WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.280 --> 00:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Wait, the Lucky land Slots. You can get lucky just

2
00:00:03.160 --> 00:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>about anywhere.

3
00:00:04.919 --> 00:00:07.799
<v Speaker 2>It's your captain speaking. We've got clear runway and the

4
00:00:07.799 --> 00:00:09.759
<v Speaker 2>weather's fine, but we're just gonna circle up here a

5
00:00:09.759 --> 00:00:13.039
<v Speaker 2>while and get lucky. No, no, nothing like that. It's

6
00:00:13.119 --> 00:00:15.720
<v Speaker 2>just these cash prizes add up quick, so I suggest

7
00:00:15.720 --> 00:00:17.719
<v Speaker 2>you sit back, keep your trade table up right, and

8
00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:18.879
<v Speaker 2>start getting lucky.

9
00:00:19.719 --> 00:00:22.559
<v Speaker 1>Play for free at Lucky Landslots dot com. Are you

10
00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>feeling lucky? No purchase necessary void We're prohibited by Law

11
00:00:26.399 --> 00:00:30.039
<v Speaker 1>eighteen plus. Terms and conditions apply. See website for details.

12
00:00:30.640 --> 00:00:32.479
<v Speaker 3>Hey guys, it is Ryan. I'm not sure if you

13
00:00:32.520 --> 00:00:34.240
<v Speaker 3>know this about me, but I'm a bit of a

14
00:00:34.280 --> 00:00:36.240
<v Speaker 3>fun fanatic when I can. I like to work, but

15
00:00:36.280 --> 00:00:37.000
<v Speaker 3>I like fun too.

16
00:00:37.159 --> 00:00:37.679
<v Speaker 4>It's a thing.

17
00:00:37.840 --> 00:00:39.759
<v Speaker 3>And now the truth is out there, I can tell

18
00:00:39.799 --> 00:00:42.920
<v Speaker 3>you about my favorite place to have fun, Chumba Casino.

19
00:00:43.039 --> 00:00:45.960
<v Speaker 3>They have hundreds of social casino style games to choose from,

20
00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:50.399
<v Speaker 3>with new games released each week. You can play for free, anytime, anywhere,

21
00:00:50.640 --> 00:00:53.359
<v Speaker 3>and each day brings a new chance to collect daily bonuses.

22
00:00:53.479 --> 00:00:56.000
<v Speaker 3>So join me and the fun. Sign up now at

23
00:00:56.079 --> 00:00:58.079
<v Speaker 3>Chumba Casino dot com.

24
00:00:58.119 --> 00:01:01.119
<v Speaker 5>No, we're just necessary daoidhever Everyboy Loss Tis Conditions eighteen plus.

25
00:01:08.319 --> 00:01:11.760
<v Speaker 4>You are now listening to True Murder, The most shocking

26
00:01:11.840 --> 00:01:14.879
<v Speaker 4>killers in true crime history and the authors that have

27
00:01:14.959 --> 00:01:22.239
<v Speaker 4>written about them Gasey, Bundy, Dahmer, The Nightstalker VTK Every

28
00:01:22.280 --> 00:01:25.959
<v Speaker 4>week another fascinating author talking about the most shocking and

29
00:01:26.040 --> 00:01:30.560
<v Speaker 4>infamous killers in true crime history. True Murder with your host,

30
00:01:30.959 --> 00:01:33.439
<v Speaker 4>journalist and author Dan Zupanski.

31
00:01:42.719 --> 00:01:46.920
<v Speaker 6>Good evening in the tight knit community of Lorain, Ohio.

32
00:01:47.560 --> 00:01:51.959
<v Speaker 6>A whirlwind of horror swept through as unsettling allegation surface.

33
00:01:52.879 --> 00:01:56.799
<v Speaker 6>A trusted bus driver and her alleged companion accused of

34
00:01:56.840 --> 00:02:00.920
<v Speaker 6>shattering the innocence of preschoolers in the recent expected head

35
00:02:00.959 --> 00:02:05.799
<v Speaker 6>Start program. The verdict lifelong prison sentences that would cast

36
00:02:05.799 --> 00:02:09.840
<v Speaker 6>a shadow over a community and initiate an untiring quest

37
00:02:10.039 --> 00:02:13.759
<v Speaker 6>for truth. The Edge of Doubt is a meticulously researched

38
00:02:13.759 --> 00:02:17.680
<v Speaker 6>true crime narrative that delves into the reverberations of a

39
00:02:17.719 --> 00:02:22.360
<v Speaker 6>sensational trial. This gripping tale is anchored in three decades

40
00:02:22.400 --> 00:02:26.599
<v Speaker 6>of unwavering claims of innocence. As the pages turn, you'll

41
00:02:26.680 --> 00:02:30.159
<v Speaker 6>find yourself torn between the scales of justice and the

42
00:02:30.199 --> 00:02:33.280
<v Speaker 6>resilience of the human spirit. In a world that is

43
00:02:33.360 --> 00:02:36.599
<v Speaker 6>quick to judge. The Edge of Doubt compels you to

44
00:02:36.680 --> 00:02:40.080
<v Speaker 6>lend an ear to the whispers of truth. This is

45
00:02:40.120 --> 00:02:44.280
<v Speaker 6>your invitation to dive into a powerful account that will

46
00:02:44.400 --> 00:02:48.919
<v Speaker 6>challenge your assumptions and unveil the complexities of human nature.

47
00:02:49.439 --> 00:02:52.479
<v Speaker 6>Read it and prepare to see the world with new eyes.

48
00:02:53.120 --> 00:02:55.639
<v Speaker 6>The book that we're featuring this evening is The Edge

49
00:02:55.680 --> 00:02:59.520
<v Speaker 6>of Doubt, The Trial of Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen,

50
00:03:00.159 --> 00:03:04.919
<v Speaker 6>with my special guest, retired attorney and author David Morldy.

51
00:03:05.400 --> 00:03:07.599
<v Speaker 6>Welcome to the program, and thank you very much for

52
00:03:07.639 --> 00:03:09.360
<v Speaker 6>this interview. David Marldy.

53
00:03:10.439 --> 00:03:12.400
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, Dan. It's my pleasure to be here.

54
00:03:12.599 --> 00:03:15.680
<v Speaker 6>It's my pleasure to have you and such a fascinating story.

55
00:03:15.719 --> 00:03:17.400
<v Speaker 6>Congratulations on this book.

56
00:03:17.639 --> 00:03:18.000
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

57
00:03:18.400 --> 00:03:20.319
<v Speaker 6>As you do in this book, you get right down

58
00:03:20.360 --> 00:03:24.039
<v Speaker 6>to business and you talk about August fourth, nineteen ninety four,

59
00:03:24.520 --> 00:03:30.319
<v Speaker 6>Judge Lynette McGuff and it involves preschooled children participating in

60
00:03:30.360 --> 00:03:34.879
<v Speaker 6>the Lorraine head Start program. Tell us about the allegations

61
00:03:35.000 --> 00:03:38.280
<v Speaker 6>and just a description of the people involved, as you

62
00:03:38.319 --> 00:03:39.280
<v Speaker 6>do right away.

63
00:03:39.560 --> 00:03:43.840
<v Speaker 5>The case actually began May seventh of nineteen ninety three,

64
00:03:43.960 --> 00:03:48.439
<v Speaker 5>when Nina Zorich came home from the head Start school.

65
00:03:48.599 --> 00:03:51.280
<v Speaker 5>She was in the afternoon class and she told her

66
00:03:51.280 --> 00:03:53.800
<v Speaker 5>mother that she hadn't gone to school that day, that

67
00:03:53.879 --> 00:03:56.800
<v Speaker 5>the bus driver in Nancy Smith It said school was

68
00:03:56.840 --> 00:04:00.479
<v Speaker 5>closed and she went to Nancy's house where she and

69
00:04:00.560 --> 00:04:04.919
<v Speaker 5>three other head Start children ages four and five years old.

70
00:04:05.199 --> 00:04:10.520
<v Speaker 5>I met Nancy's so called boyfriend now, who they described

71
00:04:10.520 --> 00:04:16.079
<v Speaker 5>as an African American. Nancy is white, and at Nancy's home,

72
00:04:16.759 --> 00:04:20.360
<v Speaker 5>they claim that various sex acts were done to them

73
00:04:20.759 --> 00:04:25.639
<v Speaker 5>by Nancy and Joseph. They also claimed that they were

74
00:04:26.000 --> 00:04:28.680
<v Speaker 5>urinated upon and had to drink urine, which is sort

75
00:04:28.720 --> 00:04:33.000
<v Speaker 5>of a satanic element to it. The police then got involved,

76
00:04:33.319 --> 00:04:35.399
<v Speaker 5>and I don't know how much you want me to

77
00:04:35.399 --> 00:04:39.439
<v Speaker 5>go into what followed up until Nancy's arrest and that

78
00:04:39.560 --> 00:04:42.160
<v Speaker 5>of Joseph Allen, but I'm happy to get into that.

79
00:04:42.360 --> 00:04:46.439
<v Speaker 6>Well, let's get into the investigation of these allegations. You

80
00:04:46.959 --> 00:04:51.959
<v Speaker 6>right away introduce Detective Tom Cantu from the Lorraine Police Department.

81
00:04:52.399 --> 00:04:55.319
<v Speaker 6>So tell us about these allegations, some more about them,

82
00:04:55.439 --> 00:04:59.800
<v Speaker 6>and then how the Lorraine Police Department how they proceeded.

83
00:05:00.040 --> 00:05:03.439
<v Speaker 5>Well. Tom Cantu was the initial detective on a case.

84
00:05:03.800 --> 00:05:10.000
<v Speaker 5>He interviewed obviously Anina Zorich. He also contacted Nancy Smith.

85
00:05:10.480 --> 00:05:15.000
<v Speaker 5>Nancy Smith was a single mother with four children at home,

86
00:05:15.160 --> 00:05:19.480
<v Speaker 5>who lived with her parents, had no criminal record, not

87
00:05:19.560 --> 00:05:23.680
<v Speaker 5>even a speeding ticket. He tried to ferret out if

88
00:05:23.680 --> 00:05:28.279
<v Speaker 5>anything had happened at Nancy's house, Canvass the neighborhood, talked

89
00:05:28.279 --> 00:05:31.160
<v Speaker 5>to Nancy, talked to her parents, and he had some

90
00:05:31.240 --> 00:05:34.680
<v Speaker 5>doubts about it. And at the same time, Nina's mother,

91
00:05:35.040 --> 00:05:39.319
<v Speaker 5>Marge Bronson, was talking to other parents in the head

92
00:05:39.360 --> 00:05:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Start program, and two in particular and said, oh, my

93
00:05:42.160 --> 00:05:45.439
<v Speaker 5>daughter said that your son was with her, your daughter

94
00:05:45.600 --> 00:05:49.240
<v Speaker 5>was with her at this house, and then explained what

95
00:05:49.360 --> 00:05:52.279
<v Speaker 5>had happened to her. And then of course Cantu had

96
00:05:52.279 --> 00:05:56.560
<v Speaker 5>to investigate all of those elements. He eventually talked to

97
00:05:56.600 --> 00:06:00.319
<v Speaker 5>all eleven children that were on the school bus. Wally

98
00:06:00.399 --> 00:06:03.480
<v Speaker 5>denied that anything had happened, that they liked Nancy, and

99
00:06:03.560 --> 00:06:07.240
<v Speaker 5>eventually she was vehement that she had not done these things,

100
00:06:07.240 --> 00:06:10.040
<v Speaker 5>that she did not have a black boyfriend named Joseph,

101
00:06:10.399 --> 00:06:13.839
<v Speaker 5>she had a white boyfriend named Charles, and she voluntarily

102
00:06:13.879 --> 00:06:17.199
<v Speaker 5>agreed to a polygraph which says she was telling the truth.

103
00:06:17.639 --> 00:06:21.720
<v Speaker 5>In the meantime, Nina's parents went to a local television station,

104
00:06:22.120 --> 00:06:26.680
<v Speaker 5>they went to the newspaper and lo and behold, you

105
00:06:26.759 --> 00:06:30.120
<v Speaker 5>have fifteen other parents coming forward with their children, ten

106
00:06:30.160 --> 00:06:32.759
<v Speaker 5>of whom were not on Nancy's bus. One. It didn't

107
00:06:32.759 --> 00:06:35.040
<v Speaker 5>it wasn't even the head Start program. But there was

108
00:06:35.160 --> 00:06:39.639
<v Speaker 5>tremendous pressure in a hysteria in the Lorain community. And

109
00:06:40.199 --> 00:06:44.160
<v Speaker 5>Cantu was told he was being promoted to a desk

110
00:06:44.319 --> 00:06:48.360
<v Speaker 5>job and the investigation was being turned over to another detective.

