Speaker 1: Welcome to the three Stories version of the Todd Herman Show.
Story number one when words Actually are violence, Story number two,
the least popular right of Fathers, and story number three
funny thing about the two AI songs topping the charts.
Speaker 2: We'll talk about this with the help of Bulwer.
Speaker 1: Capital Management, Know Your riskpodcast dot com and God Almighty.
Speaker 3: But Todd Herman Show is one hundred percent disapproved, but
big pharma technocrats in Tyrn's Everywhere from the high Mountains
of Free America. Here's the Emerald City Exile Todd Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made, and these
are the times through.
Speaker 2: Which God has decided we shall live.
Speaker 1: You know that phrase the leftists used to throw around
that silence is violence. Remember that And if you were
being silent about what Trump was doing, you're being violent.
What if there are times where words actually are violence
and maybe not physical violence, but worse, there's a worse
form of violence in physical violence, I asked, Because the
left continues to do everything they possibly can to to
stabilize and to create chaos. And I will remind myself
again God is a god of order, not chaos. It
is the other side that seeks chaos because in the
spiritual equilibrium, there's one side that's a builder. It's God
Almighty built everything, owns everything, creates everything, creative mind, a
mind of joy. Yeah, God can be angry, sure, righteous anger,
A god of humor. He invented it.
Speaker 2: A god of beauty. He gave it to us.
Speaker 1: All of these things he gives and sustains. He keeps
the planets running in order. He keeps your DNA together.
He holds all things together, says so and so so
all things together. On their side, there's an entity who
tears things apart. He cannot invent, he cannot build, he
cannot create, he cannot be creative. He has a powerful
skill set he's had a long time to perfect and
those of us with the Holy Spirit within us, he
who's within us is far greater than he who's without.
Speaker 2: There has very very little power over us.
Speaker 1: He can distract us, he can distort, he can depress,
can't build, can't create, and he is fomenting chaos. He
wants violence because it's well ungodly. When it's unguided, it's
not righteous. It's not an defensive life. It's not in
the defensive.
Speaker 2: Least of these it's chaotic.
Speaker 1: He seeks that, and he's found some partners in seeking this,
But there are times where words are actually violent, not
physical violence worse, and it might victimize the last person
you'd expect. Senator Mark Kelly is merchandising an idea that
President Trump called for his execution.
Speaker 4: Donald Trump called for my execution. Now. I served twenty
five years in the United States Navy. I flew thirty
nine combat missions. I flew into space four times. Never
once did I expect that at some point the President
of the United States was going to threaten me with
being hanged because of something I said. Folks, we have
a constitution, we have First Amendment constitutional rights of free speech.
I know a little bit about political violence. My wife,
Gaviy was nearly assassinated. She was shot in the head.
Speaker 2: Because of political violence. She nearly died.
Speaker 4: These are the kind of threats that this president makes,
not just to me, some of my colleagues as well.
Just this week he did this, threatened our lives, said
we should be hanged because of something we said.
Speaker 1: Was there something Mark Kelly left out of that? Yeah,
there's something pretty important Mark Kelly left out of that.
There's also something pretty important he left out about the
story of his wife, Gabby Gifford's horrific event. So let's
talk about the things he left out in just a second,
and let's see if we can bring some accountability to this,
because it might surprise people, but I'm here to tell
you there are times when words actually are violence, and
worse in fact than political violence. Mark Kelly is a
guy who wants accountability for President Trump having done something
Trump didn't really do. Trump did something, but it's not
quite what Mark Kelly said. And Mark Kelly's leaving out
the part where he trolled President Trump by telling members
of the military to not.
Speaker 2: Follow his orders.
Speaker 1: He didn't say which orders, because it's all a great,
big game of chaos. Reminds me very very much of
a guy named Tony Fauci all chaos. When the co
was first announced here, it had already been in the
wild for about a year and a half. We know
this through testing of sewage water in Italy and other places.
They waited a good long time. When they first started
talking about it, Fauci come out and said that it
was a mild flu that in fact, this would be
a good time to go to Italy if you're a
young person, because prices are cheap, take a cruise. All
of a sudden, he turned on a dime. There's a
new movie out that explores this from the very genesis
of the covid flu. It's called Thank You, Doctor Fauci,
And by the way, it's a sarcastic title. Award winning
director Jenner first went out and did tons of research,
came away with exclusive interviews we've never seen, exclusive interviews
with government whistleblowers and former Intel.
Speaker 2: Officials and elected officials.
