Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the thirtieth of October.
Speaker 3: You're of our Lord, twenty twenty five. Well, today we
Speaker 3: have some strange stories. I have the world's first AI
Speaker 3: minister is pregnant and it's going to have eighty three offspring.
Speaker 3: We'll unpackt that for you later. What you think about
Speaker 3: that a little bit? This is beyond Gaya and all
Speaker 3: the pagan imaginations of these status that are out there.
Speaker 3: But speaking of status, Tony will be joining us today,
Speaker 3: now that Tony's not a status, but Tony Rdman will
Speaker 3: be joining us.
Speaker 2: We'll talk about the.
Speaker 3: Federal Reserve and the interest rate cut, what that portends
Speaker 3: for gold, but especially what it pretends for next year.
Speaker 3: As there's more talk about Sorous's Lieutenant Soy Boy Bessent
Speaker 3: becoming the Federal Reserve chairman when Powell's term ends in
Speaker 3: May of next year, what do you think is going
Speaker 3: to happen to indus rate interest rates? Then that's the
Speaker 3: big story. It's amazing to me how short sighted all
Speaker 3: this analysis is that we're saying and tariffs are being
Speaker 3: pushed back hard, and some Republicans in the Senate.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back. Stay with us.
Speaker 3: Let's begin with the Second Amendment news, because as we
Speaker 3: see over note, whether it's the First Amendment and free
Speaker 3: speech or the First Amendment and the right to protest peacefully,
Speaker 3: neither the Biden administration nor the Trump administration supports these
Speaker 3: aspects to build rights, just like they don't support due process,
Speaker 3: and on and on. I could go down all the lists,
Speaker 3: but especially the Second Amendment. So it really struck me
Speaker 3: when I saw this headline on Zero Hedge, Bondy's Department
Speaker 3: of Justice defends a nineteen thirty four gun law clashing
Speaker 3: with Trump's pro Second Amendment agenda. I'm sorry, that's just
Speaker 3: nothing but empty promises. Look at what the guy does,
Speaker 3: not what he says. If you look at this from
Speaker 3: Pam Bondy, and you look at the massive precedents that
Speaker 3: this guy last time he was in office. Fortunately, I
Speaker 3: can just do all this gun control you guys send it,
Speaker 3: don't need to worry about that. I'll do it for you,
Speaker 3: just a stroke.
Speaker 2: Of a pen.
Speaker 3: And then, of course that precedent was immediately cited by
Speaker 3: LA La Harris. She may be stupid, but she's not
Speaker 3: that stupid as the dumber as Maga is. She knew,
Speaker 3: she knew that he was setting up a president that
Speaker 3: she would use to enact a wide ranging agenda of
Speaker 3: gun control, and of course Biden picked up and continued
Speaker 3: with the bump stock Executive Order ban. Trump actually had
Speaker 3: done the pistol brace ban himself and then backed off
Speaker 3: of it during the period of time between the election
Speaker 3: and January the sixth because he wanted support, so he
Speaker 3: backed off of that, and Biden immediately picked it back
Speaker 3: up and put it back in, and so it was
Speaker 3: shut down eventually. But still Bondi pen Bondi is doing this,
Speaker 3: And when we look at the Trump administration, it's kind
Speaker 3: of like his EPA going back and continuing the fight
Speaker 3: to keep fluoride in the water when we had won
Speaker 3: that fight. So a lot of people were saying about
Speaker 3: the big beautiful bill, well, at least it's got some
Speaker 3: stuff in there to get rid of suppressor suppression. They
Speaker 3: aren't trying to suppress things that would allow you to
Speaker 3: shoot firearms without blowing out your ear. Drums are having
Speaker 3: to wear a lot of protective hearing stuff. Pam Bondi
Speaker 3: is defending one of the most outdated. This is gun
Speaker 3: owners of America, by the way, and they're good gun
Speaker 3: owners of America. Unlike the NRA push back on Trump
Speaker 3: about the bump stock thing, they pointed out and were
Speaker 3: accurate about it, that it was a precedent that although
Speaker 3: the bump stock itself may not matter, this is still
Speaker 3: a very important precedent. All of these gun issues are
Speaker 3: every one of them is a precedent to slice away
Speaker 3: the Second Amendment. That's why shall not infringe? Is there
Speaker 3: all these things to be taken away a bit by bit,
Speaker 3: just shaving it off right, like you'd shave a gold
Speaker 3: coin or something, so there's left.
Speaker 2: But a nub anyway.
Speaker 3: Pambondi is defending one of the most outdated, constitutionally suspect
Speaker 3: gun control measures still on the books, the National Firearms
Speaker 3: Act of nineteen thirty four and it's restrictions on suppressors.
Speaker 3: The DOJ has argued that the NFA gun regulations and
Speaker 3: other restrictions are valid, despite acknowledging that suppressors fall within
Speaker 3: the Second Amendments protection. They don't care. Trump doesn't care
Speaker 3: about the Bill of Rights. He doesn't care about the constitution.
Speaker 3: The Trump administration just said that suppressors are protected by
Speaker 3: the Second Amendment. But dot dot dot tweeted out the
Speaker 3: gun owners of America, But tax and registration under the
Speaker 3: archaic National Firearms Act is constitutional because suppressors are readily
Speaker 3: adaptable to krim misuse. You see the danger of that statement,
Speaker 3: As they point out, you can make that argument about anything.
Speaker 3: If anything can be adaptable for criminal use, that outlaws everything.
Speaker 3: Every firearm could be adapted for criminal use.
Speaker 2: By the way, I.
Speaker 3: Guess cars could be as well, could they? Travis getaway car. Sorry,
Speaker 3: you can't have a getaway car. You're gonna have to
Speaker 3: ride in Johnny cab. You can't have an actual car
Speaker 3: that you own because it could be used for criminal use.
Speaker 3: You might even use it to get out of your
Speaker 3: fifteen minute city or to violate our lockdowns.
Speaker 4: Yes, cars, bricks, pointy sticks. It doesn't need need to
Speaker 4: be a pointy stick. You can beat someone with a
Speaker 4: blunt stick. Anything could be used for criminal use.
Speaker 2: That's right. Absolutely.
Speaker 3: So the case involved is Peterson Peterson. It was an
Speaker 3: individual who possessed an unregistered suppress for home defense. Suppressors
Speaker 3: are widely used for lawful purposes.
Speaker 2: By the way.
Speaker 3: You know, we talk about this having to register firearm
Speaker 3: components or firearms themselves. What you're doing is you're taking
Speaker 3: a god given right and you're turning it into a
Speaker 3: government granted privilege when you require registration. Suppressors are widely
Speaker 3: used for lawful purposes, reducing noise at firing ranges, protecting
Speaker 3: hearing during honting, improving safety during home defense. With more
Speaker 3: than three and a half million legally registered suppressors in
Speaker 3: the US today, ATF data shows they're rarely used in crimes.
Speaker 3: In fact, there are fewer than fifty federal prosecutions annually
Speaker 3: involving suppressors. And this was something that was kind of
Speaker 3: surprising to see it put into the big beautiful Bill,
Speaker 3: but it was about the only thing I could find
Speaker 3: that I could support, so they removed it. By any
Speaker 3: objective measure, suppressors are in common use for lawful purposes.
Speaker 3: And this is a key phrase that was cited by
Speaker 3: the Supreme Court.
Speaker 2: In a recent decision.
Speaker 3: That you're not going to ban firearms that are in
Speaker 3: common use and for lawful purpose, by the way, that's
Speaker 3: that is an infringement on the Second Amendment.
Speaker 2: The Second Amendment does.
Speaker 3: The Second Amendment protects firearms and self defense. Period. It
Speaker 3: doesn't have to be for common use for them to
Speaker 3: ban it or to say that nobody could ever use
Speaker 3: this for unlawful purposes.
Speaker 4: It shall not be in friends as long as it's
Speaker 4: already pretty common.
Speaker 3: Because we don't want to see That's why they with
Speaker 3: a second Amendment they said shall not be infringed. They
Speaker 3: knew it was going to be a gradual process for
Speaker 3: the First Amendment. If you've got free press and free speech,
Speaker 3: we're seeing over and over again, governments can just come
Speaker 3: in and with a single law wipe out free speech
Speaker 3: and free press, and what are you going to do
Speaker 3: about it? Right, But when it comes to firearms, they
Speaker 3: know that's not going to happen. It'll be a gradual
Speaker 3: boiling of the frogs. So the DOJ has defended the
Speaker 3: NFA's registration requirements by reviving an argument borrowed from California's
Speaker 3: standard Capacity magazine case that they just referenced, just like
Speaker 3: the EPA is still trying to after we'd won the
Speaker 3: fight to take floride. Now, the Drinking Water Public Supplies
Speaker 3: EPA is now pushing to get it back in. Isn't
Speaker 3: that amazing?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 3: The EPA was there created to stop pollution and you know,
Speaker 3: protect the environment. But it was initially not about managing
Speaker 3: our economy by having dictates about emissions and so forth.
Speaker 3: It was originally about pollution. And then they migrat to
Speaker 3: this to controlling our economy and shutting it down along
Speaker 3: the net zero lines. But now they are the ones
Speaker 3: who are actually polluting the water, perhaps some more than
Speaker 3: anybody else. So the Bondie Department of so called Justice
Speaker 3: insisted that suppressors are quote specially adaptable to criminal misuse.
Speaker 3: So is the Department of Justice actually by that logic,
Speaker 3: any tool that makes a firearm more effective, whether it's
Speaker 3: a scope, a magazine, even the firearm itself can be
Speaker 3: subjected to sweeping restrictions. The DOJ standard is not grounded
Speaker 3: in the text of the Second Amendment or in Supreme
Speaker 3: Court precedent, including recent precedent. It's simply a policy preference
Speaker 3: disguise as constitutional analysis. And this is pam's preference. PAM
Speaker 3: was bragging about out and one of these jurisdictions when
Speaker 3: they went in said look at how many arrests we had,
Speaker 3: and look at how many illegal guns we got.
Speaker 2: I talked about that.
Speaker 3: Last week and I said, there's no such thing as
Speaker 3: an illegal gun. That should tell you something about this
Speaker 3: tells you even more about Pam Bondy and the New
Speaker 3: York Democrat gun controller that she works for Donald Trump.
Speaker 4: There are no such things as illegal guns, only unregistered
Speaker 4: guns and sanctuary homes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, there's already documented.
Speaker 3: We should say, only unconstitutional duocracies and unconstitutional laws.
Speaker 2: That's what we have here.
Speaker 5: So, yes, you want to say something, Yeah, just the
Speaker 5: wording of the Secondmendment is incredibly clear. Yeah, it's incredibly clear.
Speaker 5: It is only these Washington stooges that come in and
Speaker 5: try to muddle around with it and pretend it means
Speaker 5: something other than what it obviously says. Well, that is
Speaker 5: why I just flat out don't tell me what the
Speaker 5: Supreme Court has said. I don't care what these fools
Speaker 5: have sat around and ginned up. I don't care. I
Speaker 5: can read what precedent says, it doesn't matter. I don't
Speaker 5: care what Ruth Bader Ginsburg had to say on anything.
Speaker 5: It doesn't matter. The Constitution is clear. If they're trying
Speaker 5: to rewrite it, it doesn't matter to me.
Speaker 3: The next thing, you know, these people at the Supreme
Speaker 3: Court will be getting a commercial driver's licen in California
Speaker 3: because they don't speak English. By the way, We've got
Speaker 3: a clip coming up of a guy that it's an
Speaker 3: interesting police camera and he engages this truck driver who
Speaker 3: not only doesn't speak any English, but he doesn't wear
Speaker 3: clothes when he drives either.
Speaker 5: The cop is remarkably calm the entire time.
Speaker 2: Patient.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's like, how many times does he have
Speaker 3: to go over this to make sure this guy knows
Speaker 3: nothing about any can't understand or speak English, and doesn't
Speaker 3: understand any signs.
Speaker 2: He's very very patient with him.
Speaker 5: Ever get pulled again. This is the egg zact coping
Speaker 5: me over. Just if he can be this calm with
Speaker 5: some dude that doesn't speak English, isn't wearing pants, isn't
Speaker 5: complying at all.
Speaker 3: You may be thinking it's kind of funny. You may
Speaker 3: be thinking this this is a This body cam I've
Speaker 3: got is going to go viral.
Speaker 2: Anyway. Clarius Thomas.
Speaker 3: Warned against this very approach in recent case New York
Speaker 3: State Rifle and Pistol Association versus Bruin The Court rejected
Speaker 3: quote interest balancing unquote tests that allow judges to weigh
Speaker 3: government interests against enumerated rights. Yeah, there is no balance
Speaker 3: between the government's rights and your rights. So governments don't
Speaker 3: have rights. Governments have powers, and those powers are meant
Speaker 3: to be restricted by the Bill of Rights. The second
Speaker 3: Amendment the court held, means what it says if a
Speaker 3: firearm or anixt scessory is commonly used for lawful purposes.
Speaker 2: No, that's not what it says.
Speaker 3: It cannot be banned or restricted simply because the government
Speaker 3: believes that criminals might misuse it. Bondi's DOJ has not
Speaker 3: embraced that principle. Instead, it has defended suppressor restrictions by
Speaker 3: adopting the same rationale that anti gun litigators have advanced
Speaker 3: for years. Well, that would be because she's working for
Speaker 3: an anti gun New York City Democrat, Donald Trump. We've
Speaker 3: seen what this guy has done. Why is there a
Speaker 3: question about this with anybody? Trump has repeatedly promised to
Speaker 3: dismantle Biden era infringements and restore constitutional protections. Yet Bondi's
Speaker 3: DOJ is telling me the courts that suppressors are dangerous
Speaker 3: tools deserving a special regulation. This reflects a commitment to
Speaker 3: institutionalism and also contempt for the constitution. I would say
Speaker 3: for politicians comprise their political views for the sake of
Speaker 3: defending the perceived institutional integrity of a government bureaucracy, even
Speaker 3: at the expense of our constitutional rights. Yeah, we got
Speaker 3: to keep the BATF going. We've got to give them
Speaker 3: something to do. The BTF would BATF would not exist
Speaker 3: if they paid attention to the Second Amendment, it would
Speaker 3: be gone. You could almost say that it is explicitly
Speaker 3: prohibited by the Constitution the ATF. So the Second Amendment
Speaker 3: is just Trump's profession of what he's going to do.
Speaker 3: It's what candidate Trump says. You need to look at
Speaker 3: what President Trump does in twenty twenty and in twenty
Speaker 3: twenty five, and also actually that bumpstock thing I think
Speaker 3: started in eighteen or nineteen, twenty eighteen or nineteen. If
Speaker 3: the DOJ's arguments prevail, millions of law biding suppressor owners
Speaker 3: will continue to be treated as potential criminals unless they
Speaker 3: navigate an onerous restrict registration system and pay a fee
Speaker 3: like the bump stock. These are dangerous precedents, folks. Bondi's
Speaker 3: DOJ could take a different position. It could acknowledge that
Speaker 3: suppressors are common lawful use. The National Firearms Act restrictions
Speaker 3: no longer serve a legitimate purpose. By the way, they
Speaker 3: were never legitimate, They were never lawful. They were always unconstitutional.
Speaker 3: It was unconstitutional when it was done by FDR back
Speaker 3: in nineteen thirty four. By defending the NFA's outdated scheme,
Speaker 3: the DOJ is not safeguarding the public. It is entrenching
Speaker 3: governmental control over rights the Constitution guarantees. The Peterson case
Speaker 3: offers a clear test of whether the administration's Department of
Speaker 3: Justice will align with the president's promises. So far, the
Speaker 3: signs are discouraging. DOJ's arguments echo those of the very
Speaker 3: administrations that Trump campaigned against, the Biden administry. So we
Speaker 3: have Bondi replacing Biden. Not too much changees does it.
Speaker 3: So it is it's the entire Constitution that when you
Speaker 3: look at you, not even just the Bill of Rights.
Speaker 3: Certainly Trump has nothing but contempt for the Bill of Rights,
Speaker 3: but the rest of the Constitution as well. Who sets tariffs,
Speaker 3: who declares war? He's going to act as a dictator.
Speaker 3: He doesn't care for the Constitution that he swore to
Speaker 3: uphold as a condition of his authority. He doesn't care
Speaker 3: what it says. He's made it very clear, and people
Speaker 3: around him like Steve Bannon have made that very clear
Speaker 3: as well. The firearms community will continue to face restrictions
Speaker 3: rooted not in the Constitution, but in the government's reluctance
Speaker 3: to let go of an unconstitutional law written nearly a
Speaker 3: century ago. So when we're talking about that and we
Speaker 3: look at the police state that it's coming out, this
Speaker 3: is an interesting story. Scores the fact that these flock
Speaker 3: cameras that are everywhere are now essentially joining with the
Speaker 3: ring cameras. All these things are feeding into the cops.
Speaker 3: And this is particularly egregious case. A woman has a
Speaker 3: cop knock on her door and she's in Colorado, actually Columbine,
Speaker 3: actually just south of Denver, and so this cop knocks
Speaker 3: on her door, very arrogant Officer Jamie Millman of the
Speaker 3: Columbine Valley Police Department, and he comes and says, I've
Speaker 3: got indisputable evidence. As this article from WND points out,
Speaker 3: he was so overconfident of his tracking of her vehicle
Speaker 3: using the flock cameras that he refused to show her
Speaker 3: the video evidence. So this is what happens when you
Speaker 3: get a police state. You know, when you chair somebody
Speaker 3: like Trump who is blowing up ships just on pure allegation.
Speaker 2: You know, where does this lead?
Speaker 3: The attitude that that portrays is one where the police
Speaker 3: don't have to show you the evidence. They don't have
Speaker 3: to prove anything. You have no due process. That's where
Speaker 3: this guy is coming from. He says, you've not been
Speaker 3: honest with me. You know, you're saying that you're innocent,
Speaker 3: and I know that you're guilty. So I'm not going
Speaker 3: to extend to you the courtesy of showing you a
Speaker 3: video when I don't need to. What is this about
Speaker 3: due process and being confronted with your accusers? In this
Speaker 3: particular case, it's a corporation with a camera that's accusing her.
Speaker 4: You aren't being honest with me when I assert that
Speaker 4: you're guilty. You aren't confessing to everything that I accuse
Speaker 4: you of. So therefore I don't have to show you
Speaker 4: any evidence.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I should just shoot you on the spot, like
Speaker 3: we do people in Venezuela and the Caribbean and the Pacific.
Speaker 4: Now, isn't that a Soviet like where's your confession? Are
Speaker 4: they going to start torturing the confessions out of people?
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, Well, you know, authoritarianism, it doesn't really matter
Speaker 3: from which direction it came. It always looks the same
Speaker 3: when it lands at your doorstep. So they spent She
Speaker 3: spent days collecting the evidence herself, and she mailed it
Speaker 3: to the police chief Catrell, who responded via email, who said,
Speaker 3: after reviewing the evidence that you have provided nicely done
Speaker 3: by the way, we have avoided the summons we issued.
Speaker 3: And you know we've had situation. I guess for a
Speaker 3: couple of years after we left Texas, we kept getting
Speaker 3: We never did sign on to the automated toll thing
Speaker 3: that they have because I figured that, you know, I
Speaker 3: wouldn't have any way to monitor the charges that they're putting.
Speaker 2: Instance.
Speaker 3: Anyway, we never signed on to that. We never used
Speaker 3: the tall roads as a matter of principle, and yet
Speaker 3: we would continually get these things from them and say,
Speaker 3: you know, you've got this told and we know people
Speaker 3: who have ignored it to their financial peril because these
Speaker 3: things start to accrue all kinds of penalties and interest.
Speaker 3: So we would spend a lot of time demanding proof
Speaker 3: from them, and if you demanded proof, we knew that
Speaker 3: we weren't on these roads, and eventually they would back
Speaker 3: off and do it. But it was a tremendous waste
Speaker 3: of our time in order to do that. She's not
Speaker 3: being compensated for this either. So the officer had claimed
Speaker 3: to Elser that the conviction was quote a lock. That's
Speaker 3: his term because he quote doesn't make stuff up. According
Speaker 3: to the Colorado Sun, the officer's wrongful allegations are based
Speaker 3: on the flock cameras.
Speaker 2: She said, what the flock are you talking about?
Speaker 3: Which record traffic, and also on ring doorbell cameras. The
Speaker 3: cop had accused her of stealing a twenty five dollars
Speaker 3: package from a doorstop nearby Bomar. Listen to what he
Speaker 3: had to say in this boast. You know we have
Speaker 3: cameras in that town. You can't get a breath of
Speaker 3: fresh air in or out of that place without us knowing.
Speaker 3: Is that the kind of country you want to live in?
Speaker 3: Not the kind of country I want to live in.
Speaker 3: So she fought the obstinacy of the officer. She assembled
Speaker 3: snapshots from her Google timeline, a phone tool that tracks
Speaker 3: her stops, so she her phone was surveiling her as
Speaker 3: well statements from people she met that day and more.
Speaker 3: She collected surveillance images from the locations that she had stopped,
Speaker 3: and she had dashboard video from her own car. Flock
Speaker 3: is one of the big spy camera operations in the country,
Speaker 3: providing its so called evidence to multiple police agencies. It's
Speaker 3: operations threatened privacy and can be abused, as we see here.
Speaker 3: She eventually got access to the victim's doorbell camera, which
Speaker 3: showed the thief running away and not getting into her vehicle.
Speaker 3: They didn't have any evidence of her doing it because
Speaker 3: she didn't do.
Speaker 2: It, she said.
Speaker 3: Problems after her exoneration are still alarming. We had to
Speaker 3: basically exonerate ourselves. It's fortunate that we have our own
Speaker 3: footage to fight back on something like this. It's a
Speaker 3: little upsetting when everyone knows that the answer what the
Speaker 3: answer to be that you are innocent until proven guilty,
Speaker 3: but it seems to be the other way around. I
Speaker 3: was guilty until I proved myself innocent. Well that's the reality, folks,
Speaker 3: the reality of how our government works, and that's why
Speaker 3: they talk about civil asset forfeiture. We're just going to
Speaker 3: take your property, and then you're going to have to
Speaker 3: prove that we were unjustified doing it, and you're going
Speaker 3: to have to pay fees in order to get your
Speaker 3: day in court and so forth. This is what happens
Speaker 3: when the bureaucracy is making rules and the government is
Speaker 3: so dishonest that it says it's bureaucracy making rules doesn't count.
