Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. What do you
Speaker 1: think the punishment should be here? And what do you
Speaker 1: think is really going on here? I guarantee you don't
Speaker 1: see this story coming. Castle Rock school bus driver accused
Speaker 1: of abandoning forty elementary students miles from home. Brian, you
Speaker 1: have not been moonlighting or anything here. Oh no, no, no,
Speaker 1: I'm just asking. I'm just gathering facts. I'm in the
Speaker 1: fact gathering stage here. Or Kelly, you're not doing a
Speaker 1: little bus driving out in Castle Rock. Okay. So here's
Speaker 1: the Denver Post story. A Castle Rock school bus driver
Speaker 1: abandoned forty elementary schoolers Monday evening at a random intersection
Speaker 1: miles away from their homes. Parents and school officials said.
Speaker 1: Parents told nine News that the driver, who they claim
Speaker 1: was a substitute for the route that day, forced their
Speaker 1: Clear Sky Elementary School students off the bus near a
Speaker 1: cemetery at East Wolfsenberger Road and Auburn Drive Douglas County
Speaker 1: School officials would not confirm if the driver was a substitute,
Speaker 1: and a video posted by nine news. Students said the
Speaker 1: trouble started before they even left the parking lot. One
Speaker 1: girl said the bus driver refused to move until they
Speaker 1: all stopped talking. Come on, these are elementary school kids.
Speaker 1: You're never gonna move, which caused them to leave the
Speaker 1: school later than they normally would. Now, there's got to
Speaker 1: be video of this, right, all these buses have video.
Speaker 1: You could probably you know, pay for the remodeling of
Speaker 1: every school by selling the cable rights to that video.
Speaker 1: Multiple parents also said their children reported the driver threatening
Speaker 1: them and using vulgar language. According to Fox thirty one quote,
Speaker 1: we felt like when he was driving and missing our stops,
Speaker 1: like we were getting kidnapped. Caitlin Zavadil, a ten year
Speaker 1: old student. A Clearsky, told nine News the bus driver
Speaker 1: eventually stopped around five pm, about two miles from the
Speaker 1: school on the corner of Wolsenberger and Ubburn, and forced
Speaker 1: all forty kids out of the bus. Students said many
Speaker 1: of the children are miles from their home and had
Speaker 1: no way to contact their parents. As temperatures dropped, and
Speaker 1: it was cold out there. While some parents arrived quickly
Speaker 1: at the intersection to rescue their kids, other students were
Speaker 1: picked up by strangers desperate for a ride home. Parents
Speaker 1: told both television stations. Now a quote from the school district, quote,
Speaker 1: we are in contact with the families of the forty
Speaker 1: students who were Get this language right. You just wonder
Speaker 1: how many people gathered around a table with how many
Speaker 1: lawyers to write this team and for the Douglas County
Speaker 1: School District quote, we are in contact with the families
Speaker 1: of the forty students who were dropped off at a
Speaker 1: different area than the regular bus stop after school. Now,
Speaker 1: come on, now, come on, man dropped off at a
Speaker 1: different area than the regular bus stop. No, from what
Speaker 1: the kids say. The one said it she felt like
Speaker 1: she was being kidnapped. This isn't dropped off at a
Speaker 1: different area other than the regular bus stop. Wait a
Speaker 1: second school district, your regular bus stop, that's where you're
Speaker 1: supposed to get off, and then you voluntarily get off
Speaker 1: because Rover's there and your mom's there and you can't
Speaker 1: wait to get home. They were dropped off, They were
Speaker 1: forced off the bus out in the middle of nowhere.
Speaker 1: So I'd love to meet whoever at the school district
Speaker 1: put this statement together anyway, because I'm to say this
Speaker 1: is incredibly concerning. Is the safety of our students has
Speaker 1: always our priority. All I would suggest is, if that's
Speaker 1: the case, then don't insult everybody's intelligence by saying, oh,
Speaker 1: they were dropped off at a different area than their
Speaker 1: regular bus stop. That implies that, oh, they were dropped
Speaker 1: off down the block so they could see all their
Speaker 1: friends on the walk home. The post story goes on
Speaker 1: to say school district officials say they're working with the
Speaker 1: Castle Rock Police Department and the bus drivers currently on leave.
