Speaker 1: I talk seriously about the hot Yeah, because I just
Speaker 1: find it extraordinary that you would think the Holocaust could
Speaker 1: ever be something that we could joke about.
Speaker 2: Why too soon? Oh like too soon? Eighty years too soon.
Speaker 2: We can make jokes about nine to eleven, but not
Speaker 2: that it's too soon. I look, I've got a lot
Speaker 2: to say about the Nick Flint is Piers Morgan Showdown,
Speaker 2: mainly just to give you kind of an insight into
Speaker 2: how I look at these things as a political commentator
Speaker 2: and someone who does debates periodically. I watch Nick, I
Speaker 2: watch Andrew Tait, I watch Dave Smith. Just a handful
Speaker 2: of people that I like. I genuinely go to them
Speaker 2: to learn how to deal with antagonistic, insulting, questioning, Like
Speaker 2: they are so gifted at it, it's unbelievable and there's
Speaker 2: a lot to learn from that. Maybe it won't work
Speaker 2: for you, Like if you're boss ever says anything shitty
Speaker 2: to you, you probably shouldn't use these tactics. But of
Speaker 2: telling you if you want to learn how to win
Speaker 2: the debate, yeah, Nick Funt does knows what he's doing.
Speaker 2: But before we get into that, I want to talk
Speaker 2: about how everyone is wrong. Yes, I know it's a
Speaker 2: bold claim. A lot of people that I like, a
Speaker 2: lot of people that are my friends. I don't care,
Speaker 2: as you guys have been able to tell, especially after
Speaker 2: that episode I did about Tim Poole, who's my buddy.
Speaker 2: I don't have any sacred cows. I'm going to tell
Speaker 2: the truth regardless. So this is going to be a
Speaker 2: mish mash of compliments paired with insults against a lot
Speaker 2: of people that I generally like. And as a consequence,
Speaker 2: I'm imagining that everyone's reaction to this is going to
Speaker 2: be negative because they're gonna be like, well, I like
Speaker 2: that person, so how dare you critique them on that?
Speaker 2: I don't care. Okay, I think that they've all of
Speaker 2: them get some things right and all of them get
Speaker 2: some things wrong. So I'm going to tell you what
Speaker 2: I think. Let's go first up, Nick funt Is on
Speaker 2: my buddy Ian Carroll at least will use senstionalism to distract.
Speaker 3: They'll push whatever is in voguieloike qu conspiratarts like you,
Speaker 3: and they've got repealed yesterday.
Speaker 2: They called themselves truthersyet.
Speaker 3: They fall for it every time.
Speaker 2: He's an idiot. I have no respect for him.
Speaker 4: He's a passive aggressive numb skull, and let's just be honest,
Speaker 4: that's always what he was. People come around and they
Speaker 4: start saying the right talking points. We gass them up
Speaker 4: because they're doing it. But he's an idiot. He's not
Speaker 4: impressive intellectually, he's just plain stupid. He looks weird. He's
Speaker 4: basically a hippie. Nobody knows where he came from, so
Speaker 4: nothing of value as lost. And he's passive aggressive. He's
Speaker 4: just another passive aggressive wolk tar who discovered the JQ.
Speaker 2: Well, he got one thing right. I do kind of
Speaker 2: look at Ian as being a bit of a hippie,
Speaker 2: but I'm kind of a hippie at heart too, So
Speaker 2: I guess that's why Ian and I like each other.
Speaker 2: But yeah, look, it's okay to disagree on some things,
Speaker 2: and it's also okay for us to call each other
Speaker 2: out from time to time. For instance, the reason that
Speaker 2: this all got sparked is because Ian Carroll had the
Speaker 2: audacity to question Nick's hypothesis or his apparent belief in
Speaker 2: the FED narrative when it comes to Tyler Robinson and
Speaker 2: the assassination of Charlie Kirk, which is what he said
Speaker 2: when he was on with Crowder right here. Do you
Speaker 2: believe the Jews killed Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 5: That's one of the conspiracies out there right now. What's
Speaker 5: your position on that.
Speaker 4: I don't believe that as it stands right now. I
Speaker 4: think it was Tyler Robinson. I saw Ian Carroll came
Speaker 4: out today on a live stream pleading with me to
Speaker 4: join in on the conspiracy. If you think that, I
Speaker 4: feel sorry for you because you are retarded and well.
Speaker 2: I am actively defending Ian Carroll, my friend. And by
Speaker 2: the way, I'm super disappointed because I thought we were
Speaker 2: very close to having me, Ian, Dave Smith, and Nick
Speaker 2: All on this show or a show, and now they're beefing.
Speaker 2: So I'm guessing that's not going to happen. What can
Speaker 2: you do? But I'm not like in lockstep with Ian
Speaker 2: on everything either, you know. I even said when he
Speaker 2: was on with Dave, I said, you know, I think
Speaker 2: that it was a mistake to come out day two
Speaker 2: after the attack and just you know, launch into Israel
Speaker 2: shot themselves in the foot by taking out Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 2: It's like, we don't know that, we don't and I
Speaker 2: e those he didn't know that at that time. He
Speaker 2: is fairly convinced at this point, it seems, but I
Speaker 2: am not. Personally. I am fairly convinced that the FED
Speaker 2: narrative is total bullshit, and I can prove that very rapidly.
Speaker 6: In our last video, a thirty out six ball round
Speaker 6: blew through twenty pounds of meat and two beef femur bones.
Speaker 6: So those are not easy to stop. I'm hoping this
Speaker 6: one will give us a slightly different result, and I'm
Speaker 6: going to aim towards the front left of our ballistic
Speaker 6: dummy neck forty five degree angle, and we are shooting
Speaker 6: slightly downward as well, so I also have to hit
Speaker 6: the vertebrae because that's allegedly what redirected this bullet. Well,
Speaker 6: we definitely penetrated our water jugs, and I don't think
Speaker 6: this is going to help to stop the conspiracy theories.
Speaker 2: His head fell off. Now. I'm not going to show
Speaker 2: you the video of Charlie being shot again because I
Speaker 2: don't want to look at it and you probably don't either,
Speaker 2: but we all have it burnt into our memories so
Speaker 2: you can compare and contrast. So this is the reason
Speaker 2: that I actually push back on Ian's assertion in the
Speaker 2: early hours after the attack a day later that it
Speaker 2: was almost certainly israel Is because I think it's a
Speaker 2: mistake to put a hypothesis out there that firmly when
Speaker 2: we don't know. But what we do know is that
Speaker 2: we're being lied to. So it makes it very easy
Speaker 2: to dismiss our genuine questions, our genuine critiques of the
Speaker 2: FED narrative if they can just say, well, look up
Speaker 2: into the conclusion that it's is real. These people are
Speaker 2: just lunatics, Whereas our starting point ought to be is
Speaker 2: that here's your narrative, here's the flaws in your narrative, FEDS,
Speaker 2: and your line. So who gives a shit what the
Speaker 2: commentators have to say or what their you know, counter
Speaker 2: theories may be. You guys aren't telling us the truth.
