Speaker 1: If you want to get the show early and ad free,
head on over to the Peak Kinyonas show dot com.
There you can choose from where you wish to support me.
Now listen very carefully. I've had some people ask me
about this, even though I think on the last ad
I stated it pretty clearly. If you want an RSS feed,
you're going to have to subscribe through substack or through Patreon.
You can also subscribe on my website which is right there,
gum Road and what's the other one, subscribe Star And
if you do that, you will get access to the
audio file. So head on over to the peakan Yonashow
dot com. You'll see all the ways that you can
support me there. And I just want to thank everyone.
It's because of you that I can put out the
amount of material that I do. I can do what
I'm doing with doctor Johnson on two hundred Years Together
and everything else, the things that Thomas and I are
doing together on candinal philosophy, it's all because of you.
And yeah, I mean, I'll never be able to thank
you enough. So thank you, the Pekanyonashow dot com. Everything's there.
Want to welcome everyone back to our reading of two
hundred Years Together by Alexander Sulshanisen. This is episode seventy seven,
Doctor Johnson, How are you doing today?
Speaker 2: I'm doing well.
Speaker 3: Before the show, you asked me about little Susie cream Cheese,
And somehow a bird got into the upstairs through the
I think the bathroom window that doesn't have a screen,
and the cats went into action. The two senior cats
got it pinned in the bathroom, not quite sure.
Speaker 2: What to do with it.
Speaker 3: After that, they flapped its wings, they let go. They
went on the windowsill and I just pushed it out,
and I'm pretty sure it was fine. I look back
and Susie cream Cheese is taking the whole thing in.
You know, she's like being taught how to do this stuff.
She's killed her in training. And but so so when
a mouse comes in, I pity any mouse that comes
into this house. We've had I think ten so far,
not recently. But the bird one on a million million
shot was like the Dobson flying. So that was that
was the excitement just about an hour ago.
Speaker 1: Awesome, Awesome, it's gonna be it's gonna be great watching her,
watching her grow up. Yep, all right, picking up where
we left off last time, the Jews acutely, acutely realized
the need to defend themselves, in part because the post
war Europe and America were flooded with Protocols of the
Elders of Zion suddenly and virtually instantly. There were five
editions in England in nineteen twenty, several editions in both
Germany and France. Half a million copies in America were
printed by Henry Ford. The unheard of success of the Protocols,
which were translated into several languages, showed how much the
Bolshevik Revolution was believed to be Jewish. English researcher Norman
Kohne wrote in the years immediately after World War One,
when the Protocols entered mainstream and thunder across the world,
many otherwise entirely sensible people took them completely seriously. The
London Times and Morning Post of that time vouched for
their authenticity, although by August twenty first and by August
nineteen twenty one, the Times published a series of articles
from its Istanbul correspondent Philip Greeves, who sensationally demonstrated the
extensive borrowing of the text in the Protocols from Maurice
Jolies anti Napoleon the third pamphlets The Dialogue in Hell
between Machiavelli and Montescue eighteen sixty four. At that time
the French police managed to confiscate every single copy of
the infamous pamphlet. The Protocols came to the West from
a Russian overtaken by the Civil War, a journalistic fraud
produced in the early twentieth century in nineteen hundred and
nineteen oh one. The protocols were first published in nineteen
oh three in Saint Petersburg. The mastermind behind them is
thought to be p I. Ratschowski Rokkowski, the eighteen eighty
four to nineteen oh two head of the Foreign intelligence
unit of the Police Department. Their production is attributed to
Matvey Golenvisky, a secret agent from eighteen ninety two and
son of v. A. Golovinski, who was a member of
Petrovsky Petroshchevsky Circle. The latter was a Russian literary discussion
group of progressive minded commenter intellectuals in Saint Petersburg or
organized by Mikail Petroshevski, a follower of the French utopian
socialist Charles Foyer. Among The members were writers, teachers, students,
minor government officials, army officers. While differing in political opinions,
most of them were opponents of the Tsarist autocracy and
the Russian serfdom. Among those connected to the circle were Dostoyevsky.
