Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the program. Down
at mar A Lago. Donald Trump has had his house
raided by the Federal Bureau of Investigations, and as you
can imagine, old Trumpster wasn't too happy about what occurred today,
though we're not going to talk about that raid. What
we're going to talk about is the judge who signed
off on it. And the judge who signed off on
it is a man. Well, he's a man that those
of you who follow the Epstein case should know of.
And his name is Bruce Reinhart. That's right, the guy
who once quit his job as a US attorney to
work for Jeffrey Epstein. He's the guy who just signed
off on this warrant. And for me, it just shows
you why there was never a Rico case brought in
the first place. This guy, Bruce Reinhart, quit the federal
government when on Live TV defended Jeffrey Epstein, not as
a lawyer but just as a legal analyst. And now
he has a job as a judge where he's able
to sign off on warrants such as this. How come
he doesn't sign off on a warrant for Zoro Ranch
to get raided. Where's the warrant for the rest of
Epstein's homies to get raided? And then you wonder why
people get fired up. There is no way on God's
green earth that anybody who is working for Jeffrey Epstein
in any capacity should ever be a judge. Today we
have an article from Laws Inflorida dot com and the
headline Epstein's Little Black Book of Princes, law professors, and
now this prosecutor. This article was published by Laws in
Florida and the author is Laws in Florida Staff. The
US magistrate over seeing the legal battle between Craig Wright
and the estate of Dave Kleman over who owns a
ten billion dollar bitcoin fortune and Bitcoin's underlying ip is
not without controversy of his own. Bruce Reinhardt once quit
his job as a US attorney to work for Jeffrey Epstein,
the multimillionaire accused sex trafficker who was being targeted in
a probe by the US Attorney's office. As reported in
the Miami Herald on November twenty eighth, twenty eighteen, Epstein
also hired Bruce Reinhardt, then an assistant US attorney in
South Florida and now a US magistrate. Now, why would
Epstein have to hire all of these ex prosecutors? Why
did he have to bring on all of these ex
government employees? Was he bringing them on because of their
grand expertise? Or was he bringing them on for their connections?
Because they're part of the club. You know, the club
you're not allowed in, the club you're not welcome to.
That's where this guy, Bruce Uce Reinhart makes his living.
And it is absurd that a man like this should
ever even be a judge. He left his US attorney's
office on January first, two thousand and eight, and went
to work representing Epstein's employees on January second, two thousand
and eight. Court record show, So he quits on January
first of two thousand and eight, right, and then the
next day he is working as a lawyer defending Jeffrey
Epstein's employees. Why is this guy a judge? In twenty
and eleven, Reinhardt was named in the Crime Victims Rights
Act lawsuit, which accused him of violating Justice Department policies
by switching sides, implying that he leveraged inside information about
Epstein's investigation to Curry favor with Epstein. So what they're
saying is he used his inside knowledge of the case
as a prosecutor to help Jeffrey Epstein beat these charges.
It's the same thing I've said from the bag. This
was all manipulated, and not in a courtroom. This was
manipulated behind the scenes at bars, in restaurants, where these
high power lawyers would meet up with people in the
government and they'd work out these deals. And that's how
it always works. If you're one of Epstein's homies, you'll
never get your pad rated. You can guarantee that, because
it'll tie all these other people to you and they
can't have it. And that's why we don't have a
Rico case. If anyone needed any more reason why this
wasn't a Rico case, if it wasn't apparent before, it
should be very apparent right now. If they went the
Rico route, all of these people would have been caught
up in it, and it would have been the biggest controversy,
the biggest shit sandwich the American government has ever eaten.
Also reported in the Miami Herald, Reinhardt made plans that
would establish as private practice while still in office. On
October twenty third, two thousand and seven, a federal prosecutor
in South Florida were in the midst of tense negotiations
to finalize a plead deal with a Q sex trafficker
Jeffrey Epstein. A senior prosecutor in their office, was quietly
laying out plans to leave the US Attorney's office after
eleven years. Boy, you sure had that nice fall down
for you. Huh, nice golden parachute to jump out of
the building with, leave the prosecutor's office where you're probably
making peanuts, and go directly to work for Jeffrey Epstein.
Huh sounds like a fantastic idea. On that date, as
emails were flying between Epstein's lawyers and federal prosecutors, Bruce E. Reinhardt,
now a federal magistrate, opened a limited liability company in
Florida that established what would become his new criminal defense practice.
