Speaker 1: And welcome back to The Michael Cohen Show. On a
Speaker 1: continued journey to half a million subscribers, we are really
Speaker 1: super close, thanks to you, so hit subscribe, watch, comment,
Speaker 1: and share, because the insanity, it just doesn't start in
Speaker 1: the morning, it stops them when you finally go to sleep. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: Caroline Levit, huh Dear Caroline, back this afternoon with another
Speaker 1: press conference, trying to dispel the drama that Trump caused
Speaker 1: over the last week and the weekend. Now, as I
Speaker 1: spoke in my video of this morning, Trump used Charlie
Speaker 1: Kirk's memorial to say that he hated his opponents. Caroline
Speaker 1: was asked how that statement about hating all of your
Speaker 1: opponents would bring down the political temperature? Play the clip, sure, an,
Speaker 1: I think.
Speaker 2: Thanks Caroline. List letters with PSU's hour. I just wanted
Speaker 2: to follow up quickly on something that the President had
Speaker 2: said yesterday. So we heard from Erica Kirk she said
Speaker 2: she forgives who shot and killed her husband, and then
Speaker 2: right after that we heard from the President who said,
Speaker 2: I hate my opponent and I don't want the best
Speaker 2: for them. How does that square with bringing down the
Speaker 2: temperature of political violence in this country? And then if
Speaker 2: I could, I had to follow up on Venezuela too.
Speaker 3: Look, the President is authentically himself. I think that's why
Speaker 3: millions of Americans across the country love him and support him,
Speaker 3: including Erica Kirk, who you saw so beautifully was on
Speaker 3: stage with the President in an unthinkable moment in the
Speaker 3: midst of an unthinkable tragedy and was leaning on the
Speaker 3: President for support during that time, and he was there
Speaker 3: to give it to her, as well as the Vice
Speaker 3: president and many other top ranking cabinet officials.
Speaker 1: At kayla okay, And so where's the answer? You know, yes,
Speaker 1: he's authentic, He's authentic, I get it. But he is
Speaker 1: also the president of the United States, the president for
Speaker 1: all Americans, not just the Magus supporters. That's the point, Caroline,
Speaker 1: and a reporter thing goes on and asks Caroline about
Speaker 1: the fact that Letitia James's investigated for five months and
Speaker 1: up until that period of time, so far no crimes
Speaker 1: have been found. So here's the question. Does that mean
Speaker 1: that Trump just wants his enemies charged regardless of if
Speaker 1: there's a crime or not. What's really going on here?
Speaker 1: Does he have something or does he not? Play the clip?
Speaker 4: Thanks Caroline, but the US against Letitia James was extensively
Speaker 4: investigated for five months and President Trump's hand picked Attorney General,
Speaker 4: Eric Siver, could not find any evidence that he committed
Speaker 4: a crime. So as the President saying, here, it doesn't
Speaker 4: matter if there's a crime, he just wants his political
Speaker 4: enemies to be charged, Well, let me just.
Speaker 3: Walk you through Letitia James. Letitia James completely abused her
Speaker 3: oath of office. Letitia James was actively and openly engaged
Speaker 3: in law fair you talk about weaponizing the Department of Justice.
Speaker 3: What was Letitia James's campaign slogan? It was prosecute Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: She was saying she was going to prosecute Donald Trump
Speaker 3: before she even knew if Donald Trump committed a crime,
Speaker 3: which of course we did not. That's those are not
Speaker 3: the words of a serious prosecutor. Those are the words
Speaker 3: of a corrupt politician who is abusing their power. She
Speaker 3: actively campaigned on that. She also led the witch hunt
Speaker 3: the financial fraud investigation against President Trump and the Trump Organization.
Speaker 3: In an appeals court tossed that case out a five
Speaker 3: hundred million dollar civil fraud penalty in August, which was
Speaker 3: another win for the president and exonerated him of this
Speaker 3: witch hunt and show that this is an individual who
Speaker 3: has corrupt and abused her oath of offices.
Speaker 1: Okay, let me be very very clear, that's not how
Speaker 1: it happened, and that's not what the end result is.
Speaker 1: It was not tossed out. It does not exonerate anyone.
Speaker 1: And again I don't want to start going into you know,
Speaker 1: which aspect is right, which aspect here is wrong. What
Speaker 1: they did turn around and say is that five hundred
Speaker 1: million dollars is just an obscene amount of money. And
Speaker 1: that's the part of the case that remains now open.
Speaker 1: What the penalty is going to be Now, I've said
Speaker 1: it earlier and I'm going to continue to say it.
Speaker 1: There's a lot that's going to be coming down the
Speaker 1: road as it relates to Trump and Tiss James and
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff and also say Alvin Bragg and James Comy
Speaker 1: and a whole slew of others. There's a lot, Which
Speaker 1: is why I constantly say that there is so much
Speaker 1: chaos that we wake up to that we go to
Speaker 1: sleep every night, that we need to build a community
Speaker 1: so big that we can finally put an end to this.