Speaker 1: Oh wow. Really, while they conduct any internal investigation, it's
Speaker 1: not clear if criminal charges will be filed. Wow. Well,
Speaker 1: I will bet you my golf clubs, every Tomahawk, Ryean
Speaker 1: Owes me and a whole lot more that we not
Speaker 1: only see criminal charges filed, we see a boatload of
Speaker 1: criminal charges filed. Now, I do catastrophic injury work. I
Speaker 1: don't do criminal defense, but I and I'm not a
Speaker 1: criminal prosecutor. But I would bet you we see a
Speaker 1: whole slew of child abuse charges, maybe kidnapping charges. I
Speaker 1: don't know about the facts here, but that one kid
Speaker 1: said she felt like they were being kidnapped. Yeah, So anyway,
Speaker 1: what what do you think should happen to this guy
Speaker 1: or gal? And what do you think is really going
Speaker 1: on here? Eighty five for zero five A two five
Speaker 1: five the number. But yeah, dropped off at a location,
Speaker 1: dropped off at a different area than the regular bus
Speaker 1: stop after school. Wow? Confidence inspiring right eight f five
Speaker 1: for zero five A two five five text d A
Speaker 1: N five seven seven three nine. One of my favorite
Speaker 1: headlines of the year from the Denver Gazette, Colorado to
Speaker 1: pay one point five million in same sex wedding website case. Yeah. See,
Speaker 1: anti Christian bigotry is expensive, Governor, It's expensive, Phil It's
Speaker 1: expensive all you lefties who are part of this open
Speaker 1: hostility to Christianity in Colorado. And it's it's everybody, as
Speaker 1: far as I can tell, everybody in power in that
Speaker 1: Democratic Party, regardless of shape, size, race, gender, religion. This
Speaker 1: appears to be just a foundational thing with the leadership
Speaker 1: of the Democratic Party in Colorado, to the point where
Speaker 1: you have Justice Kennedy commenting on it when Jack Phillips
Speaker 1: won his case. Just this open aggression toward Christianity in
Speaker 1: this case, Colorado would write the check. And I don't
Speaker 1: think it's coming out of police's pocket. I bet it's
Speaker 1: coming out of our pocket to Laurie Smith for her attorneys.
Speaker 1: And you know Laurie, she's been on this show before.
Speaker 1: Laurie Smith, who feared she would run a foul of
Speaker 1: Colorado's Anti Discrimination Act if she refused to create websites
Speaker 1: for same sex weddings through a graphic design company, Three
Speaker 1: zero three Creative, sued the Colorado Civil Rights Commission and
Speaker 1: the state's attorney general. The case made it all the
Speaker 1: way to the US Supreme Court, which ruled last year
Speaker 1: in favor of Smith, concluding that Colorado sort took quote
Speaker 1: force an individual to speak in ways that align with
Speaker 1: its views, but defy her conscience about a matter of
Speaker 1: major significance, therefore violating her First Amendment rights. So yeah,
Speaker 1: Colorado had to write a check for those attorney fees.
Speaker 1: And not that I think that's going to discourage the
Speaker 1: Left in Colorado, because, let's face it, I mean, their
Speaker 1: whole existence it. Think about this for a second, the
Speaker 1: entire existence of the left in Colorado, whether you're talking
Speaker 1: about polist Johnston Weiser, Bennett hick and looprenium. I don't
Speaker 1: even mention Griswold because I think she's becoming largely irrelevant,
Speaker 1: except to the extent that she's being protected by what
Speaker 1: I perceived as a major cover up. Anyway, the entire
Speaker 1: existence of the left in Colorado depends upon a large
Speaker 1: majority of Colorado's Ryan voting against their own faith. Think
Speaker 1: about it. Literally, You've got a strong majority of Colorado's
Speaker 1: who have to set aside their faith in order to
Speaker 1: vote for these lefties. So that is in part why
Speaker 1: the left is so openly hostile and aggressive toward Christians.
Speaker 1: That's why Jared Paulus, the day after his elected governor,
Speaker 1: comes out and says, forgot to mention it during the campaign,
Speaker 1: but you really need to leave your faith outside the
Speaker 1: public square, because the left knows if you vote your faith.
Speaker 1: And I don't mean Catholics voting for Catholics. I mean,
Speaker 1: as I've called them out on air, for some of
Speaker 1: the absolute worst offenders out there are elected Democrats who
Speaker 1: claim to be Catholics. No, I'm not talking about Catholics
Speaker 1: voting for Catholics. I'm talking about people voting consistent with
Speaker 1: their faith, their morals, their core beliefs and voting for
Speaker 1: someone who will reflect those in office, and the left test.