Still new theories about the origin of the protocols appear
all the time. Although the protocols were published and republished
in nineteen oh five, nineteen oh six, nineteen eleven, they
had little success in pre revolutionary Russia. They did not
find broad support in Russian society. The Court did not
give support to distinct distribution either. After many failed attempts
to protocols were presented to Nicholas the Second in nineteen
oh six, and he was very impressed. His notes on
the margins of the book included, what a foresight, what
precise execution? It is definitely them who orchestrated the revolutionary
events of nineteen oh five. There could be no doubt
about their authenticity authenticity, But when the right wing activists
suggested using the protocols for the defense of the monarchy,
Prime Minister pa Stleipin ordered a secret investigation into their origins.
It showed they were a definite fabrication. The monarch was
shocked by Sto Leipin's report, but wrote firmly removed the
protocols from circulation. You cannot defend the noble cause with
dirty means. And since then Russian ruler's dismissal of the
Protocols of the Elders' Zion came into force, no reference
to the protocols was allowed even during the Baylists trial.
Speaker 3: All right, well, most of the listeners know my opinion
of this, and it's not really much of one.
Speaker 2: I actually went through the.
Speaker 3: Writings of those who were around major Jewish figures at
the time, the Scionist Congress of nineteen oh two, Isaac Levinson,
Schulmann and Mcginsburg, Abraham Mapu, Alfred Doblin, Anna Seegers, I
don't know Joseph Roth. They were the main ones, and
their writings are not secret. None of them sound like
the protocols, not even close to it. The first one,
of course, was First Science Congress, Theodore Hertzel, Jacques Bahar
and people like that, Samuel pinelists. And it's just like
I've said many times, if I'm a Jew and someone
says this is how my elite intellect's right. I'm going
to be offended not what's in it, but by that
statement alone.
Speaker 2: It's awfully written.
Speaker 3: I am familiar with Jewish political writing at that period,
and it has no connection whatsoever to what's written in
the protocols the First and Second zion Is Congress. Frankly,
they didn't agree on a whole lot. But really is
a telltale giveaway is the fact that it really doesn't
bring up the major issues that that's the Jews we're
talking about at the time. It doesn't use any ancient
Greek authorities because the author didn't know them. It didn't
bring up you know, they're really their own authorities. It
didn't bring up, you know, their future plans except in
the most crude possible way. And you know, it's simply
it can't be, you know. It's Their writings at the time,
regardless of what they really meant, were quite sophisticated. They
learned elders, they certainly existed, and I mentioned a few
of them, and their writing is excellent. The person who
wrote these didn't really know much about Judaism, except from
maybe a purely political.
Speaker 2: Point of view.
Speaker 3: But the truth is, of course, what you know in general.
What they were saying was true. But I didn't need
protocols for that. No one needed protocols for that. Russia
had plenty of writers, just ASKI included, that were saying
the same kind of things. Ivola wrote on it quite
a bit. This is kind of the flat earth of
the of the of the era. It's it's it's used
to hit us over the head with like a cudgel,
people who oppose the theory of evolution and get the
flat earth thing that comes out of nowhere. I have
a paper that I haven't published. It's called the Mick
Lovin of Historical Fakes, you know, the fake id he had,
you know, But there are also right the Maurice Jolie,
the Dialogues in Hell, which was an attack on Napoleon
the Third. It's imaginary discussion between Montsque and Machiavelli and
Monsacue of course represents justice et cetera. And it's pretty obvious.
The plagiarism is pretty is pretty blatant. But there it's
meant to be crude, you know, Jewish writing, especially at
that level. Desion Is congresses, you know, they had a
specific even though they didn't agree on much they had
very specific issues involved, and none of it, none of
it seemed to come up in in the in the Protocols,
all these capital letters, whole sentences and capital no one.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: One of the ways I could spot a historical fraud
pretty easily just by the fact that people don't condemn
themselves as evil in their own writings. It's it's it's
loaded with these, you know, contradictions, make belief, formality, vague language, insults,
bad history, non existent economics, high school level rhetoric. Any
truth it contains is purely coincidental. If anyone claimed that
I wrote something and produced a paper at that level,
I'd be outraged. You know, this is supposed to be
the intellectual elite of Jewish life.
Speaker 2: Talking like this, and it's not as common as it
used to be.
Speaker 3: But in debates about the Jews, the the Protocols comes up,
but only from them. Whether I'm talking about leftists or
someone else. They say, you probably believe in that.
Speaker 2: I say I do not. Yes, some of the things.
