Speaker 1: Welcome to the nonprofits. For our fourth segment. This week,
Speaker 1: we are delighted to share some wondrous news trademark. Jimmy Junior,
Speaker 1: please be delighted and share with us some wondrous news trademark.
Speaker 2: Yes, I am delighted. Attention all you intelligence nerds, dorks, dweebs,
Speaker 2: and geeks out there. We have a major breakthrough concerning
Speaker 2: the declassification of highly classified documents which leads us to
Speaker 2: arguably one of the most important findings in human history,
Speaker 2: the discover the discovery of the Arc of the Covenant. Yes,
Speaker 2: Moses' lost tablets inscribed by Yahweh, the storm God of
Speaker 2: ancient Canaanites, you know, the Southern tribe that believed in
Speaker 2: the storm God. Anyway, these tablets, this Covenant has been
Speaker 2: found by psychics several thousand miles away in a secret
Speaker 2: CIA black site, all the way back in nineteen eighty eight.
Speaker 2: I assess, being the former millilitary intelligence atalysts that I am.
Speaker 2: But the veracity of this intelligence is highly authentic and
Speaker 2: the sources are reliable. No, I'm kidding, this is not
Speaker 2: at all realistic. But this story is from The Independent
Speaker 2: by James Liddell on March twenty eighth, twenty twenty five.
Speaker 3: All right, Jimmy, thank you, thank you.
Speaker 1: This seems to be and you know this, we're tongue
Speaker 1: in cheek of course here, but it seems to be
Speaker 1: a very important moment in human history. We are some
Speaker 1: of the lucky ones that get to witness this most
Speaker 1: holy moment. So what's your take on this whole thing?
Speaker 1: What's your take on this story?
Speaker 2: Ah? Boy, Well, I think the best part of this
Speaker 2: first of all. Well, first of all, I gave my
Speaker 2: take and I think the uh, I think it's complete crap.
Speaker 2: But the best the best part about this, and this
Speaker 2: is what makes me proud to be a veteran. But
Speaker 2: it's the article said Joe mcman eagle. That's a very
Speaker 2: patriotic last name, mickman eagle. Joe mcman and an Army
Speaker 2: chief warrant officer and the first person to do remote
Speaker 2: viewing for the CIA. I mean, think about it. Back
Speaker 2: in the eighties, the government you think was wasting money. Now,
Speaker 2: the CIA was paying psychics to find treasure six thousand
Speaker 2: miles away in the Middle East. But Joe mcmaneagle, a
Speaker 2: chief warrant officer and the first person to do remote
Speaker 2: viewing for the CIA. Told The New York Post that
Speaker 2: they allegedly do not know what was scrawled down and
Speaker 2: are guided through the process by another person.
Speaker 3: So he was.
Speaker 2: Describing this so talking about the remote viewer doesn't really
Speaker 2: know what is kind of inscribed on this thing. But
Speaker 2: he had this to say, if someone claims that remote
Speaker 2: viewing proves the existence of something such as the Ark
Speaker 2: of the Covenant, they must produce the arc to substantiate
Speaker 2: their claim.
Speaker 3: Boom.
Speaker 2: I think this guy might have been an intelligence adalyst.
Speaker 2: I don't know, but yeah, I don't think that. I
Speaker 2: think this is a lot of fun. I think it's silly.
Speaker 2: I can't believe that our government, I guess I can't
Speaker 2: believe it was employing this kind of thing. But hey,
Speaker 2: back in the eighties, before we had some of the
Speaker 2: great stuff we have now, I guess psychics made sense.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I thought the headline at least was
Speaker 1: misleading because they didn't find the Ark of the Covenant.
Speaker 1: They found somebody who said they knew where the Ark
Speaker 1: of the Covenant was. And I also want to point
Speaker 1: out that the person that was identified as this remote
Speaker 1: viewer that found this so called the Arc of the
Speaker 1: Covenant was subject number thirty two. So that means they
Speaker 1: had a whole bunch of people doing this and we
Speaker 1: haven't seen any reports about what the other people reported.