Speaker 1: And government health people, and they reached a surprising conclusion
to me, what if it wasn't just what China was doing.
It just wasn't wasn't just money. What if it wasn't
just Fauci's ego and pharma. What if we're in a
bio arms race with the Chinese Communist Party and this
was part of it. This is a must watch, and
it took Angel Studios to make it. It's Angel dot com,
slash Herman, go stream, Thank You Doctor Fauci. Today, join
the Angel Guild and you're not just watching, You're helping
to make sure that movies that demand accountability people like
Fauci get made it's Angel dot Com slash herman. In
the movie is Thank You, Doctor Fauci. Mark Kelly left
some things out. He and a group of Democrat.
Speaker 2: Colleagues decided to get together and suggest that our troops.
Speaker 1: Stop following orders. Now they didn't say which orders. In fact,
in a bit, I'm gonna share with you a little
bit of a clarification. A woman maid who was in
that video. She came out to clarify something under questioning
from someone at ABC. Alisa Slotkin, a former INTELL official,
had something to clarify.
Speaker 2: He also left this out. His wife, Gabby Giffords was
targeted by.
Speaker 1: A guy who has been found to be insane, probably
well earned insanity. It was because of political violence she
was targeted. No, it was violence. Was it political? In
that case? The guy was insane?
Speaker 2: Is there political violence there is?
Speaker 1: Ask the family of Charlie.
Speaker 2: Kirk about political violence.
Speaker 1: Ask people who've been hit with political violence from Antifa
or so called Transtifa that exists, And yes, there are
some cases of right leaning political violence there are. We
need to be honest about that. Pugh looked into this
and Americans are very likely to see extremism from each
end of the political spectrum is a major problem. But
people who are what Pugh called partisans, which is an
interesting phrase, are more likely to see the problem on
the other side. So Republicans see it with democrats, Democrats
see it with Republicans. That shouldn't surprise us, and if
you look at the causes, this is rather interesting. In
the case of rhetoric, Republicans are far less likely, of course,
to see the rhetoric of Trump Republicans concernedive mega whatever
that means to be the problem. Democrats much more likely,
as you see on the chart over at about twenty
seven maybe even thirty percent of Democrats. Republicans asked about
the rhetoric behavior of liberals are far less likely to
say it's their words that are causing violence. Now some
of the things of note here, Republicans tend to splend
their brain more. They tend to see the mockingbird media
as more responsible for this. The Democrats, on the other hand,
see partisan polarization, and it's Republicans more likely to say
that Democrats are unwilling to engage with or understand those
with different views. Look, I'm a Christian conservative populist, constitutional populist,
so I'm very very likely to stand with that on
the political polarization front, and disability or unwillingness to engage
with others on the other side.
Speaker 2: So this is all people's perception. Their perception is that
it's political.
Speaker 1: Violence from the other side or rhetoric of political violence
from the other side. You could look across the political
bactrum for something I think more atrocious than this and
be hard pressed to find it. There's a woman in
New Jersey, a Megamum, a school board member or allegedly
targeted in this tech scandal. The husband of one of
her colleagues, her name is Danielle Bilemo, wrote in text
messages that they wanted to see her unlived, that she
should be unalived.
Speaker 2: Why because she asks.
Speaker 1: Questions about the school board's role in sexuality and teaching sexuality,
et cetera. So in that case that gets pretty close
to violence. Hey, she should be unlive. It reminds me
of what the now Attorney General elect of Virginia said,
he wanted to watch the children of his political opponents
get unlived and then go and unlive the parents right
before they had to watch all. That reminds me of that.
But sometimes words are violence, sometimes they are. Alissa Slockton
decided to admit that that video they made where they
said President Trump was well, they didn't say it, but
suggested he was issuing illegal orders and that troops should
refuse to obey. She had to clarify something when she
was on ABC News.
Speaker 2: Let's talk right now. Do you believe President Trump has
issued any illegal orders?
Speaker 3: To my knowledge, I am not aware of things that
are illegal, but certainly there are some legal gymnastics that
are going on with these Caribbean strikes and everything related
to Venezuela.
Speaker 1: So everything, everything related to Venezuela is legally questionable, everything negotiation, etc. Incidentally,
did you see that our CIA is against any interjection
of American will in Venezuela?
Speaker 2: Why?
Speaker 1: I wonder why the American CIA wants to back Maduro,
who is confirmed to be.
Speaker 2: A cartel head. That gets close to violence.