Speaker 2: And there's a lot of There's a lot more, and
Speaker 2: maybe i'll recap it later as to all of the
Speaker 2: reasons that I think that the FED narrative is nonsense,
Speaker 2: but just that one point alone ought to have us
Speaker 2: all on the same team here, and that includes Timpoole,
Speaker 2: can of Owen's, Dave smith I and Carol Nick Fuentes
Speaker 2: across the board. We ought to all be on the
Speaker 2: same page that the fed's narrative is garbage. It's garbage, Okay.
Speaker 2: A thirty to six hitting the softest part of the
Speaker 2: human body and then oh it catches his spine and
Speaker 2: therefore it doesn't exit is just a lie. It's just
Speaker 2: a flat out lie. It goes into the water jugs
Speaker 2: behind it and blows those up too. It is an
Speaker 2: immensely powerful round of ammunition. Immensely powerful and I'm sorry,
Speaker 2: no matter how healthy a lifestyle Charlie Kirk was living,
Speaker 2: that's not what he was hit with. Okay, So if
Speaker 2: we can just start there and go, okay, FED narrative flawed,
Speaker 2: let's all agree on that. So now let's work together,
Speaker 2: let's see what actually did happen. But is that permissible? No,
Speaker 2: We've got a lot of people who have not researched
Speaker 2: this case extensively, who are coming to very dramatic conclusions
Speaker 2: about Candice Owens and Ian Carroll probably me as to
Speaker 2: you know how, we're all lying for clicks into whatever.
Speaker 2: I don't whatever the accusations are, they're wrong though, and
Speaker 2: yes that includes Tim Poole. He's wrong. They are wrong.
Speaker 2: They are wrong that there is nothing here to be
Speaker 2: looking into. They're just flat out wrong about it. Though,
Speaker 2: if they're actually challenged on this, they'll sometimes say, well,
Speaker 2: I don't know, I'm not really sure. Fontes might even
Speaker 2: do the same, But it's like, okay, if you're not sure,
Speaker 2: then back the fuck off. Let the people who are
Speaker 2: actually researching this research it. Is there something wrong with that?
Speaker 2: And if there is something wrong with it, why tell
Speaker 2: me exactly why. And oftentimes the claim will be, oh, well,
Speaker 2: this could add to the defense and get Tyler Robinson freed.
Speaker 2: It's like, okay, if the prosecution of Tyler Robinson is
Speaker 2: so weak that a bunch of podcasters on the internet
Speaker 2: can dismantle the prosecution's narrative and free him, then he
Speaker 2: should be freed. That's how it works in America. Is
Speaker 2: that innocent people or people that cannot be proven guilty
Speaker 2: beyond a reasonable doubt, they don't go to prison forever
Speaker 2: or be put to death. Do you think that Charlie
Speaker 2: Kirk would want someone who didn't kill him to be
Speaker 2: put to death or spend the rest of their life
Speaker 2: in prison. No, I don't think he would. Do you
Speaker 2: think he wants to make sure that we have the
Speaker 2: right person. Yeah, I would say almost certainly he would.
Speaker 2: Should his family should TPO say yes? They all should
Speaker 2: want the same thing. Why don't they? Why does Pasobic?
Speaker 2: Why is Benny Johnson? Why does Tim Poole? Why does
Speaker 2: Nick fuentt this? I don't know, I don't understand it,
Speaker 2: but I will say this canness Owens doesn't get everything
Speaker 2: right either. She doesn't. Now. Granted, Tim fired the first shot,
Speaker 2: so I guess he deserves some backlash from her, but
Speaker 2: her putting this thumbnail up where it says who stood
Speaker 2: the benefit from Charlie Kirk's assassination? And you've got cash
Speaker 2: Pttel which include him whatever, he's clearly lying about this case,
Speaker 2: but you also include Timpoole like he's not benefiting from
Speaker 2: the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 7: Please, as you power scared that she'll put you on
Speaker 7: her thumbnail and claim you benefited from Charlie Kirk's assassination,
Speaker 7: which he's doing to me right now.
Speaker 8: First and foremost, what you are seeing right there is
Speaker 8: on a display of testostero. Men that speak to women
Speaker 8: like this are not tough guy, Okay, what you are
Speaker 8: seeing is actually a display of estrogen. Everything he is doing.
Speaker 8: There is somebody who is not a man. He is
Speaker 8: not tough, and he would never dare to speak to
Speaker 8: a man like that. Secondly, Tim Poole doesn't even have
Speaker 8: the intellect to understand that we put him in the
Speaker 8: thumbnail because he accused me in a full episode with Miloyanopolis,
Speaker 8: which we showed and contextualized, of being someone who benefited
Speaker 8: from Charlie Kirk's assassination. So he thinks he's being accused.
Speaker 8: You accused me of that.
Speaker 2: So it's just like below the belt, below the belt,
Speaker 2: and everyone's just spiraling downward where you know. I guess
Speaker 2: my own personal frustration is like I'm sincere in all this,
Speaker 2: Like I just really want to make sure that we
Speaker 2: get the right guy. That's my concern here, and I
Speaker 2: hate to see this infighting. But just to give a
Speaker 2: bit of background to help people with kind of the
Speaker 2: macro analysis on this, because I think a lot of
Speaker 2: people don't understand the infighting as well as I do,
Speaker 2: because I'm kind of in this world.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 2: First off, AD revenue is allegedly down. I don't even
Speaker 2: pay attention to it, So I guess, you know, if
Speaker 2: you're a big time YouTuber though that's very meaningful to you. Also,
Speaker 2: views are down for many of these people, particularly those
Speaker 2: that have not been critical of the fed's narrative about
Speaker 2: Tyler Robinson. So I think personally, the way I read
Speaker 2: this is that a lot of people are feeling as
Speaker 2: if their lunch is getting eaten and Candice Owns is
Speaker 2: the one eating it. She is gorging on their buffet,
Speaker 2: and they don't appreciate it. So that's how I feel
Speaker 2: about Jeremy over at the quartering. That's how I feel
Speaker 2: about Tim to a certain extent. I feel like they're,
Speaker 2: in some regards jealous because while they're doing a couple
Speaker 2: hundred thousand views, she's doing a couple million on every show,
Speaker 2: and that doesn't feel good for them because they feel
Speaker 2: as if she's pushing bullshit and she's ultimately I mean, Tim,
Speaker 2: I think is more sincere, and that he genuinely feels
Speaker 2: that she's a detriment to TPUSA and therefore the conservative
Speaker 2: movement and therefore the GOP and therefore defense of us
Speaker 2: the American people against the Democrats the Horde. But then
Speaker 2: it gets more nefarious. There are also pay to post
Speaker 2: organizations and campaigns that are ran by foreign intelligence, domestic
Speaker 2: government enterprises. There's a lot of people that are getting
Speaker 2: paid to push narratives, and that's pro and con, and
Speaker 2: it's all across the board. So there's a lot of
Speaker 2: really really just duplicitous, scummy people who have no principles whatsoever,
Speaker 2: who are pushing shit they don't believe in because they're
Speaker 2: being paid to do so. That's true, and I would
Speaker 2: be an idiot if I didn't assume. In fact, I'm
Speaker 2: very confident of this that there are pay to post
Speaker 2: campaigns that are being ran against particularly as I've done
Speaker 2: episodes about this in the past, Tucker Carlson, it was
Speaker 2: happening against MTG. I don't know if it still is
Speaker 2: because she's already stepped down Thomas Massey. Candice Owan's basically
Speaker 2: what's as I've said before, what is the tie that
Speaker 2: binds there? These are non interventionists sincere America for people
Speaker 2: that are talking a little bit too brazenly about the
Speaker 2: bad actions of our government and our relationship with a
Speaker 2: foreign one, which you already know which one. So I
Speaker 2: think that this is multifaceted. You've got some people who
Speaker 2: are just pissed that Candice is dominating the ratings. You've
Speaker 2: got some people who are pissed because they are sincere
Speaker 2: and that they believe the Tyler Robinson case. I would
Speaker 2: say that's a minority. And then you've got a lot
Speaker 2: of people who are being paid to carry water for
Speaker 2: the regime. And I personally would include in that the postobics,
Speaker 2: the Glenn beex the Benny Johnson's of the World, and
Speaker 2: a brief interlude on that topic. We've got Milo Yanopolis,
Speaker 2: which was on IRL a couple days ago. So illo,
Speaker 2: who's paying them?
