Speaker 1: What's going on. Thank you so much for listening to
this podcast. It is heard live every day from noon
to three on WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you
want exclusive content like invitations to events, the weekly live stream,
my daily show prep with all the links, become a patron,
go to dpetecleanershow dot com. Make sure you hit the
subscribe button. Get every episode for free right to your
smartphone or tablet. And again, thank you so much for
your support. Last hour I talked about Jay Jones, this
Virginia AG candidate who fantasized about murdering the former Republican
Speaker of the House in a series of text messages
that have now surfaced over the weekend, not only murdering him,
but also having his children murdered and his wife having
to watch them die in her arms. And so he
is Virginia's MO Davis, and that's what we're seeing. Remember
Davis retired, I think Air Force colonel and MSNBC talkinghead
guy ran against Madison Cawthorn for Congress. Was out in
the mountains, and he had a whole series of tweets
that I had uncovered, not uncovered, I just went looking
through his timeline, and he had this he had this
violence fetish fantasizing thing that he would do. And remember
one of them was about crushing Republicans necks into the
pavement until you can hear the pop of their spine
and that sort of thing. And then when I asked
him about it during a debate, he just said something like, well,
you know that was yeah. I was working as a
as a media talkinghead person, you know, like you. And
I'm like, well, not like me, Like, I don't say
anything like that, because that's grotesque. I disagree with people.
I view them as Americans. I view them as human beings.
I do not view them as people that need to
be murdered. But this mentality has been brewing for a
very very long time inside the Democrat Party. I've been
talking about it for years, and I've been calling on
Democrats to stand up and say this is not acceptable,
and here is an easy way for them to do it,
and they cannot bring themselves to do it. Case in
point aside from the all of these elected Democrats in
Virginia who are coming out and saying we still stand
with Jay Jones. We're not going to rescind our endorsements.
People still need to vote for him, right, So they
have a problem. And here's another one from the text line.
He's a lefty who likes to tweet or likes to
text status and says, so what about the whole story?
So what See, it doesn't matter to them. They don't care.
They don't care about their rhetoric. Which is amazing because
now they do care. Actually they care because there was
a judge is a judge in South Carolina who has
a house on at a Stow beach and this judge
had her house burned. Don't know if it was accidental,
don't know if it was arson. Don't know if it
was arson. Why we have no details except her beach
house burned down. And her husband, who was a former
state lawmaker, Democrat, former state lawmaker who's eighty one. I
believe at this point severely injured when he jumped out
of the window, second floor window, I believe, and he
broke multiple bones and his hips, his legs, his feet,
just terrible. And I think her son also adult son
and the grandkid or two were in the house. Also.
Everybody got out, that's the report. Everybody got out, but
some suffered injuries. And if this does turn out to
be a targeted attack based on politics or a case ruling,
I'm gonna go into these details here. This is unacceptable too.
Like this, this is not the way you settle political
policy disagreements, because if we cannot settle these things with words,
then you end up with this violence. And what that
means then is the breakdown of society. I would not
would like to have that not happen. I do not
want to see that happen, because that is chaos. That
is murdering and rioting and looting and m victimization. It's
just awful. You do not want to be in a
society that goes down that path. You may never recover
this idea that people think, oh, we'll just do this,
It'll be brief and then will emerge stronger. No, you
don't know that. You have no idea what happens in
this kind of a scenario. But there are a lot
of people that feel they're justified in articulating these kinds
of these kinds of stances. So I have no problem
condemning violence no matter who is doing it. I have
no problem saying that, hey, guys need to turn down
your rhetoric, because you know who doesn't use this kind
of inflammatory rhetoric me, I don't use it. I never
have because it's dangerous when you start encouraging people to
do things that hurt other people. I don't want that
on my conscience. I have been clear about this for
nearly twenty five years in doing this work. And there
are a lot of people, though, that have bought into
this permission structure that with their own printing press aka
social media, they get to say every inner thought they have,
no matter how deranged or stupid it is. If you
don't believe me, go take a look at what's happening
on my Twitter feed right now. You know, dealing with
dumb people is just sort of part of my job.