Speaker 1: It gets close to encouraging the troops to violently oppose,
gets very close to that.
Speaker 2: It's not quite there.
Speaker 1: In words aren't violence unless they are. They can't become
physical violence. I mean, they're words, but they can become
spiritual violence, and they can aim themselves at the speaker,
Jesus always made things harder. I mean he always did,
not redemption. The law was impossible. It wasn't hard, it
was impossible. No one could follow the whole law. That's
why it was there. Only Jesus Christ did that. He
came to fulfill the law and not cancel it. And
only he was capable of doing it, no one else.
Jesus always made things harder. Not redemption, that's free gift.
You repent of the sins against God. That involves actual
and true sorrow. You can accept Jesus Christ as your
Lord and savior in your head and in your heart.
And then you speak this with your mouth. You confess
him with your mouth, ask him to save you, and
he will, and I'll forgive you, and it'll dispatch to
you the Holy Spirit within you, and the Holy Spirit
can convict you of things. But sometimes words are actual
spiritual violence. God is anxious to forgive. Jesus came to
pay for our sins, every sin ever committed, every sin
that ever would be committed. And Jesus spoke these words.
He always made things harder. No, no, I get it.
Redemption's free.
Speaker 2: I just said it.
Speaker 1: But sometimes it's hard to give up at our flesh. Ah,
not lost, Not this time. I'm talking about righteous anger,
calling people idiots and morons walking around with the dopamine hive. Man.
I own the libs today. Hey, this guy blocked me.
Look on social media. I made him block me. Oh
my gosh, Look at my likes and retweets. Look at
all the dopamine flowing through my body. I won that argument.
Speaker 2: I stuffed that guy. I get it. I used to
be addicted to it.
Speaker 1: Matthew five, Verses twenty one through twenty three. You've heard
that it was said to the people long ago you
shall not murder. Anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.
But I tell you that anyone who's angry with a
brother or sister will be subject to judgment. Again. Anyone
who says to your brother or sister raka, that's like
saying you're worth less, is answerable to the court. And
anyone who says you fool will be in danger of.
Speaker 2: The fire of hell.
Speaker 1: Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar
and they're remember that your brother or sister has something
against you, and he says to leave the offering behind
and go and solve the thing with your brother and sister,
and then come back the words of violence, the words
of hatred, the words of condemnation. Those things are political violence.
Speaker 2: Says the left.
Speaker 1: Just the words, Well, they're not. They're precursors to it.
But it's spiritual violence against ourselves, which creates an eternal harm.
See if we commit enough of this, and we're not
repentant enough, and we become addicted to it enough that
we get dopamine hit after dopamine hit after dopamine hit.
By owning the libs or making the cons cry drink
and conservative tears, this becomes an idol for us. It
can be just as destructive as lust, because it's police
the flesh. So there are in fact times words are
actual violence, not physical, but spiritual, which in an eternal sense,
is far worse. Story Number two the least popular right
of fathers. Now, this isn't something that we talk about
in modern American society. It's the right of a father
to do something that's unthinkable in today's society, utterly unthinkable
that you could do this, and girls and young women
they would hate this. I'm not talking about arranged marriages.
I am talking about marriage and.
Speaker 2: It's the right.
Speaker 1: Fathers were fools to turn themselves away from and fools
to not rediscover and bring back to life.
Speaker 2: Talk about this in a second.
Speaker 1: People who will not care for the families, men who
will not provide for the families. God says are worse
than non believers. That's a pretty big statement. You're a Christian,
but you refuse to provide for your family, You're worse
than a non believer. What happens to non believers? They
don't go to heaven. One of the things we need
to do in taking care of our families is not
be a burden. Bulver Capital Managements Know Your riskpodcast dot
com helps people prepare for retirement. And if you're five
to ten, even fifteen years from retirement, how can you
make sure that you are not a burden? When AI
is going to come along and eat sixty percent of jobs,
including big time white collar jobs such as four hundred
and five hundred thousand dollars year jobs or a couple
million per year as surgeons. How can you make sure
you're not a burden when AI is going to do
things like run warfare and going to steal those jobs,
the jobs of soldiers. How can you make sure you're
not a burden. Well, get with the company that's tracking
everything it can about AI, including the risk profiles.
Speaker 2: They'll take a look at your.
Speaker 1: Portfolios today, your retirement which you plan to have, your assets,
and your liabilities, and they'll tell you if you're overexposed
to risk.
Speaker 2: They'll tell you.
