Speaker 1: It was actually scheduled by Joe Strecker. I'm pleased to
Speaker 1: introduce the thirty five Karse Morning Show, author of one
Speaker 1: of the authors of the Parallel Election, A Blueprint for Deception,
Speaker 1: evidence of massive election fraud in Delaware County, Pennsylvania in
Speaker 1: the November twenty twenty election, Leah Hoops. Welcome to the
Speaker 1: fifty five Karosee Morning Show. It's a pleasure to have
Speaker 1: you on today.
Speaker 2: Good morning. Thank you for having me.
Speaker 1: Understand your bit of legal hot water right now protective
Speaker 1: order in Philadelphia accord because of your work on election integrity.
Speaker 1: Can you give my listeners the background on this absolutely.
Speaker 2: I was a poll watcher in the twenty twenty election
Speaker 2: in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, and my partner, Gregory Sentstrom, and
Speaker 2: I uncovered massive election fraud. We did a sting operation
Speaker 2: unbeknownst to the election workers in which we got them
Speaker 2: on video and audio committing not only fraud, but they
Speaker 2: were spoilating or getting rid of the evidence rate on
Speaker 2: camera beknownst to them. Like I said, but right before
Speaker 2: we exposed that we had this video and audio, the
Speaker 2: voting machine warehouse custodian James Savage decided to file a
Speaker 2: lawsuit against myself, Gregory Sinstrom, Donald Trump, Mayor Giuliani in Philadelphia,
Speaker 2: claiming that we defamed him in public and that we
Speaker 2: caused his heart attacks and so on and so on.
Speaker 2: About a month later, we released all the videos to
Speaker 2: the world exposing James Savage's crimes and also the other
Speaker 2: election bureau workers inside of Delaware County, and it lasted
Speaker 2: for about eight hundred and sixty days in a Democrat City,
Speaker 2: Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas with the Democrat judge Michael Urdos,
Speaker 2: and myself and Gregory Sinstrom. We represented ourselves per se
Speaker 2: and they were unable to dispute anything that we said
Speaker 2: in our book, in testimony in Gettysburg, in our interviews,
Speaker 2: and in our court filings. To pretty much sum it up,
Speaker 2: we won four hearings. We use the truth as a
Speaker 2: complete defense, and when they started to lose, they decided
Speaker 2: to file a protective order, which was absolutely ridiculous. It
Speaker 2: was lawfare, and the attorney j Connor Corkoran and James
Speaker 2: Savage decided to say that we were domestic terrorists and
Speaker 2: that we were a threat to the courts and the judge,
Speaker 2: and they wanted in a civil court to confiscate our firearms,
Speaker 2: to completely silence us, and to find us thirty thousand dollars.
Speaker 2: They lost miserably. They ended up trying to offer us
Speaker 2: settlement in January, and that meant leaving behind President Trump,
Speaker 2: and we said absolutely not. And then in March of
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four they withdrew the case and as of
Speaker 2: today J. Connor Corkoran, he has been suspended sanctioned because
Speaker 2: of us. His license has been suspended for eighteen months
Speaker 2: and he had to close down his law firm.
Speaker 1: Wow. Well, congratulations being an attorney. When you mentioned about
Speaker 1: the the law fair component of it, and this is
Speaker 1: one of the ways that you know, evil forces like
Speaker 1: the folks that you were working are you know you're
Speaker 1: working for the American people and bring this out, but
Speaker 1: that we're trying to suppress your voice and keep this down.
Speaker 1: They can cause your legal bills to go through the roof,
Speaker 1: can't they engage in protracted a litigation following extra motions?
Speaker 1: Of course, the protective order which was meritless, as demonstrated
Speaker 1: by your victory on that all of that means billable hours,
Speaker 1: and when you're representing yourself you're in a precarious position
Speaker 1: in and of itself because you're not necessarily savvy with
Speaker 1: all the laws and rules about motion practice.
Speaker 2: Wow, that's one hundred percent correct. So Greg and I
Speaker 2: have learned things on our own, with the help of
Speaker 2: obviously a lot of people and a lot of studying
Speaker 2: and basically just going into the courtroom and you know,
Speaker 2: just telling the truth. And the judges are supposed to
Speaker 2: be helpful to the pro se litigants, and some of
Speaker 2: them have been. But it's really just as we go,
Speaker 2: we learn a lot, and we understand that this is
Speaker 2: a really awful, terrible corrupted team that we are very
Speaker 2: good at. We use a lot of tactical strategies. We
Speaker 2: approach this kind of like a military operation, because this
Speaker 2: is like the communist takeover of the United States, and
Speaker 2: the lawyers are in on it and the judges and
Speaker 2: they're getting beat at their own game, and that's just
Speaker 2: where we need to be in this country.