Speaker 3: Think entities associated with or possibly name named rrectly probably
Speaker 3: Turning Point. Oh yeah, because they are losing the war
Speaker 3: against Candice. They're losing, So why we're paying people? That's
Speaker 3: what Turning Point does.
Speaker 2: That's what it is.
Speaker 3: The question for me is the Brandon Taitum who keeps
Speaker 3: saying I'm not getting paid by Israel. Well, then you're
Speaker 3: an idiot.
Speaker 2: I never got paid by Israel either. So for those
Speaker 2: that don't know Miloianopolis, well he knows of which he speaks.
Speaker 2: That dude is a legit political operative. He definitely was
Speaker 2: responsible for funding different, you know, influencing campaigns for different
Speaker 2: political campaigns and when he says that you know, it
Speaker 2: could be possible at TPUSA is either paying people to
Speaker 2: be quiet or paying people to talk and go against Cannis.
Speaker 2: I think that that's totally viable. I do. I mean,
Speaker 2: this is a ten hundred million dollar organization or whatever
Speaker 2: it is, and if you have Cannis Owans, which is
Speaker 2: destroying your reputation, there would really be no cost. That
Speaker 2: wouldn't be worth attacking her like right, It's just logical.
Speaker 2: So I think a lot of people are being paid.
Speaker 2: I'm not saying it's TPUSA. I can't prove that, but
Speaker 2: I would be It would be a mistake to assume
Speaker 2: that there aren't people who are being paid for their
Speaker 2: opinions when it comes to this showdown. And for the record,
Speaker 2: I'm not saying that's the case with Tim Poole. I
Speaker 2: think Tim's is actually a much more nuanced and complex topic.
Speaker 2: I think that he's genuinely concerned about the GEO, and
Speaker 2: he's really really concerned about the Democrats getting back into power.
Speaker 2: He's also very concerned about the financial stress that his
Speaker 2: organization is facing, I think because of security issues. And
Speaker 2: I got to dismiss a conspiracy theory that's floating around
Speaker 2: out there right now. And a couple days ago Tim
Speaker 2: came out and he said that someone actually after that
Speaker 2: episode with Milo, someone drove by the property and fired
Speaker 2: a gun. I actually know for a fact that that happened.
Speaker 2: The reason I know is because I know people that
Speaker 2: work there, and I know for a fact that the video,
Speaker 2: which he's not putting up publicly because it would give
Speaker 2: away the location of his property and he doesn't want
Speaker 2: to do that, or it could. But I do know
Speaker 2: that he showed the video to his employees and I
Speaker 2: have verified that. And basically, someone drives by and they
Speaker 2: fire a gun out of the window three times and
Speaker 2: you can see the muzzle flash. That's what I was
Speaker 2: told the person who I was told it by, I believe,
Speaker 2: So take it with a grain of salt if you want.
Speaker 2: I personally am one hundred percent convinced that did happen.
Speaker 2: Consequence of that, what is Tim facing now? Tim is
Speaker 2: facing probably additional insurance premiums, probably additional costs with additional security,
Speaker 2: maybe additional surveillance. There could be a litany of other
Speaker 2: issues that he's facing as a consequence of that, And
Speaker 2: the price tag on his security is already astronomical. Increasing
Speaker 2: that anymore is brutal. So he's facing a lot of stress,
Speaker 2: like a lot of stress. He's got a very like
Speaker 2: a big overhead, a serious operation, having random guests from
Speaker 2: all over the country, sometimes not even in the country,
Speaker 2: fly in every day of the week or weekdays, and
Speaker 2: to do the show live is already cost prohibitive. But
Speaker 2: then you add into that the security details and the
Speaker 2: security layers that they have to now deal with, and
Speaker 2: he's under immense pressure. So I'm trying to be much
Speaker 2: more I guess kind with my disagreements with Tim, because
Speaker 2: I do think he's wrong about Tyler Robinson. I think
Speaker 2: he's at least wrong about the FED narrative overall, and
Speaker 2: that he ought to be more critical of it. And
Speaker 2: I think he would be if he was able to
Speaker 2: spend the time necessary to dig into this case. Unfortunately
Speaker 2: he has not, and that is evident to me. Same
Speaker 2: situation with Nick Fuentt is it's fairly obvious to me
Speaker 2: that Nick has not done the deep dives that myself
Speaker 2: and I and Carol and so many others have done.
Speaker 2: So look, the fact that he's coming out really antagonistically
Speaker 2: against Candace, I think is about Old Blood, like, well
Speaker 2: bad blood, I should say old bad Blood. They hate
Speaker 2: each other. He jokes about it all the time. There's
Speaker 2: this give and take, this love hate relationship, and he
Speaker 2: constantly jokes that they're in love with each other. I
Speaker 2: think deep down he really doesn't like her, like really
Speaker 2: really doesn't like her. So that's my read as to
Speaker 2: why Nick is doing that. A lot of people are
Speaker 2: jumping to, oh, he's a fed Look what he did
Speaker 2: on j six and he got away with it and
Speaker 2: he didn't face any charges and he's an informant, and
Speaker 2: I'm not going that far. I don't. I have no
Speaker 2: idea if that's accurate or not. I think that he
Speaker 2: just hates Candace and he hasn't done his due diligence
Speaker 2: on this. But also he's been in the wilderness. He's
Speaker 2: been totally blacklisted everywhere, deep banked, not able to fly.
Speaker 2: It's like the kid was abused so mercilessly, and then
Speaker 2: he finally gets, you know, his head above water effective
Speaker 2: earlier this year, and he starts to be permitted to
Speaker 2: go on these big platforms, and people are like, all right,
Speaker 2: are you gonna double down on israel A? You're gonna
Speaker 2: say that Israel took out Charlie Kirk, and I can
Speaker 2: understand just like naturally he would be hesitant to take
Speaker 2: a stand on that because it could send him back
Speaker 2: into the wilderness. So or maybe he's just not certain,
Speaker 2: but I would be fine with that. That's the thing that, like,
Speaker 2: I guess, differentiates me from a lot of people in
Speaker 2: the anti Tyler Robinson fed's slop narrative is that I'm
Speaker 2: not asking anybody to agree with me. I'm just asking
Speaker 2: people to be fucking open minded about it. Like if
Speaker 2: you don't know, that's okay, it's okay to say that,
Speaker 2: but don't go on with Steven Crowder and say this
Speaker 2: as it stands right now, I think it was Robinson. Yeah, yeah, okay,
Speaker 2: me too. He's not saying it definitively, he's saying as
Speaker 2: it stands right now, So he's leaving a bunch of
Speaker 2: open space there for him to maneuver. But it's like, yeah,
Speaker 2: but you don't think it was Tyler, You don't know.