Speaker 1: Let the investigations happen, and if Congress had any balls,
Speaker 1: they would open up investigations too, so that we the people,
Speaker 1: we the people will have some idea of what's actually
Speaker 1: really going on.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 1: Meanwhile, reporter goes on and asks her if Bondi will
Speaker 1: be fired if she doesn't find Leticia James committed a crime.
Speaker 2: Play that clip, well, Kristin Chren, just going back to
Speaker 2: this Letitia James story.
Speaker 5: What does President Trump plan to do if the Attorney
Speaker 5: General Pambondi tells him that there is not enough evidence
Speaker 5: to bring his political opponents' cases or to charge those cases.
Speaker 3: That's a hypothetical question, Kristin. That hasn't happened at this point,
Speaker 3: but we.
Speaker 5: Did see one US attorney not be able to find
Speaker 5: enough evidence and now they no longer have a job.
Speaker 5: Is that something that you would consider.
Speaker 3: Look, the President stands with Pambondi one hundred percent. He
Speaker 3: made that clear this weekend. He answered questions from all
Speaker 3: of you last night on Air Force One. He said
Speaker 3: the same, and that's how he feels at this moment.
Speaker 5: I'm just learn more than the Attorney general.
Speaker 1: Pabody, Sure, Bump, what's the point to have these pressors?
Speaker 1: You know, you can't answer these questions. It's almost like
Speaker 1: it's become stupid at this point. And why is anybody
Speaker 1: asking her a question because you turn around the ask
Speaker 1: her a question. Hey, you know, can pamp bind the
Speaker 1: possibly be fired? Well, this water is really good, you know. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the president likes what or two, but he prefers diet coke.
Speaker 1: Next question, miwil Caroline continues to say that the president
Speaker 1: has the right to express how he feels about people.
Speaker 1: Play that clip, well, I.
Speaker 4: Want the President accepts the conclusions of his Justice Department
Speaker 4: to not bring charges against Letitia James. In fact, you
Speaker 4: had Bondie and Blanche TOPDJ leadership who were against ousting
Speaker 4: Eric Sebert, who again was picked by President Trump.
Speaker 3: I just answered that question for you. And the president
Speaker 3: has every right to express how he feels about these
Speaker 3: people who literally campaigned on trying to put him in jail,
Speaker 3: who literally tried to ruin his life and ruin his businesses.
Speaker 3: And he wants to see accountability for those who abuse
Speaker 3: their office and abuse their power, and Letitia James absolutely
Speaker 3: did that, whether you want to admit.
Speaker 2: It or not.
Speaker 3: Not retribution though, yeah, it's accountability.
Speaker 1: Thanks Caroline to more impossible. Again, why she's even doing
Speaker 1: these pressers? I have no IDEA new reporter goes on
Speaker 1: and asks if Trump would in state a national holiday
Speaker 1: honoring Charlie Kirk play that clip?
Speaker 5: No, thank you, Carolyn. Would the President like to see
Speaker 5: Congress has a national holiday honoring Charlie Kirk annually?
Speaker 3: That's an interesting question. I'm sure he wouldn't opposed such
Speaker 3: a thing, But you can pose that to him yourself
Speaker 3: next time you get the chance.
Speaker 1: Sure thing.
Speaker 4: And to follow up to I know the President is
Speaker 4: honoring Charlie with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Speaker 5: Is there anything else that we don't know of in
Speaker 5: the works to honor Charlie?
Speaker 3: Not at this time, but we do look forward to
Speaker 3: that Medal of Freedom ceremony very soon.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I'm sure that's going to bring tremendous solace
Speaker 1: to the children growing up without a father. You think
Speaker 1: that maybe there's more that possibly could be done, like
Speaker 1: maybe some sensible gun legislation somehow. Now, look, as I'm
Speaker 1: sure that you've all seen, borders are Tom Homan was
Speaker 1: recorded last September accepting a bribe of fifty thousand dollars
Speaker 1: in a Kava brown paper bag right. I mean, it
Speaker 1: wasn't even like a Gucci bag. It was a brown
Speaker 1: paper bag from this Mediterranean bowl fast food restaurant called
Speaker 1: Kava I undercover FBI agents. Meanwhile, Caroline is now asked
Speaker 1: about it, but she seems to forget, forget that it
Speaker 1: was caught on tape. Play the clip.
Speaker 5: Sure, thanks, Kellen, So two of the women investigation, I mean,
Speaker 5: can you just speak to to.
Speaker 3: The president and ask the Justice Department to close the case.
Speaker 3: And does Holman have to return the fifty thousand dollars. Well,
Speaker 3: mister Homan never took the fifty thousand dollars that you're
Speaker 3: referring to, so you should get your fact straight. Number one,
Speaker 3: Number two. This was another example of the weaponization of
Speaker 3: the Biden Department of Justice against one of President Trump's
Speaker 3: strongest and most vocal supporters. In the midst of a
Speaker 3: presidential campaign, you had FBI agents going undercover to try
Speaker 3: in and trap one of the President's top allies and supporter,
Speaker 3: someone who they knew very well would be taking a
Speaker 3: government position months later. Mister Homan did absolutely nothing wrong,
Speaker 3: and even the President's Department of Justice, even Cash Patel's FBI,
Speaker 3: looked into this just to make sure. They had a
Speaker 3: number of different prosecutors and FBI agents who looked into this.
