Speaker 1: It says we are live, no countdown. I'm trying to
Speaker 1: stay away from the Rumble studio to see if that
Speaker 1: helps the issues here. Hold on, let me do that too. Okay,
Speaker 1: we are live. It is four nine, twenty twenty five.
Speaker 1: It is twelve fifty eight PM Mountain Standard. Also, at
Speaker 1: this particular moment in the season, it's also Pacific time.
Speaker 1: So we have my YouTube channel, the Rumble channel. And
Speaker 1: for those of you who we're witnessing the downtime earlier today,
Speaker 1: we should be on we should be on FTJ Media
Speaker 1: as well, and I will check that right now to
Speaker 1: be sure. I think we should be all good. Don't worry.
Speaker 1: This isn't going to be a slow start thing. It's
Speaker 1: just I'm yeah, we're here cool. I'm gonna just pop
Speaker 1: it up so that I don't miss anybody in the
Speaker 1: live stream over here. Right now, I'm the I'm the one.
Speaker 1: I'm the only one. But that's okay, it'll change. People
Speaker 1: will be tuned in. So if you're over on Rumble, hello,
Speaker 1: how's it going, How you doing? How you doing? Good
Speaker 1: to see you. Let me go back to that hoops.
Speaker 1: We have four thousand and six and seventy five people
Speaker 1: following over on rumble. So for people who haven't seen
Speaker 1: me in four years plus over on YouTube, this is
Speaker 1: where I've been for the most part. I was on
Speaker 1: this thing called Brand YouTube or BNT for some time
Speaker 1: before they got hacked and destroyed. And of course all
Speaker 1: the low league channels are on the server that got destroyed.
Speaker 1: But you know, not good old Alex Jones and all
Speaker 1: that stuff. I'm not sure if that's even a thing anymore.
Speaker 1: Brand YouTube. I don't care about it, honestly. It's it
Speaker 1: was not a very secure site. And we got people
Speaker 1: coming in for Prescraft number two Deuce a drop, that
Speaker 1: is what we're calling this episode. And I'm going to
Speaker 1: be showing you some video here. And I don't know
Speaker 1: about the intros because most of my intros have material
Speaker 1: on there that might get it turned into a silent
Speaker 1: movie overad YouTube, right. Unfortunately, they'll strip the whole thing
Speaker 1: if it's uh got material on there that they say
Speaker 1: you can't use. This is gonna pop up weird, So
Speaker 1: I gotta stop it. It's gonna be second. I gotta
Speaker 1: take myself off the screen. All right. We are here,
Speaker 1: and I'm using obs as the interface here, so hopefully
Speaker 1: we can get through this. I'm gonna be reading this chapter.
Speaker 1: I'll show you in a second good scene dose and
Speaker 1: pull up this. This is on page one ninety eight
Speaker 1: of the larger version of my book, and it's Jacob
Speaker 1: Frank the Ipetus behind the New World Order and Zionism.
Speaker 1: That is what we're going to be reading today. I'm
Speaker 1: going to read this one last chapter of my book
Speaker 1: and hopes that people will pick up the whole thing
Speaker 1: for their reading and learning enjoyment from the links that
Speaker 1: you see in the description, and also because we're talking
Speaker 1: about this particular topic right now, So there you go.
Speaker 1: Before we do that, however, let's go have a look
Speaker 1: at a video that is on YouTube from that Esoteric
Speaker 1: Guardian that we had been watching before when we were
Speaker 1: talking about the Kabbalah and the Tree of Death. Now,
Speaker 1: this one is called the True Identity of Yahweh. Who
Speaker 1: do Christians really worship? And of course I'm gonna say
Speaker 1: it's set and Saturn, right, That's who Yahweh morphed into.
Speaker 1: But he was, yes, a canonit deity as well, by
Speaker 1: the same name Yahweh, and he was known as I
Speaker 1: Gotta move myself again, put myself right about there. He
Speaker 1: was known as the god of metallurgy, as is described
Speaker 1: in my book. Now we can get into this other
Speaker 1: topic here if we must. But there's a book out
Speaker 1: there called The Laughing Jesus that there's some naive comments
Speaker 1: made about who actually did the real trade center thing,
Speaker 1: and they were talking about Muslims and stuff like that,
Speaker 1: but they're talking about also the what they called the
Speaker 1: Jewish fantasy factory. And once they were given a an
Speaker 1: education from Talamai that they went kind of on a
Speaker 1: rampage of yellow journalism and drafted a whole history of
Speaker 1: themselves that didn't exist prior to then in Hellenistic period,
Speaker 1: and they had access to the libraries they were being educated. Right,
Speaker 1: So there's that to consider, and in my book it
Speaker 1: describes just exactly what that means when it entails what
Speaker 1: they said, and I can find it. I will show
Speaker 1: you that, and we'll talk a little bit about this
Speaker 1: thing too. I'll put a pin in this one, and
Speaker 1: we'll take a look at this. God often forbids his
Speaker 1: followers to show pity or mercy. Who does that sound like?
Speaker 1: And that's in Deuteronomy seven to Ezekiel nine five through six,
Speaker 1: and sometimes God undertakes the mass killing of children himself
Speaker 1: twenty nine. Indeed, children have a particularly hard time of it.
Speaker 1: Not only are they punished for the crimes of their ancestors,
Speaker 1: but they are also victims of family cannibalism. To people
Speaker 1: who fail to meet God's requirements, he promises that, amongst
Speaker 1: many other tribulations, they will have to eat their own children.
Speaker 1: Now think about that in the minds of a Talmudist
Speaker 1: or a Cabbalist. And what do you think that means? For? Oh, no, no,
Speaker 1: places like McDonald's. The Golden Arches a very Masonic thing.
Speaker 1: Deuteronomy twenty eight to fifty three. The Lord threatens, and
Speaker 1: thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the
Speaker 1: flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters, which the
Speaker 1: Lord thy God hath given thee in the siege and
Speaker 1: in the straitness, where with thine enemies shall distress thee.
Speaker 1: And note vaccines have fetal tissue in them. In recent
Speaker 1: decades they have been using human remains and fertilizers, using
Speaker 1: the bones of the dead, calling it calcium and adding
Speaker 1: it to an array of food products, including subtlements, and
Speaker 1: it's been found in the water. The verses of Deuterotomy,
Speaker 1: as many other places in the Bible, are a laundry
Speaker 1: list of vicious threats. It makes you wonder, if this
Speaker 1: quote unquote God is the infallible, benevolent one, then how
Speaker 1: is it that he continues to have to annihilate his
Speaker 1: own creation, cutting down whole swaths of people. Couldn't he
Speaker 1: have just made them correctly? To begin with? The cannibalistic
Speaker 1: component here seems to suggest more of a ball or
Speaker 1: Saturn lord than the benevolent Creator. Could it be perhaps
Speaker 1: there was a mix up here? Are they possibly filing
Speaker 1: the commandment the commands of a ball or a Saturn
Speaker 1: as oken through their manipulative dark priests, rather than of
Speaker 1: God himself. It seems to follow more closely the modus
Speaker 1: operandi of the various cults devoted to Saturn. Is it
Speaker 1: possible that an opposing so called deity was interwoven with
Speaker 1: the Creator by way of a mistranslation or deliberate mistranslation? Okay?
Speaker 1: And then it says on blood sacrifices, one of the
Speaker 1: sights that I was looking at when I was writing
Speaker 1: the book says, as in many primitive religions, God had
Speaker 1: wanted blood. Blood was far more important than the flesh.
Speaker 1: It was the life force, the seat of the of
Speaker 1: life itself. That was Genesis nine to four and Leviticus
Speaker 1: seventeen eleven. Anyone might eat the flesh, but the blood
Speaker 1: belonged to God himself. Leviticus seven eleven seventeen eleven reads,
Speaker 1: for the life of the flesh is in the blood,
Speaker 1: and I have given it for you on the altar
Speaker 1: to make atonement for your souls. For it is the
Speaker 1: blood that makes atonement by the life. According to the
Speaker 1: Book of Judges, Jephtha killed his only child in fulfillment
Speaker 1: of a promise made to God Judges eleven twenty nine
Speaker 1: through forty. As the narrative points out, God was taking
Speaker 1: a personal interest in Jeptha at the time, yet he
Speaker 1: did not attempt to stop him, nor was Jephtha regarded
Speaker 1: as acting excessively. He was well regarded as a judge
Speaker 1: and was mentioned with approval in the New Testament. The
Speaker 1: New Testament that should rattle your cage a little bit.
Speaker 1: God repeatedly makes the point that this animal sacrifice must
Speaker 1: be done in front of him and that he like
Speaker 1: this is a different quote right, that he likes the
Speaker 1: smell of the burning flesh, referring to Noah's mass animal sacrifice.
Speaker 1: Genesis eight twenty two tells us that he Lord, that
Speaker 1: the Lord smelled the pleasing odor in front of him.
Speaker 1: Pleasing odor? What would give human living attributes to the
Speaker 1: one that they call Lord? This is all too confusing,
Speaker 1: and why I have a difficulty with reading the book
Speaker 1: the book right. The impression I have of the God
Speaker 1: I know is in opposition to the one described in
Speaker 1: the snok. While in my view there is nothing wrong
Speaker 1: with the warrior attributes when destruction of evil is the goal,
Speaker 1: it's altogether different to take pleasure in harming or even
Speaker 1: threatening children, let alone targeting them specifically as a punishment
Speaker 1: to their parents. The blood obsession seems to point more
Speaker 1: toward the cult of ball or Saturn and later day
Speaker 1: Adrenochrome applications. Another site, this time a ministry called Come
Speaker 1: and Reason, posted an article in May of twenty twenty
Speaker 1: with this passage two kinds of laws. God is the
Speaker 1: creator who built all reality, and his laws are the
Speaker 1: laws upon which reality operates. When one breaks God's laws,
Speaker 1: one takes themselves out of the harmony with God, with
Speaker 1: life itself and sure, and the sure natural result is
Speaker 1: ruin and death. As the Bible teaches, the one who
Speaker 1: sows to please his sinful nature from that nature will
Speaker 1: re up, or sorry, reap destruction. My eyes are little blurry.
Speaker 1: But false gods like Ball do not create, They impose.
Speaker 1: Their laws are imperial rules designed to control others. Breaking
Speaker 1: the imposed rule that created beings make up, that created
Speaker 1: beings makeup doesn't cause damage to the breaker of the rules.
Speaker 1: It results in the ruling authority inflicting punishment. This is
Speaker 1: the root of all false systems of worship, a false
Speaker 1: law construct which leads to a false god construct in
Speaker 1: which the deity is the enforcer of punishment, one that
Speaker 1: requires appeasement and payment. So there's that. We will get
Speaker 1: into more of that later. Maybe we'll grab one more here.
Speaker 1: The Bible's Old Testament, which suggests a grizzly end for
Speaker 1: many Sorry again, my eyes are blurry. The Bible's Old Testament,
Speaker 1: which suggests a grizzly end for many Cannonites. After the
Speaker 1: Israelites exodus from Egypt quote unquote, and I rolled my
Speaker 1: eyes to that God ordered them to destroy Canon and
Speaker 1: its people. Through other passages suggest the weather passages suggest
Speaker 1: that some Canonites may have survived, but did that really happen?
Speaker 1: Archaeological data suggests that Canonite cities were never destroyed or abandoned.
Speaker 1: Now ancient DNA recovered from five Cannonite skeletons suggests that
Speaker 1: these people survived to contribute their genes to millions of
Speaker 1: people living today. The new samples come from Sidon, a
Speaker 1: coastal city in Lebanon. It's also where the uh the
Speaker 1: latter day what do you call it? Well, you'll find
Speaker 1: you'll find the knights hospitaller. There, you'll find the lights
Speaker 1: of Malta. You know, you'll find what they call it,
Speaker 1: the quote unquote Phoenicians, even though they never called themselves that.
Speaker 1: But it's not. Just because they live in a certain
Speaker 1: area doesn't mean that they were Phoenicians. We're talking about
Speaker 1: the Semitic or the Oives that came later, not the
Speaker 1: Goths that were there prior to which were all all
Speaker 1: lumped up together to be called Phoenicians. The new samples
Speaker 1: come from Sidon at coastal city and Lebnon. Mayor Haber,
Speaker 1: a geneticist at the Welcome Trust uh Senger Institute, so
Speaker 1: Margaret Sanger right Seger Institute in hinks Hinkston, UK extracted
Speaker 1: enough DNA from the ancient skeletons to sequence the whole
Speaker 1: genomes of five Canna individuals, all around thirty seven hundred
Speaker 1: years old. Sidon was a Phoenicians settlement later occupied by
Speaker 1: the Templars. You noticed where the researchers is from, right,
Speaker 1: Claus Schwab's Welcome Trust Fund group. They can't even spell welcome, right,
Speaker 1: So I gotta find I have to find the other
Speaker 1: passages where I'm quoting the laughing Jesus if it's even
Speaker 1: necessary or required. But we're gonna get into this video here.
Speaker 1: It's called the true identity of Yahweh? Who do Christians
Speaker 1: really worship? And a lot of times they're gonna, they're
Speaker 1: doc gonna, they're not gonna mentioned Saturn. But I'm gonna.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna make sure I implement that as we go along.
Speaker 1: That's a bit h.
Speaker 2: What if the god worshiped by billions today was originally
Speaker 2: just one among many desert deities later transformed through political
Speaker 2: and theologic shifts into the supreme being. We know the
Speaker 2: true identity of Yahweh, the God of the Bible is
Speaker 2: far more complex than most realize, from ancient inscriptions to
Speaker 2: hidden connections with Mesopotamian gods like Enlil and Enki, his
Speaker 2: origins might not be as unique as we've been led
Speaker 2: to believe. Could Yahweh be an evolution of older gods?
Speaker 2: Or is there something even more mysterious behind his rise
Speaker 2: to supremacy. Stick around until the end to uncover how
Speaker 2: Yahweh's transformation reshaped entire civilizations and why his true identity
Speaker 2: might challenge everything you thought you knew about religion. When
Speaker 2: we think of Yahweh, we imagine the all powerful god
Speaker 2: of the Bible, the creator of heaven and earth, the
Speaker 2: guiding force behind the people full of Israel.
Speaker 3: But what if I told you.
Speaker 1: He looks lovely, doesn't he?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 1: That looks an awful lot like a Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: I know these are all he I generated things a
Speaker 1: storm guidel like in nature, making it more like ball,
Speaker 1: which could be a composite for Saturn as well.
Speaker 2: Right, du that this god might have had a much
Speaker 2: more humble past archaeological research.
Speaker 1: Not humble as in, you know, kind and wonderful, but
Speaker 1: just not exactly the top dog in his pantheon. He
Speaker 1: only has three fingers there because he is sucks, which.
Speaker 2: An ancient texts revealed that Yahweh was not always the
Speaker 2: supreme figure we recognize today. One of the earliest historical
Speaker 2: records of Yahweh can be found in the famous Misha Stelle,
Speaker 2: a stone inscription dating back to around eight hundred and
Speaker 2: forty BCE. In it, King Misha of Moab claims to
Speaker 2: have defeated Israel and captured sacred objects belonging to Yahweh,
Speaker 2: regarding him as just another god among many. This discovery
Speaker 2: suggests that at the time, Yahweh was not the universal
Speaker 2: and singular deity, but rather a local god worshiped by
Speaker 2: a specific group of people. Another intriguing discovery comes from Egypt,
Speaker 2: where an inscription found in the ancient Temple of Soleb
Speaker 2: mentions the Chasu of Yahweh, a nomadic Semitic group that
Speaker 2: worshiped this god while roaming the deserts of Canaan. The
Speaker 2: Egyptians described the Shasu as wandering desert tribes, leading some
Speaker 2: scholars to theorize that Yahweh was originally a desert god worshiped.
