Speaker 1: If you want to support the show and get the
episodes early and ad free, head on over to Freemanbeyond
the Wall dot com forward slash Support. I want to
explain something right now. If you support me through substack
or Patreon, you have access to an RSS feed that
you can plug into any podcatcher in Apple and you'll
be able to listen to the episodes through there. If
you support me through a subscribe, star, gum Road or
on my website directly, I will send you a link
where you can download the file and you can listen
to it any way you wish. I really appreciate the
support everyone gives me. It keeps a show going. It
allows me to basically put out an episode every day now,
and I'm not going to stop. I'm just going to accelerate.
I think sometimes you see that I'm putting out two
even three a day, and yeah, can't do it without you,
So thank you for the support. Head on over to
Freeman Beyond the Wall dot com Forward slash Support and
do it there. Thank you. Happy MLK day everyone, Yay, amazing.
Huh how are you celebrating in the day, Charlie.
Speaker 2: Uh sleeping? I never thought i'd be happy for it
to be MLK Day, but I'm off work and desperately
needed some sleep because that blizzard that came through the
whole country basically was pretty devastating and I basically got
no sleep the last two nights before last night. So
thank you Martin Luther King for letting me rest.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's it's of course being an Alabama We're not
getting it here and everything, but it's going to drop
into the teens a couple of nights this week, and
I mean people are just going to lose their minds.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it was freaking crazy. I mean, what was it
three nights ago? It was minus thirty five here, a
real country windschill. It was Miney's fifty five, which is insane.
Whenever it gets that cold, I always think of the Wehrmacht.
I find it very educational.
Speaker 1: Oh man. I mean it's like when you read when
you read Jigrel's the book I have back there on
the on the Russian campaign. It's just brutal. And I
was reading I read another book on the Blue Division,
the Spanish Division. You can imagine how those guys felt
coming from the climate they were in.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I started listening to the Degrell stream last night.
That's a large chunk of content there. It's like almost
three and a half hours long, so that should be interesting.
I've read a good number of memoirs at this point,
and even a fiction book, mostly also recommended by by Thomas.
So yeah, the Last Citadel was the fiction novel I read.
That was quite good.
Speaker 1: Well, let's let's start off with this. Let's get our
friend Devin Stack had a tweet today and what did
he say? Black people that like MLK are like kids
who think Santa is real. White people that like m
I l K are like adults thinks Santa the Tooth
Fairy and Count Chocula or real.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I think that's just a perfect summary of the
myth of MLK. It's when you really think about it.
I mean, what do most people know about MLK. They
know he said, like I have a dream, and it
was it was that people are judged by the content
of their character and not the color of their skin.
And that's literally the only thing they know about MLK,
and they have this entire mythology built up around him.
I mean, just ask ask any normy what they actually
know about MLK and see if they can cite literally
anything other than that one quote. When you think about it,
most people know absolutely nothing about this guy. They just
know that one line, and they have this whole concept
that's been propagandazed since their brain about what he is,
what he represents.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I put you know, the what is it like
the Rockwell pain sing of the guy standing up and
everybody always does different stuff. He's in a room people.
And I posted that on my shockingly still have a
Facebook account this morning, and I said Happy MLK day
on on and it said I hate them for the
content of their character.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I saw that. That was a good meme.
Speaker 1: All right, so let's stop sharing this. I see every
let's see I may We got about one hundred on
YouTube twenty three on on Odyssey waiting for rumble. As
the as the question goes Prager, somebody just says Justin
and eight liner Justin Lanas said Prager. JU has been
ratio today pretty hard.
Speaker 2: Oh I didn't see them. I probably have them blocked, So.
Speaker 1: Yeah, get out real quick. Yeah I can't. I can't
deal with that. No, all right, so entrpees going and yeah,
let's uh, let's share this and get this started, because
this is a. It's not the longest article we've ever read,
but it's definitely lengthy. So this was written in nineteen
eighty eight by Samuel Francis says good, twelve years before
he got canceled, and for I think it was for
chronicle print version of Chronicles magazine at the time, most.
Speaker 2: Likely, I mean nineteen eighty eight. I doubt it was
a digital publication.
Speaker 1: No, it wasn't digital at all. And they reput they
redid it here. And this is three years after Ronald Reagan,
the Hero the Right, made mlk's birthday a holiday. So
let me start reading here, because this is If no
one's ever read this, they'll they're in for something here.
Speaker 2: Before you do. Can can we check of that illustration
real quick? I think it's just a great illustration. It
reminds me of those demonology books from the Catholic Church showing,
you know, the various demons from Hell and falls idols
and that sort of thing. I really like. I wonder
who made that. Actually it's got initials on it, but
it's a great illustration to show the sort of idolatrous
position MLK occupies in America.
Speaker 1: So many, so many people occupied too all right, but
not all of them get a day, so all right.
The third annual observance of the birthday of Martin Luther
King Junior passed happily enough in the nation's capital, with
the local merchants uploading their assorted junk into the hands
of an eager public. It is hardly surprising that King Day,
observed as a federal legal public holiday since nineteen eighty six,
has already become part of the cycle of mass indulgence
through which the national economy annually revolves. Excuse me, Christmas itself,
commemorating an event almost as important as the nativity of
Doctor King, has long been notorious for its materialism and
appetitive excesses, and a visit to any shopping mall will
alert the consumer of the next festal occasion on the
public calendar and instruct him in what ways and to
what extent he is expected to turn out his pockets
in its celebration. I think it's appetitive, but you know,
I'm just streaking. Let me alone. Since Doctor King, wherever
he is now, has been promoted to full fellowship in
the national pantheon, it is to be expected that he
too must perform his office and keeping the wheels of
American commerce well greased.
Speaker 2: I like the line wherever he is now at the moment.
That's a sly little thing I missed the first time
I read this.
Speaker 1: Yes, a Stone Choir did did an episode on Michael
King in which they showed that he was he had
no way held to the tenants of Christianity.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and what he says about the commodification here, I
suppose it's dwarfed now by what they've done to Christmas.
But it's been interesting over my life to observe the
commodification of Christmas to where it's so far removed from
any sort of religious celebration at this point. You know,
I remember when this idea of Black Friday got really big,
and now the entirety of Thanksgiving is like the Black month,
which is interesting to use that particular color in relation
to Christmas, but you know, it's like two months of
just engorge yourself on consuming product and quote unquote deals
on crap from China. Yeah, and yeah, MLK Day, same thing.
I mean, you know, does anyone celebrate the day? No? No,
not really.
