or
Speaker 1: Woden's day is called Boot and curiously, the Indian Lunar
Speaker 1: Brahmin's Lunar Moon cult, who adopted his moon and Serpent
Speaker 1: and hell cult despite the evidence of the Veda as
Speaker 1: to his demonst character. They don't give a fuck, also
Speaker 1: make him the father of the first Arian king. Right,
Speaker 1: so they're retarded because that would be in direct defiance
Speaker 1: to the Arian king, the complete opposite the repulsiveness of
Speaker 1: these people. We rejected them wholeheartedly, just as the later
Speaker 1: European Wodenists arbitrarily make Woden the father of Thor, presumably
Speaker 1: because Thor's reign dates from the downfall of Woden, whom
Speaker 1: he conquered. Indeed, the self same confusion occurs also in
Speaker 1: Egyptian myth, wherein the Semitic Free Oh Gee, I'll look
Speaker 1: you there, gee gee, the Semitic priests of Egypt of
Speaker 1: the Nile Valley degraded the original pure son worship of
Speaker 1: Asar or Asirius. Remember I told you the Cyrus and
Speaker 1: the whole thing wasn't the bad evil thing until these
Speaker 1: pieces of crap got a hold of it and started
Speaker 1: introducing all their sick discussing practices to it. And now
Speaker 1: we look back and all we see is the whole.
Speaker 1: We don't see where they corrupted it. They could do
Speaker 1: the same thing and have basically to Christianity, making it
Speaker 1: christian Zionism. You know. They all they, all they do
Speaker 1: is it's like pouring poisonous blood into a the container.
Speaker 1: The container is what is already the structure that's already
Speaker 1: been established in some cultures. So this is their religious beliefs,
Speaker 1: this is their government, this is their finances. They just
Speaker 1: pour themselves in. They don't try to change the outside appearance,
Speaker 1: just corrupt from within and alter its function and its
Speaker 1: attributes and its intent alia. So and so, the Semitic
Speaker 1: priests of the Nile degraded the original pure son worship
Speaker 1: of Asar or a Cyrus, the Samaran assary title of
Speaker 1: King Dur or Terror so Cyrus, sorry thor Okay, not
Speaker 1: a bad guy. So of course, in their and they're
Speaker 1: you know, renditions, they have to chop them up into
Speaker 1: fourteen pieces because they if they can't beat him in
Speaker 1: real life, they beat him in their in their mythology.
Speaker 1: If they can't beat people, they create a story that's
Speaker 1: repeated for a billion times throughout history, and they make
Speaker 1: every thing ugly just like them by deliberately introducing into
Speaker 1: the serpent and annual sacrificial cult of their own debased
Speaker 1: aboriginal Egyptian mother son Creed. This is the cult that
Speaker 1: serpent cult, mother son Balder and Elu or l They
Speaker 1: had a funky relationship, and so does Tamus, which was
Speaker 1: essentially similar to the pre Adamite Chaldean thus Votin Motan
Speaker 1: Bodo or bwata was or Bota sorry we shall find
Speaker 1: was called by the Semitic Egyptians Bhutan or patah Hata.
Speaker 1: Remember remember that uh that deity p t a h
Speaker 1: This is p a t a h But and it
Speaker 1: was their traditional human ancestor and represented as a naked
Speaker 1: dwarf with the tendant spirit serpents, and laterally identified by
Speaker 1: these neolotic priests with King Osiris or Atmu and invested
Speaker 1: with the solar attributes and achievements of the latter. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: this confusion is worse confounded by finding that although the
Speaker 1: name Odin is exclusively used for Thor in the central
Speaker 1: lay and most of the other lays, in certain later
Speaker 1: lays of the Codex Regis Regis and other manuscripts copies
Speaker 1: of the Edda, the name Odin is actually used for
Speaker 1: Woden because people are dumb as. However, all these existing
Speaker 1: copies date to the period of Snory and later. It
Speaker 1: seems probable that the older name of Bodo or Bota
Speaker 1: or Udnya for the Woden for Woden had been arbitrarily
Speaker 1: altered by the scribes into Odin right under the influence
Speaker 1: of Snorri's theory. But our new keys and the context
Speaker 1: of the Edda itself indicate clearly in all cases where
Speaker 1: this Odin name has been substituted for Woden. Another outstanding
Speaker 1: serious mister misinterpretation of the Eda theme by Snorri and
Speaker 1: his modern followers, mistaking more mere titles for the same
Speaker 1: personages or a personage for different individuals and resulting in
Speaker 1: hopeless confusion, is that, arising from Balder's title of Loki
Speaker 1: and the Wolf of Fenn or Vaughan, our new literal
Speaker 1: translation makes it certain that nowhere in the Edda is Balder,
Speaker 1: the so called Balder, the son of Wooden, ever once
Speaker 1: good or beautiful or even an Asa or Lord Asa
Speaker 1: means lord to the gods. A Gothic lord is an
Speaker 1: assa and R or you know when you have the
Speaker 1: R prefix that means they're aryan asa is a lord
Speaker 1: as usual, the usual title of Thor and his Gothic heroes.
Speaker 1: On the contrary, Balder is called the baleful, the harrier,
Speaker 1: the ruffian, and is everywhere throughout the edit represented as
Speaker 1: the villain of the narrative, the malicious son and champion
Speaker 1: of the malignant Woden, the inveterate antagonists of Thor, and
Speaker 1: as identical with the Wolf of Fenn and Loki. Remember
Speaker 1: the little mischievous asshole who likes to harm people, get
Speaker 1: people to kill her children. Yeah, that guy, Loki, the
Speaker 1: human historical original of Lucifer. That's who Bald is. Balder
Speaker 1: is also able by the way in the Bible, because
Speaker 1: remember all, they're all offended. The cult is offended when Caine,
Speaker 1: who doesn't who doesn't do animal sacrifice right, kills Abel,
Speaker 1: who's a bloodthirsty asshole and where and the way they
Speaker 1: spin the story and invert it, Caine's the bad guy
Speaker 1: as identical with both and locate the human historical original
Speaker 1: of Lucifer and of the truculent green man, as we
Speaker 1: shall see in the Arthur legend. Resuming now our reconstruction
Speaker 1: of the Eda, out of all this disordered tangle into
Speaker 1: which it has been thrown by Snorri and as Modern
Speaker 1: and his modern followers, as a consistent epic by means
Speaker 1: of our new historical keys. This reconstruction was especially facilitated
Speaker 1: by the arresting lyrical lay entitled Volospa or the spying
Speaker 1: or vision of the Volo or Sybil, the name Volo
Speaker 1: being supposed to be akin to the Greek Sibullah or
Speaker 1: Sibyl or priests a prophetus by erosion of the first syllable,
Speaker 1: and B and V being freely interchangeable dialectically. This long
Speaker 1: lay is admittedly the finest of all the Eda poems.
Speaker 1: It is appreciatively called by Professor Kerr the noblest work
Speaker 1: of the Northern imagination, except for the imagination part, as
Speaker 1: he naturally accepted the current erroneous notion that's the subject
Speaker 1: of the poem was mythological, as showing the traditional prime
Speaker 1: importance of this Sybil's vision lay. It was placed in
Speaker 1: the forefront of his collection by Samond, and similarly in
Speaker 1: the copy in the Codex Regis. Notwithstanding this traditional preminence
Speaker 1: pre eminence, all the leading modern authorities on the Eda,
Speaker 1: from Yigfussen and Powell down to the very latest writers,
Speaker 1: each mechanically following the other, imagine it to be outside
Speaker 1: the scheme of the Edda proper and have relegated it
Speaker 1: to the end of their translations as allegorical or mythical.
Speaker 1: The basic Edla, the Sybils vision has hitherto been supposed
Speaker 1: to be a kind of world drama, having for its
Speaker 1: subject the mythical life of the gods and men from
Speaker 1: the beginning of the world till the crack of doom Ragnarok.
Speaker 1: All nonsense, this last app epoch, which they thus mistranslate
Speaker 1: and meaning literally the rain or rule of reason, Ragnarok,
Speaker 1: this destruction, this complete end. Remember Gwar the band. They're
Speaker 1: all fucking wrong. It's the rain or rule of reason.
Speaker 1: That's what we want back. This is where everybody should
Speaker 1: be living at all times in reality, the rain or
Speaker 1: rule of reason. They identify with the introduction of Christianity. Oh,
Speaker 1: that's horrible. Into Iceland, in the belief that the Edda
Speaker 1: was originally composed by Icelanders. But they see this. That's
Speaker 1: interesting that they that they see this as their downfall
Speaker 1: is Christianity because they attack their histories. That's very interesting.
Speaker 1: And who are they in real life? Like I mean, seriously,
Speaker 1: what were the original first Christians and all the people
Speaker 1: that ran the church? Because not really talking about Christians,
Speaker 1: we're talking about Catholics. There are basically right a misled
Speaker 1: in this way by the Edic writers of the day. Carlyle,
Speaker 1: in his glorification of Woden and relegation of Thor to
Speaker 1: quite a subordinate position, wrote some wild prophecies we have
Speaker 1: in the voluspah or of the elder Eta. But they
Speaker 1: were comparatively an idle adjunct of the matter. But Carlyle
Speaker 1: here here, like his authorities, and like all Edic authorities
Speaker 1: ever since, took the husk Woden and threw away the Colonel.
Speaker 1: On the other hand, I early observed that this foremost
Speaker 1: of all the lays formed really the backbone and framework
Speaker 1: of the whole collection of the Eda poems, that it
Speaker 1: was in itself a fairly complete epic summary of the
Speaker 1: history historical achievements of King Thor, and contained nothing really
Speaker 1: mythical or supernatural, and that the rest of the detached
Speaker 1: ed of poems were merely expanded detailed descriptions of fleeting
Speaker 1: episodes or incidents that were briefly summarized in this central poem.