Speaker 1: And what was said what was Typhon right, they were
Speaker 1: the negative aspects. And because we have a Semitae or
Speaker 1: Ooivade history taught to us, they made sun worship the
Speaker 1: evil thing and them the good, which when you look
Speaker 1: at the perspective and who's telling the story, you can
Speaker 1: see that that has been inverted. There was a monotheistic
Speaker 1: sun cult that the Goths brought with them along with
Speaker 1: a culture, ready made culture when they came into the
Speaker 1: same lands that they found five thousand years ago, inhabited
Speaker 1: by these sorcerers who were conducting human sacrifice and pharmaciea
Speaker 1: and horrific you know, practices on the people, terrifying the
Speaker 1: crap out of them and messing around with all kinds
Speaker 1: of drugs a lot of them to do with venom
Speaker 1: and also poisonous for the same reason, same purpose.
Speaker 2: By nomadic tribes before being adopted by the Israelites. Could
Speaker 2: it be that Yahweh was in his earliest days simply
Speaker 2: the god of a nomadic and warrior people. Scholars have
Speaker 2: also found evidence suggesting that Yahweh may have been part
Speaker 2: of the cana Nide pantheon.
Speaker 1: If you have a copy of this book, I go
Speaker 1: into detail on that, showing there was two hundred and
Speaker 1: thirty six gods in the pantheon. Ball wasn't even a
Speaker 1: son of l He was a son of Dagon. That's
Speaker 1: why he needed special permission to have his pantheon built.
Speaker 1: And if you look in here you'll find the god
Speaker 1: of metallurgy in the when was the Bronze age, right,
Speaker 1: so that would be Yahweh. He was a lesser, kind
Speaker 1: of an insignificant god at the time, so I think
Speaker 1: they merged that name with that which was already you know,
Speaker 1: se hahaha in Stone. And it's just another morphing of
Speaker 1: the old Saturn court that was kind of broken up
Speaker 1: a little bit by our ancestors.
Speaker 2: A vast collection of gods that included Bal, the storm god,
Speaker 2: and El, the supreme deity. In this context, Yahweh may
Speaker 2: have started as a minor nature god associated with storms
Speaker 2: and volcanoes.
Speaker 1: Metallurgy actually elements crucial for desert try but I can
Speaker 1: understand them tian in the whole ball being, you know,
Speaker 1: the storm guid in with the Yahweh too. There there's
Speaker 1: a definite connection there too. There's a lot of conflating
Speaker 1: of these things together that they had done over time
Speaker 1: deliberately ripes.
Speaker 2: In fact, many biblical descriptions of Yahweh depict his presence
Speaker 2: with fire, smoke, and trembling mountains, all of which are
Speaker 2: typical signs of a deity to extreme natural forces.
Speaker 1: Or lost technology. From a previous research.
Speaker 2: However, the story takes an even more fascinating turn when
Speaker 2: we look towards Mesopotamia.
Speaker 1: What we find about it if everyone else, So even
Speaker 1: right now, like Papua New Guinea, there's like headhunters, right
Speaker 1: there's people in Africa and other places that are very primitive.
Speaker 1: They don't have very much contact with other people unless
Speaker 1: there's some nature show guide that shows up and you know,
Speaker 1: is a unique curiosity to them for a little while.
Speaker 1: But you know with his film crew. But as far
Speaker 1: as contact, they don't have a whole lot. So they
Speaker 1: could be isolated. So that still happens even though we
Speaker 1: have all this other technology around us in modern day.
Speaker 1: So there's two ways that this could come about. You
Speaker 1: could have that scenario that I just said, or you
Speaker 1: could have the scenario where everyone else was reduced to
Speaker 1: primitive again because of some sort of cataclysmic reset event
Speaker 1: and over a couple of generations, they lose sight, they
Speaker 1: lose memory of technology, so that when they see it
Speaker 1: again it seems godlike because they're not familiar with it.
Speaker 1: They never had any experience with that in their lifetime.
Speaker 1: It doesn't necessarily mean that they were gods. It could
Speaker 1: just mean that they had more highly technological society because
Speaker 1: those people survived with every cataclysm, or they were the
Speaker 1: ones who caused that cataclysm and that's why they're still around, right.
Speaker 1: Everyone else was pushed back into the tribal stone age,
Speaker 1: but not those people. Potentially, there's that possibility out there.
Speaker 2: And striking similarities between Yahweh and the ancient Sumerian and
Speaker 2: Akkadian gods.
Speaker 1: Gods were all demons by the the Acadians.
Speaker 2: Such as Enlil, lord of wind and storms, and Enki,
Speaker 2: god of wisdom and water, share many attributes with Yas.
Speaker 2: These similarities have led some researchers to ask was Yahweh
Speaker 2: an adaptation of these ancient Mesopotamian gods brought to Canaan
Speaker 2: through migration or cultural influence. What seems clear is that
Speaker 2: Yahweh's figure did not emerge out of nowhere. His identity, name,
Speaker 2: and attributes appear to be intertwined with older cultures and
Speaker 2: beliefs from the Near East. Over time, his worship evolved
Speaker 2: and strengthened, transforming him from the god of a wandering
Speaker 2: tribe into the foundation of a monotheistic religion that would
Speaker 2: change the course of history. So the big question remains,
Speaker 2: was Yahweh always the one true God? Or is his
Speaker 2: story the result of centuries of cultural, political, and religious influences.
Speaker 2: The answer could reshape our understanding of the roots of
Speaker 2: monotheism and the evolution of human spirituality. The transformation of
Speaker 2: Yahweh from a regional deity into the one and only
Speaker 2: God of Israel was not an instant.
Speaker 1: It looks like he's got a bit of a tendre.
Speaker 2: Doesn't he stantaneous event, but rather the result of centuries
Speaker 2: of social, cultural and political changes.
Speaker 3: Initially, Yahweh was not the sole deity.
Speaker 1: Oh in b Yahweh if anything, that's a depiction of
Speaker 1: Thor ORed in Thor, Yes, I will explain that again
Speaker 1: some time. I know YouTube hasn't had my videos here
Speaker 1: in a while, but when you go into the British Eda,
Speaker 1: you find that Thor and Ode of the Inn were
Speaker 1: the same people, different title, not the father and the son.
Speaker 1: He has multiple titles, and because it was poem, it
Speaker 1: was like a poetic writing. They didn't always use the
Speaker 1: same word for the same for that person. They would
Speaker 1: use their titles. And that's why people who are translating poorly,
Speaker 1: translating languages that were long dead with a Gothic Aryan
Speaker 1: root got it wrong, and maybe deliberately so too, because
Speaker 1: it ties in better with their claims of its oves
Speaker 1: all the way down right.
Speaker 3: Just like turtles, he worshiped by the ancient Israelites.
Speaker 2: Instead, he shared prominence with other gods from the Canaanite pantheon,
Speaker 2: such as Baal, the storm god, and a Sharer, the
Speaker 2: goddess of fertility. However, over time, Yahweh transitioned from being
Speaker 2: one god among many to being regarded as the one
Speaker 2: true God, a shift that had profound implications for the
Speaker 2: history of monotheism. The early Israelites practiced a belief system
Speaker 2: known as Henotheism, which acknowledged the existence of multiple gods
Speaker 2: while giving special devotion to Yahweh.
Speaker 1: Because they can't call it pagan, right, it is not
Speaker 1: funny how they oh, it's Henohism or whatever the hell
Speaker 1: they said with Yahweh in the middle. In the in
Speaker 1: the top in the in the big chair, right right,
Speaker 1: because our Gothic ancestors, let me just repeat this again,
Speaker 1: and you find this out in Makers of Civilization in
Speaker 1: Recent History by L. A. Waddell. You can find that
Speaker 1: book online for free seven hundred and something pages. You
Speaker 1: can also find the British Edda L. A. Woddell that
Speaker 1: straightens out the misconceptions and the misunderstandings of the Edda
Speaker 1: that talks about the Goths in Sumer being the first
Speaker 1: kings of Sumer, not Semitic at all, not like they claim,
Speaker 1: like they're the arbiters or everything. No, our Gothic ancestors
Speaker 1: from the north brought Monotheism. It was a sun cult.
Speaker 1: Don't let the word cult scare you. They didn't. They
Speaker 1: venerated the sun as the gift from God rather than
Speaker 1: as God and Mithraism has been misunderstood by many, and
Speaker 1: it was also corrupted and bastardized over time, not helping
Speaker 1: the situation for clarity. In addition to that, they our
Speaker 1: ancestors brought this little funny thing with water that you
Speaker 1: may recognize in your own religion called baptism. That was
Speaker 1: ours baptized into the New life under the Sun cult,
Speaker 1: and that goes into detail about Guinevere aka Eve and
Speaker 1: thor or ad thor Adam thor get it or are
Speaker 1: as an Aryan r Thorer as in the roundtable, all
Speaker 1: these myths potentially coming from the same history five thousand
Speaker 1: years ago, and that all sounds very you know, but
Speaker 1: when you start to read the edit, it makes a
Speaker 1: lot of sense. It makes a lot of sense, and
Speaker 1: it makes a lot of sense how they would manipulate
Speaker 1: things to completely eradicate our understanding of our own past.
Speaker 2: In fact, ancient Hebrew inscriptions discovered at archaeological sites like
Speaker 2: cold until at Adrud mention Yahweh and his Ashera, suggesting
Speaker 2: that Yahweh had a consort in the early stages of
Speaker 2: his worship.
Speaker 1: That would make him more like l and potentially Maliks sadder.
Speaker 1: Even though when you look at the Yukarigt texts, ll
Speaker 1: doesn't seem like a bad guy. It's what the priest
Speaker 1: craft does with the method of worship. These sorcerers that
Speaker 1: come about that may you not have been let's just
Speaker 1: say the core of the you know, you know, there's
Speaker 1: the two percent of the population you feel what I mean,
Speaker 1: who seem to have some sway and power, and they're
Speaker 1: also very good at magic and pharmacia, and they start
Speaker 1: influencing people and they dazzle them, saying that they're the
Speaker 1: closest to the gods because they can do all these
Speaker 1: parlor tricks, and they start corrupting people and have them
Speaker 1: do wicked acts in the name of these gods, who
Speaker 1: would probably have nothing to do with that. And these
Speaker 1: gods also, by the way, at one point in time,
Speaker 1: weren't gods at all. They were heroes whose stories had
Speaker 1: lasted a while in people's minds, being retold and then
Speaker 1: later deified over time. But in reality, we're real people
Speaker 1: at one point, like thor.
Speaker 2: This contradicts the idea of pure monotheism from the beginning
Speaker 2: and reveals that the evolution of Yahweh was far more
Speaker 2: complex than previously thought.
Speaker 1: I think it's funny that they still use they still
Speaker 1: use AI generated images that made mistakes, like the snake
Speaker 1: with the extra tail and just kind of like he's
Speaker 1: not even there at all. After that, it looks like
Speaker 1: he's been severed. Just weird stuff like that. They just
Speaker 1: kicked out, what the hell good enough cut prince, and
Speaker 1: you know.
Speaker 2: As the Israelites settled in Canaan, competition with neighboring cultures
Speaker 2: drove the need to solidify their religious identity. Yahweh, originally
Speaker 2: a god of storms and war, began to absorb attributes
Speaker 2: from other deities, including the role of creator of the universe,
Speaker 2: which was previously attributed to l the supreme god of
Speaker 2: the Canaanitests and religious leaders played a key role in
Speaker 2: this transition, emphasizing Yahweh's exclusivity and rejecting the worship of
Speaker 2: other gods. One of the most crucial moments in Yahweh's
Speaker 2: evolution occurred during the Babylonian Exile in the sixth century BCE,
Speaker 2: when the Babylonians conquered Jerusalem and destroyed Solomon's Temple. The
Speaker 2: Israelites were forced to rethink their relationship with their god.
Speaker 2: Stripped of their homeland and temple, priests and scribes began
Speaker 2: to reinterpret their faith.
Speaker 1: There you go, presenting.
Speaker 2: Yahweh not only as the God of Israel, but as
Speaker 2: the universe of God who controlled history and the destinies
Speaker 2: of all nations. It was during this period that the
Speaker 2: texts forming the Hebrew Bible were written and compiled shaping
Speaker 2: a more definitive and monotheists stick image of Yahweh. King
Speaker 2: Josiah in the seventh century BCE also played a pivotal
Speaker 2: role in centralizing Yahweh's worship. His religious reforms eliminated the
Speaker 2: worship of other gods, destroyed altars throughout the kingdom, and
Speaker 2: declared that Yahweh should be worshiped exclusively.
Speaker 1: In Look, he's about the tenderise the meat. I know
Speaker 1: that's probably a golden caf. The is about the bus,
Speaker 1: but it just looks funny. He's got the meat tenderiser
Speaker 1: in his hands. Yet look how they're I think you're
Speaker 1: supposed to wait till you get to the meat part. Now,
Speaker 1: while they're standing still, now, while they're still.
Speaker 3: Air in Jerusalem, this movement's solidified.
Speaker 1: Maybe that's where kosher practices came from. Hahaha.
Speaker 2: I the monotheistic identity of the Jewish people and paved
Speaker 2: the way for the development of Judaism as we know
Speaker 2: it today.
Speaker 1: Yes, which is set and caught by a different name.
Speaker 1: Right again Hell in this period and then they backdated themselves.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to find the passage. I'll keep looking. You know,
Speaker 1: I could probably look for even better on the you know,
Speaker 1: we'll do that from the digital copy because I can
Speaker 1: type in words for a word search and that should
Speaker 1: be easier. But yeah, and it's funny that they show
Speaker 1: right now they have these this light coming from him
Speaker 1: in this v pattern. And of course again this is
Speaker 1: probably more Ai, but there are depictions of Moses and
Speaker 1: other men of the Judaic cloth apparently that have little
Speaker 1: tiny horns in their head, and you'll see this in
Speaker 1: a lot of Greek statues too. Well, that's kind of
Speaker 1: funny because as their cult, the Saturn cult of five
Speaker 1: thousand years prior, they had a serpent totem, which would
Speaker 1: make them the sorcerers and the pharmacue of people, right,
Speaker 1: and then they had the wolf totem, which may be
Speaker 1: more like Rome, which was another word for the eden Kites,
Speaker 1: and those were like the followers all the way stretching
Speaker 1: all the way to Arminia, Turkey and all that stuff,
Speaker 1: and those people were devotees to these this priestcraft back then,
Speaker 1: this human sacrifice priestcraft. So there was two separate totems,
Speaker 1: animal totems for this cult. Well, funny enough, the Goths
Speaker 1: were called the heat goats goats, right, they may have
Speaker 1: even been the ones that brought bearding, good old beards
Speaker 1: into into style for all we know. And so having
Speaker 1: those horns on their head, it's like they made it.
Speaker 1: They made a mistake in the translation when they're stealing
Speaker 1: attributes from actual heroic people with nobility and a long history.
Speaker 1: They kept the horns, and that was a symbol, not
Speaker 1: a thing that was actually on the people's heads. It
Speaker 1: was just a symbol of where they came from. So
Speaker 1: that makes it that would make their moses actually an
Speaker 1: aryan interesting right.
Speaker 2: M Despite these reforms, the evolution of Yahweh was not
Speaker 2: immediately accepted by all.
Speaker 3: For a long.
Speaker 2: Time, many Israelite communities continued to worship gods such as
Speaker 2: Baal and Ashera, leading.
Speaker 1: To common what you're looking at there is a depiction.
Speaker 1: It's obviously again Ai making mistakes, but that is a
Speaker 1: Moloch for furnace. And when you go into detail, you'll
Speaker 1: find that Moloch was more of a type of sacrifice
Speaker 1: than it was a god. And well, we can look
Speaker 1: at a video from Mythvision podcast called Horrific Canadate God's
Speaker 1: Ancient Dark israelit practices. If we have time right now,
Speaker 1: it's a beautiful ninety four degree day here in Numa,
Speaker 1: and I want to see some of it.
Speaker 2: Constant conflicts between religious leaders and the people. The Bible
Speaker 2: itself contains numerous warnings against idolatry, indicating that the transition
Speaker 2: to Monotheism was neither easy nor swift. Over time, the
Speaker 2: image of Yahweh transformed from a tribal warrior god to
Speaker 2: a moral, omnipresent creator. He was no longer just the
Speaker 2: god of the Israelites, but the supreme ruler of the universe. However,
Speaker 2: traces of him got a promotion, you see, is polytheistic.