Speaker 3: Only your elected representatives passing laws count. And of course
Speaker 3: your elected representatives don't care about passing laws anymore. So
Speaker 3: when we look at this, I guess you can just
Speaker 3: be grateful they didn't kill on the spot, you know,
Speaker 3: and I'm not exaggerating about that. Trump bragged about Rodrigo
Speaker 3: du Terte, the president of the Philippines. He thought what
Speaker 3: he was doing with extra judicial killings of people on
Speaker 3: the streets of the Philippines was a great idea. And
Speaker 3: now Trump is doing that to foreigners and international waters.
Speaker 3: This is the way that tyranny comes home. It's the
Speaker 3: mindset of people like Donald Trump and these cops that
Speaker 3: is so dangerous. And you got at the same time,
Speaker 3: you've got ice and the federalized police or how they're
Speaker 3: stopping people everywhere, and these are US citizens and they
Speaker 3: tell them prove that you're a citizen. Right, you are
Speaker 3: guilty until proven, And if the people don't have their
Speaker 3: identity paper with them what they're doing now. Then there's
Speaker 3: a lot of videos that are on social media of
Speaker 3: the cops holding up their cell phone taking a picture
Speaker 3: of your face and they immediately get confirmation from their
Speaker 3: massive database that they have of our faces. A biometric
Speaker 3: database has already been assembled quietly, and I would say illegally,
Speaker 3: they just did it and say stop us. Right, So
Speaker 3: it's probably some private partner like flock, so they can
Speaker 3: take your picture and immediately get a verification of who
Speaker 3: you are, not just your citizenship, but everything about you.
Speaker 3: I've got a real problem with that.
Speaker 5: Also a bit of a side note, but police can
Speaker 5: compel you to unlock your phone if you are using
Speaker 5: facial recognition, if you haven't set up on your phone
Speaker 5: to unlock when it looks at your face, the police,
Speaker 5: the cop can grab your phone, hold it up to
Speaker 5: your face, and if you try to turn away, that's
Speaker 5: an extra crime. If you do not use that, if
Speaker 5: you are simply have a passcode on there or whatever
Speaker 5: other kind of words.
Speaker 3: It's the crime resisting identification.
Speaker 5: Basically something like that. But if you do not have
Speaker 5: that activated, if you simply have a passcode, they have
Speaker 5: to go through an extra step to get the authority
Speaker 5: quote unquote to unlock your phone. But if you just
Speaker 5: have it set up as facial recognition, if they stop you,
Speaker 5: if they decide you're under arrest, they can just take
Speaker 5: your phone and unlock it using your face.
Speaker 3: They can't be bothered to get warrants. And you know,
Speaker 3: the interesting thing is that the warrant process is typically
Speaker 3: a rubber stamp for these people anyway. You know, it's
Speaker 3: like going to a grand jury or something. Nobody is
Speaker 3: there to argue your side of it. And so they
Speaker 3: have an approval from the judges of well over ninety percent,
Speaker 3: way over ninety percent, but they don't want to even
Speaker 3: bother with that. They just do whatever they wish.
Speaker 5: Now, Yeah, so if you are using facial recognition on
Speaker 5: your phone, maybe don't do that. Maybe switch back to
Speaker 5: a passcode. Not that you're going to get arrest and
Speaker 5: they're going to go through your phone, but you know,
Speaker 5: anything you can do to make things.
Speaker 3: We think about. I've said for the longest time, you know,
Speaker 3: the way our government operates is that they believe that
Speaker 3: they are entitled to know everything about you, and I
Speaker 3: mean everything, and yet we are not allowed to know
Speaker 3: anything about them. And the perfect example of this are
Speaker 3: these thugs and goons wearing masks and many times not
Speaker 3: even having a uniform, and you're not allowed to know
Speaker 3: who they are or ask who they are. You're not
Speaker 3: allowed to know their names, see their face, any of
Speaker 3: that stuff. But they're allowed to know everything about you.
Speaker 3: They've got a database on all of us, a biometric
Speaker 3: database to look people up. You know, these mass liederal
Speaker 3: police have all of udden their biometric ID Already, We're
Speaker 3: pretty far down the tautalitarian rat hole. Frankly, California medicaid
Speaker 3: provider is paying parents hundreds of dollars to vaccinate their kids.
Speaker 2: This is from Children's Sealth Defense.
Speaker 3: One of the largest medicaid plans in the US is
Speaker 3: bribing people hundreds of dollars in gift cards if they
Speaker 3: will unnecessarily vaccinate their infant. I wonder what they do
Speaker 3: do they pay for funeral charges for sids? Anyway, And
Speaker 3: when you look at this, look at this unholy alliance
Speaker 3: between insurance companies and the pharmaceutical business as well as
Speaker 3: hospitals and stuff. I guess they're just drumming up business
Speaker 3: in the future. And the insurance companies are obsessed with
Speaker 3: getting all the children vaccinated, and it is an unholy
Speaker 3: alliance to kill them. In this particular example, this is
Speaker 3: the Inland Empire Help Plan, which serves about one point
Speaker 3: six million people in southern California. They will give parents
Speaker 3: a two hundred dollars gift card to poison their child
Speaker 3: with a flu shot and the rotavirus series of shots
Speaker 3: by the age of one, According to the twenty twenty
Speaker 3: five Medical Member Incentive FAQs sent to all the GPS
Speaker 3: family practitioners and pediatricians. You know, we go back and
Speaker 3: we look at what happened in twenty twenty. Remember we
Speaker 3: had Trump was giving financial incentives to hospitals to say
Speaker 3: that people at COVID, you just don't do a test,
Speaker 3: don't even do the PCR test. We don't have enough
Speaker 3: of them and they don't work. Said the American Hospital
Speaker 3: quoted that back to them. They said, you know, when
Speaker 3: all this stuff began and you told us you were
Speaker 3: going to give us money for finding COVID patients, he said,
Speaker 3: we don't have enough tests and they don't work anyway,
Speaker 3: and so I said, now you want to you're not
Speaker 3: going to pay us if we don't have the test.
Speaker 3: And that's when I realized that, you know, they were
Speaker 3: not just getting the nine thousand dollars lump sum to
Speaker 3: point at somebody, say you got COVID, but then everything
Speaker 3: that they did to you, they would get a twenty
Speaker 3: percent bonus. That was started by Trump, that Trump precedent
Speaker 3: was continued by Biden, and it was just flat out bribery,
Speaker 3: incentivizing them to say that people had COVID and then
Speaker 3: incentivizing them to put them on a ventilator where they
Speaker 3: get another thirty nine thousand dollars and a twenty percent
Speaker 3: bonus for all the fees associated with that. Well, we
Speaker 3: also had you know, it's just the bad Democrat governors
Speaker 3: who did this, right, But it was the Republican governor
Speaker 3: of Ohio, Mike DeWine, who came up with the idea,
Speaker 3: I'll put you in the lottery.
Speaker 2: You might win a.
Speaker 3: Million dollars if you get the COVID shot. So here
Speaker 3: they are telling parents and this is going to be
Speaker 3: a big deal to poor parents. I'll give you a
Speaker 3: two hundred dollars if you'll vaccinate your child. Does that
Speaker 3: sound ethical to you? Does that sound like informed consent?
Speaker 3: Or does this sound like financial pressure of bribery on
Speaker 3: people who are susceptible to that and taking advantage of
Speaker 3: people who are not informed. You know, when we talk
Speaker 3: about gambling laws, for example, one of the arguments that's
Speaker 3: been made, and I think it's a pretty good argument,
Speaker 3: is that the government, when the government runs these lotteries,
Speaker 3: they're taking advantage of people who are poor and ignorant.
Speaker 3: You know, Las Vegas is the city that was built
Speaker 3: on bad math, and so are these lotteries that are
Speaker 3: out there, and so there's an exploitation aspect of that.
Speaker 3: And that's the case here too. You want to gamble
Speaker 3: with your child's life so that you can get two
Speaker 3: hundred dollars payouts as incentivized parents. Choosing vaccination is not
Speaker 3: a medical decision, it's economic decision making, said a Children's
Speaker 3: Health Defense senior research scientist jam Blinowski Carl Jamblinowski. He said,
Speaker 3: in the case of low income medicaid families, that incentive
Speaker 3: may look like an undue influence. Exactly, you're going to
Speaker 3: bribe the parents, You're going to blackmail the pediatricians and
Speaker 3: tell them, if you don't get a certain percentage of
Speaker 3: vaccination with your patients, we're going to basically put you
Speaker 3: out of business than they do, and they do that
Speaker 3: through the insurance companies, so we're not going to pay
Speaker 3: you fully for the fees that are there. Researchers from
Speaker 3: the University of Maryland publish a peer reviewed study in June.
Speaker 3: They found that the HPV vaccine increases risk of autonomic dysfunction,
Speaker 3: including POTS, which is a tachy cardia syndrome and a
Speaker 3: heartbeat rhythm issue. And a twenty twenty four peer reviewed
Speaker 3: study by doctor Jacob Puliel and Children of Self Defense
Speaker 3: Chief scientific Officer Brian Hooker on the health risk limited
Speaker 3: to India's rotavirus vaccine showed that the US rotavirus vaccines
Speaker 3: may pose similar risks to this HPV thing. Doctor Michael Perow,
Speaker 3: a pediatrician in California, I'm sorry. Michelle Perrow agreed. She
Speaker 3: called the use of gift cards to influence parental medical
Speaker 3: decisions deeply troubling. Health decisions must be based on education
Speaker 3: and the child's best interest, not on financial reward. So yeah,
Speaker 3: tell back to Mike Dowine, tell back to Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: Do you think the hospitals they're heavily incentivized. You know,
Speaker 3: they say somebody's got COVID and they put them on
Speaker 3: a machine. Again, they get about fifty two thousand dollars,
Speaker 3: which is more than the cost of the machine, and
Speaker 3: then they get twenty percent bonus for charging you for
Speaker 3: using it every single day. Don't tell me that that
Speaker 3: influence doesn't influence their medical decisions.
Speaker 4: Yes, yeah, I mean there's already a ton of financial incentification.
Speaker 4: It's just that in the past it's always been directed
Speaker 4: at the doctors, who then push it on the patients
Speaker 4: in the name of oh, well, this is for your health,
Speaker 4: when they're getting paid off. This is nothing new, at
Speaker 4: least not to doctors. It's new who they victims be
Speaker 4: able to prop it off of it to some extent.
Speaker 3: Yeah, like the million dollar lottery from the line, So
Speaker 3: this s Pediatrician Michelle Perrow added that she doesn't recommend
Speaker 3: routine flu shots or the rotavirus vaccine series for infants.
Speaker 3: She said, in my clinical experience and review of the data,
Speaker 3: the benefits are overrated, while the risks, particularly to the
Speaker 3: developing immune and gastrointestinal system are underacknowledged. Again, this is
Speaker 3: something that they haven't put on the schedule yet. It's
Speaker 3: not one of the seventy plus that they've got there.
Speaker 3: And medical has posters in every office about getting your
Speaker 3: two hundred dollars gift card if you stab your child.
Speaker 3: Isn't that amazing?
Speaker 5: It also raises the question in my mind, how well
Speaker 5: are they keeping track of which children have been vaccinated?
Speaker 5: Are you going to have some person show up and
Speaker 5: he's like, well, I need more than two hundred dollars
Speaker 5: and I've got this kid. Can I take him to
Speaker 5: one doctor's office, get him injected there, get some kind
Speaker 5: of code that says, yeah, I got the flu shot,
Speaker 5: go to the next doctor's office. So can you just
Speaker 5: load your kid up with you know, five or six
Speaker 5: flu shots and make yourself a thousand dollars or more?
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, you're probably going to have some messed sob
Speaker 3: in a government uniform that's going to point the phone
Speaker 3: at you and give him your vaccine record.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 3: So Trump says he won't seek a third term. Guess
Speaker 3: what he cited the US Constitution. This is a man
Speaker 3: bites dog story.
Speaker 5: Here, miracles do happen.
Speaker 3: I've never seen Trump cite the Constitution for anything. And
Speaker 3: so again we saw Steve Mannon stirring the pot incessantly,
Speaker 3: and then when he gets everybody stirred up, you have
Speaker 3: people like Steve Watson come out and say, oh, come on,
Speaker 3: the liberals are just losing it.
Speaker 2: Look at this.
Speaker 3: We're owning the liberals by telling them that Trump is
Speaker 3: going to run for a third term. Now, I tell
Speaker 3: you what's happening is Steve Bannon is owning the people. Yeah,
Speaker 3: let's play that Bannon video again. It's just amazing to
Speaker 3: hear this guy.
Speaker 2: Well, he's going to get a third term.
Speaker 6: So Trump twenty eight. Trump is going to be president
Speaker 6: in twenty eight, and people just sorted to get accommodated
Speaker 6: with that.
Speaker 7: So what about the twenty second Amendment.
Speaker 6: There's many different alternatives. At the appropriate time, we'll lay
Speaker 6: out what the plan is. But there's a plan. And
Speaker 6: President Trump will be the president in twenty eight. We
Speaker 6: had longer odds in sixteen and longer odds in twenty
Speaker 6: four than we got in twenty eight. And President Trump
Speaker 6: will be the president of United States, and the country
Speaker 6: needs him.
Speaker 8: To be president United States.
Speaker 6: We have to finish what we started and the way
Speaker 6: we finish it. To Trump, Trump is a vehicle. I
Speaker 6: know this will drive you guys crazy, but he's a
Speaker 6: vehicle of divine prophetence.
Speaker 8: He's an instrument.
Speaker 6: He's very imperfect, he's not churchy, not particularly religious, but
Speaker 6: he's an instrument of divine will. And you could tell
Speaker 6: this of how how he's pulled this off. We need
Speaker 6: him for at least one more term, right, and he'll
Speaker 6: get that.
Speaker 2: In twenty eight. There's an instrument of safety.
Speaker 7: I'm really simp I'm trying to understand the coherence of
Speaker 7: the things you've just told me in the last few minutes.
Speaker 7: On the one hand, you've said the Constitution is fit
Speaker 7: for purpose. Secondly, you've said that President Trump needs another term,
Speaker 7: even though the twenty second Amendment makes pretty clear that he.
Speaker 5: Cannot have a second another time.
Speaker 2: Wise, make that clear because.
Speaker 7: He's on his second term already, because we.
Speaker 8: Can read that point in time.
Speaker 6: We will make sure we go through zanny and define
Speaker 6: all those terms.
Speaker 7: But even if you find to undermine that, you will
Speaker 7: be undermining the spirit of that amendment. Even if you
Speaker 7: find some way around it, and to those.
Speaker 6: The American people can the American people if the American people,
Speaker 6: with the mechanisms we have put Trump back in office,
Speaker 6: Are the American people tearing up the Constitution with.
Speaker 2: That guy's period.
Speaker 8: Be going against the spirit of the Constitution? Man?
Speaker 7: I think yes, actually, because I think what you are
Speaker 7: going to, what you will end up with is miss
Speaker 7: justification for.
Speaker 2: The American people. I represent the American people Trumps.
Speaker 6: What sounds like Trump is a dictatorship. Did you just
Speaker 6: see the compromises he had to make on the big
Speaker 6: beautiful Bill. You see the compromises he has to do
Speaker 6: on everything on accommodating.
Speaker 2: Okay, I can't stand lists on that guy anymore, but.
Speaker 3: It is important for people to understand what a grifting,
Speaker 3: liar and criminal Steve Bannon is. He has been convicted
Speaker 3: of that of his own people, and he's still out
Speaker 3: there doing it. And you notice all this we stuff, Well,
Speaker 3: that little piggy goes we we all the way home.
Speaker 2: I wish you would go home.
Speaker 3: But the interesting thing about this story is that the
Speaker 3: guy who put the cabash on all this was none
Speaker 3: other than the little sikophant squeaker mouse Johnson, who said
Speaker 3: on Tuesday, there's no way around the Constitution to allow
Speaker 3: Trump to run for a third presidential term because a
Speaker 3: nation's founding document requires a link ratification process. He said
Speaker 3: Trump has no plans of changing term limits, despite the
Speaker 3: president in the past teasing a twenty twenty eight run.
Speaker 3: As Kimberly Hayak reports for The Epic Times, Johnson did
Speaker 3: say that he had discussed the US Constitution's constraints with
Speaker 3: Trump during his trip in Asia, where he has been
Speaker 3: since Sunday, and again, Mannon fraud a poser, an idiot
Speaker 3: who went to jail unnecessarily because of his hubris and ego.
Speaker 3: And if he had known the Constitution. If Steve Mannon
Speaker 3: knew the Constitution, he could have invoked the Fifth Amendment
Speaker 3: and he could have avoided jail.
Speaker 2: But he is so.
Speaker 3: I guess you could, says the few people who have
Speaker 3: been jailed for his absolute arrogance and ignorance about the Constitution.
Speaker 3: And here he is telling us what we are going
Speaker 3: to do on the Trump administration. It really was an
Speaker 3: influencer in the sense that when he was a co
Speaker 3: chief of staff. I don't know that we've ever had
Speaker 3: another co chief of staff any administration, certainly not in
Speaker 3: my lifetime, I don't think ever. And Trump didn't trust
Speaker 3: him enough to make him chief of staff. He actually
Speaker 3: had him pair up with Wright's previous who was this
Speaker 3: little bureaucrat for the RNC.
Speaker 5: Well, well, you have someone that's that belligerent, that prone
Speaker 5: to flying off the handle and opening their mouth and
Speaker 5: saying insane things, someone that personally, to me, Steve Bannon
Speaker 5: looks like an alcoholic. He's very flushed, he's very red.
Speaker 5: He seems to look very unhealthy. I don't know anything
Speaker 5: about the man. He just has that look, and the
Speaker 5: way he goes about and carries himself looks that way
Speaker 5: to me. I don't know any I don't want to
Speaker 5: slander the man. He's bad enough as is, whether he
Speaker 5: is or not. But he's obviously someone you cannot trust.
Speaker 5: You cannot just give that man a project and say
Speaker 5: run with it. You cannot trust him to not soil
Speaker 5: everything he touches. And there's a lesson in there for
Speaker 5: other people that are wanting to be in bed with
Speaker 5: the Trump administration. You're never going to make it to
Speaker 5: the big leagues. You'll never be brought in close.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Yeah, it's just amazing. And again he keeps going
Speaker 3: back to but the people, what the people want pure demagoguery.
Speaker 3: We don't want a democracy, we don't want to be
Speaker 3: ruled by a mob. We want to have a constitutional republic,
Speaker 3: a republic that's based on laws that he says, we'll
Speaker 3: find a way around that or we'll just ignore it. Right,
Speaker 3: So Johnson stress the amendment process needs approval by two
Speaker 3: thirds of both houses and ratification by three quarters of
Speaker 3: the states. He says, I don't see a path for that.
Speaker 3: You know what, I don't see a path for that.
Speaker 3: For the drug war that is now the center of
Speaker 3: this Venezuelan thing we need to call bs and all
Speaker 3: this stuff. Look, we had enough respect even when they
Speaker 3: did the alcohol prohibition, and I understand, you know, alcohol
Speaker 3: is a very very bad drug. Heroin is about as
Speaker 3: addictive as heroin from what the experts say, and it
Speaker 3: had done a lot of damage to a lot of people,
Speaker 3: and they made it a lot worse people because of prohibition. Actually,
Speaker 3: consumers went from beer and wine to hard liquor and
Speaker 3: in many cases bathtub liquor that made them go blind.
Speaker 3: And that's always the way that it works with drug prohbition.
Speaker 3: But at least they had respect for the Constitution, they
Speaker 3: passed the eighteenth Amendment, and then they undid it with
Speaker 3: a twenty first Amendment. Why do they go to all
Speaker 3: of that trouble when you know you can just do
Speaker 3: as you want. According to Trump and to Biden, you
Speaker 3: don't abandon I should say, well Biden as well. So
Speaker 3: it reads no person shall be elected to the office
Speaker 3: of president more than twice. So they play cute little games. Well,
Speaker 3: we get him elected as vice president and then he
Speaker 3: assumes the office. Well, if you look at it, you
Speaker 3: have to be qualified as vice president. You have to
Speaker 3: be qualified to be president, and that would mean that
Speaker 3: you're not qualified for that. So Trump has been selling
Speaker 3: twenty twenty eight merchandise at his rallies, and Johnson says, well,
Speaker 3: he's just trolling Democrats. And so again we've been.
Speaker 5: Rifting his MAGA supporters and think he really is going
Speaker 5: to run in twenty twenty eight. I can fully see
Speaker 5: him having no intentions of running, but playing it up
Speaker 5: just so like, yeah, keep donating to me, keep giving
Speaker 5: me money, I'm definitely going to use it in twenty
Speaker 5: twenty eight.
Speaker 2: Well, look at the whole January the sixth thing.
Speaker 3: I mean look at how much money he got from them,
Speaker 3: and he never really spent it, you know, in terms
Speaker 3: of trying to contest this stuff, he basically kept it.
Speaker 3: It's like, turn fifty million dollars, and then when he
Speaker 3: gets attacked by the Department of Justice, he's now writing
Speaker 3: himself a check for another two hundred and thirty million dollars.
Speaker 3: But he's not writing any checks for compensation for his
Speaker 3: own supporters that he betrayed, picked their pockets and let
Speaker 3: them get hanged by the Biden administration. So we have
Speaker 3: thirty three amendments have been proposed since seventeen eighty nine,
Speaker 3: only twenty seven have been ratified. It took an average
Speaker 3: of two years to create an amendment, and the twenty
Speaker 3: seventh Amendment on Congressional pay took more than two hundred years.
Speaker 2: Let me get this idea through.
Speaker 3: So the Trump administration is lying us into another war.
Speaker 3: And again, what about the drug war which is unconstitutional?
Speaker 3: What about declaring war? No, we're not going to do
Speaker 3: that either. So even if you can get somebody like
Speaker 3: Mike Johnson to try to explain to Trump what the
Speaker 3: constitution says, even if Trump understands it and is willing
Speaker 3: to abide by it on these bigger issues of war
Speaker 3: and on the drug war. He's just a ignoring the
Speaker 3: Constitution and then lying to the American public the people
Speaker 3: because he's a demagogue, and it just keeps escalating. So
Speaker 3: the idea that we're going to just kill these people
Speaker 3: on the spot because we believe that they are doing drugs,
Speaker 3: As Mess points out, this excuse completely falls apart with
Speaker 3: even the slightest look into how American users are getting
Speaker 3: their fentanyl. Fentanyl is synthetic, meaning that it's produced in
Speaker 3: a lab rather than being derived from a plant like
Speaker 3: heroin or cocaine, and so they don't have labs there.