Speaker 1: Further study fully confirmed this observation. This lay gets its
Speaker 1: present title of the Sybil's Vision from its having been
Speaker 1: laterally sung or recited by an official or professional sibyl
Speaker 1: or Volo, a wise woman whom the early Icelandic sagas
Speaker 1: described as a lady of rank and education, and her
Speaker 1: personal appearance and dress are described in the appendix. She
Speaker 1: was held in high honor, and at the great autumn
Speaker 1: festivals of rejoicing, was seated on a high seat or throne,
Speaker 1: and sang her songs to the severaled nobles and populace.
Speaker 1: Her lay was called a vision, obviously because the Old
Speaker 1: Epic story is for the sake of vividness, composed in
Speaker 1: this particular lay in the present tense, with the words
Speaker 1: I see prefixed to most of the leading episodes and
Speaker 1: stanzas as if the singer were an eyewitness of the
Speaker 1: great events passing before her eyes, as in a vision
Speaker 1: of the past. This Bardic device of eyewitness and vision
Speaker 1: was also used by the Old Britain, Welsh Bard Talisen,
Speaker 1: the Anglo Saxon, Beowulf, and others in their historical songs,
Speaker 1: not to mention Langlan's vision of Piers the plowmen of
Speaker 1: the fourteenth century. This central Eda poem, discovered as the
Speaker 1: backbone and framework of the entire epic, is disclosed as
Speaker 1: the oldest form of the Eda epic and complete in itself,
Speaker 1: and in its refrain we seem to find, as seen later,
Speaker 1: the original form of the name Eta, which was laterally
Speaker 1: applied to the whole collection. Different manuscripts of Deslay or
Speaker 1: its fragments, of which there are several, show significant differences
Speaker 1: in the sequence of its stanzas from that in the
Speaker 1: Codex Regis, and in some versions the sequences are better
Speaker 1: connected together than in the latter, Thus presuming that the
Speaker 1: Codex Regis was copied from several detached fragments fragmentary manuscripts
Speaker 1: in which the stanzas were not stitched together in their
Speaker 1: original and proper sequence. But our Sumerian and Indian historical
Speaker 1: keys enable us to restore such dislocated stanzas. So here's
Speaker 1: another proof of the thing. Here is that he utilizes
Speaker 1: the inscriptions on the walls and the carvings of ancient civilizations,
Speaker 1: to what they're depicting, to how to put and arrange
Speaker 1: the ata. One proves the other. It's awesome, right, especially
Speaker 1: when you find out it wasn't a bunch of drugs
Speaker 1: and scumbags in all of history, in all of present time,
Speaker 1: but our Sumerian Indian, Yeah, that a original position of
Speaker 1: sequence and reconstructing the Eda Epic. Therefore, I have taken
Speaker 1: this central Eda the Sybil's vision as the framework of
Speaker 1: the Edda, and introduce in dovetail fashion the other scattered
Speaker 1: lays at the respective points where they or their associated
Speaker 1: scenes are referred to in this basic poem. The form
Speaker 1: of the epic as preserved in its central lay retains
Speaker 1: presumably something of the shape of the original epic as
Speaker 1: composed shortly after the great epoch of the rise of
Speaker 1: civilization about three thousand, three hundred and eighty BC, which
Speaker 1: it celebrates, if this to be. If this be so,
Speaker 1: its language has from time to time been modernized by
Speaker 1: generations of bards in handling and handing down the old
Speaker 1: story through the ages to adapt it to the changing
Speaker 1: to change is undergone in the evolution of the ancient speech.
Speaker 1: It has clearly descended in writing, as evidenced by its
Speaker 1: remarkable preservation of such a large number of the ancient
Speaker 1: personal names and titles and place names in agreement with
Speaker 1: those of the ancient Samerian records. The ancient Samerian records
Speaker 1: support this at a And so just think about that again,
Speaker 1: Like Sameria Perton, you know, they have the story because
Speaker 1: it's their people who traveled there with their history is
Speaker 1: intact telling the same story because it was so freaking important.
Speaker 1: They came across something wickedly evil and they wanted forever
Speaker 1: to remember and have it documented that this thing cohabits
Speaker 1: earth with them, and to be leary, weary, and you know,
Speaker 1: watching for it, always be watching for this cult so
Speaker 1: that it doesn't overtake you. That's what this whole thing
Speaker 1: is written for us to, uh, you know, venerate the
Speaker 1: heroes who did free mankind and established civilization in in
Speaker 1: defiance of this sick, wicked evil cult, which by the way,
Speaker 1: still has that that rem fans symbol on their flag
Speaker 1: these days. Yeah. Oh, let's see where did that live off?
Speaker 1: It was clearly descent descended in writing, as evidenced by
Speaker 1: its remarkable preservation. Okay, and and nowhere else except in
Speaker 1: the edit as now restored, do we find preserved, either
Speaker 1: in Europe or in the East, any such complete tradition
Speaker 1: of the early history of the world and of pre
Speaker 1: Adamite man. This is the story by the people who
Speaker 1: were there at the time telling you a piece of
Speaker 1: history that you never even knew existed, that you never
Speaker 1: even knew survived, and that isn't coded in you know, mythology,
Speaker 1: And it makes you wonder how many other things were mistranslated,
Speaker 1: like the Greek mythology, and that is kind of tied
Speaker 1: to this, by the way, as well as other things
Speaker 1: like how many things did they turn into goopy slop
Speaker 1: and into just ASoP type fables for us, so that
Speaker 1: we get nuggets of you know, I don't know, values
Speaker 1: or a conceptual truth from but not the true meaning
Speaker 1: behind it. They broke all of our stuff into interesting
Speaker 1: but meaningless junk, and then they pushed their freaking bullshit
Speaker 1: Bible down our throats. I have a big problem with
Speaker 1: the Abrahamic death cult religions. Yeah, is the reason for
Speaker 1: all human suffering, basically all three and nowhere else say
Speaker 1: I said that we find preservatives in europroduced any such
Speaker 1: complete tradition of the early history of the world of
Speaker 1: the preadamite man which will bear examination in the light
Speaker 1: of ascertained scientific facts. The poetry or verse of the
Speaker 1: Eda is epic or heroic. It is crouched in narrative
Speaker 1: form in which the dramatic element is introduced as impassioned horongs.
Speaker 1: I just like playing on that word, with occasional dialogues
Speaker 1: and sometimes culminating in tragedy. The breathless flow of its
Speaker 1: narrative and adventure holds the hearers and readers continuous interest,
Speaker 1: and is obviously intended to excite the patriotism. The gothic
Speaker 1: arian patriotism, our ancestral patriotism. Never mind are little countries
Speaker 1: or geographical location patriotism, Now the patriotism of being the
Speaker 1: good in the world, of being those who guide, help protect,
Speaker 1: and you know, I guess I already said guide people.
Speaker 1: Who's the real chosen if there is to be any gee,
Speaker 1: I guess maybe the ones that aren't trying to rape
Speaker 1: and kill everyone? How about that? How about the ones
Speaker 1: that try to you know, lift up, preserve, you know,
Speaker 1: preserve and leave better than what they've found? All the
Speaker 1: people that they encounter. Yeah, but they're going to guide them. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's the I think they've kind of earned that. They're
Speaker 1: going to teach them the way and expect them to
Speaker 1: live to a standard. God forbid. Uh excite the patriotism
Speaker 1: and heroic feelings of the audience in celebrating the rise
Speaker 1: and establishment of civilization achieved by their greatest ancestral heroes.
Speaker 1: In some respects, the verse and Times resembles that of
Speaker 1: the Ballad, though occurring many centuries before the supposed rise
Speaker 1: of Ballad Verse. The diction is always simple and homely,
Speaker 1: terse and vigorous, couched in the language of ordinary life
Speaker 1: so as to be understood by the people. The language
Speaker 1: is obviously that of British Gothic, as distinguished from Anglo Saxon,
Speaker 1: and of a period shortly before the eighth century when
Speaker 1: Iceland Iceland was first inhabited by parties of Irish Scots
Speaker 1: and hebrides refugees. It is seldom embroidered with ornamental phrases,
Speaker 1: yet occasionally it is gracefully lyrical, as for example, when
Speaker 1: describing Thor it sings mighty much eyed watcher, and of
Speaker 1: the ruled ruler kind newly born. Is he this? He's
Speaker 1: worshiping man, He is of the earth. The mighty Eye.
Speaker 1: Oh who is that? Not this evil eye that they
Speaker 1: talk about, this evil eye in the triangle. No, they
Speaker 1: bastardized that too. His son became the eye afterward, but
Speaker 1: when Thor was around, it was he. So Horace is
Speaker 1: another name, because if he's Cyrus, then Horace would be
Speaker 1: get to watch her. They're they're the protectors, the guardians,
Speaker 1: watching over you. Not surveillance. They're watching over the lands
Speaker 1: for intruders and bad doers. The eye was supposed to
Speaker 1: give you a sense of relief that there was someone
Speaker 1: there to protect you. If you're just the farmer with
Speaker 1: a family doing your thing. Now, you're not gonna have
Speaker 1: a bunch of marauders going there rapid and kill your
Speaker 1: children and you know, steal all your belongings and burn
Speaker 1: your fields. That was what we were supposed to prevent.
Speaker 1: So the eye was remind you that there's someone taking
Speaker 1: care of business. Don't worry. And they turned into surveillance
Speaker 1: eye surveillance state because this is what these evil folks do.
