WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.560 --> 00:00:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Look, it's a great question, and I've predicated my statements

2
00:00:03.480 --> 00:00:06.759
<v Speaker 1>by saying this isn't a Democrat versus Republican thing. As

3
00:00:06.799 --> 00:00:09.279
<v Speaker 1>you just pointed out on fit twenty one seventy one,

4
00:00:09.279 --> 00:00:12.599
<v Speaker 1>Democrats voted for it. Like you know, Actually, frankly, if

5
00:00:12.599 --> 00:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>there's any party that philosophically should agree with like getting

6
00:00:17.440 --> 00:00:20.399
<v Speaker 1>out crypto to the people, it's the Democrats, right. I mean,

7
00:00:20.440 --> 00:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>these are the people that I've always believed in pushed

8
00:00:22.760 --> 00:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the power back to the people, right. They believe they're

9
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:29.519
<v Speaker 1>open for freedom, et cetera. Party alignment is strong.

10
00:00:36.240 --> 00:00:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Welcome into the Thinking Crypto Podcast. I'm your host, Tony Edward,

11
00:00:39.399 --> 00:00:41.399
<v Speaker 2>and with me today is Mike Belshie, who's the co

12
00:00:41.479 --> 00:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>founder and CEO of Bitgo. Mike, great to have you back.

13
00:00:45.200 --> 00:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>On Always good to see you, Tony. How are you great?

14
00:00:48.719 --> 00:00:52.439
<v Speaker 2>Mike? I always love speaking to you because of your

15
00:00:52.520 --> 00:00:55.840
<v Speaker 2>web pedigree web one point zero two point zero, and

16
00:00:55.840 --> 00:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>you have just a great perspective on technology in the markets.

17
00:01:00.119 --> 00:01:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Start with bitgo. What's new any clients that you can

18
00:01:04.799 --> 00:01:07.439
<v Speaker 2>highlight anything cool that you guys are working on.

19
00:01:08.359 --> 00:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, thanks, Tony, it's always always a pleasure to be here.

20
00:01:11.159 --> 00:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>You do a great job covering the space. Look, the

21
00:01:14.519 --> 00:01:17.879
<v Speaker 1>industry moves at a million miles an hour, and Bitco

22
00:01:18.120 --> 00:01:21.239
<v Speaker 1>is no exception. Been really happy. We've we've been growing

23
00:01:21.239 --> 00:01:24.079
<v Speaker 1>the team considerably this year just on all the new

24
00:01:24.159 --> 00:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>initiatives that we have. One of the things you might

25
00:01:26.400 --> 00:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>have heard about is go Network. Go Network is finally

26
00:01:29.680 --> 00:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>connecting the ability to post trade settlements all within qualified custody.

27
00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Pretty Much every single one of our institutional customers needs this.

28
00:01:37.239 --> 00:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>They've been doing various forms of you know, on chain,

29
00:01:42.000 --> 00:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, self custody. I'll call them hacks. And while

30
00:01:45.799 --> 00:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that works great for individuals, when it comes to businesses,

31
00:01:48.799 --> 00:01:50.719
<v Speaker 1>they really can't be holding their own keys. They don't

32
00:01:50.760 --> 00:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>want to hold their own keys. They know this. So

33
00:01:53.760 --> 00:01:56.159
<v Speaker 1>we've spent a ton of time. We got super fast

34
00:01:56.159 --> 00:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>withdrawals straight out of cold custody. It's in qualified custody

35
00:02:00.040 --> 00:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>all the time. And the reaction that we had, you know,

36
00:02:02.640 --> 00:02:04.239
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago is like, well, you know,

37
00:02:04.359 --> 00:02:07.519
<v Speaker 1>I got other operational processes, et cetera. But this year,

38
00:02:07.640 --> 00:02:10.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, the tune has really changed, and so people

39
00:02:10.039 --> 00:02:12.639
<v Speaker 1>are really excited about that. Other than that, you know,

40
00:02:12.680 --> 00:02:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the bull market carries everybody we've expanded our trading offering,

41
00:02:16.599 --> 00:02:21.319
<v Speaker 1>we've expanded our our custody offering, and you know, pretty

42
00:02:21.360 --> 00:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>much kind of at all time highs I guess for

43
00:02:24.120 --> 00:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the company in terms of how things are doing. Uh,

44
00:02:26.840 --> 00:02:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the ETF markets have helped. Obviously, we're custodying a number

45
00:02:29.919 --> 00:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of those, some of them we haven't heard about yet,

46
00:02:32.560 --> 00:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>which are coming as well, but as we're good. And

47
00:02:35.240 --> 00:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>then lastly we're finally getting our full network of you know,

48
00:02:39.960 --> 00:02:43.439
<v Speaker 1>global custodians together are fully fully operationally, I should say,

49
00:02:43.439 --> 00:02:45.719
<v Speaker 1>it takes time, you know, get the regulatory clearances for

50
00:02:45.919 --> 00:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>all the parts of the stack. Bicko does a tremendous

51
00:02:48.960 --> 00:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of staking. For instance, we spend a lot of

52
00:02:50.719 --> 00:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>time with regulators understanding what it means to be doing

53
00:02:54.439 --> 00:02:57.879
<v Speaker 1>staking from within uh, from within qualified because see, of

54
00:02:57.919 --> 00:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>course we did that in an institutional way that it

55
00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>never has any friction with the regulators. But there's so

56
00:03:03.199 --> 00:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>much confusion about how this industry works that we have

57
00:03:07.159 --> 00:03:08.319
<v Speaker 1>to do a lot of time with it. So anyway,

58
00:03:08.400 --> 00:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Tobai is very close to being up and running Singapore,

59
00:03:11.080 --> 00:03:13.599
<v Speaker 1>very close to being up and running our Boffin license.

60
00:03:14.400 --> 00:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, European entity is already running and that's been

61
00:03:17.000 --> 00:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>growing very well. It's one hundred percent MEEKER ready today.

62
00:03:21.639 --> 00:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So actually, from Bicco's perspective, you know, we'd like to

63
00:03:24.919 --> 00:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>like to have MEEK go into effect. Effect Earlier we

64
00:03:28.840 --> 00:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>went with the hardest regulator we're in in Germany with

65
00:03:31.560 --> 00:03:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Boffen that's like the New York dfs of Europe. But

66
00:03:35.360 --> 00:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to you know, being ready for the next

67
00:03:38.080 --> 00:03:41.479
<v Speaker 1>wave of institutions, and you know, the next wave brings

68
00:03:41.520 --> 00:03:44.159
<v Speaker 1>in the more and more conservative folks, so pension funds

69
00:03:44.560 --> 00:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that previously couldn't touch crypto because the infrastructure wasn't ready.

70
00:03:48.319 --> 00:03:50.599
<v Speaker 1>We want to make sure we've got the infrastructure ready.

71
00:03:51.120 --> 00:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're doing and so far it's got really

72
00:03:54.080 --> 00:03:55.159
<v Speaker 1>good positive signals.

73
00:03:55.879 --> 00:03:59.319
<v Speaker 2>That's amazing. Congrats on the success. Follow up question on

74
00:03:59.360 --> 00:04:04.199
<v Speaker 2>your expansion in Dubai. Are you seeing demand from sovereign

75
00:04:04.319 --> 00:04:06.840
<v Speaker 2>wealth funds? That's been you know, one of the areas

76
00:04:06.840 --> 00:04:08.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people are interested in because they know

77
00:04:08.680 --> 00:04:12.120
<v Speaker 2>endowments are here, they know hedge funds, family offices, high

78
00:04:12.120 --> 00:04:14.319
<v Speaker 2>net worth individuals, but a lot of folks have been

79
00:04:14.319 --> 00:04:16.319
<v Speaker 2>wondering where are the sovereign wealth funds.

80
00:04:17.959 --> 00:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I mean they've been in for quite some time,

81
00:04:20.439 --> 00:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>so this isn't this isn't new, and I don't think

82
00:04:23.279 --> 00:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it's surprised obviously, you know, tremendous amount of investment from Dubai.

83
00:04:27.839 --> 00:04:30.959
<v Speaker 1>I think the UAE in general is a super positive

84
00:04:31.000 --> 00:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>business climate, you know. I mean obviously that entire region

85
00:04:34.879 --> 00:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>is has a bit of a single point of failure

86
00:04:37.319 --> 00:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>within their business acumen, you know, too much on just

87
00:04:40.199 --> 00:04:44.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of oil and energy. They're looking to diversify. They

88
00:04:44.480 --> 00:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>are spending in tremus amount of resources to bring technology

89
00:04:47.560 --> 00:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that includes you know, obviously crypto, bitcoin, et cetera, so

90
00:04:51.079 --> 00:04:54.879
<v Speaker 1>includes AI and things like that. So the regulators there,

91
00:04:54.920 --> 00:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we find are very much trying to understand what the

92
00:04:58.040 --> 00:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>issues are, how they can provide great service. I think

93
00:05:00.680 --> 00:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>they've got a real opportunity to become like a global

94
00:05:03.399 --> 00:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>hub of finance over the next ten years. They're definitely

95
00:05:09.160 --> 00:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>they have a great attitude.

96
00:05:11.680 --> 00:05:14.199
<v Speaker 2>For sure. And do you feel that, you know, once

97
00:05:14.240 --> 00:05:17.720
<v Speaker 2>we figure out some of the legislation and regulations here

98
00:05:17.759 --> 00:05:21.600
<v Speaker 2>in the US and there's clarity, some of that business

99
00:05:21.639 --> 00:05:23.319
<v Speaker 2>in these other parts of the world will come to

100
00:05:23.360 --> 00:05:26.079
<v Speaker 2>the United States, maybe some that have already left, and

101
00:05:26.160 --> 00:05:26.920
<v Speaker 2>they may come back.

102
00:05:28.399 --> 00:05:31.199
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I mean crypto is still relatively small, so

103
00:05:31.199 --> 00:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the amount that's left, I think is also relatively small.

104
00:05:35.160 --> 00:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>By definition, the US owns the markets, right, it is

105
00:05:39.240 --> 00:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>ours to lose. We have the most stable markets, we

106
00:05:42.839 --> 00:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>have the strongest legal system. As long as we continue

107
00:05:46.279 --> 00:05:50.399
<v Speaker 1>to provide stable currencies like a reserve currency that everybody

108
00:05:50.399 --> 00:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>can trust and understand and use, as long as we

109
00:05:53.360 --> 00:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>continue to provide a legal backdrop that provides a fair

110
00:05:57.000 --> 00:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and understandable business climate, we will win. And this is

111
00:06:01.040 --> 00:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>where like the current events are so troubling. I mean, obviously,

112
00:06:04.079 --> 00:06:07.879
<v Speaker 1>on the US dollar side, sanctions controls, I understand the

113
00:06:07.920 --> 00:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>need for politically to have sanctions et cetera. And of

114
00:06:11.360 --> 00:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>course you know we fully abide by that, but the

115
00:06:13.800 --> 00:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>US needs to be very careful when you tell the

116
00:06:15.879 --> 00:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>world that you might take away their money and use

117
00:06:20.519 --> 00:06:24.079
<v Speaker 1>it to fund their enemies. In some cases, if if

118
00:06:24.079 --> 00:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you go a foul of US policy, you're telling the

119
00:06:26.399 --> 00:06:28.639
<v Speaker 1>world like, hey, you need to be really extra careful

120
00:06:28.680 --> 00:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>about using US dollars as a reserve reserve currency. Further,

121
00:06:33.600 --> 00:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>on the law front, you know, whether it's the SEC

122
00:06:37.959 --> 00:06:41.079
<v Speaker 1>or other, when we make it difficult for businesses to

123
00:06:41.120 --> 00:06:44.199
<v Speaker 1>predict how they're going to operate. They won't operate. But

124
00:06:44.879 --> 00:06:48.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, the demand is there. Crypto hits I forget,

125
00:06:48.759 --> 00:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty million Americans today globally, it's growing on a daily basis.

