Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen,
Speaker 2: It's Tuesday, the fourth of November of Our Lord twenty
Speaker 2: twenty five. Well, today we have the election that so
Speaker 2: many people have been so concerned about. Not me, actually,
Speaker 2: I mean this is New York's. It doesn't really affect
Speaker 2: me what's going on in New York City. But we're
Speaker 2: going to talk about a lot of the political firing
Speaker 2: all around this stuff. And I think it has a
Speaker 2: lot to do with the iyre against Tucker and Nick Quintey's,
Speaker 2: two people who I never was interested in interviewing people
Speaker 2: like Nick Quinte's. I'll talk about that. I understand people's
Speaker 2: concern about Tucker Carlson platforming him. We'll also talk about
Speaker 2: the calls to cancel them both. I think that's a
Speaker 2: very different thing. So we're going to talk about that.
Speaker 2: We'll also talk about Trump's sixty minutes interview that he
Speaker 2: had and the back and forth about that, as well
Speaker 2: as the chaos about this Fourth Turning and what is
Speaker 2: happening with the shutdown. We'll be right back by the way.
Speaker 2: Our guest in the third hour today will be doctor
Speaker 2: Brian Hooker of the Children's Health Defense Organization, and I'm
Speaker 2: very interested to talk to him. He's got a new
Speaker 2: resource that they put together that you can share little
Speaker 2: clips onto social media to try to help to wake
Speaker 2: up people as to what happened with COVID. And it's
Speaker 2: just so many people still don't get what happened, and
Speaker 2: so I think that's very important. We're gonna ask a
Speaker 2: lot of questions about what's going on under RFK Junior
Speaker 2: in the HHS and the MAHA stuff as well. The
Speaker 2: most important court case ever, says Trump. The Swim Court
Speaker 2: is about to decide the fate of Trump's tariffs, and
Speaker 2: SOMP is telling us it's going to be the end
Speaker 2: of the country if we don't enact as taxes. I mean,
Speaker 2: if this guy isn't a died in the wall Democrat,
Speaker 2: who is, it's just absolutely amazing. At issue is whether
Speaker 2: the fifty year old law, which has never before been
Speaker 2: used to impose taxes, justify as the levies. And of
Speaker 2: course this is the law about declaring emergency powers. How
Speaker 2: in the world can Trump declare that it is an
Speaker 2: emergency when things are not really very different than they
Speaker 2: were throughout his first four years or for quite some time.
Speaker 2: You know, he may not like it, but it's not
Speaker 2: an emergency. And he just showed that it's not an
Speaker 2: emergency with his tempered tariffs against Canada for an ad
Speaker 2: that they ran and appellate court struck down the tariffs
Speaker 2: in August. The majority said that Trump's AEPA tariffs. That's
Speaker 2: ie e PA, something about emergency. I don't really care
Speaker 2: what it stands for. But for different reasons, one of
Speaker 2: them said the law didn't authorize tariffs, while the others
Speaker 2: said that the tariffs in question could not be imposed
Speaker 2: under the law. So again, you know, they can argue
Speaker 2: about how many angels fit on the head of the pen,
Speaker 2: but we know it's a bad policy, it's a shifting policy,
Speaker 2: and he doesn't have the authority to do this. It's
Speaker 2: a fake emergency, and we don't want one person, especially
Speaker 2: somebody who is capricious and arbitrary and whimsical, setting the
Speaker 2: tariff rates and changing them for a couple of days.
Speaker 2: The dissenting group, which included two Obama appointed judges, said
Speaker 2: that AYAPA does not extend tariff power to the president
Speaker 2: at all, so he's got an uphill battle. I think
Speaker 2: this is a major confrontation between the executive branch and Congress,
Speaker 2: said a former appellate judge appointed by Bush. Bush the
Speaker 2: second the shrub. This is not a confrontation between the
Speaker 2: executive branch and Congress. He's wrong about that, because Congress
Speaker 2: doesn't care. Congresses abdicated their power. They got little Mike Johnson.
Speaker 2: There was kind of a rude meme that was I
Speaker 2: didn't play it because it got very rude. It was
Speaker 2: Mike Johnson's sitting on the lap of Trump as a puppet,
Speaker 2: and it was the graphics were well done, but what
Speaker 2: he had to say was a bit rude, So I
Speaker 2: didn't play it. But that's Mike Johnson is such a puppet,
Speaker 2: and Congress doesn't really care anyway. Congress wants to hold
Speaker 2: hearings and they want to raise money for themselves, and
Speaker 2: other than that, they are more than happy to kick
Speaker 2: all responsibility over to anyone else. Anybody will take the
Speaker 2: hot potatoes that they are elected to handle. They'll send
Speaker 2: it to the bureaucracy, they'll send it to the judiciary,
Speaker 2: they'll send it to the executive branch. They don't care,
Speaker 2: so This is not a struggle between Congress and the
Speaker 2: president over who has the power. This is a struggle
Speaker 2: over everybody wanting to say it's not my responsibility. I
Speaker 2: don't have anything to do here. I'm just make money
Speaker 2: and to have lifetime employment and fringe benefits. That's all
Speaker 2: I'm here for. I came here for the buffet. The
Speaker 2: reality is is that the Constitution is what Trump is fighting,
Speaker 2: and Congress doesn't give a whip about the constitution. Department
Speaker 2: of Justice lawyers have argued, at least in part, that
Speaker 2: the courts should not question what Trump says constitutes a
Speaker 2: national emergency. Well, this is a really bad idea. If
Speaker 2: he can declare what an emergency is and nobody can
Speaker 2: argue with him about emergency, and then the emergency declaration
Speaker 2: that he made unlocks dictatorial powers. Do you see the
Speaker 2: problem with that structure. I think anyone should be able
Speaker 2: to see the problem with that structure. And that's exactly
Speaker 2: what he did with COVID for example.
Speaker 3: That would be called a fing in law the whole
Speaker 3: If the president, it's not illegal. If the president an emergency, it's.
Speaker 2: An emergency, that's right. Yeah, whatever emergency emergency. Everyone to
Speaker 2: get from building. Trump claims that the nation will fall
Speaker 2: into ruin if I eatu a terrats to strike down,
Speaker 2: even as the White House says it will replace the
Speaker 2: levees using other more process heavy trade laws. I'm assuming
Speaker 2: that that means that they'd have to try to follow
Speaker 2: some due process. I don't know, but that would all
Speaker 2: be destroyed. The Oval office tariff switch, the ability to
Speaker 2: impose terrafs quickly without much notice. That's precisely what needs
Speaker 2: to be stopped. Again, it isn't even this is far
Speaker 2: beyond the argument of what form of taxation, what level
Speaker 2: of taxation should be applied, who should be taxed, and
Speaker 2: so forth. It's the constant switching. The taco aspect. We've
Speaker 2: got to take these tacos and flush them down the toilet.
Speaker 2: It was we moved to Houston. The house that we
Speaker 2: bought was new construction, and God, we had been there
Speaker 2: about I guess nine months. In the living room, he
Speaker 2: noticed this, this spot forming on the ceiling, and it's
Speaker 2: getting darker and darker. What is in the world is that?
Speaker 2: Do we have a water leak? I went up there
Speaker 2: into the attic and under the insulation was a taco
Speaker 2: that was left and I took it that from the
Speaker 2: creasy thing to really get rotten and stinking and start
Speaker 2: coming through the drywall. That's basically what's going on with
Speaker 2: Trump's taco terrace. We're at the point now where I
Speaker 2: think everybody should be able to see this greasy spot
Speaker 2: on our economy that's coming through the ceiling. But I
Speaker 2: guess they can't. So I would love to get rid
Speaker 2: of the very thing that they're talking about. His ability
Speaker 2: to switch back and forth on these tariffs, constantly changing them.
Speaker 2: That is the big issue that is chaos for everybody,
Speaker 2: foreign and domestic. I mean you go when you when
Speaker 2: they write the history books and they go back and
Speaker 2: they look at what happened. Here's my vote for what happened,
Speaker 2: what brought us down, what brought us into a global
Speaker 2: economic crisis and a global war and the fourth turning.
Speaker 2: I would say it was Trump throwing the economy under
Speaker 2: the bus with his tariff tantrums. That's my nomination for
Speaker 2: the cause. So the so reason has Maybe you guys
Speaker 2: know more about the Punisher than I do. This is
Speaker 2: a comic book thing. How the Punisher, a murderous anti hero,
Speaker 2: became the mascot for an increasingly militarized police force. And
Speaker 2: I think that's the they got a good point here.
Speaker 2: I mean, I always refer to it as Judge dread
Speaker 2: because I always remember that dreadful movie with Sylvester Saloono.
Speaker 4: I've never seen that one.
Speaker 2: I'm afraid I saw that movie, and I saw that
Speaker 2: trailer many many times, because people would, in spite of
Speaker 2: my guidance, they would go with movies that had stars
Speaker 2: in it that they liked rather than directors. And so
Speaker 2: he's like, well, you want to watch that, okay, but
Speaker 2: I wouldn't advise it. I can give you a better
Speaker 2: movie to watch to night anyway. That's what I always
Speaker 2: think of, and that's what I see with these police
Speaker 2: out there, and so reason this guy wrote this thing,
Speaker 2: Joe Lancaster, sounds like he's about your age, and he
Speaker 2: grew up reading Punisher comics. But he was kind of
Speaker 2: taken back as he saw how the law enforcement people
Speaker 2: are embracing this. So it truly is a contradiction to
Speaker 2: what they're there for. He's breaking the very laws that
Speaker 2: the cops are supposed to uphold. And as I said before,
Speaker 2: we must not lose the rule of law. We must
Speaker 2: not lose the We've got to pay attention to the means.
Speaker 2: The means are so important. Yes, we want to get
Speaker 2: rid of illegal aliens who are here. First of all,
Speaker 2: get rid of them on the welfare rolls, get rid
Speaker 2: of them on the in the eighteen wheelers when they
Speaker 2: speak English to read the signs. Definitely get rid of
Speaker 2: them there. But for their own sake as well as
Speaker 2: for ours. But you know, when we look at this,
Speaker 2: is it okay if we get rid of the illegal
Speaker 2: aliens but we wind up with the illegal cops. Is
Speaker 2: that okay? Is that a good switch? I don't think so.
Speaker 2: I think we're jumping out of the frying pan into
Speaker 2: the fire if we have illegal law enforcement officers who
Speaker 2: thumb their nose at the law and at due process.
Speaker 2: In twenty fifteen, actor John Burnhaal appeared in New York
Speaker 2: comic cons soon after the announcement that he would portray
Speaker 2: Marvel Comics's famous vigilante, The Punisher in the Netflix series Daredevil.
Speaker 2: He said, I know how important he is to law enforcement,
Speaker 2: to the military. He told the crowd, I look at
Speaker 2: this as a huge honore, a huge responsibility, and now
Speaker 2: I give you my apps word I'm going to give
Speaker 2: it everything I have, he says. Since that time, Punisher
Speaker 2: iconography has only continued to proliferate among police officers. The
Speaker 2: character's skull logo has become synonymous with uncritical support for
Speaker 2: the police. Even FBI director Cash Patel is a fan.
Speaker 2: I'm not surprised at that at all. MSNBC's Ken Delanian
Speaker 2: shared a photo of a challenge coin that Patel had
Speaker 2: given out featuring the skull that greatly resembled the Punisher symbol.
Speaker 2: That trend is disheartening both for the fans of the
Speaker 2: comics character like me, and for Americans who want a
Speaker 2: sane law enforcement apparatus that is dedicated to serving citizens
Speaker 2: rather than unleashing violence and folks. This is important because
Speaker 2: this Punisher mentality, we see it already domestically here, but
Speaker 2: we see it escalated and elevated put on a pedestal
Speaker 2: by Trump when it comes to the actions of ice,
Speaker 2: when it comes to the actions of the military and Venezuela.
Speaker 2: It is a very dangerous thing, and it should be
Speaker 2: we should speak out against this all the time. This
Speaker 2: is another very very dangerous precedent that he's setting, he says,
Speaker 2: as a teenager. I found the Punisher's brutally uncompromising worldview
Speaker 2: a fascinatingly stark contrast other more optimistic comic book heroes.
Speaker 2: A Punisher inhabited that same world, but seemed to flout
Speaker 2: all of its rules and conventions. He had no superpowers
Speaker 2: other than military training and a seemingly unlimited arsenal and tenacity.
Speaker 2: I have accrued numerous issues of Punisher comics and collectibles,
Speaker 2: and multiple T shirts bearing his signature skull logo, But
Speaker 2: in more than two decades since I picked up my
Speaker 2: first issue, the character's cultural meaning has shifted. For years,
Speaker 2: the people most likely to wear the skull logo were
Speaker 2: comic fans like me. Then over time it became to
Speaker 2: be more popular among police officers. Custom shops such as
Speaker 2: Etsy and Red Bubble. Mass retailers like Amazon carry thousands
Speaker 2: of items printed with Punisher skulls, often combined with American
Speaker 2: flags and pro police iconograty. So he said, there has
Speaker 2: to be a recognition that while he's doing everything they
Speaker 2: want to fantasize about doing that, he's wrong, said The
Speaker 2: Punisher co creator Gary Conway. He is breaking the very
Speaker 2: laws that cops are supposed to uphold. So putting a
Speaker 2: Punisher decal on your cop car is saying that you
Speaker 2: want to break the rules and that you want to
Speaker 2: be outside of the law and above the law. You know,
Speaker 2: kind of like Ice, a warrior who is fighting a
Speaker 2: lonely war, who kills only those who deserve killing, and
Speaker 2: he will determine who those are. He had a purpose
Speaker 2: and a sense of honor. There was something behind his
Speaker 2: motivation that we didn't know, something terrible that had to
Speaker 2: turn this very straight laced, rules bound guy into the Punisher,
Speaker 2: And so later issues filled in his backstory. He had
Speaker 2: had numerous medals for Vietnam. His final tour went badly.
Speaker 2: That experience haunts him. He survived combat, returned home in
Speaker 2: Queen's only to see his wife and children murdered in
Speaker 2: Central Park after they accidentally witnessed a mafia hit. We've
Speaker 2: seen this storyline told over and over again by Hollywood,
Speaker 2: some one of the reasons I don't like to watch
Speaker 2: movies that are set in twentieth century. They almost all
Speaker 2: along this same line. Here, when corrupt cops and courts
Speaker 2: failed to bring justice to the killer, he declares war
Speaker 2: on all the killer criminals from terrorists to muggers and
Speaker 2: everybody in between. Frank Castle died with his family. He
Speaker 2: corrects a villain while pulling the trigger. I am the Punisher.
Speaker 2: He didn't get his own solo title until nineteen eighty six,
Speaker 2: a dozen years after his debut. They've been trying to
Speaker 2: get him a series off the ground for years, but
Speaker 2: no one at Marvel was interested, but they did a
Speaker 2: five issue limited series. It sold well and led to
Speaker 2: him getting his own series the following year. Comic book
Speaker 2: heroes are traditionally inherently benevolent, they usually refuse to kill.
Speaker 2: The Punisher not only has no compunction about killing, but
Speaker 2: it was his singular purpose. His murderousness also puts them
Speaker 2: at odds with other heroes, who can see him as
Speaker 2: little better than the crooks and killers that they encounter.
Speaker 2: As a result, he has battled fellow heroes like Daredevil,
Speaker 2: Spider Man, Wolverine, and for some reason, Archie. I wonder
Speaker 2: who won when he fought Archie.
Speaker 4: Does Archie have Juughhead to back him up? Is the
Speaker 4: real question.
Speaker 2: What is Archie's superpower? I don't know, Bubblegum pop I
Speaker 2: guess anyway.
Speaker 4: We Scooby do cross over, though I guess.
Speaker 2: In twenty seventeen, le's mean this into the real world
Speaker 2: with cops. Catleitsburg, Kentucky Police Chief Cameron Logan commissioned vinyl
Speaker 2: decals for the department's cruisers, a punish your skull that
Speaker 2: read blue Lives Matter. Now again, I have a problem
Speaker 2: with that. I have a problem with Black lives matter
Speaker 2: and blue lives matter because there's an implication there that
Speaker 2: they matter more than other lives do, and I just
Speaker 2: think that that's wrong, especially when you are somebody out
Speaker 2: there who's supposed to be a public servant. What that
Speaker 2: says to me is that you care more about your
Speaker 2: club that you're in, and you're going to protect the
Speaker 2: blue lives and the blue line more than you're going
Speaker 2: to protect the community. Logan said, I consider it to
Speaker 2: be a warrior logo. That decal represents that we take
Speaker 2: any means necessary to keep our community safe. Well, exactly
Speaker 2: what is your community? Is it Katletsburg, Kentucky or is
Speaker 2: it your police department? What is your community? He spoke
Speaker 2: as if he were commanding troops in a war zone.
Speaker 2: After a public backlash, he had the decouns moved. That
Speaker 2: same year in a small town in New York Solvey,
Speaker 2: New York, the police department drew criticism for similar decaals.
Speaker 2: There's clearly a war on police, said the police chief,
Speaker 2: and the criminal element attempting to infiltrate and destroy our communities,
Speaker 2: lifestyles and quality of living, requiring men and women willing
Speaker 2: to stand up to evil and to protect the good
Speaker 2: of society. We know who the bad guys are and
Speaker 2: take them down. In other words, no need for the
Speaker 2: courts to get involved here with us taking it face value,
Speaker 2: These police departments see themselves as under assault from unchecked
Speaker 2: criminal forces. Isn't this the same mentality that Trump is
Speaker 2: selling the conservatives about what ice is there for. Once
Speaker 2: you sell that, once people believe that everything is up
Speaker 2: for grabs and that mindset, the only way to survive
Speaker 2: is to treat the community like an occupied territory, to
Speaker 2: see civilians as potential threats, and to display a decal
Speaker 2: that signals your willingness to use unconstrained violence on anybody
Speaker 2: who gets in your way. And isn't that what we're
Speaker 2: seeing from Trump's federal police. The rhetoric we're seeing, the
Speaker 2: attitude we're seeing. You know, you're following me, you're using
Speaker 2: a camera on what I'm doing. So they ram these
Speaker 2: people with their cars and arrest them. Solvay's decals, in particular,
Speaker 2: featured a thin blue line and the skull design as
Speaker 2: noted in Errol Morris's documentary of the same name, the
Speaker 2: thin blue Line. The phrase refers to the concept of
Speaker 2: the thin blue line of police that separates the public
Speaker 2: from anarchy. And of course, in that documentary, which I've
Speaker 2: referred to many times, it was a guy who was
Speaker 2: put on death row because a police officer was killed,
Speaker 2: and they had to make it clear to everybody, you
Speaker 2: don't mess with the police. We've got to find somebody.
Speaker 2: Even if we got the wrong guy, we got to
Speaker 2: get somebody and punish them for the death of this cop.
Speaker 2: Let this go unsolved, and we're going to do it
Speaker 2: quick too quickly. We're not going to take the time.
Speaker 2: We've got to find somebody right away, say they did
Speaker 2: it and stick with that.
Speaker 3: And didn't the person they get let go because of
Speaker 3: the documentary and what he uncovered.
Speaker 2: With that, Yes, Earl Morris, as part of that documentary,
Speaker 2: he started to do a documentary on people on death
Speaker 2: row and he saw this guy's case, and he believed
Speaker 2: him that he was innocent, and he started investigating, and
Speaker 2: he started as part as the investigation, he interviewed other
Speaker 2: people and he got the actual killer to confess on video.
Speaker 2: But then he also he also got Robert McNamara, the
Speaker 2: really big killer, the mass killer, to confess on a
Speaker 2: video that that Vietnam was started with a false flag
Speaker 2: in the Gulf of Tonkin. So he's a master in
Speaker 2: terms of getting people relaxed, and he's like a one
Speaker 2: man truth serum that truly is amazing. Yeah.
Speaker 4: Sure, I'll tell this guy with a camera my deepest,
Speaker 4: darkest secrets that could condemn me in the eyes of
Speaker 4: the population forever.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 2: That's the thing. Karen used to be a district personnel
Speaker 2: manager for a convenience store. When they would have a
Speaker 2: theft in the store, they would bring all the people
Speaker 2: in and they would polygraph them, and of course the
Speaker 2: polygraphs don't tell you anything. It's the skill of the
Speaker 2: person who's doing the interrogation and it's the intimidation that
Speaker 2: is there. But he works kind of in the opposite way,
Speaker 2: rather than intimidating somebody into telling the truth, because we're
Speaker 2: going to know if you're lying, he just relaxes then
Speaker 2: and somehow and gets them to tell the truth. I
Speaker 2: wish I knew how that worked. I'd like to try
Speaker 2: that tactic on a lot of politicians I know, besides
Speaker 2: Robert McNamara anyway, Well, the symbol is now ubiquitous. The
Speaker 2: design of a thin blue line and an American flag
Speaker 2: originated in twenty fourteen, three years before it was incorporated
Speaker 2: into the punisher skulls on police cars and solving the
Speaker 2: blue line symbol. The blue Line Punishers symbol have been
Speaker 2: widely embraced by law enforcement community as a symbol of
Speaker 2: a war against those who hate law enforcement. It's how
Speaker 2: we show the world that we hold the line between
Speaker 2: good and evil. Well, here's the thing. If you're going
Speaker 2: to say that law enforcement is a wonderful thing and
Speaker 2: it's the line between good and evil, then you don't
Speaker 2: get to break the law as a cop. You are
Speaker 2: under the law as well. You're not a punisher that's
Speaker 2: been sent on a mission from God. Also known as
Speaker 2: Donald J. Trump, the thin Blue Line narrative highlights the
Speaker 2: assumed differences between officers and citizens. If further progresses and
Speaker 2: US versus them mentality among officers, said a criminol couple
Speaker 2: of criminologists who wrote in twenty nineteen, this is also
Speaker 2: my criticism of the Black Lives Matter. As I said before,
Speaker 2: if you're concerned about police brutality and singling out black people,
Speaker 2: if you're a minority, why wouldn't you join forces with
Speaker 2: a larger group. And why wouldn't you Because the white people,
Speaker 2: in terms not as a percentage, but in terms of
Speaker 2: absolute numbers, had more people that were that suffered from
Speaker 2: excessive force of police than black people did. But it
Speaker 2: was a higher percentage with the black people. So why
Speaker 2: don't you all come together instead of making this about
Speaker 2: white versus black. I felt that Black Lives Matter was
Speaker 2: a misdirection. All of this stuff came from the Bill
Speaker 2: Airs and these other revolutionaries whose goal is not to
Speaker 2: solve societal problems. Their goal is to divide and conquer society.
Speaker 2: I always saw it as that, and I think the
Speaker 2: same thing about this blue line thing, this Blue lives matter.
Speaker 2: So these two guys, these criminologists, Kurts and Colburn, found
Speaker 2: that the blue line narrative relates to the idea that
Speaker 2: death surrounds officers as they go through their daily job,
Speaker 2: though statistically that's not true. As a result, the narrative
Speaker 2: pushes a limited upset of society into seeking the profession.