Speaker 1: Not a dow sweater, the swallow of the cool sea,
Speaker 1: the son of dreams. Like all ancient poetry or reverse,
Speaker 1: it differs sharply from the modern in its total absence
Speaker 1: of any rhyme or end. Jingles a valuable aid, emphasis
Speaker 1: and establishment to poetic expression, which however, only came into
Speaker 1: general use in Europe about six centuries ago. The Eedic
Speaker 1: verse depends for its rhythm and melody on its meter.
Speaker 1: And let's talk about with and as I'll finish this
Speaker 1: send this alliterative assonance or assonance sound, the latter feature
Speaker 1: in poetry being significantly called by Professor Kurr the Gothic verse,
Speaker 1: and regarded by him as the source of all alliterative
Speaker 1: early British and Anglo Saxon verse. Now let's go back
Speaker 1: to what he says here. The misleading term Anglo Saxon
Speaker 1: has been comparatively lately coined by English lexa lexicographers like
Speaker 1: Lexicon and historians who believed as that the Angle and
Speaker 1: Saxon invaders of the fifth and sixth centuries exterminated the Britons,
Speaker 1: and that all the words current in England and the
Speaker 1: South of Scotland from the sixth to eleventh century, when
Speaker 1: early English begins were Anglo Saxon but as a fact,
Speaker 1: the Britons and their language were no more or less
Speaker 1: exterminated by the Anglo Saxons than were the latter and
Speaker 1: their so called language on their conquest by the Normans.
Speaker 1: The great bulk of the words swept by later English
Speaker 1: lexicographers into their net as Anglo Saxon are really Britain
Speaker 1: or British Gothic. As the Scottish poet Charles Mackie truly says,
Speaker 1: the compound word Anglo Saxon is purely an invention of
Speaker 1: English writers at a comparatively late period, and is neither
Speaker 1: justified by history nor philology. It is thus blank verse
Speaker 1: fucking get off my head. It is thus blank. It
Speaker 1: is thus blank verse, with this difference that its verses
Speaker 1: are clearly separated and grouped together into stanzas, usually containing
Speaker 1: eight verses. Get the fuck off of me. It's a
Speaker 1: little tiny like it's a mosquito, little shit. Hold on,
Speaker 1: and I have to laugh it with hold On, I missed.
Speaker 1: Give me your little son of a bitch, got him? Yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, anyway, It is us blank verse with it
Speaker 1: with this difference that its verses are clearly separated and
Speaker 1: grouped together in just stanzas, usually contending eight verses, though
Speaker 1: sometimes only six or even less. The meter of the
Speaker 1: edda is highly specialized. It is seen at its best
Speaker 1: in the central a the symbols vision. Let's even get
Speaker 1: a little further down here we're looking at the meter. Now,
Speaker 1: we're getting ideas that let's get into more of what
Speaker 1: it is. Triameter, the alliteration of edic verse which Professor
Speaker 1: bas move on Old English, Old British. Here we noticed
Speaker 1: that the first line edic bard makes the second foot. Yeah.
Speaker 1: See they're talking about the structure again, more structure. We
Speaker 1: want to get the meat and poctators here, all right.
Speaker 1: Scene two discloses the sudden meteoric advent into the grievously stricken,
Speaker 1: riotous old world of the greatest of all reformers and
Speaker 1: culture heroes. He is the greatest of all reformers and
Speaker 1: culture heroes. Be proud of who you are and your ancestry. Everybody,
Speaker 1: please please, because you know what you have to be,
Speaker 1: because you have to reteach your children what the hell
Speaker 1: they're learning outside your doors. The tall, fair redbearded thor
Speaker 1: Or injury with his sturdy, industrious, law abiding men of
Speaker 1: Gothic breed a sun worshiper, he reflects the shining brilliance
Speaker 1: of that luminary and becomes himself a fixed star in
Speaker 1: the firmament of civilization, and was afterwards deified as Indra
Speaker 1: or Jupiter, as the humanized type of God Thor or
Speaker 1: ad or Adam see the first historical king in the
Speaker 1: ancient world, who, as I have demonstrated by a concrete
Speaker 1: historical proofs in my previous works, and as now fully
Speaker 1: established in the present pages, was the historical original of Adams,
Speaker 1: the son of God of the New Testament, well actually
Speaker 1: the old one, right New Testament, where however, as well
Speaker 1: as in Genesis, his true history as the reformer of
Speaker 1: Eden is spitefully mutilated, spitefully mutilated by whom. Who's telling
Speaker 1: you the story, The fucking cult that we defeated, That's
Speaker 1: who's telling you the story. This is what I keep saying.
Speaker 1: That's why I keep reiterating it, because it's very important.
Speaker 1: They're pushing us over the freaking edge right now, and
Speaker 1: we're following along trying to help them. Yeah, let me
Speaker 1: get that for you. Let me shorten the plank so
Speaker 1: I don't have to walk so far regenerates and transforms
Speaker 1: the riotous old world into a civilized, settled, law abiding, industrial,
Speaker 1: and habitable land. This is why anarchists don't realize that
Speaker 1: their own worst enemy they is the lack of a monarchy. Anarchy, right, well,
Speaker 1: that sounds all wonderful and great because things get corrupted,
Speaker 1: But then you're leaving everybody to themselves. And what happens.
Speaker 1: Those who have pushed for anarchy the most end up
Speaker 1: becoming despotic rulers. Not good. Not good. You need fair
Speaker 1: and just people to show you the way guiding is ruling,
Speaker 1: guiding is leading, right you don't. It's not about punishment
Speaker 1: and enforcement. It's about example and if everyone's doing what
Speaker 1: they should be doing, meaning not abusing the people, but
Speaker 1: maybe being like Gaddafi who nationalized the minerals he had
Speaker 1: in his own ground and said, that's not for a
Speaker 1: foreign corporation to come in here and take that's not
Speaker 1: for any corporation to come in here and lay claim
Speaker 1: to that is ours, in our territory, in our country.
Speaker 1: We will sell it ourselves. We will produce it and
Speaker 1: sell it ourselves, and the people, the community, the country
Speaker 1: will benefit from that. No electric bill, free college, free
Speaker 1: free housing, fifty percent of your car paid fourteen cent gas,
Speaker 1: no health care to pay for, no utilities. Can you
Speaker 1: believe it? Wow, when a leader cares about his people,
Speaker 1: wonderful things can happen when oi vays run your country.
Speaker 1: This is what happens. Isn't that enough reason to not
Speaker 1: want that anymore? We can be a little selfish here
Speaker 1: and say, financially, this just blows. Why are we wasting
Speaker 1: all of our time? Oh? Because they are the arbiters
Speaker 1: of time right, talk TikTok. Oh, by the way, they
Speaker 1: just create. They just acquired TikTok through Larry Ellison talk
Speaker 1: And what's TikTok's time? Time is Chronos is saturn as Satan,
Speaker 1: ticking away your time away away from your family, not
Speaker 1: being able to live in the moment because you're doing
Speaker 1: everything you can to plug every hole in the boat
Speaker 1: for your family, and then being hated for it by
Speaker 1: your family because of the cultural manipulation of their minds
Speaker 1: to not have any care or concern for the father.
Speaker 1: They did not appreciate them, but think of them as
Speaker 1: being aggressive or you know, insignificant, unnecessary. Yeah, see how
Speaker 1: well you fare without us into a civilized settled, law abiding,
Speaker 1: industrial and habitable land by his great uplifting crusade against
Speaker 1: these evil pricks, under his banner of the red cross
Speaker 1: of his son worship. That's where you're getting your By
Speaker 1: the way, if you look at the sun, you'll see
Speaker 1: the cross right there in the circle in the center,
Speaker 1: and just look at it, of his son worship and
Speaker 1: establishes civilization and thus affects the rise of man. That
Speaker 1: doesn't sound like a bad or negative thing, does it?
Speaker 1: The rise of man the historical atom is now disclosed
Speaker 1: to have been not the first created man here we go, ready,
Speaker 1: but the first man who made men of men. He
Speaker 1: is the protagonist of the eda epic. Is this not
Speaker 1: yet important to anybody? His noble, forceful and resourceful this
Speaker 1: is your Bible. If you're of European descent. Throw away
Speaker 1: that bullshit that from a different freaking culture, piss on it,
Speaker 1: light it on fire, or don't, but pay attention to
Speaker 1: know this. Know this because this is where your people
Speaker 1: come from. And you're being sold a bag of bullshit,
Speaker 1: magical grimoire dog shit from these fucking demons who, if
Speaker 1: they have any claim to goodness or something that's not despicable.
Speaker 1: They stole it from a story of our people and
Speaker 1: then repurposed it and changed them into Jews or Semitic.
Speaker 1: They don't have good examples in their in their in
Speaker 1: their numbers, they don't. They don't have them. There was
Speaker 1: no good Solomon, there was no good David. There was
Speaker 1: no good If any of them have good characteristics, and
Speaker 1: they don't, if any of them did, they stole them
Speaker 1: from a story of our people. His noble, forceful and
Speaker 1: resourceful and inspiring personality with his traditional personal appearance of
Speaker 1: the tall, fear Nordic racial type. This is why I can.
Speaker 1: I can also say this to Larkin Rose, because he's
Speaker 1: gonna say, shrug all that off. That's statism, that's valulence
Speaker 1: out of the sh I'll say it again. His noble,
Speaker 1: forceful and resourceful and aspiring personality with his traditional personal
Speaker 1: appearance of the tall, fair Nordic racial type, majestic with
Speaker 1: a happy combination of brawn and brain, are vividly described
Speaker 1: in keeping with the more or less contemporary Sumerian and
Speaker 1: Hittite sculptures. Right, those are sculptures of our people, not
Speaker 1: of Semitic assholes or fucking Anonachi. It's not aliens, it's aryans.