Speaker 1: You know, if they had yamakas, they wouldn't even be
Speaker 1: able to be told. You know, we would even know
Speaker 1: that they were bald ah ah. Kind of shitty that
Speaker 1: only one group gets to wear those things, because I
Speaker 1: could use one in the back of my head like
Speaker 1: a little bit of spot.
Speaker 2: Past can still be found in Biblical texts, which frequently
Speaker 2: mentioned struggles against other gods and the constant reaffirmation of
Speaker 2: his supremacy.
Speaker 3: Ultimately, the evolution of Yahweh.
Speaker 1: So conditioning over time, and it's forceful indoctrination to make
Speaker 1: that Yahweh wants a God of Metallurgy into the all
Speaker 1: supreme being. So the Grand Architect of the Universe, as
Speaker 1: they call him in the Free Masonic Order and other
Speaker 1: fraternal orders right that go, the Grand Architect of the
Speaker 1: Universe is more like Gato, but he is an architect,
Speaker 1: not a creator. What's the difference. Well, an architect drafts
Speaker 1: up plans and carpenters put things together with material that
Speaker 1: already exists. They don't create the material, and neither does
Speaker 1: the architect. So you can only make things with what's
Speaker 1: already in existence. If you're an architect. If you're a creator,
Speaker 1: that's a whole different story, and there's a big difference there,
Speaker 1: especially when you're trying to play follow the leader and
Speaker 1: trying to pick the right one.
Speaker 2: Not only reflects the history of the people of Israel,
Speaker 2: that also illustrates a broader process of how religions evolve
Speaker 2: and adapt to cultural and political changes. From a desert
Speaker 2: deity to the central figure of three major monotheistic religions,
Speaker 2: Yahweh's story is a testament to how faith and identity
Speaker 2: can be reshaped over time throughout history. The figure of
Speaker 2: Yahweh did not develop in isolation. His identity and characteristics
Speaker 2: were shaped by the influences of various ancient cultures with
Speaker 2: which the Israelites came into contact, from Egypt to Mesopotamia
Speaker 2: and through Canaanite beliefs. Yahweh absorbed attributes, symbols, and practices
Speaker 2: that enriched his worship and transformed him into the omnipotent deity.
Speaker 1: Grafting, so manipulation, e stealing all the add to this
Speaker 1: is what they do when they create their composites for
Speaker 1: their heroes that were forced to believe actually existed, like
Speaker 1: Moses and Abraham and YadA and YadA, YadA, YadA, all
Speaker 1: the way down. They take attributes from things that are
Speaker 1: already pre existing because they didn't have a long history.
Speaker 1: They were nomadic, they were sorcerers, they didn't have a
Speaker 1: history of any achievements, so they had to create their own.
Speaker 1: When they were in the Hellenistic times, during the time
Speaker 1: of Talame Soda, they were given a Greek education. And
Speaker 1: then there's this passage that says they wrote in Greek
Speaker 1: and they thought in Greek and what does that mean. Well,
Speaker 1: ancient Hebrew has a very limited way of expressing things, right,
Speaker 1: It's a very primitive language. Stone Age when you have
Speaker 1: more words at your disposal, you can express more complicated thoughts.
Speaker 1: So if you think in Greek, it's because it's your
Speaker 1: first language, not because it's your second. So that goes
Speaker 1: to show that they were basically mostly illiterate before the
Speaker 1: time of the Greeks giving them the education. As soon
Speaker 1: as they acquired it, the first thing they try to
Speaker 1: do is one upmanship on the Greeks, not because they were,
Speaker 1: you know, like the narcissists that they are never content
Speaker 1: with appreciating anything that people do, but rather envious and
Speaker 1: jealous of that. So they took to task, starting very
Speaker 1: early on yellow journalism, to rewrite and revise history to
Speaker 1: put themselves in the center.
Speaker 3: We recognize day.
Speaker 2: One of the most intriguing connections is with Mesopotamian religion,
Speaker 2: particularly with Sumerian and Akkadian gods. Some scholars suggest that
Speaker 2: Yahweh may have inherited elements from Enlil, the god of
Speaker 2: wind and storms, or from Madak, the great Babylonian god
Speaker 2: known for his role as a creator and supreme ruler.
Speaker 2: The similarities between Biblical narratives and Mesopotamian myths, such as
Speaker 2: the Great Flood indicate that the image of Yahweh was
Speaker 2: influenced by the religious traditions of this region, especially.
Speaker 1: Which would have been the Babylonian uh what is called
Speaker 1: it's the Babylonian Genesis story. The the mu Elish had
Speaker 1: a very similar character as Noah, with a little bit
Speaker 1: less of the Semitized dirty practices and actions. Right, once
Speaker 1: they get their hands on things, everything's perverted, you know,
Speaker 1: messing with your daughters and stuff like that. But hey,
Speaker 1: let's read this real quick. In Dennis Party's researching the
Speaker 1: topic of the Yigretic tablets, he has this to say,
Speaker 1: the tablets execavated. Now, this is Yugurd, this is Cannonites. Right,
Speaker 1: so far present the result of accidental and random preservation. Therefore,
Speaker 1: they cannot be considered a fair and complete representation of
Speaker 1: the cult. Further, the difficulty of vocabulary and syntax in
Speaker 1: these texts is compounded by the fact that they are
Speaker 1: almost entirely prescriptive. That is to say, they define aspects
Speaker 1: of what is to be offered or said in a
Speaker 1: sacrifice or ritual. They do not explain the significance of
Speaker 1: these actions or of the ceremony as a whole. This
Speaker 1: leaves many uncertainties and questions regarding the practice of religion
Speaker 1: at Yugrit. Nonetheless, the texts do say something about religion there.
Speaker 1: The texts themselves are divided into two large groups. The
Speaker 1: first constitutes those writings that describe religious matters associated with
Speaker 1: the official sacrificial cult. These include lists of gods and goddesses,
Speaker 1: descriptions of which animals are to be sacrificed and what
Speaker 1: the officiates are to do during various holy days, mortuary offerings,
Speaker 1: texts about divination, and one or two prayers. Some texts
Speaker 1: even reveal a form of check marks in the left
Speaker 1: margin of the tablet, placed beside each deity's name. They
Speaker 1: indicate that the appropriate sacrifice was made and they check
Speaker 1: it off like a little list kind of you know,
Speaker 1: very very mechanical and industrious of them. A second group
Speaker 1: of texts examined religious practice outside the cult. This includes
Speaker 1: incantations and recipes for snakes, a lesson the snake bite right,
Speaker 1: how to cure it, a hangover, sexual dysfunction, and other problems.
Speaker 1: It also may include rituals involving the dead necromancy, right, well,
Speaker 1: that's just speaking to the dead, and there's probably never
Speaker 1: feel you good on too, for all we know, as
Speaker 1: well as other texts describing the administrative taxation. Oh of course,
Speaker 1: oy veaser are in the house. Of course, there's gonna
Speaker 1: be some sort of taxation and the distribution of goods
Speaker 1: for religious purposes. Most significantly significantly are the few prayers
Speaker 1: that are preserved. This indicates the different types of literature
Speaker 1: that has been discovered at Yugurrit more than it suggests
Speaker 1: the amount of praying that the citizens of Yugrit did.
Speaker 1: One of the prayers preserved exhorts the reader to invoke
Speaker 1: Ball when attacked by an enemy. The significant prose, I'm
Speaker 1: sorry the supplequent promises to visit Ball's temple and to
Speaker 1: offer sacrifices and a manner not unlike some of the
Speaker 1: lament psalms of the Bible. Another text, sometimes called the
Speaker 1: Eugarritic Day of Atonement. Oh look at that. That's a
Speaker 1: ritual is described by Party as a party as the
Speaker 1: Guy Dennis party as where am i at? As a
Speaker 1: ritual of national unity. Nevertheless, a sense of confession and
Speaker 1: forgiveness seems to be involved in his conclusion. Party E
Speaker 1: hopefully helpfully sorry helpfully provides his list of similarities and
Speaker 1: contrasts between Yugarritic religions religious practice and that found in
Speaker 1: the Bible. Among the former the Bible, he lists vocabularies
Speaker 1: such as alter, peace offering, burnt offering and which is
Speaker 1: a holocaust right, burnt offering, and the House of the
Speaker 1: dit Mostly he notes a similarity in terms of what
Speaker 1: is absent. Both do not mention the sacrifice of children, pigs,
Speaker 1: and wild animals, nor do they record a year's festival
Speaker 1: for or a fertility cult. In terms of contrasts, there
Speaker 1: are differences of genres between the two collective collections of literature.
Speaker 1: Yugarritic sacrificial texts do not mention expiation, sin, sorry, expiation, sin, clement,
Speaker 1: blood and fat. There is a text describing a donkey sacrifice,
Speaker 1: and there is more emphasis on offerings of wine and
Speaker 1: of textiles. Distinct personnel and their rules are not mentioned
Speaker 1: much at Ygurrit. Now here's a funny thing describing a
Speaker 1: donkey sacrifice. What do they have, old heyeseus writing in
Speaker 1: on is that a little bit of a foreshadowing for
Speaker 1: those chuckling in dark mockery who write in that right, right, right,
Speaker 1: right right, Because as a Christian you've elected by manipulation
Speaker 1: and treachery and schemes. The people have tricked you into
Speaker 1: adopting the role as the sacrificial class. So this is
Speaker 1: all the same Saturn cult but as a Christian, you
Speaker 1: are going to be the one that goes and fights
Speaker 1: the Jews, wars for them. Hey, has that turned out
Speaker 1: to be the case? Do they kidnap other Jewish children
Speaker 1: for human sacrifice or do they do it to other
Speaker 1: than Jews? Right, so there you have it. We are
Speaker 1: the sacrificial class if we've elected to be a Christian.
Speaker 1: All right. Distinct personnel and their roles are not mentioned
Speaker 1: in Yugra. In light of the more recent publications of
Speaker 1: the thirteenth century BC in mar religious texts from the
Speaker 1: North Syrian city, it would have been useful to note
Speaker 1: comparisons in contrast between the three groups. Mr has priestly installation,
Speaker 1: festival and cultic calendar texts that much more closely resemble
Speaker 1: the genres found in the Bible than those of you
Speaker 1: grit and that write up can be found at Dendurerseminary
Speaker 1: dot EEDU. All right, so there's that. I just wanted
Speaker 1: to add that in there. It kind of like dispel
Speaker 1: the rumor like is it the culture or is it
Speaker 1: the priest craft that corrupts everything? Because I want to
Speaker 1: the case to be made here is that this stuff
Speaker 1: was changed over time by a corruption and co opting.
Speaker 1: And that's the only thing that those things that we
Speaker 1: call the Oivays today are really accomplishing throughout history is
Speaker 1: just the poisoning, the parasitic infection, all other things our
Speaker 1: attributes that they steal from others and claim that they
Speaker 1: are the sole arbiters of, such as morality, monotheism, baptism
Speaker 1: and all those things.
Speaker 3: Right during the Babylonian nations.
Speaker 1: Well, and sorry, monogamy. That was another Gothic thing brought
Speaker 1: into their world because when our ancestors came upon them
Speaker 1: five thousand years ago, they were into sexual ritual acts
Speaker 1: because of course it was a cult. And this is
Speaker 1: what they still practice in all of these all these
Speaker 1: manifestations such as the Lurian cabalistic practices, sabotage, heavy the
Speaker 1: the you know, Francism and all that stuff. So we're
Speaker 1: going to get into that and how depraved that is
Speaker 1: once I get a chance to. Once we get through this,
Speaker 1: and I read you from my book, the chapter called
Speaker 1: Jacob Frank, the impetus behind the New World Order and Zionism.
Speaker 2: Sile when the Israelites were exposed to Mesopotamian cosmology. Another
Speaker 2: significant influence comes from Egypt, where the Israelites lived for
Speaker 2: centuries before the Exodus. Some aspects of Yahweh's depiction, such
Speaker 2: as his association.
Speaker 3: With fire, smoke, and mountains.
Speaker 2: Reflect parallels with the Egyptian god Tah, a created deity
Speaker 2: linked to metallurgy and craftsmanship.
Speaker 1: Right, melurgy and craftsmanship. That's the Yahweh, one of two
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty six quote unquote deities.
Speaker 2: Over the famous episode of the burning bush may have
Speaker 2: connections to Egyptian symbolism, where fire was seen as a
Speaker 2: purifying and divine element. The impact of Canaanite culture.
Speaker 1: Is there's two Egypts too, right, there's the uncorrupted Egypt,
Speaker 1: and then there's the corrupted and in poisons and this
Speaker 1: is how every culture, kingdom and empire, this is their
Speaker 1: their his, their life cycle. Unfortunately, the poison comes in
Speaker 1: too a strong and semi if not very noble people
Speaker 1: and slowly alters them, corrupts them. And then the sorcery
Speaker 1: I believe also strips from them the tether that they
Speaker 1: have to anything that is pure good, and because once
Speaker 1: you get into these practices and you start doing the
Speaker 1: things that they do, you can't possibly go back from that,
Speaker 1: like you can't harm a child the way that they
Speaker 1: do and then still think that you have some sort
Speaker 1: of tether to God, the Creator, the benevolent love, trust,
Speaker 1: you know, truth. So then they become like self made NPCs, detached,
Speaker 1: rootless wanderers as they are nomadic a place would that
Speaker 1: will not assimilate anywhere, and envious and hateful because either
Speaker 1: they were duped, tricked, or whatever. But from from one
Speaker 1: priest to another, now they have to either corrupt or
Speaker 1: destroy all that is good. Corrupting as well helps because
Speaker 1: then they're you know, misery loves company. If they got
Speaker 1: tricked into losing their their light, their soul, their whatever
Speaker 1: through sing around with this stuff, well then they're going
Speaker 1: to take others with them, and maybe that beast on
Speaker 1: their back, the dark packast passenger that they now have
Speaker 1: demands it of them. And that's what we're dealing with
Speaker 1: on a world scale right now. There doesn't have to
Speaker 1: be a lot of them, especially when they have all
Speaker 1: the influence of the media. They've created your education all
Speaker 1: through an infiltration, and they run under countries and your
Speaker 1: financial institutions. What else is left? Oh yeah, they also
Speaker 1: are in charge of allopathic sorcery, even though by Pharmachia
Speaker 1: shall all nations be deceived.
Speaker 2: Perhaps the most evident, as the Israelites lived in close
Speaker 2: contact with them, the Canaanites worshiped a supreme god called El,
Speaker 2: who was considered the father of the.
Speaker 3: Gods and ruler of the pantheon.
Speaker 2: Over time, the Israelites began to identify Yahweh l adopting
Speaker 2: his titles and attributes. This is evident in the frequent
Speaker 2: use of names such as Elohem, a plural form that
Speaker 2: originally referred to the multiple Chanaanite gods but was reinterpreted
Speaker 2: in the Bible.
Speaker 1: That's an assumption too. We don't know if that's the why.
Speaker 1: It sounds like it's a plausible explanation for that. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of we that it just gets dismissed by
Speaker 1: people reading the Old Testament that to knock. But I
Speaker 1: would also venture I guess that maybe it's because there
Speaker 1: was an actual group of people, because God and God,
Speaker 1: there's a thing that they love and hate, they despise
Speaker 1: because they're not, and they're constantly flipping between inverting what
Speaker 1: they are and then still adopting their attributes to create
Speaker 1: their own composite people. Right, So it's very odd how
Speaker 1: they've it's a schizophrenic mind. It's the mind of an insane,
Speaker 1: really wicked, treacherous individual. Plural majestic plural to denote Yahweh.
Speaker 2: Archaeological evidence also suggests that in the early stages of
Speaker 2: Israelite religion, Yahweh was worshiped alongside as Shier, a Canaanite
Speaker 2: mother goddess of fertility ancient inscription.
