Speaker 1: And here we go May still, the fifteenth of September
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, allegedly according to that thing we call
Speaker 1: a calendar, and I'm doing a part two and for
Speaker 1: some goddamn reasons open I'm gonna see dogs in a minute. Anyways,
Speaker 1: hello buster. Anyways, here we are broadcasting for part two
Speaker 1: of the Monday night shows that I'm doing, just you know,
Speaker 1: because I gotta get this done by request. You know,
Speaker 1: the very few supporters that I have remain and I
Speaker 1: want to do what it is they ask and I've
Speaker 1: been asked several times to do the news wrap ups,
Speaker 1: and unfortunately, I can only work with what the universe
Speaker 1: gives me. So we're going to dive into the thing
Speaker 1: that everybody else is talking about in this segment which
Speaker 1: I separated, and you know, we're gonna have to do it.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have to talk, you know, Charlie Kirk, and
Speaker 1: I went away from the microphone to try and message somebody.
Speaker 1: I had a little little chaos here in the office quickly,
Speaker 1: but anyway, it is what it is. I gotta talk
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk. I know everybody else and their mother is
Speaker 1: doing this already. I know that, but they're missing everything
Speaker 1: that to me is everything about this. You know, very
Speaker 1: few people are covering it properly, okay, and it's getting
Speaker 1: weird out there, Okay, it just is. You know, Look,
Speaker 1: I go through hundreds of things in order to create
Speaker 1: one podcast. If I do a solo podcast, there is
Speaker 1: no way that less than one hundred pieces of media
Speaker 1: have been consumed. I may show you a list of
Speaker 1: five or six write commentary about it, but me doing
Speaker 1: that is a twenty to one elimination of This is garbage.
Speaker 1: This is pointless. This is repetitive because I'm not here
Speaker 1: to repeat what other people are saying. I'm here to
Speaker 1: look at things from an angle they didn't. And that
Speaker 1: doesn't make me any friends, It doesn't make me fans. Okay.
Speaker 1: They captured this twenty two year old suspect in the
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk assassination. Finally they say they have the right suspect.
Speaker 1: They've caught two other persons of interest before that. That
Speaker 1: people automatically took as guess what the perpetrator. And you know,
Speaker 1: this kid apparently comes from a Christian Republican MAGA home.
Speaker 1: He wasn't with Antifa. Although people are going to tell
Speaker 1: you that he was the slang on his weapon. What
Speaker 1: was written out was actually online gamer stuff. You know,
Speaker 1: it's more about being poned instead of you know, being
Speaker 1: drowned or whatever in you know, woke mob ism whatever.
Speaker 1: I don't know what the terminology is anymore. I don't
Speaker 1: care the left right paradigm, the wing nuts. They're screwing
Speaker 1: together other weird ideas. Now they got a guy, one
Speaker 1: of the first guys that was arrested, right that was
Speaker 1: arrested like moments after the assassination took place. And this
Speaker 1: is a horror show all the way around, not just
Speaker 1: for his family. I don't care about. His wife is
Speaker 1: now gonna, you know, capitalize on his death and go
Speaker 1: around and try and you know, do see exactly how
Speaker 1: she can float along, you know, the will that has
Speaker 1: now been given to him by the establishment, the state
Speaker 1: as well as the outsiders, but not quite the gripers
Speaker 1: all the way to the real friends right now, which
Speaker 1: is saying, no matter how right wing you are, you're
Speaker 1: not right wing enough, which is a gradual progression, just
Speaker 1: like Trump saying, you know, people at Rhinos, if they
Speaker 1: don't agree with me, Republicans in name only, even though
Speaker 1: they were the standard bearers for Republicans for decades, and
Speaker 1: those standards held and they were supposed to be what
Speaker 1: our baseline of real true American values, but they weren't
Speaker 1: Republican enough, just like you can't be woke enough on
Speaker 1: the left. Yes, I'm going to do this too fisted
Speaker 1: because it needs to be done anyway. They captured a
Speaker 1: suspect moments after Charlie Kirk's tragic assass the nation where
Speaker 1: he was hitting the neck whether Bpe's right and it
Speaker 1: was deflected or looks to me like a direct shot,
Speaker 1: but you know, look eyesight, and I'm not doing a
Speaker 1: deep analysis on his shooting just I did see the
Speaker 1: original videos which are now mostly blocked and you know censored.
Speaker 1: You know, the lefty mob is so bad at their
Speaker 1: propaganda that by the time you even begin to research
Speaker 1: their nonsense, if you do a full thorough, deep dive,
Speaker 1: like for an hour or two, they're already retracting their crap.
Speaker 1: The Republicans can't keep it straight because they just wanted somebody,
Speaker 1: anybody to blame and string them up quick. They nailed
Speaker 1: two persons of interest right away, and one of these
Speaker 1: guys was taken away right away and was shown on
Speaker 1: the videos that went viral, you know, saying stuff like
Speaker 1: shoot me, I did it, shoot me, I did it.
Speaker 1: Weirdly left and right wing extremists, the real extremists, Okay,
Speaker 1: not just the ones that are being told they're the
Speaker 1: extremest being pitted against each other in public like normal
Speaker 1: on Fox News and CNN and whatnot. But the real
Speaker 1: deep dark rabbit holes of wokeism, strangeness, and also right
Speaker 1: wing fascism. They're out there and they're arguing but agreeing
Speaker 1: on something very very odd. They think that first guy
Speaker 1: who was screaming shoot me, whose name I'm not even
Speaker 1: gonna mention, might have been present at nine to eleven
Speaker 1: describing the towers falling in New York and guess what,
Speaker 1: he's a crisis actor. I'm not kidding. This is what
Speaker 1: they're pushing in these weird, weird, deep dark holes in
Speaker 1: the extremes. And they had another suspect. They've dosed people,
Speaker 1: terrorized docks and exposed. At least thirty people connected to
Speaker 1: the two persons of interest now have been terrorized and
Speaker 1: had their lives overturned and tossed into disarray, totally disrupted
Speaker 1: because the right Wing thought they might have been somehow
Speaker 1: connected to the perpetrator. But the FBI arrested people, and
Speaker 1: the locals arrested people. And guess what, just like with
Speaker 1: other assassinations, does any of this sound familiar to the
Speaker 1: nineteen sixty three incident. You know, they arrested a couple
Speaker 1: of people before Oswald. What happened there? They had the
Speaker 1: wrong people. Well, they had a couple of the wrong
Speaker 1: people here and Charlie Kirk and one of them, weirdly
Speaker 1: was screaming, I did it shoot me, which very bizarre.
Speaker 1: And there's a lot of bizarre wrinkles in this. No
Speaker 1: matter how, somebody is trying to straighten it out to
Speaker 1: you and tell you, Nope, it's absolutely just this straight line.
Speaker 1: This is a lefty Nope, it's absolutely this straight line.
Speaker 1: This is a maga kid Anyway. I'll get to the
Speaker 1: punchline on that later. But a lot of people are
Speaker 1: trying to oversimplify this and tell you they have all
Speaker 1: the knowledge when they're taking fragmentary information, weaving it into
Speaker 1: the tapestry they want to see it become and telling
Speaker 1: you they've got the truth the scoop on it, you know,
Speaker 1: Biden being unable to handle things in public and other
Speaker 1: incompetent people because they got too old, and whether Trump
Speaker 1: actually has dementia, not much of this matters so much
Speaker 1: in this case. But I got to tell you there
Speaker 1: is something that does matter quite a bit, okay, and
Speaker 1: I'm going to get to it. I'm going to get
Speaker 1: to it, but it's pretty rough and right wing people
Speaker 1: are not going to like it. So let me offer
Speaker 1: the olive branch of peace here as Kerrie Lake delivers
Speaker 1: remarks or whatever it is you want to call it,
Speaker 1: at a Charlie Kirk memorial that was broadcast on c SPAN,
Speaker 1: you know, not on a right wing network or on
Speaker 1: c SPAN. Okay, you know where they keep track of stuff.
Speaker 1: A memorial and prayer service prayer vigil, excuse me, which
Speaker 1: was held at the Kennedy Center in Washington, DC. Okay,
Speaker 1: apparently yesterday Sunday. I'm a place, I'm a Cary Lake's remarks.
Speaker 1: I'm not a fan of carry Lake, but I want
Speaker 1: you to listen closely to how well she definitely signals
Speaker 1: the sentimentality that is being amplified and modulated for a
Speaker 1: particular purpose at a memorial service and prayer vigil ostensibly.
Speaker 2: He's welcome a senior advisor for the US Agency for
Speaker 2: Global Media, Carrie.
Speaker 1: Lately Senior Advisor for the US Agency for Global Media.
Speaker 1: If that's not a Norwellian title, I don't know what is.
Speaker 1: But let's listen to Kerry Lake, because I haven't actually
Speaker 1: listened to all of these comments myself.
Speaker 3: Oh wow, Charlie, you can still draw a crowd.
Speaker 4: And I know that if Charlie were to be told wow,
Speaker 4: you filled up Kennedy Center tonight, he said, it wasn't me,
Speaker 4: it was God.