So while he was on the dime taking taxpayer dollars
and being entrusted to go after people like Epstein instead
the Marl bul Bruce Ryan Hart had a whole different
idea going on, setting himself up for a little bit
of dose kid to secure that bag, right, Ah, you
know what, we're prosecuting Epstein. Maybe if I leave and
go and work for Epstein, that'll be more profitable. In
twenty eleven, Halfid David Reinhart swore, under penalty of perjury
that he was not part of the team involved in
Epstein's investigation and therefore was not privy to any confidential
information about the case while he was at the US
Attorney's office. So you want us to believe that your
boys didn't ever hit you to what was going on
to the case. You didn't ever talk to any of
your colleagues about what's going on in the Jeffrey Epstein case. Okay, sure,
we believe you missed the rein Hart. However, as the
Miami Herald points out, Reinhart's former supervisors in the US
Attorney's office filed a court paper contradicting him, saying that
while Brucey Reinhardt was an assistant US attorney, he learned confidential,
non public information about the Epstein matter. Can I ask you,
folks again, how anyone can cheer on a guy like this?
How anyone can think that this is someone that we
can trust with justice. In one of the twenty eleven
Epstein cases Jane Doe's number one and number two United
States Reinhardt took offense at the idea that he did
anything wrong. In that motion, the plaintiff alleged that Reinhardt
joined Epstein's payrolls shortly after important decisions were made limiting
Epstein's criminal liability, and improperly represented Epstein's survivors in follow
on civil suits. Plaintiffs contend that such conduct gives at
least the improper appearance that Reinhart may have attempted to
curry favor with Epstein and then reap his reward through
favorable employment. And this is a guy who is a
judge making these impactful decisions for us. And I'll throw
out Mara a lago. I don't even care about Trump
a Trump's house. All you want, you know, if you
have the goods and you have enough to get the warrant. Great.
My point for this episode is, why is a guy
like Judge Reinhart even involved in it at all? How
is it that he still has a job, How is
it that he was made a judge when everybody knows
this information, And you tell me the system isn't broken,
You tell me it isn't set up for people like
us to fail. Reinhart takes great offense to these actions,
accusations which he contends are false, irrelevant to the CVR claims,
and gratuitous, and seeks intervention to rebut these allegations and
move for sanction. These are the survivors, by the way,
saying this, the plaintiffs who called Reinhart out. In twenty twelve,
he went to work for the white collar crime division
of McDonald Hopkins LLC in Miami. At the time, a
public relations firm put out a press release stating, since
two thousand and eight, Reinhart has been in private practice
providing white collar and complex civil litigation strategies for a
variety of businesses, executives, and nonprofit entities around the country.
As Julie K. Brown of Miami Herald put it, rein
Art's defection was one of many highly unusual turns that
the Epstein case took twelve years ago, moves that could
merit examination as the multimillionaire's controversial non prosecution agreement is
dissected in the wake of his arrest last week on
sex trafficking charges. Now again, if you just look at
Epstein dying in custody on its own, you could say,
all right, I get it. Dude was depressed, he didn't
want to be in prison forever. He killed himself. But
when you look at all of this other stuff, all
of these other quote unquote coincidences and other situations that
just happened to pop up along the way, it's hard
for me to just sit here and say, oh, this
is all coincidence. How can anyone believe that what happened
down here in Florida especially was on the up and up,
and that Epstein wasn't manipulating from behind the scenes. And
if you believe that, how can you possibly cheer the
FBI on? Ever, I don't trust the FBI. I don't
trust their motivations, and I believe that they're politicized, So
how can I trust them? And I don't pick and
choose when I trust the government folks. People that do that,
you know what they're called. They're called hypocrites, and your
bias is showing when you're doing that. Me, I rage
against the FBI no matter who's in office, because I
find their behavior to be absolutely beyond the pale, and
the fact that these people never face consequences, meaning the
FBI agents or prosecutors involved in things like this. The
fact that they never face consequences really launches me into orbit.
How many more cases do we need to discuss? See,
I don't just pick and choose. If I'm going to
cheer the FBI on, Chances are I am not cheering
them on, okay, because I don't trust that they're going
to do things correctly. And that's on them, that's not
on me. That's because the way they they conduct themselves.
In twenty fifteen, Reinhart defended Epstein on TV, not as
his attorney of seven years, but as a legal expert
and a former US prosecutor. Isn't that nice? Let me
just hop on TV and defend Jeffrey Epstein and then
let me go ahead and get a job as a judge,
because you know why not. Reinhart was appointed US magistrate
in March twenty eighteen, nearly a year after Alexander Acosta
began his stint as Labor Secretary. Acosta resigned on July nineteenth,
twenty nineteen, over his handling of the Epstein case. At
the time, Reinhart is recorded in the Palm Beach Post
is saying it's been a good week in our house. Yeah,
you know who hasn't been a good week, for a
good year, for a good decade for the survivors, Judge Reinhart.