Speaker 1: Well, let me ask you this. Can you outline for
Speaker 1: my listeners some of the things that you reveal in
Speaker 1: the parallel election and some of the evidence that you
Speaker 1: presented to the court in this lawsuit? Is she there?
Speaker 1: Leah see if you can get her back on Joe,
Speaker 1: apparently we've lost the connection. My apologies to the listening
Speaker 1: audience for that. I was just getting ready to get
Speaker 1: into the details on this anyway. It's the parallel election
Speaker 1: at blueprint for deception. I can have Joe at a
Speaker 1: link to that on my blog page fifty five careca
Speaker 1: dot com. While he's trying to get her back, apparently,
Speaker 1: he goes into great detail with what is described as
Speaker 1: irrefutable evidence the amassive election fraud that was perpetrated against
Speaker 1: the citizen around November twenty twenty in the general election,
Speaker 1: specifically in Delaware County, Pennsylvania. Unprecedented fraud result of the
Speaker 1: installation of an illegitimate government. She writes, so, along with
Speaker 1: Gregory Strengths and Leah Hopes, shows you what was done
Speaker 1: and by whom It's called parallel election because obtaining fraudulent
Speaker 1: results they manufactured required the wholesale substitution of fake ballots
Speaker 1: for authentic ones. You got her back, Joseph, Yes, she has. Leah,
Speaker 1: I'm here.
Speaker 2: I don't know what happens.
Speaker 1: It's yeah, well maybe it is. We'll let people fester
Speaker 1: on that one way. I was just reading the description
Speaker 1: of your book The Paril Election, I was going to
Speaker 1: ask you if you would please just sort of recite
Speaker 1: some of what is described as irrefutable evidence that you
Speaker 1: had showing that these fake ballots were substituted for authentic ones.
Speaker 1: It sounds unbelievable.
Speaker 2: Yes, So what we had witnessed on election day, Greg
Speaker 2: is experienced obviously in fraud, and what he was looking
Speaker 2: for specifically is where the cameras were not and where
Speaker 2: the ballots were being ingested. There's multi levels in the
Speaker 2: counting center and what he was trying to understand was
Speaker 2: the delta, and that's what you start with what you
Speaker 2: end with. And what we saw is that there was
Speaker 2: a a back room where these mail in ballots were
Speaker 2: being processed in canvas and no one was allowed back there.
Speaker 2: And what we figured out was is that they're ingesting
Speaker 2: fake mail in ballots into the system that have no
Speaker 2: chain of custody. They're using removable media, you know, USB
Speaker 2: drives in order to insert you know, fake votes into
Speaker 2: the tabulation servers. It's very convoluted, but we do explain
Speaker 2: it in the Parallel Election. We don't just explain the fraud,
Speaker 2: we explain the who, the what, the where, and the
Speaker 2: When we give pictures, it's large font for those who
Speaker 2: have a hard time seeing. But we really do get
Speaker 2: into everything from start to finish, and that includes it.
Speaker 2: You know basically that this was a plan about I
Speaker 2: don't even know about twenty fifteen when it came to
Speaker 2: taking down President Trump. So it really is detailed. We
Speaker 2: do not hold back. We give links to our evidence.
Speaker 2: We've submitted that evidence into multiple courts. We've won several
Speaker 2: cases hearings, and actually we're the last remaining election fraud
Speaker 2: lawsuit in the country and we will be heard between
Speaker 2: November fourth and November eighth, twenty twenty four, in the
Speaker 2: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: Wow. Nothing like putting it off till roughly election day
Speaker 1: before you get some definitive word on Yeah. Okay, well,
Speaker 1: let me ask you this. The allegations that are set
Speaker 1: forth in the parallel election, this is exactly what you
Speaker 1: were sued over and you prevailed because you brought forth
Speaker 1: the information that you have documented in the book and
Speaker 1: you put it in front of the court and they
Speaker 1: basically threw out his claim against you. So this is
Speaker 1: an era of judicial support around it based upon the litigation.
Speaker 1: You just got through fighting.
