WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.600 --> 00:00:02.919
<v Speaker 1>This is Gary and Shannon and you're listening to KFI

2
00:00:03.080 --> 00:00:05.839
<v Speaker 1>AM six forty the Gary and Shannon Show on demand

3
00:00:05.919 --> 00:00:10.359
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app. Chevron, the second largest oil company

4
00:00:10.400 --> 00:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, is leaving California, formalizing this long

5
00:00:16.320 --> 00:00:20.079
<v Speaker 1>expected breakup. The company has ties to California the date

6
00:00:20.160 --> 00:00:25.719
<v Speaker 1>back to the eighteen seventies. Chevron had about seven thousand

7
00:00:25.719 --> 00:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>employees already in the Houston area, about two thousand at

8
00:00:29.280 --> 00:00:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the current headquarters in San Ramon, California, which is right

9
00:00:32.759 --> 00:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>up near San Francisco.

10
00:00:34.679 --> 00:00:35.880
<v Speaker 2>So they're going to be moving.

11
00:00:35.679 --> 00:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Everybody, it looks like to just about everybody to Houston.

12
00:00:40.479 --> 00:00:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Three years after the broadcast audience plummeted for the Summer

13
00:00:43.840 --> 00:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Games in Tokyo, they have rebounded dramatically. NBC says it

14
00:00:47.399 --> 00:00:51.399
<v Speaker 1>drew nearly thirty five million viewers for the Tuesday night coverage,

15
00:00:51.439 --> 00:00:55.679
<v Speaker 1>which included the women's gymnastics team finals. They said total

16
00:00:55.719 --> 00:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>audience delivery number includes all of the NBC platforms, live

17
00:00:59.600 --> 00:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>coverage on NBC, Peacock, et cetera, the Gold Zone coverage,

18
00:01:04.480 --> 00:01:07.719
<v Speaker 1>which is like the NFL Networks Red Zone. Speaking of

19
00:01:07.760 --> 00:01:11.519
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics, there's a lot that's going on regarding men

20
00:01:11.680 --> 00:01:14.799
<v Speaker 1>fighting women in boxing in the Olympics. We'll try to

21
00:01:14.799 --> 00:01:16.439
<v Speaker 1>get to the bottom of it. And oh my gosh,

22
00:01:16.519 --> 00:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a second Gary and Shannon show breakdown?

23
00:01:19.599 --> 00:01:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Ready?

24
00:01:20.040 --> 00:01:22.959
<v Speaker 3>Do you understand the worst that are coming out of

25
00:01:22.959 --> 00:01:23.439
<v Speaker 3>my mouth?

26
00:01:23.640 --> 00:01:26.000
<v Speaker 2>What are you talking about? The news got you confused?

27
00:01:26.000 --> 00:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you understand it's time for another breakdown with Gary

28
00:01:29.879 --> 00:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>and Shannon?

29
00:01:30.400 --> 00:01:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Explain it to me slowly.

30
00:01:31.920 --> 00:01:35.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm very old, all right.

31
00:01:35.760 --> 00:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>In this case, there are two boxers in the women's competition,

32
00:01:41.719 --> 00:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Algeria's Imani Khalif and Taiwan's lynn U Ting. Both of

33
00:01:46.120 --> 00:01:49.439
<v Speaker 1>them have won. Lyn U Ting actually fought this morning

34
00:01:49.599 --> 00:01:56.159
<v Speaker 1>and won, and they're The Olympic Committee is forced to

35
00:01:56.439 --> 00:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>answer questions about all of this because these two women

36
00:02:02.040 --> 00:02:06.079
<v Speaker 1>appear to be men. Now, it's not as easy as

37
00:02:06.200 --> 00:02:09.159
<v Speaker 1>just saying that, because there are some questions about who

38
00:02:09.199 --> 00:02:13.199
<v Speaker 1>they are, where they came from, etc. Mark Adams is

39
00:02:13.240 --> 00:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>an Olympic Committee spokesman and asked for a pause in

40
00:02:17.280 --> 00:02:20.759
<v Speaker 1>the rhetoric that has exploded around this case, which these cases,

41
00:02:20.800 --> 00:02:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I should say, which is basically that the Olympic Committee

42
00:02:23.319 --> 00:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is allowing men to fight women.

43
00:02:25.599 --> 00:02:32.159
<v Speaker 4>Athletes boxes are entirely eligible. They are women on their passport,

44
00:02:33.159 --> 00:02:35.919
<v Speaker 4>they have competed for many years, and I actually think

45
00:02:36.039 --> 00:02:40.080
<v Speaker 4>it's not helpful to start stigmatizing people who take part.

46
00:02:39.919 --> 00:02:40.759
<v Speaker 2>In sport like this.

47
00:02:41.319 --> 00:02:44.879
<v Speaker 4>But they are aided in Tokyo. I think we will

48
00:02:44.960 --> 00:02:47.479
<v Speaker 4>have responsibility, by the way to try to dial down

49
00:02:47.520 --> 00:02:49.879
<v Speaker 4>this and not turn it into some kind of witch hunt.

50
00:02:50.159 --> 00:02:53.400
<v Speaker 4>These are regular athletes who've competed for many years in boxing.

51
00:02:53.439 --> 00:02:58.400
<v Speaker 4>They're entirely eligible women on their passports, and that I

52
00:02:58.400 --> 00:03:00.360
<v Speaker 4>think is enough said for me.

53
00:03:00.560 --> 00:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Now this is the question arises because a different organization,

54
00:03:07.879 --> 00:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the International Boxing Association, disqualified these two because they were

55
00:03:17.439 --> 00:03:21.599
<v Speaker 1>subject to a separate and recognized test. They said they

56
00:03:21.639 --> 00:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>did not go through testosterone examinations, but that they were

57
00:03:25.919 --> 00:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>disqualified from international competition by the International Boxing Association. The

58
00:03:33.080 --> 00:03:37.879
<v Speaker 1>International Olympic Committee stopped recognizing the IBA, and now it's

59
00:03:37.919 --> 00:03:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the IOC that oversees the boxing competition at the Olympics.

