Speaker 1: Get ready for.
Speaker 2: So January seventh, twenty twenty six, allegedly, according to that
Speaker 2: thing we call a calendar, this is what's left of
Speaker 2: your host, Chuck o'ceelly, And of course this is the
Speaker 2: O'Kelly effect. So I'm going on a little early here
Speaker 2: because it was time to get something done, and I
Speaker 2: should have got it done yesterday. And god knows what
Speaker 2: my schedule is going to turn out to be for
Speaker 2: the rest of the week. But before we get to
Speaker 2: the rest of the mess and the best of the mess, also,
Speaker 2: you know what am I gonna do. I'm gonna talk
Speaker 2: to Larry Hancock in just a little while, and I
Speaker 2: got to conclude that in a quick hour. But before
Speaker 2: we get there, the news is starting to explode as
Speaker 2: a constant left and right. You know, I was looking
Speaker 2: to put together a couple of different and show ideas
Speaker 2: to get you the first show of the year in
Speaker 2: the can and I got to say, it's just depressing
Speaker 2: and disturbing as a constant, and there go to Weenie Dogs.
Speaker 2: Of course. Anyway, twenty twenty six is often running in
Speaker 2: cruelty free pants, it looks like, and that's where we're going.
Speaker 2: So I'll tell you what we'll do. Let's just stick
Speaker 2: around a moment, and we'll get right back to you
Speaker 2: as soon as I can take this little break.
Speaker 3: The War State by Michael Swanson explains the great national
Speaker 3: transformation that took place and put the Kennedy presidency in
Speaker 3: the context of the times and reveals never before published
Speaker 3: information about the Cuban missile crisis. President Kennedy would not
Speaker 3: have been assassinated if he had been president two hundred
Speaker 3: years ago. His assassination took place in the context of
Speaker 3: the Cold War and the rise of the national security state.
Speaker 3: Before World War Two, the United States was a continent republic.
Speaker 3: In the decade that followed, it became an imperial superpower.
Speaker 3: Generals such as Curtis LeMay not only wanted to invade Cuba,
Speaker 3: but knew that there were short range missiles on the
Speaker 3: island arn't with nuclear warheads that they could not destroy
Speaker 3: because they were on mobile launchers. Their invasion could have
Speaker 3: led to a Third World War, and they wanted to
Speaker 3: go to war anyway. The War State by Michael Swanson
Speaker 3: reveals why, and we'll show you what President Kennedy.
Speaker 4: Was up against.
Speaker 3: For more information, The Warstate dot.
Speaker 4: Com revelation through conversation.
Speaker 2: Walls dot com, Wall Street, Window dot comd dot com.
Speaker 2: Michael Swanson, the brilliant author of The War State, gives
Speaker 2: you the benefit of his knowledge. Wall Street dot.
Speaker 4: Dot Go there, now go there, now go there now
Speaker 4: Chili dot Com revelation.
Speaker 2: Through calm sage.
Speaker 1: Here is ll you fact?
Speaker 2: What? All right? So back at it because we always
Speaker 2: got a break for we need dogs? Anyways? Is this
Speaker 2: thing on?
Speaker 3: You know?
Speaker 2: That's actually the name of a movie that that came
Speaker 2: out at the end of the year and is out
Speaker 2: there and I think stars the guy who does the
Speaker 2: voice of BoJack Horseman. Believe it or not? Anyway, you
Speaker 2: know what what is going on in the future golf
Speaker 2: courses of Gaza, you know, because they did want to
Speaker 2: build that into a resort, and you know, is that
Speaker 2: war still happening? Is anybody talking about Israel? Well you're
Speaker 2: not supposed to, that's for sure. But should we get
Speaker 2: into other things? How about today's news since nobody really
Speaker 2: cares about that or where it's going or exactly what
Speaker 2: kind of madness or war crimes are being pulled off,
Speaker 2: or maybe we'll get to that in a moment, But
Speaker 2: how about what's happening domestically today? Okay, I love the
Speaker 2: New York Post headline which states protesters protester burns American
Speaker 2: flag in Minneapolis after ICE agent shoots and kills women. Well,
Speaker 2: there's a lot of ways to put that headline out.
Speaker 2: There's a lot of ways to describe it, and the
Speaker 2: administration is reacting in a particular way. You know what,
Speaker 2: I thought? I had the statement. I thought I did.
Speaker 2: Let's see looks like I do. Yeah, I do. I
Speaker 2: have the statement from the Trump administration regarding this, but
Speaker 2: apparently in Minneapolis, and I've looked at this video now
Speaker 2: from a couple different angles. Do you care about my analysis?
Speaker 2: Probably not. You're going to do the roar shock test
Speaker 2: thing anyway and decide to see what it is you
Speaker 2: choose to see. So you know, what I see is
Speaker 2: somebody listen carefully telling this lady to get the hell
Speaker 2: out of air. She's trying to drive away from a
Speaker 2: bunch of Ice agents and local police. There's no rioters present,
Speaker 2: but there are people saying that they were rioting and
Speaker 2: this and that if they were, it was definitely off camera.
Speaker 2: And I've seen more than one angle, even in a
Speaker 2: wide shot there's no rioters on this particular suburban street
Speaker 2: where a singular white woman in a car who was
Speaker 2: not the target of the ice raid. Nobody seemed to
Speaker 2: know exactly what the ice raid was about anyway. She
Speaker 2: was shot and killed by an ICE agent when they
Speaker 2: claimed that she attempted to drive into the ICE agents
Speaker 2: with her car. I don't know. Can you see that
Speaker 2: from the angle of the videos out there? I guess
Speaker 2: I'll leave it up to your judgment. Guess what I see. No,
Speaker 2: they did decide to fire at her, and somebody shot
Speaker 2: across the hood at her. Looks like a reckless discharge
Speaker 2: of a firearm that would not normally be acceptable in
Speaker 2: years past, but we are in a new era. This
Speaker 2: is the statement in response to the shooting and killing
Speaker 2: of this woman in Minneapolis. They did release their name,
Speaker 2: but because it's so early on, I don't even want
Speaker 2: to get into the name release yet, because I got
Speaker 2: a feeling there's a lot more to the story that
Speaker 2: they're going to try and spin and tell, And of
Speaker 2: course witnesses are telling a different story. The video itself
Speaker 2: tells a different story. But here's the statement from the
Speaker 2: government by the.
Speaker 5: Officer on the left, hand side of your screen. Let's
Speaker 5: read through the statement.
Speaker 2: See right there, I was just that was after one
Speaker 2: of the videos that's being shown on the Fox affiliate
Speaker 2: in Minnio in Minneapolis, which they only have one angle,
Speaker 2: but there are one, two, three, three good angles. I see.