Speaker 1: Not to be confused with a not and that was
Speaker 1: a daughter of El who was kind of like Balls.
Speaker 1: If you don't remember Huggadah, he had like all female guards.
Speaker 1: It was kind of like that, but she was kind
Speaker 1: of like his woman too. She threatens to kill l
Speaker 1: at one point because she's very adamant about, you know,
Speaker 1: Ball getting his own pantheon. She reblishes and killing Ball's opponents,
Speaker 1: even though those were human opponents that were apparently taking
Speaker 1: sights of another deity. So she goes ahead and talks
Speaker 1: about how it's basically like the same thing with bloody Mary, right,
Speaker 1: it's like like to bathe in the blood type of deal,
Speaker 1: Like she really gets into her killing of humans or
Speaker 1: other people. But we can also start to wonder, now,
Speaker 1: were these actually deities or is this the perception of
Speaker 1: people who are being ruled by to them foreign people.
Speaker 1: And that might harken back to our ancestors, and they
Speaker 1: just made everything that we did evil because they were
Speaker 1: pissed off that we were there reigning on their parade.
Speaker 1: There's a possibility.
Speaker 2: Optionians discovered at sites such as countil at Ajrud, Mention
Speaker 2: Yahweh and his Ashier, indicating that pure monotheism was a
Speaker 2: gradual construction that evolved over time as foreign influences were
Speaker 2: absorbed or rejected. Nomadic cultures so played a crucial role
Speaker 2: in shaping.
Speaker 1: The whole idea that this is like the God's word
Speaker 1: and the divine thing and YadA yadah. That's the part
Speaker 1: that we need to like get away from because if
Speaker 1: this is, oh, that part we can use, we can
Speaker 1: use that part. Oh, that's a good selling point over time.
Speaker 1: You know, it's all merchandising, baby, it's all marketing, so
Speaker 1: that it's not the it's not the word of God,
Speaker 1: a word of which, like you know, the nature of
Speaker 1: God cannot be understood. But apparently the Jews have decided
Speaker 1: that because the chosen ones, they understand them perfectly right right,
Speaker 1: and their their actions show so whatever God they are
Speaker 1: attached to would not be the creator, if they are
Speaker 1: of any to any But they do mess with conjure
Speaker 1: and probably interact with some sort of dark forest quite often,
Speaker 1: and that's what they're going to like, whatever they summon
Speaker 1: is must be the guy. That's quite the assumption there.
Speaker 3: The perception of Yahweh.
Speaker 2: Groups like the Shasu, ancient desert peoples, worshiped a god
Speaker 2: named Yahweh long.
Speaker 3: Before the Israelites adopted his worship.
Speaker 2: Egyptian records mentioning the Chasu of Yahweh suggests that his
Speaker 2: veneration centered around a desert deity associated with fire, wind,
Speaker 2: and water, key elements for survival in an arid environment.
Speaker 2: This could explain why Yahweh is frequently depicted in the
Speaker 2: Bible as a storm deity capable of leading his people
Speaker 2: through the wilderness and providing water from the rock. As
Speaker 2: the Israelites expanded their territory and established a kingdom, the
Speaker 2: image of Yahweh continued to have if.
Speaker 1: That even happened, I have a lot of questions about
Speaker 1: this whole temple temple temple nonsense was cleaned in what
Speaker 1: was reality. I don't believe in that there was an
Speaker 1: exodus at all, whatsoever. I think that's all made up
Speaker 1: as well. Well.
Speaker 2: Evolve elements from surrounding cultures were incorporated, but unique narratives
Speaker 2: were also created to reinforce his singularity as the god
Speaker 2: of Israel. Prophets played a crucial role in this process,
Speaker 2: condemning the influence of foreign gods and promoting the idea
Speaker 2: of a unique and jealous yah Wo who tolerated yahooooooo.
Speaker 1: Right, jealous, because that's what a creator god needs to be. Right,
Speaker 1: You're only jealous if you're not the one. What is
Speaker 1: there to be jealous of? If you're on top and
Speaker 1: you're not just an impostor? Right, this is an impostor
Speaker 1: talking and feeling and sensing and his actions destroying if
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. It's like, don't you have
Speaker 1: a better handle on your creation then to have to
Speaker 1: keep on resetting it and destroying it and bringing it
Speaker 1: back to nothing with only a few survivors. That aren't
Speaker 1: really the greatest people in the world either, but they
Speaker 1: have that morality. That is, the lack of morality that
Speaker 1: is common in the Uivas today did.
Speaker 2: No other deities. Finally, interactions with the Persian Empire introduced
Speaker 2: new philosophical and religious ideas that influenced the conception of Yahweh.
Speaker 1: Polishing up the image to sell similar people. That's marketing everybody.
Speaker 3: Version.
Speaker 2: Dualism, which presented a cosmic conflict between the forces of
Speaker 2: good and evil, profoundly impacted Israelite theology. This influence helped
Speaker 2: shape concepts such.
Speaker 1: As the os three Arms because aaacs designs behind them
Speaker 1: and designers right.
Speaker 2: There position between Yahweh and Satan and contributed to the
Speaker 2: development of a more defined eschatology in late Judaism.
Speaker 1: And for those of you who don't remember, eschatology is
Speaker 1: like the study of the end of the world. Blah
Speaker 1: blah blah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Throughout history, Yahweh has been portrayed as the almighty and
Speaker 2: protective God of the people of Israel. However, some theories
Speaker 2: suggest a much more unsettling interpretation of his true identity,
Speaker 2: raising questions about his origin and role in human history.
Speaker 2: One of the most striking hypotheses comes from Gnosticism, a
Speaker 2: philosophical movement that identifies Yahweh as a demiurge, a jealous
Speaker 2: and imperfect being who created the material world to trap
Speaker 2: humanity in an illusion of reality. According to this view,
Speaker 2: Yahweh is not the supreme god of the universe, but
Speaker 2: an inferior entity that seeks to keep humans away from
Speaker 2: true divinity and spiritual knowledge. Ancient texts, such as the
Speaker 2: writings of the Scythians and Marsianites, depict Yahweh as a
Speaker 2: cruel and vengeful god, vastly different from the God of
Speaker 2: love preached by Jesus in the New Testament. Another widely
Speaker 2: debated theory suggests a connection between Yahweh and ancient astronauts,
Speaker 2: specifically the Sumerian Anunaki.
Speaker 1: All right, well, I'm going to stop them right there
Speaker 1: and say that this idea of ancient aliens to explain
Speaker 1: away previous, you know, societies that were of high advancement,
Speaker 1: is the way of eracing history once again, so that
Speaker 1: their fingerprints aren't all over what may have been their
Speaker 1: hand that actually caused some sort of reset catastrophic event
Speaker 1: potentially or not, who knows, but that these cyclical things happen,
Speaker 1: and that would also be a dangerous thing for control,
Speaker 1: Right if you knew that at some point cyclically you're
Speaker 1: gonna get wiped out again, Why is anybody going to
Speaker 1: file follow anyone else's lead, because then life seems to
Speaker 1: have less purpose because it's all going to get set
Speaker 1: back to nothing again. So you erase that, you throw
Speaker 1: an aliens to this to explain away pyramids and stuff
Speaker 1: like that, and you take away the true formers of
Speaker 1: culture at the same time, who were the Goths our ancestors.
Speaker 1: Now they're going to semitize them, so we don't even
Speaker 1: realize that that's who they are that they're discussing. Call
Speaker 1: the man a naki because this is how those other
Speaker 1: people were viewed. The Goths were considered gods to some
Speaker 1: people because they were of a whole different line of people.
Speaker 1: They had different technological abilities, and there might have been
Speaker 1: some old artifacts that they had, you know, hanging around
Speaker 1: that would have shown to the primitive mind that they
Speaker 1: may have some kind of supernatural powers. Right, But they
Speaker 1: may have had some artifacts from the previous high society
Speaker 1: that still hung around for a while and that they
Speaker 1: were utilizing, and that might have made them appear to
Speaker 1: be like gods.
Speaker 2: Researchers like Zechariah Sitchen have proposed the biblical accounts such
Speaker 2: as the giving of the Law to Moses on Mount
Speaker 2: Sinai engulfed in fire and smoke.
Speaker 1: Zechariah Sitchen was highly funded by Jordan Maxwell, who was
Speaker 1: an adept, which means he was sonic, which means he
Speaker 1: was a little little sorcerer himself, so that being said.
Speaker 2: Could be evidence of encounters with extraterrestrial beings. According to
Speaker 2: this hypothesis, Yahweh might have been an advanced entity guiding
Speaker 2: the Israelites using superior technology which was missing too dept
Speaker 2: as divine intervention. Interestingly, descriptions of Yahweh descending from the sky,
Speaker 2: emitting fire, and leading his people with a pillar of
Speaker 2: cloud closely resemble reports of spacecraft sightings in ancient civilizations
Speaker 2: from an esoteric and a cult perspective.
Speaker 1: Though, was that aliens because aren't we in a dome,
Speaker 1: aren't we in a firm? Or could that potentially just
Speaker 1: be survivors of a previous cataclysm or a different part
Speaker 1: of the Earth that we don't know about because they've
Speaker 1: isolated us to just these continents you know, or something
Speaker 1: that's underground that comes out every once in a while
Speaker 1: to like a cicada, so let people know that they're
Speaker 1: the ones in charge.
Speaker 2: Yahweh has been linked to Saturn, the planet associated we go.
Speaker 1: Finally, he says it, Yahweh has been linked to Saturn.
Speaker 1: What are all these Abrahamic death cults about? Besides having
Speaker 1: way too much emphasis on the end of the world
Speaker 1: and end of times? Uh what escatalid logical? But also
Speaker 1: they are the Saturn cult. This is a sick, sick
Speaker 1: cult of priests who love human sacrifice, canibalism, drinking blood
Speaker 1: and sorcery and poisoning people for their delight, which is pharmacia. Yeah,
Speaker 1: good times. That is Saturn cult.
Speaker 2: Is with discipline, restriction, and control over time.
Speaker 1: Conas right control over time. Chronos Cornus is Saturness. Satan
Speaker 1: is set.
Speaker 3: Because of esoteric symbolism.
Speaker 2: Argue that Yahweh may have originally been a deity tied
Speaker 2: to structure and power, more connected to submission and punishment
Speaker 2: than unconditional love.
Speaker 1: And what have I been saying? It's not the benevolent
Speaker 1: Creator that's their god. It's something completely different. It's an
Speaker 1: impostor whether it exists or not. They're communicating with something
Speaker 1: that's pretty dark. I mean, magic does have an actual effect.
Speaker 1: There is something that they're doing. They are getting something.
Speaker 1: There is an exchange here, but at the detriment there. Well,
Speaker 1: whatever soul they may have had prior, they don't have
Speaker 1: anymore now. Like I said, they're like NPC's they don't
Speaker 1: have it tether. They don't have empathy, they don't have compassion.
Speaker 1: They don't have They're indifferent to other human suffering, and
Speaker 1: they actually go to great lengths to do all kinds
Speaker 1: of creative torture to people to see if they can
Speaker 1: get a rise, some kind of dope mean hit from
Speaker 1: it right.
Speaker 2: Some suggest that many ritual practices and symbols attributed to Yahweh,
Speaker 2: such as the Sabbath, Saturn's Day, the black garments worn
Speaker 2: by priests, and the presence of the cube in Jewish tradition,
Speaker 2: are deeply linked to the ancient worship of Saturn. Additionally,
Speaker 2: some believe that the hidden numerology behind Yahweh's name may
Speaker 2: be connected to sixty six y' six.
Speaker 1: Oh, so, let's just keep in mind that the number
Speaker 1: eight is the number of Saturn. Eights pop up a
Speaker 1: lot when you start looking into this stuff. And in
Speaker 1: my book the last episode, I explained the one surrounding
Speaker 1: the Heina and what they did in twenty twenty three.
Speaker 2: The infamous number of the beast mentioned in the Book
Speaker 2: of Revelation. Even within theological circles, some scholars have suggested
Speaker 2: that Yahweh's portrayal in the Old Testament bears striking similarities
Speaker 2: to the characteristics attributed to Satan in modern Christianity. Is jealousy, upsie,
Speaker 2: severe punishments, and demand for absolute submission have led some
Speaker 2: to speculate that Yahweh and Satan might represent two sides
Speaker 2: of the same entity, a dual principle that governs the
Speaker 2: universe through.
Speaker 1: Or the schizophrenia that they themselves possess in their own
Speaker 1: you know, their own makeup, so they of course will
Speaker 1: have a reflection of that and the deity that they create.
Speaker 1: So the capability of both, but more geared towards the
Speaker 1: punishment and taking this chosen or supremacy, supremacist stance that
Speaker 1: they're the only ones bright enough to do and create
Speaker 1: and make this condition that they need. In the Kabbalistic
Speaker 1: tradition for the reuniting of the of the sparks or
Speaker 1: of the light back to source so that they can
Speaker 1: see their God that God wants souls. Basically, isn't that interesting?
Speaker 1: They want to rip the life force out of us
Speaker 1: or torture it out of us to where we're detached
Speaker 1: and without a tether ourselves, and then that light goes
Speaker 1: back to their source, more bent on destruction and human
Speaker 1: misery than it is on good and love. But that's
Speaker 1: always the rope, that's the that's what the trap is
Speaker 1: baited with. You think it's something good because it can
Speaker 1: also be capable of good, But good for what purpose?
Speaker 1: To be good? To show love? Or is it to
Speaker 1: manipulate and to trick? And what is their nature? Ah? Baby,
Speaker 1: you're the stop baby, you're the one. You're the one.
Speaker 1: It's all about you, right, and then they rip you
Speaker 1: off and steal your money or do something else horrible
Speaker 1: to you.
Speaker 3: Creation and destruction.
Speaker 2: These alternative perspectives on Yahweh challenge traditional religious beliefs and
Speaker 2: invite us to reconsider our understanding of divinity, history, and
Speaker 2: the forces that have shaped human civilization. Throughout this journey
Speaker 2: into the historical, mythological, and esoteric roots of Yahweh. We
Speaker 2: have uncovered that his image is far more complex than
Speaker 2: what we have traditionally been taught. From his possible origins
Speaker 2: as a local desert deity to his rise as the
Speaker 2: one true God of monotheism, Yahweh's story is filled with transformations, reinterpretations,
Speaker 2: and adaptations over time. Archaeological evidence and ancient texts suggests
Speaker 2: that Yahweh was not always the supreme and all powerful
Speaker 2: god we know today, but rather a constantly evolving figure
Speaker 2: shaped by the cultural.
Speaker 1: U does not forget here, I mean, I don't care
Speaker 1: what the hell is surrounding him here with others weird
Speaker 1: to mind shit, but this and there are depictions of
Speaker 1: what our ancestors would have looks like, not theirs, not them, weird.
Speaker 2: Right, Political and religious shifts of humanity. His associations with
Speaker 2: Mesopotamian gods, his ties to ancient Canaanite practices, and even
Speaker 2: the unsettling theories linking him to the Anonaki or the
Speaker 2: gnostic Demiurge challenge our understanding of this enigmatic divinity. Yet,
Speaker 2: beyond the theories and historical data, Yahweh represents something much deeper,
Speaker 2: the eternal human longing to understand our origins and purpose
Speaker 2: in the universe. Whether seen as a god of love
Speaker 2: and justice or as a demanding and formidable deity, Yahweh
Speaker 2: remains a powerful symbol that has left an indelible mark
Speaker 2: on human history. Is our way, the key to our
Speaker 2: spiritual destiny, or merely a cultural construct created to give
Speaker 2: meaning to our existence? The answer, as always, lies in
Speaker 2: each person's individual quest for truth.
Speaker 3: If this video has given you a new.