Speaker 2: People that are more likely to be conservative, justify physical
Speaker 2: violence and deadly force, and are distrustful of the community,
Speaker 2: generally suspicious of those outside of law enforcement. Now imagine
Speaker 2: what that same symbol signifies, impaired with a skull logo
Speaker 2: of extra judicial murderer. And again, I see people cheering
Speaker 2: this all the time. You know, they cheer the actions
Speaker 2: of Ice, They cheer the actions of Trump and Venezuela,
Speaker 2: Vinnie and am As. They're blowing up ships left and right.
Speaker 2: They want this kind of conflict, you know. I think
Speaker 2: back to the case of Aging Schoolcraft, the police officer
Speaker 2: in New York. He was the son of a cop,
Speaker 2: and he took it very seriously, and his dad was
Speaker 2: an old school cop, and he thought he was there
Speaker 2: to protect the community. He didn't have an US versus
Speaker 2: them mentality, So he was not doing all the quota
Speaker 2: arrests that they had there in the department. They were
Speaker 2: telling them that they needed to have X number of
Speaker 2: arrests and so forth, and he didn't like what was happening,
Speaker 2: and so they punished him by making him walk the beat,
Speaker 2: and he loved that. I mean, that's the old kind
Speaker 2: of policing that was done in the cities, maybe the
Speaker 2: middle of the twentieth century and earlier, you know, when
Speaker 2: they first started with the bobbies in the UK. The
Speaker 2: UK has now completely adopted the American model. When we
Speaker 2: went in nineteen eighty, they were still walking the beat,
Speaker 2: unarmed and that type of stuff. Now they are in cars,
Speaker 2: carry guns all the way, they act like American cops.
Speaker 2: But it all began with people who were basically peace
Speaker 2: officers who knew the people in the neighborhood as they
Speaker 2: walked the beat. And so school Craft really liked that.
Speaker 2: They thought they were punishing him, but he really liked it.
Speaker 2: But they were doing all kinds of stuff, like saying,
Speaker 2: on a holiday, you know, go out and round people
Speaker 2: up and bring him back and we'll figure out what
Speaker 2: we're going to charge him with. Afterwards, he started recording
Speaker 2: what the police were doing, and they eventually figured out
Speaker 2: that he was recording them. They came to his apartment
Speaker 2: and they questioned him. This is a guy who was
Speaker 2: like the number two in the police department. They questioned
Speaker 2: him and they took him off and put him in
Speaker 2: an insane asylum. They didn't know that he'd also put
Speaker 2: a second camera up on the shelf. His dad, after
Speaker 2: he disappeared, went to his apartment and investigated and found
Speaker 2: the camera that was up there, and so you know,
Speaker 2: they got him out. There were stories that were done
Speaker 2: about it, not that many. I've always tried to get
Speaker 2: a hold of him, but they have disappeared. He and
Speaker 2: his dad have got there. They learned exactly, like Frank Cirpica,
Speaker 2: what happens when you blow the whistle on a corrupt
Speaker 2: community of cops who think they are punishers, who think
Speaker 2: they are above the law, outside of the law, and
Speaker 2: act that way. Punisher specifically contradicts what the police should represent.
Speaker 2: But if you look at this, they're actually telling us
Speaker 2: what they are. They're wearing their heart and their worldview
Speaker 2: on their sleeve, and we should believe them when we
Speaker 2: see this kind of stuff. Frank Castle, the cartoon character,
Speaker 2: does to bad guys and girls what we sometimes wish
Speaker 2: we could do legally. It's aid a security official who
Speaker 2: worked in law enforcement, federal law enforcement. He said this
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty. He said, Castle doesn't see shades of gray,
Speaker 2: which unfortunately the American justice system is littered with, and
Speaker 2: which tends to slow down and sometimes even hinder victims
Speaker 2: of crime from getting the justice that they deserve. Well,
Speaker 2: I firmly believe that it is better to let a
Speaker 2: guilty person gain the system and go free that it
Speaker 2: is to allow the government to become criminal. That's what
Speaker 2: we're talking about. Yeah, we don't want to have criminals
Speaker 2: on the street. I understand that do you want to
Speaker 2: have an army of criminals who you cannot you have
Speaker 2: absolutely no recourse against them, and they feel entitled to
Speaker 2: use any kind of force, including lethal force, against you.
Speaker 2: That's what you are begging for when you get rid
Speaker 2: of the rule of law. That's what Trump is there
Speaker 2: to push. That's why this is an important article. I
Speaker 2: think so. Police Captain James Gilzuski later discovered that officers
Speaker 2: involved an assault I skipped over something. In two thousand
Speaker 2: and four, numerous off duty Milwaukee police officers accused Frank
Speaker 2: Judd of stealing a wallet and a badge and a house party.
Speaker 2: They then assaulted him so badly that an emergency room
Speaker 2: physician resorted to taking photos because quote, there were too
Speaker 2: many injuries to document in writing. So the police captain
Speaker 2: discovered the officers involved belonged to a clique within the
Speaker 2: department who called themselves wait for it, the punishers. They
Speaker 2: wearing black caps and a skull on them, and they
Speaker 2: get carried away while on duty. This is a group
Speaker 2: of rogue officers with on our agency who I would
Speaker 2: characterize as brutal and abusive. He said in a two
Speaker 2: thousand and seven report. Reminds me very much of the
Speaker 2: sequel to Dirty Harry. You know, Dirty Harry had kind
Speaker 2: of this punisher mentality and you know, the putting too
Speaker 2: many handcuffs on me, I can't get the bad guys
Speaker 2: type of thing. And so Eastwood, who is not an
Speaker 2: authoritarian guy, does a sequel follow up. If you remember
Speaker 2: Magnum Force, and that was two years later. So he
Speaker 2: did Dirty Harry in seventy one, Magnu Force in seventy three,
Speaker 2: and that was about when the cops become punishers, when
Speaker 2: they become vigilantes, when they believe that they don't have
Speaker 2: to follow the law. And so Eastwood had Dirty Harry
Speaker 2: opposing them. You know, they thought Dirty Hairy was a hero,
Speaker 2: and they went to follow him, and I think Eastwood
Speaker 2: realized that he did not want to put that out
Speaker 2: there and push the police in that dark direction. Nine
Speaker 2: Sergeant Brent Raban of Florida's Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
Speaker 2: reportedly bragged on Facebook about beating suspects in the course
Speaker 2: of his work. He wore a skull cap with a
Speaker 2: word punishment on it. Ray Ben told investigators he was
Speaker 2: inspired by comic book characters like The Punisher. He was demoted, reassigned,
Speaker 2: and would be fired the following year. An arbitrator later
Speaker 2: ordered the department to reinstate him and to pay him
Speaker 2: one hundred and fifty thousand dollars in back pay. Because
Speaker 2: you see, there's a different standard of justice for cops
Speaker 2: now there is for other people. Have a law enforcement
Speaker 2: bill of rights that basically is, these same people who
Speaker 2: wish to deny us our rights have got all kinds
Speaker 2: of protections on steroids. Early as the actor that we
Speaker 2: begin with eluded, the Punisher is also popular with members
Speaker 2: of the military, and we can see what is happening
Speaker 2: with that in Venezuela. I won't go need details of that.
Speaker 2: The article continues, but I'll leave it with that that
Speaker 2: delicate thing, the rule of law, is dying. Who is
Speaker 2: killing it? Well, I would say the Trump administration is
Speaker 2: beating it to death, just like this click of punishers
Speaker 2: in that police department. The rule of law has been
Speaker 2: an anomaly on the world scene historically speaking. By the way,
Speaker 2: this is from the New American Selwyn Duke. The Romans
Speaker 2: had it. In fact, they essentially gave us the concept
Speaker 2: of the rule of law. It is a norm today too,
Speaker 2: and the lands that they most influenced those of the
Speaker 2: modern West. But with the default from men being the
Speaker 2: rule of men, there's ever the threat of regression to
Speaker 2: or a behavioral relapse as we could call it. Enter
Speaker 2: the twenty first century, where the rule of law has
Speaker 2: been eroding. Notably, most observers left, right and center agree
Speaker 2: on this proposition too, They just disagree as to who
Speaker 2: is at fault. And so he talks about conservative commentator
Speaker 2: Susan Quinn who believes that it is solely the left
Speaker 2: that is destroying the rule of law. She says, that's
Speaker 2: for leftist protestations to the contrary, are they projection? She said, Well,
Speaker 2: she cites Chuck Schimmer's twenty twenty attack on the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court when they were about it was leaked that they
Speaker 2: were going to overturn roeby Wade, and he called for
Speaker 2: people to threaten them. He said, we know where you
Speaker 2: live and all the rest of this stuff. Well, Barack
Speaker 2: Obama also tried intimidating the Court over Obamacare. But Heritage Foundation,
Speaker 2: which Quinn cites, points out that the US is tragically
Speaker 2: beginning to mirror South America. The weaponization of government has
Speaker 2: spread from Latin America to the US. It Rights drawing
Speaker 2: parallels between Brazilian censorship and Mark Zuckerberg's revelations in Google's
Speaker 2: recent admissions all revealed government complicity. That is, the FBI
Speaker 2: and other Biden officials actually pressured big tech figures to
Speaker 2: suppress speech contrary to their agenda. I'm sorry this all
Speaker 2: started in twenty eighteen in a big way. It started
Speaker 2: in August sixth when Info Wars was hit, and then
Speaker 2: before the midterms and October they took out another eight
Speaker 2: hundred sites. And these were sites that were not pro Trump.
Speaker 2: These are sites that were against the military industrial complex's
Speaker 2: agenda and against the police surveillance state. This has been
Speaker 2: going on for a long time, and all of this
Speaker 2: stuff continued during the Trump administration, through the COVID issue
Speaker 2: and the lockdowns and all the rest of the stuff,
Speaker 2: censoring people who were speaking the truth. And as I
Speaker 2: said before, we're going to have doctor Brian Hooker from
Speaker 2: Children's Health Defense is going to be joining us in
Speaker 2: the third hour. They know that firsthand. Is any of
Speaker 2: the surprising leftists or infamous for talking about situational values
Speaker 2: and ethics, talking about shades of social constructs relative truth?
Speaker 2: And if people actually believe morality is relative, why would
Speaker 2: we think that they would treat the law as absolute. Yet,
Speaker 2: in fairness, it is not just a leftist. I remember,
Speaker 2: for example, a conservative writing a Free Republic years ago
Speaker 2: saying constitutionalism is good. Sometimes he said, well, that's a
Speaker 2: bit like saying the fidelity to your wife is good sometimes.
Speaker 2: Of course, if you're only faithful, sometimes you're not faithful
Speaker 2: at all, which is where Trump is. And that's why
Speaker 2: I said, is not just the fact that he was divorced,
Speaker 2: which has become unfortunately very common in our society, but
Speaker 2: the way he came after his wives afterwards, the way
Speaker 2: that he threw them under the bus and publicly tried
Speaker 2: to humiliate them. I said that is very telling, and
Speaker 2: we saw him doing this to everybody that was in
Speaker 2: his administration. First he builds them up and flatters them excessively,
Speaker 2: and then he attacks them and follows them down the road,
Speaker 2: throwing rotten tomatoes at him. The rule of law is
Speaker 2: fading in America because virtue is fading without it, without morality,
Speaker 2: and the people. We will regress to the mean of
Speaker 2: the rule of law, for to whatever extent virtue does
Speaker 2: not govern animal instinct will, and in the wild, the
Speaker 2: might of the mightiest makes right. And they're absolutely right
Speaker 2: about that. New American is such a it's just it's
Speaker 2: the fundamental problem I think of our time, and that
Speaker 2: is the lack of morality, ethics, and the symptom of
Speaker 2: all that is the lack of the rule of law. Well,
Speaker 2: the largest trucking capacity purge in history is coming. This
Speaker 2: is from freight waves, and they're looking at the problems
Speaker 2: that are going to happen for the brokers and the
Speaker 2: shipping companies and everything. But it's going to be it's
Speaker 2: going to be raising the cost of shipping significantly for consumers.
Speaker 2: That's going to be like a value added tax going
Speaker 2: through are distributed just in time supply chains. It will
Speaker 2: be good for the truckers, though they need some relief
Speaker 2: because they have been severely hurt by these open borders
Speaker 2: and immigrations and people being brought in who can't drive.
Speaker 2: The freight industry is experiencing what experts describe as one
Speaker 2: of the most experienced interesting times ever, though unfortunately not
Speaker 2: in a positive way for most of the participants. Motor
Speaker 2: carriers and freight brokers across the spectrum are feeling the
Speaker 2: significant pain from weak freight volumes and a rapidly changing
Speaker 2: operating climate. What we're witnessing appears to be a calm
Speaker 2: before a significant storm, with indicators pointing toward what could
Speaker 2: become the largest capacity wash out and trucking history. Now,
Speaker 2: this is a story that goes beyond the trucking industry
Speaker 2: because what it does is this tells us better than
Speaker 2: any lying statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, or
Speaker 2: the people who go through and look at the inflation
Speaker 2: rate or whatever and prices, people who calculate CPI, people
Speaker 2: who calculate unemployment figures. This tells us better than anything
Speaker 2: what is happening to the economy. Freight is crashing like
Speaker 2: about twenty percent, and so this could really be catastrophic
Speaker 2: for the drivers. It will be catastrophic for the companies
Speaker 2: that have hired a bunch of illegals if they continue
Speaker 2: to follow through on this as they have begun and
Speaker 2: as they have promised to do. But again, the freight
Speaker 2: volumes have dropped a staggering eighteen percent. That's because of
Speaker 2: the economy. That's because of the terriffs, the effects of Trump,
Speaker 2: and so the combination of that and the fact that
Speaker 2: a lot of these companies are going to be losing
Speaker 2: most of their drivers. And these are the companies that
Speaker 2: decided that they were going to cut the throat of
Speaker 2: American drivers and hire illegal aliens who don't even speak English.
Speaker 2: Good riddits, That's all I can say. But it is
Speaker 2: and the snapshot of what is going on in the economy.
Speaker 2: These people who are non domiciled, as they call them,
Speaker 2: are approximately five percent of all the registered commercial driver's
Speaker 2: licenses in the US, so it's quite a few of them.
Speaker 2: The shift toward a more traditional supply and demand balance
Speaker 2: may ultimately lead to improve profitability for the carriers that survive,
Speaker 2: but likely the ones who have gained the system, who
Speaker 2: have thrown American truckers under the bus may not survive.
Speaker 2: I'm fine with that speak yeah.
Speaker 4: And also just goes to show how insane these Marxists
Speaker 4: are that think we're post scarcity and the fact that
Speaker 4: Karl Marx all those years ago is postulated, Oh we're
Speaker 4: post scarcity now in twenty twenty five, we are not
Speaker 4: post scarcity, Karl Marx. We are still at a very
Speaker 4: tenuous balance of trying to make sure that things get
Speaker 4: where they need to go because if not a lot
Speaker 4: of people are going to be very unhappy, to say
Speaker 4: the least. And this is the great thinker, they're great thinker,
Speaker 4: the man that they think revolutionized political ideology. All he
Speaker 4: did was say give me that. Yeah, I deserve that,
Speaker 4: you should take that. That's all this. He was a thief.
Speaker 2: He never produced anything except.
Speaker 4: He bothered to take care of his own children. That's
Speaker 4: who these people worship and idolize. A man that would
Speaker 4: not take care of his own children. He's a despicable,
Speaker 4: reprehensible man and a fool an idiot.
Speaker 3: But yes, we're at post scarcity now.
Speaker 4: Ali, though, now though you can cook all your I
Speaker 4: forgot the government I know it hasn't happened before and
Speaker 4: we weren't close.
Speaker 2: But now that's what George Guilder says as a matter
Speaker 2: of fact about the Silicon Valley people. He calls him
Speaker 2: neo Marxists because they believe that same fundamental idea. It's
Speaker 2: not though this time, it's not because the factory, but
Speaker 2: it's because of what they build that we are post scarcity.
Speaker 4: It's always these people that get so entrenched in their
Speaker 4: own industry and ideology, so they think it's going to
Speaker 4: be us. We're the ones that are going to do it.
Speaker 4: We're so important. We're going to fix the world.
Speaker 2: You're not.
Speaker 4: You're not going to do it. Human nature is broken.
Speaker 4: It's only going to be fixed when Christ comes back.
Speaker 4: That's what's going to fix it. Everything else is simply
Speaker 4: a scam. But we've got a lot of comments. We've
Speaker 4: got bulldogs saying breaking. Recent announcement by U N. Gutierrez
Speaker 4: warns of mandatory climate reduction measures for manufacturing more to come.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's not giving up.
Speaker 4: Oh come on.
Speaker 2: Well, you know that's the thing I think. You know,
Speaker 2: you got to give credit to Gates. You know, he
Speaker 2: can read the trends there and so you know he
Speaker 2: put himself in the right position. Even though he didn't
Speaker 2: create any software. He stole it, but he did put
Speaker 2: himself in the right position. And he understands that people
Speaker 2: see what's being done to them and the name of
Speaker 2: climate change, and they don't see.
Speaker 4: It's beginning to feel a little bit like when I
Speaker 4: started to get shoved in a locker.
Speaker 2: Well to hit him in the face with that pie.
Speaker 2: I've seen that memes so many times when people put
Speaker 2: up there. This is the moment that Bill Gates decided
Speaker 2: that he wanted to destroy all humanity.
Speaker 4: It was a different time in American history. People were
Speaker 4: throwing shoes at George Bush, pies at Bill Gates. It
Speaker 4: was a good time to be alive. Well, dog, the
Speaker 4: climate lie is still being enforced by the UN. They're
Speaker 4: not going to stop you, and apparently don't care what
Speaker 4: Bill Gates had to say about it being untrue. You
Speaker 4: went true, it's gone.
Speaker 2: That's not you, and true that's not That is the
Speaker 2: way it goes it.
Speaker 4: Scunn callo Rose Gardens. Anyone not into substack, get on it.
Speaker 4: That's right. You can follow the David Knight Show on substack.
Speaker 4: Just look it up. The David Night Show Substack.
Speaker 2: And thank you for reminding us because we do such
Speaker 2: a poor job of taking care of business. For the
Speaker 2: longest time podcast. We monetized podcast years ago. I guess
Speaker 2: it took us about a year to monetize the podcast,
Speaker 2: and they would put a few ads in it, and
Speaker 2: I didn't realize how they had increased the number of ads.
Speaker 2: They just kept building them and building them till it
Speaker 2: got to an absurd level, I think, And so I
Speaker 2: used to I'm not uploading the show anymore, but I
Speaker 2: would go back in and I would cut the commercials
Speaker 2: out significantly because I just thought it was excessive. But
Speaker 2: if you want to get the show without any commercials,
Speaker 2: we have set it up on is it on podcasts
Speaker 2: a substack Now.
Speaker 4: Substack has a completely ad free podcast, so you can
Speaker 4: go there.
Speaker 2: We do make it available to our subscribe start people
Speaker 2: and have for quite some time.
Speaker 4: But I think I need to change how that's set
Speaker 4: up though. I think maybe if I could give them
Speaker 4: a direct download link that's available for a week or
Speaker 4: something like that, that'd be a better, more efficient set
Speaker 4: up than what we have. If you're in the well,
Speaker 4: well they get that with substack. No, that would be
Speaker 4: a different thing, but specifically for subscribe star people, I
Speaker 4: could probably provide them a direct download link that they wait.
Speaker 4: That way they could have it and might be more
Speaker 4: efficient than what we're doing now. So if you're in
Speaker 4: the chat and you have any feelings about that, let
Speaker 4: us know.
Speaker 2: Well we could use Mega for that, just like we
Speaker 2: did for the Christmas album. But anyway, if you want
Speaker 2: to support the show and get a show ad free,
Speaker 2: we're now posting it up on substack, so you can
Speaker 2: get a subscription there on substack.
Speaker 3: It's currently free on substack, but that will be changing.
Speaker 4: It is no longer currently free on substack.
Speaker 2: So we've had these We have these business meetings all
Speaker 2: the time, right, we.
Speaker 4: Go through, we talk about things and then nothing gets decided,
Speaker 4: and then eventually then somebody takes action.
Speaker 2: Then we and we're all catching it up. So that's fine.
Speaker 2: So now tell us what the status.
Speaker 4: Is as substack. If you're a subscriber, you get the
Speaker 4: podcast the full show ad free, and that's where you
Speaker 4: can find it substack dot com, forward slash the David
Speaker 4: Nights Show. If I remember the u url off the
Speaker 4: top of my head, pretty sure that's what it is.
Speaker 2: Okay, good, you'll find a link at David Night dot
Speaker 2: news though.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and you should probably be able to find it
Speaker 4: if you type David Knight Show sub stack into your
Speaker 4: search engine of choice. Yeah, the real Octo spook. Law
Speaker 4: abiding citizens lives matter, bulldog. The cops will do what
Speaker 4: they're told to, as you've seen Pezoovante seventeen seventy six.
Speaker 4: Dick Cheney dead at eighty four.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I saw that.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so oh no.
Speaker 2: Oh, well anyway, anyway, Yeah, he has a long list
Speaker 2: of people that he has sent before him, hasn't he.
Speaker 2: I guess they're going to have a stock split at
Speaker 2: Halliburton in his honor.
Speaker 4: My question is that guy he shot in the face.
Speaker 4: Do you think he's sitting there like that's right when
Speaker 4: Cheney he shot in the face. Yeah, there's a hunting act.
Speaker 2: I didn't know he shot him in the face.
Speaker 4: I'm pretty sure was the face got him with bird shot.
Speaker 2: Oh.
Speaker 4: I could be wrong. I could be wrong. I could
Speaker 4: be misremembering. But my memory says that Dick Cheney shot
Speaker 4: the guy in the face with bird shot, and then
Speaker 4: the guy apologized to Dick. Change is like, I'm sorry,
Speaker 4: my head got in the way of your gun.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you better apologize to him, which, yeah, that just
Speaker 2: goes to show you a guy that's personification be Well.
Speaker 2: I know that Keith Karen's brother did a cartoon of
Speaker 2: Dick Cheney as Darth Vader. It was really funny, little
Speaker 2: Darth Vader.
Speaker 4: How insanely evil do you have to be to shoot
Speaker 4: someone and they apologize to you. I should not have
Speaker 4: put my head there. Yeah, so Bogus says punishment is
Speaker 4: for the courts, not police. Unbelievable. The overall narrative is
Speaker 4: that people are inherently bad and without police around of
Speaker 4: crack skulls, you can't be safe. Well, people are inherently bad,
Speaker 4: So I've got bad news on that front.
Speaker 2: But it is you know, the police against you know,
Speaker 2: they're good and the community is evil. That's the name.
Speaker 4: The police are also inherently bad. Human nature is inherently bad.
Speaker 4: As such, you need a modifying force upon it. Honor Seeker.
Speaker 4: Dirty Harry was also about when our justice system and
Speaker 4: political correctness randam uck was Harry more predictive with what
Speaker 4: would eventually come rather than reactionary.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there's a great clip of when they're when they're
Speaker 2: selling the female police officer and he's not buying it
Speaker 2: that clip yeah something.
Speaker 4: How long you've been on the force, Yeah, exactly. It's
Speaker 4: just like she hasn't done anything, she hasn't experienced anything.
Speaker 4: They're just putting her out there because this will look,
Speaker 4: this will be great for pr.
Speaker 2: It was a wonderful takedown with DEI.