Speaker 1: That's why the left test to get people to set
Speaker 1: their faith aside for the left to get votes, because
Speaker 1: once the left takes office, in many, many different cases,
Speaker 1: they're doing the exact opposite of what the faith of
Speaker 1: most people calls for. So yeah, so yeah, anti Christian
Speaker 1: bigotry is expensive, and the lefties in Colorado happy to
Speaker 1: pay that price with your money. Eight five five for
Speaker 1: zero five eight two five five takes d an five
Speaker 1: seven seven three nine.
Speaker 2: And now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Hey, we got a lot going on, but I really
Speaker 1: want to get your take on this. It is fortunately
Speaker 1: so unique. Good Denver post story. Castle Rock school bus
Speaker 1: driver accused of abandoning forty elementary students miles from home.
Speaker 1: I gave you the details to start the show. Wants
Speaker 1: your take on What do you think is going on here?
Speaker 1: What do you think cost this? I mean, literally, these
Speaker 1: are elementary school kids. It's cold for to them all
Speaker 1: off the bus two miles from school. Of course, the
Speaker 1: bureaucrats at the school district chose to portray it this way.
Speaker 1: The forty students were dropped off at a different area
Speaker 1: than their regular bus stop. You could say that Texter
Speaker 1: says Dan Boss metal breakdown slash illness. Yeah, it'll be
Speaker 1: very interesting to see, you know, you would think so, right,
Speaker 1: which goes to another issue, and listen, I understand lots
Speaker 1: of things can cause psychotic breaks before drug use, besides
Speaker 1: drug use. I have no idea who this driver is
Speaker 1: or whether or not he or she was on drugs.
Speaker 1: What I do know is we see all sorts of
Speaker 1: horrific stuff happening in Colorado because of psychotic breaks caused
Speaker 1: by people using high potency marijuana. So when people say, oh,
Speaker 1: well wait a set you know, marijuana, it just gets
Speaker 1: you high, it mellows you out. Nobody gets intoxicated enough
Speaker 1: to do ABC or D, they're not understanding the science
Speaker 1: that this science with this high potency pot is that, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, just intoxication causes all sorts of death and
Speaker 1: misery and crashes and awfulness. But it's the psychotic breaks
Speaker 1: that's different than an intoxication. The psychotic breaks that get
Speaker 1: triggered that then cause this otherwise very happy family, the
Speaker 1: husband to take out a gun and shoot the wife
Speaker 1: in the head in front of the young children. You know,
Speaker 1: a real case from Colorado, the Observatory Park case, for example.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I don't know what went on in this example,
Speaker 1: but the textures speculation of some kind of mental breakdown
Speaker 1: illness would seemed to make sense. Dan, This bus driver
Speaker 1: had to be mentally ill. The story is incomprehensible, says
Speaker 1: a Texter boy in it. I think it's more than that,
Speaker 1: my friend. I think you're looking at a ton of
Speaker 1: criminal charges, starting with probably forty counts of child abuse.
Speaker 1: Do you get kidnapping charges thrown in there? We'd call
Speaker 1: George Brockler, but we can't because George is just won
Speaker 1: the election. He's going to be sworn in as DA
Speaker 1: there in mid January, so he would have a con
Speaker 1: flicked on that.
Speaker 3: Dan.
Speaker 1: Oh, this is one of the texts of the year.
Speaker 1: The White House called and they would like their bus
Speaker 1: driver back. Boy, I love our listeners, Dan, Why didn't
Speaker 1: anyone call the police to go and wait with the kids,
Speaker 1: take them home or call their parents? Good question, because
Speaker 1: according to the post story, some of the kids ended
Speaker 1: up getting picked up by strangers because they're standing out
Speaker 1: there freezing. Uh, all right, so live long enough you'll
Speaker 1: see everything. But one of these days it's going to
Speaker 1: dawn on us as a people in Colorado. And I'm
Speaker 1: not saying marijuana had anything to do with this, but
Speaker 1: we need to get to the bottom of that, right.
Speaker 1: But the problem is that way were set up in Colorado,
Speaker 1: and I think it's intentional. You've got all this ugly, crazy, bloody, gory,
Speaker 1: terrible stuff happening caused by marijuana that really isn't documented
Speaker 1: or there's no central repository of such facts so that
Speaker 1: the people as a whole could take out the old
Speaker 1: scale and okay, legalized marijuana. Is it worth it or not?