Speaker 1: Okay their advertisement? Now okay, well some people ask some
Speaker 1: questions here, let's go ahead, uh back over came out there,
Speaker 1: you go, yeah, okay, so that's interesting. The Rumble doesn't
Speaker 1: have a character that's really strange. Doesn't let you see
Speaker 1: how many people are watching. You have to go to
Speaker 1: the actual sleep all right? For those of you on
Speaker 1: FTG media, how are you good? To see you those
Speaker 1: of you have run Rumble always a pleasure and hello
Speaker 1: On YouTube by old old channel from five six years ago.
Speaker 1: We are playing a game here, rolling the dice, trying
Speaker 1: to make video content over there that might actually stick
Speaker 1: without it being deleted or muted or whatever. So I
Speaker 1: don't know, I don't know. We'll see how long ago.
Speaker 1: It's the first BS I see that I get irritated
Speaker 1: with it again, I'll just stop again, go back to
Speaker 1: breaking animal videos and make a whole different channel. All right,
Speaker 1: now here it comes to the reading. But also I
Speaker 1: think we should take a look at this real quick.
Speaker 1: This is a forty five minute long video. I'm not
Speaker 1: going to get into that deep of it, but I
Speaker 1: just want you guys to see. I don't know if
Speaker 1: we ever covered this or not. I think we did.
Speaker 1: I think pretty sure we did actually, but this ties
Speaker 1: in with this. Yeh h. It's very cumbersome. I definitely
Speaker 1: appreciate the Rebel Studio thing that it's been not making
Speaker 1: very good videos lately. The audio is way off. I'm
Speaker 1: right now, I'm recruiting on my road casters, so I
Speaker 1: don't have to deal with bad audio quality when I
Speaker 1: go to post the podcast.
Speaker 4: Society's ever practiced the ritual murder of their own offspring
Speaker 4: is almost impossible for the modern mind to grasp. Of
Speaker 4: all the moral topics on which everyone can agree, this
Speaker 4: is surely at the top of the list. Our religious literature, however,
Speaker 4: records a violent past in which child sacrifice was a
Speaker 4: regrettable reality. Even the Bible contains both obvious and subtle
Speaker 4: references to the practice, but it is a topic few
Speaker 4: believers ever dwell on. In the Christian West, the Bible
Speaker 4: is often upheld as a moral load stone, with the
Speaker 4: implicit understanding that horrors like slavery and human sacrifice were
Speaker 4: never ever condoned by God, even if such practices existed
Speaker 4: at the time. And yet we find verses like this
Speaker 4: one in Ezekiel, which implies something much more sinister.
Speaker 5: I gave the Israelites statutes that were not good, and
Speaker 5: ordinances by which they could not live. I defiled them
Speaker 5: through their very gifts, in their offering up all their firstborn,
Speaker 5: in order that I might horrify them so that they
Speaker 5: might know that I am Yahweh to get the full story.
Speaker 1: Demanding of them, so says the person writing the book,
Speaker 1: demanding of them sacrifice seeing their firstborn, so that they
Speaker 1: may know He's Yahweh. But who's actually putting that to practice.
Speaker 1: There was no Yahweh dancing around making sure that you
Speaker 1: did this. It was the priesthood. The priesthood right. He's
Speaker 1: sick focks once again for their own delight and enjoyment,
Speaker 1: just power, you know, showing off their power and how
Speaker 1: they can manipulate people. They get off on that.
Speaker 4: Story on child sacrifice in the Bible. We must turn
Speaker 4: to the Bible's scholars, archaeologists and historians who.
Speaker 1: Have absolutely no fucking clue what they're talking about.
Speaker 4: Half the time, by the way, dedicate their lives to
Speaker 4: understanding ancient Israel. In this documentary, we take an unflinching
Speaker 4: look at the hard question.
Speaker 1: Right, We're gonna move ahead a little bit here. All right, yeah,
Speaker 1: here it is the meaning of Moloch. Now, this is
Speaker 1: exactly what I wanted it to be. I'm going to
Speaker 1: leave you to this for a second because people said,
Speaker 1: what do you mean? Molock is just a type of
Speaker 1: sacrifice and not a deity. Well, here you go, this
Speaker 1: is the answer for you. I'll be back in two
Speaker 1: point two. I drink a lout of coffee, do you
Speaker 1: know what I mean? So there you go that one.
Speaker 1: There you go, and back to that and.
Speaker 4: Play verses that concern child sacrifice in the Bible. In
Speaker 4: these later Bible translations, the Masoretic, Hebrew, the Septuagint, and
Speaker 4: the Vulgate treat the term as though it was a
Speaker 4: proper name or title of a god. Thus, for a
Speaker 4: long time, Bible scholars and historians assumed that the ancient
Speaker 4: Canaanites had sacrificed their children to an evil god named Molek.
Speaker 4: A typical example of these Molec verses is Leviticus eighteen
Speaker 4: twenty one, which.
Speaker 5: States you shall not give any of your offspring to
Speaker 5: pass them over to Molesh and so profane the name
Speaker 5: of your Oh God i Am Yah, where.
Speaker 4: In each of the Molek passages, one's offspring is described
Speaker 4: as being passed over or given to the Molek. So far,
Speaker 4: so good. Right, the evil Canaanite god Molek demanded child sacrifice,
Speaker 4: but the benevolent Israelite god Yahweh prohibited it. We may
Speaker 4: be reassured that the Bible preaches a morality that was
Speaker 4: far superior to that of Israel's wicked neighbors, or so
Speaker 4: people used to think. Almost a century ago, German theologian
Speaker 4: Atto ice Felt published a book claiming that there never
Speaker 4: was any deity called Molec. Instead, ice Felt argued that
Speaker 4: to the Molek actually meant as a Molek sacrifice, and
Speaker 4: he based his claim on new archaeola logical evidence for
Speaker 4: child sacrifices that had been discovered at ancient Phoenician colonies
Speaker 4: around the Mediterranean. Now, the accusation of child sacrifice had
Speaker 4: been made against the Phoenicians since ancient times. We find
Speaker 4: lurid descriptions of their sacrifice rituals the writings of Diadora Siclus,
Speaker 4: a historian from the first century BCE, and in the
Speaker 4: writings of Philo of Biblos, among others. What the new
Speaker 4: archaeological evidence showed, though, was that the inscriptions at these
Speaker 4: Phoenician sites referred to the child's sacrifices as mulk sacrifices,
Speaker 4: and that they were performed in fulfillment of a vow
Speaker 4: by the child's parents. Some inscriptions even used the identical
Speaker 4: phrase to the mulk that we find in the Bible,
Speaker 4: although the meaning of the word mulk was unclear and
Speaker 4: is still debated to today. Who was obvious to Eisfeldt
Speaker 4: and others that molek or molk was not in fact
Speaker 4: the name of a god, but a category of sacrifice
Speaker 4: ritual associated with vows. At the Phoenician sites, who is
Speaker 4: usually the goddess Tanate or her consort bal Haman, who
Speaker 4: was the recipient of the sacrifice, and the parents would
Speaker 4: receive some kind of blessing in return. One inscription found
Speaker 4: at a ritual site.
Speaker 5: Reads presented to the Lord bah al Hahman, is the
Speaker 5: vow that Idnibol, son of ab Deshmun, vowed the molk
Speaker 5: sacrifice of a person of his own flesh. He heard
Speaker 5: his voice and he blessed him.
Speaker 4: It's important to remember that Hoenicians and Israelites were two
Speaker 4: ethnic subgroups descended from the same West Semitic culture. They
Speaker 4: lived next to each other, spoke similar language dialects, and
Speaker 4: had similar religious practice. Thus, the strong argument can be
Speaker 4: made that the Bible verses in question are criticizing, not
Speaker 4: sacrifices to a foreign God, sacrifices of the mulk category. Now,
Speaker 4: there is no point in making laws prohibiting people from
Speaker 4: doing something they have no history of doing or interest
Speaker 4: in doing. From the Moloch verses alone, it is clear
Speaker 4: that some Israelites were indeed sacrificing their children through this
Speaker 4: ancient ritual. But to which God were they sacrificing their children?
Speaker 4: That should be obvious now when we take a new
Speaker 4: look at the same Leviticus eighteen twenty one.
Speaker 5: You shall not give any of your offspring to pass
Speaker 5: them over to the moulk and so profane the name
Speaker 5: of your god, I am Yahweh.
Speaker 4: Why would the name of Yahweh be profaned by this ritual?
Speaker 4: Sacrifices carried out in honor of Ball or Dagon or
Speaker 4: any other Canaanite god would not have that effect. The
Speaker 4: answer can only be that the Israelites were performing child
Speaker 4: sacrifices in Yahweh's name, with Yahweh as the recipient. You go,
Speaker 4: there's a second group of passages in the Pentitude that
Speaker 4: command the Israelites to give their first born to Yahweh.
Speaker 1: Oh, by the way, this is the and I read
Speaker 1: this in my book. One of the reasons why, like
Speaker 1: in a carthage they went on a kill crazy rampage
Speaker 1: when the Romans came to the gates, because they're like, oh,
Speaker 1: it's because we didn't we kind of forged are our
Speaker 1: duties to Ball or whomever? Because we were putting replacements
Speaker 1: in for our first born. So this is where this
Speaker 1: practice of dressing your children in a different a different
Speaker 1: gender's clothing to hide them and the black market for
Speaker 1: kidnapped children came into play because they were to use
Speaker 1: a substitute some other person's child. Sometimes they purchased these
Speaker 1: children from other parents. Sometimes they had scouts out there
Speaker 1: who were getting these people for the nobility, who were
Speaker 1: required by their strange culture to sacrifice their firstborn. So
Speaker 1: all these replacements, they felt guilty. It must be because
Speaker 1: we didn't do it the right way that we're being
Speaker 1: punished right now. So like two hundred children are like
Speaker 1: being thrown into into the fire when the Romans came,
Speaker 1: and they were disgusted and appalled by this right.
Speaker 4: And from the language used, it is clear that sacrifices
Speaker 4: are intended. One of these passages is Exodus twenty two,
Speaker 4: verses twenty eight and twenty nine.
Speaker 5: You shall not delay to make offerings from your fullness
Speaker 5: of the grape harvest and from your outflow of the presses.
Speaker 5: The first born of your sons you will give to me,
Speaker 5: just as you will do with your oxen and with
Speaker 5: your sheep. Seven days, he or it shall remain with
Speaker 5: his or its mother. On the eighth day you shall
Speaker 5: give he or it to me.
Speaker 4: And Stavrocapulu points out human first born are distinguished from
Speaker 4: animal first born here, but not differentiated, as the text
Speaker 4: plainly reads the same. Sacrificial our come applies to both.
Speaker 4: In contrast, Exodus thirteen thirteen and Exodus thirty four to
Speaker 4: twenty command similar sacrifice.
Speaker 1: No, it says, but every firstborn donkey you shall redeem
Speaker 1: with the sheep. If you do not redeem it, you
Speaker 1: must break its neck. Every first born male among your
Speaker 1: children you shall redeem. That's Exodus thirteen thirteen, Mockingbird Lane.
Speaker 1: Isn't that nice? That's a monster's address. But that's enough.
Speaker 1: But it should show you just how wonderful that book
Speaker 1: is in reality. And why the hell are people trying
Speaker 1: to bring about the end of the world for that
Speaker 1: stupid shit? I don't know. You'd have to ask the psychopaths.
Speaker 1: We're doing that? Oh, Christian Zionists by vase of all
Speaker 1: walks of life, Columultists, Cobbalists, you're a day psychopath, sociopath,
Speaker 1: ashke Nazi, Yeah, you know those people. Why why do
Speaker 1: we need a red heifer sacrifice? Oh? Yeah, because you know,
Speaker 1: the Kabalists want to do another reset, bringing the world
Speaker 1: back to the time before the vessels broke. Even though
Speaker 1: that's just a schizophrenic idea that was in someone's head.
Speaker 1: There's no way to actually prove that any of that
Speaker 1: is real. But hey, so what it's just the entire world,
Speaker 1: in all of existence that we're messing with. Why should
Speaker 1: that be a big deal? I don't know. Good question.
Speaker 1: All right, So now, oh well one, Jack and Freak
Speaker 1: The Impetus behind the New World Order and Zionism. All right,
Speaker 1: this is another piece of my book I'm giving you
Speaker 1: with my commentary side notes. I'm not really gonna like yesterday.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to stop to say quote or let
Speaker 1: you know when i'm adding. You just have to, you know,
Speaker 1: roll with it. Right. That's the thing that Cooper sometimes
Speaker 1: did very well. He'd say quote when he's quoting somebody,
Speaker 1: But oftentimes if he was reading a book called write
Speaker 1: Out and he was adding his own, you wouldn't know
Speaker 1: the difference between what he was reading and what he
Speaker 1: was actually saying himself. So anyway, Jacob Frank, The Impetus
Speaker 1: behind the New World Order and Zionism. This is on
Speaker 1: page one ninety eight of the larger book. At first glance,
Speaker 1: it may appear that the desires of Sabotage, Heavy and
Speaker 1: Frank are no different than the hedonistic thought of an
Speaker 1: average twenty something male. Heck by age seventeen, I was
Speaker 1: already brained someone of my own religious ideas of free loving,
Speaker 1: orgiastic indulgence. Same ethics applied as would be considered good
Speaker 1: conduct in any individual with common sense. The single do whatever,
Speaker 1: while the married aren't to behave like shitheads. But I
Speaker 1: saw a way too great conflict resolution to commness and
Speaker 1: harmony through a more socially acceptable sexual expression. The under
Speaker 1: sects are very uptight. I mean, Jacob Frank taught that
Speaker 1: orgies were necessary for purification from sin, so did Zebby.
Speaker 1: That sounds like something I'd say to a few girls
Speaker 1: at a beach resort when I couldn't decide which one
Speaker 1: was my favorite? What what my parents had time chairs?
Speaker 1: That is a little weird though, Right, the concept of
Speaker 1: resisting sin wasn't considered. It was better to commit sin
Speaker 1: so as to cleanse yourself from it. Right, no paradox there.
Speaker 1: They essentially were purging. And remember we talked about this
Speaker 1: with the tree of death path. Right, they're supposed to
Speaker 1: indulge in all the taboos. They basically are pointing the
Speaker 1: finger at religions that they too also set up, right
Speaker 1: like Catholicism. Now it's a heavy burden oh, that Catholic.
Speaker 1: You know, the Christian view of the world, such a
Speaker 1: burden on these taboos that now we must indulge in
Speaker 1: them or even in their own faith in ju days,
Speaker 1: and you know, when you're not reading the talbot and
Speaker 1: realize that they're all full of shit and that there
Speaker 1: is nothing really their conduct on a daily basis might
Speaker 1: be more restrictive than their sexual appetites and when it
Speaker 1: comes to the sickness of the Talmut. But nonetheless, nonetheless
Speaker 1: they are indulging as per the Kabbalah under this path
Speaker 1: to merge the the profane with the good right, or
Speaker 1: the or the wicked with the good. They're trying to
Speaker 1: they say, in those are two aspects of the same God.
Speaker 1: And watch the previous episode of Preestcraft when I read
Speaker 1: from the book before, same same basic thumbnail. It's a
Speaker 1: dog pooping. Yeah, it was better to commit sin so
Speaker 1: as to cleanse yourself from it. They essentially were purging
Speaker 1: like that horrific movie series based on Saturday Nilia, but
Speaker 1: perhaps purging with no ceiling or floor rather, because these
Speaker 1: acts sink straight to the bottom of hell. Frank and
Speaker 1: Zebby and I typed out the multiple ways of spelling
Speaker 1: that that I've seen had a religion of convenience where
Speaker 1: they could make it up as they went along and
Speaker 1: make excuses for whatever they did. And we went over
Speaker 1: that in just the last episode again that they do this.
Speaker 1: This is part of the Kabbala. It's subjective truth. They
Speaker 1: throw out truth for their own truth right and through
Speaker 1: this missicism nonsense. This is my impression of the lure
Speaker 1: in Kabbala, or rather Jacob Frank's manipulation. Have said, you know,
Speaker 1: using it, Frank, he actually took pride in his ignorance
Speaker 1: of it. To be clearer, but wasn't the apt pupil.