111
00:06:48.639 --> 00:06:52.279
<v Speaker 5>So at that point we have another detective involved who

112
00:06:52.319 --> 00:06:56.920
<v Speaker 5>is basically stymied as well. He reinterviews the children. There's

113
00:06:57.000 --> 00:07:01.800
<v Speaker 5>all kinds of conflicts in their testimony. They provide different

114
00:07:01.839 --> 00:07:06.079
<v Speaker 5>locations as to where this happened. One boy identifies someone

115
00:07:06.480 --> 00:07:11.759
<v Speaker 5>who the police later clear the descriptions of this Joseph,

116
00:07:11.839 --> 00:07:16.399
<v Speaker 5>this elusive Joseph. He's a black man. He's a white man.

117
00:07:16.800 --> 00:07:19.759
<v Speaker 5>He's a white man with black makeup on his face.

118
00:07:19.800 --> 00:07:23.879
<v Speaker 5>He's a young man, he's an old man with receding hairline.

119
00:07:23.920 --> 00:07:26.800
<v Speaker 5>He has blue eyes, he has dark eyes. They're all

120
00:07:26.920 --> 00:07:30.639
<v Speaker 5>over the place. But they identify Nancy as the person

121
00:07:30.639 --> 00:07:33.879
<v Speaker 5>who took them to Joseph. And with all of this pressure,

122
00:07:34.399 --> 00:07:38.680
<v Speaker 5>The police continue their investigation the last about six months

123
00:07:38.759 --> 00:07:42.240
<v Speaker 5>until they are working on another case and man by

124
00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:44.800
<v Speaker 5>the name of Joseph Allen, a black man, a painter,

125
00:07:44.879 --> 00:07:48.959
<v Speaker 5>a handyman, comes to their attention. He is an African American.

126
00:07:49.040 --> 00:07:52.879
<v Speaker 5>He does have some white splotches on his skin, some burns.

127
00:07:53.040 --> 00:07:57.319
<v Speaker 5>He has a prior conviction for sex abuse of a minor.

128
00:07:57.800 --> 00:08:01.839
<v Speaker 5>He'd spent three years in prison. And they go to

129
00:08:01.879 --> 00:08:07.800
<v Speaker 5>search his home and they find children's toys, clothing, books,

130
00:08:07.839 --> 00:08:11.759
<v Speaker 5>and they think they've got their man now. They fail

131
00:08:11.879 --> 00:08:16.040
<v Speaker 5>to really consider that he sometimes had woman and her

132
00:08:16.040 --> 00:08:19.240
<v Speaker 5>two children living with him, and nieces and nephews. But

133
00:08:19.759 --> 00:08:23.160
<v Speaker 5>now they finally feel that they have the elusive Joseph

134
00:08:23.240 --> 00:08:27.040
<v Speaker 5>Allen and they can proceed. And even though they had

135
00:08:27.040 --> 00:08:31.920
<v Speaker 5>a photo lineup where the children could not identify him

136
00:08:32.039 --> 00:08:35.240
<v Speaker 5>or only maybe one did they and probably get to

137
00:08:35.240 --> 00:08:38.320
<v Speaker 5>this s latter, they also had a live lineup that

138
00:08:38.679 --> 00:08:42.759
<v Speaker 5>is just an absolute disgrace in terms of went on

139
00:08:42.840 --> 00:08:44.679
<v Speaker 5>there and identifying Joseph Allen.

140
00:08:45.200 --> 00:08:48.799
<v Speaker 6>You talk about the prosecutor in this case, Rosenbaum, and

141
00:08:49.480 --> 00:08:52.399
<v Speaker 6>how he conducted himself at this trial as well. He

142
00:08:52.559 --> 00:08:54.639
<v Speaker 6>was known as by the book, and what does buy

143
00:08:54.720 --> 00:08:57.600
<v Speaker 6>the book mean as a prosecutor in terms of an

144
00:08:57.639 --> 00:09:01.120
<v Speaker 6>advantage for the prosecutor and the disadvantage for the defense.

145
00:09:01.279 --> 00:09:04.600
<v Speaker 5>In nineteen ninety three nineteen ninety four, there's a term

146
00:09:04.639 --> 00:09:08.240
<v Speaker 5>that we use in both civil and criminal case called discovery.

147
00:09:08.279 --> 00:09:11.519
<v Speaker 5>It means what the other side is entitled to receive

148
00:09:11.960 --> 00:09:16.080
<v Speaker 5>from the prosecution in preparation for the trial. And in

149
00:09:16.200 --> 00:09:20.120
<v Speaker 5>Ohio at that time, the obligation was to turn over

150
00:09:20.240 --> 00:09:23.320
<v Speaker 5>what is known as exalatory evidence, that that those types

151
00:09:23.360 --> 00:09:26.120
<v Speaker 5>of things that tend to show that the defendants were innocent.

152
00:09:26.519 --> 00:09:30.200
<v Speaker 5>But there's also an aspect the police take a number

153
00:09:30.240 --> 00:09:34.960
<v Speaker 5>of statements, both recorded and written statements, but under the

154
00:09:35.080 --> 00:09:38.879
<v Speaker 5>law at that time, of the discovery law, those statements

155
00:09:39.120 --> 00:09:42.039
<v Speaker 5>did not have to be turned over to the defense

156
00:09:42.080 --> 00:09:47.600
<v Speaker 5>attorneys until that witness testified at trial. And then after

157
00:09:47.639 --> 00:09:51.919
<v Speaker 5>that the witness testified on direct examination, they go into

158
00:09:52.000 --> 00:09:54.240
<v Speaker 5>the judges chambers, they pull out the statement, the judge

159
00:09:54.240 --> 00:09:57.440
<v Speaker 5>listens to it, see if there's inconsistencies, and then it's

160
00:09:57.440 --> 00:10:02.159
<v Speaker 5>turned over to the defendant attorneys to cross examine that

161
00:10:02.159 --> 00:10:05.840
<v Speaker 5>that witness. And you know, it's a it's a it's

162
00:10:05.879 --> 00:10:09.759
<v Speaker 5>a it's a huge disadvantage today and that and by

163
00:10:09.919 --> 00:10:13.440
<v Speaker 5>when you ask the question by the book prosecutor, he

164
00:10:13.559 --> 00:10:16.759
<v Speaker 5>follows that rule. Some prosecutors are a little more open

165
00:10:16.759 --> 00:10:20.320
<v Speaker 5>than that would provide those statements earlier. But you know

166
00:10:20.360 --> 00:10:23.200
<v Speaker 5>he was he was within his rights not to turn

167
00:10:23.240 --> 00:10:29.519
<v Speaker 5>those statements over, at least under the discovery rules about inconsistency. However,

168
00:10:29.960 --> 00:10:33.440
<v Speaker 5>if there's anything exculpatory in those statements, then he did

169
00:10:33.519 --> 00:10:35.399
<v Speaker 5>have a duty to turn that over. And that's one

170
00:10:35.440 --> 00:10:36.840
<v Speaker 5>of the big issues in the case.

171
00:10:37.240 --> 00:10:40.960
<v Speaker 6>Joseph Allen has a previous record. How was it that

172
00:10:41.159 --> 00:10:45.759
<v Speaker 6>the attorneys were not able to separate those trials given

173
00:10:45.840 --> 00:10:49.440
<v Speaker 6>the risks of the association with a convicted felon.

174
00:10:49.600 --> 00:10:52.600
<v Speaker 5>It's within the discretion of the judge to whether to

175
00:10:52.639 --> 00:10:55.840
<v Speaker 5>consolidate two matters, and in this case, you know that

176
00:10:55.919 --> 00:10:59.120
<v Speaker 5>the judge considers the economy of having one trial. She

177
00:10:59.240 --> 00:11:03.919
<v Speaker 5>considered the trauma of having the children testify in two trials,

178
00:11:04.120 --> 00:11:07.919
<v Speaker 5>and that's weighed against the prejudice, particularly here of Nancy Smith,

179
00:11:08.039 --> 00:11:12.000
<v Speaker 5>of being in the courtroom with a convicted sex offender,

180
00:11:12.159 --> 00:11:16.440
<v Speaker 5>and was within the judges discretion to do that, and

181
00:11:16.519 --> 00:11:20.360
<v Speaker 5>that was upheld on appeal, but it obviously had very,

182
00:11:20.480 --> 00:11:22.559
<v Speaker 5>very dire consequences for Nancy Smith.

183
00:11:22.679 --> 00:11:25.799
<v Speaker 6>Give us some of the highlights or low lights of

184
00:11:25.879 --> 00:11:30.480
<v Speaker 6>this trial where Nancy testifies at this trial, but give

185
00:11:30.559 --> 00:11:32.600
<v Speaker 6>us some of the issues that were raised at this

186
00:11:32.759 --> 00:11:37.720
<v Speaker 6>trial that will become again issues that they fight for

187
00:11:38.000 --> 00:11:38.519
<v Speaker 6>later on.

188
00:11:38.879 --> 00:11:41.919
<v Speaker 5>Well the trial. My description of the trial ASTs for

189
00:11:42.279 --> 00:11:46.919
<v Speaker 5>chapters and chapters. I think what comes through, and it's

190
00:11:47.000 --> 00:11:49.360
<v Speaker 5>not evident at the time of the trial, is that

191
00:11:49.919 --> 00:11:55.480
<v Speaker 5>several key witnesses have verdured themselves. We're talking about two

192
00:11:55.639 --> 00:12:00.000
<v Speaker 5>parents of the child quote unquote victims. Well, another bus

193
00:12:00.039 --> 00:12:04.279
<v Speaker 5>striver who claims that she saw Joseph Allen and Nancy

194
00:12:04.320 --> 00:12:08.559
<v Speaker 5>Smith together, which is a very I don't think there's

195
00:12:08.559 --> 00:12:11.679
<v Speaker 5>any question that it was an exaggerated, fabricated type thing,

196
00:12:11.720 --> 00:12:15.600
<v Speaker 5>So that's certainly critical. The other is, whenever you have

197
00:12:15.799 --> 00:12:19.159
<v Speaker 5>witnesses who are four and five years old, the judge

198
00:12:19.159 --> 00:12:23.360
<v Speaker 5>is the gatekeeper yes on whether they are competent to

199
00:12:23.480 --> 00:12:28.320
<v Speaker 5>testify and judgment. Can they tell the difference between right

200
00:12:28.360 --> 00:12:31.399
<v Speaker 5>and wrong, between a lie and the truth? Will they

201
00:12:31.440 --> 00:12:33.600
<v Speaker 5>be punished if they tell a lie? And the judge

202
00:12:33.799 --> 00:12:36.519
<v Speaker 5>makes that determination in her courtroom, it was a very

203
00:12:36.559 --> 00:12:40.279
<v Speaker 5>low bar for these kids for her to say that

204
00:12:40.320 --> 00:12:44.080
<v Speaker 5>they were competent to testify, and that's extremely important in

205
00:12:44.120 --> 00:12:47.879
<v Speaker 5>any child sex abuse case. If the child testifies that

206
00:12:48.000 --> 00:12:54.639
<v Speaker 5>these things happen, that is extremely powerful testimony. It's very

207
00:12:54.679 --> 00:12:58.879
<v Speaker 5>hard for a jury to ignore that. And we can

208
00:12:58.919 --> 00:13:03.360
<v Speaker 5>go into why the children's testimony was so powerful and

209
00:13:03.399 --> 00:13:05.480
<v Speaker 5>how they can be so effective if in fact, what

210
00:13:05.519 --> 00:13:08.320
<v Speaker 5>they were telling had happened, and that has to do

211
00:13:08.399 --> 00:13:11.799
<v Speaker 5>with the interview process and how they had been conditioned

212
00:13:12.120 --> 00:13:15.440
<v Speaker 5>and programmed to tell their stories. But I'll wait for

213
00:13:15.480 --> 00:13:18.120
<v Speaker 5>a question from you on that one.

214
00:13:18.360 --> 00:13:20.440
<v Speaker 6>Well, that's what you get to. In part two, you

215
00:13:20.879 --> 00:13:25.480
<v Speaker 6>introduce a journalist named Paul Fassinelli and who had joined

216
00:13:25.519 --> 00:13:28.279
<v Speaker 6>the Chronicle in nineteen eighty six, and he had a

217
00:13:28.320 --> 00:13:31.840
<v Speaker 6>popular column and he was intrigued by one of the

218
00:13:31.840 --> 00:13:35.000
<v Speaker 6>people that wrote in letters to the editor, a Raymond Kant,

219
00:13:35.559 --> 00:13:37.320
<v Speaker 6>and so he had read a few of these letters

220
00:13:37.360 --> 00:13:40.279
<v Speaker 6>and he was intrigued. Tell us about what interested him

221
00:13:40.559 --> 00:13:43.279
<v Speaker 6>about those letters and as a result, what did he

222
00:13:43.360 --> 00:13:44.480
<v Speaker 6>do well, Paul.