Speaker 1: Well, considering how many merchants were around him, it's not
you know, you would expect that his holiday would be
commoditized in some way. What is remarkable about the King Holiday, however,
is that, alone among the ten national holidays created by
Act of Congress, it is celebrated in other ways that
are pretty much in keeping with its original purpose, while
the other nine festivities are merely excuses for protracted buying
and selling, three day weekends with an attractive campadre or
orgies of eat and swill punctuated by football games. Only
the third Monday in January is the regular subject of
solemn x peatex expatiations by the Brahmins of the Republic
as to what it really means. Newspaper columnists, television commentators,
and public school teachers, the nearest things we have to
a priesthood, devote at least a week to discussing Doctor
King's life and achievements and their place in our national consciousness. Certainly,
they do not explore the lives of Jesus, Christ, George Washington,
or Christopher Columbus with such piety, nor do they usually
dedicate much time to reflecting on the less anthropomorphized occasions
that celebrate national independence. Public Thanksgiving are remembrance of American
fallen in war for the Fatherland. Only Doctor King seems
to elicit the effusions from the guardians of the public
tongue and as in the rituals of the Heathen gods
of old, loads of the blasphemer who fails to bend
the knee. I think that's supposed to be gods of old,
but it could be gods of old.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean this is the one. He makes a
good point there. You wouldn't see on Christmas Day or
Christopher Columbus Day, you know, I guess now we would
say tweets for the most part about you know, the
how the importance of these men or the great things
they've done. But you know, on MLK Day you see
literally everybody, you know, including so called right wingers, you know,
sort of praising MLK. Is this idol of the true
spirit of America? We're all brought together, you know. Under
those lines I quoted from his I have a dream
speech earlier, it's it is the one time where like
everyone comes together and puts their differences aside and celebrates.
I mean, really, it's mostly just like white people doing
this on Twitter and for these magazines. In fact, I
have no idea what black people do on MLK Day.
I probably, as he said, just you know, engage in
the sort of orgy of engorgement and consumerism.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, I think they just take the day off,
just like pretty much everybody else does, and since most
businesses are still open, they go ahead and get Errand's done.
That's pretty much what I think everyone's doing. The fate
of Jimmy the Greek Snyder is a case in point,
though not unique approach that I I'm so old I
remember this approach that a table at Duke Zeibert's restaurant
in Washington on the Friday before the official ceremonies, mister Snyder,
a sports commentator created, created and employed by CBS, was
asked by a local reporter for his views on the
price aggressive blacks and professional athletics. Mister Snyder perhaps is
dying too well, and he was foolish enough to say
what he really thought in response to the uninvited question. Yeah,
he had been drinking just a bit. He praised the
accomplishments and hard work of black athletes, made some insulting
remarks about the laziness of white athletes, and suggested that
the athletic prowess of blacks, was due in part to
their having been bred for size and strength in Antebellum days,
specifically for their big thighs, and that they can jump
higher and run faster because of their big thighs. It
is not known if the Greek, a professional gambler, gave
odds on how long he would keep his seven hundred
and fifty thousand dollars a year job after uttering his inanities,
but there was little time to place any bets, and
probably few would have taken them. Within twenty four hours,
mister Snyder was in the ranks of the unemployed.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's pretty interesting to read for me since this
was written before I was born, and this easily could
have just been written yesterday and you just you know,
replace Snyder with some other canceled white person. I guess
it really highlights how, you know, we have this stupid
concept called the woke. I really hate this term. It's
mostly used by center right people to obfuscate the true issues.
But this, this kind of brought to mind to me
the sort of myth of the nineties. And I'm probably
getting slightly ahead of myself here, but people talk about,
you know, returned to the nineties this time when the
nineties was like this time of unity and everything was
like pretty good and people are well well off and
you didn't see the crazy racial tension of the day.
But that's all just a lie. I think a lot
of this myth comes from millennials like myself. All they
are a member of the nineties is you know, Nintendo, Sega, Genesis, Diehard,
fun movies. But really, if you think the nineties existed
as I've described, you've actually just been duped by Hollywood,
because the idea of the nineties is as this sort
of island of stability, like you know, in nuclear physics,
you have this idea of islands of stability for for
like highly unstable elements. That's not and it's not actually real.
That never happened. It was never like that so called
cancel culture always existed, and there was never this sort
of great time period, uh you know, right at the
end of the Cold War where America was this this unified,
like post racial state. It just didn't happen. And if
you believe any of that, you've literally just been duped
by the movies. You know, That's what I was asking.
I was, uh, you know, asking someone the other day, Like,
what do you actually know about World War Two? For example,
that isn't from the movies? Like, do you know anything
about World War two that isn't from the movies? Same
thing as I brought up earlier with MLK, what do
you actually know about him other than that one quote
that you memorized from your from your school days. So yeah,
I think this article is really punctuates this point at
that everything we think is new right now isn't new
at all. It's just really coming for everyone at this point,
and that you know, there was never a time when
this stuff wasn't there, and we should have you know,
stamped out a long time ago.
Speaker 1: Anyway, Yes, when you really look at this, like when
you look at the movement of King, So when does
the real civil rights move? When does it really start
to pop off? When do you really start to see organization?
It's after Brown and be Board, before Brown versus Ward
of Education. Sure there was some you know, actually, but
you didn't have this militancy until Brown versus Board of Education,
you know. And if from my reading of Race War
in high school, the whole book by Harold Saltzman, it
really just goes to show that you have you went
from okay, you have we're going to force you to
desegregate the schools to teachers being let on fire fifteen
years later.
Speaker 2: Yeah, MLK. The whole reason we're taught about him and
that one particular quote and how he was quote unquote
nine violent, which is a lie. It's all just this
thing so that you can trick white people into accepting
the entire civil rights movement, which is, you know, ninety
eight percent violent, like you know Malcolm X for example,
Weather Underground, take your pick. And it's just a trick,
you know, a very simple trick played on white people
to make them think that this this civil rights movement
is just totally benign and all about fairness. And you
know the minority case is when you know, it actually
becomes violent. But that's all, that's all just a lie.
Speaker 1: Our buddy Prude here says, I don't know if you've
read it, but you should give what went wrong, what
went wrong with the creation and collapse of the Black
jew Alliance. I'm just sharing that so that I can
have it on the screen and so I can come
back to it later. By the way, anyone who wants
a super chat, I'll read your comment I mean, I
don't really care what the comment is. If it's insane,
I may censor it a little bit, but comment A
wait please. Mister Snyder was not the first victim of
the New Deity, and the practice of ruining a white
person once a year in honor of Doctor King is
becoming a national tradition. Last year, the victim was another
sports figure, Los Angeles Dodgers official Al Campanis, who was
asked on ABCTV's Nightline about black athletic performance and wound
up discoursing on the comparative buoyancy of the races wheniversed
in water. He too got his clock cleaned by his employers,
and though the incident did not occur in connection with
Doctor King's birthday, it did happen to fall during the
week of the nineteenth anniversary of the civil rights leader
assassination in April nineteen sixty eight.
Speaker 2: Yeah something, Yeah, I just find this interesting because it's
like it's not enough to just, you know, praise black people.
If you do it in like an out of date
fashion that more or less shows you're not. It's sort
of like a shit test for whether or not you're
really one of them. Like now, we have the term
people of color or whatever, and you can only you
can only keep up with the latest terminology if you're
sort of a true believer. So it's not even enough
for you to like, you know, praise them and say
anti white statements like you have to do it in
this very specific, updated, a ritualized way, or else they
sort of they detect that you're, you know, not from
the same ant colony and just destroy you instantly, urban
non swimmers.
Speaker 1: That's funny, Thank you, tell tho salamanka, All right onward,
miss okay. In nineteen eighty six, when King Day was
first celebrated after its enact by Congress in nineteen eighty three,
the victim got off easy. In Montgomery County, Maryland, missus
Karen Collins, a part time music teacher in a Silver
Spring elementary school, made the mistake of giving her private
opinion to a colleague that the country was making too
much of doctor King and that she had heard that
he had been a Communist supporter and had Communist friends. True.