60
00:03:41.479 --> 00:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>The IOC has very specifically said neither of these athletes

61
00:03:45.199 --> 00:03:48.319
<v Speaker 1>is transgender, and that the IOC has defended its decision

62
00:03:48.360 --> 00:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to allow both of them to compete in this year's

63
00:03:50.400 --> 00:03:57.599
<v Speaker 1>Paris Games. The unknowns about this, though, include what kind

64
00:03:57.680 --> 00:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of a test did the International Boxing is Association do?

65
00:04:02.199 --> 00:04:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Was it a chromosomal test? Did they check and see

66
00:04:06.039 --> 00:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>if these athletes have X Y chromosomes? Because that means, dude,

67
00:04:12.719 --> 00:04:14.759
<v Speaker 1>they don't. They're not telling us all. They're saying that

68
00:04:14.800 --> 00:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the IBA maintains both boxers were subjected to a separate

69
00:04:19.480 --> 00:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and recognized test, but it wasn't about testosterone examinations. They

70
00:04:27.120 --> 00:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>were disqualified because of that whatever. The results of that

71
00:04:30.639 --> 00:04:36.199
<v Speaker 1>test were late in last year's World Championships and according

72
00:04:36.240 --> 00:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to a Russian news agency, and again, I mean, I

73
00:04:38.759 --> 00:04:41.439
<v Speaker 1>just did an hour on why we can't necessarily trust Russia,

74
00:04:41.480 --> 00:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>but a Russian news agency said that the disqualification of

75
00:04:45.279 --> 00:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>those two from the World Championships was because it was

76
00:04:47.879 --> 00:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>proven that they have X Y chromosomes. According to the

77
00:04:51.920 --> 00:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>International Olympic Committee, they say they have no knowledge of

78
00:04:54.720 --> 00:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>what those tests were. They were cobbled together overnight during

79
00:04:59.160 --> 00:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>the championships to change the results. The IOC is sticking

80
00:05:02.879 --> 00:05:07.319
<v Speaker 1>by this. The IOC says it measures the age and

81
00:05:07.439 --> 00:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>gender of athletes based on their passport in addition to

82
00:05:11.279 --> 00:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the boxing regulations that they came together and put together

83
00:05:14.160 --> 00:05:17.959
<v Speaker 1>for the Olympics. Specifically, the medical guidelines for these Olympics

84
00:05:17.959 --> 00:05:20.399
<v Speaker 1>do not appear to include any sort of an examination

85
00:05:20.480 --> 00:05:23.879
<v Speaker 1>to determine whether a competitor fighting in a women's competition

86
00:05:24.279 --> 00:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>would possess unfair biological advantages. The IOC apparently does not

87
00:05:30.720 --> 00:05:33.439
<v Speaker 1>do chromosomal testing. I don't know if they ever will,

88
00:05:33.720 --> 00:05:36.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they need to. But Algeria's im

89
00:05:37.000 --> 00:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>On Kif and taiwan Kehlief and Taiwan's Lyn Tu Yang

90
00:05:41.720 --> 00:05:46.319
<v Speaker 1>one of them. I think Algeria's boxer fights tomorrow, Taiwan's

91
00:05:46.439 --> 00:05:51.319
<v Speaker 1>fought today, and one handily this is not over because

92
00:05:51.319 --> 00:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>there are questions about what the IOC should do going

93
00:05:54.399 --> 00:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>forward when it comes to things like genetic testing or

94
00:05:56.920 --> 00:06:00.639
<v Speaker 1>chromosomal testing for this whole thing. The four or person

95
00:06:00.759 --> 00:06:04.759
<v Speaker 1>blockbuster prison swap carried out this week required the US

96
00:06:04.800 --> 00:06:08.079
<v Speaker 1>to regroup after the death of Alexi Navalney. I mentioned

97
00:06:08.079 --> 00:06:10.319
<v Speaker 1>that in the first hour where I went through some

98
00:06:10.360 --> 00:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of the details and broke down exactly some of the machinations.

99
00:06:15.000 --> 00:06:17.040
<v Speaker 2>We used that word too much. Somebody called us out

100
00:06:17.040 --> 00:06:17.240
<v Speaker 2>on it.

101
00:06:17.759 --> 00:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>The details of exactly what happened in that prisoner swap

102
00:06:21.839 --> 00:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and the negotiations it took to get there depended on

103
00:06:24.480 --> 00:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the willingness of Germany to release from custody a Russian

104
00:06:28.120 --> 00:06:31.040
<v Speaker 1>hit man who just five years ago committed a cold

105
00:06:31.079 --> 00:06:34.319
<v Speaker 1>blooded killing in Berlin. It also forced Russia to part

106
00:06:34.319 --> 00:06:36.759
<v Speaker 1>with the Americans that it was holding that were so valuable,

107
00:06:36.800 --> 00:06:40.319
<v Speaker 1>including Evan Gershkevich, the Wall Street Journal reporter.

108
00:06:40.519 --> 00:06:42.279
<v Speaker 2>They'd just been, as.

109
00:06:42.120 --> 00:06:46.959
<v Speaker 1>The Associated Press puts it, they've been stockpiling American prisoners

110
00:06:46.959 --> 00:06:52.959
<v Speaker 1>for bait. In all of this, few Americans have high

111
00:06:53.040 --> 00:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>confidence in the Secret Services ability to keep presidential candidates safe.

