Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Epstein Chronicles. Whenever you hear people try and dismiss what
Jeffrey Epstein was up to, one of the first things
people point to is the fact that Jeffrey Epstein wasn't
charged the first time around with trafficking or anything in
the realm that resembles trafficking. So of course people say, well,
Jeffrey Epstein was in charge with trafficking, he wasn't convicted
of trafficking, so how could he be a human trafficker? Well,
one of the main reasons that that didn't occur is
because it was by design the state when after their
own witnesses, they destroyed their own witnesses credibility on behalf
of Jeffrey Epstein Barry Krisher than the rest of them.
That's what happened. You really think that a jury would
have given a shit if a kid had a MySpace
page talking about drinking and smoking some pot if they
were molested by Jeffrey fucking Epstein. This is the kind
of bullshit we've been dealing with since the very beginning
of this. Oh well, these kids are incredible. They smoked
some pot, They drank some beers, They talked about sex.
Do you forget being a teenager? I did all of that,
and I'm sure most of you did too. So does
that mean that they couldn't have been abused by Jeffrey Epstein?
Does that mean that they had a credibility problem? Well
maybe if it was one person, but what about forty?
What about fifty? So today we have an article from
the New York Post and the headline Jeffrey Epstein accusers
had credibility challenges, including past arrests, changing stories. Doj memos
detail and we've talked about this countless times. We didn't
need the memos for this. It's no secret that they
destroyed their own case and their own witnesses, and they
only brought one girl up. Now they'll tell you it's
because they had credibility issues, but that's not really true.
Does Glenn Maxwell have credibility issues? She sure got some
favorable treatment. Huh? How about Sammy de Bolgravano or how
about Whitey Bulger Give me a break. Okay, they think
you're stupid, That's what it comes down to. And of
course it gives ammunition to the people that are running
cover for the cover up, and there's plenty of them
out there. This article was authored by Samuel Chamberlain and
Josh Christiansen. South Florida prosecutors pitched the sixty count indictment
of Jeffrey Epstein on charges including child prostitution and sex
trafficking in the late two thousands, but fretted that their
case would be undone by some of the pedophiles alleged victims.
According to newly released files, well, the OIG report says
that CEOs, the Child Exploitation Unit, was completely on board
and wanted to go forward, and everything was on track
to do so until Mukasey and Philippe got involved from
Main Justice, And of course that came after a lot
of pressure that was put on them by Epstein's legal team.
So it wasn't like, you know, there was this gigantic
push for this case to go away. In fact, they
thought they had enough. And that's basically all the line prosecutors.
It was the bosses, the brass that killed it. The
Justice Department made public twenty additional documents related to the
disgraced financier at Thursday evening, including for the first time
memos laying out the aborted Sunshine State case against Epstein,
who died in his Manhattan JEL cell in August of
twenty nineteen while awaiting trial on separate sex trafficking charges. Yeah.
But the first time around they were incredible, right the
second time though very credible. The idiocy here is just
almost unbelievable. And it's whild that they believe that anyone
is going to believe this. As we said a week ago,
the Department of Justice reviewed public allegations that formed three
h two inters summary documents originally produced a Glenn Maxwell
and discovery of our criminal case we're missing from the
EFTA Epstein Files Transparency Act library. The DOJ posted on
x What we found through extensive review is that a
published in review summary additionally disclosed in a published spreadsheet,
had a subsequent document that were coded as duplicative. The
DOJ also said, after this was brought to our attention,
we reviewed the entire batch with similar coding and discovered
fifteen documents were incorrectly coded as duplicative under normal circumstances,
I might give you the benefit of the doubt, but
here I do not. I think you're lying, and I
think everything you're saying is bs. Five more documents were
prosecution memos, three of which were drafted by the office
of then South Florida US Attorney Alex Acosta. Those memos
revealed that prosecutor suggested taking Epstein into custody as early
as May two thousand and seven and seeking the seizure
of his Pond Beach, Florida home and two private jets
until Epstein's lawyers started controlling the situation. Have you not
been paying attention? That's what happened. Epstein's lawyers got the
justice the brass and started, you know, pulling levers. That's
why he hired the people he did. What you think
Ken Starr was just out of the blue. Alan Dershowitz
just out of the blue. Left Kowitz out of the blue,
Menchell out of the blue, Lily Sanchez out of the blue,
Bruce Reinhart out of the blue. Come on, all these
people were working on the case and then they flipped
sides to start working for Epstein. Nothing to see here though,
No big deal. However, the documents also outlined the lines
of attack that could be used by Epstein's all star
legal team to place reasonable doubt in the minds of
a potential jury that is such BS. Can you imagine
sitting on a jury and then trying to pitch that
to you, and then the prosecution bringing eight ten girls
up to tell you their story, which way you got
to lean as a juror? The whole thing is BS.