126
00:06:53.959 --> 00:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>It's absolutely unquestionable that the people of the world, not

127
00:06:58.879 --> 00:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>just the US, want to have good access to crypto

128
00:07:02.680 --> 00:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and the United States has a choice either a regulators,

129
00:07:06.480 --> 00:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, get off their high horse and start working

130
00:07:09.199 --> 00:07:11.399
<v Speaker 1>with business to figure out how to bring it here.

131
00:07:11.879 --> 00:07:13.759
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it may have faults to do that,

132
00:07:13.839 --> 00:07:16.439
<v Speaker 1>it may seem uncomfortable for others to do that. I

133
00:07:16.480 --> 00:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>tell you, you know, Bicco is here to help make it

134
00:07:18.399 --> 00:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>work well for regulators coinbases as well. There's a bunch

135
00:07:21.720 --> 00:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of stand up companies that are really working hard to

136
00:07:24.519 --> 00:07:27.519
<v Speaker 1>make it so that regulatory needs could be met. But

137
00:07:27.720 --> 00:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>if we do that, we can bring all the business here.

138
00:07:30.360 --> 00:07:32.439
<v Speaker 1>We can do it over an interative period. You get

139
00:07:32.439 --> 00:07:34.879
<v Speaker 1>the business here first. And there's two things. I mean

140
00:07:35.040 --> 00:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>people worry about, like you said, you know, us money

141
00:07:38.319 --> 00:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>leaving the US to go find better regulatory environments. But

142
00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:45.439
<v Speaker 1>don't forget there's also the opportunity to have all of

143
00:07:45.480 --> 00:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the world's money come to the US markets right, and

144
00:07:49.160 --> 00:07:50.839
<v Speaker 1>as long as we don't have our act together, I

145
00:07:50.879 --> 00:07:52.879
<v Speaker 1>get specific examples as we go deeper. I know you

146
00:07:52.920 --> 00:07:54.639
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about SEV one twenty one and stuff

147
00:07:54.680 --> 00:07:58.839
<v Speaker 1>like that, but if we don't get our act together,

148
00:07:58.959 --> 00:08:02.279
<v Speaker 1>that money doesn't come to the US, which otherwise by default,

149
00:08:02.759 --> 00:08:07.399
<v Speaker 1>we have the strongest, best, safest markets here today. It's

150
00:08:07.439 --> 00:08:07.959
<v Speaker 1>our solution.

151
00:08:08.879 --> 00:08:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, And on that note, we'd slop one two one.

152
00:08:13.360 --> 00:08:16.399
<v Speaker 2>I want to get your thoughts, And obviously your POV

153
00:08:16.600 --> 00:08:20.720
<v Speaker 2>is very critical because you're working in the custody business.

154
00:08:20.720 --> 00:08:24.839
<v Speaker 2>You're helping to custody institutions and many other folks. What

155
00:08:24.879 --> 00:08:28.120
<v Speaker 2>are your thoughts in the situation? One the repeal and

156
00:08:28.120 --> 00:08:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Biden vetoed it, and it seems to be still something

157
00:08:31.720 --> 00:08:34.159
<v Speaker 2>that's working its way through the House that they may

158
00:08:34.240 --> 00:08:36.080
<v Speaker 2>try to get it back up. I know there was

159
00:08:37.399 --> 00:08:40.879
<v Speaker 2>the vote to overturn Biden's beach it didn't go through,

160
00:08:40.879 --> 00:08:42.919
<v Speaker 2>but there are some bills that may solve it. But

161
00:08:43.000 --> 00:08:45.320
<v Speaker 2>what are your take what's your take on this entire situation.

162
00:08:46.879 --> 00:08:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Look, I think there's been a coordinated effort from the

163
00:08:49.320 --> 00:08:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration to lock down crypto and SAB one twenty

164
00:08:55.320 --> 00:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>one has been what they've put in the front as

165
00:08:58.799 --> 00:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of the lightning rod. Attention. Look, Gary Gensler, you know,

166
00:09:02.919 --> 00:09:06.919
<v Speaker 1>at the SEC has been controversial in crypto, certainly struggled

167
00:09:06.919 --> 00:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>on a bunch of fronts. By creating SAB one twenty one,

168
00:09:10.159 --> 00:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>they continue to put the lightning rod on him. But

169
00:09:14.480 --> 00:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>SAB one twenty one at the end of the day,

170
00:09:16.360 --> 00:09:19.799
<v Speaker 1>is a side show. It's not the real issue. Now,

171
00:09:19.799 --> 00:09:21.639
<v Speaker 1>before I go deeper, I want to I want to

172
00:09:21.639 --> 00:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>make it clear. I don't think this is a political

173
00:09:23.679 --> 00:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>issue for Democrats versus Republicans. This is this is a

174
00:09:27.000 --> 00:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>political issue, but it's individuals, and there's only a few

175
00:09:30.360 --> 00:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of them, you know. So Joe Biden has made it

176
00:09:32.679 --> 00:09:37.039
<v Speaker 1>very clear he is anti crypto. You know, Elizabeth Warren

177
00:09:37.200 --> 00:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously is on that list. We've got Brad Sherman, We've

178
00:09:41.240 --> 00:09:43.879
<v Speaker 1>got Maxine Waters. We've got a few people here right

179
00:09:44.120 --> 00:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that are bad apples. And you know, by the way,

180
00:09:47.000 --> 00:09:49.519
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a jeriatic problem with all of these

181
00:09:49.559 --> 00:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>guys not understanding technology as well, which is interesting, but

182
00:09:53.639 --> 00:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>we'll leave that for somebody else who's more expert on politics.

183
00:09:57.120 --> 00:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to SAB one twenty one, I think

184
00:10:00.320 --> 00:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>they've consciously decided to make it look like it's all

185
00:10:02.840 --> 00:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the SEC's fault. But actually that's not the big steal,

186
00:10:06.559 --> 00:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>because even if we were peeled SAP one twenty one,

187
00:10:11.200 --> 00:10:13.799
<v Speaker 1>the traditional banks would not be coming a non crypto

188
00:10:14.279 --> 00:10:17.039
<v Speaker 1>And that's because there's actually three agencies that matter, and

189
00:10:17.080 --> 00:10:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the SEC is probably the bottom of the list. It's

190
00:10:20.879 --> 00:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly the bottom of the list when it comes to

191
00:10:22.519 --> 00:10:26.279
<v Speaker 1>supporting bitcoin as opposed to you know, other types of

192
00:10:26.320 --> 00:10:28.759
<v Speaker 1>crypto assets. So what I mean by that is the

193
00:10:28.799 --> 00:10:32.879
<v Speaker 1>three agencies that matter is the OCC, the FDIC, and

194
00:10:32.919 --> 00:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the SEC, and I would rank them in that order.

195
00:10:36.480 --> 00:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So the OCC is the Office of the Control of

196
00:10:38.879 --> 00:10:43.039
<v Speaker 1>the Control of the Currency. And remember under the previous administration,

197
00:10:43.159 --> 00:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Brian Brooks was the interim OCC Controller and under that

198
00:10:50.159 --> 00:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>administration they made it available that crypto could there's a

199
00:10:54.000 --> 00:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>path for traditional banks. This is Bank in New York Mellon,

200
00:10:57.879 --> 00:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>this is State Street, this is JP Morgan, etc. To

201
00:11:01.559 --> 00:11:03.519
<v Speaker 1>be able to cuss see crypto. And of course, if

202
00:11:03.559 --> 00:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to de risk this industry, the number one

203
00:11:06.399 --> 00:11:08.639
<v Speaker 1>thing you should do is go and list the guys

204
00:11:08.679 --> 00:11:10.879
<v Speaker 1>that are the experts in risk. Right, So these are

205
00:11:10.879 --> 00:11:13.279
<v Speaker 1>the biggest institutions of America. They know how to do

206
00:11:13.279 --> 00:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it well. They absolutely should be invited into the ecosystem,

207
00:11:17.279 --> 00:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Brooks made that possible. Then we had a

208
00:11:20.440 --> 00:11:23.399
<v Speaker 1>new administration under Joe Biden come in and not a

209
00:11:23.440 --> 00:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>single law was changed, not a single regulatory written word

210
00:11:27.720 --> 00:11:30.639
<v Speaker 1>was changed. And yet all of a sudden, the new

211
00:11:30.720 --> 00:11:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Comptroller of the Currency, and this is interim Comptroller, Michael

212
00:11:34.440 --> 00:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>schu had a night and day, black and white, completely

213
00:11:38.399 --> 00:11:44.519
<v Speaker 1>opposite interpretation of the exact same regulatory and legal constructs. Now,

214
00:11:44.879 --> 00:11:48.399
<v Speaker 1>if this doesn't piss off Congress, I don't know what should,

215
00:11:48.440 --> 00:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>because they have been made completely impotent by the administration.

216
00:11:52.679 --> 00:11:55.799
<v Speaker 1>And I don't believe that this makes good business. What

217
00:11:55.879 --> 00:11:58.279
<v Speaker 1>do we want in America? We want to have businesses

218
00:11:58.440 --> 00:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>have a set of rules to comply with. You can

219
00:12:00.440 --> 00:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>agree or disagree with them, but they shouldn't change just

220
00:12:03.600 --> 00:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>because the President switches seats. Right, something written should have happened,

221
00:12:08.159 --> 00:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and yet nothing was written, and yet the policy went

222
00:12:10.840 --> 00:12:13.799
<v Speaker 1>completely in a different direction. This is a real problem

223
00:12:13.799 --> 00:12:16.799
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. This indicates that the US may

224
00:12:16.879 --> 00:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not be the bedrock of stability that it once was

225
00:12:20.080 --> 00:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to law. All right. So anyway, Office

226
00:12:22.720 --> 00:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of the cum Ful of the Country, Currency absolutely is

227
00:12:25.759 --> 00:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the gateway. They claim safety and soundness issues with regard

228
00:12:29.360 --> 00:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>to bitcoin and digital assets, and they will not allow

229
00:12:32.799 --> 00:12:37.159
<v Speaker 1>any federal chartered bank today to touch crypto. So that's

230
00:12:37.200 --> 00:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a problem. Now. Even if you get past there, and

231
00:12:39.600 --> 00:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>there's some good news, we've got a federal federal powers

232
00:12:43.440 --> 00:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>versus state powers, there's a whole bunch of state powered

233
00:12:46.159 --> 00:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>banks that are not governed by the occ they are

234
00:12:48.679 --> 00:12:52.039
<v Speaker 1>not regulated there. So look, a bunch of state chartered

235
00:12:52.039 --> 00:12:55.919
<v Speaker 1>banks are absolutely in on crypto. And for the most part,

236
00:12:56.159 --> 00:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, that does give us still some avenues into

237
00:12:59.159 --> 00:13:02.159
<v Speaker 1>the banking system, which is critical for building a great

238
00:13:02.840 --> 00:13:07.759
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem for the new wave of finance. But introduce the

239
00:13:07.840 --> 00:13:12.799
<v Speaker 1>FDIC also a federal agency. So obviously pretty much every

240
00:13:12.799 --> 00:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>bank in America wants to be FDIC insured, and that

241
00:13:16.720 --> 00:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>means they are subject to the scrutiny of the FDIC regulator.