Speaker 5: God.
Speaker 3: Wheah, miss Charlie.
Speaker 4: I will say that he would be He'd have a
Speaker 4: couple of criticisms tonight he said, where are the smoke machines?
Speaker 3: Where's the confetti? Where are the sparklers?
Speaker 4: When Bobby Kennedy took the stage, because Charlie knew how
Speaker 4: to put on a show to spread the message of
Speaker 4: Jesus Christ.
Speaker 3: It's really did.
Speaker 1: Okay. Charlie Kirk was there to spread the message of
Speaker 1: Jesus Christ. Just just say, you know what.
Speaker 3: There's a in the Book of Genesis.
Speaker 4: There's a Bible quote that says, in so many words,
Speaker 4: it's actually a little easier to understand if I put
Speaker 4: it in modern language.
Speaker 1: In the Book of Genesis, there's a quote and I'm
Speaker 1: not going to quote it. I'm going to give you
Speaker 1: my own version of it because you fill in the.
Speaker 3: Blank what the enemy meant for harm, God will use
Speaker 3: for good. That God is using Charlie card for good.
Speaker 1: Visually, she does have an index card, so I guess
Speaker 1: she needed to stall to find the index card. Well,
Speaker 1: mashing up the meaning of whether I'm going to quote
Speaker 1: something or paraphrase it.
Speaker 3: But okay, I'm heartbroken. Got Charlie's loss thirty one and
Speaker 3: somebody took his life. I got the call on Wednesday.
Speaker 3: I was working and a friend of.
Speaker 4: Mine call him said, as Charlie, Okay, ever, rebody was shot,
Speaker 4: said Charlie.
Speaker 3: Who couldn't have been chart Charlie Kirk and I got
Speaker 3: on of course, I went to Twitter, like how many
Speaker 3: of you went to Twitter? To Twitter?
Speaker 4: And I saw a clip of people running.
Speaker 3: And I thought, that doesn't look good. That doesn't look good.
Speaker 4: I knew Charlie was starting up this amazing movement where
Speaker 4: he was going to go campus to campus to talk
Speaker 4: about America and what's happening in America, which is so amazing.
Speaker 4: And so powerful and talk to people who disagreed with him,
Speaker 4: debate them. There's nothing more peaceful than that. Our first
Speaker 4: clip I saw was of people running, and I thought,
Speaker 4: that looks bad, but of course everything's going to be fine.
Speaker 3: And then I saw another clip and it was Charlie being.
Speaker 4: Asked a question, and out of nowhere, an assassin's bullet
Speaker 4: came through the crowd and hit him in the neck.
Speaker 4: We saw his head, we saw the blood, and we.
Speaker 3: Saw them go down.
Speaker 4: We've got to stop this, folks, we can't let this
Speaker 4: go on. This violence has got to stop.
Speaker 1: It might help to stop the violence if you don't
Speaker 1: give people the idea that they are of the devil
Speaker 1: and evil. They could be your opponents, they could disagree
Speaker 1: with you, but they're not automatically Satan's work. See when
Speaker 1: you do that, she's using metaphor jokes, you know, nuances
Speaker 1: that she may or may not understand at all. But
Speaker 1: she knows well enough. She's been a politician long enough,
Speaker 1: and she's the head of Global whatever the hell or
Speaker 1: wellyan title that we now have for her. She knows
Speaker 1: well enough that you can't take every word that is
Speaker 1: stated seriously, because not I mean especially as a politician.
Speaker 1: She knows not every word that comes out of a
Speaker 1: human figure's face is one that they actually mean. They're
Speaker 1: insincere often, so you can't take what they say that seriously.
Speaker 1: So when you declare someone evil, Satan's work, Satan's soldier,
Speaker 1: the enemy of all things that matter to you, that
Speaker 1: are taking away your country, your life, your race. When
Speaker 1: you tell people that that's the case, that is how
Speaker 1: you encourage someone to go, I am a soldier for God.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna do God's work. And that's a logical and
Speaker 1: righteous thing, doing God's work. And how do you do
Speaker 1: God's work? You combat evil? How many times does that
Speaker 1: have to be drilled into the Judeo Christian mind before
Speaker 1: you realize that a small percentage of you will take
Speaker 1: it seriously, because you will, and some of you can
Speaker 1: accomplish great things when you do. I've encouraged Christians by
Speaker 1: counseling them as a minister, to utilize precisely that the
Speaker 1: idea the divinity is within you, that God blessed you
Speaker 1: with it, that you are special because you know what,
Speaker 1: Almost every religion teaches the followers that they are special
Speaker 1: because they are and they're not wrong. They I got
Speaker 1: problems with the you're the old only people that are special,
Speaker 1: like when you become the chosen ones, You're the only
Speaker 1: true follower of God's law. You're the only one who
Speaker 1: is following the right God literally the definition of devices.
Speaker 1: But to encourage people that God is within them and
Speaker 1: they should behave as God would want them to. Some
Speaker 1: people might decide that if they are true follower of Christ,
Speaker 1: they're going to behave like Christ. And if they did,
Speaker 1: they'd be disruptive to some of the institutions that they're
Speaker 1: bowing to. If they decided to be christ like, to
Speaker 1: use Christian as a verb, and if they were acting
Speaker 1: as the Father and the Holy Spirit, the entirety of
Speaker 1: the Trinity, and they did their best through their imperfect
Speaker 1: human vess vessel to do so without regard to having
Speaker 1: to destroy or denigrate others, but seeking to uplift all,
Speaker 1: because all are God's children. If that was done, and
Speaker 1: that was followed in its true spirit, I would have
Speaker 1: no objection to how you interpret your book. You don't
Speaker 1: read it properly, you don't read it entirely, and you
Speaker 1: don't read a properly you know, transcribed nor translated version.
Speaker 1: But that's okay if you could keep the spirit. I
Speaker 1: am willing to encourage as a multi faith listener, a
Speaker 1: multi faith minister in people that are devout Christians. Take
Speaker 1: that spear it even if you don't look. You don't
Speaker 1: have to fully understand everything. Ah, why God would not
Speaker 1: expect you to understand all that which is under you?
Speaker 1: Know God? Because God is God. Look at your hierarchy,
Speaker 1: there's only one of those according to your faith. You
Speaker 1: can't be expected to be God. You can't even try
Speaker 1: to be God, blasphemy. But you have that spirit in you.
Speaker 1: You have that gift. And that gift is not a
Speaker 1: gift that you take and you just covet and you
Speaker 1: hide away from others. That is a gift that you
Speaker 1: grant others by doing, by serving, by being a minister
Speaker 1: of sorts one way or another. This is the the
Speaker 1: type of thing that I do in religious counseling. I
Speaker 1: know it sounds crazy from what you hear on my
Speaker 1: show usually, but that's a separate role for me. I
Speaker 1: don't normally do and I don't like to bring religion
Speaker 1: onto this show. I haven't done it much over the
Speaker 1: years at all. I've talked about morality, but religion and
Speaker 1: that type of spiritual conversation, I've discouraged it because too
Speaker 1: many people take that to be the ultimate divisive mechanism. Because,
Speaker 1: as I said, if the logic works, you're of God,
Speaker 1: you are in God's image, all that stuff true with
Speaker 1: absolute certainty. And then you have others who are on
Speaker 1: your team telling you, but this is the evil of
Speaker 1: the tyrannical. This is literally the work of the devil. Well,
Speaker 1: the righteous and godly man is required to destroy that.
Speaker 1: That's not even murder, to destroy that, that is to
Speaker 1: punish and remove evil. In fact, you save lives by
Speaker 1: taking that life. I've heard that many a time, and
Speaker 1: you know what, I can see the logic in it.
Speaker 1: If somebody stops the mass murderer before he murders the mass,
Speaker 1: I mean, it almost sounds like I'm gonna go into
Speaker 1: star trek here. You know, the right, the needs of
Speaker 1: the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one. Indeed,
Speaker 1: they do. It's the logical balance. It's a logical scale.
Speaker 1: If the idea is that one man dies to prevent
Speaker 1: the death of many more, it's a dicey area because
Speaker 1: all life is supposed to be equally sacred. But again,
Speaker 1: these are the things that are forgotten in the teaching
Speaker 1: because they remember the part about the eye for an eye,
Speaker 1: but they don't know how they got to making that determination,
Speaker 1: and they forget again that the Christ character in the
Speaker 1: book says many times I am the new law, the
Speaker 1: old laws or for the old people. Since I'm here,
Speaker 1: guess what new sheriff new rules. I'm not mocking this.
Speaker 1: I'm telling you that literally, it says that in any
Speaker 1: of your Bibles, no matter how you read it, the
Speaker 1: red words that Christ is supposed to have spoken, whatever
Speaker 1: variation in the Catholic Bible. A couple other Bibles add
Speaker 1: or subtract a chapter, but I'm telling you it's retained
Speaker 1: in all of them. The Christ is the new Covenant.