And that's why it makes me so goddamn mad. Top
of the lists potential weaknesses was the girl whose parents
initially flagged Epstein's proclivities to the Palm Beach Police Department
in two thousand and five. Get Ready for this. Copies
of a MySpace page credited or redacted were provided to
the State Attorney's Office and to our office. Reads the
possible credibility challenges section from a February two thousand and
eight version of the prosecuting memo. On that page, redacted
states that she's twenty one years old, she drinks and
has taken drugs, she shoplifts, and she earns two hundred
and fifty grand a year. The MySpace page also shows
a picture of redacted wrestling with her boyfriend and a
photograph of a naked girl lying on a beach during
her first session with the police. She also minimized what
happened with Epstein denying that he touched her she was scared.
How about the second interview or the third one that
we went through. You see, they can't fool us. We've
actually read the interviews, so they can try and spin
it however they want. But I've given it to you, uncut, unadulterated,
so that when they try their bullshit, you see it
for what it is. The memo then sought to address
each of those concerns, noting that the accuser denied the
MySpace page was hers acclaim investigators could neither confirm or refute,
and adding that prosecutors had secured two experts to testify
that sex accuse victims minimize what happened to them until
they feel more secure about the interviewer. Well, that's pretty obvious,
and we can see Jane Doe wore them up to
Michelle Pegan as she's talking to her in the interview.
Another accuser was flagged for having brought several girls Devestein's home,
knowing that they were under age, and she has been
given immunity for her testimony, though prosecutorsted that she is
very straightforward about Epstein's actions and her own, and that
members of the federal grand jury had seemed to believe her.
I think they're talking about Hailey Robson here and her
behavior and her activities while in Epstein's clutches. Now, there's
a bunch of dickheads out there that'll try and tell
you that Hailey Robson is some kind of gigantic human trafficker.
But let's remember that she fell into Epstein's clutches when
she was sixteen, and not only that, she spoke with
the police, not like she was hiding. She wasn't pulling
a Nadia Marsenkova. She didn't pull a Leslie Groff or
a Sarah kellen Vickers. She talked to the police. Maybe
somebody should let Anna Pauline a Luna know that when
she's done with her interdimensional demons or whatever the fuck
she's up to. A third was mentioned as a credibility
risk after an arrest while a juvenile for marijuana possession
and shoplifting, while concerns were raised about a fourth accuser
over an arrest on drug charges and her dismissal from
a retail job Victoria's Secret for theft. So those are
the credibility issues, as Adjur would any of that matter
to you. If all the evidence was overwhelming, you had
the massage pads, I mean, the message pads, you had
all the corroborating evidence, you had all the circumstantial stuff
we seen. Would that really matter to you? It wouldn't
to me, because guess what, even if those girls were
doing drugs and having sex and all the rest of
its shoplifting, they can still be abused. They can still
be taken advantage of. So stop the bullshit, follow the
evidence wherever it goes. The same accuser admittedly has used
drugs since becoming involved with Epstein, but she seems to
have finished that phase of her life. Prosecutors also noted
that our allegations were backed up by phone and financial
records indicating Epstein paid her between three hundred and one
thousand four sexual favors. Ever, think she was using drugs
because Epstein was abusing her, that might have something to
do with it, right, I mean, you know, correlation and all.
In a February two thousand and eight memo, prosecutors noted
that a fifth victim had given testimony to a state
grand jury during which she exhibited no hostility towards Epstein
and said that she testified only because she was subpoenaed
to appear. Well, did you ever think that Epstein got
to her, reached out to her, paid her, threatened her,
threatened her family. Holy shit, man, Her statements are well
corroborated by the telephone records, et CETERA. Prosecutor said of
this accuser. But as with the other girls, her past
is not pristine. If she's under age, it doesn't matter.