Speaker 1: If you are actively managed, if your portfolio is being
actively managed, and they can tell and they'll do this
all for free, absolutely no obligation. It's just information. You
decide what to do next. Go to Know your riskpodcast
dot com. That's Know your riskpodcast dot com and they
will give you all that information for free, no obligation.
Know your Riskpodcast dot Com. Investment advisors services Option Truck
Financial LLC and sec Renchered Investment Advisor. Investments involve risk
and are not guaranteed past performances and guarantee future results
Truck twenty five Dash three three eight. The divorce rates
in the United States reached its peak and then came
down from its nineteen eighty peak. It was about twenty
two point six percent. It's down now to fourteen point
four percent. Seems like good news, but if fathers were
taking advantage of the rights it would be far lower now.
Some notes here something sad and disappointing, but also indicative
of when these people came of age. So called gray
divorces are up and precipitously. So over about a twenty
five year period, the rate of people getting divorced who
are over the age of fifty went from a left
seven percent up to about fifty percent now. And again
look at when they were raised the seventies, right the
time of self Now. There's something else to note about this,
there's some self selection. People are getting married now who
tend to be better off, tend to be more financially
able to care for each other.
Speaker 2: That's self selection.
Speaker 1: Also this a lot of young people are choosing to
not marry because why, you can go out and have
all the friends with benefits you want. You can hook
up forty times before you ever consider a marriage. And
the number of hookups that people have before they marry
is on the increase, and so is the idea that
one never need to be married. I mean, why do
you need a man?
Speaker 2: After all?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 1: They're just like Homer Simpsons. So there's some self selection there,
and the people who are marrying tend now to be
more religious and in religious communities. And this is the point.
Fathers were given rights by God. Jesus didn't come along
and canceled these rights. And this is going to be
incredibly unpopular with young women, and if I were a
young women, it would be incredibly unpopular with members.
Speaker 2: Chapter thirty, verses three through five.
Speaker 1: When a young woman, still living in her father's household,
makes a vow to the Lord or obligates herself by
a pledge, and her father hears about her vow or
pledge but says nothing to her, then all her vows
in every pledge by which she obligated herself will stand.
Speaker 2: But if her father forbids her.
Speaker 1: When he hears about it, none.
Speaker 2: Of her vows or the pledges by which.
Speaker 1: She obligated herself will stand. The Lord will release her
because her father has forbidden her daddy at marrying him.
They're not now. You can't go out in this day
and age and physically stop an eighteen year old from
getting married. Frankly, you can't stop a seventeen year old.
And in the separate countries of Washington in California, you
lose your parental rights when your kids are thirteen. In
relation to their medical and psychological so called health. But
it doesn't mean we're free from the obligation. Father's are
obligated to say no when well. For instance, when the
young man they're dating has decided that he's going to
take what's not his as in sexuality, when a young
man who's dating your daughter decides he doesn't need church,
he doesn't need God, the answer should be no. Now,
this is really difficult to imagine when you haven't raised
your kids in the church. We haven't raged them around
a Christian family, or a Christian village or a Christian
world with a Christian worldview. If we teach your daughters
from very very early on, if you decide you want
to marry someone, you meet someone, first thing that's going
to happen is I and your mother are going to
sit and determine if this is a godly person.
Speaker 2: Do they abide with the Lord?
Speaker 1: Do they know the Lord. We're going to make suggestions.
We're not going to arrange marriages, but we're going to
make suggestions. We're going to get together with other Christian families,
often at parks and retreats and you camps. We're gonna
do everything we can to make sure we're spending time
with other Christians. It doesn't mean it's going to be
perfect that it does mean that you and your mother
and I can look and say, wow, what about him?
And it might be that a dad goes to another
dad and says, hey, you know what, I think my
daughter really likes your son. Is that reciprocal?
Speaker 2: And I think it is.
Speaker 1: It means that the institute reinstitute rules about dating. Fathers
are obligated to do this. You can see my daughter
right here in the living room while we're all sitting here.
You don't need to go out alone. If fathers will
reclaim their rights, their daughters will not end up out
with the world raising them with.
Speaker 2: Seven hookups before the age.
Speaker 1: Of twenty one, and when every time there's a hook
up there is a d well, let's say, de emphasis
on the importance of sexuality that God designed. He designed
it to be an incredibly important thing that happens only
to other the auspices of marriage after waiting a very,
a very long time, and it's an incredible gift that
you only give to one person. Oh, I know, I know, abstinence. Wow,
old man's insane. No old man is looking back at
the word of God and taking into account his own
huge errors as a father, such as, well, you can't
really force a kid no, but you can say no.