Speaker 3: That they point at are generally true, But I'm not
sure why. You know why that got so much promotion,
since there were so many very competent writers saying the
exact same thing about the Jews, including Jews in a
much more sophisticated way. So no one needed that. And
it's a little embarrassing. I mean, you know, Nicholas was right,
you know, yeah, that's true, that's true. Yeah, of course
there's there's some truth in it, you know, to some extent.
This was the part of the part of the agendas,
but the elites at the Zionist congresses didn't agree on
a whole lot. So this was this was a this
was a bit of an embarrassment. And I know some
people don't like that, don't like me talking like that. Uh,
which that's too bad. I'm independent for a reason. And
you know, it's never to defend them. That sort of
mentality is always there, don't get me wrong. That sort
of mentality is always there, but not in their elite writings.
And I think we've mentioned some of this before, but
you know, like you know, you know, it's still eaping,
so you know, you can't. I think we said, you know,
you can't defend a noble cause with by dirty means.
So Russia's Russia generally dismissed it.
Speaker 2: It's a bit of a you know, it's a shame.
Speaker 3: But if I was to create something like this, it
would be you know, at least would I would know
how to do it. You know the fact that they
don't bring up any of their own stages or carrow
anyone like that. But but more than anything else, you know,
there's it's not really all the fake quotes that you
see from like Lenin, fake quotes from Hitler, from from Stalin.
You know, you can go there's a whole page on
fake quotes. There's actually a book out on fake quote
and they're really easy to spot because every one of them,
almost every one of them is self condemning. We're gonna
slaughter this one, we're gonna murder that one. We're gonna
you know, it's like a like a bad action movie villain.
And that's exactly how what the protocol puts out. And
after a while I got sick and tired of people
beating me over the head with it. As a way
that you probably believe in this nonsense kind of like
you know, we're debating evolution and they bring up the
flat earth. You know, it's very similar kind of Yeah,
they you know, they don't fight fair. They love this
kind of thing. You're not going to learn much from it. However,
finding the actual elders of Zion at the time I
mentioned a few of them, and finding their works, well
that's different. See what they had to say. I mentioned
a few works about the Jewish political future written roughly
around that time. I can't think of them off the
top of my head now, and I said, well, yeah.
Speaker 2: I have, I have them listed here.
Speaker 3: No one mentions that in the protocol, and you know,
you know other things like that. They you know, it
just it wasn't written certainly wasn't written by by Jews.
Speaker 2: It was written.
Speaker 3: By some sort of knew a little bit about Jews
but didn't like them. I had a good reason not
like them, but I really didn't know how to how
to write like them. And ever since then it's been
a it's been a problem.
Speaker 2: I'm just surprised it it had.
Speaker 3: The currency it did that it got that this is
this is what the elite elders, This is how they wrote.
Are you kidding me? Their writings aren't secret, you know.
The stuff that they wrote at the time is available
at least for most of them, as far as I know.
And they didn't write like that. Now again, I'm not
saying that that sort of thing isn't in the back
of their minds. Maybe it is, that's a different story.
But in terms of you know, and writing it down,
this is you know, yeah, they do think like that
many times. It's in the back of their minds, but
they certainly not going to write it down. God for
for a long time the Talm it wasn't written down,
or when it was written down, they use you know,
code words and and symbols and things like that if
it fell into the wrong hands. So I could go
on and on and on about it.
Speaker 2: It's just.
Speaker 3: I think it's a little bit of an embarrassment. But
I will say again that sort of crude thinking does exist.
Speaker 2: It does exist in.
Speaker 3: The mind of of of many Jews. Now they're not
going to call themselves evil, but they certainly will, you know,
realize that they're taking over and they've they've done, you know,
things that might be evil, but you know, it's for Jews.
So it doesn't matter. When I read when I first
read them, it was I was shocked.
Speaker 2: I said, people bought this.
Speaker 3: So again, the Jewish stagers at the time who were
at these conferences, their writings are out there. You could
compare them anyway. That's that's my that's my opinion. And
you had so many other great writers in Russia and
Western Europe talking about the Jews. No one needed the
protocols to learn about what they were actually planning and
what they thought of themselves and what they were going
to do.