Speaker 1: Because I have no doubt if people could see all
Speaker 1: the harms I gathered in one place that say, no, no,
Speaker 1: way it's worth it. How about Matt Gates a couple
Speaker 1: of things. There much more talk now about that taking
Speaker 1: a recess appointment in order to get Gates confirmed with
Speaker 1: some doubts out there that'll be able to get enough senators.
Speaker 1: And the other related issue do you think there should
Speaker 1: be a recess appointment? But the other related issue is
Speaker 1: should the House Ethics report be released? Because as you know,
Speaker 1: there was an ethics report underway after DOJ declined to
Speaker 1: charge any crime, and then Gates resigned just a short
Speaker 1: time before the ethics report was going to be released.
Speaker 1: Resigned in order to become Donald Trump's ag nominee. So
Speaker 1: my quick take on this, but I'm really anxious to
Speaker 1: get yours because I don't have a good sense right
Speaker 1: now of kind of where the electorate is at on this.
Speaker 1: My guess would be the electorate saying, give me a break.
Speaker 1: We elected Trump, we trust Trump, we want Trump to
Speaker 1: have his people, give them a chance, which is exactly
Speaker 1: where I'm at. Unless there's proof that Gates is guilty
Speaker 1: of this terrible crime, then even though he wouldn't have
Speaker 1: been my choice, I think Trump should have him. Trump
Speaker 1: should get him, and if it takes a recess appointment,
Speaker 1: so be it. And I understand why a lot of
Speaker 1: people I respect say, no, wait a second. You know,
Speaker 1: founders put this business of Senate confirmation in place for
Speaker 1: a reason. And I get that argument. It's a darn
Speaker 1: good argument that the problem we have is that there
Speaker 1: have been a bunch of recess appointments by a bunch
Speaker 1: of different presidents, Republican Democrat. So after all Trump's been
Speaker 1: through and the voter's speaking loudly and clearly. They want
Speaker 1: to give him another shot. They liked what they saw
Speaker 1: the first time around. I think he's got to have
Speaker 1: his folks again, even though it wouldn't have been my choice.
Speaker 1: So yeah, unless there's proof, I mean proof that Gates
Speaker 1: committed this crime and the allegation, because right now you've
Speaker 1: got the lawyer for woman who was alleged at least
Speaker 1: seventeen at the time, claiming that Gates had sex with
Speaker 1: their paid for sex, et cetera, et cetera. Apparently DOJ
Speaker 1: didn't put much stock in this witness, I'm guessing because
Speaker 1: DODJ didn't charge in DJ obviously now to fan of Gates,
Speaker 1: and when I say DOJ, I'm talking about the Biden administration,
Speaker 1: which obviously politicized, you know, the enforcement of the law.
Speaker 1: So unless there's actual proof that he's guilty, then I
Speaker 1: think Trump's entitled to get his people and then see
Speaker 1: what Trump and his team can do. It did a
Speaker 1: darn good job the first time around.
Speaker 3: And do all these congress members, both House and Senate
Speaker 3: one us kind of opening up that can of worms
Speaker 3: dan as to what they might have hidden in their
Speaker 3: personal lives. Non disclosure agreements, hush money payments, et cetera.
Speaker 1: You're talking about the report, the House report. My guess
Speaker 1: is they don't. But where I come down on that,
Speaker 1: because where I come down clearly is Trump should have
Speaker 1: his people unless there's proof. I'm talking about very high
Speaker 1: level of proof that Gates is guilty of this crime,
Speaker 1: which he has not been charged with. Innocent until proven guilty,
Speaker 1: Trump should have his people. With that, said my friend Ryan,
Speaker 1: I think that report should be released. I think the
Speaker 1: report should be released and let the chips fall where
Speaker 1: they may. Obviously, Gates's position is that's a false allegation.
Speaker 1: It's pretty clear from what's out there in the reporting
Speaker 1: right now that you do have one or more women,
Speaker 1: young women, claiming that Gates did this. But it's also
Speaker 1: clear that law enforcement chose not to charge. But why
Speaker 1: shouldn't we just get the information on the table. All
Speaker 1: these people work for us, right, Congress works for us,
Speaker 1: The House Ethics Committee works for us. Apparently the report
Speaker 1: was just about Dawn other than some spell checking type
Speaker 1: of stuff. If that's true, why shouldn't it be released.
Speaker 2: Let's see all of it done, not just Gates.