Speaker 1: He wasn't the apt pupil of Kabbala like his predecessors
Speaker 1: Sabbatai and Nathan of Gaza. Excuse me. Born Jacob Livovitz,
Speaker 1: Frank was the garbage paiale kid of two Polish Sabbatians.
Speaker 1: He was brought into this realm in Corolikua, Coroluca or Podolia, Ukraine.
Speaker 1: And oh look at that, yeah, Ukraine, isn't that something?
Speaker 1: In seventeen twenty six, Like the name indicates, this was
Speaker 1: prior to the recarving of Poland. It's noteworthy to recognize
Speaker 1: Jacob Frank's birthplace in the same country currently full of murderous,
Speaker 1: genocidal neo Bolsheviks backed by the NATO New World Order
Speaker 1: and funded by the looting of America, as the Bolosheviks
Speaker 1: were funded to invade Russia in nineteen sixteen seventeen using
Speaker 1: the recently looted gold and confiscated wealth of American post
Speaker 1: the Federal Reserve Act, you know, the act that allowed
Speaker 1: the foreign hands in London to successfully bank up our
Speaker 1: nation in twenty short years. In nineteen thirty three, the
Speaker 1: insolvment US lost sovereignty, defaulted and have ever since been
Speaker 1: fighting wars for bankers and taking commands from whoever the
Speaker 1: financial hands tell us to. Usually it's the United Nations
Speaker 1: or one of its communist socialist offshoots. Our once free
Speaker 1: country is owned by counterfeiting, pedal files and child killers.
Speaker 1: The Rothschilds were long standing Knights of Malta or the
Speaker 1: Sovereign Military Order of Malta. That's not only a there's
Speaker 1: not only a Zionist but also a Roman component to
Speaker 1: all this global dominance that may claim that many claim
Speaker 1: is spearheaded by the Rothschilds and the other international banking families,
Speaker 1: as hopefully this book has been illustrating. It isn't that simple,
Speaker 1: but they are certainly major players in the world affairs.
Speaker 1: The fact that they are in service to Roman military
Speaker 1: orders should tell you where the ultimate power likely lies.
Speaker 1: Same as it ever was. I mean, you get into
Speaker 1: the the eta and the inscriptions left in stone by
Speaker 1: our ancestors Rome edenites same word, basically different proportions of
Speaker 1: the same cult that they came across that were saturn worshippers.
Speaker 1: What do they practice? Do they not practice saturn Elia
Speaker 1: in Rome? Was that.
Speaker 5: Not?
Speaker 1: You know, I mean considered Messianism as it is termed
Speaker 1: on the Jewish Virtual Library site had gone from an
Speaker 1: over and popular pursuit to a secret sectarian cult. By
Speaker 1: the end of the seventeenth century. One may surmise there
Speaker 1: was a big letdown after Abbatai had converted to Islam
Speaker 1: after proclaiming himself the Messiah and promising the building of
Speaker 1: the Temple in Jerusalem. Many were disillusioned by the whole thing,
Speaker 1: while others, perhaps overly hopeful and self deluded, right into
Speaker 1: the conversion as simply a natural process of what it
Speaker 1: meant to enter the realm of the kleapoth in the
Speaker 1: effort to liberate the sparks. These loyalists, to the vision
Speaker 1: of Sabotai Zevi were playing it close to the chest
Speaker 1: now and a half Jewish, half Islamic sect of Sabatians
Speaker 1: was established in Turkey same place, so you find Ashquarnazis
Speaker 1: in Poland and particularly in Pololodia and Galatia, where they
Speaker 1: were formed numerous secret societies. Where there were numerous secret
Speaker 1: societies of Sabotians known among the people as Sabatai Zevits
Speaker 1: or hbs. To be clear, these were heretical sects awaiting
Speaker 1: in messiah stantic revolution and believing they were living in
Speaker 1: the Messianic age. They defied quote unquote Jewish principles of
Speaker 1: faith and discarded Jewish religion and laws and customs. Right
Speaker 1: power struggle between them and the Talmudic rabbis, right, But
Speaker 1: in reality it's because they said, hey, yeah, we can
Speaker 1: just dump all that and your authority because I'm the guy.
Speaker 1: The Shebs partook in sexual acts that were in direct
Speaker 1: opposition to the nature of Judaism, but not really when
Speaker 1: you get into the Talmud right mysticism, practiced by sebs
Speaker 1: still continued to attract the disenfranchised to their doctrine. In Weld,
Speaker 1: the rabbinical schools declined the atmosphere was right for the
Speaker 1: frustrated to gravitate toward and underground, toward the underground practices.
Speaker 1: I tell uside coach from the kay Blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: Jacob Leevwitz, Jacob Believwitz. Frank's father was expelled from their community,
Speaker 1: the Zevits, for his involve in such a sect of chebs. Remember,
Speaker 1: one of their practices was wife swapping, who took his
Speaker 1: family to Chernowitz. Wallachia, which is modern day in Romania.
Speaker 1: Willachia is famous for being the territory of one of
Speaker 1: my favorite Christians of all time, who Vlad the Third
Speaker 1: or Vlad Dragula, Son of the Dragon. The Order of
Speaker 1: the Dragon was a monarchical monarchical chivalric order only for
Speaker 1: selected higher aristocracy and monarchs, founded in fourteen oh eight
Speaker 1: by Sigismund of Luxembourg, who was the King of Hungary
Speaker 1: and Croatia and later the Holy Roman Emperor. It was
Speaker 1: fashioned after the military Order of the Crusades, requiring its
Speaker 1: initiates to defend the cross and fight the enemies of Christianity,
Speaker 1: particularly the Ottoman Empire, Wikipedia Order of the Dragon, or Wickipedifield.
Speaker 1: The lad knew how to handle infiltrators, something useful in
Speaker 1: the current climate of political terrorism and demicide we see worldwide.
Speaker 1: Nothing gets evils attention save its devastation, right when the
Speaker 1: only thing that they fear is their own detriment. So
Speaker 1: when you see they see a bunch of their buddies
Speaker 1: sliding down twenty foot spikes, they might think otherwise as
Speaker 1: to mess around, Right, The Turkish Sabatians were thriving in
Speaker 1: Wallachia by the time of Leivwitz's family. By the time
Speaker 1: the leave of its family arrived in seventeen thirty, the
Speaker 1: Turkish Saboteens were thriving in Wallachia already by the time
Speaker 1: they arrived. So much for the warrior Christians of earlier predominance.
Speaker 1: So we're talking about fourteen o eight over here founded,
Speaker 1: and then by seventeen thirty it's it's all gone ready.
Speaker 1: Frank himself was said to have resisted and rejected Jewish
Speaker 1: teachings of the Talmud even as a boy. From what
Speaker 1: I gather from an outside of looking in that's not
Speaker 1: necessarily a bad thing, considering how the Talmud depicts Yesu
Speaker 1: or Jesus as boiling an extrement for eternity and basically
Speaker 1: calling him a magician. I'm sure that's not why Frank
Speaker 1: opposed it. In fact, the methodology of the Talmud, while
Speaker 1: maybe not its laws, is something he would embrace as
Speaker 1: it pertains to numerology, damatia, and esoteric mysticism. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: you know they also have that license to you know,
Speaker 1: rape little three year olds, so yeah, Jacob to full
Speaker 1: advantage of that too. I'm sure Jacob was given the
Speaker 1: surname of Frank by those and he encountered in Turkey
Speaker 1: as a merchant. It was a name designated him as
Speaker 1: a European in their midst. Well, it also could have
Speaker 1: been because of the Franks. By the way, this is
Speaker 1: me talking now, as in you know who I'm talking about, right,
Speaker 1: It might have been a throwback to that to relate
Speaker 1: himself to that. But anyway, moving on, when in Podilia
Speaker 1: he began preaching to the revelations of Sabatai, which in
Speaker 1: Hebrew means Saturn. Yeah, Sabatai means Saturn. But this is
Speaker 1: not the Saturn cult. Everybody, no, no, no, Zevi was
Speaker 1: had somebody argue with me on Instagram. I started, They're
Speaker 1: like yeah, they're like not the Saturn cult though, like
Speaker 1: you're an idiot. Don't correct me if you don't know
Speaker 1: what you're talking about, which in Hebrew means Saturn Sabatai
Speaker 1: Zevi and caused a disturbance that led to a backlash
Speaker 1: by the Orthodox Jews. He was made to leave, while
Speaker 1: others he had gathered were apprehended by authorities and rabbis
Speaker 1: to be dealt with. The rabbis and the authorities apprehended
Speaker 1: the rest in seventeen fifty six, at the rabbidical court
Speaker 1: held in the village of Satanov. Interesting word, many of
Speaker 1: the sectarians confessed to having broken the fundamental laws of morality,
Speaker 1: and women confess to have being violated their marriage vows,
Speaker 1: and told of the sexual looseness which reigned in the
Speaker 1: sect under the guise of mystical symbolism. As a result
Speaker 1: of these disclosures, the Congress of Rabbis and Brody proclaimed
Speaker 1: a strong harem Hebrew for excommunication against all unashamed heretics,
Speaker 1: and made it obligatory upon every prusd to search them
Speaker 1: out and expose them. Right, But again, it doesn't make
Speaker 1: one portion of them better than the other. They all
Speaker 1: had their own sick, freaking practices and evil devices. Right
Speaker 1: as time went on, the sect began styling themselves as
Speaker 1: the anti Telmudists or Zoharists. Even under persecution, Frank went
Speaker 1: all in and identified himself as the successor to sabotaze
Speaker 1: Evy and claimed he was receiving messages from God right
Speaker 1: which God one can simply assume. He insisted his followers
Speaker 1: convert to Christianity outwardly, while remaining in and maintaining their
Speaker 1: true practices in secret. Remember that line from before. One
Speaker 1: cannot be a true believer if he professes what he
Speaker 1: believes publicly outwardly. Right, just the crypto, it's the spy,
Speaker 1: it's the liar, it's everything that they do is a
Speaker 1: goddamn lie. They live in lies, the lying liars who lie.
Speaker 1: He insists his followers convert to Christianity. They did all
Speaker 1: let's see twenty six thousand give or take, were baptized
Speaker 1: into Christianity slash Catholicism, and then they later developed the brethrens.
Speaker 1: And of course you have people like the the Jesuit
Speaker 1: who had a father who was a rabbi, Adam weishopt
Speaker 1: created the Illuminati. But what was the Illuminati? It was
Speaker 1: a group of Jesuits and Francists. Anyhow, this conversion occurred
Speaker 1: for political reasons, mainly as a shield for their activities.
Speaker 1: They went so far as to become baptized. Frank himself
Speaker 1: took on the baptismal name of Joseph. The Francis were
Speaker 1: also urged to urge by Protestants to come to them
Speaker 1: instead of to Catholicism. The Francis were urged by the Protestants,
Speaker 1: Hey we want you. Yeah, it was, and guess what,
Speaker 1: that's where the Brethrens came from. It was a short
Speaker 1: lived romance for Frank himself was still seen by his
Speaker 1: followers as the Holy Master, and while in Turkey he
Speaker 1: posed as a Muslim. He was arrested in Warsaw and
Speaker 1: brought to a church tribunal for being a lying faker Pants.
Speaker 1: That was the charge, lying faker Pants. He was imprisoned
Speaker 1: for thirteen years for the crime being a faker. Pants
Speaker 1: to the church had stiff penalties as he was convicted
Speaker 1: of being a teacher and a spurtter of heresy. The
Speaker 1: Francs posted up near the monastery Frank was held at
Speaker 1: and would routinely sneak in and receive direction from him.
Speaker 1: This is why you don't make a god out of
Speaker 1: any man. These people gave Frank his power by surrendering
Speaker 1: theirs to him. Without them, he'd just have been a
Speaker 1: forgotten shipbird in a cell. This impulse or desire in
Speaker 1: people to relinquish their own power and follow another is
Speaker 1: the only means by which one man can do that
Speaker 1: which he could not do alone. There's a lesson here
Speaker 1: that has been beaten out of us about the importance
Speaker 1: of individuality versus that of a hive mind. Collective unquestioning
Speaker 1: masses at the command of one often become quite dangerous.
Speaker 1: Discernment is lost in the mind of the follower mob.
Speaker 1: Frank taught that salvation was only attainable by a religious
Speaker 1: paradoxical mixture of Christianity and Sabatanism. Didn't think you were
Speaker 1: going to hear that, did you? Basically the grafting of
Speaker 1: the two to better co opt and infiltrate it. Frank,
Speaker 1: once released, was in Poland exploiting his daughter aptly named
Speaker 1: Eve to build his following right. Yes, incest was on
Speaker 1: the menu, as was the passing around of the children
Speaker 1: and wives for mystical ritual sex magic. Everywhere Frank traveled,
Speaker 1: the same story would play out. Optimism by the hierarchy
Speaker 1: that Frank was a bridge between the Christian Jewish relations
Speaker 1: would sour when they learned more of his subversive and
Speaker 1: perverse practices. Many were awestruck by Eve's beauty, and she
Speaker 1: played an important role in clouding the better judgment of men.
Speaker 1: She was fucking everybody yeah, at her father's request. While
Speaker 1: in Offenbach, Germany, Frank would have an encounter that would
Speaker 1: greatly improve his financial holdings and set the parameters for
Speaker 1: a plan of action that is in effect at a
Speaker 1: great magnitude today, the third man in the room. No doubt,
Speaker 1: anyone even slightly curious about American history has some familiarity
Speaker 1: with the story of the Jesuit trained animalislopt in mayorn
Speaker 1: Amshell Roschew's long term plan for co opting and infiltrating
Speaker 1: all key institutions and appointments under the flagship of what
Speaker 1: Mus called the Illuminati, originally known as the perfectibilist In
Speaker 1: or perfectibileists. The name embodied the concept of the perfect
Speaker 1: man to its initiates, a concept straight out of the
Speaker 1: ancient secret religions of Mystery Babylon and later the Kabbalah.
Speaker 1: But during this planning and plotting phase, there was a
Speaker 1: third man in the room, none other than Jacob Frank.
Speaker 1: It's possible that franksin flints on the Illuminati wasn't until
Speaker 1: a seventeen eighty six meeting, but evidence he was involved
Speaker 1: earlier exists from Zevi's teachings and the Lyrian Kabbala. Frank
Speaker 1: concluded that the only way to a new society or
Speaker 1: world order was through the inversion of of several sorry
Speaker 1: was through the inversion of every moral law and the
Speaker 1: total destruction of the present institutions and cultures. He declared
Speaker 1: it the duty of every Francis to partake in ritual sacrifice,
Speaker 1: child killing, flesh eating, blood, drinking, incest, sodomy, and passing
Speaker 1: around wives and children like party favors. Any of this
Speaker 1: sound familiar? Do these themes not pop up surrounding celebrities
Speaker 1: and I call them deletes in the book instead of elites?
Speaker 1: Would it surprise you then that Meyer rothschild converted to Frankism,
Speaker 1: and is that influence not apparent now that you've learned
Speaker 1: some of the core responsibilities of the Francists. He insisted
Speaker 1: that child sacrifice, rape, incests, and drinking of blood were
Speaker 1: perfectly acceptable and necessary religious rituals Sepper Robert sixteen sixty six,
Speaker 1: Redemption through Sin, page twenty. All of that and more
Speaker 1: were part of Frank's annual Lamb festivals. Now think about
Speaker 1: that for a second. It's important to also clarify something
Speaker 1: that's at the foundation of all this. Frank believed that
Speaker 1: the creator God was not the God that presented himself
Speaker 1: to the Israelites, who I still maintain are Canonites. He
Speaker 1: similar to some labeled nastics, but I call early Christians
Speaker 1: saw the Biblical God as an impostor the demiurge. For Frank,
Speaker 1: the central theological point was the garbing of the holy
Speaker 1: and the unholy. In his pseudo gnostic perspective, fake the
Speaker 1: holy evil world was a creation not of Yahweh but
Speaker 1: of an evil creator God. And yet God had But
Speaker 1: that's the thing. See, there's the mixture there. Yahweh was
Speaker 1: the evil demiurge. He was there, and yet God had
Speaker 1: become manifested and present in the world, thus transgressing the
Speaker 1: boundary between pure and impure. Of course, they did human beings.
