Speaker 1: What's going on. Thank you so much for listening to
this podcast. It is heard live every day from noon
to three on WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you
want exclusive content like invitations to events, the weekly live stream,
my daily show prep with all of the links, become
a patron, go to dpeakclendarshow dot com. Make sure you
hit the subscribe button. Get every episode for free right
to your smartphone or tablet, And again, thank you so
much for your support.
Speaker 2: Today's show will probably be a little different. I don't
know how different, but at least a little because I was.
I was more reflective after yesterday's show, and I'll be
here all weeks. I get to be reflective every day.
But I was really trying to get through. You know,
we oftentimes get callers that they disagree with the host
or they disagree with Trump, and they ask questions. And
what those questions usually are, and this goes back, yeah
decades in talk radio, is that they will all already
know the answer and they will try to ask a
very pointed question that is designed to make you know
the conservative perspective, well not the conservative perspective, but trump.
You know, a difficult answer I had someone online saying
when was the last time the budget was balanced? I
think it was during Clinton. That is true, those those
last four years of Bill Clinton. The budget was balanced
heading into George Bush's term, but it was the Clinton
budget with the first two years really kind of set
the stage with new Gingrich's contract with America to which
Clinton And here's what made that work was that Clinton
acquiesced and literally in the State of the Union did
something that Democrats have not done since when he said,
and I quote, the era of big government is over.
So there was a a balanced budget. In fact, there
was a surplus, and and that was a different time
rolling into it set up it set up the dot
com bubble burst of the overvaluing of the dot com sector.
But that wasn't when Clinton or Gingris's But it was
a great It showed that limiting government, limiting the power
of government, limiting what it could do, requiring work with
you know, medicaid, require having a welfare work requirement. Those
policies were all very successful. So you have to give,
as someone would say, have to have credit where credits due.
Those two working together did something that we haven't really
seen since we became We kind of went through a
unity that is rare after nine to eleven. And the
sad reality is the intelligence gap that was that existed
in the nineties throughout the Clinton presidency led on too.
In fact, the World Trade Center was bombed during We
forget that. There was a truck van that had bombs
and it went off. Didn't tear the towers down. That
happened in the nineties, and then it led to nine
to eleven. And then the Bush administration and I'm not
trying to get to historic here, went on a massive
spending spree and I can remember I was at the
Institute of Political Leadership. Then this massive expansion called Homeland Security.
You know, you could you could go to the gate,
you know, with your family or whatever. You can't do
that anymore. You you know, now, we we took away
freedoms under the auspices that were making us safer. And
there was a lot of money that went into that,
billions and billions of dollars, a brand new agency, super funded,
throwing more money at it to solve the problem. So
you could argue whether that was successful or not. But
you know, now we're seeing a little bit of the
scaling back. I saw this morning that I think you
might not they're scaling back on you having to take
your shoes off, because really they need they need to
study how to make those lines move more quickly. It's
not the airlines that are necessarily you know, you're having
to arrive at the airport two hours earlier. It's getting
through security. It shouldn't be that complicated. The Israelis and
several other countries do this very well. By the way,
Not to get off on that, tangent I said that
was kind of a preface to where I wanted to
head in some of the show. There's a lot more
topics obviously that we're going to talk about it, and
who knows what may come up with a caller that
has something to say. But having said all that, what
it would say is that the situation that there's two
sides of the coin that are rather extreme right now,
and that is the MAGA movement and the TDS movement.
So the MAGA movement is not that extreme. There are
extremists in it, but by and large it's it's how
the Tea Party evolved, I mean Trump in many ways.
This is what I don't understand why liberal lefties can't
figure this out. He's not difficult to figure out. He's
not an ogre. If you were, if you're John Fetterman,
you get this. I don't know why, and I think
other Democrats do, but they're they're thinking that if they
agree with him in any way, it's only going to
make him stronger. He's not a tyrant. He's just not
whether you like him or not, He's not whether you
like him or not. He's not a fascist. He's not
trying to expand the role of the federal government. And
what made him the real groups of people that made
Trump stronger, made him undefeatable, was the left. It wasn't
the mag of faithful, although they were going to stick
with him through thick and thin. But when you learn
that the prosecution in New York was a political prosecution,
the Letitia James thing. When you when you prosecute that,
and people have never been prosecuted for that, and even
the banks were testifying that, hey, we were we were
fine with that. When when you see, you know, Alvin
Bragg prosecuting for something that's never been done before, you know,
creating felonies that no one's ever been prosecuted, the public
sees that this is the problem whether whether you Trump's convicted. Yeah,
but he was convicted of something that no one's ever
been convicted of before, never ever, you know, even and
Laticia James that they undervalued his property, Mari al Lago.