Speaker 1: He is the new law in and of himself. Do
Speaker 1: things my way and you follow the law. It's right there.
Speaker 1: But anyway, when I'm listening to somebody else flinging religion
Speaker 1: around in a certain way, I gotta tell you, I
Speaker 1: find some of this efensive. But I'm going to continue
Speaker 1: and just let carry Lake play a little through, and
Speaker 1: we're gonna get into less serious things and more important
Speaker 1: issues where I have a worldly obligation, just like a
Speaker 1: man who is of Christ and christ like has an
Speaker 1: obligation to confront and prevent evil from thriving. I feel
Speaker 1: I have an obligation to point out that which is
Speaker 1: no one seems to want to face or think about,
Speaker 1: doesn't make me friends. And oh Christ says something about
Speaker 1: that in the Bible too. This ain't going to make
Speaker 1: your friends, but it will make for a time when
Speaker 1: you know you did right, and that's when things get
Speaker 1: a lot easier on you than they would be if
Speaker 1: you were in the wrong. But let's continue with Carrie
Speaker 1: Lake and her pseudo Christian interpretations that she applies to
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk, the people in this place, and that the
Speaker 1: Kennedy Center of all places in between jokes and her
Speaker 1: index cards.
Speaker 3: And I'm not.
Speaker 4: Gonna say our side is perfect, but damn it, this
Speaker 4: is coming from the other side. How does a twenty
Speaker 4: two year old become so filled with hate?
Speaker 3: Five years earlier, I was told he was a Trump supporter.
Speaker 4: And we sent our kids off to college and they
Speaker 4: brained Washington. I am making a pleat of mothers out there.
Speaker 1: Okay, So he spent his whole life in a Conservative
Speaker 1: Republican House. So far as what's being reported lately, Trump
Speaker 1: supporter actually had a Halloween costume where he's sitting on
Speaker 1: Trump's shoulder a couple of years back, and he spent
Speaker 1: a couple of months. He didn't go to college for
Speaker 1: years or dive deep. He went to college for a
Speaker 1: couple of months, kind of barely attended left, and that
Speaker 1: was enough to brainwash him away from all that all
Speaker 1: important upbringing that he had in the conservative Christian Republican House.
Speaker 1: Just realize the maths she's throwing at you. Mothers, Make
Speaker 1: sure they don't deprogram your children that you programmed. Not
Speaker 1: so good if they broke it in two months at
Speaker 1: a college that he barely went to. Criticizing Carrie Lake here,
Speaker 1: not justifying this kid who's obviously got a psycho issue,
Speaker 1: and he's clearly got a problem. He's not cooperating, which
Speaker 1: is weird because a guy who wants to write announcements
Speaker 1: on a bullet and wants to kill somebody in public
Speaker 1: who doesn't want to take credit for it. I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you, it reminds me of another shooter. They told
Speaker 1: me I'd absolutely certainly done it. I'm not saying this
Speaker 1: kid is innocent, not at all. But something's wrong with
Speaker 1: the story so far. And I think as we go
Speaker 1: through a couple other audio clips and other things happening,
Speaker 1: if you're thinking for yourself, you might see what's wrong
Speaker 1: with the story as we go. And it's not carry
Speaker 1: Lake's story, although she's carrying the echo of it in this.
Speaker 1: You know, let me use God as another weapon speech.
Speaker 4: Do not send your children into these indoctrination camps.
Speaker 1: Up are you ah? The indoctrination camp that I say again,
Speaker 1: broke your fine upbring in a month or two.
Speaker 4: At one moment, that twenty two year old who shot
Speaker 4: Charlie was a baby in his mother's arms, and by
Speaker 4: all accounts, those parents did a good job raising him until.
Speaker 3: He was sent off to be brainwashed.
Speaker 4: We have lived through the most horrific brainwashing campaign in
Speaker 4: the history of mankind.
Speaker 1: This I concur with. But this kid is not good
Speaker 1: enough proof of it for going to college. Now. There
Speaker 1: is brainwashing going on that, from what we can tell
Speaker 1: so far, is evident in this kid's life. He was
Speaker 1: brainwashed into violence from his otherwise more stable kind of
Speaker 1: you know, consistent upbringing and programming. No matter what you
Speaker 1: think of it, there was a you know, there was
Speaker 1: conservatism before Trump and pre Trump. You know, I know
Speaker 1: it seems like one hundred years ago, but quite honestly,
Speaker 1: the guy didn't get selected until twenty sixteen, right, so
Speaker 1: less than a decade ago. Conservatism didn't mean following Trump
Speaker 1: guys twenty two. So when he was twelve, there was
Speaker 1: no trump Ism. There was no maga maga maga, not really.
Speaker 1: I mean, maybe his parents were there right at the beginning,
Speaker 1: but even so, oh, maga maga maga didn't really happen
Speaker 1: until this guy started a run in ten years ago
Speaker 1: intensely against Hillary. Lock her up. And he was twelve
Speaker 1: by then, a lot of his formative years already done.
Speaker 1: I've got much more serious questions than the you know,
Speaker 1: it's easily debatable, and we could talk about it, and
Speaker 1: we could debate, and we could argue over exactly what
Speaker 1: spiritual forces are at play here. It's hard to empirically
Speaker 1: prove that someone is of for and by the devil.
Speaker 1: That's for sure, it really really is. But there's a
Speaker 1: lot of better questions here, and I do mean a
Speaker 1: lot of better, better questions to be asked about. What's
Speaker 1: happening here? Why is it that how many wrongs make
Speaker 1: the right paradox both sides? Like I told you, I mean,
Speaker 1: the most extreme sitting here going what the hell crisis
Speaker 1: actors insane? That is, by the way, I say again,
Speaker 1: I don't endorse that crap at all. You know, blame
Speaker 1: whitey tidy, righty hook and race bait. Yeah, that's going
Speaker 1: on from the left. It's not very coherent, but again
Speaker 1: it is the left. It is eerily more coherent than
Speaker 1: most things that those fools spit out. But you know,
Speaker 1: it's the keystone cops of you know, cognitive organization there.
Speaker 1: The right is well organized and well focused. I mean,
Speaker 1: don't get confused by you know, the former Hindu currently
Speaker 1: Christian talking about Valhalla. That kind of makes sense if
Speaker 1: you understand right wing ism and the newly adopted white people.
Speaker 1: It all makes sense. But then again, maybe some of
Speaker 1: it doesn't. Right, Maybe some of it doesn't. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I gotta say, b Pete loves that guy Gutfeld on Fox.
Speaker 1: But another thing I found offensive regarding God from Fox
Speaker 1: recently was Gutfeld in his statement, let's see if you
Speaker 1: can catch what I find offensive here?
Speaker 6: So their legacy grows in Charlie's will too, beyond his
Speaker 6: wildest dreams. And where Charlie is right now, he is fine.
Speaker 5: I picture God asking him for his autograph.
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk is fine because he's in heaven, and that's
Speaker 1: Gutfield's idea, but also he thinks God is going to
Speaker 1: ask for Charlie Kirk's autograph. Anybody want to look up
Speaker 1: hyperbolic in a dictionary somewhere, just somewhere.
Speaker 3: To be public.
Speaker 7: It should be quick, it should be televised. By the
Speaker 7: way you could sell, you could force the government wat
Speaker 7: you could have brought to you by Coca Cola to
Speaker 7: be public. It should be quick, it should be televised.
Speaker 1: That's Charlie Kirk's idea about public executions. Later on in
Speaker 1: that discussion, he goes on to talk about how they
Speaker 1: should be by guillotine, and his panel starts talking about
Speaker 1: how young should the children be allowed to watch it.
Speaker 1: I don't know if that part is in the Bible somewhere.
Speaker 1: Maybe somebody can give a chapter and verse on that,
Speaker 1: but I don't recall. I mean, then again, people find
Speaker 1: parts of stories and say that's an encouragement sometimes, and
Speaker 1: there are rabbis and priests that will agree with that concept.
Speaker 1: But I guess that's the difference between being a Methodismist
Speaker 1: or a Methodist and you know, maybe rewriting the whole
Speaker 1: thing and trying to make it strange and talking about
Speaker 1: how you know, the darker your skin is, the lower
Speaker 1: and closer you are to Hell like the Mormons did.
Speaker 1: I guess there are nuances to be had. I'm going
Speaker 1: to talk about the thing that I find most offensive
Speaker 1: about all this, and it's got nothing to do with
Speaker 1: God in the next segment year and finally get this
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk thing dispatched with as far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 1: although people are going to continue to talk about it
Speaker 1: and it'll continue to be the spell cast through the
Speaker 1: casts in order to maintain the Caste system. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: one that we have in America now that you better
Speaker 1: believe is a lot more real than Charlie Kirk thought
Speaker 1: it was. There are no starving children in America. The
Speaker 1: only reason why people don't have things because they need
Speaker 1: to get a job. Well, Dad, what else did.
Speaker 3: The be.
Speaker 1: Sticking around it? How do that go? Ahead?
Speaker 3: Call it the truth about the Jafa assassination?
