Speaker 1: What's going on? Thank you so much for listening to
this podcast. It is heard live every day from noon
to three on WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you
want exclusive content like invitations to events, the weekly live stream,
my daily show prep with all of the links, become
a patron go to Thepete calendarshow dot com make sure
you hit the subscribe button. Get every episode for free
right to your smartphone or tablet. And again, thank you
so much for your support.
Speaker 2: Welcome to the show.
Speaker 1: Pete Calendar here seven oh four five seven zero eleven ten.
The email is Pete at the Pete calendarshow dot com.
You can also hit me up on Twitter at Pete
Calender and that is spelled k A l I n
e R. Much like Republicans are always in a civil war,
Democrats are never in a civil war inside their party,
but Republicans are always like in a civil war according
to the media branding. But Democrats are always in disarray,
and they are very sensitive to that media narrative that
they're in disarray. Democrats in disarray, but I kind of
feel like they are in disarray over the transgender athlete issue.
Speaker 2: And I have said this many times.
Speaker 1: I have sympathy for them on this on many things,
because if I had to argue their positions, I don't
think I could do any better because their arguments are stupid.
Speaker 2: So I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: I mean, well, they are. They don't make any sense.
They're easily dismantled. And the reason they don't get them
dismantled publicly as often as they should is because they
have the institutions you know of the media and Hollywood
that protect them, and they are allowed to just a
silly slogan.
Speaker 2: They're allowed to.
Speaker 1: Just launch an ad hominem personal attack on somebody and
then that's sufficient for the media to tell whatever story
they want to tell. Usually Republicans are bad about this
particular issue, or really any particular issue, and what that
has done to Democrats is that has made them intellectually flabby.
Right they are, They're out of practice. This is why
I always say unchallenged ideas are easy to hold. If
you think something and never say it out loud, you
can hold that idea for your entire life because no
one's ever challenging it. When you are challenged on your idea,
then it forces you to have to defend it, and
when you do that right, Resistance to pressure build strength,
and so you get pressure tested on you, your idea,
on your opinion, and you either emerge with a better
understanding of your own opinion, or you've identified through that
process some weaknesses in your opinion, and you know, the
rational person would go back and reassess whether or not
their opinion is correct, because I don't know about you,
but I do not hold really any opinions that I
know to be false. I generally don't hold those. I
think most people don't hold opinions that they know are
not true. Everybody thinks their opinions are true, so otherwise,
why would you hold them right? Why would you believe
something that you know is not true. So with the
transgender athlete issue, they have now found themselves between a
rock and a hard place because they have been on
the wrong side of this, but their base requires them
to be so, even though the vast majority of Americans
are on the other side of the issue. And it started, well,
it started a while ago, but it really it came
to a head last week. I want to say, what's today, Well, no,
today's the seventh. So this was, yeah, Monday. They in
the US Senate, they blocked a measure that sought to
ban transgender girls. This is according to CBS News. So
they're writing it in the preferred narrative of the leftist
activist base because as I mentioned earlier, right, these institutions
are captured by the progressive leftists, and so whenever the
leftists say, hey, we're now going to call you know,
straight men cisgender men, and we're going to call straight
women and cisgender women like, we're going to apply these
terms in order to you know, dilute what it means
to be a man. Like.
Speaker 2: There is a definition of what a man is.
Speaker 1: It is a is an adult human male that is
a man, and an adult human female is a or yeah,
is a woman like? That's these are very simple definitions.
They've served the human race very well for well, basically
since the beginning of time really, and so they have
been put into this position by the forcing of the
issue through legislation at the US Senate, and they could
not bring themselves to say, no, we don't want men
playing against women in sports, right and unless it's you know,
co ed, you know, something like that. But if you are,
you know, going to go into a boxing ring against
a woman. You should also be a woman, not a
transgender woman, because that's a man. That's still a man,
and that is not assigned at birth. It is determined
by genetics. And you can doctor up the hormones and such,
and you can do certain things chemically, you can even
castrate the guy, but it's still a man because that
is determined by the genetics. And I don't say any
of this to be mean. I say this because it
is the truth. And I'm not going to surrender truth
to the postmodernist leftists. I refuse to see the ground
ced not seed. I refuse to surrender this territory because
it's about truth. That's the larger issue at play on
this topic, and it is no more stark than in athletics.