112
00:06:57.279 --> 00:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>That's according to a new poll from the Associated Press,

113
00:07:00.199 --> 00:07:05.199
<v Speaker 1>about three in ten three in ten Americans say they're

114
00:07:05.240 --> 00:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>extremely or very confident that the Secret Service can keep

115
00:07:09.199 --> 00:07:12.879
<v Speaker 1>a presidential candidate safe from violence before the election. Of course,

116
00:07:12.879 --> 00:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>secret Service, tasked with protecting presidents for more than a century,

117
00:07:16.279 --> 00:07:18.639
<v Speaker 1>is under scrutiny because of somebody who was able to

118
00:07:18.639 --> 00:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>get close to and shoot former President Trump at that

119
00:07:22.920 --> 00:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. There is a news conference that

120
00:07:27.160 --> 00:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>we do expect to see at the top of the

121
00:07:28.639 --> 00:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>hour from the Secret Service. Don't know exactly what it

122
00:07:30.759 --> 00:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is that they're going to talk about, but we know

123
00:07:33.120 --> 00:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that they're out there. The Dow Jones Industrial average right

124
00:07:36.079 --> 00:07:40.319
<v Speaker 1>now is down about eight hundred and fifty points. A

125
00:07:40.480 --> 00:07:43.639
<v Speaker 1>new recession fear has come in crept into all of this.

126
00:07:43.759 --> 00:07:46.879
<v Speaker 1>And we're actually going to be talking with Mick mulvaney. Yeah,

127
00:07:46.959 --> 00:07:50.279
<v Speaker 1>former White House Chief of Staff McK mulvaney was a

128
00:07:50.279 --> 00:07:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Congressman for a long time and had actually been in

129
00:07:53.959 --> 00:07:56.519
<v Speaker 1>the Office of Management and Budget in the White House.

130
00:07:56.560 --> 00:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>So we'll talk with him coming up at the bottom

131
00:07:58.480 --> 00:08:00.319
<v Speaker 1>of the hour about what we can expect to see

132
00:08:00.560 --> 00:08:06.319
<v Speaker 1>for stocks going into a tumultuous ninety plus days before

133
00:08:06.399 --> 00:08:11.079
<v Speaker 1>the election. There's an issue that's come up. California Governor

134
00:08:11.120 --> 00:08:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Newsom has signed an extradition warrant to bring Harvey Weinstein

135
00:08:15.560 --> 00:08:19.839
<v Speaker 1>back to California. And there's a weird it's not weird.

136
00:08:19.920 --> 00:08:23.399
<v Speaker 1>There is a connection, a personal connection. The Gavin Newsom

137
00:08:23.480 --> 00:08:27.879
<v Speaker 1>has to Harvey Weinstein through his wife, the first partner,

138
00:08:28.160 --> 00:08:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer Siebel Newsom. Now Weinstein, of course, was convicted of

139
00:08:31.360 --> 00:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>rape and criminal assault four years ago in New York.

140
00:08:34.559 --> 00:08:37.039
<v Speaker 1>It was sentenced to twenty three years in prison. Now

141
00:08:37.080 --> 00:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>he's in medical detention right now because he's just an

142
00:08:39.120 --> 00:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>absolute mess.

143
00:08:40.039 --> 00:08:42.039
<v Speaker 2>He's a bag of disease.

144
00:08:42.159 --> 00:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like, and he's got COVID, and he's got

145
00:08:45.600 --> 00:08:48.519
<v Speaker 1>double pneumonia, et cetera, and on top of everything else

146
00:08:48.519 --> 00:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that's gone wrong with this guy physically. But the conviction

147
00:08:51.720 --> 00:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>from New York was overturned at the end of April

148
00:08:54.360 --> 00:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>after an appellate court said that the trial judge made

149
00:08:57.159 --> 00:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the mistake of allowing three women to testify that Harvey

150
00:09:01.320 --> 00:09:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Weinstein had assaulted them, even though he wasn't being charged

151
00:09:04.440 --> 00:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>with those crimes or crimes related to their testimony. So

152
00:09:10.559 --> 00:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>he was convicted of the rape charges in LA in

153
00:09:14.080 --> 00:09:19.039
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two and sentenced to sixteen years in California prison.

154
00:09:20.240 --> 00:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>There was about a ninety day window that opened to

155
00:09:23.080 --> 00:09:26.759
<v Speaker 1>sign an extradition warrant after the conviction was overturned in April,

156
00:09:27.080 --> 00:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>so he did so. The governor did on June nineteenth.

157
00:09:31.559 --> 00:09:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Now again the connection is Gavin Newsom's wife testified in

158
00:09:37.679 --> 00:09:41.799
<v Speaker 1>that trial here in LA. She testified she accused him

159
00:09:41.799 --> 00:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of raping and sexually assaulting her in two thousand and five.

160
00:09:45.480 --> 00:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>They did find him guilty those on three charges, but

161
00:09:50.480 --> 00:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>not of the two charges related to the accusations that

162
00:09:54.480 --> 00:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>came from Jennifer Cebel Newsom. She says, the entire process

163
00:10:00.559 --> 00:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>been one of the hardest experiences of my life.

164
00:10:02.399 --> 00:10:03.559
<v Speaker 2>The most important takeaways.

165
00:10:03.600 --> 00:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>We all have a role to play in healing this

166
00:10:06.159 --> 00:10:08.799
<v Speaker 1>culture in which violence against women is the norm. And

167
00:10:08.840 --> 00:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>she said of Harvey Weinstein, what he did to me

168
00:10:11.600 --> 00:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>was the worst. His assault was excruciatingly traumatic. And she

169
00:10:15.919 --> 00:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>said for years he walked away unfettered, while I spent

170
00:10:18.440 --> 00:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>years nursing my wounds. Is it a little weird that

171
00:10:21.360 --> 00:10:25.519
<v Speaker 1>her husband gets to sign the extradition warrant for I mean,

172
00:10:25.960 --> 00:10:27.399
<v Speaker 1>he has to because he's the governor.

173
00:10:27.559 --> 00:10:27.639
<v Speaker 5>Or.

174
00:10:27.919 --> 00:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to he gets to because he's the governor.

175
00:10:31.519 --> 00:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he's just a little poetic justice for him to

176
00:10:35.360 --> 00:10:36.279
<v Speaker 1>protect his wife.

177
00:10:36.360 --> 00:10:37.840
<v Speaker 2>It just seems a little bit odd.