That was the American public saw that they went after
him on the loans, which the banks said, hey, we
would loan money to him. Again, the loans were paid back.
It was this creation of a prosecution that made a
lot of Americans go, wait a minute, they can do
that to him, they can do that to me, They
can really do this. That they weaponized justice that's supposed
to be blind. Then the situation in Georgia was just laughable.
Whatever happened to that, whatever happened that just went away
in a corrupt prosecutor, her paramore, her lover involved. He's
getting there, going on trips together while they're going after Trump,
saying hey, where are the good guys here? So those things,
and then you know the Russia collusion, which turned out
to be a lie, the hundred laptop story. It was
buried by the left and news media. So if you
wanted to make Trump stronger, you couldn't have written a
better script to do so you have the media fallover
itself to cover up things or not cover stories, or
say they're illegitimate when they are. You have people like
Adam Shift saying I have the evidence to prosecute him,
I'm going after him, and you never present anything. You
basically have made Trump to be bulletproof for lack of
a better phrase, and he's not because he almost got killed.
But you guys on the left did that. You said
things that were just patently on trade. Then you couple
that during COVID, you know, exploring the lab league theory,
you made fun of anybody that said that, oh, it's
possible that a place that studies viruses like this might
possibly could have released one into the public. No, you
made it about, you know, a dead critter in a
wet market, and you you ridiculed and made fun of
any anybody that said otherwise, even though the Institute of
Virology in Wuhan is right there and was studying this,
which now most intelligence agencies agree was probably a leak.
So in every possible way, and then during COVID the
freedoms and the way the left went zealously after freedoms
during that virus, it just in bold and made it
made the political right look more normal. So if anyone
owns it, it's the left. Now we'll talk about the
difference here. Now that again, you all child just going
after those democrats again. No, no, no, no, I'm going after
those two movements. Whether you're a Democrat or republican's relevant
because a lot of fiscal conservatives are. We're sick of
the Republican party. We'll talk about that on the other
side of the break.
Speaker 1: You know, stories are powerful. They help us make sense
of things, to understand experiences. Stories connect us to the
people of our past while transcending generations. They help us
process the meaning of life, and our stories are told
through images and videos. Preserve your stories with Creative Video
started in nineteen ninety seven and Mint Hill, North Carolina.
It was the first company to provide this valuable service,
converting images, photos and videos into high quality produced slide shows,
videos and albums. The trusted, talented and dedicated team at
Creative Video will go over all of the details with
you to create a perfect project. Satisfaction guaranteed. Drop them
off in person or mail them. They'll be ready in
a week or two. Memorial videos for your loved ones,
videos for rehearsal, dinners, weddings, graduations, Christmas, family vacations, birthdays,
or just your family stories, all told through images. That's
what your photos and videos are. They are your life
told through the eyes of everyone around you and all
who came before for you, and they will tell others
to come who you are. Visit creative video dot com.
Speaker 2: Now, I do want to mention a couple of things. One,
if you want to get into the conversation, I've given
the phone number seven oh four five seven eleven ten.
That is also the WBT text line driven by Liberty
Viewing GMC, same phone number, so you can text it in.
It pops right in and you, guys kind of somewhat
in control, or at least you have the illusion of control, right,
You have the illusion that you're in control of the show.
Now the illusion look here, not here, listen here now now,
before we went to the breakup, was talking about how
we kind of arrived at this teds Maga world. It's
so funny. We really should be talking about differences between
the party. If I were to tell you here's the
Democrat vision for the country, you can't really do that.
Now it is marked by just being opposed to one individual.
It's kind of, it's not kind of. It is a
a very primitive place to be politically, I mean Heretofore,
Democrats liked to have big debates about given issues. You know,
the Great Society was marked with huge debates about the
role of the new creation of Medicaid, the new welfare state,
the new Great Society. Republicans pushing back, and then along
comes Reagan and you have this massive conservative pushback. You know,
I'm here from the government, I'm here to help you,
being one of the most feared phrases, you know, from
a Reagan perspective. So we had these debates, you know,
empathy that the Democrats were very empathetic to people, so
they wanted to provide more things. They they they it
wasn't a profession of a profession of Christian faith as
you as an individual stepping up and helping your fellow man.