242
00:13:20.080 --> 00:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>FDIC regulator I Guy was his name, sort of the

243
00:13:23.639 --> 00:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>g He might be retiring, he's pseudo retiring anyway, he's

244
00:13:29.120 --> 00:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>been absolutely negative on crypto for quite some time. In

245
00:13:32.399 --> 00:13:36.279
<v Speaker 1>April twenty twenty two, he came out and said Gruenberg. Sorry, yeah,

246
00:13:36.279 --> 00:13:38.879
<v Speaker 1>that's his name. He came out in April twenty two

247
00:13:39.399 --> 00:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and said, if you guys are touching crypto any of

248
00:13:42.159 --> 00:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>my regulated entities, If you're touching crypto, I'm going to

249
00:13:46.600 --> 00:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>put you on extra scrutiny. I need more documentation. I

250
00:13:49.240 --> 00:13:51.919
<v Speaker 1>need to know exactly what you're doing. And basically what

251
00:13:51.960 --> 00:13:54.679
<v Speaker 1>he did is setting said, if you get into this

252
00:13:54.720 --> 00:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>part of the business, your life is going to get harder.

253
00:13:57.720 --> 00:13:59.519
<v Speaker 1>And every bank had to make a choice. And look,

254
00:13:59.519 --> 00:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to businesses just like everybody else, and they

255
00:14:01.879 --> 00:14:05.399
<v Speaker 1>want to participate in the future and what's up and coming.

256
00:14:05.440 --> 00:14:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Of course they do, but they've also got their mainline

257
00:14:09.200 --> 00:14:12.519
<v Speaker 1>business in traditional finance, and do they want to take

258
00:14:12.559 --> 00:14:14.799
<v Speaker 1>on that battle. So a number of state chartered banks

259
00:14:14.840 --> 00:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>have dropped out as a result of the FDIC. And

260
00:14:17.480 --> 00:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>then the guy at ranked third is actually the SEC. Now,

261
00:14:20.240 --> 00:14:23.919
<v Speaker 1>the SEC is critical if you're launching something that somebody

262
00:14:24.000 --> 00:14:28.039
<v Speaker 1>might determine as a commodity, I'm sorry, a security. Bitcoin.

263
00:14:28.080 --> 00:14:30.519
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's pretty much already been declared a commodity.

264
00:14:30.840 --> 00:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I think eth has now gotten the past as well.

265
00:14:33.639 --> 00:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's now officially a commodity, even though it

266
00:14:35.639 --> 00:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of went up and down for a little while.

267
00:14:38.440 --> 00:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So the SEC is important for information disclosures, et cetera.

268
00:14:41.519 --> 00:14:44.519
<v Speaker 1>If you're building securities that one's still getting sorted out.

269
00:14:44.720 --> 00:14:50.919
<v Speaker 1>It looks like increasingly tokens sold as tokens are not securities.

270
00:14:50.960 --> 00:14:53.039
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean that they couldn't be sold or packaged

271
00:14:53.080 --> 00:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>into security type products, which the CEC absolutely has purview over,

272
00:14:58.039 --> 00:15:01.679
<v Speaker 1>but in general, you know, anyway, they'll sort out. So

273
00:15:01.840 --> 00:15:04.559
<v Speaker 1>SAB one twenty one is down there. As you know,

274
00:15:04.679 --> 00:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the FIT twenty one bill, which starts to do much

275
00:15:07.799 --> 00:15:12.919
<v Speaker 1>more interesting things for crypto, which is introduce regulatory market structure,

276
00:15:12.960 --> 00:15:18.039
<v Speaker 1>which would actually greatly expand the safety and stability of

277
00:15:18.039 --> 00:15:21.039
<v Speaker 1>our markets that we trade on for crypto. It also

278
00:15:21.440 --> 00:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>effectively neutralizes SAB one twenty one. So anyway, sorry that

279
00:15:26.120 --> 00:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>was so long winded, but I think it's really important

280
00:15:28.600 --> 00:15:31.559
<v Speaker 1>for people to understand, like who are the federal agencies

281
00:15:31.600 --> 00:15:35.159
<v Speaker 1>that matter? And it's interesting to note that when a

282
00:15:35.200 --> 00:15:38.039
<v Speaker 1>new administration comes into power in the United States, he

283
00:15:38.120 --> 00:15:40.519
<v Speaker 1>pretty much immediately puts new people in charge of all

284
00:15:40.559 --> 00:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of those, right, So really what it comes down to

285
00:15:44.480 --> 00:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is whatever the president says goes. And this is why

286
00:15:47.399 --> 00:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in this electrical cycle it's so important to think if

287
00:15:50.000 --> 00:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you are a crypto voter, you have to be voting

288
00:15:53.480 --> 00:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for a president that's going to support crypto, and you know,

289
00:15:57.200 --> 00:15:59.639
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately the current administration just isn't it.

290
00:16:00.799 --> 00:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Mike, That's great inside because I didn't think about the

291
00:16:03.159 --> 00:16:06.879
<v Speaker 2>OCC and FDIIC. Everyone had their targets set on the SEC.

292
00:16:07.799 --> 00:16:10.360
<v Speaker 2>But it's a great context that even if this was

293
00:16:10.440 --> 00:16:12.679
<v Speaker 2>a result from an SEC standpoint, you still have these

294
00:16:12.679 --> 00:16:15.759
<v Speaker 2>other two hurdles. A quick follow up question though, on

295
00:16:16.279 --> 00:16:21.360
<v Speaker 2>the handful of people, and aside from the geriatric layer,

296
00:16:22.200 --> 00:16:25.039
<v Speaker 2>why do you think they are so anti crypto? Because

297
00:16:25.039 --> 00:16:27.960
<v Speaker 2>even the younger Democrats in the House and some in

298
00:16:28.000 --> 00:16:30.840
<v Speaker 2>the Senate were you know, joined with the Republican colleagues

299
00:16:30.879 --> 00:16:33.639
<v Speaker 2>to repealself one to one to pass the FIT twenty

300
00:16:33.679 --> 00:16:35.320
<v Speaker 2>one bill out of the House. But you have this,

301
00:16:35.519 --> 00:16:38.000
<v Speaker 2>these handful of folks, and I'm scratching my head trying

302
00:16:38.000 --> 00:16:41.200
<v Speaker 2>to figure out, you know, is this a currency control issue?

303
00:16:41.279 --> 00:16:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Is it we can't properly understand or tax this, or

304
00:16:45.600 --> 00:16:49.360
<v Speaker 2>we don't control it, and that's why there's this Okay,

305
00:16:49.399 --> 00:16:52.799
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to allow you know, following Biden, Elizabeth Warren,

306
00:16:52.919 --> 00:16:54.559
<v Speaker 2>Brad Sherman, what do you think that is?

307
00:16:55.759 --> 00:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Look, it's a great question, and I predicated my statements

308
00:16:58.639 --> 00:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>by saying this isn't a Democrat versus Republican thing. As

309
00:17:02.000 --> 00:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you just pointed out on fit twenty one, seventy one

310
00:17:04.480 --> 00:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Democrats voted for it. Like Actually, frankly, if there's any

311
00:17:08.720 --> 00:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>party that philosophically should agree with like getting out crypto

312
00:17:13.400 --> 00:17:15.759
<v Speaker 1>to the people, it's the Democrats, right. I mean, these

313
00:17:15.799 --> 00:17:18.039
<v Speaker 1>are the people that I've always believed in pushed the

314
00:17:18.079 --> 00:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>power back to the people, right, they believe they're open

315
00:17:21.440 --> 00:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for freedom, et cetera. Party alignment is strong. So the

316
00:17:26.039 --> 00:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that there's a few you know that don't like

317
00:17:29.039 --> 00:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>crypto in Congress or in the White House shouldn't be surprising.

318
00:17:34.000 --> 00:17:36.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course there's different points of view out

319
00:17:36.559 --> 00:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>there now the individuals involved. Look, I do think that

320
00:17:40.599 --> 00:17:42.559
<v Speaker 1>age is a problem. I think they really have a

321
00:17:42.599 --> 00:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>hard time understanding how new technology is going to fit

322
00:17:46.279 --> 00:17:49.039
<v Speaker 1>affect the world, and they're just afraid of it. And

323
00:17:49.079 --> 00:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I think this is something that you know, is not

324
00:17:51.079 --> 00:17:53.799
<v Speaker 1>specific to these individuals. I think it's it's a human

325
00:17:53.880 --> 00:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>nature thing. You and I are going to go through

326
00:17:55.519 --> 00:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it as well. As we get older and older, we

327
00:17:57.480 --> 00:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>will also become a little bit you know, grumpy and

328
00:18:00.200 --> 00:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>be fuddled about whatever it is that's coming next. It's

329
00:18:03.759 --> 00:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of our destiny, all right, unless we live forever,

330
00:18:06.680 --> 00:18:09.079
<v Speaker 1>I guess, and then maybe maybe we forget that technology

331
00:18:09.119 --> 00:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>will be okay. But you know, these individuals also happen

332
00:18:12.960 --> 00:18:15.079
<v Speaker 1>to be a little bit farther on the statist curve.

333
00:18:15.559 --> 00:18:18.319
<v Speaker 1>So there is a group of people that believe in

334
00:18:18.359 --> 00:18:22.519
<v Speaker 1>the absolute power of the centralized government, and they think

335
00:18:22.559 --> 00:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that what's best for the people is for the centralized

336
00:18:25.680 --> 00:18:29.759
<v Speaker 1>government to have control of all things. And it's very

337
00:18:29.759 --> 00:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>interesting that, you know, when it comes to money, that

338
00:18:32.559 --> 00:18:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is the number one way that you can control people politically.

339
00:18:37.480 --> 00:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>One great example we saw was with COVID nineteen. We

340
00:18:40.160 --> 00:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>had the truckers protest, right, and this of course was

341
00:18:43.160 --> 00:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in Canada, but Canada and the US are very similar here,

342
00:18:47.279 --> 00:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and Canada came out and said, we're going to freeze

343
00:18:49.680 --> 00:18:53.599
<v Speaker 1>the bank accounts of the truckers that are protesting. I mean,

344
00:18:53.640 --> 00:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>this is an incredible thing to do, right, You're going

345
00:18:56.240 --> 00:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to attack somebody's finance the livelihood of not just them,

346
00:18:59.200 --> 00:19:03.319
<v Speaker 1>but they're family based on their political viewpoints and their

347
00:19:03.359 --> 00:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>desire to protest against the government that they disagree with.

348
00:19:07.799 --> 00:19:10.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly good news is that was in Canada,

349
00:19:10.640 --> 00:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>not the United States. But it's absolutely antithetical to you

350
00:19:14.640 --> 00:19:19.759
<v Speaker 1>know what I believe every American, every American patriot believes in. So,

351
00:19:19.880 --> 00:19:22.799
<v Speaker 1>like some of these folks that are status level people,

352
00:19:24.079 --> 00:19:26.799
<v Speaker 1>they very much want to have the dollar continue to dominate.

353
00:19:27.359 --> 00:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>These are not financial experts. They do not understand free

354
00:19:30.119 --> 00:19:34.079
<v Speaker 1>markets per se. They do understand control, and they're afraid that,

355
00:19:34.200 --> 00:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, bitcoin will take away some of the control

356
00:19:36.960 --> 00:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>that they have today with the dollar. It's true bitcoin will,

357
00:19:41.720 --> 00:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>So they should be afraid of that if that's what

358
00:19:43.400 --> 00:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you're really afraid of. But if you are actually for

359
00:19:46.759 --> 00:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the people, if you actually want the people to have

360
00:19:49.480 --> 00:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>power and so that the banks to have power, then

361
00:19:51.960 --> 00:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of course you should believe that people should have the

362
00:19:54.720 --> 00:19:57.799
<v Speaker 1>right to access to money. They should have private access

363
00:19:57.799 --> 00:20:00.559
<v Speaker 1>to money. You shouldn't be judged based on your trans actions.