Speaker 1: Right? Well, what do you want to know.
Speaker 4: Wild claim Oswal girlfriends he knew Ruby and Barry cancer weapons.
Speaker 1: Really, I imagine I could claim I have four wheels.
Speaker 1: It doesn't make me a wagon.
Speaker 4: But Okaywal was on the building and trying to prevent
Speaker 4: the murder of John Kennedy.
Speaker 8: Come on, now, has it real?
Speaker 5: Effert on the DAFA assassination.
Speaker 1: Go to Amazon dot com enter Judith Baker in her
Speaker 1: own words. You'll get the results for a digital copy
Speaker 1: of a book where Walt Brown us is her own
Speaker 1: words and the known evidence in the case. To get
Speaker 1: at well a different perspective, let's say you can get
Speaker 1: Judithari Baker in her own words from the author himself,
Speaker 1: signed if you request it by contacting doctor Brown at
Speaker 1: k I A s j f K at aol dot com.
Speaker 1: It's a fun book and it actually dissects the many,
Speaker 1: many fantastic claims Judith very Baker in her own words.
Speaker 3: Thank you all the great information.
Speaker 2: The views expressed by callers, stools, there anyone else who
Speaker 2: happens to get on the air o'jlly dot com do
Speaker 2: not necessarily reflect the views of Jelly dot com or
Speaker 2: Jeff O'Kelly, and we are not responsible for any stupidity
Speaker 2: which might ensue. Thank you.
Speaker 9: This is James Corbet at Corpa Report dot com and
Speaker 9: you're listening to the olly affected o'helly dot com.
Speaker 1: My name is Alex the Duel. I'm gonna turn you out,
Speaker 1: Phara and Farah and I practice person Night and Drelaw.
Speaker 1: I'm from Macon, Georgia dot com Radio network.
Speaker 6: Is what would I do? Revelation through conversation in a
Speaker 6: radio show slash podcast. You want the good news, listen
Speaker 6: to the o'helly effect. Check o'celly is the most underrated
Speaker 6: voice in all media, news, education, and entertainment. The Daily
Speaker 6: Bread from o'helly dot com. Go there, save yourself from ignorance.
Speaker 7: Revelation though, sage.
Speaker 8: Go ahead, calin, I'm the truth about the Jafay assassination.
Speaker 1: Right, Well, what do you want to know?
Speaker 3: Judy Baker's wild claim Oswald girlfriends you knew? Ruby and
Speaker 3: Barry answer weapons?
Speaker 5: Really?
Speaker 1: I imagine I could claim I have four wheels. It
Speaker 1: doesn't make me a wagon.
Speaker 2: But okay, Oswald was on the building and trying to
Speaker 2: prevent the murder of John Kennedy.
Speaker 8: Come on now, has a.
Speaker 5: Real effort on the Day of hay assassination.
Speaker 3: Book into Claims.
Speaker 1: Go to Amazon dot com enter Judith Baker in her
Speaker 1: own words. You'll get the results for a digital copy
Speaker 1: of a book where Walt Brown utilizes her own words
Speaker 1: and the known evidence the case to get at well
Speaker 1: a different perspective. Let's say you can get Judith Barry
Speaker 1: Baker in her own words from the author himself, signed
Speaker 1: if you request it by contacting doctor Brown at kias
Speaker 1: jfk at aol dot com. It's a fun book and
Speaker 1: it actually dissects the many, many fantastic claims. Judith Vary
Speaker 1: Baker in her own words.
Speaker 6: Thank you for all the great information.
Speaker 5: The War State by Michael Swanson explains the great national
Speaker 5: transformation that took place and put the Kennedy presidency in
Speaker 5: the context of the times, and reveals never before published
Speaker 5: information about the Cuban missile crisis. President Kennedy would not
Speaker 5: have been assassinated if he had been president two hundred
Speaker 5: years ago. His assassination took place in the context of
Speaker 5: the Cold War and the rise of the national security state.
Speaker 5: Before World War II, the United States was a continental republic.
Speaker 5: In the decade that followed, it became an imperial superpowers
Speaker 5: such as Curtis LeMay not only wanted to invade Cuba,
Speaker 5: but knew that there were short range missiles on the
Speaker 5: island armed with nuclear warheads that they could not destroy
Speaker 5: because they were on mobile launchers. Their invasion could have
Speaker 5: led to a Third World War, and they wanted to
Speaker 5: go to war anyway. The War State by Michael Swanson
Speaker 5: reveals why, and we'll show you what President Kennedy was
Speaker 5: up against. For more information, The Warstate dot Com Nuclear Holocaust.
Speaker 8: You know what uranium is?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: I think called nuclear weapons and other things.
Speaker 8: Like lots of you know what uranium is right?
Speaker 2: The use expressed by callers schools There anyone else who
Speaker 2: happens to get on the aera of jelly dot com
Speaker 2: if you not necessarily reflected he views of Jelly dot
Speaker 2: com or Jeff Jelly and we are not responsible for
Speaker 2: any stupidity which might ensue.
Speaker 5: Thank you.
Speaker 3: Devilation through Conversation.
Speaker 1: Segment number two of this particular snapfoo news or news snaffoo.
Speaker 1: I don't know, maybe we should I think it should
Speaker 1: be snapoo news anyway, segment number two of podcast number
Speaker 1: two from this Moonday or Monday night. Here we go
Speaker 1: and let's try and keep it tight. The bottom line is,
Speaker 1: I'm much more offended by something else here. Yeah, that's right,
Speaker 1: I'm listing my grievance is my offended, snowflake ish thing.
Speaker 1: You know, So people that are gonna vote for jd vance,
Speaker 1: you've decided the PayPal mafia should run the country. Just
Speaker 1: so you know. I see Aaron Franzis responding on Twitter
Speaker 1: to somebody who's saying that and just letting the world
Speaker 1: know they will be voting for j Evans because they
Speaker 1: think Donald Trump might not run again. But if Trump
Speaker 1: runs again, hey maybe maybe maybe. Look, this is what
Speaker 1: I find even more offensive, the fact that, no matter what,
Speaker 1: the right side of the equation continues to support their
Speaker 1: people even when they can't do the job. Cash Pattel,
Speaker 1: who's probably gotta give, Like I say, Hunter k and
Speaker 1: Cash to guess who the alleged shooter's dad. That's what
Speaker 1: they were offering, and that's what they were offering within
Speaker 1: hours of the assassination of Charlie Kirk. But let's put
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk aside. My feelings about him, my thoughts about him,
Speaker 1: are not important. It's a tragedy. It's a horrible thing.
Speaker 1: A thirty one year old who is not directly harming
Speaker 1: anyone should not be shot dead for any reason, and
Speaker 1: the perpetrator should be punished. Very simple. However, when you
Speaker 1: have a guy like Cash Patel heading up the FBI,
Speaker 1: guess what you get ineptitude and idiocy for the sake
Speaker 1: of gaining TV and online viral presence. What am I
Speaker 1: talking about? Right? This guy, foolish enough went out and
Speaker 1: made a public statement that they had already gotten the
Speaker 1: shooter when they grabbed one of these other guys. I
Speaker 1: think it might have been the guy that some of
Speaker 1: these wing nuts thinking it was a crisis actor who
Speaker 1: was screaming shooting me I did it kind of logical
Speaker 1: to think maybe he did it. But then again, a
Speaker 1: mental case could be yelling anything at any time under pressure.
Speaker 1: A shot was fired and people went to run in.
Speaker 1: There was clearly a high stress environment on the campus.
Speaker 1: What was the old guy doing there? Anyway? I don't
Speaker 1: want to ask those questions. I'm not feeding the crisis
Speaker 1: actor police at this point. No, let's get into it.
Speaker 1: Cash Betel makes public statements we got the shooter, not,
Speaker 1: we got a suspect, not, we've taken someone. He is
Speaker 1: not careful about his statements, just like Donald Trump, who
Speaker 1: went on Fox and Friends, Oh, I'm happy we got
Speaker 1: the guy. You know, Richard Nixon made this mistake with
Speaker 1: Charles Manson where he said, we've got the murderers before
Speaker 1: they were convicted. We got this due process thing here
Speaker 1: for anybody who's under the jurisdiction of the United States,
Speaker 1: and this shooter is from all accounts, I understand a
Speaker 1: citizen too. So you know, no matter what circular, stupid
Speaker 1: argument you want to make about the Constitution, he's got
Speaker 1: rights as a defendant, including to a vigorous defense. And
Speaker 1: guess what that can now include a subpoena for the
Speaker 1: FBI director to have him come up and say you
Speaker 1: said that you had the other guy and he was
Speaker 1: the guy. Now you captured my client and said he
Speaker 1: was the guy. Which time were you wrong and which
Speaker 1: time were you just talking out your ass and not
Speaker 1: knowing what you're talking about. And you're the head of
Speaker 1: the agency and you're the taskmaster because you fired the
Speaker 1: superiors that would have been running that investigation and making
Speaker 1: that statement in that particular location, and you rushed to
Speaker 1: the podium to make ill timed and ill advised statements
Speaker 1: that a local yocal prosecutor would not bother to make
Speaker 1: to the media in any murder case. So, FBI Director Patel,
Speaker 1: which time were you either inept or incorrect? And how
Speaker 1: do we know that you were in apt or incorrect
Speaker 1: on on one occasion and not both. This is what
Speaker 1: we call reasonable doubt, folks. Now, I'm not a lawyer, true,
Speaker 1: but even you've seen a courtroom drama and often reasonable
Speaker 1: doubt comes up. But there's more to it than this.