223
00:13:44.559 --> 00:13:48.279
<v Speaker 5>It was somewhat of an outspoken journalist. He had his

224
00:13:48.360 --> 00:13:51.120
<v Speaker 5>detractors and he had his fans, but one of the

225
00:13:51.200 --> 00:13:55.320
<v Speaker 5>letters to the editor directed him towards a child psychologist

226
00:13:55.360 --> 00:13:58.039
<v Speaker 5>who had written a book about how you question young

227
00:13:58.120 --> 00:14:06.159
<v Speaker 5>children about sex abuse, and he got copies of the statements,

228
00:14:06.240 --> 00:14:09.039
<v Speaker 5>the interviews of the children, you know, the original interviews,

229
00:14:09.120 --> 00:14:12.440
<v Speaker 5>which were disclosed you know, at trial, and were available,

230
00:14:12.840 --> 00:14:17.559
<v Speaker 5>and he did some research and sent them to two

231
00:14:18.000 --> 00:14:22.600
<v Speaker 5>child psychologists who were known for their expertise in partying

232
00:14:22.679 --> 00:14:27.720
<v Speaker 5>out whether the interviews were tainted or contaminated right. And

233
00:14:28.120 --> 00:14:31.639
<v Speaker 5>when he sent them to the two psychologists, they both

234
00:14:31.639 --> 00:14:35.639
<v Speaker 5>agreed to review them, but no charge, and both were

235
00:14:35.679 --> 00:14:39.879
<v Speaker 5>appalled by the way the children had been questioned. They

236
00:14:39.879 --> 00:14:44.399
<v Speaker 5>didn't believe that the police and the social workers had

237
00:14:44.559 --> 00:14:49.840
<v Speaker 5>broken the rules of interrogation on purpose, but they had. Nonetheless,

238
00:14:50.279 --> 00:14:52.200
<v Speaker 5>they were some of the worst interviews that they had

239
00:14:52.200 --> 00:14:55.759
<v Speaker 5>ever seen. And there's a proper way to interview children

240
00:14:55.840 --> 00:14:58.759
<v Speaker 5>about sex abuse four and five year olds. The first

241
00:14:58.840 --> 00:15:02.519
<v Speaker 5>is you don't ask eating questions, because the children are

242
00:15:02.559 --> 00:15:06.600
<v Speaker 5>smart enough they want to please the person who's questioning them,

243
00:15:06.840 --> 00:15:09.639
<v Speaker 5>and they will usually agree with a leading question. You

244
00:15:09.679 --> 00:15:13.399
<v Speaker 5>don't repeat questions, you know, until I mean, the child

245
00:15:13.440 --> 00:15:16.159
<v Speaker 5>will eventually change the answer. And you don't want a

246
00:15:16.240 --> 00:15:21.159
<v Speaker 5>questioner who has bias a confirmation bias. There's these things

247
00:15:21.200 --> 00:15:24.639
<v Speaker 5>happen and he or she is trying to confirm that,

248
00:15:25.080 --> 00:15:28.600
<v Speaker 5>and so all of these things happened. You don't reward

249
00:15:28.360 --> 00:15:30.759
<v Speaker 5>the child. Oh yeah, you can have a can of

250
00:15:30.799 --> 00:15:32.759
<v Speaker 5>pop if you answer this question. You know, if you

251
00:15:32.759 --> 00:15:35.120
<v Speaker 5>don't answer this, your sister is going to be attacked

252
00:15:35.159 --> 00:15:38.039
<v Speaker 5>by it. By Joseph. The proper way to do it

253
00:15:38.080 --> 00:15:42.519
<v Speaker 5>is to ask open ended questions. You should develop a

254
00:15:42.600 --> 00:15:45.159
<v Speaker 5>rapport with the child and say, hey, I understand things

255
00:15:45.279 --> 00:15:47.559
<v Speaker 5>have been happening at the school. Tell me what's happened,

256
00:15:47.639 --> 00:15:50.720
<v Speaker 5>and don't leave out any details, and then you let

257
00:15:50.720 --> 00:15:55.399
<v Speaker 5>the child talk. That's called spontaneous recall. And that is

258
00:15:55.440 --> 00:16:00.559
<v Speaker 5>the most reliable information that anyone can get. You only

259
00:16:01.200 --> 00:16:05.279
<v Speaker 5>you try to limit your number of interviews. One is great,

260
00:16:05.360 --> 00:16:08.360
<v Speaker 5>two is probably adequate. But in this case, we have

261
00:16:08.480 --> 00:16:12.360
<v Speaker 5>four statements of Nina Zorich that are that were recorded.

262
00:16:12.399 --> 00:16:16.159
<v Speaker 5>They're probably more, and as they continue, they become more

263
00:16:16.200 --> 00:16:20.159
<v Speaker 5>and more unreliable. And that's exactly what happened in this case.

264
00:16:20.440 --> 00:16:23.279
<v Speaker 6>Now you're talking is called part three, and you talk

265
00:16:23.320 --> 00:16:26.840
<v Speaker 6>about the civil case, the incredible civil case in July

266
00:16:26.960 --> 00:16:30.159
<v Speaker 6>twenty third, nineteen ninety six, and with and you introduce

267
00:16:30.200 --> 00:16:34.039
<v Speaker 6>the character William Thomas Locke, executive director of Lorraine County

268
00:16:34.200 --> 00:16:39.799
<v Speaker 6>Community Action Agency, that the organization that oversaw the Lorraine

269
00:16:39.879 --> 00:16:41.879
<v Speaker 6>County head Start program.

270
00:16:41.639 --> 00:16:42.720
<v Speaker 5>Right in the bus drivers.

271
00:16:42.799 --> 00:16:45.399
<v Speaker 6>Yes, yeah, So tell us what he believes about this

272
00:16:45.720 --> 00:16:50.000
<v Speaker 6>Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen and what he does.

273
00:16:50.399 --> 00:16:54.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, he was when the verdicts came out. He was outraged. Shevy,

274
00:16:55.080 --> 00:16:58.440
<v Speaker 5>He could not believe this had happened. First of all,

275
00:16:58.519 --> 00:17:00.840
<v Speaker 5>there were certain safeguards that were involved in the head

276
00:17:00.879 --> 00:17:04.400
<v Speaker 5>Start program. Nancy was you know, the allegations were that

277
00:17:04.720 --> 00:17:08.119
<v Speaker 5>Nancy would leave three or four children on the bus,

278
00:17:08.319 --> 00:17:10.559
<v Speaker 5>not let them get off at the school, and then

279
00:17:10.640 --> 00:17:14.240
<v Speaker 5>take them to Joseph's house. Well, they had besides Nancy

280
00:17:14.240 --> 00:17:16.160
<v Speaker 5>and the bus, there was an AID. So they had

281
00:17:16.160 --> 00:17:17.759
<v Speaker 5>to argue that it had happened on a day when

282
00:17:17.799 --> 00:17:19.880
<v Speaker 5>there wasn't an AID, and sometimes if there wasn't an AID,

283
00:17:19.960 --> 00:17:22.279
<v Speaker 5>there was, you know, a parent that was on board.

284
00:17:22.480 --> 00:17:26.200
<v Speaker 5>So and the teachers came out from the school and

285
00:17:26.279 --> 00:17:28.359
<v Speaker 5>met each bus they were unloaded one at a time.

286
00:17:28.519 --> 00:17:31.519
<v Speaker 5>He just couldn't believe that this had happened, and he

287
00:17:31.640 --> 00:17:34.960
<v Speaker 5>was roundly criticized in the newspapers for not agreeing with

288
00:17:35.000 --> 00:17:38.480
<v Speaker 5>the jury verdict, you know, and one newspaper actually called

289
00:17:38.519 --> 00:17:42.920
<v Speaker 5>for his resignation because he the jury heard all the

290
00:17:42.960 --> 00:17:46.200
<v Speaker 5>evidence and obviously he had not. He enters the story

291
00:17:46.799 --> 00:17:51.039
<v Speaker 5>when no surprise for the parents. After there have been

292
00:17:51.079 --> 00:17:55.000
<v Speaker 5>these convictions and the appeals have been exhausted for Nancy Smith,

293
00:17:55.119 --> 00:17:58.640
<v Speaker 5>they filed civil lawsuits against the head Start program, Loraine

294
00:17:58.720 --> 00:18:03.079
<v Speaker 5>County Community Action Agency, which you said was the umbrella organization,

295
00:18:03.640 --> 00:18:07.400
<v Speaker 5>claiming that they're responsible, they were negligent, that they were

296
00:18:07.480 --> 00:18:13.039
<v Speaker 5>negligent in hiring, supervising and retaining Nancy Smith, that they

297
00:18:13.160 --> 00:18:16.559
<v Speaker 5>failed then to protect the children from these awful things

298
00:18:16.799 --> 00:18:20.480
<v Speaker 5>that happened. And this then became a very long drawn

299
00:18:20.519 --> 00:18:26.119
<v Speaker 5>out lawsuit which had an unfortunate ending for those of us,

300
00:18:28.079 --> 00:18:33.359
<v Speaker 5>at least from my perspective. The insurance company eventually capitulated

301
00:18:33.559 --> 00:18:36.920
<v Speaker 5>and offered settlements of one point five million to each

302
00:18:36.920 --> 00:18:39.839
<v Speaker 5>of the four families. Now, you've got to understand, the

303
00:18:39.920 --> 00:18:44.200
<v Speaker 5>issue in this case was not whether Nancy Smith and

304
00:18:44.279 --> 00:18:46.960
<v Speaker 5>Joseph Allen had done these things that had been established

305
00:18:47.000 --> 00:18:49.440
<v Speaker 5>in the criminal case, and so you know, it was

306
00:18:49.480 --> 00:18:52.640
<v Speaker 5>an open question whether that can be re litigated. The

307
00:18:52.759 --> 00:18:55.799
<v Speaker 5>question was whether the head start of the agency was

308
00:18:55.839 --> 00:18:58.799
<v Speaker 5>put on notice of some things that had happened regarding

309
00:18:58.920 --> 00:19:02.359
<v Speaker 5>Nancy that have larded them that she was going to

310
00:19:02.400 --> 00:19:05.759
<v Speaker 5>do these things. And the insurance company, after I can't

311
00:19:05.799 --> 00:19:09.400
<v Speaker 5>recall it was eight or nine years of litigation, finally

312
00:19:09.720 --> 00:19:12.119
<v Speaker 5>wanted to get the book, get the case off their books,

313
00:19:12.119 --> 00:19:13.599
<v Speaker 5>and they paid on it.

314
00:19:14.039 --> 00:19:18.119
<v Speaker 6>You talk in part four. You introduced the Ohio Innocence

315
00:19:18.200 --> 00:19:22.079
<v Speaker 6>Project July two thousand and six, the two thousand and seven,

316
00:19:22.400 --> 00:19:26.480
<v Speaker 6>and it's based in Cincinnati, and you introduce two important characters,

317
00:19:26.519 --> 00:19:30.880
<v Speaker 6>Mark Gotsey who's the founder, and Jenny Carroll, former public defender,

318
00:19:31.000 --> 00:19:34.319
<v Speaker 6>and a couple of students, students in their second year,

319
00:19:34.440 --> 00:19:37.200
<v Speaker 6>Chef and Madonna. So tell us a little bit about

320
00:19:37.279 --> 00:19:40.880
<v Speaker 6>what happens with the Ohio Innocence Project being involved, getting

321
00:19:40.880 --> 00:19:43.519
<v Speaker 6>involved and Amber Brnish.

322
00:19:43.720 --> 00:19:47.359
<v Speaker 5>There are a number of chapters there, but the Innocence

323
00:19:47.400 --> 00:19:50.640
<v Speaker 5>Project got involved when all of the peals had been

324
00:19:51.000 --> 00:19:55.720
<v Speaker 5>exhausted for Nancy Smith. Several years thereafter. It had come

325
00:19:55.759 --> 00:19:59.279
<v Speaker 5>to their attention through another investigator, someone that had been

326
00:19:59.359 --> 00:20:02.000
<v Speaker 5>hired by the family, who worked for them trying to

327
00:20:02.000 --> 00:20:06.680
<v Speaker 5>find exculpatory evidence. Right after the trial, and he continued

328
00:20:06.720 --> 00:20:09.960
<v Speaker 5>to work for the family for free. He had a

329
00:20:10.000 --> 00:20:13.880
<v Speaker 5>lot of reliability for the Ohio Innocence Project and when

330
00:20:13.880 --> 00:20:17.279
<v Speaker 5>he brought this case to them, Mark Godsei reviewed it

331
00:20:17.640 --> 00:20:20.960
<v Speaker 5>and was convinced that, you know, a miscarriage of justice

332
00:20:20.960 --> 00:20:24.200
<v Speaker 5>had occurred. He read those statements of the children's statements

333
00:20:24.480 --> 00:20:28.359
<v Speaker 5>that showed contamination and also, we haven't talked about it.

334
00:20:28.599 --> 00:20:31.799
<v Speaker 5>The children at trial had no difficulty pointing out who

335
00:20:31.920 --> 00:20:35.200
<v Speaker 5>Joseph Allen was in the corporate However, it came to

336
00:20:35.319 --> 00:20:38.640
<v Speaker 5>light through Fatchinelli's article that there was a videotape of

337
00:20:38.680 --> 00:20:42.599
<v Speaker 5>that lineup to show the children and how they reacted.