Speaker 3: In reality, Americans are getting their fentanyl from secret labs
Speaker 3: in Mexico using chemicals shipped from China or India. In fact,
Speaker 3: those precursor chemicals are often shipped to Canada or the
Speaker 3: US and then smuggled into Mexico to obscure their origin,
Speaker 3: where they're then used to produce finna. All that has
Speaker 3: smuggled back into the US. How's it smuggled in the US.
Speaker 3: According to the DEA and data from the CBP and
Speaker 3: the US Sentencing Commission, the vast majority of the illicit
Speaker 3: fentannel entering the country is hidden in vehicles being driven
Speaker 3: across the southern border at legal points of entry, mainly
Speaker 3: by young men with US citizenship. Well, I don't know
Speaker 3: if that's the case anymore. We got a lot of
Speaker 3: foreigners who are coming here and getting commercial driver's licenses,
Speaker 3: which we'll be talking about later, and that could be
Speaker 3: one of the ways that this whole foreigner is getting
Speaker 3: CDLs started in the first place.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 3: But the bottom line about all this, as I've said,
Speaker 3: is just skipping the whole new process thing and then
Speaker 3: killing people when the crime is not a capital offense.
Speaker 3: And that is very similar to what he's doing with
Speaker 3: ice agents in the US as well. You know, we
Speaker 3: look at it, there's an overwhelming of for most people
Speaker 3: to get to deport the people who are here illegally,
Speaker 3: and yet there's a lot of different ways that that
Speaker 3: could be done. When you do it the way that
Speaker 3: Trump is doing it, where you have thugs and masks
Speaker 3: go out and get violent with people and then violate
Speaker 3: their due process and other issues like that, that's a
Speaker 3: whole separate issue, and it looks very much like what
Speaker 3: he's doing in the Caribbean as well. So Russia, as
Speaker 3: we talked about, war, is now moving to a year
Speaker 3: round military draft anticipating extended Ukraine fight. And of course
Speaker 3: it's not just Russia, it's also France is doing this,
Speaker 3: the UK is talking about it. You have all these
Speaker 3: different European countries are reinstituting their draft or talking about it,
Speaker 3: and they're all preparing for mass casualties. This is absolutely insane.
Speaker 3: I've never seen anything like this slow motion march into
Speaker 3: a global war like we're seeing right now. It truly
Speaker 3: is like the COVID thing. It shows that we have
Speaker 3: completely lost control of our governments that are acting in
Speaker 3: a suicidal manner for them as well as for us. Well,
Speaker 3: let's take a quick break before.
Speaker 4: We do that.
Speaker 5: I've actually got some comments and tips here. We have
Speaker 5: North American House Hippo. Thank you very much. We really
Speaker 5: do appreciate the support. Says I met Trump recently. He
Speaker 5: stuck his hand in my right pocket and took out
Speaker 5: a C note, and one of his henchmen punched me
Speaker 5: in the stomach and knocked me on the floor. Another
Speaker 5: henchman repeatedly kicked me in the head in the face,
Speaker 5: and then the Family jewels. Finally, the two henchmen helped
Speaker 5: me out. Trump walked up to me, shook my hand
Speaker 5: and put a ten dollars my right pocket where one
Speaker 5: hundred dollars used to be. I love Trump. Trump is awesome.
Speaker 5: If I wasn't a non voting legal alien, this is
Speaker 5: totally what I would vote for. Thanks Trump, Well, thank you,
Speaker 5: thank you North American House Hippo. We appreciate it. And
Speaker 5: IRS machine Gun says the king finally got his crown
Speaker 5: also says he finally got a golden crown.
Speaker 2: An I.
Speaker 5: RS machine Gun has gifted a sub.
Speaker 3: Oh, thank you really do? Yeah, that was when I
Speaker 3: didn't talk about that, doesn't I think South Korea he
Speaker 3: went to Saul, so he's finally found his soul as well.
Speaker 2: No, they had one, right.
Speaker 5: You gotta travel the world to find it. And do
Speaker 5: not Oh, bay, thank you very much.
Speaker 2: Do not obey.
Speaker 5: We appreciate it, says let me some truth. Thank you,
Speaker 5: David Knight show, Well, thank you, do not obey. It's
Speaker 5: because of your support that we're able to keep on
Speaker 5: doing this. We thank everyone that donates. We really do
Speaker 5: appreciate it. Yes, and of course, if you would like
Speaker 5: to support the show. It's a great way to do
Speaker 5: it by donating on Rumble. We're going to Davidnight dot
Speaker 5: news and following the links there. Subscribe Star dot com,
Speaker 5: fort slash the David Night Show is a great way
Speaker 5: to support it. I won't be labor the point, but
Speaker 5: subscribe Star dot com, fort slash The David Night Show.
Speaker 5: Nad Lander, I'm so glad that Chase Bank accommodates blind
Speaker 5: drivers by putting braille dots on the drive through keypad. Well,
Speaker 5: I mean, you got to accommodate those blind. You got
Speaker 5: to make sure they can read once they get up there.
Speaker 5: We live in strange times, that is Wally Walris. Politicians
Speaker 5: are readily adaptable for criminal use. That's right, we need
Speaker 5: to ban them. I agree, can't be trusted.
Speaker 2: That's a good point.
Speaker 5: THEFI tire at seventeen seventy six, we're in the Second Amendment.
Speaker 5: Does it say anything about common use? Again, It's like
Speaker 5: what I'm saying, I don't care what the Supreme Court
Speaker 5: has said, I don't care what Lindsey Graham has said.
Speaker 5: I don't care what a politician has said about gun control.
Speaker 5: None of it matters. They're all liars, they're trying to
Speaker 5: rewrite history.
Speaker 3: You know, the Supreme Court saying that it's a right
Speaker 3: to abortion because we had a right to privacy. Right,
Speaker 3: that is, clearly we do have a right to privacy,
Speaker 3: but they don't respect.
Speaker 2: That in any other regard. And that doesn't have.
Speaker 3: Anything to do with killing a baby. And you know,
Speaker 3: when you commit murder, that's not a private affair. Okay,
Speaker 3: that's something that the government needs to be involved in.
Speaker 3: And so again the Summe Court is just making this stuff.
Speaker 2: Up left and right.
Speaker 5: Yeah, whether they left and right, they don't have the
Speaker 5: true authority, but they do have power. If you let
Speaker 5: people do what they want, then, you know, is what
Speaker 5: it is. Wally Wallris read that defy tyrants. Read that,
Speaker 5: Peasant Avonte, seventeen seventy six. Every damn firearms infridgement not
Speaker 5: only destroys rights, it makes firearms more dangerous and less
Speaker 5: useful for the user.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Peasantovonte also says stabilizing braces aid those with disabilities and
Speaker 5: suppressors save hearing in a defense situation. You see, that's
Speaker 5: part of my plan. I'll be wearing hearing protection. The
Speaker 5: robber won't, and if he gets in too close, I'll
Speaker 5: just discharge my fifty caliber Desert Eagle directly next to
Speaker 5: his ear drum. It will shatter, it will render him incapacitated,
Speaker 5: and we'll just disregard the fact that the fifty fifty
Speaker 5: AE is now traveling very fast through all my walls.
Speaker 4: I know someone who worked at a gun shop and
Speaker 4: he would always have a constantly changing collection of guns,
Speaker 4: and for a while he had a Desert Eagle and
Speaker 4: he said he once tried to fire it without hearing
Speaker 4: protection justice see what it was like. And he said,
Speaker 4: this gun absolutely could not be used for self defense
Speaker 4: because it was so loud that it was like flashbaging himself.
Speaker 4: He was literally dizzy from the noise.
Speaker 2: That it made. Oh that's amazing.
Speaker 5: Yeah, the concussion was strong enough that it messed with
Speaker 5: his inner ear. So yeah, if you were to fire
Speaker 5: the Desert Eagle right next to someone, hit someone's head,
Speaker 5: chances are it would actually do quite well at disorient.
Speaker 2: I guess that's a non lethal weapon in that case, right.
Speaker 5: Not only those for that guy, but with the fifty
Speaker 5: action Express traveling through the air, you don't know where
Speaker 5: it's going to land. It's a big bullet moving real fast.
Speaker 3: Well, we're gonna take a break and we got a
Speaker 3: special treat for you that Lance worked really hard on,
Speaker 3: and I was up really late last night working on
Speaker 3: it as well. So in terms of I kind of
Speaker 3: feel like somebody has shot off a fifty caliber weapon
Speaker 3: right next to my ear. With hollmen coming up, we
Speaker 3: thought it'd be interesting to go back and talk about
Speaker 3: this lab leak shilling they got going trying to distract
Speaker 3: people from the fact that the actual monster is the JAB.
Speaker 9: I was working on the news late one night for
Speaker 9: my eyes beheld an ear recite for the monster's head rehearse.
Speaker 3: To my surprise, the tactics to inject what they divide
Speaker 3: the job, the monster is the jobs, the job. The
Speaker 3: spikes a graveyard stand. I caught on in a flash.
Speaker 2: It is the job. The monster is the JAB.
Speaker 10: Labs in the cast.
Speaker 3: So least to the FBA with a form of vampire's feast.
Speaker 3: The goold rehearse before nine one had to poison us,
Speaker 3: which is what they've done. The monster is the Jazz job.
Speaker 3: The spikes are graveyard stabs. He'll put you on a slab.
Speaker 10: The job.
Speaker 2: The monster is the Jab.
Speaker 3: Big Pharma was having fun the party had just begun.
Speaker 3: The guests included Fauci Trump, then Biden. Scene was a
Speaker 3: lockdown all we're fearing the news. The fly chains were broken.
Speaker 3: We were singing the blues. The coffins. They told us
Speaker 3: we're about arrived. You can see it all on Channel five.
Speaker 3: The monster is the Jazz job. The spikes a graveyard stab,
Speaker 3: It'll put you on a slab.
Speaker 10: The job.
Speaker 3: The monster is the Jab. From the All Office, his
Speaker 3: voice did ring. Hospital cash registers went a ching. When
Speaker 3: people caught on to keep on the lift. They said,
Speaker 3: whatever happened to the wu hand lab Jab? The monster
Speaker 3: is the Jab, Monster Job. The spikes a graveyard stab,
Speaker 3: He'll put you on a slab is the job. The
Speaker 3: monster is the Jab. Now everything's cool. Lab weeks a
Speaker 3: part of the plant. Their ally echoes throughout the land
Speaker 3: for you living, and they'll try.
Speaker 2: It again when they get to your door. Tell them farmer,
Speaker 2: no more.
Speaker 8: Is the job.
Speaker 10: The monster is the Jab, mister Jab.
Speaker 3: The spikes a graveyard stabs, It'll put you on a slab.
Speaker 10: The job. The monster is the Jab. About medical mass here.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: Well, welcome back, and I want to apologize to the
Speaker 3: people who were getting the audio feed. It's a little
Speaker 3: bit painful to listen to. The thing that makes it
Speaker 3: work are the excellent graphics that lance created. He did
Speaker 3: a great show with that, especially like the giant mosquito
Speaker 3: that comes in through the window instead of a vampire
Speaker 3: bat and turns into gates.
Speaker 2: Of course, I thought the touch with Alex.
Speaker 3: Jones was pretty good too, you know, selling the whole
Speaker 3: idea of the sugar water there to people.
Speaker 2: But I had a.
Speaker 3: Lot of clever stuff in it, very well executed. I
Speaker 3: appreciate that.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 3: Lancey put that together in a surprisingly quick short amount
Speaker 3: of time. Well, we have Washington, d C. Is seeing
Speaker 3: a bloody night as twelve people have been shot. Wait
Speaker 3: a minute, even with the military on the street and
Speaker 3: ice on the street, I thought that the crime problem
Speaker 3: was solved in Washington, d C.
Speaker 2: Maybe not.
Speaker 3: It's almost like the people that are that are oding
Speaker 3: in prison, right. You have people who are addicted to drugs,
Speaker 3: you put them in prison, like the mother turned in
Speaker 3: her son and then he died from an overdose in
Speaker 3: a federal prison. Yeah. Sometimes this force stuff just doesn't
Speaker 3: work the way they expect it to. But they're very
Speaker 3: proud of their gun control. BONDI is very excited about
Speaker 3: the places where they have put their federal police and
Speaker 3: the number of guns that they have confiscated. But evidently
Speaker 3: with Washington, d C. It's trying to look more like Chicago.
Speaker 3: Trump makes a stunning claim that he can send the
Speaker 3: Navy to US cities.
Speaker 2: I can do whatever I want. Yeah, he can even
Speaker 2: send the Navy. He can.
Speaker 3: He can suspend the laws of nature as well as
Speaker 3: the Constitution. Trump made the stunning claim that he can
Speaker 3: send any military branch he wants, including the Navy. This
Speaker 3: is from Media eight. He claims that the Insurrection Act
Speaker 3: gives them unquestioned power, or that's his term, to order
Speaker 3: such deployments, unquestioned power. Well, there's people who are questioning that,
Speaker 3: and he's going to have to answer some questions about
Speaker 3: that with the Supreme Court or his lawyers. Will Trump said,
Speaker 3: if we need more than the National Guard, we'll send
Speaker 3: more than the National Guard. He was the board Air
Speaker 3: Force one. He obliquely cited the Insurrection Act. Yesterdays he
Speaker 3: claimed the power to use every branch of the military
Speaker 3: on US soil. He was asked by Katie Rogers what
Speaker 3: did you say last night when you said you were
Speaker 3: prepared to send more than the National Guard into American cities?
Speaker 3: Trump said, sure, I would do that if it was necessary.
Speaker 3: If it were necessary, I would do that. But it
Speaker 3: hasn't been necessary. We're doing a great job without that.
Speaker 3: But yeah, if it was necessarily, as you know, I'm
Speaker 3: allowed to do that. She said, do you mean other
Speaker 3: branches of the military you would send in if it
Speaker 3: were And he says, who are you with? She said
Speaker 3: New York Times Oka, I guess, well, that's very good,
Speaker 3: very good. Well, if you write it correctly, I'll give
Speaker 3: you the answer. But you know, if I want to
Speaker 3: enact a certain act, I'm allowed to do it routinely.
Speaker 3: Another about fifty percent of the presidents have used that,
Speaker 3: as you know, and I'd be allowed to do whatever
Speaker 3: I want. That's not true. It's not true that he
Speaker 3: can do whatever he wants. It's also not true that
Speaker 3: fifty percent of the presidents have pushed through the Insurrection Act.
Speaker 3: More recently have done it than through the two hundred
Speaker 3: and fifty year history of our country, but certainly not
Speaker 3: fifty percent of them, and certainly not our best presidents. Actually,
Speaker 3: I could send the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines. I
Speaker 3: could send anybody I wanted, but I haven't done that
Speaker 3: because we're doing so well without it. But I can
Speaker 3: do whatever I want. That is his attitude. Actually, by
Speaker 3: the way, I didn't and didn't mention that the female
Speaker 3: backup was Travis's wife on that. I appreciate her doing
Speaker 3: that late last night as well. There's some touches that
Speaker 3: we need to make with that before we put that
Speaker 3: out anywhere. But I just wanted to emphasize the people
Speaker 3: that the real issue is what Trump and all of
Speaker 3: these world leaders did. But of course Trump used our
Speaker 3: taxpayer money and our debt in order to pay Pfizer
Speaker 3: and Moderna in these other countries to make this poison,
Speaker 3: and he's still cheering it and pushing it out there.
Speaker 3: And nowther alibi is that it was released it came
Speaker 3: from the lab. No, the dangerous thing came from the JAB,
Speaker 3: not the lab.
Speaker 5: And we have a comment and tip from I'm Marty.
Speaker 5: Really appreciate it, Marty, thank you, he says in monstrous appreciation.
Speaker 2: For the monster.
Speaker 5: Jeb, thank you very much.
Speaker 2: Marty, thank you.
Speaker 3: Well, we had Bill Gates as a bloodsucking vampire, which
Speaker 3: is a pretty description, being able to transform from a
Speaker 3: vampire into a giant mosquito that he is so.
Speaker 2: Fond Bill Gates.
Speaker 3: Again, a lot of people are picking up the fact
Speaker 3: that he is leaving this alarmist dumer view of climate change,
Speaker 3: and a lot of people are thinking that it's a
Speaker 3: positive development. I'm very skeptical about this. Here's Daily Skeptic,
Speaker 3: which has been pretty good in the UK about pushing
Speaker 3: back against the climate mcguffin. Bill Gates says, climate change
Speaker 3: is not the end of the world. That's their headline.
Speaker 3: He's rejected his doom's day view of climate change. But
Speaker 3: look what is coming, and they have fought against the
Speaker 3: pandemic mcguffin as well, the Daily Skeptic. They need to
Speaker 3: take a look at how these two mcguffins align. It
Speaker 3: doesn't really matter what the excuse is, That's why I
Speaker 3: call it a mcguffin, And it doesn't matter what the
Speaker 3: motivating item or near is. What they want from all
Speaker 3: these things is exactly the same thing. They want to
Speaker 3: control everything about you. And so they found that one
Speaker 3: of them is working and the other one isn't. It's
Speaker 3: just as simple as that, and so you've got President
Speaker 3: Trump saying we beat him, we won, you know, except
Speaker 3: he's the guy who sold the other mcguffin, the other
Speaker 3: shoot a Trump. The doomsday narrative that predicted climate change
Speaker 3: would decimate civilization was wrong, said Bill Gates, And so
Speaker 3: Daily Skeptic says, well, so it's not a recognition that
Speaker 3: carbon dioxide is not a harmful pollutant and that is
Speaker 3: having negligible impact on global temperatures while boosting plant growth.
Speaker 3: But by dialing down the catastrophism and regaining a semblance
Speaker 3: of perspective, it is a step in the right direction.
Speaker 3: Except again, count me skeptical when you look at history
Speaker 3: of alarmism.
Speaker 11: World emits over fifty one billion tons of greenhouse gases,
Speaker 11: and as we keep doing that, the consequences for human
Speaker 11: life will be catastrophic and time is running out.
Speaker 12: Bill Gates now says this climate change will not lead
Speaker 12: to humanity's demise. People will be able to live and
Speaker 12: thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future.
Speaker 12: But if he's serious about making things better, it should
Speaker 12: start with an apology tour. Apologize to the scientists who
Speaker 12: are punished for speaking the truth. Apologize to the young
Speaker 12: people who sacrifice their futures because of the fear you
Speaker 12: help spread and apologize to the developing countries that were
Speaker 12: forced to stay poor chasing green technologies that don't even work.
Speaker 3: How about de industrializing the West with this lie as well?
Speaker 3: And you know, he's got a different kind of alarmism
Speaker 3: as well, not just the pandemic alarmism and the vaccine alarmism,
Speaker 3: but he is also spreading AI alarmism. A lot of
Speaker 3: people are doing that, and hopefully it's going to be
Speaker 3: just as false as what we're seeing here. As a
Speaker 3: matter of fact, show that meme that somebody put together
Speaker 3: as yeah, here, he is not an engineer, never finished college,
Speaker 3: not a doctor, not an epidemiologist, not a virologist. He's unelected,
Speaker 3: He's a documented thief. He owns virus patents, he owns
Speaker 3: vaccine companies, and he visited Epstein's Pedo Island countless times.
Speaker 3: That's Bill Gates. As a matter of fact. What they
Speaker 3: didn't put in there is that his entire fortune is
Speaker 3: based on fraud and theft.
Speaker 2: I remember that really well. I remember when.
Speaker 3: First computer I had, I put it together from a
Speaker 3: kit and it was at the time you had the
Speaker 3: Intel processors, the eighty eighty processors and the Z eighty processors,
Speaker 3: and everybody was using an operating system called from digital
Speaker 3: company called Digital Research.
Speaker 2: It was called.
Speaker 3: CPM, and it had a command line interpreter that was
Speaker 3: had a command line interpreneur that was just got a
Speaker 3: note from Lancy's having trouble with comments on Rumble, may
Speaker 3: not be able to get all the comments that are there. Okay,
Speaker 3: He's got a way to see him, Okay. So anyway,
Speaker 3: this was one of the old fashioned. It looks very
Speaker 3: familiar if you use the command line on MS JOS
Speaker 3: because Bill Gates copied it exactly exactly. It was its
Speaker 3: most blatant ripoff of intellectual property I've ever seen anywhere.
Speaker 3: The Chinese couldn't do it any better, even called the
Speaker 3: Colonel bios, same term that Digital Research did. So they
Speaker 3: sued him and he won in court, stealing that from him,
Speaker 3: and because he had more lawyers and he had more
Speaker 3: money where he was coming from, and then he sold
Speaker 3: his operating system to IBM and they created that standard.
Speaker 3: So it's based on intellectual property theft. And the same
Speaker 3: thing happened to some degree with Windows and Apple he
Speaker 3: was able to beat Steve Jobs at.
Speaker 2: That as well.
Speaker 3: But he's pushing AI alarmism as well. Maybe these false
Speaker 3: prophets ought to be taken out of the community in stoned.
Speaker 3: I don't know. Maybe they are are stoned on something.
Speaker 3: I don't know what they're what they're taking. But a
Speaker 3: person who that report was from, that was Lucy Biggers
Speaker 3: from the Free Press that put together the coats from
Speaker 3: Bill Gates. Trump is gloating saying we just won. Gates
Speaker 3: is admitting that climate change won't end the world. Well,
Speaker 3: I again, I don't see it that way. It's I'm
Speaker 3: still skeptical about this. I'm like the end of a
Speaker 3: blast in the past where the guy's told that the
Speaker 3: Soviet Union fell, and he's out there Christopher Walken character
Speaker 3: the Father starts out a new underground bunker. I'm pacing
Speaker 3: out a new underground bunker against the mcguffin because I
Speaker 3: don't believe that we won anything. I think they simply
Speaker 3: have shifted tactics. All these mcguffins take us to the
Speaker 3: same place. They're just false narratives that they give us.
Speaker 3: He's dropped that one because everybody's onto him.
Speaker 4: I think they're just giving it a rest because people
Speaker 4: are so numb to the alarmism. So they got to
Speaker 4: pull it back. Oh, well, it's not going to kill
Speaker 4: us all. And then after a few years, well it
Speaker 4: turns out it's going to kill us all again.