Speaker 1: I'm with you all of it. Yeah, they all work
Speaker 1: for us. Now listen, I can understand if there's an investigation,
Speaker 1: there's an internal investigation that concludes, wait a second, this
Speaker 1: is just a false allegation. Somebody's just trying to take
Speaker 1: this gal or this guy down. No, that stuff shouldn't
Speaker 1: be released because anybody can make a false allegation, and
Speaker 1: you shouldn't be tarnishing anybody. I don't care if it's
Speaker 1: the janitor in a school, if it's a school principal,
Speaker 1: if it's a congressman. If it's been determined to be
Speaker 1: a false allegation, then yeah, that in my mind, should
Speaker 1: not be released. That would be very unfair to the
Speaker 1: person that false accuser set out to harm. But if
Speaker 1: it has not been determined to be a false allegation,
Speaker 1: then yeah, I think the public should be able to
Speaker 1: see it. My guess is there is not proof in
Speaker 1: there that Matt Gates did or else he'd be criminally prosecuted.
Speaker 1: And if there's not proof he committed a crime, I
Speaker 1: think Trump should get his people, including Gates. But what
Speaker 1: do you think about all that eight five five for
Speaker 1: zero five eight two five five text d an five
Speaker 1: seven seven three nine When we come back. We're going
Speaker 1: to hear the statement Lake and Riley's stepfather read to
Speaker 1: the court. All these lefties in office should be required
Speaker 1: to listen to this.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Sonny host in on the few.
Speaker 4: How could you nominate someone with allegations of child trafficking
Speaker 4: across the or trafficking across state lines and having sex
Speaker 4: with a seventeen year old my understanding. Further on in
Speaker 4: the interview, they discussed the fact that once he finds
Speaker 4: out that she's seventeen, he stops having sex with her.
Speaker 1: Then Sonny Hosten a short time later.
Speaker 4: Sonny, you have illegal I do have a legal No,
Speaker 4: thank you, Wippy. Matt Gates has long denied all allegations,
Speaker 4: calling the claims quote invented and saying in a statement
Speaker 4: to ABC News that this false smear following a three
Speaker 4: year criminal investigation should be viewed with great skepticism. That
Speaker 4: DOJ investigation was closed with no charges being brought.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back, Yeah, didn't do that with the
Speaker 1: same gusto. Ditchy, just didn't sound the same. Texter nails it. Dan.
Speaker 1: They also said they had a witness for Brett Kavanaugh. See,
Speaker 1: that's the thing, and I've said it a long time ago.
Speaker 1: First of all, let's start with Gates. Okay, wouldn't have
Speaker 1: been my nomination, but innocent until proven guilty. And come on,
Speaker 1: anybody with the brain Biden administration hates this guy. Do
Speaker 1: you really think that that DOJ after an investigation is
Speaker 1: going to pass on a prosecution if they believe they
Speaker 1: have any chance to convict him. Doesn't that say a
Speaker 1: lot in addition to presumed innocent. So yeah, but here's
Speaker 1: the thing, it's one of them, many many ways we've
Speaker 1: documented on the show where the left is blatantly anti
Speaker 1: woman because there are a lot, unfortunately, of real sex
Speaker 1: assaults out there. But every time the left makes a
Speaker 1: false claim of sex assault in order to try to
Speaker 1: bring down a political opponent, you know, whether it's Brett
Speaker 1: Kavanaugh or somebody else, what the left does is it
Speaker 1: hurts the women who are victims of true sex assaults. Brett,
Speaker 1: Brett Kavanaugh didn't sexually assault anybody. This was a political
Speaker 1: assassination attempt of Brett Kavanaugh in that committee hearing. And
Speaker 1: so this is what the left does. So it's another
Speaker 1: way they hurt women because how is anybody supposed to
Speaker 1: take any of these sex assault allegations seriously or give
Speaker 1: them credibility when so often the left just lies to
Speaker 1: try to take down political opponents. And in the Gates case,
Speaker 1: where Biden's DOJ didn't prosecute, yeah, how do you do
Speaker 1: it anything other than presume him innocent. Now at the
Speaker 1: same time, hey, if there are facts, like actual, real facts,
Speaker 1: somebody can produce to show he's guilty of that crime,
Speaker 1: then he shouldn't be ag But I'm I'm guessing nobody's
Speaker 1: going to be producing those facts or he would have
Speaker 1: been criminally charged. Is there a flaw in that logic,
Speaker 1: Young Ryan.