But you know, this acceptance of this kind of violence
is unacceptable. It's and it should be shunned and people
should be called out for it. And I'm watching a
political party and its adherents become more and more comfortable
with it. We've got another poll that came out that
shows young people, like a third of young liberal Democrats
college educated and a third of them think violence is
acceptable against your political opponents. This is not good, not good,
and so the people that have been unable to unequivocally
condemn the murder of Charlie Kirk, to unequivocally say, no,
you shouldn't go hunting down the Supreme Court justice. No,
you shouldn't you know, get political opponents and ice agents,
and you shouldn't be engaged in this kind of violence.
This rebellion is what it is. It's it is rebellion,
and it's once again the Democrats. And they have been
unable to make any kind of connection between rhetoric and
violence because they're doing it until now, until this weekend,
all of a sudden, everybody, stochastic terrorism is back. It's
back because of this judge's house that burned. It's like
a one and a half million dollar waterfront mansion burned
to the ground. There was a report that there was
an explosion as well, don't know from what could have been,
you know, gas line or something, don't know, and the
family got out, but there were injuries. And immediately immediately
the left has dare i say, pounced on this, seized
upon this, and they are tying it now to political
rhetoric after a month of them saying that the Left
has no fingerprints or responsibility on the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
They are not to blame for any of this now
all of a sudden, Republicans are That's how fast they pivot.
It's like they have no actual standard by which to
measure these things. Just whatever gives them the upper hand
in a power dynamic, because of course that is because
that's what that's Marxism. Everything is power dynamics. That's at
the core. Everything is power dynamics. So here is the
right of This is a Time magazine, which I don't
even know if they still publish. It may just be
online now I don't even know. But I remember when
Time and Newsweek, Like I actually had a subscription to
Newsweek when I was a kid. I know that's going
to be a shock to many people. But the home
of South Carolina Circuit Court Judge Diane Goodstein was set
on fire. That's the headline, or that's the first sentence,
was set on fire. We actually don't know if it
was set on fire. It could have caught fire. We
literally do not know yet. There is an arson investigation
to find out what was the cause of the fire.
But without any information, how dare you as a journalist
Miranda j rannam something. How dare you write that that
the house was set on fire because you don't know
that to be true? She had The judge had reportedly
received death threats as well. State law enforcement is investigating
the house fire on Edistow Beach, which began at around
eleven thirty am on Saturday. And there is video of this.
By the way, some boter shot video of it from
some of the sitting in the water off the marsh
near the house. I mean it was fully engulfed, it
was it looked bad, it was raging. And Goudstein was
reportedly not at home at the time of the fire.
She reportedly was out walking on the beach alone when
the house caught fire. You know, stories are powerful. They
help us make sense of things, to understand experiences. Stories
connect us to the people of our past while transcending generations.
They help us process the meaning of life, and our
stories are told through images and videos. Preserve your stories
with Creative Video started in nineteen ninety seven in Minhill,
North Carolina. It was the first company to provide this
valuable service, converting images, photos and videos into high quality
produced slide shows, videos, and albums. The trusted, talented and
dedicated team at Creative Video will go over all of
the details with you to create a perfect project. Satisfaction guaranteed.
Drop them off in person or mail them. They'll be
ready in a week or two. Memorial videos for your
loved ones, videos for rehearsal, dinners, weddings, graduations, Christmas, family vacations, birthdays,
or just your family stories, all told through images. That's
what your photos and videos are. They are your life
told through the eyes of everyone around you and all
who came before you, and they will tell others to
come who you are. Visit creative video dot com. This
is from Melissa on Twitter. It's a Pete tweet. No
one should be surprised that death threats coming from the left.
They support democracy, and we all know that democracy is
just a shorter name for mob rule. Indeed it is.
It's you know, the old two wolves and a lamb
voting on dinner. That's democracy. So also, let me play
this clip for you. This is from the Attorney General.