It is the thing that when I was growing up,
we would watch the Olympics and we would like be
watching all of the Soviet Union athletes to make sure
that you know the females were actually female, right, because
they because the idea, the understanding was that if they
could smuggle in a man to compete against the women,
then they would win the medals. That was all that
was always understood until about a minute ago. So in
the Senate, this bill comes up and it fails to
go to get the sixty votes required to avoid the
legislative filibuster.
Speaker 2: Basically they're not actually.
Speaker 1: Having which see now, if if I'm in the Senate,
I force if I'm like, if I'm the Republican Senate leadership,
I would force to Democrats to actually filibuster. I would
force them to have to stand up there for as
long as possible to filibuster rather than just say, you know,
we're not going to vote for Klotchure whatever sixty votes,
know whatever, Like, if you're going to do a filibuster,
you should actually do the filibuster. I've said this for years.
The fifty one to forty five vote fell short of
the sixty votes required to advance the bill. They call
it cloture. So Democrats were not even willing to advance
the bill for the vote, okay, because they didn't want
to be on record as voting against the bill. Although
refusing to advance the bill is actually voting against the bill.
Republicans have fifty three seats in the Senate. They needed
to get seven Democrats to join them.
Speaker 2: They were not able to do that.
Speaker 1: Obviously, the bill was called the Protection of Women and
Girls in Sports Act. It would prevent schools from receiving
federal funding if they allow transgender girls and women to
participate in female athletic programs. It adds that a person's
sex quote shall be recognized based solely on a person's
reproductive biology and genetics at birth, which by the way,
can be determined with a cheek swap. And that's going
to be important to keep in mind as I go
through the ridiculous argument that is made by the left
on this. And if you know you were in North
Carolina during our bathroom bill a year when HB two
was passed about bathroom access, you will remember this argument
from the left, which is about potty police. They want
to inspect everybody's junk. No, that's I don't know why
that's where your mind goes on this thing, like immediately
want to to look in people's pants. I don't understand
why you think that's the only way to determine this,
because in fact, it's not, as you guys say, right,
you say that looking in the pants does not determine
what their gender is. Yet you think for some reason
that Republicans want to look in everybody's pants, and that's
not the case. It's a simple cheek swab that will
do the trick here, because again it's determined by genetics.
Here's a great idea. How about making an escape to
a really special and secluded getaway in western North Carolina.
Just a quick drive up the mountain and Cabins of
Asheville is your connection. Whether you're celebrating an anniversary, a honeymoon,
maybe you want to plan a memorable proposal, or get
family and friends together for a big old reunion, Cabins
of Asheville has the ideal spot for you where you
can reconnect with your loved ones and the things that
truly matter. Nestled within the breath taking fourteen thousand acres
of the Pisga National Forest, their cabins offer a serene
escape in the heart of the Blue Rays Mountains. Centrally
located between Ashville and the entrance of the Great Smoky
Mountain National Park. It's the perfect balance of seclusion and
proximity to all the local attractions with hot tubs, fireplaces,
air conditioning, smart TVs, Wi Fi, grills, outdoor tables, and
your own private covered porch. Choose from thirteen cabins six cottages,
two villas and a great lodge with eleven king sized bedrooms.
Cabins of Ashville has the ideal spot for you for
any occasion and they have pet friendly accommodations. Call or
text eight two eight three six seven seventy sixty eight
or check out all there is to offer at Cabins
Offashville dot com and make memories that'll last a lifetime.
I got a message here from John to Pete at
thepeteclendershow dot com. He says allowing men to compete in
women's sports is indefensible. A few years ago, the Olympics
added a sport mixed relay race. In swimming, you have
a team with two men and to women, and they
do relays right. The teams could go in whatever order
they wanted to, so they were There were instances where
men and women would be swimming at the same time, competing,
and that is when you can really tell the difference
in the athleticism of men versus women. Men would be
starting like a third of a lap behind and then
would catch up to the female swimmers before that leg
of the relay was over. And then he has a
quote which is attributed to Lincoln. You know, if you
call the tail of a dog a leg, how many
legs does a dog have?
Speaker 2: And the answer is four.