Speaker 1: This guy's literally in charge of an agency where arguments
Speaker 1: could be made that for political reasons, for the reasons
Speaker 1: of his own emotional creation, or to satisfy agendas outside
Speaker 1: of the correct implementation of investigation and justice. Being careful
Speaker 1: to not poison the tree from which the evidence is
Speaker 1: the fruit of You're responsible to do that, right, So
Speaker 1: which time were you screwing that up or not? And
Speaker 1: by the way, since you made emotional statements ill advised
Speaker 1: once again about how you're gonna nail this person and
Speaker 1: now you're going to see him in Valhalla because you're
Speaker 1: clearly Nordic Aryan warriors. Okay, that's what that means out
Speaker 1: there in a righteous battle and now your fallen brother.
Speaker 1: Do you think possibly? Because other people might be recused
Speaker 1: from investigations if they knew the murder victim. But you're
Speaker 1: not only involved with it, you're driving it. You're driving
Speaker 1: the public, contaminating the jury poll how many aspects of
Speaker 1: reasonable doubt did cash Bettel open up? Whoever is going
Speaker 1: to prosecute this thing to have to deal with? Plus
Speaker 1: releasing fragmentary evidence, okay, violating Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, all
Speaker 1: kinds of stuff on various people's behalf. The right to
Speaker 1: a fair trial kind of tainted here presumption of innocence,
Speaker 1: which is also one of those things in our due
Speaker 1: process facing your accusers when multiple accusers have now emerged
Speaker 1: regarding him committing a crime, a competent defense lawyer with
Speaker 1: a little bit of imagination could probably bury the prosecution
Speaker 1: in motions. And all you need is a couple of
Speaker 1: jurors to create guess what hung jury during nullification repeatedly,
Speaker 1: And since you made sure to amp this up to
Speaker 1: heated status, you're almost guaranteed you know somebody in Utah.
Speaker 1: I mean it's not highly likely, but it's possible now
Speaker 1: that you could get jurors in Utah or any other
Speaker 1: venue you bring this trial to. Somebody might want to
Speaker 1: nullify this just to stick it to your conservative ass
Speaker 1: because you have run around and made it into this
Speaker 1: you and President Trump and other people. The only person
Speaker 1: being responsible, frankly, during the public proclamations about this investigation
Speaker 1: is the governor of Utah, who has been intelligent about
Speaker 1: the statements he made. Hm hm. Nonetheless, this guy ran
Speaker 1: out made all sorts of public proclamations, had the President
Speaker 1: of the United States making some fairly let's call them,
Speaker 1: what do you call that. Let's see indicative statements where
Speaker 1: you indicate something you kind of infer inferred statements that
Speaker 1: could lead someone to believe that there is no reason
Speaker 1: to even have a trial. And you have not only
Speaker 1: gone ahead and done that with less evidence than than
Speaker 1: than than a solid game two turns into clue the
Speaker 1: board game. Okay, you've done that with fragmentary evidence similar
Speaker 1: to that. Okay, but you're also possibly creating a way
Speaker 1: for the perpetrator, if indeed this kid is the perpetrator,
Speaker 1: to escape punishment because you're not interested in doing your
Speaker 1: job properly, or you don't know how to do it properly.
Speaker 1: But you're all about going after that collective punishment and
Speaker 1: civil war which you want to prosecute as opposed to
Speaker 1: the perpetrator. Okay, And I know conservative guys are going
Speaker 1: to be pissed at this me saying is how dare you? Well,
Speaker 1: let's be honest, man. You know the US Constitution is
Speaker 1: practically holy doctrine to some people. And and you know, basically,
Speaker 1: why not just wipe your backside with the other hand
Speaker 1: while you hold it in either the left or right hand,
Speaker 1: pick one, because the accused has rights under that thing.
Speaker 1: I guess if you completely suspend all aspects of habeas
Speaker 1: corpus and due process, hey we don't need trials anymore.
Speaker 1: Welcome to guess what not America. But okay, whichever uniform
Speaker 1: you want to wear a flag you wave as long
Speaker 1: as you win. Right. I cannot believe that people that
Speaker 1: swear to love the country and the constitution are perfectly
Speaker 1: fine with this right now. But they are. And another thing,
Speaker 1: just because it could easily come up, is something I'm
Speaker 1: going to read to you from the BBC. In part
Speaker 1: fired FBI agents are suing cash Fattel over retribution claims Okay,
Speaker 1: this article from five days ago, so this is contemporaneous
Speaker 1: with what's happening here. A guy who's got this going
Speaker 1: on should know better than to be sticking his neck
Speaker 1: out in public for the photo op he's going to
Speaker 1: get off of making sure that the president's buddy is
Speaker 1: being handled by you personally when you don't know how
Speaker 1: to handle it. Cash three for this from the article.
Speaker 1: Three former FBI agents havesued FBI Director Cash Patel and
Speaker 1: US Attorney General Pam Bondi, alleging the officials fired them
Speaker 1: to a peace President Donald Trump. Patel allegedly told his
Speaker 1: employees that he had to fire and quotes those individuals
Speaker 1: because quote his ability to keep his own job dependent
Speaker 1: on the removal of the agents who worked on cases
Speaker 1: involving the president end quote, according to the lawsuit. Now
Speaker 1: pause from the article. If you forget yet the team
Speaker 1: you're rooting for, and just think about this, and I
Speaker 1: don't care, Liberal and conservative, listen carefully, red and blue,
Speaker 1: mega and libtard all together now, if you remove the
Speaker 1: impartiality of the FBI director who is serving under the
Speaker 1: threat of the president at the pleasure of the president,
Speaker 1: and all together as an arm of the president. Then
Speaker 1: you do not have, by definition, an impartial investigator or
Speaker 1: head of investigations, a person that needs to recuse themselves
Speaker 1: from things like this when personal involvement comes up in
Speaker 1: order to remove the possibility that they might be so
Speaker 1: over anxious and over zealous in their desire to get somebody, anybody,
Speaker 1: for this heinous personal act against you and your boss
Speaker 1: who holds your job and your future in his hands.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, things become disqualified when even the
Speaker 1: lightest when even the lightest caliber weapon is pointed at
Speaker 1: your head, if you were acting under duress, You're not
Speaker 1: even supposed to testify in a court case. These are
Speaker 1: legal norms and precedents that are set in various ways,
Speaker 1: and I'm not even gonna say I know how to
Speaker 1: articulate them all. But my point is this guy, in
Speaker 1: a world of objective and critical thinkers, would immediately make
Speaker 1: it easy for reasonable doubt to enter the equation regarding
Speaker 1: this accused assassin, which is what he is right now.
Speaker 1: And I don't even know if he's been formally charged yet,
Speaker 1: because who's going to bother to pay attention to the
Speaker 1: process when nobody cares about the process. They got their
Speaker 1: man already. I mean, you see the problem. Not saying
Speaker 1: that he's innocent or deserves to be treated as innocent.
Speaker 1: What I'm telling you is that under our system, if
Speaker 1: it's not full of shit, everybody has the presumption of innocence.
Speaker 1: You know, even if they catch the cannibal killer with
Speaker 1: a guy's arm hanging out of his mouth. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: presume that you don't know the entire story until you
Speaker 1: can enter it into evidence in a court and prove it.
Speaker 1: You know, So problems. Cash Betel is not competent to
Speaker 1: do the job of heading the FBI, period, And I
Speaker 1: said that when he was appointed, and other people said
Speaker 1: that when he was appointed, and it was like, now
Speaker 1: you're racist because you don't like Indians and he's a
Speaker 1: rich guy and he's Trump's you know, pick, and you
Speaker 1: just have Trump derangement. No, some things are just true.
Speaker 1: There are various people in jobs that Trump gave jobs
Speaker 1: too that are not competent at them. He was just
Speaker 1: rewarding people and giving people stuff that he thought would
Speaker 1: execute his demands. And fair enough, you kind of are
Speaker 1: supposed to do that sort of, but not in the
Speaker 1: direct way and not in the ham handed absolutely, here
Speaker 1: we go, bag bag bag direct. You know, it's like
Speaker 1: you want to sleep with a woman, you wine and
Speaker 1: diner and see if she'll just volunteer to do that
Speaker 1: with you. You know what I'm saying. You don't just go, hello,
Speaker 1: let's have sex and go at it. Wait a minute,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump kind of thinks that way. Well, I mean,
Speaker 1: at least you can just grab him or kiss him anytime.