Speaker 1: Get it, engraved seals and historical records. His building of
Speaker 1: the first town, establishment of agriculture, metal forges and other industries,
Speaker 1: and town life. He created something you know to run
Speaker 1: away from. Isn't that something you can walk around freely
Speaker 1: without worried about being slaughtered by this cult? His creation
Speaker 1: of free institutions and of the first Parliament, His message
Speaker 1: of literally love, Wow, where did that come from? Again? Christianity?
Speaker 1: Fuck no? And the brotherhood of Man Bob that sounds
Speaker 1: familiar to and abhorrence of the serpent and its mother.
Speaker 1: Weird cult and blood sacrifices are graphically and dramatically narrated.
Speaker 1: This is the real good versus evil story. And guess
Speaker 1: where you falled. If you are anything but one of
Speaker 1: these serpent cult pieces of shit, you're on the good side. Congratulations.
Speaker 1: Act accordingly. You have a responsibility in the duty. That's
Speaker 1: what we're here for. The place of his first appearance.
Speaker 1: In the place of his first appearance is located at
Speaker 1: Troy in the troad, I think, is how you pronounce
Speaker 1: that district of Mount Ida bordering the Dardanell's. Here's a
Speaker 1: funny thing, what's Dardanelle mean well, what does Dar mean?
Speaker 1: Tour tour thor Dardanelles in northwestern Asia Minor, and a
Speaker 1: tradition in a later scene refers to his having come
Speaker 1: from the Danube Valley in Middle Europe and memorial home
Speaker 1: of the Goths the Danube Valley. It could have been
Speaker 1: the Dan tribe by extension, yeah, Goths arians uh a
Speaker 1: memorial home of the Goths this point of his advent
Speaker 1: and establishment of the first or it's just one of
Speaker 1: those places that is incorrectly named. And either way, this
Speaker 1: point of his advent and establishment of the first civilized
Speaker 1: state of at Troy. This point of his advent and
Speaker 1: establishment of the first civilized state at Troy discloses him
Speaker 1: as the historical original of the first traditional king of
Speaker 1: the Greek Dardanos. Dardanos, after whom the Dardanelles are named
Speaker 1: Thor or King Dar of the Sumerian records, bears in
Speaker 1: the Eda as well as in the Sumerian the title
Speaker 1: of Dan. Well, look at that Dan, Hey, that's me.
Speaker 1: Though Homer's tradition has placed him about two millenniums later
Speaker 1: than his real date. He has also identified through his
Speaker 1: Edic title of burr meof or permit of Sumerian and
Speaker 1: identical achievements with his historical original of the far famed Prometheus. Right. Remember,
Speaker 1: Prometheus has turned into the bad guy because the Jews
Speaker 1: got into the Greece. This, uh, well, they were the Jews.
Speaker 1: They were the Serpent cult. Right. This, This is where Saturn,
Speaker 1: the Saturn Moon, they all they all have the same meaning. Right,
Speaker 1: whether you call it the Saturn cult where they called
Speaker 1: the serpent wolf cult, whether you call it the moon cult.
Speaker 1: If you go back far enough, this is all the
Speaker 1: same people. Okay, the serpent wolf cult, serpent dragon was
Speaker 1: one thing. The wolf were there minions, So the serpent
Speaker 1: wolf two different totems, two different animal totems for their
Speaker 1: cult stretched pretty far. They were the moonies. They were
Speaker 1: moon which is the negative aspects that the dark magic,
Speaker 1: the murder of people for sacrifice, blood sacrifice, YadA, YadA.
Speaker 1: That's what Abel was about. That's what Balder is. Balder
Speaker 1: is the able in the Bible that they're referring to.
Speaker 1: Balder is the son of l Or. Elu is her
Speaker 1: other name, which means evil gods or god, and Limnu
Speaker 1: is the last part of it. Limnu Illuminati. You get
Speaker 1: on the center Illuminati. It's not about it's not about light.
Speaker 1: It's about the evil gods of Babylon. Okay, where worry Prometheus. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they split up. They split up Zeus. Zeus had great attributes.
Speaker 1: He was good dude, because Zeus was actually named or
Speaker 1: founded off of the the memory of or Remember they
Speaker 1: also have flighting. Both they both have flightning in their
Speaker 1: stories in thunder right, so it's how you kind of
Speaker 1: put it together. But they split him into two characters,
Speaker 1: made one Prometheus, and then they punished Prometheus to have
Speaker 1: his freaking liver picked out for all of eternity because
Speaker 1: and then Zeus takes on darker characteristics after that in
Speaker 1: as as chronology goes on, because this wicked cult is
Speaker 1: now permeated into the Greek culture because they let these
Speaker 1: OVAs in and they taught them how to read and write,
Speaker 1: and all of a sudden, grab and shit went to hell.
Speaker 1: And what they do They infiltrated, they they will we
Speaker 1: go their way into things and poisoned their mythology too,
Speaker 1: because that's what that's what they were. That's how you
Speaker 1: manipulate the minds of the people of the time. Of
Speaker 1: that culture, of that society. And if you're placing darker
Speaker 1: in easy, easy to tempt or manage or manipulate, traits
Speaker 1: or virtues are not the right word. But it's like
Speaker 1: the anti virtue in people, the aspirations is that the
Speaker 1: better word in people, Then you can manipulate them when
Speaker 1: you promise them those things. The far famed Prometheus of
Speaker 1: the Greek legend, who first brought fire to the domestic
Speaker 1: earth hearth of primitive men and gave them the blessings
Speaker 1: of knowledge and civilization. And so we evoked the anger
Speaker 1: of the jealous old gods. The jealous old gods were
Speaker 1: the Serpent Cult and their demons. Prometheus went against the cult,
Speaker 1: and therefore they say, against their demons who wanted full
Speaker 1: total control over a pressing man. And we were showing
Speaker 1: man how to take care of themselves and liberate themselves
Speaker 1: from dependency of this cult. And that's why they hate us.
Speaker 1: Since then, that's the reason right here, and that's why
Speaker 1: they hate farming, because we taught the magriculture another thing
Speaker 1: that makes people independent. They don't. And if you want
Speaker 1: to get into the extension of this, when we talk
Speaker 1: about what the tower Babbel may very well have also been,
Speaker 1: which was a storing facility for grain. That was against
Speaker 1: their gods too, because they wanted to be able to
Speaker 1: starve people at will. They like to starve people, don't they.
Speaker 1: So if you have a leader who's stocking up for
Speaker 1: such a horrific poisoning of your fields by the sick
Speaker 1: wicked cult and having something preserved for the people to
Speaker 1: survive off of, that makes you against their gods or
Speaker 1: their demons the jealous of gods, and he too, with
Speaker 1: his wife Asia, was located by the Greek tradition of
Speaker 1: in Asian minor. This etic account of the coming of
Speaker 1: King Thor Daar or ad or Adam and his establishment
Speaker 1: of civilization is profusely illustrated in these pages by early
Speaker 1: Sumerian and Hittite sculptures and engraved seals, and is further
Speaker 1: confirmed by the ancient Sumerian, Egyptian, Greek, and Indian traditional
Speaker 1: records detailed in the appendix. And it is of especial
Speaker 1: Gothic significance that the Sumerian in Hittite portraits of the
Speaker 1: first King and his men and women folk represent them
Speaker 1: usually in Gothic dress and wearing the horned hat of
Speaker 1: the Goths, early Britons, Anglo Saxons, and Norsemen of the
Speaker 1: Viking period, which is way later after the Vikings. The
Speaker 1: Vikings basically signify the period of their corruption by this sick,
Speaker 1: wicked cult who taught the black magic and human sacrifice,
Speaker 1: you know, sacrificing for for fertility yielding and stuff like
Speaker 1: that of the agriculture, and raiding people and all that nonsense.
Speaker 1: The Vikings and these people are people. In the beginning,
Speaker 1: I have nothing to do with each other, really, except
Speaker 1: for blood relation. The succeeding scenes in the chronological sequence
Speaker 1: disclosed Thoor civilizing the Aboriginal tribes not only of the Troad,
Speaker 1: but many also from Middle and Eastern Asia, minor as
Speaker 1: far as Lake Van in Armenia, and even from Eden itself,
Speaker 1: who had flocked to his sun Cross standard. When they
Speaker 1: saw how life could be, they wanted some of that.
Speaker 1: He appointed them headmen or chiefs of their own ranks.
Speaker 1: He didn't suppress or oppress the people that lived there.
Speaker 1: He incorporated them into his kingdom, and he enfranchises and
Speaker 1: admits those tribal chiefs into his Gothic parliament and commonwealth.
Speaker 1: He even sanctions, the intermarriage of a regenerate chief with
Speaker 1: a like somebody who is you know, rehabilitated with a
Speaker 1: Gothic maid. He establishes weaving workshops at Troy. He has
Speaker 1: an adventure, so he teaches people how to do things
Speaker 1: like make their clothes, because this cult wore skins of
Speaker 1: animals that they've likely probably sacrificed, and they would wear
Speaker 1: the skins. Our Gothic againststers didn't wear animal skins, they
Speaker 1: wore woven thread. He has an adventure on a fishing
Speaker 1: excursion in the troyad with his adversary Wolden and the
Speaker 1: Edenite of the serpent Wolf chief, the Edonite and serpent
Speaker 1: Wolf chief, who with his hordes raids Troy and its factories.
Speaker 1: The repeated raids on Troy by Woden and his men
Speaker 1: forced Thor to conquer and annex Phrygia, or the Land
Speaker 1: of Lions. Right tells you about the lion faced people
Speaker 1: on the east to the borders of cap Podosha, which
Speaker 1: is where their main state was, which were Himen was
Speaker 1: for the Goths which means Heaven and Hittite. In this
Speaker 1: expedition and supported by his aboriginal allies, he encounters Amazonian
Speaker 1: warriorses from Eden, who wore skin coats and Edenite fashion
Speaker 1: that has again come into vogue since the war, as
Speaker 1: distinguished from the cloth tailor made garments of the Goths.