Speaker 2: Why do you say you think it is?
Speaker 7: Why?
Speaker 2: Just because we're giving the benefit of the doubt to
Speaker 2: the Feds, like on a political assassination, When has that
Speaker 2: ever worked ever? To give the benefit of the doubt
Speaker 2: to the FEDS when it comes to a lone wolf
Speaker 2: political assassination in American history, When has it ever been
Speaker 2: a wise, a prudent decision to give the FEDS the
Speaker 2: benefit of the doubt? When never The answer is fucking never.
Speaker 2: And yet a lot of people who are usually hyper
Speaker 2: Israel skeptical and is reel critical and hyper critical of
Speaker 2: the government of the Feds, the media, suddenly all of
Speaker 2: these independent minded people who've got track records years long,
Speaker 2: in case some cases decades, are like, yeah, I think
Speaker 2: Tyler Rouminson did it, acted alone. It's like, what's happening,
Speaker 2: what's happening here? And now as all of this is
Speaker 2: escalating out of control, we've got Tim Poole saying this
Speaker 2: yesterday when he's flipping out, and you know what, you
Speaker 2: fucking told me. She has no security.
Speaker 7: She doesn't fucking deal with the shit we.
Speaker 2: Have to deal with.
Speaker 7: Ye that was the I'm fucking done with these people.
Speaker 1: She has security just on the level of you.
Speaker 7: Oh yeah, the one fat guy you mentioned with no
Speaker 7: wall and no barrier in a suburban neighbor with neighbors.
Speaker 7: She doesn't give two fucking shits. No one's out for her,
Speaker 7: she's lying about all of this. You told me you
Speaker 7: went to her house and she's got a four foot
Speaker 7: wall and one fat guy and she doesn't give a
Speaker 7: shit about her security. Meanwhile, I get bullets fired at
Speaker 7: my fucking property and I have to go live in
Speaker 7: the middle of nowhere.
Speaker 2: Now, as I already explained, Tim legitimately had a gun
Speaker 2: shot outside his property, so he's under immense stress and pressure.
Speaker 2: But I got a It does not justify doing what
Speaker 2: he did there. I understand why he's angry. He has
Speaker 2: every right to be angry about Cannas putting him in
Speaker 2: that thumbnail. But you can't then turn around and respond
Speaker 2: and basically detail out how lacking of security Candas Owens
Speaker 2: is when we all know. We all know, regardless of
Speaker 2: whether or not you believe Tyler Robinson did it, and
Speaker 2: even more so, if you believe that Tyler Robinson took
Speaker 2: out Charlie Kirk because of his anti transpositions or whatever nonsense,
Speaker 2: well then all of them are in jeopardy, all of
Speaker 2: them are under threat by the Left, and it's just
Speaker 2: not an acceptable thing to do. And I don't had
Speaker 2: he had an opportunity to think that through before he
Speaker 2: said it. I don't think he would have said it.
Speaker 2: I think he knows that that's a mistake. Maybe he'll,
Speaker 2: you know, address it later. I don't know. This just
Speaker 2: happened yesterday, But you just can't be listing off the
Speaker 2: details of people's security in a time like this. Really
Speaker 2: you should never do it. But certainly in a time
Speaker 2: like this, right after one of her best friends, maybe
Speaker 2: her best friend was just assassinated.
Speaker 9: Arlie's life could have been the Truman show. That terrifies
Speaker 9: me more than nothing in your life is real, genuinely,
Speaker 9: like I was expecting, like we're all getting the old
Speaker 9: band back together and it's going to be me and
Speaker 9: Trump and I'm going to have the FBI help me
Speaker 9: investigate this. We're going to figure out what happened to
Speaker 9: my friend. And it was like Cannis is the enemy
Speaker 9: for asking questions. Was Charlie Kirk's life real? Is what
Speaker 9: I think I cried the hardest about, because how are
Speaker 9: you not fighting for him?
Speaker 2: That's kind of someone's talking to Russell Brand And you know,
Speaker 2: it's very easy, because it's now been three months since
Speaker 2: the assassination to kind of forget in the immediate aftermath,
Speaker 2: kind of the very brief moment where we were all
Speaker 2: together and mourning Charlie and sincerely interested in justice, and
Speaker 2: everybody just wanted to make sure that they got the
Speaker 2: right person. And we all, I think maybe not all,
Speaker 2: but most of us expected that well. Regardless of how
Speaker 2: you feel about the FBI, I don't trust them at all,
Speaker 2: but you still were like, all right, Charlie Kirk was
Speaker 2: largely responsible for putting Donald Trump in the White House.
Speaker 2: He appeared to be friends with Dan Bongino and Cash Ptel.
Speaker 2: These guys are not going to feed us garbage. They
Speaker 2: are definitely going to deliver justice. This was their guy,
Speaker 2: regardless of whether or not you trust Trump or the
Speaker 2: FBI or anything else. I was like, I think that,
Speaker 2: I think that they're going to come together and they're
Speaker 2: going to do right by Charlie Kirk. He has done
Speaker 2: so much on their behalf, and particularly Trump's behalf. They
Speaker 2: gotta do right by him. And it's like, no, And
Speaker 2: I think I think Cannice is telling the truth there.
Speaker 2: I think that's what totally you know, freight her wires is.
Speaker 2: She's just like, was anything real? Are the relationships between
Speaker 2: any of the political commentators, the influencers, the politicians, the
Speaker 2: media apparatics, is any of this reel? Does anyone actually
Speaker 2: care about one another? Is everyone just looking at everybody
Speaker 2: else as a tool for their own ends, And as
Speaker 2: soon as that tool becomes useless, so do they? And
Speaker 2: that's what it feels like to me. It looks a
Speaker 2: lot to me, like You've got Donald Trump Junior posting
Speaker 2: about Charlie Kirk's new book that just dropped this week,
Speaker 2: And what's his book dedicated to? Taking the Sabbath off,
Speaker 2: taking Saturdays off, and putting your tech down, putting your
Speaker 2: cell phone down. It's like, ah, man, look, I'll grant
Speaker 2: I believe that he was writing that book, but it's
Speaker 2: just it just rubs me so the wrong way when
Speaker 2: you don't even have justice for his own assassination and
Speaker 2: you've got the son of the President of the United
Speaker 2: States shilling his book, You've got his wife going on
Speaker 2: Fox News and talking about it, and it's just like,
Speaker 2: is everyone so poor? Like do people have no morals?
Speaker 2: Or better yet, am I the only one with morals
Speaker 2: in this entire space? Sometimes that's what you start to
Speaker 2: feel like, because you feel like you're going crazy because
Speaker 2: you're disturbed by these things when everyone else is like,
Speaker 2: this is normal, this is good, this is yeah, this
Speaker 2: is total. This makes perfect sense. Of course, you're going
Speaker 2: to go out and just hawk a book from a
Speaker 2: dead guy when you don't even know that you have
Speaker 2: his assassin in custody. Of course that's what you would do.