Democrats perspective of that same mentality is that we should
create a program and those programs should help people out.
But at least there was a debate, and there's not now.
It's whatever the guy in the White House says is
an instant knee jerk. Reaction to why people will die.
It's the weirdest thing. You know. When AID was being debated,
not even debated. When they said we're going to cut aid,
the instant response from the left wasn't, well, we really
need to look at what it does. Well, you know,
as the Trump administration was putting out all of these
billions of dollars in chronic waste and giving it to
countries that were, you know, basically sworn political and enemies
of the United States, saying hey, we're getting rid of this.
Democrats didn't say, yeah, we need to get rid of
some of those, but we need to keep these. They
just said, oh, people in Africa are going to die.
That was the response. They're going to die. Whatever, look
at this, this big, beautiful bill, as is apt to
be called. You know. The Democrat response wasn't let's debate
various parts of it are to say, hey, we like
these parts. Instead. Now the Democrats are on record voting
against the or voting against the or voting for I guess,
the largest tax increase in US history. But their response was,
you know what, in your state, people are going to die.
That's the response in Texas when the floods happened. What
was their instantaneous response, Not Trump administration killed people, Pete Budages.
Whenever there's a plane crash, Trump administration kill people, that's
their instantaneous go to. It isn't even sensical anymore. It's
not sensical. And then when an avowed socialist communist wins
the New York City primary, rather than say hey, we've
got some serious questions here now, he got Keem Jeffries,
the minority leader in the US House, the press actually
shockingly asked him, hey, you're gonna support this guy. He
could have said no. He could have easily said, you
know what, as much as I would like to, that
is not what I believe our party stands for, which
is getting rid of capitalism, you know, anti Israel and
many anti Semitic comments the guy's made. You know, he's
made many comments that could easily be rejected by Democrats,
but because he's a Democratic, Keem Jefferies' answer was curious.
He said, well, I'm meeting with him later this week.
Not a rejection of his platform, which by the way,
is is not the it's not the Democrat platform. But
by virtue of the fact that you can't reject him,
and that's why the left wants everybody to reject Trump.
But unfortunately, the president continues to have a string of
victories on You would think that Democrats would embrace the piece,
you know, whether they hate him or not. You would
embrace the successful peaceful endeavors in Africa, India, Pakistan, Israel, Iran, Bosnia.
You would think they would embrace that. No, it's a
full on, absolutely whack a do. It's only it's like
a glitch in the matrix. For those of you who
are inclined to like such phrases, it's like they're glitching.
It's like they have a software you know, a software
loop that prevents them from moving forward. They're still stuck
on the guy coming down the escalator, rather than the
policies that are played that make up the society today.
He's on the escalator. Oh he's terrible. Look at that
guy coming down the escalator. Wait it's ten years later.
Oh he's still terrible. He hasn't changed. It's the devil.
He's been in office four years before this time. Oh
he's terrible. End of the world. I So you wonder
so so, you know, if you were to look at
the the Teds accusations of the right. It's this. It's
that that Maga people the people who want to make
America grade again, which is the weirdest thing to reject.
You would think if I were a Democrat, I'd want
to say, hey, you guys, my party makes America great.
We're make America. We're the original make America Great party.
That's not true, but I would at least try to
co instead. You have to be against America to be
against Trump, because you're letting him, you're keeping the brand.
You're literally calling the people that support him make America
great people. That's just so anyway. But the accusations of
this before we get to the bottom of the hour,
is that that Maga people worship Donald Trump. And this
is where this is why you miss this. It's sure
there are people that, I mean, especially after all of
the lies everything I just did, the Russia thing, that
you guys were wrong on the political prosecution of him,
the Biden decline that you guys covered up the COVID origins,
which you on the left covered up. You know, these
multiple false narratives that were all wrong. You think that
Maga people worship in what the Maga people do that
you called them maga is that they were the tea
party that started liking the tax enough already president that
they have now, so he is an affirmation of them
rather than the worship of him, although you can say
it either way, but it's mutual respect from both groups.
You think that they're a cult because they disagree with you,
which is funny because all the things I just told
you would be indicative of a cult kind of thing.
The full scale rejection of the reality about all of
the things I just even the Biden declined. You almost
imagine a cult leader that all the problems Biden did,
and you stuck with that cult leader. You're like the
l Ron Hubbard people. Biden was clearly on you. Guys
still wouldn't reject, wouldn't even admit the truth to America.