178
00:10:37.879 --> 00:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, the Dow Jones Industrial Average down about eight hundred

179
00:10:40.919 --> 00:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>plus points. It's down eight seventy six right now, the

180
00:10:44.120 --> 00:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>S and P five hundred, the NASDAK also down two

181
00:10:47.279 --> 00:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>three percent. It's not been a great day on Wall Street,

182
00:10:50.360 --> 00:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's on top of a down day from yesterday,

183
00:10:53.440 --> 00:10:56.279
<v Speaker 1>and we're probably seeing the worst August start that we've

184
00:10:56.320 --> 00:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>seen on Wall Street for more than twenty years. To

185
00:10:59.480 --> 00:11:02.159
<v Speaker 1>help us kind of break down. Some of this is

186
00:11:02.320 --> 00:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Mick mulvaney, of course, former acting White House Chief of

187
00:11:05.120 --> 00:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Staff and also a former director of Office of Management

188
00:11:07.960 --> 00:11:11.519
<v Speaker 1>and a Budget currently an economic contributor to News Nation. Mick,

189
00:11:11.559 --> 00:11:13.039
<v Speaker 1>thanks for taking time for us today.

190
00:11:14.080 --> 00:11:15.879
<v Speaker 5>Happy to be here, hey, interesting to be in the

191
00:11:15.919 --> 00:11:16.480
<v Speaker 5>markets always.

192
00:11:16.559 --> 00:11:17.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, kitten.

193
00:11:18.320 --> 00:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>The part of this has to be this unemployment report

194
00:11:21.720 --> 00:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that came out this morning. Job creation was not as

195
00:11:25.480 --> 00:11:28.159
<v Speaker 1>great as we expected in July, and the unemployment rates

196
00:11:28.159 --> 00:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>back up to four point three percent, which is still

197
00:11:30.360 --> 00:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a good number.

198
00:11:31.879 --> 00:11:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Why is it?

199
00:11:32.679 --> 00:11:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Why does that have an impact on what's going on

200
00:11:34.639 --> 00:11:35.279
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street?

201
00:11:36.240 --> 00:11:39.279
<v Speaker 5>Well, a couple of different things, is always the case

202
00:11:39.279 --> 00:11:41.480
<v Speaker 5>with the stock market. There's five or six different things

203
00:11:41.480 --> 00:11:43.320
<v Speaker 5>to go into an answer to a question like that,

204
00:11:43.399 --> 00:11:45.120
<v Speaker 5>So a couple of different things. First of all, the

205
00:11:45.159 --> 00:11:47.840
<v Speaker 5>markets are only back down now to where they were

206
00:11:48.200 --> 00:11:50.799
<v Speaker 5>I think July tenth, so less than a month ago.

207
00:11:50.840 --> 00:11:53.159
<v Speaker 5>So yes, they're down dramatically in the last couple of days.

208
00:11:53.200 --> 00:11:55.279
<v Speaker 5>But it's not like this is a I think BS

209
00:11:55.320 --> 00:11:57.240
<v Speaker 5>and P might be in a correction, but this is

210
00:11:57.279 --> 00:11:59.799
<v Speaker 5>not a major meltdown taking us back six months or

211
00:12:00.080 --> 00:12:04.799
<v Speaker 5>years worth of wealth creation That jobs numbers got a

212
00:12:04.799 --> 00:12:07.039
<v Speaker 5>lot of attention. Folks have been wondering about whether or

213
00:12:07.039 --> 00:12:09.679
<v Speaker 5>not that has been waiting too long to cut rates,

214
00:12:09.679 --> 00:12:11.840
<v Speaker 5>that been worried about a recession. They watched the job

215
00:12:11.919 --> 00:12:14.840
<v Speaker 5>numbers very clearly is sort of a bell weather for

216
00:12:15.399 --> 00:12:18.200
<v Speaker 5>whether or not we're moving towards recession, and the job

217
00:12:18.279 --> 00:12:22.639
<v Speaker 5>numbers were down. Any number below two hundred thousand is

218
00:12:22.679 --> 00:12:25.000
<v Speaker 5>a bad number. Getting above two hundred thousand is a

219
00:12:25.039 --> 00:12:27.360
<v Speaker 5>good number. You can take the unemployment rate and ignore

220
00:12:27.360 --> 00:12:30.679
<v Speaker 5>it because the unemployment rate is a two factory equation

221
00:12:30.960 --> 00:12:34.080
<v Speaker 5>too variable equation. It sort of depends on the number

222
00:12:34.080 --> 00:12:37.080
<v Speaker 5>of people actually looking for work. The real number that

223
00:12:37.159 --> 00:12:39.320
<v Speaker 5>we look at is the number of jobs created every

224
00:12:39.320 --> 00:12:41.240
<v Speaker 5>single month, and if it's under two hundred thousand dollars,

225
00:12:41.360 --> 00:12:43.600
<v Speaker 5>that's just kind of a weaker economy. This is the

226
00:12:43.639 --> 00:12:45.840
<v Speaker 5>third month in a row with under two hundred thousand

227
00:12:45.879 --> 00:12:48.039
<v Speaker 5>after the revisions, and I think it's five out of

228
00:12:48.080 --> 00:12:50.039
<v Speaker 5>the last ten that have been below two hundred thousand.

229
00:12:50.080 --> 00:12:52.440
<v Speaker 5>So that's that week getting the slow week ending of

230
00:12:52.440 --> 00:12:55.039
<v Speaker 5>the job market that got the market's a little bit spooped,

231
00:12:55.200 --> 00:12:57.240
<v Speaker 5>and they gave back most of the games from July,

232
00:12:57.360 --> 00:12:58.039
<v Speaker 5>but that's about it.

233
00:12:58.919 --> 00:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Did defend make a mistake? Did we wait too long

234
00:13:01.759 --> 00:13:02.759
<v Speaker 1>to cut rates?

235
00:13:03.720 --> 00:13:06.480
<v Speaker 5>You know, in hindsight, it's always easy to say that.