I know I'm kind of bridging both of these topics here,
but from the first hour, we're talking about Jay Jones,
the Virginia Attorney General candidate Democrat. All these messages surfaced
about him wishing murder on a Republican Speaker of the House,
as well as that Republican's two young children in order
to affect policy change, like make him feel pain, so
he'll do what I want, which is actually the definition
of terrorism. Here is here's an ad that the incumbent
Republican Attorney General, Jason Mallaris Majas has now put out
about the situation, and it is very it is. It's
to the point My Washington Post confirms j Jones sent
texts that imagine shooting the Republican Speaker of the House.
Speaker 2: J Jones wish the speaker's wife could watch her own
child die in her arms. It's so disgusting, it's hard
to believe, but it's true. J Jones confirmed that he
hoped an opponent's children could die to advance his political agenda.
Can you trust Jay Jones to protect your children?
Speaker 1: I'm Jason Yarrez, candidate for Attorney General. I sponsor this ad.
There you go. The d literally wrote itself for him. Well, actually,
Jay Jones wrote the ad for him. There you go.
So the people that were, you know, telling us Saturday morning,
Friday night, Saturday morning, and really for a while now
that none of their language does anything to inspire any
kind of violence, even though their language catastrophizes everything from
climate change to immigration control to gun policy, like everything
is the end of the world. You know, we have
literally worse than Hitler in the White House. We've got
authoritarians and fascism and all of this stuff. It's going
to end the democraas it's going to end America. In fact, here,
don't take my word for it. Let's say here, this
is to do. Here it is. This is Governor Gavin Newsom,
this is from yesterday. This is it. This is it.
Speaker 3: We're losing this country. We're losing it in real time.
This is a chaos presidency. He is a wrecking ball.
This is unlike anything we've experienced in our lifetime. It
is code read. No time for neutrality. It's time to
stand up, pick a side, and be firm and resolute.
That's what I'm calling for.
Speaker 1: All right, So there you go, pick a side, stand up,
Code red. You damn night, I ordered the code red.
There you go. But his words are obviously not an
incitement to do anything. Of course, not saw this uh,
you know those stupid signs that people put out in
front of their houses to to virtue signal morally preen
to say that they are morally superior to you, because
you don't have one of these signs in front of there,
in front of your house. You know, it's a it's
got the black background and then all of the different lines,
you know, in this house, we believe, and then it's
got all these things, you know, these slogans of the
left in different you know, rainbow colors. And there's a
new sign apparently that's being offered up in the Virginia race,
but it really is beyond just Virginia. It could you know,
you could put this in your yard in any state. Really,
it says, in this house, we believe. Political violence is
never the answer, except when our guys literally fantasize about
murdering Republicans. But other than that, be kind and stuff.
That's yeah, there you go, that's a that's a good sign.
Put that in your front yards, please, The Hellion says
on the text line, when folks say I take responsibility
for something, or sorry, I take responsibility for X, something
usually comes along with that, you know, resignation, demotion, something,
but not for DEM's and Jay Jones. Hillary even stepped
up once or twice and took responsibility for whatever, but
there was nothing that came with it. So it's empty, right, Right.
That's the thing, like, I take full responsibility for this thing,
which means what, whatever the consequences are, I will accept them.
I will atone for them. Right. But that's not what
he's doing. He's saying, yes, I said it. I'm sorry.
I said it. I'm sorry, you know I said it.
Please elect me, in other words, reward me for it,
Reward me despite what I said. That's what he's saying.
Chris says, I have a solution for Virginia. Have Barack
Obama and George Clooney approached the murder hungry candidate to
force him out of the race, and then they could
simply put Kamala Harris in his place. That's a solid plan, Chris.
I like it. That is a solid, solid plan. So
back to this article at Time Magazine about this South
Carolina Circuit Court judge Diane Goudstein her house set on fire.