Speaker 3: That was the same problems with no solutions, no real solutions,
Speaker 3: and the same fake solutions being pushed. Do you see
Speaker 3: over and over again.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's the thing. As a general rule, a solution
Speaker 4: to a problem is going to be quite complex. So
Speaker 4: if someone comes to you with a very simple look,
Speaker 4: all we got to do is this, chances are they're
Speaker 4: trying to grift you. And if they say and give
Speaker 4: me money to make this happen, there trying to grift you.
Speaker 4: Narrow way, narrowgate ministries. Rule of law has been replaced
Speaker 4: by rules for thee, the people, and not for me
Speaker 4: the government, which which is unrighteousness, lawlessness, the spirit of
Speaker 4: anti Christ. Yep, yeah, a Syrian girl. The founding fathers
Speaker 4: went on record to say that our form of government
Speaker 4: can only exist as long as the populace is moral
Speaker 4: in virtuous. I believe it was Was it Benjamin Franklin.
Speaker 2: I think it was Adams.
Speaker 4: It might have been, Yeah, you're right. I think John
Speaker 4: Adams said the consequence.
Speaker 2: Said that it's a republic if you can keep it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, And Adams said, you know, the Constitution is only
Speaker 4: suitable to the governing of a moral people.
Speaker 2: I believe that was Adams here.
Speaker 4: Yeah, we have not such a moral people anymore. Gard
Speaker 4: Goldsmith says, I would disagree with David here. The trucking
Speaker 4: industry is in trouble is because of the federal regulation
Speaker 4: layer cake, and the only thing that has kept their
Speaker 4: cost slow enough to void costs by hiring migrants.
Speaker 2: And well, I think the federal government is always putting
Speaker 2: regulations in, but I don't support putting people who can't
Speaker 2: drive or read signs on the street. They need to
Speaker 2: be pulled off yesterday. And so yeah, I don't have
Speaker 2: any from that.
Speaker 3: You're actively making the roads a much less safe place
Speaker 3: so that you can stay in business. There should be
Speaker 3: some consequences for that. I mean, I get that they're
Speaker 3: having economic problems.
Speaker 2: Everything the government does is supposed to be far as safety,
Speaker 2: except this. This would be one place, one place, one
Speaker 2: place where you could have cops pulling people over that
Speaker 2: I would agree with only one the rest of the time,
Speaker 2: leave us alone.
Speaker 4: And I believe, actually even the sovereign citizen crowd tend
Speaker 4: to believe that's trucking. You know, when you're engaged in
Speaker 4: commerce in a vehicle, that's when the cops have some jurisdiction.
Speaker 2: They'll say, I'm not driving, I'm traveling. Yes, I'm traveling,
Speaker 2: and you don't have any right to tell me how
Speaker 2: I can travel or whether I can travel.
Speaker 4: Which if you, of course that line of argumentation, good luck.
Speaker 4: I have a lot of respect for you. If you
Speaker 4: do that, well, are going to lose though.
Speaker 2: You're absolutely right, But they're up against the crooked system
Speaker 2: and you are not listening to their arguments.
Speaker 4: You're not going to win that fight. It's a going
Speaker 4: to be long and difficult, and it's going to ruin
Speaker 4: your life. But if you want to take that stand,
Speaker 4: I you know that's great. I think that is honorable
Speaker 4: and incredible. Good for you.
Speaker 2: And I've known a lot of people who've taken that
Speaker 2: route gone to jail. You know, whether it's against the
Speaker 2: I R. S. Typically was what they would do. One
Speaker 2: of the Peter Schiff's father Irwin Schiff. He used to
Speaker 2: come to the Libertarian conventions and read from his court
Speaker 2: transcript outside like on a soapbox, and it's like, I
Speaker 2: felt really sorry for him, and he was right legally,
Speaker 2: and he was hardcore about.
Speaker 4: Conventions are a very strange place. You have all these
Speaker 4: weird esthetia's like it's like a gaggle of wizards and
Speaker 4: hermits scuttle in from the woods. Yeah, they're all just together.
Speaker 2: And you know, I see this.
Speaker 3: As much the same thing as if you know, a
Speaker 3: company started dumping a bunch of chemicals in the town's
Speaker 3: water supply because that was the only way that they
Speaker 3: could stay in business because of some new government regulation,
Speaker 3: should still be consequences for the primes that they committed.
Speaker 2: That's right, That's right. So yeah, I'm all for deregulation.
Speaker 2: I think truckers are. It's just really burdensome the regulations
Speaker 2: of that.
Speaker 4: And of course you can find Guard Goldsmith at on
Speaker 4: Rumble Liberty Conspiracy six pm daily. Go check them out
Speaker 4: there and on Twitter at guard Goldsmith. Go check them out.
Speaker 2: Well, we're going to take a quick break, folks, and
Speaker 2: we'll be right back to talk about what's going on
Speaker 2: with sixty minutes? What's going on with a mom Danny Mania?
Speaker 2: This has really got everybody upset. I've never seen a
Speaker 2: mayoral race, even in a big city that has got
Speaker 2: people this exercise about what's going on. Stay with us,
Speaker 2: We'll be right back in defending the American Dream. You're
Speaker 2: listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 6: Elvis, a Beatle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find
Speaker 6: them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 2: Well, welcome back, And I wanted to thank people who
Speaker 2: have sent us a contribution by mail. Mary N, Joel b,
Speaker 2: hd Famenci and Dale L. Thank you very much. I
Speaker 2: have a long list of people I'm getting behind on
Speaker 2: Zell put it together on Monday and for two days
Speaker 2: now forgotten to bring it in with me in the
Speaker 2: studio and did not print it out. And I wanted
Speaker 2: to thank Mary, thank you so much for it always
Speaker 2: sends a nice letter, very concerned about my health, and
Speaker 2: many tips and gave me a tip as to where
Speaker 2: I could find broken A's at a discount. So thank
Speaker 2: you very much. I really to appreciate the kind words
Speaker 2: letters and your concern. Thank you very much. Let's talk
Speaker 2: a little bit about Elon Musk. Elon Musk did Joe
Speaker 2: Rogan again? And I guess the question is what is
Speaker 2: he smoking this time? You know he went on before
Speaker 2: and they smoked pot together. This time Elon Musk is
Speaker 2: blowing smoke about immigration, and I say he's blowing smoke
Speaker 2: about it. He's saying that the Democrats want open borders
Speaker 2: and uncontrolled immigration, and he's absolutely right, and he's right
Speaker 2: about the destructive aspect of that. However, remember that he
Speaker 2: and Ramas Slimy when Rama Slimey was running for president,
Speaker 2: the two of them got together, they all agreed that
Speaker 2: American workers just are not up to the task and
Speaker 2: they need to bring in people from other countries using
Speaker 2: H one BV. And so he wants to replace us
Speaker 2: in a different way from the top down. So there'll
Speaker 2: be cases where they will be over zealous and expelling illegals.
Speaker 2: But if you say that the standard must be perfection
Speaker 2: for expelling illegals, then you won't get rid of anybody
Speaker 2: because perfection is impossible. Well, we're not saying that perfection
Speaker 2: is a standard. We're saying that the law is the standard.
Speaker 2: And we're saying that due process needs to be preserved.
Speaker 2: It's going to be preserved imperfectly, but you need to
Speaker 2: have that standard that is external to what we were
Speaker 2: just talking about. That's how little people appreciation people have
Speaker 2: for the rule of law. So if the cops can't
Speaker 2: follow the law, folks get rid of the cops. Keep
Speaker 2: the law. Must supports the h one B stuff. He
Speaker 2: supports robots taking your job. He was one of the
Speaker 2: earliest and biggest supporters of universal Basic INCA. He and
Speaker 2: people like Michael Bloomberg, you know, another mayor of New
Speaker 2: York City, which people are freaking out about this mom
Speaker 2: Danny guy. When you look at the Marxists that have
Speaker 2: been there, de Blasio was a full on marxisty honeymoon
Speaker 2: in Cuba with Castro. And when you look at what
Speaker 2: Bloomberg has done. He worked with London's cidiq Khan to
Speaker 2: set up this c forties organization, which wants to tell
Speaker 2: you that you can't have meat, you can't have milk,
Speaker 2: you can only travel once every three years for nine
Speaker 2: hundred miles. You can only get three articles of clothing
Speaker 2: a year. I mean we're talking about drastic measures. Of course,
Speaker 2: no cars, right, and you know this is the kind
Speaker 2: of evil along with universal basic income that Michael Bloomberg
Speaker 2: was spitting out there. So again I'm a little bit
Speaker 2: surprised at how people are freaking out about Mom Danny
Speaker 2: because we've had such horrible mayors in New York. And
Speaker 2: so again, when you go back to Musk, he supports
Speaker 2: the surveillance state, even supports surveilling your brain with a
Speaker 2: brain link. And when we look at dark Enlightenment, let's
Speaker 2: not get so caught up in this false political landscape,
Speaker 2: this paradigm of left right, conservative, liberal, democrat, republican that
Speaker 2: is not sufficient to explain where people are. And that's
Speaker 2: one of the reasons why people can't figure out what's
Speaker 2: going on with the technocrats people like Musk and Teal
Speaker 2: because they don't fit conveniently under these labels. They go
Speaker 2: across a lot of these things, but they're very authoritarian.
Speaker 2: But the false left right paradigm is just insufficient for
Speaker 2: people to understand the danger of Elon Musk. But I
Speaker 2: think as we're looking at this Mount Danny thing, I
Speaker 2: think that when you see the reactions of people this
Speaker 2: last week to Tucker Carlson and platforming Nick Fintes, and
Speaker 2: you've got. Both Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin, as well
Speaker 2: as the Republican Jewish Coalition, are really freaking out about this,
Speaker 2: and they are coming for Tucker carls Awlson. And you know,
Speaker 2: if you listen to this program that I don't have
Speaker 2: any trust at all for Tucker Carlson because of his background.
Speaker 2: Not just the fact that his dad was CIA, that's
Speaker 2: an important thing, but the fact that he completely towed
Speaker 2: the line in order to get a paycheck when he
Speaker 2: was at Fox News, and now he's off the reservation.
Speaker 2: He wants to reinvent himself. He's either he's even going
Speaker 2: to do a nine to eleven documentary, the guy who's
Speaker 2: shut down any questioning of nine to eleven for the
Speaker 2: longest time. So with all this happening in the US,
Speaker 2: I'm really amazed at how fixated these people are on
Speaker 2: mom Danny, on Nick Fuenttes, and on Carlson, how Shapiro,
Speaker 2: Levin and others are And I think that has more
Speaker 2: to do with mom Danny's perspective on the state of
Speaker 2: Israel than has to do with him being a socialist
Speaker 2: and a Marxist. So I think that they missed their
Speaker 2: opportunity Shapiro and Levin. If they want to support Israel,
Speaker 2: they should have given him advice and said, hey, you
Speaker 2: need to pull off of what you're doing. Everybody sees
Speaker 2: that you are mass murdering civilians and children, so maybe
Speaker 2: you should stop that. We had that from John Stewart.
Speaker 2: He says, if you want Israel to survive, they're becoming
Speaker 2: a pariah because the way that this war is being conducted,
Speaker 2: So stop it. But they never said that. But they
Speaker 2: had quite a bit to say in terms of anti
Speaker 2: free speech and deep platforming people. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: Ben Shapiro just used his entire program to come after
Speaker 2: Tucker Carlson and Nick Flintes because the two of them
Speaker 2: were on opposite sides. But then Tucker Carlson invited him
Speaker 2: in for an interview. A little clip that I saw.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to play it for you, but you know,
Speaker 2: I thought you were fed. No, I thought you were fed.
Speaker 2: It's a comedy routine is crazy. I think they're both
Speaker 2: controlled opposition, where they realize it or not. And as
Speaker 2: we've said before, I have absolutely no use for Flint's
Speaker 2: He's somebody that Alex Jones would bring in frequently and
Speaker 2: I refused to interview this guy. He's somebody who also
Speaker 2: was one of the people hanging around with Alex Jones,
Speaker 2: and he's doing the steel grift and deception. People like
Speaker 2: Nick Flintes, Ali Alexander were going everywhere with Alex Jones
Speaker 2: to deceive their followers. They call themselves gouipers. They're white supremacists.
Speaker 4: There's also a good bit of evidence that Ali Alexander
Speaker 4: is a predator pedophile that Nick Flointes knew about it
Speaker 4: and still put him in a position at America First
Speaker 4: where he could interact with a lot of young, impressionable guys.
Speaker 2: Well, if you look at how much Nick Flintes hates women,
Speaker 2: maybe there's an explanation.
Speaker 4: Yeah that if Nick Fointes isn't closeted, then there's something
Speaker 4: he is strange.
Speaker 2: You know, he just pretty much every group. He has
Speaker 2: nothing but hatred for Jews, Hendrew's, Christians of certain types,
Speaker 2: brown people, blacks, America's foreign policy, and America's constitution. He
Speaker 2: admires Hitler and Stalin. I mean, the guy is a
Speaker 2: basket case, but he's a very nasty little guy. So
Speaker 2: a lot of people who were are not happy with
Speaker 2: their lives love to see Nick Fuentes and his sharp
Speaker 2: tongue go after the people that they dislike as well,
Speaker 2: which is pretty much ever.
Speaker 4: If you're a fan of Nick Fuentez, and don't get
Speaker 4: me wrong, I can understand why you might be. I
Speaker 4: can understand. I've seen clips. He says good things. Sometimes
Speaker 4: he's right on things, but that's what makes him dangerous.
Speaker 4: He's not completely.
Speaker 2: Anybody can be right. Occasionally he says something where they're
Speaker 2: coming from.
Speaker 4: He says some things that I absolutely agree with. He's very,
Speaker 4: very good at pointing out the control Apak in Israel
Speaker 4: has over the United States. But saying that and pointing
Speaker 4: that stuff out is not enough. That doesn't make you
Speaker 4: a person worth listening to. If that's all you do,
Speaker 4: I encourage you all. If you are a fan of
Speaker 4: Nick Fuentees, look into his sussy squad, looking to black Swan.
Speaker 4: Look into how he treated Jaden McNeil. Look how he's
Speaker 4: treated everyone that comes into America first and then leaves.
Speaker 4: Look at his connections with Ethan Ralph. Ethan Ralph, revenge pornographer, abuser.
Speaker 4: This man is a horrible monster of a human being,
Speaker 4: so bad that he had to flee the country to
Speaker 4: live in a tin shack in Mexico to avoid child
Speaker 4: support and court cases. That's who Nick Fuintes willingly has
Speaker 4: associated with. That's the type of people he is willing
Speaker 4: to associate with.
Speaker 2: Hey, you know, I was just reading your quote here
Speaker 2: from Ben Shapiro about Corey Purs white supremacists. They hate women, Jews, Hindu's,
Speaker 2: many types of Christians, etc. And you know the thing
Speaker 2: is is that then he goes after Tucker Carlson for
Speaker 2: platforming him. But we saw the same thing with Alex Jones.
Speaker 2: They platform people like this. I mean Alex Jones platform
Speaker 2: not just Nick Fuente's, but he platformed Milo Inopolis when
Speaker 2: he was going through these issues of pedophilia accusations and
Speaker 2: so forth. And he's brought in Blair White multiple times,
Speaker 2: this transvestite trainee, and anything that will get views, he
Speaker 2: will do because that's all that matters. And that's exactly
Speaker 2: where Tucker Carlson is coming from. And the two of
Speaker 2: them will tell you the truth so they can mislead
Speaker 2: you at a critical juncture. That's the way I view
Speaker 2: both of them.
Speaker 4: So again, the fact that they're both that Tucker Carlson
Speaker 4: and Fwendes and Navis kind of buddy, buddy, like you said,
Speaker 4: I thought you were a FED. Oh I thought, well,
Speaker 4: I thought you were a FED. Oh isn't this funny? Yeah,
Speaker 4: isn't funny how that happens? Well, the truth is, buddy,
Speaker 4: they're both FEDS. They're both FEDS. This was all about
Speaker 4: controlling their viewership. Anyone that saw Nick went, I say,
Speaker 4: Tucker Carlson is a FED, that thought Tucker was a FED,
Speaker 4: goes yeah, point is a speaking truth to power. And
Speaker 4: the exact opposite is true for Tucker Carlson. Fans of
Speaker 4: Tucker saw him calling Nick out, who's an obvious FED?
Speaker 4: Go wow, Yeah, Tucker Carlson speaking truth to power. And
Speaker 4: so they keep both of their audiences locked in.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 4: And now they get to come together and maybe their
Speaker 4: audiences go, oh okay, I guess they're friends. Now, maybe
Speaker 4: they're both good guys.
Speaker 2: Well, the way Shapiro puts it, he says, Carlson acts
Speaker 2: like an ideological launderer for other people's evils. Well, that's true,
Speaker 2: you know, and we've seen this over and over again.
Speaker 2: I mean, you know, you had Alex Jones to bring
Speaker 2: on people like David Duke or Lewis faar Koant for example. Again, anybody,
Speaker 2: you know, he can bring on somebody who's selling the
Speaker 2: transgender agenda, as long as it gets eyeballs, okay, And
Speaker 2: if it's if it's controversial and people hate what you're doing,
Speaker 2: just make sure you spell my name right. You know.
Speaker 2: That's the attitude that these people have. So I agree
Speaker 2: with Shapiro's characterization of these two guys. I did not
Speaker 2: agree with Shapiro because he puts Israel first. I don't
Speaker 2: agree with Levin. The two of them have been just
Speaker 2: pulling their hair out, especially Mark Levin. I guess what
Speaker 2: little the Mark Levin and over Tucker and over Fuintes,
Speaker 2: and you know, and I disregard. I think Mark Levin
Speaker 2: is wrong on so many things, not just Israel first,
Speaker 2: but also on having a constitutional convention. I think is
Speaker 2: a foolish, dangerous idea from the get go. Who would
Speaker 2: be writing that constitution? It'd be the same people refuse
Speaker 2: to follow the one that we've got right now, they've
Speaker 2: already shown their contempt for it.
Speaker 4: I for one, would love to see the Constitution rewritten
Speaker 4: by Chucky Schumer and Nancy Pelosi. Yeah, wouldn't that be
Speaker 4: great guys.
Speaker 2: Or how about Mike Johnson.
Speaker 4: Oh boy, maybe we get Lindsey Graham to author something.
Speaker 4: Wouldn't you love to see what amendment Lindsay Graham might
Speaker 4: add to the Constitution. This is the Lockheed amendment, he says.
Speaker 4: Lockheed gets to sell us bombs, and we have to
Speaker 4: use him.
Speaker 3: Who needs Washington and Jefferson.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right. So he says, he takes other
Speaker 2: people's hideous ideas and he softens them up, and he
Speaker 2: treats them with loving care. Then he provides them with
Speaker 2: a massive signal boosts. And again that's what Alex says.
Speaker 2: That's what Joe Rogan does as well. Right, And so
Speaker 2: he says he'll ask a series of wildly obsequent questions
Speaker 2: to Nick Fuinte's. He'll even let Fuinte's support first. Joseph stalinslide, well,
Speaker 2: I kind of say, when Tucker Carlson went to Russia,
Speaker 2: I thought he was a bit obsequious about that as well.
Speaker 2: I remember when he went through the.
Speaker 4: Seaware, when you're in Russia and the leader of this
Speaker 4: go somewhat authoritarian country is in front of you, you
Speaker 4: might I might be a little obsequious to Vladimir Putin myself.
Speaker 4: You know he's not my authoritarian leader.
Speaker 2: Well it wasn't even when Putin was there, but he
Speaker 2: went through the subway. Look at this beautiful architecture. Anything
Speaker 2: they zoom in on that mosaic of Lenon, I think
Speaker 2: it was if I remember correct. It's been a while
Speaker 2: since I looked at that. But I was like, what
Speaker 2: is he doing? A loving shot of.
Speaker 4: As he lost it my ancestores.
Speaker 2: So again, I share a lot of those concerns about it. However,
Speaker 2: when I saw what the Republican Jewish Coalition was doing,
Speaker 2: I had a big problem with this, especially when at
Speaker 2: Randy Fine, who is has something there for.
Speaker 7: The kids down here? Because it's easy to talk about
Speaker 7: anti semitism on the left, I want to talk about
Speaker 7: the dark force rising on our side. Multiple speakers have
Speaker 7: talked about the rise of anti Semitism on the right.
Speaker 7: But it is not enough to speak in platitudes.
Speaker 4: He's got the red we must call the people.
Speaker 7: Five years ago, if I was talking to my father,
Speaker 7: who's watching High Dad, If I was talking.
Speaker 4: To Mike America Boy.
Speaker 7: Again PM at night, he would say, Randy, I gotta go.
Speaker 7: Tucker Carlson's going to be on. But make no mistake, today,
Speaker 7: Tucker Carlson is the most dangerous anti Summite in America.
Speaker 5: He has chosen.
Speaker 4: I'm sure Nick was seething when he got that take.
Speaker 7: On the mantle, a leader of a modern day Hitler youth,
Speaker 7: to broadcast and feature those who celebrate the Nazis, those
Speaker 7: who call for the extermination of Israel, to defend Hamas,
Speaker 7: to even criticize President Trump for stopping Iran's nuclear ambitions. Friends,
Speaker 7: make no mistake, Tucker is not Maga.
Speaker 4: Everyone knows the first tenant is of Maga is Israel.
Speaker 7: Tucker fall from grace has been one of the most
Speaker 7: extraordinary implosions in political history, and the rapidity of it
Speaker 7: has created real challenges.
Speaker 2: They've all got professionally printed signs at say Tucker is
Speaker 2: not Magga. Did lead them all waving them.
Speaker 7: I even deal with this with my colleagues in the House. See,
Speaker 7: they remember the Tucker of five years ago. They don't
Speaker 7: live with anti Semitism every day. They don't think about
Speaker 7: it the way that we do, and it's jarring for
Speaker 7: them to try to understand how did this person become
Speaker 7: who he is today? But the challenge is He's inspired
Speaker 7: a movement of hate in our midst and I'm not
Speaker 7: done calling people out.
Speaker 4: One of the most insane things to me about this
Speaker 4: continual anti semitism anti Semitism is it's these massively wealthy,
Speaker 4: well connected, powerful people sitting there complaining that some plumber
Speaker 4: in Iowa thinks Israel might have too much influence on
Speaker 4: the American government and they're going to ruin his life
Speaker 4: for it. It's just so utterly absurd. Oh No, Now
Speaker 4: Joe Bob and his little small business over here has
Speaker 4: an opinion I don't like, So Miriam Adelson is, and
Speaker 4: we're going to rush him.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and we're going to use the government to crush
Speaker 2: him as well. We got to suspend the First Amendment.
Speaker 2: This is the problem I have with these Zionists who
Speaker 2: come here and say, we're going to stop you from
Speaker 2: criticizing our political entity, our foreign government by destroying your
Speaker 2: First Amendment. And we're going to do that by buying
Speaker 2: people and Congress and buying the president. That's what they're doing.
Speaker 2: So r jc's that's the Republican Jewish Coalitions. Norm Coleman.
Speaker 2: This is an article from Information and Liberation boasted before
Speaker 2: the JNS International Policy Summit in Jerusalem in April that
Speaker 2: the masters of the universe are Jews. Now, isn't this
Speaker 2: a trope? Isn't this the first sign of anti Semitism
Speaker 2: to say that the Jews run everything?