First Corinthians, Chapter seven, verses thirty six through thirty seven.
If anyone is worried that he might not be acting
honorably toward the virgin he's engaged to, and his impassions
are too strong, and he feels he ought to marry,
he should do as he wants. He's not sinning they
should get married. But the man who has settled the
matter in his own mind, who's under no compulsion but
has control over his own will, and who has made
up his mind to not marry the virgin, this man
also does the right thing. Now in that case, it's implied,
of course, that you don't continue to string a person along.
If you're a young man and you're dating a girl
who's saying yourself for marriage, you're not going to marry her.
You're in an.
Speaker 2: Obligation to tell the truth.
Speaker 1: The Bible is filled with instances like this. What we
have Christians has failed to do is we look around
the world and the world has fallen, and how can
people live like this? And how can there be so
much screen addiction, and so much addiction to somebody that's sick.
Things that people are seeing on screens. We haven't said no.
Christian fathers should get very very good at the phrase
because I love you. The answer is no. Story number three, there's.
Speaker 2: A funny thing about the two AI.
Speaker 1: Songs topping the charts, and then there's a really interesting
conversation to have as Christians about two of these songs
that are topping the charts. The first song is by
a thing called Solomon Ray. Yes, a thing called Solomon Ray.
Something named this song find your Rest. It's cool beginning,
real soul affirming of a swing gospel. Take love be
the slide guitar. Is that a dough bro I think
it's a dough bro doughbro like guitar.
Speaker 3: O time from all this?
Speaker 2: What a voice?
Speaker 1: Week to count my blessings and window dress earthy, just
trying to keep my souls suggestion to swing there, trying
to keep my soul intact. Well, that's interesting because this
has no soul. This is an AI. There's no soul
in it. And interestingly, if the AI came up with
the lyrics as well, news for AI, our souls were
always intact, from the time God gives us souls till
forever our souls all go somewhere intact. Question is where
do they go?
Speaker 2: Back to the.
Speaker 1: Song, I've been running hard, feet on fire, feet on
dreams and do so did you hear the answer? Recall
feet on fire, tangled?
Speaker 4: Am a stray?
Speaker 2: Start slipping away? Steal here you over?
Speaker 1: Okay, So now we get this optimist.
Speaker 2: Take keep this in mind.
Speaker 1: He's not going to be kept down.
Speaker 2: Get those problems at more.
Speaker 1: Swing pronounced got the swing, white guy shuffling.
Speaker 2: Boom.
Speaker 1: It must be God giving us rest. So that's from
a thing called Solomon Ray. It's an ai that doesn't
have a soul, and so it thinks of soul as
being intact. There's a second song I want you to hear,
and I want you to listen really closely, because I'm
not so certain these are completely separate songs.
Speaker 2: Talk about this in a second.
Speaker 1: Soul matters in business, it really does. I don't know
what soul exists behind let's say great big soap companies
like Irish Spring. Now you know that comes from a
spring in Ireland. Water as clear as day can reach down.
Just get on your knees and suck that up mm.
And then that water is taken from that spring and
it sent to communist China, and maybe that stuff is
made in slave labor and tested on wigers. Here there's
no Irish spring. And the dove stuff, it's not clean
as a dove. It comes from great, big, huge factories.
And yet you continue to put this in your body.
And I've done the same thing without thinking there's an
alternative to this, And this is the time to change
over during Christmas. Changeover for yourself to alansoaps dot com
slash todd. This is made in America by family with
three generations of soap making expertise, and its entire mission
beyond the excellence of the soap, chemical free, best soap
you'll ever have, all natural is to employ people like
Alan and Ian that you know the rest of the
world would just say, look, just put them on some
psychosomatic drugs, park them in front of a video game,
send them in a box. They'll be fine. Now, now, these
kids are designed to work and have the joy of that,
and they do work there. We want to hire more people,
So make that decision. Alan soaps dot com slash Todd
or make it for someone else, particularly people with special
needs kids. There's a lot of hope in them seeing
how Alan works there every single day despite being effectively
nonverbal with his eighteen operations in difficulty moving go to
Alan soaps dot com slash todd. That's Alan soaps dot
com slash todd. So this is a song by a
thing called Breaking Rust, and I watched the listen for
some of the similarities because therein begins our spiritual discussion
and then an interesting, I think question for Christians about
the limits of God Almighty. You know the way he's limited. Wow,
kind of earthy.