Speaker 1: What I just say, And under his title of medi
Speaker 1: the Asa, bearing his son cross Wooden standard some cross
Speaker 1: Wooden centard, he vanquishes Wolden in a notable scene described
Speaker 1: in Woden's lament at his defeat by the Nine Woods
Speaker 1: of Medae the ass, which thus explains for the first
Speaker 1: time the nine Saint George's crosses on the prehistoric rock
Speaker 1: carving on the Mida monument in the heart of Phrygia,
Speaker 1: and it also explains the contemporary portrait of King Thor
Speaker 1: with his five horned headdress, taming, civilizing the Phrygian lions
Speaker 1: or totems, the Frygian totems or anything they show like
Speaker 1: that picture and they say, you see that, Oh, that's Gilgamesh.
Speaker 1: She must have been a really tall guy, because he's
Speaker 1: got a lion in a headlock, Phrygian lions, totems, symbolism
Speaker 1: motherfuckers on the archaic ivory carving. The next scenes disclosed
Speaker 1: Thor's conquest of Cappadocia east of Frygia up to the
Speaker 1: Euphrates and down through the Taurus to the seaboard of Silesia.
Speaker 1: Necessily his establishing his new chief capital at Vidhara Oraria
Speaker 1: at Boguskoi in the heart of Cappadocia as George of
Speaker 1: the Red Cross, the historical original of Saint George of
Speaker 1: Cappadocia and England. His building and fortifying his capital there,
Speaker 1: which he calls him in or Heaven, his judgment hall
Speaker 1: hit like a courthouse, his rowan apple tree of life,
Speaker 1: Igsdrasil as the symbol of the sun. His establishing of baptism.
Speaker 1: Who'd that come from? Yeah, us as the initiating right
Speaker 1: into the sun colts. They're having concluded a treaty with
Speaker 1: the Edenites, whose central mother weirds serpent shrine and garden
Speaker 1: on the Euphrates was now only a few days journey
Speaker 1: to the south of his borders. He is visited in
Speaker 1: his mountain capital by a party of weird vessels from
Speaker 1: Eden including Eve, to spy out his capital. You know
Speaker 1: how like oyves do. Yeah, let's go to a peace talk.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, we bombed you. Kind of like that, except
Speaker 1: they're doing the espionage thing first, and most of the
Speaker 1: episodes in these scenes, also from three onwards, are confirmed
Speaker 1: by the Sumerian and Hittite sculptures and seals, and Phrygian
Speaker 1: Andcappadocian monuments. Frygin's weren't all bad, but they were under
Speaker 1: the spell. If you will of these uh or the
Speaker 1: fear to it to to be loyal to these, this
Speaker 1: cult until until they got liberated, if you will, the
Speaker 1: courtship and marriage of Thor or air Thorp Arthur with
Speaker 1: Eve or gun Ifa or Guinevere. See how this solidates
Speaker 1: the eden vestal of the Serpent cult. She was a
Speaker 1: vestal of the Serpent cult after her conversion by Thor
Speaker 1: to his son cult is dramatically to so did who
Speaker 1: did Eve actually betray? Was it the fall of Adam? No?
Speaker 1: No it wasn't. But see how they mixed the story
Speaker 1: around on the female is the is the downfall of them,
Speaker 1: of the serpent cults, the one telling the fucking story.
Speaker 1: They're telling you about how they got kicked out of
Speaker 1: their their little pleasure factory of humans torture, but they're
Speaker 1: not telling you about that part because that's meaningless to them.
Speaker 1: Because they're like they're look look at who they are. Now,
Speaker 1: do you think they ever have any reflection on what
Speaker 1: they actually do to people? They don't care. But if
Speaker 1: God forbid you offend them, well, then is this woman
Speaker 1: who did it? Because she turned her back on these
Speaker 1: sick fox and went to the good side, the light
Speaker 1: side of the force. After her conversion by Thor to
Speaker 1: his son, Call is dramatically described at the next scene,
Speaker 1: and significantly, the EDA account is in full agreement down
Speaker 1: to the most minute detail with the great prehistoric boss
Speaker 1: relief rock sculptures of that ceremony in your Pataria Orteria
Speaker 1: or bogus Koi, which the excuse which the EDA now
Speaker 1: interprets for the first time, and also in agreement with
Speaker 1: the Samerian, Greek, and Indian records all three records of
Speaker 1: that ceremony. Then follow scenes with Eve at home in
Speaker 1: Thor's mountain capital of Heaven as queen consorts of the
Speaker 1: Goths and as custodian of the life giving Rowan apples
Speaker 1: of the Sacred Tree, the birth and boyhood of Thor
Speaker 1: Adam and Eve's son Thor Adam and Eve Adam and
Speaker 1: Eve's son the Crown Prince gun Or Cohn Cain or Gowin,
Speaker 1: Sir Gowin. In the story Kin, remember he's the bad
Speaker 1: guy and their shitty book that we've been reading. I don't,
Speaker 1: but people have been. The young prince Kin being treacherously
Speaker 1: wounded by the elderly balder Or Epley Abel abel Caine.
Speaker 1: Abel Abel strikes first the son of Woden and the
Speaker 1: eden Kite matriarch. That's Able. That's balder Cane's succor Succor
Speaker 1: by some Alrids are just fun by his mother Eve,
Speaker 1: who warns him against the treachery of the eden Kites
Speaker 1: and imparts to him. On his initiation as a young
Speaker 1: Solar red Cross knight, the ten Commandments different ones, not
Speaker 1: those ones of his father Adam Thor. Now all ten
Speaker 1: commandments are basically about watching out for these pieces of
Speaker 1: shit and being noble and good to people, right, Okay,
Speaker 1: living more involved, innocuole. What else we got here? There's
Speaker 1: another portion here? Right, So this is kind of like
Speaker 1: an old version, an early version of why would you
Speaker 1: make like you know, when you're being attacked all the
Speaker 1: time and you're the countries around Israel and then Israel
Speaker 1: and the world because it's their media points at these
Speaker 1: are their cultures, and say, look at them. They're teaching
Speaker 1: their children to use AK forty seven when they're eight
Speaker 1: years old. These are demon evil, war like people who
Speaker 1: are just born terrorists. No, asshole, they're born into your terrorism,
Speaker 1: and they're teaching their children how to survive in the
Speaker 1: environment that you've created for the world. That's what you did.
Speaker 1: So when she's teaching her son, who's already been wounded
Speaker 1: once by this piece of crap, who is after a
Speaker 1: child way younger than him, Balder is about you know,
Speaker 1: he's he's he's a little bit elderly these days, and
Speaker 1: so does Wooden gets killed later though, I mean prior
Speaker 1: to Walder's doing this, do you know what I'm saying? Though,
Speaker 1: So she teaches them how to be a word. Other
Speaker 1: scenes follow with an attack on thors Berg by Balder
Speaker 1: or Abel and his men from Vaughn the Von district
Speaker 1: of Eden, which, by the way, it means hell. It's
Speaker 1: referred to as hell and they're so heaven and hell.
Speaker 1: This is how they completely fictionalized this story and turned
Speaker 1: it into superstitious nonsense about worldly things that don't exist
Speaker 1: up in the air and down below and blah blah lah,
Speaker 1: it's all it's all terrestrial. I know a lot of
Speaker 1: people need that, they need that otherworldly thing. Otherwise it's
Speaker 1: no fun. They'll go look for the stupid nonsense. But
Speaker 1: I say, this is how you set yourself free from
Speaker 1: the superstitious bullshit that they've been trying to hold you
Speaker 1: down with all your life. And they're so by Bald
Speaker 1: and his men from the Van District of Eden and
Speaker 1: their repulse and having to pay an indemnity. Hah yeah,
Speaker 1: take that. Ever, since they beat Wooden and set them back,
Speaker 1: they made them pay if tithing to their good King
Speaker 1: Thor's defense of his cappidotion frontier on the Euphrates up
Speaker 1: to the Garden of Eden. The almost fatal wounding of
Speaker 1: adam Thor by the murderous stone missile of Bardler, an
Speaker 1: incident seized on by the later Mother Cult Greek bards
Speaker 1: and magnified into the binding and wounding of Prometheus. See
Speaker 1: what they did there, So they're they're, they're, they're a
Speaker 1: little tiny victory of wounding him, they turned into an
Speaker 1: eternal damnation, uh torture for adam Thor when they reimagined
Speaker 1: him as Prometheus getting his liver picked out Prometheus for
Speaker 1: rejecting the old gods. Yeah, the old gods being their
Speaker 1: demons that they summons, they literally do. Thors Socor and
Speaker 1: extraction of the missile by his son Canes Kane pulls
Speaker 1: the freaking thing out of it, his being capsized in
Speaker 1: this ship off this sleicy coast by Balder or Sultz
Speaker 1: seth Abel and punishment of Ladder. So either way you
Speaker 1: look at it, it's either you know seth seth Abel
Speaker 1: sat God bad not good. It's their hero. They've taught
Speaker 1: you that it's your hero. And punishment of Ladder as
Speaker 1: the source of the Babylonian legend of adam U, the
Speaker 1: son of God capsized by Sutu and his revenge on
Speaker 1: a piece being again patched up. You can't have peace
Speaker 1: with these people. They lie. Adam Thorer visits the old
Speaker 1: matriarch weird l at Eden, who recites to him and
Speaker 1: his an ancestry from the Western heirs or ariyans h
Speaker 1: R s remember hr or Ar means arian of the
Speaker 1: idol or Ethel and Dan clans. So yes, he was
Speaker 1: a clan dan Man of Europe. Also Eve's ancestry from
Speaker 1: the same Gothic clan stock and taunts him with wishing
Speaker 1: to capture her central fetish magic bowl, stone, cauldron or
Speaker 1: holy grail. During this piece, Balder or Loki meaning that's
Speaker 1: Louis Cipher of the Serpent Dragon coll visits King Thorpe's
Speaker 1: banqueting hall at Vedhara Petra Peteria or Heaven Thor's banquet
Speaker 1: hall is Himen or Heaven and riotously coraling there with
Speaker 1: his Gothic hosts and foully insulting Queen Eve. He is
Speaker 1: cast out of Heaven kimmen the banquet hall strah, not
Speaker 1: fantastical bullshit, superstition, nonsense, terrestrial things that happened real life people.