Speaker 1: However, nineteen eighteen changed everything for the protocols. After the
Bolshevik sis power, after the murder of the royal family
in the beginning of the Civil War, the popularity of
the protocols surged. They were printed and reprinted by the
Osvosh White Army counter intelligence agency in the South of
Russia in Novo Scherkosk, Kharkoff, Rossofan, don Omsk, Kabarovsk, Vladivostok,
and were widely circulated among both the volunteer army and
the population and later Russian immigrants, especially in Sofia and Belgrade.
Speaker 3: You know, I could see it used as almost like
a primer for people who you know, couldn't read, who
don't have the who couldn't read the level of scholarship
of the actual learned elders, you know, who knew Plato
and Aristotle, they knew Mamonodes, they knew Cairo.
Speaker 2: It's difficult reading. This could be used you know, this is.
Speaker 3: Kind of a summary of it in crude terms. I
could see it being used as that, because in essence
that for the most part is true. I mean, the
Economics Center is terrible. Some of it doesn't make sense. Uh,
And it's one thing that and it's odd that you know,
who are they talking to?
Speaker 2: Do you learned alters are talking to each other or
a conference.
Speaker 3: They know they know this stuff already and they surely
don't need anyone lecturing them about economics and taking over
various industries. So but I maybe they had a limited use.
As you know, if this is your this is your
first you know, you can grasp it and absorb it quickly.
Oh wait a minute, Okay, maybe it's not real. But
do they really think like this and then you start
reading more when you get to our stuff? Oh my god,
really they do. I could see it as a sort
of a primer for people just getting started, because so
often these people they wrote in a way that your
college freshmen would struggle with. So maybe that's the use
that it had, and I think the White Army had
that in mind. But as any kind of work of
scholarship or something you could you know anything more than that.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 1: After the Bolshevik victory, the selling of protocols was banned
in Russia and became a criminal offense. But in Europe
the Protocols brought in by the white immigration played an
ominous role in the development of right wing ideology, especially
national socialism in Germany. No boy exposure of the protocols
is forgery and general denial of identity between Bolsheviks and
Jews constituted a major share of liberal immigrant journalism of
the nineteen twenties and nineteen thirties. We see several prominent Russians.
There are Miryakov, Rdishev, Bertsev and Kartashev Av Kartashev historian
of religion, orthodox theologian and at the same time a
public figure. Wrote about the unacceptability of anti Semitism for
a Christian and the pre revolutionary collection shield, which I
have often cited. In nineteen twenty two in Emigration, he
wrote the forward to hy Yoldlevsky Yyu Delevsky's book on
the Protocols. In nineteen thirty seven, Bertzev too asked him
to write a forward for his book, Kartashev wrote it,
a man with common sense, goodwill, and a little scientific
discipline cannot even discuss the authenticity of this police and
journalistic forgery, though certainly a talented forgery able to infect
the ignorant. It's unfair to continue supporting this obvious deceit
after it has been so unambiguously exposed. Yet it is
equally unfair to do the opposite, to exploit the easy
victory over the p to cause authenticity, to dismiss legitimate concerns.
A half truth is a lie. The whole truth is
that the Jewish question is posed before the world, is
one of the tragic questions of history, and it cannot
be resolved either by savage pograms or by libel and lies,
but only by honest and open efforts of all mankind.
Pograms in slander make a sensible and honest raising of
the question more difficult, degrading it to outright stupidity and absurdity.
They confuse the Jews themselves, who constantly emphasize the emphasize
their oppressed innocence, and expect from everybody else nothing but
sympathy and some sort of obligatory obligatory Judeophilia. Kartashchef certainly
regarded debunking of this sensational apocrypha as a moral duty,
but also thought that in washing out the dust of
protocols from the eyes of the ignorant, it is unacceptable
to impair their vision anew by pretending that this obliterates
the Jewish question itself.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you see what I mean.
Speaker 3: Throughout the twentieth century you had modernist theologians in the
Orthodox world who equated our understanding of bolsivism as you know,
mostly Jewish, to the acceptance of the protocols. That's why
this is damaging. That's why people will say, you know,
your your rejection of evolution Darwin means you accept the
flat earth. Now, I've heard that straight out and on
social media. Said to me, it's just it's just a weapon.
Of course, they realize it. They don't go together. But
for people who aren't quite as intellectually honest as we
try to be, the protocols just allowed them to say, okay, see,
the protocols are nonsense. Therefore, therefore their whole agenda's nonsense,
and the Jews are not involved, or at least only
partially involved. With Bolsivism, and everything they say is in
the white are wrong. And and this has allowed liberals,
especially you know, moderate liberals that type, to avoid and
sidestep the question of the Jewish domination of Bolsivism. We
all know, not just the Jewish domination of Balsivism, but
the revolutionary movement in general, including its opponents on the left.