Her remark was overheard by some students who ran home
to tell their parents, who alerted the local NAACP to
the presence of Unamerican activities even before the NAACP invited
itself to settle the matter. However, missus Collins had received
a reprimand from her principle, had been placed on an
administrative leave, transferred to another school, and required to enroll
in a human relations course where she could learn something
about the American way.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this is fascinating because it's an example of how
the ADL tends to function as well, where you know,
they don't even do the hard work entity of this.
It's really the people who you'd expect to be on
your side like that. Who knows what that principle's political
beliefs were, but he was probably just acting out, you know,
the Nuremberg moral paradigm here and just did all the
work for them.
Speaker 1: That's exactly what I was thinking Nuremberg.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Cato Man fifty five over on Entropy super Chat
says throughout the twentieth century there was a concentrated effort
by Jewish activists like Frank Boaz, Ashley Montague, Stephen J.
Gould to distort scientific truth to benefit their own ethnic group.
Montague explicitly stated reducing antisemitism was his goal of his
promotion of biological equality all right, let us move on.
Thank you for that. The NAACP was not at all
satisfied and demanded her dismissal. Quote. Any person who says
doctor King was a communist is either maliciously racist or uninformed,
says said Roscoe Nick's president of the local chapter. I
wonder where he learned that. Where he learned that from? Where?
You know anybody who says a is b h Actually well,
I mean, if you know who actually started the NAACP
and it wasn't black people, you might have an idea. Actually,
it was never certain exactly what missus Collins had said.
She denied saying the King was a communist, and after
her disciplining, school superintendent Wilmore S. Cody acknowledged that quote,
although her exact words are still in dispute. She did
express some satisfaction about the school system special program concerning
Martin Luther King's birthday. Missus Collins appears to have kept
to have kept her job, but the god whom she
blasphemed had tasted blood.
Speaker 2: This reminds you of that popular video I published Cold
on No Exit. It's not enough. You can't just opt
out of their system. You know, if you don't, especially
if you're in one of these, you know, priesthood positions,
like an educator. If you don't, you know, zealously bow
down to their idols and zealously enforce their moral paradigm,
they're going to come after you. There's really no way,
there's no way you can sort of be the the
House Conservatives successfully that always backfires are on you in
the end, and it's it's actually worse to be that
than to be one of them, because then you're just
a trader to your own people.
Speaker 1: M good point. Ao asks the question super chat over
an entropy. Do you think the MLK idolatry will begin
to crack when the FBI files are declassified? Nah? Yeah,
I say no, yeah, nothing.
Speaker 2: Really, that's like winning with facts and logic like that.
Speaker 1: They're really And we're not laughing at you, Ao, you know,
I'm not laughing at you because I know you and
I respect you. We're laughing because it's just, yeah, I'm
laughing because nothing ever changes with the release of information.
Nothing gets better. I mean, even the snowed in leaks
and even the Wikipedia. I mean, what does it change.
Things Just get shittier and shittier.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because it. You know, that's sort of the irony
of the Internet is the access to all information was
supposed to fix these problems, but you still just have
controlled sources like Wikipedia. So it doesn't really matter how
much information is out there. What matters is you know
what's on the controlled platforms that are taken to be canonical.
Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, moving on. If the reader thinks I
exaggerate the metaphor of King as God considered the demand
of nineteen seventy nine and since to add doctor King's
letter from birming the Birmingham Jail to the Bible. At
the third Annual Conference of the Black Theology Project in
nineteen seventy nine, a proposal to add the letter as
an epistle and the New Testament was approved by the
convention of about forty Black ministers, theologians, and lay people.
And the Reverend Mohammed Kenyata, instructor in sociology at Haverford College,
held that we believe God worked through doctor King in
that jail in Birmingham in nineteen sixty three to reveal
his Holy Word end quote. The pious sociologists also noted
that quote people generally do not realize that the process
of deciding what is in what is or is not
Holy Scripture has been an ongoing one end quote.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this is a big problem with Americans. If there's
there's one major thing you could criticize about Americans. And
I found this tendency too in this book I read
by Thomas Fleming, Disease in the Public Mind. Yeah, also
recommended by Thomas. If you look at my blog, it's
basically just book reviews of books recommended by Thomas, but
it basically Abolitionism was this ex act thing as well,
where people Americans just get obsessed with these like preacher
characters who sort of speak in a certain religious way
and they sort of project one of them that they're
put there by God. And it's a it's a big
problem in revolutionary American politics that we've had from the beginning.
And this is a sort of part of our character.
Is probably intrinsic to our character. So I don't think
we can get rid of it, but we need to
understand how to sort of control this negative tendency in
the American spirit to just become obsessed with the and idolize,
you know, in a heretical way. Frankly, these these preacher
characters that we just sort of declare like prophets from God.
You know, if you speak in that, I have a
dream that every man and woman, regardless of color and
creed is, deserves a five piece chicken tenders from Popeye's.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 2: It's like like people just fall for this and like
you got they have to stop that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, super chadow of on Odyssey from Potato Mutt says. Supposedly,
Malcolmax talked about the tribe a lot in his autobiography,
but his co author Alex Haley, who later went on
to write Roots, removed most of it. Haley also interviewed
George Lincoln Rockwall for Playboy in the nineteen sixties. The
interview may Worth may be worth looking into. And I
will say, and this is basically no one's reporting on this,
but it is everybody pretty much believes it in academia. Now.
Haley's book Roots, that was turned into a mini series
that was meant to guilt every white person in the
country for slavery in the early eighties, completely made up,
just completely made up. So yeah, there you go. A
whole bunch of including including myself, watching this going why
are they whipping that man? Why are they whipping that man?
It's like, yeah, it'd be like me. It'd be like
me taking a for entire iron to my computer equipment here.
Why would I want to Why would I want to
hurt something just Troy, something that makes me money. It's
ridiculous anyway, moving on, If the thirst of the New
God were slaked only by the ritual slaughter of school
teachers and sports commentators, Doctor, if the thirst of the
New God was slaked only by the slaughter by the
ritual slaughter of teachers and sports commentators, Doctor King's apotheosis
might actually represent a step forward for the country, but
evidence mounts that more is being demanded. King Day is,
in fact King Day, in fact, represents a revolution in
our national mythology, a transformation that seeks to delegitimize the
symbols of American history and national identity, and to redefine
the meaning of the American Republic, perhaps even the meaning
of the Christian faith. This, at least, is the explicit
understanding of the holiday that the dominant molders of public
opinion articulate every year in their ceremonial ruminations. Writing in
The New York Times on January eighteenth, of this year, Thenton,
professor of Religion and Social Transformation at the Ill School
of Technology in Denver, rejected the notion that King Holiday,
that the King Holiday commemorates merely a kind, gentle and
easily managed religious leader of a friendly crusade for racial integration.
Such an understanding, he writes, would quote demean and trivialized
doctor King's meaning, and the higher truth of King Day
is made of sterner stuff. The Martin Luther King of
nineteen sixty eight, writes, mister Harding quote was calling for
and leading civil disobedience campaigns against the unjust war in Vietnam,
courageously describing our nation as quote the greater purveyor of
violence in the world today. He was arguing us away
from a dependence on military solutions. He was encouraging young
men to refuse to serve in the military, challenging them
not to support America's anti communist crusades which were really
destroying the hopes of poor non white peoples everywhere. This
Martin Luther King was calling for a redistribution of wealth
and political power in American society as a way to
provide food, clothing, shelter, medical care, jobs, education and hope
for all of our countries people.