There's no coercion when someone's underage. That's it. You cannot
have relations with her. Stupid. You can't traffick her. Stupid,
you can't coerce her. Stupid. Protective orders in the Southern
District of New York and Southern District of Florida had
initially prohibited the release of grand jury material in the
Epstein and max All cases, a senior DOJ official told
The Post on Thursday. Appearing before the House Oversight Committee
in September of twenty twenty five, Acosta told lawmakers that
securing a guilty verdict against Epstein would have been a crapshoot,
Borrowing the characterization of the case from an officer in
the Justice Departments Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section who work
briefly on the case. That's not true. We know that
CEOs was completely on board. Just go back and read
the OIG report, and again, that's why we do it. Well,
you think I have fun reading all those core documents.
Not exactly the greatest time in the world, but it's necessary,
and I think it's important that all of you know
what's going on and not from these people telling you
directly from the source. That's how you form a real opinion. Right. Ultimately,
we just wanted the guy to go to jail, he
said of a much derided June two thousand and eight
non prosecution agreement. That's aw Epstein's are fewer than thirteen
months on a state charge of soliciting sex from a minor,
with much of that time spent on work release. Very
fair deal, very fair, the kind of deal everybody gets, right,
Certainly not the deal my family member got launched disaster
at prison for over six years for illegal gambling. But cool,
Jeffrey Epstein thirteen months, gets to go out do whatever
he wants and continue to abuse people while he's under
the custody of the state. Hell of a job, guys,
hell of a job. Tell us about credibility issues some more,
though many victims refused to testify. Many victims had changing stories.
All of us understood why they had changing stories, but
they did, and defense counsel would have cross examination would
have been withering a cost to added, many of them
had issues in their background, They had the MySpace pages,
they had priors that would have been used against them
by defense counsel. And that was at a time when
in all candor, defense could be much much tougher on
victims on the stand, said the former US attorney, who
added that he considered the tactics used by Epstein's legal team,
which included famed advocate Alan Dershowitz and former independent counsel
Kenneth Starr, skirted the line of professional misconduct. Not skirted
the line. They crossed the line many many times, and
alex Acosta didn't have the courage to stare them down.
Insteady acquiesced to everything that they demanded, and when he
didn't acquiesce to one of their requests, they just went
over his head with the non prosecution agreement. Acosta said,
we put him in jail, he registered as a sex offender,
and the victims had an opportunity to recover and that
was a win. Not true. You put him in jail,
he kept abusing. Victims had a chance to recover. Which
ones point them out? Everybody likes to say victims this,
survivors that, which ones. They're not monolithic. These are all
different people with unique stories of abuse that they suffered
at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein and his friends. It's
not monolithic looking at all of this. The ultimate judgment
was dear all the dice and if he gets away
with it, you're sending a signal to the community that
he can get away with it. Such bullshit. You sent
that signal to the community by not going hard. That
was the signal you sent. Don't give us as bs.
You were scared to go after him at trial. Federal
prosecutors pursue shit all the time. That's way weaker than this.
It wasn't You didn't have the evidence, you didn't have
the courage. That's what it was. A senior DOJ official
toll reporters that roughly sixty thousand documents had been pulled
from the Epstein library and placed back under review to
ensure proper redactions of victim images or pornographic material. More
than three and a half million pages of the documents
have been reviewed by DOJ employees and placed on the
library's web page since President Trump signed the Epstein Files
Transparency Act into law last November YO. There's no such
thing as a perfect victim. All kinds of people can
be victimized, even people that have a checkered past, and
that doesn't make them liars. That doesn't mean we shouldn't
believe them. What we should do is look at all
the evidence provided and go from there. But they just
skipped all of that and instead decided that it wasn't
worth pursuing in federal court, and they just kicked it
back down to state, because you know, that's what the
federal government always does. So they can talk about credibility
issues all they want, But the only credibility issue I
see here isn't what the witness is. It's with the
DOJ itself. All the information that goes with this episode
can be found in the description box.