Speaker 2: One of them is too much, is obscured to tell
Speaker 2: a lot about what's happening. It's from somebody's cell phone, definitely.
Speaker 2: I don't know if any of these other things come
Speaker 2: from bodycms or anything else, but I do believe we
Speaker 2: also have a homeowner's camera from a property somewhere nearby
Speaker 2: capturing the action. And this was pretty rough because they
Speaker 2: shot her, then she accelerated and crashed, but she might
Speaker 2: have already been dead or on her way to it
Speaker 2: when she did actually crash, but attempting to drive away.
Speaker 2: She was doing while the ICE agent was talking to her,
Speaker 2: that's for sure. Like I said, here's the official statement
Speaker 2: as read by a news anchor in Minneapolis on Fox nine.
Speaker 5: That the Trump administration had put out just a short
Speaker 5: time ago. I believe we have that we have that
Speaker 5: up if we want to take that.
Speaker 2: Today.
Speaker 5: Ice officers in Minneapolis were conducting targeted operations when riders
Speaker 5: began blocking ICE officers, and one of these violent rioters
Speaker 5: weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement
Speaker 5: officers in an attempt to kill them. An active domestic
Speaker 5: terrorism and I.
Speaker 2: Okay, so already they're trying to categorize it a certain way.
Speaker 2: But if you look at who's on the road right there,
Speaker 2: a local or at least a state police presence shows
Speaker 2: up in a truck, not a marked vehicle, and there
Speaker 2: are ICE people all over the place. Apparently their vehicles
Speaker 2: are around. I don't see protesters blocking the traffic in
Speaker 2: the immediate area here, but they did sort of getch
Speaker 2: this woman who was in this reddish SUV looking vehicle
Speaker 2: in the midst of Yeah, a bunch of them pulled
Speaker 2: around on this suburban street. And it's not even like
Speaker 2: there were a lot of people on the street. I
Speaker 2: saw two civilians, one of them yelling and complaining about
Speaker 2: what was going on, like leaning off of a curb
Speaker 2: doing that weird thing where I don't know why, I
Speaker 2: guess we learned to do this as kids, where we
Speaker 2: lean over the edge of the curb to yell at
Speaker 2: somebody or to talk to somebody. It's a weird little
Speaker 2: body motion thing. If you ever take notice when people
Speaker 2: are talking to each other on the street anyway, you
Speaker 2: see somebody doing that. Just before this situation goes hey wire.
Speaker 2: They've got her stopped kind of at a crooked angle,
Speaker 2: like she had just pulled out of somewhere, and they've
Speaker 2: sort of surrounded her. And in the midst of this conversation.
Speaker 2: I don't know how it went because all I heard
Speaker 2: was somebody yelling at her to get out of there,
Speaker 2: or somebody yelling at somebody to get out of there,
Speaker 2: you know, again from a distance with the camera. Who
Speaker 2: knows if there's body cams on anybody nearby, because like
Speaker 2: I said, there is the local or state police that
Speaker 2: showed up in the midst of this too. Tries to
Speaker 2: drive away and yeah, to flee the scene. Basically, it'd
Speaker 2: be like one of those you know videos you see
Speaker 2: on Core TV or whatever where somebody's trying to flee
Speaker 2: the scene and three four shots maybe were fired real quick,
Speaker 2: pop up, a pop, and the second you know, when
Speaker 2: she got about three feet rolling with the car. Now,
Speaker 2: I didn't see anybody standing on foot nearby, nor did
Speaker 2: I see her trying to collide with vehicles. It looked
Speaker 2: like she was trying to avoid vehicles in the very
Speaker 2: short distance that the car made it, because there was
Speaker 2: a little bit of a turn. But then you can
Speaker 2: tell that, you know, there's no longer anybody trying to
Speaker 2: steer that wheel because it goes straight into another car
Speaker 2: parked on the side of the road, bang, without even
Speaker 2: an attempt to avoid it. So so what it looks
Speaker 2: like anyway, But continuing on with this, like I said, Okay,
Speaker 2: today ice officers in Minneapolis were conducting targeted operations when
Speaker 2: rioters began blocking ice officers, and one of these violent
Speaker 2: rioters weaponized her vehicle. Again, I don't see her rioting,
Speaker 2: I don't see rioters around her. Unclear as to whether
Speaker 2: she was aiming at somebody who was on the ground,
Speaker 2: But okay, weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our
Speaker 2: law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them. A
Speaker 2: lot of loaded language here and active domestic terrorism. All
Speaker 2: of these things right here are completely loaded to tell you, look,
Speaker 2: evil woman, we had to kill her. I wonder if
Speaker 2: that's really going to pan out as time goes on here. Anyway,
Speaker 2: The rest of the statement, which the news anchor is
Speaker 2: going to read to you. An ICE officer, fearing for
Speaker 2: his life, the lives of his fellow law enforcement and
Speaker 2: the safety of the public, fired defensive shots. He used
Speaker 2: his training and saved his own life and that of
Speaker 2: his fellow officers. You know, I've been told that I'm
Speaker 2: way too biased about these sorts of things, but I
Speaker 2: urge you to go take a look at the available
Speaker 2: video online and see what you think of whether that
Speaker 2: looks like somebody trying to weaponize their vehicle commit an
Speaker 2: active domestic terrorism aiming at the law enforcement angles I'm
Speaker 2: seeing so far, I would disagree. Perhaps you can see
Speaker 2: it different, and who knows what will come out in
Speaker 2: the next few days. This happened only hours ago, once
Speaker 2: again in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of course there's a lot
Speaker 2: of reaction to it. It is not pleasant. People are
Speaker 2: pissed that now an American citizen they know that they
Speaker 2: released name supposedly and she's been shot and killed by
Speaker 2: an ICE agent. So not happy in Minneapolis. And there's
Speaker 2: been a statement issued by I believe the office of
Speaker 2: the Governor and perhaps the mayor's officer in Minneapolis saying,
Speaker 2: you know, you guys need to get out and thus far,
Speaker 2: the Trump administration has said, predictably, we're going nowhere. Let's
Speaker 2: let the news anchor complete the rest of the statement
Speaker 2: from the Trump administration on Fox nine.
Speaker 5: Nice officer, fearing for his life, the lives of his
Speaker 5: fellow law enforcement and the safety of the public, fired
Speaker 5: defensive shots. He used his training and saved his own
Speaker 5: life and that of his fellow officers.