And it's because of people like you that refuse to
really pursue justice that things like this are happening. That
was odd because the next sentence is about a guilty
verdict for a client. He recently represented former Boynton Beach
police officer Michael Brown. The veteran cop last month was
sentenced to six months house arrest in three years of probation.
The Sun Sentinel headline on the story on November tenth,
twenty seventeen, was Boynton Beach cop found guilty and beating
of unarmed man. So this guy's out here talking about, oh,
it's been a good week in our house, as he
just loses the case. But the real thing that gets
me here, folks, is why is this guy in the
position of being a judge in the first place. Anyone
who's linked to Epstein, especially in a manner of such
as this, should not be a judge. Should Alan Dershowitz
be a judge. Should Jay left Gowitz be a judge?
Should a Star can Starr be a judge? No, of
course not, and neither should mister Bruce Reinhardt. If you'd
like to contact me, you can do that at Bobby
Capucci at ProtonMail dot com. That's b O. B b
Y c ap eu Cci at ProtonMail dot com. If
you'd like to find me on Twitter, you can do
that as well at Bobby Underscore cap Ucci. The link
that we discussed can be found in the description box.
All right, everybody, I'll be back later on with a
little bit more hope that all of you are having
a good one, folks. We're going to jump into our
article today. And this article has to do with the
government finally apologizing to Epstein's victims, but at the same
time defending the immunity deal that it tossed out that
it gave out to Epstein and the co conspirators. So
this is an article from the Courthouse News and the
author is is he Kapnick. The article is published on
January sixteenth in the Eleventh Circuit. Government prosecutors at long
last utter the words sorry in open court to victims
of Jeffrey Epstein's underage sex ring. After years of refusing
to apologize. For keeping them in the dark about a
deal that protected the wealthy money manager pedophile from federal charges. Well,
isn't that nice? The government is just so great they
finally decided to say sorry for throwing these girls under
the bus. Boy, isn't that awesome the government? You know,
there really are a bunch of great people over there
in the federal Prosecutor's office, Aren't there just a bunch
of just incredibly awesome people. The apology was issued during
a Thursday morning a pellet proceeding in Miami attended by
Courtney Wilde, who says Epstein sexually abused her at his
mansion when she was fourteen years old. Again, folks, every
time I read stuff like this fourteen years old, thirteen
years old, eleven years old, it makes me so sad.
Imagine cause I remember being that age. I remember being
that age. I remember how the world was. You know,
I was going to be a professional football player. You know,
the whole world was mine to take. And I can't
even imagine the rug being pulled out from under me
by some sick, demented pervert. The way her whole world
was shook up. I mean, are you kidding me? Right now?
She and her lawyers were in court to challenge a
federal judge's decision to preserve the two thousand and seven deal,
which gave Epstein and his assistants immunity from federal sex
crime charges in South Florida. The government should have communicated
to miss wild in a straightforward way. We are genuinely sorry,
Assistant US attorney Jill Steinberg said, apologizing for her predecessor's
mistreatment of victims. We're well, you know, since they're genuinely sorry,
we could all move on now, folks. You know they're
genuinely sorry, So it's okay. No, it's not okay, and
take your sorry and shove it. We want movement in
the case, all right. We want everybody involved that got
that plush plea deal the immunity because of Jeffrey Epstein.
We want that throwne in the trash, and we want
all of them to face the music. Wild's longtime lawyer,
Bradley Edwards, set outside the courthouse that wild Wilde welcomes
the government repentance, she wants more concrete relief, citing the
government's admitted violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act. Edwards
said that the clear remedy is to rescind the non
prosecution agreement. Hallelujah. That is obviously what should happen, all right,
it was not granted in good faith. Okays of the
prosecution agreement was not granted in good faith, and it
needs to be overturned. And everybody named in those documents,
and everybody named as a co conspirator needs to have
a very speedy trial and then harsh punishment. The government
told the appellate panel that the Crime Victim's Riots Act
provides a means for disenfranchised victims to challenge plea bargains,
not non prosecution agreements like Epstein's. Steinberg claimed that because
federal prosecutors never filed a formal charging document, the acts
recive remedies do not apply. Look, it's such legal ease, right,
they're using loopholes. The government is using loopholes so that
they don't have to do their job again. Fire them
all and bring in new people. I've had enough, honestly, folks,
I've had enough with all of these institutions, all of
these federal government institutions, all of these supposed law law
offices and places where you know, the Justice Department, the FBI.