338
00:20:42.960 --> 00:20:46.200
<v Speaker 5>There were seven children went in for absolutely could not

339
00:20:46.359 --> 00:20:50.599
<v Speaker 5>identify him. One looked as if the father had whispered

340
00:20:50.680 --> 00:20:54.559
<v Speaker 5>in his ear as to it's number two. And then

341
00:20:54.599 --> 00:20:58.559
<v Speaker 5>we have Nina Zorich and her mother eight nine agonizing

342
00:20:58.640 --> 00:21:01.960
<v Speaker 5>minutes where she had entifi' is the wrong person. He's

343
00:21:02.000 --> 00:21:05.759
<v Speaker 5>given second and third chances. The mother points at point says, oh,

344
00:21:05.799 --> 00:21:11.079
<v Speaker 5>it's this person. It's just an incredible videotape. It's available

345
00:21:11.119 --> 00:21:15.279
<v Speaker 5>online if people want to watch that. But anyway, Gatzi

346
00:21:15.319 --> 00:21:18.680
<v Speaker 5>had seen that, and he obviously met with Nancy and

347
00:21:19.319 --> 00:21:23.480
<v Speaker 5>became very much an advocate for her. Because there were

348
00:21:23.480 --> 00:21:27.359
<v Speaker 5>no appeals left, her best chance of getting out of

349
00:21:27.359 --> 00:21:29.359
<v Speaker 5>prison was through paroles. She was going to have a

350
00:21:29.400 --> 00:21:31.839
<v Speaker 5>parole hearing. One of the difficulties with the parole hearing

351
00:21:32.000 --> 00:21:34.799
<v Speaker 5>was that they want to know that The parole board

352
00:21:34.839 --> 00:21:37.519
<v Speaker 5>wants to know that you've been rehabilitated, which means that

353
00:21:37.640 --> 00:21:41.039
<v Speaker 5>you have admitted that you've done these things, You've taken

354
00:21:41.079 --> 00:21:44.880
<v Speaker 5>a sex offender course, and you're ready to be reintegrated

355
00:21:45.279 --> 00:21:50.000
<v Speaker 5>into society. Nancy will not do that. And you know,

356
00:21:50.079 --> 00:21:53.759
<v Speaker 5>they put together a great document for the parle board.

357
00:21:54.119 --> 00:21:57.440
<v Speaker 5>It shows the likelihood that the jury had gotten it wrong.

358
00:21:57.640 --> 00:22:00.480
<v Speaker 5>It also showed, you know, what an exemplary person she

359
00:22:00.519 --> 00:22:02.680
<v Speaker 5>had been in prison, the things that she had done.

360
00:22:03.000 --> 00:22:08.079
<v Speaker 5>But she would not admit to these crimes and she

361
00:22:08.240 --> 00:22:11.799
<v Speaker 5>knew that that would probably end her opportunity for parole,

362
00:22:12.000 --> 00:22:16.079
<v Speaker 5>and in fact, her parole was initially what was denied.

363
00:22:16.240 --> 00:22:18.759
<v Speaker 5>And then you asked me about Amber Brownish, and I'll

364
00:22:19.000 --> 00:22:22.240
<v Speaker 5>go in to that. You know, after her parole was denied, Amber,

365
00:22:22.279 --> 00:22:24.319
<v Speaker 5>who had been fifteen I think at the time her

366
00:22:24.359 --> 00:22:28.839
<v Speaker 5>mom had been convicted, was now an adult, was her champion.

367
00:22:29.400 --> 00:22:32.519
<v Speaker 5>She was always uppering the attorneys and prodding them to

368
00:22:32.519 --> 00:22:35.200
<v Speaker 5>do things, and she decided she had to do something

369
00:22:35.200 --> 00:22:37.960
<v Speaker 5>on her own. So she contacted the Lorraine police, not

370
00:22:38.039 --> 00:22:40.960
<v Speaker 5>expecting anything to happen. But the police chief who had

371
00:22:40.960 --> 00:22:44.559
<v Speaker 5>been involved and been in charge of the detectives when

372
00:22:44.559 --> 00:22:47.160
<v Speaker 5>her mom was convicted, that's the person that I know.

373
00:22:47.319 --> 00:22:51.359
<v Speaker 5>He since passed away Sea rivera very warm, a good individual,

374
00:22:51.599 --> 00:22:54.200
<v Speaker 5>and he said, come on in. He gave her, you know,

375
00:22:54.480 --> 00:22:57.400
<v Speaker 5>let's talk about it. And he suggested to her that

376
00:22:57.960 --> 00:23:02.240
<v Speaker 5>she go to the alleged victims who were now adults,

377
00:23:02.640 --> 00:23:06.240
<v Speaker 5>and see if they would admit that these things hadn't happened.

378
00:23:06.279 --> 00:23:09.039
<v Speaker 5>And he even gave her a tape recorder and so

379
00:23:09.200 --> 00:23:12.559
<v Speaker 5>she could secretly tape record Christmas. Allowed in Ohio only

380
00:23:12.599 --> 00:23:15.880
<v Speaker 5>one person has to consent to that. That didn't work out,

381
00:23:16.160 --> 00:23:18.359
<v Speaker 5>and then he said he would help her with filing

382
00:23:18.440 --> 00:23:22.440
<v Speaker 5>some paperwork for a clemency. Then, when the place chief

383
00:23:22.559 --> 00:23:25.720
<v Speaker 5>was contacted by Mark Gotsey from the Ohio Innocence Project,

384
00:23:25.960 --> 00:23:29.680
<v Speaker 5>he was not as cooperative, and Amber went in and

385
00:23:29.720 --> 00:23:33.279
<v Speaker 5>tape recorded some of their conversations in hopes that that

386
00:23:33.319 --> 00:23:35.119
<v Speaker 5>would speed her mother's release.

387
00:23:35.519 --> 00:23:37.680
<v Speaker 6>Let's use this as an opportunity to stop to hear

388
00:23:37.759 --> 00:23:41.200
<v Speaker 6>from our sponsor. My wife Lisa and I were talking

389
00:23:41.240 --> 00:23:44.200
<v Speaker 6>recently about a favorite restaurant of ours and one of

390
00:23:44.240 --> 00:23:48.759
<v Speaker 6>our favorite meals there, seafood risotto, and we've both talked

391
00:23:48.759 --> 00:23:50.680
<v Speaker 6>about how great it would be to be able to

392
00:23:50.720 --> 00:23:55.119
<v Speaker 6>have delicious meals like that at home. Well Cooked Unity

393
00:23:55.200 --> 00:23:59.440
<v Speaker 6>is the first Chef to you service, delivering locally sourced

394
00:23:59.480 --> 00:24:03.400
<v Speaker 6>meals from award winning chefs right to your door every

395
00:24:03.440 --> 00:24:08.400
<v Speaker 6>week and cheaper than other delivery options. We ordered meals

396
00:24:08.440 --> 00:24:13.359
<v Speaker 6>with a Mediterranean dietary preference. All of the meals arrive fresh,

397
00:24:13.640 --> 00:24:16.799
<v Speaker 6>never frozen, in packaging that keeps meals fresh in the

398
00:24:16.799 --> 00:24:20.359
<v Speaker 6>fridge or up to seven days. All of the meals

399
00:24:20.400 --> 00:24:24.920
<v Speaker 6>we ordered were absolutely delicious. Some of our favorites were

400
00:24:24.920 --> 00:24:30.000
<v Speaker 6>the Chopolte lime salmon with Brussels sprouts by Chef Reuben Garcia,

401
00:24:30.680 --> 00:24:34.920
<v Speaker 6>a spicy, perfect paleo dish. It's amazing what Reuben does

402
00:24:34.960 --> 00:24:38.960
<v Speaker 6>with salmon. We also really enjoyed the rainbow chicken and

403
00:24:39.000 --> 00:24:44.559
<v Speaker 6>pasta salad with coalamada, olives and feta by Chef Nelson Brusella,

404
00:24:45.319 --> 00:24:49.640
<v Speaker 6>and also we loved chef John de Lucy's Mum's Sunday

405
00:24:49.680 --> 00:24:54.599
<v Speaker 6>Rigatoni with penyl sausage and meatballs, a tangy marinara sauce,

406
00:24:55.039 --> 00:25:00.079
<v Speaker 6>and yes, a spicy Italian sausage. Cook Unity is a

407
00:25:00.119 --> 00:25:02.960
<v Speaker 6>step ahead and a step above any other meal delivery

408
00:25:03.000 --> 00:25:08.200
<v Speaker 6>service we've tried, and it's great supporting local chefs and suppliers.

409
00:25:08.960 --> 00:25:12.599
<v Speaker 6>There is no cooking required to have chef quality dining

410
00:25:13.000 --> 00:25:16.839
<v Speaker 6>at home, with hundreds of dishes to choose from, with

411
00:25:16.960 --> 00:25:23.640
<v Speaker 6>a constantly updated menu and seven different dietary options, including Paleo, Mediterranean,

412
00:25:23.880 --> 00:25:28.880
<v Speaker 6>Keto and Vegan, and filters for soy, nut and dairy options.

413
00:25:29.640 --> 00:25:32.680
<v Speaker 6>Pick as few as four or as many as sixteen

414
00:25:32.759 --> 00:25:38.960
<v Speaker 6>meals per week. Experience chef quality meals every week, delivered

415
00:25:39.079 --> 00:25:43.440
<v Speaker 6>right to your door. Go to cookunity dot com slash

416
00:25:43.519 --> 00:25:48.480
<v Speaker 6>murder or enter code murder before checkout for fifty percent

417
00:25:48.519 --> 00:25:52.119
<v Speaker 6>off your first week. That's fifty percent off your first

418
00:25:52.160 --> 00:25:55.759
<v Speaker 6>week using code murder, or by going to cook unity

419
00:25:56.039 --> 00:26:04.000
<v Speaker 6>dot com slash murder. Introduce Judge James Burge December twenty

420
00:26:04.039 --> 00:26:06.839
<v Speaker 6>of two thousand and eight, and you write that he's

421
00:26:06.920 --> 00:26:10.559
<v Speaker 6>considered a maverick. Tell us about what the Maverick judge

422
00:26:10.559 --> 00:26:11.680
<v Speaker 6>does all right.

423
00:26:12.079 --> 00:26:15.880
<v Speaker 5>Jim Burge, at age fifty nine, decides to run for

424
00:26:16.279 --> 00:26:21.400
<v Speaker 5>Judge mcguff's seat. Judge McGuff was retiring. Jim Burge had

425
00:26:21.400 --> 00:26:23.960
<v Speaker 5>been a criminal defense attorney in his entire life and

426
00:26:24.160 --> 00:26:28.240
<v Speaker 5>won that election. He brought a new perspective to that

427
00:26:28.400 --> 00:26:31.960
<v Speaker 5>judge ship early in his in his judge ship, he

428
00:26:32.599 --> 00:26:37.960
<v Speaker 5>contested Ohio's lethal injection and found that it was unconstitutional

429
00:26:38.240 --> 00:26:42.880
<v Speaker 5>as cruel unusual punishment. He was completely different personality than

430
00:26:43.119 --> 00:26:47.839
<v Speaker 5>Judge McGuff, who relished her reputation as a tough on

431
00:26:48.000 --> 00:26:51.640
<v Speaker 5>crime judge. Judge Jack Bradley, who we haven't talked about,

432
00:26:51.640 --> 00:26:55.839
<v Speaker 5>who was Nancy's original attorney and was still working on

433
00:26:55.880 --> 00:26:59.839
<v Speaker 5>her case even though the Innocence Project is involved, filed

434
00:27:00.079 --> 00:27:04.960
<v Speaker 5>emotion based on a technicality in the sentencing order. There

435
00:27:04.960 --> 00:27:07.319
<v Speaker 5>had been a recent High Supreme Court case that said,

436
00:27:07.640 --> 00:27:10.359
<v Speaker 5>when somebody has found guilty, the journal entry has to

437
00:27:10.400 --> 00:27:13.359
<v Speaker 5>say how they were found guilty. Was it by the judge,

438
00:27:13.839 --> 00:27:17.640
<v Speaker 5>was it by a jury? Had they pled? And in

439
00:27:17.759 --> 00:27:21.319
<v Speaker 5>Judge mcguff's journal entry, she just simply said that she'd

440
00:27:21.319 --> 00:27:25.000
<v Speaker 5>been found guilty, and most people thought, well, this is

441
00:27:25.000 --> 00:27:27.839
<v Speaker 5>no big deal. You know, you just have to amend

442
00:27:27.880 --> 00:27:30.559
<v Speaker 5>that entry and say that she's found guilty by a

443
00:27:30.680 --> 00:27:34.839
<v Speaker 5>jury and the original sentencing would be in effect. But

444
00:27:35.240 --> 00:27:39.920
<v Speaker 5>Judge Burge looked at it that, hey, this was never finalized.