Speaker 2: Okay, So, like I said, there's definitely lots of violent
Speaker 2: reaction to this right now in Minneapolis, and we're going
Speaker 2: to see some unrest. Now, does this mean we're going
Speaker 2: to see full blown alleged rioting once again? Are we
Speaker 2: going to see actual riding? Are we going to see?
Speaker 2: You know? And why in the hell is this a
Speaker 2: constant problem in Minneapolis. I know that some people figure, well,
Speaker 2: it's because of the very much you know, non citizen
Speaker 2: population over there, the illegal immigrants. Some people would say
Speaker 2: it's because of darker skinned individuals over there, et cetera,
Speaker 2: et cetera. But this is a white woman killed all
Speaker 2: by herself in a truck. One two. You know what
Speaker 2: about the protesters, I know, the terrible liberals, and I
Speaker 2: guess the National Guard. And now we're going to need
Speaker 2: to justify that. I'm telling you this is an ugly
Speaker 2: spiral looking to go no better for anybody in the
Speaker 2: very very near future. That much, I think is absolutely predictable.
Speaker 2: And like I said, ICE is resisting any calls for
Speaker 2: them to leave and all that. Anyway, other things going on.
Speaker 2: What's happened in the past week, Well, the FBI disrupts
Speaker 2: an alleged New Year's Eve attack a man charged with
Speaker 2: attempting to provide material in support to ISIS. Remember I
Speaker 2: was asking where have the terrorist gone not long ago
Speaker 2: in recent discussions before I got disrupted, and yeah, well
Speaker 2: here it is. And according to Justice dot CoV and
Speaker 2: their OPA regarding this, there is definitely this thing that
Speaker 2: happened in guess where, North Carolina. So I'm hearing about
Speaker 2: terrorist attacks in the Carolinas, of course, domestic terrorism from
Speaker 2: people resisting ICE. And meanwhile, what else is going on?
Speaker 2: All right? Blood for oil twenty twenty six, how's that
Speaker 2: working out for you? Oil waxes as traders assess Venezuela fallout. Now,
Speaker 2: that's something according to a couple of news agencies, and
Speaker 2: of course the president of Venezuela, the allegedly illegitimate president
Speaker 2: of Venezuela and his wife both snatched up, captured and
Speaker 2: brought to a New York court to stand for a
Speaker 2: hearing for an indictment. Anyway, a US carries out a
Speaker 2: large scale strike. That's in quotes Maduro and his wife
Speaker 2: quote captured and quote Trump says, and that happened, you know,
Speaker 2: just this week, it's been quite the center of attention,
Speaker 2: Trump says, Maduro captured, flown out as US military conducts
Speaker 2: large scale strike. Again, the use of large scale. They
Speaker 2: want to make sure you know that the scale is
Speaker 2: large regarding this strike. And I think the implications are
Speaker 2: certainly large, that's for certain. I've got a couple of
Speaker 2: video links which I definitely am attaching to the show
Speaker 2: notes for you guys, so you can follow up on
Speaker 2: this and follow the timeline of events. Venezuelan VP appears
Speaker 2: to defy Trump calls Maduro only president in fiery speech. Okay,
Speaker 2: he's the only president. Why is he the only president?
Speaker 2: This New York Post article, by the bye, so remember
Speaker 2: the spin on that. And I'm using the right wing
Speaker 2: sources so you can see it very clearly what's happening here. Anyway, Again,
Speaker 2: the snatch and grab of the wife and the president
Speaker 2: of Venezuela, who allegedly was threatening us with drugs, and
Speaker 2: now you know, we need the oil to screw them anyway,
Speaker 2: But that's happening. And you know, in the initial press conference,
Speaker 2: Trump had said, you know, listen, we had to do this.
Speaker 2: We need good neighbors. We got to make sure your
Speaker 2: neighbors are good. So under the good neighbor policy and
Speaker 2: you know our homeowners Association rules of the Western hemisphere,
Speaker 2: we snatched up Maduro. And you know, it's all good.
Speaker 2: It's all justified. This has to be done. Is it unprecedented, No?
Speaker 2: Is it provocative? Yes? Indeed, could it be seen as
Speaker 2: acts of war against sovereign nations in our own hemisphere
Speaker 2: and caused the Central and South American resistance to American
Speaker 2: policy to increase? Possibly, But of course Trump said no,
Speaker 2: they'll all step in line, and for the most part
Speaker 2: he may be right. But it's interesting to me that
Speaker 2: that is all justifiable and all good under the peace President.
Speaker 2: And meanwhile, you know, if this were done to an
Speaker 2: ally of ours, we would not be pleased. Now, the
Speaker 2: funny part again is that Trump immediately said, hey, look,
Speaker 2: you know that Vice president lady. She's not very good,
Speaker 2: you know, because she came in with Maduro, so she's
Speaker 2: not super legitimate either. But she'll do as she's told
Speaker 2: because we need people on the ground. We're going to
Speaker 2: run Venezuela. That's the language. Even Marco Rubio on the
Speaker 2: Sunday Shows was asked, hey, are you running Venezuela because
Speaker 2: Trumpets sort of indicated that his State Department in foreign
Speaker 2: you know, diplomats will be running Venezuela and the Vice
Speaker 2: president will go along with it. Well, she kind of
Speaker 2: issued a statement as fast as she could to tell
Speaker 2: us all that, yeah, first of all, return our president.
Speaker 2: This is not good and I'm not falling in line
Speaker 2: with anything. So the Trump administration probably ignore that, because
Speaker 2: sovereign leaders of any nation, regardless of whether they're legitimate
Speaker 2: or not or definitely all about our business when we
Speaker 2: feel like it's our business to make it our business.
Speaker 2: And how about this from the White House and what
Speaker 2: might be next regarding you know, because it's kind of
Speaker 2: a bold move. You got to give it that regardless
Speaker 2: of whether you agree or disagree. And I'll be discussing
Speaker 2: it at link with Larry Hancock very shortly, so I'll
Speaker 2: leave my editorialization on the floor, but what might be next?
Speaker 6: And I would point out that the acquisition of Greenland
Speaker 6: by the United States is not a new idea. This
Speaker 6: is something that presidents dating back to the eighteen hundreds
Speaker 6: have said is advantageous for America's national security. The President
Speaker 6: has been very open and clear with all of you
Speaker 6: and with the world that he've used it in the
Speaker 6: best interests of the United States to deter Russian and
Speaker 6: Chinese aggression in the Arctic region. And so that's why
Speaker 6: his team is currently talking about what a potential purchase
Speaker 6: would look like.