Speaker 3: Well, part of the problem is people see what the
Speaker 3: de industrialization is doing to them and to their country
Speaker 3: and their homes, and you know, they understand the hardship
Speaker 3: that's being imposed on them, and nobody has, really the
Speaker 3: public has never bought in to this climate alarmism, to
Speaker 3: the consternation of people like Bill Gates and others. So
Speaker 3: they're kind of beating a dead horse, and if they
Speaker 3: don't back off, they're going to wind up with people
Speaker 3: with pitchforks coming after them and torture in the middle
Speaker 3: of the night. So I think it's in their best
Speaker 3: interest to give it a rest or to back off
Speaker 3: from it. They can still accomplish all this stuff with
Speaker 3: the pandemic mcguffin just as easily, and I think that's
Speaker 3: where they're going again. As Biggers said, that shift to
Speaker 3: common sense is welcome, but it comes after decades of
Speaker 3: fear mongering that harmed young people, stalled development, and punished
Speaker 3: dissenting scientists. And I think it's even worse than that
Speaker 3: when you look at it, the damage that's been done
Speaker 3: to manufacturing, damage that has been done to our societies.
Speaker 3: It's a big deal to have all these kids think
Speaker 3: that the world is going to end because of, you know,
Speaker 3: having a car, or because of eating meat and things
Speaker 3: like that. But it is vast what has been done
Speaker 3: to us, and none of this stuff is being undone
Speaker 3: because it's all in place with the Paris Climate Acord
Speaker 3: transferring all manufacturing and industry to China fully and finally,
Speaker 3: so now Trump is gloating, maga's guard is down as usual.
Speaker 3: It's weird that Gates didn't come to this conclusion before.
Speaker 3: Big tech needed tons of energy really fast, which can
Speaker 3: only be produced with fossil fuels. That's the comment from
Speaker 3: zero Hedge, and I think that has something to do
Speaker 3: with it as well, the hypocrisy of shutting down all
Speaker 3: manufacturing and power so that you can heat and cool
Speaker 3: your home while these guys have their massive data centers
Speaker 3: and they're running their massive data centers on the stuff
Speaker 3: that they say is going to kill everybody that is
Speaker 3: not sustainable for them, but they will still have the
Speaker 3: surveillance and the control using another bogus mcguffin, the last
Speaker 3: five years of fake climate doom headlines were merely a
Speaker 3: move to enrich their lies such as climate NGOs, with
Speaker 3: taxpayer funds. And again you could say the same thing
Speaker 3: about Trump and his friends with a pandemic mcguffin. It
Speaker 3: was a lot of doom and gloom headlines and a
Speaker 3: move to enrich their friends in the pharmaceutical companies. Wind
Speaker 3: and solar farms in the u CREATE, by the way,
Speaker 3: are set up to take over nine percent of total
Speaker 3: land area in the United Kingdom. Think about that. So
Speaker 3: you have about ten percent of land is going to
Speaker 3: be covered with wind farms and solar farms, and it
Speaker 3: still isn't going to provide affordable power or reliable power.
Speaker 5: Ten percent all the land are going to be covered,
Speaker 5: all the land iceores. Yeah, it's going to be so
Speaker 5: incredibly ugly and it is not going to provide the
Speaker 5: power that they need, and it's.
Speaker 2: Going to be another way to take away food.
Speaker 3: Sorry, lands was onto something, that's right, Yeah, I need
Speaker 3: to adjust with these things. Surely you must be jesting
Speaker 3: Clean Power twenty thirty action plan. Here we got another
Speaker 3: twenty thirty plan. Currently approximately fifteen gigawatts of offshore wind capacity,
Speaker 3: which will nearly triple in five years, fourteen gigawats right
Speaker 3: now of onshore wind capacity which will double, and there
Speaker 3: are seventeen gigawatts of solar which will also triple, bringing
Speaker 3: the UK's solar and wind fleet up from forty six
Speaker 3: gigawatts to a whopping one hundred and twenty five gigawatts.
Speaker 3: Very little of it will work on cold winter nights,
Speaker 3: despite costing billions of pounds each and every year.
Speaker 2: So there you go. That's jigawats, Marty, great Scott, That's
Speaker 2: what I mean. That's right.
Speaker 3: There's a lot of energy that's not going that's going
Speaker 3: to be extremely expensive and extremely unreliable and unavailable, and
Speaker 3: it's going to decimate them as far as manufacturing goes.
Speaker 5: Are you telling me this sucker isn't nuclear? We've got
Speaker 5: some comments and tips, DG eight, Thank you very much.
Speaker 5: DG eight says David. I'm going to be blunt. Only
Speaker 5: an idiot, thinks, Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Ellison and Teal changed
Speaker 5: and are on our side. It's a game to these demons.
Speaker 3: Well, that idiot might be Trump, and it might be
Speaker 3: he thinks that because they're funneling money to him.
Speaker 5: Now we also have Tourinator, Thank you very much. Tourinator says,
Speaker 5: does this mean Bill Gates is going to stop funding
Speaker 5: geo engineering in my area? It's gotten worse since Trump
Speaker 5: has been back in office, not better. Have you guys
Speaker 5: heard of Dane Wiggington at geoengineering?
Speaker 3: Oh? Yeah, yeah, absolutely, Yeah, he does some good work,
Speaker 3: I think. Yeah, he's been on the geoengineering thing for
Speaker 3: a very long time. All right, let's take a quick break,
Speaker 3: and when we come back, we're going to take a
Speaker 3: look at the news. We've got a lot of unusual news,
Speaker 3: especially about AI. But we're going to begin with the
Speaker 3: cat fight between Trump's leading ladies. I think they need
Speaker 3: to come up with another name. Of course, it is
Speaker 3: all theatrical, isn't it. But I think calling him his
Speaker 3: leading ladies, it's kind of a beauty contest there in
Speaker 3: the White House. And I wonder they need to have
Speaker 3: a ballroom. Perhaps they can parade out his harem of
Speaker 3: women on a regular basis.
Speaker 2: There.
Speaker 3: We're gonna take a quick break, folks, we'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 13: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 13: these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 13: all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
Speaker 13: And I could if only David Knight would send me
Speaker 13: one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
Speaker 13: black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But
Speaker 13: he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
Speaker 13: American suckers can buy me some. At the Davidknightshow dot com.
Speaker 13: You should be able to buy me several hundred. Those
Speaker 13: amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd wear
Speaker 13: something other than green military cosplay to my various galas
Speaker 13: and social events. If you want to save on shipping,
Speaker 13: just put it in the next package of bombs and
Speaker 13: missiles coming from the USA.
Speaker 14: Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have
Speaker 14: access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues,
Speaker 14: classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
Speaker 14: for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 3: And we want to thank APS for carrying the show
Speaker 3: on their news channel and of course they have a
Speaker 3: lot of different radio channels as well, based on different genres.
Speaker 3: And you've got a comment you want to yes quickly.
Speaker 5: I want to let people know alien poop evolution says,
Speaker 5: Can you please tell folks the Rumble chat is working
Speaker 5: on the app, So if you use the Rumble app,
Speaker 5: the chat works fine. It is simply browser based viewers
Speaker 5: that are having issues.
Speaker 2: And that's why Lance is having.
Speaker 3: Issues seemingly yeah, in terms of being able to see
Speaker 3: the comments on Rumble. But it is working on the app.
Speaker 3: That's why that solves some myth. We're wondering why you
Speaker 3: were seeing the comments and he was not seeing it
Speaker 3: so well. The reported cat fight between Trump's leading ladies.
Speaker 3: This is an article from a revolver and on September
Speaker 3: twenty first, Trump appointed Lindsay Halligan, one of his former
Speaker 3: personal lawyers, to run the Justice Department's Eastern District Virginia office.
Speaker 3: The move overruled Pam Bondy, who had tapped a conservative
Speaker 3: lawyer from Virginia, Mary Maggie Cleary, for the role. Halligan
Speaker 3: is a glamorous, thirty six year old ex beauty queen
Speaker 3: who a finalist, and she immediately got to work even
Speaker 3: though she has absolutely no experience as a prosecutor or trials.
Speaker 3: She was basically a real estate lawyer who had no
Speaker 3: experience that qualified her for this job except her appearance.
Speaker 5: Oh you said prosecutor. I thought you said her mind.
Speaker 3: It is kind of funny, and apparently Pam Bondy is
Speaker 3: really not happy about that, just like she's not happy
Speaker 3: about the Second Amendment, I mean the other things. She's
Speaker 3: also upset about this. Not that I'm necessarily a fan
Speaker 3: of Halligan. I think it's kind of comical that she
Speaker 3: was looking at these indictments and Pam Bondy was kind
Speaker 3: of pulling back, and Trump scolded her in public, and
Speaker 3: I said, so, what's this about. Is not the way
Speaker 3: that he communicates with people that are in his cabinet.
Speaker 3: He communicates with him on social media. Why is he
Speaker 3: putting that out on social media. Well, he was scolding
Speaker 3: her publicly so he could get his real estate lawyer
Speaker 3: to become a prosecutor. And the other prosecutors were in
Speaker 3: the office. It's not just Pam Bondy. The others couldn't
Speaker 3: see that there was a case for Trump. And I
Speaker 3: don't think there's a way forward for this as well.
Speaker 3: She kind of put off going after Adam shift she
Speaker 3: could finny thing on if she went to James Comy.
Speaker 3: And as I pointed out before, I'm not a fan
Speaker 3: of Comy. I'm not a fan of John Bolton. John
Speaker 3: Bolton's another Lindsay Graham wants to get us involved in
Speaker 3: warris everywhere, another neocon. And you know, but these people
Speaker 3: that are being charged of this stuff, these are let's say,
Speaker 3: trumped up charges that I don't think are going to fly.
Speaker 3: Sources tell The Daily Mail that these indictments blindsided Bondi
Speaker 3: and senior Justice Department officials. They were furious, The Daily Mail,
Speaker 3: as told over what they saw is Holligan's rogue move,
Speaker 3: even though it was in pursuit of Trump's demands. Bondy
Speaker 3: has since tried to distance herself from all three cases.
Speaker 3: It's real and it's personal, said one insider. They both
Speaker 3: want to be the president's enforcer. So yeah, his harem
Speaker 3: is there's there's trouble there in this harem.
Speaker 2: And you look at the people that he picks for
Speaker 2: Press secretary.
Speaker 3: He has a long history of picking women that he's
Speaker 3: infatuated with their looks on what was the name of
Speaker 3: the first one, the first administration.
Speaker 2: She was a brunette.
Speaker 3: Oh, anyway, there was something going on between her and Guilfoyle.
Speaker 2: No, no, no, Trump Junior.
Speaker 5: Yeah, that's the other There's so many of these women
Speaker 5: that were around the Trump family.
Speaker 3: Christine Holmes. I guess, yeah, he likes lip filler or
Speaker 3: something like that. But anyway, it's the result, according to
Speaker 3: Guard sources, is a vicious power struggle between two of
Speaker 3: the most prominent women and Trump's orbit. And there are
Speaker 3: a lot of prominent women in this orbit, always have been.
Speaker 3: When two of his lieutenants compete, they say, Trump is
Speaker 3: usually the winner. So again, the when you look at
Speaker 3: what the president posted publicly, the public message was not
Speaker 3: an accident, they said, well, I think it was just
Speaker 3: an accident.
Speaker 6: No.
Speaker 3: An insider dismissed the explanation as ridiculous. That doesn't sound
Speaker 3: like Trump, said. The sources, familiar with the dynamics of
Speaker 3: Trump and Bondi's relationship. If the President wants to send
Speaker 3: a message, he'll pick up the phone and he'll call them,
Speaker 3: which is what I said at the very beginning of this.
Speaker 3: So again, we look at the Pedophile Palace in honor
Speaker 3: of Epstein. Trump's new ballroom larger than the White House
Speaker 3: and fueled by Zionist billionaires, reports Brian Shallhave at Health
Speaker 3: Impact News, and Trump and his billionaires are funding him.
Speaker 3: It's not just the Zionist billionaires, it's also Silicon Valley
Speaker 3: billionaires that are there funding. A new addition to the
Speaker 3: White House advertises a ballroom, and he said he's going
Speaker 3: to be calling it the Pedophile Palace because it's a
Speaker 3: true symbol of where American culture is here in twenty
Speaker 3: twenty five.
Speaker 4: Any of those who eund name Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Ballroom.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. Yeah.
Speaker 3: And do we still have that clip. I don't think
Speaker 3: we do. Yeah, the one that's put together by the
Speaker 3: Lincoln Project. They really nailed it. But Brian goes back
Speaker 3: to the history of ballrooms and it's got quite a
Speaker 3: history with the LGBT crowd. Actually, you know about one
Speaker 3: hundred years history of that. So it's also in keeping
Speaker 3: with the sexual scandals that have constantly been happening in
Speaker 3: the White House throughout history, from the affairs between JFK
Speaker 3: and Marilyn Monroe to the sexcapades of Bill Clinton and
Speaker 3: Monica Lewinsky to the homosexual prostitution rings that rocked the
Speaker 3: White House under Reagan and Bush, to the Nixon and
Speaker 3: Billy Graham child sex trafficking rings that led to Watergate.
Speaker 3: So he said it really should be called the Jeffrey
Speaker 3: Epstein Donald Trump White House Ballroom, which is exactly what
Speaker 3: the Lincoln Project called it. So Trump has emphasized the
Speaker 3: dramatic changes that will come at zero cost to the
Speaker 3: American taxpayer. Let me just say, you know, when you
Speaker 3: look at things like the ballroom and the amount of
Speaker 3: money that's going to be spent on that. But of
Speaker 3: course he says, it's not going to be taxpayer money.
Speaker 3: It's going to be my supporters that are out there.
Speaker 3: What are they going to get for that? Though it's
Speaker 3: even worse than if it was taxpayer money. If it
Speaker 3: was taxpayer money, it would cost us a couple of
Speaker 3: hundred billion dollars. But since these people are going to
Speaker 3: be contributing a couple hundred billion dollars, it's going to
Speaker 3: cost us a couple hundred billion dollars in terms of
Speaker 3: what these people are going to get out of the
Speaker 3: federal government. They're not doing this, They're not doing this
Speaker 3: because of altruism. They are investing in Trump and they
Speaker 3: expect to be paid back, and they will be paid
Speaker 3: back with a lot of money from US. So it's
Speaker 3: actually going to be even more expensive for that. Here
Speaker 3: are some of the donors that are going to be there,
Speaker 3: The Addilson Family Foundation. Of course, Miriam Adelson, who famously
Speaker 3: Trump pointed out she likes Israel a lot more than
Speaker 3: she likes the US. She makes her money in the U,
Speaker 3: and she spends her money in the US for the
Speaker 3: benefit of Israel. One of his biggest campaign donors then
Speaker 3: the Altria Group previously known as Philip Morris. They sell
Speaker 3: Regina Slim's, Marlborough and Parliamont cigarettes. They are giving a
Speaker 3: lot of money. Amazon Jeff Bezos. He gave a million
Speaker 3: dollars to the inaugural committee and earlier this year in January,
Speaker 3: and Amazon Web Services is earning more than five hundred
Speaker 3: million from federal contracts over the last three years, shows
Speaker 3: government data. Apple Tim Cook was on Trump's American Workforce
Speaker 3: Policy Advisory Board during his first term. He attended the
Speaker 3: president's twenty twenty five inauguration along with other tech leaders.
Speaker 3: The company secured a major win this summer when smartphones
Speaker 3: were exempted from the heavy tariffs that were levied on
Speaker 3: goods imported from India and China. Then you got Coinbase,
Speaker 3: one of America's largest cryptocurrency exchanges. The SEC had sued
Speaker 3: the company in twenty twenty twenty three, allegedly acting as
Speaker 3: an unregistered broker, but the Trump administration dropped the lawsuit.
Speaker 2: Earlier this year.
Speaker 3: They gave a million dollars to Trump's inaugural committee. You
Speaker 3: also have Pepe and Amelia van Jewel. They are part
Speaker 3: of a Cuban American family that owns massive sugar conglomerate,
Speaker 3: and Trump has already announced that he's persuading Coke to
Speaker 3: release cane sugar versions instead of the high fructose cornserpt
Speaker 3: don't know if that's going to happen orright. He also
Speaker 3: made claims that Toyota was going to invest ten billion
Speaker 3: dollars in the US. Toyota has been backpedaling on that,
Speaker 3: saying it's not really true. So he is known to exaggerate.
Speaker 3: But Pepe and Amelia have given more than three million
Speaker 3: to Trump campaigns going back to twenty sixteen, and not
Speaker 3: only has Trump pushed using sugar rather than high fructose
Speaker 3: corn syrup. He's also put big tariffs on Brazil, the
Speaker 3: largest exporter of sugar to the US fifty tariff. Of course,
Speaker 3: some of that was because of just personal relationships and preferences,
Speaker 3: because a lot of this is about that Google. We
Speaker 3: all know about Google. Harold Ham a billionaire founder of
Speaker 3: Continental Resources, natural gas and petroleum producer, one of the
Speaker 3: richest women in America, one of the richest men in
Speaker 3: the world, according to Forbes. Hard Rock International, owned by
Speaker 3: the Seminole tribe of Florida. The hard Rock cafes and
Speaker 3: casinos run by them. I didn't know that they purchased
Speaker 3: an Atlantic, New Jersey casino that was once owned by Trump.
Speaker 3: Their chairman, Jim Allen, has previously served as vice president
Speaker 3: of operations at the Trump organization. We have the Laura
Speaker 3: and Isaac Pearlmutter Foundation. They sold Marvel Entertainment to Walt
Speaker 3: Disney in two thousand and nine, and they've given more
Speaker 3: than twenty three million to Trump's campaigns, supporting his super
Speaker 3: pack since twenty and sixteen, and they use Marvel comics
Speaker 3: to promote his COVID pandemic. Mcguffin Lockheed Martin obvious what
Speaker 3: they're in it for the biggest defense contractor so Lutnik family.
Speaker 3: They're putting stuff in there. Meta Mark Zuckerberg, who has
Speaker 3: got a lot of territory to make up with earlier
Speaker 3: criticism of Trump, and he's been doing everything he can
Speaker 3: Microsoft and volunteer round out the group here, and so
Speaker 3: you can see that this is something that's going to
Speaker 3: be very expensive for the American taxpayer. We'll get the
Speaker 3: bill and it'll be about a thousand times more than
Speaker 3: these people have contributed. They're buying their way with influence
Speaker 3: with Trump, who is someone who is very easy to
Speaker 3: buy your way into with influence, one of the most
Speaker 3: corrupt administrations we've ever had, and it'll go down that
Speaker 3: way in history. I think I'm pretty confident that we're
Speaker 3: going to when we look at crypto corruption, and we'll
Speaker 3: talk a little bit about that when Tony joins us.
Speaker 3: He's ready to join us now. So I'm going to
Speaker 3: cut this short, and it's we look at what is
Speaker 3: happening Trump with all the money that he's spending on
Speaker 3: the ballroom. I just think that they're not thinking through
Speaker 3: the optics of all this stuff. They are energizing the
Speaker 3: Democrats like, you can't believe the Democrats who are all
Speaker 3: about the welfare programs, and I'm not about the welfare programs.
Speaker 3: I don't think that they serve the people on welfare well.
Speaker 3: And I think it'd be better if we had a
Speaker 3: private system. Perhaps that is something that will come out
Speaker 3: of this. It's an opportunity for individuals and for churches
Speaker 3: and for private organizations to make up the gap that
Speaker 3: the government would do. But I don't think it's going
Speaker 3: to be long enough for that to really have an effect. Nevertheless,
Speaker 3: doing it right at Thanksgiving time is well, he's all
Speaker 3: about his ballroom. I think is one of the most
Speaker 3: tone deaf things that Trump has ever done. And you know,
Speaker 3: just like shoving people around with masks, these these agents
Speaker 3: shoving people around with masks on and doing biometric idea
Speaker 3: on the street. When you look at those tactics, you
Speaker 3: know he could do the same things. And yet the
Speaker 3: ways that he's choosing to do this, he truly is
Speaker 3: energizing people, which we saw with the No King's rally,
Speaker 3: and the Republicans are just whistling in the dark about
Speaker 3: all this stuff.
Speaker 5: And so oh yeah. The first press secondary was Sarah
Speaker 5: Huckabee Sanders.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right. Yeah, well no McCartney, Yeah, that.
Speaker 3: Was the previous Press secretary, but there was somebody before
Speaker 3: her that was a that was not the one I
Speaker 3: was thinking of, the one.
Speaker 2: I was thinking of, and interchangeable.
Speaker 3: Yeah, maybe Press secretary was not the one, and maybe
Speaker 3: that was not her title, but I remember she was
Speaker 3: the gatekeeper when we were trying to get into the
Speaker 3: hotel and Washington to cover that event that we were
Speaker 3: there for. And she was very attractive, very young, and
Speaker 3: I don't know what other qualifications she had.
Speaker 2: I just I'm trying to assume she.
Speaker 5: Had other qualifications.
Speaker 2: But Trump is not necessary to have any.
Speaker 5: My question is, you know it's coming up to Thanksgiving.
Speaker 5: The President always pardons the turkey. Do you think maybe
Speaker 5: he'll pardon them in the new ballroom, you know, get
Speaker 5: to have a nice little slow dance with the turkey afterwards,
Speaker 5: really show it off.
Speaker 3: A butter ballroom, he could call it exactly. Okay, we're
Speaker 3: gonna take a quick break and we're going to connect
Speaker 3: up with Tony Rdman of Wisewolf Gold.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back, folks, h you're listening to the
Speaker 2: David Knight.
Speaker 14: Show Here News Now at APS Radio News dot com
Speaker 14: or get the APS ra do you have and never
Speaker 14: miss another story.
Speaker 3: Welcome back in Joining us now is Tony Rdeman of
Speaker 3: Wisewolf Gold and he has set up David Knight Taik
Speaker 3: Gold to take you to him and let him know
Speaker 3: that you're coming through us from hearing about this on
Speaker 3: the program. And I wanted to talk to Tony today
Speaker 3: because gold has been popping around like it was bitcoin
Speaker 3: almost but of course it's not unusual to see gold
Speaker 3: bitcoin moving several percentage points in a day or certainly
Speaker 3: in a week, but that's something that is kind of
Speaker 3: new for gold and silver, and so as it went
Speaker 3: up so quickly, it is now bouncing around at different levels.
Speaker 3: And right now, what is it around four thousand?
Speaker 2: Is that correct?
Speaker 8: It's just under four thousand this morning.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So, I mean it's still very high compared to
Speaker 3: where it has been for the year. And what is
Speaker 3: shaking it up this week is the Federal Reserve cutting
Speaker 3: interest rates by twenty five basis points a quarter of
Speaker 3: a percent and saying that they're going to only do
Speaker 3: one more by the end of the year. And so
Speaker 3: a lot of people on Wall Street and other places
Speaker 3: are saying, all right, So then that means that inflation
Speaker 3: is not going to kick up as much as we
Speaker 3: thought it would if he gets real aggressive on these
Speaker 3: interest cuts.
Speaker 2: He's not going to get real aggressive.