Speaker 2: Of course, and ten didn't stop there.
Speaker 7: Their leader and founder murdered, and prominent pieces of human
Speaker 7: trash are trying to destroy It's it's fucking evil. So
Speaker 7: you know what when someone pulls in front of my
Speaker 7: property and fires on it several times, I'm sitting here
Speaker 7: looking at these vile pieces of shit and thinking to myself,
Speaker 7: for what purpose will I stick my neck out if
Speaker 7: this is what happens, If it Charlie Kirk is killed.
Speaker 7: Kennice Owens is a fucking evil scumbag. She is a
Speaker 7: degenerate cunt.
Speaker 2: He continues on like that for about ten minutes. I'm
Speaker 2: gonna spare you all that look. His emotions are sincere.
Speaker 2: He's definitely pissed off, and a lot of people he
Speaker 2: gets accused of being performative with his outrage from time
Speaker 2: to time, but I'm sure he does do that from
Speaker 2: time to time, but uh, that wasn't one of them.
Speaker 2: He's definitely sincerely mad. I think he's a little on
Speaker 2: the spectrum like all quasi libertarians are, and his emotion,
Speaker 2: his delivery is so polished that I think it sometimes
Speaker 2: belies the underlying sincere emotions. But let me tell you,
Speaker 2: he's sincerely angry. But again, from my vantage point, like
Speaker 2: the move with all of this is not to do that,
Speaker 2: not to get so angry and heated that you start,
Speaker 2: you know, calling people names that I'm sure you'll regret later,
Speaker 2: but rather digging yourself, Like, if you believe that Tyler
Speaker 2: Robinson did it, well, then help dig, help confirm that,
Speaker 2: help push for disclosure, help get additional surveillance footage. I mean,
Speaker 2: you've got a tremendous platform and tremendous reach yourself, Like
Speaker 2: I wouldn't I wouldn't hold it against you if you
Speaker 2: were like, look, we are. We are going to try
Speaker 2: and prove who did this. As of now, we believe
Speaker 2: that Tyler Robinson did it because I trust Cash Betel
Speaker 2: and Dan Bongino or whatever whatever you're is for believing
Speaker 2: that and just saying okay, but we're gonna make sure,
Speaker 2: We're gonna make absolutely certain Cannice Olwens wants to make
Speaker 2: money trying to paint a picture that Tyler didn't do it. Well,
Speaker 2: we're gonna make money trying to prove that he did.
Speaker 2: And let's see, let's see who has the best evidence
Speaker 2: to prove out their case. Either way, that would be
Speaker 2: much more valuable to the public and to the to
Speaker 2: the Charlie Kirk Heritage Legacy Family Organization TPUSA, everything else.
Speaker 2: That would be way more beneficial than whatever this is.
Speaker 2: And there's one other variable that I haven't mentioned that
Speaker 2: I need to a lot of these people are scared
Speaker 2: to death. They really are. We did something extremely ordinary
Speaker 2: like go to Target or CBS.
Speaker 10: I can't go to thanks whether as the general public
Speaker 10: these days, particularly in light of Charlie Cook's motor there
Speaker 10: are serious security issues. That's not that I don't want to.
Speaker 10: I simply count.
Speaker 7: Has Charlie's murder changed how you do things?
Speaker 2: Or were you already locked down pretty fuel before that?
Speaker 10: It certainly reinforced the severity of the situation where life
Speaker 10: is on a hardcore mode. You make one mistake and
Speaker 10: your dad. It only takes on one mistake a.
Speaker 2: Lot of people won't talk about it openly, but especially
Speaker 2: the high profile political commentators. They are scared. As soon
Speaker 2: as Charlie Kirk was taken out like that, especially the
Speaker 2: way he was taken out like that, and then all
Speaker 2: of the chicanery and thuckery when it comes to the
Speaker 2: Tyler Robinson narrative, especially in the aftermath that the Epstein
Speaker 2: cover up and everything else. A lot of people who
Speaker 2: are bluepilled, in my opinion, that are regime water carriers.
Speaker 2: A lot of them are doing it because they're I mean, yeah,
Speaker 2: sure it's still cowardice, but a lot of them are
Speaker 2: just scared to death. And I don't blame them. I
Speaker 2: don't blame them for being scared to death. That's scary shit,
Speaker 2: especially if you really think that a foreign intelligence organization
Speaker 2: or your own intelligence agencies were responsible for it. That
Speaker 2: you're like, I'm not going to talk about that. Charlie
Speaker 2: Kirk was just like me, I'm not going to fucking
Speaker 2: put my neck out there. It's like, all right, well,
Speaker 2: myself and Ian Carroll and Candie Owns, we all go
Speaker 2: the opposite direction. We all go, well, maybe that is
Speaker 2: the case, but all the more reason we must talk
Speaker 2: about it because that paradigm cannot persist. It must end
Speaker 2: here and now, and I continue to believe that we
Speaker 2: must dive a deep dive and dig until we figure
Speaker 2: out what the fuck truly happened and make sure that
Speaker 2: whoever did it gets held to account. That is my
Speaker 2: overarching mission in all this. And yes, my viewership has
Speaker 2: increased a lot in subscriptions and everything else because I'm
Speaker 2: willing to dig on this when a lot of these
Speaker 2: people aren't. But that's not my fault. I haven't lied
Speaker 2: at all. You know. The one thing that I said
Speaker 2: that I would take back at this point is that
Speaker 2: I did an episode dedicated to what I thought was
Speaker 2: a potential charge in the microphone, and I don't think
Speaker 2: that's what happened now because I did additional research and
Speaker 2: I came to the conclusion that it was the impact
Speaker 2: of the rifle or the round into his neck that
Speaker 2: caused the cavitation event, which ultimately puffs your chest briefly
Speaker 2: because there's so much pressure from the round hitting and
Speaker 2: it basically pressed his skin up and it launched, or
Speaker 2: maybe the round hit the chain somehow, but regardless, basically
Speaker 2: I came to the conclusion, Okay, I think it was
Speaker 2: probably caused by the round itself. I don't think that
Speaker 2: there was a charge, like that's it. Like, of all
Speaker 2: the things I've said at this point, that's the one
Speaker 2: thing that I no longer think is probable. And I
Speaker 2: didn't even say it definitively because I was like, this
Speaker 2: looks weird. Why is his shirt coming up to hear?
Speaker 2: You know, it was like that was a reasonable question.
Speaker 2: I have no regrets in asking it. I don't think
Speaker 2: there's anything wrong with asking it. Why aren't we all
Speaker 2: asking these questions? It's so strange, and I think that's
Speaker 2: the one that's the one underlying variable. A lot of
Speaker 2: people go all these people are you know, bought and
Speaker 2: paid for. These people are opsies, people are CIA mouthpieces,
Speaker 2: and it's like, yeah, in searcher instance, you're right, there's
Speaker 2: no doubt. Oh they're Feds. Certain instances, you're right, there's
Speaker 2: no doubt. And a lot of instances though, they're just scared.
Speaker 11: Man.