364
00:20:00.960 --> 00:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>The government shouldn't be able to supervise all of it

365
00:20:03.160 --> 00:20:07.599
<v Speaker 1>through a CBDC. These are just very basic things. If

366
00:20:07.640 --> 00:20:10.599
<v Speaker 1>you want to really give power to the people, So

367
00:20:11.079 --> 00:20:14.279
<v Speaker 1>all right, Anyway, we've got at least three different factions

368
00:20:14.279 --> 00:20:17.039
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about right here. Right We've got some at

369
00:20:17.039 --> 00:20:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the federal level that want to increase federal level federal

370
00:20:19.759 --> 00:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>powers all the way up to centralization and statism. We've

371
00:20:23.200 --> 00:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>got those that believe in strong federal powers, maybe not

372
00:20:26.200 --> 00:20:28.279
<v Speaker 1>quite as extreme. And then the third, you know, where

373
00:20:28.279 --> 00:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>should the state powers be with regards to banking. You know,

374
00:20:31.000 --> 00:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>should the FDI see really have this ability to overlay

375
00:20:34.680 --> 00:20:38.039
<v Speaker 1>and influence all of the state banks, preventing them from

376
00:20:38.039 --> 00:20:41.519
<v Speaker 1>being able to compete in business, whether that's crypto, whether

377
00:20:41.599 --> 00:20:45.839
<v Speaker 1>that's gambling, whether that's you know, whatever your other unsavory

378
00:20:46.880 --> 00:20:48.039
<v Speaker 1>political topic may be.

379
00:20:49.119 --> 00:20:51.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, Mike, as crypto continues to get adoption and

380
00:20:51.920 --> 00:20:56.319
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing it become ubiquitous in politics and tradify, it's everywhere. Now,

381
00:20:56.920 --> 00:20:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I think, I zoom out, and I think, are we

382
00:20:59.480 --> 00:21:02.759
<v Speaker 2>in one of the these major inflection points in history,

383
00:21:03.720 --> 00:21:06.279
<v Speaker 2>kind of like the printing press right where it kicked off?

384
00:21:06.839 --> 00:21:11.279
<v Speaker 2>Just this whole new world and democratize things, And you know,

385
00:21:11.319 --> 00:21:14.319
<v Speaker 2>obviously with money and the movement of value with crypto,

386
00:21:14.400 --> 00:21:16.640
<v Speaker 2>and I'm like, I wonder what the world's going to

387
00:21:16.680 --> 00:21:18.400
<v Speaker 2>look like in a hundred years that these people are

388
00:21:18.400 --> 00:21:22.599
<v Speaker 2>fighting so hard, but we know disruptive technology always wins.

389
00:21:22.880 --> 00:21:25.039
<v Speaker 2>They may put up hurdles right and it slow us down,

390
00:21:25.480 --> 00:21:30.119
<v Speaker 2>but throughout history and civilization, disruptive tech always wins. It's

391
00:21:30.119 --> 00:21:32.000
<v Speaker 2>just fascinating. I feel like I want to write a book,

392
00:21:32.039 --> 00:21:35.319
<v Speaker 2>another book about it.

393
00:21:35.440 --> 00:21:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Look, technology has a way of just just winning, right.

394
00:21:37.839 --> 00:21:40.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it makes things more efficient for us, it

395
00:21:40.079 --> 00:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>makes our lives better, and if the technology has value,

396
00:21:44.480 --> 00:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it will win. You know, when I was creating a

397
00:21:49.240 --> 00:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>protocol called Speedy, which is what eventually became HTDB two

398
00:21:52.480 --> 00:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>point zero. In the early days of starting to deploy

399
00:21:56.319 --> 00:22:00.319
<v Speaker 1>that out and garner support to make it an actual stand,

400
00:22:00.440 --> 00:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of naysayers and people are like, ah, Mike,

401
00:22:03.240 --> 00:22:05.759
<v Speaker 1>you know Microsoft's never going to do this because I

402
00:22:05.880 --> 00:22:10.039
<v Speaker 1>was at Google and I did that, and you know

403
00:22:10.039 --> 00:22:12.279
<v Speaker 1>there's too much infrastructure that has to be replaced, et

404
00:22:12.319 --> 00:22:14.839
<v Speaker 1>cetera now. And what I always said in response is

405
00:22:14.880 --> 00:22:18.079
<v Speaker 1>I said, look, if we don't make the new version

406
00:22:18.559 --> 00:22:21.119
<v Speaker 1>so much better than the old version that people aren't

407
00:22:21.119 --> 00:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>willing to take those costs to do the upgrade, then

408
00:22:24.519 --> 00:22:26.559
<v Speaker 1>we don't deserve to be the two point zero version,

409
00:22:26.920 --> 00:22:31.039
<v Speaker 1>it's not worthwhile. So actually, some of this I would

410
00:22:31.079 --> 00:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>throw back to the bitcoin and digital asset ecosystem. We

411
00:22:36.400 --> 00:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>still have a boatload of work to do. I know,

412
00:22:39.000 --> 00:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people that are you know, making

413
00:22:41.960 --> 00:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money on early tokens, on early projects.

414
00:22:45.759 --> 00:22:49.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of exploration. It's global. It's definitely changing

415
00:22:49.680 --> 00:22:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the way people think about money for those that are involved.

416
00:22:52.279 --> 00:22:54.519
<v Speaker 1>But we have to make it even easier to use,

417
00:22:55.039 --> 00:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>We have to make it even easier to keep secure.

418
00:22:58.319 --> 00:23:01.119
<v Speaker 1>We have to make it more private. I mean, you know,

419
00:23:01.160 --> 00:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>for most kind of non technical normal people out there,

420
00:23:05.559 --> 00:23:09.079
<v Speaker 1>this idea that you put your transactions on the blockchain

421
00:23:09.119 --> 00:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and then they can be traced by almost anybody. Look,

422
00:23:13.960 --> 00:23:16.079
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a real problem. And you know,

423
00:23:16.119 --> 00:23:18.759
<v Speaker 1>part of this gets back to regulatory Like the regulators

424
00:23:18.799 --> 00:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>have told you know, Bicco and other companies that they

425
00:23:21.000 --> 00:23:24.039
<v Speaker 1>don't like privacy coins. They think that they are solely

426
00:23:24.400 --> 00:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for the purpose of you know, defrauding the government or

427
00:23:27.359 --> 00:23:30.559
<v Speaker 1>drugs or whatever. Look, that's not true. People have the

428
00:23:30.680 --> 00:23:32.519
<v Speaker 1>right to the freedom of money, and we have seen

429
00:23:32.559 --> 00:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>persecutions that happen when people are able to trace and

430
00:23:35.519 --> 00:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>infer often wrongly ideas about other people's transactions. So all right, anyway,

431
00:23:42.799 --> 00:23:46.559
<v Speaker 1>there's no stopping this technology so long as we continue

432
00:23:46.559 --> 00:23:50.599
<v Speaker 1>to provide enough value that this is so obviously better

433
00:23:50.640 --> 00:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>than the system that came before it that people will

434
00:23:52.920 --> 00:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>move to it. And we're not done. We got a

435
00:23:55.920 --> 00:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of work. I would like to rally, you know,

436
00:23:58.680 --> 00:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>another million developers to come into the crypto space to

437
00:24:03.079 --> 00:24:05.039
<v Speaker 1>really work on these problems. And I don't mean just

438
00:24:05.119 --> 00:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>issue new coins that are going to be a token,

439
00:24:07.279 --> 00:24:10.799
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, like, really solve the problems that matter for

440
00:24:10.920 --> 00:24:15.519
<v Speaker 1>people with money. And if we do that, of course

441
00:24:15.519 --> 00:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it's unstoppable. I think it's unstoppable anyway. Maybe I'm just

442
00:24:19.240 --> 00:24:21.079
<v Speaker 1>asking I want the pace to go a little faster.

443
00:24:21.720 --> 00:24:24.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No, that's a great point, and I've been talking

444
00:24:24.599 --> 00:24:26.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot about that. You know, how you bring in

445
00:24:26.200 --> 00:24:28.759
<v Speaker 2>the next billion people and you've got to eliminate as

446
00:24:28.839 --> 00:24:32.000
<v Speaker 2>much of the friction as possible, make it feel like

447
00:24:32.160 --> 00:24:34.559
<v Speaker 2>Web two, but it's using Web three technology where it

448
00:24:34.559 --> 00:24:36.599
<v Speaker 2>has to be simple enough where my mom and dad

449
00:24:36.640 --> 00:24:39.359
<v Speaker 2>can do it. But I don't think it's there yet,

450
00:24:39.400 --> 00:24:42.559
<v Speaker 2>you know, But like you said, we need more developers

451
00:24:42.559 --> 00:24:44.880
<v Speaker 2>to come in more people to bring their ideas at

452
00:24:44.880 --> 00:24:46.200
<v Speaker 2>a table and start building.

453
00:24:46.920 --> 00:24:49.799
<v Speaker 1>And you know, frankly, we do need you know, traditional

454
00:24:49.839 --> 00:24:53.160
<v Speaker 1>firms that have not been particularly innovative, but we need

455
00:24:53.200 --> 00:24:55.799
<v Speaker 1>them to be able to participate as well. Obviously they

456
00:24:55.799 --> 00:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to be on the cutting edge, but they

457
00:24:58.240 --> 00:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>will be adopters that take the piece says they're already

458
00:25:00.720 --> 00:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>working and turn it into real products. The ETF, the

459
00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin ETF isn't an example of that. Derivatives markets clearly

460
00:25:07.400 --> 00:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>an example of that. Can these guys come in and

461
00:25:09.720 --> 00:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>start to help with custody and basic banking on ramps

462
00:25:12.680 --> 00:25:14.839
<v Speaker 1>and off ramps, of course they can do all those things,

463
00:25:15.319 --> 00:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and then we can start to really focus on how

464
00:25:17.519 --> 00:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>do you have a world that's got a combination of

465
00:25:20.319 --> 00:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>You can have your assets custied at a single bank.

466
00:25:22.720 --> 00:25:25.039
<v Speaker 1>You can have the custody that multiple banks at the

467
00:25:25.119 --> 00:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>same time, like multiple banks are required in order to

468
00:25:28.240 --> 00:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>authorize certain transactions, we can have self custody side by side,

469
00:25:32.599 --> 00:25:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, the options and potential is limitless,

470
00:25:37.640 --> 00:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, we need everybody to be able to participate.

471
00:25:40.640 --> 00:25:43.279
<v Speaker 2>That's you know what you just mentioned there with multiple

472
00:25:43.319 --> 00:25:46.920
<v Speaker 2>banks custodying your assets. So it would be kind of

473
00:25:46.920 --> 00:25:50.400
<v Speaker 2>the splitting up the private keys maybe into three four parts.

474
00:25:51.079 --> 00:25:55.039
<v Speaker 1>Well, as you know, I mean Bitco pioneered multi signature

475
00:25:55.079 --> 00:25:57.839
<v Speaker 1>technology back in twenty thirteen. Like we didn't invent it.