Speaker 1: The demon is cast from the freaking banquet hall. The
Speaker 1: demon is cast from heaven. The devil's cast from heaven. Okay,
Speaker 1: all right, sure thing? Who does this serve? Though it
Speaker 1: serves these idiots who are keeping you locked down in
Speaker 1: their beliefs. He is cast out of that heaven by
Speaker 1: gun or Cain or Meoch Michael, disclosing the real traditional
Speaker 1: historical source of the casting out from Heaven of the
Speaker 1: Great Dragon Lucifer or apollyon able by Saint Michael. The
Speaker 1: archangel of the later New Testament legend, and also the
Speaker 1: earlier and truer version of the expulsion of the Green
Speaker 1: Man from King Arthur's banqueting Hall by the young Knight
Speaker 1: Sir Gawain in the Arthurian legend. Subsequent scenes disclose the
Speaker 1: binding of Balder Loki by Mioch Michael Orkin Michael Caine,
Speaker 1: owing to his continued destructive raids on the Gothic territory. Right,
Speaker 1: he wouldn't stop attacking them. So Balder's escape from his
Speaker 1: fetters his kidnapping in Revenge of Eve, whom he carries
Speaker 1: off to Eden. So what is this story? This is
Speaker 1: the raping of Europa, whom he carries off to Eden
Speaker 1: into Hell basically King Thor's fury, because that's where he lives.
Speaker 1: King Thor's fury at this dastardly outrage and rape. There
Speaker 1: it is, in plain English rape Bibalder, his hurried crusade
Speaker 1: against Eden. Why did they make Zeus the guy who
Speaker 1: rapes his own wife? Because they're scumbags, That's why. And
Speaker 1: it's always someone else's fault. His hurried crusade against Eden.
Speaker 1: Besides that gives a god their characteristics makes him dirty.
Speaker 1: And repulsive. But they just quickly did a quick switch
Speaker 1: rough with you know, here is a benevolent creator. Well,
Speaker 1: they can't live up to that. So they give the
Speaker 1: Benevolent Trader their attributes and they and they killed or
Speaker 1: make disappear from that dark, ugly thing that they've just
Speaker 1: replaced it with the real god, benevolent Trader. Right now
Speaker 1: it has their attributes. Now it's not God at all,
Speaker 1: it's an imposter. King Thorpe's fury at this dash of
Speaker 1: the outrage and rape Biballder his hurried crusade against Eden
Speaker 1: frequently called in the Eda Hell they call Eden Hell
Speaker 1: Heaven Himen fight between Heaven and Hell, Apollon cast out
Speaker 1: or Lucifer cast out of him in or Heaven Ta
Speaker 1: Da Da his entry there bearing along with his invincible
Speaker 1: stone mace, big gass hammer, or whatever the hell it
Speaker 1: really was. I think there's something more to it than that,
Speaker 1: some sort of a relic of a sort of technological persuasion.
Speaker 1: The Sacred Epiphytic Rowan Tree, the Sacred Epiphytic Rowan Tree
Speaker 1: branch of his son cult now disclosed as the real
Speaker 1: origin of the Golden Bow legend of Virgil and not
Speaker 1: the mistletoe, and also as the source of the old
Speaker 1: British and Scottish adage rowan tree and red threed guard.
Speaker 1: The witches take heat their speed. Now when you end
Speaker 1: up reading this whole thing, whatever their poison is that
Speaker 1: they were using, that contained Adder's blood, that purple that
Speaker 1: amine talks about, the burning purple, it can be used
Speaker 1: as a drug other things that the concoctut or that
Speaker 1: very thing is a poison that can't kill you. This
Speaker 1: rowan tree somehow is an antrocdote for it. So that's
Speaker 1: why he's probably taking that branch with him. Thors rescue
Speaker 1: Avive with the aid of Cain from the clutches of
Speaker 1: the Edenite balder here called in the ed Epley I
Speaker 1: e Abel Thor's physical punishment of the latter and his
Speaker 1: seizure and carrying off of the central fetish stone magic
Speaker 1: bull or witch's cauldre, the veden. He takes this thing,
Speaker 1: he breaks it, and that's supposed to like break the
Speaker 1: spell of the people. Is starting to have that movie
Speaker 1: Weapons kind of sense to it now, because that was
Speaker 1: bably in Black Magic that they were showing in that
Speaker 1: movie from these same people, which he then consecrates to
Speaker 1: his son cult as the holy grail of King Arthur,
Speaker 1: new intent for the thing which still exists with the
Speaker 1: Sumerian inscription of his great grandson and the wounding of
Speaker 1: gun Or Caine during their victorious retreat by the stone
Speaker 1: missile of the pursuing Balder. Form of other scenes, the
Speaker 1: Great Battle of Eden, the most momentous and epoch making
Speaker 1: battle of the Old World. Forms the next scene, Battle
Speaker 1: of Eden. Fearious at the loss of their central fetish bowl.
Speaker 1: Balder and his mother weird L who is the matriarch,
Speaker 1: Queen whatever you want to call her, She's the leader
Speaker 1: of this discussing murder cult muster all their Edenite swarms
Speaker 1: of hordes by river, sea and land for a great
Speaker 1: battle against Thor. All the Hydra's heads are coming after Thor, who,
Speaker 1: on hearing of it, musters along with Caine, all their
Speaker 1: force of well disciplined who on hearing of it, musters
Speaker 1: along with Caine, all their force of well disciplined Gothic Yeomen,
Speaker 1: cultivators and their allies for the fray. Eden was, according
Speaker 1: to the Eda, defended by skin clad and wolf tailed
Speaker 1: men armed with flaming switches, cherubims with flaming swords. Seems
Speaker 1: to me like there might be something technological about that too.
Speaker 1: The battle, which proved catastrophic for the Edenites, is described
Speaker 1: in lurid colors in the Edda, as in the Samerian
Speaker 1: and Babylonian records. In the battle, Miak or Michael or
Speaker 1: Cain right, the son of Thor, slays balder aka Abel,
Speaker 1: the Dragon cult chief, in single combat, and avenges his
Speaker 1: father for the rape of his mother Eve. Thus the
Speaker 1: Edda recovers at last the true history of the event,
Speaker 1: which has been so falsely misrepresented by the later kald
Speaker 1: Semitic scumbag demon literature, and reveals the historical source of
Speaker 1: the New Testament legend of Saint Michael's slaying Apollion the
Speaker 1: Dragon the Egyptian Horus, which is Caine Michael of the
Speaker 1: Sun Cult slaying Set and Sir Godwin slaying the Green Man.
Speaker 1: It discloses the Sumerian origin of the title Tubul for
Speaker 1: Caine as the slayer of Ball, Tubal Caine Slayer of Ball,
Speaker 1: and confirms his identity with Cain through the Hebrew tradition
Speaker 1: of his being the instructor of every artificer in brass
Speaker 1: or bronze and iron, and his traditional inventorship of the plow.
Speaker 1: That's all from Cain. It also discloses the real historical
Speaker 1: sources of the lamentations of the Cality, which modern writers
Speaker 1: mistakenly called the killing of the God. Notwithstanding the villainy
Speaker 1: of balder Thor and his son and nobles sinking all animosities,
Speaker 1: gave his body a decent funeral, worthily without vengeance, as
Speaker 1: if their own brother. This is written in the Eda.
Speaker 1: We were not scumbags. We don't lower ourselves to scumbaggery.
Speaker 1: Even when someone kidnaps and rapes our fucking wife, we
Speaker 1: still gave him a proper burial. Then follows the lament
Speaker 1: of the Caldes for the death that we killed him.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, but we gave him a properly bet don't know.
Speaker 1: Then follows the lament of the Caldes for the death
Speaker 1: of Abel, whilst other Caldies rejoice, saying thanks only only
Speaker 1: my own man is what that means. I agree, dry tears.