And we talked about it in nineteen oh five, nineteen
oh six, we talked about it even in Dostoevsky's time.
Dost Aski talks about it in detail in his Diary
of a Writer nineteenth century, so late nineteenth century. So
you know, the protocols is is a weapon that our
enemies tend to use. Now I don't know what Kartanshev
really is. Is refers to I've read him before a
long time ago, but I guess by legitimate issues. I
don't know what he means. I don't recall precisely where
he stood on that issue. But you have a lot
of Philo Semitism, because you know, you can't be a
major public get major works published in a major publisher
unless you're philo Semitic in America, and so you have
these authors very piously. Now, I've responded to some of
this stuff over the years with long letters that I
know get attacked and all that. And of course you know,
they bring up the protocols in their response.
Speaker 2: They always do.
Speaker 3: Now, the last one I did was mostly about race,
but you know what, it came up anyway. So this
this was just a way, almost like a sob It's
like a cough drop for them to soothe any and
their bad conscience. Yes, you know, Jews everywhere in this movement.
Oh wait, look, these people believe the protocols. So okay,
all right, all right, let's calm down now, we know
it's not true. And they could, they could, they could
keep going. It was almost a way to deal with
their their cognitive dissonance, which most modernist Orthodox have twenty
four hours a day. And that's something I wouldn't wish
on anybody.
Speaker 1: Indeed, the Jewish question cannot be removed by either books
or articles. Consider the new reality face in the nineteen
twenties by Jews in the Baltic countries in Poland and Baltics.
Although Jews managed to maintain for a while their influential
position in trade and industry, they felt social pressure a
good half of Russian Jewry lived in the newly independent states.
New states trumpet their nationalism all the louder the less
secure they feel. These Jews feel themselves besieged by a hostile, energetic,
and restless popular environment. One day, it has demanded that
there be no more Jews percentage wise in the institutions
of higher learning than in the army. The next, the
air of everyday life becomes so tense and stressful that
Jews can no longer breathe in the same. In the
self determined nations, the war against Jews is waged by
the society itself, by students, military, political parties, ordinary people.
I Bickerman concluded that in leading the charge for self determination,
Jews were preparing the ground for their own repression by
virtue of higher dependence on the alien society. The situation
of Jews in Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania is literally tragic.
Yesterday is oppressed or today's oppressors. What is more, extremely
uncouth oppressors, entirely unashamed of their lack of culture.
Speaker 3: This is one of the reasons during the Russian Civil
War that the Western Powers intervened, at least in the
northern part after the war was over. Now before the
war was over was different. But nineteen nineteen, early nineteen nineteen,
part of their agenda was to defend these new republics,
which economically same thing occurred in the nineties were almost
immediately colonized by Germany and Sweden. Estonia especially, and they
are because they're so small, they're very dependent. Now the Jews,
of course, we were not oppressed by anybody. But I
think you know, when you have any kind of nationalism,
there's nothing wrong with with, you know, Lithuanian nationalism, nothing,
nothing whatsoever.
Speaker 2: You find a lot of it in Belarus.
Speaker 3: That's not the point. And there is this weird you know,
rivalry between Belarus and Lithuania. For that they take up
a lot of the same a lot of the same space.
But it can't be based on this, uh you know
my probably know my problems with with with Albanians and
Muslim Albanians anyway, And the close of all is who
I'm pretty sure I'm not allowed to to fly there.
Speaker 2: I heard that from somebody. I'm on the list. I
can never go there.
Speaker 3: Anyway. But it's very similar. These tiny little countries are
used as ways to hurt the larger one. The same
thing happened in nineteen ninety one. In ninety two, I
had nothing to do with the Jews. Jews, of course
dominated these societies in terms of finance, but any kind
of ethnic nationalism, even at that small scale, they will
notice that they do have a rival, far more nationalists
than themselves, and they may have to do something about it. Now,
given the fact that they were under very close Western control,
I don't know how much was done about it, because
the West was not going to permit anything to be
done to their to their social betters. So but that
was just a way self determination nonsense. These countries, even
even Ukraine. You know, I'm finishing up, by the way,
I should note my book on the Ukrainian War, the
Ruster Ukrainian War of twenty twenty two.