Speaker 2: Right, it's race communism. Like you know BAP likes to
point out, I think it's pretty accurate to call him
a communist both in the sort of original technical meeting
and also you know, in his racial politics. I mean,
a friendly crusade for racial integration. Get real, I mean
this this is a problem too, where like the thing
with MLK is like, oh, he's he's peaceful or whatever,
And like I said earlier, that just gets you to
ignore all the violence. You know, I think it's actually
right to you know, judge people not just by what
they do themselves, but what their followers do, you know,
in their wake. I think that's a completely valid way
to you know, look at figures like this and you know,
judging by everything else around MLK. You know, he he
was fully aware of what he was doing in the
role he was playing in terms of you know, being
this you know figure that white people were supposed to
to love, while you know, providing cover for the radicals.
Like Malcolm X.
Speaker 1: Connor on YouTube says, I'm taking a workplace harassment course
for MLK day. Thanks for the fire content. One of
the things I wanted to say here when you go
back to this paragraph, the transformation that seeks to legitimize
the symbols of American history and national identity, Well that happened.
They succeeded in doing that. Also, perhaps even the meaning
of the Christian faith. They've succeeded, succeeded in doing that.
Even like the Presbyterian Church of America. When I went
to one of their seminaries, you know, in two thousand,
you know, from two thousand and two thousand and three,
they were probably some of the most conservative people I've
ever met with the conservative program. And I just thought
the PCA would always be conservative. It's not anymore. They're changing.
The Southern Baptist Convention another one. I mean, I worked
for them at one point. They they're all bowing down
to the woke. And where did this stuff start? It
started with this.
Speaker 2: They've been bowing, you know, since before I was born.
They came out of the womb in the bowed position
because the you know, their progenitors were doing it too.
Like this has just been going on. When was this
written eighty eight, so it's thirty five years or something
like that. It's been the same thing.
Speaker 1: All right, Roger Wilkins, civil rights leader, activist and now
a senior fellow at the far left Institute for Policy
Studies in Washington, had some similar thoughts about the meaning
of doctor King's legacy in the Washington Post, and similar
interpretations of the man and the holiday could be reproduced
from the major media of public opinion for every year
since the holiday was created. To be sure, the use
of the King Holiday to legitimize the left's long march
to America's institutions is not the only meaning attributed to it.
At the time of its enactment by Congress. Various rationales
were offered by liberals and conservatives alike. That the holiday
was merely a celebration of the personal virtues of a
man of courage and vision, that it honored the national
rejection of racial bigotry, and that it was a holiday
for American blacks, who, it was patronizingly said, needed their
own hero, much as children in a restaurant need their
own menu. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's not really a hero for blacks as he
though he's a hero for whites. That's the whole point. Like,
blacks don't care about an MLK that much. They care
about the other more radical figures more.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but I think that's a great line, just as
a just as as much as a child in a
restaurant needs your own menu. Yet these are not the
presiding apologea apologia for the holiday, nor were they at
the time it was adopted, and the radical interpretation of
Doctor King and his legacy is both the dominant as
well as the more accurate version. The objective meaning of
the King Holiday, the actual meaning, independent of what its
sponsors thought they meant or what some of its celebrants
think that they mean, now, has little to do with
the renunciation of cross burnings and lynch parties, or even
of less malevolent incarnations of Jim Crow. To be sure,
a nation that honors Doctor King and his legacy renounces
such manifestations of racial inequality. But it also must renounce
all forms of inequality, racial or other, because if all
men are indeed equal, then it is absurd to say
that only some forms of inequality or equal. If, as
Doctor King understood it, the declaration of independence is a
promissory note, not merely declarative of national independence, but also
imperative of social reconstruction. That the Deltament delegitimization of the
traditional symbols, values, and institutions of America is not only
in order but also long overdue. And the radical reconstruction
of American society is not only a legitimate goal but
also the principal legitimate goal of our national endeavors.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this is another problem Americans are susceptible to where
I guess we read too much in literally to some
of the founding documents, like the Declaration of Independence. If
you sort of worship these documents and treat them like
their scripture, which again sort of plays into this religious
you know weakness that Americans can have for for this
sort of trickery. Well, you can get trapped in these
these sort of tricks that King is pulling air where
he's sort of a he's appealing to your sort of
Anglo sensibilities with the reference to the Declaration of Independence. There.
I mean, these things can't just be understood purely textually.
They have to be understood within the historical context of
the men who produce them, and you have to you
have to understand that context in order to get what
America actually is, or at least was supposed to be.
It's not just something that's written down on papers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Doctor King understood this well himself, expressing it in
the millenniy, in the millenary and imagery he loved and
used so effectively. I have a dream that one day
every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall
be made low, the rough places shall be made plains,
and the crooked places shall be made straight, and the
glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh
shall shall see it together.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's that sounds great when you read it
in his his millinery and voice, like I mimicked earlier,
but actually read what he's saying there. I mean, this,
this is what communism is, or race communism. It sounds awful.
It's every valley and hill leveled, everything turned into one
giant flat plane. I mean, that doesn't sound good to me.
That's that's what That's what communism is. It's literally it's
a leveling of everything. It's disgusting. It produces a completely
boring world, devoid of anything interesting at all. It's like,
this is literally the bug man. He's he's laying out
a sort of religious statement of what a bug man is.
Everyone's just going to live this singular, boring life where
no one is allowed to express difference, which is where
everything interesting comes from.
Speaker 1: Doctor King, of course, seldom trouble to inquire into the
sources of his dream, and today occurs to no one
to ask why his dreams should prevail over the less
grandiose dreams of others. Like all charismatic prophets, he was
the founds of his own authority, and his private visions
were intended to become law for lesser men. Among the
several hills and mountains that wait lowering by the New
God and his gnostic bulldozers is the tradition common among
white Southerners of displaying the Confederate flag in places of honor.
Some Southern states, Alabama and South Carolina in particular, still
fly the stars and bars over their state capitals, while
the official flags of several other Southern states retain at
Saint Andrew's cross design in one way or another. The
NAACP has recently decided that the flag must go and
has given the project priority in its current legislative agenda,
and innumerable Southern schools already have been obliged to give
up the flag as the symbol of their local football teams,
along with the playing of Dixie, calling the team the rebels,
and other traditional usages distinctive of Southern cultured identity. I mean,
could you imagine that, I mean, there were actually football
teams that displayed the Dixie flag at the Southern flag
at this time. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I can vaguely remember, you know, that sort of imagery
from my childhood, but it was fading at that point.
You know, this once again totally blows out the water
the idea of the slippery slope in a fallacy, because
it isn't you know, they they're still They came for
the Mississippi state flag a few years ago, and it's
a they come for the flags, they come for the statues,
they come for you. You know, no one is protected
from this. It's not going to stop at any point.
It's not reasonable in any case to remove any of
these symbols ever, period, simply because they demanded.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yep, all right.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: In Alabama, state Representative Thomas Reid threatened to tear down
the flag over the state House if it were not removed.