This was at eleven thirty am and her husband, eighty
one year old former state lawmaker Arnold Goodstein, had to
jump out of a window. He broke multiple bones. He's
eighty one years old. I mean hip injury, broken hips
and legs and feet, just broken bones from jumping out
of the window at his age. His son, their son
also hospitalized with serious injuries. According to the Saint Paul
Fire District, which responded to the scene, the occupants had
to be rescued via kayak. Law enforcement have not disclosed
whether the fire is being investigated as an arson attack,
which okay, I mean, I think it would be like
you're going to be doing an investigation, and I would
imagine you approach any kind of an investigation like this
as if it's either accidental or intentional. Right, You're looking
for any signs as to the cause, and once you
see those signs or you find the source of where
it started, then you're able to make a determination. You know,
is it more likely this was intentional or accidental? And
we don't know at this time. Here's a quote. At
this time, we do not know whether the fire was
accidental or arson until that determination is made. Sleds Chief
Mark Keel has alerted local law enforcement to provide extra
patrols and security. According to South Carolina Chief Justice John Kittridge.
I told that to Fitz News, adding that the fire
appeared to have been caused by an explosion. So again,
we don't know what exploded was it? I mean, we
had one of these happened in Mecklenburg County, right, it
blew up. There was an explosion at a house and
it killed wasn't it a Carolina Panther player's father or something?
And he was in the house sleeping and the house
just blew up. It was like a natural gas line explosion.
The sixty nine year old judge had received death threats
in the weeks leading up to the fire, according to
multiple sources telling fitz News. Last month, Goudstein had temporarily
blocked the state's election Commission from releasing its voter files
to the Department of Justice, a decision that was openly
criticized by Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights harmyat Dylan.
That decision was later reversed by the State Supreme Court.
So this is now what they're saying. They're now saying
that Harmony Dylan targeted this judge. Now I have what
Harmony Dylan said on Twitter. Assistant Attorney General for Civil
Rights at the DOJ. Harmey Dillon responded after a South
Carolina state judge blocked that state from giving voter data
over to the federal government for the purpose of ensuring
the roles are accurate. Okay, that was the reason why
the DOJ wanted the information the voter rules was to
make sure that they're being maintained, that they're that they're clean,
and that there aren't people on there that shouldn't be
on there. And the state, or I should say, a resident,
a voter, an crook? Really, what is it with these names?
I am living in a simulation and crook a South
Carolina voter, sued saying that disclosing her personal information would
violate her right to privacy under the state's constitution. And
this judge died in Goudstein put a tro in place,
blocked the DOJ from getting the information, and Harmeie Dillon
with the DOJ, said the following on Twitter quote, This
Justice Department's Civil Rights Office will not stand for a
state court judge's hasty nullification of our federal voting laws.
I will allow nothing to stand in the way of
our mandate to maintain clean voter rules. One citizen, one vote,
that's oh my gosh. I mean she's like literally called
for violence. Of course, no, of course she didn't. But
this is what the left is going to stretch in
order to make this, to make this fit the stochastic
terrorism culpability framework. This is what they're going to do.
This is what they are doing. We again, we don't
even know the cause of the fire in that house,
and if it was intentionally set, if it was a bomb,
If it was a intentionally set fire, then I hope
they catch the person and I hope that they put
them either in prison. Well I think that would be it,
because it wasn't any actual I don't know if you
can go the death penalty because South Carolina still does
the death penalty, so I don't know if they could
do that if nobody was actually murdered with the attempted
murder of a judge. But that's an aggravating circumstance, so
it actually could be. But I want them, I want
you to drop the hammer on the person if that's
what it was. But we don't know that yet. But
the narrative is already being written, so it calcifies in
enough people's minds before we move on to the next
left wing attack, in which case they will tell us
that stochastic terrorism was not a thing when a Republican
is targeted if the fire hang on. Second, let me
back up. In this New York Times peace right, the
DOJ was seeking the information, including the names, addresses, driver's
license numbers, and social security numbers of more than three
million registered voters as part of President Trump's March executive
order restricting non citizens from registering to vote, And then
Time magazine helpfully puts in in parentheses non citizens because
you can't call them illegal aliens. Non citizens are already
not allowed to vote in federal and state elections. Yes,
technically that is true, but as we covered just last week,
it doesn't always work out like that. We had a
guy in North Carolina who has been in America for
like sixty years, and he voted in at least the
last two elections. So how did that happen? That's why
proper maintenance of the voter roles is essential to election
in techy. And if you're fighting that, well, now I
have some thoughts about why you might be doing so.