Speaker 2: All up, Yeah, a potential purchase. But if that doesn't
Speaker 2: work out or they don't want to do as we
Speaker 2: tell him to, perhaps we'll, you know, pull a Maduro
Speaker 2: kind of situation. I mean to time this again in
Speaker 2: reintroduction of let's go get Greenland into the conversation after
Speaker 2: a large scale invasion of Venezuela and taking a guy
Speaker 2: because you say he's bringing drugs in and he's part
Speaker 2: of a narco state organization, even though he just led
Speaker 2: off the largest leader of a narco state to ever
Speaker 2: be convicted in an American court, just gave him a
Speaker 2: part in that. By the way, was the guy who
Speaker 2: was running Guatemala. I think look back in history, maybe
Speaker 2: you'll see who it was. Trump pardoned rather recently regarding
Speaker 2: NARCO state officials. And he's not one of the independent
Speaker 2: drug dealers that Trump had pardoned, but actually one of
Speaker 2: the state leaders that he pardoned. Here we go, so
Speaker 2: what does this mean for Greenland? And oh, by the way,
Speaker 2: we're crazy enough to do this, maybe we're crazy enough
Speaker 2: to do other stuff. Now she's talking about a purchase,
Speaker 2: and of course Trump has made that all clear. But
Speaker 2: what's very clear to me is the stuff that we
Speaker 2: were told to take as you know, hyperbole, jokes, posturing,
Speaker 2: political you know, peacocking, et cetera, et cetera. All of
Speaker 2: those things that were meant to not be taken seriously
Speaker 2: are only meant to be not taken seriously until they're
Speaker 2: what implemented. So, you know, call me crazy, but I
Speaker 2: would say stay tuned because you never know what will
Speaker 2: be implemented next. Maybe again, it's just me. So let's see,
Speaker 2: I'm a prisoner of war. Okay. In the room for
Speaker 2: Medua's dramatic court hearing, this is an article according to
Speaker 2: the BBC. And I've been looking at the barn Press,
Speaker 2: by the way, not just the BBC, but their stuff
Speaker 2: is clear, concise, and they don't take down their articles
Speaker 2: very quickly after they post them. So you know, Meduro
Speaker 2: says quote I was captured end quote, as he pleads
Speaker 2: not guilty to drug trafficking charges. This according to the
Speaker 2: AP and that's what happened when he went to court.
Speaker 2: What was it yesterday? Anyway, should we continue to pay
Speaker 2: attention to this or should we wait until something else
Speaker 2: is implemented and then we'll re engineer it so that
Speaker 2: it fits the original narrative and the current narrative. And oh,
Speaker 2: by the way, winning guests, we'll have to stay tuned.
Speaker 2: Trump wants to overhaul the President's golf course. He hasn't
Speaker 2: played there yet. That's according to the AP. Okay, let's
Speaker 2: see new redesigned coins marking nations two hundred fiftieth birthday
Speaker 2: began circulating today. Now there's some interesting stuff on redesigned
Speaker 2: coins and how they're really trying to push for Trump's
Speaker 2: face to be on a coin. Now, generally speaking, there's
Speaker 2: been a rule in place for a couple hundred years here, well,
Speaker 2: not quite a couple hundred years, but like say one
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty years easily that we don't put a
Speaker 2: living person on a coin to avoid the appearance of
Speaker 2: like what they do in you know, nation states where
Speaker 2: you have a strong man, dictator or royalty, et cetera.
Speaker 2: Because that's the only time you see a living person
Speaker 2: on the money. But they want to put Trump on
Speaker 2: money like he's a king. You know, gee, those democrats
Speaker 2: are acting like we have a king. Da da duh.
Speaker 2: Can't do that. But same time, let's bring in some
Speaker 2: of the accouterments like putting the guy's face on a coin.
Speaker 2: I don't know. You know, you could say he's been
Speaker 2: a significant figure in the past decade or so, But
Speaker 2: shouldn't we wait a little time for that to cool
Speaker 2: off before you decide, you know, eat the dinner and
Speaker 2: digest it before you decide whether it was actually good.
Speaker 2: Because if you discover you had food poisoning, no matter
Speaker 2: how tasty it was, and the long term effects are
Speaker 2: not good because some of your guests are dropping dead,
Speaker 2: you might want to reconsider your Yelp review of that dinner.
Speaker 2: But again, I'm just crazy. The power of christinome the
Speaker 2: puppy killing garden Nome that is, you know, and the
Speaker 2: no Glove love child ghost of Morton Downey Junior and
Speaker 2: Orange Julius Jesus Wig compels you. In other nostalgia, it
Speaker 2: seems like there are no original ideas, you know, And
Speaker 2: I started taking a look back at a whole bunch
Speaker 2: of stuff on YouTube to see, you know, some of
Speaker 2: the old videos and such. Morton Downey Junior is extremely informative. Hell,
Speaker 2: I might even turn around and try and go get
Speaker 2: us a couple of pieces of audio here real fast,
Speaker 2: let me see what time it is. Yeah, you know what,
Speaker 2: I have time, So I'm gonna take a break and
Speaker 2: go get a couple of pieces of audio if I
Speaker 2: can quickly and give you an idea of how everything
Speaker 2: that's old is new again and continues to recycle itself
Speaker 2: as we move for.
Speaker 4: Like his real history that you were never taught in schools,
Speaker 4: Why the Vietnam War, Nuclear Bombs and Nation Building in
Speaker 4: Southeast Asia by author Mike Swanson, with new documentation never
Speaker 4: seen before that'll open your eyes to events that led
Speaker 4: up to this. Why the Vietnam War, Nuclear Bombs and
Speaker 4: Nation Building in Southeast Asia nineteen forty five through nineteen
Speaker 4: sixty one. Get your copy today at Amazon dot com.
Speaker 4: Why the Vietnam War by author Mike Swanson.
Speaker 5: This is James Corbin at corner Report dot com and
Speaker 5: you're listening to the Ocelly Affect at o'helly dot com.
Speaker 1: Ask the man if from my grandma.
Speaker 7: I got strange days of college, but smell the dream.
Speaker 2: That I.
Speaker 3: Be doing well.
Speaker 7: You believe that Hi within your dime as a bub.
Speaker 1: Well, nor you good dime?
Speaker 7: We got die before manisty, no do well, flatnom me
Speaker 7: your no whatever.
Speaker 2: That Bruce was scared.
Speaker 8: You're kidding me, You're kid me.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So back to it. I just wanted to give
Speaker 2: you a little taste because I've been looking into a
Speaker 2: few things lately about you know, what's old is new again.
Speaker 2: And I'll give you a bunch of stuff that I
Speaker 2: have saved from YouTube so that you can go back
Speaker 2: and look at a whole lot of old TV clips
Speaker 2: to give you an idea about the nostalgia the craziness.