Speaker 1: Just because you call the tail a leg doesn't make
it so. So the House passed a measure in January
to block men from competing in women's sports. Month, Donald
Trump signed in an executive order to ban girls and
women from competing. Sorry, see, when you take out the
word transgender girls, then it doesn't make any sense. Why
would you ban girls and women from competing on female
sports teams? Now you're banning men from competing on female
sports teams. Schools not in compliance jeopardize any federal funding
that they receive. The order also affects US visa policies
for athletes who travel to the country to compete in
the Olympics or other sporting events. CBS News reporting here,
Those in favor of the bands contend that transgender athletes
have biological advantages that are unfair and unsafe for other
girls and women. For other girls and women say like,
CBS is trying to tell you that two plus two
is five. Those in see the people who favor the bands,
in other words, like seventy to eighty percent of the
American public.
Speaker 2: Right. It's just our opinion here.
Speaker 1: It's just a belief that somehow men have you know,
greater lung capacity, bigger muscle mass, greater bone density. I mean,
just these are just thoughts that we have. Opponents of
such policies have argued that a band opens the door
here it is to intrusive genital examinations of girls, particularly
those who do not fit stereotypical feminine appearances. This is
a BS argument. As I said, this can be determined
with a cheek swab, also with a birth certificate, which
is why, by the way, you should not be able
to change your birth certificate based on how you feel
this idea. Was watching Piers Morgan's Uncensored the other day
and he had that left wing moon bad Jojo from
Jersey and he asked her, so, like, if I just
say I'm a woman, am I a woman? And she
said eventually, after he like kept dragging her back to
the question, she refused to answer it, and she said, yeah.
Speaker 2: That's it. Then you're a woman.
Speaker 1: You just say you feel like a woman, and that's it.
You're a woman, And that's insanity.
Speaker 2: Polling.
Speaker 1: And by the way, this does not mean that you
should bully people and attack people and whatever an ostracize
or discriminate. That's not That's not what I advocate, nor
should anybody. But it is to say that there is
truth here, and you will not get me to pretend
that there isn't. Polling in recent years has found a
lack of support for transgender athletes participating on sports. That's
interesting way to frame it, right, CBS or as I
like to call it, CBS news polling has found a
lack of support for transgender athletes participating on sports teams
that match their gender identity.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: In other words, the majority of Americans oppose men playing
on women's teams. So that was the first problem that
Democrats ran into. The second problem they ran into on
this was at the don't call it State of the
Union address, Trump's address to the joint Session where Lake
and right or sorry, Riley Gaines, the former University Kentucky swimmer,
she's become a champion on this issue and because she
remember was was beaten by what was his name, Michael
Thomas or something or no, yeah, whatever, but then changed
his name to Leah Thomas and then like obliterated the field,
won a bunch of stuff, a bunch of these competitions,
and she pointed out that Democrats kneeled for eight minutes
and forty six seconds. Remember that after the George Floyd
death up in Minnesota, and they would not stand for
Lake and Riley. They wore pink to protest Donald Trump
and his quote anti women policies, which is just abortion right.
But they also were the same women that voted or
you know, women that were wearing pink at the speech,
but they also voted unanimously to keep boys and girls sports.
This is what I This is what I mean. They
don't have a coherent message on this stuff. It makes
it very difficult. Even just when you think, you know,
like oh, John Fetterman, he said something that makes me
wonder if that uh, if he's like the sanest Democrat
of them all, and then he says something like this.
He went on Twitter and he said, the small handful
of trans athletes in Pennsylvania in a political mailstream deserve
an ally and I am one depersonalized as they them
in a political ad, but are just school children empty
show votes or cruel on social media? Aren't part of
a thoughtful, dignified solution. He voted against this bill as
well in the US Senate. So lest you think that
Fetterman you know that you can work with him on
this issue, apparently not. He's an ally for them. And
that's why what happened on Gavin Newsom's very first podcast,
Governor of California. Everybody expects him to run for president.
That's why what happened on his first episode where he
had Charlie Kirk on conservative activist Guy, podcaster Guy Charlie Kirk.
That's what makes Gavin Newsom's comments so incredibly chaotic for
the Democrat Party now. Because Newsom said that he thinks
it's an issue of fairness and he's not in favor
of men playing on women's teams.
Speaker 2: Outrage is ensuing.
Speaker 1: Who's Talk eleven ten ninety nine three WBT seven four
five seven eleven ten. Email ISPT at the Pete Calendarshoe
dot com on Twitter at Pete Calendar. Let's head over
to the phones. We'll talk with Mark. Hello, Mark, Welcome
to the shoe.