Speaker 4: He man when I watched the cartoon.
Speaker 3: I can play this video if you want, Yeah, go ahead.
Speaker 8: Majority of gen Z have an unfavorable impression of Israel,
Speaker 8: and my friends, I think the reason of that is
Speaker 8: that we're losing the digital war. Okay, They're getting the
Speaker 8: information from TikTok and eck whatever it is, and we're
Speaker 8: losing that war. And when you think about it, the
Speaker 8: masters of the universes Jews. You know, we've got all
Speaker 8: minute aa oh yeah, we got Zuckerberg, We've got Sir
Speaker 8: j A. Brinn, we got the whole group across the Ward,
Speaker 8: John Colmes, you know, bounded WhatsApp.
Speaker 5: It's us, And.
Speaker 8: We have to figure out a way to win the
Speaker 8: digital battle, Emelia. We got to get all digital sneakers
Speaker 8: on so that the truth can prevail over the lies.
Speaker 8: And when we do that, the future of Israel will
Speaker 8: be stronger because the majority of all Americans will support Israel,
Speaker 8: will make that happen.
Speaker 9: We have to make it happen.
Speaker 5: Thank you for a coustime.
Speaker 2: Thanks So they're going to use the people who have
Speaker 2: created social media. They're going to use them like they'll
Speaker 2: use Hollywood, and they'll say, well, it's us, we should
Speaker 2: bear bring this to bear, to use political propaganda, to
Speaker 2: use canceling and censorship against people in order to make
Speaker 2: them like what we're doing and not criticize. I have
Speaker 2: a real big problem with that. And of course Randy
Speaker 2: Fine is talking about how he wants to cancel people
Speaker 2: there is says, there's the reason first time I shook
Speaker 2: Netnyahu's hand, I did not wash it until I could
Speaker 2: touch the heads of my children. This is the kind
Speaker 2: of idolatry political.
Speaker 4: Is utterly sickening. Just this, who says that how to lunch?
Speaker 4: Do you have to be? To say something like that,
Speaker 4: one would think.
Speaker 3: That after shaking hands with and y'all who, the first
Speaker 3: thing you would want to do is a long, long,
Speaker 3: hot shower.
Speaker 2: Well, also, just I don't know does the blood come
Speaker 2: off that video?
Speaker 4: End? It can't be washed off. That video reminds me
Speaker 4: of an article and I forget where it was or
Speaker 4: who wrote it. But There's an article that basic gets
Speaker 4: a Jewish guy saying, you know who runs Hollywood? Well,
Speaker 4: the Jews do we do? You know, I'm tired of
Speaker 4: pretending we don't. We deserve the credit for this. We've
Speaker 4: created this big, beautiful machine, and you know it's ours.
Speaker 4: And you know, he just full on outlines it. He
Speaker 4: says what you will get in trouble for saying. But
Speaker 4: because he's Jewish and he's bragging about it, it's okay.
Speaker 4: And that's what this guy is doing. He says, you know,
Speaker 4: we're the masters of the universe. We should be running this.
Speaker 4: We should be in charge. They should be buying our narrative.
Speaker 4: Why aren't they. It's because we haven't adapted to the
Speaker 4: new medium of the times. And that's what they're realizing.
Speaker 4: That's what they're saying. It's not you know, oh we've failed.
Speaker 4: It's we just got to change things up Hollywood. It's
Speaker 4: old hat. Kids aren't watching these movies, and if they are,
Speaker 4: they're on their phones the entire time. They're not paying attention.
Speaker 4: You need to get them in a way that they'll understand.
Speaker 4: He's simply saying, we need more Jewish influencers on TikTok
Speaker 4: selling this, that's.
Speaker 2: Right and meta. And Facebook even has a Jewish diaspora chief,
Speaker 2: Jordana Cutler. She told Israelis at the same event that
Speaker 2: she used her position to carve out quote specific protections
Speaker 2: for Israelis and Jews unquote. We banned content claiming Zionists
Speaker 2: run the world or control the media. This is always
Speaker 2: be Jews.
Speaker 4: Run the media. We will blacklist you, we will make
Speaker 4: it so you can't post.
Speaker 2: But we can say that, we can say that. So
Speaker 2: he just boasted about them being the masters of the universe.
Speaker 2: But if you say that they run the world or
Speaker 2: control the media. Now, while they call for control of
Speaker 2: the media and so in the same way, you've got
Speaker 2: these people like Mark Levin and so forth, they're demanding
Speaker 2: that people be canceled. And look, I think that's a
Speaker 2: very different thing than boycott. If you don't like what
Speaker 2: Tucker Carlson does, says, or Nick Flentes, don't watch them,
Speaker 2: don't support them whatever. I agree with that. I agree
Speaker 2: with boycott's But of course the Israeli people do not
Speaker 2: like it when people boycott the state of Israel. Oh,
Speaker 2: that's anti Semitism. If you boycott the State of Israel.
Speaker 2: I think a boycott is a perfectly legitimate response to
Speaker 2: things that you don't like from a corporation or from
Speaker 2: a foreign country or whatever. But when they're talking about
Speaker 2: banning people, that is something that is completely different. Banning
Speaker 2: and canceling people, Especially when they're bragging about how much
Speaker 2: influence they can exercise as social media. To deperson somebody
Speaker 2: because of your political power that you can exercise in
Speaker 2: a back room, I think that is absolutely reprehend It
Speaker 2: may not be illegal, unfortunately it should be, but it
Speaker 2: is certainly reprehensible.
Speaker 4: Maybe they just need to get all the zoomers together
Speaker 4: in one area. They can just show them Shindler's List
Speaker 4: a few times and that'll get them back on board.
Speaker 5: Well.
Speaker 2: She spoke at the RJC summit on the importance of
Speaker 2: free expression while combatting anti Semitism and saying that they
Speaker 2: were going to ban people who said that we're actually
Speaker 2: running the world as they run the world and then
Speaker 2: boast about it, except it was.
Speaker 3: Even more on the nose than that will ban anyone
Speaker 3: from social media if they say that we have influence
Speaker 3: over social media.
Speaker 2: Ted Cruz is now doing the whole silence is video
Speaker 2: meme attack to come after Tucker Carlson at the Republican
Speaker 2: Jewish Coalition. And again this is Chris Minahan who went
Speaker 2: through and documented all this stuff in his article at
Speaker 2: Information Liberation. Zionist Reverend Johnny Moore said to the Republican
Speaker 2: Jewish Coalition, listened to this, I promise as an evangelical
Speaker 2: Christian to not try to convert anyone. So again, this
Speaker 2: is somebody who is worshiping a political entity and not
Speaker 2: the Lord Jesus Christ. And he also doesn't care about
Speaker 2: these people, or he is a rank unbeliever, because if
Speaker 2: he believed Christ, if he loved these people that he's
Speaker 2: talking to, the first thing he would do is try
Speaker 2: to convert them to Christ, to turn them towards Christ.
Speaker 2: But he doesn't want to do that. He says, every
Speaker 2: blessing in my Christian life is the byproduct of your
Speaker 2: Jewish religion. This is the kind of racism, idolatry, and
Speaker 2: ethnic superiority that many Christians are guilty of. They don't understand. Yes,
Speaker 2: Israel was chosen as a means by God to tell
Speaker 2: us about the coming Messiah, who would be a blessing
Speaker 2: to everyone. However, these people have substituted the actual Messiah
Speaker 2: for a political state, and they're doing it to protect this.
Speaker 2: And so you have Christians who are substituting Israel for
Speaker 2: a political who are substituting Israel for Christ and they're
Speaker 2: doing it for political purposes. So yeah, go.
Speaker 10: Ahead, Johnny Moore. And I am a Christian Zionist.
Speaker 2: I'm not. I'm a Christian. It's like we say, I
Speaker 2: want to.
Speaker 5: Here tonight.
Speaker 10: I know, inviting a reverend for Shabbat is a little
Speaker 10: unorthodox pun intended.
Speaker 5: I promise, though.
Speaker 10: I brought my own wine. Actually I'm a Baptist, so
Speaker 10: I brought grape juice. But I'm also not going to
Speaker 10: try to turn your water into anything tonight.
Speaker 5: So I also.
Speaker 10: Promise, as an evangelical Christian to not try to convert
Speaker 10: anyone to anything unless you're a Democrat, and then all
Speaker 10: bets are off.
Speaker 2: I can't take this guy. I'm sorry, I'm gonna cut
Speaker 2: this off. Lindsey Graham threatened perspective anti Israel GOP candidates,
Speaker 2: telling them I'm in the Hitler Sucks wing of the
Speaker 2: Republican Party. He's in the Eternal War wing. You ought
Speaker 2: to be buddies with Hitler.
Speaker 4: I mean, the funniest thing is like the fact that
Speaker 4: he say I'm in the Hitler sucks with the Republican Party,
Speaker 4: implies that there's a Hitler was awesome wing of the
Speaker 4: Republican Party. Like there's just some Republican senators somewhere sitting
Speaker 4: in his office like that Hitler guy has some good ideas.
Speaker 3: Well, that's what he wants you to believe.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what he wants you to believe. Exactly what
Speaker 2: Hitler do? He started World War two? Right, what does
Speaker 2: Lindsey Graham want to do? He has tried over and
Speaker 2: over again to start World War three. He is buddies
Speaker 2: with Hitler. You know, he is on the same ideological
Speaker 2: page as Hitler.
Speaker 4: One can get me such a beautiful war. It's gonna
Speaker 4: be so big. Martin's gonna sell so many bombs.
Speaker 2: He says. If you ever run for our office as
Speaker 2: a Republican and you embrace this weird stuff, We're gonna
Speaker 2: beat your brains out, says Lindsay, and he had.
Speaker 4: Morty's a real tough guy.
Speaker 2: Oh he is. You know, he's he doesn't go fighting
Speaker 2: the wars that he starts, but he's really good at killing.
Speaker 11: He recognized Jerusalem as capital of Israel. Why because if
Speaker 11: you got a problem with that, take it up with God.
Speaker 11: He's the guy, did it, not Trump?
Speaker 2: I thought Trump was God to you people.
Speaker 11: Hey, I feel good about the Republican board. I feel
Speaker 11: good about where we're going as the nation. We're killing
Speaker 11: all the right people, and we're cutting.
Speaker 2: Your Texas, killing all the right people.
Speaker 11: Trump is my favorite president.
Speaker 2: We've run out of bombs.
Speaker 11: We didn't run out of bombs in World War Two.
Speaker 4: So excited by that.
Speaker 2: He as a.
Speaker 11: Of Republicans. I'm Baptists, some Jewish. We organize ourselves around
Speaker 11: principles that we love and we cherish. We love individual freedom,
Speaker 11: we love entrepreneurship, we love capitalism.
Speaker 2: We love Israel.
Speaker 9: We love Israel.
Speaker 2: I knew that was coming. Yeah, okay, of Israel, not America.
Speaker 2: Not America. He loves Israel, and he loves war more
Speaker 2: than anything. That's the thing that really gets him going.
Speaker 2: With any luck, you know, we can kill even more
Speaker 2: people of nuclear weapons, that's what he wants. Yeah, we've
Speaker 2: run out of bombs, and we didn't even run out
Speaker 2: of bombs in World War Two. He said, well, we
Speaker 2: were a different country then. I think if we're going
Speaker 2: to find out that if we want to have a war,
Speaker 2: we don't have the manufacturing capacity. And that's your problem,
Speaker 2: lindsay on your watch that all happened. So Newsmax's CEO
Speaker 2: Chris Ruddy was also there. He said that Mark Levin
Speaker 2: is a real conservative, not Tucker Crosson or Candice Owen.
Speaker 2: Tucker doesn't think that Jews are the chich and people
Speaker 2: of God, said Reddy, imagine that. Well, again, the question is,
Speaker 2: you know, when we say Israel, we say what do
Speaker 2: you mean by Israel? Do you mean an ethnic group?
Speaker 2: Do you mean a political designation? Do you mean some
Speaker 2: people who follow and listen to God, who believe in God?
Speaker 2: What is it that you mean? You needed to find
Speaker 2: what Israel is. And when you talk about a chosen people,
Speaker 2: what were they chosen for? Rachel? What was their mean?
Speaker 2: Why did God choose them? He chose them to tell
Speaker 2: the world about the Messiah, and they don't want the
Speaker 2: Messiah anymore, and evidently neither does Chris Ruddy. So then
Speaker 2: you know Levin isn't even conservative. As I said before,
Speaker 2: this is a guy who is a big believer in
Speaker 2: big government. He wants to rewrite the Constitution. He's got
Speaker 2: his liberty amendments, but the whole idea of a constitution
Speaker 2: convention is a disaster, so he said. Chris Menahana quoted
Speaker 2: Chris Reddy saying, these folks are spreading old lies and
Speaker 2: anti submitted claims, like the ones that Jews secretly control everything.
Speaker 2: Wait a minute, didn't we just settle that they secretly
Speaker 2: to make up their minds they control everything, But then
Speaker 2: they don't control everything. We're going to punish people on
Speaker 2: social media because we control social media and we're the
Speaker 2: masters of the universe, but we don't control everything.
Speaker 4: Well, you see, the taconomy is if you're Jewish, you're
Speaker 4: allowed to point out that you run and everything. It's
Speaker 4: great you should, but if you're not Jewish, you must
Speaker 4: never acknowledge it. You must never point that out.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so here's Lendsy Graham, not Lindsay Graham, Mark Levin
Speaker 2: with his typical nasty sneers.
Speaker 12: Six months, I've been fighting these bastards, whether it's Tucker
Speaker 12: Carlson or whether it's Nick Fouantis, and I've been looking
Speaker 12: over my shoulder looking for.
Speaker 9: Help, and you know, I found nothing.
Speaker 2: Nothing, nothing.
Speaker 12: We're here today to do something. Yeah, what do you mean,
Speaker 12: we don't cancel people.
Speaker 2: Listen to this.
Speaker 12: We canceled David Duke, Donald Trump canceled David Duke. We
Speaker 12: canceled Pat Buchanan. We canceled the John Birch Society.
Speaker 9: We canceled Joe.
Speaker 2: Wait a minute, I like those people ornography on David Duke.
Speaker 12: We cancel David Uke, all the damn time, Hitler admirers,
Speaker 12: Stalin admirers, Jew haters, American haters, Churchill haters. You're damn right,
Speaker 12: we're going to cancel them in deep platform.
Speaker 2: You cancel people because you can't handle free speech. You demagogue.
Speaker 2: I can't stand that guy. He hates free speech and
Speaker 2: you can't handle the debate. That's why he cancels people.
Speaker 2: You're a fraud, Vin, You're lying, fraud and a racist
Speaker 2: to boot. This is why Pat Buchanan said, here, we
Speaker 2: have this right here.
Speaker 13: You've also said that Congress is a Israeli occupied territory.
Speaker 2: Now what do you mean by that? Wait a minute,
Speaker 2: he said, the Jews run everything.
Speaker 14: In response to a question Jim, they said, do you
Speaker 14: think that the Congress United States will resist this demand
Speaker 14: for feather?
Speaker 2: Aid I said.
Speaker 14: Throughout a crack i'd heard. I said, no, the Congress
Speaker 14: of the United States Israeli occupied territory. What I met
Speaker 14: by that is the most powerful lobby in Washington, which
Speaker 14: Congress can't stand up to. One of the most powerful
Speaker 14: is certainly the pro Israeli lobby. It has gotten its
Speaker 14: way in this town year in and year out. And
Speaker 14: I don't think the automatic votes of the Congress of
Speaker 14: the United States for three and four billion dollars worth
Speaker 14: of aid to Israel are necessarily in the national interests
Speaker 14: of the United States. And that comment, which is to
Speaker 14: ridicule the subservience of the Congress of the United States,
Speaker 14: is perfectly valid.
Speaker 13: Do you believe there are members of the Congress of
Speaker 13: the United States who are voting the interest of Israel
Speaker 13: over the interests of the United States.
Speaker 14: So I think they're voting the interest of a powerful
Speaker 14: lobby which they can't stand up to. In many cases,
Speaker 14: one of many they cave into lobbies all over this city.
Speaker 14: I think the Congress of the United States, where it's
Speaker 14: got brave men on both sides, is an institute coward.
Speaker 14: And that when a powerful lobby can influence or defeat
Speaker 14: them back at home, and they can't get much support
Speaker 14: on the other side for a vote. Many of them
Speaker 14: who will even tell you privately, they will tell you privately,
Speaker 14: I can't stand.
Speaker 2: Up to that kind of heat. They will vote for it. Yeah,
Speaker 2: but of course, well doubt this Trump can say that
Speaker 2: lobby Congress is owned by Israel.
Speaker 15: Well, you know the biggest change I've seen in Congress
Speaker 15: is Israel.
Speaker 1: Literally owned the Congress. You understand that ten years ago,
Speaker 1: fifteen years ago, and.
Speaker 2: So Pat Buchannan was right.
Speaker 1: It was so powerful and I think you know exactly
Speaker 1: what I'm saying.
Speaker 15: They had such power, Israel had such power and rightfully
Speaker 15: over Congress. You know, Israel was the most powerful lobby
Speaker 15: in the country fifteen years ago. Today, between Taleb and
Speaker 15: AOC and all of these people, what they're doing Israel,
Speaker 15: they don't have the back end that they once had.
Speaker 9: You'll give it to the I have. I'm good, I'm.
Speaker 2: Good begging like a whore. It's just that's the difference,
Speaker 2: you know. Pab Buchanan told people the truth about this lobby,
Speaker 2: this foreign government's lobby, and they canceled them. And Mark
Speaker 2: Levin is bragging about that. What a despicable character. Levin
Speaker 2: is and then Trump goes in front of them and
Speaker 2: begs like a political whore for their money. And then
Speaker 2: he says after they give him the money.
Speaker 5: They call her. Now.
Speaker 16: They spun quite a few articles off of it, which
Speaker 16: is a smart thing to do, and one of them
Speaker 16: is as you mentioned, Trump acknowledges that Israel is losing
Speaker 16: control of Congress. Now go to that next one. There
Speaker 16: were some surprising comments, doctor Paul, for a number of reasons.
Speaker 16: Now this is Reagan Ree. She's the interviewer, and I
Speaker 16: didn't see a video of it, but the question seemed
Speaker 16: pretty good. Reagan Ree says a different war Israel. A
Speaker 16: March Pewpole found that fifty three percent of surveyed US
Speaker 16: adults had an unfavorable view of Israel. That's down or
Speaker 16: that's up from forty two percent in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 16: Among young Republicans under fifty, fifty percent have an unfavorable
Speaker 16: view of Israel.
Speaker 5: That's up from thirty five percent in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 16: There's a growing group, and I highlight this, there's a
Speaker 16: growing group within the MAGA America First Coalition Republicans, especially
Speaker 16: younger Republicans, who are skeptical of our support for Israel.
Speaker 16: Are you aware of this group and are you worried
Speaker 16: about it?
Speaker 5: Now? Trump's answer is shocking in some ways.
Speaker 16: If you go to the next one, doctor Paul, here's
Speaker 16: what he says. Yeah, I'm aware of it. So Israel
Speaker 16: is amazing because you know, I have good support from Israel.
Speaker 5: Okay, I have.
Speaker 2: That makes them amazing if they support him.
Speaker 16: Part nobody has done more for Israel than I have,
Speaker 16: including the recent attacks with Iran.
Speaker 5: Wiping that thing out.
Speaker 16: Now, let's stop right there, doctor Paul, before we ahead,
Speaker 16: because he's admitting with that sentence that he attacked Iran
Speaker 16: for Israel, not for America. He used the might of
Speaker 16: the US military and the billions of dollars that it
Speaker 16: cost to take those attacks. He did it for Israel
Speaker 16: rather than for the United States. That is really interesting.
Speaker 16: And then he said he goes on about CNN didn't
Speaker 16: believe that he wiped everything out.
Speaker 5: Da da da da dah.
Speaker 16: He said, But if you go back twenty years, I mean,
Speaker 16: I will tell you Israel had the strongest lobby in
Speaker 16: Congress of anything or body, or any company or corporation
Speaker 16: or state I've ever seen. Israel was the strongest today,
Speaker 16: it doesn't have that strong of a lobby.
Speaker 5: I mean, it's amazing. Now.
Speaker 16: One of the things that he did say, and I
Speaker 16: highlighted on the first the other quote, Doctor Paul, he said,
Speaker 16: Israel was the strongest lobby I've ever seen. They had
Speaker 16: total control over Congress and now they don't. Those two
Speaker 16: statements are really startling. The first that we attacked for
Speaker 16: Israel and the other Israel had total control over the
Speaker 16: US Congress. That almost sounds like an antisemitic stereotype.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because they'll punish you and cancel you, like Pat
Speaker 2: Buchanan or the John Birch's side or whatever, if you
Speaker 2: tell the truth about what is out there. They do it,
Speaker 2: and they do it deceptively. They're ashamed of what they're doing. Well,
Speaker 2: Colonel McGregor also had something to say about this.
Speaker 17: Why do you think, Colonel President Trump, with judgement PAULA Thomas,
Speaker 17: Prime Minister Nado Natan Yahoo to resume genocide in Gaza,
Speaker 17: which unfortunately resulted, I say, unfortunately it was intentional, the
Speaker 17: killing of four hundred civilians in the past two days.
Speaker 1: I don't think he has any choice, isaid what he
Speaker 1: ran for office, he made in agreements with major donors.
Speaker 1: These donors are moved far beyond just Miriam Addison, and
Speaker 1: these donors oblige him to effectively underwrite whatever mister data
Speaker 1: Yah who wants to do. I thought it was interesting
Speaker 1: that in a recent meeting was set up for the
Speaker 1: United States with Azerba John to talk about cooperation with Israel.
Speaker 1: But it was set up by mister Datanyahu. He called
Speaker 1: and made the arrangements with mister Eliev, who's the president
Speaker 1: of Azerba John. The State Department did.
Speaker 2: Not do it.
Speaker 1: I think we're very much in the in the grip
Speaker 1: of the Israel lobby, and I think President Trump is
Speaker 1: obliged to go along, and I don't see any evidence
Speaker 1: that he's going to diverge from that path.
Speaker 17: Does he have no choice but to back up Israel
Speaker 17: militarily when it attacks Run?
Speaker 2: I think so.
Speaker 1: And keep in mind you always have the possibility that
Speaker 1: a war is precipitated somehow by Israel somewhere in the
Speaker 1: region with Iran. The Iranians respond, and the expectation is
Speaker 1: with the build up of force in the region, you know,
Speaker 1: we're sending additional.
Speaker 2: Carrier battle groups over there right now.
Speaker 1: The expectation is that we will reinforce whatever the Israelis
Speaker 1: want to do. We've already done all of the planning
Speaker 1: for joint strikes and joint strike packages. We're sharing all
Speaker 1: of the intelligence with our vast satellite arrays with THEIRS.
Speaker 1: So I think it's a foregone conclusion. I can't predict
Speaker 1: when or how, but I think it's going to happen.
Speaker 5: Can you get your hand?
Speaker 2: Well, again, you have the truth that's coming out. I mean,
Speaker 2: we know what's happening with us. And Trump was talking
Speaker 2: about that because he's telling them, you know, I'm your guy.