Even the media were more cult like here. God, there's
so much to this. This is a rich tapestry of
opportunities for both sides to grow and become better. We'll
see if they do.
Speaker 1: Here's a great idea. How about making an escape to
a really special and secluded getaway in western North Carolina.
Just a quick drive up the mountain and cabins of
Asheville is your connection. Whether you're celebrating an anniversary, a honeymoon,
maybe you want to plan a memorable proposal, or get
family and friends together for a big old reunion. Cabins
of Asheville has the ideal spot for you where you
can reconnect with your loved ones and the things that
truly matter. Nestled within the breath taking fourteen thousand acres
of the Pisga National Forest, their cabins offer a serene
escape in the heart of the Blue Ridge Mountains. Centrally
located between Asheville and the entrance of the Great Smoky
Mountain National Park. It's the perfect balance of seclusion and
proximity to all the local attractions with hot tubs, fireplaces,
air conditioning, smart TV, Wi Fi grills, outdoor tables and
your own private covered porch. Choose from thirteen cabins, six cottages,
two villas, and a great lodge with eleven king sized bedrooms.
Cabins of Ashville has the ideal spot for you for
any occasion, and they have pet friendly accommodations. Call her
text eight two eight, three six seven seventy sixty eight
or check out all there is to offer at cabins
Offashville dot Com and make memories that'll last a lifetime.
Speaker 2: Chat Adams your guest host sitting in for my good
friend Pete Calender, who I hope is enjoying his time
off here at News Talk eleven ten ninety nine three Wbteam.
You'd like to get on the conversation seven of four
five seven oh eleven ten, five seven eleven ten. You
can get in and move right out now, win of
the break. We were talking about this distinction. It's not
an attack on the left, it's not calling them names
and that, but it is that. It is this completely
mystifying reality. Now I right now, I would tell you
I strongly believe that the Trump administration has a couple
of landmines that are laying out there, and one of
them has been stepped on, and we'll talk about that soon.
It's not him, it's one of the people in his
team that I believe is creating a moment that really
needs to be addressed, and we'll talk about that soon.
But this difference, this distinction between the TDS, the Trump
derangement syndrome on the left, and it's pervasive. You know, MAGA,
is you put an American flag out your maga. You're
just in a cult if you, you know, put a
Trump flag, God forbid you put a Trump flag somewhere.
Oh my gosh, look at that person. But what I'm
noticing is the attempt to shame Trump supporters backfired completely
over the past eight years or so. It backfired unbelievable.
I don't think the political left has realized that they
are the ones that are contributing to the growth in
the Trump base that in many ways is redefining the
Republican Party. Heretofore, the Republican Party attempted to attempted to
define itself as a fiscally conservative, kind of a little
hawkish on foreign policy, and socially conservative. And what we've
seen in this realignment is that the Trump administration, in
spite of protestations from the political left, it is not
all that socially conservative. I mean, it's it's just not
it's not going after and and going after any of
these sacred calism left. It's saying, hey, the transis you know,
there are two sexes. That that's where they are. But
as far as the rest of it, they're not the
LGBTQ stuff that they're not going to be DEI, but
they're like, hey, we want to go to a meritocracy
in society. You you're the smartest person in the room,
you move to the front of the class, or the
strongest person there, you move to the front of the class.
Whatever it is you do, you do to live, thrive,
and survive. It's about meritocracy, about being the best. Whether
you're pilot, a surgeon, a plumber, electrician, whatever you are,
you climbed to the top. That's your goal. And I'll
get to the Medicaid cuts also in the show, because
the left has just fabricated these these lies, and we'll
get to that because because Medicaid is not actually being cut,
it's still growing. This is something that the Democrats. I
remember debating Congressman Bob Ethridge one time on television and
he was talking about all these horrible cuts to government.
And I said, Bob, if I want to give you
one thousand dollars and then instead I'm going to give
you five hundred dollars, you're still getting more money. I
just cut the full amount. So this wasn't actually a cut.
But the Democrat bobsled on TV and just said they're
cutting and that's what you see now there's actually not cuts.
It's not look at it was going to get a
billion and now it's going to get nine hundred million.
It's was going to get one point five billion instead
of gets like one point twenty five billion. It's still growing.
That's one of the problems. But I digress. What I
really hope I do hope we get to the point
where we have debates and society again instead of just
castigating the other side around Trump. I think the Democrats
are find themselves in a deep poll because they just
wanted to be about him and the people on the right.