Speaker 3: The thing is that I'm looking at, Tony, is that
Speaker 3: Powell isn't going to be there that much longer. Right,
Speaker 3: his term ends in May. So these people are saying, well,
Speaker 3: that's it. I guess they're going to follow a very
Speaker 3: conservative path there that's only going to last for a
Speaker 3: couple of months anyway. And we know, you know, as
Speaker 3: you and I have talked about, and Jerald Clenty has
Speaker 3: said so many times, Trump is really good for gold
Speaker 3: because he's all about borrowing money and not paying his bills,
Speaker 3: and so we know where this is all going to go.
Speaker 3: He's going to have somebody who is going to have
Speaker 3: an easy money approach and it's going to stoke inflation,
Speaker 3: and it's going to happen at the latest in May
Speaker 3: of next year.
Speaker 15: You know, that's at the latest. And you were thinking
Speaker 15: the exact same thing I was. It's so funny the
Speaker 15: markets are so fickle and so short term. They look
Speaker 15: at stuff and say, oh, well, I guess everything's fine
Speaker 15: and we're back to normal, and you know, the meltdown
Speaker 15: isn't really happening, but it's all short term.
Speaker 8: And then you know, it's interesting too.
Speaker 15: You mentioned Palell talking about a second rate cut, but
Speaker 15: he didn't seem that that was a foregone conclusion.
Speaker 2: It may not be.
Speaker 15: It may not be until you know, Trump finally gets
Speaker 15: his new fed chair, and then I think all bets
Speaker 15: are off at that point.
Speaker 8: I think it's going to be easy money.
Speaker 15: Lots and lots of printing, probably unprecedented amount of currency
Speaker 15: injection into the economy, and that's only going to drive
Speaker 15: all these fundamentals everything we talk about, you know, as
Speaker 15: far as dedollarization and the repricing of commodities, it's only
Speaker 15: going to continue to inflate the prices of commodities as
Speaker 15: the dolls.
Speaker 3: Yes, I mean, it is something that is so dear
Speaker 3: to the heart of Trump. I mean, look at how
Speaker 3: angry he got with Thomas Massey's pushed back against both
Speaker 3: his stimulus bill and his One Big Beautiful Bill because
Speaker 3: of the spending, and that is you know, he takes
Speaker 3: that very personally, and that is one of his core things. Now,
Speaker 3: I thought it was interesting that this article said FED
Speaker 3: officials had to make yesterday's decision without key federal economic
Speaker 3: data amid the ongoing government shutdown. The Bureau of Labor
Speaker 3: Statistics is mostly shuttered during the shutdown. But it's all
Speaker 3: a lie anyway, as audi's program says, it's all a lie.
Speaker 3: All these we couldn't get the numbers from the Bureau
Speaker 3: of la Labor Statistics, but it's all a lie anything
Speaker 3: that they would have gotten from them. And zero Hedge
Speaker 3: is saying gold is doing what it normally does. After
Speaker 3: FED rate cuts. It typically goes down a little bit
Speaker 3: and then starts to climb Shortly after that. People are
Speaker 3: anticipation of that inflation maybe something is you know, gonna
Speaker 3: kick off with us, but they realize that it's not
Speaker 3: really going to change the fundamentals in the long term,
Speaker 3: and so then we get back to where we were.
Speaker 15: It's like what we were saying that that statistics don't lie,
Speaker 15: but liars use statistics.
Speaker 8: That comes to mind.
Speaker 15: Yeah, now you know you're you're looking at gold too
Speaker 15: as far as the price, and that's the way it
Speaker 15: usually goes. There's a rate cut, there's some liquidation of
Speaker 15: current holdings to get into the market, because that signals,
Speaker 15: you know, the money printer is on the money printer
Speaker 15: is going to go bur and some of these stocks
Speaker 15: and other things in short term investments will inflight, so
Speaker 15: people take profit positions out on gold and there'll be
Speaker 15: some sell off in the market.
Speaker 8: But again, you know, and also too that the news of.
Speaker 15: There being some sort of tentative agreement on trade between
Speaker 15: China and the US, and China supposedly to start buying
Speaker 15: soybeans again, and all this other stuff all temporary, and
Speaker 15: you see these price pullbacks some gold. Matter of fact,
Speaker 15: I bought some gold over the weekend because you can't
Speaker 15: trade on the exchange, and it was a significant amount,
Speaker 15: and Monday morning it's just bleeding red and I'm like,
Speaker 15: I don't think I made anything, you know, But that's okay.
Speaker 15: That's the risk you take when you're a dealer, that
Speaker 15: you roll with the market. Sometimes you're up, sometimes you're down.
Speaker 15: But that's the volatile nature where we are right now.
Speaker 15: And I think it's looking for both gold, silver and
Speaker 15: bitcoin are looking for a price. I think they're trying
Speaker 15: to find price position and price discovery in all of
Speaker 15: this turbulence, and we just never it's like you look
Speaker 15: at the charts. One of the reports was saying that
Speaker 15: this is the most gains that gold has had since
Speaker 15: nineteen seventy nine. What's true for silver as well. It's
Speaker 15: a forty five years in the making of these price adjustments.
Speaker 15: And you were, if you know, you know as well
Speaker 15: as anybody, David the the shock, the Nixon shock of
Speaker 15: going off the gold standard in seventy one, and by
Speaker 15: seventy nine you had eight hundred dollars an ounce gold,
Speaker 15: which was massive in nineteen seventy nine, same thing with
Speaker 15: silver at fifty two dollars. There was a lot of
Speaker 15: intervention that went on Paul Volker from the FED, and
Speaker 15: this is interesting history to look at because they went
Speaker 15: out of their way to make sure that there wasn't
Speaker 15: some you know, scramble or crash of the dollar at
Speaker 15: that time, you know, getting out of the dollar. I
Speaker 15: think I think they stabilized it with high interest rates
Speaker 15: and kind of a you know, dangling the trinket of
Speaker 15: you know, Caynesen economics and the Laugher curve with Reaganomics
Speaker 15: and all that stuff in the eighties.
Speaker 8: I think that's really important history to pay attention.
Speaker 15: To because it created the price of gold and it
Speaker 15: kept silver suppress for a long time. Well, but he
Speaker 15: talked about that when you measured the markets against gold,
Speaker 15: they don't look good anymore.
Speaker 2: Mm hmmm.
Speaker 3: Mes has talked about that, and they said, you know
Speaker 3: what would it take to burst.
Speaker 2: The bubble for gold?
Speaker 3: And they said, when you look at when that has happened,
Speaker 3: like you're just talking about one of those incidents, it's
Speaker 3: because people have lost faith in the Federal Reserve and
Speaker 3: then they got that faith back. I don't see that happening.
Speaker 3: I don't see the Federal Reserve being able to get
Speaker 3: people's confidence back. Even if they could do it at
Speaker 3: the retail level, they're not going to do it based
Speaker 3: on the sanctions that have been put in by Biden
Speaker 3: and by Trump and others, and with the competition coming
Speaker 3: from bricks, they're not going to get the confidence of
Speaker 3: countries back, even if they could do it at the
Speaker 3: retail level. So I don't think that's going to happen.
Speaker 3: And when you look at all of the fundamental issues
Speaker 3: in terms of inflation, in terms of debt, those are
Speaker 3: all still there, bigger than we've ever seen in the past.
Speaker 3: And what Trump is doing is adding a layer of
Speaker 3: chaos and instability to businesses which we were already were
Speaker 3: headed for a stagflation or a selenty said dragflation. And
Speaker 3: when you add that kind of chaos and instability that
Speaker 3: people can't plan on, then it just makes it all worse.
Speaker 15: No, it does, and that's I think misunderstanding where we
Speaker 15: are too and having normalcy bias has hurt the average consumer,
Speaker 15: the average American and possibly every person around the world.
Speaker 15: The IMF just came out and said that they expect
Speaker 15: that global debt will reach one hundred percent of global
Speaker 15: GDP by twenty thirty.
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 15: Yeah, Now, isn't that an interesting metric. Yeah, we're talking
Speaker 15: about twenty thirty and we've been calling out the it's
Speaker 15: a broken world predictive programming of the Great Reset for
Speaker 15: a long time. I think these things go hand in hand,
Speaker 15: the projections that are out there of global debt to GDP,
Speaker 15: the collapse of Fiat currencies, the resetting of things. It's
Speaker 15: very important to pay attention to these fundamentals about prices
Speaker 15: and commodities that matter. Wall Street's really talking more about
Speaker 15: the periodic table than they have in a long time.
Speaker 8: I got that from Gold Telegraph.
Speaker 15: He's talking about how he was overhearing traders talking about
Speaker 15: copper and things that they you know, years ago you
Speaker 15: wouldn't have heard it would be tech stocks and AI.
Speaker 15: But I think getting looking around the world, seeing what
Speaker 15: nation states are hoarding and what they're stockpiling based off
Speaker 15: of I think the devaluation that's inevitable, the devaluation of
Speaker 15: Fiat currencies is really important to understand those metrics, and
Speaker 15: I think the average person here in this country is
Speaker 15: going to get caught flat footed, unfortunately, because they're just
Speaker 15: going off of you know, these rate cuts and other
Speaker 15: things that it really don't matter much in them, especially
Speaker 15: in the long term. They matter in the short term,
Speaker 15: but it's not changing the fundamentals of what we're witnessing
Speaker 15: in this.
Speaker 8: Revaluation of all things.
Speaker 3: Well, when you look at the global great reset and
Speaker 3: the great taking and all the rest of this stuff
Speaker 3: that's there, Trump has got a really important role to
Speaker 3: play in all this. He has been sowing global discord
Speaker 3: with his tariff tantrums that are out there, and so
Speaker 3: we look at it and we say, we argue about
Speaker 3: whether or not he's got the power to do this,
Speaker 3: And you know, what is the basis for him putting
Speaker 3: this stuff in, But the reality is is that this
Speaker 3: is exactly what the globalists want to have done, and
Speaker 3: so it really kind of plays into everything they want
Speaker 3: to the extent that you have to wonder if, just
Speaker 3: like in twenty twenty, if he isn't the leader for
Speaker 3: the globalist agenda rather than the leader of the opposition
Speaker 3: because he's putting all this, you know, and all this
Speaker 3: chaos that is out there. Canada just cut theirs by
Speaker 3: their interest rates by a quarterbule percent. They're about one
Speaker 3: and a half points in terms of interest rates below us.
Speaker 3: They're down at two and a quarter and they say
Speaker 3: it's because of structural damage caused by the Trump tantrums,
Speaker 3: reducing capacity of the economy and adding costs to people
Speaker 3: limits a role that monetary policy can play, and so
Speaker 3: they're saying, you know, these Trump tariffs and trade policy
Speaker 3: have harmed our economy, and of course it's harming a
Speaker 3: lot of other economies, and it's just, you know, we
Speaker 3: have this global system, which I'm not a big fan of,
Speaker 3: but that's what we have right now, and what he's
Speaker 3: doing is he's just wrecking it. Like he wrecked the
Speaker 3: supply chains in twenty twenty with his lockdown, and in
Speaker 3: a sense, what he's doing is contributing to this chaos
Speaker 3: and this reset that is there doing it globally because
Speaker 3: all these different lines have been connected to the United
Speaker 3: States and it is just just you know, by abruptly
Speaker 3: cutting off these supply things. Rather than going through an
Speaker 3: orderly transition or having a plan, he just does this
Speaker 3: knee jerk reaction and does it all at once and say, Okay,
Speaker 3: we're going to cut this off, nay, and build your
Speaker 3: business back up by your own bootstraps without the suppliers
Speaker 3: that you've been getting product from. And so he's harming
Speaker 3: American businesses as well, but the impact that he's having
Speaker 3: around the world is huge.
Speaker 15: Yeah, and it's disastrous. Yeah, you and I both know
Speaker 15: what grows an economy. What what what made the United
Speaker 15: States great in the first place. You know, it's free markets.
Speaker 15: There was there was a plan, yes, there was, there
Speaker 15: was coherence.
Speaker 2: And government was out of our lives. People. People can
Speaker 2: make a plan. Government was out of our lives.
Speaker 3: It didn't it didn't have a heavy tax burden on them,
Speaker 3: and so you had to ability, you had freedom and
Speaker 3: people can invest for the future. All this stuff has
Speaker 3: been shut down, these types of policies.
Speaker 15: You go back to COVID nineteen eighty four. I mean,
Speaker 15: look at the smashing of small business. I mean just
Speaker 15: the wrecking of the system and the supply lines. And
Speaker 15: that wasn't the beginning of inflation in this country, but
Speaker 15: it certainly was the accelerant that was poured on it.
Speaker 15: And think of the wealth that has been stolen from
Speaker 15: the average American. Think of this transfer of wealth, likes
Speaker 15: of which we've never seen before. The only thing that
Speaker 15: even comes close to it was the free trade policies
Speaker 15: put in by the technocrats and the oligarchs back in
Speaker 15: the nineteen seventies who wanted to transfer the wealth away
Speaker 15: from the United States and moved eastward. Absolutely nothing like this, though,
Speaker 15: we've not seen anything ever before, this massive transfer of
Speaker 15: wealth that's gone on, and it continues to go on. No,
Speaker 15: you're right to call this out because if you really
Speaker 15: wanted to grow the economy, you have the markets love certainty,
Speaker 15: and not only that, but incentives for people, let for
Speaker 15: them to be able to feel safe to take risks.
Speaker 15: I don't see that there's lots of small manufacturers that
Speaker 15: are absolutely baffled.
Speaker 8: You look at the cattle industry, Oh yeah, they have.
Speaker 15: No idea like why are we helping Argentinian beef producers
Speaker 15: over our own? You know, we're injecting cash all over
Speaker 15: the world into places that again they're not it's not
Speaker 15: our business, and it's not America first. All that stuff
Speaker 15: that really is just shameful and all of those fundamentals too.
Speaker 15: Everything that we're doing right now will have lasting repercussions,
Speaker 15: unfortunately for this continual transfer of wealth. And that's why
Speaker 15: it's important to understand the difference between currency and money.
Speaker 3: Well, when you look at more than ever, the entire
Speaker 3: Chicago border trade is said this last week, why is
Speaker 3: that there? Well, it's because farmers want to be able
Speaker 3: to lock in a price at some point. They're willing
Speaker 3: to pay a premium for that. And that's the entire
Speaker 3: reason that that giant Chicago border trade exists is to
Speaker 3: lock in prices for farmers so that they have certainty
Speaker 3: so they can make plans. And what Trump is doing
Speaker 3: is single handedly worse than just taking out the entire
Speaker 3: Chicago border trades.
Speaker 2: Like he flew over it with his.
Speaker 3: Jet and dropped a bunch of excrement on it. That's
Speaker 3: what's really happening to all the cattle farmers. And so
Speaker 3: it's it's and not just them, other farmers as well,
Speaker 3: the cattle ranchers, I should say, but also the farmers,
Speaker 3: because they've got to have that certainty, and that's what
Speaker 3: Trump is destroying. Nobody can make any plans. Nobody knows
Speaker 3: what's going to happen. And that's true not just for
Speaker 3: the farmers and the ranchers, it's also true for all
Speaker 3: the small retailers, all the small manufacturus. They need to
Speaker 3: know what their parts are going to cost, or what
Speaker 3: their goods are going to cost. If they're a manufacturer,
Speaker 3: they're going to have to get some parts. They don't
Speaker 3: know if they're even going to be able to get
Speaker 3: the parts anymore. It might be embargoed. But if they
Speaker 3: get it, they don't know if it's going to be
Speaker 3: a twenty percent tariff or it's going to be one
Speaker 3: hundred percent tariff. You can't operate like that.
Speaker 15: No, and this was supposed to be, you know, the
Speaker 15: basis for bringing jobs back to this country, and we've
Speaker 15: just weaponized the dollar by other means. That's what the
Speaker 15: threat of tariffs and in the incoherence of the blanket
Speaker 15: tariffs that they put out. I mean, it really is,
Speaker 15: you know, the playbook for accelerating the great resets. I mean,
Speaker 15: that's all that is. I mean, it's we're not winning.
Speaker 15: I know we're supposed to get We're supposed to be
Speaker 15: tired of winning by now, David, That's what I was told.
Speaker 15: We're going to get so tired of winning. But we're
Speaker 15: not winning. And that's I think they must spell that.
Speaker 15: I'm just tired of the whining that they were coming
Speaker 15: out of the White House.
Speaker 2: I'm very tired of that.
Speaker 3: But let's look at gold, because we just had the
Speaker 3: London Bullion Market Association talked about where they think gold
Speaker 3: is going to go in the next year. Last year,
Speaker 3: they thought that gold this year would get up to
Speaker 3: twenty nine forty one announce and it's quite a bit
Speaker 3: higher than that obviously, and so it's up around Instead
Speaker 3: of twenty nine hundred and around three thousand, it is
Speaker 3: now around four thousand, So they missed it by about
Speaker 3: a third. So they were pretty conservative on it, and
Speaker 3: they are expecting that gold is going to get up
Speaker 3: to around five thousand and about a year. And while
Speaker 3: we're talking about London and the medals, did we talk
Speaker 3: about when you were here last week, did we talk
Speaker 3: about what happened with silver and India and all the
Speaker 3: rest of that stuff, the massive shortage of that stuff. Yeah,
Speaker 3: so silver has done quite a bit better than they
Speaker 3: thought it would. Gold is seeing its best annual gains
Speaker 3: since nineteen seventy nine, prices up fifty percent this year. However,
Speaker 3: it's not the best performing asset of precious metals. Silver
Speaker 3: is up sixty one percent year to date and platinum
Speaker 3: is up by ninety three percent.
Speaker 2: You said people are looking at.
Speaker 3: The different minerals and trading that the chart there, So
Speaker 3: I guess platium is another one of these things that's there.
Speaker 3: But anyway, forty participants expect gold to be the top
Speaker 3: performing asset and precious metals through twenty twenty six. And
Speaker 3: so again last year they thought it would be silver,
Speaker 3: and it was silver. And then you see what is
Speaker 3: happening with Tether Lucky Lutnix company. They are making massive
Speaker 3: investments in gold and then tokenizing it. And I'm looking
Speaker 3: at this, I'm thinking, why in the world would you
Speaker 3: want to own.
Speaker 2: Gold that way?
Speaker 3: When you look at all of the different issues about
Speaker 3: how they can change the rules about what you can
Speaker 3: do with your token coins. They can completely shut you off.
Speaker 3: You can have any kind a lot of different kinds
Speaker 3: of cyber attacks or things like that that can separate
Speaker 3: you from your ownership of that stuff. I'm just looking
Speaker 3: at it. I'm saying, what's in it for the people.
Speaker 2: That are out there.
Speaker 3: I just really don't understand that the risk is greatly
Speaker 3: finn Yeah.
Speaker 15: I mean, if you don't understand the risk of the
Speaker 15: counting party risk of those type of coins, then yeah,
Speaker 15: maybe it looks great to you and you can digitize whatever.
Speaker 15: Maybe you have a lot more faith in the system
Speaker 15: than I do. But think about that, Think about the
Speaker 15: power to take something digital and then buy real assets
Speaker 15: with that. When somebody gives you value for the digitized
Speaker 15: thing that you made up, I mean, that is a
Speaker 15: that's a break that's not since the credit card fees
Speaker 15: have since something been so brilliant it's almost evil genius.
Speaker 2: Or maybe it is.
Speaker 3: Oh, it is evil genius and it's Scott Bessen and
Speaker 3: it's the Trump family. There's a long article from Reuters
Speaker 3: about the Trump family's global crypto cash machine and the
Speaker 3: connections that they've made with other foreign governments who are
Speaker 3: able to invest in these crypto ventures. They have a
Speaker 3: World Liberty Financial which is WLF instead of w EF,
Speaker 3: but kind of the same idea. You will own nothing,
Speaker 3: and you will transfer all of your wealth to the
Speaker 3: Trump family and they will do a pump and dump
Speaker 3: on you, which they've already pulled off once this year
Speaker 3: on people. It's pretty amazing. But they see themselves as
Speaker 3: replacing banks and even as replacing the Central Bank, I
Speaker 3: think is what their goal is, and they're going to
Speaker 3: become probably trillionaires off of this thing.
Speaker 8: That is the play.
Speaker 15: I think there's a reason why, you know, especially with
Speaker 15: the difference between the Harris administration that never was in
Speaker 15: this one as the push for CBDC and the centralized
Speaker 15: plan to digitize through the Federal Reserve, or as the
Speaker 15: plan to do it through stable coin in this public
Speaker 15: private partnership. And think about the wealth that'll be created
Speaker 15: for a few again when you start using these stable
Speaker 15: coins and if they you know, dollar for dollar, you
Speaker 15: trade it in and they buy real assets, which they're doing.
Speaker 15: They're buying bitcoin and they're buying gold and other things
Speaker 15: and you mentioned that, you know, the Trump family, and
Speaker 15: I think it's Eric Trump with the American Bitcoin Yeah,
Speaker 15: and Don Junior is involved with another what I believe
Speaker 15: out of Japan.
Speaker 3: Well, we look at this World Liberty financial thing. You've
Speaker 3: got Eric and Don Jor and Baron are listed as
Speaker 3: the co founders, along with Witcoff's two kids. That's Trump's
Speaker 3: real estate partners. Now his special envoid to Israel in
Speaker 3: other places, and Trump is listed. This is really funny.
Speaker 3: As emeritus co founder, I got to get his name
Speaker 3: on there. And so Reuters went around talking to these
Speaker 3: different individuals, many of them high ranking government officials and
Speaker 3: other countries that are pouring massive amounts of money in
Speaker 3: and they're pretty clear that they said, well, there's been
Speaker 3: no special offers made to us outside of this, but
Speaker 3: we think it's going to do really well because it's
Speaker 3: connected to the Trump family. So a lot of people
Speaker 3: are talking about the open corruption, which is really pretty amazing.
Speaker 3: But you know, we saw that open corruption in the
Speaker 3: Biden family with Hunter and you know, the big guy,
Speaker 3: and what was happening in Ukraine. This is the same
Speaker 3: type of thing, except the Trump's situation is global. It's
Speaker 3: not just limited to one corrupt country in Ukraine, and
Speaker 3: nobody on the right is going to talk about this
Speaker 3: because they all are afraid of Trump's wrath and of
Speaker 3: Maga's wrath.
Speaker 15: Yeah, well, they don't understand what's actually being done here.