445
00:27:40.240 --> 00:27:42.440
<v Speaker 5>This case is still open to me. I can re

446
00:27:42.519 --> 00:27:45.519
<v Speaker 5>sentence her if I want. And it was a novel idea.

447
00:27:45.799 --> 00:27:48.920
<v Speaker 5>So he decided to read the entire transcript, read the

448
00:27:49.000 --> 00:27:51.920
<v Speaker 5>children's statements to see what would be a proper sentence,

449
00:27:52.240 --> 00:27:56.119
<v Speaker 5>and in so doing he had no confidence in the verdict.

450
00:27:56.240 --> 00:28:01.400
<v Speaker 5>And to the surprise of everyone, a gathered everyone together

451
00:28:01.440 --> 00:28:06.240
<v Speaker 5>and said, I am issuing an acquittal for Nancy Smith

452
00:28:06.279 --> 00:28:08.599
<v Speaker 5>and Joseph Allen. And he had said, and in doing

453
00:28:08.640 --> 00:28:10.119
<v Speaker 5>so he had said, well, you know, there have been

454
00:28:10.119 --> 00:28:13.480
<v Speaker 5>some changes in the loss since nineteen ninety four. Number one,

455
00:28:13.720 --> 00:28:16.480
<v Speaker 5>the parents could testify as to what their children said

456
00:28:16.640 --> 00:28:19.200
<v Speaker 5>about the sex acts which happened in this case, and

457
00:28:19.200 --> 00:28:22.160
<v Speaker 5>that that rule was later found to be unconstitutional. Right

458
00:28:22.319 --> 00:28:25.160
<v Speaker 5>because they said that, you haven't, defendant has a right

459
00:28:25.519 --> 00:28:28.839
<v Speaker 5>to confront the actual person who said that. Not this

460
00:28:28.839 --> 00:28:31.359
<v Speaker 5>this hearsay. The other thing is he looked at the

461
00:28:31.400 --> 00:28:34.480
<v Speaker 5>statements and he said, these are all exculpatory why weren't

462
00:28:34.480 --> 00:28:38.640
<v Speaker 5>these turned over to the defense attorneys? And when he excluded,

463
00:28:39.079 --> 00:28:41.680
<v Speaker 5>when he exclude those things, are provide for those things,

464
00:28:42.000 --> 00:28:45.880
<v Speaker 5>there was no basis for a conviction. And then this

465
00:28:45.920 --> 00:28:48.279
<v Speaker 5>said in progress appeals that went all the way to

466
00:28:48.319 --> 00:28:50.079
<v Speaker 5>the Ohouse Supreme Court as to whether he had the

467
00:28:50.160 --> 00:28:52.119
<v Speaker 5>right to do what he did, and the ultimate answer

468
00:28:52.160 --> 00:28:52.839
<v Speaker 5>was they said no.

469
00:28:53.119 --> 00:28:57.319
<v Speaker 6>But for the interim, Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen are free.

470
00:28:57.599 --> 00:29:01.000
<v Speaker 5>Yes incredible, Yes, yes they're They're free for several years.

471
00:29:02.079 --> 00:29:06.680
<v Speaker 5>But there's a tremendous pressure on Judge Burge to set

472
00:29:06.680 --> 00:29:09.920
<v Speaker 5>a hearing to correct the journal jury and send them

473
00:29:09.920 --> 00:29:14.039
<v Speaker 5>back to prison, which he basically refuses to do. And

474
00:29:14.119 --> 00:29:17.119
<v Speaker 5>so other than the Ohio Innocence Project says what can

475
00:29:17.200 --> 00:29:19.799
<v Speaker 5>we do for Nancy? And they really do a two

476
00:29:19.839 --> 00:29:24.319
<v Speaker 5>prong attack. They talk to the prosecutor's office about perhaps

477
00:29:24.720 --> 00:29:29.960
<v Speaker 5>arranging a sentencing agreement that could override the sentences. And two,

478
00:29:30.279 --> 00:29:34.000
<v Speaker 5>they have a petition for clemency that they file with

479
00:29:35.000 --> 00:29:38.799
<v Speaker 5>down in Columbus to try to prove that this was

480
00:29:38.839 --> 00:29:43.119
<v Speaker 5>a wrongful conviction and they should grant her clemency, grant

481
00:29:43.119 --> 00:29:48.039
<v Speaker 5>her freedom, and the Ohio Innocence project in Cincinnati enlisted

482
00:29:48.200 --> 00:29:52.640
<v Speaker 5>a top notch New York City law firm, Davis Polk

483
00:29:52.720 --> 00:29:56.640
<v Speaker 5>that does pro bono work, who put together an incredible brief,

484
00:29:57.079 --> 00:30:01.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, with three hundred pages of exhibits, And then

485
00:30:01.400 --> 00:30:04.799
<v Speaker 5>they had a full hearing with the eleven member Parole board,

486
00:30:05.440 --> 00:30:08.839
<v Speaker 5>with the New York attorney putting on the testimony of

487
00:30:08.880 --> 00:30:14.519
<v Speaker 5>a psychologist showing the unreliability of the interviews. Tom Canto testified.

488
00:30:14.720 --> 00:30:17.960
<v Speaker 5>They had two of the daughters testify and it was

489
00:30:18.000 --> 00:30:22.200
<v Speaker 5>a very impressive performance, but only two of the eleven

490
00:30:22.279 --> 00:30:25.079
<v Speaker 5>members seemed to be in favor. They would make a

491
00:30:25.119 --> 00:30:28.160
<v Speaker 5>recommendations to the judge as to whether the grant clemency,

492
00:30:28.160 --> 00:30:30.960
<v Speaker 5>and that can take months and time was running out.

493
00:30:31.039 --> 00:30:36.400
<v Speaker 5>The other surprising witness at the clemency hearing was Judge

494
00:30:36.759 --> 00:30:39.680
<v Speaker 5>James Burge, who said he was convinced that she was innocent.

495
00:30:39.960 --> 00:30:44.240
<v Speaker 5>Now what that meant he no longer could preside over

496
00:30:44.279 --> 00:30:46.359
<v Speaker 5>her case. He had to re accuse himself, and so

497
00:30:46.519 --> 00:30:50.559
<v Speaker 5>once he had testified, then the Supreme Court brought in

498
00:30:50.640 --> 00:30:54.400
<v Speaker 5>someone else, a visiting judge from another county, and the

499
00:30:55.119 --> 00:30:58.519
<v Speaker 5>Innocence Project Mark Gotsey knew that time was of the

500
00:30:58.640 --> 00:31:01.680
<v Speaker 5>essence and Sharon Katz, who was the attorney from New York,

501
00:31:01.720 --> 00:31:06.119
<v Speaker 5>worked out a sentencing agreement where Nancy was there were

502
00:31:06.119 --> 00:31:08.240
<v Speaker 5>certain findings that you know, the jury, the jury had

503
00:31:08.279 --> 00:31:12.200
<v Speaker 5>found her guilty. They changed the gross sexual imposition sentenced

504
00:31:12.240 --> 00:31:14.440
<v Speaker 5>to twelve years. He'd already served fifteen years, so she

505
00:31:14.559 --> 00:31:18.519
<v Speaker 5>was free. Not so lucky for Joseph Allen, the judge

506
00:31:18.559 --> 00:31:20.920
<v Speaker 5>that had been appointed. They had been apparently worked out

507
00:31:20.920 --> 00:31:23.839
<v Speaker 5>a similar deal for him, but he would be free

508
00:31:23.880 --> 00:31:27.400
<v Speaker 5>on time served. But because he had a prior record,

509
00:31:27.640 --> 00:31:31.119
<v Speaker 5>the prosecutor had had him examined by a psychologists and

510
00:31:31.160 --> 00:31:33.839
<v Speaker 5>they thought that he should be supervised once he was free.

511
00:31:34.079 --> 00:31:38.240
<v Speaker 5>And the judge said no, and so he insisted that

512
00:31:38.680 --> 00:31:41.319
<v Speaker 5>although he reduced it to one kind of rape and

513
00:31:42.039 --> 00:31:45.359
<v Speaker 5>a sentence of twenty five years, Joseph Allen had not

514
00:31:45.559 --> 00:31:47.920
<v Speaker 5>served that, and he was going back to prison, and

515
00:31:47.960 --> 00:31:52.960
<v Speaker 5>did go back to prison until we get to part five, yes, yes.

516
00:31:53.559 --> 00:31:59.359
<v Speaker 6>And before that you introduced another character, of course, Rocko Bronson, junior,

517
00:31:59.559 --> 00:32:01.400
<v Speaker 6>brother of Nina Zor.

518
00:32:01.839 --> 00:32:04.720
<v Speaker 5>Right, that's in part five, that's correct. Yeah, you know,

519
00:32:04.920 --> 00:32:08.640
<v Speaker 5>we've got we've got Nancy free in Lorraine. We have

520
00:32:09.200 --> 00:32:12.279
<v Speaker 5>we have Joseph Allen in prison. And I'll tell you

521
00:32:12.799 --> 00:32:15.799
<v Speaker 5>that's what intrigued me about the case. Initially, I mean

522
00:32:15.799 --> 00:32:18.119
<v Speaker 5>to start writing about it because I thought, here, we

523
00:32:18.200 --> 00:32:21.920
<v Speaker 5>have Joseph Allen in prison, a black man. We have

524
00:32:22.039 --> 00:32:24.599
<v Speaker 5>Nancy Smith free, a white woman. You know, that was

525
00:32:24.640 --> 00:32:26.839
<v Speaker 5>one of the things that one of the reasons I

526
00:32:26.839 --> 00:32:29.640
<v Speaker 5>got the transcripts and got into this case. And when

527
00:32:29.640 --> 00:32:31.640
<v Speaker 5>I write my book, I write the first chapter and

528
00:32:31.680 --> 00:32:34.039
<v Speaker 5>my last chapter. And when I had and I was

529
00:32:34.039 --> 00:32:37.200
<v Speaker 5>writing it, my last chapter had been Joseph Allen going

530
00:32:37.279 --> 00:32:40.440
<v Speaker 5>back to prison. Yeah, well, little did I know that.

531
00:32:40.599 --> 00:32:44.799
<v Speaker 5>About a couple months after I wrote that, Rocco Bronson

532
00:32:45.440 --> 00:32:51.680
<v Speaker 5>content it was contacted. Mark gotsee late at night and said, hey,

533
00:32:52.359 --> 00:32:56.079
<v Speaker 5>my mom coached my sister to say those things. She

534
00:32:56.200 --> 00:32:59.200
<v Speaker 5>promised her a trip to Disney World, she said she

535
00:32:59.279 --> 00:33:02.279
<v Speaker 5>was going to get and she's trying to do that

536
00:33:02.400 --> 00:33:05.359
<v Speaker 5>with me and trying to gain custody of my daughter,

537
00:33:05.519 --> 00:33:09.839
<v Speaker 5>her granddaughter. She's accused my wife of abusing our daughter.

538
00:33:10.319 --> 00:33:14.839
<v Speaker 5>She accused that this happened during a supervised visit with

539
00:33:15.480 --> 00:33:18.200
<v Speaker 5>Children's Services, with the potential that there would be a

540
00:33:18.200 --> 00:33:22.240
<v Speaker 5>claim against Children's Services. And so Mark Gotsey got a

541
00:33:22.319 --> 00:33:26.880
<v Speaker 5>Virginia Brayden, who was an investigator AHD to look at

542
00:33:26.880 --> 00:33:29.799
<v Speaker 5>those allegations and others and father the motion for a

543
00:33:29.839 --> 00:33:33.599
<v Speaker 5>new trial based on newly discovered evidence.

544
00:33:33.839 --> 00:33:37.039
<v Speaker 6>You talk about Rocco Bronson. Police ask him because he

545
00:33:37.079 --> 00:33:40.039
<v Speaker 6>says he was only six years old when this occurred

546
00:33:40.240 --> 00:33:43.880
<v Speaker 6>back in ninety four, in that who else would support

547
00:33:44.000 --> 00:33:45.839
<v Speaker 6>some of the things? He said, who does he say

548
00:33:46.200 --> 00:33:46.880
<v Speaker 6>the supports?

549
00:33:47.160 --> 00:33:49.920
<v Speaker 5>He said, my father will, My father will. And at

550
00:33:49.920 --> 00:33:54.920
<v Speaker 5>the time his father was divorced from Marge Bronson. He

551
00:33:55.000 --> 00:33:59.359
<v Speaker 5>had the rock O Bronson Senior had two children with Marge,

552
00:33:59.720 --> 00:34:02.480
<v Speaker 5>and he would come for visitation to pick them up,

553
00:34:02.640 --> 00:34:06.279
<v Speaker 5>and he you know, he overheard, I mean his ex

554
00:34:06.279 --> 00:34:08.000
<v Speaker 5>wife told him, yeah, I'm gonna get paid for this.