I don't have any faith in any of them. Sorry.
Edwards said after the hearing that the government's stance amounts
to using a legal loophole to sidestep victims. Right, That's
exactly what I just said. It's definitely a loophole. It's
definitely a legal loophole. These guys they know the law
inside and out. They wrote the laws basically, so they
know how to skirt to the side when they don't
want to prosecute. This is an argument the government has
been making for some time. They're saying, we never formally indicted,
so we didn't have to treat the victims with dignity.
Edward said, well, they didn't do that. They didn't treat
the victims with any dignity at all, and they still
aren't treating them with dignity to this day. And it's
offensive to see. It's just offensive to see the way
the government is still treating these victims of Jeffrey Epstein
and his pals. Epstein, who rubbed shoulders with the richest
of the rich and the beach social scene, members of
the British Royal family and Presidents Donald Trump and Bill
Clinton died in August twenty nineteen, while in custody on
new sex crime charges filed in New York. His death
was deemed a suicide by a New York City medical examiner,
though a forensic pathologist hired by his brother argued that
his injuries suggested homicide. And we talked about that yesterday,
the burst capillaries. I'm not gonna, you know, rehash all
of that stuff. We all know where we're at there.
But come on, come on. Epstein killed himself on okay.
In the old Florida criminal case, Epstein was accused of
luring more than thirty underage girls to his Palm Beach
mansion and coerce them into sexual activity in a massage
room that his aids allegedly helped him set up and maintain.
He cut the two thousand and seven deal with the
Southern District of Florida's prosecutors, under which he pleaded guilty
to a state charge of soliciting underage prostitution in exchange
for assurances that he would not be federally charged. Every
time I read that, it makes me mad too. Underage prostitution,
What it's not even a thing. If you're underage, how
can you consent? How can you be a prostitute if
you're underage? Just another way to try and sully these girls.
Epstein served roughly a year in prison. He was allowed
to leave his cell and spend daytime in an office
under a work release program. In February twenty nineteen, eleven
years deep intok Wilde's lawsuit against the government, US District
Judge Kenneth Marra a George W. Bush, a George W.
Bush appointee, found that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victim's
Rights Act by concealing Epstein's deal from victims as plea
negotiation played out and even after the deal was signed.
That right, there is enough to bring these prosecutors in
and charge them, in my opinion, talk about a dereliction
of duty. You're gonna you're gonna go after Tobin Noel
and the other and the other guard I forget his name,
Michael Thomas. I believe you, Michael Thomas, and to and
uh Tobin Noel because they fell asleep on the job.
But the whole entire government violated the crimes the Crimes
Victims' Rights Act, And no big deal, Right, nobody gets punished.
We'll just move on must be nice to make the law,
must be nice to not to have to follow the
law too. Last September, Marra granted virtually no relief to
Wilde and the other plaintiff. However, he found that their
demand to nullify Epstein's immunity in Florida was made moot
when Epstein died. Boy isn't that convenient? Boy, isn't that
convenient for Judge Mara, a George W. Bush appointee. Hmmm, interesting,
I wonder how many rounds of golf Mara has played
with Epstein's people. As for the assistants who allegedly helped
Epstein allure underage girls to pump to the Palm Beach mansion,
Judge Mara found that the court couldn't avoid their immunity
because there were never parties to Wilde's litigation. Again, more
legal ease, more loopholes. Basically, what he's saying is you
have no recourse. You're screwed. Basically what the judge is saying.
Wiles's attorneys argued Thursday that if the co conspirators needed
to be brought into the litigation for Judge Marat to
grant relief, then the judge could have could have and
should have ordered a joinder case. Law establishes that if
a joinder problem arises in granting relief, the proper response
is not to terminate the case, but rather to direct
that any necessary missing parties be joined. Lawyer Paul Kassel argued,
in any event, Cassell claimed the co conspirators were nothing
more than indirect beneficiaries of the Epstein non prosecution agreement.
Judge Mara's findings that they need to be brought into litigation.
It was consequently untenable. Castle said the deal, which was
not signed by the alleged cohorts, reads, Oh wow, that's crazy.
So it was not signed by the people that are
being protected by it. How is it a binding document?
If you or I don't sign something, there's no way
that it's going to be a binding document. But all
of a sudden, because it involves Jeffrey Epstein and is
you know, a circle of witches. Eh, that's all good.