Speaker 15: I mean, if you're you get to wreck a current
Speaker 15: system in order to create a new one, that's pretty
Speaker 15: apparent that's what happens. And so they're going to you know,
Speaker 15: if you want to see the dollar on it, you
Speaker 15: want to accelerate the way the dollar being turned into
Speaker 15: or digitized and doing you know, create a bridge to
Speaker 15: a new system, well you got to, you know, hasten
Speaker 15: its decline. And that's if you wanted to whip saw
Speaker 15: the value and create uncertainty, this is how you would
Speaker 15: do it.
Speaker 8: It's being done, that's right.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Their income from crypto has gone up seventeen fold and
Speaker 3: just the first half of this year. I mean they're
Speaker 3: making unbelievable amounts of money and uh, you're partnering with
Speaker 3: Lucky lootnik is we're going to see that really explode.
Speaker 3: And it is as they said in this article, it's
Speaker 3: legal but unethical. And I thought, well, okay, that's a
Speaker 3: little bit different than most of the things that Trump does.
Speaker 3: Most of the things he does are unethical and illegal.
Speaker 3: At least this is legal but unethical, I guess. So
Speaker 3: it's a little bit of a surprise there that actually
Speaker 3: do something within the law, kind of break it and
Speaker 3: then dare them to do something about it. But so
Speaker 3: as we look at it, I would just say that
Speaker 3: we're kind of in the same situation that we were
Speaker 3: last year with the election, and everybody soured on gold
Speaker 3: and silver and started moving into crypto. Of course, crypto
Speaker 3: has been a phenomenal investment for the Trumps as well,
Speaker 3: but I still think that gold and silver are on sale.
Speaker 3: I think that they are very important to not only
Speaker 3: see them as a hedge against uncertainty and a hedge
Speaker 3: against the complete restructuring of the financial system, but to
Speaker 3: see them as a hedge against the surveillance state and
Speaker 3: the attack on private financial transactions and your ability to
Speaker 3: make private financial transactions or to buy and to do
Speaker 3: what you want. That's going to be a function of
Speaker 3: having that ability. So I don't really see anything fundamentally
Speaker 3: changing on this stuff, even though the price is going
Speaker 3: to get noisy from time to time reacting to things
Speaker 3: that may or may not be real.
Speaker 15: What do you think, Well, that's true, and we're I
Speaker 15: think still looking for price discovery. There's a lot of
Speaker 15: unknowns that are pushing the price of gold and silver,
Speaker 15: and a nation state adoption of the bitcoin also is
Speaker 15: another unknown. You know, bitcoin was trading at one hundred thousand,
Speaker 15: hit one hundred thousand in December of last year, and
Speaker 15: it really hasn't. It's had another all time high this month,
Speaker 15: but you one hundred and twenty four thousand or whatever
Speaker 15: it was, but it's back down. You know, the news
Speaker 15: of the rate cuts and you know, volatility is it
Speaker 15: hurts Bitcoin's price. Gold has gone the opposite way. You know,
Speaker 15: it's because of the volatility. It's it's driven up to
Speaker 15: forty three hundred announced and then of course silver going
Speaker 15: up to fifty three plus announce. These are price discoveries
Speaker 15: in an uncertain time. The system that was built post
Speaker 15: World War two, you know, the Breton Woods one system
Speaker 15: is unraveling, and we had Breton once two in nineteen
Speaker 15: seventy one with going off the gold standard. But this
Speaker 15: is chaos in so many ways, and I think that's
Speaker 15: what it's looking for. So fundamentals, you know, are still there.
Speaker 15: The rate cuts are important to watch because there's going
Speaker 15: to be selloffs and things happen. But and we may
Speaker 15: see a dip in gold. Further down, there may be
Speaker 15: more liquidations and holdings, and that would be a good time.
Speaker 15: You know, it's a good always good to buy someone
Speaker 15: when you see the price in the red, because we're
Speaker 15: not going back to any sort of you mentioned earlier
Speaker 15: the restoration of trust, which always reminds me of this
Speaker 15: happened in twenty eleven. If history's your guide, they you know,
Speaker 15: BERNANKI came out and said it was the Great Depression
Speaker 15: was our fault.
Speaker 8: We did that.
Speaker 15: Also, this won't happen again, and we're not going to
Speaker 15: bail these banks out. We're not going to do this
Speaker 15: massive liquidity injection again. And that was quaint as I
Speaker 15: think we're about eleven trillion in debt at the time.
Speaker 15: So now we're you know, thirty eight trillion plus in debt.
Speaker 15: Nobody believes that rhetoric anymore. So all bets are off
Speaker 15: at this point. The future is finite in the sense
Speaker 15: of commodities and the pricing of currencies because trust has diminished,
Speaker 15: and so inside the fourth turning, I think that's really
Speaker 15: important to remember. The trust is diminished in the institutions,
Speaker 15: so people are going to be looking for what they
Speaker 15: can count, what's real, or at least to the best
Speaker 15: of their ability to understand what's real and cannot be
Speaker 15: duplicated or counterfeited. That will be more and more important
Speaker 15: as the years go on. Trust outside of counterparty risk
Speaker 15: will be everything in the next five years.
Speaker 2: I agree.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we talked earlier about how Powell's term is going
Speaker 3: to end in May of next year. There's rumors now
Speaker 3: this is a newsweek talking about Donald Trump considering Sorous's
Speaker 3: soy boy Scott Bessant for the chair of the FED,
Speaker 3: and of course this type of thing that we saw
Speaker 3: with Jennet Yellen. We have this revolving door between Treasury
Speaker 3: Secretary and FED chair, kind of what you see with
Speaker 3: these high level cabinet positions with HHS and FDA and
Speaker 3: CDC going back and forth with big pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer,
Speaker 3: Moderna and Eli Lilly. So it's that kind of revolving
Speaker 3: door that's there. And it truly amazes me, Tony that
Speaker 3: the right is I see all this stuff all the
Speaker 3: time about Soros, This and sorosid and look at his
Speaker 3: connections with illegal immigration, which is true, and it's connections
Speaker 3: with Andy Via, which is true. But when it comes
Speaker 3: to Scott Bessant, the guy who helped him and actually
Speaker 3: probably masterminded the breaking of the Bank of England, they
Speaker 3: don't see anything at all there, even as this guy
Speaker 3: is breaking our farmers in order to bail out a
Speaker 3: foreign country Argentina. You know, when you look at bailouts
Speaker 3: down the road with somebody like Scott Bessant a lieutenant
Speaker 3: in there, how bad do you think that's going to
Speaker 3: be If he gets in there as a fed chair.
Speaker 3: Of course he's going to do that type of thing.
Speaker 3: It's truly amazing to me to see the people that
Speaker 3: are getting the levers of control and our government's kind
Speaker 3: of scary, frankly, and again, the thing about Trump is
Speaker 3: that he can push a globalist agenda of a great reset,
Speaker 3: he can hire Soros people to do it, and Maga
Speaker 3: people don't see it at all coming. It's truly amazing.
Speaker 15: It's kind of like the first head of the Federal
Speaker 15: Reserve was Paul Warburg. Yeah, you know, it's where they
Speaker 15: based the character Daddy Warbucks and Little orphan Annie off
Speaker 15: of you know, and if you watch the movie or
Speaker 15: watch the play, like he calls up Roosevelt and tells
Speaker 15: him what to do in the nineteen thirties that they
Speaker 15: knew that then, you know, it was the Warburgs were
Speaker 15: really out, you know, in the periphery of the House
Speaker 15: of Rothschild. Of course, his brother Max Warburg ran the
Speaker 15: Central Bank in Germany at the time. We'reklos to have
Speaker 15: this mortal enemy, you know, in the First World War.
Speaker 8: Yeah, so there's always.
Speaker 3: And he gave one and ten million dollars in gold.
Speaker 3: What else would you give him?
Speaker 2: Right right?
Speaker 3: Put him on a seal train to go in and
Speaker 3: start the Russian Revolution. Here's a bunch of gold, you know,
Speaker 3: to do something.
Speaker 8: This has always been the case.
Speaker 15: And it's always a Goldman Sacks person, you know, And
Speaker 15: I was besting is he Goldman Saxe, I'm sure or
Speaker 15: something like that. And the same thing with the the
Speaker 15: connection of sorts. It reminds me of Bill Barr.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 15: Bill Barr is picked by Trump to come in and
Speaker 15: uh be Attorney general. And we know where it's what
Speaker 15: he tracks back to what he is, you know, going
Speaker 15: back to the first Bush administration and UH being the
Speaker 15: defending lan Haruci you know who shot Vicky Weaver in
Speaker 15: the head. I mean, just these are awful people that
Speaker 15: are with the with their tentacles and you know, deep
Speaker 15: state connections and all the rest. And as long as
Speaker 15: it's you know, we have this team sport mentality in
Speaker 15: this country. If we're oh, so and so is picked
Speaker 15: by by my guy, so it absolves him, washes away
Speaker 15: all of his sins.
Speaker 2: Yeah, when you look at him.
Speaker 3: There's a lot of articles being put out by the
Speaker 3: conservatives really upset about Mom Danny. Okay for New York mayor,
Speaker 3: And here's a typical headline, Soros' fingerprints are all over
Speaker 3: the rise of Democrat socialist zoron Mom Danny And yeah, oh,
Speaker 3: I guess he's got his fingerprints on Bestlin, don't you think.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's pretty amazing, you know, Scott bessant O's
Speaker 3: his entire career to his relationship with sorrows.
Speaker 2: But that's nothing that there's nothing to see here. Just
Speaker 2: move on.
Speaker 3: We'll focus on Mom Danny, who again I'm not a
Speaker 3: fan of uh. And they can see the Sorow's fingerprints
Speaker 3: on him, but they can't see it when when Trump
Speaker 3: is there, I guess Hee wipes the fingerprints off.
Speaker 15: Oh yeah, I mean it if you start unveiling things,
Speaker 15: it confuses people.
Speaker 8: It can be I'm sure unsettling.
Speaker 15: And there's it's it's scary obviously, it's terrifying to look
Speaker 15: at the world through the lens of Wow, that's all
Speaker 15: a lie.
Speaker 8: Because you cling to like my side is fighting.
Speaker 15: I can just you know, I can turn it off
Speaker 15: for a while at my side fight it out with
Speaker 15: the other side. But what if both sides? What if
Speaker 15: it's not really a side. What if it's just you know,
Speaker 15: you got a corrupt few that are orchestrating a lot
Speaker 15: of these things. And the other Monday, I have people
Speaker 15: say that to me, So, well, wait a minute.
Speaker 3: You know, we got to have a hope in something,
Speaker 3: and you know, if if Trump can't do it, then
Speaker 3: what is our option?
Speaker 2: What do we do?
Speaker 3: I said, Well, you got to think outside the ballot box,
Speaker 3: and you know, think outside this box they put you in.
Speaker 3: Maybe your solution doesn't lie in politics and government. Maybe
Speaker 3: you need to keep an eye on them, but they're
Speaker 3: not the solution and the savior of things. And so
Speaker 3: that is a scary thing. For people, they want to
Speaker 3: have a savior that they can put their hope in.
Speaker 2: Which just leads to a fake idolatry.
Speaker 15: I think, well, it's like the I saw a meme today.
Speaker 15: It just made me laugh. It's the Star Wars. It's
Speaker 15: the Two Suns or the Two Moons or whatever it
Speaker 15: was on tattoo Wing. I think with Luke Skywalker and
Speaker 15: it says it had both the Republicans and the Democrats
Speaker 15: and it was like most important election of our lifetimes.
Speaker 8: Every and it's.
Speaker 15: The same one. It's the same, both of them saying
Speaker 15: the same things. It's the most important election of our lifetimes. Yeah,
Speaker 15: just get off that train. Yeah, that's the you know,
Speaker 15: you're just caught up in that. Unfortunately, it's about ideas
Speaker 15: and about what you do as an individual. It's a
Speaker 15: it's it's the it's a counterintuitive way to deal with
Speaker 15: this amount of corruption. But you know, just joining it
Speaker 15: and getting in team sports it just encourages some folks
Speaker 15: stop doing That's right.
Speaker 3: We'll tell us at a bit about what's going on
Speaker 3: with a team wolf Pack there and uh and what's
Speaker 3: happening with Wise wolf Gold before we.
Speaker 15: Go, well, I'm going to make some announcements soon. I
Speaker 15: may put up a I don't know. I'm thinking about
Speaker 15: doing something really different here at the Texas location.
Speaker 8: I may start refining, but I don't know.
Speaker 15: I may put up an opportunity if somebody wants to
Speaker 15: join in with me on it.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 8: I've been running it through.
Speaker 2: Are you talking about urban mining and.
Speaker 8: I'm talking about Actually there's so I have that.
Speaker 15: I'm in the Bank location now and it's not a
Speaker 15: very big building, but I'm in the back. I've it's
Speaker 15: all wired in and I could put in, you know,
Speaker 15: the equipment to melt and refine, and put my own bars.
Speaker 15: I could make once, you know, you could. I could
Speaker 15: even be a hub for dealers to sell scrap gold
Speaker 15: and silver to. And right now the refiners aren't even
Speaker 15: melting silver day like they won't take it. So they're like,
Speaker 15: we're too busy because they're buying so much and that
Speaker 15: and that may that may ease up here shortly with
Speaker 15: the prices being down a little further. But I'm just stockpile,
Speaker 15: like I kept my buy. I still even though I
Speaker 15: can't melt it, I'm still buying uh scrap silver, which
Speaker 15: you know sterling silver you know, all the dinnerware and
Speaker 15: you know, jewelry and other things.
Speaker 3: So keep your eye out for that stuff coming from
Speaker 3: the louver, right. I think that's got more than scrap
Speaker 3: value associated with it.
Speaker 15: I think so there's there's some stuff that has got
Speaker 15: more than scrap value for sure.
Speaker 8: But yeah, I'm thinking about doing something with that. So
Speaker 8: I don't know.
Speaker 15: I there's there's gonna be so much opportunity in the
Speaker 15: coming years.
Speaker 8: I want to be able to better serve people. We
Speaker 8: so I'm working on that.
Speaker 15: And we've got, of course wolf Pack and just keeping
Speaker 15: that supply, which is you know every week and you
Speaker 15: talk about it.
Speaker 8: It's it's a weird place.
Speaker 15: I'm sourcing different products and we appreciate anybody who's part
Speaker 15: of wolf Pack. You know, we've got the I think
Speaker 15: we got the best precious Meedtal subscription service in the
Speaker 15: business in my opinion on variety, and uh I agree, yeah,
Speaker 15: in service. I got a great team. So just keeping
Speaker 15: these things afloat, I'm really grateful.
Speaker 3: I don't MV your job because you know, we're talking
Speaker 3: about how difficult things are for farmers and cattlemen and
Speaker 3: all the rest of the stuff, and and yet you know,
Speaker 3: you're in this very volatile uh situation as well, where
Speaker 3: the price is fluctuating quite a bit. It's it's very
Speaker 3: difficult to navigate those waters on a storm like that.
Speaker 8: Yeah, well, I think I'm built for it.
Speaker 15: I think fortunately for me, God wanted me to do
Speaker 15: this if I I think I'd have failed long ago
Speaker 15: if I didn't have his help.
Speaker 3: So you know, at least you've had a lot of
Speaker 3: experience with it. That's that's good to have that. Well,
Speaker 3: thank you so much for coming on and really really
Speaker 3: do appreciate your support of our show here and if
Speaker 3: you want to go to Tony, you can also find
Speaker 3: a wolf pack and everything else there David Knight dot Gold.
Speaker 3: He can help you with metal iras. He can also
Speaker 3: help you with large purchases or with the wolf pack
Speaker 3: where you can start to gradually accumulate physical metals that
Speaker 3: are going to retain their value in this very chaotic
Speaker 3: environment that we're in right now. Thank you so much, Tony,
Speaker 3: appreciate it.
Speaker 2: Folks.
Speaker 3: We're going to take a quick break and we'll be
Speaker 3: right beck. We'll play the monster job here for you again.
Speaker 9: I was working on the news late one night for
Speaker 9: my eyes beheld and recite for the monster's head.
Speaker 3: Rehearse to my surprise, the tactics to inject what they divide.
Speaker 3: The monster is the job job. The spikes a graveyard stand.
Speaker 3: I caught on in a flash job. The monster is
Speaker 3: the jaz last in the castle, least to the FBA
Speaker 3: with a form of vampires feast the goold rehearsed before
Speaker 3: nine one one had a poison us, which is what
Speaker 3: they've done.
Speaker 2: The monster is the jazz job.
Speaker 3: The spikes are graveyard staff. I'll put you on a slab.
Speaker 3: The job. The monster is the job. Big Pharma was
Speaker 3: having fun. The party had just begun. The guests included
Speaker 3: Fauci Trump, then Biden. Scene was a lockdown. All we're
Speaker 3: fearing the news. The fly chains were broken. We were
Speaker 3: singing the blues. The coffins, they told us, were about drive.
Speaker 3: You can see it all on Channel five.
Speaker 10: Job.
Speaker 3: The monster is the Jabster job. The spikes a graveyard stab.
Speaker 3: It'll put you on a slab, the jab The monster
Speaker 3: is the jab From the Oval office. His voice did ring.
Speaker 2: Hospital cash registers went a ching.
Speaker 3: When people caught on to keep on the list, they said,
Speaker 3: whatever happened to the Wuhan Lab.
Speaker 6: The Job.
Speaker 3: The monster is the Jab, Monster Job, the spikes, a
Speaker 3: graveyard stab.
Speaker 2: He'll put you on a slab.
Speaker 14: The job.
Speaker 3: The monster is the Jab. Now everything's cool. Lab leaks
Speaker 3: a part of the planet. Their alibi echoes throughout the
Speaker 3: land for you, the living, and they'll try it again
Speaker 3: when they get to your door. Tell them farmer, no
Speaker 3: more is the Jab. The monster is the Jab, Jab,
Speaker 3: the spikes, the graveyard stab.
Speaker 2: It'll put you on a slab.
Speaker 10: The job. The monster is the Job.
Speaker 5: You.
Speaker 16: Elvis the Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown find
Speaker 16: them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 3: Well, welcome back, and we've got a sale to tell
Speaker 3: you about a product that's on sale.
Speaker 5: That's right, Homestead Products dot shop is having a sale
Speaker 5: on their freeze dried egg. It comes in a my
Speaker 5: lar packaging which gives it a twenty five year shelf life.
Speaker 5: So it's a great thing to add to your storable
Speaker 5: foods collection.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you know a lot of this stuff that people
Speaker 3: buy for storable foods as just like carbs and crackers
Speaker 3: and garbage filled chips and stuff like that, which I mean,
Speaker 3: there comes a.
Speaker 5: Point where you'll need anything.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and you probably want some of that too, you know,
Speaker 3: you want to have some twinkies. They have a very
Speaker 3: long self fry five here. There's nothing real in there.
Speaker 3: But this is healthy and has a really long shelf
Speaker 3: life and a lot of protein and and of course
Speaker 3: as well.
Speaker 5: That's right.
Speaker 2: Freeze dried eggs.
Speaker 5: Freeze dried eggs that come from free range hens. They
Speaker 5: make sure that their hens are living a good life.
Speaker 5: These are high quality eggs before they're freeze dried, and
Speaker 5: their high quality still afterwards. Like I said, it comes
Speaker 5: in a my lar package, can last up to twenty
Speaker 5: five years. It's great for survival food that you're going
Speaker 5: to store, or if you're taking a camping trip and
Speaker 5: want something you can just take with you. So home
Speaker 5: Seid Products dot shop sale on their freeze dried eggs,
Speaker 5: and you can use promo code night at Homestead Products
Speaker 5: dot shop for ten percent off anything in the store.
Speaker 5: So go support them. They're the good guys. And I
Speaker 5: also let's go. I want to think I've been making
Speaker 5: notes since we're having problems. Radut Bro, thank you very much,
Speaker 5: He says, Americans want or too out of highlux. One
Speaker 5: of the only manual modern cars we can't have in America,
Speaker 5: but it's the land of the Free and home of
Speaker 5: the slave for us.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that Toyota Highlux that was legendary with Tarkson and
Speaker 3: top Gear. Yeah, they had an episode where they tried
Speaker 3: to kill one of these things. They think to it,
Speaker 3: and then they gave it a place of honor hanging
Speaker 3: up from the ceiling that after they.
Speaker 5: As a mashed wreck.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they'd wrecked it in so many different and it
Speaker 2: just kept going and going.
Speaker 3: And I think it was a diesel I believe so
Speaker 3: Diesel high Lux. But yeah, so who knows. Maybe they'll
Speaker 3: lip and some of this stuff up.
Speaker 5: Nah, not happening.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm not going to get our diesels bike probably.
Speaker 5: And s a Miller. Thank you. That was very, very generous.
Speaker 5: We really do appreciate it. Says greetings everyone. Thank you
Speaker 5: especially to the Night family for always making my mornings
Speaker 5: interesting and blessed. Let's do let's all do what we
Speaker 5: can to keep it going, stay safe and hope filled.
Speaker 5: Thank you very much. As similar, thank you for those
Speaker 5: words of encouragement.
Speaker 2: Yes, do you want to read these other comments before
Speaker 2: we begin?
Speaker 5: Here a minute man militia. They should put that statue
Speaker 5: of Trump and Epstein holding hands to the centerpiece. That's right,
Speaker 5: but it directly dead center of the ballroom.
Speaker 3: Well they did in that commercial, and also you had
Speaker 3: Brian Scholhave in his article where he called it the
Speaker 3: pedophile Palace.
Speaker 2: He had that.
Speaker 3: Top in center of his article as well. They don't
Speaker 3: want people to know these guys were such close friends.
Speaker 3: As I said, I think it's kind of interesting with
Speaker 3: all this law fair bullying tactics and intimidation, threatening to
Speaker 3: suit people for billions of dollars, and this guy and
Speaker 3: Michael wolf may blow.
Speaker 2: This whole thing up.
Speaker 3: He's done several books and had direct interviews with Trump.
Speaker 3: Trumps stopped with all that stuff because the interviews the
Speaker 3: books were not complimentary. But he also did interviews with
Speaker 3: Jeffrey Epstein. I played that cliff for Yesterday where he
Speaker 3: and I believed for the longest time this was true.
Speaker 3: The timing was just too coincidental that somebody reported Epstein
Speaker 3: is being a pedophile right about the time these two
Speaker 3: guys broke up their fifteen year friendship and it got
Speaker 3: really acrimonious, and Epstein told Michael Wolfe about that and
Speaker 3: even said I think I went too far once Michael
Speaker 3: wolf reported that in his book he says, I think
Speaker 3: I went too far, And he said, right after that
Speaker 3: call I got from him, he was immediately arrested as
Speaker 3: he came back to the United States, and then we
Speaker 3: know what happened after that. So, yeah, he was taken
Speaker 3: out one way or the other where he's alive, whether
Speaker 3: he's alive or dead, he was taken out of the situation.