Speaker 3: Then beat down.
Speaker 1: Thematically kind of the same theme, kind of a lower voice,
earthy sound, laying back on the rhythm.
Speaker 2: Not quite straightforward, but I'm still.
Speaker 1: Almost sounds like it's building up to a rich.
Speaker 2: Don't go to fans gospel.
Speaker 1: In the past. You're a fake organ back there, moving forward.
Speaker 3: And I'm looking back with a worn out at and
a six string string.
Speaker 1: I wonder if we're going to get to something that's more.
Speaker 2: Of a shuffler. We are, it's not the white guy
head nod and shoulder shot.
Speaker 1: Changing my You might even get a call on answer back.
Speaker 2: Way being allowed too long. You gave my style your A,
but I ain't slowing the same thing.
Speaker 1: The same thing that can be held.
Speaker 2: Down walk a little bit.
Speaker 1: But there is answer back, the little gospel answer back,
the same song. Not really a straightfor four, earthy kind
of singer, lowered voice. Thematically, it's about not going to
be kept down, et cetera. One has got in it,
this one does not. We'll neither of them do or
do they.
Speaker 3: Do?
Speaker 1: You think God's gonna ignore the efficient that the mission
field of AI. I think He's just gonna let it
run wild. There's a really super fascinating question for me
about intelligence that's artificial A is intelligence? B? Can it
be unique? Let's start where I said to we would
these songs sounds so similar to me, maybe to you
as well. Let's remind ourselves that Satan can't create a thing,
is not imaginative. They can't have any curiosity. They can't
be creative, can't do it. He can despress, he can distort, it,
can distract, he can destruct, cannot build, cannot make beauty.
God can AI can't invent songs. AI can scan the
entire universe of published music and work within parameters. To
have something that approximates song and people can listen to
it because math is musical or musical is music is math.
So music theory will tell you that. So it can
understand the music theory what appeals to a Western audience?
Four four beat one four five, Maybe step put into
the chorus, call and repeat, easy to remember one two
line hooks because it's memorable. It can scan all that,
but it can't invent. It can amalgamate, it can approximate,
but it can't invent. Sure, it could come out and
be Robert Fripp and have sort of atonal tone music,
right a a rhythmic quote music Frip did that. It's
been done countless times. John Lennard experimented with it. So
it could go scan those sort of experiments too, But
it can't invent a thing says things like my soul intact.
A soul's always intact. It can't really understand what it's saying. Now,
God forbid. Maybe one day it might. It might become
self aware, good thing God planned for that. I mean,
if AI become self aware God's plan for this. Do
you think that God's going to give up on the
mission field? Do you think that God's going to give
up on using AI. Do you think this is a
mission field on which Christians should give up? I heard
the craziest idea for my friend Alex Producer the other day.
At the risk of giving it away. He talked about
what would happen if we actually had to dispatch disciple
makers into artificial intelligence worlds? Because I can imagine a
matrix world where a whole bunch of young people are
sitting on couches or god forbid, floating in gobs of
prebiotic goo like in the movie Matrix. And it's not
this time Counta Reeves who breaks out and then the
other actors have to go break back into the Matrix.
But it's actually disciple makers going into a world where
people have been captured and dominated by AI to first
of all take them out of the AI world and
then back into the fallen world so they can go
to the actual new Heaven and New Earth. That's a
pretty amazing phenomena that could occur. Wouldn't that have to
involve AI. One of the things that we should be
aware of is there's never been an invention that God
didn't use. God used radio, God's used technology. Look at
the number of young people who are using YouTube to
find out about Jesus Christ. Guysn't at the least bit
surprised about AI. And I bet he finds it very,
very funny that an AA thinks that souls can be
broken apart. Oh, they can be tarnished, they can be oppressed,
they can be tortured. But ultimately, let's fear not he
who can harm the body. Let's hear who can harm
the body and the soul, And let's not fear AI.
It can harm our minds, but he who dwells in
with us, within us, is stronger than.
Speaker 2: He who dwells without.
Speaker 1: God saw AI coming. I'm staying convinced that all the
AI in the world, which is simply an amalgamation of
all express human intelligence, doesn't begin to match the intelligence
of God. Not by long shot. It's off by oh,
I don't know, an eternity. This is the todd Hermannshew.
Please go be well, be strong, be kind, and go
out and make every effort to walk in the light
of Christ.