Speaker 2: They are just super super freaked out. And can you
Speaker 2: blame them? Imagine if you were in their position, like,
Speaker 2: try and have sympathy, even if you disagree with Temple,
Speaker 2: have some sympathy. He's got millions of dollars in annual
Speaker 2: security expenses and someone just fired off a gun outside
Speaker 2: of his property. That sucks. That sucks, right, it does. Anyways,
Speaker 2: I want to get into Nick Fuentt's devouring Piers Morgan,
Speaker 2: but before I do that, I want to remind you
Speaker 2: that this is what's happening behind the scenes. This is
Speaker 2: why these stories, while they matter, there's also important shit
Speaker 2: that we need to be privy to. We're going to
Speaker 2: rise to the occasion. We will not let this evil
Speaker 2: win this time.
Speaker 12: Israeli leaders encourage the pastors to be bold and express
Speaker 12: gratitude for their support.
Speaker 5: Stand up and be counted, Tell the truth. Speak to
Speaker 5: young people, speak up and be counted. I'm counting on you,
Speaker 5: and I know you'll do what has to be done.
Speaker 5: That's what our destiny calls for.
Speaker 13: This is not just Israel's fight. This is a fight
Speaker 13: for civilization. We're facing very much a civilizational struggle like
Speaker 13: we saw in the thirties, between Nazism and the free world.
Speaker 13: Today that Nazism is Islamism in coordination with communism, which
Speaker 13: today's expression is called woke, but it's the same thing.
Speaker 4: Division going forward, recruiting ten thousand more pastors in the
Speaker 4: next thirty six months.
Speaker 14: Because there's a lot of misinformation out there, a lot
Speaker 14: of young people that are not for Israel and they're
Speaker 14: just getting the wrong information. So our whole idea here
Speaker 14: is to reach the youth of America and around the
Speaker 14: world and just show the truth.
Speaker 2: Our whole idea here is to make sure that we
Speaker 2: reach the youth with overt propaganda on behalf of a
Speaker 2: foreign nation known as Israel. That's what it is, and
Speaker 2: it's not just done. It's our current unite. The state's
Speaker 2: ambassador under Donald Trump to Israel, Mike Huckabee. Yeah, the
Speaker 2: same guy who just met with the convicted traitor and
Speaker 2: spy Jonathan Pollard.
Speaker 12: But I say that those who were saying things that
Speaker 12: are negatives that are not true, they have.
Speaker 4: The free speech to say them.
Speaker 12: But you have the free speech responsibility to push back,
Speaker 12: stand up, speak up, and say not in this country
Speaker 12: America will not stand silent.
Speaker 2: That a stripper may very visibly.
Speaker 12: Say that this is the land that God gave to
Speaker 12: the Jewish people, and he said he will bless those
Speaker 12: who bless, but he will curse those who curses.
Speaker 2: So you're thinking of yourself. Clinton. You know, that's not
Speaker 2: that big of a deal. Like we all know that
Speaker 2: my Cuokabees is so Phrasriel, Like he's the ambassador Israel.
Speaker 2: It's not that big of a deal. You know what
Speaker 2: that you know what that speech was given at. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it's called Israel Ambassador Summit. One thousand Pastors United, a
Speaker 2: thousand American Christian pastors getting together to game plan how
Speaker 2: to win the propaganda war in defense of a foreign
Speaker 2: government led by a current politician and representative in the
Speaker 2: Trump administration. That is super meaningful. So when I say, yeah,
Speaker 2: some people are scared, some people are just wrong, some
Speaker 2: people are whatever. Some people are paid. And if you
Speaker 2: think that they're having an organization or a you know,
Speaker 2: a gathering like that, and there's not major money, we
Speaker 2: already know this. We've already covered it before Project Ester
Speaker 2: and all this stuff, Like there is major money going
Speaker 2: into this psychological warfare propaganda against you on behalf of
Speaker 2: a foreign government using in many cases your religion against you.
Speaker 2: If you aren't disturbed by that, even if you're not Christian,
Speaker 2: if you're Muslim or seek or atheist or agnostic, who
Speaker 2: cares you should find that reprehensible that you have American
Speaker 2: politicians weaponizing the Christian faith or any faith against its
Speaker 2: practitioners in America on behalf of a foreign government.
Speaker 15: If God breaks his covenant promises with Israel, then you
Speaker 15: now have no assurance that you'll make it to heaven
Speaker 15: as a believer. Some people have said over the years
Speaker 15: is quite a cute but cool response and quite accurate.
Speaker 15: Can you prove the existence of God with one word?
Speaker 15: And that person said, Israel.
Speaker 2: I rest my case. We should all be able to
Speaker 2: point that out and say this is wrong. And when
Speaker 2: you recognize that many of these propaganda pushes that would
Speaker 2: which began in earnest earlier this year when they really
Speaker 2: really attacked Tucker Carlson, and then it migrated to Ian Carroll,
Speaker 2: then it migrated to Candice Owans, and then Fointez has
Speaker 2: been dealing with it forever. There is major money that
Speaker 2: is being put into prosecuting in the public arena commentators
Speaker 2: that they don't like, that's a problem. We should wherever
Speaker 2: you fall on Israel, really, wherever you fall on any topic,
Speaker 2: we should all be able to agree. We should not
Speaker 2: be getting actively and openly overtly propagandized by our own
Speaker 2: government or a foreign government, particularly using our religious institutions
Speaker 2: against us, And people go, why is Nick Funta so popular?
Speaker 2: Huh Okny, figure it out. It's because we've all recognized
Speaker 2: what's happening here, that that shit is crazy, it's egregious,
Speaker 2: it's insulting, it's infuriating. Fuck you if you don't see
Speaker 2: it as such. So while Nick Funt does was the
Speaker 2: Wilderness blacklisted by the same organizations that I'm talking about
Speaker 2: right now, I might add, and debanked and deplatformed and
Speaker 2: thrown off of fucking airlines for a year, we were
Speaker 2: watching people get obliterated in Gaza on top of just
Speaker 2: basically a realization that much of our political establishment was
Speaker 2: controlled by the same entity, and then media was kind
Speaker 2: of carrying water on behalf of the same edity. And
Speaker 2: you're like, wait, so well, Nick is being blacklisted by
Speaker 2: all of these same entities. We're recognizing that these entities
Speaker 2: are doing what they're doing. And then Nick comes out
Speaker 2: of his involuntary servitude for years and he's like, oh,
Speaker 2: everyone agrees with me now, and his numbers explode because
Speaker 2: it's like, well he was away. We were radicalized. And
Speaker 2: it started actually with the name of my show, Liberty Lockdown.
Speaker 2: The lockdowns is when, yes, a lot of people were
Speaker 2: radicalized before that. Calm down, you're soap based, you got
Speaker 2: it before everybody else, but we all were radicalized to
Speaker 2: a certain extent when they said you got to stay
Speaker 2: home for a year, like that was a pretty too far.
Speaker 2: And then we come to find out that whole narrative
Speaker 2: is a lie. And then all of the origin of
Speaker 2: that was covered up and that was a lie, and
Speaker 2: it's like okay, and then the Epstein case and then
Speaker 2: that was covered up and that was a lie, and
Speaker 2: then yeah, we're radicalized. So it's nixt time now. He's
Speaker 2: been saying the same shit for a decade, Well it's
Speaker 2: his time now. This is why I agree with Ian Carrol.