Speaker 5: And so isn't that an anonymous tip call you'd like
Speaker 5: to hear though? This guy Epstein, bad guy. He's doing
Speaker 5: bad things. The kids on an island. You got to
Speaker 5: go check it out now that I've been there.
Speaker 3: Just and that's the point he was making. He said,
Speaker 3: you know, Trump knew all this stuff for him to
Speaker 3: be able to be an informant, which is not just
Speaker 3: Michael Wolfe saying that. That's what Mike Johnson said. He said, hey,
Speaker 3: you know Trump was an informant. He wants people to
Speaker 3: know what Jeffrey Epstein was doing. Well, he didn't want
Speaker 3: people to know until they had that fight over the
Speaker 3: real estate, I think, but he's going to get discovery
Speaker 3: and he's actually after they threatened him, he went on
Speaker 3: offense against Millennia and Trump, and he is sticking to
Speaker 3: the story that he says that Jeffrey Epstein told him
Speaker 3: that it was you know, Jeffrey Epstein was one who
Speaker 3: introduced the two of them, that he was central to
Speaker 3: their relationship. When you look at those pictures of the
Speaker 3: foursome that they had there, it's pretty amazing pictures. It's
Speaker 3: a real jaw dropper to look at that.
Speaker 4: Yeah, we have the deck I believe what's that? Oh wait,
Speaker 4: nomber one. I was thinking of a different picture of
Speaker 4: them together, Trump and Epstein, and.
Speaker 3: Yeah, there's a foursome picture of them where they're just
Speaker 3: standing there, all four of them posing. And there's another
Speaker 3: picture where she's like looking at Jeffrey Epstein and very
Speaker 3: seductively and leaning up against him, and it's like.
Speaker 2: They have a history here. I don't know what's going
Speaker 2: on with that.
Speaker 5: But gross Brian and Dev McCartney says, all the big
Speaker 5: Pallenteer donors.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 4: Volunteer is also one of the donors. I have a
Speaker 4: full list here. We didn't get to that.
Speaker 5: Yeah, very bottom there here we are Pallunteer. Yeah, bounded
Speaker 5: in two thousand and three by Peter Thiel, known anti
Speaker 5: christ obsessive.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's yeah.
Speaker 3: You would expect them to be there, and I'm sure
Speaker 3: that they're going to be buying influence as they always
Speaker 3: are doing.
Speaker 5: President Avonte seventeen seventy six.
Speaker 3: Hope Picks, that was it. That's the person I was
Speaker 3: trying to think of, communications director.
Speaker 5: I would have never gotten it, Hope Picks. That name
Speaker 5: came and went and has been removed from my memory.
Speaker 5: It will go again once we are done with the show.
Speaker 2: Well, thank you.
Speaker 3: That's the one I was thinking of, because she was
Speaker 3: communications director.
Speaker 2: I'm not really sure what that was. She wasn't pressed.
Speaker 2: I could there. She's communications director.
Speaker 5: Whatever that means.
Speaker 2: Personal assistant to the president.
Speaker 5: Isn't good for you, Hope. I'm sure you had many
Speaker 5: talents and skills a Syrian girl. Don't see how they
Speaker 5: can be looking for a bubble in gold to burst.
Speaker 5: The bubble is in global fa and it's been exposed.
Speaker 2: Yep. That's right.
Speaker 5: Gold gets gold becomes more expensive as the dollar grows
Speaker 5: weaker and weaker. It's just inverse. The real Octo Spook,
Speaker 5: four thousand dollars of gold goes unnoticed. In my pocket.
Speaker 5: Same amount of coffee and sugar won't fit. The value
Speaker 5: of gold is much larger than just monetary.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 5: To be fair in the coming times, I may if
Speaker 5: you've got four thousand dollars worth of coffee and I've
Speaker 5: got four thousand dollars worth of gold, you may be
Speaker 5: in the stronger bargaining position. Considering now much of a
Speaker 5: coffee addict. I am please, I'll do anything I need
Speaker 5: the caffeine. Nice of the Storm Tony sends out the
Speaker 5: gold backs and one grand bar is in the wolf packs.
Speaker 5: That's one way to get a little at a time.
Speaker 5: It's right. And of course Knights of the Storm is
Speaker 5: Jason Barker, Angry Tiger, Karen Carpenter, and I believe others.
Speaker 5: You can catch them on their programs and you can
Speaker 5: go to Nights of Thestorm dot com to find out
Speaker 5: when the programs are that include our program, Guards Program,
Speaker 5: Tony's program, and others. Nights of Thestorm dot com. The
Speaker 5: James Mason zero five two one? What AI did they
Speaker 5: use to make that video?
Speaker 4: Mostly and Cling When two point two can be run
Speaker 4: locally and some of them were done with fast When,
Speaker 4: which is a faster local thing and then cling you
Speaker 4: have to pay for. And some of them were done
Speaker 4: with WHEN two point five, which is number online paid thing,
Speaker 4: and also the images were created with Daniel Banana before that.
Speaker 4: So it's a combination of a bunch of AI tools,
Speaker 4: some online, some offline.
Speaker 3: Well, you're real spot on with all the characterizations of people.
Speaker 3: Fauci I liked Trump even though it didn't look all
Speaker 3: but much like Trump. I liked him as a swamp
Speaker 3: creature with spikes on his shoulder. It's a great characterization.
Speaker 3: But the Gates vampire was was really spot on.
Speaker 2: And we got the invisible man there. He's a little
Speaker 2: bit hard to see. It's kind of dark.
Speaker 3: Maybe you need to lighten that scene up, but that
Speaker 3: was a cool invisible man that was there.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I should put him against a lighter background.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, something there to lighten him up because he's invisible,
Speaker 3: you know.
Speaker 2: A little bit harder.
Speaker 5: That's his entire stick.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's it's a superpower right there.
Speaker 5: Brian and de McCartney says, will this piece be sharable?
Speaker 5: And I assume it's.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we gotta tweak it a little bit more. I mean,
Speaker 3: we wanted since it's a kind of Halloween season and thing.
Speaker 3: But Almos, all those characters as well as what they
Speaker 3: did in twenty twenty, I think is a.
Speaker 2: True horror story.
Speaker 3: It's scarier than anything that Hollywood could cream up, certainly
Speaker 3: scarier than the old Universal monsters that were the center
Speaker 3: of what was the guy's name, Boris Boris Karloff, Yeah,
Speaker 3: Boris Karloff. But the guy that did Boris Pickett was
Speaker 3: his name, or that was his nickname.
Speaker 4: Balby Boris something.
Speaker 3: Yeahickett, Yeah, the guy who did the thing initially.
Speaker 5: So got a question here from tunnel Lord one three
Speaker 5: three seven says, was David the singer of that music video?
Speaker 3: Yes, yes, if you could call it singing, it was
Speaker 3: just kind of speaking the words there. But yes, unfortunately
Speaker 3: that was me. Only so much we could do to
Speaker 3: my voice to make it sound and I don't know
Speaker 3: if it's even acceptable. But one of the things that
Speaker 3: we want to do before we make it shareable is
Speaker 3: I want to put up the have subtitles for the lyrics.
Speaker 3: We need to run that through a film that's going
Speaker 3: to throw that stuff up, because that's the key message
Speaker 3: we want people to get across. So going to the
Speaker 3: story that I mentioned at the top of the show,
Speaker 3: the world's first AI minister is pregnant with eighty three
Speaker 3: offspring and the government announce it, which is just the
Speaker 3: creepiest headline I think I've seen it in a long time,
Speaker 3: the whole image of pregnant AI about to drop eighty
Speaker 3: three offspring like some kind of a spider or something.
Speaker 3: The world's first AI minister, which has been named Dala
Speaker 3: by Prime Minister of Albania, I guess we should say Diella.
Speaker 3: Diella is expected to give birth to eighty three offspring.
Speaker 3: Each of them will be assigned to assist a member
Speaker 3: of parliament. But again they choose this kind of pagan
Speaker 3: imagery like Gaia or something, and they have done this
Speaker 3: in Albania. I hope we don't go down the same path.
Speaker 3: They're trying to personify this AI and the whole idea
Speaker 3: behind it is that Albania is such a corrupt government.
Speaker 3: In this country, they said that we got to get
Speaker 3: away from humans because the corruption is so bad. I
Speaker 3: can see us going in that direction.
Speaker 4: So now they're going to have an extra layer of
Speaker 4: detachment between the corruption and the people that are suffering
Speaker 4: from it, so that you don't see who's actually taking
Speaker 4: the money. You just see the results of the AIS
Speaker 4: that they program.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: You don't want to see that man behind the curtain
Speaker 3: that's actually pulling the strings on this. And so I
Speaker 3: think can pretend that it is something that is not
Speaker 3: biable and not controllable and not by these people, that
Speaker 3: it's completely objective and honest. It became one of the
Speaker 3: earliest nations to deploy an AI chatbot that they call
Speaker 3: Diella as a public administration assistant. Then to become the
Speaker 3: first country with an AI government official when it elevated
Speaker 3: the chat bot to the role of Minister of State
Speaker 3: for Artificial Intelligence. So they actually made a gave it
Speaker 3: a cabinet position, someway.
Speaker 4: And it is not a conflict of interest. That's an
Speaker 4: ALI itself.
Speaker 3: Is going to be regulating yourself kind of the same
Speaker 3: type of thing that we do with the FDA and
Speaker 3: pharmaceutical companies and with the banking industry and all the
Speaker 3: rest of the stuff. We've already established that precedent here.
Speaker 3: These children are as these children will have its mother's
Speaker 3: knowledge regarding EU legislation. They said, if you go for
Speaker 3: college for coffee and you forget to come back to work.
Speaker 3: This child will say what was said when you were
Speaker 3: out of the room, And if your name is mentioned,
Speaker 3: and if you have to counterattack someone who mentioned you
Speaker 3: for the wrong reasons, your AI assistant will tell you, oh.
Speaker 4: Good thing, we have an ALI that now. I mean
Speaker 4: people used to just have to record meetings or have
Speaker 4: someone there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, or actually be at the meeting. You know. Just
Speaker 2: think about this.
Speaker 3: You go out for coffee and you forget to come
Speaker 3: back to work. That's the beginning of this whole thing.
Speaker 5: This is so stereotypically Balkan. Everything I hear coming out
Speaker 5: of the Balkan States is just, yeah, our politicians are
Speaker 5: so ludicrously corrupt. What if you just step out for
Speaker 5: coffee and you forget to come back to your bureaucrat
Speaker 5: job that day. Just this is so incredibly Balkan that
Speaker 5: it's hard for me to read. I have routinely said
Speaker 5: I don't know about on the show, but the Balkans
Speaker 5: are all hilariously similar to outside viewers. The Balkan States,
Speaker 5: they're barely different, but they all hate each other with
Speaker 5: passion that is hard to rival. Every Balkan state hates
Speaker 5: every other Balkan state for no particular reason other than
Speaker 5: they have long history.
Speaker 3: Well it's a cradle of World War One.
Speaker 5: Right, they all hate each other and they're all so
Speaker 5: similar that you can't tell the difference they can.
Speaker 4: I mean, I would say this sounds like just about
Speaker 4: any corrupt politics stuff like you see with all these
Speaker 4: senile politicians in America that are on so many drugs
Speaker 4: that the doctors say if Americans knew what these people
Speaker 4: were on, they would be terrified.
Speaker 3: Well, especially when it got to the thing where you know,
Speaker 3: if you're not in the room and these people are
Speaker 3: talking about you, it'll tell you, so you'll know who
Speaker 3: to counter attacks. O. This sounds like Trump. Trump needs this.
Speaker 3: Actually it sounds like the Trump administration. But all of
Speaker 3: that is a hallmark. Even when this guy talks about
Speaker 3: how well we're going to use AI because we've got
Speaker 3: so much corruption of the humans here, and then the
Speaker 3: case that he makes for AI just shows the corrupt
Speaker 3: mentality of these people. You go to coffee and you
Speaker 3: forget to come back, and you want to know what
Speaker 3: they're saying about you this meeting that you're not at.
Speaker 5: Yeah, quick, activate the corruption matrix. Run the bribery protocols.
Speaker 3: It's a bold escalation from the Prime Minister's stance just
Speaker 3: a few months ago when Rama, the Prime Minister, first
Speaker 3: came up the idea of an AI minister to make
Speaker 3: a point about stamping out nepotism and conflicts of interest
Speaker 3: in the nation's infamously corrupt government.
Speaker 2: Well, it looks like.
Speaker 3: They you know, you can, you can put AI there,
Speaker 3: but it's still going to have the nature of corrupt
Speaker 3: humanity there, especially of a corrupt government, will be there.
Speaker 3: Centators have unveiled a bill to ban AI chatbot companions
Speaker 3: for miners, and this is I'm so.
Speaker 5: Glad the government's finally going to do something about this.
Speaker 5: I mean depending upon parents to actually take care of
Speaker 5: their children.
Speaker 3: Yeah, what we're thinking this is the nanny state right here,
Speaker 3: and it is bipartisan. But the people who are leading
Speaker 3: it in the first place, or Republicans, people like Josh Holly,
Speaker 3: you know, when we look at this, didn't it used
Speaker 3: to be that we would say the Democrats are about
Speaker 3: nanny government. And yet you got the GOP, which is
Speaker 3: not just GOP guarding our pedophiles, but it's now GOP
Speaker 3: as they see themselves as guardian or parent. We don't
Speaker 3: need the government being nanny. We don't need them to
Speaker 3: be a GOP guardian or parent, and we don't need
Speaker 3: them to be guarding our pedophiles. And the reality of
Speaker 3: this is, how are you going to how are you
Speaker 3: going to enforce this right? Well, they're going to enforce
Speaker 3: it by starting to require a digital IDA on everybody.
Speaker 3: We've seen this is not the first time we've seen
Speaker 3: the Republican Party come up with something like this and say,
Speaker 3: we've got to protect the kids from pornography on the internet. Yes,
Speaker 3: you do, but that's the parent's position to do that.
Speaker 3: And if they're going to do that, then that's basically
Speaker 3: a back door to having a digital ID for people.
Speaker 3: And the Republicans that's their two favorite tactics to get
Speaker 3: digital ID to us. Number one the immigration, open borders,
Speaker 3: taking people's jobs, that's number one. Number two is protecting
Speaker 3: the kids. And so they're always coming up with these
Speaker 3: type of issues. Republicans are being joined in this with
Speaker 3: Mark Warner, Democrat of Virginia, Chris Murphy, Democrat of Kentucky,
Speaker 3: and then on the Republican side, you got Katie Britt
Speaker 3: from Alabama and you have Josh Holly from Missouri, the
Speaker 3: two Republicans on it. It would require AI companies to
Speaker 3: implement an age verification process. What's that going to be
Speaker 3: id and ban those companies from providing AI companions to minors.
Speaker 3: The whole AI companion thing is just so sick and disgusting. Frankly,
Speaker 3: it's kind of a sign of our times.
Speaker 2: I think.
Speaker 3: So Amazon has been caught somebody who's leaked a document
Speaker 3: to the Guardian who's reported that Amazon had internal documents
Speaker 3: scheming to keep the amount of water that their AI
Speaker 3: data center is using secret. I guess it's kind of
Speaker 3: like an Amazon river terms the quantity of water that
Speaker 3: these things use, and it truly is amazing. The document
Speaker 3: shows that Amazon used one hundred and five billion gallons
Speaker 3: of water in twenty twenty one, significantly more than the
Speaker 3: company publicly disclosed. What happens to the water when they
Speaker 3: quote unquote use it? What do they heat it upisode
Speaker 3: it turns to steam and goes away? What happens to it?
Speaker 3: Is it contaminated that they can't reuse it?
Speaker 5: I feel like it has to just be recycled somewhere.
Speaker 3: You'd think, yeah, we do have this, this cycling of water.
Speaker 3: That happens naturally.
Speaker 4: But what I mean if you look at the nuclear
Speaker 4: power plants, they just have the big smoke stacks for
Speaker 4: the water vapor to evaporate off of. If it's a
Speaker 4: large enough thing, it might not be practical for them
Speaker 4: to recycle the thing. They're using it for cooling.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it might be like those condensing towers that are there,
Speaker 3: and hopefully it's not radioactive. If it's just steam, it's
Speaker 3: gonna find its way back into becoming water at some
Speaker 3: point in time, some way. If your data centers are
Speaker 3: guzzling more water than a major US center city, you
Speaker 3: face a choice. You can either come clean to the
Speaker 3: public and risk the bad press, or you can hide
Speaker 3: what is happening. And they chose to do that. According
Speaker 3: to a document that was leaked to The Guardian, Amazon
Speaker 3: executives exchanged notes about keeping the masses ignorant about the
Speaker 3: true extent of the staggering amount of water that their
Speaker 3: data centers use. They said Amazon used one hundred and
Speaker 3: five billion gallons of water in twenty twenty one. That
Speaker 3: is as much as nearly a million US households nine
Speaker 3: hundred and fifty eight thousand and it's as much water
Speaker 3: as is used by a city bigger than San Francisco. So,
Speaker 3: like I said, it's crimey a river, it's like the
Speaker 3: Amazon River. They only disclosed, however, that they had used
Speaker 3: seven point seven billion gallons of water, so they only
Speaker 3: talked about roughly seven percent of what they had used.
Speaker 3: The two publications report that the creative accounting was done
Speaker 3: to ease executives' anxiety about reputational risk. The paper even
Speaker 3: included theoretical headlines like Amazon hides its water consumption. If
Speaker 3: we do this, you know, and we get caught, it
Speaker 3: might look like a headline like this, which is what
Speaker 3: it did look like. In terms of the headline, they
Speaker 3: predicted the future.
Speaker 4: There you go, thanks writing these easy.
Speaker 3: They even gave us a headline for the article, and
Speaker 3: Amazon spokesman added in twenty twenty two document was now obsolete,
Speaker 3: but then declined to explain what exactly was outdated and
Speaker 3: why it was outdated. By far the largest operator of
Speaker 3: data centers around the globe, Amazon has no legal incentive
Speaker 3: to share water usage numbers with the public under US law,
Speaker 3: so you know, they can try to keep that quiet.
Speaker 3: One thing they're not keeping quiet is the fact, they
Speaker 3: may be using a lot of water, but they're getting
Speaker 3: ready to not use a lot of employees. They have
Speaker 3: fired thirty thousand. I think I saw it on Babel
Speaker 3: and Bee. They said Elizabeth Warren complains that Amazon is
Speaker 3: exploiting their workers in this horrible place to work. But
Speaker 3: now they have fired fired. She's now upset that they
Speaker 3: fired thirty thousand people that were there. It's kind of
Speaker 3: like that joke the two old ladies. The one said
Speaker 3: that food was horrible and the other one said yeah.
Speaker 3: And then such low quantities as well, such small portions.
Speaker 3: And so that's kind of what's happening with Amazon. Is
Speaker 3: it a good thing or a bad thing when you
Speaker 3: lose your job working for a company like that. But
Speaker 3: these were not warehouse jobs where they really come down
Speaker 3: on the people. I mean, they may give you time
Speaker 3: to go to the bathroom. You know, you've got to
Speaker 3: take something so that they can go to the bathroom
Speaker 3: at your station because it takes you too long to
Speaker 3: walk back to do that. So these were corporate positions.
Speaker 3: They got fired thirty thousand of those. I didn't realize
Speaker 3: that Amazon is the nation's second largest private employer. They
Speaker 3: have one and a half million people working for them globally,
Speaker 3: and so this is the thirty thousand staffers are across
Speaker 3: their corporate offices. And they've got about three hundred and
Speaker 3: fifty thousand corporate employees, so that's about eight and a
Speaker 3: half percent that they're cutting right there. And one fell
Speaker 3: swoop and they said that they're looking at hundreds of
Speaker 3: thousands of people being fired because they want to completely
Speaker 3: automate their warehouses. Now, if anybody can do that, I
Speaker 3: think Amazon can do it. I mean, they're heavily automated
Speaker 3: right now. If you look at the robots that they're using.
Speaker 3: They've got like these little rumba robots that get under
Speaker 3: these trays and you know, of products, racks of products
Speaker 3: and move those racks of products from place to place.
Speaker 3: And they're going to be using the robots to pick
Speaker 3: product out and fill the orders as well.
Speaker 5: They've also driven away most of their competition, so they
Speaker 5: don't have to worry that well, while we get these
Speaker 5: kinks worked out, while things are a little bit shaky,
Speaker 5: while the robots might get you the wrong order a
Speaker 5: bit more frequently than human packers will, where else are
Speaker 5: you going to go? You don't have many other options.
Speaker 5: There's Walmart. You know, you've got a couple of small
Speaker 5: mom and pop shops left, but chances are they don't
Speaker 5: carry a lot of what you're gonna need. Amazon effectively, well,
Speaker 5: they largely have a monopoly. Most people have an Amazon's
Speaker 5: description at this point and they buy everything.
Speaker 3: And it's very easy to shop online as opposed to
Speaker 3: trying to find something in physical You know, if it's
Speaker 3: something that's unusual, a niche product or something like that,
Speaker 3: or something that's a technical product, you never know where
Speaker 3: you're going to be able to find that anymore. And
Speaker 3: it's a self enforcing thing as Amazon gets bigger and bigger,
Speaker 3: and it makes it harder and harder for the physical
Speaker 3: locations that we try to use the physical locations as
Speaker 3: much as we can, but.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's just it's difficult. There's not many places left.
Speaker 5: You know, when we were redoing the studio needed some
Speaker 5: cabling and things, and there's a radio shack nearby a and.
Speaker 2: They don't care much anymore.
Speaker 5: They've got a very limited selection. I was able to
Speaker 5: find one of the cables I needed there.
Speaker 2: That was it.
Speaker 5: Everything else had to be ordered from online retailers, you know,
Speaker 5: places like you know, Sweetwater, B and H. And that's
Speaker 5: really Amazon's only competition is in these niche markets where
Speaker 5: there's already a large retailer that exists.
Speaker 4: Yeah, you know, especially after the lockdown killed a lot
Speaker 4: more of these small businesses, it's hard for them to
Speaker 4: compete against something that large just in an open market.
Speaker 4: But it wasn't.
Speaker 3: Didn't Fry Electronics to go out in twenty twenty, there
Speaker 3: was a large.
Speaker 5: I think, so either they're totally gone or they cut
Speaker 5: down to just the minimum minimum stores. But I think
Speaker 5: they're totally gone. Yeah, because if the Austin location isn't profitable,
Speaker 5: it's are to imagine they're profitable in any other locations.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they were really kind of a successor and an
Speaker 3: improvement over what Radio Shock get then.