Speaker 3: No, because they went after Trump with far less, oh
Speaker 3: my lord, fabricating that and they saw how that worked
Speaker 3: out for them. So they must have really had nothing
Speaker 3: on Gates from a materialistic evidentiary standpoint to prove a
Speaker 3: case beyond a reasonable doubt. A lot of this is conjecture,
Speaker 3: and maybe something happened, but the truth lies between maybe
Speaker 3: the two points of Gates's version of the events. Young
Speaker 3: lady who knows and I don't know that the House
Speaker 3: again wants to open up this can of worms.
Speaker 1: I really don't well again if you just joined to
Speaker 1: thank you. In terms of the House Ethics Committee report,
Speaker 1: where I come down on that is, listen, if if
Speaker 1: any ethics body is investigating a complaint and has determined
Speaker 1: that it's unsubstantiated, I don't think that report should be
Speaker 1: released because then you're just hurting an innocent person being
Speaker 1: the accused, because false accusations are are a horrific form
Speaker 1: of violence. And yeah, if an allegation has not been substantiated,
Speaker 1: then then the target of that investigation should not be
Speaker 1: harmed by the release of that report. So I think
Speaker 1: it comes down to the nature of the report. But listen,
Speaker 1: if you've got and I'm not saying this is a
Speaker 1: case of Gates. I don't know what's in that report.
Speaker 1: But if you've got a House Ethics Investigation Committee report,
Speaker 1: you know, that concludes that that certain charges are supported,
Speaker 1: then yeah, that that kind of report I think should
Speaker 1: be released. Does that mean that if such a report
Speaker 1: was released in the House Committee concluded that Gates did it,
Speaker 1: that he really did it. Not necessarily, you'd have to
Speaker 1: see what's in the report. I just keep coming back
Speaker 1: to the man was criminally investigated by an administration that
Speaker 1: hates him and they didn't charge him. To me, that
Speaker 1: just says a lot. And again I'm not a big
Speaker 1: Matt Gates fan. Funny thing is, Ryan, I'm starting to
Speaker 1: think that if he does take over his age, I
Speaker 1: might end up really liking him as ag after a while.
Speaker 1: But I think We're going to get the chance to
Speaker 1: find out because Donald Trump's a fighter. Thank god he
Speaker 1: fought for Brett Kavanaugh. I think any other president in
Speaker 1: our lifetime, Republican or Democrat, would have abandoned Brett Kavanaugh.
Speaker 1: That would have been a gross injustice to Brett Kavanaugh.
Speaker 1: It would have set the precedent that proof doesn't matter anymore.
Speaker 1: It's just how loud the howling is and how hot
Speaker 1: the political pressure is. So Donald Trump did a great
Speaker 1: service to a very good man in Brett Kavanaugh and
Speaker 1: to this nation by sticking with the Kavanaugh nomination. You
Speaker 1: really think he's going to abandon Gates. I don't think so.
Speaker 3: How many Biden nominees were voted down for his cabinet
Speaker 3: and how well performed It's.
Speaker 1: Been an atrocious disaster.
Speaker 3: At Mayorcis blinked and Grand Holme, Buddha Jedge go down
Speaker 3: the line.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I have no room to talk here, no
Speaker 1: none at all. And that reminds me of a tweet
Speaker 1: that George Brockler had sent out. You know how often
Speaker 1: has Phil Wiser sued the Biden administration? Right? Yeah, I'm
Speaker 1: guessing that's kind of a goose egg, Texter Dan, I
Speaker 1: am completely against Gates being nominated as AG. I understand
Speaker 1: what you and so many other very smart people are saying,
Speaker 1: but this guy is slimy and the optics are terrible.
Speaker 1: He's not even mentioning eyebrows, especially as being nominated AG.
Speaker 1: He's unqualified and he has baggage. There must be someone
Speaker 1: who has Trumps back with proper qualifications. DK and Broomfield listen,
Speaker 1: I get it. I get it, man. I've never been
Speaker 1: a Gates fan. I don't like the way that that
Speaker 1: he I thought, very selfishly undermine the GOP and Congress,
Speaker 1: hurt the national interest by doing so, all part to
Speaker 1: this personal vendetta with Kevin McCarthy. I didn't like that
Speaker 1: one a little bit. Didn't like his act with some
Speaker 1: stuff he did on the convention floor. I've not been
Speaker 1: a Gates fan, but I am a fan of the
Speaker 1: many good things Trump has done. And he risked his
Speaker 1: life to win the presidency. He fought hard, he won,
Speaker 1: he saved the nation again by doing it. I think
Speaker 1: he should get his people unless there's proof that Gates
Speaker 1: is guilty of that crime. And I think Trump knows
Speaker 1: better who he needs to carry out his vision, including
Speaker 1: his vision for Department of Justice. And I don't know
Speaker 1: if it would be my vision. I honestly don't know,
Speaker 1: because I don't know what his vision for DJ is.