Speaker 1: And you know, even a broken clock is right, you know,
Speaker 1: twice a day, right. I mean, if you get enough people,
Speaker 1: somebody is going to talk about I mean the Ark
Speaker 1: of the Covenant. This was in what year was was
Speaker 1: the remote viewing it was in? It was in around
Speaker 1: the time I think when the Indiana Jones was kind
Speaker 1: of becoming a big thing, and so people knew about
Speaker 1: the Ark of the Covenant. They knew what it looked
Speaker 1: like in the movie, which was conspicuously identical to what
Speaker 1: they you know, what they described in their remote viewing session. Helen,
Speaker 1: what is your take on this story? What do you
Speaker 1: what do you tell? Tell us what your heathen reprobate
Speaker 1: mind uh tells you about this story.
Speaker 4: I would like to share a personal experience. I used
Speaker 4: to work at a psycond university back when I was
Speaker 4: into new age wu WU stuff.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Is that a credited university?
Speaker 4: No?
Speaker 3: It was not.
Speaker 4: I know guess what you can't be your credit to
Speaker 4: become a medium or read ors. It's just so you know, shocking,
Speaker 4: and I can tell you that it's all bullshit. So
Speaker 4: this is the thing. There was also mentioned in the
Speaker 4: arkle like he didn't know what he was looking for. Okay,
Speaker 4: granted he didn't, but as you pointed out, Scott, Indiana
Speaker 4: Jones was really popular in the eighties and it's kind
Speaker 4: of become part of the zeitgeist even now. You know,
Speaker 4: like I can think of sometimes this week, I think
Speaker 4: of Indiana Jones. So you know, just in or it's quoted,
Speaker 4: or something comes up in your life that you're like, oh,
Speaker 4: a mean Jones.
Speaker 3: Okay, so you're.
Speaker 4: Back in the eighties and you're supposed to, you know,
Speaker 4: have magic.
Speaker 5: Powers, I guess, guys, and you're able to view thousands
Speaker 5: and thousands of miles away what is in a secure base.
Speaker 2: The CIA is hiding that, I guess.
Speaker 4: And this is another thing.
Speaker 2: Why would you because.
Speaker 4: Then if like you want to prove that, like you
Speaker 4: know something, you have this religious artifact.
Speaker 2: You know what did she want to show it? Everybody
Speaker 2: doesn't prove.
Speaker 4: A god, but you have a religious historical artifact that's.
Speaker 3: Mentioned in the Bible, right right.
Speaker 2: I don't think I made that up. The CIA black site.
Speaker 2: So I think when the psychic was in the black site,
Speaker 2: that's what it was.
Speaker 4: I don't know why I'm getting lost of.
Speaker 2: The but I don't know. I'm in your youth. This
Speaker 2: is important shit, I said, remember, no, no, but but
Speaker 2: you're right though. She did say that it's being guarded
Speaker 2: by people, right, and it's being guarded by like dark forces,
Speaker 2: but that there are people that know about it. So
Speaker 2: I'm kind of just like, I see where you're coming from, Like, hey,
Speaker 2: this is like, this is like powerful stuff. Why wouldn't
Speaker 2: these people show it? Why would Why is this being
Speaker 2: kept secrets along? I don't know, but yeah, this is
Speaker 2: what was going on in our black sites.
Speaker 1: So this was information that was recently declassified. And Jimmy,
Speaker 1: I know you you mentioned that you had experience in
Speaker 1: military intelligence, just out of curiosity. Why would something like
Speaker 1: this ever become classified?
Speaker 2: Well, you know, first of all, it's essential intelligence agency.
Speaker 1: So they're just default, they just knee jerk everything's classified, or.