Speaker 2: Oh and also the ucy dot tv YouTube channel was
Speaker 2: restored recently, which does contain a whole bunch of O'Kelly
Speaker 2: effect old shows that I recently mirrored onto my Rumble site.
Speaker 2: So the Rumble channel is, you know, quite a bit
Speaker 2: loaded with I don't know, fifteen twenty new videos this
Speaker 2: month alone, and they're old videos mostly and a couple
Speaker 2: of clips. I mean, I'm gonna get a lot more
Speaker 2: active with video in this coming year, given that I
Speaker 2: can recover and get myself back to my old pace,
Speaker 2: and I am trying to keep a good track of
Speaker 2: the time right out anyway, what else is just randomly
Speaker 2: inserted here into the news at the moment as we
Speaker 2: go post New Year's Uncle Revolution show here on the network.
Speaker 2: How about this? There was an interesting little article put
Speaker 2: out on let's say jonathanderby dot com about who grocthinks
Speaker 2: killed JFK an interesting look at what happens when AI
Speaker 2: tries to solve the Kennedy assassination. And also another article
Speaker 2: which I actually grabbed a YouTube video for this one.
Speaker 2: I grabbed a YouTube video for it as well. But
Speaker 2: let's just give you the YouTube video in the show links,
Speaker 2: And like I say, you look at the show notes,
Speaker 2: you're gonna find plenty of reference links other stuff to read,
Speaker 2: listen to and watch on video as I go. But
Speaker 2: they know you're stealing it self checkout, right, So a
Speaker 2: guy describes how they wait for felonies to arise and
Speaker 2: what it is they're doing strategically, because they always no
Speaker 2: when you're robbing them at the self checkout. A lot
Speaker 2: of people think they're real slick at Walmart because they
Speaker 2: didn't get busted this time for adding on an extra
Speaker 2: salad or whatever else. And indeed, some legitimate mistakes are
Speaker 2: made at the self checkout, but a lot of people
Speaker 2: do you know, you know, what's the difference if I
Speaker 2: write up, you know, I pay for three blocks of
Speaker 2: cheese instead of four, I'll see if I can get
Speaker 2: the fourth one free, and if not, I'll say some mistake. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that happens, And can we blame you, especially given the exorbitant,
Speaker 2: insane and punishing prices of food currently. Not really, I
Speaker 2: would say, you know, But then again, these are my
Speaker 2: opinions and they usually don't match anybody else. And so
Speaker 2: what is it? Oh? Did I mention that there was
Speaker 2: a second celebration in Times Square this past New Year's
Speaker 2: Eve time period, Because not really on the Eve, but
Speaker 2: after midnight at twelve oh four on January one. Yeah,
Speaker 2: on January one, recognizing the two hundred and fifty years
Speaker 2: since you know, morons became oxy happy. But by centennial
Speaker 2: plus a quarter America. I remember the bi centennial in
Speaker 2: seventy six, and you know, illiterate children sang the songs
Speaker 2: of the South on TikTok Live and X and also
Speaker 2: also titties. It just was what it was. So anyway,
Speaker 2: between the ice agent shootings and the weirdness going on
Speaker 2: and the culture wars and culture faux wars that are happening,
Speaker 2: I mean it's like fake fur. I already told you
Speaker 2: about the New Year's Eve alleged attack. I guess that's
Speaker 2: sort of like the millennial reboots. I mean, it is
Speaker 2: a weird time period here, and I just had to
Speaker 2: kick off, you know, the New Year and at least
Speaker 2: get one snap woo news in place here for you, Right,
Speaker 2: So I figured the seventh day is best, But going forward,
Speaker 2: I really want to know what you guys think would be,
Speaker 2: you know, best, because this week I'm gonna talk to Larry.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna talk to Larry Hancock. Actually in about twenty minutes,
Speaker 2: we're gonna have a discussion here on the network, and Larry,
Speaker 2: I hope to keep as a regular guest as long
Speaker 2: as he'll put up with me, uh, because he's the
Speaker 2: most sober and analyst of you know, history and current
Speaker 2: events that I can get who doesn't make hyperbolic statements
Speaker 2: of any kind. But that means, you know, we usually
Speaker 2: lack a lot of controversy, so you know, sober, reasonable
Speaker 2: but still quite alternative viewpoints that you're not gonna get
Speaker 2: anywhere else. I have a tentative schedule with Pierce Redman
Speaker 2: again this week, hopefully to do something fun with him.
Speaker 2: I have a few other guest scheduled, but I mean,
Speaker 2: as far as the focus shows, besides doing the Friday
Speaker 2: night call in, I'd like to hear from you guys
Speaker 2: whether Sundays would be better for a call in show,
Speaker 2: because some people have indicated to me that Fridays just
Speaker 2: a bad day and maybe it would be better off
Speaker 2: two in Sundays as a call in show, kind of
Speaker 2: like warm up the week, you know that way Plus
Speaker 2: is their room for sports here on the network. Does
Speaker 2: somebody really want a sports report? Now? I've been against
Speaker 2: that because I'm not super focused on sports. I know,
Speaker 2: you know, a couple of the old fashioned sports, that's
Speaker 2: for sure, but I mean, I'm not like a great
Speaker 2: analyst on this stuff. I'm not you know, hyper focused
Speaker 2: on and I'm not a big fan of anything. I
Speaker 2: do appreciate the Mets. I've always been a Mets fan.
Speaker 2: I like baseball. I enjoyed watching the World Series this year.
Speaker 2: I will be watching some football as it happens, because
Speaker 2: missus Oh watches football. You know, I appreciate a good
Speaker 2: boxing match, especially heavyweight division, when you got some solidly
Speaker 2: talented people, which currently is not the heavy division. You know,
Speaker 2: there's exhibition joke fights out there, Jake Paul doing whatever
Speaker 2: getting his jaw broke regardless of whose trainer gets dead
Speaker 2: in a car wreck right afterwards, and everything else. You know,
Speaker 2: I'm wondering, do we need a sports report on the network,
Speaker 2: and if so, should I try to find somebody to
Speaker 2: separately dedicate themselves to it. You know, I think we
Speaker 2: need a brand new volunteer to start doing weekly reports
Speaker 2: on some things. And I'm thinking I would love to
Speaker 2: source from you guys, if you wanted to give me,
Speaker 2: like a TikTok style videos of some audio, we could
Speaker 2: produce some videos and audios off of you just giving
Speaker 2: your opinions straight from the hip, but I don't want
Speaker 2: to get stuck with one guy doing it. I would
Speaker 2: need to source, you know, a handful of things. Let's
Speaker 2: just say I wanted to play three good, solid, you know,
Speaker 2: reports from reports from the listeners, listener reports, let's call
Speaker 2: it U. If I want to do three a week,
Speaker 2: I would require probably you know, six or seven be
Speaker 2: submitted every week. I can't get people to send me articles.