Speaker 2: I'm going to protect you. You know you can't buy
Speaker 2: all this protection from Congress that I can give you.
Speaker 2: I'm going to do everything that you tell me to do.
Speaker 2: And so Randy Fine again, as Chris Manahen tweeted out,
Speaker 2: he said, he celebrated Israel killing babies in Gaza, and
Speaker 2: he tells the Republican Jewish Coalition that Tucker Carlson and
Speaker 2: Thomas Massey and Marjorie Taylor Green are evil. How does
Speaker 2: one become evil to somebody like Randy Fine. Well, you
Speaker 2: push back against sending so much money to Israel and
Speaker 2: being owned by them. Of course, Randy Fine doesn't have
Speaker 2: a problem with the kind of evil that Jeffrey Epstein does.
Speaker 2: Like the rest of the GOP except for people like
Speaker 2: Thomas Massey and Marjorie Taylor Green. The rest of the
Speaker 2: GOP is guard our pedophiles, and they don't want to
Speaker 2: have any information coming out about Jeffrey Epstein, and they
Speaker 2: will keep the Congress shut down to make sure that
Speaker 2: that doesn't happen.
Speaker 18: He's calling it the Schumer shutdown. But I'm calling it
Speaker 18: the Epstein recess. Not only are we shut down, we're
Speaker 18: in recess, and that's unconventional, unprecedented in the thirteen years
Speaker 18: I've been in Congress. The other thing that Speaker Johnson
Speaker 18: established a precedent on himself and tell Speaker Johnson had
Speaker 18: been speaker, I never had observed this. But he swore
Speaker 18: into members during a pro forma session. They happened to
Speaker 18: be Republicans. And now he's has no real good reason
Speaker 18: for why he's not swearing in the Democrat during pro
Speaker 18: forma session. Okay, to the Epstein thing. One of my
Speaker 18: favorite memes on the internet. Well before before we get there,
Speaker 18: let me set it up. The White the President himself
Speaker 18: is called this Epstein the Epstein files a hoax, and
Speaker 18: we know it's not a hoax. That my press conference
Speaker 18: with Rocanna involved almost a dozen survivors of Epstein's sex
Speaker 18: trafficking ring, and they were there to tell us there
Speaker 18: are other men who they were trafficked to, and they've
Speaker 18: togethered collective. They know what some of those names are.
Speaker 18: In fact, through their lawyer. Their lawyer has informed me
Speaker 18: there are at least twenty names and he described their professions,
Speaker 18: which I said to the FBI director Cash Bettel.
Speaker 4: When he was there.
Speaker 18: But getting back to my favorite, one of my favorite
Speaker 18: memes on the internet was it's too bad Epstein killed
Speaker 18: himself before he realized this was a hoax, Like, if
Speaker 18: it's a hoax, why are they resisting releasing the files?
Speaker 2: If it's the hoax, then why did Trump become an
Speaker 2: FBI informant? According to Mike Johnson. But what Massey is
Speaker 2: pointing out, and don't miss the details there in the
Speaker 2: distinction with all previous shutdowns, they have not put Congress
Speaker 2: in a recess, and I think the Senate is still meeting,
Speaker 2: but not the House. They shut it down. Why because
Speaker 2: Mike Johnson doesn't want this information about Epstein to come out,
Speaker 2: and he doesn't want to where in this new Democrat congresswoman,
Speaker 2: because that's the final vote that they need to force
Speaker 2: this to happen. So he's keeping them in recess. He's
Speaker 2: keeping her from being sworn in. Marjorie Taylor Green says
Speaker 2: that when they finally do come back, she's going to
Speaker 2: read the Epstein list and some names they're on the
Speaker 2: floor of the House where they can't come after her legally.
Speaker 19: Yeah, it's a scary thing to name names, but I
Speaker 19: will tell you I'm not afraid to name names. And
Speaker 19: so if they want to give me a list, i
Speaker 19: will walk in that capital on the House floor and
Speaker 19: I'll say every damn name that abuse these women. I
Speaker 19: can do that for them, and I'd be proud to
Speaker 19: do it.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 19: Another thing, this is not about politics, and this is
Speaker 19: a boiling point in American history where the American people,
Speaker 19: just like Roe just said, there's become two Americas. There's
Speaker 19: the America for the rich and the powerful and the elite,
Speaker 19: where they know ever face any struggles or problems and
Speaker 19: never experience what real America goes through. And then there's
Speaker 19: forgotten America that faces all the problems and deals with
Speaker 19: all the issues and never gets justice for being sexually
Speaker 19: assaulted and raped by a monster. It shouldn't exist anymore,
Speaker 19: and people are sick of it. So let's recognize the
Speaker 19: fact that the administration before and the one before it,
Speaker 19: and the one before it, and the one before it
Speaker 19: and before it never did anything about this. So this
Speaker 19: isn't one political party or the other. It's a culmination
Speaker 19: of everyone worked together to silence these women and protected
Speaker 19: Jeffrey Epstein and his cabal. And this is not just
Speaker 19: rich powerful people. Think his drivers, his maids, his chefs,
Speaker 19: all the people.
Speaker 2: His people that work intelligence agencies, of course, and you
Speaker 2: know when we look at this, we're all metaphorically getting
Speaker 2: raped by the government. But these women experienced it directly
Speaker 2: and physically and they don't care. That's not evil, Randy.
Speaker 2: You don't want to know who these people are, Randy?
Speaker 2: Is it could? Could it be because Trump and and
Speaker 2: Epstein or MASAD agents, and you're trying to protect that
Speaker 2: as well? Is that the kind of evil that you
Speaker 2: want to protect the guard the pedophiles? So again, Mark Levin,
Speaker 2: what do you mean we don't cancel people, we cancel
Speaker 2: pap by cannon because he said they were running Congress
Speaker 2: and then they brag about it. In this same meeting,
Speaker 2: we demanded conservative institutions speak out and do something. Cancel
Speaker 2: these people, or we're going to stop giving you money.
Speaker 2: He said, We've been putting billions of dollars into you
Speaker 2: for half a century. The Heritage Foundation, which is clearly
Speaker 2: a target of his, actually sponsors his show, and so
Speaker 2: he's throwing this gauntlet down, and I guess maybe what
Speaker 2: he should do is stop taking their money. Do you
Speaker 2: think I don't think the Heritage Foundation is going to
Speaker 2: sponsor me anyway, But I've got a lot of different
Speaker 2: disagreement survirondments.
Speaker 4: Do you want to throw that money our way as
Speaker 4: opposed towards Mark Levin? You know, we won't change our opinions,
Speaker 4: we won't suck up or give you any sort of
Speaker 4: clout for it. But hey, you can do that well.
Speaker 2: As he pointed out the crowd. Does Chris Minihan point
Speaker 2: out the crowd about one hundred and fifty two hundred
Speaker 2: people perhaps at that meeting, But again it's a small
Speaker 2: group of people that's controlling the many Trump speech to.
Speaker 3: At the end of that video of Buchanan. They have
Speaker 3: how they cancel them. It's a whole bunch of people
Speaker 3: that just have a sign that says Buchan is a racist.
Speaker 3: He's giving a speech on some topic that he's trying
Speaker 3: to give a detailed description, and they just run up
Speaker 3: on stage shouting into the microphone holding it. I can
Speaker 3: play the end of.
Speaker 5: It if you want.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, play that. I cut it off too soon,
Speaker 2: you go ahead.
Speaker 3: Uh yeah, I just need to find it in the deck.
Speaker 2: Between these forty the same tactics that we're seeing everywhere.
Speaker 2: Where'd those tactics come from? Where are the tactics of
Speaker 2: canceling people, banning people, shadow banning people, calling people racist?
Speaker 2: Where did those tactics come from? They came from the universities,
Speaker 2: and it came from the universities that were being paid
Speaker 2: by the Israeli organizations to do those types of tactics.
Speaker 2: And yet everything about is about race and ethnicity.
Speaker 13: Is really occupied.
Speaker 2: I guess that convinces me of exactly the opposite. Actually, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: that's it's important to play that. Thank you linz Well. Again.
Speaker 2: I got to say a lot of Jews don't support Bibi.
Speaker 2: A lot of Jews don't support the Israeli government, and
Speaker 2: a lot of Jews, you know, it has become a
Speaker 2: stereotype of racism to say that people are racist when
Speaker 2: they do that. Peppy Canon was an honest guy. If
Speaker 2: they had disagreements with him about the amount of money
Speaker 2: that the US should send to Israel, that's the way
Speaker 2: they respond, right. It's one thing to buy the politicians,
Speaker 2: so another thing to respond by attacking free speech and
Speaker 2: flat out lying to people, which is what they do. So,
Speaker 2: he said President Trump in speech the Republican Jewish Coalition,
Speaker 2: tatting his subservience to the Israeli lobby, laments that he
Speaker 2: only got thirty two percent of the Jewish vote. I
Speaker 2: can't imagine we didn't do better than that, after all
Speaker 2: I've done for the Jewish vote. I must be honest
Speaker 2: with you. And again, a lot of Jews don't support
Speaker 2: what BB is doing. They don't support what Israel is doing.
Speaker 2: They see it as counterproductive because it is The US
Speaker 2: Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee attacked Tucker for platforming Fentes,
Speaker 2: and again, I would not platform Flintes. I refuse to
Speaker 2: do so. I think there's certain things you have to
Speaker 2: look at it, and you know, we can cover what
Speaker 2: they have to say and we don't have to have
Speaker 2: them there to debate them. And you know, when you
Speaker 2: draw attention to people like Flintes, when you draw attention
Speaker 2: to people like Blair White and my little Inanopolis, I
Speaker 2: have a problem with what Alex did with that, and
Speaker 2: I think that's wrong to do that. I wouldn't do it,
Speaker 2: But it's a different thing to say I'm not going
Speaker 2: to platform them, then to say that I want them
Speaker 2: canceled and to you know, if I was really rich
Speaker 2: and powerful to go behind the scenes and to bribe
Speaker 2: and to control the corporations, to literally deperson these people.
Speaker 2: I think the answer to bad people and to bad
Speaker 2: speech and the bad ideas is debate, not running up
Speaker 2: with you know, signs calling somebody a racist. And that's
Speaker 2: really what we need to move to it. That is
Speaker 2: not what the Zionus lobby is doing, and they are
Speaker 2: trying to destroy the First Amendment from the right, just
Speaker 2: as the left is doing it.
Speaker 3: It's about having someone on as a guest where you
Speaker 3: are essentially tacitly endorsing to a certain degree what they're
Speaker 3: saying on your show.
Speaker 2: As your guest that's right.
Speaker 4: There's also the fact it's just like you said, if
Speaker 4: you were to be going around lobbying these companies, you know,
Speaker 4: let's say, you know, we're on Rumble, someone we don't like,
Speaker 4: you know, comes into chat and start saying things. I
Speaker 4: would feel comfortable banning them from the chat. But I
Speaker 4: would not go to Rumble higher ups and say I
Speaker 4: want this guy off Rumble, I want his channel deleted. No,
Speaker 4: I want you to have your ability to make your
Speaker 4: own Rumble channel, put out your own videos expressily.
Speaker 2: I think Steve Manner is a crook, he's a liar,
Speaker 2: he's a deceiver, and I think he's hurt a lot
Speaker 2: of conservatives and people who follow Trump. But again, I'm
Speaker 2: not going to say to YouTube or to Rumble get
Speaker 2: him off of there, right, That's not the right way
Speaker 2: to approach it. And I really strongly disagree with been
Speaker 2: with Carlson with a Republican Jewish coalition on all of this.
Speaker 2: And so Trump is revealing the long awaited endorsement in
Speaker 2: the New York City mayoral race, which I believe is today.
Speaker 2: It can't be soon enough. As far as concern, I'm
Speaker 2: sick and tired of hearing about it. He says, it's
Speaker 2: going to be between a bad Democrat and a congressman
Speaker 2: and a communist. He said, and this is the sixty
Speaker 2: minutes interview with Nora o'donald. He said, I'm going to
Speaker 2: pick the bad democrat all the time, to be honest
Speaker 2: with you. Well, of course he will because Trump is
Speaker 2: a bad Democrat, so he will hang with birds of
Speaker 2: a feather. He will support Cuomo, just like I showed
Speaker 2: you yesterday. Hillary Clinton thought that Trump would be a
Speaker 2: great president in nineteen ninety four. So let's cover some
Speaker 2: of these before we take a break.
Speaker 4: Yeah, stealth patriot, thank you very much. He says. I
Speaker 4: think people like Nick Fuintis, Andrew Taate and Steve Peters
Speaker 4: maybe supposed to be Stu Peters. I don't know of
Speaker 4: Steve Peters. Our controlled opposition to spew so much hate,
Speaker 4: so they can CLASSI anyone who oppose Israel as a
Speaker 4: hate bonger. Not unlikely. I also encourage you all to,
Speaker 4: as much as you know, I don't like any of
Speaker 4: those people, pray for him. You know, Nick Fuenttis has
Speaker 4: a lot of influence, Andrew Tate has a lot of influence.
Speaker 4: Stu Peters has influenced. It would pray for them. They
Speaker 4: could do a lot of good. They could. They're not
Speaker 4: right now, but they could. And everyone needs Christ. Their
Speaker 4: sins are no more unforgivable than mine. That's right, Marky,
Speaker 4: Mark and Jay. Didn't the Free State of Florida make
Speaker 4: BDS and criticism of Israel illegal?
Speaker 2: Yes? They also, at the insistence of Randy Fine, they
Speaker 2: also criminalized free speech. I have a big problem with that.
Speaker 2: And they did that before Trump was president and because
Speaker 2: again DeSantis went to Israel and begged for money from Israel,
Speaker 2: and that was when he was running for president. So
Speaker 2: if the way that you if what you have to
Speaker 2: do to become president is to take money from Israel
Speaker 2: and destroy the First Amendment, you don't deserve to be president.
Speaker 2: That goes for Desanta's as well as for Trump.
Speaker 4: Yeah, he says. Also, Florida is one of five states,
Speaker 4: so it doesn't allow you to opt out of real ID.
Speaker 4: If you get a Florida driver's license, you have to
Speaker 4: get real ID two.
Speaker 2: Oh man, Well, they deceive me into doing that in
Speaker 2: Tennessee and tell me I was producing all this reams
Speaker 2: of documentation so that I could get real ID. I
Speaker 2: thought I just had to do it to get a
Speaker 2: driver's license from this.
Speaker 4: Yeah, they made everything so look god a gold start.
Speaker 2: It's like, yeah, I remember where that was for as well.
Speaker 4: So they make everything so monumentally complex. I remember when
Speaker 4: we first moved to Texas, I thought I'll get a
Speaker 4: library card. You know, I enjoy books. I like reading.
Speaker 4: They needed three forms of identification to get a library card.
Speaker 4: Why you got some real valuable classics. You can't risk
Speaker 4: renting out until you know who I am. For certain, DGA,
Speaker 4: thank you very much, DJ eight says David. This version
Speaker 4: of Trump in the Republican Party is a disgrace against
Speaker 4: constitutionalist Massey, attacking noticers, completely against free speech and warmongering.
Speaker 4: MAGA will never wake up.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and he says again, David. Notice Levin talks about
Speaker 4: banning porn, does he realize the two biggest funders of
Speaker 4: eight pack, the owner of the biggest porn sites in
Speaker 4: the world, and only fans disgusting. Well, he knows that
Speaker 4: banning porn is red meat to the base, and they'll
Speaker 4: like it, and then it'll never get enacted. It'll never pass.
Speaker 3: Well, when they say banning porn, what they really mean
Speaker 3: is instituting an ID for all people that want to
Speaker 3: use the Internet for anything under the name of banning porn.
Speaker 3: That won't actually stop porn at all, but it will
Speaker 3: let these people restrict other types of speech and see
Speaker 3: what everyone wants to look at on the Internet.
Speaker 2: And that's a very big thing within the Republican Party.
Speaker 2: You know, we've got to protect the kids from porn.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 2: Oh, we got trouble right here. And we're the city
Speaker 2: with the capital P andis for porn. So get your
Speaker 2: global IDs so that you can't get on the Internet
Speaker 2: without us knowing everything that you're doing.
Speaker 4: Yeah, hucksters, d G eight again, thank you very much,
Speaker 4: says David. Serious question. Thomas Massey is a ninety nine
Speaker 4: percent record of voting with the constitution. Yeah, Trump opposes him.
Speaker 4: That's all you need to know. Trump rejects constitutional reps.
Speaker 4: Massy and Bob.
Speaker 2: Good that's right. It came after Bob Good as well.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's all about Trump. It's not about principles. It's
Speaker 2: not about the party. Trump is the party, that's all
Speaker 2: it's about. It's about personal loyalty to this dictator. Want
Speaker 2: to be and I'm disgusted with the whole thing. I've
Speaker 2: been discussed with politics my whole life, but never as
Speaker 2: much as I am right now. I think it has
Speaker 2: taken on new, completely new level.
Speaker 4: M Sellers Cops in Tennessee admitted to ruining people's lives
Speaker 4: with false arrests for quotas.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, we know that sheriff that arrested that guy
Speaker 2: for the meme that he put up, claimed that he
Speaker 2: was I can't people, you know, because I disagree with
Speaker 2: their speech because he's a critic of Charlie Kirk. But
Speaker 2: when he says when he quotes Trump, and actually he
Speaker 2: didn't even create the meme. Other people created it. But
Speaker 2: what Trump was saying was about a mass shooting in
Speaker 2: a city in Iowa that had the same name as
Speaker 2: this county. He said, you're threatening that high school. So
Speaker 2: he came after him for charges for that. It's truly amazing.
Speaker 4: That's ridiculous.
Speaker 2: But at least that sheriff can be voted out. You
Speaker 2: can't vote out ice.
Speaker 4: Yeah. That's the thing is. I know some people come
Speaker 4: in here and be like, well, what's your solution, and
Speaker 4: we don't talk about it super frequently, but the really
Speaker 4: only solution is to get involved at the local level.
Speaker 4: Big politics in Washington, DC is basically out of our
Speaker 4: reach at this point. It is occupied by players with
Speaker 4: billions upon billions of dollars.
Speaker 2: I'll just say the guest that we had on last week,
Speaker 2: which is like hyper local reporting, I think he's got
Speaker 2: a great business model and it's something that would be
Speaker 2: very valuable to us. If many of you are politically active,
Speaker 2: you know what's going on in your community, write an
Speaker 2: article about it, and then you know, as if that
Speaker 2: site grows, then people will see that information, and you know,
Speaker 2: it's one way for us to figure out what's going
Speaker 2: on at the local level. It's difficult to get information
Speaker 2: at the local level, and it requires eyes and ears
Speaker 2: on the ground and then telling people what you saw.
Speaker 2: And that's a good place to do it. And I
Speaker 2: forgot the name of them of the website.
Speaker 4: Something about your news.
Speaker 2: Your news, yeah, your news or your local news or something, yeah,
Speaker 2: your news dot com.
Speaker 4: I think I think the news dot com is it.
Speaker 4: But I know it sucks. I know social media is
Speaker 4: evil and you know we all hate it. But generally
Speaker 4: there is local groups for whatever town you're in, there
Speaker 4: is a local group for it. On Facebook, and there
Speaker 4: are people in there that are involved in their community.
Speaker 4: They're talking about stuff, they are addressing, they're communicating about things.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I just don't like Facebook, and Facebook will censor
Speaker 2: you the I don't like what you're doing. That's why
Speaker 2: I mentioned your news and that's why I had him
Speaker 2: on again. I had him on a couple of years ago.
Speaker 2: But that's why I think it's good, because he's not
Speaker 2: going to censor you like Facebook.
Speaker 4: Well, that's the thing is just the thing is, there
Speaker 4: is an audience in Facebook. So while it sucks to
Speaker 4: play within their little walled garden by their rules, you
Speaker 4: can interact with people and give them at least some
Speaker 4: of the info you might.
Speaker 2: Not be appreciate. You do an article on your news
Speaker 2: and then you put a link to it on Facebook.
Speaker 4: That's the type of thing you have to do. It's
Speaker 4: a run around, it's a rigamar role. But those are
Speaker 4: the sort of games you have to play unless you
Speaker 4: just want to be the guy that says, well, I've
Speaker 4: done my part. I don't think we're gonna achieve anything.
Speaker 4: I'm checking out to the woods and you know, whatever
Speaker 4: happens happens, which I can understand the feeling and doing that.
Speaker 4: I wouldn't fault I don't fault people for doing that.
Speaker 4: I just think it is not It's not the way
Speaker 4: I would go m Sellers. Cops already read that. Phonsie
Speaker 4: Bear says Fwentis screamed stormed the Capitol with a bullhorn
Speaker 4: on January sixth, No arrests, no consequences on video. Surprise, surprise.
Speaker 2: Isn't it strange somebody else I know that stuff like
Speaker 2: that by any means, we're going to make sure that
Speaker 2: Biden doesn't get in there. No arrest, no charges.
Speaker 4: It's truly strange how that happened. It's almost like he
Speaker 4: sold out all of his fans to the federal government
Speaker 4: so that he could get off scott free.
Speaker 2: Almost like that.
Speaker 4: Right now, I'll play Devil's advocate for a second. Nick
Speaker 4: Quentess has way more money than any of his fans do,
Speaker 4: so we could afford better legal representation. So maybe simply
Speaker 4: that maybe the Feds were scared of the good lawyer
Speaker 4: Quentis was obviously going to hire and beat the case,
Speaker 4: Except why would they be. The Feds are never scared
Speaker 4: of that sort. They have an ulimited amount of money
Speaker 4: they could simply prosecute him for the fun of it,
Speaker 4: to waste his time and money.
Speaker 2: But they didn't.
Speaker 4: They didn't. Strange, very strange. MAV twenty twenty two says
Speaker 4: anti Semitism quote unquote, is a is dangerous in the
Speaker 4: US because Noah Hyde laws are on the books and
Speaker 4: idiots like DeSantis and Nome put laws into their states
Speaker 4: to go after Semitism.
Speaker 3: Yeah, is it idiocy or is it they're traders?
Speaker 4: I thought Noah Hyde was what Noah did when sham
Speaker 4: Hamm and j Jafoth played U hide and seek.
Speaker 2: With them when he got drunk. And I don't know.
Speaker 4: It's gonna call rose gardens. Ice punishers are just a
Speaker 4: refined TSA goon, rapid deployment squad. Deploy the goons. Get
Speaker 4: the goons out there on the street.
Speaker 9: We need goons right.
Speaker 4: Now, Give me some goons. Audi, Mr R. There's a
Speaker 4: recent video Israeli citizens burning the Israeli flag as I
Speaker 4: suspected the general population there does not approve of the genocide.
Speaker 2: Well, there was a massive protest of the Orthodox Jews
Speaker 2: and Hasidic Jews in Israel because they want to draft
Speaker 2: them and they don't want to be drafted and they
Speaker 2: don't support the government. And I've shown videos in the
Speaker 2: past of the Israeli police beating uh, these Orthodox Jews
Speaker 2: ultra Orthodox Jews, I should say, I guess, in the streets.