Speaker 3: Hey, v this is Mark. I gave you that eighty
nine percent of rating that time and said you are
to be proud of that.
Speaker 1: Remember that vaguely I get I get a lot of
a lot of compliments and even more insults.
Speaker 3: So listen, here's the deal. So, like, I grew up
as a Democrat all my life, and then I saw
in fact, you remember when Joe Biden back in the
eighties was in a big demratic field for the president.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and he had to drop out because of the plagiarism.
Speaker 3: Oh I remember that. I just remember as a stupid
you know, young per I said, hey, that guy, he
looks kind of the part. He a little pugilistic. So
I voted for him this presidency of his. He couldn't
have done anything more wrong than he did. I mean
everything he did seemed to be just wrong, wrong thing.
So my question where are the Democrats like me who
have nothing in common with these people?
Speaker 2: They voted for Trump, Diana, they all voted for Trump.
Speaker 1: That's the problem the Democrat party has now is they
have lost the demographic that you are in.
Speaker 3: Well, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and they don't know how to get you back.
And because they have built their party around the demands
of the most far left wing in their activist base.
Speaker 2: It's a problem. It's a real problem.
Speaker 3: For it it is amazing. I look at my wife,
and I say, I think purposely trying to destroy this country.
Who do that?
Speaker 2: Leftists?
Speaker 1: Not even the communists, no Communis, communists would leftists, that
is precisely what they want.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they believe. That's why.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's why you have you have a belief,
you know, among the left that And I keep in
mind I differentiate between leftists and liberals.
Speaker 2: They're different leftists.
Speaker 1: And the problem is that liberals inside the Democrat Party,
liberals do not stand up to the leftists very often,
and so they end up getting dragged around by those leftists.
And the liberals are okay with that as long as
it means electoral victories. And so now we're we're seeing
what happens when they can't even deliver any more on
the electoral victories. And so, you know, will liberals now
start pushing back on the leftists inside their party. But
leftists do, in fact want to dare I say, fundamentally
transform America?
Speaker 2: And you don't do that to a country that you love.
Speaker 3: No, No, So, you know, and she's reminded me of
when I metic said, Bernie, what's the guy's named Bernie?
Speaker 2: Frank Barney Frank.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Barney Frank. I remember when he was running for
president as a Democrat and he was doing pretty good,
and I told my wife then I said, who is
this choke? Why does he get to run as a Democrat?
Why shouldn't he run? Is what he's elected as? Which socialist?
Speaker 1: Oh Bernie Sanders, Yeah, Bernie Sanders, Yeah, he's the Yeah,
he's the Vermont senator.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, and yeah.
Speaker 1: Well he was there as a sort of pressure release
valve for those leftists in the Democrat Party in the
primary system, and then the party locked him out right,
and then of course he endorsed Hillary Clinton and said
enough about her emails. Right, He didn't seem to mind
so much. He threw all of his way back behind
the Democrat Party. So that's why I say it was
kind of a pressure release valve for the for the socialists.
But they got to keep them as part of the
party because they're part of the coalition.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Mark, yeah, man, I appreciate the call, sir, take
it all right, you too.
Speaker 1: So from the vote on Monday against protecting female athletics,
get this, this is axios. Now, Senate Democrats want to
leave the issue of trans athletes playing in women's sports
to state and local governments. So we finally found something
that Democrats are like, no, no, no, let the states decide,
and we don't want federal regulation on this.
Speaker 2: We don't need it.
Speaker 1: Here's the problem. Okay, here's the problem with this. Number one,
there are federal laws that apply here. Right, you got
funding that's attached to like the schools, and Democrats, you
guys are really to blame for this because you hook
up all of these schools and nonprofits and all sorts
of agencies, state, local governments and stuff to the federal spigot.
And once you do that, they become dependent on the revenue.
And then whoever controls the federal spigot, right, they get
to dictate the rules you have to live by in
order to keep getting the money. So that's the structure.
And then when somebody like Trump says, hey, dismantle the
Department of Education, you're like, we can't do that. We
have to keep a national agency for education. But on
this issue, they're like, oh no, no, kick it back down,
because why so they can make their own rules. See,
they want federalism when a Republican is writing the rules.