236
00:13:06.519 --> 00:13:08.919
<v Speaker 5>What I've always wondered, as someone who you know, worked

237
00:13:08.919 --> 00:13:10.600
<v Speaker 5>for the government and would work very you know, watch

238
00:13:10.679 --> 00:13:13.080
<v Speaker 5>this very very closely, was why do we think the

239
00:13:13.159 --> 00:13:16.159
<v Speaker 5>Fed is so much smarter than everybody else? They've been

240
00:13:16.200 --> 00:13:18.639
<v Speaker 5>wrong more than they've been right anyway, So if it

241
00:13:18.759 --> 00:13:21.600
<v Speaker 5>have been wrong this time, it shouldn't surprise anybody. You

242
00:13:21.639 --> 00:13:24.480
<v Speaker 5>won't go to answer that question until six months or

243
00:13:24.519 --> 00:13:27.919
<v Speaker 5>a year from that. Markets bounce back tomorrow if inflation

244
00:13:27.960 --> 00:13:30.559
<v Speaker 5>comes under control because of the little slowdown that we've

245
00:13:30.559 --> 00:13:32.240
<v Speaker 5>had on the job market, that everybody's ob well, maybe

246
00:13:32.279 --> 00:13:34.919
<v Speaker 5>the Fed was right. It's always hard to say. But

247
00:13:35.080 --> 00:13:39.559
<v Speaker 5>clearly the markets are spooped by the possibility of a

248
00:13:39.600 --> 00:13:41.759
<v Speaker 5>recession given those job numbers, And that's where I think

249
00:13:41.799 --> 00:13:42.519
<v Speaker 5>it's driving.

250
00:13:42.279 --> 00:13:43.879
<v Speaker 2>All this is there speaking of?

251
00:13:44.200 --> 00:13:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Is there a mechanism whereby they can cut rates without

252
00:13:47.759 --> 00:13:49.039
<v Speaker 1>waiting for their regular meeting?

253
00:13:50.360 --> 00:13:53.000
<v Speaker 5>Sure? But why? I mean you do that in emergencies?

254
00:13:53.600 --> 00:13:56.559
<v Speaker 5>The Dow losing a couple of percentage of points is

255
00:13:56.759 --> 00:13:59.559
<v Speaker 5>not an emergency, and emergency would be the likes of

256
00:13:59.559 --> 00:14:03.679
<v Speaker 5>which we have during during the global financial crisis, maybe

257
00:14:03.799 --> 00:14:06.919
<v Speaker 5>during COVID, where they would jump in and do something

258
00:14:07.639 --> 00:14:11.200
<v Speaker 5>out of sequence. But I would I would hardly think

259
00:14:11.279 --> 00:14:13.600
<v Speaker 5>that this rise. And keep in mind that the FED

260
00:14:14.120 --> 00:14:17.000
<v Speaker 5>supposedly says they don't care about markets, right, they don't

261
00:14:17.000 --> 00:14:20.919
<v Speaker 5>care about the equity markets, They care about the overall economy.

262
00:14:21.279 --> 00:14:24.600
<v Speaker 5>And yes, the markets can be an indicator of health

263
00:14:24.600 --> 00:14:27.240
<v Speaker 5>from the economy, but that's only one of several. So

264
00:14:27.480 --> 00:14:30.120
<v Speaker 5>the SED is not going to intervene in the economy

265
00:14:30.320 --> 00:14:32.279
<v Speaker 5>just because the Dow shared a couple of thousand points.

266
00:14:32.360 --> 00:14:35.399
<v Speaker 1>We're talking with Mick mulvaney, economic contributor for News Nation.

267
00:14:35.519 --> 00:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Of course you remember him as acting White House Chief

268
00:14:38.080 --> 00:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of Staff, also Director of Office of Management and Budget,

269
00:14:41.240 --> 00:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>currently a co chair of Active Strategic Consultants. So you

270
00:14:44.080 --> 00:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in terms of keeping an eye on when we

271
00:14:46.559 --> 00:14:50.679
<v Speaker 1>get these jobs reports, not necessarily, you know, putting all

272
00:14:50.720 --> 00:14:53.919
<v Speaker 1>of our attention on the unemployment rate itself to four

273
00:14:53.960 --> 00:14:55.799
<v Speaker 1>point three percent, but to look at the number of

274
00:14:55.879 --> 00:14:59.799
<v Speaker 1>jobs created, is there, in general a better indicator of

275
00:14:59.840 --> 00:15:03.519
<v Speaker 1>the strength the health of the economy than the Dow.

276
00:15:03.759 --> 00:15:06.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everybody refers to that because it's a quick snapshot.

277
00:15:06.919 --> 00:15:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Is there a better number that we should keep an

278
00:15:08.919 --> 00:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>eye on.

279
00:15:10.080 --> 00:15:12.519
<v Speaker 5>Oh? I think, I think. I think that the job

280
00:15:12.720 --> 00:15:17.720
<v Speaker 5>creation is just as good. I think that wage growth

281
00:15:17.840 --> 00:15:21.399
<v Speaker 5>is just as good. Is our wages keeping up with inflation.

282
00:15:21.480 --> 00:15:23.080
<v Speaker 5>That's a pretty good sign of whether or not the

283
00:15:23.120 --> 00:15:25.759
<v Speaker 5>economy is healthy if you actually feel like you have

284
00:15:25.919 --> 00:15:28.919
<v Speaker 5>more money this month than you had last month, even

285
00:15:28.960 --> 00:15:31.320
<v Speaker 5>when you take into consideration increase in prices. And we're

286
00:15:31.360 --> 00:15:34.960
<v Speaker 5>not there yet, but in those circumstances, generally people might

287
00:15:34.960 --> 00:15:37.360
<v Speaker 5>think the economy is doing fairly well. Why well, because

288
00:15:37.399 --> 00:15:40.039
<v Speaker 5>they have more money to spend, They spend more, they

289
00:15:40.039 --> 00:15:42.600
<v Speaker 5>buy more things, companies' earnings go up, et cetera, et cetera.