Speaker 2: I can't get people to send me audios. They do
Speaker 2: send me links, and I read almost every link that
Speaker 2: I can. Sometimes I get lost in a flood of stuff.
Speaker 2: I mean, even for this little news report where I
Speaker 2: basically focused on some headlines gave you a couple of details,
Speaker 2: that's probably two hundred articles that I went over, various
Speaker 2: videos that I listened to, audio I made, videos, I watched,
Speaker 2: audios I listened to. I mean, there are probably one
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty, easily pieces of media that were consumed
Speaker 2: in order to create the analysis and commentary for what
Speaker 2: amounts to maybe a half hour's worth of discussion here
Speaker 2: on the show. I would love to be able to
Speaker 2: get more stuff from you guys. Now, there's two ways
Speaker 2: to do it, and one is through the call ins,
Speaker 2: if we could get a great variety of call ins,
Speaker 2: and if switching the day would be better. I mean,
Speaker 2: should I hold an online vote for making a new
Speaker 2: call in night? You know? Should we add to the
Speaker 2: Friday night call in? Or should we just drop the
Speaker 2: Friday night show and have myself and Be Pete go
Speaker 2: to another night. Be Pete's always been all for it,
Speaker 2: but I've tried to stick by that format because generally
Speaker 2: B Pete and I don't agree. So you've got two
Speaker 2: different kinds of analysis going on for anything you bring up,
Speaker 2: whether it's social or it's you know, hey, let's talk
Speaker 2: about this band is greater or it sucks. Anything you
Speaker 2: talk about, You've got a diverse group of ideas and
Speaker 2: vantage points coming from me and Be Pete automatically. Plus
Speaker 2: I can talk to him even if you guys don't
Speaker 2: call in for a bit. But I don't want to
Speaker 2: keep doing shows where we've got one two callers. So
Speaker 2: is it the fault of the Friday night? Is it
Speaker 2: just the fact that it's Friday night? I'm thinking most
Speaker 2: of our listeners are not young people that are sitting
Speaker 2: at home you know that are Yeah, they're not young
Speaker 2: people because young people might go out, and even if
Speaker 2: they didn't, they don't feel tethered to their radio for
Speaker 2: a particular time of day or night on a Friday.
Speaker 2: There's maybe some other stuff that happens online on Friday
Speaker 2: that is live that they'd rather listen to, or they'd
Speaker 2: rather hang out on, or they'd rather join, you know,
Speaker 2: for the YouTube live whatever. I want to get away
Speaker 2: from the JFK stuff because I'm sick and tired of
Speaker 2: the community, that's for sure. And you know, took notice
Speaker 2: that I was scrubbed from the Lancer website, but more
Speaker 2: commentary on that later. You know, I had to beg
Speaker 2: to get a picture up on there, and then they
Speaker 2: scrubbed it just as quick. And boy, it's interesting who
Speaker 2: unfriends you when they decide that you're no longer their ally,
Speaker 2: because you know, you really weren't their ally to begin with.
Speaker 2: But I thought you were sort of useful. Now you're not,
Speaker 2: so you're gone. Anyway, That's happened on a whole bunch
Speaker 2: of fronts. That's why I'm glad I at least have
Speaker 2: some contacts with some of my old friends. I'm gonna
Speaker 2: be making some calls to my remaining people that I
Speaker 2: might still speak to in the JFK community soon, and
Speaker 2: you know, aside from Larry Hancock, yeah, I guess that's it,
Speaker 2: you know, as far as respectable JFK people. Who else
Speaker 2: am I still going to speak to? The list is
Speaker 2: very very short, and it was always short, but now
Speaker 2: it's gonna be even shorter. So I want to get
Speaker 2: away from the JFK stuff some because either I'm going
Speaker 2: to write a book and conclude my work on this
Speaker 2: and be done, or you know, or or I'm just
Speaker 2: gonna drop it and not bother to produce a book
Speaker 2: or anything else of significance. I'm working with a co
Speaker 2: writer right now to see about maybe producing a book,
Speaker 2: not telling you what it's about, but it's a different
Speaker 2: book than would have been produced before.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 2: I would love to do The Hitchhiker's Guide to the
Speaker 2: JFK Assassination, which is the working title I've had for
Speaker 2: my JFK book for a long time. Thirty years. The
Speaker 2: hell of a lot of time to put into something
Speaker 2: and really, just you know what, produce a couple hundred podcasts,
Speaker 2: Nobody gives a crap about those, even when I do
Speaker 2: re release them and try to say, hey, guys, you
Speaker 2: know I actually have done some of this stuff before,
Speaker 2: and like a decade ahead of you and five years
Speaker 2: ahead of you, and maybe at the same time some
Speaker 2: of you other people were doing and oh, by the way,
Speaker 2: I always did it differently than anybody. But you know,
Speaker 2: none of that matters. Nobody cares. So why should I
Speaker 2: What should I do? I enjoy doing this art form
Speaker 2: called talk radio. I enjoy doing it my own way
Speaker 2: without somebody forcing their opinions or their angles into my scripts,
Speaker 2: my mouth and my content. I'd like to maintain my independence,
Speaker 2: maybe bring a along some other people. I love theater
Speaker 2: of the mind. It doesn't have to be video. I know,
Speaker 2: every podcast is some weird little video construct, you know,
Speaker 2: mostly on YouTube. And by the way, if you want
Speaker 2: to talk about somebody forcing themselves on somebody else, you
Speaker 2: gotta call it graping, you know, like it's grape ape
Speaker 2: over there doing it now, no kidding. You add a
Speaker 2: G to it and it gets past the YouTube sensors.
Speaker 2: And you know, if something else happens, like in Epstein,
Speaker 2: you know, you sayed somebody or you had KP material,
Speaker 2: you know, I mean everything speaking like you're talking around
Speaker 2: a bunch of five year olds. That's how you survive
Speaker 2: on gotube. And you have to be approved and given
Speaker 2: the blessing of the only ones who can give the
Speaker 2: blessing in the high religious order of the digital book burning,
Speaker 2: which is Google and government approval, and that's the only
Speaker 2: way you're gonna survive. Oh but by the way, you know,
Speaker 2: they are having a little trouble with some of those
Speaker 2: CBS news anchors that really are crappy performers, forget about
Speaker 2: their political points of view. But Barry Weise and injecting
Speaker 2: lots of maga into the media is a thing I get.