Speaker 2: And so there was a massive number of people, they
Speaker 2: estimated at one hundred thousand people. And when you look
Speaker 2: at that, when you've got Israel's got about ten million people,
Speaker 2: about seven and a half million of them estimated are Jewish,
Speaker 2: and so when you look at a crowd of one
Speaker 2: hundred thousand people, that is huge. That's bigger than the
Speaker 2: no King's rallies across the country that we had. And
Speaker 2: so that was a massive number of people all in
Speaker 2: one place, and I don't really know what would have
Speaker 2: happened with that. The police started fighting with them, but
Speaker 2: then some of these guys climbed up into a building
Speaker 2: that was under construction and he was either jumped or
Speaker 2: fell and died, and that put a whole damper on
Speaker 2: the thing. And everybody went home at that point. So
Speaker 2: that ended it. But they're very there's a lot of division.
Speaker 2: As we've talked about this before. Yah who stood for
Speaker 2: election three or four times in the last couple of
Speaker 2: years before all the wars stuff started, and he kept
Speaker 2: winning a plurale, but he couldn't get a majority. People
Speaker 2: typically don't get a majority when you have a multi
Speaker 2: party parliamentary system. But he couldn't put together a ruling
Speaker 2: coalition over and over again until they did the war.
Speaker 2: You know, when all else fell as they take you
Speaker 2: to war. As jeral Cinti always says, So yeah.
Speaker 4: D G eight says, imagine Trump bragging about Ivanka converting
Speaker 4: to Judaism. If Trump was truly a Christian, he wouldn't
Speaker 4: be happy about his daughter renouncing Jesus Christ, which is
Speaker 4: mandatory to convert to Judaism.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he doesn't know, he doesn't know christ. Actually, there's
Speaker 2: an article which is kind of interesting because the person said, well,
Speaker 2: you know, there has been a transition in the way
Speaker 2: that Trump is talking. Remember early on when he was
Speaker 2: running for president, people had ask him about that because
Speaker 2: he was trying to present himself to Christians and there
Speaker 2: was this huge contradiction in his personal life. And he said,
Speaker 2: they said, you know, is there anything that you would
Speaker 2: repent of or whatever? He said, No, I'm fine, I
Speaker 2: don't really need to worry about that. I don't have
Speaker 2: anything I need to repent from He's very different now.
Speaker 2: He seems to be concerned that he's not going to
Speaker 2: make it to heaven. But he also seems to think
Speaker 2: that there's nothing that he can do, and in that
Speaker 2: he is right. There's nothing that any of us can do.
Speaker 2: But he could be at the point. You know, the
Speaker 2: thing that could save him is if he comes to
Speaker 2: the realization of the tax collector and the Pharisee story
Speaker 2: that Christ told the pharisee, who was probably a really
Speaker 2: good person and mostly followed the law, but nobody follows
Speaker 2: it perfectly. The tax collector, who was not a good person,
Speaker 2: beat his chest and said, be merciful to me, a sinner.
Speaker 2: If Trump gets there, if even somebody with the crimes
Speaker 2: of Trump or Dick Cheney, there's nothing that you do
Speaker 2: that is so big that Christ did not pay for it.
Speaker 2: But he has to come for that. I don't know
Speaker 2: that any of his spiritual advisors are going to tell
Speaker 2: him that. I mean, he comes from a long line.
Speaker 2: He listened out his spiritual influences, people like Norman Vincent Peale,
Speaker 2: people like Paul White as his key influence. These people
Speaker 2: have their focus is on material prosperity and not on
Speaker 2: Christ and that's exactly why people like Trump would be
Speaker 2: drawn to them. Well, we're just about to run out
Speaker 2: of time, but before our guest comes on, I want
Speaker 2: to real quickly.
Speaker 4: I want to let people know about Homestead Products dot shop.
Speaker 4: Yes please do they have a new product. And saw
Speaker 4: them in chat earlier. Good to see you. They have
Speaker 4: new organic popcorn kernels. So if you like popcorn but
Speaker 4: don't want these nasty stuff that they tend to put
Speaker 4: on popcorn, go to Homestead Products dot schop get yourself
Speaker 4: some high quality organic popcorn kernels and you can add
Speaker 4: whatever seasoning, whether it's butter, chili powder, t heen, whatever
Speaker 4: you want to put on there. You can put it
Speaker 4: on yourself and it will be delicious.
Speaker 2: And that's really key because corn is one of the
Speaker 2: things that is genetically modified more than anything. So you
Speaker 2: can get organic organic popcorn's.
Speaker 4: And that's Homestead Products dotsch it's their new product. I
Speaker 4: know that some people are popcorn fiends, but they don't
Speaker 4: like eating it because it's covered in this fake butter
Speaker 4: sludge that you can't get off your fingers and it
Speaker 4: just makes a mess. So go to Homestead Products Dot Shop.
Speaker 4: If you want popcorn, they've got popcorn. It's high quality
Speaker 4: and you won't have to feel so guilty and gross
Speaker 4: about it.
Speaker 2: Yes, Well, we have our interview with doctor Brian Hooker
Speaker 2: coming up. Have you made contact with him yet? Lance?
Speaker 15: He has?
Speaker 2: Okay, do you have the video that I sent you
Speaker 2: that is an introduction to what we're going to be
Speaker 2: talking about today. Okay, okay, we will play that before
Speaker 2: we go to the break. But I just wanted to
Speaker 2: cover one thing, and that is in Mississippi. This is
Speaker 2: covered by the UK. They think it was terrible that
Speaker 2: this monkey was shot. A Mississippi mum, as they said,
Speaker 2: fatally shoots an escaped research monkey. This got my attention
Speaker 2: because this is associated with Tulane University. The primate center
Speaker 2: is in Tulane University, and this is how I first
Speaker 2: got involved with all the biosafety level three and four stuff.
Speaker 4: They can't even keep a monkey in check.
Speaker 2: Well, what happened when they were transferring a bunch of
Speaker 2: these recents monkeys that they used to experiment on, and
Speaker 2: they take them in this particular biosafety level three or four,
Speaker 2: I don't remember which one it was lab there was
Speaker 2: associated with National Primate Center. Just to give you an
Speaker 2: idea of the heinous, monstrous stuff that our government does.
Speaker 2: They brought in this bacteria that's called Burkholderia pseudomalii. It
Speaker 2: only grows on a couple of places on Earth, and
Speaker 2: they decided they would bring it in and try to
Speaker 2: make it more dangerous. This bacteria.
Speaker 4: I know it's got a ninety nine point nine percent
Speaker 4: kill rate, but what if it was one percent?
Speaker 2: It was actually forty five percent, which is really high.
Speaker 2: You know. They were trying to freak everybody out, saying, well,
Speaker 2: we get about one percent of people die from covid
Speaker 2: or water. This is forty five percent. It wasn't good
Speaker 2: enough for them. So they bring this in and they
Speaker 2: have this monkey that they've exposed this bacteria, and he's sick,
Speaker 2: and they've got him in their biosafety level three or
Speaker 2: four area, and lo behold, all of a sudden, another
Speaker 2: monkey gets sick that is outside of the lab. And
Speaker 2: this is a National Primate Center. They had about five
Speaker 2: hundred monkeys that were there, several many many acres that
Speaker 2: are around there, and somehow this guy out of the
Speaker 2: lab and a monkey that was not exposed to this
Speaker 2: monkey got sick. Well, that's a concern because the way
Speaker 2: that this bacteria propagates is through the soil. And so
Speaker 2: they brought in the CDC, and the CDC is investigating,
Speaker 2: and they come in, nothing to see here, move on,
Speaker 2: and yet one of them got sick with this, and
Speaker 2: then the story was, well, I'm sure she was exposed
Speaker 2: to this somewhere else.
Speaker 4: Didn't related, completely unrelated, nothing.
Speaker 2: To see here, didn't happen here, except there's only two
Speaker 2: places on Earth where that really happens. And so that
Speaker 2: got my attention. I talked about that quite a few times.
Speaker 2: And actually Alison Young, a reporter with USA Today, started
Speaker 2: doing a series then on all these accidents with these
Speaker 2: biosafety level and three, biosafety level three and bio safety
Speaker 2: level four labs everywhere. And they got that shut down
Speaker 2: in twenty fourteen. Congress and the Obama administration shut it down.
Speaker 2: Trump started it back up in twenty seventeen. But so
Speaker 2: in this particular case, the stuff is still going on, folks,
Speaker 2: that's the point they have. She and other residents had
Speaker 2: been warned that these escaped monkeys carried diseases. I did
Speaker 2: what any other mother would do. To protect her children.
Speaker 2: Officials from the university said the monkeys did not have
Speaker 2: any infectious agent yet. The thirty five year old mother
Speaker 2: of five said her sixteen year old son alerted her
Speaker 2: to a monkey in the backyard of Mississippi. She got
Speaker 2: out of bed, grabbed her gun and her cell phone.
Speaker 2: Spotted the animal about eighteen meters away. I shot at
Speaker 2: it and it stood there. I shot again. He backed
Speaker 2: up and that's when he fell. There has been confusion
Speaker 2: surrounding the escape, including how many monkeys were transported, maybe
Speaker 2: as twelve, wasn't there move from Terry Giller from Twelve Monkeys,
Speaker 2: who owned the monkeys, and why the truck was overturned.
Speaker 2: Videos shared online showed the monkeys moving through tall grass
Speaker 2: on the side of the Mississippi Highway. On the highway
Speaker 2: were wooden crates that were labeled live animals the monkeys
Speaker 2: were being transported. They were Racis monkeys, animals commonly used
Speaker 2: in biomedical research, particularly in the study of infectious diseases
Speaker 2: and vaccine development.
Speaker 4: I genuinely feel bad for monkeys they are I don't
Speaker 4: like chimpanzees. I think they're freaky. I think they're too large,
Speaker 4: too strong, and people insist on keeping them as pets
Speaker 4: when all they want to do is rip out your
Speaker 4: eyes and eat your face. You shouldn't keep them as pets.
Speaker 2: They do that when they get old.
Speaker 4: Little monkeys though, look cute. They're kind of babyish. They
Speaker 4: have the sort of inquisitiveness to it. They're very, very cute.
Speaker 4: I feel so bad.
Speaker 2: In my monkey story that we had. My parents had
Speaker 2: a friend and their grandchildren would collect pets, and then
Speaker 2: they would get tired of them, and they'd wind up
Speaker 2: the grandparents to take it. So they had a dog
Speaker 2: that the grand kids had given up on, and then
Speaker 2: the grand kids had this spider monkey, and they gave
Speaker 2: up on the spider monkey as well, and so they
Speaker 2: kept a spider monkey. They had a large tree that
Speaker 2: they had wrapped like chicken wire all around in the backyard,
Speaker 2: and he was free to roam up there, but they
Speaker 2: would let him out from time to time, and he
Speaker 2: would generally go back into that area. It was a
Speaker 2: real vexation to the German shepherd. He would get on
Speaker 2: the German shepherd's back. And you know the expression I
Speaker 2: got a monkey on my back, Well, you literally see
Speaker 2: it playing out in real time. This is this German
Speaker 2: shepherds trying to get that monkey off his.
Speaker 4: Back monologue nine.
Speaker 2: But anyway, they told us. They said, one day it disappeared,
Speaker 2: and it was gone for several days, and I finally
Speaker 2: came back and they wanted to have some work done
Speaker 2: in their house. They contacted a painter and he came
Speaker 2: out and he said, well, I had a really interesting
Speaker 2: experience in this neighborhood a few months ago, and he said,
Speaker 2: I went it said, I was painting this house, and
Speaker 2: he said the paint was still wet, and when I
Speaker 2: came back, there were all these tiny hamprints all the
Speaker 2: ceiling and everything else. He goes, I don't know how
Speaker 2: that happened, like the size of a child, but I
Speaker 2: got a child to get up there. And they said,
Speaker 2: well that's They kind of told the guy, well, we'll
Speaker 2: talk to you later. They didn't want him to know
Speaker 2: that they had.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's crazy. You don't know how that would happen.
Speaker 2: Anyway, I got to go, and I've got to go
Speaker 2: as well, because I got a guest who is ready,
Speaker 2: And let's play the Do you know where that the
Speaker 2: video is? Land?
Speaker 3: Second page?
Speaker 2: Okay, here it is right here. Our guest Today is
Speaker 2: doctor Brian Hooker with the Children's Health Defense and they
Speaker 2: have set up a resource that we want to tell
Speaker 2: you about that will help you to They've got a
Speaker 2: lot of short one minute videos that you can use
Speaker 2: to help to educate people about what happened to us
Speaker 2: and five years ago and why we still have not
Speaker 2: had any justice about that. Here is doctor Hooker introducing
Speaker 2: this in one of the videos that you'll find at
Speaker 2: the site.
Speaker 9: Hi, my name is Brian Hooker, and I'm the chief
Speaker 9: Scientific officer for Children's Health Defense and I want to
Speaker 9: talk to you about an important initiative of HD called
Speaker 9: the COVID Index. This is the information that the powers
Speaker 9: that be did not want you to see. This web
Speaker 9: repository refutes the narrative, the official narrative regarding COVID nineteen.
Speaker 9: It has a very very comprehensive, easy to use search engine,
Speaker 9: so you can search readily and also get direct excerpts
Speaker 9: from every entry in the COVID in depth. There's so
Speaker 9: much information out there that needs to be curated, and
Speaker 9: this is a place where it has been done and
Speaker 9: is being done continuously. So I highly recommend that you
Speaker 9: check out this resource at www. Dot COVID index dot science.
Speaker 2: All right, welcome back. And that was a little introductory
Speaker 2: video that you'll find at that site, covid index dot science.
Speaker 2: I didn't even have to dot science. I guess they
Speaker 2: did that an honor of Fauci. It'd be interesting to
Speaker 2: get the domain name. I am dot science. I'm joining
Speaker 2: us now is doctor Brian Hooker with He's a chief
Speaker 2: scientific officer at Children's Health Defense, formerly the Department Chair
Speaker 2: and Professor Emeridis of Biology at Simpson University. And I
Speaker 2: have been following his very valuable research and the very
Speaker 2: valuable things that Children's Health Defense had through this massive
Speaker 2: pandemic mcguffin that we always talk about, and it's good
Speaker 2: to you know, we can look at this stuff and
Speaker 2: we can understand the motivations of these people, and we
Speaker 2: can sanity check it. But it's important to have the
Speaker 2: scientific information that's there as well, and that's what doctor
Speaker 2: Hooker provides. You know. It was actually Children's Health Defense
Speaker 2: and I think icon that when they sued the CDC,
Speaker 2: the CDC is part of the vaccine, holding them not
Speaker 2: responsible for any damage that they did to the kids.
Speaker 2: I forget the exact name of the nineteen eighty six act.
Speaker 2: And you probably know what that is, doctor Hooker. What
Speaker 2: is that. What's the name of that official act?
Speaker 9: It is called the nineteen eighty six National Childhood Vaccine
Speaker 9: Injury Act, and then set up the National Vaccine Injury
Speaker 9: Compensation Program in a program was up and running at
Speaker 9: about nineteen eighty nine.
Speaker 2: And they were supposed to be tracking as part of
Speaker 2: that agreement. They were supposed to track the adverse events
Speaker 2: and to make recommendations and so forth, and so I
Speaker 2: remember RFK Junior and Dell big Tree at Icon asked them,
Speaker 2: you know, we'd like to see your records and see
Speaker 2: what recommendations you have made and so forth and so on.
Speaker 2: They stalled, installed, installed, and wouldn't comply with it. Finally
Speaker 2: they had a judge that forced them to give the information.
Speaker 2: You could see that for thirty plus years they had
Speaker 2: not been concerned about any of this stuff. They've kept
Speaker 2: no records at all. And so it's very important when
Speaker 2: we come into this if we understand what the priorities
Speaker 2: of these people are. That it's not your health, that
Speaker 2: is the profits of the corporations and the revolving door
Speaker 2: that is there. That's an important thing to start with.
Speaker 2: But what doctor Hooker has provided is beyond that, and
Speaker 2: it gives us the tools that we need in order
Speaker 2: to try to help educate people. And they've got a
Speaker 2: new resource now, Covidindex dot Science. So with that long introduction,
Speaker 2: thank you so much for joining us, and I really
Speaker 2: appreciate you coming on today.
Speaker 9: Well, you're very welcome, and I'm excited that Children's Health
Speaker 9: Defense is hosting covid indepth dot Science. It is such
Speaker 9: an amazing repository of information of all things around the
Speaker 9: COVID era and now what's going on the post COVID era.
Speaker 9: You know, the the the mess that was created by
Speaker 9: the whole pandemic needs to be cleaned up, and that's
Speaker 9: you know, the fallout. We're continuing to see publications come
Speaker 9: out and publications that we feel are bad or fraudulent,
Speaker 9: that are not good science. We want to make sure
Speaker 9: that those are critique in the COVID Index and then
Speaker 9: also the good science that's coming out so people will know,
Speaker 9: you know, what's going on with things like Remdesivier hospital protocols,
Speaker 9: the vaccine, the therapies that work that have been disparaged,
Speaker 9: like ivermetin and hydroxy quor quin and vitamin D three
Speaker 9: and zinc and you know, so we've got sort of
Speaker 9: a historical basis and we've built this edifice of information
Speaker 9: and it's and it's a living database. We're always updating
Speaker 9: the COVID index, so when things come out, then we
Speaker 9: can feature the new information. And some of the information
Speaker 9: pouring out like ties to things like autism as well
Speaker 9: as neurodevelopmental disabilities for individuals that got the shot in pregnancy.
Speaker 9: And also, you know, one of the things that practitioners
Speaker 9: are talking about are turbo cancers. We're seeing so many
Speaker 9: turbo cancers that we believe that the vaccine played a
Speaker 9: role in either causing that cancer or hastening the growth
Speaker 9: of that cancer.
Speaker 2: Yes, I remember, and I remember pathologist doctor Ryan Cole
Speaker 2: talking in the spring of twenty twenty one as it
Speaker 2: was really starting to roll out in a large way.
Speaker 2: He said, I'm looking at patients and I'm seeing that
Speaker 2: it's damaging their killer T cells. And he goes and
Speaker 2: that's when I first heard the term turbo cancer. I
Speaker 2: think he was talking about that. He said, it's really
Speaker 2: going to cause that to explode, because it's your body's
Speaker 2: first defense against cancer. Cells, the killer T cells, And
Speaker 2: so I guess the first question I would have for
Speaker 2: you what about people who got the shots? Many of
Speaker 2: the listeners have hopefully they haven't gotten it, but perhaps
Speaker 2: they have family or friends who have all types of things.
Speaker 2: Are there going to be resources there at covidindex dot
Speaker 2: science that would help people who have been exposed to
Speaker 2: this pathogen?
Speaker 9: Yes, there are resources on recovery from COVID vaccine injury
Speaker 9: that is a part of the database. And I would
Speaker 9: also encourage those individuals that are suffering and they really
Speaker 9: don't know where to go because so many practitioners either
Speaker 9: don't acknowledge that it happens, or they'll throw up their
Speaker 9: hands and say, I have no idea what to do.
Speaker 9: So I would encourage those individuals to email us at
Speaker 9: info at Children's Health Defense dot or org and ask
Speaker 9: that question directly. You know, I can't really recommend practitioners,
Speaker 9: you know, in an interview or in a particular setting,
Speaker 9: but at least we can let people know what practitioners
Speaker 9: are in the area, or what practitioners are especially are
Speaker 9: specializing in those types of cancers or in those types
Speaker 9: of difficulties, like you know, long COVID vaccine injury is
Speaker 9: extremely prevent A lot of people are having symptoms that
Speaker 9: are similar to fibromyalgia that either got COVID or got
Speaker 9: the COVID shot, And we're finding circulating spike protein in
Speaker 9: these individuals that got the COVID shot for upwards to
Speaker 9: two years after they got their last vaccine. So things
Speaker 9: can be done, and things need to be done.
Speaker 2: Yes, I had an interview years ago with an injuried
Speaker 2: orthopedic surgeon who could no longer work because his hands
Speaker 2: were shaking, and he kept going to follow physicians and
Speaker 2: you know, as soon as he would say he thought
Speaker 2: it was a vaccine injury, and this is what they
Speaker 2: would just basically it can't help you. You know, they
Speaker 2: would run away. It just tells us so much about
Speaker 2: the state of medicine right now, doesn't it, Even to
Speaker 2: the extent they finally went to somebody and the guy said,
Speaker 2: all right, I've got some things here that I think
Speaker 2: will help you, but we're not going to talk about
Speaker 2: what caused it. I mean, that kind of fear is
Speaker 2: like a ttalitarian Stalinist state. I mean, this is the
Speaker 2: kind of stuff that Soulsan Knitsen talked about in Soviet Union.
Speaker 5: It is.
Speaker 9: And you know, we were so fortunate California had a
Speaker 9: bill to actually codify that, so physicians and providers could
Speaker 9: not deviate from the standard of care. They could not
Speaker 9: talk about things that were outside of like en Deservir
Speaker 9: or patslavid or Mono pulvinair that were the sort of
Speaker 9: you know, patented technologies that were going to give the
Speaker 9: most money, you know, to government scientists, and so they
Speaker 9: could not deviate from that line. They we could never
Speaker 9: talk about iver metin that bill passed, but fortunately it
Speaker 9: was overturned by a court decision and the bill the
Speaker 9: California legislature with druid. But many practitioners do not know
Speaker 9: that that they have the freedom to be able to
Speaker 9: deviate from the standard of care. Many are afraid, you know,
Speaker 9: because of individuals that have been persecuted, that have lost
Speaker 9: their certifications, things like that. But you know, quite honestly,
Speaker 9: I know the practitioners that have gone through the persecution,
Speaker 9: that have lost their certifications, they fight back, they win,
Speaker 9: and so many of them are still in practice today.
Speaker 9: And I'm glad for people like Ryan Cole, for Peter McCullough,
Speaker 9: for pr corey that have really fought the system and
Speaker 9: are still seeing patients, treating patients and doing a.
Speaker 5: Lot of good.
Speaker 2: That's great. Yeah, it is horrific to look at how
Speaker 2: corrupt the system is. And of course they got a
Speaker 2: lot of different ways that they can come after you.
Speaker 2: I'm pretty sure it was a Children's Health Defense article
Speaker 2: where they were talking about how the insurance companies will
Speaker 2: come after the pediatricians who don't follow the vaccine schedule
Speaker 2: and get a certain percentage of their children vaccinated on schedule.
Speaker 2: They will basically cut across the board what they will
Speaker 2: pay these pediatricians and basically put them out of practice.
Speaker 2: Even if you don't get some review board to pull
Speaker 2: their license, they can pull that economic trick on you.
Speaker 2: I think that was from Children's Health Defense.
Speaker 9: They have done that and they threatened that all the time.
Speaker 9: We were able to get the incentive program for one
Speaker 9: of the largest HMOs in the United States and it
Speaker 9: was Anthem Blue Cross, and what we found was that
Speaker 9: pediatricians stood to make over a half a million dollars
Speaker 9: year if sixty three percent or more of their pediatric
Speaker 9: practice was fully vaccinated. They could get six hundred dollars
Speaker 9: per patient. If they had one thousand patients that were
Speaker 9: fully vaccinated, that was six hundred thousand dollars and that
Speaker 9: was a yearly incentive. So you know, those those individuals
Speaker 9: that have been fired from pediatric practices is because they
Speaker 9: haven't been following the vaccine schedule. That's why. It has
Speaker 9: nothing to do with health. It has everything to do
Speaker 9: with a pediatrician on the take.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, and of course we look at the
Speaker 2: whole COVID thing. I was absolutely amazed. I remember it
Speaker 2: was in August of twenty twenty. The American Hospital Association
Speaker 2: was saying, wait a minute, you told us you're going
Speaker 2: to give us a twenty percent bonus, and now you're
Speaker 2: telling us that we got to give you our PCR test.