And no, I don't believe your argument from Krook and
Krook the I'm sure dispassionate voter that just happened to
file a suit all on her own and not without
the backing of any kind of left wing organizations. Right,
I'm sure, I'm sure that it's really about privacy concerns.
If the fire at the judge's house turns out to
be targeted, it may mark the latest incident of a
startling rise in political violence in the US. And while
the Trump administration has blamed the left rhetoric for inspiring
violence such as the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk,
an attack on a judge would come as the administration
has increasingly vilified the judiciary, blasting judges that rule against
it as quote USA hating end quote insurrectionists. There's actually
a better comparison. It would be the attempted assassination of
Brett Kavanaugh. That would be a better analogy because he
too is a judge, and Democrats whipped up their mob
against Kavanaugh. Cavin reaped the woolwin, remember Chuck Schumer, So
that would be a better analogy rather than the Charlie
Kirk analogy. Although I understand why they made that. This
is now this is a quote from Nancy Gertner, a
former judge current professor of practice at Harwood, Quoted in
The Guardian in May, she says, I'm hearing everywhere that
judges are worried about their own safety. There are people
who are inflamed by the incendiary comments of our president
and members of Congress about judges public officials. By the way,
judges in the past, my understanding, they are usually murdered
by leftists. But anyway, public officials have legitimized attacks on
judges with whom they disagree, She said, so, by the way,
I don't know if this whole stochastic terrorism. I don't
know if that works when it's the Democrats attacking Republican judges.
Less than a year into his second presidential term, Trump
has asserted an expansive view of his executive orders. As
of October, Trump has issued over three hundred orders, proclamations,
and memoranda, many of which have resulted in thorny and
protracted legal battles. Between May one and June twenty third,
federal district courts blocked Trump's actions with temporary restraining orders
or preliminary injunctions around ninety four percent of the time,
that's according to data analyzed by some guy named Adam
Bonica and associate professor of political science at Stanford. So
ninety four percent of the time federal district courts have
blocked Trump's actions, the Supreme Court reversed those orders in
ninety four percent of the cases. So Time Magazine's reporter
here does not dive any deeper. And you know me,
I'm a why guy. I like to ask why what
does this mean? Why would the Supreme Court reverse ninety
four percent of these orders? Why would these district court
judges be blocking ninety four percent of his actions? Does
this indicate something I would submit it does? It indicates
venue shopping, judge shopping by leftist attorneys and plaintiffs and
these you know, NGOs and nonprofits. They sue, they get
a friendly judge who blocks the order, and then this
Supreme Court has to weigh in smack down the lower
court saying you're ridiculous, which is what happened in this case,
by the way, with this judge herself, when she said, no,
we're not turning this over. You don't have to turn
this over and block the DOJ from accessing the election data,
and she got smacked down by the State Supreme Court. Also,
I would point out here this is actually establishing a
legal framework and precedent for all of these cases that
the Left keeps bringing. Trump is actually building a legal
framework now that is going to have the precedent and
is going to lock the judiciary into these with these rulings,
into staying within the judicial guardrails. And because the Left
can't help themselves, they are helping in creating this structure too.
Here's a great idea. How about making an escape to
a really special and secluded getaway in western North Carolina.
Just a quick drive up the mountain and Cabins of
Ashville is your connection. Whether you're celebrating an anniversary, a honeymoon,
maybe you want to plan a memorable proposal, or get
family and friends together for a big old reunion, Cabins
of Ashville has the ideal spot for you where you
can reconnect with your loved ones and the things that
truly matter. Nestled within the breath taking fourteen thousand acres
of the Pisga National Forest, their cabins offer a serene
escape in the heart of the Blue Ridge Mountains. Centrally
located between Asheville and the entrance of the Great Smoky
Mountain National Park. It's the perfect balance of seclusion and
proximity to all the local attractions with hot tubs, fireplaces,
air conditioning, smart TVs, Wi Fi grills, outdoor tables, and
your own private covered porch. Choose from thirteen cabins, six cottages,
two villas, and a great lodge with eleven king sized bedrooms.