It wasn't, and Governor Guy Hunt had the local head
of the NAACP arrested when he clambered over the fence
with his merry band of icon smashers. Alabama Representative Alvin
Holmes readily compares the Confederacy to Nazi Germany and instructs
the people of the state, quote, they need to forget
about the Confederacy. Earl Shinhoster, head of the Southeastern Division
of the NAACP, says to the flags their racist symbol.
These flags stand for racism, divisiveness, and oppression, and also
for defiance and resistance to school segregation.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well he just said the quiet part out loud
there more or less, you know the that's the Durremberg
moral paradigm. You know, if you're if you're a right wing, uh,
that means you are a Nazi and that's illegal.
Speaker 1: Yep. Columnist Carl Rowan, who seldom declines to dance to
the NAACP's tune, compares the flag to the Nazi swastika
and writes, quote, show me a guy who rides around
with Confederate flags flying on his front fenders, and I'll
show you someone who thinks the Civil War still goes on.
I'll give you a racist who thinks that it is
only a matter of time before this nation makes white
supremacy it's official policy and returns to slavery with black
people the god designated humors of wood and drawers of water.
Mister Rowan apparently has never had a dream of a
day when men would not be judged by the color
of their front fenders. I mean, that's that's a really
insane I love this return to slavery thing. Well, who
would who would ever even want to own slaves?
Speaker 2: Like? Could you imagine how miserable that would be to
to like manage slaves. I don't want to to make
them like build your furniture. I mean what, I don't
want them near my property? Now the fuck no, it's
it's it's so I mean, slavery would have been out
of the windows civil War or not, just because it's
so horribly inefficient.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: Like, the idea that white people like actually want to
own slaves is crazy. I mean even at even at
the time, it was viewed as this unfortunate problem that
you know, we wish we could get rid of. But
the economy in the South was simply too tied to
slave labor in order to easily just sort of untangle everything.
But I mean there's there's virtually no expression of the
idea in America that like, really we really want to
own slaves, Like nobody wants that. In fact, like it's
a good thing that at least, given that the war
between the States happened, at least out of it, slavery
was actually eliminated. You know, that's that is that actual positive,
you know, for all the bloodshed, at least we got
rid of this one thing that you know, we really
should never have had to begin with. And nobody, nobody
wants to bring it back.
Speaker 1: Yeah, nobody. And it's just the problem was is they
don't they after they ended it, they didn't deal with
the obvious issue that you know, the elephant in the room.
Seasider sent a super chat on YouTube saluting us. Thank
you all right, Next, but the fact that many Southerners
and some non Southerners regard the Confederate flag as a
symbol of things other than racism, Southern cultural identity, sacrifice
for a cause, and interpretation of the Constitution, or simply
ancestral piety does not really help. Mister Schinnhaster, mister Rowan,
mister Reid, and mister Holmes all and mister Holmes all
are correct. That the Confederate flag symbolizes a cause that
was defeated in eighteen sixty five and which is not
compatible with the worldview symbolized by Doctor King's holiday. If
as a nation we are going to honor Doctor King
as an official hero, then we cannot also continue to
honor the Confederate flag in the political and cultural identity
that is the main contents of its symbolism. It is
merely a matter of time before the Confederate flag is
surrendered along with local statues of Confederate veterans and heroes,
Dixie and most other memorials of Antebellum civilization. Their passing
may not be a cause of mourning among many outside
of the South, or many within the South for that matter,
but the same logic that compels their abandonment reaches further.
The three most prominent monuments in Washington, d c. Are
those dedicated to George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Abraham Lincoln.
If they're a school child, if there is a school
child in the United States today who does not know
that the first two were Is there a school child
in the United States today who does not know the
the first two were slave owners? So by George Washington
Thomas Jefferson. Is there any literate person in America who
does not know that none of the three was a
racial egalitarian, That every one of them uttered statements that
made Jimmy, that made jim make Jimmy the Greeks sound
like an a CLU lawyer. The same argument that drives
mister Snyder from his low but honest trade and pulls
down a banner commemorating the last stand of a desperate
people will demolish the obelisk in temples that memorialized the
major statesman of the American nation. And we saw, we
saw that happen, we see we're watching it happen now.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And then that that quote earlier about the Civil War,
you know, still going on? Well is it not? I
mean that's what MLK is just a continuation, Oh, just
a war against America itself. So yeah, it is still
going on. It's not white rebels doing it. It's the
other side. And they're you know, just pure pure vindictiveness
on their part.
Speaker 1: Nor is it merely the physical symbols of the old
America that are shattered. Last may Supreme Court Justice, their
good marshal proclaimed in a public speech that he could
not find the wisdom, foresight, and sense of justice exhibited
by the framers of the US Constitution particularly profound because
they did not bow to the egalitarian and universalist idols
in the shrines where Justice Marshall has worshiped all his life,
and because they failed to include blacks and women in
the Constitution. The document they drafted was defective from the start,
no doubt. It is just what happened.
Speaker 2: It's like, how could this guy be a Supreme Court justice?
I mean, you know, we have clowns in there today,
at least fifty percent of them total, clowns, who have
no business even being in that highest court. How can
you be an effective and fair Supreme Court justice if
you don't even believe in the Constitution itself? Yeah, as
a document that you're supposed to dedicate yourself to.
Speaker 1: I mean well, I mean we saw the latest Supreme
Court judge didn't even know what was in the Constitution
one question. So yeah, no doubt. It is astonishing that
an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court could say that
the fundamental law of the country, which it is his
business and his duty to interpret, is inherently flawed. But
the justice merely forces us up another rung. On the latter,
we forfeited the right to rever the Constitution, the governmental
principles and mechanisms it established, and the men who wrote
it when we put doctor King into the pantheon. The federalism,
rule of law, states rights, limits on majority rule, checks
and balances, and separation of powers that characterize the Constitution
all are incompatible with the full blossoming of the egalitarian
democracy that doctor King envision and which is the completion
of the radical reconstruction to which his holiday commits us.
Political symbols in the form of the Confederate Flag, anthems
such as Dixie and Maryland, My Maryland, and the Constitution
itself are not the only routes to be pulled up, however.
Last year, the Reverend Jesse Jackson led a protest march
at Stanford University in one of the more explicit demonstrations
against the humanity's curriculum at the school, giving the chant
hey ho, hey, hey, hey ho ho, Western culture has
got to go. This year, the Faculty Senate of the
university considered a proposal to abandon a required course on
Western culture and to replace it with one entitled Culture,
Ideas and Values. The latter contained no core list of
assigned readings, and the only requirement was that the professors
included in their assignments works by women, minorities, and persons
of color, and emphasized the last six to eight centuries.
In particular, One alternative course, developed by Professor Claiborne Carson,
director of the Martin Luther King Junior Papers Project, required
such texts as Black Elks, Beaks, ain't I a Woman?
W du Bois, The Souls of Black Folk, France Fannin,
and those long neglected Third World persons of color, Herbert
Marcuse and Karl Marx. Whatever merits such writers might have
over the ancient, medieval, and modern classics of the West,
it should be clear that the alternative curriculum was intended
as part of the radical reconstruction of the American mind
and the extirpation of the philosophical roots of Western predominance.
The demand for the change at Stanford, according to news reports,
was led by black, Hispanic and Asian students who denounced
the traditional curriculum as a year long class in racism.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we still see that war chant used today in
various contexts. It shows just how old their organization is,
how long they've been doing this. I was also forced
to read, you know, these works by women, minorities, persons
of color, whatever, you know, W. E.