Speaker 2: I would say that probably if they are. So somebody
Speaker 2: you know, why this was classified because somebody actually believed
Speaker 2: that this could work. That's why. That's why. So somebody
Speaker 2: actually believed that this could work. And tax dollars went
Speaker 2: into it, and there there was maybe maybe a likelihood
Speaker 2: that if this did work, now the United States had
Speaker 2: a new weapons system, right, a new advantage over our
Speaker 2: adversaries or or over any any other countries military or
Speaker 2: government trying to contest us. If this happened to work,
Speaker 2: then maybe it would work later and we could use
Speaker 2: this again. We could use this to find other things.
Speaker 2: So anyway, I think that that is probably why these
Speaker 2: tests were classified. I also had an uncle. Why I
Speaker 2: still have an uncle, But my uncle was in intelligence
Speaker 2: when he was in the in the military in the seventies,
Speaker 2: and his whole thing is sometimes things are classified because
Speaker 2: they really need to be, and other times things are
Speaker 2: classified because of how much they can embarrass the United States.
Speaker 3: Now, I never I.
Speaker 2: Never came across anything like that, but this could very well.
Speaker 3: Be proof of that.
Speaker 2: So you know that that might explain the high classification.
Speaker 2: I'm I'm almost I almost wish they just kept it classified,
Speaker 2: because this is a little depressing that this is what
Speaker 2: this is what our premier intelligence agency was doing. We're
Speaker 2: supposed to be a world class I did not lead
Speaker 2: the comments section.
Speaker 3: You will need to.
Speaker 1: Go back because I wrote down some comments, and we're
Speaker 1: gonna be talking about them.
Speaker 3: But before we do that, Before we do that, I
Speaker 3: got one last thing.
Speaker 1: So if if the Raiders of the Lost Dark was true,
Speaker 1: then maybe the third Indiana Jones movie was also true.
Speaker 1: That's the one where they found the Holy Grail. And
Speaker 1: so I looked that up. I wanted to see, have
Speaker 1: we found the Holy Grail? And so, as reported on
Speaker 1: all That's Interesting dot com, quote theories about where the
Speaker 1: Holy Grail can be found very wild, very widely. Some
Speaker 1: believe it's lost in the sewers of Jerusalem, while others
Speaker 1: believe it's hidden in the Americas. The Holy Grail has
Speaker 1: also been found in the ancient city of Antioch in Toledo, Ohio,
Speaker 1: of all places, and in two hundred other places across Europe.
Speaker 1: So what do we think is going to be the
Speaker 1: next big fool proof evidence of the truth of the Bible?
Speaker 3: Helen, what do you think? What's the next thing we're
Speaker 3: going to find?
Speaker 1: So if we got, if we got is Noah's Ark,
Speaker 1: I mean that we've found Noah's Ark, like we've got Okay,
Speaker 1: So let's so let's see, let's let's apply your give
Speaker 1: us some of your remote viewing from your your history
Speaker 1: there and see if you can divine the next wondrous
Speaker 1: artifact that we're going to be finding.
Speaker 4: We're going to find the cross, the cross that Jesus
Speaker 4: was crucified.
Speaker 1: On the cross, because I know that like Peter pop
Speaker 1: Off and people like that sell.
Speaker 3: Parts of the Cross.
Speaker 1: So we're going to find like the whole big thing, right, we.
Speaker 4: Find the whole going to are we're going to play
Speaker 4: put together like a puzzle, still Jesus together so that
Speaker 4: you can take that to the bank.
Speaker 2: Everybody.
Speaker 4: You can bet money on that that's the best thing
Speaker 4: they're going to find because I thought of it.
Speaker 2: Okay, obviously it's.
Speaker 1: True, right, all right, definitely true. Take your money to
Speaker 1: the bank.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 1: And this information is for entertainment purposes only, and we
Speaker 1: are non financial experts, blah blah blah, legal legal ease.
Speaker 3: And so on.