Speaker 1: It's okay, right, okay, so bad joke, But back to it.
Speaker 1: Here's from the Washington Ap. Okay, and this article, I
Speaker 1: guess was written on the thirteenth. But man, is this
Speaker 1: relevant because it lays the early groundwork and it gives again,
Speaker 1: any competent defense attorney a chance. I don't know who's
Speaker 1: gonna want to defend. But then again, you know, people
Speaker 1: get defense anyway because there's lawyers who have you know,
Speaker 1: do not care who they represent at all. Somebody's gonna
Speaker 1: get famous off. It is, especially if they basically, you know,
Speaker 1: do an OJ here and get somebody that you're pretty
Speaker 1: sure is guilty, right the hell off in one of
Speaker 1: the highest profile, highest divissive. And here's the other problem
Speaker 1: with that. The damage that if somebody did find that
Speaker 1: there was reasonable doubt. You can't see the jury, and
Speaker 1: there's no way to get this done as a fair trial,
Speaker 1: and the process has been ruined, and who knows what's
Speaker 1: going on behind the scenes, where over zealous and oversimplified
Speaker 1: thinking and stupid jumps to conclusion and improper collection of evidence.
Speaker 1: One hundred things could be wrong here. I mean, I'm
Speaker 1: looking at there were people taking away things that were
Speaker 1: in proximity to Charlie Kirk's murder minutes after it happened.
Speaker 1: Looks to me like you got crime scene tampering. You
Speaker 1: got a gun that was allegedly broken down, put back together,
Speaker 1: broken down on a rooftop, okay, you got a guy
Speaker 1: changing his clothes various times. You got issues in the
Speaker 1: fragmentary crap that you released already, and you've got a
Speaker 1: got by showing there's a bit of prejudice here in
Speaker 1: the investigative you know, circles, especially like at the head
Speaker 1: the main boss of the FBI, might be a bit
Speaker 1: of I don't know what would they call that. I mean,
Speaker 1: prejudice is a good word, but bias, bias might be
Speaker 1: a better word. There is clearly a bias that could
Speaker 1: be shown here. That if properly illustrated and demonstrated to people,
Speaker 1: could become a display of guess what, this guy was
Speaker 1: so anxious to nail anybody? He nailed my guy. And
Speaker 1: the evidence of this, this, this, and this need to
Speaker 1: be questioned is there, you know? And now you got
Speaker 1: to go back over things. Was there anything manipulated? And
Speaker 1: even just by repeating that, as we've learned in America,
Speaker 1: just by repeating the same crap, whether it's true or not,
Speaker 1: it can become true to some people in the population.
Speaker 1: And like I said, all you need is one out
Speaker 1: of twelve in most states in order to not get
Speaker 1: a conviction. So what favors are being done here? I
Speaker 1: know the ultimate goal is totalitarian theocracy, so long as
Speaker 1: they got the religion that you agree with. And that's
Speaker 1: all good and fine, and we love this here now
Speaker 1: in America, we are in a time of the majesty
Speaker 1: of the majority of voices, even though ask anybody, do
Speaker 1: you think the majority of people are stupid? Yes, not
Speaker 1: my people, but the majority of people are stupid. In
Speaker 1: any media from the American sphere of influence, casts, broadcast,
Speaker 1: podcast simulcast newscasts, all things cast. There are spells over
Speaker 1: the American mind. But if somebody breaks through with the
Speaker 1: factual and realness of what the Constitution actually says, you
Speaker 1: might have reasonable doubt an undermined investigation, evidence being tossed
Speaker 1: out of the trial because of his fruit of xyz
Speaker 1: poison trees, and a guy who is indeed guilty could
Speaker 1: walk theoretically, and you got people out there dumb enough
Speaker 1: to think that we're not right wing enough. We need
Speaker 1: to start the civil war. Now that's going to be
Speaker 1: a good idea. Crisis actors are appearing in front of
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk for god knows what reason destroy anybody who
Speaker 1: was even remotely a person of interest, because that's the
Speaker 1: American way. You got Patel admitting allegedly in lawsuits that
Speaker 1: you know, look, I gotta fire you because I gotta
Speaker 1: do what Trump says, otherwise I don't have a job,
Speaker 1: and you know, things get rough, not the way this
Speaker 1: stuff is supposed to roll. I mean, Valhalla prejudicing potential jurors, judges, etc.
Speaker 1: While creating reasonable doubts seems like what a competent FBI
Speaker 1: director does. Inviting scrutiny of any objective observer who could
Speaker 1: see the FBI as over zealous in building a case.
Speaker 1: Or how about this, let's get technical. The third party
Speaker 1: culprit defense a strategy used by defendants to argue that indeed,
Speaker 1: another person was taken seriously by the investigative agency. There's
Speaker 1: a name for that defense because he has to run
Speaker 1: around and make public statements and be you know, look, look, Donnie,
Speaker 1: I'm doing my jobby Jobbi, Donnie, that's right. I'm going
Speaker 1: to go and Fox and Friends that tell about how
Speaker 1: we got him. We got him, which is exactly what
Speaker 1: that governor said. Sounded just like the tone they used
Speaker 1: when they told us they got Osama bin Laden. And
Speaker 1: I know I'm not a lawyer, but do you have
Speaker 1: to be a lawyer to see this? I mean, if
Speaker 1: you can just produce any evidence that appears as though
Speaker 1: there's an alternative suspect. Ah, I'm pretty certain that's the
Speaker 1: definition of reasonable doubt in most jurisdictions. And various officials
Speaker 1: have talked about the death penalty. Okay, the governor of
Speaker 1: Utah make you know, careful statements about punishments in subtle ways,
Speaker 1: and there are subtle differences that were necessary there. But
Speaker 1: when local law enforcement all the way to the president
Speaker 1: or pretty much talking about how they got to put
Speaker 1: you to death. And you know, you can string together
Speaker 1: a narrative that's being forged by the entirety of the government,
Speaker 1: even if Trump praised a small role in it, and
Speaker 1: his Fox and Friends appearance that he did that morn
Speaker 1: that day, you get conclusions in public and private just
Speaker 1: waiting for a person of interest to show up. There's
Speaker 1: another thing if they have a narrative in place, but
Speaker 1: they don't have the subject, and they start making assumptions
Speaker 1: about the subject, and you can prove that, which you
Speaker 1: can by various public statements. You could just play let's
Speaker 1: go to the videotape. Warner Wolf used to say in
Speaker 1: New York. I mean, you know, between that and the
Speaker 1: hijacking of the Godly, I don't know. If you're an
Speaker 1: American and you're a Christian and you're not offended, I
Speaker 1: got to ask what can your team do to offend you?
Speaker 1: And one more key question, what does victory look like
Speaker 1: in your mind? In anything that's not right is wrong paradox?
Speaker 1: I want to know. Seriously, I'm not trying to mock you,
Speaker 1: although there has been an AI created a Charlie Kirk
Speaker 1: to mock him a bit where I'm not I've thought
Speaker 1: about playing it, but I'll probably just give you a link.
Speaker 1: But Charlie Kirk starts talking about, you know, like he
Speaker 1: was talking about the death penalty and how he wanted
Speaker 1: it done and all this stuff, and how it was
Speaker 1: also okay. They clipped it together with AI stuff about
Speaker 1: how it's okay that there's gun deaths. You know, it's
Speaker 1: an acceptable thing. To have a couple of gun debts
Speaker 1: every year is acceptable because that's how we keep the
Speaker 1: Second Amendment, and that's an acceptable price to pay. I
Speaker 1: don't think his children would agree with that when they
Speaker 1: grow up without him. But he had a right to
Speaker 1: his view. Didn't deserve to die for it, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: But they create an AI video where Charlie Kirk realizes
Speaker 1: he's dead or you're kidding me, and he starts getting
Speaker 1: angry about I can't believe you guys did this to me.
Speaker 1: You guys did this to me. I only heard one shot.
Speaker 1: There appears to be only one perpetrator. Oh and by
Speaker 1: the way, all of this, you know, he's a tranny
Speaker 1: or he's dating a tranny, or they can't even substantiate
Speaker 1: where this kid lived, by the way, because there's two
Speaker 1: different narratives about that. Where he was living at home
Speaker 1: and then he wasn't living at home. His grandmother doesn't
Speaker 1: seem to think he knew anything about politics, by the way.
Speaker 1: All those messages, the O woo and you know, hey
Speaker 1: sees a bulge? Can you see a bulge? And all
Speaker 1: that stuff, and if you can read this, you're gay.