Cabins of Ashville has the ideal spot for you for
any occasion, and they have pet friendly accommodations. Call her
text eight two eight three six seven seventy sixty eight
or check out all there is to offer at Cabins
Offashville dot com and make memories that'll last a lifetime.
So here's another story we're talking about these, uh, the
violence against judges right because the South Carolina judge whose
home burned down at Edistow and whether or not this
was an act of domestic terrorism, was she put you know,
targeted because of her ruling against the DOJ. So about
I guess it was like a month ago it was
overturned by the State Supreme Court. She reportedly got death threats.
We don't know what the cause of the fire was
I'm glad nobody died, but there were injuries, some of
them pretty severe. Her husband, eighty one years old, has
a bunch of broken bones and his hips, knees, legs,
and feet from jumping out of the window. And I
hope they, I hope everybody recovers. And it's it's a
terrible story, but we don't know the cause. And so
I always, you know, point this out to people. Just wait,
give it forty eight hours, let them do the investigations.
Let's get some information first. But of course everybody rushes
in to try to fill the void and craft a
narrative that will then take hold. So now there's this story.
This is out of DC Police arrested and charged Amand
with possession of explosives yesterday outside of a Washington, d c.
Church where an annual mass to mark the start of
the Supreme Court term was set to play take place
hours later. The so called Red Mass is held each
year to invoke God's blessings on those responsible for the
administration of justice, according to Saint Matthew's Cathedral. A spokesperson
for the Supreme Court told CNN that no justices were
in attendance on Sunday, though members of the High Court
have previously gone to that mass. The Supreme Court's new
term begins today. The DC Metro Police Department said in
a statement that the suspect, Lewis Jerry, a forty one
year old from Vineland, New Jersey, faces preliminary charges of
unlawful entry, threats to kidnap or injure a person, and
possession of a Molotov cocktail. It's all the information I've got.
Officers assigned to protect the event approached Jerry, who had
set up a tent on the steps of the cathedral
just before six am. They arrested him after he refused
to vacate, though he had been previously barred from the premises. Okay,
so I've got some questions here now. You set up
a tent on the steps of the church, but you
had also been barred from the church premises, which means
you've been there before, caused some trouble, cops were you
got banned? But you're from New Jersey? So are you
like making frequent trips to this church or are you
from New Jersey but actually living on the streets in DC?
Is this a homeless guy who put up his tent
on the steps, But that seems weird unless it's like
a landing area, because why would you like that seems
really uncomfortable, you know, to pitch a tent on steps.
I don't know how you would do that. The Metro
teams that investigate explosives and arson incidents searched his belongings
and found vials of liquid and possible fireworks. So right now,
I'm not sure that this was attack planning. I like,
I would be surprised if this was some sort of
targeted political attack that he was planning on doing something. However,
there's this charge threats to kidnap or injure a person,
so maybe it's it's not the kidnapping part, it's just
injuring a person. But he obviously made some threats, so
I don't know. I don't know what that is now.
This incident came just days after the person who admitted
to trying to kill Justice Brett Kavanaugh in twenty twenty
two was sentenced to just over eight years in prison
that charge. Nicholas Rosky, a man who now identifies as
a woman in the court proceedings, pleaded guilty and was sentenced.
He got a little over eight years and a lifetime
of supervised release. He could have been looking at life.
The prosecutors asked for like thirty years, but the judge,
Deborah Boardman, said, while reprehensible, he did cooperate and he
did confess, and so those were all mitigating factors. And
so also he's trans and so we're gonna, you know,
we're not going to give him the thirty years. I'm
only going to give him eight. By the way, Deborah Boardman,
she was the judge or not, but well, she was
a judge and she was appointed to this post by
the Biden administration. And in her confirmation hearings, Senator Kennedy
from Louisiana asked her if she knew what the rational
basis test was, which is a sort of fundamental legal concept,
and she did not know. That's who this judge is,
same judge. All right, that'll do it for this episode.
Thank you so much for listening. I could not do
the show without your support and the support of the
businesses that advertise on the podcast, So if you'd like,
please support them too and tell them you heard it here.
You can also become a patron at my Patreon page
or go to thepetecallanershow dot com again, thank you so
much for listening, and don't break anything while I'm gone.