476
00:25:57.839 --> 00:26:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to overtake over credit, but we were

477
00:26:00.759 --> 00:26:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the first to really deploy a solid two out of

478
00:26:03.440 --> 00:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>three multi six system. And the whole idea is that

479
00:26:07.240 --> 00:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>there's no single key that can get compromised and you

480
00:26:09.960 --> 00:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>lose all the money. You know, as of today, we

481
00:26:12.720 --> 00:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>do multi say, we do multi sake and smart contracts,

482
00:26:15.480 --> 00:26:18.519
<v Speaker 1>we do threshold signature MPC, we do a whole bunch

483
00:26:18.559 --> 00:26:23.599
<v Speaker 1>of technologies on different blockchains, and absolutely that should be used.

484
00:26:23.960 --> 00:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>And once that's used, and then you standardize the format

485
00:26:26.759 --> 00:26:30.880
<v Speaker 1>for how each of the key shares or the key

486
00:26:30.920 --> 00:26:34.559
<v Speaker 1>parts are accessed, then you can start to distribute them.

487
00:26:34.599 --> 00:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So today, you know, people are used to this idea.

488
00:26:37.240 --> 00:26:39.519
<v Speaker 1>I bank at Wells Fargo or I bank at Bank

489
00:26:39.559 --> 00:26:42.759
<v Speaker 1>of America. Now imagine you're banking at Wells Fargo and

490
00:26:42.920 --> 00:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America. And for a lot of purposes that

491
00:26:46.079 --> 00:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>might be overkill, Like you know, for your regular checking

492
00:26:48.440 --> 00:26:51.279
<v Speaker 1>account which has got a small amount of your your

493
00:26:51.319 --> 00:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>funds that you're kind of using for your day to

494
00:26:53.480 --> 00:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>day bills. You probably don't need something so crazy, but

495
00:26:57.440 --> 00:27:00.079
<v Speaker 1>for large amounts of money, for sovereign wealth funds that

496
00:27:00.119 --> 00:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier, for the reserves of the governments of

497
00:27:03.880 --> 00:27:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the world, which is coming right. We already have an

498
00:27:05.680 --> 00:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>El Salvador. Some presidential candidates are saying they might put

499
00:27:10.359 --> 00:27:13.759
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin on the US balance sheet. Those are going to

500
00:27:13.799 --> 00:27:15.319
<v Speaker 1>be large sums of money, and then you're going to

501
00:27:15.359 --> 00:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>want to, of course, be able to do that. By

502
00:27:17.480 --> 00:27:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the way, this is what bic Go's doing. It's part

503
00:27:19.279 --> 00:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of why we have seven licensed custodians around the world.

504
00:27:23.680 --> 00:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Imagine a world where you come to bicco, you sign

505
00:27:26.200 --> 00:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>up for your wallet, You're like, I want a key

506
00:27:27.759 --> 00:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in Switzerland, I want a key in Germany, and I

507
00:27:30.000 --> 00:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>want a key in Dubai. Oh and by the way,

508
00:27:32.759 --> 00:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to have the administration of that cussy, the

509
00:27:35.319 --> 00:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>qualified cussy, out of the United States, so we can

510
00:27:38.200 --> 00:27:41.519
<v Speaker 1>actually build these things. And that is what we're building U.

511
00:27:42.519 --> 00:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's incredibly powerful. All of a sudden, the ownership

512
00:27:48.039 --> 00:27:50.799
<v Speaker 1>of money is no longer subject to the failure of

513
00:27:50.799 --> 00:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>a single entity, and it's no longer subject to the

514
00:27:53.359 --> 00:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>failure of a single government. Now, by the way, one

515
00:27:55.960 --> 00:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>last I often get a question about that, like, well, Mike,

516
00:27:59.039 --> 00:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>but don't you contry all of those trust coming is

517
00:28:01.519 --> 00:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a fair question. Look, over time it will open up

518
00:28:03.720 --> 00:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>across multiple custodians. But even now, the thing that people

519
00:28:06.920 --> 00:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>need to know when we open up a licensed regulated

520
00:28:10.279 --> 00:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>entity in Dubai or Singapore or whatnot, the regulators there

521
00:28:14.160 --> 00:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>absolutely care about the autonomy and so sovereignty of that

522
00:28:18.559 --> 00:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>entity away from Bitco, you know, the United States. And

523
00:28:22.000 --> 00:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>so while it's true I am the CEO of the

524
00:28:24.160 --> 00:28:27.599
<v Speaker 1>the overarching set of companies, each one of those I

525
00:28:27.640 --> 00:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>have zero access to. Keys is through a number of

526
00:28:31.000 --> 00:28:34.759
<v Speaker 1>independent controls teams on the ground in those regions that

527
00:28:35.759 --> 00:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely have a regulator that they report to as well.

528
00:28:39.039 --> 00:28:41.599
<v Speaker 1>So no, it is not possible for Bitco to just say, hey,

529
00:28:41.640 --> 00:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take across all those Anyway, I think

530
00:28:44.000 --> 00:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge innovation. I think we're the first to

531
00:28:45.920 --> 00:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>do it. It's coming, and this is going to be good

532
00:28:48.720 --> 00:28:49.359
<v Speaker 1>for everybody.

533
00:28:49.880 --> 00:28:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, and I love it. I you know, as

534
00:28:52.960 --> 00:28:56.000
<v Speaker 2>you're saying saying that the smoke the engines are turning

535
00:28:56.079 --> 00:28:57.960
<v Speaker 2>in my head, like what that would look like. So

536
00:28:58.000 --> 00:28:59.519
<v Speaker 2>that's that's pretty incredible.

537
00:29:00.559 --> 00:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Question.

538
00:29:00.960 --> 00:29:04.599
<v Speaker 2>On the Etheroremist Body TFS. There is news yesterday that

539
00:29:04.599 --> 00:29:06.920
<v Speaker 2>broke that we're going to see the approval next tuesday.

540
00:29:07.240 --> 00:29:09.799
<v Speaker 2>Are you working with any of the issuers? Will you

541
00:29:09.839 --> 00:29:11.599
<v Speaker 2>be cussinging Ether for any of them?

542
00:29:12.440 --> 00:29:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Yes, we will.

543
00:29:14.480 --> 00:29:15.599
<v Speaker 2>Are you able to name drop?

544
00:29:16.359 --> 00:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't I want to name job. Look, I

545
00:29:18.759 --> 00:29:21.759
<v Speaker 1>mean these guys are all going through their own regulatory components,

546
00:29:22.400 --> 00:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting the SEC to approve. Uh, They're very

547
00:29:25.400 --> 00:29:28.559
<v Speaker 1>careful with their words. Bicco is an approved you know,

548
00:29:28.720 --> 00:29:32.839
<v Speaker 1>custodian for a number of of the bitcoin ETFs already,

549
00:29:33.000 --> 00:29:36.079
<v Speaker 1>and this is this is an obvious easy one. I

550
00:29:36.119 --> 00:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>think the next step, which is interesting, will be when

551
00:29:38.759 --> 00:29:40.759
<v Speaker 1>we get to the ability to have ETFs that can

552
00:29:40.799 --> 00:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>do staking of the ether.

553
00:29:43.240 --> 00:29:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

554
00:29:44.039 --> 00:29:47.519
<v Speaker 1>I think that's out for this first round. By the way,

555
00:29:48.160 --> 00:29:50.079
<v Speaker 1>we also had kind of a similar concern about the

556
00:29:50.079 --> 00:29:53.759
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin ETFs. Right the bitcoin ETFs don't take in kind

557
00:29:53.759 --> 00:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>deposits and withdrawals. That is a feature that should come.

558
00:29:57.519 --> 00:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>It makes a better market because all of a sudden,

559
00:30:00.279 --> 00:30:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the market makers in the industry can really keep that

560
00:30:03.200 --> 00:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>price totally lockstep with the actual market price. Globally. Without

561
00:30:08.519 --> 00:30:13.039
<v Speaker 1>that feature, there's an inherent inefficiency in terms of the

562
00:30:13.119 --> 00:30:17.759
<v Speaker 1>arbitrage between the ETF pricing and other pricing. So there's

563
00:30:17.759 --> 00:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>more work to do on the ETFs. I don't know

564
00:30:20.559 --> 00:30:23.039
<v Speaker 1>the timeline for these things to happen. I fear that

565
00:30:23.079 --> 00:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the regulators move probably in intervals of years, whereas companies

566
00:30:29.079 --> 00:30:33.599
<v Speaker 1>move in intervals of days and weeks. That's a big spread.

567
00:30:34.160 --> 00:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>We got to fix that, I think at the regulatory

568
00:30:36.480 --> 00:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>level for the next wave of money to come, regardless

569
00:30:42.200 --> 00:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of that is in digital form.

570
00:30:44.319 --> 00:30:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, question on staking. Obviously you provide staking for your

571
00:30:47.920 --> 00:30:52.200
<v Speaker 2>institutional clients. The SEC they said, hey, no staking in

572
00:30:52.240 --> 00:30:57.400
<v Speaker 2>these ets. They've also been suing different exchanges regarding staking,

573
00:30:57.480 --> 00:31:00.799
<v Speaker 2>saying it's a security offering. How are you navigating those

574
00:31:00.839 --> 00:31:04.200
<v Speaker 2>waters as a business as the SEC approach you, guys,

575
00:31:04.640 --> 00:31:07.119
<v Speaker 2>or are you in a separate category from exchanges?

576
00:31:08.480 --> 00:31:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we do things very differently. We have not had

577
00:31:10.920 --> 00:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>any approach from the SEC, and I think it's because

578
00:31:13.759 --> 00:31:17.279
<v Speaker 1>what we do is so clean and differentiated. There's a

579
00:31:17.279 --> 00:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of areas where the SEC gets concerned, right, so

580
00:31:20.640 --> 00:31:25.039
<v Speaker 1>it's very easy to create a securitized product. You know.

581
00:31:25.240 --> 00:31:31.359
<v Speaker 1>The third prong is a return derived from the efforts

582
00:31:31.400 --> 00:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of others. Right, So if you're managing someone's ethereum and

583
00:31:34.759 --> 00:31:36.599
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, hey, i'm going to keep twenty percent of

584
00:31:36.640 --> 00:31:39.519
<v Speaker 1>it in a liquid pool, and I'm going to stick

585
00:31:39.559 --> 00:31:42.599
<v Speaker 1>the rest on this interval, and I'm going to give

586
00:31:42.599 --> 00:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you a net yield of that amount, that starts a

587
00:31:45.960 --> 00:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>look a lot like a security I mean, you know,

588
00:31:49.200 --> 00:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>as much as like the crypto industry wants to say

589
00:31:51.440 --> 00:31:54.759
<v Speaker 1>nothing's of security, I mean, yes, some things are securities

590
00:31:55.680 --> 00:31:58.799
<v Speaker 1>in some of the some of the exchanges have embarked

591
00:31:58.839 --> 00:32:03.079
<v Speaker 1>upon that, and I think they actually did create securities. Now,

592
00:32:03.079 --> 00:32:05.559
<v Speaker 1>whether that should be regulated by the SEC or not,

593
00:32:05.599 --> 00:32:07.519
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a different question, and probably more likely

594
00:32:07.559 --> 00:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to say I don't think the SEC sh to worry

595
00:32:09.680 --> 00:32:12.759
<v Speaker 1>about that. But that's the way the law is today.