Speaker 1: Dubois. You know.
Speaker 2: So this this stuff did effectively replace any more traditional
education you'd have in the Western canon. You know, most
people my age and younger only read this modern trash
now and spend very little time actually in our own history.
Of course, the idea is just to you know, eliminate
our own history. That's why we only look at the
last six to eight centuries. As they said there, we
don't even go that far back. I mean, it would
be actually great if we covered anything that far back
in most of what happens in you know, public schools
since the nineties and beyond. Yeah, I mean I actually
I actually took an African American lit course in college
as an elective, and uh, you know, this stuff is
just garbage. It's just it's just garbage. It shouldn't and
no one should stay are you in any serious university period?
Speaker 1: But I mean I read the book Black Elk Speaks,
and all that is is the perpetuating the myth of
the noble Native American who was peaceful, never had any
wars among themselves, and just total fucking bullshit. The point,
of course, is not that the establishment of the King
Holiday makes the extirpation of the traditional symbols of American
and Western civilization inevitable. Anti American and anti Western movements
found that on militant egalitarian universalism are powerful forces and
would make gains regardless of the holiday, but that once
the United States, through its national government, chose to adopt
Doctor King as an official hero, neither the American people
nor their leaders have any legitimate grounds for resisting the
logic and dynamic of such forces and the radical reconstruction
of American society that is implicit in them. It is
one thing to say that doctor King was a great
man American, a man whose personal courage and vision, despite
his human flaws and errors and enthusiasms, challenged lesser men
of both races and forced them to confront evils, falsehoods,
and obsolete ways. It is quite another to say, as
the US government does say in creating a legal public
holiday for him, that Martin Luther King Junior was the
most important American who ever lived, at least a peer
of George Washington, the father of his country, the only
American in history to have his birthday made a national holiday,
the man who is now first in the hearts of
his Countrymen conservatives, some of whom, like representatives jack Kamp
and Gingrich, voted for the King Holiday in nineteen eighty three,
may devise whatever clever rationales for supporting it they can imagine.
But mister Harding's understanding of the meaning of King's Holiday
is far closer to the truth in any case. Aside
from obligatory genuflections to the King by neo conservatives, cultural conservatives,
and the adherence to mister Gingrich's conservative opportunity society, I
know of not a single serious, sustained effort by those
on the contemporary American right to substantiate their endorsement of
the holiday, or of any serious argument why conservatives should
honor Doctor King at all. If there are valid reasons
why we should do so, we do not hear them.
What do we What do we hear are sermons from
apostles such as mister Harding and company, most of whom
can press a far more persuasive claim to Doctor King's
legacy than conservatives of any description.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean I saw some of this today. It's
you see so called conservatives or so called right wingers,
you know, uttering the praises of Martin Luther King. You
know they'll say something negative about him too, But it's like,
can't you just say nothing instead? Like why even say
why even say anything positive about this guy? Rejected completely,
He was total scum, terrible human being. We reject idea
that he deserves to have a holiday at the same
level as the actual people who created this country for
their you know, for their children. And yeah, there's no
reason to pay lip service to it. You don't win
either way, as we saw earlier. You know, if you
if you try to play house conservative, you still lose.
So why why play the stupid game where you like,
you know, do some sort of mental gymnastics to figure
out how you can like espouse something positive about the guy,
because it's not going to be enough.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Infuriating.
Speaker 1: Yeah, everyone who's watching. As I said earlier, if you
want a super chat, I'll read it. You can make
it as you can write whatever you want. I may
just alter it a little bit if it's a little
more insane than something even I would say, So that
that legacy, as its keepers know, is profoundly at odds
with the historic American order, and that is why they
can have no rest until the symbols of that order
are pulled up root and branch to say that doctor
King and the cause he really represented is now part
of the American creed, indeed the defining and dominant symbol
of that creed, which is what both houses of the
United States Congress said in nineteen eighty three and what
President Ronald Reagan signed into law shortly afterwards, is the
beginning of a new order of the ages, in which
the symbols of the old order and the things they
symbolize can retain neither meaning nor respect, in which they
are as mute and dark as the gods of Babylon entire,
and from whose cold ashes will rise a new God,
leveling their rough places, straightening their crookedness, and exalting every
valley until the whole earth is flattened beneath his feet
and precedes the glory of the new Lord.
Speaker 2: Yeah. One of the one of the problems too, I've
been seeing is people will well even at the time
you saw that lady point out in that article that
the school teacher that you know, MLK was a communist
or whatever. Obviously that came with more weight at us time,
but people will still say that, you know, the problem
is that he's a communist or he's a It's like, no,
the problem with MLK isn't that he's a communist, is
that he's a he's a black supremacist who hates and
wants to destroy whites and wants to take away everything
that you know, white people created in America and actually,
well you know they succeeded at doing that pretty much.
That's why he's bad. It's not because he's a freaking communist.
I mean, that's not good either, but that's not why,
you know, you should revile this person. You should revile
him specifically because of his racial politics. You know, that's
not the redeeming factor that he was a communist, but
he was like this gentle you know, racial equality guide
like that. That itself is the reason to hate him.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I mean it when you read this article
and when you especially that he's quoting so many people,
when you see the quotes and the things that they're
trying to accomplish, and then you finally you look around
today and you're like, oh, they accomplished that. That that's done.
They won, and where do you go from there? I
mean it's I mean they won.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they did win, and yeah, it's like this is
what really I hate the term woke. I hate all
this crap where we supposed to like call our enemies
Marxists or play into this stupid color blind myth that
you know, this particular holiday is all about. Like, no,
that is the problem. It's not that the left or
radical Marxist or something stupid like that, or postmodernist. It's like,
it's it's that they are racial supremacists who hate white people.
They want to destroy and take away everything would from
white people. The only sense in which there are communists
is that they're they're race communists. And that's the whole problem.
That's not the redeeming factor. You know, I just get
so tired of this, you know, I have to say,
I mean, we are getting some pretty good wins the
last couple of well last year, you know, even watching
Devin Stacks video on the uh the Tunnels in New York,
he even sort of expressed some white pilled sentiments, which
was pretty surprising considering his channel is named blackpilled. But
you know it's it's like you still have this tendency
on the rate that we have to just smash, Like
that's the enemy, right, The enemy is the center right.
You know, Rufo is putting himself out today as this
sort of figure. I mean this, these sentiments where you
pay any lip service to the idols has to be
just totally crushed and shamed out of existence, because the
only way to get the power within our faction is
to destroy the direct competitor, you know, which is the
people just to your left.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: It's kind of like the opposite of the way the
left works is like there's no enemies to the left.
All enemies are to the right. For us, all enemies
are to the left. And if you're one of these
like center right dorks, who's who's just like, oh, it's
the woke and the marks and you know, we love
racial quality, even though that's not what it means. Like
you're the bad guy, right, you're doing more than the
radicals ever could do to actually reinforce the regime that
actually crushes you.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Rufo said today that to attack MLK is shortsighted.
We measure our great statesmen by their accomplishments within the
tragic conditions of human of history and human nature. Oh
so do we don't? Do we measure great statesmen on
the conditions in Weimar in the nineteen twenties or now now,
let's not talk about that. Whether it's founders or doctor King.
A certain degree of idealization is necessary for creating a
coherent national narrative.