290
00:15:42.639 --> 00:15:45.480
<v Speaker 5>So there's no again, no easy answer to your question

291
00:15:45.559 --> 00:15:48.720
<v Speaker 5>of multi variable equation. But yeah, you watch the markets,

292
00:15:48.720 --> 00:15:50.639
<v Speaker 5>but you watch again five or six other things.

293
00:15:50.519 --> 00:15:52.440
<v Speaker 2>As well, and volatility.

294
00:15:53.120 --> 00:15:55.919
<v Speaker 1>I look at the next nine to ninety five days

295
00:15:55.960 --> 00:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>before before the election, I can't imagine. Listen, we there's

296
00:16:01.240 --> 00:16:05.519
<v Speaker 1>no way that in April you could have predicted that

297
00:16:06.000 --> 00:16:12.039
<v Speaker 1>what has happened this summer happened this summer with craziness

298
00:16:10.799 --> 00:16:17.759
<v Speaker 1>on all accounts of the campaign. An assassination attempt, a

299
00:16:17.799 --> 00:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>major candidate dropping out, getting out of the race. I

300
00:16:20.360 --> 00:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>mean none of this was predictable. That obviously goes to

301
00:16:24.759 --> 00:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of volatility that we might be able

302
00:16:27.279 --> 00:16:29.159
<v Speaker 1>to expect over the next ninety five days.

303
00:16:29.159 --> 00:16:31.279
<v Speaker 2>What are you looking for in the next three months.

304
00:16:32.639 --> 00:16:34.799
<v Speaker 5>If you had written this and submitted it to Hollywood

305
00:16:34.799 --> 00:16:36.440
<v Speaker 5>for an episode or a series of episodes of The

306
00:16:36.440 --> 00:16:38.320
<v Speaker 5>West Wing, you would have laughed out, yeah, you know,

307
00:16:38.360 --> 00:16:42.039
<v Speaker 5>we would ever predict any of it's happening. Look, look,

308
00:16:42.080 --> 00:16:45.279
<v Speaker 5>election season has always there's always got variables to We

309
00:16:45.279 --> 00:16:47.559
<v Speaker 5>always look at these sort of you know, September surprises,

310
00:16:47.559 --> 00:16:50.919
<v Speaker 5>October surprises, et cetera. And yes, this is what worries

311
00:16:50.960 --> 00:16:53.639
<v Speaker 5>me the most, and it's something that doesn't get nearly

312
00:16:53.720 --> 00:16:55.480
<v Speaker 5>enough discussion. In fact, you haven't said the word yet,

313
00:16:55.519 --> 00:16:57.639
<v Speaker 5>and neither have I. Which is for thirty five more

314
00:16:57.679 --> 00:16:59.519
<v Speaker 5>than thirty five trillion dollars in debt now, I think

315
00:16:59.519 --> 00:17:01.600
<v Speaker 5>we bart on just one hundred billion dollars this week.

316
00:17:02.639 --> 00:17:05.720
<v Speaker 5>That's a huge number. And what does it do to us.

317
00:17:06.000 --> 00:17:10.880
<v Speaker 5>It takes away our ability to respond to emergency situations

318
00:17:10.960 --> 00:17:14.119
<v Speaker 5>because ordinarily, when times are good, we spend least of

319
00:17:14.119 --> 00:17:15.759
<v Speaker 5>times are bad, the government spends more to try and

320
00:17:15.799 --> 00:17:18.519
<v Speaker 5>even things out, And nowadays all we do is spend

321
00:17:18.519 --> 00:17:21.200
<v Speaker 5>more all the time, and that eventually is going to

322
00:17:21.200 --> 00:17:24.160
<v Speaker 5>take away our ability to respond when you really need help.

323
00:17:24.279 --> 00:17:28.200
<v Speaker 5>You need, say, an injection of stimulus into the economy.

324
00:17:28.400 --> 00:17:30.480
<v Speaker 5>That's what worries me. It worries everybody. Which is that

325
00:17:30.519 --> 00:17:32.200
<v Speaker 5>black Swan event. Would you just wake up when morning

326
00:17:32.200 --> 00:17:34.680
<v Speaker 5>everybody decides, you know what the government knows thirty six

327
00:17:34.720 --> 00:17:37.279
<v Speaker 5>train dollars. I'm not lending them any more money at

328
00:17:37.319 --> 00:17:39.519
<v Speaker 5>three and a half or four or four or five percent.

329
00:17:40.400 --> 00:17:43.119
<v Speaker 5>That's what you're really worry about. But the day to

330
00:17:43.160 --> 00:17:46.079
<v Speaker 5>day stuff, you know, certainly an assassination of temp is

331
00:17:46.119 --> 00:17:49.200
<v Speaker 5>a big deal, there's no question. But I don't think

332
00:17:49.680 --> 00:17:52.319
<v Speaker 5>who Kamala Harris is going to pick for her vice

333
00:17:52.319 --> 00:17:54.839
<v Speaker 5>president is going to move the markets very much. Neither

334
00:17:54.880 --> 00:17:57.920
<v Speaker 5>did when when Donald Trump took JD Vance. So those

335
00:17:57.920 --> 00:18:02.720
<v Speaker 5>are the those are the ordinary vicissitudes of American politics

336
00:18:02.720 --> 00:18:03.160
<v Speaker 5>and marketing.

337
00:18:03.319 --> 00:18:06.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well there's nothing ordinary about this year, that's for certain.

338
00:18:06.880 --> 00:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Hey, great stuff, I really appreciate it. I

339
00:18:09.759 --> 00:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>am of a fan of yours, and I like your

340
00:18:12.279 --> 00:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>down to earth knowledge. About all of this stuff.

341
00:18:15.119 --> 00:18:16.839
<v Speaker 2>So thank you, thanks so much.

342
00:18:16.880 --> 00:18:17.799
<v Speaker 5>Have a great weekend, you bet.