Speaker 2: You told us at the beginning that you didn't have
Speaker 2: enough of them and that they didn't work anyway.
Speaker 9: Right, this is amazing.
Speaker 2: You know, I've been shouting about that now for five years,
Speaker 2: and people just don't realize how they use financial strings
Speaker 2: to get their way with people and how they were
Speaker 2: financially incentivizing people. So you just point at them and
Speaker 2: say they got COVID nine thousand dollars you put on
Speaker 2: a ventilator. We're going to give you thirty nine thousand dollars.
Speaker 2: We'll give you a twenty percent bonus on everything that
Speaker 2: you do if you say this person has COVID. I mean,
Speaker 2: the whole thing was bought and paid for, wasn't it.
Speaker 9: It really was, And that you know, there was there
Speaker 9: was sort of an economic dearth right during the shutdown
Speaker 9: because they were shutting down hospitals and telling and taking
Speaker 9: elective surgeries and things like that and telling them to
Speaker 9: stay home. So then they waive these incentive programs come
Speaker 9: you know, July August of twenty twenty to the providers,
Speaker 9: to the hospitals, and really you know, force them into
Speaker 9: a situation where many of them just had to go along.
Speaker 9: You know, let's diagnose COVID, let's diagnose you know, we're
Speaker 9: we're not going to give effective therapies. We really want
Speaker 9: to put people on ventilators. Because they got more money
Speaker 9: for ventilated patients that were in ICU, and so that
Speaker 9: forced many many more patients into that whole system where
Speaker 9: they got worse and worse and worse, and I think
Speaker 9: a lot of them. David died of bacterial pneumonia, but
Speaker 9: they you know they were never tested for the I agree,
Speaker 9: I agree it's a bacteria and they were allowed to die.
Speaker 9: It was just a crying shame and people should go
Speaker 9: to jail over this.
Speaker 2: Yes, Yes, putting people on the ventilator and that type
Speaker 2: of thing.
Speaker 15: We have.
Speaker 2: Grace Sheriff's case and they're reopening that again. And that
Speaker 2: was another one of these cases, just basically hospital murder,
Speaker 2: but it do not resuscitate but on a ventilator. But
Speaker 2: I wanted to ask you a couple of things because
Speaker 2: there's been some disappointment with on my part and as
Speaker 2: well as a lot of my listeners with what's going
Speaker 2: on with Maha. Disappointed that the MR and a JAB
Speaker 2: is still there. I mean, we've had the process, and
Speaker 2: I understand there's a lot of inertia here. I understand
Speaker 2: there's a real political fight there. And I kind of
Speaker 2: watched this as it's been developing in Florida with Joseph
Speaker 2: Fladipo there. First they came back and they said, well,
Speaker 2: we don't recommend it, you know, but you know, if
Speaker 2: you get it, you can go ahead and get it,
Speaker 2: but they're not going to ban it. And then gradually
Speaker 2: moving into that, you know, first saying we strongly we
Speaker 2: don't recommend it. We're not going to force anymore. But
Speaker 2: now we strongly do not recommend it. But they won't
Speaker 2: actually come in with a ban on this kind of stuff.
Speaker 2: And it's so frustrating because we have seen in the
Speaker 2: past when a handful of people died over a vaccine
Speaker 2: or over a medicine, they would pull it, and that
Speaker 2: is not happening now. They will pull it. If you've
Speaker 2: got a couple of children who die because of a
Speaker 2: faulty baby crib, they pull all of them off the market.
Speaker 2: But they don't do that with this. And so the
Speaker 2: question is, you know, what is happening, why don't we
Speaker 2: see a ban of the MR and A. And of course,
Speaker 2: but Latipo has moved to is to say that now
Speaker 2: pointing out the fact there's a lot of DNA contamination
Speaker 2: in the vaccines, and say this is something that should
Speaker 2: cause you to pull this off the market, but it's not.
Speaker 2: And so at what point do you think this is
Speaker 2: going to happen or is it going to happen?
Speaker 9: I want it to happen desperately. You know, we have
Speaker 9: things that are not on the open market, that are
Speaker 9: not sold or distributed ever, because they're poisoned. We call
Speaker 9: them poisons. And so when you look at the mRNA shot,
Speaker 9: it is it is pure poison. It is basically, you know,
Speaker 9: and people unfortunately are up in arms that they want
Speaker 9: their COVID boosters. They want their COVID boosters. I know
Speaker 9: people personally that are on their seventh or eighth booster
Speaker 9: and they are addicted to these things, and you wonder, like, well,
Speaker 9: why are you still around because they are so so
Speaker 9: toxic and we've seen so many people affected. You know,
Speaker 9: I believe that in the United States easily, if the
Speaker 9: calculations were done, we'd see over a million people who
Speaker 9: have died because of the COVID shop. But the HHS
Speaker 9: has been dragging its seals, and I think that part
Speaker 9: of it is, you know, the more the administration end
Speaker 9: of it and not the AHHS end of it, because
Speaker 9: I know, you know, I know Secretary Kennedy. I've worked
Speaker 9: with Secretary Kennedy for you know, twelve years before he
Speaker 9: became Secretary Kennedy, and it is his heart and his
Speaker 9: plan to be able to get rid of that technology
Speaker 9: because it's it was never sort of been rolled out.
Speaker 9: People knew historically that that type of technology was bad news,
Speaker 9: and it was a grand medical experiment, you know, basically
Speaker 9: a big clinical trial that was head up by Tony Fauci,
Speaker 9: and it should never happen. That man belongs in jail.
Speaker 9: You know, we're pushing as hard as we can push,
Speaker 9: and honestly, there are people on the inside of AHHS
Speaker 9: that are rooting for us and saying no, push harder,
Speaker 9: push harder, because we have this behemoth of an organization
Speaker 9: that doesn't want to change. We have deep state people
Speaker 9: in AHHS that don't want to change, so we need
Speaker 9: more pressure.
Speaker 2: And of course when we look at this, I think
Speaker 2: we really dodged the bullet there with Susan Monrez being
Speaker 2: taken out of the CDC, and you know, she was
Speaker 2: somebody who was at BARDA and ARPA h and very
Speaker 2: focused on mr and A plus AI. And we know
Speaker 2: that Trump was pushing that on like his first day
Speaker 2: in office with Stargate, he had Larry Elson there saying, yeah,
Speaker 2: we're going to do an AI assessment of you and
Speaker 2: we'll custom make an m RNA thing there. So I
Speaker 2: was very concerned as to what was going to happen
Speaker 2: there and of course that's created a lot of pushback
Speaker 2: against rfk uh And they said, well, you just fired
Speaker 2: her because of a personal disagreement or something, you know,
Speaker 2: and subordination because he wanted some of these other people
Speaker 2: fired and she said no, no, no, I'm not going
Speaker 2: to fire them, and so he fired her. What do
Speaker 2: you know about that? Do you think that he gets
Speaker 2: that that he's pushing back against the mRNA that's basically
Speaker 2: being put out there for everything. I mean, we had
Speaker 2: at USDA with this administration, with the Trump administration, we
Speaker 2: had Brooke Rawlins who with all this bird flu in
Speaker 2: Sandy in the mass colling of chickens, whether it was
Speaker 2: happening with Biden, her big solution was, well, we'll give
Speaker 2: the mRNA bird flu shot to all the chickens and
Speaker 2: then that'll be fine. And has also to the chicken,
Speaker 2: to the cattle and to the pigs as well all
Speaker 2: of our food supply. And so she has the authority
Speaker 2: to approve that for agricultural issues. But on the other side,
Speaker 2: the mRNA things that are there, especially when you combine
Speaker 2: it with artificial intelligence, very very concerning. What do you
Speaker 2: know about the what's going on with monterrees? And the
Speaker 2: rest of stuff. You're talking about deep state. I mean,
Speaker 2: that's what I think of as BARTA and ARPA H
Speaker 2: and these insidious programs that are out there. It seems
Speaker 2: like there's a lot of people in the Trump administration.
Speaker 2: Trump is working with Larry Ellison and of course Burt
Speaker 2: Brollins is in on all that as well.
Speaker 20: What's your take on that, Well not, you know, not
Speaker 20: all that litters this gold even in AHHS and so
Speaker 20: you know, the bye Susan Monez being fired and then
Speaker 20: other you know, CDC officials taking their toys and going home.
Speaker 9: I mean, they did this a huge favor. Yeah, they
Speaker 9: needed to be fired anyway. So it's like, okay, you know,
Speaker 9: don't let it. Don't let the door hit your butt.
Speaker 5: On the way out.
Speaker 9: So we were, you know, we were very very fortunate
Speaker 9: to that. There has to be more of a mass
Speaker 9: exodus of these individuals because mRNA technology is sort of
Speaker 9: this new play toy. Yeah, and scientists think, oh, well,
Speaker 9: let's plug and play. We can we can just you know,
Speaker 9: program AI to tell us what the next pathogen is.
Speaker 9: And they have this buzzword that they're hiding behind called
Speaker 9: universal vaccination. And so when you look at the buzzword
Speaker 9: universal vaccination, and even Ja Bodicharia put it out in
Speaker 9: a memo talking about a new vaccine platform. It was
Speaker 9: Mr enahborritten all over it.
Speaker 2: That needs to go.
Speaker 9: You know, I've already, you know, emailed him directly and said,
Speaker 9: you know what universal vaccination is co word for gain
Speaker 9: and function. And so that means that you're that you're
Speaker 9: weaponizing and you're basically giving permission for scientists in the
Speaker 9: NIH to weaponize age five N one, to weaponize you know,
Speaker 9: sarcov two or whatever monkey pots and so they can
Speaker 9: have the pathogen pathogen dajour and if that leads out
Speaker 9: and that's the whole pandemic that you know, Fauci is
Speaker 9: sitting on the edge of a seat waiting for so
Speaker 9: we can you know, somehow swoop in and save the
Speaker 9: day again. But these these are bad, These are horrible technologies.
Speaker 9: Nobody has talked about in the immune suppression that happens
Speaker 9: when you get mRNA shots. Nobody's talked about the effect
Speaker 9: of the lipid nanoparticle on the immune system.
Speaker 2: And I think you shots, excuse me, I think you
Speaker 2: mentioned that at the very beginning. I remember in the
Speaker 2: fall of twenty twenty when they were talking about it.
Speaker 2: There was an article and I think it was you
Speaker 2: that was involved in it, that questioned the idea of
Speaker 2: this pegilation, the peg encapitulation, and he says, this is
Speaker 2: going to create anaphylactic shot. And I've told this to
Speaker 2: people many times. I said, they told you to You
Speaker 2: contacted the FDA and said, no, I don't care about it.
Speaker 2: Contact Fiser. Of course, Pfiser doesn't care. If the FDA
Speaker 2: doesn't care, that was you. I think at Children's Health
Speaker 2: Defense was it?
Speaker 9: It was Children's Health Defense and I was working with
Speaker 9: a distinguished colleague, Lynn Redwood on that. And it turns
Speaker 9: out that because of exposure to PEG, seventy five percent
Speaker 9: of population in the United States carries PEG antibodies, and
Speaker 9: so that meant, you know that and many people did
Speaker 9: go into annaplaxis and you know, sudden analoflactic shot shock
Speaker 9: after getting the JAB and so you know, it was predictable.
Speaker 9: It was highly predictable. Why would you coach you know,
Speaker 9: this lipid nanoparticle with a known allergen. You know it's
Speaker 9: a recipe for disaster, but it's convenient. People say, oh, well,
Speaker 9: you know you have immune reactions all the time. They
Speaker 9: frankly didn't really care. They didn't want to do the experimentation.
Speaker 9: They just wanted to roll out a vaccine. And they
Speaker 9: were paid handsomely to the tune of about two hundred
Speaker 9: and fifty billion dollars over the course of the pandemic
Speaker 9: in sales of those shots.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's amazing how many billionaires they coined with that
Speaker 2: minature shows the utter disregard for safety and help that
Speaker 2: exists in these institutions and these corporations. I've got a
Speaker 2: question here from Flower Sower. Thank you for the tip.
Speaker 2: Flower Stower, please ask doctor Hooker, when Children's Health Defense
Speaker 2: is going to pursue and promote removing the protection the
Speaker 2: pharmaceutical industry hides behind with a nineteen eighty six Act.
Speaker 2: Why isn't this a priority for HDCS.
Speaker 9: Well, I am so grateful for that question, because we
Speaker 9: are working on it. We're working with key legislators that
Speaker 9: we can't name right now on being able to abolish
Speaker 9: the nineteen eighty six Act. We're also working with hh
Speaker 9: ASS who is trying to re envision the Act. I mean, frankly,
Speaker 9: my own opinion is that it just needs to go.
Speaker 9: It needs to go away, and then we need guardrails
Speaker 9: for protection of families of vaccine injured kids. We need
Speaker 9: at least a one time look back for those that
Speaker 9: were denied justice, especially around the omnibus autism proceedings. You know,
Speaker 9: my family and this is why I fight this. My
Speaker 9: family was in vaccine court for sixteen years. We filed
Speaker 9: our claim in May of twenty to twenty two, and
Speaker 9: we did not get a decision, and we were not
Speaker 9: allowed to even go to oral arguments because of a
Speaker 9: sort of a vendetta I believe that our special master
Speaker 9: had against our expert witnesses, you know, regarding the toxicity
Speaker 9: of mercury. You know, my son got a full wall
Speaker 9: of mercury from his vaccines that never should have been
Speaker 9: in there, and arguably mercury does cause neurodevelopmental disorders. And
Speaker 9: so we were never never given our day in court.
Speaker 9: There are thousands upon thousands of families just like that,
Speaker 9: and they all need justice. They all need their day
Speaker 9: in court. They were promised that by the Seventh Amendment
Speaker 9: in the fourteenth Amendment, and they were never given in.
Speaker 2: And that's one of the things that was the key
Speaker 2: Aha moment for me when I found out about the
Speaker 2: nineteen eighty six Act very important. That's why you know,
Speaker 2: I've talked many times about doctor Andrew Wakefield's movie nineteen
Speaker 2: eighty six of the act I think is the name
Speaker 2: of it, and it's a dramatization of how it affects
Speaker 2: a family when you do something like that. Basically that
Speaker 2: shows what this is truly all about, and that should
Speaker 2: be the moment I think we need to spread the
Speaker 2: news far and wide if we can't stop this, if
Speaker 2: people at least understand that they have absolutely no liability
Speaker 2: and that, as we said before, if somebody you got
Speaker 2: a crib and you might have one or two freak
Speaker 2: accidents with that crib, they recall all of them and
Speaker 2: massifines for the manufacturers, but nothing for this. No matter
Speaker 2: how many people they kill, it's absolutely amazing the damage
Speaker 2: that they're allowed to get away with. And that is
Speaker 2: that type of stuff that you know, I look at
Speaker 2: and it's like, Okay, well I know what's going on here.
Speaker 2: That's how I make my decisions. But it's always good
Speaker 2: to have a scientist who's going to go through and
Speaker 2: tell people what the mechanisms are to get them to
Speaker 2: understand that. You know, there was just a recent article
Speaker 2: on Reason. I haven't covered it on the show yet,
Speaker 2: but I was absolutely stunned to see this article from
Speaker 2: Reason saying, well, we were told we're all going to die,
Speaker 2: and look, I'm still alive. I got the vaccine. I
Speaker 2: know a lot of people got the vaccine and they're
Speaker 2: still alive. And again, this is another one of the
Speaker 2: issues why when you have the covidindex dot science, it's
Speaker 2: good to have the truth that is out there. We
Speaker 2: had a lot of people who made predictions that everybody
Speaker 2: that got this vaccine is going to be dead within
Speaker 2: a year or so. A guy that I used to
Speaker 2: work for said that, and that is making the That
Speaker 2: is essentially an alibi for these people because they can
Speaker 2: point to that exaggeration and say that didn't work. And
Speaker 2: of course, when Reason looks at this, they should know
Speaker 2: of all that the statistics are being suppressed, they were
Speaker 2: being lied to about it. They understand that. They see
Speaker 2: that all the time, whether you're talking about unemployment figures
Speaker 2: or we're talking about inflation figures. They know the government
Speaker 2: lies with statistics. They should expect that the government is
Speaker 2: going to lie with statistics about this when they rush
Speaker 2: something to market. But the other part of it is
Speaker 2: the individual variation that we see from person to person.
Speaker 2: But there's the third thing that I wanted to ask
Speaker 2: you about, and that is there was research that was
Speaker 2: done by Naomi Wolf and they went through and looked
Speaker 2: at the different badges. And I remember at the very
Speaker 2: beginning of this again back in August September, the CDC
Speaker 2: was putting out information about a form that they wanted
Speaker 2: the health providers to collect information on about the vaccine.
Speaker 2: And so they want all your personal information, your address
Speaker 2: and so forth and so on. And the only other
Speaker 2: thing they kept about the vaccine was a LOT number.
Speaker 2: And I talked about that at the time because I said,
Speaker 2: it's kind of ominous that they get all this personal
Speaker 2: information and there's a box there that says refused. I said,
Speaker 2: what are they going to do with that? And so
Speaker 2: I said, you know, be aware of that that's there,
Speaker 2: that you know they're going to keep a record of
Speaker 2: you if you refuse. But they kept the lot information
Speaker 2: and she went back in her research and they found
Speaker 2: a tremendous variation. I think it was like thirtyfold from
Speaker 2: the least to the most active ingredients that were in there.
Speaker 2: Is that something you're aware of, is that something that
Speaker 2: is still going on.
Speaker 9: It is still going on, And a lot to lot
Speaker 9: variability with this type of technology is is you know,
Speaker 9: very very you know, the margins for error are really
Speaker 9: really large, and that's not something you want to see
Speaker 9: in anything that you would put in your body. We
Speaker 9: saw that, you know, the first batches that were rolled
Speaker 9: out had so many adverse events that you know, maybe
Speaker 9: eighty thousand and sixty thousand would be distributed and then
Speaker 9: they would quietly pull them off the market and not
Speaker 9: tell anybody.
Speaker 2: That that was a hot lot.
Speaker 9: And you can actually go, you know, to a tracking
Speaker 9: site that tracks the adverse events on bears and just
Speaker 9: google how bad is my badge and that will tell you,
Speaker 9: you know, what adverse events have been reported for that
Speaker 9: particular batch of vaccines. That's the lot of information that
Speaker 9: you need. And we know that historically lots and lots
Speaker 9: of vaccines, not just the COVID shot, have been subject
Speaker 9: to this level of you know, poor biotechnology processing. You
Speaker 9: look at the MRK MMR vaccine MMR two that was introduced,
Speaker 9: I believe in the United States in about nineteen seventy eight.
Speaker 9: Nobody knows the exact concentration of virus in that vaccine.
Speaker 9: Nobody has ever really done the quality control, and so
Speaker 9: the lot to lot variability is very, very high. And
Speaker 9: the only thing that we do know because of whistleblowers
Speaker 9: that have come out of MIRTH, is that the maximum
Speaker 9: concentration of virus in that vaccine is much much higher
Speaker 9: than what the FDA ever approved. And so it's another
Speaker 9: grand medical experiment, and we know when that happened. It
Speaker 9: happened in nineteen ninety nine. They started dueling a process
Speaker 9: called overfilling the batches and boosting the virus concentrations. That's
Speaker 9: when anaphalactic shop really started in Earnest and death really
Speaker 9: started in Earnest for the MMR vaccines. After they boosted
Speaker 9: those virus concentrations. You can see it clear as the
Speaker 9: those on your face if you do a Varia's analysis.
Speaker 5: Wow.
Speaker 2: And that's the other thing too, besides the fact they
Speaker 2: don't have any liability so they don't have to care.
Speaker 2: It's just a lackadaisical, haphazard attitude of this of all
Speaker 2: things medicines and pharmaceuticals that are very concentrated, They are
Speaker 2: carefully controlled in terms of the amounts of whatever that
Speaker 2: it is that you're getting, and that I always looked
Speaker 2: at that and I kind of thought, doctor Hooker, that
Speaker 2: maybe what they were doing was that was maybe part
Speaker 2: of the experiment, you know, experimenting on everybody, because when
Speaker 2: you're trying to roll out something, you're trying to find
Speaker 2: the sweet spot between something that is going to be
Speaker 2: toxic because it's too much, and something is going to
Speaker 2: be ineffective because it's too little. I said, it looks
Speaker 2: to me like a massive experiment to play around with people.
Speaker 2: But it's just absolute disregard for any standards of safety
Speaker 2: or medicine that's.
Speaker 9: There, really is. It is abysmal. And when you look
Speaker 9: at the level of contamination in biologics, you know, FDA
Speaker 9: is separated into two divisions, two main divisions or centers.
Speaker 9: There's the Centers for Drugs Evaluation and Research and then
Speaker 9: the Center of Biologics Evaluation and Research. It's called SEBER.
Speaker 9: But historically those biotech drugs they come from a soup
Speaker 9: that has been fermented with a particular genetically modified organism.
Speaker 9: A lot of times it's e coali that is involved
Speaker 9: in that. So you get carryover of E coal eye proteins,
Speaker 9: you get carryover of these proteins, you get carryover a
Speaker 9: foreign DNA. Wow, and I'm in the case of the
Speaker 9: MR and A jabs, then you have carryover of virus
Speaker 9: particles like SV forty and SV forty we know causes cancer.
Speaker 9: It is known to be carcinogenic.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's just awful. I've got a couple of questions here,
Speaker 2: several questions as a matter of fact, from the audience.
Speaker 2: Jerry al Atalo says, please ask doctor Hooker how he
Speaker 2: feels about nf AK y I L d i Z
Speaker 2: public admission that COVID MRA injections are nanoscale machines programmed
Speaker 2: for human injection. I don't know who that individual is.
Speaker 2: Are you familiar with its work and that statement?
Speaker 5: No, thank you.
Speaker 9: I'm not familiar with the work, but you know, I
Speaker 9: will say I have not observed this directly. I obtained
Speaker 9: some of the MR and A technology shots myself, examined
Speaker 9: them under the microscope, you know, just used face contrast
Speaker 9: my cross could be to see what I could find,
Speaker 9: and then tried to incubate it over a period of
Speaker 9: time at physiological temperature, and the backs that I saw
Speaker 9: did not have that in it. I'm not saying that
Speaker 9: it doesn't because again, you know, David, nothing surprises me
Speaker 9: anymore when I see the things that the government has
Speaker 9: gotten away with and knowingly gotten away with with, you know,
Speaker 9: with horrible poisons that should have never been introduced, like Remdesevere.
Speaker 9: You know, Redesever killed the organs that caused the lungs
Speaker 9: to fill up with fluid, and then the patients had
Speaker 9: to be intubated to force the fluid out of the
Speaker 9: lungs because the tissue in the lungs with dying. So
Speaker 9: so many different things have been foisted. Is that is
Speaker 9: that technology readily available and off the shelf?