Speaker 2: It's necessary, it's necessary to idealize Martin Luther King. Are
you kidding me?
Speaker 1: I mean, I agree that a certain level of idealization
is needed for a coherent national national narrative. But if
your identity is going to be associated with doctor King,
it is completely at odds with that of the founders,
which you put, which you put right before him.
Speaker 2: Right, he's doing this game where he's you know, he's
reinforcing what the holiday is is where Martin Luther King
is a what do they call it, a late arriving founder.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, oh yeah, yeah, I've heard that. And he
says after that. The correct reaction to the left's noxious
ideology is not to say we need radicalism on the right.
It is to say we recognize the realities of race,
but aspired to a higher standard. The full expression of
natural rights that subordinates racial faction to the best of
our nation.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I would just recommend on this point go read
the Distributist substack from the other day, which sort of
addresses this idea of the purpose of what a system is,
what it does, and it gets into this idea of
meritocracy and what it really means. I think he totally
lows this take out of the water in an indirect fashion.
That's probably the best essay of the year so far.
It's only been fifteen days, but in terms of what
I've seen produced this year, I think the Distributist essay
is a must read. It's like the latest on a
sub stack. I forget what the title is.
Speaker 1: We do have a super chat here. Tony Offshore said,
can you guys elaborate on Stanley Levinson and who his
backers were. I will tell you what I know about
Stanley Levinson. Outside of the obvious he was he was
a radical. I mean he he aided in the defense
of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, which they were communists and
they were traders. He was the treasurer of the American
Jewish Congress. This is all stuff on you can find
out on his Wikipedia. I mean, he he's basically one
of the one of the creator. He basically helped create
the civil rights movement in the United States, working with
the Southern Creative Christian Leadership Conference, who was more than
happy to help them. So yeah, I mean it was
you want me to say it, I'll say it. It
was Jewish money that backed the Civil rights the civil
rights movement. The Civil Rights movement was distinctly Jewish. The
heart what was his first name, I can't even remember.
Something really Jewish from the oh no seller from the
Heart Seller act Jewish. And he basically wrote the Civil
Rights Act. He wrote the Immigration Act, which is basically
destroyed the country as far as immigration goes for the
last you know, since nineteen sixty five fifty almost sixty years.
So yeah, I mean, this is a it is what
it is. It's what we say it is. And as
Ziman said in his podcast is Great podcast from this Past,
he said, the problem with the right is they always
ask how, and they never ask who. If you're not
asking who, what's the point of knowing the how?
Speaker 2: Oh, they can't ask who because that starts to get
into scary identitarian politics like that's bad. I really hate
this concept that having like collective group politics is somehow bad.
It's the most asinine way of looking at the world ever,
and it's frankly born from a serious hubris, as if like, oh,
you're an individual, you don't need anybody else. You could
just be an individual and not you know, you you
don't actually need any similar people around you to help you.
You're totally independent. It's this sort of like libertarian esque
attitude that some Americans tend to take, but that's retarded frankly, like,
you're not an individual. You are part of a group,
whether you want to be or not, and you you
depend on these systems and other people to keep your
life going, you know, like me, like I'm quote unquote
off grid, right, but I still need gasoline from complex
systems and refineries. You know, I'd eat complex electrical systems,
all kinds of stuff. I'm never you can never be
some like truly independent, you know, man on your own.
So rejecting quote unquote identitarianism as this bad weak thing
is completely asked backwards. It's it's it's not a weakness,
it's it's actually a strength to recognize that actually, no,
you can't just stand on your own and you do
need to depend on other people, right, it's overcoming your
own hubris to do that. It's not weakness to to
to feel these you know, the belonging to some particular
identity that way people call it like, you know, it's
like you're prideful. It's like, no, you're not prideful. The
pride is imagining that you, yourself are this self contained
unit who can get by without anyone else that you're
going to depend on as part of this larger group.
That's that's what pride actually is. It's self pride anyway.
Speaker 1: So son of hast super chat on YouTube, thank you
very much, says finally caught a stream live. It was
cathartic to hear Charlie talking about how much he hates
the term woke. There's a lot, there's a lot there.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, it's the same thing with like the term
disson it right, I've always hated that term as well.
Mostly it's used as a slur. But well, yeah again woke.
It's just a horrible term. The only context in which
you should use it as when there's there's no viable alternatives,
you know, at least put scare quotes around it if
you're going to use it. It just totally fails to
what what woke does is this new speak that hides
this entire history that we just went through and pretends
like the woke is some new phenomenon that just sort
of came out of nowhere and response to President Trump,
which is total nonsense.
Speaker 1: Cato Man fifty five and others to chat over an entropy,
thank you so much. He says, Rufo is a subversive
person paid by zionist Paul Singer, whose other causes are
pro immigration and LGBTQ. He asked the question, is this
quote unquote based or is it neo kan two point zero? Uh?
What is the question again? Yeah, I Cato Man, I
love you. I don't understand the question. He says, Rufo
is subversive paid by his zionist Paul Singer, whose other
causes are pro immigration and LGBTQ. Is this and he
puts in quotes based. I'm thinking he's saying based in
a negative way. I just don't understand what the negative
way he's saying it is in. Or is it neocon?
Two point oh?
Speaker 2: Well, for some reason, the term neocon is getting thrown
around a lot lately.
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't because no one wants to say
because people don't want to say.
Speaker 2: Ju yeah, fair enough. Yeah, it's not econ, It's it's
definitely not based. I mean yeah, it's like Rufo seems
to be doing this thing where he's like, oh yeah,
scalped Claudine gay or whatever. But it's like, I don't
care how many you know, black ladies you get fired.
I'm not going to listen to your zio takes. Basically,
like you're not You're not gonna become some right wing
hero because you did that, Like you know that I
was great. I thought that was, you know, cool to do. Frankly,
I know some people are like, oh, well the j's
are just coming in now. It's like, yeah, okay, whatever,
I mean, it was it's nice to sort of break
their aura of invincibility, you know, even if they just
sort of play this like two step where they swap
in another person. But you know, it's you're not going
to become somethre a hero we all listen to just
because you you sort of orchestrated that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, El Si Leon on super chat on YouTube. Thank
you the white quote. The quote unquote white man's burden
is destroying the world, that nons have the tools to
violate the planet and our multiple applying quickly. Something must
be done when we have power. Whencola and others warn
warns this, I think El sid Leon is English is
not his first language, and thank you for learning how
to speak other and being able to speak more than
one language, because I don't. But the white man's burden
is saying is destroying the world. These nuns have tools
to violate the planet and are multiplying quickly. Something must
be done when we have power. So yeah, I mean
he's basically saying I think the quote he's quoting white
man's burden, he may be talking about another group who
claims to be white.
Speaker 2: I mean this, the white man's burden right now is
to overcome this self destructive impulse to go around elevating
everyone else on the planet, even if it means, you know,
exporting all of our industry and bringing the Third world
into Europe and America. That's the burden, apparently, is we're
just obsessed with this idea of elevating the planet.
Speaker 1: Yeah. John Morton five British pounds on on YouTube. Thanks mate,
did blacks in general actually want desegregation or did they
want more stuff for black people. I would answer that
they wanted neither. I think this was foisted upon them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the civil rights is not some sort of movement.