They don't want it when they write the rules. They
want to write rules for everybody in the country. But
then if somebody they disagree with takes control and wants
to write different rules, then it's like, oh, no, no,
we should have federalism again. That's the first problem. They're
already are federal rules that are attached here, so you
can't just say, oh, kick it down to the locals.
Here's the other problem. We don't believe you. We don't
believe you, because as soon as you get back in power,
you're going to turn around and re implement the very
things that you say you want to implement. We don't
believe you, just like we don't believe you right now
when you say or you try to avoid talking about
packing the US Supreme Court, we know you want to
do that. As soon as you get back into power,
you want to pack the court, add more seats, stuff
in your people, and this way you get complete control.
Democrats privately admit that they need a sharper response to
counter Republican attacks on their support for transgender rights, especially
when it involves sports. See, they know they have a
problem on this issue. They just don't know how to
combat it because there isn't a good way that's the
spoiler alert here. There isn't a good argument here. That's
why you can't make a good argument. The Democratic messaging
effort has now been spearheaded by Senator Tammy Baldwin, Democrat
out of Wisconsin. She is the first openly gay person
elected to the Senate. She faced a barrage of attacks
on this topic in her twenty twenty four re election campaign.
She feared Republicans were flooding the zone with their attacks
without Democrats having a clear and consistent rebuttal, well, that
is true, they don't have.
Speaker 2: They do not have that.
Speaker 1: Republicans in Washington are saying they know better than parents
in local school districts. She says in a statement, they
are wrong. I trust parents, schools, and local sports leagues
to make these decisions for their children, unless, of course,
we want to trans your kid without your knowledge, in
which case then but the hell out right. This is
why you cannot make these arguments any longer costs. You've
made the alternative argument for too long. We don't believe you.
Now you want to leave it up to parents, the
same parents that you want to cut out, the same
parents you want to keep in the dark when their
kids are socially transitioning in school, the same parents that
you want to keep in the dark if their kid
leaves their state, heads to California and wants to undergo
hormone replacement therapy, and you don't want to tell the
parents about that.
Speaker 2: I don't believe you.
Speaker 1: Nobody should, all right, If you're listening to this show,
you know I try to keep up with all sorts
of current events, and I know you do too. And
you've probably heard me say get your news from multiple sources.
Why Well, because it's how you detect media bias, which
is why I've been so impressed with ground News. It's
an app and it's a website and it combines news
from around the world in one place so you can
compare coverage and verify information. You could check it out
at check dot ground, dot news, Pete. I put the
link in the podcast description too. I started using ground
News a few months ago and more recently chose to
work with them as an affiliate because it lets me
see clearly how stories get covered and by whom.
Speaker 2: The blind spot.
Speaker 1: Feature shows you which stories get ignored by the left
and the right.
Speaker 2: See for yourself.
Speaker 1: Check dot ground, dot news slash Pete. Subscribe through that
link and you'll get fifteen percent off any subscription. I
use the Vantage plan to get unlimited access to every
feature your subscription. Then not only helps my podcast, but
it also supports ground news as they make the media
landscape more transparent. News Talk eleven ten, ninety nine three
WBT Run Around, I Believe seven four five seven zero
eleven ten. Email is Pete at the petecleanershow dot com.
So Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, expected presidential candidate,
launched a podcast and to his credit, he brought Charlie
Kirk on. So he's having guests that don't just agree
with him, and in this first episode, Charlie Kirk presses
him and he finally Knewsome finally breaks with progressives by
saying transgender participation in sports was quote an issue of fairness.
He called it deeply unfair. Some Senate Democrats agreed with
Newsom on the sports fair issue, but they said to
be careful that the overall conversation doesn't demonize transgender athletes.
They also want to avoid federal overreach. Yeah okay, yeah,
sure they do. Senator Gary Peters from Michigan Democrats said,
we let local schools make those kinds of decisions. There's
no one set of facts. No, and this there is
buddy on this issue. There really is one set of facts.
That's what I mean. You can't defend this stuff. It's
it is logically incoherent. And this is why people were
going along at first, because they didn't want to. As
was just mentioned, you know, don't demonize, right, This is
called suicidal empathy. Like I'm empathetic. I don't want to offend.
I'm gonna try to be nice. I don't want to
be called names. Trying to go along and all this,
and you keep on pushing with federal overreach. You guys
did this. You don't get to cry now about, oh,
federal overreach. You pushed this. US House of Representatives Minority
leader Hakim Jeffries repeated the unsubstantiated argument that the Defending
Women and Girls in Sports Act would have unleashed sexual
predators on girls.