596
00:32:13.200 --> 00:32:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Another example is reward systems. May know this, Some are

597
00:32:18.079 --> 00:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>creating this clever idea where like, hey, we're not gonna

598
00:32:21.880 --> 00:32:24.079
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to give you a return on this,

599
00:32:24.240 --> 00:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>but if you deposit it with us, we will give

600
00:32:26.440 --> 00:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you a reward which allegedly comes from our balance sheet

601
00:32:30.640 --> 00:32:33.559
<v Speaker 1>but happens to be very coincidentally close to like the

602
00:32:34.319 --> 00:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>on chain staking yield, or if it's a stable coin,

603
00:32:38.519 --> 00:32:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the bond rate that they get behind it. Okay, I

604
00:32:42.759 --> 00:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>think those are thinly veiled wrappers around securities or potentially

605
00:32:47.039 --> 00:32:49.519
<v Speaker 1>are all right, Well, BICCO does though, like, look, we

606
00:32:49.519 --> 00:32:52.759
<v Speaker 1>don't pool funds, so we don't take an each clients

607
00:32:52.799 --> 00:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and put them together. So there's no question about that.

608
00:32:56.440 --> 00:32:58.839
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I think staking pooling is different

609
00:32:58.880 --> 00:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>from the concept of pooling that the sec is traditionally

610
00:33:02.200 --> 00:33:05.519
<v Speaker 1>dealt with. Traditionally, that's about like, hey, two people coming

611
00:33:05.519 --> 00:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>together to buy a particular product or to enable something.

612
00:33:09.920 --> 00:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I think putting it into a common wallet, you know

613
00:33:12.039 --> 00:33:15.119
<v Speaker 1>omnibus walllets banks use them all the time. It's not

614
00:33:15.279 --> 00:33:18.599
<v Speaker 1>really pooling. It's a it's a method of efficiency for

615
00:33:18.640 --> 00:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the storage of the asset. But nonetheless that the sec

616
00:33:22.720 --> 00:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and the securities world is not clear on this point yet,

617
00:33:25.480 --> 00:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So Biicco doesn't do it. We never pool assets together,

618
00:33:28.079 --> 00:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and the yield we get is not derived by bico.

619
00:33:30.720 --> 00:33:33.079
<v Speaker 1>It's whatever's on chain and that's what you get, so

620
00:33:34.000 --> 00:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't have any control over it. Oh. One last

621
00:33:36.640 --> 00:33:40.119
<v Speaker 1>thing that's really important. When you deposit a bicho, we

622
00:33:40.160 --> 00:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>don't stake it by default. You know, you have to say, hey,

623
00:33:43.200 --> 00:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to stake it. You know, we work at

624
00:33:45.759 --> 00:33:49.039
<v Speaker 1>the client's direction, so as an investor, you tell us

625
00:33:49.039 --> 00:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>what you want to do. If you want to move

626
00:33:51.039 --> 00:33:52.839
<v Speaker 1>it from your account here to your account there, we

627
00:33:52.839 --> 00:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>would do that. Of course, we're acting as as your

628
00:33:56.000 --> 00:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>agent to do it, but we are not creating a

629
00:33:58.920 --> 00:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>security anyway. So anyway, what we do is a little

630
00:34:02.200 --> 00:34:04.599
<v Speaker 1>bit different, and I think it's important to navigate those

631
00:34:04.640 --> 00:34:07.359
<v Speaker 1>waters for now. I do think we'll get clarity from

632
00:34:07.359 --> 00:34:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the SEC at some point on you know, how to

633
00:34:09.719 --> 00:34:13.199
<v Speaker 1>handle staking in a really clean way. But again, like

634
00:34:13.719 --> 00:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I do, think there's so much change happening so quickly

635
00:34:17.639 --> 00:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>in digital assets that, yeah, the regulators are having a

636
00:34:20.239 --> 00:34:23.199
<v Speaker 1>tough time keeping up. I don't think we should be

637
00:34:23.199 --> 00:34:25.119
<v Speaker 1>mad at them about that part. I think that part's

638
00:34:25.159 --> 00:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>actually okay and natural. And you know, Go and other

639
00:34:28.320 --> 00:34:30.679
<v Speaker 1>companies are here to step up and help educate and

640
00:34:30.719 --> 00:34:35.119
<v Speaker 1>provide backstops and make sure it's get done in a

641
00:34:35.199 --> 00:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>very safe way.

642
00:34:36.480 --> 00:34:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. And I'm empathetic. I've spoken to like

643
00:34:40.039 --> 00:34:42.760
<v Speaker 2>hester peers and some of these SEC folks. I can't

644
00:34:42.760 --> 00:34:44.760
<v Speaker 2>imagine what their job is like with all the things

645
00:34:44.760 --> 00:34:49.440
<v Speaker 2>that they have to deal with. But I guess, going

646
00:34:49.480 --> 00:34:52.920
<v Speaker 2>back to earlier in our conversation, the politics of it right,

647
00:34:52.960 --> 00:34:55.360
<v Speaker 2>and we don't want that to be part of it.

648
00:34:55.400 --> 00:34:58.159
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time they have they have to

649
00:34:58.159 --> 00:35:00.719
<v Speaker 2>go through the journey of learning about this and understanding

650
00:35:00.800 --> 00:35:04.559
<v Speaker 2>it and working with the industry to provide proper legislation

651
00:35:04.719 --> 00:35:07.960
<v Speaker 2>and guidelines. So hopefully we get there soon. Hopefully twenty

652
00:35:07.960 --> 00:35:09.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty five is a year.

653
00:35:10.960 --> 00:35:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And again I don't actually think it's as much politics

654
00:35:14.800 --> 00:35:17.119
<v Speaker 1>as people want to lean that way. But I think

655
00:35:17.159 --> 00:35:19.039
<v Speaker 1>what we have gotten to is a world where the

656
00:35:19.079 --> 00:35:22.320
<v Speaker 1>president has a lot of power that people don't see

657
00:35:22.320 --> 00:35:25.519
<v Speaker 1>from a regulatory perspective. And this is because there's a

658
00:35:25.519 --> 00:35:27.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of regulation out there and it locks down a

659
00:35:27.760 --> 00:35:30.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of business. And as I mentioned before, with just

660
00:35:30.639 --> 00:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>those three agencies, and by the way, I didn't mention

661
00:35:33.039 --> 00:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the CFTC, I didn't mention the IRS, I didn't mention

662
00:35:36.280 --> 00:35:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the FTC. Like the list goes on. It's just that

663
00:35:40.400 --> 00:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the ones that we're dealing with today is just the

664
00:35:42.480 --> 00:35:44.679
<v Speaker 1>first tip of the iceberg part and then there's a

665
00:35:44.679 --> 00:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch more that still coming. So having all this

666
00:35:48.880 --> 00:35:53.360
<v Speaker 1>regulation does give the president an undue amount of power

667
00:35:53.400 --> 00:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion in the United States, And obviously that

668
00:35:55.920 --> 00:35:58.079
<v Speaker 1>I guess is a bit of a political thing. But

669
00:35:59.360 --> 00:36:02.639
<v Speaker 1>the actual act of like who's in president, whoever's in

670
00:36:02.679 --> 00:36:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the president gets the control and decide whether these things

671
00:36:04.760 --> 00:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>are turned on or off. And that's why I think

672
00:36:07.760 --> 00:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the individual in that office, not the party.

673
00:36:12.000 --> 00:36:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So, speaking of that, Donald Trump will be speaking

674
00:36:16.000 --> 00:36:20.119
<v Speaker 2>at the Bitcoin conference in Nashville next week. He selected

675
00:36:20.360 --> 00:36:23.119
<v Speaker 2>his vice president and it's JD. Vans, who's actually very

676
00:36:23.119 --> 00:36:26.639
<v Speaker 2>pro crypto, has spoken out against Cherry Genser at the

677
00:36:26.719 --> 00:36:28.920
<v Speaker 2>SEC and much more. What are your thoughts on that?

678
00:36:30.760 --> 00:36:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Look, I think it's a logical candidate for him. I'm

679
00:36:33.639 --> 00:36:36.599
<v Speaker 1>a I'm in business right and I'm a single issue voter.

680
00:36:36.960 --> 00:36:39.199
<v Speaker 1>I have had a little bit of people, you know,

681
00:36:39.239 --> 00:36:44.599
<v Speaker 1>as my my political choices this round have become more public.

682
00:36:45.119 --> 00:36:47.199
<v Speaker 1>People are asking me, I mean that you're you know,

683
00:36:47.719 --> 00:36:51.239
<v Speaker 1>big go is. Look, everybody, everybody that wants to be

684
00:36:51.280 --> 00:36:54.639
<v Speaker 1>a client a BICCO should know that myself and BICCO

685
00:36:55.039 --> 00:36:57.800
<v Speaker 1>are one hundred percent in politicians that are going to

686
00:36:57.840 --> 00:37:02.440
<v Speaker 1>make digital assets safer and more accessible. And I think

687
00:37:02.480 --> 00:37:06.159
<v Speaker 1>that's why people pick BICCO. So I don't want to

688
00:37:06.159 --> 00:37:09.599
<v Speaker 1>be in politics. In my thirty year career, I've never

689
00:37:09.679 --> 00:37:13.280
<v Speaker 1>had to voice political opinions. I do not want to

690
00:37:13.320 --> 00:37:17.519
<v Speaker 1>disenfranchise anybody that you might be from the other side

691
00:37:17.559 --> 00:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>on other issues unrelated to crypto. But I also want

692
00:37:20.800 --> 00:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to make it very clear that I am a single

693
00:37:22.480 --> 00:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>issue voter. So look, I like that jd Vance was

694
00:37:25.039 --> 00:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>put in with Trump. I think Trump is looking very

695
00:37:28.039 --> 00:37:30.880
<v Speaker 1>strong by the way. I also like RFK Junior. He's

696
00:37:30.920 --> 00:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>also been very positive on bitcoin, and then you can debate.

697
00:37:35.599 --> 00:37:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Your audience can debate whether they like RFK Junior better

698
00:37:39.400 --> 00:37:44.159
<v Speaker 1>or Trump better on the other non crypto issues. Bicco's

699
00:37:44.199 --> 00:37:47.519
<v Speaker 1>happy to and I am happy to support both of them.

700
00:37:48.079 --> 00:37:50.679
<v Speaker 1>But then President Biden has made it very clear that

701
00:37:50.719 --> 00:37:53.159
<v Speaker 1>he is anti everything we're doing, and so of course

702
00:37:53.199 --> 00:37:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I have to be anti anti that, but it's it's

703
00:37:57.719 --> 00:38:00.280
<v Speaker 1>not a broader thing other than what we get high for,

704
00:38:00.400 --> 00:38:03.800
<v Speaker 1>which is to make digital assets great. Mm hmm, that's

705
00:38:03.800 --> 00:38:05.679
<v Speaker 1>great again. Oh, better not say.

706
00:38:05.559 --> 00:38:10.280
<v Speaker 2>That that's actually a good slogan. I did want to

707
00:38:10.280 --> 00:38:13.960
<v Speaker 2>ask you about stable coins. Stable coin market is heating up.

708
00:38:14.039 --> 00:38:16.920
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing us d C on the rise, Ripple's gonna

709
00:38:16.960 --> 00:38:18.719
<v Speaker 2>launch a stable coin to folks that van acktter A

710
00:38:18.800 --> 00:38:23.239
<v Speaker 2>gonna just stable coins soon. I was curious, is bitco

711
00:38:23.320 --> 00:38:26.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna do anything on that front? And are you custoding

712
00:38:26.800 --> 00:38:28.280
<v Speaker 2>reserves for any of these players.