343
00:18:17.839 --> 00:18:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Mick mulvaney there again, political economic contributor to News Nation,

344
00:18:21.519 --> 00:18:23.559
<v Speaker 1>former White House Chief of Staff, former Director of the

345
00:18:23.599 --> 00:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Office of Management and Budget, know as what he.

346
00:18:25.400 --> 00:18:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Was talking about.

347
00:18:25.960 --> 00:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>The Federal Trade Commission has announced it's going to investigate

348
00:18:29.960 --> 00:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>why grocery prices are still high even as the costs

349
00:18:34.240 --> 00:18:38.319
<v Speaker 1>for retailers have gone down. Chair Linda Kahan from the

350
00:18:38.319 --> 00:18:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Federal Trade Commission says this is investigation will look into

351
00:18:44.279 --> 00:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>major grocery chains and that those grocery chains would be

352
00:18:47.799 --> 00:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>ordered to provide information on their costs and prices on

353
00:18:51.200 --> 00:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>common products. She did this at a She made the

354
00:18:54.480 --> 00:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>announcement yesterday at a public meeting with a Justice department

355
00:18:57.240 --> 00:19:02.319
<v Speaker 1>that's looking into pricing practices. The United States has officially

356
00:19:02.359 --> 00:19:07.759
<v Speaker 1>recognized Venezuela's opposition presidential candidate at Mundo Gonzalez as the

357
00:19:07.799 --> 00:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>winner of Venezuela's disputed election. Secretary of State Tony Blinken

358
00:19:12.680 --> 00:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>made the comments despite the claim by the authoritarian president

359
00:19:16.359 --> 00:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>there Nicolas Maduro that the Venezuelan controlled electoral body won

360
00:19:23.599 --> 00:19:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the Sunday election. The government is of course run by Maduro,

361
00:19:27.359 --> 00:19:31.279
<v Speaker 1>the election body was chosen by Maduro, and all of that.

362
00:19:32.480 --> 00:19:35.519
<v Speaker 2>Still under a questionable.

363
00:19:36.440 --> 00:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Questionable look out of Venezuela determining who actually won that election.

364
00:19:41.279 --> 00:19:44.279
<v Speaker 1>The four point seven billion dollar verdict against the NFL

365
00:19:44.680 --> 00:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>for colluding to raise prices for the Sunday ticket TV

366
00:19:47.599 --> 00:19:52.559
<v Speaker 1>package overturned last night by federal judge. He disqualified expert

367
00:19:52.680 --> 00:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>testimony used by the jury to determine damages.

368
00:19:56.440 --> 00:19:57.400
<v Speaker 2>That's the key.

369
00:19:57.799 --> 00:20:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not that the NFL is necessarily off the hook,

370
00:20:00.519 --> 00:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>but the judgment itself, the four point seven billion may

371
00:20:04.160 --> 00:20:07.839
<v Speaker 1>have been crazy. In fact, the two economic witnesses. According

372
00:20:07.880 --> 00:20:11.559
<v Speaker 1>to the judge, the plaintiff's two economic witnesses used flawed

373
00:20:11.680 --> 00:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>methodology and their attempts to show that the league was

374
00:20:14.240 --> 00:20:17.559
<v Speaker 1>overcharging Sunday ticket customers. They were thrown out because they

375
00:20:17.559 --> 00:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>were based on witness testimony which included comparisons to how

376
00:20:20.920 --> 00:20:25.559
<v Speaker 1>college games are broadcast, and then some speculation on substantiated

377
00:20:25.559 --> 00:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>speculation on how the NFL might sell games individually if

378
00:20:29.880 --> 00:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it was to do so. Also just in out of DC.

379
00:20:33.160 --> 00:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk more about it at the top of the hour.

380
00:20:35.039 --> 00:20:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris has won the votes of enough Democratic Convention

381
00:20:37.880 --> 00:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>delegates to become the party's presidential nominee. The DNC chair

382
00:20:42.200 --> 00:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Harrison, made the comments today in a video. So

383
00:20:46.119 --> 00:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>she is now I think the term that they're using

384
00:20:49.400 --> 00:20:56.599
<v Speaker 1>on social media is the official presumptive Democratic nominee for president.

385
00:20:56.880 --> 00:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>So I have a dog. Dever's got a dog, mon

386
00:21:00.279 --> 00:21:02.839
<v Speaker 1>has got a dog. We all have dogs. Everybody has dogs.

387
00:21:02.960 --> 00:21:03.759
<v Speaker 3>We love dogs.

388
00:21:03.880 --> 00:21:04.839
<v Speaker 2>Dogs are incredible.

389
00:21:05.240 --> 00:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't deserve them, but we have them, and we

390
00:21:07.519 --> 00:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>keep them as little, tiny slaves in our homes.

391
00:21:09.720 --> 00:21:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh I deserve them. Why because I'm a great dog owner.

392
00:21:13.799 --> 00:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, and also you are so in love with other

393
00:21:16.440 --> 00:21:20.079
<v Speaker 1>animals also, I am that, okay, But you choose dogs

394
00:21:20.119 --> 00:21:22.319
<v Speaker 1>to be the thing that you keep in your home.

395
00:21:22.400 --> 00:21:22.680
<v Speaker 2>I do.

396
00:21:23.039 --> 00:21:24.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm allergic to cats.

397
00:21:24.559 --> 00:21:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Good, everyone should be.

398
00:21:27.160 --> 00:21:29.319
<v Speaker 3>I did have a parakeet and a cockatial at once.

399
00:21:29.359 --> 00:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, birds can get loud and messy. Yeah, very

400
00:21:32.640 --> 00:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>messy in this case. A survey says thirty nine percent

401
00:21:37.599 --> 00:21:42.559
<v Speaker 1>of dog owners report their emotional health is improved by dogs.