I mean, I'll give Rand Paul a little bit of credit.
I disagree with him, but he's consistently libertarian on debt
and deficit spending. That's why he voted against the billing. Now,
Tom tell us one of the problems with Tom and
why he cost him his political career, is because he's inconsistent.
He's for it, he's against it. Here they didn't really
worry about medicaid. That was anthy worried about medicaid. He's inconsistent,
and that pragmatism is what was became intolerable from the
political right. So some of the other things is that
the political left is driven by anger about one person.
They're beyond logic at a certain point. And what proved
that was the COVID narrative. They were beyond logical, and
that their initial reaction when the masking and Fouch and
all of that stuff was Everything that came out of
that mouth, everything that came from the news media was
one hundred percent true. Everything came out of Fauci's mouth.
Nemverer Fauci saying, I am science. No scientists in their
right mind would say that. You know you have a
eighth craators know this. You have a hypothesis. To test
the hypothesis? Did you did you prove or disprove the hypothesis?
They moved to the next level of science. You keep
moving up. It's never proven. There's a lot that turns
out what's wrong about what Fauci said. So we and
the political left could have learned why do Americans not
trust the media now? So instead of Democrats saying, you
know what, I know why I don't trust that, I
completely get why the white people don't trust the media anymore,
they double down on it. MSNBC numbers start tanking they
double down on why they were bad. CNN's numbers start tanking,
they double down on why they were bad. They never
look in the mirror, go you know what, we probably
should have been more fair. I was reading one this morning.
It was it was about media, the media research anyway.
It was about npr are and ninety three percent of
their coverage was anti Republican. This is funded with your
taxpayer money for now, for now, but that's probably going
to change. I mean, if you have one group that's
that's that's the problem. I think Fetterman, oddly enough, I
think John Fetterman represents a path that the Democrats could
become a force to be reckoned with. But instead, I
think that the Chuck Schumer's, the Nancy Pelosi's, the Corey Bookers,
I could name all of them the crowd. Instead, I
think they're they're more interested in Trump stumbling than they
are giving Americans another choice, and that is particularly terrifying.
There they're stumbling, they're stumbling, Fetterman said. I think Fetterman
gives them a golden opportunity to say, hey, when he
does something we agree with, say it, and then we
then that gives us because if you if you agree
with it once in a while, that actually gives you
viability on other issues. Hey, he was really reasonable on
that last issue. Maybe he's got a point here. And
the mag of people don't think Trump is flawless. They're
not all Trump all the time. They're going to support him.
If you guys attack him, they're going to double down
and support him. And I think that's what the left
wants to politically count on. If we just keep attacking
his base, you know, it'll make them look dumber and
dumber and dumber. But that's just the opposite is happening,
because then as the more you attack it, the more
we see these videos, the more we see these videos
of the multihired people that are screaming at the woods
and stuff, it's just they're lunatics. And that's where you're
embracing or embracing that lunacy.
Speaker 1: All right, if you're listening to this show, you know
I try to keep up with all sorts of current events,
and I know you do too, And you've probably heard
me say get your news from multiple sources. Why Well,
because it's how you detect media bias, which is why
I've been so impressed with ground News. It's an app
and it's a website, and it combines news from around
the world in one place, so you can compare coverage
and verify information. You can check it out at check
dot ground, dot news, slash pete. I put the link
in the podcast description too. I started using ground News
a few months ago and more recently chose to work
with them as an affiliate because it lets me see
clearly how stories get covered and by whom. The blind
spot feature shows you which stories get ignored by the
left and the right. See for yourself. Check dot ground,
dot news slash pete. Subscribe through that link and you'll
get fifteen percent off any subscription. I use the Vantage
plan to get unlimited access to every feature. Your subscription
then not only helps my podcast, but it also supports
ground News as they make the media landscape more transparent.
Speaker 2: So we were talking about and I was saying a
lot of this. I didn't know it would extend this
fart honor and privileged to be here. But this, all
of what I'm telling you is not an attack of Democrats.
The Democrats, you know, in the past thirty years, they
had moments. There were Southern Democrats that had a bit
of a conservative ideology. I mean, the Zell Miller types
are gone. They're just they've gone away, and the ones
that remained the party has moved. It's not progressive, it's
actually oddly regressive. It's moved further to the left. The
irony if you were to look at North Carolina for instance,
and look at Roy Cooper. Roy Cooper starts out in
the legislature in the late eighties, about eighty nine, literally
the end of the eighties, and he goes through a
period of time the legislature, which is one hundred percent
driven by Democrats. Now, those Democrats at that time in
the nineties, they had lefty elements. I mean they did.