555
00:34:08.400 --> 00:34:12.239
<v Speaker 5>One of the amazing things about Rocco Bronson's affidavit in

556
00:34:12.320 --> 00:34:15.119
<v Speaker 5>his testimony is that he said that his mom had

557
00:34:15.159 --> 00:34:18.639
<v Speaker 5>set up almost like a school in the basement, you know,

558
00:34:18.679 --> 00:34:21.599
<v Speaker 5>with desks, whether the kids would recite what they were

559
00:34:21.639 --> 00:34:23.880
<v Speaker 5>supposed to say, and they had a picture Joseph Allen,

560
00:34:23.880 --> 00:34:26.599
<v Speaker 5>and they would advance from desk to desk, you know,

561
00:34:26.639 --> 00:34:29.599
<v Speaker 5>the better that they performed. And he also claimed that

562
00:34:29.719 --> 00:34:33.679
<v Speaker 5>some of the things that were allegations of sex abuse

563
00:34:33.719 --> 00:34:36.800
<v Speaker 5>were things that had he claimed had happened to him. Now,

564
00:34:36.960 --> 00:34:40.039
<v Speaker 5>the other side of the coin is Roco Bronson Junior

565
00:34:40.400 --> 00:34:44.320
<v Speaker 5>had drug issues. The prosecutor was investigating whether he had

566
00:34:44.320 --> 00:34:48.159
<v Speaker 5>planted drugs in his mother's home. I mean, was he

567
00:34:48.280 --> 00:34:52.039
<v Speaker 5>was not a he was he was not your perfect witness. However,

568
00:34:52.199 --> 00:34:56.719
<v Speaker 5>the Lorraine County Sheriff's Department had investigated the claim about

569
00:34:56.920 --> 00:35:01.280
<v Speaker 5>whether the granddaughter was sexually abused by her mother, and

570
00:35:01.800 --> 00:35:05.559
<v Speaker 5>they found that Marge Bronson had been coaching her. They

571
00:35:05.559 --> 00:35:09.559
<v Speaker 5>had left the videotape on one point where the little

572
00:35:09.599 --> 00:35:12.960
<v Speaker 5>girl was practicing how to cry. So as it would

573
00:35:13.039 --> 00:35:17.159
<v Speaker 5>later turn out, you know, Mark Gazzi was able to argue, hey,

574
00:35:17.159 --> 00:35:19.760
<v Speaker 5>we're not you don't have to rely on Rocko. Look

575
00:35:19.800 --> 00:35:21.440
<v Speaker 5>at you know, she's doing the same thing. You've got

576
00:35:21.480 --> 00:35:25.719
<v Speaker 5>the Lorraine County Sheriff's Department saying that she coached these children.

577
00:35:25.800 --> 00:35:29.199
<v Speaker 5>And you know, this is bombshell evidence. We couldn't possibly

578
00:35:29.199 --> 00:35:31.960
<v Speaker 5>have had that in nineteen ninety four. And that's a

579
00:35:32.000 --> 00:35:34.079
<v Speaker 5>test for newly discovered evidence. You know, it has to

580
00:35:34.119 --> 00:35:37.400
<v Speaker 5>be something that would really shift the needle and was

581
00:35:37.440 --> 00:35:42.400
<v Speaker 5>not discoverable in nineteen ninety four, and that was their argument.

582
00:35:42.599 --> 00:35:45.599
<v Speaker 6>You introduced j D. Tomlinson. When you talk about this

583
00:35:45.800 --> 00:35:48.559
<v Speaker 6>new evidence claim, tell us about j D. Tomlinson.

584
00:35:48.719 --> 00:35:52.199
<v Speaker 5>Well, again, when you talk about Jim Burge taking over

585
00:35:52.400 --> 00:35:55.320
<v Speaker 5>for Judge McGuff, you also talk about j. D. Tomlinson,

586
00:35:55.679 --> 00:36:00.079
<v Speaker 5>a criminal defense attorney, defeating the current, the past prosecutor,

587
00:36:00.079 --> 00:36:02.400
<v Speaker 5>Dennis Will. And so it was. You know, Dennis Will

588
00:36:02.440 --> 00:36:05.320
<v Speaker 5>had always been a prosecutor, been a police officer, and

589
00:36:05.840 --> 00:36:09.239
<v Speaker 5>one of his one of j. D. Tomlinson's campaign promises

590
00:36:09.599 --> 00:36:12.440
<v Speaker 5>was he was going to look into the head startcase again.

591
00:36:12.719 --> 00:36:17.320
<v Speaker 5>And indeed, once he was elected, he had two investigators too,

592
00:36:17.559 --> 00:36:21.079
<v Speaker 5>both were retired detectives, one from the Lorraine Police department,

593
00:36:21.119 --> 00:36:24.440
<v Speaker 5>went from the Illyria who went through the transcript, went

594
00:36:24.519 --> 00:36:28.039
<v Speaker 5>through all of the statements, the police reports, talked with

595
00:36:28.079 --> 00:36:31.280
<v Speaker 5>the number of people and they came back to Tomlin

596
00:36:31.320 --> 00:36:33.880
<v Speaker 5>and said these people are innocent. So you know that's

597
00:36:33.920 --> 00:36:38.119
<v Speaker 5>happening at the same time that Mark Gatzi is receiving

598
00:36:38.119 --> 00:36:40.079
<v Speaker 5>this information from Rock Bronson.

599
00:36:40.480 --> 00:36:43.559
<v Speaker 6>So tell us about what happens next in this fight

600
00:36:43.840 --> 00:36:45.880
<v Speaker 6>for again for justice.

601
00:36:46.440 --> 00:36:51.480
<v Speaker 5>The judge, Judge Burgess is no longer in that courtroom

602
00:36:51.519 --> 00:36:55.239
<v Speaker 5>that had been Judge mcguff's. Judge Burge had left and

603
00:36:55.559 --> 00:36:58.480
<v Speaker 5>Judge Cook had been elected, so this case came to him.

604
00:36:58.719 --> 00:37:03.480
<v Speaker 5>And Judge Cook had a pretty extensive background. He'd been

605
00:37:03.920 --> 00:37:07.519
<v Speaker 5>a prosecutor. He'd also been in a law firm that

606
00:37:07.639 --> 00:37:12.920
<v Speaker 5>included Jack Bradley, Nancy Smith's attorney. But he understands that

607
00:37:13.039 --> 00:37:16.360
<v Speaker 5>he wants, he wants to hold a hearing and make

608
00:37:16.400 --> 00:37:18.639
<v Speaker 5>sure he gets this right as to whether he should

609
00:37:18.639 --> 00:37:21.760
<v Speaker 5>grant a new trial. And most thought that this was

610
00:37:21.800 --> 00:37:24.599
<v Speaker 5>going to be you know, the prosecutor was you know,

611
00:37:25.199 --> 00:37:27.880
<v Speaker 5>this was going to be an easy thing because the

612
00:37:27.920 --> 00:37:31.559
<v Speaker 5>prosecutor was not contesting, you know. And in fact, the

613
00:37:31.639 --> 00:37:34.360
<v Speaker 5>prosecutors sent a letter said we believe she's innocent. But

614
00:37:34.760 --> 00:37:38.639
<v Speaker 5>the former prosecutor, Jonathan Rosenbaum, who was no longer a

615
00:37:38.639 --> 00:37:42.000
<v Speaker 5>prosecutor but in private practice, was hired by two of

616
00:37:42.519 --> 00:37:47.199
<v Speaker 5>the alleged victims to contest this motion for a new trial.

617
00:37:47.639 --> 00:37:50.840
<v Speaker 5>And in Ohio we have something called Marci's Law, which

618
00:37:50.920 --> 00:37:54.559
<v Speaker 5>was actually a constitutional amendment that gave victims certain rights

619
00:37:54.719 --> 00:37:57.480
<v Speaker 5>and it allowed them to be heard at any hearing.

620
00:37:57.639 --> 00:38:04.519
<v Speaker 5>And John Rosenbaum of strenuously objected to this motion for

621
00:38:04.760 --> 00:38:07.679
<v Speaker 5>a new trial. He thought that there should be a

622
00:38:07.679 --> 00:38:12.679
<v Speaker 5>special prosecutor. Pointed that Tomlinson could not be fair, and

623
00:38:13.360 --> 00:38:17.119
<v Speaker 5>that was partly because Tomlinson had hired Jim Burge to

624
00:38:17.199 --> 00:38:19.199
<v Speaker 5>be his chief of staff. And he said, well, you

625
00:38:19.239 --> 00:38:22.079
<v Speaker 5>know he's already he should there's a conflict of interest here.

626
00:38:22.320 --> 00:38:26.440
<v Speaker 5>Fortunately for Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen, Judge Cook had

627
00:38:26.719 --> 00:38:30.199
<v Speaker 5>like twenty five years of experience dealing with ethical claims

628
00:38:30.199 --> 00:38:34.199
<v Speaker 5>and was on a state board that investigated claims against

629
00:38:34.360 --> 00:38:37.079
<v Speaker 5>judges and lawyers. And he said, no, this doesn't apply.

630
00:38:37.719 --> 00:38:41.440
<v Speaker 5>Prosecutor's office is different than a law office, and Jim

631
00:38:41.480 --> 00:38:44.960
<v Speaker 5>Burge is excluded from participating, but no one else's. But

632
00:38:45.360 --> 00:38:53.440
<v Speaker 5>he became quite heated battle and wrote. Judge John Rosenbaum claimed, hey,

633
00:38:53.480 --> 00:38:55.519
<v Speaker 5>they can't you know, I, you know, I don't have

634
00:38:55.559 --> 00:38:59.320
<v Speaker 5>a conflict of interest in this case. In the judgeable,

635
00:38:59.360 --> 00:39:01.880
<v Speaker 5>I think you do. You represented the state of Ohio.

636
00:39:02.280 --> 00:39:05.000
<v Speaker 5>How can you be here arguing a position contrary to

637
00:39:05.039 --> 00:39:08.440
<v Speaker 5>your former client? And Rosenbaum said, well, I'm just saying that,

638
00:39:08.599 --> 00:39:11.440
<v Speaker 5>you know, putting forth an argument that is consistent with

639
00:39:12.280 --> 00:39:15.320
<v Speaker 5>what we argued back in ninety four. Judge said, well,

640
00:39:15.639 --> 00:39:18.559
<v Speaker 5>can't a client change is there her mind? You know,

641
00:39:20.639 --> 00:39:23.079
<v Speaker 5>does a former attorney. You have the right to tell

642
00:39:23.119 --> 00:39:26.679
<v Speaker 5>a client what it can or cannot do. And ultimately

643
00:39:26.800 --> 00:39:30.159
<v Speaker 5>John Rosenbaum withdrew that he had a conflict of interest,

644
00:39:30.679 --> 00:39:33.079
<v Speaker 5>and the last chapter of the book is Judge Cook

645
00:39:33.239 --> 00:39:35.719
<v Speaker 5>rules that they have they're entitled to a new trial,

646
00:39:36.320 --> 00:39:41.599
<v Speaker 5>and the prosecutor gets up and tells the judge, we

647
00:39:41.679 --> 00:39:44.400
<v Speaker 5>are not going to be pressing charges. We want this

648
00:39:44.480 --> 00:39:49.159
<v Speaker 5>case dismiss, dismissed with prejudice. We apologize to Nancy Smith

649
00:39:49.159 --> 00:39:52.480
<v Speaker 5>and Joseph Allen for this ill conceived prosecution. And then

650
00:39:52.559 --> 00:39:56.719
<v Speaker 5>Nancy Smith gets up and she says that she it

651
00:39:56.800 --> 00:39:59.800
<v Speaker 5>is a statement against you know, Marge Bronson. So you

652
00:39:59.800 --> 00:40:02.159
<v Speaker 5>don't know what you did to me. I'm not the

653
00:40:02.199 --> 00:40:05.119
<v Speaker 5>only victim. My whole family were victims. You took me

654
00:40:05.159 --> 00:40:09.519
<v Speaker 5>away from my children in their most crucial period and

655
00:40:09.960 --> 00:40:12.239
<v Speaker 5>wanted to be known that what you did was it

656
00:40:12.280 --> 00:40:16.599
<v Speaker 5>was a horrible, horrible thing. With that, the judge granted

657
00:40:16.599 --> 00:40:20.119
<v Speaker 5>the motion to dismiss and the case was over. Twenty

658
00:40:20.159 --> 00:40:20.880
<v Speaker 5>eight years later.

659
00:40:21.119 --> 00:40:23.920
<v Speaker 6>Let's use this as an opportunity to hear these messages.

660
00:40:24.000 --> 00:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>With Lucky Landslots. You can get lucky just about anywhere.

661
00:40:27.960 --> 00:40:31.360
<v Speaker 5>Dearly beloved, we are gathered here today. Has anyone seen

662
00:40:31.400 --> 00:40:32.679
<v Speaker 5>the bride and broom?

663
00:40:32.679 --> 00:40:33.079
<v Speaker 2>Sorry?

664
00:40:33.360 --> 00:40:35.880
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, we're here. We were getting lucky in the limo

665
00:40:35.920 --> 00:40:36.920
<v Speaker 5>and we lost track of time.