Speaker 1: Only let hell hold what it has. The next scene,
Speaker 1: so some were happy, some were not. Some were vengeance full,
Speaker 1: hateful of us, basically freeing them from this discussing group
Speaker 1: of freaks. The next scene is the pursuit and capture
Speaker 1: of l the Old Serpent Dragon Matriarch, who actually becomes
Speaker 1: Tiamot in Babylon and Medea to the Greeks colleague to India,
Speaker 1: the Old Serpent Dragon Matarch, who had meaningwhile escaped on
Speaker 1: the River Euphrates by boat, she was captured and slain
Speaker 1: by Thor or Gore or George, and in this scene
Speaker 1: she is represented allegorically as the Serpent Dragon itself, of
Speaker 1: which she was the archpriestess, and she and her conqueror
Speaker 1: are similarly represented in full agreement with all the details
Speaker 1: of the Egyptian version of the scene engraved on the
Speaker 1: alabaster sarcophagus of Seti, the first the father of Ramses
Speaker 1: the second in the same museum in London, and figured
Speaker 1: in the text and also as Let's see, and also
Speaker 1: as with the other scenes, in agreement with the Samerian
Speaker 1: and Babylonian and Hittite versions three different territories in sculptured
Speaker 1: seals and records, and in the Indian literary versions. For
Speaker 1: this recovers for us the historical originals of the scene
Speaker 1: and the personalities of the actors in Saint George slaying
Speaker 1: the dragon figured on the royal insignia of the of
Speaker 1: England and on British coins, and in Mid Europe, Syria
Speaker 1: and Asia Minor. The next scene is the enthronement of Air,
Speaker 1: which means Aryan Thor or Arthur or Adam on the
Speaker 1: Hill of Eden, which is in ark Sheemish or Arthur's
Speaker 1: c to signalize his victory over Eden with the speech
Speaker 1: he made on that occasion. This at of record is
Speaker 1: in agreement not only with the Sumerian versions but also
Speaker 1: with the ancient Hittite sculpture actually found on the Hill
Speaker 1: of Eden at Karshmish, which represents King dar Doman know
Speaker 1: where Eden is, It's in Turkey, well Krce Shemish is
Speaker 1: kind of like split up now, but it what we
Speaker 1: used to be known as that is. Yeah, So there
Speaker 1: you go, Tuckers and your phrad's a bit bolm. I
Speaker 1: don't know why you'd want to know what it is,
Speaker 1: but which represents King dar tur or Thor and throne
Speaker 1: there as represented in the photograph. In the text and
Speaker 1: the Anglo Saxon Bard Cadman still retained the genuine old
Speaker 1: tradition that Adam was enthroned in Eden on the firm
Speaker 1: set throne formerly occupied there by Lucifer or Satan, because
Speaker 1: that was balder. He's not the king of the world.
Speaker 1: He's not the king of this world. Everybody we re
Speaker 1: lie to this is the greatest Michael like Keino mind
Speaker 1: or they've been able to pull off, is telling us
Speaker 1: in their book that guy that Satan, their guy is
Speaker 1: the king of this world. Who do you think is
Speaker 1: really right in this? Even though they try to frame
Speaker 1: it in a way where you know, there's this guy
Speaker 1: who tries to rehability and tell people, know this this
Speaker 1: Jesu's character, right, what happens to him? Do you make it?
Speaker 1: How's he do doing? All? Right? No, that's so good. Okay,
Speaker 1: we're supposed to expect that though, because it's this is
Speaker 1: guy's this is the devil's domain, right is that? And
Speaker 1: if we think that way, what do we do we
Speaker 1: accept a predictable, predictive programming wise, what evils befall us
Speaker 1: in this world? Not that there's something wrong, not that
Speaker 1: that maybe this isn't the way life was supposed to be.
Speaker 1: Maybe not that this was from our benevolent creator or
Speaker 1: this fate for us that we just don't even try
Speaker 1: to stop it, because this is just the way it
Speaker 1: is until man learns something. It's not about man learning shit.
Speaker 1: It's about getting rid of this fucking cult. We're good,
Speaker 1: we got this. We're not crazy people, but we might
Speaker 1: have to get our hands a little dirty, little red
Speaker 1: if we want to ever live in peace again and prosper.
Speaker 1: The reformation and regeneration of Eden by Adam Thor and
Speaker 1: the conversion of that serpent cults abode into a utopian
Speaker 1: city of God forms the next scene. The regenerate Edenites
Speaker 1: were freely admitted on equal terms into the Riyan fellowship
Speaker 1: and commonwealth of that transformed city state. And it was
Speaker 1: from this advance post of King adam Thor's Cappadocian Empire
Speaker 1: at the head of northern at the head or northern
Speaker 1: end of the Euphrates plane, that King Thor's son King descended,
Speaker 1: in the twelfth year of his reign three three three
Speaker 1: six BC, into Mesopotamia of the Caldis and annexed and
Speaker 1: civilized it down to the seaboard of the Persian Gulf,
Speaker 1: building as his chief Mesopotamian capital, the city of Enoch,
Speaker 1: named after his son on the Euphrates, and so named
Speaker 1: after his son in success or, the third Arian or
Speaker 1: Samarian king Unuk or ireq Enoch is a Sumerian slash
Speaker 1: Aryan name, and his epoch making an advent into Mesopotamia
Speaker 1: is now disclosed to be what as as serioologists have
Speaker 1: called the coming of the Sumerians. Though who the Sumerians were,
Speaker 1: what was their race, what were they from, where they
Speaker 1: came from, and what their date have hitherto I've been
Speaker 1: all alike unknown until now disclosed, because that's not where
Speaker 1: they're looking. They're not looking for the truth. They're looking
Speaker 1: to see how they can make it Semitic. The EDA
Speaker 1: ends here with this utopia or golden age of early civilization,
Speaker 1: a real golden age, not their type of golden age
Speaker 1: where they're having a kill crazy rampage on innocent, unarmed people.
Speaker 1: And that's not They're having their golden age right now
Speaker 1: in certain places in the world, established by King Adam
Speaker 1: Thor about thirty three thirty three fifty BC, but one
Speaker 1: additional pregnant Stanza has been added, presumably by a later hand.
Speaker 1: Human nature being what it is, progress is not always forward,
Speaker 1: but sometimes now listen to this. This is the one
Speaker 1: of the main things why their histories are so important.
Speaker 1: Forward forward I and backward downward too. Into the cyclical
Speaker 1: resets makes sense. You're on a Saturn's timetable. Now he's
Speaker 1: about to flip it again, invert everything. There was some
Speaker 1: time after King Adam's adam Thorp's death, presumably several generations later,
Speaker 1: a reactionary revival of the aboriginal mother son cult of matriarchy,
Speaker 1: with its blood sacrifices, fetish worship, and superstition of hell,
Speaker 1: thus resulting in a real fall of man, a real
Speaker 1: fall of man. In the post Adamite period, the Chaldean Semites,
Speaker 1: in their reactionary religion, whilst discarding the atomist worship of
Speaker 1: the one God in Heaven represented by the Benign Sun
Speaker 1: or the God of the Sun and Light of the World,
Speaker 1: Light of the World as the universal power of nature,
Speaker 1: on reverting to their old mother Son cult and its demons,
Speaker 1: now deified their Moon of darkness and converted their demons,
Speaker 1: personified as the Mother Matriarch and her son the serpent
Speaker 1: wolf totems into gods and goddesses. By borrowing the idea
Speaker 1: of God as well as the god name from their
Speaker 1: aryan civilizer and great benefactor adam Thor. Benefactor, yes, but
Speaker 1: hateful of them? Yes? Who does that sound like? You
Speaker 1: can't be friends with them, you can't help them out,
Speaker 1: You can't try to live with them, because as soon
Speaker 1: as they get a chance, there'll be a subversive uprising.
Speaker 1: They'll attempt to murder you viciously, and that's why they
Speaker 1: get kicked out of places. They then vilified and cursed
Speaker 1: the audacious King adam Thor, the friend of man with
Speaker 1: his cult of Heaven, along with his noble heroic son
Speaker 1: Prince Kin the Former, for his great offense and sin
Speaker 1: of uplifting man by knowledge and disobeying the jealous Preadamite
Speaker 1: serpent demon in its oracular priestess. They didn't want people
Speaker 1: to be able to enjoy their lives. They wanted them
Speaker 1: to cower in fear. What do you think AI and
Speaker 1: their death digital prison is going to do to us
Speaker 1: and the latter for this, for slaying. This is what
Speaker 1: they've been working on ever since, this to bring us
Speaker 1: back under their thumb and the latter for slaying the
Speaker 1: Serpent cult. Necromatic priest and Sacrifice are the only son
Speaker 1: of the weird the abolishing and abolishing their sanguinary sacrifices.
Speaker 1: We didn't like sacrifice. We're the ones to stop that.
Speaker 1: They can write whatever the hell they want in their
Speaker 1: stupid book that they sell to the Christians bullshit. For
Speaker 1: it to have been around in that period means that
Speaker 1: they brought it back from the time it was already
Speaker 1: destroyed by US two thousand years pro previous, and this
Speaker 1: spiteful vilification has been actively and mechanically propagated down through
Speaker 1: the ages to the present day in Semitic creeds. On
Speaker 1: the other hand, the ruling race of the Sumerians or Arians,
Speaker 1: who formed only a relatively small proportion everywhere they go
Speaker 1: of the or superstratum of the mixed population in their
Speaker 1: empires in Mesopotamia and elsewhere, carried on the good work
Speaker 1: of Adam Thorpe's reformation and continued to be more or
Speaker 1: less monotheistic. Sun worshippers or became worshippers of the deified
Speaker 1: and Dhara or zeus Zas or ia jah Jove as
Speaker 1: the heavenly King, and some of them laterally deified his
Speaker 1: titles mystically as separate personages dull and also deified his
Speaker 1: clean consort and his son through the purer Aryans, though
Speaker 1: the purer Arians treated his canonized son merely as an archangel,
Speaker 1: Saint Michael. Hence we have today the paradox that the
Speaker 1: self same people. There's no there's no doubt that these people,
Speaker 1: these this cult wrote those books because they took something
Speaker 1: that old and incorporated into it with the whole Michael store.
Speaker 1: This is this is what they do. But gee, how
Speaker 1: did how did the Savior they gave us fair? Not
Speaker 1: too good? Huh? Is that is that? Is that a
Speaker 1: Is that a threat? Is that a threat? There? Hence
Speaker 1: we have today the paradox that the self same people
Speaker 1: in our British isles who blindly swallowed those Semitic calumnies
Speaker 1: against the first and noblest of all epoch making kings,
Speaker 1: the arean establisher of the world's civilizations, the first bringer
Speaker 1: of just government, peace and goodwill to men, the first
Speaker 1: apostle of brotherly love, the deliverer of the week from
Speaker 1: the oppressor, the knitter together of men into nations, and
Speaker 1: the uplifter of men. And against his queen and heroic
Speaker 1: son under their titles, respectively, of Adam, Eve and Cain.