713
00:38:30.360 --> 00:38:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's see, I'm not announcing any any products, so

714
00:38:32.880 --> 00:38:35.199
<v Speaker 1>I guess I won't. I won't answer that part of

715
00:38:35.239 --> 00:38:39.199
<v Speaker 1>the question. But remember, actually, the the repertoire of stable

716
00:38:39.199 --> 00:38:41.360
<v Speaker 1>coins is bigger than that. We got the black Rock coin,

717
00:38:42.199 --> 00:38:44.199
<v Speaker 1>which is out there. We got Mountain Protocol, which is

718
00:38:44.239 --> 00:38:48.079
<v Speaker 1>out there. We got h hash knows us d y

719
00:38:49.239 --> 00:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Paxos just launched lift Dollar out of Dubai. So I

720
00:38:55.039 --> 00:38:58.320
<v Speaker 1>think there's probably ten more that are en route to

721
00:38:58.400 --> 00:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the markets. Look, it's interesting like if you go back

722
00:39:03.880 --> 00:39:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to twenty seventeen when bicco was getting ready to launch

723
00:39:08.840 --> 00:39:12.119
<v Speaker 1>wrap Bitcoin and kind of you know, Tether was out there,

724
00:39:12.159 --> 00:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>but other stable coins weren't around. I don't know when

725
00:39:14.079 --> 00:39:17.599
<v Speaker 1>USDC came around, but it is about that time. You know,

726
00:39:17.599 --> 00:39:19.800
<v Speaker 1>people were kind of afraid to launch stable coins because

727
00:39:19.800 --> 00:39:22.599
<v Speaker 1>the interest rates were at zero. They were going negative

728
00:39:22.599 --> 00:39:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in Europe if you recall that. Yeah, and people were afraid,

729
00:39:25.880 --> 00:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like geez, well what happens if interest rates go negative

730
00:39:28.000 --> 00:39:30.639
<v Speaker 1>in the United States? How that stable coin even work?

731
00:39:31.519 --> 00:39:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Which is a great question, But that didn't happen. Now

732
00:39:35.760 --> 00:39:38.679
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are high, and everybody wants to capture the

733
00:39:38.719 --> 00:39:43.639
<v Speaker 1>interest rates bought backing the USD stable coin. So look,

734
00:39:43.679 --> 00:39:46.079
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a bunch of these, but most of

735
00:39:46.119 --> 00:39:48.880
<v Speaker 1>them are going to fail that we just don't need

736
00:39:49.639 --> 00:39:52.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty different types, and in fact, it's painful to convert.

737
00:39:53.280 --> 00:39:55.199
<v Speaker 1>So what it's really going to come down to is

738
00:39:55.239 --> 00:39:57.840
<v Speaker 1>which one's the best. And like a lot of things

739
00:39:57.840 --> 00:40:00.639
<v Speaker 1>with technology, you know, it's going to be probably more

740
00:40:00.639 --> 00:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>about the ecosystem than it is about the features of

741
00:40:04.000 --> 00:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the coin. And you know, in an analogy you can

742
00:40:06.960 --> 00:40:12.760
<v Speaker 1>make with technologies like programming languages. So for those on

743
00:40:12.840 --> 00:40:15.199
<v Speaker 1>your show that are not programmers, you've probably heard of

744
00:40:15.199 --> 00:40:19.039
<v Speaker 1>things like JavaScript. You've probably heard of things like Python.

745
00:40:19.559 --> 00:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>You've probably heard of PHP, maybe Perl if you go

746
00:40:23.519 --> 00:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>farther back, look, the winners in programming languages in terms

747
00:40:27.440 --> 00:40:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of which ones get used, is not always the best technology.

748
00:40:31.639 --> 00:40:34.880
<v Speaker 1>There's something about the ecosystem, Like Perl has been pretty

749
00:40:34.920 --> 00:40:37.039
<v Speaker 1>much a despised programming language. I guess it's kind of

750
00:40:37.039 --> 00:40:41.159
<v Speaker 1>dead now, So I'm dating myself, but it's not dead.

751
00:40:41.199 --> 00:40:43.880
<v Speaker 1>It's used. You've probably a lot of places, but javascripts

752
00:40:44.159 --> 00:40:46.719
<v Speaker 1>used everywhere, and I don't think there's very many people

753
00:40:46.760 --> 00:40:49.199
<v Speaker 1>that would argue that JavaScript is the greatest language ever.

754
00:40:49.639 --> 00:40:51.800
<v Speaker 1>So the same thing is going to come with stable coins.

755
00:40:51.840 --> 00:40:53.880
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be about how do you make it

756
00:40:53.920 --> 00:40:57.960
<v Speaker 1>so that the ecosystem can use it? And each one

757
00:40:57.960 --> 00:41:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of these guys taking a very different approach. You know,

758
00:41:00.320 --> 00:41:03.159
<v Speaker 1>those that are going out securities like the black Rock

759
00:41:03.239 --> 00:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>type product. The only people that can touch it are

760
00:41:06.480 --> 00:41:10.239
<v Speaker 1>people that already have access to US markets and securities, right,

761
00:41:10.239 --> 00:41:13.119
<v Speaker 1>so it's not going to really penetrate, you know, much

762
00:41:13.159 --> 00:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of the crypto industry as we know it. It's going

763
00:41:15.920 --> 00:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to have a real tough time going across borders. Another

764
00:41:19.440 --> 00:41:22.079
<v Speaker 1>approach is like what Mountain Protocol did. So they're like

765
00:41:22.400 --> 00:41:24.800
<v Speaker 1>they're going to return all the interests down to the holder,

766
00:41:25.679 --> 00:41:28.679
<v Speaker 1>which sounds great, and then they're just going to lock

767
00:41:28.719 --> 00:41:31.199
<v Speaker 1>out the US markets. So they're going to whitelist and

768
00:41:31.280 --> 00:41:33.320
<v Speaker 1>blacklist and if you touch the US markets, they're going

769
00:41:33.400 --> 00:41:36.039
<v Speaker 1>to kind of kick you out. I think lopping off

770
00:41:36.119 --> 00:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>forty percent of the global market is a tough place

771
00:41:39.039 --> 00:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to start, but you know, Americans often underestimate what can

772
00:41:43.039 --> 00:41:47.639
<v Speaker 1>happen in emergence emerging economies, and frankly, you know a

773
00:41:47.639 --> 00:41:50.519
<v Speaker 1>lot of those countries probably need it more than Americans to,

774
00:41:50.800 --> 00:41:53.800
<v Speaker 1>so that could be a winning approach. And then you've

775
00:41:53.840 --> 00:41:57.320
<v Speaker 1>got like the packs of this approach out of Dubai again,

776
00:41:57.320 --> 00:41:59.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to make a regular distable point there that returns

777
00:41:59.440 --> 00:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>interest back. So look, and there's gonna be many more.

778
00:42:02.880 --> 00:42:05.639
<v Speaker 1>I do think that we're going to see change where

779
00:42:06.159 --> 00:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea that circle can collect all the interest and

780
00:42:12.039 --> 00:42:15.079
<v Speaker 1>give half the money to Coinbase, who turns around and

781
00:42:15.119 --> 00:42:20.400
<v Speaker 1>competes with the entire industry, is not going to last.

782
00:42:21.280 --> 00:42:25.039
<v Speaker 1>It just has to change. It's simply uh, you know,

783
00:42:25.039 --> 00:42:27.039
<v Speaker 1>know none of us want to use it. I mean,

784
00:42:27.599 --> 00:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I do think Coinbase is a good company. I'm really

785
00:42:29.400 --> 00:42:32.599
<v Speaker 1>glad that they're in the ecosystem. But the idea of

786
00:42:32.639 --> 00:42:36.519
<v Speaker 1>supporting a token that funds my competitor, and I'm not

787
00:42:37.159 --> 00:42:40.280
<v Speaker 1>really the biggest competitor, Like all the exchanges of course,

788
00:42:40.320 --> 00:42:44.199
<v Speaker 1>are far more directly in line here, and you know,

789
00:42:44.280 --> 00:42:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Coinbase competes everywhere there. They provide staking, they provide base layer,

790
00:42:48.440 --> 00:42:55.079
<v Speaker 1>they provide wallets, they provide exchanges, they provide cussy. Okay, look,

791
00:42:55.119 --> 00:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just a tough place to be so but lastly,

792
00:42:57.400 --> 00:42:59.559
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really important that you know some of

793
00:42:59.559 --> 00:43:02.559
<v Speaker 1>that interest goes back to the rightful holder, and it will.

794
00:43:03.000 --> 00:43:06.079
<v Speaker 1>So I'm probably rambled a lot on different stable coin options,

795
00:43:06.079 --> 00:43:09.039
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot going on. And this is what happens,

796
00:43:09.039 --> 00:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, when you open up innovation. Right the

797
00:43:12.079 --> 00:43:14.760
<v Speaker 1>banking system has no innovation because it's so locked down

798
00:43:14.800 --> 00:43:18.800
<v Speaker 1>on the regulatory front. And here we've got a great

799
00:43:18.960 --> 00:43:22.519
<v Speaker 1>We just listed six different models, and at the end

800
00:43:22.559 --> 00:43:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of the day, the consumer is going to decide what

801
00:43:24.360 --> 00:43:27.400
<v Speaker 1>they like, and that's going to dictate to business which

802
00:43:27.440 --> 00:43:29.400
<v Speaker 1>way to go. And the ones that predict it right

803
00:43:29.440 --> 00:43:31.519
<v Speaker 1>will win, and the ones that predicted wrong will lose,

804
00:43:31.920 --> 00:43:34.599
<v Speaker 1>maybe go out of business. But that's life business. You've

805
00:43:34.599 --> 00:43:36.559
<v Speaker 1>got to make it right for your customers or you lose.

806
00:43:37.840 --> 00:43:40.239
<v Speaker 2>Mike, given your pedigree and Web one point zero and

807
00:43:40.239 --> 00:43:42.400
<v Speaker 2>two point zero, and let's do the analogy with search.

808
00:43:42.440 --> 00:43:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Here, you had.

809
00:43:43.639 --> 00:43:47.039
<v Speaker 2>Google, I mean you had AOL and Yahoo and Google

810
00:43:47.079 --> 00:43:49.400
<v Speaker 2>and so forth in the early and the mid nineties.

811
00:43:50.239 --> 00:43:54.159
<v Speaker 2>Then you saw a consolidation of that, right, the ones

812
00:43:54.199 --> 00:43:57.559
<v Speaker 2>that went out of business, some God acquired and so forth,

813
00:43:57.599 --> 00:44:00.119
<v Speaker 2>and then Google became the clear leader. Do you think

814
00:44:00.119 --> 00:44:02.199
<v Speaker 2>the same thing happens in the staple coin market? And

815
00:44:02.440 --> 00:44:05.639
<v Speaker 2>or and let me make sure I phrased this right.

816
00:44:05.880 --> 00:44:08.480
<v Speaker 2>There's there's the Google, the clear leader with the giant

817
00:44:09.119 --> 00:44:11.239
<v Speaker 2>share of the market, right, and then you still have

818
00:44:11.320 --> 00:44:14.239
<v Speaker 2>being and you still have y'allhoo hanging around as far

819
00:44:14.280 --> 00:44:16.480
<v Speaker 2>as search engines, is it like that there's going to

820
00:44:16.519 --> 00:44:18.960
<v Speaker 2>be three, but one is a clear leader.

821
00:44:19.920 --> 00:44:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know whether it's account of three or

822
00:44:21.679 --> 00:44:27.119
<v Speaker 1>account of five or what, but yes, of course, And

823
00:44:27.360 --> 00:44:30.320
<v Speaker 1>just remember that at the end of the day, computers

824
00:44:30.480 --> 00:44:34.039
<v Speaker 1>are tools for humans to communicate. And this is why

825
00:44:34.079 --> 00:44:39.280
<v Speaker 1>we have naturally seen monopolies form decade after decade in

826
00:44:39.320 --> 00:44:41.559
<v Speaker 1>our space. Going back to the seventies, you know IBM

827
00:44:41.719 --> 00:44:46.599
<v Speaker 1>was dominant. Everybody's using IBM technology. Why because everybody speaking

828
00:44:46.599 --> 00:44:48.679
<v Speaker 1>the same language. Right at that point, we didn't have

829
00:44:48.719 --> 00:44:51.599
<v Speaker 1>any interop protocols. So if you wanted software to work

830
00:44:51.599 --> 00:44:53.199
<v Speaker 1>between two companies you want to sell it, you wrote

831
00:44:53.239 --> 00:44:57.840
<v Speaker 1>for the IBM mainframes right come into the PC era.