Speaker 5: Oh?
Speaker 9: Most definitely, most definitely they could do that.
Speaker 5: Did they do it?
Speaker 9: That's something I'm still investigating, and I honestly do not know.
Speaker 2: Let me ask you this. This is something else I covered.
Speaker 2: I remember when it happened in Japan. They had two
Speaker 2: different batches of over a million each. It's like one
Speaker 2: was a million, the other was like one point two
Speaker 2: million of these Pfizer or Dona mRNA things, and they
Speaker 2: noticed that there were black particulates in it. And they
Speaker 2: also noticed that they interacted with magnets and they threw
Speaker 2: all of them away and that was briefly reported and
Speaker 2: then they then disappeared. And uh, I was just wondering,
Speaker 2: are you familiar with that? Could you verify that that
Speaker 2: that happened? Anything?
Speaker 9: I know individuals that you could do that experiment on
Speaker 9: and you know at the injections and it was magnetic.
Speaker 2: Wow, what I make of that? Was there?
Speaker 9: You know where their magnetic particles in the vaccine?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 9: The technology exists, So it is we need all of
Speaker 9: the documentation of Pfizer. There's a big, big reason why
Speaker 9: Pfizer wanted to see those records for seventy six years. Yeah,
Speaker 9: because you know that is you know, we're going to
Speaker 9: find a Witches brew in there.
Speaker 2: Yes, Yeah. And the connection with DARPA, Yeah, connection with
Speaker 2: DARPA and BART and everything right there that point. So
Speaker 2: witch has brew of some sort. I was just wondering
Speaker 2: if maybe, you know, it showed up in Japan because
Speaker 2: of the long travel time, Maybe there was an issue
Speaker 2: with refrigeration because of the unusual issue about how unusually
Speaker 2: cold it had to be kept. But it's also it
Speaker 2: seems like the Japanese are a little bit more open
Speaker 2: and honest about some of these things. There were first
Speaker 2: ones to report about the biodistribution issues, and that was
Speaker 2: something that people reported on that severely punished in the West,
Speaker 2: but they reported it in Japan exactly.
Speaker 9: I'm thankful for that information because we didn't know the
Speaker 9: bio distribution. We were told lies, and I think that
Speaker 9: they were bold face lives. I don't think that they
Speaker 9: were just mistakes or miss speaking. I think those people
Speaker 9: had the distribution. They did animal studies, surely they had
Speaker 9: the distribution information at that time. In fact, what was
Speaker 9: leaked in Japan was a Pfizer document.
Speaker 2: Yes, Yes, got another question here from Karen Carpenter twenty
Speaker 2: seven with Knights of the Storms says, a question, please
Speaker 2: comment on Susan Monrez and the Vaccine Safety Data Link.
Speaker 2: Is the VSD accessible for studies?
Speaker 9: That is a horrible mess, and I think that we
Speaker 9: need to apply pressure on AHHS. I think we need
Speaker 9: to apply pressure on Congress to open up the Vaccine
Speaker 9: Safety Data Link. The Vaccine Safety Data Link.
Speaker 15: Is a.
Speaker 9: Ongoing record of about ten million patients enrolled in ten
Speaker 9: different HMOs. It's all de identified anonymised, so you can't
Speaker 9: figure out what patient is what, you can't get any
Speaker 9: type of hype an the information from that.
Speaker 11: But the.
Speaker 9: Doctor dosca Locis I forget his first name, he hid,
Speaker 9: literally hid and then bragged about hiding the Vaccine Safety
Speaker 9: Data Link from Secretary Kennedy for the first seven months
Speaker 9: that Secretary Kennedy was in office, and then doctor Daska
Speaker 9: Lookas then ended up resigning in protests with Manarez. Now
Speaker 9: we know it's there. Now we know that the Vaccine
Speaker 9: Safety Data Link is there, but there are contractual hiccups
Speaker 9: that keep anybody from getting data. From two thousand and
Speaker 9: two on, we do not have that information, and we
Speaker 9: need to demand that information because you know, there's so
Speaker 9: many different things. There were so many different vaccines that
Speaker 9: were introduced that have never been adequately studied. There are
Speaker 9: even unvaccinated individuals in the Vaccine Safety dattaaling because it's
Speaker 9: not required. The patient enrollment doesn't require vaccination, so I
Speaker 9: know they have it. You know, they have tens of
Speaker 9: thousands of records for individuals that they've never seen a vaccine,
Speaker 9: So we need all that information. Monarez was hiding it.
Speaker 9: Doscolocus was hiding it.
Speaker 2: Should go to jail.
Speaker 9: And now the head of the Immunization saw Is Safety
Speaker 9: Office I believe his name is Mike mcneilan is stonewalling
Speaker 9: to allow Secretary Kennedy and his advisors to get access
Speaker 9: to that data. Again, it's deep state gurus that have
Speaker 9: been there forever that are hiding this information. It needs
Speaker 9: to come open.
Speaker 2: Well again, it's the sort of thing in another field
Speaker 2: that I was working in. We were trying to get
Speaker 2: climate data from doctor Michael Mann and it was something
Speaker 2: that he had done at a public university on their
Speaker 2: work computers, and he had published the information and it
Speaker 2: had been used to create public policy. But he absolutely
Speaker 2: refused to show us the data. You know, when I
Speaker 2: see something like that same type of thing that we're
Speaker 2: seeing with Susan Monarez and the CDC doing trying to
Speaker 2: hide this vaccine safety data, that is an admission of guilt,
Speaker 2: and it's admission. You know, science is not on your
Speaker 2: side if you are afraid to show people the data
Speaker 2: and you just want them to do what you say,
Speaker 2: because the position you're in that is the antithesis of science.
Speaker 2: I've got another question here from Guard Goldsmith of Liberty
Speaker 2: Conspiracy said, I wonder if the doctor has any knowledge
Speaker 2: of breakthroughs for long COVID. I still search finding some
Speaker 2: interesting hope. What do you think about that?
Speaker 9: I you know, I am not a practitioner, and I
Speaker 9: know many many good practitioners that are starting to have
Speaker 9: breakthroughs using different cocktails of anti virals, anti parasitics, and
Speaker 9: antibiotics that you know, that's where I'm hearing the success.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 9: There are also you know, and and David, I thought
Speaker 9: I'd never hear myself saying this. There are also individuals
Speaker 9: that are using hypochloride hypochlorus solutions. You know, they're not
Speaker 9: it's not bleach. Everybody says, oh it's bleach. You know, No,
Speaker 9: these are very very deleute, very very safe solutions. Uh.
Speaker 9: And they're doing uh nasal levage on patients that is
Speaker 9: helping clear the virus, that's helping clear the spike. And
Speaker 9: then there are myriad sort of uh recipes. Homeopathy is
Speaker 9: you know I'm hearing from those practicing uh natural path
Speaker 9: and homeopaths are having really really good success with long
Speaker 9: COVID in COVID vaccine injury. So you know, follow the
Speaker 9: rule that you know, try it, do one thing at
Speaker 9: a time, see if it works. If it doesn't work,
Speaker 9: digit and move on to the next thing. I mean,
Speaker 9: you know, because you shouldn't suffer. He've brought my son
Speaker 9: a tremendous amount of way with his vaccine injury that
Speaker 9: he sustained it fifteen months. And my house is a
Speaker 9: house of many clinical trials. Whether it's allopathic, whether it's naturopathic.
Speaker 9: You know where it comes from. You know, I honestly
Speaker 9: don't care. If it's effective, you need to use it,
Speaker 9: and if it's not effective, then move on.
Speaker 2: I agree, I look at it, and if it's something
Speaker 2: that is not going to be harmful, you know, I'll
Speaker 2: try it. You know, how much does it cost? I'll
Speaker 2: buy it. That's going back to the old song from
Speaker 2: nineteen seventies. Let me ask you about what's going on
Speaker 2: with autism, because I know that you spend a lot
Speaker 2: of time with autism focusing on that. I'm looking at
Speaker 2: this time all thing to me, it looks like a
Speaker 2: red herring. It looks like they're trying to dodge the
Speaker 2: connection for the vaccine stuff. What is your take on that.
Speaker 2: I mean, I just don't see that tailand all has
Speaker 2: corresponded uptake in talanol has changed radically. That would explain
Speaker 2: the radical change and autism. I just don't buy that all.
Speaker 2: What do you think about that? What do you think
Speaker 2: is that?
Speaker 9: I think, you know, I've done a lot of research
Speaker 9: on this and spend a lot of time with the
Speaker 9: lead researcher in that whole field of a SEEDOMINIFN neurodevelopmental
Speaker 9: disorders in audism. His name is William Parker. I actually
Speaker 9: sat down with him for five days and said, look,
Speaker 9: convince me, you know, because he was hounding me about this.
Speaker 9: And so the thing that's really convenient about tilan all
Speaker 9: is that it is a quick solution to a not
Speaker 9: so quick problem. And I think that, yeah, there are
Speaker 9: cases that are definitely associated with some type of infection,
Speaker 9: some type of vaccination followed by a seat tominifin definitely,
Speaker 9: you know, sort of a one two punch. But thailan
Speaker 9: all itself is a necessary component, but it's not sufficient.
Speaker 9: You can't just say, oh, you know, thailand all is bad.
Speaker 9: It is the individuals that have genetic susceptibility that then
Speaker 9: have a huge amount of oxidative stress, like multiple vaccines
Speaker 9: all at the same time, and then you add taileanol
Speaker 9: to the mix. That's really the perfect storm. So you
Speaker 9: can't just take care of one and say, oh, we've
Speaker 9: broken the chain. All of them need to be taken
Speaker 9: care of. All of them need to be addressed. I
Speaker 9: think that the administration came out with regarding taileanol because
Speaker 9: they thought it's an easy fix, but you know it is.
Speaker 9: We didn't get here just from thailan al. We got
Speaker 9: here from years of abuse of the system, and that
Speaker 9: needs to be a fit fixed and then we can
Speaker 9: see the autism epidemic go away.
Speaker 2: That's good. Yeah, I feel like you know, when you
Speaker 2: look at this, it seemed to coincide with a rapid
Speaker 2: escalation of the vaccine schedule. Now what is going on
Speaker 2: with that? You know what is happening with that. I
Speaker 2: know you were involved with the measles issue, you know
Speaker 2: where they said a couple of people died in Texas
Speaker 2: and you investigated that with the families. I know the
Speaker 2: media is still selling that narrative. I think you effectively
Speaker 2: debunked that that was what had happened there. Yeah.
Speaker 9: Yeah, they died of bacterial pneumonia. It was left untreated.
Speaker 2: Yes, but I'm still seeing mainstream articles saying, oh, I
Speaker 2: killed two people and so forth. And you know, so
Speaker 2: what are the chances of us pulling back on this
Speaker 2: vaccine schedule. I know that it's tremendous support within the
Speaker 2: bureaucracy and the corporations and the media, and I guess
Speaker 2: that's another part of it. What's going to happen with
Speaker 2: the ads, the issue with that. I know that RFK
Speaker 2: Junior has talked about that.
Speaker 9: Well, my hope is that you know, direct to consumer
Speaker 9: pharmaceutical advertising will go by the wayside. I mean, it's
Speaker 9: gotten ridiculous. It is absolutely you know, inn and I
Speaker 9: watched news and Old People TV. So you know, my
Speaker 9: wife is a serial addict to the Hallmark channel, and
Speaker 9: so it's it's all the drugs, biologics and vaccines that
Speaker 9: you can push on old people. Yeah, you know, every
Speaker 9: day every ad. It is very infrequent that you see
Speaker 9: anything else, and so those need to be pulled they
Speaker 9: and I believe that Secretary Kennedy is working stepwise to
Speaker 9: get there too.
Speaker 2: I believe that they're de facto fraudulent, you know, in
Speaker 2: the sense that you know, ask your doctor, well you're
Speaker 2: not you don't understand that they're not giving you all
Speaker 2: the information that you need to make an informed decision,
Speaker 2: and so it is really fraudulent what they're putting out there.
Speaker 2: Even if they have somebody rattling off very apparently all
Speaker 2: the adverse effects that they are going to talk about,
Speaker 2: it's still not sufficient to be truthful. I think.
Speaker 9: No, No, it doesn't tell you tell you how effective
Speaker 9: that that particular therapy is. It doesn't tell you how
Speaker 9: the effective the vaccine is at preventing that particular disease.
Speaker 9: I mean, we see, you know, over and over again RSV, shingles, pneumonia,
Speaker 9: you know, flu, over and over again, but they don't
Speaker 9: you know, the dirty little secret is some years that
Speaker 9: when you get the flu shot, you're more likely to
Speaker 9: get the flu than if you didn't get the flu shot.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, and so you know they're saying that over
Speaker 2: and over again. Yeah, pretty much every year. People who
Speaker 2: get it, they get it right away. Yeah.
Speaker 9: And we know individuals that get the trivalent the quad
Speaker 9: valent flu shot got them for their babies and the
Speaker 9: babies died within hours. I mean, we're investigating several cases
Speaker 9: of sis right now that were the quadri valance flu shot,
Speaker 9: and it's just it's such a shame, you know, when
Speaker 9: you see these babies die, yes, and then you know
Speaker 9: the entire system is there to cover it up. We
Speaker 9: want to be able to expose it.
Speaker 2: It's just terrrifict. Yeah. I've played a clip several times
Speaker 2: of a lady that was on social media and she
Speaker 2: said it wasn't until she saw the sudden adult death
Speaker 2: syndrome stuff that was out there that it clicked with her.
Speaker 2: And she said, I killed my baby, And I said
Speaker 2: so many times I wish I could talk to her.
Speaker 2: She didn't kill her baby as people who lied to her,
Speaker 2: people who knew better, who killed her baby for money.
Speaker 2: That's the saddest thing about it. I got a couple
Speaker 2: more comments here, real Jason Barker with Knights of the Storm.
Speaker 2: So the CDC took down the publicly available tools that
Speaker 2: show excess death spikes after the vaccine rollout. That's very
Speaker 2: damning info right there. In reply to a person who said,
Speaker 2: I can't even get the excess death statistics anymore, I
Speaker 2: could in twenty twenty two for every year since it
Speaker 2: started to be recorded. What's going on with that? And
Speaker 2: do you have that information at covidindex dot science.
Speaker 9: That has been pulled down, and I believe that that's
Speaker 9: addressed in COVID Index dot science. We do not have
Speaker 9: the new data regarding excess desk. And it's weird because
Speaker 9: I published on XS desks and d MEAD the Department
Speaker 9: of Defense Medical Epidemiological Database. I published on xsdesks in
Speaker 9: twenty twenty two from you know, from the rollout of
Speaker 9: the vaccine, and all of a sudden, all this stuff
Speaker 9: just dried out. CDC was no longer reporting exs desks
Speaker 9: on their website. There's so many show games on.
Speaker 2: You know, you've got to the.
Speaker 9: National Center for Health Statistics. They never they never say
Speaker 9: flu desks. They always say influenza and pneumonia. They combine
Speaker 9: those two categories so people will get scared and get
Speaker 9: their flu shots, even though they're not effective at preventing death,
Speaker 9: preventing serious illness, and many times not even effective at
Speaker 9: doing the flu. So yeah, a lot of those databases
Speaker 9: are pulled down. I do encourage any and everybody to
Speaker 9: FOYA the CDC for specific information. It's as simple as
Speaker 9: an email, just you know, Foyer request at CDC dot gov,
Speaker 9: Foia request at CDC dot gov. You know, put very
Speaker 9: concise language of what you want, limit, you know, the
Speaker 9: ass to specific information, and then by law they have
Speaker 9: to respond to you within thirty days.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I remember when they did that with a Defense
Speaker 2: department's database of d MEAD stuff. I remember there's some
Speaker 2: doctors that saw how things were exploding in a lot
Speaker 2: of different areas, and their absurd reply wise, well, not
Speaker 2: that there was something going on with the vaccine, but
Speaker 2: they went back and they looked at it, they compared
Speaker 2: it over five years. They said, well, all of our
Speaker 2: data for five years is wrong, and it's like, come
Speaker 2: on right, And then the next thing, you know, they
Speaker 2: pulled it all down. I mean, if this isn't the
Speaker 2: most juvenile cover up, it's just absolutely amazing. It would
Speaker 2: be comical if it wasn't so horrific what it's doing
Speaker 2: to people's lives. I've got let's see bulldogs says they
Speaker 2: can have very specifically targeted people by lot number. Yeah,
Speaker 2: they could, SG Sutton. Can doctor Hooker tell us about
Speaker 2: the volunteer opportunity with the COVID index?
Speaker 9: Oh that is so good. That is such a great question.
Speaker 9: If you look at the COVID index dot science, there
Speaker 9: is a box that you can click on to volunteer
Speaker 9: and these volunteers, they are basically individuals that go out
Speaker 9: and they get new information, newly published information for the
Speaker 9: COVID Index.
Speaker 5: They curate it.
Speaker 9: You know, it's very very simple. You fill out a
Speaker 9: very very simple form and then once you filled out
Speaker 9: that form, then it goes to a very small committee
Speaker 9: and then they give you thumbs up or thumbs down
Speaker 9: like oh yeah, this should go on the COVID And
Speaker 9: it's about ninety five percent of it does go into
Speaker 9: the index. But that helps us keep it up to date.
Speaker 9: We have an army of volunteers that does that and
Speaker 9: we're recruiting more volunteers. You get free COVID Index merch
Speaker 9: you get free CHD emerged, And we love our volunteers
Speaker 9: that we want. I mean, I know there's a lot
Speaker 9: of people out there that want to help that are
Speaker 9: really studious and nerdy like me, and they like to
Speaker 9: read this literature. And so you know, if that is
Speaker 9: your vibe, if that's the thing that you'd like to do,
Speaker 9: make sure that you check out that volunteer Opportunities tab
Speaker 9: on COVID Index dot Science.
Speaker 2: That's great, that's great, And again, yeah, covidindex, dot Science
Speaker 2: and they have I guess most of them are one
Speaker 2: minute videos that you can just very easily click on
Speaker 2: the thing and share it on social media. Get this
Speaker 2: information around, that's the most important thing. People are not
Speaker 2: informed or they're misinformed about what's going on here, and
Speaker 2: so it's very important to get those videos that they
Speaker 2: put together are out there. I got one more question
Speaker 2: here from Karen Carpenter when Nice the Storm says, does
Speaker 2: doctor Hooker think that ultrasound and Wi Fi EMF could
Speaker 2: play a role in autism? What do you think about that?
Speaker 9: I absolutely believe that it plays a role on autism.
Speaker 9: A lot of autism researchers have have looked into this
Speaker 9: and they find statistically significant correlations with EMF.
Speaker 2: You know, there there was.
Speaker 9: Very little reason for five G. Five G is basically
Speaker 9: there for surveillance purposes. Uh. So that not not so
Speaker 9: you can have better internet, but so the government can
Speaker 9: know more about you. And so you look at all
Speaker 9: these you know, new technologies, the Internet of things, so
Speaker 9: you know, my phone can talk to my computer, my
Speaker 9: refrigerator and you know my ironing board or whatever. Uh
Speaker 9: that is producing energetic signals. It's producing energetic signals in
Speaker 9: the IR range, uh, in the you know, in the
Speaker 9: microwave range, and that is bad for you. I mean,
Speaker 9: there's nothing good about it. I mean, if I had
Speaker 9: my choice, my uh, my own house would be hardwired.
Speaker 9: But what we do is we turn off our devices
Speaker 9: and Wi Fi at night and have just like an
Speaker 9: old clock that tells us the one that you have
Speaker 9: to change during daylight things, uh, and just tells us
Speaker 9: what time it is, you know, just sleep with it off.
Speaker 9: Sleep and just just start with turning your WiFi off
Speaker 9: because there is a connection. I don't believe that it's
Speaker 9: completely causal, but there is a connection with Wi Fi
Speaker 9: and with excitatory uh excited toxic processes in the brain,
Speaker 9: and you don't want to stimulate that.
Speaker 2: I agree. I mean when I was going back trying
Speaker 2: to do some research on MONSTF, slowly I found all
Speaker 2: these different conferences that he was speaking at, found You
Speaker 2: was speaking at, and Francis Commins was speaking at, and
Speaker 2: they're all talking about electroceuticals, and I thought, well, this
Speaker 2: is going to be the next big thing, electrocutical. So
Speaker 2: it's like, okay, well, if you're going to treat people
Speaker 2: electrically with things like that, then clearly EMF is going
Speaker 2: to have a big effect.
Speaker 9: On people and a tacit admission, isn't it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 9: The MF does have an effect if we can manipulate
Speaker 9: it to you know, do you know some type of
Speaker 9: medical intervention, then what is it doing every day?
Speaker 2: Yes? Exactly. And you know, we had Alan Fry who
Speaker 2: worked for the Navy doing experiments and he documented the
Speaker 2: Fry effect, which you can certain frequencies you'll hear it
Speaker 2: like a clicking type of thing, you know, just like
Speaker 2: we had, you know, the military discovered microwave cooking, you know,
Speaker 2: the radar ranges of a mana in the early days.
Speaker 2: You know, then just notice that the coffee was getting hot. Well,
Speaker 2: if you see something like that, then there's a little
Speaker 2: bit of smoke there. There's got to be a fire
Speaker 2: there somewhere as well. I think I started looking at
Speaker 2: that in conjunction with the Havana effect that was out
Speaker 2: there because people were saying they were hearing the clickings.
Speaker 2: It's like, oh wait, that sounds like the Fry effect.
Speaker 2: Maybe that is some kind of directed EMF. Not sure.
Speaker 2: And I got another question here just about at a time.
Speaker 2: This is from Jerry Alatalo. He says, please ask doctor
Speaker 2: Hooker how he felt immediately after listening closely to DARPA
Speaker 2: associated neuroscientist James Giandaro's horrifying public lectures. Thank you, you
Speaker 2: know I am that.
Speaker 9: One stumped me. I know of those lectures. I just
Speaker 9: don't know enough about those lectures. I apologize. You know,
Speaker 9: I should know this information. And my defense is that
Speaker 9: we're playing whackable with everything right now.
Speaker 2: That's right, there's so many. I mean, these people have
Speaker 2: billion dollar budgets and they're constantly coming up with one
Speaker 2: bizarre Frankenstein experiment to the other. It truly is a
Speaker 2: scary situation that we find ourselves in this particular time.
Speaker 2: It is an interesting time, and it is a very
Speaker 2: dangerous time. But thank you so much for the work
Speaker 2: that you you do a children's health defense and for
Speaker 2: the covidindex dot science. Thank you, doctor Herger Hooker, thank you,
Speaker 2: thank you very much. Thank you. The common man. They
Speaker 2: created common Core and dumped down our children. They created
Speaker 2: common past, track and control us. They're Commons project to
Speaker 2: make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 2: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 2: each of us has worth and dignity created in the
Speaker 2: image of God.
Speaker 9: That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 2: everything about us. They hide everything from us. It's time
Speaker 2: to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Speaker 2: Please share the information and links you'll find at the
Speaker 2: Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing.
Speaker 2: If you can't support us financially, please keep us in
Speaker 2: your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com