Speaker 2: I bet you that there still will be nothing but
Speaker 2: complaints about the liberal media, even though we literally have
Speaker 2: an absolute takeover and a serious swing, which has happened
Speaker 2: more than once. This is not a big shocker, but
Speaker 2: you know, more than one time in history you've watched
Speaker 2: actual conservative elements take over the editorial sections of every
Speaker 2: kind of news, newspaper, broadcast entity. And they've swung both ways,
Speaker 2: and they've swung in weird ways. And it's funny because
Speaker 2: if you're opposed to it, you don't like. If you're
Speaker 2: opposed to it, you recognize it. But at least that's
Speaker 2: the way you used to work. You know, you were
Speaker 2: angry at the liberal media because you were conservative. You know,
Speaker 2: I'm actually a bit more conservative. I mean, I'm not
Speaker 2: as far right as this one. This is the typical template,
Speaker 2: but I'm more conservative and I don't like the liberal media.
Speaker 2: And then others will complain about, well, but all of
Speaker 2: talk radio is conservative. And it is, but that's because
Speaker 2: that's the only thing that ever sold. That's the way
Speaker 2: that used to work, and the liberal media was a
Speaker 2: mirage for the most part. Now there's some of the
Speaker 2: media that was clearly liberally biased, because you had bias
Speaker 2: in all directions, but it was usually directed by the
Speaker 2: people that controlled the money. If the money wasn't there,
Speaker 2: they couldn't produce the liberal content, and the liberals weren't
Speaker 2: giving all the money if you took a look at it.
Speaker 2: You know, I don't know how, but some people are
Speaker 2: telling me, like the Ford Foundation is liberal, and somehow
Speaker 2: or other, the very same people that are working with
Speaker 2: the Koch brothers are now liberals. I mean, I'm very
Speaker 2: confused about this. But the truth about the media is
Speaker 2: that what they can sell is what they can sell,
Speaker 2: and there is a whole lot of Ready for this word,
Speaker 2: I'm going to bring it back, collusion between these different
Speaker 2: corporate entities in order to generate stuff that is a
Speaker 2: marketable and b covers the spectrum, so that independent media
Speaker 2: is superfluous in the process. See, you have no reason
Speaker 2: to look for the alternative. Why did Fox News get
Speaker 2: the blessing it did? Why was an entire TV network
Speaker 2: literally fabricated out of hundreds of wayward independent you know,
Speaker 2: digital media sources of the time, television stations, radio stations,
Speaker 2: you know, the the what was left of the printed stuff.
Speaker 2: A whole lot of consolidation happened there for Rupert Murdoch,
Speaker 2: a foreigner by the way, which they would not normally
Speaker 2: have allowed back then. That was a controversy to fabricate
Speaker 2: an entire media network out of what cobbling together a
Speaker 2: bunch of of independent, failing assets. I mean, much like
Speaker 2: we're watching iHeartRadio collect together. You know, there's really like
Speaker 2: just a couple of entities now that own every single
Speaker 2: radio station that exists. I know, radio Yo, whata a
Speaker 2: you a k Manchuck, I get it. But realistically, if
Speaker 2: you look back at the history, the same type of
Speaker 2: consolidation still occurs now, and it's under a certain flag.
Speaker 2: Why was Fox allowed to be created? Well, on the
Speaker 2: one hand, you had a you know, a sort of
Speaker 2: fu to the PC of the time being created on
Speaker 2: the creative side, like with Married with Children, these are
Speaker 2: controversial episodes. Oh my god, the Simpsons is gonna destroy
Speaker 2: America and will be the outrageous and crazy ones. Who
Speaker 2: do you know? Shows like Women in Prison, which I
Speaker 2: don't think I could even find a copy of one
Speaker 2: of the episodes online now, Women in Prison and the
Speaker 2: earlier stuff, and they would later grow into the alternative media,
Speaker 2: so to speak. Right, So, as soon as that happened
Speaker 2: with Fox and that blessing was given, you saw the CW,
Speaker 2: the UPN Networks and all that kind of stuff being
Speaker 2: cobbled together. It's like, hey, look, we're Paramount Pictures, We're
Speaker 2: the big movie company. Why shouldn't we own TV? Eventually
Speaker 2: you have these you know, super conglomerates that have now
Speaker 2: come together where the you know, these massive media outlets.
Speaker 2: I defy you to tell me where they really begin
Speaker 2: and where they really end, because every time I explore them,
Speaker 2: I find new chasms. You know, It's like going through
Speaker 2: the mind shafts of old They've been abandoned for thirty years,
Speaker 2: but yet we can find caves that are over one
Speaker 2: hundred years old in there. It's amazing. But anyway, Fox
Speaker 2: was allowed to be cobbled together because there was not
Speaker 2: a solid, you know, disruptor network. There wasn't a clear
Speaker 2: controlled opposition with a corporate backing, so there wasn't a
Speaker 2: major you know, printing press for money and to be
Speaker 2: able to control the net narratives in general by handling
Speaker 2: both sides of the equation. See how do you best
Speaker 2: control the politics in America right now? If you've got
Speaker 2: a handle on the so called you know, maga and
Speaker 2: you know, a Republican gop sphere of stuff in combination
Speaker 2: with to some degree, the Rogan sphere and the creative
Speaker 2: you know, we're just gonna say the N word because
Speaker 2: we can, and screw you if you don't like it.
Speaker 2: Attitude era. You put that together with your WWE entertainment,
Speaker 2: and you've got one whole side of the equation. The
Speaker 2: other side of the equation is not the touchy feely
Speaker 2: Oh well man, you know, we're hippies or whatever. I
Speaker 2: don't even know how they categorize these these these really
Speaker 2: bipolar lunatics that are allegedly on the left, because I
Speaker 2: can't even make sense out of them. The most of
Speaker 2: the time. It's it's insanity on steroids. And you can't draw,
Speaker 2: I mean, neither side of the equation. Can you have
Speaker 2: a logical linear argument about anything with because they don't
Speaker 2: think that way. One thing leads to another, what logically
Speaker 2: sets up another is not part of the equation there.
Speaker 2: They just want to win, and they want to win
Speaker 2: based on a principle. And if you really dig down,
Speaker 2: deepen up, you find their principles. They're loud, they're intense,
Speaker 2: they're emotional, but do they make sense with the actions
Speaker 2: and the things that they're supporting and the things they're allowing.
Speaker 2: I'll give you a good example, this snatch and grab,
Speaker 2: you know, with Venezuela. Imagine any other regime in recent
Speaker 2: history pulled this crap publicly. I'm not talking about the
Speaker 2: pleasable deniability of the CIA pulling these things off. And
Speaker 2: get behind the scenes where you know, our president comes
Speaker 2: out and goes, wow, we got some strange news today.