It's just you know, the will of the people in
power being enforced. You know, like you said, most blacks,
like you know, most white people were just more or
less a political and this this ideology has been forced
on them, just the same it's been forced on white
people when the reality was, you know, things were moving
along well enough for everybody, and there was no real, organic,
you know, mass civil rights movement. I don't like the
term movement when even referencing this thing, because it implies
some sort of populous dimension to it, which there really wasn't.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I el sid says. He says, I was
forced to compact. I ran out of letters. I appreciate it.
Thank you, thanks for another super chat there. I've talked
to all blacks here in South Carolina. They didn't support desegregation,
So I think it was justin justin Landers saying that.
Speaker 2: Oh, what it did is it ripped up their communities
because you know, they were brought at gunpoint on both
ends to white schools and white areas and that sort
of thing, like you're forcing them also to break up
their you know, community bonds and just go get thrown
into these other places they don't belong in.
Speaker 1: Wing Te prod with like a penny super chat over
on Odyssey says, if dissident right is a a good term,
what does Charlomagne propose? I use west Man.
Speaker 2: I don't know, man, like dissident right has become a slur.
I don't really I don't feel the need for a term.
I kind of use sensible centrist in a tumming chungue
in cheek way. I like Bapp's faction of truth idea.
But do we even need some sort of like faction label,
like it's a video game or something like. I don't really,
I don't really care what you're called when people call
me about like grouping myself in some broadway, Like I
can pretty easily identify my friends and enemies without any
sort of label. I think the labels are they just
become slurs, as dissident right has.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I like what Thomas says. He says, we're not
Jovis witnesses. We're looking for a vanguard. Yeah, we're a
vanguard movement. And you know, I think a lot of
people don't understand what he's saying. I hesitate to explain
it because of the implications, but you know, it's something
I think people should look up because it's, uh, it's
exactly what it is. And I love that he he says,
you know, we're not Jevas witnesses because it just immediately
destroys democracy. Even libertarians are like libertarians like, well, you know,
we just need to get more people woken up. I'm like, okay,
so then you believe in democracy. You believe that if
you get enough people to believe what you believe, you
can know that's not the way it works.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I stopped caring about convincing people or debating
or arguing. I mean, debates are good, don't get me wrong,
but I mean, like in terms of like trying to
red pill people a long time ago, like I just
don't care. I don't I don't care how many people
I like wake up or something that I just sort
of put out the content or whatever that I feel
needs to be said at the time for the people
who are already sort of like part of this thing.
Of ours rate. And if you're not, you know, you're
welcome to come in. But I'm not really out to
like propagandaze and you know, try and like turn turn
this thing into a mass movement or something. I'm just
you know, you know, I'm just interested. I'm interested in history,
truth or you know, these sort of things. This is
the kind of content I make. If you're interested and
you sort of you know, vibe with what we're doing,
it's yeah, you know, that's that's great. And if not,
well whatever, man, you know, like I'm not out to
form some sort of like big political faction or something.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean right now, we're not at the point.
We're nowhere near the point where we need to be. Yeah.
So it's like I'm just, I guess, more than anything,
I'm trying to tell people just get your personal shit together,
you know, get your personal life together by land pay,
get out of debt, get your home.
Speaker 2: Get getting out of debt. Can't really be overstated. Like
I'm not at that point yet, but you know I
will be eventually if everything continues right, and it'll still
be well obviously, but you know, do just don't take
on debt.
Speaker 1: And if you have debt.
Speaker 2: Your priority should just be paying off once. Once you
actually live debt free and you don't owe constant, you know,
large sums of money to a bank or whatever. Uh,
It's like that'll just liberate you to such a huge
degree because you just gain the freedom to sort of
not care anymore and not sort of have to enslave
yourself to these systems to get by because you can actually,
you know, if you actually own your property and everything,
you can get by on actually very little money and
it becomes actually like viable to do what you're doing.
For example, where you're you just I mean I think
you just like full time stream at this point, right, yeah,
like if you if you want to do that, that's
how you do it, as you get rid of your debt.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean I'm not completely out of that. But
like when we moved here, I had I had to
buy a mower, and I didn't want to buy used one,
so I bought one new. But I got it if
I paid it off in six months no interest, And
I mean that was like, I mean, I was I
stressed over it. It's like to get this thing paid off.
I gotta get this until and then when I made
the final payment, you know, in five months, you know,
four and a half months, five months. I was just like, great, great,
now I only have I mean really, I only have.
Both of the cars are paid for everything. It's just
the house at this point and that's it.
Speaker 2: And having having like a decent sized property not in
a suburb as well, is really good because what you
can do is okay, yeah, maybe you can have very
small home and no debt, but what you can do
is you can build up something larger over time without
having to take on, you know, additional loans for it.
So yeah, I'm a I mean, that's this is also
what I did, right, But I'm a I think it's
a good idea to get a large foundation first and
work from that the correct way, rather than trying to,
you know, buy your giant house on a small piece
of property, because then then you're just stuck there too, right,
and the only solution to expansion is okay, well, now
I guess I got to go into debt to buy
a bigger house, whereas if you had started with your foundation,
you know, you can build within your means.
Speaker 1: Yeah, now that's a you're one hundred percent right. It's
just what I have now is what I have now
is perfect, And the people have surrounding me in real
life who who I can rely upon for for things
that if I had a bigger property I could deal with.
I have people around me that I can rely upon
for things, and they can rely upon me for things.
So I've already been here less than a year and
already made some really really good, really good contacts in
real life. So yeah, all right, that's it, Let's get
out of here. What do you what do you want
to promote Cepa Glory Club?
Speaker 2: Oh uh, well that's a good question these days, I
guess you can always check out my blog Neo Reactor.
I do try to do book reviews there. I am
working on one right now. I mean, this is my
paid content. I've been reading a few books on mid
century Germany and none of them quite done it for
me into being able to produce a post. But I'm
trying to come up with a combination post. I'm reading
an interesting book right now called This is Germany by
Anglo written in nineteen thirty eight. That's pretty interesting. Check
out my YouTube channel Charlemagne for mostly coverage of the
Ukraine conflict these days, and I guess in terms of
Old Glory Club, we're going to be doing true detective
reviews in the coming weeks, So I think people find
that fascinating, So definitely, you know by a subscription to
check out that.
Speaker 1: Content I'm doing on my sub stack, I'm making every
attempt to do three a week, two of them public,
one private, and the one private one. The one private
a week. I started a series last week basically on
things that I've been reading that have been written by
Jewish authors and philosophers trying to understand the psychology behind
their thinking. So I started last week with how they
when one Jew is attacked, every Jew is attacked. That's
the way they look at it. I think ten to
seven proved that pretty much, that they all come together.
But you know, if one is, if one is a torturer,
like if one is uh Yagoda in the Soviet Union,
he has to be judge as an individual. And I've
just taken to looking at I'm reading right now Israel
Shahaks Jews rereading Jewish Jewish history, Jewish religion the way
to three thousand years, and there's so much in there.
There's so much in there that people don't know that
even I think even most Jews don't know that I'm
gonna start tearing that apart, so all right. Dawn threw
a super chat at the last minute there. Thank you
so much. I appreciate it, and she says good luck
with that Pete with big with eyes wide emoji. But
thank you everyone for tuning in. I appreciate it, and
for myself and for Charlie. Take care, have a good day.