Speaker 1: Yet at one and the same time glorify all unknowingly
Speaker 1: these self same personages under their other names or titles.
Speaker 1: Thus they canonize that first king under his title of
Speaker 1: Saint George of Cappadocia and England with his Red and
Speaker 1: of Cappadian England with his Red Cross, and see as
Speaker 1: the dragon Slayer, as Saint Andrew of the Cross, the
Speaker 1: patron Saint of the Scots and of Gothland, Scythic Russia,
Speaker 1: Hungary and the Danube Valley with its andreas Island and
Speaker 1: Burgundy of the Visigoths, and admire him as King Arthur
Speaker 1: and as Jack the Giant Killer, not to mention his
Speaker 1: classic heroic titles of Prometheus, Zeus, Jove and Dardanos. They
Speaker 1: glorify or admire his queen consort as Guenevere and under
Speaker 1: her classic titles of Hira or Juno Athene and Eurydus,
Speaker 1: and his crown Prince they admire as the Majestic Dionysus,
Speaker 1: the Sun Dionysus, and and honor as Sir gowain Is
Speaker 1: the foremost of Red Cross Knights, the vanquisher of the
Speaker 1: fearsome truculent green Man, and canonize and adore him under
Speaker 1: his title of Saint Michael, the Archangel, the Vanquisher of
Speaker 1: the Dragon, Apoleon, the old Serpent Satan. And these three
Speaker 1: are now disclosed as identical, respectively with the leading hero,
Speaker 1: his Queen and Crown Prince of our great ancestral national
Speaker 1: epic of the ancient Britons, the Gothic Arians, real people,
Speaker 1: Serpent Satan cult, right, Serpent cult Apollion. This is this
Speaker 1: is balder, This is able even in the late shadowy
Speaker 1: King Arthur, even in the shadowy in the late shadowy
Speaker 1: King Arthur legend in England, And that an analogous fashion
Speaker 1: of deprecation of the central hero, his Queen and Crown Prince,
Speaker 1: has steadily developed amongst the later English romancing bards, and
Speaker 1: the great license they have taken with the ancient historical tradition,
Speaker 1: following somewhat the same lines as the spiteful, pervasive, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: perversive propaganda of the Mother Son cult. This deprecation as
Speaker 1: regards King Arthur was already beginning to show itself in
Speaker 1: the time of Sir Thomas Mallory, and evoked from him
Speaker 1: in his La Morte de Arthur eighty fourteen eighty five.
Speaker 1: The following indignant protest protest in the quaint old English
Speaker 1: speech of his day. Thus was Sir Arthur depraved and evil?
Speaker 1: Said of lo yee, all Englishmen, see ye not what
Speaker 1: a mischief here was? For he that was the most
Speaker 1: king and knight of the world, and most loved the
Speaker 1: fellowship of noble knights, and by him they were all upholden.
Speaker 1: Now might not this Englishman hold them content with him?
Speaker 1: Alas this is a great default of us Englishmen, For
Speaker 1: there may no thing please us, no length of time.
Speaker 1: This perversion of the King Arthur legend not only degraded
Speaker 1: the traditional high mortal character of the King Arthur himself
Speaker 1: and his queen and his crown Prince, Sir Gowin, but also,
Speaker 1: at the same time fictitiously exalted his inveterate, aboriginal caldi enemies.
Speaker 1: Thus the felonious Balder and his truculent father Woden were
Speaker 1: whitewashed and thrust as lee as leading red Cross knights
Speaker 1: or kings into the brilliant company of King Arthur's heroes,
Speaker 1: and even the mother weird herse He was introduced there,
Speaker 1: thus hopelessly distorting the entire scheme of the epic and
Speaker 1: falsifying it. This medley of these personalities and their characters
Speaker 1: seems to have arisen partially through the mis interpreting several
Speaker 1: titles of Thor and his Son, and of Balder and
Speaker 1: Wooden and his Weird Paramour, which had still been floating
Speaker 1: about in medieval England attached to the Arthur legend, but
Speaker 1: with the characters of their owners blurred or more or
Speaker 1: less forgotten. Those titles were evidently imagined by the later
Speaker 1: romancing English bars or sorry to represent different personages in
Speaker 1: the retinue of King Arthur, just as the later Icelandic
Speaker 1: and Scandinavian bards had imagined them, and were thus used
Speaker 1: to spell the galaxy of named knights and ladies in
Speaker 1: King Arthur's court right using the same title, using a
Speaker 1: title for the same guy, but making a different person
Speaker 1: out of them. Thus, for instance, in the later English
Speaker 1: version of the Arthurian legend, we have clearly Balder ball
Speaker 1: Fall or Val of the Fiery Lance of Yoatin, and
Speaker 1: the Van Lake or Van Lake, under the duplicate titles
Speaker 1: of Perceval or Parseval, or the Wolf Vall or Fall
Speaker 1: Wolf Wolf. That's also where you get Fenmere from, right,
Speaker 1: who saw the Grail and as Lancelot of the Lake
Speaker 1: with his edict abduction or of Airthor's queen represented merely
Speaker 1: as an illicit uh as an illicit armor. No, I'm
Speaker 1: more sorry. But significantly he loses sight of the holy
Speaker 1: Grail because he betrayed Queen Guenevere, just as in the
Speaker 1: Eda epic ball Or Balder, who carried a lance, loses
Speaker 1: the material Grail as a punishment for his abduction of
Speaker 1: Thorn Queen Gwenevere gwenne Fall similarly or Eve. Similarly, Balder's
Speaker 1: father Wolden of the Dragon cult, who was miscalled o
Speaker 1: Tar by the later Icelandic and Scandinavian bars and made
Speaker 1: by them the father of Thor, is called in the
Speaker 1: later Arthurian legend Uther Pendragon, and also made the father
Speaker 1: of Arthur. Dumb shits later Arthurian legends, that's not the
Speaker 1: correct one. If you ever get that one, that's the
Speaker 1: one that's wrong. The paramour of Paramar of Wooden, the
Speaker 1: old mother Serpent dragon Weird, made by later Icelanders and
Speaker 1: Scandinavians the mother of Thor under her Edic name and
Speaker 1: titles of l See how they merge everything like this
Speaker 1: is stupidity partially, but this is also you know, cultish
Speaker 1: people with that inclination in their hearts to let people
Speaker 1: be misilet and help them guide them along and encourage
Speaker 1: their stupidity. We can go through more of the similar time,
Speaker 1: but this is this is what we did tonight. I
Speaker 1: hope about people some people understand why I go to
Speaker 1: this and reference it as much as I do, because
Speaker 1: it's important. It's like the important thing, the only important thing. Hey,
Speaker 1: Jules Vernson here, let's say, hold on, let me go
Speaker 1: back over here. They've got Karen Wow, I got Jewel's
Speaker 1: over on rumble gotta catch live go Irish Lebrica on
Speaker 1: the level. Yes, that's sure. You did to hang from
Speaker 1: you go to speak, all right, it's bumping up a lot.
Speaker 1: Who's oh, who is the equivalent for colleague? I was
Speaker 1: saying the same woman. This is this il Ilu. Her
Speaker 1: name is el. She's the matriarch of this cult. Well,
Speaker 1: you get went into more detail once you actually start
Speaker 1: reading the edit itself. But I have that, I have
Speaker 1: that on YouTube. You just I think I'm pretty sure
Speaker 1: I didn't which one of them. I put a uh
Speaker 1: timestamp in the comments so that you can click to
Speaker 1: where I start talking about that, because some of them
Speaker 1: have introductions. I'm going through other stuff first. So Macomba,
Speaker 1: Jills Verne, the green Man is Yeah, he gets whacked.
Speaker 1: He's the guy who tries to come and crash the
Speaker 1: party too. Yeah, but this is all that you're talking about,
Speaker 1: your conflating things though, this is what this all came first,
Speaker 1: before any of this other nonsense that like the Sagittary.
Speaker 1: There's a few kids I know who Ofi is OPHI
Speaker 1: needs a snake. I get that. But what they're talking
Speaker 1: about here has nothing to do with any of the
Speaker 1: stuff that came after the fact. That's just the reinterpretations
Speaker 1: of the older story. So why don't we talk about
Speaker 1: what the original story was? That's that's kind of like
Speaker 1: where we're going here is all the crap that's been
Speaker 1: added and misunderstood and the ship that they got horribly
Speaker 1: wrong and then created another mythos about. It's mixing attributes,
Speaker 1: character riistics of good people with bad and then making
Speaker 1: you think everybody has a flaw and that's not good.
Speaker 1: That's the erosion because it's not true. And why is
Speaker 1: this jumping around all the fucking time? So annoying. Let's see,
Speaker 1: I had a bunch of things to share with you tonight,
Speaker 1: but I didn't get to any of them. Actually myristics
Speaker 1: of shut up. So there's nobody saying anything over here
Speaker 1: on YouTube. But hey, you know what you should do anyway,
Speaker 1: follow damn thing, all right? And then what we got
Speaker 1: we got because my last night is rumble. Oh here
Speaker 1: we are on rumble. So is everybody's very much on
Speaker 1: rumble tonight. Yeah, I go ahead, and uh, I gotta
Speaker 1: go say good night to my daughter, So you guys
Speaker 1: have one for the night. But let me just go
Speaker 1: ahead and do all right. So on the screen right now,
Speaker 1: you'll see we're still trying to get to that six
Speaker 1: crime million, all right. I keep working on that. There's
Speaker 1: my website, there's the the YouTube channel. Let's get up
Speaker 1: a pot past one thousand, rest seven and nine seventy
Speaker 1: seven right now, and the uh, you can look at
Speaker 1: my website for all the other stuff that you did.
Speaker 1: Right later. By m