Speaker 1: Okay, So you wanted customer or you wanted reader comments,
Speaker 1: and I wrote down some of my favorite ones here,
Speaker 1: so we'll we'll talk about these. So this I'll get
Speaker 1: Jimmy's comment first on this one. This one was by
Speaker 1: a reader by the name of Elizabeth Hazard. Elizabeth said,
Speaker 1: it's interesting that our oligarchs dismissed psychics as whoey but
Speaker 1: then enlist their services in top secret intelligence operations. Very
Speaker 1: hypocritical and suspicious. It's either huey or it's not. We
Speaker 1: are just told great powers don't exist, so we don't
Speaker 1: rise up to them. That's what the Crickets did when
Speaker 1: the ants in Bugs Life. They made the ants feel weak,
Speaker 1: even though the answer and credibly strong and outnumber the
Speaker 1: crickets one hundred to one, and so plus one for
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Hazard for mentioning the Bugs Life. But Jimmy, what
Speaker 1: are your thoughts on that? Do you think this is
Speaker 1: just like a you know, some kind of manipulated manipulation tactic.
Speaker 1: They're trying to keep the keep the uninformed uninformed and
Speaker 1: chasing ghosts and stuff.
Speaker 2: I think Elizabeth Hazard was an intelligence officer as well,
Speaker 2: and probably the original classification authority for this whole thing,
Speaker 2: and classified herself because she knows. She knows that these
Speaker 2: psychics might actually be onto something, that the remote remote
Speaker 2: viewing might actually work. No, I don't think. I don't
Speaker 2: know where this person's coming from. I don't think that
Speaker 2: I don't think that this means that there's any credibility
Speaker 2: for it. I think that somebody said, you know what,
Speaker 2: all right, these people say that they can do this thing,
Speaker 2: we need to test it out. Okay, we need to
Speaker 2: test it out, and we need to see if they
Speaker 2: can really do it. That way we know for sure
Speaker 2: they either can or cannot. And I think that that's
Speaker 2: what really happened and why this test was done in
Speaker 2: the first place. I would be surprised if we found
Speaker 2: any more tests, you know, like two, three, five, ten
Speaker 2: years later they were still doing this stuff. I just
Speaker 2: think that, you know, a claim was made, they examined it,
Speaker 2: and that was it. And Elizabeth, no, I'm sorry. I
Speaker 2: don't think that this is a cover up. My conspiracy
Speaker 2: theory tendencies can't go that deep.
Speaker 3: All right. That sounds good.
Speaker 1: That's fair, fair assessment there, Helen, this one's for you.
Speaker 1: This one is from a reader by the name of
Speaker 1: Todd Turtle. He said, Todd says my best advice, and
Speaker 1: I want you to seriously consider this advice.
Speaker 3: Here.
Speaker 1: My best advice to anyone trying to prove the arc
Speaker 1: exists to not go messing around with things they are.
Speaker 3: Not authorized by God to do so.
Speaker 1: In the Bible, when King David and his army were
Speaker 1: moving the arc to Jerusalem when they retrieved it from
Speaker 1: the Philistines who wanted rid of it. A person during
Speaker 1: during celebration walking up the street barely touched it by
Speaker 1: accident and they died instantly. I think we saw some
Speaker 1: of that in that Indiana Jones movie. That's that famous
Speaker 1: scene at the end there with the Nazis. They sure
Speaker 1: learned their lesson. It's best to not mess with the
Speaker 1: arc until the appointed time to do so, and only
Speaker 1: by those God has authorized, which are certain protest proests
Speaker 1: from the Leevite tribe that's supposed.
Speaker 3: To pre Christ. You're right, which are certain priests?
Speaker 1: Yep, thank you for that was a certain priests from
Speaker 1: the Levite tribe that are of Jewish descent. So what
Speaker 1: do you think, do you think we're messing with powers
Speaker 1: we can't possibly comprehend and that we need to be
Speaker 1: careful with this or what's going on there?
Speaker 4: I just love the reply to that vice hear in
Speaker 4: Keslana who said, basically, only the worthy can lift mignor God.