Speaker 2: I would appreciate it if Nick would just keep an
Speaker 2: open mind when it comes to the Tyler Robinson narrative.
Speaker 2: At this point, I think it was do you do
Speaker 2: you really think that? Because I don't. I don't think
Speaker 2: that at least I don't think he hit him with
Speaker 2: a thirty out six can West Can we at least
Speaker 2: agree on that that the round that took his life
Speaker 2: was not what they purported to be could we can
Speaker 2: we at least agree on that? And if you will
Speaker 2: agree on that, then shouldn't we also doubt or question
Speaker 2: the rest of the narrative? Why is one of the
Speaker 2: key aspects of the narrative provably false and yet we're
Speaker 2: just accepting the rest of it? That doesn't make sense
Speaker 2: to me. All Right, I've been critical of a lot
Speaker 2: of people I like more than enough throughout this episode.
Speaker 2: Let's get into some of the better hits between Nick
Speaker 2: Fonts and Piers Morgan.
Speaker 1: I've got three sons, and they don't share your views
Speaker 1: about slavery and about the Holocaust. They can have decency
Speaker 1: and compassion and humanity about some of the worst things
Speaker 1: that have happened in the last one hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: years or more, then they can do that.
Speaker 2: That's one of my favorite lines of the whole thing.
Speaker 2: Sound like girls, but I think I think, actually, well,
Speaker 2: I was watching that. What it made me recognize about
Speaker 2: Nick and his popularity is that it's the It's actually
Speaker 2: not even what he says sometimes, it's the energy. Like
Speaker 2: he's sitting there and he's just got this kind of
Speaker 2: like smug disdain, but there is this tendency and I
Speaker 2: have this tendency myself, and this is why I'm trying
Speaker 2: to This is why I watch it as kind of
Speaker 2: educational on how to be better at what I do.
Speaker 2: Is that he sits there and he's just like, my
Speaker 2: tendency would be. This is Piers Morgan. He's like big time.
Speaker 2: He was the Homeost Crazy Lady and Home Alone two.
Speaker 2: Sorry that's a joke. Anyways, he's got a very successful
Speaker 2: show on YouTube now and he was on CNN forever
Speaker 2: or whatever station it was. And it's like, my tendency
Speaker 2: would be to show some respect, and that's a mistake,
Speaker 2: Like why should I respect you, Piers Morgan? Why should
Speaker 2: I respect people who got everything wrong for decades and
Speaker 2: made a fortune doing it and now they basically get
Speaker 2: a handful of things right, like way too late for
Speaker 2: it to matter. And I'm supposed to fucking be impressed.
Speaker 2: I'm supposed to kneel to you. So that's what I
Speaker 2: like about Nick. I like that energy there. He's just
Speaker 2: sitting there, very smug, very condescending, very dismissive, just like
Speaker 2: you can see an his face like yeah, and I'm like, yeah,
Speaker 2: that's the right energy actually, Like why do I sit
Speaker 2: there and I act like I should respect these people.
Speaker 2: I should go into it like fuck these people. Like literally,
Speaker 2: for those that haven't watched it, it's a two hour
Speaker 2: one on one and the entire time is just peers
Speaker 2: running clips of Nick's greatest hits, him saying sometimes truthful
Speaker 2: and sometimes off the cuff wild, you know, jokes and
Speaker 2: shit like that, and then just going how do you
Speaker 2: feel about what you said there? Would you like to
Speaker 2: backtrack on any of that? And Nick's really appropriate responses. No,
Speaker 2: I stand by all of that. It's so smart. It's
Speaker 2: such a smart tactic. I don't know why I didn't
Speaker 2: just think of that or start doing that years ago.
Speaker 2: But it's like, yeah, you're dealing with bad actors. Why
Speaker 2: are you pretending as if they're reputable or that you
Speaker 2: need to defend yourself instead go on the offensive, actually
Speaker 2: hold them up to their own accusations.
Speaker 4: They're always coming up with, No, it's not the Jews,
Speaker 4: No it's not women, No it's not blacks. It's actually
Speaker 4: really complicated. No, it fucking isn't at all. Jews are
Speaker 4: running society. Women need to shut the fuck up, Blacks
Speaker 4: need to be in prison for the most part, and
Speaker 4: we would live in paradise.
Speaker 2: It's that simple.
Speaker 1: Okay, would you like to clarify what you meant?
Speaker 4: Then that's all true. That's one hundred percent true. Everything
Speaker 4: I said in that clip is true.
Speaker 1: Including that blacks need to be imprisoned for the most part.
Speaker 2: Uh yeah, yes, that's like that might be my favorite
Speaker 2: moment of the year, Like no exaggeration. Uh yeah, yes,
Speaker 2: it's fucking perfect. It's so good. I don't care if
Speaker 2: you agree with him, if you can't watch that and go, oh,
Speaker 2: that was great, that's exactly what you should do to
Speaker 2: these people, Like that's perfect. If you still don't get
Speaker 2: why Nick is popular, I just think you're fucking lame.
Speaker 2: Like that's my honest I just think you're a lame
Speaker 2: ass bitch at this point. That's such a fucking boss move. Well,
Speaker 2: including the pot that black should be in prison for
Speaker 2: the most part. Uh yeah, yes, I've watched that like
Speaker 2: ten times. It never gets old. It's so good. It's
Speaker 2: so so good. So anyways, like I was saying earlier,
Speaker 2: I think the tides have just changed, Like and I
Speaker 2: actually I was saying this. Someone was asking me about,
Speaker 2: you know, my success lately, and they're like They're like,
Speaker 2: why do you think you'd been doing this for five
Speaker 2: years now? And it's like you you were successful, but
Speaker 2: like you exploded in terms of audience and stuff, and
Speaker 2: I'm like, I think it's just the world catching up
Speaker 2: to me. Like that's honestly my opinion. And I think
Speaker 2: that's the same thing that is happening with Nick now.
Speaker 2: Granted he was also you know, blacklisted, deplatformed everywhere. Now
Speaker 2: he's getting immense reach that he wasn't permitted before. But
Speaker 2: I think that a lot of his success, though, is
Speaker 2: that people are super radicalized already and now he's just
Speaker 2: permitted to go viral. And it's like, I think that's
Speaker 2: what's happening with me too. Is that a lot of
Speaker 2: people that were radicalized against the lockdowns or the war
Speaker 2: in Ukraine, or the backs, or the war in Gaza,
Speaker 2: or the Epstein list or the list goes on and on,
Speaker 2: is just or the Charlie Kirk assassination and they're just like, Yeah,
Speaker 2: this guy was right about all these things, so I'm
Speaker 2: gonna see what he has to say now. I think
Speaker 2: that's it. And they're like, well, but isn't he saying
Speaker 2: things that are inappropriate and they're like, nope, no, I
Speaker 2: agree actually yep, and they're like, well that's cancelable, and
Speaker 2: they're like, fuck off, don't care. I just think this
Speaker 2: is a much like when people say, well, you disagree
Speaker 2: with Nick on something, so why don't you critique him more.