Speaker 2: Have you heard this argument? What is this argument? What
is it?
Speaker 1: This?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: Anybody who's paying attention to this issue is probably thinking,
what the hell are they talking about?
Speaker 2: I'll explain.
Speaker 1: Jeffries first made this argument the day the House voted
on the bill back in January, joining other prominent Democrat representatives,
including Alexandria A. Cazu Cortez. The argument prompted harsh backlash
among some registered Democratic voters and was not repeated leading
up to the Senate vote. Okay, so in the House
they were making this argument that it's going to unleash
sexual predators on girls. Senators did not make this argument,
but Jeffries raises the argument again. When he was asked
about Newsom's comments, he said, quote, I haven't seen the comments.
What Democrats opposed was unleashing sexual predators on girls throughout
the United States of America. When Jeffries and other House
Democrats pushed the argument in January, it was not rooted
in any language within the bill. Republicans insisted here it
is no genital inspection would ever be necessary, and that
proof of birth gender could simply be determined by a
birth certificate. That's been their argument. The Democrats thought this
was the way to argue against men playing in women's sports,
robbing them of opportunities and scholarships and such and world records.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: They thought this was the best argument they had was
that it's going to require these types of private part inspections,
and that's going to unleash sexual predators. When again, birth
certificate would suffice and a cheek swab would prove what
your gender is, what your sex is. They are the same.
It's not your personality like, oh, she's a tomboy. That
doesn't mean she thinks she's a boy, doesn't mean she
is a boy. That's just her personality. And she's perfect
the way she is. You don't have to change her
physical body and her hormone levels. This was one of
the most I thought powerful things that Trump said during
that speech was that every child, you are perfect the
way you are. You are as God made you. That
is the message that every kid needs to hear. You
are perfect the way you are right, well, not perfect,
like you can obviously always you know, improve yourself, better yourself, whatever,
Like you can always improve. Yes, that's that's true. But
there's nothing wrong with you, right, It's okay. You are loved.
The argument that the bill so that's when they say
that that's what this sexual predator argument is.
Speaker 2: It's a lie.
Speaker 1: The argument that the bill would empower sexual predators to
give genital examination to young girls would be not trusting
local governments. So you have the Senators that are saying
we should leave this to the locals to decide, and
you got the House saying, well, the locals are just
going to hire sex predators. See what I mean. You
guys are in disarray. You don't even know what you're arguing.
And again I have sympathy for them on this because
I wouldn't be able to figure out a logical argument
for it either. By the way, eighty percent of the
American people, including more than sixty percent of Democrats, do
not want men in women's sports. Also, Newsom might have
created some disarray in his own house because his wife,
known as the gender neutral First Partner in California, that's
what they call her, the first Partner, Jennifer Siebel Newsom. Apparently,
she's a big LGBT activist, very publicly supporting sports equity,
a euphemism for encouraging all children, including trans kids, right
to compete in the athletics. She also worked. She founded
rather the Representation Project, nonprofit to battle sexism through film, education,
research and activism, and it refers to itself as the
nation's leading gender watchdog organization, where they basically crank out
a bunch of movies and films with her husband, and
then they sell them to local schools.
Speaker 2: Through a nonprofit.
Speaker 1: She's made one point four million dollars by charging schools
to screen the films films like The Mask You Live
In that aggressively push students to question their gender identity.
In The Mask You Live In, the materials that support
the film, like so you watch the film and here's
some you know, support materials to hand out to the children.
And do you remember this concoction the genderbread Person? Remember
that one, the genderbread Person that was her group. Gavin's
wife runs this organization.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I don't know if he's going to be sleeping
on the couch.
Speaker 1: Not sure after he made this comment, but I think
he's trying to tack back to a moderate center position
in order to preserve his electoral prospects in a presidential run.
Speaker 2: We'll see if it works.
Speaker 1: All right, that'll do it for this episode.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for listening.
Speaker 1: I could not do the show without your support and
the support of the businesses that advertise on the podcast,
So if you'd like, please support them too and tell
them you heard it here. You can also become a
patron at my Patreon page or go to thepetecleanershow dot com. Again,
thank you so much for listening, and don't break anything
while I'm gone. M