Speaker 1: It's all gamer crap. It's all gamer taunts when you
Speaker 1: throw grenade at somebody or a certain bomb at somebody
Speaker 1: in one of these games. I don't play these things,
Speaker 1: but my older children probably know it because these are
Speaker 1: from what I understand, like ten fifteen year old, sort
Speaker 1: of like phrases that kids used to use taunting each
Speaker 1: other online. Now, does that mean that that's not something
Speaker 1: that's being used for a political purpose. No, not necessarily,
Speaker 1: because there are these little political subgroups and subcultures that
Speaker 1: also took gaming culture memes and ran with them in
Speaker 1: a different way. You know, like calling somebody a queen
Speaker 1: has had a different meaning in different time periods, and
Speaker 1: you can't even use most of the words for gay
Speaker 1: or whatever. But they got their own thing going. I mean,
Speaker 1: I even see younger kids still today using slang like bruh, bruh, bruh,
Speaker 1: like that's their response to something. It means, I don't
Speaker 1: really care. It means I'm actually kind of surprised. It
Speaker 1: means like ten different things. Bruh, bruh, okay, the ouh
Speaker 1: wau and all that. They got five six different meanings,
Speaker 1: just like many things do anymore. There are so many,
Speaker 1: so so many of these weird. Well, you don't know
Speaker 1: what it means. Great, uh, you know, in the old days,
Speaker 1: you're not cool. You don't know what debt music is
Speaker 1: and you don't know what that means. And I have
Speaker 1: an X on my shoe and that means that I'm
Speaker 1: this And there's a whole generational game that goes on there.
Speaker 1: And I'm in my fifties some way out of it.
Speaker 1: And I was never a video game like Nerd. Like
Speaker 1: I played video games when games were you know, simpler,
Speaker 1: and I did play some of the transition into today's games,
Speaker 1: but you know, at a certain point, I didn't have
Speaker 1: time for games anymore. You know, I stopped somewhere around
Speaker 1: I don't know, Mario Kart, the original Resident Evil stuff,
Speaker 1: you know, probably the first Call of duty stuff came
Speaker 1: out James Bond for the Nintendo sixty four. That's where
Speaker 1: I took true joy out of gaming. And I've enjoyed
Speaker 1: a couple of online games here and there, but usually
Speaker 1: their throwbacks to something that I did before. You know,
Speaker 1: like I like my Little Star Trek game for a
Speaker 1: little while, I've now quit playing that. I played Magic
Speaker 1: the Gathering online because I couldn't afford to build up
Speaker 1: my card collection again, so you know, and I played
Speaker 1: a baseball game. I admit these things, but these are
Speaker 1: all throwbacks. Activities are things that I've done before and
Speaker 1: enjoyed before. This isn't you know, new landscape talking to
Speaker 1: on a headset to people, I mean to me, The
Speaker 1: first iteration of that was a game called Halo, I think,
Speaker 1: and it was I think that was an Xbox game.
Speaker 1: And by the way, it was never an Xbox guy.
Speaker 1: But anyway, these kids have gone into you know, full on.
Speaker 1: I got a computer dedicated to a game, and also
Speaker 1: I've got a gaming console, and we go online and
Speaker 1: we yell things at each other, and they have to
Speaker 1: speak in code because to simply you know, say yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. You know, you get thrown off at air
Speaker 1: for you know, I FD you in the A and
Speaker 1: this and that and hey, you know, screw you a
Speaker 1: fag and whatever else. Well, they started calling that hate speech,
Speaker 1: So these guys invented a whole new to basically say,
Speaker 1: that's right, damn it. I just killed you because you're
Speaker 1: pain in the ass and f you because you keep
Speaker 1: costing me money, because I got to keep buying new equipment,
Speaker 1: because you kill me on this gape and screw you
Speaker 1: and you're yelling at a guy in Korea. That's real,
Speaker 1: and that indeed could be the whole of the story
Speaker 1: with this kid. Truth is you listening to me right now?
Speaker 1: Unless newly discovered information has been verified, and I mean
Speaker 1: super verified at this point, you don't know any better
Speaker 1: right now than what I just said, and I don't.
Speaker 1: I will tell you that the best and most solid
Speaker 1: explanation for all of what we supposedly know right now
Speaker 1: is that we don't know it yet. And it's not
Speaker 1: trusting the government and trusting the investigators because I don't.
Speaker 1: But you know, eventually we're going to get a competent
Speaker 1: enough person to try and put it together, and then
Speaker 1: we'll have an idea of what actually happened here right now,
Speaker 1: we are almost in the dark, even though we are.
Speaker 1: You know, listen, you can see just as little when
Speaker 1: you're being blasted with all kinds of incoherent lighting from
Speaker 1: all directions. You're just as blind as if they turn
Speaker 1: all the lights off and you're in the dark. And
Speaker 1: we are being blasted with lights from all different directions
Speaker 1: right now by this information. So the truth is the
Speaker 1: absolute truth and the punchline to this tragedy, and it
Speaker 1: is a tragedy. A thirty one year old guy got
Speaker 1: killed while speaking. This is not supposed to happen here.
Speaker 1: He wasn't sending people off to war. He was inciting people. Yes,
Speaker 1: he was irritating people, and he did call people names. Boohoo.
Speaker 1: None of it deserves a direct bullet to the neck.
Speaker 1: That simple shouldn't have happened. Shouldn't have to be something
Speaker 1: that is wiping his kids go through. Absolutely true, shouldn't
Speaker 1: have been witnessed by a bunch of college kids who
Speaker 1: barely know what the hell they're doing alive. Absolutely true.
Speaker 1: Made millions off of being an adjutant and an agitator. True,
Speaker 1: that's what he did, and he did it well, but
Speaker 1: the reality is the whole country doesn't need to be
Speaker 1: turned upside down, especially based on nothing but and I
Speaker 1: do mean nothing but mis and disinformation which is being
Speaker 1: fed to you fast and furious from both sides of
Speaker 1: the equation, alleged sides of the equation. And by the way,
Speaker 1: see how there's no alternative here to give you an
Speaker 1: honest look at things. The libertarians, so called libertarians, sucked
Speaker 1: into the Republican maga. The idiots added to the other
Speaker 1: idiots that call themselves liberal that aren't really liberal. Both
Speaker 1: sides of the equation are pumping out their fastest, hardest
Speaker 1: and best propaganda, and honestly, the right is winning, as
Speaker 1: they have been for the past few years. They're winning
Speaker 1: the game. But again, like I talked about on the
Speaker 1: last show, just simply winning the debate is not the
Speaker 1: point of debating. It is not the whole reason to debate.
Speaker 1: I just want to win. Great. You know what if
Speaker 1: you're playing a game of chess and you decide to
Speaker 1: shoot the opponent in the head with a gun, well
Speaker 1: they have to forfeit the game. You win, But did
Speaker 1: you actually win the game? Did you play chess? Nope?
Speaker 1: So until new information can be verified, and I'll be
Speaker 1: able to research, and I won't have to read three
Speaker 1: hundred articles and go through five hundred commentators and watch
Speaker 1: different coverage and see who's got which piece of video
Speaker 1: and what TMZ nedded, what CNN ended up with, what
Speaker 1: Fox News was privileged with, what the president said, what
Speaker 1: the investigator said. When I don't have to do all
Speaker 1: of that in order to get to well, damn, they
Speaker 1: all are not telling me anything reliable here when I
Speaker 1: don't have to go through hundreds of things to get
Speaker 1: to nothing reliable here, folks. I'll get back to this issue.
Speaker 1: I'll probably be forced back to it on Friday. But
Speaker 1: I can't help where other people's heads are at. And
Speaker 1: I know very well I'm not here to make friends anymore.
Speaker 1: I know that even at my peak. Quite honestly, this
Speaker 1: is a sad thing to me. I realized this the
Speaker 1: other day, and I've never said it on air. I
Speaker 1: don't think anywhere at the peak of my success doing this,
Speaker 1: even though I couldn't make money, I could range for
Speaker 1: a short time from eighty to one hundred and twenty
Speaker 1: thousand listeners. Now I know that's not the massive success
Speaker 1: of Charlie Kirk or some of these other people. But
Speaker 1: at the time I was doing it, that was just
Speaker 1: below upper echelon territory. Couple of times I cracked into,
Speaker 1: unknowingly even the Apple Top five for news and me
Speaker 1: it was at news and I think news slash politics podcasts.
Speaker 1: I was in the top five a couple of times
Speaker 1: accidentally didn't know it, didn't try and get there. Nobody
Speaker 1: gave me an award. I'm just saying I arrived there
Speaker 1: with nobody backing me, just based on what I was doing,
Speaker 1: and it didn't take as long as it took other
Speaker 1: people to get half as high there. I didn't maintain
Speaker 1: that long. What I really truly maintained was a level
Speaker 1: of about twenty thousand people that were listening to this podcast.
Speaker 1: That was my successful run, and I could carry that,
Speaker 1: and I could bring some of that to other shows,
Speaker 1: and I was happy to share my audience and bring
Speaker 1: them along to people that even didn't have podcasts before,
Speaker 1: or didn't know how they would function to do it,
Speaker 1: or they were veterans and they just didn't have a
Speaker 1: good platform where they weren't going to be muzzled and
Speaker 1: screwed with. And I brought different people onto my little
Speaker 1: network to share that. And I was super happy when
Speaker 1: I maintained five thousand listeners an episode. I really was.
Speaker 1: I was thrilled at that for that part of it.