Speaker 1: According to Frank, to imitate God, likewise, must enter into
Speaker 1: the realm of the profane. This is a very convoluted
Speaker 1: Swiss Cheese methed out mind. Even though they didn't have
Speaker 1: meth back then, probably maybe something close to it. So
Speaker 1: here's the difference. Frank does another twist of the assignments
Speaker 1: of who's who in regards to the Nastics viewpoint. It
Speaker 1: appears where Yahweh is seen as the true God and
Speaker 1: not the Creator. To Frank, the Gnostic Christians saw Yahweh
Speaker 1: or Yahweh as both the creator God and the demiurge
Speaker 1: or imposter. Gnostics viewed the God of the Old Testament
Speaker 1: as evil, and I would agree that there seems to
Speaker 1: be more than one God described in the Snack, and
Speaker 1: one is quite wicked and malicious. Both Frank and a
Speaker 1: good portion of Gnostics perceived the dualism, although perhaps disagreeing
Speaker 1: on the identity of the Creator. The very term gnostic
Speaker 1: or narcissism was a label later given to early Christians,
Speaker 1: among others, by those who had a very jaded, negative
Speaker 1: and biased opinion of them. The Gnostics weren't unified, and
Speaker 1: I said in quotes, Gnostics weren't unified by a core
Speaker 1: doctrine they all agreed with. There were so many exceptions
Speaker 1: and variables one could hardly lump everyone together and house
Speaker 1: them under a common term. Calling someone a gnostik had
Speaker 1: a disparaging connotation. Some claim it was like cynically calling
Speaker 1: someone to know it all by today's vernacular, they were
Speaker 1: simply early Christians, prior to the nic monopolization of acceptable thought.
Speaker 1: Other similarities between what was deemed Gnostic viewpoints and those
Speaker 1: which were espoused by the Cobblists was their ruling that
Speaker 1: this world is either evil, gnostic or impure or kabbala.
Speaker 1: And this is where they came from, right the gnostics,
Speaker 1: or what they call gnostics, where they said the world
Speaker 1: is either evil or impure. And the idea of divine
Speaker 1: sparks or a peace of God within, where Frank greatly
Speaker 1: differs is pretty distinct. It's all about the approach. The
Speaker 1: gnostic may clean and bandage it cut on a finger,
Speaker 1: whereas Frank may cut the hand off at the wrist
Speaker 1: and sodomize the unfortunate patient. He may have cut off
Speaker 1: the hand of the of the yeah at the risks
Speaker 1: and sodomized the unfortunate patient. While gnostic Christians rely on
Speaker 1: the individual journey for truth and gnoses to uplift their
Speaker 1: inner sparks or pieces of God and help them remember
Speaker 1: their true identity and purpose as they ascend after death,
Speaker 1: Frank took the approach of corrupting oneself to the ultimate
Speaker 1: extent and set out with the goal of making the
Speaker 1: world fully wicked so his Messiah may come annihilate them.
Speaker 1: His idea was to raise the sparks by way of
Speaker 1: force soul snatching, guys, taking your life force away from you,
Speaker 1: because we're not supposed to have it. We're the piles
Speaker 1: of material shit that just happen to somehow be there
Speaker 1: during the time of creation, right and we were animated,
Speaker 1: and we don't belong we don't, we don't belong with
Speaker 1: these But but but don't worry, because the chosen Jews,
Speaker 1: those people are different. They're not gonna be judged and
Speaker 1: they're not gonna have their souls ripped out, probably because
Speaker 1: they don't have any. But anyway, or the more modern
Speaker 1: alternative ending will be for the Francs to play the
Speaker 1: role of the corruptor and the destroyer, feeling justified that
Speaker 1: in doing so they're performing a great work. Many Gnostics
Speaker 1: see this world as a trapping created by an evil hand,
Speaker 1: and that the ascension back to Sourus is full of
Speaker 1: distractions and obstacles set in place to keep the soul
Speaker 1: or spark from reuniting to the monad or supreme God,
Speaker 1: therefore stuck in a reincarnation loop. But they seem to
Speaker 1: agree that it's everyone's personal journey to get to that
Speaker 1: point of liberation, and not something that can can or
Speaker 1: should be hastened, let alone forced by others. Frank, on
Speaker 1: the other hand, worked to invert everything and rather than
Speaker 1: lift up, he said, I did not come into this
Speaker 1: world to lift you up, but rather to cast you
Speaker 1: down to the bottom of the abyss abyss. Further than this,
Speaker 1: it is impossible to descend, nor can one ascend again
Speaker 1: by virtue of one's own strength, For only the Lord
Speaker 1: can raise one up from the depths by the power
Speaker 1: of his hand. So basically, from down there there's no
Speaker 1: place to go but up. Most perceived God as benevolent
Speaker 1: and of truth and love. Why Oh, why would anyone
Speaker 1: be worth raising whose deliberate objective was to destroy all
Speaker 1: good in the world, either by violence or by rotting
Speaker 1: them from within, by co opting and corrupting their homes
Speaker 1: in his institutions. If you make yourself truly discussing and
Speaker 1: harm children as a primary means of frankest duty, who
Speaker 1: do you think that really attracts the attention of a
Speaker 1: good God or the other guy, maybe even legions of
Speaker 1: other guys. I'm still baffled at how people can read
Speaker 1: about Solomon using demons to build a temple and think
Speaker 1: that's somehow in line with God's will? But hey, who
Speaker 1: am I besides someone who thinks when they read just
Speaker 1: a word more For the Christians that were called gnostics
Speaker 1: by douchebags who turned Jesus their enemy into their mascot
Speaker 1: for a false doctrine. The douchebags I'm naming then sold
Speaker 1: out further to the Roman Emperor, and no bit of authentic,
Speaker 1: sincere and true message wasn't without its corrupted elements, Since
Speaker 1: the reason those who would go on to build the
Speaker 1: Roman abomination to Christ despised the Gnostics was because these
Speaker 1: church builders had something to protect Christ was truth, and
Speaker 1: truth was dangerous in the world of mystery religions and
Speaker 1: secret teachings. They didn't want anyone getting the idea that
Speaker 1: personal liberation was a possibility that would destroy the power
Speaker 1: of the institutions that would undermine rules. Said the world
Speaker 1: was evil, and if it was the people they met Okay, Sir,
Speaker 1: Nastics said the world was evil, and if it was
Speaker 1: the people they meant, then I attended to agree. The
Speaker 1: parasitic control freaks of this world were threatened by the
Speaker 1: early Christian quote unquote Nastics because they lived in the
Speaker 1: world that the king. They lived the word that the
Speaker 1: Kingdom of God is within the individual. It is not.
Speaker 1: It isn't ration by man, and it doesn't come from
Speaker 1: a leader who deifies himself, nor from a church built
Speaker 1: on the backs of the poor. All the lower form,
Speaker 1: all the lower forms have, are their illusions in an
Speaker 1: illusory world they fashioned. And there's a really deep message there,
Speaker 1: based on what the Church actually even talks about in
Speaker 1: their doctorate. It created a false world. This is what
Speaker 1: this whole thing is about. The duties and responsibilities, tithings
Speaker 1: and money, it's all part of the artificial construct. Yes,
Speaker 1: Julie Christians believed in Christ and in the Christ before
Speaker 1: time as a principle of the monad and that which
Speaker 1: awakens our little piece of divinity into full awareness, so
Speaker 1: that we may liberate ourselves from that from what is
Speaker 1: essentially a prison world of matter through the virtue of
Speaker 1: our divine nature. Attaining nosis is a personal path because
Speaker 1: it has to be. It's not a group activity. It's
Speaker 1: about the connection with the one Monad and your relationship.
Speaker 1: If these vaccine sorcerers weren't well aware of this, they
Speaker 1: wouldn't be obsessed with trying to sever that toether between
Speaker 1: us and the Source by destroying what they claim is
Speaker 1: the VMAT two gene. Everything has to be reduced to
Speaker 1: quantitative physical material. With these sciences, the quantum physicists are
Speaker 1: what can Wheeler referred to as being counters. When there
Speaker 1: isn't any matter, like for a soul, they deny it
Speaker 1: or make stuff up like a photon to measure light.
Speaker 1: They cannot admit to anything ethereal or spiritual. From that
Speaker 1: connection with God, we have a sense of right and wrong.
Speaker 1: We have the ability to feel empathy and relate for
Speaker 1: when we are plugged into it. We're plugged into whoever
Speaker 1: else is connected to the divine. We all sense each
Speaker 1: other's joys and pains. Some with stronger connections are more sensitive,
Speaker 1: and we call them empaths. And that's what the narcissists
Speaker 1: love to feast on. Jacob Frank was not as popular
Speaker 1: as Sevendizz with his one million Kabbola Graham Kabbala Graham followers.
Speaker 1: He only hit about fifty thousand. And my question is
Speaker 1: whose job was it to count these stats? And how
Speaker 1: is it? And how in the sixteen and seventeen hundreds,
Speaker 1: what Frank lacked in quantity he made up for in quality,
Speaker 1: if you can call it that big surprise, he was
Speaker 1: befriended by the most wealthy bankers and other members of
Speaker 1: society with high power and influence. Here's the quote from
Speaker 1: rad by Marvin Antleman Aleman. Frankfurt at the time was
Speaker 1: the headquarters of the Jesuit Adam Weisop, founder of the Illuminati,
Speaker 1: as well as Rothschild's Brothers financial Empire. This is worth repeating.
Speaker 1: Frankfurt was the birthpay place of both the Illuminati and
Speaker 1: the Rothschild Empire. When Jacob Frank entered the city, the
Speaker 1: alliance between the two had already begun. Wisap provided the
Speaker 1: conspiratorial resources of the Jesuit order, while the Rothschilds contributed
Speaker 1: the money. What was missing was a means to spread
Speaker 1: the agenda of the Illuminati, and the Francists added with
Speaker 1: their network of agents throughout the Christian Islamic worlds. That's
Speaker 1: what they added, That's what they brought to the table.
Speaker 1: Jacob Frank became instantly wealthy because he was given a
Speaker 1: nice handout by Meyer Amschel Rothschild of Frankfurt Rabbi Marvin
Speaker 1: s Antleman to eliminate the Olpiate Volume two. It was
Speaker 1: this union of ideologies and objectives that formed the building
Speaker 1: blocks for and the rationale behind Zionism. One could go
Speaker 1: so far as to say these days Frankism and Illuminism
Speaker 1: are masked by this term Zionism. After all, one cannot
Speaker 1: be a true Francist if one expresses so outwardly. Right,
Speaker 1: we've walked through what a converso is in relation to
Speaker 1: the Sephardic juriors of Spain who converted to christian Those
Speaker 1: who converted are known as crypto Jews, as if it's
Speaker 1: common knowledge that they had no true intention of assimilating.
Speaker 1: There we learned it was three wealthy Jewish converso financiers
Speaker 1: who funded the voyage of Christopher Columbus, and that at
Speaker 1: least one of the vessels contained the remaining Jews fleeing
Speaker 1: the expulsion of fourteen ninety two. Moranos were also crypto
Speaker 1: Jews in Spain and Portugal, and some were members of
Speaker 1: a secret society of the Alambrados Enlightened Ones, which at
Speaker 1: first sounds good. They believed in the high forms of
Speaker 1: spirituality and that they could reach such a state of perfection.
Speaker 1: Oh way, you mean like the perfectible listen or Illuminati. Ah,
Speaker 1: a state of perfection that they could, while living, contemplate
Speaker 1: the essence of God, become as God and the Trinity,
Speaker 1: and they could sin at will without tainting their own soul.
Speaker 1: This sounds an awful lot like Frankism, only sin was
Speaker 1: an absolute duty. This is why Elambrados were deemed an
Speaker 1: early form of the Illuminati. Ignatius of Loyola was a Morano.
Speaker 1: He was a Christian in name only, using the secret
Speaker 1: society to explore mysticism. He founded the Jesuits. So the
Speaker 1: tie in here is Jewish mysticism and the Kabbala with
Speaker 1: the Society of Jesus Moranos were already in the practice
Speaker 1: of presenting a false outward persona. And as the Jesuit
Speaker 1: Oath and his Initiation describes, there is a clandestine organization formed.
Speaker 1: There is a clandestine organization formed of spies who spy
Speaker 1: on one another as much as anyone else. It's a
Speaker 1: cult of severe penalties for betrayers, just like Masonic log
Speaker 1: just like a Masonic lodge or ancient mystery school. Over
Speaker 1: two hundred years before Jacob Frank gets in on the
Speaker 1: game of spycraft and infiltration, his brethren in Spain are
Speaker 1: institutionalizing it with the blessings of the Pope. Now'll picture
Speaker 1: this in the proper lighting. We have an extremely wealthy
Speaker 1: Meyer Bauer or Rothschild, someone with likely significant family ties
Speaker 1: to the old Roman Empire, who's a Knight in the
Speaker 1: Military Order of malta recipient of their highest alcolaid, the
Speaker 1: Cross of Saint Sylvester, and he's having a powow with
Speaker 1: Jacob rape beneath Baby's Frank and Jesuit Adam Weisop, whose
Speaker 1: father was a rabbi. All three of these men are
Speaker 1: familiar with the same cabbalists mysticism and deeper insight into
Speaker 1: magical endeavors, whether while in secret societies as members or
Speaker 1: as leaders. Meyer amscheld Bauer slash Rothschild re emerges as
Speaker 1: a convert to Frankism and the Plan and the Plan
Speaker 1: the three endeavor to set in motion adopts the strategies
Speaker 1: and philosophies of both the Jesuit Order and Sabotine in Frankism.
Speaker 1: This is why some say extreme Zionists are responsible for
Speaker 1: the world's hellish worsening condition, while others argue that the Jedi,
Speaker 1: which are sowing the seeds of discontent and fomenting wars
Speaker 1: through various NGOs, non government agencies and the UN. The
Speaker 1: fact is both are half right. The understanding needed here
Speaker 1: is that at the core they're not. They're one in
Speaker 1: the same Francist movement galvanized since seventeen seventy six. That is,
Speaker 1: it was evolved to become that over time. I'm not
Speaker 1: suggesting in the least that the Francis themselves are at
Speaker 1: the top of the order. What I'm saying is their
Speaker 1: plan for bringing about the conditions necessary for the end
Speaker 1: of days redemption is being utilized and followed to usher
Speaker 1: in a one world government. It was this mindset of
Speaker 1: Jacob Frank that was adopted by the Perfectible List and
Speaker 1: also known as the Illuminati. At the very top of
Speaker 1: it appears, at the very top, it appears that this
Speaker 1: plague that the world is suffering from is Roman in origin.
Speaker 1: That is to say, the Roman Empire never left. It
Speaker 1: just rebranded itself as religion and has use proxy powers
Speaker 1: and infiltrated governments along with their agents, the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Shifts,
Speaker 1: et cetera, and their acquired territories to take over the world,
Speaker 1: you know, ruled by proxy. That way, it's less obvious.
Speaker 1: You have you don't, don't take away the constitution, don't
Speaker 1: scare the people. Just to understand that all the representatives
Speaker 1: quote unquote representatives are going to be working for us,
Speaker 1: and there is no real constitutional rights, just go ahead
Speaker 1: and try to claim them. We in America, as an
Speaker 1: insolvent country brought to bankruptcy in nineteen thirty three by
Speaker 1: the Rothschild's Central Banking, are one of those conquered and
Speaker 1: controlled territories. We have been under an illusion, a sort
Speaker 1: of live action Jesuit theater that makes us believe we
Speaker 1: still have a government and that we are somehow free.
Speaker 1: There are other cult groups that are also that also
Speaker 1: operate in the world with far reaching power and influence.