666
00:40:37.679 --> 00:40:40.480
<v Speaker 3>No Lucky land casino with cash prizes that add up

667
00:40:40.519 --> 00:40:41.760
<v Speaker 3>quicker than he gets registered.

668
00:40:42.039 --> 00:40:44.360
<v Speaker 5>In that case, I pronounce you lucky.

669
00:40:44.800 --> 00:40:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Play for free at Lucky landslots dot com. Daily bonuses

670
00:40:48.159 --> 00:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>are waiting. No purchase necessary boid. We're prohibited by Law

671
00:40:50.920 --> 00:40:54.159
<v Speaker 1>eighteen plus terms and conditions applaing see website for details.

672
00:40:55.159 --> 00:40:58.199
<v Speaker 6>You say that it took that twenty seven years to

673
00:40:58.519 --> 00:41:02.320
<v Speaker 6>get this the high of exoneration that Nancy Smith had

674
00:41:02.320 --> 00:41:05.440
<v Speaker 6>wanted all the time. We spoke earlier, and you talk

675
00:41:05.480 --> 00:41:08.840
<v Speaker 6>about the plea agreement that Nancy was given early on

676
00:41:09.079 --> 00:41:11.880
<v Speaker 6>and the what she would have done in the parole

677
00:41:11.920 --> 00:41:15.119
<v Speaker 6>hearing if she was if she were smarter, tell us

678
00:41:15.360 --> 00:41:19.079
<v Speaker 6>a little bit more about Nancy and when we talked

679
00:41:19.079 --> 00:41:22.239
<v Speaker 6>about that. It isn't exactly an exoneration that she was

680
00:41:22.280 --> 00:41:23.840
<v Speaker 6>looking for that she received.

681
00:41:24.000 --> 00:41:27.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's really a question of, you know, what is

682
00:41:27.039 --> 00:41:31.159
<v Speaker 5>an exoneration. The University of Michigan keeps the role of

683
00:41:31.159 --> 00:41:34.880
<v Speaker 5>all the people who have been exonerated, and she and

684
00:41:34.960 --> 00:41:37.920
<v Speaker 5>Joseph Allen are on that list. Some say that you're

685
00:41:37.920 --> 00:41:43.800
<v Speaker 5>not completely exonerated until there's been a case for wrongful

686
00:41:43.960 --> 00:41:47.760
<v Speaker 5>imprisonment filed and that that has concluded. And in a

687
00:41:47.800 --> 00:41:52.079
<v Speaker 5>wrongful imprisonment lawsuit, the first step is you file something

688
00:41:52.159 --> 00:41:54.800
<v Speaker 5>in the county court to hear is Lorraine County, and

689
00:41:54.840 --> 00:41:58.280
<v Speaker 5>it's tried to the judge and he determines whether you

690
00:41:59.039 --> 00:42:02.840
<v Speaker 5>were innocent of those charges. And once there's that finding,

691
00:42:03.360 --> 00:42:06.039
<v Speaker 5>and there's the second part to the case, and it

692
00:42:06.159 --> 00:42:09.960
<v Speaker 5>is transferred to the Ohio Court of Claims in Columbus,

693
00:42:10.239 --> 00:42:13.679
<v Speaker 5>who then makes a decision as to what award of

694
00:42:13.760 --> 00:42:18.079
<v Speaker 5>damages that person is entitled. To this point, that case

695
00:42:18.159 --> 00:42:21.079
<v Speaker 5>is still pending. I think. I think for all intents

696
00:42:21.079 --> 00:42:24.760
<v Speaker 5>and purposes, both she and Joseph Allen have been exonerated,

697
00:42:25.119 --> 00:42:29.679
<v Speaker 5>but compensation for their wrongful imprisonment is still in the offing.

698
00:42:30.159 --> 00:42:33.840
<v Speaker 6>In this book, throughout you provide for the reader the

699
00:42:33.960 --> 00:42:37.400
<v Speaker 6>reasons why you believe that this conviction occurred in the

700
00:42:37.440 --> 00:42:40.880
<v Speaker 6>first place. She was given thirty years minimum ninety years maximum.

701
00:42:40.920 --> 00:42:43.840
<v Speaker 6>He was given the life sentence, and so all throughout

702
00:42:43.880 --> 00:42:47.400
<v Speaker 6>this book, Nancy you mentioned just her statement at the

703
00:42:47.480 --> 00:42:50.960
<v Speaker 6>very end, but the terrible time she had in prison,

704
00:42:51.119 --> 00:42:54.119
<v Speaker 6>the way she was looked attorneys when they came to

705
00:42:54.199 --> 00:42:58.079
<v Speaker 6>visit her, the despair that she had over this conviction

706
00:42:58.199 --> 00:43:01.039
<v Speaker 6>and that she would never get out and see her

707
00:43:01.159 --> 00:43:04.960
<v Speaker 6>children again. You put the reasoning for this, and we

708
00:43:05.000 --> 00:43:09.920
<v Speaker 6>talk about those detectives, the initial detectives that conducted those interviews,

709
00:43:10.119 --> 00:43:14.559
<v Speaker 6>and the over zealous, to say the least, prosecutor Rosenbaum.

710
00:43:14.800 --> 00:43:18.519
<v Speaker 6>Tell us how you believe that this really was perpetrated

711
00:43:18.760 --> 00:43:22.079
<v Speaker 6>and Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen were wrongfully convicted.

712
00:43:22.159 --> 00:43:24.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, one of the things that I always try to

713
00:43:24.360 --> 00:43:26.920
<v Speaker 5>do when I was a trial lawyer and talking to

714
00:43:26.960 --> 00:43:30.559
<v Speaker 5>the jury, I didn't like to preach to them and

715
00:43:30.960 --> 00:43:33.039
<v Speaker 5>tell them this is why they should find One way,

716
00:43:33.559 --> 00:43:37.559
<v Speaker 5>I think both a trial lawyer and an author leads

717
00:43:38.360 --> 00:43:42.679
<v Speaker 5>the reader with presenting to them the facts and allowing

718
00:43:42.880 --> 00:43:46.679
<v Speaker 5>that reader to draw their own conclusions. That being said,

719
00:43:46.880 --> 00:43:49.599
<v Speaker 5>I'm not aware of anybody who's read my book who

720
00:43:49.599 --> 00:43:53.400
<v Speaker 5>doesn't believe that this was a grave miscarriage of justice,

721
00:43:53.679 --> 00:43:58.039
<v Speaker 5>although I'm careful not to express my opinion. But what

722
00:43:58.280 --> 00:44:01.519
<v Speaker 5>did happen here. First of all, we are told that

723
00:44:01.639 --> 00:44:04.840
<v Speaker 5>we have, you know, the best criminal system of justice

724
00:44:04.960 --> 00:44:06.760
<v Speaker 5>in the world, which we do. We have all of

725
00:44:06.760 --> 00:44:11.039
<v Speaker 5>these protections, right against self incrimination, presumption of innocence, all

726
00:44:11.039 --> 00:44:14.920
<v Speaker 5>these things, so we believe that innocent people aren't convicted.

727
00:44:15.840 --> 00:44:18.760
<v Speaker 5>In law school, we're told, given to the mantra, it's

728
00:44:18.800 --> 00:44:22.199
<v Speaker 5>better that ten guilty persons go free than one innocent

729
00:44:22.239 --> 00:44:27.119
<v Speaker 5>person be convicted. But what we're discovering, particularly with DNA evidence,

730
00:44:27.119 --> 00:44:32.760
<v Speaker 5>that these people who have been convicted and exhausted all

731
00:44:32.840 --> 00:44:36.440
<v Speaker 5>their appeals, there's DNA evidence that shows that they didn't

732
00:44:36.480 --> 00:44:40.519
<v Speaker 5>do it. So we're suddenly aware that our system does

733
00:44:40.639 --> 00:44:44.159
<v Speaker 5>make mistakes and why does it make mistakes? And I

734
00:44:44.239 --> 00:44:47.559
<v Speaker 5>can't talk to you on a macro level. I can

735
00:44:47.639 --> 00:44:51.159
<v Speaker 5>only talk to you about this case. And I think

736
00:44:51.679 --> 00:44:55.480
<v Speaker 5>what I'm trying to show through this case is it

737
00:44:55.519 --> 00:45:00.000
<v Speaker 5>can happen to anyone. If it can happen to Nancy Smith,

738
00:45:00.039 --> 00:45:03.360
<v Speaker 5>it can happen to you. And I think that that's

739
00:45:03.400 --> 00:45:06.320
<v Speaker 5>an important message. You know, it's just not the story,

740
00:45:06.400 --> 00:45:09.199
<v Speaker 5>it's just it's a cautionary tale that you know, we

741
00:45:09.360 --> 00:45:11.760
<v Speaker 5>just have to be vigilant, but you know, to try

742
00:45:11.760 --> 00:45:14.599
<v Speaker 5>to answer your question, you know a little more with

743
00:45:14.599 --> 00:45:18.079
<v Speaker 5>a little more specificity. This was a perfect storm. I mean,

744
00:45:18.119 --> 00:45:20.599
<v Speaker 5>when the system fails, it's not just one thing that

745
00:45:20.679 --> 00:45:23.760
<v Speaker 5>goes wrong. It's usually four or five or six things

746
00:45:23.840 --> 00:45:27.079
<v Speaker 5>that go wrong. You have to look at the police investigation,

747
00:45:27.159 --> 00:45:29.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, was it shoddy, was it biased? You have

748
00:45:29.960 --> 00:45:33.199
<v Speaker 5>to look at the prosecutor. Did the prosecutor follow the

749
00:45:33.239 --> 00:45:35.800
<v Speaker 5>guidelines in the law in terms of turning over evidence?

750
00:45:36.480 --> 00:45:39.480
<v Speaker 5>Was the judge fair? Was you know, was the judge biased?

751
00:45:40.159 --> 00:45:42.320
<v Speaker 5>You know, did he or she favor one side or

752
00:45:42.519 --> 00:45:46.559
<v Speaker 5>over the other? Where the defense attorneys prepared, you know,

753
00:45:47.159 --> 00:45:50.760
<v Speaker 5>was there perjured testimony or is there a witness who

754
00:45:50.840 --> 00:45:55.559
<v Speaker 5>later recants? And then you add this final element in

755
00:45:55.599 --> 00:46:00.920
<v Speaker 5>this case, which is these horrible, horrible allegations of child

756
00:46:01.039 --> 00:46:05.440
<v Speaker 5>sex abuse, and there's a hysteria, a pressure on the jury.

757
00:46:05.800 --> 00:46:08.519
<v Speaker 5>I've had prosecutors tell me that if they can get

758
00:46:08.559 --> 00:46:12.960
<v Speaker 5>a child to testify that sex abuse happened, the case

759
00:46:13.039 --> 00:46:17.760
<v Speaker 5>is over. You know, it's extremely powerful testimony, and that's

760
00:46:17.800 --> 00:46:20.480
<v Speaker 5>why in this case it was extremely important for the

761
00:46:20.519 --> 00:46:23.599
<v Speaker 5>defense to have an expert to come in and explain

762
00:46:23.719 --> 00:46:27.719
<v Speaker 5>how the children's memories can be molded and programmed, and

763
00:46:27.960 --> 00:46:31.960
<v Speaker 5>once the story has been cemented, it's as real to

764
00:46:32.000 --> 00:46:36.079
<v Speaker 5>that child as any other memory. So it's a perfect storm.

765
00:46:36.079 --> 00:46:39.199
<v Speaker 5>And I really have highlighted, you know, six different things

766
00:46:39.000 --> 00:46:43.119
<v Speaker 5>that that probably led to it, and each case is different,

767
00:46:43.239 --> 00:46:48.280
<v Speaker 5>but certainly there were failures in a lot of sectors.

768
00:46:48.480 --> 00:46:52.000
<v Speaker 6>It's very interesting too that you're able to in the

769
00:46:52.079 --> 00:46:55.039
<v Speaker 6>end of the book sort of wrap up this ultimate

770
00:46:55.159 --> 00:46:59.599
<v Speaker 6>motivation for this Marge Bronson coming forth, which was just money,

771
00:46:59.760 --> 00:47:02.920
<v Speaker 6>and so it explains so many things that aren't wrapped

772
00:47:03.000 --> 00:47:05.679
<v Speaker 6>up to the very end with this Marge Bronson.

773
00:47:05.960 --> 00:47:09.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, she's an interesting character. I think, you know,

774
00:47:10.000 --> 00:47:12.519
<v Speaker 5>I've never met her, never talked with her, and she's

775
00:47:12.559 --> 00:47:14.880
<v Speaker 5>a very attractive woman. I think she was a very

776
00:47:15.159 --> 00:47:19.599
<v Speaker 5>persuasive woman, and she could really excite others and convince

777
00:47:19.639 --> 00:47:22.239
<v Speaker 5>them that certain things had happened. I think one of

778
00:47:22.280 --> 00:47:25.119
<v Speaker 5>the tragedies in this case is that at the trial

779
00:47:25.199 --> 00:47:28.840
<v Speaker 5>it was never disclosed that she was a convicted fella herself,

780
00:47:28.880 --> 00:47:31.800
<v Speaker 5>that it sold cocaine out of her house. That was

781
00:47:31.840 --> 00:47:35.119
<v Speaker 5>information that the defense should have had, and then they

782
00:47:35.239 --> 00:47:37.400
<v Speaker 5>used that as a basis for a new trial. However,

783
00:47:37.880 --> 00:47:40.840
<v Speaker 5>the prosecutor said I asked her whether she had any convictions.