Speaker 5: When I was in college or Circuit City.
Speaker 4: Yeah, there's Microcenter now, but they're only in a few cities.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, the thing about Fry was actually did have electronics
Speaker 3: and components and things like that.
Speaker 5: Yeah, you could go out of you could go into
Speaker 5: Fries and build yourself a PC. You could get basically
Speaker 5: every single thing you needed there. And you know that
Speaker 5: doesn't really exist an I'm sure certain places have smaller
Speaker 5: stores dedicated to that sort of thing. But they can't
Speaker 5: compete with Amazon. No one can at this point anymore.
Speaker 5: So they're free too. Like I said, roll this out
Speaker 5: if it causes problems, so what, maybe you lose a
Speaker 5: small portion of your customer base, but they're probably going
Speaker 5: to come back eventually, because where can they go?
Speaker 3: Yeah that's right, Well again, where can we go?
Speaker 2: You know?
Speaker 3: If you know we've done, our jobs have been our businesses,
Speaker 3: even service businesses, have been taken over by the big
Speaker 3: box retailers with the assistance of the lockdown that Trump
Speaker 3: imposed in twenty twenty. Universal basic income, and of course
Speaker 3: that was something that Elon Musk's first foray into politics
Speaker 3: in a big way was the support of Andrew Yang,
Speaker 3: who was running on that single issue. When he began,
Speaker 3: he was trying to push for universal basic income. And
Speaker 3: this is something that Elon Musk as well as Michael
Speaker 3: Bloomberg in that election cycle, they're both pushing UBI because
Speaker 3: again they want to take everybody's jobs, making slavery great again.
Speaker 3: Is the Brownstone article from David Bell. He said, I
Speaker 3: once worked in the communities that were supported mainly through
Speaker 3: a form of universal basic income. Most money was received
Speaker 3: from the government for no or for token work, or
Speaker 3: from running or from mining royalties, where others worked digging
Speaker 3: on the community's lands. Were walls that were black and
Speaker 3: heaving with cockroaches, while children slept with dogs on stained
Speaker 3: mattresses below, and babies covered head to toe and pustular
Speaker 3: scabies while the mother complained about a sore back. This
Speaker 3: is not universal, but it was not uncommon. Other communities
Speaker 3: that stood out as strong and healthy had people working
Speaker 3: hard for a living, particularly in roles that reflected their culture,
Speaker 3: a very different economy. And you know, this is the
Speaker 3: type of thing that was described by losing ground. It
Speaker 3: was Charles Murray's book in the early nineteen eighties talking
Speaker 3: about how demoralizing welfare is, and yet he's now become
Speaker 3: a supporter of universal basic income, which is amazing. Universal
Speaker 3: basic income is just universal welfare with all the problems
Speaker 3: that we have seen with that. He said, men who
Speaker 3: once worked hard to support families lose the reason to
Speaker 3: do so when it makes no real difference. When the
Speaker 3: basics of life and leisure are equally available to those
Speaker 3: who work for them and those who do nothing. It's
Speaker 3: not a political issue. It's just human behavioral and psychological one.
Speaker 3: A loss of interest in the world, a loss of role,
Speaker 3: in other words, a loss of dignity, and therefore depression.
Speaker 3: This is not theoretical. It can be seen all of
Speaker 3: the world with the people of all different types of backgrounds,
Speaker 3: and this is I think one of the most insidious
Speaker 3: things that was done with the Trump lockdown. Not only
Speaker 3: did they put a lot of people out of work
Speaker 3: and out of business, the small businesses that were there,
Speaker 3: but it was also combined with the STEMI check. I
Speaker 3: believe that it was a psychological test. These people always
Speaker 3: talking about how they wanted to run a test on
Speaker 3: universal basic income, and it's like, well, we know what
Speaker 3: will happen if you give somebody one thousand dollars a
Speaker 3: month and you pick five hundred people in a society.
Speaker 3: But you know, it's not going to be a healthy
Speaker 3: thing for them. It's not going to be a healthy
Speaker 3: thing for society either. But it was a giant experiment,
Speaker 3: I believe. And you know, when you look at Bef Skinner,
Speaker 3: the guy who's kind of the father of behavioral psychology,
Speaker 3: his seminal book was Beyond Freedom and Dignity, I can
Speaker 3: think of no better label for what Donald Trump and
Speaker 3: the other global leaders pushed on all of us in
Speaker 3: twenty twenty than to say that it was truly beyond
Speaker 3: freedom and dignity. It was anesthetical to both of those things. Well,
Speaker 3: we're going to take a quick break and when we
Speaker 3: come back, we're going to take a look at that
Speaker 3: story about the truck driver. And we told you about
Speaker 3: that was intercepted. I think you're going to want.
Speaker 2: To see this.
Speaker 3: It's pretty crazy, actually, But we'll take a quick break
Speaker 3: and we'll be right back.
Speaker 17: Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Yet, Laos, your annual Global Risk
Speaker 17: Report makes for a stunning and sobering read for the
Speaker 17: global business community. The top concern for the next two
Speaker 17: years is not conflict or climate. It is disinformation and misinformation,
Speaker 17: followed closely by polarization within our societies.
Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. You are listening to the David Knight.
Speaker 14: Show, whether you're feeling like the Booze or bluegrass ads
Speaker 14: radio as you covered check out a wide variety of
Speaker 14: channels on our app at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 3: Well, this horrible story about this Indian driver who was
Speaker 3: doing a U turn on a highway and got his
Speaker 3: eighteen wheeler sideways on the road just as a passenger
Speaker 3: car was coming and was unable to stop. He made
Speaker 3: an illegal U turn and so they crashed into the
Speaker 3: side of the trailer and killed all three people in
Speaker 3: the car. This just keeps dropping more and more incredible details.
Speaker 3: This Indian illegal who was involved in the triple fatality
Speaker 3: crash had a real ID commercial driver's license. I mean,
Speaker 3: it's not enough that these guys are getting commercial driver's
Speaker 3: licenses when they can't read English and they can't even
Speaker 3: read the signs. This guy has real ID. Think about that.
Speaker 3: You know, we've been fighting this battle with the federal
Speaker 3: government since not even They want everybody to have a
Speaker 3: real ID because that's going to be secure, it's going.
Speaker 2: To be vetted.
Speaker 3: You've got to have all this paperwork to get your
Speaker 3: real ID. Right, Well, it's not so hard to get
Speaker 3: This guy had real ID. He's not even can't speak English,
Speaker 3: and he's not an American citizen, but he had a
Speaker 3: commercial driver's license and also real ID, which is not
Speaker 3: available to illegals. So so much for the real aspect
Speaker 3: of the real ID, right Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, so
Speaker 3: the California ignored his order to enforce federal regulations regarding
Speaker 3: commercial driver's licenses. On Friday, the Department detailed the state's
Speaker 3: refusal to keep this guy sing off the road in
Speaker 3: defiance of these regulations. Bill Malugan of Fox News dug
Speaker 3: down on this and found some of this information. He said,
Speaker 3: the state admitted that it gave real id commercial driver's
Speaker 3: license to sing because the federal government authorized it. The
Speaker 3: state Transportation Agency said that Singh received federal employment authorization
Speaker 3: that is valid until August thirtieth, twenty thirty.
Speaker 2: There's twenty thirty. Again. It always shows up, doesn't it.
Speaker 3: The California followed all federal and state laws and reviewing
Speaker 3: and granting him a California commercial driver's license, they said.
Speaker 3: Maligan said, when they said that replied to him that way,
Speaker 3: he asked them to clarify what they meant when they
Speaker 3: said that the Feds had confirmed his legal status, as
Speaker 3: he is still in the US illegally even if he
Speaker 3: was granted federal work authorization while his asylum case played out.
Speaker 3: The answer appears to have been a canned reply or
Speaker 3: something created by AI that scraped the internet for state law,
Speaker 3: so he didn't really get an answer from this. Singh
Speaker 3: needed an interpreter when he pleaded not guilty to the
Speaker 3: manslaughter dui charge, and California upgraded this killer's license last
Speaker 3: week when a stricter when stricter rules were already in place,
Speaker 3: said Sean Duffy, Seculary of Transportation, they ignored my emergency action,
Speaker 3: and now three people are dead. You know, this would
Speaker 3: actually be a case for having, you know, an emergency
Speaker 3: rule that goes out there, because you've got sixty thousand
Speaker 3: illegals that are out there that you know, we're not
Speaker 3: sure how many of them speak English or can read
Speaker 3: the signs. These commercial driver's licenses have just been handed
Speaker 3: out to people, and these are very dangerous things for
Speaker 3: people to be driving. They you know, eighty thousand pounds
Speaker 3: and it's difficult. It's not easy to drive a truck.
Speaker 3: You've got to be careful of the cars that are
Speaker 3: around there, and it takes some experience and certainly it
Speaker 3: requires you to be able to read road signs and
Speaker 3: do some things like that. And it's had a crushing
Speaker 3: effect on the trucking industry as well on Americans jobs.
Speaker 3: You would think that of all things, the Trump administration
Speaker 3: would do something about this. Isn't it interesting that this
Speaker 3: is not necessarily their first priority. That their first priority
Speaker 3: is not even to go to friendly Republican leaning states
Speaker 3: to deport people. Their first priority is to have conflict.
Speaker 3: They want to go to the most Democrat cities where
Speaker 3: they know they're going to get resistance, and they want
Speaker 3: to go head to head with the people and the
Speaker 3: elected officials that are there. They want conflict. They don't
Speaker 3: want to solve these problems, and these are real problems.
Speaker 3: These are problems that people wanted to have solved. In
Speaker 3: October fifteenth, the Transportation Department now say California would lose
Speaker 3: forty million dollars in federal funding. And because it is
Speaker 3: not enforcing federal regulations that truck drivers pass and English
Speaker 3: proficiency tests to receive a commercial driver's license, other states
Speaker 3: are facing the same penalty.
Speaker 2: Again, several of.
Speaker 3: These people have been getting their licenses up in Washington
Speaker 3: State as well. Duffy ordered that non citizens will not
Speaker 3: be eligible for a non domiciled commercial driver's license unless
Speaker 3: there's much stricter set of rules. Look, we've got to
Speaker 3: get rid of this unless stuff. Why should we be
Speaker 3: giving out commercial driver's licenses a coveted job that pays
Speaker 3: pretty well, Why should we be giving that out to
Speaker 3: illegals who come here. I don't think that should be
Speaker 3: the case. I think that's why I say, you know,
Speaker 3: you get rid of the welfare magnet, you get rid
Speaker 3: of the employment magnet, and a lot of these problems
Speaker 3: would be solved without having to send out a bunch
Speaker 3: of masked goons to bully people and to shoot them
Speaker 3: with rubber bullets or pepper balls, or to tear gas
Speaker 3: them in their neighborhoods. You don't have to have that
Speaker 3: kind of conflict. You can solve this problem, but you
Speaker 3: got to want to solve this problem. Non domiciled CDL
Speaker 3: emergency rule could cause a capacity crunch, says Freight Waves.
Speaker 3: The proliferation of these licenses has contributed to a significant
Speaker 3: increase in trucking capacity, leading to market oversupply and the
Speaker 3: longest recession in the freight industry's history. They said, Duffy's
Speaker 3: is announcing an emergency interim final rule. How could it
Speaker 3: be an interim final rule?
Speaker 5: An emergency interim final no takebacks.
Speaker 2: Yeah, final rule?
Speaker 3: Well, I would say, finally, they've got a real emergency
Speaker 3: and they need to go with this thing. They need
Speaker 3: to get these people off of the road. Let me
Speaker 3: give you the example I was talking about. This is
Speaker 3: a truck driver that's been pulled over. And you'll hear
Speaker 3: as this goes on for like fifteen or twenty minutes.
Speaker 3: Don't have the time to play the whole thing for you.
Speaker 3: I'll just play a little bit of it so you
Speaker 3: get a sense of it. This guy cannot speak English,
Speaker 3: read signs, and you'll see there's a test that's given
Speaker 3: to him by the cop on the spot. He also
Speaker 3: doesn't understand that in this country we have this tradition
Speaker 3: of wearing pants when you're driving on the highway.
Speaker 2: He's knocking on the door there.
Speaker 18: That's there, Hello, good morning.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Why are you parked here?
Speaker 10: Yeah?
Speaker 2: I'm pucking for the hour?
Speaker 18: Why did you park here? Do you understand English?
Speaker 2: You do?
Speaker 18: Why did you park here?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 18: No good, I'm officer Heading's Arkansas Highway Police. I need
Speaker 18: your driver's license, registration and insurance for this truck.
Speaker 2: It's like this guy that hit me, bbody else didn't speaking.
Speaker 2: We have to blur this out here. Body else in
Speaker 2: the truck. Your company?
Speaker 18: Okay, you don't understand English.
Speaker 2: Where's your log book? At? Put you some clothes on?
Speaker 5: Put you some clothes on, pants, put.
Speaker 18: Your pants on, pants, put.
Speaker 2: Some things on.
Speaker 18: You don't understand English?
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 8: Mhmm.
Speaker 18: What company do you work for?
Speaker 2: Uh? The company?
Speaker 17: Uh?
Speaker 2: Your company?
Speaker 18: California?
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, he works for California.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you know it's right. Okay, Well, actually he might
Speaker 3: be telling you the truth that he works for California.
Speaker 3: That's what California wants to do to us. It can
Speaker 3: take news.
Speaker 18: You see this sign?
Speaker 2: Yes?
Speaker 18: Or what's that sign saying thanks?
Speaker 2: Must must enter? Right? Then you tell me what does
Speaker 2: it say? Must sign?
Speaker 11: Yeah?
Speaker 1: We next?
Speaker 2: Read okay, read it again?
Speaker 8: Wait again, read it again?
Speaker 5: Oh trus or a tin.
Speaker 8: Must enter waitt tating?
Speaker 2: Next right?
Speaker 18: What is this word taste tense?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 18: No, no, what does that sign mean?
Speaker 8: What's that mean?
Speaker 2: Mm hmm t things?
Speaker 18: What does this sign mean?
Speaker 2: Mm hmm, muster enter.
Speaker 3: M famous must enter sign. You have to wonder what
Speaker 3: Peter Sellers would do with us if he was still
Speaker 3: the proliferation of non domiciled CDLs has coincided with a
Speaker 3: dramatic increase in trucking capacity across the US since the
Speaker 3: fmus CSA permitted foreigners to obtain non domiciled CDLs in
Speaker 3: March of twenty nineteen. Oh that happened during the Trump's
Speaker 3: first administration. Right, this is not a Biden problem necessarily.
Speaker 3: The industry has added more than three hundred and ten
Speaker 3: thousand trucks to American roads. This is why I said
Speaker 3: this is a huge issue. We know that sixty thousand
Speaker 3: of these people have just been handed these things from California,
Speaker 3: and I think that's just California. Maybe it's California. In Washington,
Speaker 3: they say we know that two hundred thousand CDLs were issued,
Speaker 3: but it is unclear how many of these are still
Speaker 3: active and currently driving on the road. I guess they
Speaker 3: sent questionnaires, but since these people don't mean English, they
Speaker 3: didn't get them back.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 3: The industry has suffered greatly from the surge of new
Speaker 3: truck drivers and the sudden influx of capacity. These new
Speaker 3: participants have contributed significantly to a market oversupply condition, resulting
Speaker 3: in the longest freight recession and history. A capacity crunch
Speaker 3: is likely, but no one knows how fast one will come.
Speaker 3: The emergency interim final rule represents again the interim final rule.
Speaker 5: Emergency, interim final, It's going.
Speaker 3: To be interim and a final rule as well. I mean,
Speaker 3: this is typical of a government that doesn't know what
Speaker 3: it is doing.
Speaker 5: Maybe it's slapping words on things to make it sound official.
Speaker 3: Maybe the government doesn't speak English. What do you think
Speaker 3: do they wear pants?
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 3: Represents an important step toward addressing the unintended consequences of
Speaker 3: the non domiciled CDL program as the DOT and the
Speaker 3: FMCSA work to implement stricter controls on these licenses. Capacity
Speaker 3: will certainly tighten, and the question on the mind of
Speaker 3: every freight market executive is when will we feel it well?
Speaker 3: You know, my only criticism is this. This is that
Speaker 3: for once, the Trump administration may be acting too slowly
Speaker 3: on something that is really an emergency. I think this
Speaker 3: is an emergency for the truck drivers and their livelihood
Speaker 3: as well as for anybody who's on the road. You know,
Speaker 3: this is the same issue I've got with these technocracy
Speaker 3: companies that are putting the self driving.
Speaker 2: Semi trailers out on the road.
Speaker 3: You know, you don't put a computer on something that
Speaker 3: weighs eighty thousand pounds and just let it drive down
Speaker 3: the road without taking it really seriously. And you don't
Speaker 3: do that with people who don't speak anguish don't read
Speaker 3: the road signs either. That's the cavalier attitude that our
Speaker 3: government has. You know, they're all about safety, aren't they,
Speaker 3: And they will do all kinds of things to you
Speaker 3: in the name of safety. But when it's something that
Speaker 3: actually involves safety, they just look the other way, or
Speaker 3: they tell you to do something's unsafe, like wear a
Speaker 3: mask all day.
Speaker 2: You know, that's that's what we got it. Well, what
Speaker 2: do we have in terms of comments before we run
Speaker 2: out of time?
Speaker 5: That's right, Brian de McCartney says, Bobby Boris Pickett and
Speaker 5: the crypt Kicker five.
Speaker 2: Crypt Kicker five, Yeah.
Speaker 5: The real Octo Spook says, you got a Travis. Where
Speaker 5: are you gonna buy your foreign goods at Walmart or others?
Speaker 5: Will Walmart end up the only place eventually and then
Speaker 5: they'll go away as well. You're not gonna have any
Speaker 5: place where you can actually go shop.
Speaker 3: Well, you won't have any money, you'll own nothing and
Speaker 3: you'll be buying nothing.
Speaker 5: I guess the highways will all be toll roads, and
Speaker 5: no one will drive them because they only lead to
Speaker 5: Amazon warehouses anyway.
Speaker 4: Well, they'll stop shipping the foreign goods here because they'd
Speaker 4: be making any money off of it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, that's right, Knights of the Storm says, I know
Speaker 5: a guy who got a CDL remotely from California. He
Speaker 5: tells me he did not have to take a road
Speaker 5: test to get it. That's great, lovely to hear.
Speaker 2: I should have gone there to get my driver's sizes.
Speaker 5: You know what's great, I've seen people and.
Speaker 2: My real id. They gave me a real idea.
Speaker 3: They gave me such a run around for paperwork here
Speaker 3: in Tennessee. Then I thought that it was you know,
Speaker 3: this is really strange how they vamped this up. And
Speaker 3: then when I got to the end of the process,
Speaker 3: now you've got a real idea. It's like I didn't
Speaker 3: want to go through this paper chase for real. Iyea,
Speaker 3: I don't even want that.
Speaker 5: The second you put paperwork in my way. It's basically
Speaker 5: like an impassable blockade.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 5: There are full on video games set up to mimic
Speaker 5: over the road trucking, and people will build full rigs
Speaker 5: to completely mimic the cockpit of an eighteen wheeler. You
Speaker 5: need those guys. Get those guys out there, the searing girl.
Speaker 5: Your state cops are so picky, picky, picky. Why do
Speaker 5: I need bands? I've got more.
Speaker 3: I think the ice agents are going to be putting
Speaker 3: masks on. I think these cops who pull over these
Speaker 3: foreign drivers have to put on blindfolds.
Speaker 5: Oh god, he's not wearing pants again.
Speaker 2: Having a good day. Thanks for really quickly, Sorr. Before
Speaker 2: we go.
Speaker 5: I've got some tips here, Jersey Boy eighty nine. Thank
Speaker 5: you Jersey Boy again. If you're struggling, you don't have
Speaker 5: to tip at all. We appreciate it. But I know
Speaker 5: you said yesterday you're in a tight financial bind, so
Speaker 5: please don't worry about that. He says, Hello, David, what
Speaker 5: do you think of Garatt Brandle who saw Mary in
Speaker 5: Spain in nineteen sixties. Have you have you heard of
Speaker 5: book Pederstroika Deception by an Italian goal? Listen? Please check
Speaker 5: out King Street News channel Rumble and since it's mostly
Speaker 5: for David, then we'll save this. Thank you all so much.
Speaker 5: We appreciate it. God bless you all have a wonderful
Speaker 5: rest of your day, and we will see you tomorrow,
Speaker 5: Thank you.
Speaker 2: I was working on the news laid one night.
Speaker 3: Well my eyes beheld than aerie site full the monsters, hibryhearst.
Speaker 3: To my surprise, the tactics to inject what they divide.
Speaker 3: The monster is the Jab job. The spikes a graveyard stand.
Speaker 3: I caught on in a flash.
Speaker 5: The job.
Speaker 2: The monster is the.
Speaker 3: Jaz last in the castle, least to the FBA with
Speaker 3: a farm of vampires feast the goold rehearse before nine
Speaker 3: one one had a poisonous which is what they've done.
Speaker 10: Jab.
Speaker 3: The monster is the Jazz Job. The spikes a graveyard stab.
Speaker 3: He'll put you on a slab. The job, The monster
Speaker 3: is the job. Big Pharma was having fun. The party
Speaker 3: had just begun. The guests included Fauci Trump, then Biden.
Speaker 3: Scene was a lockdown. We're fearing the news supply. Chains
Speaker 3: were broken. We were singing the blues. The coffins they
Speaker 3: told us we're about drive. You can see it all
Speaker 3: on channel five. The monster is the jab Master Jab.
Speaker 3: The spikes a graveyard stab, It'll put you on a
Speaker 3: slab is the Jab. The monster is the Jab. From
Speaker 3: the Oval office, his voice did ring. Hospital cash registers
Speaker 3: went a ching. When people caught on to keep on
Speaker 3: the list, they said, whatever happened to the Wuhan lab?
Speaker 3: The job, The monster is the Jab, Monster Job, the spikes,
Speaker 3: a graveyard stab. He'll put you on a slab, the job.
Speaker 3: The monster is the Jab. Now everything's cool. Lab leaks
Speaker 3: are part of the plant. They're alibi echoes throughout the
Speaker 3: land for you, the living. And they'll try it again
Speaker 3: for they get to your door. Tell them, farmer no more.
Speaker 3: The monster is the Jaz, the spikes, the graveyard stands.
Speaker 10: It'll put you on a slab.
Speaker 2: The monster is the Jab. You will