Speaker 4: So basically that you have to be the right person
Speaker 4: at the right time and appointed by God to to like,
Speaker 4: you know, touch the Covenant.
Speaker 2: Listen.
Speaker 4: I don't I don't know my Bible.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 4: If your face is supposed to melt when you touch
Speaker 4: the ark of the Covenant, I don't know.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 4: If it doesn't melt the face of nazis that, I'm
Speaker 4: all for it. But other than that, other than that,
Speaker 4: this is just this is just apologetics again. And also
Speaker 4: to the conspiracy theory that you pointed out Scott. Again,
Speaker 4: either the government is efficient and wonderful masterminds and are
Speaker 4: playing like ten D chests and we're just setting out
Speaker 4: the board, or they're bumbling idiots.
Speaker 2: It's one or the other.
Speaker 3: So I think we know which one that is.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I just find it very funny that people like
Speaker 4: they just read the story and it's said, like, you know,
Speaker 4: this is not true. This is like removent reviewings not
Speaker 4: a thing, and then they do apologetics in a common
Speaker 4: session to try to explain that maybe they really did
Speaker 4: find the k Covenant, and you know, they just can't.
Speaker 4: You have to be super super special. There's that.
Speaker 2: So I wanted to say, you know, the thing that
Speaker 2: stands out to me with that quote is that you
Speaker 2: should not go messing around with things they are not
Speaker 2: authorized to do. So it sounds like God is handing
Speaker 2: out top secret security clearances and if you don't have
Speaker 2: one and you touch this thing, you'll die, right, So
Speaker 2: maybe this is really classified. And you know, I loved
Speaker 2: in the article. Anybody that's made it this far, in
Speaker 2: this in this semen you're still watching, please go back
Speaker 2: and find this article because there's a drawing of what
Speaker 2: the psychics we're seeing. And it's a picture of like
Speaker 2: this bird which is a seraphim, which they said was
Speaker 2: on each corner of the arc of the Covenant, which
Speaker 2: actually is not accurate if you check with the Torah. Uh,
Speaker 2: there's actually two angels or or cherubim on the Covenant
Speaker 2: and their wings are touching or whatever. I got that
Speaker 2: from Tora dot com and that was an article written
Speaker 2: by doctor Rabbi zeb Farmer. But in any case, there
Speaker 2: was a sketch of this bird person and it says
Speaker 2: around it, but how does it open?
Speaker 6: So the CIA, the CIA analyst was really into this,
Speaker 6: sketching down the thoughts and trying to figure out a
Speaker 6: way in I I loved it, and it reminded me
Speaker 6: of the times that I was deployed where we would
Speaker 6: just do stupid shit because.
Speaker 2: We were bored right and literally had nothing to do.
Speaker 2: I feel like there were some intelligence analysts like, hey,
Speaker 2: let's let's let's mock up this story about fake CIA
Speaker 2: psychics and in forty years people will find it and
Speaker 2: actually take it seriously.
Speaker 4: Haven't you guys seen O Have you guys seen the
Speaker 4: movie The Man Who star at Goats?
Speaker 2: Yes?
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, this is this is all I'm thinking of
Speaker 4: this article. Yeah, it's ridiculous and remote movings and you
Speaker 4: know your tax dollars being spent. I'm trying to see.
Speaker 4: I mean, you could see across large distances and maybe
Speaker 4: find the ark of the Covenant, right, it's insane.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, well, well, like Jimmy was saying, if you
Speaker 1: look at the drawings, they got it wrong, so this
Speaker 1: is not even the real Covenant. It kind of reminds
Speaker 1: me that scene in Monty Python in the Holy Grail
Speaker 1: when Sir Galahad fights his way to the Castle Anthrax
Speaker 1: and he's like, I've seen the Grail here, I've seen it.