Speaker 2: That is correct. We put it in their face and said,
Speaker 2: you know, dispute it. We're telling the truth, and they
Speaker 2: could not. And it was so bad that they ended
Speaker 2: up using a dead witness in order to corroborate the
Speaker 2: plaintive's claims. They actually were trying to use an expert witness,
Speaker 2: the same expert witness that they used in the Egen
Speaker 2: Carol case. They submitted false ovam udens. It was really awful,
Speaker 2: and we've been trying to expose the lawfair and the
Speaker 2: tactics and the lies that they use, and were demanding
Speaker 2: attorneys to fight back against this and protect people's rights
Speaker 2: in order to prevail in these courtrooms. I mean, you
Speaker 2: have to be able to fight the way that they fight,
Speaker 2: and you have to do it better than they do.
Speaker 1: Well, it's interesting at least you had standing to move
Speaker 1: forward with this. These are the kind of allegations that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was making, but they never saw the light
Speaker 1: of an actual proceeding. Their discovery was never entered into
Speaker 1: In many of the cases where they claimed the election fraud,
Speaker 1: they were just summarily thrown out on the grounds that
Speaker 1: whoever filed the lawsuit didn't have standing to sue. So
Speaker 1: none of the information that you brought forth in your
Speaker 1: book and in this lawsuit was able to see the
Speaker 1: light of trial or hearing.
Speaker 2: Right So the facts were unable to be presented right
Speaker 2: in front of a jury. So you know, there's I
Speaker 2: have a lot of opinions about that. And the things
Speaker 2: that I saw, including the R and C lawyers that
Speaker 2: were hired in twenty twenty, were placed there for a
Speaker 2: particular reason, and that was to stop any kind of
Speaker 2: court proceedings to go forward. And I could give you
Speaker 2: countless examples of the people that I know and spoke
Speaker 2: to from the RNC that were attorneys that were one
Speaker 2: hundred percent not working for the country and we're not
Speaker 2: working for Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, we know there's a lot of Republicans out
Speaker 1: there that have a certain amount of disdain for Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: and of course you can bring that in in terms
Speaker 1: of how well or poorly you defend someone to shame
Speaker 1: that that reality exists. But it does. Now is this thing,
Speaker 1: I mean the election? I want to say shentan against
Speaker 1: my favorite word to describe these types of things. But
Speaker 1: this fraud that you uncovered, now, has this been referred
Speaker 1: over to it like a criminal attorney, like a prosecuting attorney,
Speaker 1: or a US Department of Justice attorney. I know you
Speaker 1: might laugh at the idea of Department of Justice looking
Speaker 1: into it, but has it been referred for further criminal inquiry.
Speaker 2: We have actually provided with the lower declarations to the
Speaker 2: House Judiciary Committee, to Jack Smith, to Merrick Garland, to
Speaker 2: District Attorney of Delaware County Jack Stolsteimer, to former Pennsylvania
Speaker 2: Attorney General Josh Shapiro. We have filed former or excuse me,
Speaker 2: we have filed formal criminal charge referrals about Bill Barr,
Speaker 2: Christopher Ray, Josh Shapiro, former US Attorney Bill McSwain. I mean,
Speaker 2: I could go on, and the reason why it's not
Speaker 2: only is it basically just putting it in their face,
Speaker 2: but it doesn't allow them to have plausible deniability that
Speaker 2: these things exist. And on top of it, it is
Speaker 2: exculpatory evidence to President Trump. So if they do not
Speaker 2: present it, even though they're in possession of it, then
Speaker 2: they would be committing a Brady violation. So we know
Speaker 2: all of this stuff. These are tactics that everyone should
Speaker 2: be using. And just to blatantly say, well, the DOJ
Speaker 2: is corrupt, it doesn't matter. You still have to you
Speaker 2: have to refer it over to the law because not
Speaker 2: everyone inside of law enforcement is a bad person. There
Speaker 2: are good right they are good law enforcement, They are
Speaker 2: good public servants, There are good judges, there are good attorneys.
Speaker 2: So you know, we can't just throw our hands up
Speaker 2: in the air and say, well, everyone's corrupt. You know,
Speaker 2: that's kind of what they want you to believe and
Speaker 2: feel helpless and hopeless. But no, you have to do
Speaker 2: the work. You have to bust your butt. You got
Speaker 2: to sacrifice for your country and you just have to.