Speaker 1: The Order of Nine Angles is one of them. I
Speaker 1: don't believe any of these death cults operate independently from
Speaker 1: the core shadow powers I've been discussing. We should all
Speaker 1: question why most other monarchies were hunted into extinction by
Speaker 1: communist radical assassins in the eighteen to nineteen hundreds, save
Speaker 1: the British Royal family. Why because they weren't in khoots
Speaker 1: within the Bank of England, City of London. All right,
Speaker 1: potentially cryptos themselves, we should, okay. Jacob Schiff, a Rothschild
Speaker 1: agent sent to destroy America, put together the means of
Speaker 1: the Bolshevik RESI, put together the means the money, all
Speaker 1: right for the Bolshevik Revolution, one of the most horrific
Speaker 1: events to take place in recent history. Who were the
Speaker 1: Bolsheviks Communists? Yes? But where did that idea of communism
Speaker 1: really come from? The OIV, Jews and Jesuits, Because that's
Speaker 1: who they are, you know, They're all cryptos. Had set
Speaker 1: up the first Communist Communi in Paraguay known as Reductions
Speaker 1: of Paraguay from nearly sixteen hundreds until they are expulsions
Speaker 1: in seventeen seventy six seventeen sixty seven. Although socialism and
Speaker 1: communism have roots in the ancient mystery schools, we know
Speaker 1: that Ignasius of Loyola was an Alambrado and as a
Speaker 1: leader of the Jesuits, modeled his organization like a secret society,
Speaker 1: just like those of antiquity. So as I'm writing this
Speaker 1: book and not wanting it to be pulled down from Amazon, right,
Speaker 1: you can see where I'm inserting some things that I
Speaker 1: didn't say in the book. Who were the Bolsheviks? Obviously
Speaker 1: Bolsheviks were ninety percent Jews, and then they're Fillip travelers Communists, yes,
Speaker 1: but they And did the idea come from the Jesuits
Speaker 1: or was that already in play a long time even
Speaker 1: for them? And the Sanhedron is a communist framework right
Speaker 1: and actily is back way way before the Jesuits. But
Speaker 1: the Jesuits were the first to have like an actual
Speaker 1: one in practice in Paraguay, like more modern time, even
Speaker 1: though it was in the seventeen hundreds sixteen hundreds to
Speaker 1: seventeen hundreds when they were brutalizing the Paraguayans, emasculating them
Speaker 1: and making them work as slaves or for Mother Paraguay.
Speaker 1: It was the aim of the Perfectible Listing Illuminati to
Speaker 1: infiltrate the lodges of Freemasonry and select the most suitable
Speaker 1: candidates to elevate and induct them into the secret agenda
Speaker 1: of the organization. Some of the twenty five points of
Speaker 1: the plan included initiating class warfare, the fomenting of wars,
Speaker 1: and controlling peace conferences so no territory be gained and
Speaker 1: debt servitude to the banks would result, creating artificial economic disasters,
Speaker 1: forced starvation, Eliminate private property and all real estate. Utilized
Speaker 1: terrorism to create evident Utilize terrorism to create dependence on
Speaker 1: the state. Select all political leaders create listen to that.
Speaker 1: Select all political leaders. Create chaos and preach liberalism while
Speaker 1: indoctrinating the youth into false philosophies. High taxes become, become
Speaker 1: the advisors to governments, promote alcohol, drugs, and deviant lifestyles. Gee,
Speaker 1: is there a perversion going on here? And make the
Speaker 1: mob fight and kill each other. There's more, but that
Speaker 1: about sums it up. On the communist plank front, you
Speaker 1: have these objectives. Abolition of private property, Oh wow, look
Speaker 1: at matches and the institution of rent use system, own
Speaker 1: nothing and be happy, a heavy progressive or graduated income tax,
Speaker 1: abolition of rights to inheritance, centralization and monopolization of credit, state,
Speaker 1: centralized communication. Think about how many of these things have
Speaker 1: been encoded in our law and we just think, oh,
Speaker 1: that's you know, those taxicians, the state tax, the death tax,
Speaker 1: of this tax, it's all about taking away the inheritance
Speaker 1: what other families have built, your family has built over time.
Speaker 1: You can't be a vampire and get rich anymore. You
Speaker 1: can't have multiple lives, you know what I mean, because
Speaker 1: there's gonna be lots of lots of taxes to come
Speaker 1: around and take that money from you. Well, in communism
Speaker 1: is the same deal. So what do we have here?
Speaker 1: What is actually happening here at the centralized bank? Abolition
Speaker 1: rights inheritance, central blah blah uh, state, centralized communication and transportation.
Speaker 1: That's happening. State is to own all industry, free, state run. Well,
Speaker 1: they kind of are do, except it's under the guise
Speaker 1: of corporates. Corporations, but corporations that are funded by the
Speaker 1: same source, artificial source, artificial funding. They can fail upward
Speaker 1: and then they're required or they become part of the
Speaker 1: umbrella hive hydra of black Rock, all funded by and
Speaker 1: controlled by the same people who owned the banks. Free
Speaker 1: state run education, Oh boy, which means in doctrination and
Speaker 1: so on. I don't doubt you see the similarities, but
Speaker 1: to see them back to back for comparison really makes
Speaker 1: it the point clear. The Rothschild Jesuit Frankest plan was
Speaker 1: carried out in the Lodges, setting the course for the
Speaker 1: Jacobin French Revolution and the Bolshevik Revolution. It was the
Speaker 1: French lodge that devised both plans. Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin
Speaker 1: we're all Freemasons, and moreover they were Frankists. Now let's
Speaker 1: have a look at the objectives and strategies of long
Speaker 1: winded protocols that learned elders Zion. These will be in
Speaker 1: summary reform because each protocol goes on for several pages,
Speaker 1: and I don't mean just seven, as several would indicate.
Speaker 1: The reason I'm including this is because the similarities are
Speaker 1: striking and seem to come from the unified mouth of
Speaker 1: the Roman Empire. Jesuit's bullsh of a communists, the World
Speaker 1: Economic Forum, and the Illuminati. You can throw in the
Speaker 1: United Nations as well, or as well our true governing body.
Speaker 1: Protocol one states it must be noted that men with
Speaker 1: bad instincts are more in number than the good. Doesn't
Speaker 1: that sound like the cabalists giving an excuse for why
Speaker 1: they're going to turn everything into a perverse whether rather
Speaker 1: than try to make it nice and pretty here and
Speaker 1: therefore the best results in governing them are attained by
Speaker 1: violence and terrorism, and not by academic discussions. Further along
Speaker 1: Protocol one we read behold the alcoholized animals bemused with drink,
Speaker 1: the right to an inmoderate use of which comes along
Speaker 1: with freedom. It is not for us in ours to
Speaker 1: walk that road. The people's the goyam are bemused with
Speaker 1: alcoholic liquors. Their youth has grown stupid on classicism and
Speaker 1: from early immoral immorality, into which it has been inducted
Speaker 1: by our special agents, by tutors, lackeys, governesses in the
Speaker 1: house of the wealthy, by clerks and others, by our
Speaker 1: women in the places of dissipation frequently frequented by the goyam,
Speaker 1: by our women in places of dissipation frequented by the goyam.
Speaker 1: I told you it was long winded, high falutint, writing
Speaker 1: again from Potocol one. Therefore, it is not so much
Speaker 1: by the means themselves as by the doctrine of severity
Speaker 1: that we shall triumphant bring all governments into subjection to
Speaker 1: our super government. It is enough for them to know
Speaker 1: that we are merciless for all disobedience to cease. Yeah,
Speaker 1: just go ahead and take a look at the example
Speaker 1: and Israel right now, and that our president, quote unquote president,
Speaker 1: our corporate United States President, the king who calls himself
Speaker 1: the King of the Jews. He he's allowing for it,
Speaker 1: condoning it, and trying to make it even exercised, that
Speaker 1: type of horror and evil. So what does that mean
Speaker 1: about us? And these passing of laws and these ratings
Speaker 1: of people who are just speaking of their minds, telling
Speaker 1: the truth about the nature of these people, these these entities,
Speaker 1: these parasites in all corners of the earth. The words liberty, equality,
Speaker 1: fraternity brought to our ranks thanks to our blind agents,
Speaker 1: whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. They're they're
Speaker 1: relishing the fact that they've tricked people and scammed them
Speaker 1: right all and all the time. These words were kinkerworms
Speaker 1: at work, boring into the well being of the goam,
Speaker 1: putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet cell salidarity, and
Speaker 1: destroying all the foundations of the gay states. Liberty, fraternity,
Speaker 1: equality is a commonly held decree or rally cry of
Speaker 1: the Masonic Order. From this cynical description, you see the
Speaker 1: author held contempt even for the people who are being
Speaker 1: used to carry out their agenda. And there'll be the
Speaker 1: next ones on the chopping block. See it's protocol too.
Speaker 1: It is indispensable for our purpose that wars, so far
Speaker 1: as possible, should not result in territorial gains. War will
Speaker 1: thus be brought on to the economic ground, where the
Speaker 1: nations will not fail to perceive in the assistance we
Speaker 1: give the strength of our predominance. And this state of
Speaker 1: things will put both sides at the mercy of our
Speaker 1: international argenteur agenteur, which possesses millions of eyes, ever on
Speaker 1: the watch and unhampered by any limitation whatsoever. Our international
Speaker 1: rights will then wipe out national rights. Oh look at
Speaker 1: that right one world government. But also the we got
Speaker 1: to think globally and that those type of ideas like, no,
Speaker 1: there's no national boundaries, there's just the world family. That's
Speaker 1: the most discussing, unnatural thing that anybody could say in
Speaker 1: the proper sense of right. And we'll r and will
Speaker 1: rule the nations precisely as the civil law of states
Speaker 1: rules the relations of their subjects among themselves. This goes
Speaker 1: on and on Part three Protocol three. In order to
Speaker 1: incite seekers after power to a missive to a misuse
Speaker 1: of power, in order to incite seekers after power to
Speaker 1: a misuse of power, we have set all forces in
Speaker 1: opposition to one another, breaking up their liberal tendencies toward independence.
Speaker 1: To this end, we have stirred up every every form
Speaker 1: of enterprise. We have armed all parties. We have set
Speaker 1: up authority as a target for every ambition of states.
Speaker 1: We have made gladiatorial arenas where a host of confused
Speaker 1: issues contend a little more, and disorders and bankruptcy will
Speaker 1: be universal. I highly encourage everyone to learn about the
Speaker 1: dreaded year of nineteen thirteen and the US Bankruptcy of
Speaker 1: nineteen thirty three, twenty short years after the nineteen thirteen
Speaker 1: Federal Reserve Act of the terms of the two, along
Speaker 1: with the Treaty of Paris that ended that revolutionary where
Speaker 1: between the Great Britain of the United States are necessary reading.
Speaker 1: Ask yourself why the Roman Empire is named in that treaty.
Speaker 1: We ourselves are property. We already own nothing and are
Speaker 1: blissfully ignorant of it. Property by definition has no rights
Speaker 1: and can't own property. And you can read the rest
Speaker 1: yourself when you get the book. How about that. We'll
Speaker 1: go with that today. Yeah, yeah, yeah, all right, then
Speaker 1: that's all right. One, Hey, what's up, buddy? Hey, Steve's
Speaker 1: in the house. How's it going, man? And thank you
Speaker 1: to in Harvest. I think you're also the person and
Speaker 1: the new the new member of our Patreon. Good to
Speaker 1: see you, and I think we're good for now. I
Speaker 1: was just on with Flood last night and I'm gonna
Speaker 1: share a screen. I think I still have another. Maybe
Speaker 1: I don't. Maybe I have to go back to it.
Speaker 1: Hold on, let's see what we got. No, Hey, what's up?
Speaker 1: What's up? Guys? Docs? A street white male put in team.
Speaker 1: I don't think i've seen you before burning before reading? Yes, absolutely,
Speaker 1: Oh that's cool. I'm have to say that.
Speaker 3: One.
Speaker 1: How do you do that? Yeah, click it very click.
Speaker 1: I don't just pop it up. I don't know, there
Speaker 1: we go. I think there you go, very click save.
Speaker 1: That's kind of kind of it's creepy. I don't know
Speaker 1: if I other use it, but I like to keep
Speaker 1: so I like to say these things. I want to
Speaker 1: see the baby being being lost. They see what they did.
Speaker 1: They always gott to mess with something. When it comes
Speaker 1: to AI. They put med the A capitalized in the
Speaker 1: middle of the word good evening, texicality. Oh that's awesome, BBR,
Speaker 1: thank you. What's who's that? Oh be before reading? Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: oh wow, that's cool. Textically, Oh that's nice. That's nice. Nice.
Speaker 1: All right. So there's all that, and I'm not sure
Speaker 1: we used to do a whole lot more on here,
Speaker 1: like I was getting up to like thirty forty fifty ten.
Speaker 1: Ten's what we got today. I don't know if it's
Speaker 1: with more earlier, but maybe there's something going on with FTJ.
Speaker 1: When was I going to say there's something I was
Speaker 1: going over I care? Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, okay. So
Speaker 1: this is obviously this is like the thub delve of
Speaker 1: video that we're watching now, but these are all ad
Speaker 1: free podcast versions of the shows. So this is one
Speaker 1: of the things that you get as a member five
Speaker 1: bucks a month. You get to listen to these as
Speaker 1: you go wherever you want without commercial interruptions, which is
Speaker 1: what will happened if you're listening to out the podcast
Speaker 1: because this boy here, he'd be needing his his monetization,
Speaker 1: all right, So if you want to get rid of
Speaker 1: that monetization, just go ahead and the support the show
Speaker 1: on atreon. And oh yeah, I was trying to say
Speaker 1: that was on Flood. So let me say if I
Speaker 1: can find it real quick, just have to go back
Speaker 1: the other's cool. Hold on, all right, So it's this
Speaker 1: episode here. I'm going to try to cut it up
Speaker 1: later on and make it available on my sights as well.
Speaker 1: Just take out my interview and because the rest of
Speaker 1: this stuff right, the Big Brain Doom Depot takeover with
Speaker 1: Daniel Christos and that's called the din Depot with Ed Christos.
Speaker 1: It was yesterday. There's only two lights on this going on, guys,
Speaker 1: and so you don't know who Flood is, you should
Speaker 1: be watching it. So there you go see do that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's funny because I don't know if it's the method
Speaker 1: that people watching things on like I know a lot
Speaker 1: of people will like on Rumble. They have it on
Speaker 1: their Roku right, so it's not like something it's not
Speaker 1: easy to find a like button on there. You can
Speaker 1: still do it from the from the TV, but most
Speaker 1: people don't bother. So it makes me wonder why the
Speaker 1: same same type of thing kind of happens here. Did
Speaker 1: you know that? Did you know that if you have
Speaker 1: a Roku TV, you can you can get the app
Speaker 1: for Rumble and then you can watch whatever you're you know,
Speaker 1: you can sign into you account just like you would
Speaker 1: on a computer. You can watch your your shows, your
Speaker 1: stuff right there at your TV. It's a thing, it
Speaker 1: really is. We used to have that for Josh you TV.
Speaker 1: But then what do you call it? Roku change the
Speaker 1: way that developers things worked. If you guys want to
Speaker 1: show your support. I don't know what's going on, you
Speaker 1: can you can if you want. There's two buttons. One
Speaker 1: goes to the gifts and go the It don't goes
Speaker 1: to the wallet that's on the FTJ media. Already, I
Speaker 1: think we're good. It's nice. I want to go get
Speaker 1: some fresh air before I go to my daughter gymnastics
Speaker 1: tonight and I'm gonna start the book this evening and
Speaker 1: I have about two no I have about four miles.
Speaker 1: I owe the elliptical, So my day's planned orders are
Speaker 1: all getting taken care of. I remade them and they're
Speaker 1: just getting packaged now. I got two more that came
Speaker 1: in the last two days. I gotta hit those out,
Speaker 1: but they're really small and can get them don quick. Okay,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for watching. Thank you for watching
Speaker 1: the Doctor Peter Glynnen episode previously. Do this and I
Speaker 1: will talk to you sometime soon, maybe tomorrow or to day.
Speaker 1: We'll see how that works out.