Speaker 2: I'm finishing up.
Speaker 3: It's going to be out soon. And it's it's very
difficult to see how an independent Ukraine would actually function.
As large as it is, it is still going to
be dependent on somebody. It's going to have you all
the cost acts, all the all the movements opposed to
Rush in the past, they all had to go to somebody.
The poll sometimes the Turks. Mazeppa went to the Swedes.
I didn't my lecture on go to Potski, who we've
mentioned before on my Orthodox National show. They condemned him
because he was supported by the German army in nineteen eighteen.
Speaker 2: Well so what.
Speaker 3: You know, the other the other contenders for the power
were dependent on the either the Soviet Union or there
or the unentauned. But that's how it is for countries
like this, you know.
Speaker 2: So that was really the big issue this was. And
as far as the.
Speaker 3: Jews were concerned, they continue to dominate finance and everything else.
But it's always a balancing act. You know, how much
nationalism do you really want to promote? Because nationalism usually
means very strong families, it means low crime, it means,
you know, comes from a place of social trust. And
you start, you know, you begin having you start looking
at your opponents. Now, Jews need the opposite. The Jews
need total chaos to thrive. And you know, this is
the reason why they they pump pornography into the West Bank.
Speaker 2: And they still do it.
Speaker 3: Michael Jones back in two thousand and one let off
his his speech at our Barne Review conference by mentioning
that way, you think they're bringing them freedom. No, we
know what they're doing, but we know why they're doing that.
So this is a complicated issue, and it's going to
be irrelevant pretty soon because in nineteen forty Stalin will
reabsorb them.
Speaker 1: So it transpired that the breakup of Russia also meant
the breakup of Russian Jewry, as the historical paradoxically, the
history paradoxically showed that the Jews were better off in
the United Russian Empire despite all the oppression, all of it.
So now in these splintered border countries, Jews became the
faithful guardians of the Russian language, Russian culture, impatiently waiting
for the restoration of the Great Russia. Schools that still
teach in Russian became filled with Jewish children, to the
exclusion of learning the languages of the newly formed states.
In these tiny countries, the Russian Jew, accustomed to life
in the open swaths of the Great Empire, feels uncomfortable,
squeezed and diminished in his social status despite all the
civil rights and autonomy. Indeed, are people's face is bound
up with the fate of the Great Russia.
Speaker 3: All right this, I gotta say something here. Now, this
isn't from Sultanestan. This is a quote. You know, his
quotes are long, and sometimes you forget that it's a quote.
As far as I think, it's still I Bikerman Ivan Bikerman.
The Jews, given their survival strategies, we all know wherever
they are, they're going to find the minority that they
could use against the majority culture.
Speaker 2: Wherever they go.
Speaker 3: In Kazakhstan, the handful of Jews there created the Uzbek
political movement. When I read that, I could you know
wherever they go, it's the same thing here. They didn't
give a damn about Russian culture or anything else. But Russians
were a fairly small minority. I shouldn't say fairly small,
that's not true, but they were a minority in these
these places. So as I said, so as you know
these forms of nationalism Lithuanian and Estonian, so they don't
get too too strong and fight Jewish interests. They now
are suddenly going to be very interested in the Russian language.
They didn't give a damn about Russian culture because Russian
culture is Orthodoxy. It was just a contrarian aspect of
this and in promoting the conflict between the Russians who
were left behind and native Estonians. You know they could
take advantage of that. So don't think, you know, this
is who No one actually believes this nonsense except for
this guy, faithful guardian of the Rusian Languge. Rusian culture
is utter nonsense unless you're saying it's sarcastically. It just
so happens that Russians were a minority here. I mean,
look how quickly Jews suddenly supported Ukrainian nationalism of all things,
of all things, one of the most anti Jewish nationalisms
of all They're right up there with the Balestinians in
the Cossacks here. You know, this is the Cossack territory.
They're willing to do it to serve their interests of
fighting a much larger power that they despise. And on
a smaller level, it's the case here. So don't take
this too seriously. Anyone who believes that to this extent
is an idiot. But yes, it's true technically, but not
for the reasons he thinks.