Speaker 2: You got to, you know, bear it and do what
Speaker 2: you need to do in order to keep our republic.
Speaker 1: Wow, Leah Hopps hopes rather it's the parallel election of
Speaker 1: Blueprint for Deception. I've had my producer add your book
Speaker 1: to my blog page fifty five carecy dot com so
Speaker 1: folks can easily get a copy of it. So before
Speaker 1: we part company, day Lea. And it's been a real
Speaker 1: pleasure talking with you. And I can't think you know,
Speaker 1: for fighting the good fight. Are you. I presume that
Speaker 1: the election integrity issues that you disclose in the book,
Speaker 1: and you are dealing with right now. Are still a
Speaker 1: potential problem in the upcoming November election, Yes.
Speaker 2: They are, and the good news is that we've focused
Speaker 2: on our our own backyard, which is Dellawa County, and
Speaker 2: they are heavily scrutinized. There's a lot of eyes on them.
Speaker 2: We've caught them in so many lies and deceit. Actually,
Speaker 2: we're submitting a Supreme Court case this morning, and it's
Speaker 2: not only us, but it is multiple counties and we
Speaker 2: have joined together in order to go after these crooks
Speaker 2: and these criminals in multiple counties in the Commonwealth of Pa.
Speaker 2: It's going to be very hard for them to cheat
Speaker 2: and they will one hundred percent screw up when they're
Speaker 2: trying to commit the fraud that they did in twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: We are also coming out with the second part of
Speaker 2: our documentary. It's about twenty eight minutes. It's called The
Speaker 2: Big Con and it will be coming out so it's
Speaker 2: going to be very insightful and people will be able
Speaker 2: to understand the fraud and be able to look inside
Speaker 2: of their own counties and have an understanding before the election.
Speaker 2: It's going to be very powerful and people will be educated,
Speaker 2: especially if you're a poll worker or a poll watcher,
Speaker 2: or you're sitting inside of these counting centers, you're going
Speaker 2: to have a great understanding of what to actually look for.
Speaker 1: That is wonderful. News can't come soon enough. Leah hot Hopes.
Speaker 1: Thank you for what you have done and what you
Speaker 1: continue to do. The information is vitally important, and as
Speaker 1: you just pointed out, it just points out how important
Speaker 1: it is to have people overseeing the election and being
Speaker 1: in there in the polls. People from both sides of
Speaker 1: the political spectrum are entitled to be there. They should
Speaker 1: be there and observing the election to make sure that
Speaker 1: the rules are followed and no fraud is committed. God
Speaker 1: bless you, Leah. Keep up the great work, and you're
Speaker 1: welcome here in the morning show. Anytime you've got any
Speaker 1: further updates, I know my listeners would be very intrigued
Speaker 1: to find out.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much, appreciate you.
Speaker 1: God bless my pleasure, God bless you. Seven fifty one
Speaker 1: fifty five care see the talk station and you feel
Speaker 1: like you woke up in a Banana Republic some days?
Speaker 1: Doesn't it doesn't it? Plum type plumbing is plumbing done right.
Speaker 1: You can count on my friends at plumb type Plumbing,
Speaker 1: you got problems with your some pump called plumb tie.
Speaker 1: You got problems with leaky faucets, plumb tie toil it
Speaker 1: leaks and raining chandeliers. Always like to joke about that.
Speaker 1: That was my emergency situation and it's easy to schedule appointment.
Speaker 1: Plumtight dot com is how you do it. And I
Speaker 1: scheduled my last appointment there for my uh my leaking
Speaker 1: backflow valve and turned out my irrigation system had a
Speaker 1: crack in it and that's why I was leaking. So
Speaker 1: plumb Tight to the rescue fix that job and virtually
Speaker 1: no time. The price is always right and the customer
Speaker 1: service is always exceptional. That's why they enjoy an A
Speaker 1: plus with a better business Barreau count on them. They
Speaker 1: will be very good with communicating with you. They are
Speaker 1: wonderfully wonderful in terms of how they treat you and
Speaker 1: your home. And again fair and ethical pricing. That's always
Speaker 1: the case with my friends at plumb Tight Plumbing Plumbing
Speaker 1: done right. They live by that motto five one three
Speaker 1: seven two seven tight the it te five one three
Speaker 1: seven two seven eighty four eighty three again online it's
Speaker 1: plumtight dot
Speaker 2: Com fifty five krc man