Speaker 1: But I know this, the American people elected him and
Speaker 1: said we trust him, and so I think he should
Speaker 1: get that shot. I think he is going to get
Speaker 1: that shot. I think he'll use a recess appointment if
Speaker 1: he has to. And I don't think there's going to
Speaker 1: be proof Gates committed that crime or else DJ would
Speaker 1: have charged him. And then, as I just said to
Speaker 1: Ryan and DK is an excellent text through out of Broomfield.
Speaker 1: As I just said to Ryan, I am really starting
Speaker 1: to think that Gates will prove me wrong, and that,
Speaker 1: you know, six months or a year into his tenure,
Speaker 1: I'm going to say, you know, I really like what
Speaker 1: he's doing. His ag just a gut feeling I have.
Speaker 1: And for those who think the guy some kind of stooge.
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you, I've been watching more video on
Speaker 1: him now that he's been nominated. I've seen him do
Speaker 1: an awful lot of really impressive things, showing tremendous intelligence,
Speaker 1: quick thinking, etc. In some of these committee hearings. So
Speaker 1: I think it's very clear that he's a very smart guy.
Speaker 1: That's not the end of the equation, right, but a
Speaker 1: very smart guy. And the only thing I'd want to
Speaker 1: mention again, not to be redundant, but I think it's
Speaker 1: so important we remember that because of the Dems unleashing
Speaker 1: these demons, and they truly are demons. They threaten the
Speaker 1: existence of the country, these demons of lawfare, abusing the
Speaker 1: legal system to jail political opponent they can't beat at
Speaker 1: the polls. Hey, every Republican president from now on is
Speaker 1: going to have to set aside the normal AG pick,
Speaker 1: which would normally be somebody with this credential and that
Speaker 1: credential in that history and that history, and is going
Speaker 1: to have to err on the side of loyalty first,
Speaker 1: because the AG is the one position that can kill
Speaker 1: that president week one. And now that this precedent has
Speaker 1: been said of this law fair first priority for every
Speaker 1: Republican president is going to be loyalty. Blame the Democrats
Speaker 1: for that. Hey, when we come back, a warning. Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm going to place something. I really hope you're here.
Speaker 1: Obviously we want to keep our listeners. But in fairness
Speaker 1: to you and any kids in the car, I'm going
Speaker 1: to play the sound of Lake and Riley's stepfather reading
Speaker 1: from her journal in court today at the sentencing of
Speaker 1: her murder, who was led into this country by Biden
Speaker 1: and Harris. And it's a letter to her future husband.
Speaker 1: It's incredibly moving and powerful, and so you may not
Speaker 1: want young children to hear it. You're on the Dan
Speaker 1: Kapla Show.
Speaker 2: And now back to the dan Kapla Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Hey, prayers for a friend Alexa, who fills in on
Speaker 1: this show and when Kelly's out and mentioned the other
Speaker 1: day that she had suffered a bad fall and it
Speaker 1: has it has taken a very concerning turn, and so Bob,
Speaker 1: lots of prayers for Alexa, like right now, would be
Speaker 1: very helpful. Eight five five for zero five excuse me,
Speaker 1: not a motion, that's peanut butter. Eight five for zero
Speaker 1: five eight two five five The number techst d A
Speaker 1: N five seven seven three nine kind of play some
Speaker 1: sound now, I warned before the break, if you have
Speaker 1: young kids in the car, just be too upsetting. This
Speaker 1: is the father of Lake and Riley, who was brutally
Speaker 1: murdered by that illegal immigrant that Biden Harris led into
Speaker 1: the country and then paid to fly around the country.
Speaker 1: And so this is at the sentence seeing today her
Speaker 1: dad reading a journal entry that Lake and Riley had
Speaker 1: made shortly before her death, a letter to her future husband.
Speaker 1: And I heard in the opening.