Speaker 1: Still, the position of jury in the circles of international
post war politics was strong, especially in Paris, and particular
regarding Zionism. Quote. In July nineteen twenty two, the League
of Nations recognize the World Zionist Organization as the Jewish
agency which first and foremost represented the interests of Zionists
and secondly of nonion and also provided support to the
European Jews. Biekerman accused the Zionists of seeing a fragments
in Russia as an ideal. This is why the Organization
of Russian Zionists called itself not Russian but russaou Ukrainian.
This is why the Iszionists and related Jewish groups so
assiduously for fraternized with the Ukrainian separatists.
Speaker 3: No, nothing changes. It's really amazing. I think I just
said that. But relative to today. You know that Jewish
money goes into the Asov battalion. Well we know the
real reason. I mean, some of their leadership has trained
in Israel. And I've written on that before, but when
I first heard that, when it's all started, I couldn't
really you know, they have no principles except for power.
They're willing to do it for. I mean they've all
been destroyed quite a while ago, but they're willing to
do it. Zion Is really the Jewish groups uh Frat
Knights with the Ukrainian separatists, of course they did. And
in Russia, of course they will join with anyone else
who wants to split the country up. Of course, we
know logically Jews, even from their point of view, were
better off in the United Russia. But in their fantasy land,
these pograms, everything else made it impossible for them to function,
you know, in their upper middle class lives, crying about
how awful it was. Well, the typical Russian peasant, while
doing fairly well, couldn't dream of that, of that kind
of alive, maybe didn't want that kind of alive. And
certainly in Ukraine, where the peasant commune was not nearly
as strong as it was in the rest of Russia.
So it's this, this section, this few paragraphs here, this
goes far and explaining the Jewish mentality. I don't even
think Bikerman realizes it. He realizes what he's admitting here.
Plus I love the fact that the League of Nations
said that the Zionist Agency represents Jews, whether the Zionists
or not. I find that very funny. But of course, settlement,
and you still had some settlement in Palestine. Here at
this point, we're in nineteen twenty two, twenty three.
Speaker 2: It's going to take.
Speaker 3: Another World War though to to create to create Israel,
and it will be the Soviets who were the first
to fashion it and recognize it at the UN.
Speaker 1: After the Civil War, Soviet Russia sentence into a heavy silence.
From this point on for decades to follow. All independent
voices were squashed and the and only the official line
could be heard, and the less was heard from Russia.
The latter was the voice of emigration. All of them,
from anarchists to monarchists, looked back in pain and argued
intensely who and to what extent was to blame for
what had happened.
Speaker 3: Okay, I got to stop him here, I think he
means intellectually, although this means dot was just getting started
now while peasant uprisings were at their peak around this time.
They're going to continue straight up to the German invasion.
They never stopped, and they were everywhere. You had people
starving all over the place. Because of this ridiculous policy
collectivization which Lenin began installed and completed. Their old ways
of farming were destroyed. They had to become engineers. See
Lendin's idea was that the world should become one large factory.
That's the final zenith of the Enlightenment. That's the final
nosis of what the Enlightenment was all about. Mechanism. So
that means it isn't so much that they give it
damn the peasants, so they don't need as many of them.
Once they realized that these things can be eventually automated,
and that we're going to bring the factory, factory systems,
factory methods into farming. You see that in the US today,
anything concerning GMO is right in that line. You know,
people who know nothing about farming are controlling you know,
GMO crops because they know something about chemistry and they
know something about genetics. So yeah, intellectually, only the official
line could be heard after nineteen twenty three or so,
so many had been killed, but peasant uprisings physically never
stopped until.
Speaker 2: Until nineteen forty one.
Speaker 1: Discussion developed within emigrant and jewelry as well. In nineteen
twenty three, Beakerman noted, quote, Jews answer everything with a
familiar gesture, familiar words. We know where to blame wherever
we get whenever something goes wrong, you'll look for a
Jew and find one. Ninety percent of what is written
in the contemporary Jewish press about Jews in Russia is
just a paraphrase of this stereotype. And because it's impossible
that we're always to blame for everything, Jews take from
this the flattering and a first glance quite convenient conclusion
that we're always in everywhere in the right.
Speaker 3: But I don't know, I don't even know what he's
saying here. They don't say that about themselves, and shortly
not at the time.