Speaker 1: Then they're like, oops, we just lit our beacon, which
Speaker 1: I just now remember is grail shaped, and so they
Speaker 1: had a grail shaped beacon, and so he made a mistake,
Speaker 1: and so not a zut, not a zot. You deserve
Speaker 1: your spanking. But I want to read one more comment.
Speaker 1: I want to read one more comment, and this is
Speaker 1: from a reader by the name of gone Rhea, which
Speaker 1: is a very unfortunate name there, but it's spelled differently
Speaker 1: than the than the std, which happens to be my initials.
Speaker 1: So I got screwed on the last name and on
Speaker 1: the initials there. So this last comment is and this
Speaker 1: goes directly to Helen what you were saying. You said
Speaker 1: remote viewing is not a real thing, and how does
Speaker 1: this comment start out? Remote viewing and astra projection is
Speaker 1: a very real thing. So there, Helen. You can accomplish
Speaker 1: it through the use of You can accomplish it through
Speaker 1: the use of hallucinogenic drugs or lucid dreaming, not that
Speaker 1: those would cause anything else that might be different than
Speaker 1: actual remote viewing. I'm not recommending anyone to seek this out,
Speaker 1: as I believe it is forbidden. There's that thing again,
Speaker 1: that gatekeeping. It's forbidden by God. But when I was younger,
Speaker 1: I did both by accident by smoking salvia, which I
Speaker 1: actually looked up. Salvia is apparently a variation of sage
Speaker 1: or something like that.
Speaker 3: And I think that.
Speaker 1: Allowed me to remote view later in life while I
Speaker 1: was dreaming, while I was dreaming. No sense of self
Speaker 1: awareness on that comment there, Helen, what do you think
Speaker 1: about that?
Speaker 2: Well, checkmate, that was written, That was written directly for you.
Speaker 6: That was.
Speaker 3: She knew, they knew what you were going to say.
Speaker 3: I don't know, sure, I don't know.
Speaker 1: That's a pretty solid evidence there, that's pretty solid evidence.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 4: Yeah, color me impressed.
Speaker 3: Girl girl, girl girl, Jimmy, let's give you that. Sorry,
Speaker 3: what's that? Yeah? You do drugs.
Speaker 1: She did drugs and was dreaming and dream so imagine
Speaker 1: that it happened when it happened, Jimmy, let's give.
Speaker 3: You the last word on the story here.
Speaker 2: Would you could you imagine giving testimony and being taken
Speaker 2: seriously like your honor. I know this is true. I
Speaker 2: was on drugs and I was dreaming. Case closed, case closed.
Speaker 2: Uh yeah, she was.
Speaker 4: I couldn't do it.
Speaker 2: She did drug and then she had a dream and
Speaker 2: then she caught gone rhea. Uh and and who knows
Speaker 2: what she was doing while she was in that state
Speaker 2: of mind.
Speaker 3: But Uh.
Speaker 2: In any case, this has just been a lot of fun. Uh.
Speaker 2: I appreciate the comments, and I appreciate the banter. And uh,
Speaker 2: while I used to be a military intelligence analyst, I
Speaker 2: just want to say that, Uh, my thoughts are opinions
Speaker 2: on my own, and I don't represent any agency in
Speaker 2: the United States government and Department of Defense. And uh,
Speaker 2: I also don't think that any of this is credible,
Speaker 2: So that's just my You're just hiding.
Speaker 1: Yeah, right, you guys are You're just trying to to
Speaker 1: you know, to bum our high man.
Speaker 3: You're trying to high Maybe we should.
Speaker 2: Go take some hallucinogenics after this.
Speaker 4: Maybe take a nap and then trying to remove you
Speaker 4: maybe you'll find the ark of cove.
Speaker 3: Yeah, maybe maybe you could. Maybe you could.
Speaker 1: All right, well, hey, I just want to tell both
Speaker 1: of you that I had a really great time this
Speaker 1: week talking to the two of you. I think we
Speaker 1: had some really interesting conversations and I look forward to
Speaker 1: the next time we have an opportunity to do that.