Speaker 3: They found zero evidence of a legal activity or criminal
Speaker 3: wrongdoing in the White House. And the President stand by
Speaker 3: Tom Homan one hundred percent because he did absolutely nothing
Speaker 3: wrong and he is a brave public servant who has
Speaker 3: done a phenomenal job in helping the President shut down
Speaker 3: the border.
Speaker 1: And you couldn't be stupid if you tried, you bullshit, Barbie.
Speaker 1: He's caught on tape taking fifty grant. The fact that
Speaker 1: cash Pattel's not prosecuting it only to show you how
Speaker 1: brazen this administration is, how brazen this DOJ is when
Speaker 1: it comes to handling accountability crimes, crimes by people that
Speaker 1: are within this circle of trust now, I mean while
Speaker 1: Carolyn also spoke about the potential TikTok deal, check out
Speaker 1: what she says on this one. Play the clip on TikTok.
Speaker 2: The deal?
Speaker 1: How much is the deal? And if you can't give an.
Speaker 3: Exact number how much the deal is, when can we
Speaker 3: expect to learn how much the deal is being valued at?
Speaker 3: And then separately, who is who.
Speaker 2: Are the members involved?
Speaker 1: And the deal?
Speaker 4: Like, can you share anywhere fails there.
Speaker 3: So I don't have a specific number for you, nor
Speaker 3: am I going to confirm the specific individuals and entities
Speaker 3: in the deal at Kayla, But I do have several
Speaker 3: details I'm happy to run through for all of you,
Speaker 3: and the President will be signing the deal the official
Speaker 3: deal later this week at some point. Under the terms
Speaker 3: of this deal, TikTok will be owned by a majority
Speaker 3: of American investors and controlled by a board of directors
Speaker 3: with extensive national security and cybersecurity credentials. In partnership with
Speaker 3: the US government, Oracle will serve as TikTok's trusted security provider,
Speaker 3: and they will independently monitor the safety and data security
Speaker 3: of all US user data on TikTok's platform. Americans data
Speaker 3: will be stored securely in the United States without access
Speaker 3: from China. All US user data will be stored.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Okay, we already know you got Murdoch, you got Lachlin,
Speaker 1: you got Rupert, you know you got Ellison and several
Speaker 1: other people. It's already been out there, So why you're
Speaker 1: holding onto that information like you're holding on to some
Speaker 1: top secret info. Meanwhile, she goes on, she claims that
Speaker 1: I mean it's amazing the ability of this young person
Speaker 1: to lie with impunity as she does. She goes on
Speaker 1: and claims that Trump has secured nearly nine trillion dollars
Speaker 1: nine trillion in US investments. Well, Caroline, according to Trump,
Speaker 1: it's seventeen trillion. Which one is it? Play the clip?
Speaker 3: Part of President Trump's mission to restore America as the
Speaker 3: manufacturing superpower of the world. He has secured nearly nine
Speaker 3: trillion dollars in US investment, nearly nine times more than
Speaker 3: Biden attracted in his entire four year term. And we
Speaker 3: expect that number to be upwards of fifteen trillion dollars
Speaker 3: very soon.
Speaker 1: We're yeah. And lastly, a reported then asks Caroline about
Speaker 1: I don't know farmers being affected by these magnificent trade deals.
Speaker 1: Play that clip, As.
Speaker 3: There's still no official trade deal with China. Farmers are
Speaker 3: getting a little bit ansty navigating, you know, prices being
Speaker 3: weak and not strong. How is the administration, you know,
Speaker 3: thinking about.
Speaker 2: Farmers right now?
Speaker 5: Is there anything we can.
Speaker 3: Expect to see from the administration on you know, just
Speaker 3: like you know, sort of failing farmers out ship crisis
Speaker 3: continue to not work in their heame, the administration is
Speaker 3: completely understands the anxiety of farmers. We're very much aware
Speaker 3: of this issue. It has been a part of our discussions,
Speaker 3: the Trade team's discussions with their Chinese counterparts. As for
Speaker 3: any specific actions, I don't have any news on that
Speaker 3: for you today, but I can fully assure you the
Speaker 3: entire National Economic Council in this building, as well as
Speaker 3: our Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, have been talking with
Speaker 3: the Trade Team about this. There's been many meetings on
Speaker 3: this and they are on the ball.
Speaker 1: And if you want this nonsense, these lies, this misinformation, disinformation,
Speaker 1: malinformation to stop. Help me to build this community. Build
Speaker 1: it so large that we don't have to put up
Speaker 1: with these lies and this bullshit every single day. And
Speaker 1: as always, thanks for listening. Hey everyone, First of all,
Speaker 1: thanks for watching. I mean, we're going to be posting
Speaker 1: daily episodes with reactions and talking about politics. We'll be
Speaker 1: talking about everything in fact, so please like and subscribe
Speaker 1: join us on this journey.