832
00:44:58.599 --> 00:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you recall but there used to

833
00:45:00.519 --> 00:45:03.480
<v Speaker 1>be more word processors than just Microsoft Word. There was

834
00:45:04.000 --> 00:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Word Perfect and a whole bunch of others. But you know,

835
00:45:07.199 --> 00:45:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the center of gravity converged around eventually Microsoft Word. Which

836
00:45:11.760 --> 00:45:15.400
<v Speaker 1>one why because when people exchanged documents they had to

837
00:45:15.400 --> 00:45:17.880
<v Speaker 1>convert them from format A to format B, which always

838
00:45:17.920 --> 00:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>had some lack of fidelity. It's a communication tool that

839
00:45:21.440 --> 00:45:23.960
<v Speaker 1>people use, so it kind of centralizes on a sing

840
00:45:24.880 --> 00:45:28.679
<v Speaker 1>a single winner. The same thing has happened with PCs

841
00:45:28.719 --> 00:45:32.280
<v Speaker 1>as a usage, just easier to interoperate and communicate both

842
00:45:32.280 --> 00:45:35.920
<v Speaker 1>inside a company and out. These days we have more abstractions,

843
00:45:35.960 --> 00:45:38.400
<v Speaker 1>so now you can start to see some cross platform

844
00:45:38.440 --> 00:45:41.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff works pretty well. At this point we added in

845
00:45:41.800 --> 00:45:45.920
<v Speaker 1>mobile phones. But in each one of these arenas, I

846
00:45:45.920 --> 00:45:48.239
<v Speaker 1>think when you really break it down, it comes down

847
00:45:48.280 --> 00:45:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to people talking to people, and so with stable coins. Look,

848
00:45:52.920 --> 00:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>here's the analogy. I imagine you walked into you know,

849
00:45:55.440 --> 00:45:58.039
<v Speaker 1>you're in New York City and and you walked into

850
00:45:58.199 --> 00:46:00.880
<v Speaker 1>McDonald's and they said, that'll be six year olds, and

851
00:46:00.920 --> 00:46:03.599
<v Speaker 1>you'd be like, I don't have any euros and they'd

852
00:46:03.639 --> 00:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>be like, well, that's all we take, and you'd be like, okay,

853
00:46:05.880 --> 00:46:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I gotta take me, missus elsewhere the same thing to

854
00:46:08.159 --> 00:46:11.239
<v Speaker 1>happen with stable cooin. Do you walk in with seventeen

855
00:46:11.360 --> 00:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>USDC and if they say they only take tether, you

856
00:46:14.000 --> 00:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>know you're gonna have to convert it and that's painful.

857
00:46:16.320 --> 00:46:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So digital will make it easier to convert these things,

858
00:46:19.480 --> 00:46:22.400
<v Speaker 1>but there will always be fees. So yes, I think

859
00:46:22.440 --> 00:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in general we will continue to see things converge on

860
00:46:27.079 --> 00:46:29.920
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of solutions, and then where there's real

861
00:46:30.039 --> 00:46:33.239
<v Speaker 1>value differences, like it could be the US markets differentiate

862
00:46:33.280 --> 00:46:36.480
<v Speaker 1>from non US markets. That's definitely happening today. You see

863
00:46:36.480 --> 00:46:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that with tether and USCC in particular. You know, maybe

864
00:46:39.880 --> 00:46:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll see some pockets where like there's certain regions that

865
00:46:42.360 --> 00:46:44.400
<v Speaker 1>have big winners that are different than other regions.

866
00:46:45.599 --> 00:46:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Myke, tough question for you. Given the Internet adoption curve

867
00:46:51.559 --> 00:46:54.840
<v Speaker 2>and timeline, what do you think crypto web three is

868
00:46:54.920 --> 00:46:57.239
<v Speaker 2>right now? Are we in nineteen ninety nine, are we

869
00:46:57.360 --> 00:47:02.719
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and four? Where do you think we're at? Well?

870
00:47:02.760 --> 00:47:06.199
<v Speaker 1>I think probably you got to normalize the timeline at all.

871
00:47:06.440 --> 00:47:08.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, what is the Internet timeline and what is

872
00:47:09.000 --> 00:47:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the movement of money onto the Internet timeline? Look, I

873
00:47:12.960 --> 00:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>think overall they are similar timelines. The way I would

874
00:47:16.960 --> 00:47:19.280
<v Speaker 1>count the Internet timeline would start all the way back

875
00:47:19.320 --> 00:47:22.800
<v Speaker 1>around nineteen seventy nineteen seventy one. This is when the

876
00:47:22.800 --> 00:47:27.960
<v Speaker 1>first early origins of what became TCPIP started to emerge,

877
00:47:28.800 --> 00:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>email protocols kind of through the seventies you started to

878
00:47:31.440 --> 00:47:33.199
<v Speaker 1>see those kind of come to life a little bit.

879
00:47:33.800 --> 00:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Today these are all old hat, but you know, that's

880
00:47:37.480 --> 00:47:41.239
<v Speaker 1>a full fifty years ago to get from there to

881
00:47:41.280 --> 00:47:44.119
<v Speaker 1>where we are today. So if you consider the origin

882
00:47:44.400 --> 00:47:50.119
<v Speaker 1>of crypto to be somewhere around you know, twenty ten,

883
00:47:50.840 --> 00:47:52.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit earlier. If you want to credit

884
00:47:53.360 --> 00:47:57.519
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning of bitcoin fifty year timeframe, it's probably,

885
00:47:57.719 --> 00:48:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty sixty. I'd like to think, I guess

886
00:48:00.079 --> 00:48:02.239
<v Speaker 1>says I say that out loud. I'd like to think

887
00:48:02.280 --> 00:48:04.079
<v Speaker 1>that things are a little bit faster do to the

888
00:48:04.159 --> 00:48:08.320
<v Speaker 1>technology that we have. But I think we're going to

889
00:48:08.400 --> 00:48:12.840
<v Speaker 1>be gated mostly by humans and not the technology. I

890
00:48:12.840 --> 00:48:14.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's what we're seeing right now here in the

891
00:48:14.519 --> 00:48:18.679
<v Speaker 1>United States. It's really about human ability to adapt to

892
00:48:18.719 --> 00:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>these new technologies, both from an individual perspective in terms

893
00:48:22.480 --> 00:48:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of usability in terms of security, and then also from

894
00:48:27.039 --> 00:48:30.599
<v Speaker 1>a government and regulatory perspective, And remember the Internet did

895
00:48:30.599 --> 00:48:35.880
<v Speaker 1>not have nearly the right regulatory hurdles that money does.

896
00:48:36.440 --> 00:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Money is very established businesses, whereas the Internet was kind

897
00:48:39.880 --> 00:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of just new business. So we're also competing with incumbent

898
00:48:44.920 --> 00:48:47.400
<v Speaker 1>players that are not certain about how they will win.

899
00:48:48.559 --> 00:48:51.159
<v Speaker 1>They are running into the innovator's dilemma. I think I

900
00:48:51.280 --> 00:48:53.719
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that on your show a couple of years ago.

901
00:48:54.840 --> 00:48:57.079
<v Speaker 1>But they're going to have a hard time figuring out

902
00:48:57.559 --> 00:49:01.599
<v Speaker 1>how do they adopt the new technology without uncomfortably cannibalizing

903
00:49:01.639 --> 00:49:04.320
<v Speaker 1>their old business and yet still becoming and still maintaining

904
00:49:04.360 --> 00:49:07.559
<v Speaker 1>the size of their business. So, but I don't know,

905
00:49:07.599 --> 00:49:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I think fifty years is not that bad of a

906
00:49:10.400 --> 00:49:13.079
<v Speaker 1>range for like how long it's going to take, which

907
00:49:13.119 --> 00:49:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess means that we're still in the you know,

908
00:49:15.599 --> 00:49:18.960
<v Speaker 1>first twenty five percent ish, maybe maybe the first thirty percent.

909
00:49:20.519 --> 00:49:22.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a great take, And I'm thinking, you know,

910
00:49:22.760 --> 00:49:25.760
<v Speaker 2>as you said, because we're running on faster infrastructure and

911
00:49:25.840 --> 00:49:28.480
<v Speaker 2>everybody is pretty much on the web, maybe it's cut

912
00:49:28.519 --> 00:49:31.159
<v Speaker 2>in half, right, Maybe it's twenty five to thirty versus fifty,

913
00:49:31.199 --> 00:49:34.159
<v Speaker 2>but you never know, it's it's well half the way, Yeah, Look,

914
00:49:34.159 --> 00:49:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I think.

915
00:49:34.400 --> 00:49:37.599
<v Speaker 1>The technology part is definitely changing much faster, and you know,

916
00:49:37.599 --> 00:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got way more developers, way more power or more

917
00:49:40.000 --> 00:49:43.679
<v Speaker 1>efficient and you can see this by the plethora of

918
00:49:44.239 --> 00:49:47.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, layer one blockchains that you know, are some

919
00:49:47.199 --> 00:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of them very indistinguishable from others. However, the regulatory side

920
00:49:52.000 --> 00:49:54.679
<v Speaker 1>is going to move very slow and certainly has been.

921
00:49:55.679 --> 00:49:58.199
<v Speaker 1>And then we've also seen great innovations as we go.

922
00:49:58.320 --> 00:50:00.400
<v Speaker 1>But the Internet did this too, right, So actually was

923
00:50:00.400 --> 00:50:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the protocol for how do you communicate? And there was

924
00:50:02.800 --> 00:50:04.559
<v Speaker 1>like some chat stuff, and then it was like some

925
00:50:04.639 --> 00:50:06.800
<v Speaker 1>news group stuff, and then it was some email stuff.

926
00:50:07.599 --> 00:50:09.960
<v Speaker 1>On the blockchain side, and we started out with you know,

927
00:50:10.079 --> 00:50:13.719
<v Speaker 1>store value, maybe some payments stuff. We got the smart

928
00:50:13.760 --> 00:50:18.280
<v Speaker 1>contract stuff that led to stable coins stuff, and then

929
00:50:18.360 --> 00:50:22.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, DeFi so we see innovations as we go.

930
00:50:22.800 --> 00:50:24.880
<v Speaker 1>The time for all of this to disrupt the existing

931
00:50:24.880 --> 00:50:27.960
<v Speaker 1>financial system, yeah, it's gonna take some time.

932
00:50:28.639 --> 00:50:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Mike always great man. I appreciate your insights, your knowledge,

933
00:50:33.079 --> 00:50:36.320
<v Speaker 2>and I'm excited to see what's next for bitgo. Thank

934
00:50:36.320 --> 00:50:37.320
<v Speaker 2>you so much for joining me.

935
00:50:38.000 --> 00:50:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for all you do. It's great to have you

936
00:50:39.679 --> 00:50:42.039
<v Speaker 1>out there, you know, championing all this stuff. I see

937
00:50:42.039 --> 00:50:45.159
<v Speaker 1>your videos on YouTube all time, and keep it the

938
00:50:45.159 --> 00:51:01.599
<v Speaker 1>great work. Two two two