402
00:21:43.039 --> 00:21:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Thirty nine percent. That's a lot. Twenty seven percent say

403
00:21:46.839 --> 00:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>their mental health is improved, and twenty five percent say

404
00:21:51.160 --> 00:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>their physical health is improved by having dogs. Obviously, it's

405
00:21:56.480 --> 00:21:59.640
<v Speaker 1>simple stuff. They can comfort us when we're sad, They

406
00:21:59.640 --> 00:22:07.079
<v Speaker 1>help us through stressful times. Our bodies absolutely dump oxytocin

407
00:22:07.759 --> 00:22:13.319
<v Speaker 1>when they stare in our eyes just longingly. Our bodies

408
00:22:13.359 --> 00:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>react to that.

409
00:22:13.920 --> 00:22:14.559
<v Speaker 2>For some reason.

410
00:22:14.839 --> 00:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>They said that this is like, this is my favorite

411
00:22:17.160 --> 00:22:20.839
<v Speaker 1>stat in the whole study. Though, some people reported improvements

412
00:22:20.880 --> 00:22:23.519
<v Speaker 1>because their dog listens to them when they need to vent.

413
00:22:24.640 --> 00:22:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, what choice, I exactly.

414
00:22:27.680 --> 00:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>The dog may be asleep, but you think the dog

415
00:22:30.319 --> 00:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>is listening to you. The dog inspires them to take

416
00:22:34.440 --> 00:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>better care of themselves a little more than a third

417
00:22:36.960 --> 00:22:42.279
<v Speaker 1>of people. The big deal is that it's also physical activity.

418
00:22:42.920 --> 00:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Eighty one percent of people who own dogs say they

419
00:22:46.119 --> 00:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>are more active because of their dogs, and that another

420
00:22:49.319 --> 00:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>forty nine percent say their dog is the sole reason

421
00:22:53.440 --> 00:22:55.799
<v Speaker 1>that they get up and move. Wow, get up off

422
00:22:55.799 --> 00:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the couch because the dog is chewing something it's not

423
00:22:58.039 --> 00:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>supposed to or whatever, but a lot of them go

424
00:23:00.960 --> 00:23:03.279
<v Speaker 1>for eighty six percent say they take their dogs for

425
00:23:03.359 --> 00:23:06.079
<v Speaker 1>regular walks. I had a brother in law who when

426
00:23:06.160 --> 00:23:08.799
<v Speaker 1>they got a dog, he dropped all kinds of weight

427
00:23:08.920 --> 00:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>because he was out taking that dog for walks on

428
00:23:10.920 --> 00:23:11.799
<v Speaker 1>a regular basis.

429
00:23:12.279 --> 00:23:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Some of them just.

430
00:23:12.880 --> 00:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Play games with their dogs running. Twenty nine percent of

431
00:23:16.079 --> 00:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>people run with their dogs, and twenty five percent say

432
00:23:19.400 --> 00:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they hike with their dogs. I would absolutely run with

433
00:23:22.279 --> 00:23:25.599
<v Speaker 1>my dog if his legs weren't three quarters of an inch.

434
00:23:26.200 --> 00:23:29.119
<v Speaker 3>You don't have a hiking running kind of dogs.

435
00:23:29.160 --> 00:23:29.559
<v Speaker 2>I do not.

436
00:23:29.839 --> 00:23:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I have a dog that would rather dig in a

437
00:23:32.519 --> 00:23:35.839
<v Speaker 1>badger hole than go on a five mile walk with me. Same,

438
00:23:36.559 --> 00:23:39.559
<v Speaker 1>which is fine because there's you know, there's there's games

439
00:23:39.559 --> 00:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that you can play with a with a you know,

440
00:23:41.880 --> 00:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a terrier like that that would be just as fun.

441
00:23:45.920 --> 00:23:46.920
<v Speaker 2>He's working on that.

442
00:23:47.319 --> 00:23:48.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, he's just a baby.

443
00:23:48.440 --> 00:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>He's just a baby. Like he's a chewer, but we

444
00:23:51.119 --> 00:23:53.279
<v Speaker 1>like to chew each other. He grabs my arm and

445
00:23:53.319 --> 00:23:55.039
<v Speaker 1>then I grab his paw and I chew on it.

446
00:23:55.440 --> 00:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Really well, he's got to learn. He's got to learn

447
00:23:58.160 --> 00:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that that's not okay, that's how you teach Well, how

448
00:24:00.880 --> 00:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>else am I supposed to teach.

449
00:24:01.880 --> 00:24:05.599
<v Speaker 2>Him with a clicker, with a no, with a scolding voice.

450
00:24:05.680 --> 00:24:08.599
<v Speaker 3>I've never heard of your way before.

451
00:24:09.359 --> 00:24:10.640
<v Speaker 2>You've never heard of biting them back.

452
00:24:10.960 --> 00:24:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, technically you're not supposed to bite them, but

453
00:24:13.440 --> 00:24:16.559
<v Speaker 1>if you yelp at them or make a loud noise

454
00:24:16.640 --> 00:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>like another like an adult dog would do if a

455
00:24:19.200 --> 00:24:20.079
<v Speaker 1>puppy nipped it.

456
00:24:20.160 --> 00:24:23.559
<v Speaker 3>And that too hard, but not retaliating the same way

457
00:24:23.599 --> 00:24:24.680
<v Speaker 3>by biting.

458
00:24:24.920 --> 00:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're all animals when we get down to it,

459
00:24:26.960 --> 00:24:29.759
<v Speaker 1>aren't we. Swamp Watch is coming up. Also, we are

460
00:24:29.839 --> 00:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>expecting a news conference from the US Secret Service. We're

461
00:24:32.359 --> 00:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>not quite sure exactly what they're going to detail, but

462
00:24:34.759 --> 00:24:36.079
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if we can dip into that.

463
00:24:37.079 --> 00:24:39.480
<v Speaker 2>You've been listening to The Gary and Shannon Show.

464
00:24:39.559 --> 00:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>You can always hear us live on KFI AM six

465
00:24:42.000 --> 00:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>forty nine am to one pm every Monday through Friday,

466
00:24:45.279 --> 00:24:48.039
<v Speaker 1>and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app