Speaker 2: You know, some armed men showed up and they happen
Speaker 2: to be white people in an all black country, and
Speaker 2: they just escorted the leader out into the woods and
Speaker 2: allowed the opposition to murder him in broad daylight. And
Speaker 2: we don't know how that happened. And oh my goodness,
Speaker 2: it must be the radicals that turned against Momar Khadafi.
Speaker 2: His own people just wanted him dead because I don't know,
Speaker 2: Benghazi asked Hillary. Yeah, it doesn't mean, it doesn't have
Speaker 2: to make sense, but we'll cover it up plausible deniability.
Speaker 2: Of course, the US had nothing to do with it.
Speaker 2: I already see the setup happening for Iran and how
Speaker 2: that's going to be justified by the way quietly, I
Speaker 2: don't know if anybody noticed, but in all the frakas
Speaker 2: and ruckus of Maduro showing up for his indictments is yeah,
Speaker 2: And I did say that on purpose. Indictmentses is you know,
Speaker 2: because I heard somebody screw that up. Maybe you can
Speaker 2: find it online and match me up to the to
Speaker 2: the talking ed it did that. Because that was too funny.
Speaker 2: I couldn't stop laughing at it. It doesn't matter. It's
Speaker 2: irrelevant because logic is irrelevant. The actual cause and effect
Speaker 2: is irrelevant. Nobody cares about the actual ethical consideration logical
Speaker 2: strategic movements here. Like you know, I tell you something,
Speaker 2: why in the hell just forget about what you agree with.
Speaker 2: Let's imagine for a moment that I am a full throat,
Speaker 2: at one hundred percent Trump supporter. I could not support
Speaker 2: what I'm watching happening regarding this situation with Venezuela. And
Speaker 2: here's why this is stupid strategically to allow the entire
Speaker 2: world to see this and to hear these oversimplified explanations
Speaker 2: of well we needed the oil, well they were bringing
Speaker 2: in drugs, but screw that, we had to get him
Speaker 2: because he wasn't legitimate in the first place. Pick a
Speaker 2: lane for your excuse at least and also plausible deniability. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it looks a little sneaky on the back end and
Speaker 2: history my judge you, but not so much. And you're
Speaker 2: not inviting you know, actual patriotic, true believers who would
Speaker 2: get pissed. I mean, think about this, I bet you
Speaker 2: we have more sympathetic people, legitimately organically sympathetic people to
Speaker 2: Venezuela than we do to you know, whatever the hell
Speaker 2: is stand over in many Arab nations where we were
Speaker 2: worried about fighting them over here, you know, and going
Speaker 2: over there to fight them over there, so they didn't
Speaker 2: come over here, so we didn't fight them over here.
Speaker 2: You know, the war on terror thing. We've literally lit
Speaker 2: a fuse on a possible war on terror. If you
Speaker 2: think about the organic elements forgetting that they're evil people
Speaker 2: supporting evil and wanting to destroy America, they could be
Speaker 2: pissed that we just pissed all over their homeland and
Speaker 2: decide that they need to oppose it somehow. And if
Speaker 2: you're calling them terrorists and unwelcome guests and they have
Speaker 2: to be in here illegally to begin with, well, they're
Speaker 2: already going to try to hide if they want to
Speaker 2: hang out in the US. Now you've got double reason
Speaker 2: to hide, and why not in some of these other places?
Speaker 2: And they might be a little easier to settle in
Speaker 2: there than some of the Arabs and everything, because everybody's
Speaker 2: been on high alert for them for twenty years, oh
Speaker 2: excuse me, a quarter of a century since nine to eleven.
Speaker 2: Now almost you know, this is the thing. This sets
Speaker 2: us up for a legitimate possibility of what do we
Speaker 2: call that? Blowback? Backfire, backlash, pick a back. It's definitely
Speaker 2: not a good quarterback move to do these things so publicly,
Speaker 2: so sloppily, and pull off yes, surgical precision on the raid,
Speaker 2: on the snatch and grab on, rolling somebody up for
Speaker 2: a kidnapping and making demands. I get it. You know
Speaker 2: that was going to become obvious. But strategically, just from
Speaker 2: a strategy standpoint, wouldn't it have been better to have,
Speaker 2: you know, people go in there and not be identifiable
Speaker 2: immediately as Americans. No, see the bravado of standing up
Speaker 2: and going no, it's right, We're American and we can
Speaker 2: do what we want, and you're going to do what
Speaker 2: we say. Tell me about the people that are on
Speaker 2: the right side of the equation, I mean the right
Speaker 2: as in, you know, versus left, right of the paradigm.
Speaker 2: Tell me the people that are over there that would
Speaker 2: have agreed with anybody doing that to another sovereign nation,
Speaker 2: to another government. Should we be doing that? The people
Speaker 2: that were saying we need to stop involving ourselves in
Speaker 2: foreign wars, the forever wars need to go away. We
Speaker 2: are not the world's policemen. I've been listening to this
Speaker 2: for four decades from the alleged conservative side of things.
Speaker 2: So there must be some remnants of that in the
Speaker 2: GOP today as we stand, and yet we have zero
Speaker 2: at this point opposition to it. Really, I mean, I'm
Speaker 2: outraged just and you know what, to mark my outrage,
Speaker 2: I'm going to tell you that I'm outraged again. Well,
Speaker 2: Senator Whitman from one of the southern states, tell us
Speaker 2: again how you're outraged? Okay, good luck. This is not working. Okay,
Speaker 2: as far as telling me that this is a logical
Speaker 2: thing to do, this is whatever great leader says works
Speaker 2: just fine, And I'm just fine with that. Anyway. What
Speaker 2: is the Beatles song? And I'm just fine, right, or
Speaker 2: maybe I'm thinking of some other song like it's the
Speaker 2: end of the world as we know it. It's the
Speaker 2: end of the world as we know it, and I
Speaker 2: feel fine, Well, maybe it is, but do you feel fine?
Speaker 2: Stick around? Larry Hancock will be with me shortly here
Speaker 2: on the Ocelli dot Com radio network.
Speaker 8: What's the.
Speaker 4: Times?
Speaker 8: Don't get one time, elf, don't keep it up off?
Speaker 1: No oh.
Speaker 8: No, no, you want to sing the fast one and
Speaker 8: one father for the smallsttructure flex in three districts alt regulated,
Speaker 8: the latest not I've never been No, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 8: Bob and b Sumna with non final sermon, I said
Speaker 8: that don a white shirt. SI I am a Simon
Speaker 8: Webing Finmily Company.
Speaker 2: N no, no no no oh