Speaker 1: However, consider before the Revolution, the Jewish society passionately argued
that a revolution would save the Jews, and we still
ardently adhere to this position. When the Jewish organizations gather
resources in the West to aid their co ethnic suffering
in the USSR, they denounce, belittle and slander everything about
pre revolutionary Russia, including the most positive of and constructive things.
See the Bolshevik Russia has now become the Promised Land,
egalitarian and socialist. Many Jews who emigrated from Russia settled
in the United States, and pro Bolshevik attitudes spread quickly
among them. The general Jewish mood was that Bolshevism was
better than the restoration of monarchy. It was widely believed
that the fall of Bolshevism in Russia would inevitably engender
a new wave of bloody Jewish pograms and mass extermination.
And it is on this basis that Bolshevism is preferred
as the lesser evil.
Speaker 3: You know, he's acting like there's this huge separation between
Jewelry and Bolshevism, and there's not. It's true, you had
many leftist groups similar to the Bolsheviks, but still in
opposition to them. Some of them, you know, stayed and
just made their peace. Some of them did go into exile.
The anarchists, you know, he couldn't make their peace with this.
And coming to America, you know, they were they were
the founders of everything, you know, Jews. This mass immigration
of all of these leftists of whatever type completely altered
American society. The Jewish mafia in the in the twenty
especially in the thirties, uh, well the twenties and during
prohibition in the thirties, you know, they created later on,
they created Las Vegas. You know, the communists. The Communist
movement was entire at its inception, was was very Jewish.
You had other gentile socialists before in nineteenth century, but
you know, they became very influential. Unfortunately, the the white
movement in settling in the US was not newly as influential.
Religiously maybe, but that's about it. You know, many Jews
immigrating from ussell in the US, but the Jews overwhelmingly
and this was even more the case after World War Two.
But at this point there was a mentality, not not.
Speaker 2: Quite literally, but that the Soviet.
Speaker 3: Union was the Promised Land.
Speaker 2: If you weren't a Zionist, I.
Speaker 3: Always thought that, you know, Israel, this little tiny country
is always in trouble. You know, I think right now
it's they tried to make eastern Ukraine the Promised Land.
It didn't work, Crimea, It's not going to happen. It's
New York. It's it's at least the eastern part of
the United States right now. That's what's that's you know,
that's far more power there than you have in this
little little country in Israel. So you know, and of
course they do denounce but little and slander everything about
pre revolutionary Russia, refusing to see or to consider all
the all the things and how they were actually treated
by the monarchy. We've been through in this show four
months now, going through it, you know, at nauseum about
how well they were treated, the money that was spent
on them. They needed to create this fantasy land of
these programs for no reason, which were you know, completely
in the imagination much of the time. That was their
their starting point, and that created a school of thought
that exists in the academy today. The Frankfurt School was
a part of this training thought they were Jews, you know,
the neocons coming from Trotsky. Different story, but still the
end results the same. And this notion fall of Balsivism
would lead to Bundy Jewish programs. Yeah, you know what,
it's kind of hard to say no to that. That
would happen, you know, but it would simply be in
retaliation for what the Jews and the Chicken had been
doing up until that point. And that's why you had
all sorts of regardless of where they were on the spectrum,
all types of spectrums, but the ideological one too. They're
all on the left to Okay, we need to back
the USSR or else we're in serious trouble.
Speaker 2: We pushed so far.
Speaker 3: That we'll get another kim O on Nitski if we lose.
Speaker 1: I think we end it right there. We're going to
start getting into the nep.
Speaker 2: And yes, very different story.
Speaker 1: Okay, we're about forty five minutes, and so I'll lend this.
Speaker 2: That's fun.
Speaker 1: Good, I'll lend this as I always do. Go to
the show notes and donate to doctor Johnson. Go to
the description of the videos and donate to doctor Johnson.
Keep him flush, keep him unemployed so that he can
he can continue to educate us on this book and
this subject that, as a friend of mine, as a
good friend of the show, has said, was just laid
out there waiting to be picked up and studied by somebody.
And finally, you know, it's happening in a way that
not only can people now understand what's in the book,
but even understand the history and the culture and the
people who are part of this history. The most important
part is always the people.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and that's sort of what my job is, and
that's why this is working so well.
Speaker 2: Well, I'm having such a good time.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that's great, Thank you, doctor Johnson. So it's
seen a couple of days.
Speaker 2: All right, my friend, byebye,