Speaker 1: The money, oddly enough, worked better at five thousand listeners
Speaker 1: than it did at eighty or one hundred and twenty
Speaker 1: at weird spikes. There was a couple of weird spikes
Speaker 1: where it came up into that area and then fell down.
Speaker 1: And it wasn't YouTube numbers or some third party thing.
Speaker 1: These numbers were collected. I would consider them Legitimately. It's
Speaker 1: gotten far more complex in the following years, but this
Speaker 1: was reliable. And the sad thing is I guess I
Speaker 1: was not able to monetize that at the time, because
Speaker 1: I should have been able to monetize it and turn
Speaker 1: it into something where I would have made more money then,
Speaker 1: and therefore I could have maybe had a savings or
Speaker 1: something when things went the way that they've gone recently,
Speaker 1: but no more. And I had offers from a couple
Speaker 1: of places to sort of sell out the archive, and
Speaker 1: now I'm trying to figure out where to put it
Speaker 1: somewhere for free businessman. That's never been my primary focus.
Speaker 1: But the reason why I know I could never maintain
Speaker 1: those large audiences anyway, not with a good conscience, not
Speaker 1: to be able to sleep at night, and not to
Speaker 1: do what it is I originally set out to do
Speaker 1: with this show. The reason why I know that is
Speaker 1: because it would have required dishonesty. It would have required
Speaker 1: me to be disingenuous, and that to me, wasn't worth
Speaker 1: twelve hundred dollars a week. It wasn't worth one hundred
Speaker 1: and twenty five thousand dollars in a bulk payment to
Speaker 1: sell it all out. It wasn't worth money to be dishonest.
Speaker 1: I got into this to put out something that was
Speaker 1: uniquely honest and had an integrity to it with some intelligence.
Speaker 1: I'm not the most intelligent man, but sometimes I would
Speaker 1: just explore things I wanted to learn about with somebody
Speaker 1: that I hoped was as knowledgeable as I could find,
Speaker 1: and I did my best one way or another. And
Speaker 1: some things I knew about, and I'm confident about what
Speaker 1: I knew, but I was never too confident to not
Speaker 1: learn every time I wanted to learn, and I wanted
Speaker 1: you guys to learn along with me. And if this
Speaker 1: is the final run, if I'm gone soon, either because
Speaker 1: I just can't afford to be on the internet and
Speaker 1: screw around anymore and do that as a focus, or
Speaker 1: maybe I'm just no longer here, either where I live
Speaker 1: or on earth. I got to tell you, I don't
Speaker 1: regret the path I took. I'm okay with it. It
Speaker 1: won't be me that hurts me. But whatever happens happens,
Speaker 1: and I'm not worried about it. I know nobody cares.
Speaker 1: And if you were angry enough with me to already
Speaker 1: stop listening to get it, hear this part either. So
Speaker 1: maybe someday though, you'll go back and you'll listen to
Speaker 1: that idiot you downloaded because it's you know, stuck in
Speaker 1: your phone and you forgot what you downloaded or something.
Speaker 1: And like I said, I'll be gone, but you know, hey,
Speaker 1: you get this one little message here that says it's okay.
Speaker 1: I don't mind that. I just hope that at some point,
Speaker 1: whoever you are, wherever you are, that I've given you
Speaker 1: something of value. And if it's a couple of thoughts,
Speaker 1: piece of knowledge, advice on a book, if it's just
Speaker 1: a new way to look at something, well you made
Speaker 1: it way way more. We're worth it than any of
Speaker 1: the money could have been. I could have used it,
Speaker 1: Definitely I wanted to, and was you know, bold and
Speaker 1: arrogant enough to think that I could take care of
Speaker 1: my family with this and do it in a way
Speaker 1: that didn't, you know, just make me some kind of
Speaker 1: horror on the internet. But you know, I never claimed
Speaker 1: to be one hundred percent right about everything. I just
Speaker 1: claimed to give you something different than what you would
Speaker 1: get elsewhere. And hopefully I did that and provide it
Speaker 1: just a bit of value. Whether you took this show
Speaker 1: for free, or you supported it, or you never cared, whatever,
Speaker 1: I really do hope that I contributed something of value
Speaker 1: to the ether and to you, because you're part of
Speaker 1: the ether too, just like I am. And for whatever
Speaker 1: it's worth, the sound of my voice right now and you,
Speaker 1: we're in this same space and time, and my intent
Speaker 1: will not waiver. It has been what it is and
Speaker 1: it will remain that way no matter where I go
Speaker 1: or where you go. And I have lost friends along
Speaker 1: the way here. I had more friends than I do now.
Speaker 1: I've got none face to face. But even the ones
Speaker 1: that I've had virtually or occasionally face to face or
Speaker 1: I met here there. I'm a thousand percent grateful for
Speaker 1: all of you to use the Trump math. You know,
Speaker 1: we're he's going to get thirteen hundred percent discounts on
Speaker 1: drugs and three hundred million people died of drug overdoses
Speaker 1: last year, but let's use the Trump math. I'm a
Speaker 1: thousand percent grateful for that.
Speaker 4: And uh.
Speaker 1: Hell, that's better than I thought I would ever do.
Speaker 1: And I've lived longer than I ever thought I would.
Speaker 1: And I'll leave behind a couple of children. We actually
Speaker 1: three altogether. And I don't care what you think about
Speaker 1: me after that, because I don't got to deal with
Speaker 1: it no more. If I'm God anyway, I am merely O'Kelly,
Speaker 1: and you could be if.
Speaker 8: In Denial the Secret Wars with air strikes and tanks
Speaker 8: by Larry had Secret Wars became a staple of US
Speaker 8: covert operations and are still happening today. Larryhncock's book In
Speaker 8: Denial rips the cover off many of them, using new files.
Speaker 10: It exposes things about the Bay of Pigs that no
Speaker 10: one has ever written about before. It shows why it
Speaker 10: really failed and why the United States did not earn
Speaker 10: from it. It also shows why other countries today are
Speaker 10: doing secret operations with more success. This is the book
Speaker 10: that puts what some want to deny into the light.
Speaker 10: In denial, secret wars with air strikes and tanks Larry Hancock.
Speaker 10: For more information go to Larry hyphen Handcock dot com.
Speaker 10: Pick up your comedy of in Denial Amazon dot com
Speaker 10: in digital or physical.
Speaker 11: I think it's worth it to have a cost of
Speaker 11: unfortunately some gundets every single year so that we can
Speaker 11: have a second Amendment to protect our other guds.
Speaker 6: Of the rights.
Speaker 3: Oh wait, I'm dead. I'm dead.
Speaker 1: Seriously, are you kidding me? No? No, no, I didn't
Speaker 1: mean my death is worth it. I meant all those
Speaker 1: those poor people school his deaths are worth it, not
Speaker 1: mine and assholes.
Speaker 9: I got a smoking hot white for sake, and I
Speaker 9: got way more drifting to do.
Speaker 1: You can't do this to me.
Speaker 10: I'm Charlie, gonna hurt.
Speaker 9: You want a person?
Speaker 5: I think it's.
Speaker 7: Do you like history, real history than you? And you
Speaker 7: never talked to school? Why Vietnam War Orgular Moms in
Speaker 7: Nations Building built Southeast Asian by author Mike Swamps with
Speaker 7: Newton documentation should never have seen before. That will open
Speaker 7: your eyes to events that led up to this Why
Speaker 7: Vietnam War, Orgular Moms in Nations, Building Built Southeast Asia
Speaker 7: nineteen forty five through nineteen sixties one. Get your copy
Speaker 7: to Day at Amazon dot com. Why Vietnam War by
Speaker 7: Autumn Mike swampsh.
Speaker 9: H Order Report dot Com and You're Listening to The.
Speaker 5: War State by Michael Swanson explains the great national transformation
Speaker 5: that took place and put the Kennedy presidency in the
Speaker 5: context of the times, and revealed never before published information
Speaker 5: about the Cuban missile crisirisis President Kennedy would not have
Speaker 5: been assassinated if he had been president two hundred years ago.
Speaker 5: His assassination took place in the context of the Cold
Speaker 5: War and the rise of the national security state. Before
Speaker 5: World War II, the United States was a continental republic.
Speaker 5: In the decade that followed, it became an imperial superpower.
Speaker 5: Generals such as Curtis LeMay not only wanted to invade Cuba,
Speaker 5: but knew that there were short range missiles on the
Speaker 5: island arn't with nuclear warheads that they could not destroyed
Speaker 5: because they were on mobile launcher. Their invasion could have
Speaker 5: led to a Third World War, and they wanted to
Speaker 5: go to war anyway. The War State by Michael Swanson
Speaker 5: reveals why, and we'll show you what President Kennedy was
Speaker 5: up against. For more information, the war State dot com.
Speaker 11: Yo Yola's does Damn, host of the Dallas Action podcast
Speaker 11: presented by Wall Street Window. And you are listening to
Speaker 11: the effect revelation through conversation, going to Chuck O'Kelly.
Speaker 1: You're here, Talkolly, you know what's chalk to Shelly
Speaker 3: H.