784
00:47:40.840 --> 00:47:43.079
<v Speaker 5>It was a federal conviction, and she said that she hadn't.

785
00:47:43.280 --> 00:47:45.519
<v Speaker 5>And there were some other things, you know, dealing with

786
00:47:45.719 --> 00:47:48.559
<v Speaker 5>Jack Bradley's involvement in that case that you know, they're

787
00:47:48.719 --> 00:47:50.519
<v Speaker 5>able to say, well, you should have known that she

788
00:47:50.639 --> 00:47:52.480
<v Speaker 5>was a convicted fella, But I think that would have

789
00:47:52.880 --> 00:47:56.800
<v Speaker 5>tremendously discredited her, discredited her if it had been known

790
00:47:56.840 --> 00:47:57.360
<v Speaker 5>at trial.

791
00:47:57.840 --> 00:48:02.599
<v Speaker 6>It's also an interesting case in that it demonstrates how

792
00:48:02.760 --> 00:48:06.800
<v Speaker 6>when she went to other parents and reformed their child's

793
00:48:06.840 --> 00:48:11.639
<v Speaker 6>memories to line up with her own daughter's memories. It's

794
00:48:11.760 --> 00:48:14.840
<v Speaker 6>very interesting that it seems very comparable to some of

795
00:48:14.880 --> 00:48:18.280
<v Speaker 6>the other cases where this hysteria doesn't start off right away,

796
00:48:18.360 --> 00:48:20.280
<v Speaker 6>but bouncing it grows as a result.

797
00:48:20.400 --> 00:48:23.599
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, no question. From nineteen eighties to the early

798
00:48:23.679 --> 00:48:28.239
<v Speaker 5>nineteen nineties, there was a proliferation of these bacare cases.

799
00:48:28.840 --> 00:48:31.920
<v Speaker 5>And you know, in fact, the McMartin case in California

800
00:48:32.000 --> 00:48:35.360
<v Speaker 5>it was, you know, nineteen eighty four, seven years no

801
00:48:35.400 --> 00:48:38.639
<v Speaker 5>one was convicted. There were convictions on almost more than

802
00:48:38.679 --> 00:48:41.639
<v Speaker 5>half of them. They were eventually overturned, but it usually

803
00:48:41.719 --> 00:48:45.239
<v Speaker 5>started with one parent and in the McMartin case she

804
00:48:45.360 --> 00:48:48.760
<v Speaker 5>was a paranoid schizophrenic, you know, that made these allegations,

805
00:48:49.239 --> 00:48:51.760
<v Speaker 5>and then the way that the children were questioned. I mean,

806
00:48:52.480 --> 00:48:54.360
<v Speaker 5>at one point there were eight people that had been

807
00:48:54.679 --> 00:48:57.840
<v Speaker 5>were arrested, you know, and with satanic rites. I mean,

808
00:48:58.039 --> 00:49:01.000
<v Speaker 5>it was something that was not just happened in Lorraine.

809
00:49:01.039 --> 00:49:04.280
<v Speaker 5>It happened all over the country. And I mean the

810
00:49:04.320 --> 00:49:07.199
<v Speaker 5>surprising thing is there was plenty of literature on it

811
00:49:07.280 --> 00:49:10.760
<v Speaker 5>at the time that these things happened in Lorraine. You

812
00:49:10.800 --> 00:49:14.000
<v Speaker 5>would think that the police, the judge, the prosecutor, and

813
00:49:14.000 --> 00:49:16.880
<v Speaker 5>the defense attorneys, you know, should have been aware of

814
00:49:16.960 --> 00:49:19.880
<v Speaker 5>what had happened in these other cases and learned from

815
00:49:19.920 --> 00:49:22.960
<v Speaker 5>the fact. You know, one of the books that Fatchinelli

816
00:49:23.119 --> 00:49:25.719
<v Speaker 5>referred to in his articles was by It was in

817
00:49:25.800 --> 00:49:29.360
<v Speaker 5>nineteen ninety. It was you know, sex Abuse Hysteria the

818
00:49:29.800 --> 00:49:32.920
<v Speaker 5>Salem Witch Trials Revisited. That's a nineteen ninety book, you know,

819
00:49:33.239 --> 00:49:37.280
<v Speaker 5>showing it is how unreliable these cases were. But it

820
00:49:37.400 --> 00:49:40.639
<v Speaker 5>was as if Lorraine was in a vacuum year, but

821
00:49:40.719 --> 00:49:45.760
<v Speaker 5>they weren't looking at what had happened and had been

822
00:49:45.800 --> 00:49:47.280
<v Speaker 5>debunked throughout the country.

823
00:49:47.360 --> 00:49:50.760
<v Speaker 6>It's an extraordinary story. You Chronicle too, because of all

824
00:49:50.800 --> 00:49:55.119
<v Speaker 6>the really extraordinary efforts from so many people, you know,

825
00:49:55.360 --> 00:49:59.199
<v Speaker 6>law firms conducting the case pro bono and some really

826
00:49:59.320 --> 00:50:02.840
<v Speaker 6>unlikely allies and surprising allies as well.

827
00:50:02.960 --> 00:50:05.599
<v Speaker 5>In this I like like any book, it has its

828
00:50:05.639 --> 00:50:08.400
<v Speaker 5>good guys and bad guys, and not going to go

829
00:50:08.440 --> 00:50:12.480
<v Speaker 5>into the bad guys. I'll let the make that decision themselves.

830
00:50:12.480 --> 00:50:15.400
<v Speaker 5>But you can go right down the list. Paul Fatchinellie,

831
00:50:15.679 --> 00:50:19.800
<v Speaker 5>the journalist, Judge Burge, innocent project of people involved there,

832
00:50:20.079 --> 00:50:25.480
<v Speaker 5>Tom Can't, the original detective Jack Bradley who didn't give

833
00:50:25.559 --> 00:50:28.559
<v Speaker 5>up on his client, and Judge Chris Cook for finally

834
00:50:28.559 --> 00:50:31.000
<v Speaker 5>putting an end to it. So and they are lesser

835
00:50:31.280 --> 00:50:33.880
<v Speaker 5>good characters as well, but a lot a lot of

836
00:50:33.920 --> 00:50:36.559
<v Speaker 5>people were involved. But it's it's a tragedy that it

837
00:50:36.599 --> 00:50:39.039
<v Speaker 5>took so long to write this injustice.

838
00:50:39.119 --> 00:50:42.760
<v Speaker 6>It's interesting too, the rule of the media immediately not

839
00:50:43.280 --> 00:50:46.679
<v Speaker 6>inflaming the public and inflaming the case as a result.

840
00:50:46.760 --> 00:50:50.559
<v Speaker 6>But the Fascinelli and the Chronicle and their series really

841
00:50:51.039 --> 00:50:55.440
<v Speaker 6>helped the counter and were well really countered the disturbance

842
00:50:55.519 --> 00:50:57.719
<v Speaker 6>that the earlier media accounts created.

843
00:50:57.760 --> 00:51:01.599
<v Speaker 5>Well. Unfortunately, by the time the articles came out and

844
00:51:01.800 --> 00:51:04.599
<v Speaker 5>Joseph Allen and Nancy Smith were in prison and the

845
00:51:04.639 --> 00:51:08.159
<v Speaker 5>appeals and then exhausted, so that all that they could

846
00:51:08.239 --> 00:51:12.239
<v Speaker 5>do was try to change public opinion and perhaps place

847
00:51:12.280 --> 00:51:14.840
<v Speaker 5>in pressure for the prosecutor's office to look at the

848
00:51:14.880 --> 00:51:18.360
<v Speaker 5>case again. But you know, once someone's been convicted and

849
00:51:18.400 --> 00:51:21.239
<v Speaker 5>it's gone through the system, our criminal justice system is

850
00:51:21.400 --> 00:51:26.320
<v Speaker 5>loath to correct a mistake. And the earlier media attention

851
00:51:26.440 --> 00:51:31.639
<v Speaker 5>that you mentioned was extremely damaging. I mean it pushed

852
00:51:31.639 --> 00:51:35.280
<v Speaker 5>the police to continue on with a case that they

853
00:51:35.760 --> 00:51:39.400
<v Speaker 5>should have dropped, and it caused all of these other

854
00:51:39.480 --> 00:51:43.159
<v Speaker 5>children to come forward, two of whom hadn't been contacted

855
00:51:43.159 --> 00:51:45.519
<v Speaker 5>by Marge Grondin but became part of the case. But

856
00:51:45.559 --> 00:51:48.840
<v Speaker 5>that was all because of that earlier media frenzy.

857
00:51:49.039 --> 00:51:52.960
<v Speaker 6>Yes, absolutely, it's an incredible case and an incredible book.

858
00:51:53.159 --> 00:51:55.599
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much for coming on and talking about

859
00:51:56.000 --> 00:51:59.960
<v Speaker 6>the edge of doubt the trial, Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen.

860
00:52:00.320 --> 00:52:02.400
<v Speaker 6>For those people that might want to take a look

861
00:52:02.440 --> 00:52:05.239
<v Speaker 6>at further at this case and your other work, do

862
00:52:05.280 --> 00:52:07.159
<v Speaker 6>you have a website that they might take a look at,

863
00:52:07.199 --> 00:52:08.679
<v Speaker 6>and do you do any social media?

864
00:52:08.880 --> 00:52:13.800
<v Speaker 5>They can go to my website. Davidmuraldy dot com. I

865
00:52:13.840 --> 00:52:18.920
<v Speaker 5>also have a Facebook page. It's David Marldy author. I

866
00:52:19.000 --> 00:52:22.119
<v Speaker 5>will say my first book, if I can give a

867
00:52:22.119 --> 00:52:24.960
<v Speaker 5>little plug for that, I did a personal connection. It

868
00:52:25.039 --> 00:52:27.519
<v Speaker 5>was my dad murder trive that my dad handled you

869
00:52:27.679 --> 00:52:30.199
<v Speaker 5>back in the sixties. Man was accused of drowning his

870
00:52:30.239 --> 00:52:34.440
<v Speaker 5>wife and scalding water. I found his file decades after

871
00:52:34.480 --> 00:52:37.079
<v Speaker 5>he died, and it cast a spell on me. That

872
00:52:37.559 --> 00:52:41.280
<v Speaker 5>that first book won an International Book Award and right

873
00:52:41.280 --> 00:52:43.880
<v Speaker 5>now a Lionsgate is looking at it in terms of

874
00:52:44.440 --> 00:52:47.519
<v Speaker 5>a mini series, So if they're interested in that book,

875
00:52:47.719 --> 00:52:49.559
<v Speaker 5>and then I'll put a plug in if I can

876
00:52:49.920 --> 00:52:53.119
<v Speaker 5>for my second book, Edge of Malice. Here, my wife's

877
00:52:53.119 --> 00:52:56.199
<v Speaker 5>best friend was shot at a Burger King while she

878
00:52:56.239 --> 00:52:58.119
<v Speaker 5>was going through the drive through. She was an attorney,

879
00:52:58.239 --> 00:53:00.960
<v Speaker 5>and it's her struggle for the the Cramo and civil

880
00:53:01.119 --> 00:53:04.400
<v Speaker 5>justice system. I was involved in a civil case against

881
00:53:04.440 --> 00:53:07.719
<v Speaker 5>the burger king where this happened. But it's her journey

882
00:53:07.920 --> 00:53:11.639
<v Speaker 5>and how she eventually deals with the anger and the

883
00:53:11.800 --> 00:53:16.239
<v Speaker 5>hate and the fear towards her assailant. And that's a

884
00:53:16.559 --> 00:53:20.079
<v Speaker 5>fascinating story. Even if you don't read my book, if

885
00:53:20.079 --> 00:53:24.599
<v Speaker 5>you read another account of it, she's another courageous, courageous.

886
00:53:24.119 --> 00:53:26.880
<v Speaker 6>Woman and a very very interesting Thank you so much,

887
00:53:27.039 --> 00:53:29.679
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much, David MORELDI for coming on and

888
00:53:29.760 --> 00:53:32.519
<v Speaker 6>talking about the Edge of Doubt, the trial of Nancy

889
00:53:32.519 --> 00:53:34.960
<v Speaker 6>Smith and Joseph Allen. Thank you so much for this interview,

890
00:53:35.039 --> 00:53:36.840
<v Speaker 6>and you have a great evening and good night.

891
00:53:37.039 --> 00:53:38.159
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, thank you,