Don't even worry about it. Eh, you gotta and write
it on a napkin. We'll write, We'll write out our
contract on a napkin. No big deal, what what does
this even mean? The United States agrees that it will
not institute any criminal charges against any potential co conspirators
of Epstein. And look at that, folks, Are you kidding me?
With that huge widespread immunity deal there of any co
conspirators of Epstein. Oh I wonder why Alan Dershowitz would
have it written that way.
Speaker 2: Huh?
Speaker 1: I wonder if Alan Dershowitz is one of those COCD
spirits that is protected. Makes you think, folks. The agreement
mentions Epstein's assistant Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marsonkova, and Leslie Groff
by name. Okay, all three of them, right, plus Kilan Maxwell,
all need to be arrested, all need to be slapped
with RICO charges, and all need to be put under
a federal prison for the rest of their lives. The
government maintains that the victims' attorneys, not the court itself,
were responsible for initiating an action to bring the alleged
conspirators into the litigation. The Department of Justice, how about
we call it the Department of Injustice from here on
out is also claiming that victims' rights under the cv
RA were vindicated when they spoke their peace at a
New York criminal proceeding last year. Wow, are you kidding me?
Speaker 2: Right now?
Speaker 1: Because they had their chance to have their say that
it's all good, the CVRA was vindicated wrong, wrong. An
investigation by New York prosecutors may still yield charges against
Epstein's alleged cohort. Steinberg said. The appellate panel balked at that, reasoning,
how does the New York proceeding have any bearing on
whether the Southern District made a mistake in this case?
As Senior US Circuit Judge Gerald Bard Toeflat, A Gerald
fourth point d A Gerald Florida point d. Come on, man,
time to retire. Judge Gerald Bard Toeflat, Time for you
to retire. Pack it in, get your nice you know,
ten gallon hat, your cowboy boots, and head to Florida.
Oh wait, you're in Florida already. Time to retire, sir.
The government's argument about potential infringements on prosecute prosecutorial discretion
gained more traction among the panel. Judge Toeflat was concerned
that if the Crime Victim's Rights Act is interpreted too broadly,
it could be a slippery slope as far as judicial
interference with prosecutors day to day decisions on whether to
prosecute a suspect. The judge reference the old refrained, once
the camel gets his nose in the tent, his body
will soon follow, okay. Boomer Castle tried to allay the
panel's concerns, and, in exchange that at times grew terse,
he said that his client is asking for a narrow
decision on violations of victim's rights in the end stage
of plea negotiations, a ruling that would not pose an
existential threat to prosecutor's executive powers. Also on appeal is
Judge Mara's denial of Wilde's request for various documents from
the criminal case, including grand jury records and deliberations within
the Department of Justice regarding the decision not to prosecute Epstein.
Though the Department of Justice admitted to Judge Mara in
twenty nineteen that it failed to confer with the victims
about the non prosecution agreement, it stopped short of issuing
an apology to wild at that time. Until this morning,
the Department had taken the position that saying sorry was
not a good remedy.
Speaker 2: Folks.
Speaker 1: Folks, here we are.
Speaker 2: All the way from where we were at to where
we are now and these girls are still being screwed
around by the courts.
Speaker 1: You would think that the courts would want to unseal
this stuff and they would want to get this case,
you know, to see the light of day. But more
roadblocks and more hurdles. So let's just hope that, you know,
Bradley Edwards and the the lawyer team for these girls
continues to fight the good fight and eventually these judges
see the light. So all right, folks, again, frustrating, It's
frustrating to read stuff like this. It's frustrating to read
that this stuff was even done in the first place.
This should have this shouldn't even be a thing. We
shouldn't even be here. All of these people should have
been prosecuted and they should all be in prison. But instead,
these girls are forced to wake up every single day
and continue the fight that they've been waging since some
of them, since they've been fourteen, thirteen, eleven years old,
and the court and the prosecutors and law enforcement and
the media nobody has been anywhere to be found. These
girls have been left on an island pretty much, to
defend themselves and to try and get to the bottom
of this well not anymore. We're all here standing shoulder
to shoulder with the victims at this point, and we
won't stop until we have justice. And I hope that
they understand that. And you know, one or two nets,
no big deal. Ten million nets, well now you can't breathe.
And that's the plan, folks. We're gonna smother them. We're
gonna keep up the pressure until they're forced to do
the right thing.
Speaker 2: All right, folks, If.
Speaker 1: You'd like to contact me, you could do that at
Bobby Kapuci at ProtonMail dot com. That's bobbycapu Cci at
ProtonMail dot com. Or you can cont tack me on Twitter.
That's h B O B B Y underscore C A
p U C C. I all right, everybody, I'll be back.