They had the ones that you never could you're never
going to give education if you're never going to give
enough money to government. But there were some reality checks
in there. They never would have brought up the transgender issue.
I mean even the Clintons were against gay marriage back then.
So it was a different time and both parties. You know,
as much as the left castigated the right for being
too far right, which was always their accusation, they were moving.
They were surrendering the middle ground on every issue. In
moving further and further left. You saw that in early
two thousands through the Obama era. The age of the
government returned instantly. With Obama, I mean, the Affordable Care
Act was a complete repudiation of the Clinton era policies.
It was big government, the way to move to socialism
under the auspices of your pretending to let people have insurance,
but it's funded by the government, and it didn't make
things more affordable and made it go through the roof,
and knowing that you wanted to break it. You wanted
to break the healthcare insurance private sector side. You wanted
to make it so affordable that the battle cry that
would go up across the nation was please government take
over healthcare. So you see a consolidation of the hospitals.
You see doctors being purchased. You see these hospital cartels
get created to make enemies of hospital cartels. When you
get rid of competition, you get rid of competition by
having a certificate of need laws in place. In North
Carolina has one, and eventually it's so broken. You know,
other than met healthcare sharing type opportunities that are out
there and paying cash, which by the way, I call
my doctor the other day about something I needed to
have done, and I was like, Hey, how much is
the cash price? Since my insurance turned it down. They
took a week and a half to tell me, Oh, well,
we're got to fig get back with you on that one.
I said, well, just give me the price you give
the insurance companies. Well there's a different price. They charge
insurance companies more because there's more paperwork to do, so
it's less if you pay cash. But I say that
because the next couple of stories will go through are
kind of the background of those, whether it's a discussion
about what's going on with the healthcare welfare panic, what's
going on with the Texas, the Democrats reaction to the
Texas floods, when you look at the reliability of federal
economic boring, boring, non sexy stuff. But all of what
I've told you lead up to these discussions in society,
lead up to the kind of discussions that I found
several examples of that, and we will go through those.
I mean a real good one, a lot of people,
you know, the media bias, and then your built and
by the way, I will say this, I think Democrats
and Republicans, you guys equally for the most part, recognize
media bias when you see it, which is why even
though you know the people on the left don't like Trump,
many of them don't trust the media they get they
see it. They see it when they see prognostications about
the end of the world. There are is that there's
a small group of diehard faithful that almost want the
earth to end. And we'll talk about that also in motherhood.
What's happening to women through this. I mean, you saw
the transgender competition of sports. You see how that's affected.
But also this this desire, a natural instinct to I'll
get to and who knows that this will set people
off or not, is that men and women are fundamentally different.
Men and women have fundamentally different instincts. There are instincts
that are built in to we human jest. We're not
just popping out ready for you know, upgrades and programming.
We have some built in programming. And it's very confusing
for young men now who have an inclination to want
to protect women. It manifests itself in opening doors, It
manifests itself with umbrellas. It manifests itself in many ways
that are not just manners taught, but it's by the
desire for men to protect women, and also that women
have instincts as well. One of the most one of
the most serious instincts women have is to have children. Now,
it's some women don't want to, but there's also a
great deal of brainwashing going on to try to tell
women not to have children. And it's these two perspectives.
To try to make young men not young men and
to make women not want to have kids is creating
a degree of anxiety that I've never seen. I coached
soccer for many years and worked with kids as Fantastic
in the nineties, and I saw and have seen over
time there's a lot of anxiety in young men and
young women that are being told things that are very
unnatural to them. They get it, but they think that
something's wrong with them because they feel these instinctual issues,
and they'll be told that those are somehow that toxic masculinity.
If you open a door for a girl toxic. If
you want to have children, how dare you want to
destroy the planet? What's wrong with you? Is something wrong
with you? You want to bring that in? It's so expensive,
you shouldn't. It's going to cost you a million dollars
to have a kid. You really want to set yourself back.
You should be pursuing your career.
Speaker 1: All right, that'll do it for this episode. Thank you
so much for listening. I could not do the show
without your support and the support of the businesses that
advertise on the podcast, so if you'd like, please support
them too and tell them you heard it here. You
can also become a patron at my Patreon page or
go to dpetekallanarshow dot com. Again, thank you so much
for listening, and uh, don't break anything while I'm gone.