Speaker 2: I'm like, because I like that energy more. It's that simple. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I disagree with him on a bunch of things. I
Speaker 2: don't care, though, I don't care. We live in a
Speaker 2: better country when Nick funt Does is allowed to talk openly.
Speaker 2: That's the truth. When all of the Nick funt Does
Speaker 2: of the world are allowed to just speak their mind
Speaker 2: and to have courage, to not be afraid, to not
Speaker 2: be cowed, to not be cowards when it comes to
Speaker 2: talking about minorities or race, or religion or anything else,
Speaker 2: that's a better America. I endorse that. I prefer it,
Speaker 2: and I make no apologies for preferring it. It's the
Speaker 2: right position to have. We are free men. You don't
Speaker 2: have to agree with everything everyone says all the time.
Speaker 2: You don't have to have Piers Morgan breathing down your
Speaker 2: neck and talking shit to you and challenge. By the way,
Speaker 2: he did the most disgusting, dirty thing I've ever seen.
Speaker 2: He goes on your show one time you talk on
Speaker 2: your show one Tom you talked about how I can't
Speaker 2: do the accent. Basically, he was saying, do you think
Speaker 2: that your father is responsible for your racism? And long
Speaker 2: story short, what Peers was doing was he's bringing Nick
Speaker 2: found his dad into the public eye and opening him
Speaker 2: up for reprisals under the you woke healthscape that we
Speaker 2: function under for the past decade and maybe we still do.
Speaker 2: I don't know, but it's like, those are the old tactics, man,
Speaker 2: that's the old world. That's the world I want to
Speaker 2: see end. I wanted to. I want to see it
Speaker 2: perish viciously. And I think that's that's why, regardless of
Speaker 2: my disagreements, regardless of the fact that Nick Funt has
Speaker 2: attack my buddy, like seriously, I love Ian Carroll. I
Speaker 2: think he's awesome, and I think Nick is totally wrong
Speaker 2: about that. Setting all that aside, we are a better
Speaker 2: country with Nick Funt as energy in the media space.
Speaker 2: It's a better country because of that. I stand by that.
Speaker 2: I will not relent from that. It is better. It
Speaker 2: is significantly better just telling it like it is, saying
Speaker 2: what they feel, regardless of the consequences, regardless of the backlash,
Speaker 2: regardless of the blacklisting or deplatforming, or taking you off
Speaker 2: the fucking or putting you on a no fly list.
Speaker 2: We live in a better country when people are not
Speaker 2: afraid to just be honest. So why do I defend
Speaker 2: Nick funt As Because on the inverse of that, you
Speaker 2: have fucking psychotic Zionists that are trying to ruin the
Speaker 2: life of Miss Rachel, a kid show program, simply because
Speaker 2: she thinks that Palestinian children our children and that they
Speaker 2: shouldn't be murdered.
Speaker 11: Now we know that the only way to really make
Speaker 11: change is to get to the bottom of who is
Speaker 11: funding some of these bad actors. Stop anti semitism. Is
Speaker 11: going after Miss Rachel. They are going after who is
Speaker 11: funding her because there is no way a children's television
Speaker 11: personality like the mister Rogers of my time suddenly becomes
Speaker 11: obsessed with defending Hamas. It makes no sense unless she's
Speaker 11: a paid actor. Going after Miss Rachel is a great
Speaker 11: example of what we need to be doing. They have
Speaker 11: appealed to Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate who is
Speaker 11: funding Miss Rachel. It's guitar. It's Iran, it's funding from
Speaker 11: bad actors. These people have infiltrated our universities, our newsrooms,
Speaker 11: the United Nations, and now it is time to figure
Speaker 11: out who is funding them. And just today Miss Rachel
Speaker 11: knows how high the stakes are. She's complaining that they're
Speaker 11: putting her life at risk, which is what she has
Speaker 11: done to every Jewish person worldwide since she started campaigning
Speaker 11: for a terrorist regime.
Speaker 2: So yeah, I'm gonna set my differences aside, even when
Speaker 2: Nick decides to personally attack my homie Ian and just say,
Speaker 2: we still live in a better world when we all
Speaker 2: reject whatever the fuck that is when you try and
Speaker 2: ruin the life of Miss Rachel as if that's a
Speaker 2: huge political outrage that she goes. Yeah, it's sad, it's sad.
Speaker 2: What's happening in the Palestinian kids. I mean, oh no,
Speaker 2: she's defending Hamas. Yeah, I'm sure Miss Rachel went on
Speaker 2: her YouTube show or wherever the fuck she even puts
Speaker 2: it on, I even know, and she's defending Hamas like,
Speaker 2: I'm sure that happened. I'm sure it wasn't just that
Speaker 2: she hugged a poor Palestinian girl who had lost a
Speaker 2: limb in a war that we were forced to fund.
Speaker 2: So yeah, I'm on team not that whatever that whatever
Speaker 2: the fuck that is insanity. But anyways, I'll end by saying,
Speaker 2: Nick Ian, make him make up. You guys are awesome,
Speaker 2: be friends, love you both. I don't think this is
Speaker 2: gonna work, but yeah, the three of us along with
Speaker 2: Dave Smith, let's make it happen. We'll see if we'll see.
Speaker 2: If I can fucking be peace maker on this, I
Speaker 2: doubt it. I'm trying. I'm trying. I doubt it. If
Speaker 2: I can make Tempoole and Candice Owen's be friends again,
Speaker 2: I can. I can fix the Ian Carroll, Nick fuentt
Speaker 2: is beef. I can probably fix neither whatever. At least
Speaker 2: I'm trying. Right At liberty lockpot on X, if you
Speaker 2: want to support my work, you can subscribe there. I'll
Speaker 2: follow you back liberty lockdown dot logus dot com. You
Speaker 2: can support me there too. I don't really do anything
Speaker 2: over there, but it is always helpful if you want
Speaker 2: to help boost me. And then, last, but not least,
Speaker 2: go to my pillow dot com use promo code lockdown
Speaker 2: to get you some cozy from Mike Lindell and uh
Speaker 2: please do like comment subscribe. If you're watching on Spotify,
Speaker 2: subscribe there. If you're watching on YouTube, subscribe there. If
Speaker 2: you're not watching on those other platforms, and go to
Speaker 2: the other platform and subscribe there and set the alert
Speaker 2: so you never miss an episode, because oftentimes the show
Speaker 2: will not get alerts put out. I don't know why,
Speaker 2: probably because of the shit that I say. But yeah,
Speaker 2: I really appreciate you guys support. We are crushing as always.
Speaker 2: You guys are the best. I'm going to go to
Speaker 2: the gym now, bye, Bay.
Speaker 1: But are you actually attracted to women?
Speaker 4: I am attracted to women the gay No, but I
Speaker 4: will say that women are very difficult to be around.
Speaker 2: Okay, so there's that.
Speaker 1: I mean, I know I'm the boomer. I know I'm
Speaker 1: the boomer here, but actually you're a twenty seven year
Speaker 1: old dinosaur archie.
Speaker 2: Have you ever had sex?
Speaker 12: No?
Speaker 4: Absolutely not?
Speaker 1: Wow, since the guy you've never got laid.
Speaker 2: Subscribe to Liberty Lockdown, great podcast. Clint is Tight