Speaker 5: Statements from the defense that the loss of a life
Speaker 5: that was apparently full of promise is tragic. I'm here
Speaker 5: today to let your honor in the entire world know
Speaker 5: that Lincoln's life was not apparently full of promise, but
Speaker 5: instead was abundantly an exceptionally full of promise, and was
Speaker 5: a shining beacon in the life of everyone that knew her,
Speaker 5: that ever came in contact with her. I'm so proud
Speaker 5: of Lincoln and the beautiful person she was, and well
Speaker 5: I could stand here and try to tell the world
Speaker 5: the things that made her such a wonderful person, as
Speaker 5: well as in many things we have all been and
Speaker 5: deprived of. I think one of her last journal entry
Speaker 5: he's dated twelve seventeen twenty three.
Speaker 1: Says it best. So here we go, can my future husband.
Speaker 5: As silly as I feel writing this, my old small
Speaker 5: group leader once recommended it.
Speaker 2: So here I.
Speaker 5: Am to my future husband, I want you to know
Speaker 5: that I'm thinking about you.
Speaker 1: And I'm working.
Speaker 5: Every day to become the best wife I can be,
Speaker 5: working through my current relationships, the best prepared me for
Speaker 5: I wurs and our kids. One day, I'm focusing on
Speaker 5: God and what he defines is that faithful Christian life,
Speaker 5: and so that I can best embody those characteristics. I
Speaker 5: pray that you know that is with my full faith
Speaker 5: and trust in God, that I know this relationship has.
Speaker 1: Been handcrafted by Him.
Speaker 5: I pray that we continue to glorify the Lord, prioritize
Speaker 5: Him in every aspect of our lives, and raise our
Speaker 5: family our future family, to be God fearing Christians as well.
Speaker 5: I pray God is the center of our relationship it
Speaker 5: as it is a gift from Him. I thank Him
Speaker 5: for you before I even know you, and can't wait
Speaker 5: to love you in the.
Speaker 1: Best way I know how for the rest of our lives.
Speaker 5: I pray you know and feel the importance of my
Speaker 5: love and hopes for our relationship. No matter what challenges
Speaker 5: we face, I pray that our trust in God and
Speaker 5: love from one another overrules the obstacle. May our relationship
Speaker 5: last forever your future wife, Na could.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know you want to say that every one
Speaker 1: of these elected Democrats who decides and they decided to
Speaker 1: allow a lot of unvetted people into the country needs
Speaker 1: to hear this because they need to know. They need
Speaker 1: to know the horror they cause. You want to say that, right,
Speaker 1: But the truth is they knew it before they did it.
Speaker 1: They knew it before they did it. Whether it's Biden, Harris, Polis,
Speaker 1: Hick and Looper, Bennett Johnston, any of these people who
Speaker 1: support open borders, they know before hell is unleashed on
Speaker 1: the innocent that it's going to happen. They know it is.
Speaker 1: You can't try any other conclusion. You make that decision
Speaker 1: to allow hundreds of thousands, millions of people to come
Speaker 1: in unvetted through the border. You know, ultimate nightmares like
Speaker 1: this are going to happen in large numbers. And what
Speaker 1: all these power brokers and officeholders on the left have
Speaker 1: decided in advance was that's okay with them. That Lake
Speaker 1: and Riley is an acceptable casualty to them. It's acceptable
Speaker 1: to them that fathers like Lake and Riley's father and
Speaker 1: mother and sister and brother fiance should be living this
Speaker 1: hell on earth right now. That is an acceptable price
Speaker 1: to pay in the minds of the powers on the left,
Speaker 1: acceptable price for what the left wants, which is lots
Speaker 1: and lots of new voters. That's the reality. That's the reality.
Speaker 1: And then the Founders have given us this gift of
Speaker 1: this ability to peacefully go to the polls and vote
Speaker 1: these people out of office, and it's on us if
Speaker 1: we don't, because we know who they are. And this
Speaker 1: is just a reminder of that. This isn't like new
Speaker 1: evidence that's going to cause them to see the error
Speaker 1: of their ways. And they knew this was coming. They
Speaker 1: didn't know the names of the victims, and they don't
Speaker 1: know the names of the victims. There will be tonight
Speaker 1: and tomorrow and the next day. But they knew this
Speaker 1: was going to happen, and lots of it was going
Speaker 1: to happen, and they decided, they decided to make it happen.
Speaker 1: They didn't want Lake and Riley killed, but they knew
Speaker 1: lots of Lake and Riley's would be if they opened
Speaker 1: up that border and didn't vet, and they were willing
Speaker 1: to pay that price with other people's lives. Here on
Speaker 1: The Dame Kapla Show,